Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRP 96-03; Unocal Gas Station & Car Wash; Redevelopment Permits (RP)CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION FOR PAGE 1 OF 2 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES) (FOR DEPT USE ONLY) (FOR DEPT USE ONLY) Q Master Pian I I Specific Plan [~] Precise Development Plan Q Tentative Tract Map I I Planned Development Permit r~| Non-Residential Planned Development \ \ Condominium Permit ^ Q Special Use Permit Redevelopment Permit /^j/jft^VJ^ I I Tentative Paroel Map Obtain from Eng. Dept I I Administrative Variance I I Administrative Permit - 2nd^Dwelling Unil • • • • • • • • • • • General Plan Amendment Local Coastal Plan Amendment Site Development Plan Zone Change Conditional Use Permit Hillside Development Permit Environmental Impact Assessment Variance Planned Industrial Pennit Coastal Development Permitj Planning Commission Determination List any other applications not specificed 2) LOCATION OF PROJECT: ON THE (NORTH, SOUTH EAST, WEST) NORTH SIDE OF 880 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE (NAME OF STREET) BETWEEN HARDING AND JEFFERSON (NAME OF STREET) (NAME OF STREET) 3) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 4) ASSESSOR PARCEL NOfSV 203-354-16-00 5) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 8) EXISTING ZONING 11) PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNfTS N/Aj 6) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN I V-RJ 7) PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN [V-^^ | DESIGNATION DESIGNATION Yes 9) PROPOSED ZONING I v-R I 10) GROSS SITE ' ' ACREAGE 13 3'' N/A 12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS N/A 13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION N/A (RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL ,INDUSTRIAL) 14) NUMBER OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL UNfFS N/A 15) PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL OFHCE/SQUARE FOOTAGE N/A 16) PROPOSED COMMERCIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE 1,212 SF NOTE: A fROKtsED fROjECT mfmxBicmiiT MCLims A»iiCAiK^s%& mm mstm wmtmm mm. to i^Ji A IUOYOSES mojKCT xssQuiitiHG THAT ONtY ONS APPU<; ATTON «R mxi> mm mmrrm ffuoR TO 4 m r.M, ,^ FRM(KM)16 8/90 CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPUCATION FORM P.AGE 2 OF 2 17) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE 18) PROPOSED SEWER USAGE IN EQUIVALENT DWELUNG UNFTS 19) PROPOSED INCREASE IN AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 20) PROJECT NAME: 90% N/A N/A UNOCAL STATION NO. 7263 21) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: PROPOSED TO DEMOLISH EXISTING SERVICE BAYS AND CANOPY. CONSTRUCT A NEW 1,004 S.F. EXPRESS CAR WASH AND NEW CANOPY WITH 4 MPD WITH CREDIT CARD READERS. 22) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPUCATION FT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CTIY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS. OR CFIY COUNQL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY. TWAT IS THE SUBJECT OE^THIS APPUCATION. I/WE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE J^P<^2yri /An Vn^^ ^ SIGNATURE 23) OWNER 24) APPUCANT NAME (PRINT OR T«>E) C^/FCU) TT^ 7^/? TC NAME (PRINT OR TifPE) MAIUNG ADDRESS MAIUNG ADDRESS CriY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE CriY AND STATI ZIP C'. -/y -T/^cft^ s fry ^ 7 '/^ TELEPHONE Psi- Vc^^C I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LECAL OWNER ANO THAT Aa THC ABOVC mFORMATION IS TRUE ANO CORRECT TO THE BESr OF I axnPYIIlAT I AM IW CBCALOWNCRIl RIPRESOrrATTVC AND THAT ALLTHE AKWE INFORMATION IS TRW AND OORRKTTO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. MY KNOWLEDGI SIGNATURE DATE hn.~~]iU^ ^/(./rr FOR CriYUSE QNLY FEE COMPUTATION: APPUCATION TYPE FEE REQUIRED CP? "{(XT' Oh sar 966i \ \ 330 DAIE STAMP^nl»PLK^ftIvb»f ^ RECEIVED BY: /YL Qpym^ TOTAL FEE REQUIRED DATE FEE PAID IZ^'/lf^t RECEIPT NO. Citv of CarlsbaH Rlannini DISCLOSURE STATEMENT APPUCANfTS STATEMENT CF DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN OWNEBSHIP INTERESTS ON ALL APPLICATIONS WHICH WILL aEGU.BE 3<SCSETlONAaY ACTION ON THE PART OF THE CTY COUNCIL OR ANY APPOINTED BOAflO. COMMISSION OR CCMMfTTEE. I ^^^^^ • Please Prmt) The following information must be disclosed: 1. Applicant List the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the appiication. Charlotte Thatcher :34y0 Sea crest urive Phillip M. Dedye Union Oil Companv of California Carlsbad. CA 92008 17700 Castleton Street, #500 Robert H. Sonneman City of Industry, CA 91748 52 El Sereno Court San Francisco, CA 9412 7 Owner List the names and addresses of all persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Charlotte Thatcher Robert H. Sonneman 3490 Sea Crest Drive 52 El Sereno Court Carlsbad, CA 92008• San Francisco, ca 9412 7 If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) atiove is a corporation or partnership, list the names anc addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership. None 4. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the names anc addresses of any person serving as officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the trust. None -^.^ii,,^—^--lii^---—ii^— FRM00013 8/90 C 2075 Las Paimas Oriv« • Carisbad. California 92009-4859 • (619)438-1161 (Over) Olsciosure Statement Page 2 Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes No If yes, please indicate person(s) Peraon i« defined ••: *Any individuai, firm, eopartn«rehip, joint venture, —oclatlon, tociai club, fraternal organizalion, eorporalion, aetata, truat racaiva|, syndicata, thia and any othar county, city and county, city municipality, diatrict or othar poiitleal tubdiviaion, or any othar group or combination acting at unit" (NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessaiy.) Signature of Owner/date ^ Signature of applicant/date Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant .^M0001 12/91 ^^COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUPPLEMENTAL APPUCATION This supplemental application is to be filed for: A. Any development requiring a Coastal Development Permit issued by the City of Carlsbad, or B. Any development which requires a Califomia Coastal Cominission Coastal Development Permit. Piease answer all questions. Where questions do not apply, please indicate "not applicable" or "N/A". 1. General Background A. Has any application for a development on this site been submitted previously to the Califomia Coastal Commission? D Yes No If yes, state previous Califomia Coastal Commission Coastal Development Permit application number B. Do you wish to apply for: 1. An Administrative Coastal Development Peiroit X 2. A Regular Coastal Development Permit 3. A Califomia Coastal Commission Coastal Development Permit C. Please provide the street address of this proposed development 880 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE D. Please provide the Assessor's Parcel Nimiber of this proposed development 203-354-16-00 E. Please identify that the proposed development is located on the (^S/E/W -Circle One) side of CARLSBAD VILLAGE Dbetween HARPING STREET and JEFFERSON STREET . F. Please desciibe the present land uses (Le., Vacant land, single family homes, apartments, offices, etc.) sunounding the proposed development to the: North: OFFICES South: CHURCH East: ARCO GAS STATION West: BANK , m i i 330 FRMOOOIS 8/90 Page 1 of 5 2. Present Use of Property A. Are there existing stiuctures on the property? Q Yes • No If yes, please describe. GAS STATION WITH SERVICE BAYS No No B. Will any existing structure be demolished? 0 Yes D Will any existing structures be removed? • Yes El If yes to either question, describe the type of development to be demolished or removed, including the relocation site, if applicable. BUILDING WITH OFFICE AND 2 SERVICE BAYS 3. Development Description: A. Estimated cost of development: Land Improvements B. Project height: Maximum height of structure _— ft. Maximum height of structure as measured from centeriine of frontage road ft. C. Total number of floors in structure, including subterranean floors, lofts, and mezzanines _l D Gross floor area including covered parking and accessory buildings 2,952 sq. ft. Gross floor area excluding parking h2^ . ^• E. Lot area (within property lines) $q- ft- or acres. I OT COVERAGES Existing New Proposed Iotal Building Coverage 2,253_ sq.ft. 2.^ sq.ft 2^ sq. ft. Paved Area sq.ft. 9^ sq.ft 2^ sq. ft. Landscaped Area sq. ft. 1^ sq. ft 1^ sq. ft. Unimproved Area n e„ fr o so ft Geft natural) ^ sq. ft. sq.ft sq. ft. FRMOOOIS 8/90 Page 2 of 5 F. Parking: niunber of existing spaces 14 number of new spaces proposed TOTAL T number of covered spaces ^ number of uncovered spaces 3 number of standard spaces 3 size 9 x 20 number of compact spaces Q size N/A Is tandem parking existing? Q Yes # IZI No proposed? D Yes # B No G. If the land is to be subdivided, number of lots to be created and size: Lot Svmbol No. of Lots Lot Size Not Applicable H. If the development is residential, please state: 1. number of dwelling units Not Applicable 2. number of bedrooms per dwelling unit 3. type of occupancy proposed: O rental D stock cooperative D time share • other 4. Grade Alteration: Is any grading proposed? Q Yes Q No If yes, please complete the following: A. amount of cut cu. yds. B. amount of fill cu. yds. C. maximum height of fill slope ft D. maximum height of cut slope ft. E. amoimt of import or export cu. yds. F. location of borrow or disposal site Grading and drainage plans must be included with this applicatioiL In certain areas, an engineering geology report must also be included. Consult die Gty Engineering Department representative for a determination. FRMOOOIS 8/90 Page 3 of 5 5. Utility extensions: Are utility extensions for the following, proposed to serve the project? A. water D Yes • No B. gas • Yes No C. electric CD Yes No Above Ground Extensions D. sewer C] Yes No E. telephone D Yes • No If yes, to any of the above, would extensions be above ground? • Yes • No 6. Development on Public Trust Lands: Does the development involve diking, filling, dredging or placing any structures in open coastal waters, wetlands, estuaries, or lakes? A. diking B. filling C. dredging D. placement of structures E. amount of material to be dredged or filled Not App1ip;.b1f CU. yds. F. location of dredged material disposal site Not Applicable • Yes No • Yes • No • Yes No • Yes m No G. Has a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' pennit been applied for? • Ycs SD No H. Will the development extend onto or adjoin any beach, tidelands, submerged lands or public trust lands? (See definitions section) Q Yes El No For projects on State-owned lands, additional information maybe required. Consult the staff representative in the Planning DepartmenL 7. Sensitive Resources: Does the proposed development contain: A. a sensitive habitat area D Yes Q No (a biological survey may be required) B. a 100-year flood plain DYes 0 No (hydrologic mapping maybe required) C. a park or recreation area D Yes O No D. historic resources D Yes D No FRMOOOIS 8/90 Page 4 of 5 E. archaeological resources D Yes Q No F. paieontological resources D Yes Q No If yes to any of the above, please explain on an attached sheet. G. Would the development in any way alter or divert a stream bed or drainage course? If yes, please describe on a separate sheet of paper. 8. Coastal Access: A. Will the development protect existing lower-cost visitor and recreation faciHties? • Yes • No If yes, explain . B. Will the development provide public or private recreational opportimities? • Yes • No If yes, explain Is the proposed development: A. Visible from any park, beach, or recreation area D Yes H] No (A viewshed analysis may be required) B. Within the viewshed from any public or quasi public place (i.e., public roads, commercial sites, public or private recreation areas, etc.) to a visual coastal resource. • Yes • No 9. If the development is between the first public road and the sea, is public access to the shoreline and along the coast currendy available near the site? D Yes 0 No If yes, indicate the location of the nearby access, including the distance from the site. Under certain circumstances, additional material or documents may be required prior to issuance of a Coastal Development Permit Date Signature^f Applicant or Authorized Agent FRMOOOIS 8/90 Page 5 of 5 I When recorded please return to % Havel«ck Fraser I 1010 Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles, Califorrtia 90017 flLE 'P/CE f.'o. — AUG 20 5:C0 -cs SAN Dii ;J COJ.TV. C-l'iF. DOCUMENTAJIY TRANSFER TAX $ #6119 None THE SIGNAL COMPANIES, INC.dba SIGNAL OIL AND GAS COMPANY anb Notice of Ceas(e as of the THIS AGREEMENT. m*<}e inA entered iao Ist Jjf o/ _.. Jwly. _ * , br »Ki b«w«a RUDOLPH...H*...SONNEMAN . and_ ..JANE C.. SONNEMAN. husband, and. .wif e»_ a.s Joint. .tenants _ IHiS SIGNAL COMPANIES , INC. , a corporat ion, dba S IG NAL OIL. AND..GAS COMPAtlY _ XXXKKll» Kern'M'tw t'lW Lessee. WIT.NESSETH: That for and iA coosideratioo of the reoti, terma. ccnrcnuts aoj conditions hereini/ter described. Les«x herd>v ieisei and denise* to Lessee, •od Lessee herctif hires and (dies from Lessor, all that certain real property situated ia the Cry of... Carlsbad„ _ , couMtfof Saa.DiegQ._ _scjteo<.- California , descnbed a» foiiows: Lots 29 to 32 inclusive, in Blcck 56 of Carlsbad, in the City of Carlsbad, county cf San Diego, state of pr Califomia, according to Map thereof No. 775, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, February 15, 1895. tf'grfher «ilh the njcht. lillr uvi intrrcst ff I'AM-; ia attd tn sar rnadi. UreeO, afld ways boundtivi uid real pmprfTf foe the (cm and for the rental and upi>n the term*. ..pti.-ni, Cf«rnjm> jnj CLiedttK>i» contained in a Q.r.9M?d_ trsie rsKulrit Coficuirrnlljr herewith hf and betwrtrn (Sr fortin hereto and oxermg (he above dcKribed pfcnisc*. to ahidi nferetice is hrreiif ir*de. IN U'lTM'SS WHEREOF, the pa.-ties hc.-c-o ha.e ciecvtrj (his ios(rufnen( aa of (he da(e Srs; betexyfrore wriscn. Rlidolph H^.^onnenian Jane C. Sonneman LESSOR, THE SIGNAL COMPANIES, INC., dba SIGNAL OIL AND GAS COMPA.Vlf Secrttarf Lii SEE STATE OF jCalifomia County of.. San Diego fJL ON THIS . day of-.July_ , A.D, 19. 69, before tpfuMtl iLllidolph_ H S"""**"^" ^"^ -Tano r. .Snnnpman a Notary Milac ia aad for said Cooaty aad State; pcrsoaally executed (be same mc (0 be (he penoa_&. whose name—S dXC— ._-sii>saibcd lo the vithsa lastrmeoi. aad ackaowtedfe to rae diat -tbfy. IN WITNESS WHEKEOF, I ha«c bereuato set my haad and affisei my oSdal seal die day aadjrcat ia dus certificate fint above written. O-'-C'-il. S'.A'- JEAN E. K.^IN8IHL • NOTARY ?u3'.iC C-i;. '•-7''"^ ^.rc// oiCGO COUNTY iciai seal Ine cay aad rear la tms cmiscatc nrst atwve written. Notary PMie ia aad frr said Cooaty aad State. 20ei S. tf« St^. Oeaan»«a. ] f STATE Or_ County of.~ ON THIS-.. appeared.. day of-AC l$_ bef oec int^ ... a Notary Pk^ic in aad fot said Cooaty aad State; penooally kaowa lo me 10 be the- kaowa lo me to be the- .rroident. .-Sectary of- the <x>fporatioa lhat esccnicd die withia Ics-.runient, known to me to be :he persons who emecuted the wnhio lastmoestf. oo bcbaif of (he cor- poratioo bereia aamed. aad acknowledged to cc« tbat socti corporatioa eiecutcd tbe withia lastrumeat porsuaat to its by-laws or a rcsolutioa of its board of directors. IN WrfNESS WHEREOF. I have bereuato set my haad aad afized my (fidai seal tbe day aad year ia this certificale fint above writtca. Notary Pubiic ia and fot said Cooa^ aad State. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Los Angeles ON THIS /r2 ^ day of ;Jt»ty, 1969, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared J. B. FOWLER and HAVELOCK FRASER, known to me to be the persons who executed the within instrument on behalf of the corporation therein named and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same. ( ss. ) WITNESS my hand and official seal. Of-"K.'t»A|. SCAL A.^LEC'i e STF.?£'iEIU rt.HC. ». 3.f.u H Vf Cem-nitsion Cjip.m >iina S, ii7i . Notary Public in and for said State. err Co 05 i i ^ FILE/PACS HO.. BOOK 197fi .'.her. recorded -olease return to: RECOROEO KEQUESTOF ASSIGNEE SA^^ESCO OIL COMPANY 770 :.:-tc3if Strc:c 0CTZ5 l2i7FK»?i| OFFICIAL RECORDS SAN DIEGO COUNTY.CALIF; HARLEY F.BLOOH RECORDER ASSIGNMENT $7.00. SS #6119 25 i FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged by Signal Oil and Gas Companv. successor in interest to The Signal Companies, Inc. a corporation, hereinafter called "Assignor," said Assignor hereby sells, assigns and sets over unto E. S. Bills. Inc. a corporation, hereinafter called "Assignee," all of Assignor's right, title and interest in, to and under the lease and leasehold estate covering the premises knovm and designated as 880 Elm Street in the City of Carlsbad , County of San Diego State of California , said leaae and property being more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Assignor represents and warrants that it is the sole owner and holder of said lease and the leasehold estate created thereby, that the same are unencumbered except as shown on said Exhibit A, that said lease and said leasehold estate are in full for^- and effect and that all rentals and other obligations of the lessee which have heretofore accrued thereunder have been paid ov otherwise satisfied. Assignor makes no representation or warranty as to the condition of the leased premises or of any improvements thereon, and Assignee accepts them in whatever condition they are at the time Assignee takes possession. Assignee shall Cl CO _J 26 take possession and beccme responsible Lor said premises and improvements for" -w.ch upon acceptance of this assignment. Any prepaid rentals and tax obligations under said lease and said leasehold estate shall be prorated as of the date Assignee accepts this, assignment, Dated: February 1 , 1971. Signal Oil and Gas Company " . Vice Pre|i;<?ent c-,,: A Ass 1 stant becre^ary' • - ' ACCEPTANCE The undersigned. E. So Bills, Inc. , a corporation. the Assignee named in the within and foregoing Assignment, does hereby accept the assignment made thereby and the terms and conditions therein set forth, does hereby assume and agree to perform the obligations of the lessee under the aforementioned lease and leasehold estate created thereby accruing on and after the date of this Acceptance, and does hereby covenant and agree to hold Assignor free and harmless from all further obligations and liability under said lease. E. S, Bills, Inc. Pre^sifit'ejRt . 2 - ^ ' V/. -.1 Go 07 i . 27 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ( ss. County of Los Angeles ) ON THIS day of VVvVvA^ , ^^^^ | , before me a Notary Public in and tor said btate, personally appeared . V\..V\^.. . known to me to be the \V(;c President, and HAVH.OC< ^f^^^' , known to me to be the ri^tCr^ Secretary of — y tW corporation that executed the within Instrument, known to me to be the persons who executed the within Instrument on behalf of the corporation herein named, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the within Instrument pursuant to its bylaws or a resolution of its board of directors. WITNESS my hand and official seal. I • inniilin.<i,^,-||-|^|-|^ La, wv\rt * n-ir OFFICIAL SEAL t-V^^' ^"^^^N 8. STRASHEIM ./U* ""' Af'C£l£s county My Commission Expires June 3, m3 Notary Public in and for said State. STATE OF County of ( ss, ) ON THIS 1st day of March , 19 71 befcre me a Notary Public in and tor said State, personally appeared E. S. Bills , known to me to be the President, known to me to be the Secretary of and Marjorie C. Bills E. S. Bills, Inc. the corporation that executed the within instrument, known to me to be the persons who executed the within Instrument on behalf of the corporation herein named, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the within Instrument pursuant to its bylaws or a resolution of its board of directors. WITNESS my hand and official seal. l',-. ll'. c-.i Notary Public in and for said State. 5 Sf oo cn CO cn 28 EXHIBIT A (1) Lease dated Julv 1 August 20 , 19 69 s 19 69 recorded Ser3.es 10 , in Boo't 1969 file/ Page 151836 , Official Records of Sanjiego Co vnty, State of California between R.idolnh H. Sonneman and Jane C. Sonnenan, Husbandjc , wife as ioint tenants. . ^ r«,-r> as iussor, and The Signal Companies, Inc., a_Cor£, dba Signal Oil and Gas Company _ r » as lessee, covering the real property more particularly hereinafter described. Subject to sublease, dated to ^ as lessee. Oo cn CO 29 All improvements and personal property, if any, owned by Assignor located upon the hereinafter described real property, excepting, however, all plexiglass Signal or Hancock I.D. sign faces and any and all right to use the names Signal or Hancock. Description of Real Property: Lots 29 to 32 inclusive, in Block 56 of Carlsbad, in the City of Carlsbad, county of San Diego, state of California, according to Map thereof No. 775, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, February 15, 1895. SI fV) oo cn CO CD _J R-cording requested by Union Oil Company of CaFifornta • •^•»hen recorded return to *^Jt ^ - Union Qi' Company of Californfa AtL- .tieal Estate Dept. P. O. Box 7500 San Diego, Califomltf 92138 This Indenture, dated this 1056 3ri . < V,/ . Lease Union Oil Company of Catitornia May day of , 19 85 by and between ROBERT H. SONNEMAN and CHARLOTTE L. THATCHER, equally of as Tenants in Coimnon P. 0. Box 223, Carlsbad, Califomia 92008 Lessor, and Union Oil Company of California, a corporation, Lessee; Witnesseth: 2000 That for the term beginning June 28 ,1985 , and ending June 27 .HPCXX, and for extension of term for ^ additiona! terms of such number of years not exceeding 5 years each as Lessee may declare, and upon the terms ard conditions set forth in that certain written lease agreement dated May 3 . 19 85 . from Lessor to Lessee, all of which terms and conditions are hereby made a part hereof as fully end completely as if herein specifically set out in full, Lessor has leased, demised and let, and does hereby lease, demise and let unto Lessee the following describee real p operty situate, lying and being in the City of '^arlsbad , County of San DiegO State of California , described as follows: Lots 29 to 32 inclusive in Block 55 of Carlsbad, in the County of San Diego, State of Califomia, according to Map thereof No. 775, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, February 15, 1894. Lessee shall have the preferential right to purchase said property during the term of mis le ise or any extension thereof and Lessor agrees not to sell all, or a part thereof separately, or as a part of a larger parcel, without first giving Lessee written rotice of each propcsed sale, stating therein the price and other terms and co'tditions thereof and furnisf-ing Lessee with a copy of the offer to purchase. If said property is being soid as a part of a larger parcel cf property. Lessee's rights hereunder extend only to thg purchase of the larger parcel, including the d-^miacd premises. Upon receipt of any such notice Lessee shall have the prcferantial right to purchase the property being proposed for sale ("the property"), at the price and upon the terms and conditions set forth in such notice and Lessee shall have thirty (30) days after receipt of such notice within which to noti^/ Lessor ..iat Lessee elects to exercise such right and purchase the property. In the event Lessee exe'Cises its right to purchase, Lessor agrees to promptly convey the property to Lessee free and clear of all liens and encumbrances by good and sufficient deed, and concurrently therewith Lessee shail pay Lessor the purchase price upon the terms and conditions set forth in such notice. Taxes aid rentals shall be pro'ated as of the date title to the property is vested in Lessee. If Lessee does not exercise its preferential right to purchase the property in any such case, this lease shall remain in full force anti effect arid ary sale by Lessor to a third party shall be made subject to all the *erms and conditions of this lease, inctuding this preferential right to purchase. Thir lease shall not be binding upon Lessee until duly executed by it and delivered to Lessor. In Witness Whereof, the parties hereto have executed this instrument in duplicate as of the day and year first above written. Dt^rt Ti. SonnemaiTy^ Charlotte L. Thatcher Union Oil Company of CaUfotnia (Lessor) ••OWM 3-8 A 20 A >BCV 1 2-741 PHlNTtO s J.S.*. tmV f/lAWAGER tMRKtTtK3 R«At tSTATt • Secret/ff By ./ Assistar (Lessee) V/••••' - 4^ •X X. STATE OF COUNTY OF On this day of , 19 , before me, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, residing therein and duly commissioned and sv>^orn, perfonally appeared , known to me to be the and . known to ne to be the of the corporation that executed the within instrument and known to me to be the persons who executed the within instrument on behalf of the corporation therein named and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. (Seal) STATE OF COUNTY OF On this Notary Pubiic in and for said County and State. My Commission expires ss. day of ,19 . before me, , a Notary Public in and for said County and State, residing , personally known to me tc be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instnjment and ar :nowledged to me tnat they executed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein rrientioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, i have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year ^n this certificate first ebove written. therein and duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared and (Seai) STATE OF COUNTY OF On this Notary Public in and for said County and State. My Commission expires ss. day of therein and duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared and ,19 , before me. . a Notary Public in and for said County and State, residing . personally known to me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to jhe within instrument and acknowledged to ms that they executed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein rr>entioned. iN WITNESS WHEREOF. I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seai the diy and year in this certificate first above written. (Sea!) STATE OF COUNTY OF Notary Public in and for said County and State. My Commission expires ss. On this day of , 19 , before me, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, residing therein and duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared . known to mn to be the and , known to me to be the Secretary of UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA. the corporation that executed the within instrument and known to me to be the persons who executed the within instrument on behalf of the corporation therein named and acknowledgad to me that such corporation executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my officiel seal the day and year in this cjrhficate first above written. (Seal) Notary Public in and for said County and State. My Commissicn expires •(, 1059 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) On this fo^li day of j^-n.c^ , in the year 19-X^' , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said Stata, personally appeared C. C. RDW and R. P. VAN ZANDT, personally known to rae to be the MANAGER, MARKETING REAL ESTATE and ASSISTANT SECRETARY, respectively, who executed the within instruanent on behalf of the cx>rtoration therein named, ard acknowledged to ms that the Corporation execnited it. WITNESS my hand and official seal. OFFICIALSEAL g '/lOJE A. NORWOOD i NCTARV PL'BL!C-CAL!F0RNIA 1 PRiNClFAL OFFICE i LOS ANGLL'LS COUNTS g i My Ummission ix^:i^ fv^srch 4, iSio ^ Notary Public in and for said State 8S-239322 Jbl -3 ^M IO 06 TIR LMQ /< msassaa AH • • • • ItoAOiAc i'f^^ DOC 8 1992-0637694 0^<if>M? tVvl'F*^ rlLCU iVIAS^07-0CT-i992 10 = 00 i ^^IMpt^ OlNl^a OFFICIAL RECORDS PARCEL SAH D1E60 COyHTY RECORDER'S 3FFICE fitlHETTE EWKS, COUNTY RECORDER Of: 7. Of) FEES: 9.^ SFS 1.00 ASSESSrlKT PECORD OF SURVEY STATE HIGHWAY MISCELLANEOUS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM MAP NO. OWNER OR NAME FiLE/PAGE NUMBER FEE MO- ^ 1 1 V — 1) r - I I! r' S f i 1 Form 7(.'fev. 2/91) By. ANNETTE^EVANS, RECORDER S)^fl DiEGO COUNTY •Ji^WK^ .Deputy w til lifyfjss i A. 5" 31 H J3 CO o r> '•^ !1 o » O o . — <» • V OTOZO —O OOOO -• '-o a ~ s * r. 2 O " '^ O * 3 A O Si's J* Cl. o ? .*--T 4 \r> SftS'* oo^ if-^ 3 5 3'22a--^^-. TV<»-. =io —t» „ S ^ u 3 2.3 P • 3 <1 _ </) 4 5 3-.» „ o ~ -O » 3 2tflt»3 » 5 9 3 - » 3 - o it--' : - ^ o S 5.^ 0 :7 • o -3 io ,5 3 ;5*-.2?2| -:9. y -fa ° 9:0.5 2.. — "D/J 9. » M - O ^ O 2 S'-T •• O <• £ S. T . 9. _ >o i(/>^ 9. • O o Tl 3> >•< 2H g C O z — CD mm > ro ° ^ - c a 3 ^ _ 3- o-t 7 n 5 * ^- u 2. o <» ' » <t <» <»"» -'^ w 9 » a:a — ^ 03_ 633-3- ri(y)o> o o o o <t " ?. Q." i .|o1 ^ * r» ,^ 1 <^ > UI »-.>—_ 1 W3 o o 2 <^ \ i c Q: a i _ -n o -• S Ul — r.Ul — o - ^ - 'O lO /I o „ o- i KJ o * c £ : J TI c o c - o i W - ^ 9 5 H 2 w ?3 ?3p, ^00^ — 1 Si :3 i* o S 5 <» 3 o :3 5.0 .3 S' 3 , 9: a o 2. • 3 .? 3 5 - ^ 3 ^ _ 3 O o - ° ^?2.3'< a ' 2 *» -!S < « o•o ' /^li^J^i- 5!<>3 <» 9 <» tT S. _ o 2 9 OS 3 s" 9 * 5 o Q — j vc vO S * 3 _ • ' =^ =: —? O .1 Ul o Q-5 « y 2 = S «•* 3 9. o <» — * o * 3^ o u . lil $ a * c rt S ?9.o i 2 o ">< 3 3*. 5 o o a"- '\ ?• o ~" 5 9" o v< ^ 2 3 CO •* •a o ioL.i'^ 2 o .-'^^^^ —- <^jr ^ — Z o " ^ ^ «0 Oi rt o ? J > 3 <» 2 >^i* „ o '^z-^ty-^g (/ o _ ' -"go w w <3i o ~. 3 o ~ Si o i» IfriV " i ? ^, « o- ,^o9 3" .> " ± ~ « '-^ 00 w ^ • 5 <Ji •• s _ 2 ^»zo ? _ g <^>a.3^ A ^ — I - o QO z o — o -I o ~ ? — -S — = 3 U) ij<o 1 i rt c. o o 3 * < - — 3 - ? ° - 2 •» - -2 3 * O T3 z 2: --1 -» O 3 „ ' :j 3 - (/, — ol Z n ° 3 — — rt — lA-T >—rto — -"^ 2-<r«i:i3 5't^ u> - -c9^ ° 3X~3 OC»2 3 • S 3 3 O o •"> Z a 3- 3 o — •to 3 tl ~ o I") p 5' Tifo- ^ r- C 3- . 1 9 o " 5. » ^ 3 Ol 5 it 00 2 rJ 3 5 Z .Oi.3 .-<.*! >0 5 :?0 0_"( So £ § pot. out 1 * o •t o _ i» «; 3 ' o 2 9." » — 3 ":? s ^ o o _ 3 - o 5'^ '.^ Z " — £3 (0 1 ~ 3- !» X 9 o ««5 ? • t o-gS-S » ^ C. O 3 rt -•^ _ " o o O O ^ ZO Z cc •-' ° ~ i §-?.9.* 2'^ ^ - ,-ia !.°,^9 3 ? " O M ...» A tll "3 3 5. - O , dT 5z3 2 9.1. 2 £ o <o •£ o fc o Z 5 3 "* 2 25 O o 0 o -r 3 O — J3 3 ° 3 m'* a- a 3- - ^ 3 o 2 t 3 S SvO-T-'-airt '» •*'> - • o Z5i?S=o< 2 T — T ii - Q rt O ^9 3 5 - f ao"9. c Q. J r y r < 30- <» o ;» c - a - o < 3 - £ o. o 2 a — 3 1 ^ .5 - = o - O ° rt -a _ 5' Q. s , 9 <» o 3 < " ^ r - ^ ?. U« 5 ,3c 0 2 s •- o - ^ O 2 "io 5i ^, 2 O C. z: O j J If"" •21 3 « ^ it 2 i Oo o ^*3^o"5;d 2.'I.? 3 -O go rt J^' C rt .-r if i •O 3 < * |Z 3 a- ? ::.l3 3 2 iro- •J O ^ & <» 5 "5 o o -• - 3 "3 a. 3 ?2!?f 3 a 3 SO ^ 2 ? * f U» t O So "cn 3 " = o o 5^ 2- rt rt ^ rt ? I ^ O 2 r - tt s , 03 .-g o ^ 3 c — ii : ,— — _ ' Ci — ' : : a. o o 1 C.3 5 I 7 2 > '• 50 7 = ' 5-. I ii' 3 1, rt t 2. — o 2 § , ^ 3-.- c — a ;/! o ji s ^ 2 i a 2 3 - c _ ? i - '-~ 2 'i 5 3 si M 3 O - CO ^ _ ^ ; * C-" 5 t ' p r I ? I • < 3 3 - X 3 " 3 <» ^?59? J 3 •> c :i 3 <o 2- ?•* S — ^ n ' Z 3- 9 9. ^ 9 — r 2 a 5 o •2 J KJ — — 3 O 3- 3- rt ) "» 5 t J — = §^^ 5 2^ 3 ^ no s ^ o'l 2 "if" a * 3 o * o o _ c = 3 o 5° <: — 3 — ^3^02 •t c . ° S ?. 2f3 5,7f -1.- —rt2 ^^-t • ? '3 o. t cr. g.^ 3-;io o o - — • t <t ?t.?|9- 2 2.^ o ^ "3 3,, 3 a t 3 * 3 ^ 3 Q. 3 » 3 ^ — T O It " i •t 2 tJ 9 pi<". t ;^ , » ^ J ! O — • ? O — E. - o Or" J rt ^ ~ -t t 5 1 - . ? S? 3 I ' o ? t /) : - - , • •3 ^ >• - < •» ' ^'.^ ii' " \lozT. r rt 3 " • ' b „ -1 - ^ t t t i3 O rt -5" ~ IJ M • CO 3 to a u> — o S t .T Ul - 3. a — ?. c o i z _i -III VJ 3 t/l • — * ? o : o -t g ^ 2 3 0 52 3> 3 i ;r r't c o 5 t 3 3 ^ U3 3" 2.,., 5t o - * ci 3 3 3 " — Zc o 5 >3 9 - a ~ . 2, " • ••» --""«--'': _ v/l s '* -• fi ^ • •2is t t t — w V, Ji < 3 3- ~ o-af'* - •i _ y) o _ , ~ t '- Z 5 • o^»_-c-i £ c - 3 ;» 5 -T "* > t if K :l-2 3 = I cT> 3 T $ f 9^ 2 •» o - T .t —. —o 39.23. 2 9- . 1 o c> IL C - I o I y 3" 3 7 9. — * 2. c- c Q 3 t .2 - -s. O r- - ~. 5 Zo 3 ? 3 '* f) t XI .0 ' -5 — £ rt ' "j ' • <- J 3- -<j,0 9 .. > ?S^o * X 31 o - c _ 3 - O ^ - a .» ' 3-t ^ o — » t S cr. 3 3 ;r _•• o T , 3 ? — /I -r 3 •Jt a o ^ <n 3. S-O ° coa. 3 3 O- q- <t cojg 2 ' ^ 2 3 rt 2 t a o o. — rt .c q 3 '5-< - fc.a 035 'a <t Q 3 3 — ,^ ^ ) 2 ^ „ '00 ac o ; -3 3?. ?'-lJ ^ ' t -. -o •» ' — O 3 ^ " O 3 — 0. f 53, _ 3 3 3 O •O 1 3 — — O 2 — o 3 < :T « fc 3 . 'yi ?^ C » 21, 2C.5I. 5 2 3 g |. - J 3 - » .7 i. _ 3 O !i?-2s vl * O rt ^ o o — It * 2 3 =^-3i^t 530,2 =^..1 •£ S O 00 rt •'•'.S «J 3 CO^ 3 S 'r ^ <2.5 «o>J o ! * -f-,'^ 2 3 o .^2 UNOCAL® UNOCAL PROJECT OVERVIEW ^ 880 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 RETAIL FORMAT PROGRAM RE-DEFINING THE FUTURE SITE: 880 Carlsbad Village Dr. Carlsbad, CA 90028 UNOCAL'S PROJECT PROPOSAL: Build ground-up, state ofthe art fueling facility and PRO WASH EXPRESS SERVICE car wash. PROJECT MANAGER: John Murphy Unocal Petroleum Products and Chemicals Division 7 Capobella Irvine, CA 92714 (714) 833-8825 PROJECT ARCHITECT: Bob Mattox Holmes & Narver 999 Towne & Country Road Orange, CA 92668 (714)567-2719 (714) 567-2632 FAX RE-DEFINING THE FUTURE Unocal's new design reflects a commitment to better serve tlie community through improved products, services and convenience delivered by the corner "service station. " The distinctive architecture serves to identify a safer, more pleasant buying experience and enhances our positive image in the community. The improvements will also benefit the community through increases to the local tax base. THE SPECIFIC DESIGN ELEMENTS ARE: The proposed development will replace the existing work bays and mini-mart with a new express car wash which will operate from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. The development will consist of a 1,004 square foot car wash which has a smaller footprint than the existing building on the site, a 208 square foot car wash kiosk; 1,900 square feet of canopy covers and three parking spaces. The canopy covers will be replaced and a new orientation will be installed which directs the vehicles to circulate East and West on the property rather than North and South as currently oriented. The reorientation of the canopies and fuel pumps will improve the circulation on the site. Furthermore, a pass-through area will be provided within the fuel area to allow customers to access the car wash directly from the East. The proposed new structure is designed with a concrete flat roof tile in shake/shingle style, the color will be medium gray with a pitched roofline. The building will have a medium gray and white stucco finish with accent colors used to give visual interest. At the top of the roof, there will be glass skylights with metal frames painted in a medium gray to closely match the roof lines. Furthermore, to add some additional visual interest to the car wash building, UNOCAL has proposed metal window/louver frames painted blue and dark gray as well as ceramic tiles to accent the lower portion of the building. Also, all accent trim will be painted medium gray. The canopies and kiosk will match the car wash building in basic design, color and materials. OTHER DESIGN ELEMENTS: EXTERIOR LIGHTING This project includes fixtures with state-of-the-art metal halide light fixtures which provide high intensity, energy efficient, down lighting. This design will have a minimum effect on adjacent properties and public right-of-ways but will provide a safer, more secure environment on site. LANDSCAPING This site is currently dominated by asphalt with minimum landscaping. However, the proposed landscape plan will provide 1,746 square feet of landscaping which represents 13% of the site. Planters will be divided into bright blooms, ground cover and shrubbery. Bright blooms will be positioned for maximum visibility and will be rotated in April and September. Visual impacts from waiting cars at the entrance to the car wash will be reduced through the use of landscape planters which include several trees. The landscape areas will be on both sides of the driveway, or vehicle waiting areas, into the proposed car wash. The landscaping will be visually appealing as well as provide a screen from he waiting cars. As such, the building and car wash areas have been designed to reduce visual impacts. After the initial installation of the landscaping, a maintenance service will visit the site at least twice a month to keep the planters looking fresh and inviting. They will clean, weed, fertilize and handle pest problems. They will also remove faded blooms and replace damaged plants. RE-DEFTNTNG THE FUTURE FUEL FACILITY The existing mechanical dispensers will be replaced with new electronic, multi-pruduct dispensers. The use of lightweight hoses and nozzles allow for easier customer use. A credit card reader system will be installed to allow for payment at the pump. The dispensers will be set further apart to provide additional maneuverability. Service is available 24 hours a day. PRO WASH EXPRESS SERVICE CAR WASH PRO WASH EXPRESS SERVICE car wash features a 40 foot state-of the art soft cloth car wash with exterior only cleaning. An attendant guides customers into the car wash tunnel. Customers will remain in their car as it travels through the tunnel on an automatic conveyor. A second attendant will quickly towel dry the car once it leaves the conveyor. The wash will bake 2-3 minutes from start to finish. A full line of car protection upgrade packages will be offered (ie Waxes). Video technology via payment at the pump system installed within the gasoline dispensers will also provide additional customer convenience. The PRO WASH EXPRESS SERVICE car wash will be open from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. daily. 80% of the water used to wash and rinse the car is reclaimed. All the water used to wash and rinse the car is captured in the conveyor trench. From the trench, the water is drained to clarifier tanks where suspended solids settle to the bottom of the tanks as the water flows through them. Clear water is then transferred from the clarifier tanks, through filters, for reuse. Compared to the 75 gallons typically used in a driveway washing, only 13 gallons of fresh water is needed to wash each car. This facility will help minimize residential driveway washing and chemical inflow to the storm drain system. Most of the noise generated from car wash operations stems from the air dryer. However, the decibel level attenuates to ambient noise levels at approximately 30 feet. To help minimize noise concems, Unocal has placed the dryer as far back a possible from the exit end of the tunnel. UNOCAL® FLEX WRAP A ROUND MITTERS CHETi/IICAL TIRE APPLICATOR QUADRA JET ARCH TIRE SCRUBBER UNDERCARRIAGE WASH COMPLETE SYSTEM UNOCAL® CONVEYORS FRONT TO REAR MITTERS 4 X 4 ROCKER PANEL MITTERS CAR WASH EOUiPIVIENT CORRELATORS 2X2 ROCKER PANEL MITTERS SIDE TO SIDE MITTERS RE-DEFINING THE FUTURE LOITERING DETERRENCE PROGRAM Loitering is a hindrance to a successful business operation; the site operator and his employees will be trained to be aware of all customers both in the store and on the property. Public telephones will be placed in well lighted areas on the property and installed with a call out feature only. FACILITY MAINTENANCE & LITTER CONTROL PROGRAM Unocal believes a clean, attractive facility is necessary for a successful operation. The site operator and his employees will be required to attend training programs that include both daily and periodic litter control and maintenance duties. Unocal's litter control program includes a schedule for keeping the premises and surrounding area free from litter (street frontage and abutting sidewalks). There will be refuse receptacles at each gasoline island and one adjacent to the PROWASH facility. Further, all Unocal facilities are inspected under the Company's Five Star Program three times a year. Every site is required to meet minimum scores or written defaults may lead to lease termination. PRODUCTS COMPANY July I, 1996 City of Carlsbad Housing & Redevelopment Department Ms. Deborah K. Fountain Senior Management Analysis 2965 Roosevelt Street, Suite B Carlsbad, CA 92008-2389 RE: RP-86-7(A) / CDP 95-05 UNOCAL GAS STATION AND CAR WASH Dear Debbie: As you are aware, the Design Review Board held a public hearing on April 17, 1996, to evaluate the demolition of the existing work bays and mini-mart at the existing UNOCAL station and the construction ofa new express car wash. Based upon the meeting, the Design Review Board continued the public hearing to May I, 1996, so City staff could address the proposed conditions of approval recommended by UNOCAL, the Design Review Board, and the citizens of Carlsbad. For example, UNOCAL recommended that an Acoustical Study be completed prior to the issuance of building permits to address any potential noise issues. However, after giving the planning process some thought, I gave you a call and recommended that the public hearing be continued to July 17, 1996. As you realize, I requested the continuance so UNOCAL could complete the various studies and recommend the appropriate conditions of approval and/or mitigation measures to the Design Review Board and citizens as part of the public hearing process as opposed to prior to the issuance of building permits. On the behalf of UNOCAL, it's very important that we facilitate the City and our neighbors since we have been a member ofyour business community for many years. Based upon our meeting of May 2, 1996, to confirm the outstanding issues and conditions of approval associated with the proposed project, please note that the following summarizes my understanding ofthe issues and UNOCAL'S recommendations for project approval. ISSUE - FLOODING At the Design Review Board meeting the property owner who is located behind the existing service station was concerned about the flow of water on to her existing parking lot. Currently, when the gas station is washed down, the water runs on to her parking lot. Based upon the potential flooding issue, I 553 Anton Blvd . Casca Mesa Califo .-ma 92625 Mailing Address, ? 0 Box 25375, Sanca Ana, California 92799-5375 ,'=a< (7141 423-3051 A Unocal Cor^ioany 1 rts OMOM / nso mnt aoa oraoilMi^ —• 1 !-»" Xuoduioo spnpojj 9^ eivDONn aa 30vniiA avssiavo oes N^rid ans C93^ S S IVDONn II 111 Ui i 7 I 2 » 5 :6 I I lh i i s iji B i 9 i 9 6 i S i 8 s I I § e 3 & 2 snt Ih ! « ; f HHl 2 li 1 wi\ \ 1:1 ! 00© i in CO 01 requested Holmes and Narver to prepare a Grading/ Drainage Plan to mitigate any potential flooding at the site. Based upon the plan, the proposed project will decrease the impact of water onto adjacent properties. Per the enclosed plan, there will be a masonry wall and/or concrete curb running the entire length of the property and the site will be graded so water flows to the south. Furthermore, storm water and hose down water will be collected before it leaves the site by V-gutters and trench drains and conveyed underground to the City's storm drainage system. The new facility will also meet NPDES requirements. Storm and hose down water will pass through an oil-water separator before entering the storm water drainage system which will help improve the quality of the storm water entering the ocean. UNOCAL RECOMMENDATION Based upon the Grading and Drainage Plan UNOCAL would recommend that the City condition the project so the City has to approve the Grading/ Drainage Plan prior to the issuance of the grading permits to mitigate the flooding of the adjacent properties. ISSUE - PARKING Per the proposed parking plan, three on-site parking spaces will be provided at the site. However, the Design Review Board had reservations with only three parking spaces since three UNOCAL employees will be on site between 6:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. To address the City's concerns UNOCAL has evaluated the issue and is willing to provide an additional three off-site parking spaces. UNOCAL RECOMMENDATION I would like to recommend that the City condition UNOCAL to enter into a Shared Parking Agreement prior to the issuance of building permits. The Parking Agreement would require an additional three parking spaces off-site. The three off-site parking spaces would be for our employees and the three on- site parking spaces should be reserved for customer parking only. Furthermore, the off-site parking spaces will to be in close proximity to the project site. ISSUE - UNLOADING OF FUEL Recently, the City asked UNOCAL how the fuel trucks would enter and leave the project site. Based upon the City's request please note that I have enclosed the Fuel Delivery Plan and it meets the intent of the standards established by the City. UNOCAL RECOMMENDATION UNOCAL would like to recommend that the City condition the project so the unloading of fuel can only take place between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. ISSUE - ON-SITE CIRCULATION PLAN As you are aware, the Design Review Board requested an On-Site Circulation Plan to address the flow of traffic on-site. Please note that I have enclosed an On-Site Circulation Plan for your review. The proposed circulation pattern consists of vehicles entering the site via the easternmost driveway on Carlsbad Village Drive (a one-way entrance) or the Harding Street dnveway, fueling underneath the canopy, and eiiher exiting via the southwest driveway on Carlsbad Village Drive (a one-way exit) or proceeding to the car wash entrance. One-way circulation (from northeast to southwest) will be permitted through the fueling area. The one-way driveways will be marked with "entrance-only" and "exit-only" signage. Vehicles leaving the car wash will use the Harding Street driveway to exit the site. SITE VICINITY MAP 4t/3)r HARDING STREET UJ > oc Q QJ o < _J -1 > Q < CD CO _l CC < o ON-SITE CIRCULATION PLAN l7265?miDWG TRANSPORTATION/ENVIRONMENTAL/URBAN SYSTEMS 3347 Micfielson Ofiva, Suite 490 . Irving, California 92715 • (714) 756-6440 The car wash attendant at the exit will direct vehicles out onto Harding Street. With clearly marked pavement delineation and directional signs, the driveways will not pose traffic safety or congestion problems. UNOCAL RECOMMENDATION The City should condition the project so the On-Site Circulation Plan has to be implemented by UNOCAL. ISSUE - ON-SITE PUBLIC TELEPHONE As you realize, UNOCAL supported the recommendation of the Design Review Board in reference to a public telephone near the cashiers booth. Furthermore, I recommend that the public telephone be for out call service only. UNOCAL RECOMMENDATION Condition the applicant to provide a public telephone on-site with out call service only. ISSUE - TIME LIMIT ON THE MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT/ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT At the April 17, 1996, Design Review Board meeting the board asked if the applicant would support a condition which only granted approval of the Major Redevelopment Permit/ Conditional Use Permit for a period of flve (5) years. At the meeting 1 indicated that UNOCAL had reservations with the condition because ofthe substantial investment we were making in the community. As you are aware, the City currently has the discretion to revoke the permits after a public hearing if it is found that the use has a substantial detrimental effect on the surrounding land uses and the public's health and welfare, or the conditions imposed upon the project. UNOCAL RECOMMENDATION At this time, UNOCAL would like to recommend that the City draft a condition of approval which grants approval of the Major Redevelopment Permit/ Conditional Use Permit for a period of ten (10) years. Furthermore, the permits may be extended for a period of ten (10) years upon written application ofthe applicant made no less than 90 days prior to the expiration date. However, the Planning Commission may not grant such extension, unless it flnds that there are no substantial negative effects on surrounding land uses or the public's health and welfare. ISSUE - NOISE ANALYSIS As you are aware, a majority of the residents at the April 17, 1996, meeting expressed concern with the potential noise associated with the project. At the meeting I indicated that UNOCAL would undertake a Noise Analysis for the proposed car wash. Please note that I have enclosed a copy of the Noise Analysis Report prepared by Mestre Greve Associates. UNOCAL RECOMMENDATION Based upon the noise study I would like to recommend the following as conditions of approval. 1) The Wind Shear Air Dryer (with silencer) by Proto-Vest (or a dryer with equal or lower noise level) shall be used. 2) The skylights in the car wash tunnel will need to be at least 1/4" laminated glass. 3) Car wash operation shall be limited to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. 4) The height of the door at the exit end of the tunnel shall be reduced to 10 feet. 5) A masonry wall 6.0 feet high shall extend 45 feet beyond the entrance end of the tunnel. 6) A masonry wall 6.0 feet high shall extend 20' beyond the exit end of the tunnel. 7) Modify Landscape Plan so the 6 foot masonry walls are landscaped with bougainvillea. Both the north and south elevations of the walls shall be landscaped. 8) In addition to the above conditions of approval, the City has recommended that the proposed coin operated vaccum be prohibited at the site. UNOCAL supports the staff recommendation. Based upon the City's Review of the studies and the recommended conditions of approval it is my understanding per our recent meeting that we have resolved all of the potential issues. However, if you have any questions please give me a call prior to the Design Review Board meeting of July 17, 1996. Furthermore, as I have indicated to date, I would like the City to schedule a meeting with the citizens who attended the Design Review Board meeting so I can present our recommendations for each of their concerns. Hopefully you can schedule the meeting the week of July I or July 8, 1996. Again, I would like to thank you and the Design Review Board for giving UNOCAL the opportunity to address and resolve the issues early in the planning process. Sincerely, John Murphy Project Manager cc: Mr. Bill Compas, Design Review Board Ms. Sarah Marquez, Design Review Board Ms. Peggy Savary, Design Review Board Mr. Nick Vessey, Design Review Board Ms. Kim Welshons, Design Review Board Mr. Evan Becker, Housing & Redevelopment Director Mr. Clyde E. Wickham, Associate Engineer Mr. Cary Brockman, KHR Associates Mr. Allan Cornia, Holmes & Narver Mr. Fred Greve, Mestre Greve Associates Mr. Philip Dedge, UNOCAL Mr. Ron Jones, UNOCAL Mr. Eric Munoz, Associate Planner CD ®lV30Nn NVld-^lilC m w in a?- * HI Jf•' ? 31 5 5 el -4- \[ 3 • / "I z < a LU (7) • m AuDduiOQ spnpojd 9L ®lV30Nn S llViaa i33S 'SNOlIVA.jTi I I < IO fs;----.;:::i5 ? . 5'-' i -I; n ; 3 .- » ' J f S 4: - I . , £ J j,j 1 e i D. % * r Q Pl CD O 8G iOvriA CvaroldVJ 088 SNOIJ.VA313 dOiy3J.X3 QNV S3iON "ssnnosHOS "wvid aooii S'5 ivDONn • :>! m% < llli IO 3 1 5? ; sC- >- t -^ •/ 3i^i o : • o ••'C-w::-. CO ® 0 < 1' >s' i : ^1^ ^ ' :i I. OQ O trHjKu omssiliVM XuodujoQ spnpojci 9^ IMW3I i IMW •ya 3ovni/\ ovssiyvo 098 NVld 3dV3SCN\n £9Zi 'S'S ivDOwn s 1 CO ii ® O 0 (DO®© !i in ili li ii! l! itl! ill < CD o O XuDduiOQ spnpojd 9/ VfidQjl 'Vj 'QVLi'l'IdV..' >!Ci _:-:.v ;MA ^v?]'^ i;-iv: .^^r: II' < J rA-2 Ol ©IVDONfl SNOliVAJTr .UOia3lX3 i9;:/ : iv:.;"._.t-i?' II r' ro Noise Analysis for Unocal Car Wash #7263 (at Carlsbad Village Drive and Harding Street) City of Carlsbad Report #96-80-B June 3,1996 Prepared For: UNOCAL CORPORATION 555 Anton Boulevard Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Prepared By: Fred Greve, RE. Mike Holiitz MESTRE GREVE ASSOCIATES 280 Newport Center Drive, Suite 230 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Phone (714) 760-0891 FAX (714) 760-1928 Mestre Greve Associates Report #96-80-B Page 1 of 6 Summary Noise Analysis for Unocal Car Wash #7263 (at Carlsbad Village Drive and Harding Street) City of Carlsbad INTRODUCTION The proposed Unocal Car Wash #7263 is to be located at the site of the existing Unocal gas station on the west comer of the intersection of Carlsbad Village Drive and Harding Street, in the City of Carlsbad. This report will address the potential noise impacts due to the proposed Unocal Car Wash on the adjacent land uses. Any significant noise impacts on the adjacent land uses due to the proposed project will be identified. Design mitigation measures used are presented below. DESIGN MITIGATION MEASURES 1) The Wind Shear Air Dryer (with silencer) by Proto-Vest (or a dryer with equal or lower noise level) shall be used. 2) The skyUghts in the car wash tunnel will need to be at least 1/4" laminated glass. 3) The height of the door at the exit end of the tunnel shall be reduced to 10 feet 4) A masonry wall 6.0 feet high shall extend 45' beyond the entrance end of the tunnel, as shown in Exhibit Sl. 5) A masonry wall 6.0 feet high shall extend 20' beyond the exit end of the tunnel, as shown in Exhibit Sl. With these planned design mitigations in place, the noise levels at the adjacent land uses will be substantially reduced. The results of the analysis indicate that even using worst case assumptions, the worst case offices adjacent to the proposed car wash will experience an interior noise level of about 54.7 LEQ(H). This is below the 55 LEQ(H) interior noise guideline. Therefore, all adjacent offices will meet the Gty of Carlsbad 55 LEQ(H) interior noise guideline without additional mitigation. The nearest residence to the project is about 180 feet from the property line of the proposed car wash. A two-story office building between the residence and the car wash will act as a substantial barrier. The shielding provided by the car wash building, the wing wall, and the two-story office building renders the car wash noise insignificant at this location. The car wash noise at the residence will be well below ambient, and is not expected to be audible. Mestre Greve Associates Report #96-80-B Page 2 of 6 Noise Analysis for Unocal Car V^ash #7263 (at Carlsbad Village Drive and Harding Street) City of Carlsbad 1.0 INTRODUCTION The proposed Unocal Car Wash #7263 is to be located at the site of the existing Unocal gas station on the west comer of the intersection of Carlsbad Village Drive and Harding Street, in the City of Carlsbad, as shown in Exhibit 1. The site plan is shown in Exhibit 2. This report will address the potential noise impacts due to the proposed Unocal Car Wash on the adjacent land uses. A bank is located to the southwest of the site, and is separated from the site by an alley. Office buildings are located to the northwest of the site, and are separated from the site by a driveway and parking spaces. The nearest residence is located along Harding Street, just northwest of the project. Any significant noise impacts on the adjacent land uses due to the proposed project will be identified. Design mitigation measures are specified, and additional mitigation will be suggested if necessary. 2.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON NOISE Sound is technically described in terms of the loudness (amplitude) of the sound and frequency (pitch) of the sound. The standard unit of measurement of the loudness of sound is the decibel (dB). Decibels are based on the logarithmic scale. In terms of human response to noise, a sound 10 dB higher than another is judged to be twice as loud; and 20 dB higher four times as loud; and so forth. Everyday sounds normally range from 30 dB (very quiet) to 100 dB (very loud). Since the human ear is not equally sensitive to sound at all frequencies, a special frequency-dependent rating scale has been devised to relate noise to human sensitivity. The A-weighted decibel scale (dBA) performs this compensation by discriminating against frequencies in a manner approximating the sensitivity of the human ear. Community noise levels are measured in terms of the "A-weighted decibel," abbreviated dBA. A-weighting is a frequency correction that correlates overall sound pressure levels with the fi^uency response of the human ear. Exhibit 3 provides examples of various noises and their typical A-weighted noise levels. 3.0 NOISE STANDARDS The City of Carlsbad Noise Guidelines Manual (September 1995) was consulted in an attempt to find noise ordinance limits for non-transportation related noise. No limits were found that strictiy apply to this type of noise source. However, the City does have indoor noise guidelines for general offices. Therefore, in this report we will demonstrate compliance of the project with the City of Carlsbad indoor noise level guidelines. 3.1 City of Carlsbad Noise Guidelines The City of Carlsbad specifies indoor noise guidelines for office land uses. The guidelines are based upon the LEQ(H) index. LEQ(H) (Equivalent Hourly Noise Level) represents the average noise level based on the A-weighted decibel. The City of Carlsbad has adopted an interior noise guideline of 55 LEQ(H) for office land uses. (The City's interior noise standard for residential land uses is 45 CNEL.) MESTRE GREVE ASSOCIATES Exhibit 1 - Vicinity Map SOUND LEVELS AND LOUDNESS OF ILLUSTRATIVE NOISES IN INDOOR AND OUTDOOR ENVIRONMENTS (A-ScaU WtighUd Sound LtvtU) dB(A) OVBR-ALL LBVBL $•••<! PrM8«r« Level Approx. 0.0002 MIcrobarf COMMUNITY (OHtdcer) BOMB OR INDUSTRY LOUDNESS HUM* Judgeantat or DirrartBt S«aad 130 UNCOMFORTABLY Milituy Jet Aircraft Take-Off With Afier-bumer From Aircnft Cairkr @ SO Ft. (130) Oxygen Torch (121) 120 dB(A) 32 Times as Loud 120 110 LOUD Ttobo-Fan Aircraft @ Take Off Power @200FL (90) Rivetng Machine (110) Rock-N-Ron Band (108-114) 110 dB(A) 16 Times as Loud 100 VERY Jet Ryover Q 1000 FL (103) Boeing707. DC-S96080FI. Before Laiidif« (lOfi) Bell J-2A Heliooptcrd 100 PL (100) 100 dB(A) 8 Times as Loud 90 LOUD f\iwerMo«ra-(96) Boeins 737. DC-9 9 fOtO PL BcforeLandinc (97) Motorcycle Ft (90) New^Mper Press (97) 90 dB(A) 4 Times as Loud 80 Car Waah @ 20 Ft. (S9) Prop. Airplane Ryover Q 1000 FL (88) DieaelTmck. 40 MPH9 50 FL (84) Diesel Train. 45 MPH 0 100 Pt (83) Food Blender (88) ^filling .Machine (85) Garbage Disposal (80) 80 dB(A) 2 Tones as Loud 70 MODERATELY LOUD High Urban Ambient Sound (80) Paaaeager Car. 65 MPH @ 25 Pt (77) Freeway @ 50 R. From Pavement Edge. 10:00 AM (76 -for- 6) Living Room Music (76) TV-Audio. Vacuum Cleaner 70dB(A) 60 Air Conditioning Unit® 100 FL (60) Cash Register @ 10 Ft (65-70) Electric Typewriter @ 10 R. (64) Dishwasher (RirMe) @ 10 R (60) Convemtion (60) 60dB(A)l/ZasLoud 50 QUIET Large Truisformen @ 100 Ft (50) 50dB(A) 1/4 as Load 40 Binl Calls (44) Lower Limit Urban Ambient Sound (40) 40dB(A) 1/8 as Loud JUST AUDIBLE (dB[A] Scale Iniemipied) 10 THRESHOLD OFHEARINa SOURCE: Reproduced firom Melville C. Branch and R. Dale Beland. Outdoor Noiae in the Metropolitan RnvironmenL Published by the Gty of Los Angeles, 1970, p.2. MESTRE GREVE ASSOCIATES Exhibit 3 Typical A-Weighted Sound Levels Mestre Greve Associates Report #96-80-B Page 3 of 6 4.0 AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENT LEVELS Ambient noise levels were measured at three sites. The sites were selected to represent the adjacent bank, the adjacent office buildings, and the nearest residence. The measurements were made on May 2, 1996. Noise measurements were conducted during the daytime hours between 10:30 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. The measurements were made with a Bruel & Kjaer Type 2231 Sound Level Meter. The measurement system was calibrated before and after the measurements with a Briiel & Kjaer Type 4230 sound level calibrator, with calibration traceable to the National Bureau of Standards. Noise measurements were made for two 15-minute periods at each site. The noise measurement results are presented in Table 2. Table 2 AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS (DBA) Site Leq Lmax Lmin Bank 61.8 75.6 50.8 Bank 62.9 81.6 51.7 Offices (2nd floor) 61.6 73.9 54.4 Offices (2nd floor) 61.4 77.2 54.0 Nearest Residence 59.4 71.8 51.0 Nearest Residence 61.2 76.7 51.2 The LEQ noise levels in Table 2 were caused by the nearby traffic on Carlsbad Village Drive and Harding Street. This is a very busy intersection, and the noise levels reflect this condition. During the measurments, it was also noted that tire busting, tuneups, and other sendee operations occur at the existing gas station. Noise levels from these operations are typically much louder than the projected car wash noise levels. 5.0 CAR WASH NOISE 5.1 Car Wash Noise Measurements The main noise sources associated with the proposed car wash will be the air dryer/blower and coin operated vacuum. The proposed car wash will be using the Wind Shear Air Dryer/blower with silencer manufactured by Proto-Vest, Inc. Noise measurements were conducted by Mestre Greve Associates of the same nKxiel of dryer/blower as the one planned for the proposed car wash. Based on these measurements, the proposed dryer/blower (including the silencer) will generate a noise level of approximately 75 dBA at a distance of 40 feet from the source. The dryer/blower represents the largest noise source for the car wash tunnel area. Other associated noises from the car wash tunnel are insignificant compared to the dryer. Mestre Greve Associates Rcport #96-80-B Page 4 of 6 Noise levels for thc dryer/blower are listed below in Table 3. It should be emphasized that the noise levels in Table 3 represent source noise levels. In the following section, these noise levels will be projected to the distances of the adjacent land uses, and will include adjustments for noise barriers. Table 3 TYPICAL CAR WASH EQUIPMENT SOURCE NOISE LEVELS (DBA) Source Distance (feet) Unmitigated Level Dryer/blower 40 75.0 5.2 Projected Car Wash Noise Levels at Adjacent Land Uses All significant noise generating equipment will be within the car wash tunnel. The car wash tunnel is proposed to be located along the northwest property line. The proposed car wash will be partially enclosed by the car W2ish tunnel which has two sides and a roof. The sides will be solid masonry walls. The roof is proposed to consist of concrete tiles, with glass skylights. No openings or holes are proposed on the roof. The wing walls arc masonry block, 6 feet high, and will extend at least 45 feet beyond the entrance end and at least 20 feet beyond the exit end of the tunnel. The main noise source from the car wash is the dryer/blower, which will be located near the exit end of the car wash. The car wash entrance end is very much quieter than the exit end. Car wash noise levels were projected at three sites (the adjacent bank, the adjacent office buildings, and the nearest residence). These sites represent the closest adjacent land uses around the site. The source noise levels have been adjusted for distance and noise barrier effects. These projected noise levels include several worst case assumptions, listed below: For the purposes of this study, it was assumed that the dryer/blower runs continuously. Actually, even during the busiest times, the dryer/blower cycles on and off. This cycling results in a lower LEQ(H) than that which is projected. It was assumed that the offices with operable windows need to meet the 55 LEQ(H) standard with windows open, and offices with fixed windows need to meet the 55 LEQ(H) standard with windows closed. At the bank and offices, traffic noise was added to the car wash noise, so that the total indoor noise levels could be determined. Design mitigation measures already planned for the project are shown in Exhibit 4 and are presented below: Mestre Greve Associates Report #96-80-B Page 5 of 6 DESIGN MITIGATION MEASURES 1) The Wind Shear Air Dryer (with silencer) by Proto-Vest (or a dryer with equal OT lower noise level) shall be used. 2) The skylights in the car wash tunnel will need to be at least 1/4" laminated glass. 3) The height of the doOT at the exit end of the tunnel shall be reduced to 10 feet 4) A masonry wall 6.0 feet high shall extend 45' beyond the entrance end of the tunnel, as shown in Exhibit 4. 5) A masonry wall 6.0 feet high shall extend 20* beyond the exit end of the tunnel, as shown in Exhibit 4. The projected worst case noise levels at the adjacent land uses (with the planned design mitigation) are listed in Table 4. Table 4 CAR WASH NOISE LEVELS AT ADJACENT LAND USES WITH DESIGN MITIGATION MEASURES Location Source Noise Level (LEQ) Bank Blower/dryer (entrance end) 50.7 Traffic 60.4 Total Exterior 60.8 Building Noise Reduction 25.0 Interior Noise Level 35.8 Office Building with flxed windows Blower/dryer (exit end) 65.2 Traffic 61.5 Total Exterior 66.7 Building Noise Reduction 25.0 Interior Noise Level 41.7 Offlce Building with operable windows Blower/dryer (exit end) 65.2 Traffic 61.5 Total Exterior 66.7 Building Noise Reduction 12.0 Interior Noise Level 54.7 Mestre Greve Associates Report #96-80-B Page 6 of 6 The results in Table 4 indicate that with the above mitigation measimes in place, noise levels at the adjacent offices will be below 55 LEQ(H). Therefore, all adjacent offices will meet die City of Carlsbad 55 LEQ(H) interior noise guideline without additional mitigation. The nearest residence to the project is about 180 feet finom the property line of the proposed car wash. A two-story office building between the residence and the car wash will act as a substantial barrier. The shielding provided by the car wash building, the wing wall, and the two-story office building renders the car wash noise insignificant at this location. The car wash noise at the residence will be well below ambient, and is not expected to be audible.