HomeMy WebLinkAboutRP 97-01; STARBUCKS COFFEE; Redevelopment Permits (RP) (7)CITY OF CARLSBAD
LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION
1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECKBOXES)
(FOR DEPARTMENT
USE ONLY)
IFOR DEPARTMENT
USE ONLY)
• Administrative Permit - 2nd
Dweiling Unit
Q Administrative Variance
[p^ Coastal Development Permit
• Conditional Use Permit
LD Condominium Permit
• Environmental Impact
Assessment
• General Plan Amendment
• Hillside Development Permit
• Local Coastal Plan Amendment
• Master Plan
• Non-Residential Planned
Development
• Planned Development Permit
COP ^T-a)
• Planned Industrial Permit
• Planning Commission
Determination
• Precise Development Plan
y
Redevelopment Permit
• Site Development Plan
[]] Special Use Permit
• Specific Plan
• Tentative Parcel Mop
Obtain from Engineering Department
• Tentative Tract Map
Q Variance
L] Zone Change
• List other applications not
specified
2) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).:
3) PROJECT NAME:
4) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
5) OWNER NAME (Print or Type)
TEFFRE^ C • R/\5P.K
6) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type)
SAMl£ A'S OUONJSR
MAILING ADDRESS
3Z5Z MoLioAN CcuKT ^2Z5
MAILING ADDRESS /
CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPh(ONE CITY AND STATE ZH^ TELEPHONE
1 CERTIFY T/AT 1 AM THE^GAL OWNE^ND THAT ALL THE ABOVE
INf ORMATION 197 TR|^E^^ND CQBB^T TO THE BEST OF MY
/ICNOWLEDGE. /y ^y^"""^/^
1 CERTIFY THAT 1 AM XHE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
OWNER AND THAT ALLTHE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE ANO
CORRECT TO THE BE^OF MY KNOWLEDGE. \
SI^XI^/TORE' DATE SIGNATURE/ DATE
') BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION
NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPUCATIONS BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30 P.M.
A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATION BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M.
Form 16 PAGE 1 OF 2
8) LOCATION OF PROJECT:
ON THE
BETWEEN
f
, STREET ADDRESS
SIDE OF I CAfiUSe>ftO 6L-VD"
(NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST)
AND
(NAME OF STREET)
INAME OF STREET)
(NAME OF STREET)
9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE
10) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS
13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION
16) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED
PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE
19) GROSS SITE ACREAGE
22) EXISTING ZONING
to/^
11) NUMBER OF EXISTING
RESIDENTIAL UNITS
14) PROPOSED IND OFFICE/
SQUARE FOOTAGE
17) PROPOSED INCREASE IN
ADT
20) EXISTING GENERAL
PLAN
23) PROPOSED ZONING
ZOO
5sm<i
12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF
RESIDENTIAL UNITS
15) PROPOSEDCOMM
SQUARE FOOTAGE
18) PROPOSED SEWER
USAGE IN EDU
21) PROPOSED GENERAL
PLAN DESIGNATION
IOOO
IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY
STAFF, PLANING COMMISSIQ^^ERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMEBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
TO \NSP^AND ENTER TM€^R0PEHTY7^AT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT
TO FOR THffS Pl
FOR CITY USE ONLY
FEE COMPUTATION
APPLICATION TYPE FEE REQUIRED
TOTAL FEE REQUIRED
DATE FEE PAID
Form 16
oo
0^
DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED
RECEIVED BY:
RECEIPT NO.
PAGE 2 OF 2
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
SUPPLEMENTAL APPUCATION
This supplemental application is to be filed for:
A- Any development requiring a Coastal Development Permit issued by the City of
Carlsbad, or
B. Any development which requires a Califomia Coastal Commission Coastal
Development Permit.
Please answer all questions. Where questions do not apply, please indicate "not applicable" or
"N/A".
1. General BackCTOund
A. Has any application for a development on this site been submitted previously to the
Califomia Coastal Commission? D Yes No
If yes, state previous Califomia Coastal Cominission Coastal Development Permit
application number
B. Do you wish to apply for:
1. An Administrative Coastal Development Permit
2. A Regular Coastal Development Permit ^ M V N/O^ REOE VGLOPM €srA
3. A Califomia Coastal Cominission Coastal Development Pennit
C. Please provide the street address of this proposed development
Z^Z^ r>Ag.L^P)AO BOOLFUAI^D
D. Please provide the Assessor's Parcel Nimiber of this proposed development
E. Please identify that the proposed development is located on die (N/S^A^ -Circle
One) side of (2ARL5BP\0 P^VC^ between CARLseftO vi i/jg^kP and iLREjoO Av^ .
F. Please describe the present land uses (Le., Vacant land, single family homes,
apartments, offices, etc.) surrounding the proposed development to the:
North: Gonnmcrcia I/Rjc4aAl ((A^I^C)^ CrceK u5^t^o^c5^
South: P^^RKlMC LOT ^ ReSTPuRArMT"
East: SHopPiN3<i c^NiTeR (RerPn<- » cFF/ce 4 Res-ri^ojiAfrr^\
West: 5HoPP<NG ce>^'r^< (R<rm»L , OFFice t- /?fcSTA0RWJ7-sJ
FRMOOOIS 8/90 Page 1 of 5
2. Present Use of Propertv
A- Are there existing structures on the property? Yes •
If yes, please describe.
Approx- NCOyf )6oii.)OiA)6 Pl^l:\/tOU>gLV U^FiO .
B. Will any existing structure be demolished? 0 Yes , , O No
Will any existing structures be removed? C] Yes No
If yes to either question, describe the type of development to be demohshed or
removed, including the relocation site, if applicable.
A p^iicD O-F exi^-fing boildvng U;'v)l b;
in "Size -firoyn approx (-^Iqc0i2f -fz/ iccoyl
3. Development Descriprion:
No
A.
B.
Estimated cost of development: Land ^330^ GOO Improvements ^0> " SO, 00?
Project height: ^ ^ 24 (OOO - 50, CCo
Maximum height of structure 2.^ IT^ ft.
D.
Maximum height of structure as measured from centeriine of frontage road
2-2^^ I'Z- ft. A"^ PBP^K., or- TF^LU?5T PRCH\ T6CTORFVC F 6^ ATOR 6 •
Total number of floors in stmcture, including subterranean floors, lofts, and
mezzanines / ^L^cf^
Gross floor area mcluding covered parking and accessory buOdings , 3O/LOI»OG
I OOP sq. ft.(60iL.PiN4.) TbT^BL LO( '
Gross floor area excluding parking I G 50 ^^pprOvT^ sq. ft. ^
Lot area (within property lines) _ 3,750 ^Slt:\>r acres.
LOT COVERAGES
Building Coverage
Paved Area CINCL . c^RTMfveo\
Landscaped Area
Unimproved Area
Geft natural)
FRMOOOIS 8/90
Existing
IH^ sq. ft.
3-100 sq. ft.
Z50 sq. ft.
sq. ft.
New Proposed
\aX) sq. ft
Z5Q0 sq.ft
Z50 sq.ft
^sq.ft
Total
m>sq. ft. r^o.^^J^^^^
ZSOOsq. ft.
^5C) sq. ft.
y^ sq. ft.
Page 2 of 5
F. Parking: number of existing spaces Co N)o4«
number of new spaces proposed 7p^
TOTAL
nimiber of covered spaces 7^^
number of uncovered spaces ^
number of standard spaces size
number of compact spaces size
Is tandem parking existing? [U Yes # 0^o
proposed? CD Yes # B^o
G. If the land is to be subdivided, number of lots to be created and size:
Lot Svmbol No. of Lots Lot Size
H. If the development is residential, please state: .
1. number of dwelling units
2. number of bedrooms per dwelling unit
3. type of occupancy proposed: CD rental
n stock cooperative
n time share
• other
4. Grade Alteration:
Is any grading proposed? • Yes No
If yes, please complete the following:
A. amount of cut " """' cu. yds.
B. amount of fill cu. yds.
C. maximum height of fill slope ft.
D. maximum height of cut slope ft.
E. amount of import or export cu. yds.
F. location of borrow or disposal site
Grading and drainage plans must be included with this application. In certain areas, an
engineeiing geology report must also be included. Consult the City Engineering Department
representative for a determination.
FRMOOOIS 8/90 Page 3 of 5
5. UtiUtv extensions:
Are utility extensions for the following, proposed to serve the project?
No PLC OTl^^-^^^S
Above Ground Extensions p^OP^ "SEO
D. sewer • Yes Ef No OvAP^^ ^^"^
E. telephone • Yes EC Uo
If yes, to any of the above, would extensions be above ground?
• Yes • No
A. water • Yes
B. gas • Yes
C. electric • Yes
6. Development on PubUc Trust Lands: ^
Does the development involve diking, filling, dredging or pladng any structures in open
coastal waters, wedands, estuaries, or lakes?
A. diking • Yes • No
B. filUng • Yes • No
C. dredging • Yes • No
D. placement of stmctures • Yes • No
E. amount of material to be dredged or filled
cu. yds.
F. location of dredged material disposal site _
G. Has a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' pennit been appUed for?
• Yes • No
H. Will the development extend onto or adjoin any beach, tidelands, submerged lands
or pubUc trust lands? (See definitions section) CD Yes CD No
For projects on State-owned lands, additional information may be required. Consult
the staff representative in the Plarming Department.
7. Sensitive Resources:
Does the proposed development contain:
A. a sensitive habitat area D Yes D No (a biological survey may be required)
B. a lOO-year flood plain D Yes CD No (hydrologic mapping maybe required)
C. a park or recreation area CD Yes O No
D. historic resources D Yes CD No
FRMOOOIS 8/90 Page 4 of 5
E. archaeological resources D Yes D No
F. paieontological resources D Yes D No
If yes to any of the above, please explain on an attached sheet.
G. Would the development in any way alter or divert a stream bed or drainage course?
If yes, please describe on a separate sheet of paper.
8. Coastal Access:
A. WiU the development protect existing lower-cost visitor and recreation faciUties?
TNl projec-V LOlU r«5+' impc^c-t- v'lS i" f^r of
• Yes [Tl No ^ecrea-Vjcn -f.acv\\-\-\c^ Currcn+ly in pl^cc-
Ii yes, exp Iam \ '_
5cvrvv r\c\ Commercial u^es lo 4he Cbe'5>4'3|
IL^nc. TVi'g-ncio use ujUl replace ^
B. WiU the development provide pubUc or private recreational opportunities?
• Yes No
If yes, explain
Is the proposed development:
A. Visible from any park, beach, or recreation area CD Yes No (A
viewshed analysis may be required)
B. Within the viewshed from any pubUc or quasi pubUc place (i.e., pubUc roads,
commercial sites, pubUc or private recreation areas, etc.) to a visual coastal resource.
• Yes \3C No
9. If the development is between the first pubUc road and the sea, is pubUc access to the
shoreline and along the coast currendy available near the site? CD A Yes CD No
NJ7A
If yes, indicate the location of the nearby access, including the distance from the site.
Under certain circumstances, additional material or documents may be required prior to
issuance of a Coastal Development Permit.
Date
FRMOOOIS 8/90 Page 5 of 5
City of Carlsbad
Planning Oepartment
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Applicant's statement or disciosure of certain ownership interests on all
applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City
Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee.
The foHowing information must be disclosed:
1. APPLICANT
List the names and addresses of aii persons having a financial interest in the
appiication.
^=)&lFK^y cy, ^y^S^kl
OWNER
List the names and addresses of all
property involved.
^r^<^7=^/L7^^r CL y^T^^K
y-?^ y^77/a Oi)^y, Cy^'^^HJ
~~ ; ,5v9A) o^Jt?/ <^
3^^^ 7^c//j^y ay: p?^:?^^'^
7 .
persons having any ownership interest in the
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership,
list the names and addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares
in the corporation or^Dv\(ning any partnership interest in the partnership.
y=^g^/r 5''<3L. y^;//o TsPxy
in the corporation or^Dv\(r
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a
trust, list the names and addresses of any person serving as officer or director of
the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the trust.
2075 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (619) 438-1161 « FAX (619) 438-0894
5. Have you had more^[|^n $250 worth of business transacfll with any member of
City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve
(12) months?
• Yes o If yes, please indicate person(s):.
Person is defined as "Any Individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club,
fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, this and any other county, city
and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or
combination acting as a unit.'
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary,
^/7^/<^^ iature of applicant/date
Print or type name of applicant
Disclosure Statement 10/96 Page 2 of 2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION
PROJECTNAME: Conversion of Medical Office to Coffee House rStarbucks)
APPLICANT NAME: Jeff Rasak. Propertv Owner
Please describe fully the proposed project. Include any details necessary to
adequately explain the scope and/or operation ofthe proposed project. You may
also include any background information and supporting statements regarding the
reasons for, or appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if
necessary.
Description/Explanation:
The project consists of the conversion of a Medical Office to a Coffee House (Starbucks)
on property located at 2924 Carlsbad Boulevard. The site for the project is 3750 square
feet in size and currently contains a building which is approximately 1400 square feet in
size and provides for approximately 6 to 7 parking spaces. Under the proposed project,
the existing building will be reduced in size to 1000 square feet of building and provide
for approximately 400 square feet of outdoor patio/courtyard area. The building will be
substantially improved through exterior improvements which consist ofnew storefront
windows, colorful awnings, a comer entry feature, and new architectural tower roof
features to break up the existing flat roofline. The proposed building improvements will
significantly enhance the appearance of the existing building, which is outdated and
creating a blighting influence on the area.
The proposed improvements to the site include restriping of the existing parking lot to
provide for a standard handicap parking space and 4 regular size spaces (Sft 6in in width).
The site and existing building do not currently meet applicable handicap accessibility
regulations. The improved site and building will meet the applicable handicap
accessibility regulations.
The proposed project is consistent with the land uses permitted for the site and meets all
applicable development standards. It also meets the goals and objectives for the Village
Redevelopment Area. Consequently, the project will have a substantial positive impact on
the Village from a fiscal (property tax increase) standpoint as well as physical
enhancements and an added visitor-serving commercial land use.
CAl )BAD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
ADMINISTRATIVE PEBMIT APPUCATION & DISCLOSURE m TEMENT
6. APPLICANT INFORMATION/CERTIFICATION
Mam^- CGNCG CONSTRUCTION
Mailing Address: P»0« BOX 1582
APPLE VALLEY, CA 92307
Daytime Telephone No.: 619-247-8814
List the Names and Addresses of aii persons having a ftnanciai interest in the applicalion:
NA
If any person identified above is a corporation or partnership, list the n^mes and addresses of all individuals
owning more than 10% of the shares In the corporation or owning any partnership Interest in the
partnership:
m.
If any person identified above is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of any
person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary ofthe trust:
NA
Have you had more lhan $250 worth of business transacted with any member of Gity Staff, Boards.
Commissions. Committees, and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? • Yes CO No
if yes, piease indicate per$on(s):.
Certification Statement
I Ceriify that I am the Legal Owner's representative and lhat all of lhe above informalion is true and correct
to XhQ besl of my knowledge. I have been aulhorized by lhe legal owner of the subjeci property lo submil
this application and I agree to accept and abide by any condilions placed on the subjeci property, including
use of buildings, as aresult-fct^ppt^;^)^^^ this applicalion.
Signature Dale:
CA: 5BAD REOEVELOPMENT AGENCY
ADMINISTRATIVE PEEMIT APPLICATION & DISCLOSURt^ATEMENT >|p/ll
7. RECEIPT OF APPLICATION
Date Applicalion Received: /-/^-^7
Applicalion Received by: t^^'^ ^Yvg^
Permit No. A^^ign^d: A^P <m'^^7^C7(
8. FEES FOR APPLICATION PROCESSING
The following fees shall apply to this applicalion; list lype of fee and amount:
$220.00 - Environmental Review
$160.00 - Administrative Redevelopmenl Permil
$ 50.00 - Public Facilities Fee Agreement
$500.00 - Noticing Deposit
:ication:^-^^-c:>0 Tolal Fee(s) required forthis applicatior
Date Fee(s) cdlecled by City Slaff: hH-'^'7
Receipt No.: 1GVIX..
9. ACTION ON THE APPLICATION
The following action has been taken by the Housing and Redevelopmenl Direcior on this application:
• Approved subject to conformance wilh plans submitted as part of applicalion, daled .
• Approved, wilh condilions. See condilions noted below.
D Denied. Reason \
Housing and Redevelopment Direcior Signalure: CD Director Initials: Dale:
10. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (IF APPLICABLE) ]
XARLSBAD RtDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
ADMINISTRATIVE REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION & DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
& ADJi|pSTRATIVE COASTAL DEVELOPMENT P^||pT
7. RECEIPT OF APPLICATION
Date Application Received: 1/14/97
Application Received bv: Van Lvnch. Planning Counter. 2075 Las Palmas
Permit No. Assigned: ARP 97-01
8. FEES FOR APPLICATION PROCESSING
The following fees shall apply to this application; list lype of fee and amount:
$ 0.00 - Environmental Review (Project Exempt)
$150.00 - Administrative Redevelopment Permit
$400.00 - Administrative Coastal Development Permit
$ 50.00 - Public Facilities Fee Agreement
$125.00 - Noticing Deposit (Administraiive)
Total Fee(s) required for this application: $725 ($920 collected: refund of $195 to be processed for
retumed to the applicant
Date Fee(s) collected by City Staff: 1/14/97 (Communitv Development Counter: see original ARP aoo)
Receipt No.: 36222 ^
9. ACTION ON THE APPLICATION
The following action has been taken by the Housing and Redevelopment Director on this application:
Approved subjeci to confomiance wilh plans submitted as part of application, dated 3/14/97 .
Approved, with conditions. See conditions noted below.
O Denied. Reason
Housing and^edevelopment Director Signature:
y. ^^u.>lx^x.^^(77^j^
3 Directorjr CD Directorjnitials: Date:
4/3/97
FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL :
Findings:
1. This approved consolidated pemiit serves as the required administrative redevelopment and
coastal development permits for the subject project (ARP 97-01).
2. The project is consistent with the development standards for existing buildings and the land use
plan set forth within the Village Master Pian and Design Manual. The project is also consistent
with the Viiiage Segment of the Local Coastal Program for the City of Carlsbad.
ARP 97-Ol/J.Rasak/Starbucks/Decision Date: 4-3-97
3. I he use (coffee house) is appropriate to the Village and the site.
4. The project has been deslg^j^ to be compatible with the Village ^^ronment
Standard Conditions: i
1. The project shall be completed according to, and be consistent with, the plans approved by the
Housing and Redevelopment Director on April 3,1997. The approved plans have been stamped
by the Housing and Redevelopment Director and indicate the final revision date of 3/14/97.
2. The project must comply with the latest non-residential disabled access regulations for existing
buildings pursuant to Title 24 of the State Building Code. The applicant shall obtain all
appropriate building permits to complete the interior and exterior improvements to the subject
existing building prior to beginning construction on the subject project
3. No outdoor storage of materials shall occur onsite unless required by the Carlsbad Fire Chief. In
such instance, a storage plan will be submitted for approval by the Fire Chief and the Housing
and Redevelopment Director.
4. The applicant shall be responsible for all fees, deposits and charges which will be collected
before and/or after the time of issuance of the building permit(s).
5. This administrative redevelopment/coastal development approval shall become null and void if
all required building permits are not issued for the subject project within twelve (12) months
from the date of project approval.
Special Conditions:
1. The applicant is required to restripe the parking lot prior to approval of the Certificate of
Occupancy for the subject building. The restriping shall ensure that all of the required parking
spaces (5 total) are located entirely on the property owned by the applicant. Each regular space
shall be a least SH feet In width and each compact space shall be a minimum of 8 feet In width.
The compact space(s) shall be marked appropriately. The handicap space shall meet the size
regulations established by state regulations and/or the City's Building Code.
2. The applicant shall make all necessary arrangements to ensure that all business-related trash is
collected and removed from the site in an appropriate manner. Every effort shall be made by the
applicant to ensure that the collection and removal of business-related trash from the site does
not have a detrimental impact on surrounding properties.
3. The applicant, or his agent, shall apply for, pay the applicable fee, and obtain a separate sign
permit for the subjeict property in accordance with the requirements of the Village Master Plan
and Design ManuaL No signs have been approved for the subject building or site as part of this
Administrative Redevelopment/Coastal Development Permit
4. The applicant, or his agent, shall apply for, pay the applicable fee, and obtain approval from the
Housing and Redevelopment Director for a separate Administrative Redevelopment Permit
specificaily issued for any tables and chairs to be located within the public right-of-way (on the
public sidewalk), prior to placing any tables and chairs within the public right-of-way.
ARP 97-Ol/J.Rasak/Staibucks/Dccision Date: 4-3-97
^^fm&m llUIIIUyi Ul mm UIIU Uliairs to I6e^ted outside the subject buildmg shail be equal to
or less than the total number of tables and chairs located inside the subject building. The plans
submitted for the building (j^pit shall Indicate the total number cAbles and chairs to be
located both inside and outWe the subject building. i
t
6. The applicant shall ensure that the on-site parking will be made available for customers of the
subject coffee house business only; no employees of the related business shall park on the
subject site, with the exception that a handicapped employee may use the parking space on site
which is specifically designated for that use. All non-handicapped employees of the subject
business shall use public parking which is avaiiabie within the Village Redevelopment Area at
various off-site locations.
7. The project has been approved with the understanding that there will be no physical limitations
to the use of all of the required parking spaces on the subject site. If any City-approved site
improvements are made by an adjacent property owner which in effect eliminate, or otherwise
limit, the existing access to the subject parking spaces or the site itself, as shown on the
approved plans, the Housing and Redevelopment Director shall reconsider the approval of this
permit and may require additional action by the applicant to correct the access issues in order
for the permit to remain in effect
Note: This consolidated permit is subject to appeal to the Design Review Board. Action of the
Design Review Board on any appeal of the Director's decision shall be final. If no appeal is filed or
the subsequent appeal is denied by the Design Review Board, the applicant may proceed to obtain
issuance of the required building permit(s).
ARP 97-01/J.Rasak/Starbucks/Decision Date: 4-3-97
EXHIBIT 5
5^
J
c
^ ^ EXHIBIT 6
City oj^^Oarlsbad Housir r< Rctd(;i^C!lopfnent Department
APPEAL FORM
I (we) appeal the following decision ofthe Housing and Redevelopment Director to the
Design Review Board:
DATE OF APPEAL
Project Name and Number (or subject of appeal):
Date of Decision/Notice: A^Pg-Vu V\^1
Reason for Appeal of Director Decision: Ic^l c^(x>^c^ ^bolJ
(2> Pc^Ww 4v ^^pAa<> VvNsW^5 U .^KC^^^^e.
Signature: C\JA7y\^A\ (\Jf/y TTXyMX^
Name: (Please Prints 7l) /\ <3 r
Address:
Daytime Telephone Number.
2965 Roosevelt St.. Ste. B • Carlsbad. CA 92008-2389 • (619) 434-2810/2811 • FAX (619) 720-2037
(^itv of
g & Re
APPEAL FORM
I (we) appeal the following decision of the Housing and Redevelopment Director to the
Design Review Board:
DATE OF APPEAL:
Project Name and Number (or subject of appeal):
Date of Decision/Notice: h^^Kv. ^, W^T
Reason for Appeal of Director Decision: ^€ueHC<6aT ?F>-e^\.t^(sr :
Ji::^^ >(0U f^"?> ^? -cue ^J^cioixSL^T^ U^(5TB^ -rv^ ^^Ve MECaSSA^
Signature!
Name: (Please Print): t^^^w A^^^^
Address: Ci^-.^^^fc>^ \jcUHNc<^ie D^ ^Te> "^^C
(^/^^ei5gM> C^' ^200^
Daytime Telephone Number 0^<>^ "^ao I^IO
2965 Roosevelt St. Ste. B • Carlsbad. CA 92008-2389 • (619) 434-2810/2811 • FAX (619) 720-2037 0
(?itv of C&pj'S^eLdi
Housing & Rede^ -^kpm^n* C p rtment
APPEAL FORM
I (we) appeal the following decision of the Housing and Redevelopment Director to the
Design Review Board:
DATE OF APPEAL
Project Name and Number (or subject of appeal):
Date of Decision/Notice: 3 \<^H~l
Reason for Appeal of Director Decision: ni('^jUtS^-iOr^i* COir>Cfiy-K\ -J-Kt ^prt>v»-*-
^ : r^'^ t^'«^ prioijuvvx. ho hJexr mfl<i&
Signature: ^^j^ftOvt^ (^^^^^
Name: (Please Print): B^TT^ BtJQrUlC /VirOAvLA
Address:
Oy\^J ^ Ca . 92001?
Daytime Telephone Number 1.20'l^^Q CV ^3^-^33
2965 Roosevelt St., Ste. B • Cartsbad, CA 92008-2389 • (619) 434-2810/2811 • FAX (619) 720-2037 ffi
&.ccA^-ryu AWg. ow^u^ftw'^ (wjt. d-
r^?^-^ oicv^ ^ ^ ^^^^^ ^ p-^r-
"XMui^^ P»>^ Co-Op^aTu)^
^ . ... ^ ul 0 ^
C^itv of Carteb^ad.
Housing & Redevelopme 't Heparim^nt
•Km O
APPEAL FORM o
———————— "Ti
(we) appeal the following decision of the Housing and Redevelopment Director to thg 5
Design Review Board: -o \A
•:^y///^7a DATEOF APPEAL: ' ^* *
Project Name and Number (or subject of appeal):
Date of Decision/Notice: A^Pg-iu ^. W7
Reason for Appeal of Director Decision: <^^^ ArT^T^H^f-E^
Signature:
Name: (Please Pnrmr^ ^^^-O''^•<TXU.^— Js^g^T^^P—
Address:"^^^^^ CJ^^^^O^'^c^ VJec.w^Oej&-%7C^. 2^(L
Daytime Telephone Numben
2965 Roosevelt St., Ste. B • Carlsbad. CA 92008-2389 • (619) 434-2810/2811 • FAX (619) 720-2037
! I
i i
i
1
1 1
1 I t 1
{
i Ac(^(2.<^vi(Ntv^ 1^ ieu4^-^ TV^tMT <Lifc-<l-C^ "F^iS- TV«^ (LA^.<=srS5
1 -
(?itv of Catlsba5l
Housing & Redevelopment Department
3 ^
APPEAL FORM
I (we) appeal the following decision ofthe Housing and Redevelopment Director to the
Design Review Board:
DATE OF APPEAL
Project Name and Number (or subject of appeal):
Date of Decision/Notice: A-pg-^u ^. W^l
Reason for Appeal of Director Decision: § &r ATT-^re ^fi5^
Signature:
Name: (Please Print):_J^:f^
Address: '^^^^ Cf<ip--L-^^^^
Daytime Telephone Number ^^2^0 '^^Q^D
2965 Roosevelt St. Ste. B • Carisbad. CA 92008-2389 • (619) 434-2810/2811 • FAX (619) 720-2037 ^
i!
il
|p)Mw "Tl-^ 9e^g.^,^<c^ tOi^HCu u;li^-J2^feuuie' f/gtPfgg^
11
Tf
T;
^U^] ^i^ilU -r^ftMT -m^^-^ v£> liJLT^Hcr- QJ^^^
•tr
1
i
1 j
j
(
— —————————— _____________________________________
i'y-g) WgCwygCI 9^.p^:Crg> AcP^^^tW^UO^t^'gt^^nrS XO 4>lSf*d?S^
uUvv^cA^ Q:?e^ KLg=»C VV»<c>e"
'1 i:s-e4^^r>kCize=wei^'T5 pc#w^ es^>^ ^-isvo
1_
(?itv of Carlsbad
Housing & Redevelopment Department
APPEAL FORM
3 4
— o
I (we) appeal the following decision of the Housing and Redevelopment Director to iBI S
Design Review Board: LO ^
DATE OF APPEAL
Project Name and Number (or subject of appeal):
Date of Decision/Notice: A^p^ku ^. \^^*7
Reason for Appeal of Director Decision:
M.'j7
£yypj777!^j^ . ^
Signature:.
Name: (Please Print):.
Address:/^ fy^PlM) /S^A
Daytime Telephone Number:.
2965 Roosevelt St., Ste. B • Carisbad, CA 92008-2389 • (619) 434-2810/2811 • FAX (619) 720-2037
itv of Carlsbad
Housing & Redevelopment Department
5- 2
— •<
APPEAL FORM ^
—- o
I (we) appeal the following decision of the Housing and Redevelopment Director to tfie ^
Design Review Board: 3 g
DATE OF APPEAL: 4^/// f^T^
Project Name and Number (or subject of appeal):
Date of Decision/Notice: /^pgL\u '^j W^*7
Reason for Appeal of Director Decision:
Signature:
Name: (Please Print): ^CTc^Mk^ [ H-^T^^
Address: ) ?2r^ XUU \.\ gfsvvS fi-VQG£^
Daytime Telephone Number C>l^ 7J?3^
2965 Roosevelt SL, Ste. B • Carisbad, CA 92008-2389 • (619) 434-2810/2811 • FAX (619) 720-2037 ^
John Reed M.D.
Board Certified Telephone 760-436-2856/619-605-8673
Anesthesiologist
1326 Ralntx>w Ridge Lone
Encinitos. CA 92024
To: Director, Housing and Redeveiopment, City of Carlsbad
Re: Appeal of Administrative Peniiit decision, Starbuck*s Coffee (APR 97-01)
Date: 4/12/97
Members of the Design Review Board,
I am appealing to you to correct the oversights of the Housing and Redevelopment
Director and DENY the request for change in land use from medical office to Cofifee
House at 2924 Carlsbad Boulevard. In the following pages I will detail the specific
inadequacies of the building and parking design which are blatantly inconsistent with the
Village Master Plan and Design Manual. I will make reference to specific pages in the
Design Manual and the Carlsbad Municipal Code, as well as to correspondence from the
Housing and Redevelopment Department, in detailing these inadequacies. After reviewing
the facts, I am confident you will agree with me that a permit should not issued.
INADEQUATE PARKING SPACE: The proposed change in land use would
increase the parking space requirement to one handicapped space, three regular sized
spaces, and one compact space (Manual pg 6-2). The widths of these spaces are defined
by State Law, the allowance of one compact space per five spaces (20%) is per Carlsbad
Municipal Code. The combined widths of these spaces exceeds the designated space on
the currently submitted plans. As currently designed, starting the parking spaces right at
the building's edge and moving southward to the property's edge, the allocated space is
inadequate to accommodate the required number and type of parking spaces. In
correspondence dated March 31, 1997 (Attached), the Housing and Redevelopment
Department stated that the current stmcture would be partially demolished to decrease the
square footage fi"om approximately 1400 sq, ft. to 1000 sq. fl., so 5 parking spaces are all
that is required. As the building plans clearly show, all reductions in square footage are at
the fi'ont of the building to provide a setback, and DO NOT increase available parking
area.
The plans, as submitted and approved, have attempted to comply with parking and
setback requirements by decreasing total floor space, and they have been reviewed by the
Director who concludes that 5 spaces are required, yet the Director has overlooked the
fact that the required parking does not fit onto the subject property. By approving the
Administrative Permit based upon the current design plan, the Director has granted a de
facto variance in parking stall size or number. It is not within the scope of duty for the
Director to grant variances (Manual, chapter 7), and all projects requiring a variance must
request a Minor or Major Redevelopment Permit and therefore be reviewed by this Board.
INADEQUATE SETBACKS: Setback criteria for the subject property are defined in
the Manual (pg 3-23). As submitted and approved, the current plan has absolutely NO
PROVISION for a side setback. Parking would be right up agjunst the building side,
making use of the space next to the building difficult to use, as the driver's side door
would open against the building wall. This side of the building is being visually
incorporated into the front by cutting off the comer of the building and making a diagonal
entrance. The visual prominence of this side of the building is therefore enhanced. The
view of this side of the building is unobstructed for a substantial distance down Carlsbad
Blvd., and is a prominent visual landmark for all Northbound trafBc. The current plan, as
submitted and approved, enhances the aesthetic visual importance of the buildmg's side,
but does not enhance its aesthetic value by providing landscaping or open space (as
required by the Manual), between parking area and the building. While setbacks are to be
determined on a case by case basis, the importance of establishing the Village unage at this
visually prominent location cannot be overiooked, even for an existing stmcture.
TRAFFIC: A change in land use from a medical office to a Coffee House would result in
a greater intensity of use of a curb cut, through a major pedestrian walkway, along
Carlsbad Blvd. between Grand Ave and Carlsbad Village Drive. As stated in the Design
Guidelines (Manual pg 4-5), curb cuts are to be avoided along major pedestrian areas,
SPECIFICALLY on Carisbad Blvd. between Grand Avenue and Carlsbad Village Drive.
"Exceptions to the curb cut prohibition may be considered where no other
access to parking is possible or where conflicts are likely to be minimal."
While a medical office, a MAXIMUM of twenty vehicles PER WEEKDAY and
NO VEHICLES on WEEKENDS utilized this curt) cut to visit the office, and conflicts
with pedestrians were likely to be minimal. The San Diego Association of Govemments
survey of traffic pattems and parking utilization estimates that for coffee houses and
similar businesses in San Diego County, an AVERAGE of 325 vehicles will utilize this
curb cut PER WEEKDAY, and that WEEKEND TRAFHC SHOULD BE EVEN
GREATER. This would create a tremendous source of conffict between pedestrians and
vehicles, a situation which the Manual states is quite clearly and specifically to be
prohibited.
Although the curb cut already exists, its current utilization is within the limits
determined by the design guidelines. By approving the permit request, the Director has
disregarded any need for a traffic impact study, disregarded veri)atim guidelines as
setdown in the design manual, and has shown no regard for the safety of pedestrians and
drivers alike. In response to my pointing out this oversight, the Department's response was
to stress that the City's Engineering Department considered Carisbad Blvd. "to be a major
thoroughfare for traffic purposes" and that "The Engineering Department has reviewed the
proposed plan and determined that it has satisfactorily met the various engineering
standards for an existing building. "(Attached)
I do not doubt that the building was built to code when erected, however several
calls to the Engineering Department last week made it clear that they were never asked to
evaluate what impact greater utilization of this curb cut, especially in the face of
inadequate parking, would have on the pattem of traffic on "a major thoroughfare" such as
Carlsbad Blvd. I agree with the Engineering Department in describing Carlsbad Blvd. as a
"major thoroughfare". Common sense would dictate that conflicts with pedestrians and the
madequacy of parking in this area would create an intolerable traffic problem affecting
both Carlsbad Blvd. and Carlsbad Village Drive. The guidelines are quite clear here, and
have obviously been completely disregarded.
TRASH: The current design, as submitted and approved, has no provisions for garbage
and refuse storage and disposal. As an existing structure, a trash receptacle is not required.
However, per Carlsbad Municipal Code (Section 6, Health and Sanitation) and Coast
Waste Management (the City's designated licensee for transporting garbage) commercial
refuse must be placed in either a commercial type can or a dumpster. The receptacles must
be accessible from the outside and unobstmcted by parking, to allow for pickup. The
receptacle CANNOT be set outside for pickup and then retrieved later. As currently
designed and approved, their does not exist an area designated for garbage storage which
is accessible from the outside. The only access for trash pickup would be from the parking
area, as there is no access to the north side, the rear abuts landscaping on another
property, and trash pick-up is not allowed along the front on Carlsbad Blvd. As currently
designed, the only area accessible would be between the front door and the beginning of
the parking stalls, but no such designation exists. This is of considerable importance as
STARBUCKS only uses disposable containers, and the amount of trash generated daily
will be considerable, and since the trash cannot be stored remotely from the building, it
will have to be removed daily (County Heakh Code).
Per the Department (Attached)
" the property owner and/or tenant (STARBUCKS) must make appropriate
arrangements to dispose of trash in a manner which does not have a
detrimental impact on surrounding properties. A special condition will be
placed on the permit which will require the property owner and tenant to
dispose of business related trash in an appropriate manner."
As of 4/12/97, no arrangement has been made with any licensed refuse transporter to
agree to pick up on a daily basis" in an appropriate manner". Coast Waste informed me
that without an alleyway access or a remote dumpster, they will be unable to service any
business at this location, especially on a daily basis. Having a garbage truck come through
your parking area daily to pick up another businesss trash would have a negative impact
on the surrounding properties. Without any evidence that a trash collection solution can be
reached, and without any evidence that a program is being devdoped with a licensed
refuse transporter, the Director has approved this permit. At best this decision is
premature and should have been made only AFTER an agreement with the surrounding
tenants and Coast Waste had been created and approved by the parties involved.
I feel very strongly that the proposed land use change would have a significant
negative impact on the Village and that the Design Manual Guidelines clearly show that
this type of high traffic, high intensity use is inappropriate for this site. I implore you to do
what the Director failed to do; protect the integrity and safety of this unique area's
environment and deny this request for land use change.
Sincerely,
Citv of Carlsbad
Housing & Redevelopment Department
March 31,1997
JOHN REED, M.D
320 SANTA FE DRIVE
ENCINITAS, CA. 92024
RE: STARBUCKS COFFEE, ARP 97-01, CITY OF CARLSBAD
Dear Dr. Reed:
Thank you for your letter dated March 27, 1997 regarding the proposal for a new coffee
house to be located at 2924 Carlsbad Boulevard within the City of Carlsbad. Your
comments are appreciated and your concem for the Carlsbad Village Redevelopment
Area is commendable. I can assure you that staff has taken great care in reviewing the
application submitted by the new owner of the property at 2924 Carlsbad Boulevard,
which requests conversion of the existing medical office building into a coffee house.
Staff has required redesign of the project several times in order to address the
development standards outlined within the Village Master Plan and Design Manual. Staff
has determined that the project is now consistent with those standards.
To assist you in understanding the Housing and Redevelopment Director's decision, the
following response is provided to the specific development issues you raised within your
correspondence.
Land Use. For the purposes of issuing a land use permit, it is sometimes difficult to
separate business operators from the actual land use. However, the Redevelopment
Agency is legally obligated to review the "land use" proposed by the applicant. We are
not permitted to base our land use decision on the entity who owns the business (e.g.
corporate vs. family owned). However, we can place reasonable conditions on the project
based on operational issues which present a concem to the Redevelopment Agency. The
"land use" proposed is a coffee house which allows for patrons to purchase coffee "to go"
or to drink at the site. This use is identical to many other coffee houses in the Carlsbad
Village Area. A coffee house is a permitted use for the subject property. Consequently,
the proposed use is consistent with the Village Master Plan and Design Manual.
Trash. A trash receptacle is not required for existing buildings. However, you are correct
in that the property owner and/or tenant (Starbucks) must make appropriate arrangements
to dispose of trash in a manner which does not have a detrimental impact on surrounding
properties. A special condition will be placed on the pemiit which will require the
property owner and tenant to dispose of business-related trash in an appropriate manner.
Since the property owner is ultimately responsible for the trash issue, your concem has
2965 Roosevelt St., Ste. B • Carisbad. CA 92008-2389 • (619) 434-2810/2811 • FAX (619) 720-2037 ^
J. REED
March 31,1997
Page 2
been shared with him. It is my understanding that the property owner/tenant will work
directly with Coast Waste Management to develop a program to remove trash from the
site as frequently as possible, in a manner which is consistent with other existing
businesses which do not have large trash dumpsters on site.
Parking Requirements. A portion of the existing building on the site will actually be
demolished as part of the proposal submitted by the property owner. The building will be
physically reduced in size from its current 1400 square feet (approximately) to 1000
square feet. As set forth in the Village Master Plan and Design Manual, the parking
requirement for coffee houses (and other quick stop food stores) is 1 space for every 200
square feet of floor space. Therefore, the actual parking requirement for the proposed
coffee house is 5 spaces total. The proposal includes 4 regular parking spaces and 1
handicap paridng space; this meets the parking requirement. State regulations require the
property owner to provide a handicap space, which is considered a legal parking space for
meeting the on-site parking requirements for the project. Since the property owner is able
to meet the required on-site parking standard for the proposed project, there is no
requirement for the owner to enter into a joint use parking agreement with Village Faire,
or obtain a variance from the City as related to the required parking. The Redevelopment
Agency, however, will place a special condition on the project which requires that
employees of the coffee house use public parking within the Village Redevelopment
Area. The parking on the site must be designated for customers only.
Signage. Although the property owner has shown signage for the Starbucks Coffee
House on the plans for the administrative redevelopment permit, signage will not be
approved as part of the land use permit. The property owner or the tenant (Starbucks)
will be required to obtain approval of a separate sign permit from the Redevelopment
Agency/City of Carlsbad before any signs may be placed on the building. The proposed
signs must conform to the requirements of the Village Master Plan and Design Manual
for both type and amount in order to obtain approval from the Agency/City. Starbucks
will not be permitted to install an "interior illuminated boxed display sign". Starbucks
may, however, be permitted to have wall signs which provide for individual solid metal
letters, or individual internally illuminated letters made of matte translucent plexiglass
faces and opaque dark metal sides. However, the total amount of signage will be limited
to 1 square foot of signage for each lineal foot of building street frontage.
Traffic and Land Use. Carlsbad Boulevard is considered by the City's Engineering
Department to be a major thoroughfare for traffic purposes. The Village Circulation
System has been established to accommodate heavy traffic for the variety of land uses
which have been deemed appropriate for Carlsbad Boulevard and the Village Area as a
whole. The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposed plan and determined that
it has satisfactorily met the various engineering standards for an existing building.
J. REED
March 31,1997
Page 3
Permit Type. Per the Village Master Plan and Design Manual, the proposed project
requires an administrative redevelopment permit. The administrative permit can be
approved, conditionally approved or denied by the Housing and Redevelopment Director,
after a comprehensive review to determine whether or not the project meets current
development standards for existing buildings. The Design Review Board reviews appeals
of the Housing and Redevelopment Director's decision and new constmction projects
only. The appropriate permit type has, in fact, been required for the proposed project.
Summarv of Staff Response
As you have done, Carlsbad Redevelopment Agency staff has reviewed the regulations
outlined within the Village Master Plan and Design Manual and applied them to the
proposed project. The property owner has been given no special considerations. The
Housing and Redevelopment Director is granting no variances as part of the
administrative redevelopment permit.
Redevelopment Agency staff does have the best interest of the Village in mind when we
review proposed projects and requests for permits. The Village Master Plan and Design
Manual was developed with the assistance of a Citizens Advisory Committee made up of
property and business owners, as well as residents of the Village Area. Staff is very proud
of the Village Master Plan and Design Manual and what has been accomplished within
the Village since the Redevelopment Agency was formed in 1981. Please be assured that
staff does not take its responsibility lightly as we implement and enforce the regulations
ofthe Master Plan document. Ifthe project is approved, staff will make an effort to
include conditions which will hopefully address your concems as related to operations.
Thank you again for your comments. If the project is ultimately approved, you will
receive a notice initiating the appeal period. You may appeal the Director's decision to
the Design Review Board, if you are not satisfied with the responses provided within this
correspondence.
Sincerely,
DEBBIE FOUNTAIN
Senior Management Analyst
JH 'HI m
Considerations
1. Although fast food restaurants in some urban
locations are pedestrian-oriented, most are
autOH)riented, require substantial amounts of
parking and generate considerable traffic by
vimie of their rapid turn-over and take-out
food policies. These characteristics can be
detrimental to retail continuity and pedestrian
safety.
2. Food for take out service is generally
packaged in throw away containers. These
along with straws, napkins and wrappeis can
create special trash problems at and for some
distance from fast food restaurants.
3. Most fast food chains desire to utilize their
recognizable corporate building and signage
styles. While some have made special efforts
in modifying their designs to fit special
community circumstances, there may be
problems in integrating the facility into the
desired Village design character.
4. Fast food restaurants oficn extensively utilize
paper or painted window signs as part of their
promotional effort. These can detract from the
quality of the Village visual environment.
Location and Development Criteria
1. Fast Food Restaurants with on-site parking
should not be located in areas where retail or
visual continuity are important nor in areas
where vehicular traffic related to their use will
dismpt significant pedestrian movement
pattems.
2. The site should be large enough to
accommodate on-site parking away from street
frontages.
3. The developer/franchisee should be willing to
design specifically and uniquely for the
Carlsbad Village visual environment as well as
agree to restrictions on temporary advertising
signs.
Findings
In order for this use to receive a Redevelopment
Permit, it should be consistent with the following
findings:
1. The use is not likely to create pedestrian and
traffic hazards.
2. The use is consistent with and supportive of
adjacent commercial uses.
3. Parking locations and visual treatments arc
consistent with Village goals.
4. The design of the facility and signage is
compatible with tlie desired Village character.
Fast Food
Restaurants (Large)
Definition
A retail eadng or eating and drini
use designed to attract and
accommodate high customer volun
or turnovers and which provida
ready-to^at food for consumption
or off the premises and meets the
foUowing criteria:
• A gross fioor area of JOOO squai
feet or more,^ mott S6ae.
• A limited menu of ready4o-eat
food prepared in advance of
customer orders, or food which
may be quickly prepared j
• Food served in disposable wrdppi
or containers,
• Food is ordered at a customer
service counter.
• Food is paid for prior to
consumption.
PROVISIONAL ys;
STANDARD
Parking and Access
Avoid parking in front setback areas.
All commercial and residential buildings ahould
have a strong relationship to the street and setbacic
areas should be devoted to landscaping.
DESIGN GUIDELINES
Avoid curb cuts along major pedestrian areas.
• State Street
• Grand Avenue (between Roosevelt Street and
Carlsbad Blvd.)
• Carlsbad Boulevard (betvi'een Grand Avenue
and Carlsbad Village Drive)
• Roosevelt Street (between Beech and Walnut)
Pedestrian retail continuity relies on a minimum of
conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians.
Exceptions to the curb cut prohibition may be
considered where no other access to parking is
possible or where conflicts are likely to be
minimal.
Avoid parking in block corner locations.
Corners within ihe Village are visually important
and should be occupied by interesting buildings.
However, owing to limited location opportunities,
public parking facilities may be exempted so long
as substantial setbacks and landscaping are
provided.
•1-5
ROSE ENTERPRISES
HeaJthcere Business Analysts
Tetephorw 760-414-2990 Fax 760-632-8398
April, 14,1997
Dear Design Review Board Member,
Today numerous protest appeals and a protest petition with hundreds signatures were
submitted to the Director of Housing and Redevelopment,. We are seeking a reversal of
the Director's decision to approve a change in land use at 2924 Carlsbad Blvd. and grant a
permit to Stari)ucks, (ARP-97-01).
We are confident that the Design Review Board will acknowledge the obstacles and come
to a just decision in the best interest ofthe Carlsbad Village area. Following are the
concems we feel the city has overlooked.
• Using all paper products Starbucks generates tons of trash, thus an agreement for
waste containment and removal is imperative, a promise to secure an agreement in not
sufficient. According to Coast Waste officials we spoke to April 8 " We have no
arrangement with anyone at 2924 Carlsbad Blvd ...waste removal from that
property is impossible due to access problems. We cannot pick-up from Carlsbad
Blvd., alley access in the only way ...there is NO alley at this location." If Starbucks
was able to find another waste removal company they would still have the problem of
where to put the trash receptacle. The only place is in one of the 5 parking spaces
taking up a minimum of 20 sq ft of a 170 sq ft parking space.
• According to the plan blueprints for the proposed Starbucks the total parking space
required by law is 3 inches short The city has overlooked inadequate parking in the
past which has created parking and traffic problems in this area. Another like variance
will only compound the existing problems.
• SANDAG estimates Starbucks will bring in 375 cars per day, 37.5 cars per hour. That
is 10 cars everylS minutes using 4 parking spaces. Since it takes 4 min. to pull in
and park-6min to order make and pay for a coffee drink- 5 min to pull out and exit the
parking lot that leaves 6 cars every 15 min looking for parking in the overburdened
Village Fair Parking lot. This area of Carlsbad Blvd. is designated a "major high
pedestrian walkway" in the Village Master Plan. This "walkway" will experience IOOO
intermptions a day-100 per hour crossmg the "pedestrian walkway" - by the cars
looking for parking. These numbers of course do not include the cars currently
utilizing that one driveway entry to the parking lot on Carlsbad Blvd. We believe the
City En^eering Department needs to reconsider it's determination as "satisfactorily
meeting standards".
According to Rick Silverman, leasing agent for the property, "I get at least 15 calls a week
about leasing this property...the owner of the property will completely remodel the
building, inside and out, regardless of who leases the property." Mr. Silverman also said,
"...we would prefer a business like a medical office." We agree with this sentiment. The
previous tenet, a chiropractic practice, was a compatible business being closed at the
Village Fare's peek hours..weekends, holidays and summer evenings.
Obviously, 2924 Carisbad Blvd. in inappropriate and inadequate for Starbucks.
There are many other, better suited properties in Carisbad. Areas in the Village where 375
additional vehicles would be welcomed, where there is alley access for trash removal, and
where the major Pedestrian walkway will not be rendered unusable.
Sincerely,
Teri Gardner-Reed
cc: Bill Compas
Peggy Savary
Kim Welshols
Larry Scheer
Debbie Fountain, Housing and Redevelopment
Ron Ball, City Attomey
Marty Orenyak, Community Development Director
Ray Patchett, City Manager
"^'^"^ QEFOSmON TO THE PROmSED "QUICK STOP FOOD STORE^ SnM^a^C\pr<^
I, as a patron ofCarlsbad VilliJ^ businesses, oppose the proposed^nge in "land use*' at
2924 Carlshad Blvd. from a Medical office to a "quick stop food store" in an area known as a "major
pedestrian area".
As stated in the Village Master Plan and Manual, confficts between pedestrians and vehicles must be
minimized. The proposed change in land use would create a major conffict.
Vehicle parking and access is currently inadequate. Increasing land use intensity to a high traffic use is
inappropriate for the site and inconsistent with the Master Plan.
SANDAG estimates an additional 375 cars per day using 4 parking spaces and t
handicap space, thaf s an additional 37 cars per hour crossing a major pedestrian
walkway. It is physically impossible for these cars to access and use the proposed parking
in a safe and effective manner.
The resultant traffic jam will create a hazard for pedestrians and block traffic along Carlsbad Blvd. and
Carlsbad Village Dr.
We find this Unacceptable.
NAME , > ADDRESS A
2. C^lo ^n)jCy^e Isc^
3ric:^\£^ (7m^
4. D;!^,jo^ pcv^A/^i^^ S.^.'J Mare 65 ~~ -L^ A^C-^M^
6./? /v//X/^ hA/ir/M TTCN:
8. T^.mn/i^A/n
9. TJATI. /^-^-/^-(^^Tz-r -'^7t( Krir^/^, f\ .i^a d.' o
J
Ck3 >c£U-^3 (y
13. 'MlCT^A^C HuLC OC7£f/\f^^iO^
14.
^4 (^mp 3^/1/es^
17
I '^•-'77^ (^(cx^ij
24 ^/ YeiarTfT^
( ^opposmON TO THE P/g^^ED "QUICKSTOP FOOD STORr^Sxic^<^^ Ct^S
I, as a patron ofCarlsbad Village businesses, oppose the proposed cRange in "land use"
?924 Carlshad Blvd. from a Medical office to ^ "quick Stop food Storc" in an area known as a "major
pedestrian area".
As stated in the Village Master Plan and Manual, confficts between pedestrians and vehicles must be
minimized. The proposed change in land use would create a major conffict.
Vehicle parking and access is currently inadequate. Increasing land use intensity to a high traffic use is
inappropriate for the site and inconsistent with the Master Plan.
SANDAG estimates an additional 375 cars per day using 4 parking spaces and 1
handicap space, thafs an additional 37 cars per hour crossing a major pedestrian
walkway. It is physically impossible for these cars to access and use the proposed parking
in a safe and effective manner.
The resultant traffic jam will create a hazard for pedestrians and block traffic along Carlsbad Blvd. and
Carlsbad Village Dr.
We fmd this Unacceptable.
ADDRESsS
T-i CA.
OX^^^^rT?^S^^^er^ 4t^o7^ f-tH T^cT^ 2)je
6.( ,; iTvibfT- >7!iU ^K4i)o-3- ^-•^c
7. •Vjv^^ >i£a-'^ O'srAi?
d r. 7:,...f
C4j'fyp i\iM7y\ [^i-^?///! ai7>< 14.,
i6.
^^^^^-/^/ti< i^-TM^- -fri^e^ Of- y7/7/^yyyc^
npposmoNTO THE PRfmOSED "QUICKSTOP FOOD STORO^ ^TIMZ.^OC^
Isbad Villa^businesses, oppose the proposed change in "land use" I, as a patron ofCarlsbad Village businesses, oppose the proposed gffange in "land use" af
2924 Carlshad Blvd. from a Medical office to a "quick stop food store" in an area known as a "major
pedestrian area".
As stated in the Village Master Plan and Manual, confficts between pedestrians and vehicles must be
minimized. The proposed change in land use would create a major conffict.
Vehicle parking and access is currently inadequate. Increasing land use intensity to a high traffic use is
inappropriate for the site and inconsistent with the Master Plan.
SANDAG estimates an additional 375 cars per day using 4 parking spaces and 1
handicap space, thafs an additional 37 cars per hour crossing a major pedestrian
walkway. It is physically impossible for these cars to access and use the proposed parking
in a safe and effective manner.
The resultant traffic jam will create a hazard for pedestrians and block traffic along Carlsbad Blvd. and
Carlsbad Village Dr.
We find this Unacceptable.
NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE
L7'P^A7^ /€^^;ypy7rr 7S^y/s^d.7.^T^7^^ ^^A ^^7?ys/^/7y 72!;
y-i:/7^jjc'(s TTU : ^v^c:;\ ,0
3. '^c /o.^ T" \!>.^L ,')i<:C7Z 3'S,, ALO^-TA. C CT)7LS^:An
( 1.
7.S4c^'C Sc^tvc/ ('t/ ^ 35 ^3>'^ /2. A/. Cc^.^r^.>'^c• ^ yCM^'J SV-ilc^-^M
8. AJ,..7 lf<:;MC-
\r. .L^ yyC^' ^M-^ Gc-y:,'7 (c<r I^^7^.^^, z<.r
12. ytWir Cm\^Y)£Y\ Vr.hmiV'T'f 7~S^
c ft rz V s b A oc A13<.<: \ y^i([yM
14. bconf^t^
OPPOSmON TO THE PROfm£ED "QUICKSTOP FOOD ,<?7^ffF W>T^M2.BO C^(?=I:^S
I, as a patron ofCarlsbad Villagebusinesses, oppose the proposed cfifuge in "land usp" i^t
2924 Carlshad Blvd. from a Medical office to a "quick Stop food Store" in an area known as a "major
pedestrian area".
As stated in the Village Master Plan and Manual, confficts between pedestrians and vehicles must be
minimized. The proposed change in land use would create a major conffict.
Vehicle parking and access is currently inadequate. Increasing land use intensity to a high traffic use is
inappropriate for the site and inconsistent with the Master Plan.
SANDAG estimates an additinnal 375 cars per day using 4 parking spaces and 1
handicap space, that's an additional 37 cars per hour crossing a major pedestrian
walkway. It is physically impossible for these cars to access and use the proposed parking
in a safe and effective manner.
The resultant traffic jam wiU create a hazard for pedestrians and block traffic along Carlsbad Blvd. and
Carlsbad Village Dr.
We find this Unacceptable.
NAME ADDRESS jjlGN ATURE
•r '•7-,\7. y
5. 4/C7 0(7 fHev\ 'mc; rOT/T 77. Aj/.T/x. f^yy^'T^. J
' (7~ 6. 7bL 9 J-
10. '-(A^i^ ^H^' ^,7kMC: C i^H'^^.rT^
X
7 '. Lm
14. LofUMe/Z [z7,'it77^7T7^e :i7cei4^.s,pe ^^l^
OPPOSmON TO THE PRCm^SED "QUICK STOP FOOD STORM^ SXPH^O C.f=^5
I, as a patron ofCarlsbad Village businesses, oppose the proposed cBnge in "] 'land use" at
2924 Carlshad Blvd. from a Medical office tn a "quick stop food store" \A an area known a "major
pedestrian area".
As stated in the Village Master Plan and Manual, confficts between pedestrians and vehicles must be
minimized. The proposed change in land use would create a major conffict.
Vehicle parking and access is currently inadequate. Increasing land use intensity to a high traffic use is
inappropriate for the site and inconsistent with the Master Plan.
SAIVDAG estimates an additional 375 cars per day using 4 parking spaces and 1
handicap space, that's an additional 37 cars per hour crossing a major pedestrian
walkway. It is physically impossible for these cars to access and use the proposed parking
in a safe and effective mannen
The resultant traffic jam will create a hazard for pedestrians and block traffic along Carlsbad Blvd. and
Carlsbad Village Dr.
We find this Unacceptable.
NAME ADDRESS STGN ATT JRE/i
2. r2-/<.vo^j • 71-12'^^ K.v.,v..,M..',. /;^/^7^ o^^^>. rj.'-.-^'^'^i ^.yjr/7^y
3. -fiVi Hm ^71 I'Hwin. T-i-mTF
rr
•JM-L
4.
5.
^' J .! Ty .., , ^
6. nic^c.p'/7/r<ef/ec - -^r7 o^^^cjy/frTy
1—^
9. mps
10
IS'^'"? ^'-'^(^ ^-2ei<f^ /^ ^
13. V
12.^
V-N ^
/ •
OPPOSmON TO THE PROmSED "QUICKSTOP FOOD .VTO/?FJj^^^ j^ tl. ((LI^S
i^)usinesses, oppose the proposed cmng I, as a patron of Carlsbad Villagfbusinesses, oppose the proposed cWnge in "land use"
2924 Carlshad Blvd. from a Medical office to a "quick Stop food Store" in an area known as a "major
pedestrian area".
As stated in the Village Master Plan and Manual, confficts between pedestrians and vehicles must be
minimized. The proposed change in land use would create a major conffict.
Vehicle parking and access is currently inadequate. Increasing land use intensity to a high traffic use is
inappropriate for the site and inconsistent with the Master Plan.
SANDAG estimates an additional 375 cars per day using 4 parking spaces and t
handicap space, that's an additional 37 cars per hour crossing a major pedestrian
walkway. It is physically impossible for these cars to access and use the proposed parking
in a safe and effective manner.
The resultant traffic jam will create a hazard for pedestrians and block traffic along Carlsbad Blvd. and
Carlsbad Village Dr.
We find this Unacceptable
NAME ADDRESS
1. fvluj.<t^\-Q>\';\u ^AZ) ^tfe&fju'l/jcde ^
STGNATTIRE,
'7
2. TT.n\ /fe-. ^"i^^ ^to^
\yjf<.T^
7. c^^.2 i^<:,' .. y7.1,1. 7 Ps7-^C./?OJ> '7y.
Ct Tt/^ c^Ty f^T' C77^
8. /.yy
7J
9. :::><xS/^ g:. ,vcu^ 3c9a-7 "4. \T^r\^ x^f^
10.' /i\l:/y.^ \UhT^ T-'u^^x. " 71{^^-
12. V 'f-^r/o<TiAi y/o h^y,oB7^
%tl7^:y^^''^
14. U'^'\Ti.^'fmyA
^9f i/^^t7a^
opposrriON TO THE PROj^Fn "QUICK STOP FOOD STORFmS^CP<t2.A^ cr c
I, as a patron of Carlsbad VillagSusinesses, oppose the proposed cffSnge in "land u<;f"
2924 Carlshad Blvd. from a Medical'office to a "quick Stop food Storc" in an area known asi a "major
pedestrian area".
As stated in the Village Master Plan and Manual, confficts between pedestrians and vehicles must be
minimized. The proposed change in land use would create a major conffict.
Vehicle parking and access is currently inadequate. Increasing land use intensity to a high traffic use is
inappropriate for the site and inconsistent with the Master Plan.
SANDAG estimates an additional 375 cars per day using 4 parking spacer; ay^d |
handicap space, that's an additional 37 cars per hour crossing a major pedestrian
walkway. It is physically impossible for these cars to access and use the proposed parking
in a safe and effective manner.
The resultant traffic jam will create a hazard for pedestrians and block traffic along Carlsbad Blvd. and
Carlsbad Village Dr.
^ . / We find this Unacceptable
^\Mt\ ADDRESS STGNATTIRE
1. --t^lTic:^ rU,r-!l. ^/fcLo(. ii
2. v\^iy2f^yc (A^ym m^cSj^-- '
TA^,J. /^L'^JL..^^ y<yi
4. M
a 5. I^^siyg Lwvu^dll o?7; iy(i<>C-TnCyd( ^^7?2 yC/u,)ir,n
6. f cri^A
9. jr^^^ ^Ty7f^7:'u J'V'u 6'l^'^/^^'.^J /7-7^..
T h ^tj '7 A ^ T" ^ Ti^l'yCt
10. f\lc-^'v\ 'K^C^W^V^ T\\^\ (^o^wHWvib vlVac^^ vi<vcv\
17
11. '^CAUy.lA Ayr
12. L^o<>^ ^. ^^ ry
14.
0^t-| foct/-^^ CT<^'\ -UPC's
OPPOSmONTO THE PROmSED "QUICKSTOP FOOD STOREjL oT/\KpUClCS
Isbad VillflRjusinesses, oppose the proposed winge in "land use" af I, as a patron of Carlsbad
2924 Carlsbad Blvd. from a Medical office to a "quick Stop food Store" in an area known as a "major
pedestrian area". '
As stated in the Village Master Plan and Manual, confficts between pedestrians and vehicles must be
minimized. The proposed change in land use would create a major conffict.
Vehicle parking and access is currently inadejuateJLncreasing land use intensity to a high traffic use is
inappropriate for the site and inconsistent with the(lCfester Plan/)
SANDAG estimates an additional J75i:a7yper day using 4 parking spaces and 1
handicap space, that's an additional 37 cars per hour crossing a major pedestrian
walkway. It is physically impossible for these cars to access and use the proposed parking
in a safe and effective manner.
The resultart traffic jam will create a hazard for pedestrians and block traffic along Carlsbad Blvd. and
Carlsbad VillageDr. y\r/i- L .{Z
We find this IInaccentahle - Ahs^/iyTe/v ![' ^ ^
NA^E ADDRESS SIGNATURE
1. CMU'^ (^f\l\i^'>0 Ijy-^^ y^{^^
Tyaf9^S.ZhE CQ. 92I7£JL
3. Uy^V pT^5hT\ 'WC>'^!7A/^
4. A^}I>eti^)? \iAk^t;M/\ ^-iCl Ave
C'J QZdzM
'Try
'7kyy\^y{l
2.r>jclrr. gW>lp. 25(0 bunging. f>mKCi^P
3. -lk^<^)^^^^..-^ "^^s^yOy^^
4. /Yj/af^a^ A7 ^AMI^ /<P/d>-i*f] z^q/^fi(i<l>
-V^ ^ OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSED "QUICK STOP FOOD STORE"
I, as a patron of Carlsbad Villa|R)usinesses, oppose the proposed Mmge in "land USC" at
, 2924 Carlshad Blvd. from a Medical office to a "quick stop food store" in an area known as a "major
pedestrian area". i
As stated in the Village Master Plan and Manual, conflicts between pedestrians and vehicles must be
minimized. The proposed change in land use would create a major conflict.
Vehicle parking and access is currently inadequate. Increasing land use intensity to a high traffic use is
inappropriate for the site and inconsistent with the Master Plan.
SANDAG estimates an additional 375 cars per day using 4 parking spaces and 1
handicap space, that's an additional 37 cars per hour crossing a major pedestrian
walkway. It is physically impossible for these cars to access and use the proposed parking
in a safe and effective manner.
The resultant traffic jam will create a hazard for pedestrians and block traffic along Carlsbad Blvd. and
Carlsbad Village Dr.
We find this Unacceptable.
NAME ApDRESS SIGNATURE
3 2>0>t^-v^-^T-€>a,/ |^(£p S^^AXj^ O^x^tycUih^
^ 3.J^^^ ^rvr..UU.^ \'h^\ O^.jr^S. r>^_^.^ ASi>jU^
S^^Wa^ \CXIK^ ^2qnAi>gnfi)(^lfY\0^\-ftrcx!^_\
A..<p>nAPf
TT OPPOSmON TO THE PRQ^SEP "QUICK STOP FOOD STO
I, as a patron of Carlsbad Village businesses, OppQSe the proposed US£!LJ^
2924 Carlshad Blvd. from a Medical office to a "quick Stop food Store" in an area known as a "major
pedestrian area".
As stated in the Village Master Plan and Manual, confficts between pedestrians and vehicles must be
minimized. The proposed change in land use would create a major conffict.
Vehicle parking and access is currently inadequate. Increasing land use intensity to a high traffic use is
inappropriate for the site and inconsistent with the Master Plan.
SANDAG estimates an additional 375 cars per day using 4 parking spaces and t
handicap space, that's an additional 37 cars per hour crossing a major pedestrian
walkway. It is physically impossible for these cars to access and use the proposed parking
in a safe and effective manner.
The resultant traffic jam will create a hazard for pedestrians and block traffic along Carlsbad Blvd. and
Carlsbad Village Dr.
We find this Unacceptable
NAME ADDRESS
1. >.v^ I^^^^Hy y /7^Y/r^4yy(^cc^^ ,
SIGNATIURE
<o^'yy
4.(A-->r \ (r(7 Ak'jyyy^ {^\ ^\yi^ --y. 5
5.
'77 \h>7T> C^^v^voJ^ ^ g, 7^-^ "nl^i
7~~77I7
%\%- /,K, >VK.X(A, , rMiSiMO H:Ly.
10. AyN>a S-fenopJ Qeyrr\or\u\U
11. Cgz-'T-txg Chyn^Jy^ tm7 ^^ymcuax uxuj- T^ymT,y :^^r^
13. VCf>s/^r> u-^VVhct:
14. -rs-cps^i^ (^(\fccs
1
^ OPPOSmON TO THE PROPOSED "QUICK STOP FOOD STORE" ^VlM^-O^Ct^S
I, as a patron of Carlsbad VillaH^usinesses, oppose the proposed 1^11^1 in "land use" at
2924 Carisbad Blvd. from a Medical office to a "quick Stop food store" in an area known as a "major
pedestrian area". \
As stated in the Village Master Plan and Manual, confficts between pedestrians and vehicles must be
minimized. The proposed change in land use would create a major conffict.
Vehicle parking and access is currently inadequate. Increasing land use intensity to a high traffic use is
inappropriate for the site and inconsistent with the Master Plan.
SANDAG estimates an additional 375 cars per day using 4 parking spaces and 1
handicap space, that's an additional 37 cars per hour crossing a major pedestrian
walkway. It is physically impossible for these cars to access and use the proposed parking
in a safe and effective manner.
The resuhant traffic jam will create a hazard for pedestrians and block traffic along Carlsbad Blvd. and
Carlsbad Village Dr.
We find this Unacceptable.
1.
E. ADDRESS . m
5. ///fr /
y.
8.
y y / /
6
M ' I ^ mPOSmON TO THE PROPOSED "QUICKSTOP FOOD STOREJL ^V^^i^%OC^^
I, as a patron of Carlsbad Villa|Pbusinesses, oppose the proposed ^fcige in "land use"
2924 Carlsbad Blvd. from a Medical office to a "quick Stop food Store" in an area known as a "major
pedestrian area".
As stated in the Village Master Plan and Manual, confficts between pedestrians and vehicles must be
minimized. The proposed change in land use would create a major conffict.
Vehicle parking and access is currently inadequate. Increasing land use intensity to a high traffic use is
inappropriate for the site and inconsistent with the Master Plan.
SANDAG estimates an additional 375 cars per day using 4 parking spaces and 1
handicap space, that's an additional 37 cars per hour crossing a major pedestrian
walkway. It is physically impossible for these cars to access and use the proposed parking
in a safe and effective manner.
The resultant traffic jam will create a hazard for pedestrians and block traffic along Carlsbad Blvd. and
Carlsbad Village Dr.
We find this Unacceptable
NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE
'^lOffT^ j^Tji^T^^ r/^/^^^^ T?'r?7^-^L 0^7Hj>$^^^ L^CKICQ
^o.^/^^r 7^ K^s^r 7<Jx3 C^^^r^^ 7^<: 'T>C.. ^yy^
y^e^c/a^:y) ~
6. ?^/jei5^
T.^ANDV PACT Mpg. 5io PMJ'hb(T\/m^Or.*ii<i OiT^h>h^,t.
8. ^%,L (.. 7^Jf.. 7Tr7 T)rr.. /7 7. UJ fA ^Zc^^ y^. yf^,^
0.
,^r. fe^^ %9:Ty l(>^^lfrMou»^ Ik/K (Lis^ d7^r>s
^^y^-^n OPPOSmON TO THE PROPOSED "QUICK STOP FOOD STOREj^^^U^^'^C^S^
I, as a patron ofCarlsbad Villa|Rusinesses, oppose the proposed ^ffnge in "land use" s^j
2924 Carlshad Blvd. from a Medical office to a "quick stop food store" in an area known as a "major
pedestrian area".
As stated in the Village Master Plan and Manual, confficts between pedestrians and vehicles must be
minimized. The proposed change ui land use would create a major conffict.
Vehicle parking and access is currently inadequate. Increasing land use intensity to a high traffic use is
inappropriate for the site and inconsistent with the Master Plan.
SANDAG estimates an additional 375 cars per day using 4 parking spaces and 1
handicap space, that's an additional 37 cars per hour crossing a major pedestrian
walkway. It is physically impossible for these cars to access and use the proposed parking
in a safe and effective manner.
The resultant traffic jam will create a hazard for pedestrians and block traffic along Carlsbad Blvd. and
Carlsbad Village Dr.
We fmd this Unacceptable.
NAj^& ADDRESS ^ , SIgNATURE.
ir=S<wr^^^^ -^Ifc^ iUUicu^y^V'/UdU ^'^TruJL (!CMly^ y
^fZ^L.Ti-7/. ^7,
7. f^re pL-T^m -^^cuHAi'TifUsAi c^Tr/kj^gm
\yjy)rjeyp~i¥^'o''!:7\777^' \ GA <\2.^7^ Tyfsy^o
my
13. --fl6r,/}e^ ^>of^^^, 7j(/.^m7U>i/:^ 9Pi^ ^7
14. \xm km./ TO'm(mm/'Ti.mi.
I
^^^^ ' OPPOSmON TO THE PROVED "QUICK STOP FOOD STOREjj^SVKfi^Kj C^
I, as a patron of Carlsbad Villa^usinesses, oppose the proposed cmnge in "land use"
2924 Carlshad Blvd. from a Medical office to a "quick Stop food Storc" in an area known as a "major
pedestrian area".
As stated in the Village Master Plan and Manual, conflicts between pedestrians and vehicles must be
minimized. The proposed change in land use would create a major conflict.
Vehicle parking and access is currently inadequate. Increasing land use intensity to a high traffic use is
inappropriate for the site and inconsistent with the Master Plan.
SANDAG estimates an additional 375 cars per day using 4 parking spaces and t
handicap space, that's an additional 37 cars per hour crossing a major pedestrian
walkway. It is physically impossible for these cars to access and use the proposed parking
in a safe and effective manner.
The resultant traffic jam will create a hazard for pedestrians and block traffic along Carlsbad Blvd. and
Carlsbad Village Dr.
We find this Unacceptable
NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE
2. :V^.E:-^J::^V-V 'JS^^ "^St^Jtv W^e.-^ • r^^-TI^^ cr^J^S'^^^'^
^-yTyj^yr' ^ ?,yxj^^,^ /,s<^y7^^ ^ 79^u//:? T>/rAi
4. t^&NisF. mog^xtfA qr-)pff^j\vthfiv./. S'^^^^xrr^s yiyoy]\,s}
6. '^0'Zn-v\v\Z-^
8.-rW<Ae/o^ H^S&. /'n^'U T FS50 Cr.^y'fi-^ ^.yy^Z^AJ^
2. \><^yC^d3u^J^n>^ 710/ U^AJJU/^J.^^
'^.<\nyy^c
^ OPPOSmON TO THE PROVED "QUICKSTOP FOOD .STO/?FJ^^U^^
I, as a patron ofCarlsbad Villa^usinesses, oppose the proposed cTOnge in "land use" at
2924 Carlshad Blvd. fi^om a Medical office to a "quick Stop food Store" in an ^ea known as a "major
pedestrian area".
As stated in the Village Master Plan and Manual, confficts between pedestrians and vehicles must be
minimized. The proposed change in land use would create a major conffict.
Vehicle parking and access is currently inadequate. Increasing land use intensity to a high traffic use is
inappropriate for the site and inconsistent with the Master Plan.
SANDAG estimates an additional 375 cars per day using 4 parking spaces and 1
handicap space, that's an additional 37 cars per hour crossing a major pedestrian
walkway. It is physically impossible for these cars to access and use the proposed parking
in a safe and effective manner.
The resultant traffic jam will create a hazard for pedestrians and block traffic along Carlsbad Blvd. and
Carlsbad Village Dr. ^^^^/^
We find this Unacceptable ^
NAME ADDRESS SIGN
2.(WW(K^. H cSmi;6A. ^TefCfr^cmSr. Ciht/{pAAfi( d<hyu±i
3. <7<^<^j;^?$.<^;<}l oi/^M CT^Pfe^^cvA^
/^K(S LJI rx '%Ot,t><k
5-fcbt^r $y^y'^<^,S^y(i7L<''('^^^ CiAmlfr.n
0'<d(> rJ^ Q.2/7Y^
7. /ToC -L Ty.'^'-.
'7^
y6b<u^^ 8.
9- /(^h.^^^-fh^oc. RQrA\h^'7^ ^ 9'^T?r7<e
y i
7
\x^c^ <~;^^flC. "Po 1^7>7 x^fdy^ 10.
^—
13. ^^KC r^Syyi^y.
14. HAAVOI A\.V.^'^
V \ V
OPPOSmON TO THE PROBOSED "QUICK STOP FOOD STOI
I, as a patron ofCarlsbad VillafRusinesses, oppose the proposed ^nge in "land use" af
2924 Carlsbad Blvd. from a Medical office to a "quick Stop food Store" in an area known as a "major
pedestrian area".
As stated in the Village Master Plan and Manual, confficts between pedestrians and vehicles must be
minimized. The proposed change in land use would create a major conffict.
Vehicle parking and access is currently inadequate. Increasing land use intensity to a high traffic use is
inappropriate for the site and inconsistent with the Master Plan.
SANDAG estimates an additional 375 cars per day using 4 parking spaces and 1
handicap space, that's an additional 37 cars per hour crossing a major pedestrian
walkway. It is physically impossible for these cars to access and use the proposed parking
in a safe and effective manner.
The resultant traffic jam wOl create a hazard for pedestrians and block traffic along Carlsbad Blvd. and
Carlsbad Village Dr.
Wefind this IJnacceptable.
^("NAMZTI iXAlSESsi SlGj^AHJR^^
2. t;,^AVf/^Jnes 7^^/:^^<f. .HvT-r-J
4^^»^ .-^xl / ^ -^/-y/ J./^o\y liftF^ ^S^y^.A
6. y^^^^t^^r/
ITT
10.
11.
12.
_
14.
"QUICKSTOP FOOD STORF^ STM^Bt^C(^
igSusinesses, oppose the proposed change in "land use"
OPPOSmON TO THE PROi
I, as a patron of Carlsbad Village
2924 Carlshad Blvd. from a Medical officj to a "quick Stop food Store" in an area known as a "major
pedestrian area".
As stated in the Village Master Plan and Manual, confficts between pedestrians and vehicles must be
minimized. The proposed change in land use would create a major conffict.
Vehicle parking and access is currently inadequate. Increasing land use intensity to a high traffic use is
inappropriate for the site and inconsistent with the Master Plan.
SANDAG estimates an additional 375 cars per day using 4 parking spaces and 1
handicap space, that's an additional 37 cars per hour crossing a major pedestrian
walkway. It is physically impossible for these cars to access and use the proposed parking
in a safe and effective manner.
The resultam traffic jam will create a hazard for pedestrians and block traffic along Carlsbad Blvd. and
Carlsbad Village Dr.
We find this Unacceptable.
NAME ADDRESS
0 ^ t^avA^^e (Vo\ 6c9^ Oe^c^
3. Pfroi^vCfc^ uucc'^^ ^c?o A-ifJcr/.vLi
4. IzVc-TT Avp-jcrfyU 9(f7i Te/fr7-^.r, /t^.f
5.Ti//^r/^ya^ji/'^ JT7¥ ,ficfljyj^Tt/9^ yy.
TJ T?£ri<;lhT ,
)^(^C^ A^' ^DoAt^- ^7^"/ l^Tj^^gy Ci,^cl^7
1. vV?cc^Ar^ y>y7^
TS'AS/^^^^^^ 7^^679
ip
^^.t i^
7('yry\
10. ; T'^Jr^ Pypnhx/ Q<^(T yeily Dy 'W^Ly-TCh^iTf)
Ulpj r^^Ndle. ^(T(T Puirr\i^Tt i'lsh^
:z3sc f^M-M-A \TJf\^ fVfTc
APR 16 '97 09:27AM STAR^KS R.E./CONSTRUCTION _ p
^ EXHIBIT 7
Stirtttda Coftae Company
Southwest Zonft OKice
17700 Newtiop« Street, Suite 200
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
714/424-1900
Fax; 714/424-1919
Fax: 714/424-1920 Store Oevelopment
April 16,1997
Via Fax: (760)720-2037
Ms. Debbie Fountain
City of Carlsbad
l iousing and Redevelopment Department
2965 Roosevelt Street, Suite B
Carlsbad, CA 92008
RE; PennitNo. ARP 97-01
Dear Ms. Foimtain:
[ would appreciate thc Design Rexdew Board's consideration of the following in response
to tbe appeals filed to the Director's decision on the above referenced permit:
Parking: Contrary to the appeals filed, restriping the parking lot does yield the five
required parking spaces pursuant to code; the parking lot consists of 4?8" of lineal feet
which will accommodate one (14' wide) handicapped space, three (8.5' wide) regular
spaces and one (8' wide) compact space or altematively one handicapped, two regular
and two compact spaces.
The parking demand generated by our customers is at its peak in the moming (between
7am and 9am) before many businesses are open and would be accommodated without
difficulty in the area During the remainder ofthe day and evening, parking demand is
much lower since most of our customers are those who work, shop, dine or live in the
area and who have already parked their vehicles for other purposes.
Traffic Generation: The impact of this project on traffic is minimal since it involves
the reuse of an existing building and does not involve new building construction; traffic
already has been reduced in thc area through the closure of the chiropractic office and the
net result will not be a significant amount ofnew traffic.
APR 16 '97 09:28Af1 STftR5yg<S R. E./CONSTRUCTION _ p
Starbucks derives the majority of its business from customers \^*o are already in the local
area for other purposes and is not independently a large traffic generator. Most of our
customers will park for other puiposes and will combine their shopping, dining,
recreational and leisure activities and patronage of other businesses with a trip to our
storc. Less than 30% of our business, primarily in the early moming hours, will involve
specific trips to our store.
Trash Disposal: Starbucks is committed to a role of environmental leadership in all
facets of our business. Store operations personnel prioritize store maintenance, recycling
effi)rts and conduct periodic "greensweeps" to collect trash from adjacent properties,
Sufficient space exists within each store to accommodate the storage of non-recyclable
trash containers and arrangements are typically made with the local disposal service as
the store opening date nears. However, Coast Management has been contacted and trash
generated through store operations is not envisioned to exceed the six containers per
pick-up five times per week local limitation.
Neighborhood Compatibility: Sterling Development Corporation's plans to upgrade and
renovate this vacant, neglected property will enhance thc retail character and vitality of
fhe downtown area while making a positive contribution toward the City's property
values and tax base. Sterling and its architects have worked closely witii City staff to
design a high-quality, unique development which Starbucks is excited about thc
opportunity to join Similarly, Starbucks has custom-designed its store to reflect the
imique characteristics of the neighborhood and to serve as a contemporary gathering
place and backdrop for our coffee and merchandise selection.
Although we realize that it is beyond the Design Review Board's scope of review,
Starbucks co-exists with many locally-owned coffee bars in many communities including
downtown Del Mar, La .iolla and San Diego's Hillcrest neighborhood. We have found
that the awareness of and enthusiasm for coffee is elevated in neighborhoods in which we
enter throu^ our education of customers and sale of coffee beans, equipment and
accessories for brewing coffee drinks at home.
Starbucks also is dedicated to supporting the conununities in which we operate and
contributes to a variety of organizations benefiting children's welfare, AIDS research,
environmental awareness, thc arts and community cultural events. Our stores typically
employ local residents who are empowered to parhcipate in their own neighborhoods and
frequently donate coffee to local non-profit organizations.
APR 16 '97 09:28ftM STPRRUCKS R. E./CONSTRUCTION ^ P. 4/4
I would appreciate it if you would convey these comments to thc Design Review Board
for their consideration and respecdvely urge the Board to uphold the Director s decision
to approve this project without delay.
SiiKscrely.
STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY
Steven A. Ishino
Real Estate Manager
Southwest Zone
FROM : STERLING DEUELOPMENT ^k'AN I ES PHONE NO. : 619 546 8807 Apr. 21 1997 04:08PM P3
EXHIBIT 8
COAST WASTE MANACeMENT, INC
LIBERTY RECYCI-ING
5B60 Bl-CAMINO HEAU. P.O. Box 9*f
CARLSBAD. CA 92010-0947
TEU: 6t9'92,B-»*00
. 6I9-4S2-SS10
FA5t: 6l9'83l-02l9
April 18, 1997
Mr. Jeff Rasak
Sterling Development Corporation
3252 Holiday Court, #225
La Jolla, Califomia 92037
Dear Mr. Rasak:
As per our conversation. Coast Waste Management will be able to service your new location (2924
Carisbad Boulevard) with commercial can pickup, sbc (6) days per week (Monday thru Saturday).
Waste recepUcals must be set outside of the building at agreed upon location.
Thank you.
Eric de Jong ^ ^;
Office #: (760)929-9418
Pager #: (760)899-0352
EDJxsm
,,c^ifrv^ Yours
CO!.L£CTlC'N » TRANSKt.P . k'CSOUPCE fECOVEKY
• EXHIBIT 9
EXHIBIT "A" SITE PLAN
m
i
o z
RIGHT ELEVATION'
May 28, 1997
NATURAL CHOICES
300 Carlsbad Village Dr. §2M
Carlsbad, CA 92008
We could not be present at the meeting tonight, but we
are totally against having Starbucks coming into the
shopping center at the Village Faire.
There is insufficient parking as is presently and having
another coffee shop in the center would definite take up
badly needed parking.
We see this as having a negative effect on our retail
business and are,strongly against Starbucks proposed
location at the Village Faire Shopping Center.
Sincerel
PS: ps
JOHN & LUCILLE CLINE
3217 Via Pescado
Carlsbad, CA 92008
760-720-7484
May 21, 1997
Ms. Debbie Fountain
Housing & Redevelopment Dept.
City of Carlsbad
2962 Roosevelt St., Ste. B
Carlsbad, CA 92008
RE: Case File: RP/CDP 97-01
Case Name: Jeff Rasak/Coffee House Project
Dear Ms. Fountain:
We are writing regarding the public hearing on the above matter that will be held on May
29, 1977. We vdll be out of town at that time and there are a few concems that we would
like to voice.
Parking in the Village Faire area, as you may already know, can be very crowded. On
weekend evenings it is nearly impossible to find parking anywhere in the provided parking,
across the street or within a block of Village Faire. Since the building in question is
located in the same area, we are wondering where the five parking places that they are
required to have will be. Where do they have enough room on that property for those
spaces without taking away valuable parking fi-om the other businesses. This past
weekend our car was blocked in by a car parked in a driveway right next to the property
in question. We can see this problem, along with the traffic congestion, becoming much
worse with the addition of that type business in a building that had previously been used
for an office building.
Another area of concem is the handling of deliveries. Where are the delivery vehicles
going to be parked? Will they be using the Village Faire parking facilities or will they be
blocking the bike lane on Carisbad Boulevard in front of the building.
Probably the most important concem of all is that of garbage pick-up. It was our
understanding from the last meeting that the garbage would be on the curb with pickup on
Carlsbad Boulevard. The City of Carlsbad is a very special place that has maintained such
high standards for Carlsbad Boulevard businesses. This is one of the few places that
walkers and bikers can enjoy the sidewalks and the boulevard without having the mess
accompanied with garbage cans or dumpsters being in the way or in view. Carlsbad is a
resort area and we feel that the standards should not be lowered for a business coming in
now any more than the standards would have been relaxed for any of the existing
businesses.
We fiilly realize that Starbucks is a desirable business, especially considering the tax
revenue such a successfiil business will bring to the city. However, having lived in the
Seattle area, we also realize that the Starbucks corporation has a habit of steamrollering
their way into locations that they want regardless of the consequences to the existing
business people or the area. Perhaps, they thought that they could get the approvals that
they needed without going through the proper charmels.
Although we realize that Starbucks facility will be very nice and that the business brings in
a good clientele, we feel that a less congested area would be a better location for them.
We already have too little parking in the area and too much traffic congestion. To say that
five parking spaces would service their needs is ridiculous.
We hope that these items will be answered in fiill at the May 29 meeting.
Sincerely,
John and Lucille Cline
May 29,1997
TO: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
FROM: HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: RP 97-01/CDP 97-01 - ADDITIONS TO, OR MODIFICATIONS OF,
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
The following conditions are to be added to Design Review Board Resolution No. 255,
which approves RP 97-01:
^yD^ 1. The applicant shall prepare and operate with ^seating plan to be approved by the
^ Housing and Redevelopment Director which ensures a clear area of at least five (5)
T^ feet in area around the building entry to allow for adequate pedestrian ingress and
/ egress from the subject building at all times.
2. The applicant shall make the necessary arrangements with the appropriate product
delivery companies to ensure that all business-related deliveries are made to the
y ^ subject site in a manner which does not impede traffic on Carlsbad Boulevard and/or
block parking on the site. The applicant may select one of the following options for
deliveries to the subject site: .
A) The applicant shall be required to ensure that all deliveries are made from
vehicles parked on the subject site during non-operation hours, either prior to
opening or after closing of the facility. Deliveries shall not be made from
vehicles parked on Carlsbad Boulevard^ which are impeding bicycle or vehicle
traffic; or, lA -Cron-f- of "Sui^^*^*^^ propt?rft^
B) The applicant shall enter into a written agreement with an adjacent property or
business owner, or property/business owner within a acceptable distance from
the subject site, to allow deliveries to the subject site from an off-site
location, which does not impede bicycle, vehicle or pedestrian traffic in the
area. The agreement shall be subject to approval by the Housing and
Redevelopment Director. Deliveries shall be made to the subject site in a
marmer which does not block customer or employee parking on the sponsor
property during hours of regular business operation.
The following modifications shall be made to the following conditions within Design
Review Board Resolution No. 255:
11. 44T-NO outdoor storage of material shall occur onsite. unless required by the Fire
A Chief If the Fire Chief determines that outdoor storage of some material is required
y , . for a specific reason. In suoh instance, a storage plan will be submitted for approval
bv the Fire Chief aa4-Housing and Redevelopment Director, and Design Review \
^9 Board. If the storage plan is not acceptable to anv of the subiect parties, the applicant / U
s.yy shall be required to make altemate arrangements for the storage of the materials or
reconsider the tenant and the arrangements of anv related lease of the building.
Ay 14. The applicant, or his agent, shall ensure that the on-site parking will be made
available for customers only; no employees ofthe related business shall park on the
subject site, with the exception that a handicapped employee may use the parking
. space on the site which is specifically designated for that use. All non handicapped . ^
.^jy omnlovees of the subiect business shall use public parldnp which io available within J^^^jr \y^^
^the Village Redevelopment i\rea. The applicant shall^nter into a written agreement
j(y^^ 1 with a private propertv or business ovmer within 600 feet of the subiect propertv to
' y^' \ provide emplovee parking for the subiect business establishment. The Ml I ft DVKLU
16. The applicant shall install bike racks on the subiect private property to accommodate
A a minimum of five (5) customers and/or employees who may arrive at the site by
^s)V- bicycle. Loc<aMoo ^ oV0|<;c> St> appn>>k3\ iDq H4)R Pir-t-ck^^
5 4ir y^^-^'^^
City of Carlsbad
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92009
(619) 438-1161
PIAMNING APPLICATION #
REC'D BY JBx^i^ I4^t^
DATE
SIGN FEE %P,C^
SIGN PROGRAM FEE
RECEIPTNO. 37/06
PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
REVIEW FOR SIGN PERMFTS
All plans submitted for sign permits/sign programs shall consist of a minimum of a site plan and sign
elevations containing the following information:
1. North arrow and scale.
2. Location of existing buildings or stmctures, parking areas, and vehicular access points to
the property.
3. Location of all existing and proposed signs for the property.
4. Distance to the property line(s) for all proposed freestanding signs.
5. Provide an elevation for all proposed signs which specifies the following:
A. Dimensions and area for all existing and proposed signs.
B. Materials the sign(s) will be constmcted of
C. Proposed sign copy.
APPLICANT MUST SUBMIT THREE (3) SETS OF SIGN/SITE PLANS, A COMPLETED
APPLICATION FORM, AND THE APPLICATION FEE.
Tbe applicadon musl $ttad[tted pnor to 4:00 pm. Average processing Time: 2 weeks
NAME OF PROJECT: .'^yyTj^^j^^.^^ykTl C2yy^Ar,^ry^
ADDRESS OF PROJECT: ^^^g^Z
ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: Zo3 • /T^ oM"
RELATED PLANNING CASE NUMBER(S): ^
SIGN TYPE: /(a)>Commercial
I) Real Estate
(g) Community identity
(b) Industrial
(e) Freeway
(h) Service Sta. Prices
(c) Residential
(f) Marquee
(i) Campaign
SIGN PROGRAM AND/OR
SPECIFIC PLAN CRITERL\ Yes No ^ SPECIFIC PLAN NUMBER
VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT AREA Yes ^ No *'*REQUIRES VR APPROVAL
SIGN ORDINANCE:
COASTAL ZONE:
Yes No
Yes jL- No ^/COASTAL PERMIT Yes No
FRMOOOlO 2/96 Page 1 of 2
EXISTING SIGNS: Type Number Size (in square feet)
(a) Pole
(b) Monument
(c) Wall
PERMITS ISSUED FOR EXISTING SIGNS: Yes
c^
No Date
TOTAL BUILDING STREET FRONTAGE
TOTAL SIGNAGE ALLOWANCE
EXISTING SIGNAGE (SQ. FT.)
REMAINING SIGN ALLOWANCE AT PRESENT
PROPOSED SIGNAGE (SQ. FT.)
REMAINING SIGN ALLOWANCE AFTER PROPOSED SIGN
y ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
OWNER APPUCANT
NAME (PRINT OR TYPE)
.sy^T2yy^j/^ .^^y.
NAME (PRINT OR T^E)^ ,
^/2y77MTy7y7DxJ^. ^WJOX;^.
MAIUNG ADDRESS
4
MAiUNG ADDRESS
JP<^'^^ y7pTj7/Z7iM^TCl^ ^T/T^
CITY AND STATE^ ZIP TELEPHONE CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE
' 7)^^ 7^^y<^ yy.
I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER
AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION
IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF
MY KNOWLEDGE
CERTIFY THAT I AM THE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
iGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE
IFORMATION IS TRUE
iE
SIGNATURE
CORRECT TO THE BEST OF
PLANNER CHECK UST:
1. Field check by plarmer..
2. Within maximum length, area.
3. Style consistent with Sign Program and/or Specific Plan criteria, if applicable.
4. Location: In right-of-way
In visibility triangle at comer
On roof
5. Pole and monument signs to be checked by Bob Johnson, Traffic Engineer, for visibility issues.
6. When approved route copy to Data Entry
APPROVED: Planner:<; Date:
FRMOOOlO 8/92 Page 2 of 2