HomeMy WebLinkAboutRP 99-13; Edwards Financial; Redevelopment Permits (RP) (2)REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT
REVIEW AND COMMENT REOUEST
Date: September 13, 1999
Planning Department - G. WAYNE Water District
V Engineering Department - B. WOJCIK Landscape Plancheck Consultant
Police Department School District
V Building Department - P. KELLEY North County Transit District
City Attorney Fire Department
To Departments: Subject: RP 99-13
The attached plans have been submitted by Edwards Financial for the conversion of the
lower half of an existing duplex to commercial office space located at 2627 State Street.
Please review the attached plans and corresponding application for Administrative
Redevelopment Permit and forward your comments on the completeness of the application
and/or project conditions to my office by September 22, 1999.
Thank you for your assistance.
Project Title:
Permit No.:
Applicant:
Edwards Financial, 2627 State Street
RP 99-13
Jerry Edwards
Brief Description of Proposal:
Assigned staff member:
The proposed project consists of converting the lower
level of an existing duplex to commercial office space
and maintaining the existing residential unit above.
Lori Rosenstein
Comments: (Please inform the Housing & Redevelopment in writing if there are no
comments or conditions from your department. Comments and conditions sent via e-mail
are greatly appreciated!)
Page 1
From: Pat Kelley
To: Lori Rosenstein
Date: 9/17/99 9:58AM
Subject: RP 99-13 - 2627 Jefferson
Lori - This conversion from a dwelling unit to an office ccupance will require a building permit. The lower
occupancy will need to fully comply with all the provisions for a new office occupancy.
Although the plans are a little light dimensionally, there may be access clearance issues inside the new
office hallways. The applicant should pay particular attention to this issue.
The plans submitted do not show the large overhang ofthe upper unit over the driveway. This overhang
will be reviewed for UBC occupancy separation requirements when it sows up for plan check.
I noticed they are already kinda working on the building out there. Please advise them to complete the
building permit process before continuing w/ any more on site.
No other comments.
Pat
Lon Rosenstein ^pncK TigeT"
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Lori:
Mike Grim
Lori Rosenstein
9/16/99 2:57PM
RP 99-13 - Edwards Financial
Here are Planning's comments on the Edwards Financial conversion from apartment to office:
1. Project is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines
(conversion of a small structure).
2. They should probably show the exact locations of parking spaces (including striping and dimensions).
We need to establish how many bedrooms in the upstairs unit to determine total parking requirements.
3. The landscaped greenbelt should probably contain some pedestrain amenities, maybe even a
connection to the alley.
Thanks again for the opportunity to comment. Feel free to call me if you have any questions, Mike
CC: Chris DeCerbo
Memot^dum
RECEIVED
SEP 23 1999
CITY OF CARLSBAD HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
TO: Lori Rosenstein, Redevelopment Department
FROM: David Rick, Engineering Department
DATE: September 21, 1999
RP 99-13; EDWARDS FINANCIAL. 2627 STATE STREET
ISSUES REVIEW
Engineering Department staff has completed a review of the above-referenced project
for engineering issues of concern. Engineering issues which need to be resolved or
adequately addressed prior to staff making a determination on the proposed project are
as follows:
1. On the existing and proposed plot plan:
a) Add a scale. Also, use a larger scale. The site plan is difficult to read.
b) show all fences and their heights.
c) show existing curb, gutter, driveway approach, and sidewalk. Provide
dimensions of these public facilities as well as distance from street centeriine
to right-of-way and face of curb.
d) Show the location of the utility pole at the rear of the lot. Will this pole be
removed due to the proposed parking lot?
2. On the proposed plot plan, show the proposed paved parking at the rear of the lot.
Provide dimensions, striping, curb location, and driveway location. Also, show
placement of a trash receptacle and enclosure. If the 11 foot wide driveway will be
connected to the rear parking, then show this connection.
3. The parking which fronts State Street must be removed. Driveways on State Street
cannot be situated such that autos would be required to back into the street. The
driveway approach will need to be shortened to only serve the 11 foot wide
driveway.
4. Depending on the information requested under item No. 2, there may be site
distance issues for motorists entering the alley from the subject property. Their
vision of approaching vehicles may be impaired by the building located on the
property to the south and/or the fence.
5. Show how the lot will drain by providing spot elevations and indicating with arrows
the direction of drainage flow. Pollutants from surface water runoff must be filtered
before exiting the site in accordance with the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System Permit held by the City. Based on the site conditions, one
feasible approach would be to direct surface drainage through a grass swale a
minimum of 10 feet long.
6. If grading is proposed, then show such grading and provide grading quantities. If no
grading is proposed, then state "no grading proposed."
7. Indicate the project's generated ADT (Average Daily Trips) amounts. Also, indicate
the total area of proposed office and remaining area of residential.
Attached is a redlined site plan to forward to the applicant. Please have the
applicant return this redlined plan with his second submittal, if you or the
applicant have any questions, please either see or contact me at extension 4324.
DAVID RICK
Engineering Technician
Land Development Division
REDEVELOPIMENT PERMIT
REVIEW AND COMMENT REOUEST
Date: December 15, 1999
Planning Department - M. GRIM V Water District - K. WEAVER
V Engineering Department - D. RICK Landscape Plancheck Consultant
Police Department School District
V Building Department - P. KELLEY North County Transit District
City Attorney Fire Department - M. SMITH
To Departments: Subject: RP 99-13
The attached plans have been resubmitted by Edwards Financial for the conversion of the
lower half of an existing duplex to commercial office space located at 2627 State Street.
Please review the revised plans for the Administrative Redevelopment Permit and forward
your comments on the completeness of the application, issues of concem, and/or project
conditions to my office by December 30, 1999.
Thank you for your assistance.
Project Title:
Permit No.:
Applicant:
Edwards Financial, 2627 State Street
RP 99-13
Jerry Edwards
Brief Description of Proposal:
Assigned staff member:
The proposed project consists of converting the lower
level of an existing duplex to commercial office space
and maintaining the existing residential unit above.
Lori Rosenstein
Comments: (Please inform the Housing & Redevelopment in writing if there are no
comments or conditions from your department. Comments and conditions sent via e-mail
are greatly appreciated!)
Citv of Carlsbad
Housing & Redevelopment Department
September 27, 1999
JERRY & SAUNDRA EDWARDS
EDWARDS FINANCIAL
3980 ADAMS STREET
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
SUBJECT: EDWARDS FINANCIAL BUILDING (RP99-13)
Thank you for applying for a Land Use Permit in the City of CaHsbad. The Housing and
Redevelopment Department, together with other appropriate City departments has
reviewed your Administrative Redevelopment Permit, application no. RP 99-13, as to its
completeness for processing.
The application is incomplete, as submitted. Attached are two lists. The first list is information
which must be submitted to complete your application. This list of items must be submitted
directly to the Redevelopment Office. All list items must be submitted simultaneously
and a copy of this list must be included with your submittal. No processing of your
application can occur until the application is determined to be complete. The second list
represents issues of concern to staff. When all required materials are submitted to the
Redevelopment Office, the City has an additional thirty (30) days to make a determination of
completeness. If the application is determined to be complete, processing for a decision on the
application will be initiated. In addition, please note that you have six months from the date the
application was initially filed, September 2, 1999, to either resubmit the application or submit
the required information. Failure to resubmit the application or to submit the materials
necessary to determine your application complete shall be deemed to constitute withdrawal of
the application. If an application is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn, a new application must be
submitted.
Please contact my office at (760) 434-2813, if you have any questions or wish to set up a
meeting to discuss the application.
Sincerely,
LORI H. ROSENSTEIN
Management Analyst
David Rick, Engineering Department vr>^5, c^t
Mike Grim, Planning Department ^^^G?
Pat Kelley, Building Department v\OViS\^otPK^^^^''^'
2965 Roosevelt St., Ste. B • Carlsbad, CA 92008-2389 • (760) 434-2810/2811 • FAX (760) 720-2037
Items Needed to Complete Application
RP99-13
Page 2
Housing & Redevelopment/ Planning:
The Housing and Redevelopment Department, along with the Planning Department, has
completed its review of the subject project for application completeness. The application
and plans submitted for this project are incomplete and unsuitable for further review due to
the following missing or incomplete items:
1. Provide building setbacks (front, rear, and sides) as measured from property lines.
2. Provide a reference to the total number of bedrooms in the upstairs unit for required
parking calculations.
3. In the summary table include the following information: existing land use district (Land
Use District 4); total number of existing parking spaces; and total number of proposed
parking spaces for office use and residential use.
4. On the site plan provide the name of the sewer, water and school districts providing
service to the site.
5. Show existing landscaping and proposed landscaping; please indicate landscaping to
be removed, if any.
6. Provide an open space calculation. Open space may be dedicated to landscaped
planters, open space pockets and/or connections, roof gardens, balconies and patios.
No parking spaces or drive aisles are permitted in the open space calculation.
7. On the site plan, show the location of all proposed signs and provide the distance to
the property line(s) for all proposed freestanding signs.
8. On the elevation for the proposed sign, please include: a) dimensions and sign area for
the proposed sign; b) materials the sign(s) will be constructed of; and c) proposed sign
copy.
9. Provide a summary table which includes: a) total building street frontage; b) total
signage allowance based on Village Master Plan and Design Manual (i.e. one square
foot of signage per linear foot of building frontage); c) the amount of all existing
signage and type; d) the amount of signage to be removed and type; and e) the
amount of new signage proposed and type.
10. The maximum height allowed for a freestanding sign is 60 inches including the sign
base. Please revise proposed sign elevation accordingly.
LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED
TO COMPLETE THE APPUCATION
No. RP99-13
Engineering:
The Engineering Department has completed its review of the subject project for application
completeness. The following information must be added to the site plan and/or clarified
before the application can be found complete:
1. The plans must be drawn to scale. Provide a scale and consider using a larger scale
to make the plans more readable.
2. Show location, height and materials of all walls and fences.
3. Show existing curb, gutter, driveway approach, and sidewalk. Provide dimensions of
these public facilities, as well as, distance from street centeriine to right-of-way and
face of curb.
4. Show the location of the utility pole at the rear of the lot. Will this pole be removed
due to the proposed parking lot?
5. Show the proposed paved parking at the rear of the lot. Provide dimensions, striping,
curb location, and driveway location. Also, show location of a trash receptacle and
enclosure. If the 11 foot wide driveway will be connected to the rear parking lot,
then show this connection.
6. The parking which fronts on State Street must be removed. Driveways on State
Street cannot be situated such that autos would be required to back into the street.
The driveway approach will need to be shortened to only serve the 11 foot wide
driveway.
7. Depending on the information requested under item No. 2, there may be sight
distance issues for motorists entering the alley from the subject property. Their vision
of approaching vehicles may be impaired by the building located on the property to
the south and/or the fence.
8. Show how the lot will drain by providing spot elevations and indicating with arrows
the direction of drainage flow. Pollutants from surface water runoff must be filtered
before exiting the site in accordance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System Permit held by the City. Based on the site conditions, one feasible approach
would be to direct surface drainage through a grass swale a minimum of 10 feet long.
9. If grading is proposed, then show such grading and provide grading quantities. If no
grading is proposed, then state "no grading proposed."
10. Indicate the project's generated ADT (Average Daily Trips) amounts. Also, indicate
the total area of proposed office and remaining area of residential.
11. A red-lined check print is enclosed for the applicant's use in making the requested
revisions. This check print should be returned with the revised plans to facilitate
continued staff review.
No. RP99-13
ISSUES OF CONCERN
Planning:
1. The landscaped greenbelt should probably contain some pedestrian amenities, maybe
even a connection to the alley.
Building:
1. The conversion from a dwelling unit to an office occupancy will require a building
permit. The lower occupancy will need to fully comply with all the provisions for a new
office occupancy.
2. There may be access clearance issues inside the new office hallways. The applicant
should pay particular attention to this issue.
3. The plans submitted do not show the large overhang of the upper unit over the
driveway. This overhang will be reviewed for UBC occupancy separation requirements
when it shows up for plan check.
4. No construction is permitted on-site without completion of the building permit process.
Please note, building plans may be submitted at any time for concurrent review with the
land use permit.
lOTR"oieniteii^^
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Pat Kelley
Lori Rosenstein
12/16/99 3:25PM
RP 99-13 Edwards Project
Lori - No further comments re: floor plans. I did meet w/ the applicants, and some of the issues have been
addressed. They will need to be further refined during the building permit plan check process. They are all
realted to the floor plan and specific building code matters.
Pat
REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT
REVIEW AND COMMENT REOUEST
Date: December 15, 1999
V Planning Department - M. GRIM V Water District - K. WEAVER
Engineering Department - D. RICK Landscape Plancheck Consultant
Police Department School District
Building Department - P. KELLEY North County Transit District
City Attorney V Fire Department - M. SMITH
To Departments: Subject: RP 99-13
The attached plans have been resubmitted by Edwards Financial for the conversion of the
lower half of an existing duplex to commercial office space located at 2627 State Street.
Please review the revised plans for the Administrative Redevelopment Permit and forward
your comments on the completeness of the application, issues of concern, and/or project
conditions to my office by December 30, 1999.
Thank you for your assistance.
Project Title:
Permit No.
Applicant:
Edwards Financial, 2627 State Street
RP 99-13
Jerry Edwards
Brief Description of Proposal:
Assigned staff member:
The proposed project consists of converting the lower
level of an existing duplex to commercial office space
and maintaining the existing residential unit above.
Lori Rosenstein
Comments: (Please inform the Housing & Redevelopment in writing if there are no
comments or conditions from your department. Comments and conditions sent via e-mail
are greatly appreciated!)
6 itv of Carlsbad
Housing & Redevelopment Department
January 5, 2000
JERRY & SAUNDRA EDWARDS
EDWARDS FINANCIAL
3980 ADAMS STREET
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
SUBJECT: EDWARDS FINANCIAL BUILDING (RP99-13)
Thank you for submitting the revised plans for Administrative Redevelopment Permit,
application no. RP 99-13. The Housing and Redeveiopment Department, together with
other appropriate City departments, has reviewed the revised plans as to their
completeness for processing. Some of the information requested of you earlier was not
included on the revised plans and some new information added to the plans requires further
clarification before your application can be found complete. Listed below is the information
needed on the plans in order to deem your application as complete. The requested
information must be included on the revised plans and submitted directly to the Housing
and Redevelopment Department. Further processing of your application can not occur until
the application is determined to be complete. When all required materials are submitted the
City has 30 days to make a determination of completeness. If the application is
determined to be complete, processing for a decision on the application will be initiated. In
addition, please note that you have six months from the date the application was initially
filed, September 2, 1999, to either resubmit the application or submit the required
information. Failure to resubmit the application or to submit the materials necessary to
determine your application complete shall be deemed to constitute withdrawal of the
application. If an application is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn, a new application must
be submitted.
Please contact my office at (760) 434-2813, if you have any questions or wish to set up a
meeting to discuss the application.
Sincerely,
LORI H. ROSENSTEIN
Management Analyst
David Rick, Engineering Department
Mike Grim, Planning Department
Pat Kelley, Building Department
2965 Roosevelt St., Ste. B • Carlsbad, CA 92008-2389 • (760) 434-2810/2811 • FAX (760) 720-2037 @
LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED
TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION
No. RP99-13
Engineering:
The Engineering Department has completed its review of the subject project for compliance
with previously determined issues. The following information must be added to the site
plan and/or clarified before the application can be found complete:
1. Either the scale appears to be slightly inaccurate or the dimensions given are wrong.
Some of examples of these inaccuracies are as follows: The lot is correctly dimensioned
at 52.78 feet wide but the scale indicates that it is 49 feet wide. The front yard set back
is dimensioned at 22'6". The scale indicates that the building set back is 20 feet.
2. Is the 6 foot high chain link fence located along the north side of the property on your
property or the neighbors? Provide a symbol such as x—x—x—" to show where the
fence is located. Also, show the 3 foot high wood fence which encloses the side yard.
3. On the site plan:
a) provide a north arrow;
b) show the location of any trees or shrubs;
c) provide the grading quantities (the grading is listed without quantities);
d) show the neighbor's facilities within 20 feet of the property.
4. Indicate the dimension of the existing driveway approach. Show that this approach will
be replaced with a new approach 12 feet wide. Add a note stating that the remaining
portion of the approach will be replaced with curb, gutter and sidewalk. The portion of
the driveway on private property is 8 feet wide based on a field measurement (the scale
indicates that it is 6.5 feet wide). Add a note to the site plan indicating that the existing
driveway will be removed and replaced with a new 8 foot wide concrete driveway (widen
the driveway to 12 feet if space permits) since the existing driveway is in poor condition.
5. The proposed driveway at the rear of the lot is 17 feet wide according to the scale. The
minimum width permissible is 24 feet. One suggestion would be to reduce the
landscaping widths at each or both ends of the property to provide the required driveway
width.
6. Is the trash area enclosed by a fence or wall? What does the dashed line represent? Also,
indicate with a note that the property has curb-side pick-up.
7. What do the various lines within the parking lot represent? Are these topographical lines?
Provide one foot intervals for slopes less than 5%. The drainage arrow in the parking lot
shows the surface water flowing towards the driveway entrance. The parking lot needs
to be graded such that drainage falls toward the landscaped drainage swale located at the
north end of the site. Otherwise, the design as proposed would not filter surface
pollutants. Please provide a cross section of this drainage swale. Also, add additional
proposed and existing spot elevations throughout the site, including along the drainage
swale. The drainage arrow at the north east corner of the lot suggests that drainage is
flowing onto the adjacent lot. At this location, flow needs to be directed to the public
street preferably by sheet flow.
Items Needed to Comple^Plpplicatlon
RP99-13
Page 2
8. Change the "no exit" sign to "one way - do not enter".
9. A red-lined check print is enclosed for the applicant's use in making the requested
revisions. This check print should be returned with the revised plans to facilitate
continued staff review. If have any questions regarding the Engineering issues identified
above, please call David Rick at 438-1161 ext. 4324.
Housing & Redevelopment/ Planning:
The Housing and Redevelopment Department has completed its review of the subject
project for application completeness. The following information must be added to the site
plan and/or clarified before the application can be found complete:
1. Provide building setbacks (front, rear, and sides) as measured from property lines.
2. Provide an open space calculation. Open space may be dedicated to landscaped
planters, open space pockets and/or connections, roof gardens, balconies and patios.
No parking spaces or drive aisles are permitted in the open space calculation.
3. On the elevation for the proposed sign, please include: a) dimensions and siqn area for
the proposed sign; b) materials the sign(s) will be constructed of; and c) proposed sign
copy.
4. Provide a summary table which includes: a) total building street frontage; b) total
signage allowance based on Village Master Plan and Design Manual (i.e. one square
foot of signage per linear foot of building frontage); c) the amount of all existing
signage and type; d) the amount of signage to be removed and type; and e) the
amount of new signage proposed and type.
5. The maximum height allowed for a freestanding sign is 60 inches including the sign
base. Please revise proposed sign elevation accordingly.
Citv of Carlsbad
Housing & Redevelopment Department
September 27, 1999
JERRY & SAUNDRA EDWARDS
EDWARDS FINANCIAL
3980 ADAMS STREET
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
SUBJECT: EDWARDS FINANCIAL BUILDING {RP99-13)
Thank you for applying for a Land Use Permit in the City of Cartsbad. The Housing and
Redevelopment Department, together with other appropriate City departments has
reviewed your Administrative Redevelopment Permit, application no. RP 99-13, as to its
completeness for processing.
The application is incomplete, as submitted. Attached are two lists. The first list is information
which must be submitted to complete your application. This list of items must be submitted
directly to the Redevelopment Office. All list items must be submitted simultaneously
and a copy of this list must be included with your submittal. No processing of your
application can occur until the application is determined to be complete. The second list
represents issues of concern to staff. When all required materials are submitted to the
Redevelopment Office, the City has an additional thirty (30) days to make a determination of
completeness. Ifthe application is determined to be complete, processing for a decision on the
application will be initiated. In addition, please note that you have six months from the date the
application was initially filed, September 2, 1999, to either resubmit the application or submit
the required information. Failure to resubmit the application or to submit the materials
necessary to determine your application complete shall be deemed to constitute withdrawal of
the application. If an application is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn, a new application must be
submitted.
Please contact my office at (760) 434-2813, if you have any questions or wish to set up a
meeting to discuss the application.
Sincerely,
LORI H. ROSENSTEIN
Management Analyst
c: David Rick, Engineering Department
Mike Grim, Planning Department
Pat Kelley, Building Department
2965 Roosevelt St., Ste. B • Carlsbad, CA 92008-2389 • (760) 434-2810/2811 • FAX (760) 720-2037 ^
LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED
TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION
No. RP99-13
Engineering:
The Engineering Department has completed its review of the subject project for application
completeness. The following information must be added to the site plan and/or clarified
before the application can be found complete:
1. The plans must be drawn to scale. Provide a scale and consider using a larger scale
to make the plans more readable.
2. Show location, height and materials of all walls and fences.
3. Show existing curb, gutter, driveway approach, and sidewalk. Provide dimensions of
these public facilities, as well as, distance from street centeriine to right-of-way and
face of curb.
4. Show the location of the utility pole at the rear of the lot. Will this pole be removed
due to the proposed parking lot?
5. Show the proposed paved parking at the rear of the lot. Provide dimensions, striping,
curb location, and driveway location. Also, show location of a trash receptacle and
enclosure. If the 11 foot wide driveway will be connected to the rear parking lot,
then show this connection.
6. The parking which fronts on State Street must be removed. Driveways on State
Street cannot be situated such that autos would be required to back into the street.
The driveway approach will need to be shortened to only serve the 11 foot wide
driveway.
7. Depending on the information requested under item No. 2, there may be sight
distance issues for motorists entering the alley from the subject property. Their vision
of approaching vehicles may be impaired by the building located on the property to
the south and/or the fence.
8. Show how the lot will drain by providing spot elevations and indicating with arrows
the direction of drainage flow. Pollutants from surface water runoff must be filtered
before exiting the site in accordance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System Permit held by the City. Based on the site conditions, one feasible approach
would be to direct surface drainage through a grass swale a minimum of 10 feet long.
9. If grading is proposed, then show such grading and provide grading quantities. If no
grading is proposed, then state "no grading proposed."
10. Indicate the project's generated ADT (Average Daily Trips) amounts. Also, indicate
the total area of proposed office and remaining area of residential.
11. A red-lined check print is enclosed for the applicant's use in making the requested
revisions. This check print should be returned with the revised plans to facilitate
continued staff review.
Items Needed to Complete Apjl^ption
RP99-13
Page 2
Housing Si Redevelopment/ Planning:
The Housing and Redevelopment Department, along with the Planning Department, has
completed its review of the subject project for application completeness. The application
and plans submitted for this project are incomplete and unsuitable for further review due to
the following missing or incomplete items:
1. Provide building setbacks (front, rear, and sides) as measured from property lines.
2. Provide a reference to the total number of bedrooms in the upstairs unit for required
parking calculations.
3. In the summary table include the following information: existing land use district (Land
Use District 4); total number of existing parking spaces; and total number of proposed
parking spaces for office use and residential use.
4. On the site plan provide the name of the sewer, water and school districts providing
service to the site.
5. Show existing landscaping and proposed landscaping; please indicate landscaping to
be removed, if any.
6. Provide an open space calculation. Open space may be dedicated to landscaped
planters, open space pockets and/or connections, roof gardens, balconies and patios.
No parking spaces or drive aisles are permitted in the open space calculation.
7. On the site plan, show the location of all proposed signs and provide the distance to
the property line(s) for all proposed freestanding signs.
8. On the elevation for the proposed sign, please include: a) dimensions and sign area for
the proposed sign; b) materials the sign(s) will be constructed of; and c) proposed sign
copy.
9. Provide a summary table which includes: a) total building street frontage; b) total
signage allowance based on Village Master Plan and Design Manual (i.e. one square
foot of signage per linear foot of building frontage); c) the amount of all existing
signage and type; d) the amount of signage to be removed and type; and e) the
amount of new signage proposed and type.
10. The maximum height allowed for a freestanding sign is 60 inches including the sign
base. Please revise proposed sign elevation accordingly.
No. RP99-13
ISSUES OF CONCERN
Planning:
1. The landscaped greenbelt should probably contain some pedestrian amenities, maybe
even a connection to the alley.
Building:
1. The conversion from a dwelling unit to an office occupancy will require a building
permit. The lower occupancy will need to fully comply with all the provisions for a new
office occupancy.
2. There may be access clearance issues inside the new office hallways. The applicant
should pay particular attention to this issue.
3. The plans submitted do not show the large overhang of the upper unit over the
driveway. This overhang will be reviewed for UBC occupancy separation requirements
when it shows up for plan check.
4. No construction is permitted on-site without completion of the building permit process.
Please note, building plans may be submitted at any time for concurrent review with the
land use permit.
Citv of Carlsbad
Housing & Redevelopment Department
September 14, 2000
JERRY & SAUNDRA EDWARDS
EDWARDS FINANCIAL
3980 ADAMS STREET
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
SUBJECT: EDWARDS FINANCIAL BUILDING - 2627 STATE STREET (RP 99-13)
The above referenced application has been on file for over six months (September
2, 1999 to September 14, 2000). Notification was given on January 5, 2000 that
the application was incomplete, along with a list of items/information needed to
complete the application, and a notice that failure to resubmit the application or to
submit the materials necessary to determine your application complete shall be
deemed to constitute withdrawal of the application.
The application is still incomplete. As a result, this letter is notification to you that
RP 99-13 has been withdrawn per Chapter 21.54.010 of the Cartsbad Municipal
Zoning Ordinance:
"When a determination that an initial application is incomplete has
been transmitted to the applicant, the applicant shall have six months
from the date the application was initially filed to either resubmit the
application or submit the information specified in the determination.
Failure of the applicant to resubmit the application or to submit the
material in response to the determination within the six months shall
be deemed to constitute withdrawal of the application. If an
application is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn a new application must
be submitted."
Please contact my office at (760) 434-2813 to apply for a refund of any unused fees.
Sincere!)
LORI H. ROSENSTEIN
Management Analyst
c: David Rick, Engineering Department
Mike Grim, Planning Department
Pat Kelley, Building Department
2965 Roosevelt St., Ste. B • Carlsbad, CA 92008-2389 • (619) 434-2810/2811 • FAX (619) 720-2037 ^