The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRP 91-02; PERL FAMILY TRUST; Redevelopment Permits (RP)r OTY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPUCATION FOR PAGE 1 OF 2 1) APPLICATIONS APPUED FOR: (CHECKBOXES) (FOR DEPT USE ONLY) • Master Plan • Specific Plan Q Precise Development Plan • Tenrative Tract Map • Planned Development Permit Q Non-Residential Planned Development • Condomixuum Permit • Special Use Permit ^ Redevelopment Permit • Tentative Parcel Map • Administrative Variance • General Plan Amendment • Local Coastal Plan Amendment • Site Development Plan • Zone Change Q Conditional Use Permit • Hillside Development Permit • Environmental Impact Assessment Q Variance • Planned Industrial Permit • Coastal Development Permit • Planning Commission Determination Q List any other applications not specificed CFOR D£?T USE ONIV^, 2) LOCATION OF PROJECT: ON THE SIDE OF (NORTH. SOUTH EAST, WEST) (NAME OF STREET) BETWEEN AND (NAME OF STREET) 3) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (NAME OF STREET) 4) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S). 5) LOCAL FACIUTIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 8) LXISTING ZONING U) PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS 4 6) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION 9) PROPOSED ZONING 12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS CDP 7) PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN CBD ' DESIGNATION 10) GROSS SITE ACREAGE 13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION .Z4- R.4. (RESIDENTLU COMMERCLAL INDUSTRLAL) 14) NUMBER OF EXISTING RESIDENTLU UNITS -4- 15) PROPOSED INDUSTRLAL OFFICE/SQUARE FOOTAGE 16) PROPOSED COMMERCLAL SQUARE FOOTAGE NOTE: A PRDPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING THAT MULTIPLB APPUCA1T0N5 BE FILED MUST BE SUBMnTED PRIOR TO 5:30 PAt A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRIhW THAT 0^a.Y 0^E APPUCAnON BE PILED MUST BE SU^^ FRM00016 8/90 r CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVTEW APPUCATION FORM PAGE 2 CF 2 17) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE 18) PROPOSED SEVVTR USAGE IN EQUIVALENT DWELUNG UNITS 19) PROPOSED INCRLASE IN AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 20) PROJECT NAME: Ki.A. >siOA.t:?):s>oiv4 3r. (pe(2rL) 21) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 22) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF. PLANNING COMMISSIONERS. B^SIGb^ REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS. OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT .AND ENTER THE PROmRTY THAVI^THIBVBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. IAVE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE cfr^'^^ Y^TLS^ ^ SlGNAt^E 23) OWNER 24) APPLICANT NAME (PRiNT OR TYPE) USOM p£<e l_ (jrZUI^T^B) NAME (PRINT OR TYPE) MAJUNG ADDRESS MAIUNG ADDRESS CITY AND STATE _ _ ZIP TELEPHONE CITi' AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LECAL OWNEH AND THAT AU THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLOXJE. \) SIGNATUR DATE ^ n 1. I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LECAL OWNEK's RJEPRISENTATIVE AND THAT AU THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORKECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWIXDCE. DATE FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION: APPUCATION TYPE FEE REQUIRED TOTAL FEE REQUIRED DATE FEE PAJD DATE ST^^ APPUCA'nOl;I[R£CE|YEp RECEIVED BY: RECEIPT NO. PERL FAMILY TRUST APPEAL OF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DECISION DECEMBER 10, 1991 INTRODUCTION Chairman and Commission Members, before you tonight is an appeal of the Design Review Board's decision on October 16, 1991 which denied minor redevelopment permit 91-2. The original permit was requested to change the use of one approved residential unit (880 sq.ft) at 3055 Madison Street to a three station beauty salon. With a 4-1 vote, the Design Review Board denied the minor redevelopment permit based on the fact that the property owner could not meet the required on-site parking. The property owner is now appealing that decision. PROJECT DESCRIPTION To assist the Commission in considering this appeal, staff has prepared a few slides for site identification purposes: [TURN 01? SLIDE PROJECTOR] SLIDE #1; The property in question is located on the west side of Madison Street between Carlsbad Village Drive and Oak Avenue. SLIDE #2! San Dieguito Bank is on the North side of the property. SLIDE #3; And a mixed-use project including an insurance office and residential units is on the South side of the property. The property includes 4 buildings: 2 880 sq.ft. buildings in the front on Madison Street and SLIDE #4! a 4 unit two-story apartment building (2 bedrooms each apt.) and a garage (400 sq.ft) which is used for storage off of the alley 6n''back of the property. Just west of this property is Security Pacific Bank & Parking lot. SLIDE #5 & #6; Across the street east of the property is KFC, a Facial Salon, Day Care Center, Private Residence & a Dental Office. [TURN OFF SLIDE PROJECTOR] [PUT OVERHEAD OF SITE PLAN ON PROJECTOR] All buildings on this property, excluding the garage, were originally approved as residential units (6 units total). The five parking spaces provided were approved as adequate on-site parking at the time (pre-redevelopment). Over time, the two single story front buildings were converted from residential units to a 880 sq.ft. medical office and a 880 sq. ft. retail establishment (La Casita video store). Staff understands that the medical office occupied 3055 Madison for approx. 11 years and the video store has been in operation for approx. 3 to 4 years at 3065 Madison. (Tuj/ a Ci-^ij booinesC2> dcen^ss.'^ The original application submitted by the applicant was for conversion of one residential unit at 3055 Madison Street to a retail establishment - a beauty salon. However, since the residential unit at 3065 Madison was never formally converted to the existing video store, staff recommended that approval of the requested minor redevelopment permit be considered for both buildings. The applicant agreed with staff's recommendation. Tv^ 0R5 ciee\t>\on UJO::^ fo cienui bo-fh Converts«oo"^. re^jys^ Because the City has no official record of approval of the office and video use at 3055 and 3065 Madison, they are technically illegal non-conforming uses. Residential is the only use currently permitted without the property owner being required to provide additional parking and/or building upgrades. In order to convert the two front residential units to retail uses, the property owner is required to bring the entire property into compliance with current parking standards. The property currently provides a total of five (5) parking spaces. The existing video store and proposed new retail establishment uses require a total of 6 paricing spaces and the four apartment units require 10 parking spaces per current code. The parking deficiency for the proposed project will be a total of eleven (11) spaces. Per Municipal Code standards, the requested change in use initiates compliance with the existing parking requirements for the entire project. If the two front buildings are used as residential units rather than retail establishments, as they were originally approved, there would be no requirement for them to bring the property into compliance with current parking standards. The proposal is in conformance with the Village Design Manual and Village Area Redevelopment Plan in terms of appropriate and compatible land use. The proposed retail uses are compatible with existing surrounding land uses within the immediate vicinity of the property. [PUT UP OVERHEAD ON SURROUNDING LAND USES] This overhead shows the surrounding land uses. Although the proposed conversion is in conformance with the Village Design Manual and Village Area Redevelopment Plan, the property is deficient in on-site parking according to current standards. Therefore, the Design Review Board denied the permit for converting the two front units to retail establishments. Staff recommends that the Housing and Redevelopment Commission adopt Resolution No. 199 denying this appeal and upholding the Design Review Board decision to deny minor Redevelopment Permit 91-2.