HomeMy WebLinkAboutRP 89-04; Montessori By The Sea; Redevelopment Permits (RP) (3)CASE NO. ^ 0i'^i
DATE: ^'-^S-f^
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART I
(To be Completed by APPLICANT)
Applicant: /iAicf/A£ig A^i TUt. S'^^ frAjSrCoMi^ AJHu/Z^u-^
Address of Applicant: /^O- /^ox. I'^l
Phone Number: (t>/9 ) 7^'^- e>^^f
Name, address and phone number of person to be contacted (if other than
Applicant): Ib/^/^i^ Af- f^uc/Kcv'^TZ , /oo ACAM Oi^'i ^
(IcA^/y/A/^O^ dA (&l^) ^3 7-0'^3^
GENERAL INFORMATION: (Please be specific)
Project Description: flA.4:'^o/^cc*^ fc.<. 3(> CJ^^^/Q^ /^U4(^ /IXJO
Project Location/Address: a~^A7 AJ^AL^S/^?^ /Si^^d J CA^i.SA7:> ^
Assessor Parcel Number: - /V^^ - OG AA^^ /'/fAT 6A v^?-o7 _
General Plan/Zone of Subject Property: / if/^
Local Facilities Management Zone: ^
Is the site within Carlsbad's Coastal Zone?
Please describe the area surrounding the site to the
North: V/^CA^T Ut4b East: d^u-A^M A^A}/) h^cLMSs
South: CAULAAIU A4/^/AS4) X^^r West: ^(.UACL c^tcfc /iuit^,^cti- I/^<^C,JL€ /'^•^^
List all other applicable permits & approvals related to this project:
MATO?- \^^fi\/lt^Pfty\li^r PfcAl^ir ^ P>Jo(>,uu^ (^AitArL Di4//e^Ai/^T f/xA^iT.
(Please be SpeciiiW:. Attach Additional Pages or mhibits, if necessarv)
1. Please describe the project site, including distinguishing natural and
manmade characteristics. Also provide precise slope analysis when a slope
of 15' or higher and 15% grade or greater is present on the site.
6AAU S34A /Sc-^'^ AU4^ /U/tr/^cj ^/^.^y AoF
2. Please describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the design
and/or operation of the project.
3. PLEASE AHACH A PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET WHICH SHOWS THE FOLLOWING:
a. If a residential project identify the number of units, type of units,
schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of
household size expected, average daily traffic generation (latest SANDAG
rates).
b. If a commercial project, indicate the exact type, activity(ies),
square footage of sales area, average daily traffic generation
(latest SANDAG rates), parking provided, and loading facilities.
J.A^^ sa i^r cA /;«JDcrA ^PAOi.] SjS^o $^Ar dA cyuXHoc^'Z. <,'p/*rC^
^^t«a h.^.'iAAT/i f^A/^y. 75- /J/ov-r 7^/>5 PM O^y /^T O^PAcny
c. If an industrial project, indicate the exact type or industry(ies),
average daily traffic generation (latest SANDAG rates), estimated
employment per shift, time of shifts, and loading facilities.
d. If an institutional project, indicate the major project/site
function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy,
loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the
project.
I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Please Answer each of the following questions by placing a check in the
appropriate space. Then, fully discuss and explain why each item was
checked yes or no. Provide supporting data if applicable. Attach
additional sheets as necessary.
YES NO
1) Could the project significantly impact or change
present or future land uses in the vicinity of the .
activity? v
EXPLANATION: 'l\i/z^ dfj^noA pA fu^ PPA^SCU^QCL.
jjiUL. p?.^ /i^Co.^ 'i^^^i^f\/^o TO ttS^-^ dA lAr^A
2) Could the activity affect the use of a recreational ^
area, or area of aesthetic value? i<
EXPLANATION: TH^ 6P/C^-ATV»'<^ &P-rwt P/^ctn>oC
3) Could the activity affect the functioning of an
established community or neighborhood? v
EXPLANATION: T^e /^^^<,cifo.^u iA^i^ A>^
/tOcciHiiAiu/cA)riA'C TO TirL /hAicrUiyJt^c/ 6/^ mt
4) Could the activity result in the displacement of
community residents?
EXPLANATION: t^ona^c, AAW THC PA'j^^^^c^
Qi^Artsi^W'h OA- mM.\rfijiiA<:t TP /U^^^
A
YES NO
5) Could the activity increase the number of low and y
moderate cost housing units in the city? \/
EXPLANATION: Ayfx^/^n toi^
1^Pii^_6tyyouMc^ //J ru<^ cury.
6) Could the activity significantly affect existing
housing or create a demand for additional housing? v
EXPLANATION: 7>f^ A^A^^cui>co Co^i^
7) Are any of the natural or man-made features in the
activity area unique, that is, not found in other ^
parts of the county, state or nation? ___ \A
EXPLANATION: 7>f^ /w/f>J C/^ /JH^MAH^
L^iMT'^ fouJd Tl/A^uCifur C&^^r^ ^^/iW 6^uA.
8) Could the activity significantly affect an
historical or archaeological site or its settings? V
EXPLANATION: TH^ui^ /^/se AJO /-i/jj^iJ /U^nAUc^c
9) Could the activity significantly affect the
potential use, extraction, or conservation of a
scarce natural resource?
EXPLANATION: /T/A^^ yUjW <d4y9<^
A
YES NO
10) Could the activity significantly affect fish, .
wildlife or plant resources? \/^
EXPLANATION: 77^^ A^^-^c^^c^ dA.^A^oy
OA AlHL /AA^sc4/evi^ (Ak^~& A)^r ^AA/i^ ^liH,
//vfWr. l4/7^/uA^t ^ix)iAAX^'S H^i^ ///A^.
11) Are there any rare or endangered plant or animal
species in the activity area? (/^
EXPLANATION: 77/^>5e /y^e K)C /CI^^A /^/yzj^ o^^
/c/JO.^^^/Q^b /4vWr O.^ A/JiMytL sPMats /J
12) Could the activity change existing features of any
of the city's stream, lagoons, bays, tidelands
or beaches? \/
EXPLANATION: 7^ /^/t^S/i^ce df/^^ioy dA-
Aric*/u'ry Ui/u. /Mi^ AJO /M/lfgr C^) A^Y
13) Could the activity result in the erosion or elimin- y
ation of agricultural lands? iA
EXPLANATION: TH^i^ /^ TJO A6AUcucruAA'C
IxAtJbV- /Ai'T^i^ T^^^UA> /Ui/^^ dA TU^ C/r£
14) Could the activity serve to encourage development
of presently undeveloped areas or intensify develop- ^
ment of already developed areas? v
EXPLANATION: 77/^ Ak^^^cA:. <^ ru/j, p.<>i^(cMoco
f^c/ury /Jt(u^ //JcoA}^7iAlu.tjJ77A<L 7^
YES NO
15) Will the activity require a variance from estab-
lished environmental standards (air, water, noise,
etc.)? y
EXPLANATION: IHA^ /4yg//v/ry ^^/^ JOor (!AiA..^r/t
CoA/^iTH>A THAT /i>^(AiAJ)S €.^r^Uii4^
16) Is the activity carried out as part of a larger
project or series of projects?
EXPLANATION: 7^ f^^ry /i- TD ^rn-ri/^
17) Will the activity require certification, authoriza-
tion or issuance of a permit by any local, state y
or federal environmental control agency? v
EXPLANATION: 77/>£ /^A^c/A^/ry /^J-^u. AjPr
L^cjj /2^t^-u/AtJ o^AitAto^rk>y, .^n^/^zA^fid-J oA
18) Will the activity require issuance of a variance or
conditional use permit by the City? ly
EXPLANATION: 7^ A',<^fcMi>^yc A-t^Jc^/oy
19) Will the activity involve the application, use, or
disposal of potentially hazardous materials? v
EXPLANATION: A/c^ /^^T^A^o*<i /H^T/^^AL
YES NO 20) Will the-activity involve construction of facilities
in a flood plain? tA^
EXPLANATION: 7?/€ ^/r/i. /^ Mo r />J .// /9v^^
A//ji-^ g^lv/^ lAiAj. /r A^^'<^A
21) Will the activity involve construction of facilities .
in the area of an active fault? \/
EXPLANATION:
ilHAie /^ ho^y Aoriu'.^- /^^^^
22) Could the activity result in the generation of
significant amounts of dust? \/
EXPLANATION: /Qo Ou^r /^'^^ ii'i A,
(S'/IA; ive^r/^O A^^^ T>A^ ^crtU^n/ls O/^
23) Will the activity involve the burning of brush, ^
trees, or other materials? y^
EXPLANATION: T^c^ BUMJ*^ (AU. Re^
24) Could the activity result in a significant change
in the quality of any portion of the region's air
or water resources? (Should note surface, ground y
water, off-shore.) y^
EXPLANATION: Y?/^ /^^y^t^ /-MA/n
QjiU. AJor AJHai,UA^ 7^/A. 4A/d iJ^fr/^
YES NO
25) Will the project substantially increase fuel y
consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)? K
EXPLANATION: 7Z/^- AiKL^^-/s>iJc>L oA nAt^
y^^»fcV/UrV tOi/^ /per A //JAAJUAA^CA- A<^/i^
Oc^^tA^P7k(?J //J /f/Oy Coyj7iAU</^7/4t. CJfy.
26) Will the activity involve construction of facilities /
on a slope of 25 percent or greater? iA
EXPLANATION: Tm ^/r/t /%-
27) Will there be a significant change to existing
land form?
(a) Indicate estimated grading to be done in
cubic yards: .
(b) Percentage of alteration to the present
land form: .
(c) Maximum height of cut or fill slopes:
i/
EXPLANATION: 7^ ^rtA^ Sink ^A- /vi^/^
28) Will the activity result in substantial increases
in the use of utilities, sewers, drains or streets? 1^
EXPLANATION: /^CAUAS^t^ //d U^e 0^
TlH-s^ Si^^rc4-r 6)/- /^c/^n£€^ c-j/u^
8^ /h^coA^.'U/aAcA)^^^^
YES NO
29) Will the project significantly increase wind or ,
water erosion of soils? v
EXPLANATION: 7^^^ /^/ary CJ^IM AXAT
30) Could the project significantly affect existing
fish or wildlife habitat? y
EXPLANATION: 71^ /^^^ry Ot^ A)or
p^AiF/iw /t^/^r/y<^ y^iA o^ cjfij)A/,^
31) Will the project significantly produce new light y
or glare? y
EXPLANATION: THi^ dA*SAyrh>J QA- T/A^
10
lHI-SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFF^S II. STATEMENT OF NifT-SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFF
If you have answered yes to any of the questions in Section I but think
the activity will have no significant environmental effects, indicate your
reasons below:
III. COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE QUESTIONS IN SECTION I
(If additional space is needed fpr answering any questions, attach
additional sheets as needed.)
Signature //^^^ l^-yT' l^^tAiA}^^ /V. /^uot^^'^a
(Person Completing' RepoYt)
Date Signed
Instruct.eia
LBS:lh
11
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II
(TO BE COMPETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO. RP 89-4/CDP 89-2
DATE: October 10, 1989
I. BACKGROUND
1. APPLICANT: St. Michael's By the Sea Episcopal Church
2. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: Dennis Buckovetz
100 Acacia Wav, Coronado. CA 92118 (619) 437-0235
3. DATE CHECK LIST SUBMITTED: June 28, 1989
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all Affirmative Answers are to be written
under Section III - Discussion of Environmental Evaluation)
YES MAYBE NO
1. Earth - Will the proposal
have significant results in:
a. Unstable earth conditions
or in changes in geologic
substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacements,
compaction or overcovering
of the soil?
c. Change in topography or ground
surface relief features? X_
d. The destruction, covering of
modification of any unique
geologic or physical features? X_
e. Any increase in wind or water
erosion of soils, either on or
off the site? X_
f. Changes in deposition or erosion
of beach sands, or changes in
siltation, deposition or erosion
which may modify the channel or a
river or stream or the bed of the
ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X_
YES MAYBE NO
2. Air - will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. Air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality? X_
b. The creation of objectionable
odors? X_
c. Alteration of air movement,
moisture or temperature, or any
change in climate, either locally
or regionally? X_
3. Water - Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. Changes in currents, or the course
or direction of water movements,
in either marine or fresh waters?
b. Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patters, or the rate and
amount of surface water runoff? X_
c. Alterations to the course or flow
of flood waters? X_
d. Change in the amount of surface
water in any water body? X_
e. Discharge into surface waters,
or in any alteration of surface
water quality, including but not
limited to, temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity? X.
f. Alteration of the direction or
rate of flow of ground waters? X_
g. Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct
additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts
or excavations?
h. Reduction in the amount of water
otherwise available for public
water supplies? X_
-2-
YES MAYBE NO
4. Plant Life - Will the proposal
have significant results in:
a. Change in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of plants
(including trees, shrubs, grass,
crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? X_
b. Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of plants? X_
c. Introduction of new species of plants
into an area, or in a barrier to the
normal replenishment of existing
species? X_
d. Reduction in acreage of any
agricultural crop? X_
5. Animal Life - Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. Changes in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of animals
(birds, land animals including reptiles,
fish and shellfish, benthic organisms,
insects or microfauna) ?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of animals? X_
c. Introduction of new species of animals
into an area, or result in a barrier
to the migration or movement of
animals? X^
d. Deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitat? X_
6. Noise - Will the proposal significantly
increase existing noise levels? X_
7. Liqht and Glare - Will the proposal sig-
nificantly produce new light or glare? X_
8. Land Use - Will the proposal have
significant results in the alteration of
the present or planned land use of an
area? X
-3-
YES MAYBE NO
9. Natural Resources - Will the proposal
have significant results in:
a. Increase in the rate of use of any
natural resources? X_
b. Depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource? X_
10. Risk of Upset - Does the proposal
involve a significant risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation) in the event of an accident
or upset conditions? X_
11. Population - Will the proposal signif-
icantly alter the location, distribu-
tion, density, or growth rate of the
human population of an area? X_
12. Housing - Will the proposal signif-
icantly affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housing? X_
13. Transportation/Circulation - Will the
proposal have significant results in:
a. Generation of additional vehicular
movement? X_
b. Effects on existing parking facili-
ties, or demand for new parking? X_
c. Impact upon existing transportation
systems? X_
d. Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods? X_
e. Alterations to waterbome, rail or
air traffic? X_
f. Increase in traffic hazards to
motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians? X_
-4-
YES MAYBE NO
14. Public Services - Will the proposal have
a significant effect upon, or have signif-
icant results in the need for new or
altered governmental services in any of
the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational
facilities? X_
e. Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads? X_
f. Other governmental services? X_
15. Enerqy - Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel
or energy? X_
b. Demand upon existing sources of
energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy? X_
16. Utilities - Will the proposal have
significant results in the need for new
systems, or alterations to the following
utilities:
a. Power or natural gas? X_
b. Communications systems? X_
c. Water? X_
d. Sewer or septic tanks? X_
e. Storm water drainage? X_
f. Solid waste and disposal? X_
17. Human Health - Will the proposal have
significant results in the creation of
any health hazard or potential health
hazard (excluding mental health)? X_
-5-
YES MAYBE NO
18. Aesthetics - Will the proposal have
significant results in the obstruction
of any scenic vista or view open to the
public, or will the proposal result in
creation of an aesthetically offensive
public view?
19. Recreation - Will the proposal have
significant results in the impact upon
the quality or quantity of existing
recreational opportunities?
20. Archeoloqical/Historical/Paleontoloqical
- Will the proposal have significant
results in the alteration of a significant
archeological, paieontological or
historical site, structure, object or
building?
21. Analyze viable alternatives to the proposed proiect such as:
a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs,
c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site,
e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alter-
nate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative.
a) The project is too small to require or justify phasing.
b & c) The proposed site design and scale of development is appropriate
and allowed.
d) The proposed use is allowed and would be compatible and
complimentary to existing uses.
e) The use is needed now; development at this time is appropriate.
f) N/A
g) The no project alternative would leave the site vacant while not
supplying the need for the proposed use.
-6-
YES MAYBE NO
22. Mandatory findinqs of siqnificance -
a. Does the project have the potential
to substantially degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wild-
life species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or en-
dangered plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory.
b. Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the dis-
advantage of long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.)
c. Does the project have the possible
environmental effects which are in-
dividually limited but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively con-
siderable" means that the incremental
effects of an individual project are
considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects, and
the effects of probable future projects.)
d. Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
X
X
X
III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
The proposed project involves a 2,160 square foot structure on a site with
8,100 square feet to provide a Montessori style preschool for 36 children.
The site is an infill lot adjacent to St, Michael's Church on Carlsbad Blvd.
The existing church parking lot will be used by the preschool on work days.
There will be no significant environmental impacts.
Rev. 12/88
-7-
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Continued)
1. Earth - The project, as proposed, involves no grading and no
disturbance to soil conditions or geologic substructure.
2. Water - Water resources will not be affected by the project.
3. Air - No change in air quality or movements will result from the
project.
4. Plant Life/Animal Life - Being an infill project, no impacts to
animal or plant life will occur.
5. Noise/Liqht and Glare - The preschool use will not significantly
impact noise levels or light and glare emissions.
6. Land Use - The project will provide a needed use that will be
complimentary to existing adjacent land uses.
7-17. Natural Resources/Risk of Upset/Population/Housinq/Transportation
- Circulation/Public SErvices/Enerqy/Utilities/ Human Health -
The nature of the preschool use, the scale of the project and the
location on an infill area will prevent it from adversely
affecting any of the above listed environmental resource issues.
18. Aesthetics - There will be no impacts to aesthetics or scenic
resources.
19. Recreation - N/A
20. Archaeoloqical/Historical/Paleontoloqical - The infill area of the
site as well as the area in general, has no cultural resources
that could be impacted.
Staff will prepare a Negative Declaration.
-8-
IV. DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
X I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on
the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant
effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in
this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached
sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative
Declaration will be proposed.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
Date Signature^
Date Plai Planning Ditrector
V. MITIGATING MEASURES (If Applicable)
-9-
MITIGATING MEASURES (Continued)
VI. APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES
AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT.
Date Signature
ENM:af
-10-