The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP 01-01; Pacifica Palomar Office Building; Site Development Plan (SDP)CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES) • » \ (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) (FOR DEPARTMENT | USE ONLY) ! • Administrative Permit - 2nd Dwelling Unit n Planned Industrial Permit PIP Ol'Oa • Administrative Variance Planning Commission Determination Coastal Development Permit • Precise Development Plan • Conditional Use Permit • Redevelopment Permit • Condominium Permit n Site Development Plan • Environmental Impact Assessment • Special Use Permit Genel-al Plan Amendment • Specific Plan • Hillside Development Permit • Tontotivo Parocl Mop Obtain from Engineering Department • Local Coastal Plan Amendment • Tentative Tract Map • Master Plan Variance \J0\-0 \ • Non-Residential Planned Development • Zone Change • Planned Development Permit • List other applications not specified 2) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S) 3) PROJECT NAME: 4) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: '^-'pifSVtj |^^Wg>f. jpf/I'ln/^'i^ffj 5) OWNER NAME (Print or Type) 6) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type) MAILING ADDRESS ' MAILING ADDRESS CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE CITY AND STATE ZIP /-^mf PHONE 1 CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWi^DGE. / / • 1 CERTIFY THAVI AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. ^- (LUITJ QAIAA^ lipoid SIGNATURE DATE SIGNATURE DATE 7) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION NOTE; A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30 P.M. A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATION BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M. Form 1 6 PAGE 1 OF 2 8) LOCATION OF ON THE BETWEEN PROJECT: ^Imdfr AiVp^-f -Sou^K^/' a/- ^U^H'<3 Fc^hw^ ' STREET ADDRESS I * (NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) SIDE OF If^^gm^ ^tYf^ffrt Ml^ ' (NAME OF STREET) (NAME OF STREET) I AND (NAME OF STREET) 9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 10) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS 7 13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION 16) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE 1 9) GROSS SITE ACREAGE 22) EXISTINQ ZONING 11) NUMBER OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL UNITS 14) PROPOSED IND OFFICE/ SQUARE FOOTAGE 17) PROPOSED INCREASE IN ADT PM 20) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN 23) PROPOSED ZONING 12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS 15) PROPOSED COMM SQUARE FOOTAGE 18) PROPOSED SEWER USAGE IN EDU 21) PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION FM 24) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMEBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. 1/WE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR TH*a PURPOSE FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION APPLICATION TYPE TOTAL FEE REQUIRED FEE REQUIRED RECEIVED BY: DATE FEE PAID RECEIPT NO. Form 16 PAGE 2 OF 2 PROJECT DESCRiPTiQN/EXPLANATIQN PROJECT NAME: Pa^iflCA folow^k AfVpgvf t^Jj, APPLICANT NAME: Please describe fully the proposed project. Include any details necessary to adequately explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include any background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for. or appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary. Description/Explanation. B«v. 4/91 ProjD««c.fnn 9 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 9200S Applicant: SMITH CONSULTING ARCHITECTS Description PRE00077 S" b P 0 I 0 0 { Amount 420.00 Receipt Number: R0016069 Transaction Date: 10/26/2000 Pay Type Method Payment Check Description Amount 37801 420.00 Transaction Amount: 420.00 Jt 4 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 9200! Receipt Applicant: SMITH CONSULTING ARCHITECTS Description Amount SDPOlOOl 1,275.00 Not valid unless validated by Cash Register PLEASE RETAIN RECEIPT FOR REFUNDS OR ADJUSTMENTS Receipt Number: R0020078 Transaction Date: 05/03/2001 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 1026 1,275.00 Transaction Amount: 1,275.00 8402 05/03/Oi 0002 01 02 CGR 1275 ..OO"^ City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 Applicant: SMITH CONSULTING ARCHITECTS Set Id: S000000547 Description CDP01002 PIP01002 SDPOlOOl VOlOOOOl Total: Amount 12,000.00 2,780.00 6,770.00 1,690.00 0472 02/01/01 0002 01 02 23,240.00 CGP 23240-00 Receipt Number: R0018170 Transaction Date: 02/01/2001 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 1000 23,240.00 Transaction Amount: 23,240.00 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 9200S Applicant: SMITH CONSULTING ARCHITECTS Description SDPOlOOl Amount 1, 135.00 G^^J^^ Receipt Number: R0019686 Transaction Date: 04/16/2001 Pay Type Method Description Payment Check 1019 1,135.00 Transaction Amount: 1,135.00 ^^Y^04/16/01 0002 01 02 CGP 1135.00 Jan-.24-01 03:15P P. 02 City of Carlsbad Planning Departnnent DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on ail applications which will require discretionary action on the part ofthe City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, fiirn, co-pannership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county, city municipaliry, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit." Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. 1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COIVIPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON- APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a oubliclv-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) PersonPario DeLuca/Robert Colucci Corp/Part PACIFICA ENTERPRISES LLC Title Manager Address 12780 High Bluff Drive Suite 160 San Diego, CA 92130 OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Title Address Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e, partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% ofthe shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv- owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person Island Realty 1 LP Title Address 12780 High Bluff Drive Suite 160 San Diego, CA 92130 Corp/Part Albert Colucci/Salvatore Colucci Jitle Partner Address Barron Global RE Limited/Universal Highland Assurance Company Albert Colucci owns 100% Barron Global RE/Barron Global own.<5 Island Realty 1 Salvatore Colucci owns 100% Universal Highland/UniversalHighlandQwns 45% Island Realy 1 LP CBC Investments, Inc. General Partner 1% 2075 Las Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (760) 438-1161 - FAX (760) 438-0894 J. Jan-,24-01 03:15P NON-PROFIT OR((JNIZATION OR TRUST ^ If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. Non Profit/Trust P . 03 Non Profit/Trust_ Title Title Address Address 4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of Cit> staff. Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? [ [ Yes j^No If yes, please indicate person(s):_ NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. I certify tj^at af\ftht above information is true and correct to the bes^of nay knowledge. Signature of owner/date Signi^re of applicant/date Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant Signature of owner/applicant's 4gent if applicable/date Prinl or type name of owner/applicant's agent H:ADMIN\COUNTER\0ISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2 ity of Carlsbad Planning Department HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT Consultation Of Lists of Sites Related To Hazardous Wastes (Certification of Compliance with Govemment Code Section 65962.5) Pursuant to State of Califomia Govemment Code Section 65962.5,1 have consulted the Hazardous Wastes and Substances Sites List compiled by the Califomia Environmental Protection Agency and hereby certify that (check one): ^)X]^ The development project and any altematives proposed in this application are not contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the State Govemment Code. I I The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the State Govemment Code. APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER Name: ^C^^O^^^C ^1^: Kull ^^^R Address: f^-Z-^ ^ <^(A^ lE^t.SC^ess: IZ7gD UUTf- PR..^9TglU> Phone Number: Phone Number: Address of Sil^^^^l^ ^F 8Zl Local Agency (City and County):_ Assessor's book, page, and parcel number: ^^.f ^^(^"2'^ -(DO Specify list(s):_ Regulatory Identification Number: Date of List: Applicant Signature/Date ^ R^perty Owne Owner Signature/Date Admin/Counter/HazWaste 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 ^ MAY.10.2001 9:34AM CHICAGO TITLE C/S NO.276 P.1/22 (§) Chicago Title ® ion: M' Attention: Ni^o Company: From: Date: L—_—_ Time: am / pm Total # ofPa^s Including This Sheet: _ Notes: Customer Service If you do not receive all pages indicated, please call back as soon as possible at: (760) 735-3111 316 W. Mission, Suite 120, Escondido, CA 92025 The mfonn^tion contamed herein is provided aa an accommodation oray by Chicago Title. A search of the county lecoxxis is necessiiry to coniplfete the examination of any documentation affectnig said property. No assurances can be given, expressed or implied, that fhe information provided is complete and accurate without the benefit of Title Insurance. MAY.10.2001-• 9:34AM~ •TCHICAGO TITLE C/S, 1 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1S 16 17 IB 19 20 21 22 S3 24 25 26 27 28 7 NO.276 P.2/22 H57 90 ao'isei VtNCGNT F. BIONDO, JR, CityAttemMy 1200 Bm Avwiua CadlbMt, CA 92008 (B1>) 486^1 ASARO « KEAQY, Sptdal Couo».r By: ROSCOE D. KEAQV By: RICHARD fl. FRiSLAND Founh Floor. 3170 Fourth Avontw SMI\ DItob, CA «ei03 (Mft) 2B7-ai70 Attemay* (pr Plalntfir CfTY OF CARLSBAD ' • f.I-'"i '•••3 ?:? 14 "!! 2 2( AJG 30 1990 NO FEE CnV OF CARI^BMD, a Municipal Corporation, fwim. V. MORQAN/PALOMAR INDUSTRIAI • Ctlltonil* llmltod paiKlonhIp; FIRST NATIONAL BANK, a naUoriQl bank awodailon; TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY; TfllCAL, INQORPORATBD; RAIN FOR RiNT, INC.; RIO VISTA, Umttfld B caillornifi llniitacl partnership dDi QIUMARRA OF CARLSBAD: DOiS 1 throug|> 60. Inclusive, and All Pariwna Unknown CMmlns an Inleresi in lh« ProfMity D«icrlt>«d In ma Complaint SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CAUFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEQO NO. N 41292 FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION ENT?:REp Judgmefit Book!\JPg— Ir App«ar:ing to tjte Court that judgment In condonvn^tion has b«en entered in the above-ent it led aotion on h^^«:* i7 , -SD:1990 00504662 5/10/01 09:26 AM 1 of21 MAY.10.2001 9:34AM CHICAGO TITLE C/S-N0.276 P.3/22 1 S a 4 B a 7 0 g 10 11 ia 13 14 15 ie 17 IB 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 26 , 1458 ( 1990, adjudging th«t Plaintiff LB .ntitled to cU« by oondennation the proparty deacribad m Pl«tiiti<f'a CeapUlnt: on file haraln and Mora <ully d*iaribad l»«r««ftar and in aeeo^danea ath thia judgmant, D«eandBnt haa raoaivad tha lum of manay due; MOW THBUrORB, IT IB HBUBT OIWBMD, ADJTOOaD. AND DBCJtKID that tha raal property and real ptoparty int«r«JEa aituatad in thi County of B»n Diego, scats of California, end nOr« particularly daaeribed in Buhtbit sttacharl haraco and nae* » pert heifaef < ba condamnad to PUintlff for tha pu^poaa of the lusrovamant of Pelonar Airport noad in tha nannar ptopoaad by Slaintif; in furtherance of puhlto and ganeral welfare. IT Ifi FUXTHU ORbEKBD, ADJODGRP, AND DEC]UE:» that a cartlf lad copy of thii Order ba recorded in tho o.'fica of --JB County Jledordar of the county of San Diago, State of Californa, and tharavpon, title to Boid property described hereir. shaiirr?^*^ Plaintiff. APPROVED AS TO FORM: Judere oi tbo Su^^riox Court VIl>CFNT F, BIONDO, JR, , City Attorney ASARO & KBAsr, spepiel counsel Attornoye fer Flaintirf MU5ICK. PEEtER t OARRETT David a. Clark ~ ACtorneya foe Defendant MORGAN/ PAtOKAR INDUSTRIAL I 'TO CfW:<IUQOE! MoaOAKFO SD: 1990 00504662 5/10/01 09:26 AM 2 of 21 MAY.10.2001' 9:34AM CHICAGO TITLE C/S, NO.276 P.4/22 Y ^459 WIS 96IRX1SIT lOi OR oaac - CEZY op OmStKb 1200 OH AVQUE <anSBM)« cx 92008 • —SPACE MPTO TCB BmnFB"! BSIi OffY... ><o. ZU'oao-ss W.O. Ho. !?!!?ill?£'^-.^**^*'-dp(«f) hasity grot, OTv«y anl d«|je«t« ta the OTY ?^^'.T^'^.f^ California, hasmi«icet e»U«d wras, aTS**^ fer^b* hl^y and pibLic utUity ptSfomm ard iMidanta tharrto, i^, ai*S fi«tttjj> roftl prupetty within tha OTY OP caRtSWD, State of c^llromia. s«B tha attached Legal deseriptioi desi^natad |S*ibit "As, cQwlstlm of 3 Ejects, i ttia atcaefMd teaoi-ition Pl«,t daci^natvl Bdiibie aatt SdaTi pm hlS^f^ raraxenoe> BMWr, 1 I -SD: 1990 00504662 5/10/01 09:26 AM 3 of 21 p MAY.10.2001 9:34AM CHICAGO TITLE C/S^ N0.27S P.5/22 TJia Grantor ltertb>' fuitrer granti te the Citv at Carichkx _ . <> there h,rtff| tfcierlbes Mont-flf-wiy ^trt Visui^ tlr^L!^^ P.rt.l of land. hV^S«'.„';V\^'?^«f9S 'IS ? 9" V/^eYfa^nK.'Vh^'V """-^^ f"te?t1on. lupport anfar drafaaje facility, PfoVlSarSJch aiitai.tuMiS^ ."5? ^TO,;r;:tr:;;:r^^•ri;^^'^j!^;ro^ r r Oatad this Oi; of STATE OF County of On .)«*• _) 5"r-j- . i9__, Mtare ne, tha undersl^neif. a Ifatipy Public 1n md for saifl County int Sii-.«, personally appaarad perisnany itnowr. to tqe zr proyeo to n on tha basis of s.t^Jf*ctery evidence} to b« «Inoil.l225 ti :i?'i*L^*^*'* siibicclbed to the within Instrument and acKnoMifogad to ae that re/she/they executed the »aM. WUnesi :*iy hand ind off:!*! seal. Notary fueiic in .nd fer ma iounty and Stata y ^•'••ir-'' ^T', "I* 'ntarest <n real property eonveyetf !>j the foreoofng ent .0 me i.1ty t' cariibad, a raunlelpal corporation lj haraiv icceoted b» tne ThfJ ciiy Council of $4id Cf:.- ef CirUbad, California pursuant to Resolution 5—?— 'dooted 3- _ and the Srifttit contents raEordadon tfieftaf ay "s oufT authorized officer. to Dated By AiklHA L. Hi\irtHimi. tkj cier'k 'SD:]990 00504662 5/10/01 09:26 AM 4 of 21 MAY.10.2001 9:35AM- CHICAGO TITLE C/S_ NO.276 P.6/22 U6i eWIBIT V LESAL OCJMIPTIOH Atiessors Parcil Jia-ow-zs That portion of that cartifn parcel of Und ,nc*n and designated at 'Oaaerlptlo, No. J, 7«.07 acres' on »,eortf of Surrey Hap Dec, er 19. I960, beina a portion of Lot -6' of the Rancho A,u. »»ed1oaJ n ''•"^'^ City .f Carlahad.^untyT' rport Head „ sho.n on Count, of San 01,50 Read Sor„y H., IS34. on file 1, e cr ' : P.rt4larly da scribed as fol low: thereon 110,?4 feet from iM beginning of a tangent curve concave southwasterl, apd having . r«slus of J.200.00 feet. ,a1d beginninj of eor„ helnj deslgnited Engineers' it»;lon 99-10,74 on said Road Survey Ho X534- thenee fron .aid centarim. point, m . „r,S,^^ „ "^^^ ^^^'^^^^ comer of that certain parcal of T.nd sho*-, and dastgnaied as •Oeicriptloa Ho. 5, 103.54 eeres' on said record of Sur^'ey Map No. 5715, 5 7*S4'S7' u 50.11 feet to tha soueh^«ttrly right-of ^*»y tm* of Palo^r Airport Road as sjowi en laid Road Survey No. 1534. »id point being tha IHUE POIKT OF teClNNING: thence along s«H southwesterly rljht-of^ay Une N 7Vl9'Sy w M 7fl'20'53' \l per Road S«ry»y Ho. isia), 1,',M4.64 feet te the inost northeaaiarly corner ef Parcl -O' of Partal Map No. 2993. filed tn tn« office •f the Count, Recorder of tald County, August 23, 197*; thence along the southeasterl, line of said Pircal "D'. S 14»10'S9' M (S l.^'36'43- v par P»rs,i Hip No. 2993) 11.01 feet; tr^cnct leavln? sild southeasterly line parallel -i\h ifta southwesKrly line of said Road Surve, No. 1534, $ 7a»i9'S3- E •SD. 1990 00504662 5/10/01 09-26 AM 5 of 21 MAY.10.2001 9:35AM CHICAGO TITLE C/S.,. NO.276 P.7/22 $ fB'ZrSV I per «o.d iorvey Np. U34) 1.26.0$ t»t tangent curve ceneay. southwesterly and h.vfn, . maci easterly .long uu curve through a eantr.i langth Of iao.«3 feet to th. Intorsactlan .l! a , ' WINT Of mmnm to th. northerly corner of , i N 7 S4 !7 E 21.4a feet to the TRUE Mlffr OF REfilNaiNG M52 ta the boflnnlng of a of 1,9 3 7,00 feet; of S»20 «- „ Irawn from the T»UE 'Description Na, S" 4n9 said Una DLV'tto SO: 1990 00504662 5/10/01 09:26 AM 6 of 21 MAY.10.2001 9:35AM CHICAGO TITLE C/S, NO.276 P.S/22 *w*«ijw*rc4*ntt<ao«fiiun3oo Job No.i^ Sfi'l? It! O thaat f Of / SD:1990 00504662 5/10/01 09-26 AM 7 of21 r' MAY.10.2001 9:35AM CHICAGO TITLE C/S„ ^ CXTY CUQUC CITY OT CXJII4BAD 1900 lUt AVDfltt CARLSBAD, CA t200B NO.276 P.9/22 MO TftAM.SrffH T^y ntm r'e Paroal 110. 2a-<M0-a •tew^cwat- iMutrial 1, a CalLfcwnii TA-1TW1 da.i9,S SaSSfS ^J*22£fLi^SSSi"aS^ upon. «hKDiagh, inter, eu«r iitl aecw thr?SrIiii--^^^^*--=-^^^^ rl^jfe^-w ytaUatlcft, cxnetxw±tai, a^intenanoo, zni irmpi^im at an tndcMd or unaneloMi fiS^ ireidantal th«E««o, and fiat; tha OcMao pf uv aM«ent and rl^-of^ by th* Ocantaa, its auixiiaaaci tf-V-'— ^--'rf. ™ £ttwver vith the right to esarmay said aasasant, or aitme public a^^ea. ^ 9M real w,v4*iLy twfecred to harainabov* aid BK of-«ay ^ tw* 9tint iM aituatsl in ta* city of ^Ufacni4, and la pctleulairly dMerit«d a* Sm xim etta^ legal daoeri^m deaiffiatad >'^<>' the attacli^ >cqili<tti<B Plat daslMtel Cdilbit "tt a part haraaf fay i«£i SD:1990 00504662 5/10/01 09:26 AM 8 of 21 MAY.10.2001 9:35AM--CHICAGO TITLE C/S^ NO.276 10/22 talnieg, md tMpIng in good rtpair ih,\K^JJ.v.l!.rf!''?''»^^'« fJf aDeratlM MinrJ^i * 't *«ecessori and at* rood driinafl. priVldrt^^^^^^^^ -;M";Vt'isr.Vt?e!^%%^;hi%X' 'isF-"'- "4*' «ndlilons/l«lydfnV."gt'nVt HrtVeV't? /K1S.?V^'T * •^-•^ P-foria!c5 b"d tr;:Jri;i,?«oJ!l«?o'' • •ra TI reaaryad to th. Grantor, hti sueeaMon . £jKutid this *" ""••wlosad cortitructad or Inttatleil by * •P?''"'** ifld to asiigni. In granting in tna contractor or Crantor of the t^ert. , day ef Jst. J S-ATE OF Ct,.niy of' Cr* 1 a • '•'^ >aio County ano State, personally appeared »LiilllT-^il ."^'f' subscribed to tw «DO»t dtterlbed Morfci ,^ aiilgns, tha Hght and ntor at any tlaa. in any 1 oia and eniejfuitnt by thi trlvnegai herein granted. .9 . under iignoj, t Hotar, Public In 11 .J • nw,jv ii^ir. SHPScrioed te a-/;nowledged to m that Ae/tha/thty eaecuted tn. saaia. l''-..iess ^ hand and official seal. ^•try puanc in and for said County an<i Uate ' ll m^Ht W ^^P^tl !"« <"t«f««t 1(1 real property t •'I^??* lL}r<\ H'' Carlsbad. » munlelpal eon.or«i • « Cny Council of said city of Carlsbad. California p • . adopted on ,„2 rsrsrainan thereof by urTuly awtnorwao officer. sailsfaczolry avioaneej to the within Instrument and conveyed by thi foregoing l^in IS hereby lecapted by purjuant to Resolution flhe Orantae ^:4d By SD; 1990 00504662 conaenti to 5/10/01 09:26 AM 9 of21 'V MAY.10.2001 9:35AM CHICAGO TITLE C/Sp, NO.276 P.11/22 1466 ItGAL DEJCRlNlSN Asit,«ters Parcel No. 5- state 0 California, baing mora pirtleolarly meribad « follow: 2:2-040-2S SI >»9lf»nlft} tt a aeint on ihi sovthtrl, right '11a Irt tha office of thi Ctiinty Surveyor of Airport Road. U Engintsr't Station 78*25.34 E rljht-cf-wy S 78'19'S3- t (M 7««20'$3' U per the TRUE POINT OP BEGIRNlNC 'A': thence leavin S U»*fl'6r- w (0.00 fttt; thence 5 JVirSi' £ M.OO feat to said southerly rlsht-of^ay; the right-of-way, « 78*19i53' W 20.00 feet to tht o1|.«a/ Tojethar Kith the following aeserlbed portion lasinnlfig it a point on the southerly rljht-of- fiU U the offlca pf the County Surveyor of si Airport Road, at Engineer'j Jt.tlon 78t25.J4 E fijht-flf-way S 78*19'53* E {n 79*ZO'S3' V per tha TRUE pomr Of REeimiNG -S'; thence )eav1n: rn'40'O7" w Sa.OO feet; thence S 78n9'53' * n U'40'O7- E 53.00 feet toiild southerly rigr southerly rightH»f.ii*ay, N 78*19'53" H 20.00 fae of Read Survey No. 1534 en I'd County, know ai Palonar thenet along tald southerly lid R.S, :S34} 70Z..77 fttt Co said soicierly right-of^y, 23.00 fee:, thence M 11«40'07' E a a1on9 sxld southerly VJ£ POINT 3F BEGINNING *A*. said Lc; "G": 'ly of Ren Sorvey No. 1534 on i County. knoM tt Patentr ; Ihenei elong safd leuthtrly d R.S. 1534J l,25S.77 fett to laid aeu*-ierly right-of-wey^ .00 far.; thence •of«way; :,ienca along said . to ci»a ~'Jl POINT OF s 1 DLW/se SD:1990 00504662 5/10/01 09:26 AM 10 of 21 '>• MAY. le. 2001 9:35AMr--CHICAGO TITLE C/S^ NO.276 P.12/22 U07 Tojetherwith the follo^ins described portion of t.ld A1» thtt pertlon of that c.rtain parcel of land ,ho.,n fas cri pti on No. 3, 7|.07 leres' on record of Survey H th. Office Of the County RKordtr af S.n oiago County, lylnfl touthorly of the cantarllne of Paloeur Airport R^ Survay No. 1534, on fll, ia tha off let of tha County Si fittnfl nore Partleulirly deieribed it foltoi**: r Lot "CJ ^hd designated is P No. S7tS, filed In Decaabcr 19, 1960, 4d, as sham on Road rvayor of si id County. end •aglnnlnj at a point on tht eenterllo. of tald Road Su theraofl 110,74 f,et fren tha beginning of a tangent cu touthweatirljr and Having i radius of J.ZOO.OO faet, u balng deslfaatad rnglnoar's Station 99»10.74 on said R thence froa said centerline point, In i itnfght Una northerly eorirer of that certain piretl of Und shown 'Bascriptfon No. 5, 103.S4 acres", on said Reeoro or S 7*54'57' V 71.S9 feat Co the TRUE POINT OP BEGINNING *l»ng tald Hn., 5 7'54'S7-W 47.8? feet; thence leavlni S Bfl-OO'OB- W 27.70 feet ta th. beplnning of a urgent southotjtarly and having i ridius of 40.00 feet; thence Slid eurva through a central angli of 40*00'00" an arc I thine, tangant to tald cur»a S 40»00'OO' w loo.00 ftet; 147.10 flit; thenee H 72*0fl'OO' E izo.Oo feet; thence N ^- to th« begfmlns of a tanjant curve, concave southeasterjly of 100,00 feat; thenee northtastorly along said curve .. of 49-Id "37' an are length of a5.95 fe.c to an intertecj cwrva eencive southerly lad hiring « radius of 1,937.00 said 1,937.00 foot eurv. beirs N 16*09'12' E, and a line foot radius cvrYi bean N 00M5'23''W( thence eaaterly'a foot curve through a central angle of 0*52'IS" m arc i the muE POINT OF BE6INN1NS *CV til W/«. SD:1990 00504662 •vay Mo. 1534. distance ve eoneav. d beginning of eurv. • Id Survey No. 1S34; |p«ard the ae$t designated at 'Upray Htp 5715. C': thence continuing said Hut <urva concave southwesterly along •ngth of 27.93 feet; thenee H Si'sClB" u 4O*00'OO- E 7a.0D feet and having a radius thl^ugh a oentral angle On with a non^tangent ^eit, I Una radial te ridlsl te said lOO.OO ons satfl 1,937.00 ehgih of 29.47 feat to 5/10/01 09:26 AM 11 of 21 rr' MAY. 10.2001- 9:35AM <:HICAG0 TITLE C/S^ ^ NO.276 P.13/22 -SD:1990 00504662 • 4 I a c 1 * r FOR Lcrr G RHDAajA HEDJC e>cuwr'»' Jab Wa.yiiO 4My7 wnP.UauL. »^tiof^ 5/10/01 09;26 AM 12 of 21 MAY. 10. 2001 9:35AM CHICAGO TITLE C/S, NO.276 P.14/22 tmiwaNffBtfrtONTOasiffnoo AuvacaacAfam mJ^^m LOT G PQR MAP ACQuisrrioN PLAT Oalas^/i>^^^ ir: 0(.|pJJU l^t^ Of ^»w««a SD:1990 00504662 5/10/01 09:26 AM 13 of 21 !• MAY.10.2001 9:36AM CHICAGO TITLE C/S, iS0;276 ^P. 15/22 HHOAGUA MAP NaS23 'till CDNWoiNefMiMnB ""oaoocAfJOS |in)«tMd«o. ciy^ewrwfya^tsocufaac AcSJiStfi^L, ^ . -JA' i &<uierri»i STORM ORA/AJ EA^MMB^' eata; 4/<b|»T OTPUIAMU •»*ot^/ SD;1990 00504662 5/10/01 09:26 AM 14 of 21 f7 MAY. 10.2001 9:36AM CHICAGO TITLE C/S,.. NO.276 P.16/22 WHEN RECOADCD, tVOSt MLTL WIS IHSTROKENT TO: «TV CLEM ciTi OT cfoistia 1200 TXJI AVCKOz CXULSSAO, CA |:aOB 1471 if r'a-f^roal No. 2U-^0-3S ZAstomiT FOR e»£N SPACE Pn4«ct HeiqarvMlc daaignacad Qrantaa, lt» > -^riT^j^^ji^. iLSf,..?^--^ QiUffBrda, hn. to the follpwl;^ to wit: i«wanw {yk >iraB r«ai' jvqparty tobj* I) 2> Tha paxpatanl riflht, but r«Bou« any hoildlj-^, str plaaad or vijjieali^ en "TTllTlm of thia aai am assi9« «±jaeE l«nt eoitxary to any taxB. eevcrwK - ficentor eervents ana ^gsmm for itaaU ar^ 1< (ft) That it Blttll eoiaeftisi. •t4.fact3ira tha t&witaa. noc ^ arattowt. plaoa «w MdneaiA ar F«ttit t. * sain»*niBiaB ag any feuildlig ' ocbar thli^ oa pttaitbaS toy toltcan pcezosSen - SD:1990 00504662 5/10/01 09:26 AM 15 of 21 r- MAY. 10.2001 9:35ftM CHICAGO TITLE C/S,. ^i.i P.17/22 1472 (b) That within tiid open spaca easement, thc subject area vill ae left in natural state far the protection of endaalc biological resources^ and na el.iHng or raaoyil of any vagetatlon ahall be peraltted except hand aruth clearing .for firt protection purpottt by written ordir of th. offlei of fira sarvictt (oordlniter within nid op.it space eataaant, and axcipt 41 for landieaplng and th. placaaant of dralnagi ttructurcs and attoclattd rip>rap within tald open spae. casefhint. without th. written authorttatlen of the City of Carltbad or Its tuocissors or assigns. (e) That it than not aicavtta or grade or pennit any excavating or grading to be done or plaet or allow to be plictd any sand« toll rock, gravel or other aeterlil whatsocv.r en the subject land Mithout th. written peratsjion of thi City of Carltbad or lis successors er ist1gn&, provldtd, howevtr, that the Grantor My excivate, grioa or place sand, soil, roek or givcl or ether aatarlal on tha subject land as It penilttcd by wrliien pernlstlon ef the City of Carlsbad. (d) That the terfs. covenants and conditions s.t forth htrein may be specifically anferead or tnjolned by proetedings In the Superior Court of tn. Stita of California. The grant of this casefnint and Us acceptance by Srintec shall net authorlza the public or any aeahers thereof to ust or enter upon any or any portion of the subject land, it befng underrteed that tha purpose of this .asimtii is solaly te rtttrlei the uses to whfcn th« tuojcct land nay be pvt. This easHntnt thUi bind th. Grantor and Its successors and assigns. To hive and te hold stid eiseinant and r1ght-of-wajr unto itself and unto its svtcessors and assigns forevar with the right -te convey salo atse«.nti or any portlan of said aasenent, to other public igeneles. The rial property referred te haretnabov. and nade subject to slid eassoent and rl9ht-<ef-wiy by this grint is situated In the Cjty of Carlsbad, County of San Oi.go, State of CalifOmli, and It particularly described as fpHwds.^ See the actachea leyal deterlptlon dcsfgnated Exhibit 'A', consisting of Z sheets, and the attached Acdulsit'en Plats, designated Exhibit "B*. consisting of 1 iheet, each nadt a part hereof by reference. .SD:1990 00504662 5/10/01 09:26 AM 16 of 21 MAY.10.2001 9:36AM CHICAGO TITLE C/S^ NO.276 P.19/22 r 1473 There Is reserved to tht &nntnr- ^ day of STATE OF County of*" ?nd lipr taid County and itit;. "^^;on%7^g;,;i; « Ngta^PuPH. l "'"""'"r Tfl riT'|i>i Dimmi Lj ii J.. U..'ir"- n ' be th, persons(t) whos. nam,(, is/i^e i«b,tit« *v«^i"'VV/»''> ^i^tncej-ackno»fledg,o to m, that he/,h./they .{^irt,?t^. mstrwient ir Withest my hand and offfclil IFII. ''otary Public in ano for me Uunty and Stic. ' - ?orUlltU. rr?nd''del!"o\'S. S'of Jr.f/hV/™""? -"r^^ ^he foresoln byNn, City Colncll ^.^VcVt,'Vf CHsba'd** CaTl^S?:?**'" •'•'"•b Resolution No. adept'ed on wnsoad, California pursuant t consents to recorTitTSn thereof i^ Its duly mtnornej officer' Pated AUMA L. RAUrSNXRANZ, City Clerk' 365.2^ SD:1990 00504662 5/10/01 09:26 AM 17 of 21 MAY. 10.2001 9:36AM—-CHICAGO TITLE C/S-NO.276 P.19/22 li7i fXMiiir "A' Assessors Parcel 212-04O-2S That portion of that cirtitn parcel of land shoMi and designate: as ''Description No. 3, 71.07 acres* oi) Record of Survey Map No. 571$, fil.d In the office of the County RecorOer of San 01 County. Oecemoer 19, 1960, being a portion of Lot '6* of the Rancho Agui .^Mfonda, according to map tharief Ne. 623, filed In the office of the Cawrty Racorder of San Oiego County, Novaaiber Id, ip^t, in tha City of Carltbad, County of San Oiago, State of California, lying southerly of tha canterlln of hloawr Airport Road, aa shoMA on County of San Oiego Read Survey No, IS*, on file la the office of the County Surveyor of sale County, bein; nore particularly dt^crlbel as foDows! Beginning at a point on the centerline of said Road Survey No. distance thereon no.74 feet from the beginning of a tangenc curve concave southwesterly and having 1 radius ef 1,200.00 feet, sate bcglnn-.i; ef curve being designated Engineers' Station 99*10.7< en s'aid Read Sorve^ io. 1S34; thence from said centerline point, 1n i straight line to the nor: northerly corner of that certain parcel of land shown and deslgnred as "ascription No. S, 103,54 acres" on iild record of Survey hap Ho. 5715, S 7*5i'S7"-V 71.S9 Teat to the TOU£ POINT OF BESlHNlNfi. said point b.ing on t :-jr>e concave southerly and having i radius of 1.917.00 feet, a radial line t: said point bears N 17'0l'O3".£: thenee westerly along said curve t.'trough a :2.itral angle ef OS'ZO'Sfi* an are length of 180.B3 feet; thence tangent te aa'^c »rve » 78*19'S3!.-V 1,22«,0S feat to the easterly line of Parte! Map fc. !J93 filed In tne office of the County Recorder of sale County, k)^vtx 25, 15^; thenee along tald easterly Une, S 14*1Q'S9' « (S L3'3«'43* V jar said :i*eel Map No. 2993] 47.SS feet; th.nec H 84*OO'O0' E 19.09 feet: thence It 23-0O'00" E 30,00 feet; thencB S 7gf00'00" E 243.00 feet; tnen:a S 77'30'00" E S«$.0O feet; thence S BO'OO'OC £ 198.00 f«t; therca S 79'00'00' E 196.00 feet; thenee $ arOCOO' E S4.87 feet; thonss S 3i-30'00' E 35.S4 feet; ihene. S 4i''00'00" W 14.03 fee;; thence South 20.00 feet; thanee S 48'DO'OO" V 60.00 feet; thenee S SB'OO'OC* '.I SO.M *«et; Oiwc. OLW/te 2SS.01>4(i(Uft5.27 Mg. 1 of 2 SD:1990 00504662 5/10/01 09:26 AM 18 of 21 MAY.10.2001 9:36AM CHICAGO TITLE C/S? _N0.276 P.20/22 S IS'OO'OO- E jo.oo fe,t, 5 Bj.oo.og. • S <O*00'DO" r ia AM - «* ww ug t izz.oo feet; thence : eg DO E 78.00 feet! thente s 74-oo'oo* £ 3139 1„ ,.r * Hn, drawn fro. the TRUE ^OINT Of BEGINN NG t^ t ^^-^Wrtlon with »a1d "Discrlption «„. 5- ,,oJ L" f; , "•"^"••"'X comar of r wn na. 9 spOWn Oh S.ld ROCOrd Of Survrv HiB kit CTtt «»cng Slid line N 7*$«'S7- f igj 7, ' E 197.72 feet to th. TRU? MINT Of BEGIKNING. OLk/se >^n-m.arunj(^,?? PaoB 2 of 2 SD:1990 00504662 5/10/01 09:26 AM 19 of 21 MAY.10.2001 9:36AM--CHICAGO TITLE C/S. NO.276 P.21/22 r • 1476 ENOIN^EtS STATION R • rtSToe I- - l»O.M' 1 » <W.4»' l?Zfr09 N7»'W'S3"U \^Q•7£ •TRue P«NT ep BECMih ht fl7-a4'aTg •WT4*dNl'<WW »1,^' N iO'OP'flOVl M1<.'AO'Ar>i.f 30490' Md0' MatfOD'M'C MOO' NOexH 20Otf . M.PS' •N 77-50'dtf'w 548L«'' 7—— N Wf IO'6q"E ( 47.W,' ^EA5TER.Y UHE PASCEU HAP 3(^03 i.Ci IB IE Acaumo 9H0HUZ0 P^^JJ^^ corpuat^IHGiNtm ACQUISITION PLATj OPEN SPACE l;AW(-.EMT Job Uo.Zifl f SD;1990 00504662 5/10/01 09:26 AM 20 of21 i rr MAY. 10. 2001 9:36AM-'• CHICAGO TITLE C/S_>,^ -- - ' "-I • NO.276 P.22/22 1477 ««P» ol lhe flnj(r»| Of hii 1.1 tM „(/,.-, an«r SEPlg |Dfln KfiNNETH E. MARTONh •a aiM ler iho ttvm 'CeiiiH|r«ISmOiip -Oejufir -SD; 1990 00504662 5/10/01 09:26 AM 21 of21 jul-12-OO 10:20A AKF&M 1 2 1 J 4 5 6 7 S 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 2J 24 25 26 27 28 613 ZS9 4268 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORiNU FOR THE COUNTY OF S.\iN DIEGO CITY OF CARLSBAD, A Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff, V. RICHARD C.K£LLY and ROBERT PATRICK KELLY Trustees under Declaration of Trust dated November 25,1985; ^ SAN DIEGO GAS&ELECTRIC COMPANY; and, DOES 1 Through 100, Inclusive, Defendants. NO. N 73929-1 STIPULATED JUT>GMENT Dept: ^25/ Teny B. O'Rourke It appearing to the Court that Plaintiff CITY OF CARLSBAD, through its attomeys of record, RONALD R. BALL. City Attomey, and ASARO, KEAGY. FREELAND & MCKINLEY, Special Counsel, by RICH-^RD R. FREELAND, and Defendants RICHARD C. KELLY and ROBERT PATRICK KELLY, Trustees under Declaration of Trust dated November 25, 1985, through their attomeys, DETISCH & CHRISTENSEN, by DONALD W. DETISCH, have stipulated that Judgment as hereinafter set forth may be entered; and it further appearing to be a proper case therefor; cu<;s .«wu.M K.Jani 9 Jul-12-OO 10:20A AKF&M 619 299 4268 P . 03 1 2 5 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 U 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED .AND DECREED: 1. That Plaintiff seeks to take, acquire and condemn the rights, tide and interest in real property as described and depicted in Exhibit "1" to Plaintiffs Complaint and Exhibit" 1" to Plaintiffs Supplemental Complaint, to which reference is hereby made and by this reference, said descriptions are made a part hereof as if fully set forth; 2. That the condenmation and taking thereof is for the public purposes set forth in The Complaint and Supplemental Complaint and is necessary for such public use; 3. That the paymeni to defendants RICHARD C. KELLY and ROBERT PATRICK KELLY Trustees under Declaration of Trust dated November 25,1985, of the sum of S410,000.00 and other considerations set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, for the laking of the real property and interests in real property, shall constitute full and final paymeni for the condemnation and taking of said real property and interests in real property, and extinguishes all defendants' claims which could have been made in this action, including, but not limited to compensation for improvements, severance damages, interest, fees, costs, litigation expenses, precondemnation damages, other damages, and all defendants' claims relating solely to this action; Defendants reserve any rights and claims they may have relating to the Palomar Airport Road Assessment District. 4. That said payment as hereinabove specified shall terminate, cancel, and extinguish all liens, leaseholds, and encumbrances of whatsoever nature on said real property; 5. That defendant SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY filed a disclaimer and having filed a disclaimer, said defendant is not entitled to any compensation herein; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 6. That said total sum of S410,000.00 be distributed to Defendants RICHARD C. KELLY and ROBERT PATRICK KELLY, Trustees under Declaration of Trust dated November 25, 1985, and their attomeys, DETISCH CHRISTENSEN & WOOD, and mailed to 444 West C Street ^^200, San Diego, CA 92101; and That the County Treasurer is herein authorized to issue a warrant to Plaintiff for the balance of tho principal sum previously deposited with the Court, if any, plus all accrued interest to thc dale of the withdrawals; 0u1-12-00 10:21A AKF&M 619 299 4268 P - 04 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 7. That the rights, benefits and obligations inuring to the parties pursuant to this stipulation for judgment and stipulated judgment including Exhibit "A" thereto shall be binding upon the parties heirs, assigns and successors in interest; 8. That Plaintiff take, acquire, condemn and own the interests in said real property referred to and described herein; 9. That Possession having been taken by Plaintiff on February 22,1997, as to the property described in Exhibit "i" attached to the complaint in eminent domain filed herein, and on November 29, 1997, as to thc property described in Exhibit "1" attached to the supplemental complaint in eminent domain filed herein, all taxes, penalties, costs, liens, leaseholds, and encumbrances of whatsoever nature which are a lien on said parcel and which are apportioned to that portion of the fiscal year after said date are hereby canceled pursuant to section 5081 ct seq. of the Revenue and Taxation Code; 10. That trial, the right to trial, hearing on the issues, the making and filing of a Statement of Decision, the right to move for a new trial or appeal. Notice of Entry of Judgment and Notice of Recording Final Order of Condemnation are waived, and that upon payment to defendants as herein specified. Plaintiff shall be entitled to a Final Order of Condemnation^ TERRY B. O'ROURKE Dated: S^P Z g ^g^^ Judge ofthe Superior Court Ju1-12-00 10:21A AKF&M 619 299 4268 P.OS * EXHIBIT "A" Rnh^rr P P^^'^"' of S410,000.00 tom the City of Carisoad to Richard C Kelly and W^^^^^^^ of Tr^t dated November 25, 1985. (^'^ i^iiys ) as set forth herem. the following items are part of the agreemem between the pames: 1 • At such time as die Kellys or their successors or assigns seek to construct an extension of "A" Street as delineated on the Laurel Tree Apartments Project anproval and as shown on the attached Exhibit "1" made a pan hereof to provide access to the southeast comer of the subject property, (APN #212-040-49), the City of Carlsbad shaU assist and support the Kellys/in obtaining the necessary permits from all regulatory agencies (including but not limited to the United States Corps of Engineers, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, and the State of Califomia Department offish and Game) for ihe construction of said "A" Street extension to a point approximately 50 feet nordi of the nonh bank of Encinas Creek at the soudieast comer of the Kellys' property With respect to the above referenced "A" Street extension only, the City shall be a co- applicant for said permits. All costs associated widi the application and the permitrine process, e,xcept for City Staff lime, shall be home by the Kellys or their successors or assigns. 2. Until such time as "A" Street extension is constructed so as to provide access to defendants' easterly remainder, access to defendants' easterly remainder shall remain as It presently exists i.e., from Palomar Airport Road at Laurel Tree Road at the northeast comer of the property. At such time as the said "A" Street extension is constmcted to provide access to defendants' easteriy remainder, defendants wiJl relinquish their access rights to Palomar Airport Road at Laurel Tree Road. 3 - Although the parties contemplate that die constmction of die "A" Street extension will not constimte conversion of agriculmral lands to urban use sc as to require payment ofthe City's LCP agricultural mitigation fee, if such extension does require such fees as to the improvement of the road, the City shall pay those fees as pan of diis setdement 4. At such time as die City of Carlsbad accepts the Aviaia Parkway roadway miprovements through the Kellys' propeny, die City of Carlsbad shaU quitclaim to die Kellys, at no cost to die KeUys, die slope easements, the temporary construction easements, and die drainage easements being taken pursuant to diis condemnation action except for drainage easements between die banks of Encinas Creek and die drainage easement designated as Parcel "1" herein. The Cily shall prepare die necessary deeds for diese conveyances and will record die same with die County Recorder. The City will not unreasonably withhold acceptance of die Aviara Parkway roadway improvements 5. ^ The Kellys and their successors and assigns will not be required to reimburse die City of Carlsbad or die developer of the Laurel Tree Apartments project or any odier party for any ofthe construction costs or right of way costs for "A" Sueei from Aviara Parkway to a point approximately 70 feet soudi of die Kellys' southeriy property line or for any right of way costs for "A" Street dirough die Ukegawa propeny to die soudi property line of die Kellys' propeny. Notwidistanding die foregoinz, die Kellys will contnbute a sum not to exceed S 10,000.00 for signaiization of die "A" Stree'7Aviara Parkway intersection. * or tJieir successors or assigns r >«.rc«»ar4.'«*viviw\»ianY cx» 'VJ^I./*. I CAW.) PLEASE NOTE: Time limits on the processing of discretionary projects established by state law do not start until a project application is deemed complete by the City. The City has 30 calendar days from the date of application submittal to determine whether an application is complete or incomplete. Within 30 days of submittal of this application you will receive a letter stating whether this application is complete or incomplete. If it is incomplete, the letter will state what is needed to make this application complete. When the application is complete, the processing period will start upjwTyllie d3.t& of/the completion letter. Applicant Signature t]^/£^^6p^ opAhe compl( staff Signature: Date: To be stapled with receipt to application Copy for file Site Photos - Existing Conditions Pacifica Multi-Tenant Office Building #1: View from Laurel Tree Lane looking east showing termination of the street. #2: View from Laurel Tree Road looking north toward Palomar Airport Road. Page 1of1 03/23/01 Site Photos - Existing Conditions Pacifica Multi-Tenant Office Building #3: View of creek and vegetation at south west corner of the site. #4: View from Palomar Airport Rd. looking east across the site. Page 2 of 2 03/23/01 Site Photos - Existing Conditions Pacifica Multi-Tenant Office Building #5: View from Palomar Airport Rd. looking east across the site. #6: View looking south down Laurel Tree Road toward residential development. Page 3 of 3 03/23/01 Site Photos - Existing Conditions Pacifica Multi-Tenant Office Building #7: View looking south down Laurel Tree Road. #8: View along Palomar Airport Road looking east at Laurel Tree Road intersection. Page 4 of 4 03/23/01 Site Photos - Existing Conditions Pacifica Multi-Tenant Office Building #9: View along Palomar Airport Road looking east. #10: View from median looking east from intersection of Palomar Airport Road and Laurel Tree Road. Page 5 of 5 03/23/01 Site Photos - Existing Conditions Pacifica Multi-Tenant Office Building #11: View from median looking west toward intersection of Aviara Parkway and Palomar Airport Road. #12: View from major intersection of Aviara Parkway and Palomar Airport Road looking east. Page 6 of 6 03/23/01 Site Photos - Existing Conditions Pacifica Multi-Tenant Office Building #13: View from path along edge of Palomar Airport Road looking east. #14: View from path along edge of Palomar Airport Road looking east. Page lof7 03/23/01 Site Photos - Existing Conditions Pacifica Multi-Tenant Office Building #15: View from median looking south - east toward center of site. #16: View from median looking south - east (apx. Location of new building) Page 8 of 8 03/23/01 Site Photos - Existing Conditions Pacifica Multi-Tenant Office Building #17: View from Palomar Airport Road looking south - west. #18: View from Palomar Airport Road from median looking south - west. Page 9 of 9 03/23/01 Site Photos - Existing Conditions Pacifica Multi-Tenant Office Building #19: View from Palomar Airport Road looking south. #20: View from Palomar Airport Road looking west showing existing grade conditions. Page 10 of 10 03/23/01 Site Photos - Existing Conditions Pacifica Multi-Tenant Office Building #21: View from Laurel Tree Road looking west to adjacent site. #22: View of existing creek at south - west corner of the site. Page 11 of 11 03/23/01 Site Photos - Existing Conditions Pacifica Multi-Tenant Office Building #23: View looking north to adjacent site showing power lines. #24: View looking north-west to adjacent site. Page 12 of 12 03/23/01 Site Photos - Existing Conditions Pacifica Multi-Tenant Office Building #25: View looking west down Laurel Tree Lane showing residential development. #26: View looking east at intersection of parking lot of residential development. Page 13 of 13 03/23/01 LEOENP Vegetation Southern willow scrub CID Southern willow scrub disturbed 4^ Freshwater marsh ^4 Diegan coastal sage scrub CD Native grassland O Southem mixed chaparral Non-native grassland o Disturbed habitat C: Developed IA/| Ephemeral drainage 3' Equals width of ephemeral drainage This map is based on site conditions as observed at the time of our field investigations. The infonnation presented herein was developed by visual inspection and/or aerial photograph interpretation. Note that both site conditions and applicable regulatory requirements may change. Job No: SHA-01 Date: 5/22/00 Revised: 4/11/01 HELIX Existing Conditions PACIFIC ENTERPRISES Figure 3 Gray Davis GOVERNOR STATE OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE PLANNING AND RESEARCH State Clearinghouse Steven A. Nissen DIRECTOR November 15,2001 Van Lynch City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92009 Re: Notice of Determination Pacifica Palomar SCH#: 2001119018 4 NOV 2001 rUNMNfiC^MRTMEin City 01 CMlstad Dear Van Lynch: The State Clearinghouse has received and posted your Notice of Determination (NOD) for the above project. For each NOD filed with the State Clearinghouse, we attempt to match the NOD to our record of the prior draft Enviroimiental Impact Report (EIR) or Negative Declaration that was submitted for state level review. In the case of the subject NOD, we can find no record of a prior draft EIR or Negative Declaration having been submitted to the State Clearinghouse. Please let us know if the prior EIR/Negative Declaration was, in fact, submitted to the State Clearinghouse for state level review so that we may correct our records. Please refer to the CEQA Guidelines for EIR/Negative Declaration submittal requirements (Public Resources Code Sections 15205 and 15206) and NOD filing requirements (PRC Sections 15075 and 15094). If you have any questions regarding this notice, please contact the State Clearinghouse at (916) 445-0613, or send an e-mail to state.clearinghouse(a)opr.ca.gov. Sincerely, Terry Roberts Director, State Clearinghouse cc: file 1400 TENTH STREET P.O. BOX 3044 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95812-3044 916-445-0613 FAX 916-323-3018 WWW.OPR.CA.GOV/CLEARINGHOUSE.HTML U.S. Postal Service C|F|rM=IEp fVIAIL RECEIPT (tJpirmatic Mieii Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) \^ -V- Po.stagt! Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee {Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $ Postmark ' Here \^ -V- Po.stagt! Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee {Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Postmark ' Here \^ -V- Po.stagt! Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee {Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Postmark ' Here \^ -V- Po.stagt! Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee {Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Postmark ' Here \^ -V- Po.stagt! Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee {Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $ Postmark ' Here Recipient's Name (Please Print Cleariy) (To be completed by mailer) Street, Apt. No.; or PO Box No. City, State, ZIP+ 4 # • FILE COPY Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT The following project is located within the City of Carlsbad Coastal Zone. A coastal pennit application for the project has been acted upon. SENT TO COASTAL COMMISSION ON //" 7^^/ Application #: CDP 01-02 Filing Date: February 1. 2001 Case Name: Pacifica Palomar Decision Date: November 6. 2001 Applicant: Smith Consulting Architects Agent (if different): Ali Shapouri and Associates Address: 12220 El Camino Real. Suite 200. San Address: 16089 San Dieguito Rd. Suite H-102. Diego. CA 92130 Rancho Santa Fe. CA 92067-6221 Phone: 858-756-8340 Phone: 858-793-4777 ACTION: I I APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I I DENIED (Copy of final resolution/decision letter is sent to: Coastal Commission, any persons who specifically requested it, and the applicant). COASTAL COMMISSION APPEAL STATUS; I I NOT APPEALABLE TO THE COASTAL COMMISSION. APPEALABLE TO THE COASTAL COMMISSION pursuant to Coastal Act Section 30603. An aggrieved person may appeal this decision to the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days following Coastal Commission receipt of this notice. Applicants will be notified by the Coastal Commission as to the date the Coastal Commission's appeal period will conclude. Appeals must be made in writing to the Coastal Commission's district office at the following address: CaUfomia Coastal Commission, 7575 Metropolitan Dr., Suite 103, San Diego, Califomia 92108-4402, Telephone (619) 767-2370. The time wtthin which judicial review of this decision must be sought is govemed by Code of Civil Procedures, Seciion 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 16. Any petition or other paper seekingjudicial review must be filed in the appropriate court not later than ninety (90) days following the date on which this decision becomes final: however, if within ten (10) days after the decision becomes final a request for the record of the proceedings accompanied by the required deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost ofpreparation of such a record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended to not later than thirty (30) days following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to Ihe party, or his attomey of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed wilh Ihe City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad. Califomia 92008. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us NOTn OF PUBLIC HEARING COUNT ERK Mail to: County Clerk, County of San Diego, Mailstop 833, PO Box 121750, San Diego, CA 92112^ Response must ba'i^eived lw: Septeftfer 16. 2001 Public Hearing Date: September 17. 2001 A£ Public Hearing Place: 1200 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE. CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA. ^^tjoS Public Hearing Time: 6:00 p.m. Project Title: SDP 01-01 - PACIFICA PALOMAR OFFICE BUILDING Lead Agency: CITY OF CARLSBAD - PLANNING Contact Person: Street Address: 1635 FARADAY AVENUE Phone: (760) 602-4613 City: CARLSBAD Zip: 92008 PROJECT LOCATION: County: SAN DIEGO COUNTY City/Nearest Community: CITY OF CARLSBAD Cross Streets: Palomar Airport Rd and Aviara Parkway Total Acres: 15.69 Assessor's Parcel No. 212-040-25-00 Within 2 Miles: State Hwy #: LS. Airports: McCLELLAN/P ALOMAR Section: _ Twp. _ Range: _ Base: Agua Hedionda Spanish Land Grant Waterways: Pacific Ocean Railways: NCTD Schools: ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: CEQA: • NOP • Supplement/Subsequent • Early Cons • EIR (Prior SCH No.) ^ Neg Dec • Draft EIR • Other:. LOCAL ACTION TYPE: •General Plan Update • Specific Plan 1 1 Rezone 1 1 Annexation [^General Plan Amendment 1 1 Master Plan • Use Permit 1 1 Redevelopment 1 [General Plan Element Q Planned Unit Development 1 1 Land Division (Subdivision, ^ Coastal Permit QZone Code Amendment I3 Site Plan Parcel Map, Tract Map, etc.) n Other; DEVELOPMENT TYPE: •Residential: Units •office: Sq. Ft. I I Commercial: Sq. Ft. •industrial: Sq. Ft. •Recreational: 120.000 Acres. Acres. Acres. Acres PROJECT ISSUES DISCUSSED IN DOCUMENT: I I Aesthetic isual I I Flood Plain/Flooding I [Agricultural Land • Forest Land/Fire Hazard •Air Quality • Geological/Seismic [ [Archaeological/Historical [ [ Minerals 1 iCoastai Zone |3 Noise [ [Drainage/Absorption [ I Population/Housing Balance •Economic/Jobs • Public Services/Facilities •Fiscal • Recreation/Parks • Schools/Universities • Water Quality • Septic Systems • Water Supply/Ground Water • Sewer Capacity ^ Wetland/Riparian • Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading • Wildlife I i Solid Waste • Growth Inducing [ [ Toxic/Hazardous • Land Use • Traffic/Circulation • Cumulative Effect ^ Vegetation • Other: Present Land Use/Zoning/General Plan Use Vacant/Fallow agricultural land/ plaimed Industrial/ Plarmed IndustriaVOpen Space Project Description: A 120,000 square foot, three-story office buillijgkMisiMatTdi&kli^ folktS Q^cliMladQQtli'Wpj^onS^^^^iftLoad and east of Aviara Parkway on 15.69 acres. i SAN DIECO COUNTY ON. AUG 2 2 ^UUi A'JG Z 2 2001 'i RETURN i:^D TO AGENCY ON - \ t f Where documents are located for Public Reviewj ^ntfi^ CcBi R£MO\'ED _S1P Z 4 2DD1 SFP 2 4 20Q1 February 2000 Sinooth Feed Sheets'^'^ 77 C/^1 se template for CARLSBAD UNIF SCHOOL DIST 801 PINE AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 SD COUNTY PLANNING STEB 5201 RUFFIN RD SAN DIEGO CA 92123 CITY OF VISTA PO BOX 1988 VISTA CA 92085 CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 S VULCAN AVE ENCINITAS CA 92024 CITY OF SAN MARCOS 1 CIVIC CENTER DR SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949 CITY OF OCEANSIDE 300 NORTH COAST HWY OCEANSIDE CA 92054 LAFCO 1600 PACIFIC HWY SAN DIEGO CA 92101 AIR POLLUTION CNTRL DIST 9150 CHESAPEAKE DR SAN DIEGO CA 92123 SANDAG STE 800 401 B STREET SAN DIEGO CA 92101 CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME 4949 VIEWRIDGE AVE SAN DIEGO CA 92123 REGIONAL WATER QUALITY STEB 9771 CLAIREMONT MESA BLVD SANDIEGO CA 92124-1331 I.P.U.A. SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND URBAN STUDIES SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505 U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE 2730 LOKER AVE WEST CARLSBAD CA 92008 SCOTT CAIRNS SMITH CONSULTING ARCH STE 200 12220 EL CAMINO REAL SAN DIEGO CA 92130 CA COASTAL COMMISSION STE 103 7575 METROPOLITAN DR SANDIEGO CA 92108-4402 ISLAND REALTY I LP STE 160 12780 HIGH BLUFF DR SAN DIEGO CA 92130 GRG MANAGEMENT MARBRISA HOA STE 200 3088 PIO PICO CARLSBAD CA 92008 CITY OF CARLSBAD PUBLIC WORKS/COMMUNITY SERVICES CITY OF CARLSBAD PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING DEPT CITY OF CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT CITY OF CARLSBAD PROJECT PLANNER VAN LYNCH 10/2/2001 ^ AVERY® Address Labels Laser 5160® Smooth Feed Sheets'^'^ Use ten^nlste ^' ATRIUM PROPERTIES LLC SUITE 180 12780 HIGH BLUFF DR SAN DIEGO CA 92130 HUGH E & LISA LACHANCE 551 VERONA ST LAHABRACA 90631 SIM USA INC 1400 FLAME TREE LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 PROGRAM L BCS NEWPORT FINANCIAL CENTER 1303 AVOCADO AVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 JAMES S UKEGAWA 4218 SKYLINE RD CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD LAUREL TREE APTS SUITE 100 22 W 35TH ST NATIONAL CITY CA 91950 KELLY&JRM-PALOMAR AIRPORT SUITE 220 8910 UNIVERSITY CENTER LN SAN DIEGO CA 92122 KELLY CORPORATE CENTER SUITE 2150 401 B ST SAN DIEGO CA 92101 CARLSBAD Cll PUBLIC AGEl^CY CARLSBXD CA 92008 CARLSBAD PUBLIOAGENCY >BAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD PUBLICASENCY CARkSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD PUBLIOACJENCY CAFik^AD CA 92008 CARLSBAD Cll PUBLIC Apef^CY CARLSB^ CA 92008 CITY OF CARLSBAD P O BOX li PUBUO^ENCY SAN-I^NCISCO CA 94120 CARLSBAD CIJ PUBLIC CARLSBAD CA 92008 CITY OF CARLi PUBLIC TORRAf^CE CA 90503 CITY OF CARLSBAD POBOX 7611 PUBLIC AGENCY SAN FRANCISCO CA 94120 CITY OF CARU PUBLICAGENCY TORRAfJCE CA 90503 CALLAWAY GOLF CO 2285 RUTHERFORD RD CARLSBAD CA 92008 M H P P INC SUITE 140 5414 0BERdN DR SANJ^i^O CA 92121 CARLSBAD AIRPORT CENTRE OWNERS SUITE 310 21515 HAWTHORNE BLVD TORRANCE CA 90503 MARBRISA MAINTENANi SUITE 101 5083 AVgNlBA'ENCINAS CABbS^AD CA 92008 ORP M H P P INC SUITE 140 5414 OBERLIN DR SAN DIEGO CA 92121 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 5780 FLEET ST 300 CARLSBAD CA 92008 AVERY^ Address Labels Laser 5960 City of Carlsbad Planning Department NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING COMPLETE DATE: September 5, 2001 DESCRIPTION: Request for the recommendation of adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and the recommendation of approval for a General Plan Amendment and Coastal Development Permit f^nH thn npprnwpii of a .c^it<a Pevelopmont Ptaa to construct a three-story multi-tenant office building with a total area of 120,000 square feet, with subterranean and at-grade parking, on a 15.69 acre site. LOCATION: This project is within the City of Carlsbad's Coastal Zone located adjacent to and on the south side of Palomar Airport Road and east of Aviara Parkway in the Coastal Zone and Local Facilities Management Zone 5. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 212-040-25 APPLICANT: Smith Consulting Architects 1222flEI Camino Real, Ste. 200 San Diego, CA 92130 A public hearing on the above proposed project will be held by the Planning Commission in the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, on September 19, 2001 at 6:00 p.m. Persons are cordially invited to attend the public hearing and provide the decision makers with any oral or written comments they may have regarding the project. The project will be described and a staff recommendation given, followed by public testimony, questions and a decision. Copies of the staff report will be available on or after September 13, 2001. If you have any questions, or would like to be notified of the decision, please contact Van Lynch at the City of Carlsbad Planning Department, Monday through Thursday 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Friday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008, (760) 602- 4613. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us APPEALS If you challenge the General Plan Amendment, -Sitn nrnrlnpmnnti Prrmit. and Coastal Development Permit, and in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad prior to the public hearing. 1. Appeals to the Citv Council: Where the decision is appealable to the City Council, appeals must be filed in writing within ten (10) calendar days after a decision by the Planning Commission. 2. Coastal Commission Appealable Project: I I This site is located within the Coastal Zone Appealable Area. IXI This site is not located within the Coastal Zone Appealable Area. Where the decision is appealable to the Coastal Commission, appeals must be filed with the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days after the Coastal Commission has received a Notice of Final Action from the City of Carlsbad. Applicants will be notified by the Coastal Commission of the date that their appeal period will conclude. The San Diego office of the Coastal Commission is located at 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, California 92108-4402. CASE FILE: GPA 01-05/SDP 01-01/CDP 01-02 CASE NAME: PACIFICA PALOMAR OFFICE BUILDING PUBLISH: SEPTEMBER 6, 2001 SITE PACIFICA PALOMAR OFFICE BUILDING GPA 01-05/CDP 01-02 (* SB 5 iba COPY Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING COMPLETE DATE: September 5, 2001 DESCRIPTION: Request for the recommendation of adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and the recommendation of approval for a General Plan Amendment and Coastal Development Permit -nnri thrp rpprny^i g cijto OevGlopmcnt Plaato construct a three-story multi-tenant office building with a total area of 120,000 square feet, with subterranean and at-grade parking, on a 15.69 acre site. LOCATION: This project is within the City of Carlsbad's Coastal Zone located adjacent to and on the south side of Palomar Airport Road and east of Aviara Parkway in the Coastal Zone and Local Facilities Management Zone 5. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUIVIBER: 212-040-25 APPLICANT: Smith Consulting Architects 12229EI Camino Real, Ste. 200 San Diego, CA 92130 A public hearing on the above proposed project will be held by the Planning Commission in the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, on September 19, 2001 at 6:00 p.m. Persons are cordially invited to attend the public hearing and provide the decision makers with any oral or written comments they may have regarding the project. The project will be described and a staff recommendation given, followed by public testimony, questions and a decision. Copies of the staff report will be available on or after September 13, 2001. If you have any questions, or would like to be notified of the decision, please contact Van Lynch at the City of Carlsbad Planning Department, Monday through Thursday 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Friday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008, (760) 602- 4613. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us APPEALS If you challenge the General Plan Amendment, Gits—Daveloiamenti Permit, and Coastal Development Permit, and in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad prior to the public hearing. 1. Appeals to the Citv Council: Where the decision is appealable to the City Council, appeals must be filed in writing within ten (10) calendar days after a decision by the Planning Commission. 2. Coastal Commission Appealable Project: I I This site is located within the Coastal Zone Appealable Area. IXI This site is not located within the Coastal Zone Appealable Area. Where the decision is appealable to the Coastal Commission, appeals must be filed with the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days after the Coastal Commission has received a Notice of Final Action from the City of Carlsbad. Applicants will be notified by the Coastal Commission of the date that their appeal period will conclude. The San Diego office of the Coastal Commission is located at 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, California 92108-4402. CASE FILE: GPA 01-05/SDP 01-01/CDP 01-02 CASE NAME: PACIFICA PALOMAR OFFICE BUILDING PUBLISH: SEPTEMBER 6, 2001 SITE PACIFICA PALOMAR OFFICE BUILDING GPA 01-05/SDP 01-01/CDP 01-02 Smooth Feed Sheets'^'^ ATRIUM PROPERTIES LLC SUITE 180 12780 HIGH BLUFF DR SAN DIEGO CA 92130 HUGH E & LISA LACHANCE 551 VERONA ST LA HABRA CA 90631 SIM USA INC 1400 FLAME TREE LN CARLSBAD CA 92009 PROGRAM L BCS NEWPORT FINANCIAL CENTER 1303 AVOCADO AVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 JAMES S UKEGAWA 4218 SKYLINE RD CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD LAUREL TREE APTS SUITE 100 22 W 35TH ST NATIONAL CITY CA 91950 KELLY&JRM-PALOMAR AIRPORT SUITE 220 8910 UNIVERSITY CENTER LN SAN DIEGO CA 92122 KELLY CORPORATE CENTER SUITE 2150 401 B ST SAN DIEGO CA 92101 CARLSBAD CITY PUBLIC AGENCY CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CITY PUBLIC AGENCY CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CITY PUBLIC AGENCY CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CITY PUBLIC AGENCY CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CITY PUBLIC AGENCY CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CITY PUBLIC AGENCY CARLSBAD CA 92008 CITY OF CARLSBAD POBOX 7611 PUBLIC AGENCY SAN FRANCISCO CA 94120 CITY OF CARLSBAD PO BOX 7611 PUBLIC AGENCY SAN FRANCISCO CA 94120 CITY OF CARLSBAD PUBLIC AGENCY TORRANCE CA 90503 CITY OF CARLSBAD PUBLIC AGENCY TORRANCE CA 90503 CALLAWAY GOLF CO 2285 RUTHERFORD RD CARLSBAD CA 92008 M H P P INC SUITE 140 5414 OBERLIN DR SAN DIEGO CA 92121 CARLSBAD AIRPORT CENTRE OWNERS SUITE 310 21515 HAWTHORNE BLVD TORRANCE CA 90503 MARBRISA MAINTENANCE CORP SUITE 101 5083 AVENIDA ENCINAS CARLSBAD CA 92008 M H P P INC SUITE 140 5414 OBERLIN DR SAN DIEGO CA 92121 GREYSTONE HOMES INC 5780 FLEET ST 300 CARLSBAD CA 92008 AVERY<? Address Labels A notice has been mailed to all property ownersyoccupants Signature: Laser 5960' Di^, NOTK OF PUBLIC HEARING COUNT^LERK Mail to: County Clerk, County of San DiSgb, Mailstop 833, PO Box 121750, San Diego, 92112 Response must be receive(J,fy: Septe^er 4. Public Hearing Date: September 5. 2001 Public Hearing Place: 1200 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE. CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA. 92008 Public Hearing Time: 6:00 p.m. Project Title: SDP 01-01 - PACIFICA PALOMAR OFFICE BUILDING Lead Agency: CITY OF CARLSBAD - PLANNING Contact Person: VAN LYNCH Street Address: 1635 FARADAY AVENUE Phone: (7601 602-4613 City: CARLSBAD Zip: 92008 County: SAN DIEGO COUN' Mm Cify Of ftmta— PROJECT LOCATION: County: SAN DIEGO COUNTY City/Nearest Community: CITY OF CARLSBAD Cross Streets: Palomar Airport Rd and Aviara Parkway Total Acres: 15.69 Assessor's Parcel No. 212-040-25-00 Within 2 Miles: State Hwy #: LS. Airports: McCLELLAN/PALOMAR Section: Twp. _ Range: _ Base: Agua Hedionda Spanish Land Grant Waterways: Pacific Ocean Railways: NCTD Schools: ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: CEQA: • NOP • SupplemenfSubsequent • Early Cons • EIR (Prior SCH No.) Neg Dec LJ OUKT: • Draft EIR LOCAL ACTION TYPE: •Genera! Plan Update • ^General Plan Amendment Q •General Plan Element • •Zone Code Amendment ^ Specific Plan Master Plan Planned Unit Development Site Plan I I Rezone • Use Permit I I Land Division (Subdivision, Parcel Map, Tract Map, etc.) I I Annexation I I Redevelopment ^ Coastal Permit • Other: DEVELOPMENT TYPE: •Residential: Units •office: Sq. Ft.. •commercial: Sq. Ft.. •industrial: Sq. Ft.. •Recreational: 120.000 Acres. Acres. Acres. Acres F 0 L E 0 Gfagafy J. Smith, Reoonder/Obuwy Clerk AUG 0 7 2001 BY. DEPUTY PROJECT ISSUES DISCUSSED EV DOCUMENT: •Aesthetic/Visual 1 1 Flood Plain/Flooding • Schools/Universities • Water Quality •Agricultural Land • Forest Land/Fire Hazard • Septic Systems • Water Supply/Ground Water •Air Quality • Geological/Seismic • Sewer Capacity Wetland/Riparian •Archaeological/Historical • Minerals • Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading • Wildlife •coastal Zone ^ Noise • Solid Waste Growth inducing 1 IDramage/Absorption | j Population/Housing Balance • Toxic/Hazardous • Land Use •Economic/Jobs • Public Services/Facilities • Traffic/Circulation • Cumulative Effect •Fiscal • Recreation/Parks Vegetation • Other: Present Land Use/Zoning/General Plan Use Vacant/Fallow agricultural land/ planned Industrial/ Planned Industrial/Open Space Project Description: A 120,000 square foot, three-story office building with associated parking located adjacent and south of Palomar Airport Road and east of Aviara Parkway on 15.69 acres. Where documents are located for Public Review: Community Development Center, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 February 2000 FILED IN THE OriiCi:;..; ir...: .1 . : i CLERK SAN DIEGO COUNTY ON POSTEDJl!l?li?L_REMOvfcD SEP 0 6 2QQ1 RETURNED TO AGENCY ON ggp o £ 2001 DEPUTY >4-^r^ ^ PROOF OF PUBLIC#ION (2010 & 2011 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen ofthe United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above-entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of This space is ^^|he County Clerk's Filing Stamp 10 , CO 11" l4 \ ^.t North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newapapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of Califomia, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: September 6, 2001 Proof of Publication of Notice of Public Hearing I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. San Marcos Dated at , Califomia this of 6th September, 2001 day NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising Cir-ouD. cxc'ffiB^^o* PUBUC HEARING ' .Reauest for the reoommendatlon ot adoption of a Mltigat- ' Negattve Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and 1-Reporting Program and ttie recommendation of approval o;-.for a Generai Plan Amendment and Coastal Deveiop-nl?S!i;'.f ^il? 'Jl® Woval ot a site Development nirl Plan tp construct athree-stoiy muttWenant office buildino yevwith a total area of 120,00(5 square feet, with subter- -bnLOC?iTlc5N- Pacing, on a 15.69 acre site. iifiThis project'is within the City of Cartsbad's Coastal Zone locatad adjacent to and on the south side of Palomar Air- •b: port Road and east of Aviara Pari<wav in the Coastal f™g;gg<„l5S>l Facilities Management Zone 5 - Ifa^^zs' ^ NUMBIR: MPPLICANT: V SmithConsultingArchitects i: 'i222 Ei CaminoTleal, Ste. 200 o, SanDiego,CA92130 ,'Al^>(rfhl'ffi'f*D!"9 ?" ^ above proposed project will be o. held by the Planning Commlsston In the Council Cham-'.,*era, f200 Carisbaa Village Drive, CarisbaTcalBornS b.l on September 19,2001 at 6«0 p.tn. v^aniomia, Persons are cordially invited to attend the* public hearing =;-and proyWe the decision mal<ers with any oral or written . .-'eomments they may have regarding the project. The pro- ''&'±i^^^^^JS^ ^ rS»mmS!dSion givea ' r.^S^?'„?l^J"''W*^'"2"y'..fiy»*''o"s and a decision: e£?i!^i^S^Sf/^P"" available on or after M Septemt>er 13, 2001. you have any questions, or would lllce to be notified of ,r?frfK''S,"' P'*^*.? contact Van Lynch at the City of , Planning Department, Monday through Thurs- ''fKlSP^'" P P "! ' P"<'ay 8.00 a.m. to5:00 p.m. f6)(760)e»2^1:?^ California 92608, APPEALS if you chaltenge the Generai Plan Amendment, Site De-Development Pemiit, and in court, you may be limited to raising oniy those issues ^rih2Ii??'!l!.f raised at the pubiic hearing de- ISnf?* %.."2i'5?'i"'J"J*^»" correspondence aellv-i'^.^ ^B^°'£?'^^''' Pflorto the public hearing. Lte*'! ^.S^^J?J^S°"'^ - Where the decision Is ap-pealable to the City Council, appeals must be filed m writing wittiin ten (lb) calendar cSys after a decision l^y the Planning Commission. 2. Coastal Commission Appealable Project: able Area not located wiffiln the Coastal Zone Appeal- Where the decision is appealable to the Coastal Com-3j^S2(,S.PE?^,?^j"''S? with the Coastal Commis-sion wittiin ien (10) working days after ttie Coastal Com-? r-^V?!^S'^ a Notice of Final Actton from the City bf Carlstjad. Applicant^ wiii be notified by the Coastal Comnjtesion of ttie date ttiat ttieir appeal pariod will conclude. The San Diego office of the CMstai^om-mission is located at 7575 Slettopolitan Drive, Suite 103 PACIFICA PALOMAR OFFICE BUILDING GPA 01.0&rSDP Omi/CDP 01-02 Legal 70928. September 6, 2001 AUQ-07-2001 11:50 PACIFICR ENTERPRISES 858 755 1687 P. 02/02 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS LIST AND LABELS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ON THIS DATE REPRESENT THE LATEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION FROM THE EQUALIZED ASSESSOR'S ROLES. APPLICATION NAME AND NUMBER PACIFICA PALOMAR OFFICE BUILDING GPA 01.05/SDP 01-01/ CDP 01-02 DATE: PRESENTATIVE RECEIVED BY DATE: G~7~(^^ TOTAL P.02 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 Receipt Applicant: SMITH CONSULTING ARCHITECTS Description Amount SDPOlOOl 10.54 Not valid unless validated by Cash Register PLEASE RETAIN RECEIPT FOR REFUNDS OR ADJUSTMENTS 6592 08/06/01 00O2 01 02 Receipt Number: R0022129 CGP 10-54 Transaction Date: 08/06/2001 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 1118 10.54 Transaction Amount: 10.54 / <^e/^ PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2010 & 2011 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above-entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of North County Times This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudged newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, for the cities of Escondido, Oceanside, Carlsbad, Solana Beach and San Diego County; that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not In any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: July 5, 2001 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at this of San Marcos 5th ., California day July, 2001 Proof of Publication of Mitigated negative Declara~t'\ *^ ^^SSM^-O.IO. §i.„^ deSSSSpPa'r^l^n^e'dTnd'L^J.^^ and .0 V.1^§^^saCne»S tt' Guidelines fw Imolementet^ Rf^sV^"' 'o 'he mental Qua ityM a^d the&P^^^^ CaFrfomia Environ-dinance of K C%fSf Carlstan?^^^^ Pratection Or-view, tti^ initial sudyfEfAPartPHrtl'??^ °* ^aid re- cur, and (2rthem li noV..?,-.'™.:^?^^ ttieXie' rfflb^fo"re the cWL?)Z''^"'=^ "9''* °' vteed- may have a s gKnt SSLS nn*^* re-Therefore, a IkliMgatea^^SLa n2.i=" ?® environment. sued tor the s7b^ proill jultS^lvi^^^^ on file in the Plaffi S|SVt^l?S^''°" 3<=«0" A>'rid°oV»fe ffeS'Sf'^n" -p- 1635 FaradarAvenSe Carilh»rt department, Comments from the publte arl fnvit^^^ ^^OOS.' comments in writina to thn Wano?„„ ^'ease subm t please ca Van unr-h tuX Xry'K 30 days of date o iWnM H Con 2 "^Partment within DATED: JULY 5, 2001 Planning Director Legal 70461, July 5,2001 NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising 09 OPEN SPACE 212-04 SHT I OF ^ 400' 7/20/00 DJB 1 CHANGES OLD NEW CUT 040 33 73 ^ Bi, 189 &i 99 55^3 ?P /Jg? 77 ff,9f *1 ?7 ^^^"^ V 9/ 2? 91 ^(S 97 CZnS4 97 5Z PC 18 97 97 to !S k It op 9! 1101 39 SB Je tf op 98 110Z 30 SS 23 50 SAME ST OP 98 4653 57 PG 19 98 22 5a -190-55 98 10O07 53 PG 21 SHT 1-3 98 76 41 SAME k. ST OP 99 4618 46&51 59 99 1513 41 60&61 00 1630 61 PG 22 00 111 4a«c55 "52-65 00 1957 50 PG 23 01 1 56 SAME & ST OP 01 4607 THIS MAP WAS PREPARH) FOR ASSESSMENT PUPOSES CNLT. NO LIABILITY S ASSUMED FOR TEE ACCURAa OF THE DATA SHOWN. ASSESSOR S PARCELS MAY NOI CCMR-r WITH LOCAL SUBOIVISON OR 1 BolDNG ORDMANCES. SAM OIEGO COUHTY ASSESSOR'S MAP BK 212 PG OU - 5H7 i OF 2 (3) boo focrf ^ou^Jl7^^ O WlTWlM m^WA^O MAP 823 - RHO AGUA HEDIONDA - POR LOT G - mS]^ ROS 5715, 8846, 13466,15061 9^ SHT. I 4 SHT 4-5 r=ioo' G . OLD ML".- . . nc i - J i Co £S lo r« tiJ€ doir.oar.y suni«6 no lieblllry for a ss occurinj; by reaao llarxe tnereor." SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASS[SSOPS MAP eOOK 212 PAGE MAPPED FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY 09 § * Q- on i7< o o o z CO -< DETAIL "A" SAN OIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S UAP 212-19 SHT 1 OF 3 1" = 100" 07/30/1998 KJA CHANGES PRIOR APN NEW Am m C3JT NO. 190 1 IHRU 54 1998 22 -040-58 55 1998 10007 18. 19. 48. 49 Jt 54 56 nm so 1999 1223 N REMAINDER OF PAR 117 SHOWN ON PG 19 SHT 2 2« OPEN SPACE IS MAP 13428-CARLSBAD TCT 84-32 A UNIT 1 MAP 823 - RHO AGUA HEDIONDA-POR LOT COBBLESTONE SEA VILLAGE G-MM514 o o MATCH LINE "'A' 500 JJ PM18034 N89'5r4yx SAN OIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S UAP 212-19 SHT 3 OF 3 1" = 200' 07/30/19S8 KJA CHANGES BLK PRIOR APN NEW APN YR CUT NO. 192 1 * 2 1998 22 2 SAUE Jt sr OP 1999 4647 2 k ST asD J 1999 1223 20^ MAP 13428-CARLSBAD TCT 84-32 A UNIT 1 COBBLESTONE SEA VILLAGE 09 25 212-09 SHT. I OF 3 e '=200' .7! AC 2/4/00 SM SHT. 2 .13 6 i25 19 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE AC SHT 2 .73 .50 AC 427 4-87 Hi \ \S^42 0 ^ 4.75 AC A A r sos.rr 752-/7 21 © 4.31 AC OPEN SPACE 4^ .33 11.74 AC .19 SHT 2 NO SAN OIEGO COUNTY ASSESSORS MAP BOOK 2IZ PAGE 09 SHT. PALOMAR CHANGES BLK OLD NEW YR CUT 8(0 //6 /O- /2 S7 23€» 14—16 20-22 99 1689 20&21 23&24 00 1253 23&24 25&26 00 1936 ACCESS AIRPOR'^ OF 3 THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESaefl" PURPOSES ONLY. MD LIABIIH 5 ASSUMED FOR TF€ ACCURACY OF THE DATA SHOWN. ASSESSORS PARCaS MAY NOT COMaY WITH LOCAL SUBOIVISDN OR BUIDING ORDINANCES. MAP II287-CARLSBAD TCT NO. 81-46 C UNIT NOD ROS 13466 I I UNM3D LOT 5^0 OPLN SPACE ESMT 76 @ 20.27 AC REMAINDER OF LOT 7€ SHOWN ON SHT 'i PALOMAR OAKS^ WAY -v.^ 212-08 SHT 2 OF 2 SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSORS MAP BOOK .212 .PACE .08. SHT 2 OF 2 MAPPED FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONIV -^S' A/,A. ELK; OLD j /- /o 1 "Vlhii"* thii" plit I« belTcre^" to be. correct, ti>e corcpar.y assumes no liability for ar.y floss occuring by reason of freliance thereon" . MAP 11289-CARLSBAD TCT NO. 81-46 CUNIT N0.30 ' — SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S UAP 212-04 SHT 2 OF 2 1" = 400' APPROX LOC STEWART RD CHAMGT^5=^ BLX PRIOR APN NEW APN IR \cuTNa 041 sue La's 01 OS 72 7144 02 06 imj 09 78 974 05 m wiD Jl BA cue 89 4735 w SAJJE k ST WID 89 4791 Q3k 04 STOPJt 10 * II 89 2339 06 THRU II 12 mj 37 92 III 05 SAUE Jt ST WID 92 4894 05 POR 211-10 1998 2 AG PR =» AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE 1« SOGicE TRANSMISSION 2« NO ACCESS MAP 12903-CARLSBAD TCT NO 85-17 pnq mmo I^AIS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART I (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT) CASE NO: ^2>P r>/~6//pif> nz-on cP/> oi~o: DATE RECEIVED: (To be completed hy staff) BACKGROUND !. CASE NAME: fAc/^fCA PAt^^^^f^tl f)t=^Plce^ n^lL}>,iJ(^ 2. APPLICANT: $J^,T-I-4 r.^v,jfl-jJ(^ AnCHtm<^TS 3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: ^/icTT ^A,a^s: 4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: j-lj-otooo ^f. Pr. tFi^tcft "J^^-r ^/anr af" 7?^/Z Cotl^hC &tiyLtC\r/^l) ( f/\ytir.^/Y^ SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: Please check any of the environnientai factors listed below that'would be potentially affected by this project. This would be any environmental factor that has at least one impact checked "Potentially Significant Impact," or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" in the checklist on the following pages. I I Land Use and Planning [^j^ransportation/Circulation |^ Public Services Population and Housing ^TBiological Resources [^|^tilities & Service Systems p/'f^eological Problems Energy & Mineral Resources Aesthetics 0^ater Q Hazards Q Cultural Resources • Air Quality g^Noise []] Recreation RECEIVED [FfMandatory Findings of Significance p^^^ ^ g 2ggj OTY OF CARLSBAD Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Si^iplementatidocurnents^ I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:. a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? (Source #(s): (A ^^^^ ) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? ( ) c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? ( ) d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses? ( ) e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low-income or minority community)? ( ) Potentially Significant Impact • • • • • Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated • • • • Less Than Significan t Impact No impact 0 • • • 0^ ]]. POPULATION AND HOUSfNG. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? ( ) b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or » indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? ( ) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? ( ) • • • • • • • [/ • • 0" III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? ( ^<s.-fcc^». i^tifi'T) b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? ( ) e) Landslides or mudflows? ( ) f) Erosion, changes irv topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? ( ) g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) Expansive soils? ( ) h) i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ' ) • • • • • • • • • • • • K • • • • • • • • • • • • IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? (/»/t<;f//H T)n<^ (l^fl^ b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards i—i such as flooding? {&r*4^ ^(f^ _ i>lj.*i,-M fi-f-y."^ '—' • • • • • Rev, 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources); (Supplemental documentsmgy be r^^ and attaclied) c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? ( ) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body?( ) e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? ( ) f) Changes in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? ( ) g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? .' ( ) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? ( ) Potentially Potentially Less Than No Significant Significant Significan Impact Impact Unless t Impact Mitigation Incorporated • 0^ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0" • • • • • • v., AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation'^ ( ) b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) c) Alter air movement, inoisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? ( ) d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposarresult in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? b) Hazards to safelt'' fi'om design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. fann equipment)? ( ) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? ( ) d^i Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? { ) g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? ( ) • • • • • • • 0^ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0^ • • • 0^ • • • • Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Infonnation Sources): (Sttppletnentaldocuments ntG^ be ref^^ and attached) VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal resuh in impacts lo: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds? ( ) b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? ( ) c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? ( ) d) Wetland habitatje.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? ( f5i« ) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( • ) VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal? a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? ( ) b) Use non-renewable resources in a wastefiil and inefficient manner? ( ) c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that wouid be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? ( ) IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? ( ) b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ( ) c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazards? ( ) d) Exposure of people to existing soufces of potential health hazards? ( ) e) Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? ( ) X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or resuh in a need for new or altered govemment services in any of the following areas: Fire protection? ( ) a) b) ^0 Police protection? ( Schools? ( Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significan t Impact No Impact • • • • • o o • • • o • • • • • 0^ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • o • • w • o o ^1 IL o • 0 Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplementdl documents mc^ibe referred to and attached) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) e) Other governmental services? ( ) Potentially Significant Impact • Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Inco^^ted o Less Than Significan t Impact No Impact 0 0^ XIL UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? ( ) b) Communications systems? ( ) c) Local or regional water treaflnent or distribution ' facilifies? ( ) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) Storm water drainage? ( ) Solid waste disposal? ( ) d) e) f) g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) o o o o 0 o o o 0 o 0 0 o o • 0^, o o 0; o ^ 0 XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic or vista or scenic highway? b) Have a demonstrate negative aesthetic effect? ( ) c) Create light or glare? ( ) 0 0 0^ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0^ XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Di.sturb paleontological resources? ( ^<tcf»' l^cf^J*/ ) b) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) c) Affect historical resources? ( ) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? ( ) e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? ( ) XV. RECREATIONAL. Would the proposal: a a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? ( ) b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0. 0^ 0" Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Informafion Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) XVI. MANDATORY FINDTKGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quaiity of tlie environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of Califomia history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viev/ed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause the substantia! adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Potentially Significant Impact o 0 0 Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated o o Less Than No Significan Impact t Irapaci 0^ 0 0 0 XVn. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used, identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less tlian Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incoi-porated or refmed from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site- specific conditions for the project. Rev. 03/28/96 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Please use this area to discuss any of the environmental factors that were checked "No impact" yet lack any information citations and any factors that were checked "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." The City has adopted a "Statement of Overriding Consideration" with regard to air quality and circulation impacts resulting from the normal buildout according to the General Plan. The following sample text is intended to guide your discussion ofthe impacts to these environmental factors. AIR OUALITY: The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased gas and electric power consumption and vehicle miles traveled. Theise subsequently result in increases in the emission of carbo.n monoxide, reactive organic gases, oxides of nitrogen and sulfur, and suspended particulates. These aerosols are the major contributors to air pollution in the City as well as in the San Diego Air Basin. Since the San Diego Air Basin is a "non-attainment basin", any additional air emissions are considered cumulatively significant: therefore, continued development to buildout as proposed in the updated General Plan will have cumulative significant impacts on the air quality of the region. To lessen or minimize the impact on air quality associated with General Plan buildout, a variety of mitigation measures are recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include: 1) provisions for roadway and intersection improvements prior to or concurrent with development; 2) measures to reduce vehicle trips through the implementation of Congestion and Transportation Demand Management; 3) provisions to encourage aitemative modes of transportation including mass transit services; 4) conditions to promote energy efficient building and site design; and 5) participation in regional growth management strategies when adopted. The applicable and appropriate General Plan air quality initigation measures have either been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval. Operation-related emissions are considered cumulatively significant because the project is located within a "non-attainment basin", therefore, the "Initial Study" checklist is marked "Potentially Significant Impact". This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" for air quality impacts. This "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan's Final Master EIR, including this project, tlierefore, no ft-irther environmental review of air quality impacts is required. This document is available at the Planning Department. CIRCULATION: The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased traffic volumes. Roadway segments will be adequate to accommodate buildout traffic; however, 12 full and 2 partial intersections will be severely impacted by regional through-traffic over which the City has no jurisdictional control. These generally include all freeway interchange areas and major intersections along Carlsbad Boulevard. Even with the implementation of roadway improvements, a number of intersections 9 Rev. 03/28/96 are projected to fail the City's adopted Growth Management performance standards at buildout. To lessen or minimize the impact on circulation associated with General Plan buildout, numerous mitigation measures have been recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include measures to ensure the provision of circulation facilities concurrent with need; 2) provisions to develop alternative modes of transportation such as trails, bicycle routes, additional sidewalks, pedestrian linkages, and commuter rail systems; and 3) participation in regional circulation strategies when adopted. The diversion of regional through-traffic from a failing Interstate or State Highway onto City streets creates impacts that are not within the jurisdiction of the City to control. The applicable and appropriate General Plan circulation mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval. Regional related circulation impacts are considered cumulatively significant because of the failure of intersections at buildout of the General Plan due to regional through-traffic, therefore, the "Initial Study" checklist is marked "Potentially Significant Impacf. This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the recent certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a "Statement Of Oveniding Considerations" for circulation impacts. This "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan's Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of circulation impacts is required. LIST OF MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE^ Rev. 03/28/96 CARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT Fire Protection Services PROJECT CONDITION REPORT .JUL 2001 Carlsbal - al PROJECT NAME: Date: ' . / , Project number: Planning G-PA ^^'^' ^'-^^ /^^f 0\-<}lf Pl^ OX-Ql^ Project conditions: (Note: This commentary identifies specific conditions necessary to achieve Fire Department approval.) Pro^aS«-<4 rv|p^,.^^ if'^^J c^^^ ^Lrs-I.^^j- Zoner «-5 Code reminders: (Note: This commentary is provided to assist the applicant, and identifies minimum code requirements that are fi-equently overlooked. ISJ! f§ JUL 2001 ..-.NIHGOEWIRTMEIIT ~ Carlsbad / CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW. COMMENT AND CONDITIONS MEMO DATE: June 25.2001 REVISED PLANS TO: * ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT- J. Riddle POLICE DEPARTMENT - ATTN: J. SASWAY FIRE DEPARTMENT - MIKE SMITH BUILDING DEPARTMENT - PAT KELLEY RECREATION - MARK STEYAERT ^ * PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (STREETS) - HEIDI HEISTERMAN WATER DISTRICT LANDSCAPE PLANCHECK CONSULTANT - LARRY BLACK (SAat^^TStf^ SCHOOL DISTRICT NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT - PLANNING DEPARTMENT SEMPRA ENERGY - LAND MANAGEMENT * Always Send Exhibits FROM: Planning Department REQUEST FOR REVIEW, COMMENT, and CONDITIONS ON APPLICATION NO. GPA 01-05/ SDP 01-01/ CDP 01-02/ PIP 01-02 NOTE: Please use this number on all correspondence. PROJECTTITLE: Pacifica Palomar Office Building APPLICANT: Pacifica Enterprises PROPOSAL: 120.000 sq ft office building Please review and submit written comments and conditions to Van Lynch , the Project Planner in the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by Julv 26.2001. (If you have "No Comments", please so state.) If not received by the date indicated, it will be assumed that you have no comment and the proposal has your endorsement as submitted. If you have any questions, please contact Van Lynch at 602- 4613 . This is also the reguest for conditions! THANK YOU COMMENTS: 'S'h'-c,^ f^^^s(j^o^ /^'ujid^ ...fti^sS "70 /^UX. (DUrhf/^ccs 4^cM^ s-j^yyt^ rY/4vkt •^ysre^'y 4br FRM0020 10/00 CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW. COMMENT AND CONDITIONS MEMO DATE: June 25.2001 REVISED PLANS TO: * ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT- J. Riddle POLICE DEPARTMENT - ATTN: J. SASWAY FIRE DEPARTMENT - MIKE SMITH BUILDING DEPARTMENT - PAT KELLEY RECREATION - MARK STEYAERT * PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (STREETS) - HEIDI HEISTERMAN ^WATER DISTRICT LANDSCAPE PLANCHECK CONSULTANT - LARRY BLACK <^/^^-5M:> SCHOOL DISTRICT NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT - PLANNING DEPARTMENT SEMPRA ENERGY - LAND MANAGEMENT * Always Send Exhibits I FROM: Planning Department REQUEST FOR REVIEW, COMMENT, and CONDITIONS ON APPLICATION NO. GPA 01-05/ SDP 01-01/ CDP 01-02/ PIP 01-02 NOTE: Please use this number on all correspondence. PROJECT TITLE: Pacifica Palomar Office Building APPLICANT: Pacifica Enterprises PROPOSAL: 120.000 sg ft office building Please review and submit written comments and conditions to Van Lynch , the Project Planner in the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by July 26.2001. (If you have "No Comments", please so state.) If not received by the date indicated, it will be assumed that you have no comment and the proposal has your endorsement as submitted. If you have any questions, please contact Van Lynch at 602- 4613 . This is also the reguest for conditions! THANK YOU COMMENTS: 4^ ^ '^O 'Of FRM0020 10/00 DATE: CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO y^'3o'-C^ / REVISED PLANS | | TO: * ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT - ATTN: J. SASWAY FIRE DEPARTMENT - MIKE SMITH BUILDING DEPARTMENT - PAT KELLEY RECREATION - MARK STEYAERT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (STREETS) - HEIDI HEISTERMAN WATER DISTRICT LANDSCAPE PLANCHECK CONSULTANT - LARRY BLACK SCHOOL DISTRICT NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT - PLANNING DEPARTMENT SEMPRA ENERGY - LAND MANAGEMENT * Always Send Exhibits FROM: Planning Department REQUEST FQR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON APPLICATION NO. 9b (> (Pt-O/ NOTE: Please use this number on all correspondence. PROJECT TITLE: UffCji P/^to uffi/t^ APPLICANT: P/kffecA. (^T^^/HCBS PROPOSAL: I'ZO CD^zD yj- ^/^cQ^ 1TC^(^. Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to \Jf^t^ Lyt/cX-^ the Project Planner in the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by s^-^cr-^r (If you have "No Comments", please so state.) If not received by the date indicated, it will be assumed that you have no comment and the proposal has your endorsement as submitted. If you have any questions, please contact OA'^ at 602- U(j fl. The request for conditions will follow at the appropriate time. THANK YOU COMMENTS: ^/^"^ lj)W[W\^^v:\? ^^^^ FRM0020 10/00 City of Carlsbad ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMORANDUM May 15, 2001 TO: Van Lynch, Planning FROM: Jeremy Riddle, Engineering SUBJECT: SECOND REVIEW OF PACIFICA PALOMAR (SDP 01-01, PIP 01-02, CDP 01-02, V 01-01, APN 212-040-25) Engineering Department staff has completed a review of the application submittal documents for application completeness. The application and plans submitted for this project are complete. However, before Engineering can make a final determination or issue conditions, the following issues must be addressed: Engineering Concerns 1. Revise the preliminary grading plan to depict the extent of proposed median hardscape, landscaping and irrigation improvements along the frontage of Palomar Airport Road. The exhibit should clearly delineate (in bold) that the developer is responsible to install median improvements along half the project frontage to Palomar Airport Road. 2. Revise the site plan to cleady indicate the right-of-way that must be obtained to construct the cul-de-sac on Laurel Tree Lane per City Standards. Refer to the site plan for specific comments. 3. Revise the preliminary drainage study to address the criteria used (or to be used) for sizing the filtration ponds. How much water will be treated? What storm event will the pond accept before its capacity is exceeded? 4. Revise the site plan to depict the waiver of access rights to and from Palomar Airport Road along the project frontage. 5. Revise the preliminary grading plan to indicate an irrevocable offer to dedicate (lOD) of a public trail easement encompassing the proposed trail. 6. Revise the site plan to reflect short legal descriptions of all adjacent properties. 7. On the site plans, indicate the location of proposed irrigation services for the project (typical). 8. Revise the title sheet to indicate the EDU's (sewer) and GPM (irrigation water) generated or required by the proposed development. Pacifica Palomar Office (Balding May 15, 2001 Page 2 of 3 9. Revise the traffic study to address the issues per the attached letter from Traffic, dated April 30, 2001. 10. On the site plan, revise the configuration of the cul-de-sac for Laurel Tree Lane so that it meets City Standard GS -3. Add the 50-foot tangent sections, and show ultimate right for the cul-de-sac). 11. On the site plan and preliminary grading plan, identify the slope of Laurel Tree Lane. 12. Revise the preliminary grading plan to callout proposed offsite private grading and slope easements to be acquired. 13. Revise the cross-sections on the preliminary grading plan to reflect the approximate location of the water table outlined in the Geotechnical Report. 14. Add provisions to the preliminary grading plan that summarize how groundwater will be handled both during construction and after construction (i.e.: Installation of storm drains, water main, sewer and the below-grade parking lot). Provide an abbreviated explanation on the possibility of de-watering for installing facilities, and design of the below-grade parking structure being water-tight with buoyancy forces included in foundation design. Refer to the Geotechnical Report for information. 15. Qn the preliminary grading plan, identify the quantity of anticipated remedial earthwork. 16. Revise the preliminary grading plan to clarify that the trail improvements include, (minimum) decomposed granite (DG), not compacted soil as an improved surface. 17. Provide longitudinal slopes of the proposed trail at appropriate intervals. 18. Qn the preliminary grading plan, include rip-rap at the sidewalls ofthe box culvert entrance to protect against scour as shown on the plans. The rip-rap at the exit should be shown outside the concrete sill, not on top. 19. Revise the preliminary grading plan to include a note (under "general notes") to clarify how storm water quality is being handled. The intent/function of the filtration ponds should be identified here. 20. The previous preliminary grading plan depicted a storm drain inlet at the cu-de- sac of Laurel Tree Lane. Now that it has been deleted, clarify how storm water from the street will be properly discharged to the creek. Where is the inlet, piping, and discharge? 21. Identify an emergency overflow for the sump condition on the cul-de-sac for Laurel Tree Lane. The emergency overflow should consist of a "surface-gravity" outlet device that allows water to discharge to the creek in the event the sump inlet fails. 22. Revise the preliminary grading plan to identify that the size of the proposed box culvert will be evaluated in final design. Identify the Qioo and Vioo that will be Pacifica Palomar Office Wffding May 15, 2001 Page 3 of 3 intercepted by the box culvert. 23. The discharge velocity of the easterly storm drain leading to the filtration pond is near 30 feet per second. If this is true, the outlet structure should be fitted with a D-41, so that the discharge is reduced to non-erosive velocities. 24. Revise the preliminary grading plans to eliminate the discrepancies where the westerly storm drain has excessive velocities are listed for relatively flat pipes (39 feet per second?). 25. Revise the preliminary grading plan to depict limits of proposed 20-foot wide public water easement to CMWD that are required to encompass the public system. The easement should encompass all water meters, fire service laterals (excluding the double check valve assembly), fire hydrants, and automatic air vacuum assemblies). 26. Revise the preliminary grading plan to include a note to identify a private sewer backflow preventer will be installed on the proposed sewer lateral. This is required due to the potential back-gas of the system when peak flows occur in the truck main. 27. Address the redline comments as noted on the returned plans. Enclosed is a redlined check-print of the project. This check print must be returned with the revised plans to facilitate continued staff review. If you have any questions, please call me at telephone (760) 602-2737. Attachment c: Skip Hammann, Senior Civil Engineer City of Carlsbad ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMORANDUM March 1, 2001 TQ: Van Lynch, Planning FROM: Jeremy Riddle, Engineering SUBJECT: INCOMPLETE STATEMENT ON PACIFICA PALOMAR (SDP 01-01, PIP 01-02, CDP 01-02, V 01-01, APN 212-040-25) Engineering Department staff has completed a review of the application submittal documents for application completeness. The application and plans submitted for this project are incomplete and unsuitable for further review due to the following missing or incomplete items: Incomplete Items 1. Complete the property boundary information on the site pan and the preliminary grading plan. The information on the site plan appears is inaccurate (15.15.84 feet?). 2. Depict the extent of existing improvements on Laurel Tree Road (per drawing 368-1), and all proposed improvements to Laurel Tree Road that are required to serve this project. The current plans do not provide clear delineation between existing and proposed improvements. 3. Depict the extent of proposed sidewalk, median hardscape, landscaping and irrigation improvements along the frontage of Palomar Airport Road. The developer is responsible to install median improvements along half the project frontage to Palomar Airport Road. However, the sidewalk improvements shall extend along the entire project frontage. 4. The City is agreeable to reimbursing the Developer for the cost of installing the other half of the median improvements along El Camino Real. The City already has improvement plans that would ease the design of this segment of median improvements. You can contact John Cahill (at 760-602-2726) to discuss reimbursement issues and the improvement plans for the median improvements. 5. Provide a hydrology/hydraulics report for this project. The report should identify the preliminary sizes if the storm drains/inlets required to intercept, convey and discharge storm water on or across the property. The report Pacifica Palomar OfficPBuilding March 1, 2001 Page 2 of 8 should identify the ultimate storm flows for the storm drains that currently discharge on the property. The report should identify the 100-year inundation limits of the creek as it crosses the property. The report should also identify the criteria used (or to be used) for sizing the filtration ponds. 6. Revise the site plan and preliminary grading plan to clearly indicate the right- of-way that must be obtained to extend Laurel Tree Lane to serve the development. 7. Revise or provide typical street sections for all streets adjacent to or serving the development (both Laurel Tree Lane and Palomar Airport Road). These sections should depict existing and/or proposed pavement, curb, gutter, median landscape and irrigation, sidewalk, streetlights, fire hydrants, etc. 8. Revise the site plan and preliminary grading plan to indicate the proposed storm drains being constructed by this project. 9. Revise the site plan to depict all existing easements. Refer to items 6 through 13, and 15 of the preliminary title report. By not showing these items, staff is unable to verify the concept of this project. Each easement should be depicted, called out and listed with the record document. Identify the disposition or proposed quitclaims for any easements impacted by this project. 10. Revise the site plan to depict all proposed public easements encompassing the storm drain and water facilities. 11. Show all existing fire hydrants located within 300-feet of the site. Below I have also listed engineering concerns that should be addressed prior to final determination or conditioning: Engineering Concerns General 1. Add the discretionary application numbers to the upper right-hand corner of the site plan and preliminary grading plan. 2. Revise the site plan to indicate the existing driveway along Palomar Airport Road will be removed and new curb, gutter, and sidewalk will be installed in its place. 3. Revise the site plan to depict the waiver of access rights to and from Palomar Airport Road along the project frontage. 4. Revise the site plan to indicate the existing right-of-way of Laurel Tree Road to be vacated by separate document. 5. Revise the site plan to indicate the existing portion Laurel Tree Road to be removed. 6. Revise the preliminary grading plan to include a complete legend of all existing Pacifica Palomar Qffic^uilding March 1,2001 Page 3 of 8 and proposed items (i.e.: proposed curb, gutter, sidewalk, pavement, driveway, streetlights, median paving, etc.). 7. A public improvement plan will be required to include, but may not be limited to, the construction of Laurel Tree Lane, public water system, public storm drain system, box culvert, sidewalk, street lights, and median improvements with all appurtenances. 8. Revise the preliminary grading plan so that the symbols for existing facilities are light and dashed, not dark and bold. Dark and bold should only be for proposed construction items. 9. Revise the preliminary grading plan to indicate an irrevocable offer to dedicate (lOD) of a public trail easement encompassing the proposed trail. 10. Revise the site plan and preliminary grading plan to callout Laurel Tree Lane, not Laurel Tree Road that sen/es this project. 11. Revise the site plan to reflect short legal descriptions of all adjacent properties. 12. Provide a letter from SDG&E stating they do not object to this proposed development. Specifically, the proposed street crossing their easement should be addressed. The execution of a joint-use agreement between the City of Carlsbad and SDG&E will be a condition of approval for this project. 13. This project will be required to pay fair share cost for the design and construction of a traffic signal at Laurel Tree Lane and Aviara Drive. 14. Qn the site plans, indicate the location of proposed sewer, water, and irrigation services for the project (typical). 15. Provide a record of survey that certifies the lot area of this development to be 15.69 acres. The Assessors Parcel Maps indicate the lot area to be 13.4 acres. Since the project data appears to be based on 15.69 acres, then certification is required. 16. Revise the title sheet to indicate the EDU's (sewer), GPM (potable water), and GPM (irrigation water) generated or required by the proposed development. 17. Revise the site plan to identify how the gate for the below-grade parking lot is opened. Is it remote controlled? Is there a keypad entry? Where is it? Is it open during business hours and just closed at night? 18. Revise the below-grade parking lot detail sheet (SDP A-2) to complete the dimensions ofthe drive aisles. 19. Revise the below-grade parking lot detail sheet (SDP A-2) to identify the symbols next to the parking stalls. Ensure that vehicles will be able to open doors as shown on the returned plans. 20. Revise the below-grade parking lot detail sheet (SDP A-2) to clarify how a vehicle will back up if columns are in the way along the easterly edge of the structure. Pacifica Palomar Qffic^uilding March 1, 2001 Page 4 of 8 21. Revise the below-grade parking lot detail sheet (SDP A-2) to callout the slope of the proposed drive ramp. 22. Clarify what the "side-yard easement" is that is located along the easterly property line. Is this a side-yard setback line? After reviewing the title report, I could not find an easement with this description. 23. Revise the preliminary grading plan to ensure the emergency access road is constructed of grasscrete, turf-block, or alternate material to ensure the connection does not appear to be a primary ingress and egress point to Palomar Airport Road. Add "no-parking" signs along the emergency access road. 24. Indicate how a truck (per Caltrans 407-E) with a 42-foot turning radius will circulate throughout the site. Show the inside and outside tire tracks. 25. A hold harmless for drainage, odor, and geotechnical conditions will be required for this project. 26. The traffic study submitted for this project is being reviewed by the City Traffic Department and comments will be forthcoming. Streets 27. Qn the site plan and preliminary grading plan, depict the location of existing and proposed street lights along Palomar Airport Road and Laurel Tree Lane. If street light spacing does not meet spacing standards, then new street lights should be installed. 28. Qn the site plan and preliminary grading plan, identify the horizontal radius of Laurel Tree Lane. It is unclear whether proposed streets meet minimum standards. 29. Qn the site plan, identify the slope of Laurel Tree Lane. 30. Revise the typical street sections as shown on the preliminary grading plans. 31. Revise the typical section of Laurel Tree Lane so that it meets the Standards as an Industrial Street. The ultimate right-of-way should be 72-feet, not 66-feet. Please refer to typical sections of Laurel Tree Lane as constructed per drawing 368-1. 32. Revise the preliminary grading plan to so the typical street section of Laurel Tree Lane includes the construction of asphalt berm along the westerly edge where the edge improvements are temporary and will be extended in the future. The current plan shown concrete curb and gutter. Refer to drawing 368-1. Grading 33. This project will require a Grading Permit. 34. Revise the preliminary grading plan to provide sufficient topographic information Pacifica Palomar Qffic^^uilding March 1, 2001 Page 5 of 8 on the westerly adjacent lot (Kelley site) to demonstrate feasibility of accessing the proposed Laurel Tree Lane cul-de-sac. Provide a separate 8^^^ x 11" exhibit depicting a schematic driveway location and driveway grades to the adjacent lot. 35. Eliminate the references in the typical section that refer to proposed 1.5:1 slopes since only 2:1 slopes are permitted. 36. Revise the preliminary grading plan to indicate the proposed and existing slope inclinations throughout the site. 37. Revise the site plan and preliminary grading plan to callout proposed offsite private grading and slope easements to be acquired. 38. Revise the cross-sections on the preliminary grading plan to reflect the approximate location of the water table outlined in the Geotechnical Report. 39. Add provisions to the preliminary grading plan that address how groundwater will be handled both during construction and after construction (i.e.: Installation of storm drains, water main, sewer and the below-grade parking lot). Provide an abbreviated explanation on the possibility of de-watering for installing facilities, and design of the below-grade parking structure being water-tight with buoyancy forces included in foundation design. Refer to the Geotechnical Report for information. 40. Qn the preliminary grading plan, identify the quantity of anticipated remedial earthwork. 41. Revise the preliminary grading plan to include clear symbols for existing and proposed topography. Existing should be light, dashed and screened. Proposed should be dark and bold. Revise the symbols to differentiate between the two. 42. Revise the preliminary grading plan to provide a cross-section of the proposed trail improvements. What is the width of the trail? Indicate the type of surface improvements the trail will consist of. 43. Provide longitudinal slopes of the proposed trail at 100-foot intervals. 44. Qn the preliminary grading plan, clarify the velocity of the creek and near the entrance and exit of the box culvert. If velocities are erosive, then rip-rap should be considered. 45. Qn the preliminary grading plan, provide a cross-section of the creek to demonstrate grading, channel design, storm water level, side-slope protection, etc. Drainage 46. Revise the site plan and preliminary grading plan to depict limits of proposed public storm drain easements that are required to encompass each storm drain extended from Palomar Airport Road to the filtration basins/creek. The storm drain easement shall be a minimum of 20-feet wide unless pipe size, pipe depth and constructability issues warrant additional easement width. Pacifica Palomar Qffic^^uilding March 1, 2001 Page 6 of 8 47. Revise the preliminary grading plan to depict limits of proposed public storm drain easements that encompass the existing easterly storm drain, if none exists. 48. Revise the preliminary grading plan to depict a proposed public access easement from the proposed driveway entrance on Laurel Tree Lane, through the drive aisles of the parking lot, leading to each proposed public drainage easement being extended to the creek edge. This is required to ensure that city staff can access the facilities located on this property. 49. Revise the preliminary grading plan to include a note (under "general notes") to clarify how storm water quality is being handled. The intent/function of the filtration ponds should be identified here. 50. Revise the preliminary grading plan to clarify the difference between existing and proposed drainage pipes. The symbol on the current plan looks the same. It should be clear was exists and what is being constructed by this development. 51. Revise the preliminary grading plan to identify the proposed "public" storm drains that extend off Palomar Airport Road. 52. Revise the preliminary grading plan to clearly identify that the inlets and storm drains that collect water from the site are private systems (i.e.: parking lot). 53. Include provisions to clarify how storm run-off collected in the below-grade parking lot is intercepted and discharged (i.e.: sump-pump and pressure line?). Where is the drainage outlet? 54. Revise the below-grade parking lot detail sheet (SDP A-2) to depict sufficient information (i.e.: drainage arrows, inlets, pipes, sump-pump, and pressure line) to show how drainage will be collected to the sump and discharged. 55. Clarify how the storm flows for the existing storm drains crossing Palomar Airport Road were obtained. What reference is used? Obtain a copy of the hydrology/hydraulics report for the future upstream development (Carlsbad Municipal Golf Course) and verify whether the storm flows you have listed reflect future/ultimate conditions. A reference to this report should be listed in the hydrology/hydraulic report for this project. 56. Revise the preliminary grading plan to include a secondary storm water overflow for each filtration pond (or a primary one). The overflow may consist of a rip-rap or concrete weir structure. This is to ensure that erosion does not occur in the event the capacity ofthe ponds is exceeded. 57. Revise the preliminary grading plan to identify that the size of the proposed box culvert will be evaluated in final design. Identify the Qioo and Vioo that will be intercepted by the box culvert. 58. Revise the preliminary grading plan to identify the limits of 100-year inundation experienced by the creek as it crosses the property. This information should be calculated by the hydrology/hydraulics report for this project. 59. It appears that each proposed headwali or discharge location on this project is not accessible by city maintenance staff. If an all-weather access road to the Pacifica Palomar Qffic^^uilding March 1, 2001 Page 7 of 8 channel bottom is not feasible, each discharge location should be fitted with a San Diego Regional Standard Drawing D-41 energy dissipater or alternative solution to ensure low maintenance and preventing vegetation from blocking discharge areas. 60. Identify an emergency overflow for the sump condition on the cul-de-sac for Laurel Tree Lane. The emergency overflow should consist of an "surface- gravity" outlet device that allows water to discharge to the creek in the event the sump inlet fails. 61. Revise the preliminary grading plan to identify the sizes of all existing and proposed storm drains. Water 62. Revise the preliminary grading plan to depict limits of proposed 20-foot wide public water easement to CMWD that are required to encompass the public system. The easement should encompass all water meters, fire service laterals (excluding the double check valve assembly), fire hydrants, and automatic air vacuum assemblies). 63. Identify the size, type, and HGL of each existing water main on or adjacent to the property. Add a reference of the City drawing number that constructed each of these facilities. 64. Revise the preliminary grading plan to ensure that proposed water mains are not located in planter areas. In general, public water mains in the parking lot should be located in the center of the drive aisle so that it can be property accessed, maintained, repaired, and marked out. 65. Qn the preliminary grading plan, clarify the point of connections for the proposed water system on Laurel Tree Lane and Palomar Airport Road. There should be a clear delineation between existing and proposed. 66. Qn the preliminary grading plan, identify the fire service connection. The site plan indicates the backflow for the fire sprinklers near the southwest corner of the proposed structure. Revise the schematic location so the backflow device is closer to the proposed 8-inch public main. The lateral leading to the backflow is considered public, and this long lateral would need a profile and easement extension as currently designed. 67. Perform research to verify the pressure zones in Palomar Airport Road and Laurel Tree Lane are the same. The hydraulic grade lines for each existing main and proposed main should be listed on the preliminary grading plan. 68. Perform additional utility research for Palomar Airport Road. There are additional water mains and sewer mains that are not depicted. This is especially critical to ensure the wrong pressure zone is not being connected to. 69. Qn the preliminary grading plan, identify the size, type, HGL, and reference drawing number for the existing waterline connected to on Laurel Tree Lane. Pacifica Palomar Qffic^^uilding March 1, 2001 Page 8 of 8 70. Clarify if there is fire hydrant required at the northerly terminus of Laurel Tree Lane. Meet with the Fire Marshal to determine to approximate location of all proposed fire hydrants. Sewer 71. Add a note to the preliminary grading plan to identify a private sewer backflow preventer will be installed on the lateral. This is required due to the potential back-gas of the system when peak flows occur in the truck main. 72. Revise the preliminary grading plan to indicate a clean-out installed on the sewer lateral in the center ofthe drive aisle as shown on the returned plans. 73. Revise the preliminary grading plan to indicate a proposed public sewer easement that encompasses the proposed sewer lateral as shown on the returned plans. The easement should extend just to the edge of the clean-out in the center of the drive aisle. The clean-out should be located outside the easement edge per City Standards. 74. Revise the preliminary grading plan to indicate the limits of the existing public sewer easement listed in the title report. This will help understand where the proposed easement must extend to. Enclosed is a redlined check-print of the project. This check print must be returned with the revised plans to facilitate continued staff review. If you have any questions, please call me at telephone (760) 602-2737. Attachment c: Skip Hammann, Senior Civil Engineer City of Carlsbad ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMORANDUM November 16, 2000 TO: Greg Fisher, Plarming FROM: Jeremy Riddle, Engineering ^ SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF PACIFICA PALOMAR PRE 00-77 NEAR LAUREL TREE ROAD (APN: 212-040-25) Engineering Department staff has completed a preliminary review of the above subject. For the applicants benefit we have broken down our issues into two sections. The first section identifies "Significant Issues" and the second section lists "General Issues". Prior to formal application submittal the following items must be adequately resolved/addressed: Significant Issues I. The updated National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit is nearing approval, and would involve significant changes to this project and other projects processed throughout the San Diego region. It is our understanding that these changes will not include a grandfather clause for projects. This means that this project and all other projects will be impacted pursuant to the approved NPDES requirements, no matter what stage of the project are in. We encourage you to review the draft permit requirements so that you understand the nature of our comments when they are made on projects. In order to facilitate the compliance of this project, the following are some criteria that should be incorporated into the design of the project: a) Post development run-off should not exceed pre-development run-off. This shall be proved via engineering calculations in a project hydrology/hydraulic report. b) On parking lot areas, include additional measures required to capture anticipated pollutants from the site. More often than not, grass-lined swales should be utilized to filter storm water before entering inlets. These tend to be the most efficient filter for pollutants. c) Offsite and downstream siltation would not be pennitted at any time during the project (long term or near term). This may include utilizing the onsite basin until all disturbed soil has been fully landscaped or paved according to the approved plans. d) Submittal of a construction and post-development storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) would be required prior to project approval. 2. Please indicate all existing and proposed utilities along Laurel Tree Road and Palomar Airport Road (i.e., storm drain, water, sewer, etc.) that will serve the development. Depict looping of public water facilities from Laurel Tree Lane to Palomar Airport PRE 00-77, Pacifica Palomar Page 2 of4 November 16, 2000 Road. Indicate gravity flow sewer facilities with invert elevations. The submitted plan does not depict any facilities. 3. Depict the extent of existing improvements on Laurel Tree Road (per drawing 368-1), and all proposed improvements to Laurel Tree Road that are required to serve this project. 4. Depict the extent of proposed sidewalk, median hardscape, and median landscaping along frontage of Palomar Airport Road. 5. Meet with the Fire Department to identity the necessary fire protection measures required for this project (access, fire hydrants, sprinklering, etc.). All proposed fire hydrants must be served by public water mains. 6. There is insufficient information to make a determination if a Grading Permit will be required. Provide grading quantities of cut/fill/export/import/remedial (in cubic yards) and depict existing and proposed topography. 7. A Public Improvement Plan will be required for the extension of Laurel Tree Road the public utilities required to serve the project. All onsite public utilities must be reflected on public improvement plans. 8. This project will require the acquisition of offsite right-of-way, slope and grading easements in order to construct Laurel Tree Road. 9. Regarding the extension of Laurel Tree Road, submit a letter from SDG&E stating their support for the proposed use within their easement. A joint-use agreement will be required for this crossing. 10. This project will be constrained for exiting vehicles during an emergency. This project must provide two points of access. Revising the project entrance to include two 20-feet wide driveways off Laurel Tree Road may accommodate this. Consider all options to best fit this project (and adjacent properties). 11. No access will be permitted from Palomar Airport Road, except the emergency access road pursuant to Fire Department considerations. 12. Revise the plans to indicate the proposed relinquishment of access rights to and from Palomar Airport Road. Access for this site shall be from Laurel Tree Road. 13. This project will be required to pay their fair-share cost for the design and construction of the traffic signal at Aviara Parkway and Laurel Tree Road. 14. It is outside the scope of a preliminary review for staff to approve technical studies. A draft copy of a traffic study for this project was provided during our review. All project documents will be reviewed upon a formal application to the City of Carlsbad. 15. Provide a preliminary hydrology study which identifies the "before" development discharge and the "after" development discharge flows. Identify measures required to ensure post-development flows do not exceed pre-development flows. Identify the PRE 00-77, Pacifica Palomar Pagl/of4 November 16, 2000 100-year inundation limits crossing the subject property. 16. Submit a preliminary Geotechnical report that provides recommendations on the proposed project. General Issues 1. Please note that this project has undergone a number of preliminary reviews and there are repeated issues that were listed in our previous review. 2. Please be advised that in order to make a more in-depth review of the proposed development, a more complete design of the project is required. 3. Dimension the drive aisles site plan throughout the parking lot (minimum 24' width). 4. Provide cross-sections of the site parallel and perpendicular to Palomar Airport Road. This is required to establish elevation differences between existing and proposed topography and how it relates to Palomar Airport Road. 5. Provide sufficient dimensions to establish all parking lot aisle widths (typical). 6. Ensure that the project includes 5-foot offsets at each comer parking stall enabling vehicles to back out if another overhangs (typical). 7. Revise the plan to indicate the ADT (traffic), EDU's (sewer), GPM (potable water), and GPM (reclaimed water) generated or required by the proposed development. 8. Depict water, sewer, and irrigation laterals required to serve the project. 9. Show all existing and proposed topography and drainage pattems for the site. Revise the plans to indicate how on-site surface mnoff is controlled. Identity the location, alignment, and discharge of any proposed drainage system. Depict the limits of 100- year inundation crossing the property. 10. Indicate the legal description of the proposed development and all adjacent properties. 11. Provide a Vicinity Map on the site plan. 12. Submit the site plan at either a I" = 40', or, I" = 20' scale. 13. If slopes are proposed off-site, a private slope easement must be obtained from the adjacent property owner. 14. Show typical street sections for Laurel Tree Road and Palomar Airport Road. Indicate existing and proposed improvements on the typical sections. 15. Depict all proposed public easements (sewer, water, storm drain, access, etc.) on the site plan. 16. Identify how refuse tmcks will maneuver throughout the site. 17. Indicate 42' (Caltrans 407-E) tuming radii on the plan to verify a tmck will circulate PRE 00-77, Pacifica Palomar Page52'of4 November 16, 2000 safely throughout the site. . 18. A recent Preliminary Title Report (PR) (issued within 6 months of formal application submittal) will be required for the proposed project. 19. All easements and encumbrances as identified in Schedule "B" of the PR must be indicated on the site plan. The future disposition of any easements and encumbrances must also be identified. 20. The complete property boundary must be shown on the site plan, which must include all bearings and distances. 21. Indicate how National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) criteria will be met. This could include, but not be limited to, doing one or a combination of the following: directing surface mn-off through vegetated swales prior to discharge to a storm drain or the public right of way, constmcting a gravel/sand/fossil filter system, constracting de-pollutant basins, etc. Also, any loading areas that are located in a sump must have pump facilities to direct drainage to a pollutant mitigation area. 22. This preliminary review does not constitute a complete review of the proposed project. Additional items of concem may be identified upon formal project application submittal. 23. A redlined check print is enclosed for the applicants use in making the requested revisions. This check print should be returned with the formal application submittal to facilitate continued staff review. If you or the applicant has any questions, please either see or call me at 760-602-2737. Attachment c: Skip Hammaim, Senior Engineer Mike Smith, Fire Marshal City of Carlsbad ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 20, 2000 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Van Lynch, Associate Planner Jeremy Riddle, Associate Enginee PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF PACIFICA PALOMAR PRE 00-43 NEAR LAUREL TREE ROAD (APN: 212-040-25) Engineering Department staff has completed a preliminary review of the above subject. Prior to formal application submittal the following items must be adequately resolved/addressed: 1. Please be advised that in order to make a more in-depth review of the proposed development, a more complete design ofthe project is required. 2. Please indicate all existing and proposed utilities along Laurel Tree Road and Palomar Airport Road (i.e., storm drain, water, sewer, etc.) that will serve the development. Depict looping of public water facilities from Laurel Tree Lane to Palomar Airport Road. Indicate gravity flow sewer facilities with invert elevations. The submitted plan does not depict any facilities, except a few storm drains. 3. Depict the extent of existing improvements on Laurel Tree Road (per drawing 368-1), and all proposed improvements to Laurel Tree Road required to serve this project. 4. Revise the plan to indicate the ADT (traffic), EDU's (sewer), GPM (potable water), and GPM (reclaimed water) generated or required by the proposed development. 5. Meet with the Fire Department to identify the necessary fire protection measures required for this project (access, fire hydrants, sprinklering, etc.). All proposed fire hydrants must be served by public water mains. 6. Show all existing and proposed topography and drainage pattems for the site. Revise the plans to indicate how on-site surface runoff is controlled. Identify the location, alignment, and discharge of any proposed drainage system. Depict the limits of 100- year inundation crossing the property. 7. Indicate the legal description of the proposed development and all adjacent properties. 8. Provide a Vicinity Map on the site plan. 9. Submit the site plan at either a 1" = 40', or, I" = 20' scale. 10. There is insufficient information to make a determination if a Grading Permit will be required. Provide grading quantities of cut/fill/export/import/remedial (in cubic yards) and depict existing and proposed topography. 11. A Public Improvement Plan will be required for the extension of Laurel Tree Road the public utilities required to serve the project. All onsite public utilities must be PRE 00-43, Pacifica Palomar Page 2 of 2 July 20, 2000 shovm on public improvement plans as well. 12. Acquisition of offsite right-of-way, slope and grading easements must be secured in order to construct Laurel Tree Road. 13. Regarding the extension of Laurel Tree Road, submit a letter from SDG&E stating their support for the proposed use within their easement. A joint-use agreement will be required for this crossing. 14. If slopes are proposed off-site, a private slope easement must be obtained from the adjacent property owner. 15. This project must provide two points of access. Revising the project entrance to include two 20-feet wide driveways off Laurel Tree Road may accommodate this. Consider all options to best fit this project (and adjacent properties). 16. Show typical street sections for Laurel Tree Road and Palomar Airport Road. Indicate existing and proposed improvements on the typical sections. 17. Revise the plans to indicate the proposed relinquishment of access rights to and from Palomar Airport Road. Access for this site shall be from Laurel Tree Road. 18. It appears a minor subdivision is proposed. If so, submit for a tentative parcel map. Depict lot line dimensions, lot areas, and easements on the property. 19. Depict all proposed public easements (sewer, water, storm drain, access, etc.) on the site plan. 20. Depict the limits of proposed private access and utility easements on the site plan for the benefit of Parcels 1,2 and 3. 21. This project will be required to pay their fair-share cost for the design and constmction of the traffic signal at Aviara Parkway and Laurel Tree Road. 22. Dimension the drive aisles site plan throughout the parking lot (minimum 24' width). 23. Depict the location of trash enclosures required to serve the development. Call-out enclosures per Carlsbad Standard drawing GS-16. Identify how refuse tmcks will maneuver throughout the site. 24. Indicate 42' (Caltrans 407-E) tuming radii on the plan to verify a tmck will circulate safely throughout the site. . 25. A recent Preliminary Title Report (PR) (issued within 6 months of formal application submittal) will be required for the proposed project. 26. All easements and encumbrances as identified in Schedule "B" of the PR must be indicated on the site plan. The future disposition of any easements and encumbrances must also be identified. 27. The complete property boundary must be shown on the site plan, which must include all bearings and distances. PRE 00-43, Pacifica Palomar Page 2 of 2 July 20, 2000 28. Indicate how National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) criteria will be met. This could include, but not be limited to, doing one or a combination of the following: directing surface run-off through vegetated swales prior to discharge to a storm drain or the public right of way, constmcting a gravel/sand/fossil filter system, constmcting de-pollutant basins, etc. Also, any loading areas that are located in a sump must have pump facilities to direct drainage to a pollutant mitigation area. 29. A draft copy of a traffic study for this project was provided during our review. Since this document was not completed, our review cannot be considered complete. However, comments were made directly on the document that must be addressed. The study shall include an analysis of the ADT and peak traffic (of this project) contributing to the signalized intersection of Poinsettia Lane and Laurel Tree Lane. The study shall also include an analysis on whether the existing improvements to Laurel Tree Lane are sufficient to accommodate the anticipated traffic from the project (and the Laurel Tree apartments). Revise the study to utilize the 2020 model as the build-out, not 2005. This document will be reviewed in detail by engineering and traffic staff, once a formal application is submitted. 30. Provide a preliminary hydrology study which identifies the "before" development discharge and the "after" development discharge flows. Identify if detention basins are warranted. The study should also identify preliminary recommendations on the anticipated storm drain infrastmcture required as part of the development. Identify the 100-year inundation limits crossing the subject property. 31. Submit a preliminary Geotechnical report that provides recommendations on the proposed project. 32. This preliminary review does not constitute a complete review of the proposed project. Additional items of concem may be identified upon formal project application submittal. 33. A redlined check print is enclosed for the applicants use in making the requested revisions. This check print should be returned with the formal application submittal to facilitate continued staff review. If you or the applicant has any questions, please either see or call me at 760-602-2737. Attachment c: Skip Hammann, Senior Engineer Mike Shirey, Associate Engineer From: Mikhail Ogawa To: Don Neu Date: 3/29/00 3:08PM Subject: Pacifica Carlsbad - PRE 00-12, CMWD 00-206 A preliminary review ofthe subject project has been completed. The following are CMWD comments: 1) Any on-site public water pipelines and fire hydrants shall be contained within a 20-foot wide easement dedicated to CMWD. No dead-end fire hydrant runs longer than 150 feet will be allowed, a "looped" water line system may be required. 2) The developer shall show all existing and proposed potable water, recycled water and sewer pipelines for the project on the Site Development Plan. 3) The developer shall coordinate with the City Fire Marshal to determine the locations of fire hydrants and sprinkler systems. 4) All landscaping shall be designed to be irrigated with recycled water per CMWD standards and City ordinances. 5) The developer shall provide the Deputy City Engineer - utilities with the irrigation and potable water demands in gallons per minute and with the estimated sewer flows in million of gallons per day. 6) The developer shaii provide a colored recycled water use map to the Planning Department for Deputy City Engineer - utilities approval. If you have any questions, please call me at ext. 2762. CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT LAND USE REVIEW March 3, 2000 TO: DON NEU, ASSOCIATE PLANNER FROM: Glen Van Peski, Consultant Land Use Engineer VIA: BOB WOJCIK, DEPUTY CITY ENGINEER RE: PRELIMINARY REVIEW PRE 00-12 PACIFICA CARLSBAD The Engineering Department has completed our preliminary review of the above-referenced project. Any formal application submittal for this project must adequately address/resolve the following items: 1. Site plan should show, topography within 100 feet of the project boundary, widths and grades of adjacent streets or alleys, street cross-sections, proposed/existing street improvements and utilities (sewer, water, storm drain) and all items indicated in the submittal checklists. 2. Provide a vicinity map on the site plan. 3. Dimension the site plan fully, including sidewalks and parking spaces. 4. Show proposed grades and spot elevations. 5. A recent Preliminary Title Report (PR) (issued within 6 months of formal application submittal) will be required for the proposed project. All easements and encumbrances as identified in Schedule "B" of the PR must be indicated on the site plan. The future disposition of any easements and encumbrances must also be identified. 6. Please indicate the amount of grading proposed for the project in cubic yards of cut/fill and import/export. 7. Indicate how National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) criteria will be met. This could include, but not be limited to, doing one or a combination ofthe following: directing surface run-off through vegetated swales prior to discharge to a storm drain or the public right of way, constructing a gravel/sand/peat filter system, constructing depollutant basins, etc. 8. Show typical street sections for Laurel Tree Road and Palomar Airport Road. 9. Refer to settlement agreement between City and Kelly for the disposition of Laurel Tree Road. The City will not be constructing the improvements - refer to document for Pacifica Carlsbad Preliminary Review Page 2 of 2 particulars. Coordination will be required to provide access to your site. If your project goes first and constructs the street, upgrading of the storm drain culvert my require permits from State and Federal wildlife agencies. 10. No access to Palomar Airport Road will be permitted. 11. A traffic study will be required to analyze the project impacts on the circulation elements of the area. Be aware that the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real is at or near capacity. This project will contribute directly to the intersection and will have an impact. Compliance with Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 5 could require additional mitigation to develop this site. 12. Indicate project's proposed ADT on the site plan. 13. A biology report should be submitted with the formal application indicating limits of wetlands and riparian habitat. 14. Project will be required to extend drainage improvements to the existing creek. Permits from State and Federal wildlife agencies may be required. 15. Check truck turning movements onsite to make sure adequate room is provided. This preliminary review does not constitute a complete review of the proposed project. Additional items of concern may be identified upon formal project application submittal. A red- lined checkprint is enclosed for the applicants use in reviewing the preliminary comments. This check print should be returned with the formal application submittal to facilitate continued staff review. If you or the applicant has any concerns, please either see me or call me at 760-941-9500. Glen K. Van Peski, P.E. Consultant Engineer - Land Use Review c: Bob Wojcik, Deputy City Engineer MEMORANDUM April 1, 1999 TO: SENIOR PLANNER DON NEU FROM: Associate Engineer - Land Use Review PRE 99-24: PACIFICA CARLSBAD PRELIMINARY REVIEW The Engineering Department staff has completed a preliminary review of the above referenced project. Prior to formal appiication submittal the following items should be adequately resolved/addressed: 1. Please be aware that the parcel adjacent to Aviara Parkway is not a legal parcel. It is currently a portion of a larger parcel that includes some land on the west side of Aviara Parkway. That land, and therefore the portion in your proposal, is currently under discretionary review for SDP 97-25 the Kelly Corporate Center. 2. The access shown from Palomar Airport Road and from Aviara Parkway will not be allowed. As part of the condemnation agreement the abutter's rights of access from both streets will be waived. Access to the site will be via Street "A" at the south side at the existing property line. 3. The cul-de-sac for Street "A" will probably have to be located across the creek within the proposed development. It is suggested that the circulation scheme for all the proposed uses be designed to include two or three access points off the cul-de-sac bulb. 4. The traffic generation for the proposed uses will most likely require a full traffic study to analyze its impacts on the circulation elements of the area. Be aware that the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real is at or close to capacity. This project will contribute directly to the intersection and will have an impact. Compliance with Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 5 could require additional mitigation to develop this site. 5. Prior to approval of any development encroaching into the existing SDG&E easement, a letter from SDG&E will be required agreeing to the proposed use of their easement 6. Since no existing or proposed grades are shown, it cannot be determined if a grading permit will be required. Please show existing and proposed contours 7. A minimum clear distance of 5 ft. is required when adjacent parking stalls are located perpendicular or at an angle to each other. 8. The trash enclosures need to be shown. As part of the circulation design, please verify that a truck with a 42-ft turning radius (CalTrans 407E) will be able to maneuver to pick up the trash. PRE 99-24: PACIFICA CARLSBAD PAGE: 2 PRELIMINARY REVIEW APRIL 1,1999 10. Indicate how National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System criteria will be met. Show parking lot water flow through a filtering system prior to discharge into a storm drain. 11. This preliminary review does not constitute a complete review of the proposed project, additional items of concern may be identified upon formal project application submittal. If you or the applicant have any questions, please contact me at (760) 438-1161 extension 4501. FRANK J.JIMENO Associate Engineer Principal Civil Engineer - Land Development 4 • City of Carlsbad Planning Department August 30, 2001 Snnith Consulting Architects Scott Cairns Ste 200 12220 El Camino Real San Diego CA 92130 SUBJECT: GPA 01-05/SDP 01-01/CDP 01-12/PIP 01-02 - PACIFICA PALOMAR OFFICE BUILDING The preliminary staff report is enclosed. This preliminary report will be discussed by staff at the Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) meeting which will be held on September 10, 2001. A twenty (20) minute appointment has been set aside for you at 11:30. If you have any questions concerning your project you should attend the DCC meeting. It is necessary that you bring your required unmounted colored exhibit(s) with you to this meeting in order for your project to go forward to the Planning Commission. Your colored exhibits must be submitted at this time to ensure review by the Planning Commission at their briefings. If the colored exhibits are not available for their review, your proiect could be rescheduled to a later time. If you do not plan to attend this meeting, please make arrangements to have your colored exhibit(s) here by the scheduled time above. If you need additional information concerning this matter, please contact your Planner, Van Lynch at (760) 602-4613. CITY OF CARLSBAD GARY E. WAYNE Assistant Planning Director GEW:VL:cs Island Realty I LP, Pacifica Enterprises. Ste 160, 12780 High Bluff Dr., San Diego CA 92130 File Copy 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us ^ • • FILEOOf Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF DECISION September 24, 2001 Scott Caims Smith Consulting Architects 12220 El Camino Real, Ste. 200 SanDiego, CA 92130 SUBJECT: GPA 01-05/CDP 01-02/SDP 01-01 - PACIFICA PALOMAR OFFICE BUILDING At the Planning Commission meeting of September 19, 2001, your application was considered. The Commission voted 4-2 (Heineman/Nielsen) to RECOMMEND ADOPTION/RECOMMEND APPROVAL/APPROVAL. The decision of the Planning Commission is advisory and will be forwarded to the City Council. If you have any questions regarding the final dispositions of your application, please call the Planning Department at (760) 602-4600. Sincerely, MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning Director MJH:VL:nih Enclosed: Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5040, 5041, 5042, 5043 c: Island Realty I LP Pacifica Enterprises 12780 High Bluff Dr., Ste. 160 SanDiego, CA92130 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department September 20, 2001 BCS Natural Resources Corporation PO Box 7716 Newport Beach, CA 92658 SIM USA Inc. 1400 Flame Tree Carlsbad CA 92009 RE: GPA 01-05/SDP 01-01/CDP 01-02 - PACIFICA PALOMAR OFFICE BUILDING The apphcation for a Site Development Permit (SDP 01-01) was approved by the Planning Commission at its meeting of September 19, 2001. The decision of the Planning Commission is final unless appealed within ten (10) calendar days ofthe decision. The decision of the Planning Commission was advisory for the General Plan Amendment and Coastal Development Pennit and will automatically go forward to the City Council for final decision. You will be notified of the decision by the City Council. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding this project, or other matters within the City of Carlsbad, at 602-4613. Sincerely yours, VAN L'YNCH Associate Planner VLxs c: file 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us ® BCS 9^atura[Resources Corporation T.O. 7716, O^zvport 'Btach, Caiifomia, 92658 Sept. 12, 2001 Mr. Van Lynch City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 (949)640-8500 Subject: Case # GPA 01-05/SDP 01-01/CDP 01-02 Pacifica Palomar Office Bldg. I am writting in response to the" Notice of Public Hearing" re a proposal to construct 120,000 sq. ft. of office bldg. on Parcel #212-040-25. As principals of BCS Program L-2,owners of the property immediately south, we are very concerned with the roof top design of the proposed structure from a visual and noise standpoint. Our residentially desiginated property overlooks the subject site and we are requesting that roof mounted HVAC, mechanical systems and other similar devices be designed and screened so as to prevent visual and noise impacts to the future residents of our site. In addition we also are requesting the same visual impact mitigation for the trash holding facilities. We are specifically requesting notification of the decision on this project. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely Lloyd Sellinger Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department August 14, 2001 Smith Consulting Architects Ste 200 12220 El Camino Real San Diego CA 92130 SUBJECT: GPA 01-05/SDP 01-01/PIP 01-02 - PACIFICA PALOMAR OFFICE BUILDING The preliminary staff report for the above referenced project will be mailed to you on Friday, August 17, 2001. This preliminary report will be discussed by staff at the Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) meeting which will be held on August 27, 2001. A twenty (20) minute appointment has been set aside for you at 9:00. If you have any questions concerning your project you should attend the DCC meeting. It is necessary that you bring your required unmounted colored exhibit(s) with you to this meeting in order for your project to go forward to the Planning Commission. Your colored exhibits must be submitted at this time to ensure review by the Planning Commission at their briefings. If the colored exhibits are not available for their review, your proiect could be rescheduled to a later time. If you do not plan to attend this meeting, please make arrangements to have your colored exhibit(s) here by the scheduled time above. If you need additional information concerning this matter, please contact your Planner, Van Lynch at (760) 602-4613. CITY OE-CARLSBAD IRY BTWAYNE Assistant Planning Director GEW:VL:cs Island Realty I LP, Pacifica Enterprises, Ste 160, 12780 High Bluff Dr., San Diego CA 92130 File Copy 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.cl.carlsbad.ca.us Investment Real Estate Services Enterprises August 6,2001 City of Carlsbad Van Lynch Associate Planner VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Planning Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 SUBJECT: GPA 01-05/ SDP 01-01/ PIP 01-02/ CDP 01-02 - PACIFICA PALOMAR OFFICE BUILDING Pursuant to your request of July 17* to Smith Consulting Architects, aiclosed are radius maps @ 1" = 400', the 600' Owners List and mailing labels, and the 100' Occupant list and mailing labels. Also enclosed ha-ewith is a check in the amount of $10.54 payable to the City of Carlsbad to cover postage per Requirement "E" of your letter. Sincerely, PACIFICA ENTERPRISES Paul HoUing, CPM Director of Asset Management Scott Caims, Smith Consulting Architects Ali Shapouri, Shapouri and Associates Dario DeLuca, Pacifica Enterprises 12780 High Bluff Dr., Suite 160 • San Diego, CA 92130 • (858) 755-0216 • Fax (858) 755-1687 Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department July 17, 2001 Smith Consulting Architects Scott Cairns 12220 El Camino Real San Diego CA 92130 SUBJECT: GPA 01-05/ SDP 01-01/ PIP 01-02/ CDP 01-02 - PACIFICA PALOMAR OFFICE BUILDING Your application has been tentatively scheduled for a hearing by the Planning Commission on September 9, 2001. However, for this to occur, you must submit the additional items listed below. If the required items are not received by August 15, 2001, your project will be rescheduled for a later hearing. In the event the scheduled hearing date is the last available date for the City to comply with the Permit Streamlining Act, and the required items listed below have not been submitted, the project will be scheduled for denial. 1. Please submit the following plans: A) 10 copies of your site plans, landscape plans, building elevation plans, floor plans on 24" x 36" sheets of paper, stapled in complete sets folded into 8/2' x 11" size. B) One BV2" X 11" copy of your reduced site plan, building elevation and floor plans. These copies must be of a quality which is photographically reproducible. Only essential data should be included on plans. 2. As required by Section 65091 of the California Government Code, please submit the following information needed for noticing and sign the enclosed form: A) 600' Owners List - a typewritten list of names and addresses of all property owners within a 600 foot radius of the subject property, including the applicant and/or owner. The list shall include the San Diego County Assessor's parcel number from the latest equalized assessment rolls. B) 100' Occupant List - (Coastal Development Permits Only) a typewritten list of names and addresses of all occupants within a 100 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us GPA 01-05/SDP 01-01/ July 17, 2001 Page 2 01-02 - PACIFICA PALOMAR OFTCE BUILDING foot radius of the subject property, including the applicant and/or owner. C) Mailing Labels - two (2) separate sets of mailing labels of the property owners and occupants within a 600 and 100 foot radius respectivly of the subject property. The list must be typed in all CAPITAL LETTERS, left justified, void of any punctuation. For any address other than a single-family residence, an apartment or suite number must be included but the Apartment, Suite and/or Building Number must NOT appear in the street address line. DO NOT type assessor's parcel number on labels. DO NOT provide addressed envelopes - PROVIDE LABELS ONLY. Acceptable fonts are: Arial 11 pL Arial Rounded MT Bold 9 pt, Courier 14 pt. Courier New 11 pt, and MS Line Draw 11 pL Sample labels are as follows: UNACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE Mrs. Jane Smith 123 Magnolia Ave., Apt #3 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Mrs. Jane Smith 123 Magnolia Ave. Apt. #3 Carlsbad, CA 92008 MRS JANE SMITH APT 3 123 MAGNOLIA AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 D) E) Radius Map - a map to scale, not less than 1" = 200', showing all lots entirely and partially within 600 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property. Each of these lots should be consecutively numbered and correspond with the property owner's list. The scale of the map may be reduced to a scale acceptable to the Planning Director if the required scale is impractical. Fee - a fee shall be paid for covering the cost of mailing notices. Such fee shall equal the current postage rate times the total number of labels. Cash check (payable to.the City of Carlsbad) and credit cards are accepted. Sincerely, Vanid-ynch Associate Planner VLcs Attachment I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS LIST AND LABELS SUBMITTED TO THE" CITY OF CARLSBAD ON THIS DATE REPRESENT THE LATEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION FROM THE EQUALIZED ASSESSOR'S ROLES. APPLICATION NAME AND NUMBER PACIFICA PALOMAR OFFICE BUILDING GPA 01-05/ SDP 01-01/CDP 01-02 APPLICANT OR APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE BY: DATE: RECEIVED BY DATE: « Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department July 2,2001 Calif. Dept of Fish and Game Environmental Services Division Natural Communities Conservation Planning 4949 Viewridge Avenue San Diego CA 92123 SUBJECT: PACIFICA PALOMAR OFFICE BUILDING - SDP 01-01 Please find enclosed a copy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration, Environmental Impact Assessment and Biological Studies prepared for the Pacifica Palomar project located adjacent and south of Palomar Airport Road and east of Aviara Parkway. The document begins its 20 day public review in accordance with CEQA Guidelines on July 5,2001. The project consists of a three story, 120,000 square foot office building with imderground and surface parking to be developed in the disturbed portion of the site. The remainder of the site will be preserved in open space. The project proposes a 50-foot buffer from the wetland area with citywide trail and a water detention structure. Please forward to me any comments you may have regarding the project's impacts and proposed mitigation measures for which you are a responsible agency under CEQA. If you have questions regarding the project ofthe proposed environmental determination, please call me at (760) 602- 4613. Sincerely, Van I^nch Associate Planner VLxs Attachments c: File 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department July 2,2001 John Martin U.S. Fish and Wildhfe Service 2730 Loker Avenue West Carlsbad Ca 92008 SUBJECT: FWS-SDG-1497.1 - PACIFICA PALOMAR OFFICE BUILDING - SDP 01- 01 Dear Mr. Martin: Please find enclosed a copy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration, Environmental Impact Assessment and Biological Studies prepared for the Pacifica Palomar project located adjacent and south of Palomar Airport Road and east of Aviara Parkway. The document begins its 20-day public review in accordance with CEQA Guidelines on July 5, 2001. The project consists of a three story, 120,000 square foot office building with underground and surface parking to be developed in the disturbed portion of the site. The remainder of the site will be preserved in open space. The project proposes a 50-foot buffer from the wetland area with citywide trail and a water detention structure. Please see your letter dated June 8, 2001. Please forward to me any comments you may have regarding the project's impacts and proposed mitigation measures for which you are a responsible agency under CEQA. If you have questions regarding the project of the proposed environmental determination, please call me at (760) 602- 4613. Sincerely, Van Lynch Associate Plarmer VL:cs Attachment c: File 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department July 2, 2001 Cahfomia Coastal Commission Bill Ponder 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103 San Diego, CA 92108-4402 SUBJECT: PACIFICA PALOMAR OFFICE BUILDING - SDP 01-01 Dear Mr. Ponder: Please find enclosed a copy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration, Environmental Impact Assessment and Biological Studies prepared for the Pacifica Palomar project located adjacent and south of Palomar Airport Road and east of Aviara Parkway. The document begins its 20-day public review in accordance with CEQA Guidelines on July 5, 2001 The project consists of a three story, 120,000 square foot office building with imderground and surface parking to be developed in the disturbed portion of the site. The remainder of the site will be preserved in open space. The project proposes a 50-foot buffer from the wetland area with citywide frail and a water detention structure. Please forward to me any comments you may have regarding the project's impacts and proposed mitigation measures for which you are a responsible agency imder CEQA. If you have questions regarding the project of the proposed enviroimiental determination, please call me at (760) 602- 4613. Sincerely, Van Lynch Associate Planner VLxs Attachment c: File 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us ^ iXA. nsHAwiLOLzne us Fish and Wildlife Service Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office 2730 Loker Avenue, West Carlsbad, CA 92008 (760) 431-9440 FAX (760) 431-9624 In Reply Refer To: FWS-SDG-1497.1 Mr. Van Lynch, Associate Planner City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 9200-7314 California Department of Fish and Game 4949 Viewridge Avenue San Diego, CA 92123 (858) 467-4201 FAX (858) 467-4299 Re: Pacifica Carlsbad Project 50-foot wetland buffer Dear Mr. Lynch: The Califomia Department of Fish and Game (Department), and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), hereafter collectively referred to as the Wildlife Agencies, have reviewed the project environmental documents and a recent map product (Grading and Drainage Plan, dated 1/28/01) provided by Shapouri and Associates, the consultant to the project, depicting a 50-foot wetland buffer along a portion of Encinitas Creek that is within the property boundary. The project site is 15.7 acres in the City of Carlsbad, south of Palomar Airport Road, west of College Boulevard and Laurel Tree Lane. The proposed project includes a 120,000-square foot office building and parking lot. As part of the project mitigation, 4.63 acres of habitat, including the portion of Encinitas Creek and its associated riparian vegetation, will be placed into open space and protected by a conservation easement. Additionally, a 50-foot wetland buffer separating the developed portion from the creek is requiied as a mitigation element. Based on the site's geometry' and project configuration, the applicant has requested that an encroachment into the buffer area be allowed for placement of a proposed vegetated swale for filtration/desilting, and a 10-foot wide (unpaved) public trail. The swale is required to address water quality impacts from the development and existing mnoff from Palomar Airport Road. The Wildlife Agencies have reviewed the placement of these stractures in the wetland buffer and agree that they are acceptable with the following conditions: (1) all sediment removal/swale maintenance will be accomplished manually, not using motorized equipment that requires placement in the buffer or wetlands; (2) the public trail will be placed between the building and the basins; (3) the public trail will not be paved, and will have a permeable surface; and (4) the filtration/desiltation swale will be planted with native vegetation. Mr. Van Lynch This letter reflects the Wildlife Agencies' opinion regarding acceptability of the placement of stmctures in the 50-foot riparian buffer zone. Other aspects of the project will be addressed in our review of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) environmental document. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact John Martin of the Service at (760) 431-9440. Sincerely, Nancy Gilbert Assistant Field Supervisor Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service William E. Tippets Habitat Conservation Supervisor South Coast Region Califomia Department of Fish and Game cc: Ali Shapouri Shapouri and Associates 16089 San Dieguito Road, Suite H-102, P.O. Box 676221 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067-6221 Bill Ponder Califomia Coastal Commission Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department June 5, 2001 Smith Consulting Architects Scott Cairns 12220 El Camino Real San Diego CA 92130 SUBJECT: SDP 01-01/ PIP 01-02/ CDP 01-02 - PACIFICA PALOMAR OFFICE BUILDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Dear Scott: Please find attached the completed environmental impact assessment form part two for the Pacifica Palomar project. Staff has determined that the project requires a mitigated negative declaration and has attached a list of mitigation measures that need to be approved by the applicant. Please review the mitigation measures and if you concur with the measures, please sign on page 18 and return the signed original to me. Please give me a call at (760) 602-4613 if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, .^£JA Van LVnch Associate Planner VLxs File Copy Attachment 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department May 23, 2001 Smith Consulting Architects Scott Cairns 12220 El Camino Real San Diego CA 92130 SUBJECT: GPA 01-05/ SDP 01-01/ PIP 01-02/ CDP 01-02 - PACIFICA PALOMAR OFFICE BUILDING LANDSCAPE PLANS Dear Scott: Please find attached the red-lined landscape plans for the Pacifica Palomar project. Please have the corrections made and resubmit the red-lined and corrected plans along with the rest of the submittal package. Please give me, or Larry Black, a call if you have any questions regarding the plans or comments. Sincerely, Van Lynch Associate Planner VLxs Attachment 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us ^ Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department May 21, 2001 Smith Consulting Architects Scott Cairns 12220 El Camino Real San Diego CA 92130 SUBJECT: GPA 01-05/ SDP 01-01/ PIP 01-02/ CDP 01-02 - PACIFICA PALOMAR OFFICE BUILDING Thanl< you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Department has reviewed your Site Development Plan and associated development applications, application no. GPA 01-05, SDP 01-01, PIP 01-02, and CDP 01-02 as to their completeness for processing. The general plan amendment application is complete, as submitted. The remaining development applications consisting of Site Development Plan, Planned Industrial Permit and Coastal Development Permit are deemed to be incomplete. Since the legislative action (general plan amendment) is being processed concurrently with the quasi-judicial actions, the Site Development Plan, Planned Industrial Permit and Coastal Development Permit applications must remain incomplete until the legislative actions are approved by the City Council. Staff will continue to concurrently process and take the development applications to the decision-making bodies together and in an order by which the applications can be decided upon. Although the initial processing of your application may have already begun, the technical acceptance date is acknowledged by the date of this communication. The City may, in the course of processing the application, request that you clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise, supplement the basic information required for the application. In addition, you should also be aware that various design issues may exist. Please see the attached list of additional issues that have been raised. These issues must be addressed before this application can be scheduled for a hearing. Please contact your staff planner. Van Lynch, at (760) 602-4613 or Jeremy Riddle, project engineer, at 602-2737 if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincerely, MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning Director c: Chris Decerbo Jeremy Riddle File Copy Data Entry Planning Aide Attachment 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us ^ ISSUES OF CONCERN No. GPA 01-05/ SDP 01-01/ PIP 01-02/ CDP 01-02 Planning: Shapouri Plans 1. Please add the project numbers to the plans. 2. Please use the depressed topographical line symbol for the detention basins. 3. Please revise the General Plan Amendment exhibit to reflect the existing General Plan designations as those shown an attachment enclosed. The proposed General Plan boundaries should follow the northern extent of the proposed buffer. Smith Consulting Plans 1. Please add the General Plan Amendment number to the plans (GPA 01-05). 2. Please remove the reference to the height variance on the architectural plans cover sheet. 3. Please remove the reference to the "mitigation easement" (just left and below the name of Palomar Airport Road) on the title sheet. This is shown on the easement exhibit (Sheet 6 of Shapouri's plans). 4. Plan should identify that 2,880 square feet of indoor employee eating area is required. If the building is multi-tenant, all employee-eating areas should be provided outdoor per Planning Policy 19. If there is a way to ensure that eating area will be provided for each building user, please identify the potential areas on each floor that could accommodate such facilities. 5. Please include a shade structure for a portion of the outdoor dining area. Please provide an illustrative elevation of a potential design. 6. On the title sheet, please correct the project address to Laura! Tree Ln (not Rd) and correct the zip code to 92009. 7. Please describe the future use of the area at the southwestern most corner of the property (under the SDG&E easement and next to the Laural Tree apartments). Is the area to be landscaped? 8. Please dimension the amount the driveway encroaches in to the front yard setback. 9. On sheet SDP-A3, please change the "additional landscape setback required for additional building height" to 8' 3", which correlates to the 8'3" increase in building height. 10. Please provide pedestrian access from the outdoor patio on the east side and parking lot on the west side, near the building, to the adjacent trail. Please reflect this on the landscape plans as well. Pedestrian access should be provided from the northwest corner of the site to the sidewalk on Palomar Airport Road. 11. Please add Key Notes (from title sheet) to sheets SDP-A2 and SDP-A3. 12. Please provide an elevation, with proposed height and architecture, of the cooling tower proposed. 13. For future submittals, please collate and staple all plans into complete sets. Transportion Analysis 1. The existing lane configurations shown in Figure 3 should be revised to reflect the actual existing lane configurations. The necessary changes are noted in red within the body of the report. The ICU worksheets in Appendix A should be revised as necessary if these changes affect those calculations. 2. The intersection of Palomar Airport Road/El Camino Real is affected by less than 20% of the project traffic and therefore falls outside the scope of intersections which must be included in the study. This intersection should be removed from the analysis. 3. Aviara Parkway between Laurel Tree Lane and Palomar Airport Road is affected by 81% of the project traffic and should be included as a street segment to be evaluated. 4. The Project Trip Generation table (Table 3) is in error and should be replaced with the correct table corresponding to the 1880 ADT assumed throughout the report. 5. Three of the intersection ICU values listed in Table 6 are incorrect as compared with the ICU worksheets contained in Appendix A. These three values, noted in red within the body of the report, should be corrected. 6. Some of the volumes shown in Table 17 appear to be incorrect. These numbers should simply result from the addition of the corresponding volumes shown in Figures 11 and 16, and most do. The incorrect volumes are noted in red within the body of the report. 7. The volumes shown for the intersection of Palomar Airport Road/Hidden Valley Road in Figure 19 do not appear to correspond with those given in the Traffic Technical Analysis for City of Carlsbad Traffic Impact Fee Study, as indicated in the text. The volumes for the westbound-to-southbound movement at the Palomar Airport Road/I-5 southbound on-ramp also do not correspond. These volumes should be revised, or their source justified. 8. The ICU calculations for the intersection of El Camino Real/College Boulevard should be revised. As noted in red on the corresponding worksheet within Appendix D, a reduction in right-turn volumes corresponding to half of the volume in an overlapping left-turn phase should not be performed where the shoulder lane is a shared right-through lane. This reduction may only be performed where a right-turn-only lane exists. In addition, reducing right-turn volumes based on a non-overlapping left turn phase is not permitted, as was done with southbound-to-westbound right turns and westbound-to-southbound left turns at the El Camino Real/College intersection. These calculations should be revised, as they should be at any other locations where similar calculations were performed. 9. The "Capacity of Laurel Tree Road" analysis performed on page 56 should be performed in a consistent manner with the street segment level of service analyses performed for all other roadway segments within the report. 10. Miscellaneous grammatical and other corrections should be fixed as noted in red within the body of the report on pages 10, 11,31,32,33, 34, 46, 56, 64 and 65. 11. Please explain the reference to the LFMP Zone 13 on pages 64 and 65 of the transportation analysis report dated April 13, 2001. Engineering: 1. Revise the preliminary grading plan to depict the extent of proposed median hardscape, landscaping and irrigation improvements along the frontage of Palomar Airport Road. The exhibit should clearly delineate (in bold) that the developer is responsible to install median improvements along half the project frontage to Palomar Airport Road. 2. Revise the site plan to clearly indicate the right-of-way that must be obtained to construct the cul-de-sac on Laurel Tree Lane per City Standards. Refer to the site plan for specific comments. 3. Revise the preliminary drainage study to address the criteria used (or to be used) for sizing the filtration ponds. How much water will be treated? What storm event will the pond accept before its capacity is exceeded? 4. Revise the site plan to depict the waiver of access rights to and from Palomar Airport Road along the project frontage. 5. Revise the preliminary grading plan to indicate an irrevocable offer to dedicate (lOD) of a public trail easement encompassing the proposed trail. 6. Revise the site plan to reflect short legal descriptions of all adjacent properties. 7. On the site plans, indicate the location of proposed irrigation services for the project (typical). 8. Revise the title sheet to indicate the EDU's (sewer) and GPM (irrigation water) generated or required by the proposed development. 9. Revise the traffic study to address the issues per the attached letter from Traffic, dated April 30, 2001. (see comments above) 10. On the site plan, revise the configuration of the cul-de-sac for Laurel Tree Lane so that it meets City Standard GS -3. Add the 50-foot tangent sections, and show ultimate right for the cul-de-sac). 11. On the site plan and preliminary grading plan, identify the slope of Laurel Tree Lane. 12. Revise the preliminary grading plan to callout proposed offsite private grading and slope easements to be acquired. 13. Revise the cross-sections on the preliminary grading plan to reflect the approximate location of the water table outlined in the Geotechnical Report. 14. Add provisions to the preliminary grading plan that summarize how groundwater will be handled both during construction and after construction (i.e.: Installation of storm drains, water main, sewer and the below-grade parking lot). Provide an abbreviated explanation on the possibility of de-watering for installing facilities, and design of the below-grade parking structure being water-tight with buoyancy forces included in foundation design. Refer to the Geotechnical Report for information. 15. On the preliminary grading plan, identify the quantity of anticipated remedial earthwork. 16. Revise the preliminary grading plan to clarify that the trail improvements include, (minimum) decomposed granite (DG), not compacted soil as an improved surface. 17. Provide longitudinal slopes of the proposed trail at appropriate intervals. 18. On the preliminary grading plan, include rip-rap at the sidewalls of the box culvert entrance to protect against scour as shown on the plans. The rip-rap at the exit should be shown outside the concrete sill, not on top. 19. Revise the preliminary grading plan to include a note (under "general notes") to clarify how storm water quality is being handled. The intent/function of the filtration ponds should be identified here. 20. The previous preliminary grading plan depicted a storm drain inlet at the cu-de-sac of Laurel Tree Lane. Now that it has been deleted, clarify how storm water from the street will be properly discharged to the creek. Where is the inlet, piping, and discharge? 21. Identify an emergency overflow for the sump condition on the cul-de-sac for Laurel Tree Lane. The emergency overflow should consist of a "surface-gravity" outlet device that allows water to discharge to the creek in the event the sump inlet fails. 22. Revise the preliminary grading plan to identify that the size of the proposed box culvert will be evaluated in final design. Identify the Q,oo and Vioo that will be intercepted by the box culvert. 23. The discharge velocity of the easterly storm drain leading to the filtration pond is near 30 feet per second. If this is true, the outlet structure should be fitted with a D-41, so that the discharge is reduced to non-erosive velocities. 24. Revise the preliminary grading plans to eliminate the discrepancies where the westerly storm drain has excessive velocities are listed for relatively flat pipes (39 feet per second?). 25. Revise the preliminary grading plan to depict limits of proposed 20-foot wide public water easement to CMWD that are required to encompass the public system. The easement should encompass all water meters, fire service laterals (excluding the double check valve assembly), fire hydrants, and automatic air vacuum assemblies). 26. Revise the preliminary grading plan to include a note to identify a private sewer backflow preventer will be installed on the proposed sewer lateral. This is required due to the potential back-gas of the system when peak flows occur in the trunk main. 27. Address the redline comments as noted on the returned plans. Enclosed is a redlined check-print of the project. This check print must be returned with the revised plans to facilitate continued staff review. If you have any Engineering questions, please call Jeremy Riddle at telephone (760) 602-2737. URBAN SYSTEMS TTSSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING & TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, MARKETING & PROJECT SUPPORT CONSULTANTS TO INDUSTRY AND GOVERNMENT mmmMMmfMi WHITE TO ADDRESSEE; YELLOW TO fILE; PINK TO MANAGER r fnv • r ATTN: Ali Shapouri phone: ^ fax: COMPANY: Ali Shapouri & Associates rslf^'^^^S) 75 6-83 40 (858) 75 6-83 44 FROM: Jim Lundquist, Senior Project Managec^ TOTAL PACES : 2 + Report DATE: April 13, 2001 TIME: ll:OoHjm TRANSMITITD VIA: Messenger SUBJECT: PACIFICA PALOMAR TRAFFIC REPORT We are sending you the following information for your: O use O for submittal O as requested approval O review £r comment # OF PAGES TYPE DESCRIPTION r 1 Report "Transportation Analysis for Pacifica Palomar" dated April 13, 2001 Ali: Please find enclosed our revised traffic report. It has been edited to reflect the N4arch 12, 2001 comment letter from David Stillman (City of Carlsbad) as follows: 1. Because the opening of new roads in the project area occurred between the date ofthe report and the date ofthe submittal to the city, v/e have revised the text and competed new ICU'sforthe most recent turning data available. 2. Changed as requested. 3. The project trip distribution was revised as agreed to between David Stillman and Urban Systems Associates, Inc. 4. We have revised the Kelly Corporate Center trip distribution to match the Pacifica Palomar as requested. 5. We have revised the Laurel Tree Apartment trip distribution as requested. #0014-00 If enclosures are not as noted, please notify us at once. C:\OfFICE_2001\1W0-^1201 -jlfdisk 4540 KEARNY VHAA RO.AD, SUITE 106 • S.AN DIEGO, CA 92123-1573 • (858) 560-4911 • FAX (858) 560-9734 Mr. Ali Shapouri ^ Uaj^n Systems Associates, Inc. April 13, 2001 ^ 5_ 6. Edits made as requested. 7. Edits made as requested. 8. A table has been prepared as requested. 9. The ramp meter section has been revised using the Cannon Court report as an example as requested. 10. This statement has been deleted. 11. Edits made as requested. 12. Text was added to the report stating that the project does not meet the criteria for a freeway analysis. Therefore, the analysis was removed. 13. Completed as requested. If you have any questions or comments, please give us a call. If enclosures are not as noted, please notify us at once. #001400 2 C:\OFFICE_200I.\lWO-41Z01-jl/'disk 4 Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department March 7, 2001 Mr. Jack Koerper San Diego Association of Governments Suite 800 401 "B" Street San Diego CA 92101 SUBJECT: SDP 01-01 - PACIFICA PALOMAR OFFICE BUILDING WITH PALOMAR AIRPORT C.L.U.P. COMPLIANCE Plans for the Pacifica Palomar project are enclosed for your review. This project is a 120, 000 square foot, three story office building. The project falls outside the 70 CNEL noise contour within the Palomar Airport influence area. The project is located south of Palomar Airport Road and east of Aviara Parkway and is 3400 feet west of the Airport. Your written comments concerning the project's conformance with Palomar Airport's Comprehensive Land Use Plan, along with other factors that would assure compatibility with airport operations, are appreciated. It would be helpful if comments are received by March 30, 2001. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (760) 602-4613. Sincerely, Van Lynch Associate Planner Attachment c: Floyd Best, Airport Manager, 2198 Palomar Airport Rd. File Copy Carlsbad CA 92008 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.cl.carlsbad.ca.us Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department March 1, 2001 Smith Consulting Architects Scott Cairns 12220 El Camino Real San Diego CA 92130 SUBJECT: SDP 01-01/ PIP 01-02/ CDP 01-02/ V 01-01 - PACIFICA PALOMAR OFFICE BUILDING Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Department has reviewed your Site Development Plan and associated development applications, application no. SDP 01-01, PIP 01-02, CDP 01-02, AND V 01-01, as to their completeness for processing. The application is incomplete, as submitted. Attached are two lists. The first list is information which must be submitted to complete your application. This list of items must be submitted directly to your staff planner by appointment. Ail list items must be submitted simultaneously and a copy of this list must be included with your submittals. No processing of your application can occur until the application is determined to be complete. The second list is issues of concern to staff. When all required materials are submitted the City has 30 days to make a determination of completeness. If the application is determined to be complete, processing for a decision on the application will be initiated. In addition, please note that you have six months from the date the application was initially filed, February 1, 2001, to either resubmit the application or submit the required information. Failure to resubmit the application or to submit the materials necessary to determine your application complete shall be deemed to constitute withdrawal of the application. If an application is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn, a new application must be submitted. Please contact your staff planner. Van Lynch, at (760) 602-4613 or Jeremy Riddle, project engineer, at 602-2737 if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincere, J. HOLZIVIILLER Plannirtg Director MJH-.VLxs Attachment c: Chris Decerbo sWfiS"C6fjf Planning Aide Jeremy Riddle Data Entry 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.cl.carlsbad.ca.us LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION No. SDP 01-01/ PIP 01-02/ CDP 01-02/ V 01-01 Planning: 1. The project will require a General Plan Amendment to adjust the open space and Planned Industrial land use boundaries. ($4,050.00) 2. The project will not need a Variance application for the building height. The P-M zone allows building heights to be 45 feet, with architectural features to 55 feet, with the Planning Director's approval with the provisions found in section 21.34.070 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Please find enclosed an application for a refund. Please sign and return the form. The Planning Department will complete the remainder of the form and process the refund. 3. Please submit a completed Environmental Impact Assessment - Part 1 form and fee ($1,135.00). 4. Please submit the Fish and Game fees. ($1,275.00) 5. Please complete and submit the "Hazardous Waste and Substances Statement" form. 6. Please provide photos of the site. 7. Please provide the construction materials board and color samples. 8. Please provide the following information on the subject related plans: A. Percent landscaping provided on the site plan. B. Area that is undevelopable per 21.53.230. C. Show location of major and undisturbed native vegetation, size and type, within and off-site for a distance of 1 50 feet. D. Correct distance measurement of the southerly property line. E. Provide truck-turning radii for the parking areas. F. Provide average peak potable water demand in gallons per minute (gpm). G. Provide fire flow demand in gpm. H. State on plans if a private fire sprinkler system is proposed. I. Provide peak irrigation water demand in gpm. J. Provide average sewer generation in million gallons per day. K. Please clearly show and label the 100 year flood line for the before and after conditions. L. Please provide a water conservation plan. M. Please show proposed exterior lights mounted on the building (if proposed). N. Please indicate the Uniform Building Code (UBC) occupancy classification of all building areas. 0. Please indicate type of construction per UBC. P. Please provide a roof plan. Q. Please provide elevations and details (construction method and materials) of the mechanical equipment enclosure. 9. Please provide a constraints map. Please refer to the application form, item I. E. for details. 10. Please provide and label the centerline location for Palomar Airport Road and label the location of Encinas Creek on Section BB of the Grading and Drainage Plan. 11. Please provide a cross section of the proposed trail and provide details of its design according to the Unpaved Hiking and Bike Path Design Concepts for the Type 2 trail found in the Open Space and Conservation Resource Management Plan. Engineering: 1. Complete the property boundary information on the site pan and the preliminary grading plan. The information on the site plan appears is inaccurate (1 5.1 5.84 feet?). 2. Depict the extent of existing improvements on Laurel Tree Road (per drawing 368-1), and all proposed improvements to Laurel Tree Road that are required to serve this project. The current plans do not provide clear delineation between existing and proposed improvements. 3. Depict the extent of proposed sidewalk, median hardscape, landscaping and irrigation improvements along the frontage of Palomar Airport Road. The developer is responsible to install median improvements along half the project frontage to Palomar Airport Road. However, the sidewalk improvements shall extend along the entire project frontage. 4. The City is agreeable to reimbursing the Developer for the cost of installing the other half of the median improvements along Palomar Airport Road. The City already has improvement plans that would ease the design of this segment of median improvements. You can contact John Cahill (at 760-602-2726) to discuss reimbursement issues and the improvement plans for the median improvements. 5. Provide a hydrology/hydraulics report for this project. The report should identify the preliminary sizes if the storm drains/inlets required to intercept, convey and discharge storm water on or across the property. The report should identify the ultimate storm flows for the storm drains that currently discharge on the property. The report should identify the 100-year inundation limits of the creek as it crosses the property. The report should also identify the criteria used (or to be used) for sizing the filtration ponds. 6. Revise the site plan and preliminary grading plan to clearly indicate the right-of-way that must be obtained to extend Laurel Tree Lane to serve the development. 7. Revise or provide typical street sections for all streets adjacent to or serving the development (both Laurel Tree Lane and Palomar Airport Road). These sections should depict existing and/or proposed pavement, curb, gutter, median landscape and irrigation, sidewalk, streetlights, fire hydrants, etc. 8. Revise the site plan and preliminary grading plan to indicate the proposed storm drains being constructed by this project. 9. Revise the site plan to depict all existing easements. Refer to items 6 through 13, and 1 5 of the preliminary title report. By not showing these items, staff is unable to verify the concept of this project. Each easement should be depicted, called out and listed with the record document. Identify the disposition or proposed quitclaims for any easements impacted by this project. 10. Revise the site plan to depict all proposed public easements encompassing the storm drain and water facilities. 11. Show all existing fire hydrants located within 300-feet of the site. ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. The biological report should take into consideration the possibility that the Draft Habitat Management Plan will not be adopted and should recommend other mitigation measures other than fee payment for impacts. The report should also be updated to reflect the outcome of the May 2000 rare plant and focused survey for the least Bell's vireo. Please include recommendation for a vireo survey prior to construction and mitigation in the event the least Bell's vireo is found on site. 2. Please provide any correspondence with other agencies regarding their concurrence with the project's biological report and proposed mitigation measures. 3. All plans should be provide on 24 x 36 inch sheets and at the same scale. The plans cover a large area and would be easier to plan check if provide at 40 scale, if possible. The site plan may be provided, or broken-up, on to two sheets for plan check purposes with the final plan being on one sheet. Engineering: General 1. Add the discretionary application numbers to the upper right-hand corner of the site plan and preliminary grading plan. 2. Revise the site plan to indicate the existing driveway along Palomar Airport Road will be removed and new curb, gutter, and sidewalk will be installed in its place. 3. Revise the site plan to depict the waiver of access rights to and from Palomar Airport Road along the project frontage. 4. Revise the site plan to indicate the existing right-of-way of Laurel Tree Road to be vacated by separate document. 5. Revise the site plan to indicate the existing portion Laurel Tree Road to be removed. 6. Revise the preliminary grading plan to include a complete legend of ali existing and proposed items (i.e.: proposed curb, gutter, sidewalk, pavement, driveway, streetlights, median paving, etc.). 7. A public improvement plan will be required to include, but may not be limited to, the construction of Laurel Tree Lane, public water system, public storm drain system, box culvert, sidewalk, street lights, and median improvements with all appurtenances. 8. Revise the preliminary grading plan so that the symbols for existing facilities are light and dashed, not dark and bold. Dark and bold should only be for proposed construction items. 9. Revise the preliminary grading plan to indicate an irrevocable offer to dedicate (lOD) of a public trail easement encompassing the proposed trail. 10. Revise the site plan and preliminary grading plan to callout Laurel Tree Lane, not Laurel Tree Road that serves this project. 11. Revise the site plan to reflect short legal descriptions of all adjacent properties. 12. Provide a letter from SDG&E stating they do not object to this proposed development. Specifically, the proposed street crossing their easement should be addressed. The execution of a joint-use agreement between the City of Carlsbad and SDG&E will be a condition of approval for this project. 13. This'project will be required to pay fair share cost for the design and construction of a traffic signal at Laurel Tree Lane and Aviara Drive. 14. On the site plans, indicate the location of proposed sewer, water, and irrigation services for the project (typical). 15. Provide a record of survey that certifies the lot area of this development to be 15.69 acres. The Assessors Parcel Maps indicate the lot area to be 13.4 acres. Since the project data appears to be based on 15.69 acres, then certification is required. 16. Revise the title sheet to indicate the EDU's (sewer), GPM (potable water), and GPM (irrigation water) generated or required by the proposed development. 1 7. Revise the site plan to identify how the gate for the below-grade parking lot is opened. Is it remote controlled? Is there a keypad entry? Where is it? Is it open during business hours and just closed at night? 18. Revise the below-grade parking lot detail sheet (SDP A-2) to complete the dimensions of the drive aisles. 19. Revise the below-grade parking lot detail sheet (SDP A-2) to identify the symbols next to the parking stalls. Ensure that vehicles will be able to open doors as shown on the returned plans. 20. Revise the below-grade parking lot detail sheet (SDP A-2) to clarify how a vehicle will back up if columns are in the way along the easterly edge of the structure. 21. Revise the below-grade parking lot detail sheet (SDP A-2) to callout the slope of the proposed drive ramp. 22. Clarify what the "side-yard easement" is that is located along the easterly property line. Is this a side-yard setback line? After reviewing the title report, I could not find an easement with this description. 23. Revise the preliminary grading plan to ensure the emergency access road is constructed of grasscrete, turf-block, or alternate material to ensure the connection does not appear to be a primary ingress and egress point to Palomar Airport Road. Add "no-parking" signs along the emergency access road. 24. Indicate how a truck (per Caltrans 407-E) with a 42-foot turning radius will circulate throughout the site. Show the inside and outside tire tracks. 25. A hold harmless for drainage, odor, and geotechnical conditions will be required for this project. 26. The traffic study submitted for this project is being reviewed by the City Traffic Department and comments will be forthcoming. Streets 27. On the site plan and preliminary grading plan, depict the location of existing and proposed street lights along Palomar Airport Road and Laurel Tree Lane. If street light spacing does not meet spacing standards, then new street lights should be installed. 28. On the site plan and preliminary grading plan, identify the horizontal radius of Laurel Tree Lane. It is unclear whether proposed streets meet minimum standards. 29. On the site plan, identify the slope of Laurel Tree Lane. 30. Revise the typical street sections as shown on the preliminary grading plans. 31. Revise the typical section of Laurel Tree Lane so that it meets the Standards as an Industrial Street. The ultimate right-of-way should be 72-feet, not 66-feet. Please refer to typical sections of Laurel Tree Lane as constructed per drawing 368-1. 32. Revise the preliminary grading plan to so the typical street section of Laurel Tree Lane includes the construction of asphalt berm along the westerly edge where the edge improvements are temporary and will be extended in the future. The current plan shown concrete curb and gutter. Refer to drawing 368-1. Grading 33. This project will require a Grading Permit. 34. Revise the preliminary grading plan to provide sufficient topographic information on the westerly adjacent lot (Kelley site) to demonstrate feasibility of accessing the proposed Laurel Tree Lane cul-de-sac. Provide a separate 8^'^"x 11" exhibit depicting a schematic driveway location and driveway grades to the adjacent lot. 35. Eliminate the references in the typical section that refer to proposed 1.5:1 slopes since only 2:1 slopes are permitted. 36. Revise the preliminary grading plan to indicate the proposed and existing slope inclinations throughout the site. 37. Revise the site plan and preliminary grading plan to callout proposed offsite private grading and slope easements to be acquired. 38. Revise the cross-sections on the preliminary grading plan to reflect the approximate location of the water table outlined in the Geotechnical Report. 39. Add provisions to the preliminary grading plan that address how groundwater will be handled both during construction and after construction (i.e.: Installation of storm drains, water main, sewer and the below-grade parking lot). Provide an abbreviated explanation on the possibility of de-watering for installing facilities, and design of the below-grade parking structure being water-tight with buoyancy forces included in foundation design. Refer to the Geotechnical Report for information. 40. On the preliminary grading plan, identify the quantity of anticipated remedial earthwork. 41. Revise the preliminary grading plan to include clear symbols for existing and proposed topography. Existing should be light, dashed and screened. Proposed should be dark and bold. Revise the symbols to differentiate between the two. 42. Revise the preliminary grading plan to provide a cross-section of the proposed trail improvements. What is the width of the trail? Indicate the type of surface improvements the trail will consist of. 43. Provide longitudinal slopes of the proposed trail at 100-foot intervals. 44. On the preliminary grading plan, clarify the velocity of the creek and near the entrance and exit of the box culvert. If velocities are erosive, then rip-rap should be considered. 45. On the preliminary grading plan, provide a cross-section of the creek to demonstrate grading, channel design, storm water level, side-slope protection, etc. Drainage 46. Revise the site plan and preliminary grading plan to depict limits of proposed public storm drain easements that are required to encompass each storm drain extended from Palomar Airport Road to the filtration basins/creek. The storm drain easement shall be a minimum of 20-feet wide unless pipe size, pipe depth and constructability issues warrant additional easement width. 47. Revise the preliminary grading plan to depict limits of proposed public storm drain easements that encompass the existing easterly storm drain, if none exists. 48. Revise the preliminary grading plan to depict a proposed public access easement from the proposed driveway entrance on Laurel Tree Lane, through the drive aisles of the parking lot, leading to each proposed public drainage easement being extended to the creek edge. This is required to ensure that city staff can access the facilities located on this property. 49. Revise the preliminary grading plan to include a note (under "general notes") to clarify how storm water quality is being handled. The intent/function of the filtration ponds should be identified here. 50. Revise the preliminary grading plan to clarify the difference between existing and proposed drainage pipes. The symbol on the current plan looks the same. It should be clear was exists and what is being constructed by this development. 51. Revise the preliminary grading plan to identify the proposed "public" storm drains that extend off Palomar Airport Road. 52. Revise the preliminary grading plan to clearly identify that the inlets and storm drains that collect water from the site are private systems (i.e.: parking lot). 53. Include provisions to clarify how storm run-off collected in the below-grade parking lot is intercepted and discharged (i.e.: sump-pump and pressure line?). Where is the drainage outlet? 54. Revise the below-grade parking lot detail sheet (SDP A-2) to depict sufficient information (i.e.: drainage arrows, inlets, pipes, sump-pump, and pressure line) to show how drainage will be collected to the sump and discharged. 55. Clarify how the storm flows for the existing storm drains crossing Palomar Airport Road were obtained. What reference is used? Obtain a copy of the hydrology/hydraulics report for the future upstream development (Carlsbad Municipal Golf Course) and verify whether the storm flows you have listed reflect future/ultimate conditions. A reference to this report should be listed in the hydrology/hydraulic report for this project. 56. Revise the preliminary grading plan to include a secondary storm water overflow for each filtration pond (or a primary one). The overflow may consist of a rip-rap or concrete weir structure. This is to ensure that erosion does not occur in the event the capacity of the ponds is exceeded. 57. Revise the preliminary grading plan to identify that the size of the proposed box culvert will be evaluated in final design. Identify the Qioo and Vioo that will be intercepted by the box culvert. 58. Revise the preliminary grading plan to identify the limits of 100-year inundation experienced by the creek as it crosses the property. This information should be calculated by the hydrology/hydraulics report for this project. 59. It appears that each proposed headwali or discharge location on this project is not accessible by city maintenance staff. If an all-weather access road to the channel bottom is not feasible, each discharge location should be fitted with a San Diego Regional Standard Drawing D-41 energy dissipater or alternative solution to ensure low maintenance and preventing vegetation from blocking discharge areas. 60. Identify an emergency overflow for the sump condition on the cul-de-sac for Laurel Tree Lane. The emergency overflow should consist of an "surface-gravity" outlet device that allows water to discharge to the creek in the event the sump inlet fails. 61. Revise the preliminary grading plan to identify the sizes of all existing and proposed storm drains. Water 62. Revise the preliminary grading plan to depict limits of proposed 20-foot wide public water easement to CMWD that are required to encompass the public system. The easement should encompass all water meters, fire service laterals (excluding the double check valve assembly), fire hydrants, and automatic air vacuum assemblies). 63. Identify the size, type, and HGL of each existing water main on or adjacent to the property. Add a reference of the City drawing number that constructed each of these facilities. 64. Revise the preliminary grading plan to ensure that proposed water mains are not located in planter areas. In generai, public water mains in the parking lot should be located in the center of the drive aisle so that it can be property accessed, maintained, repaired, and marked out. 65. On the preliminary grading plan, clarify the point of connections for the proposed water system on Laurel Tree Lane and Palomar Airport Road. There should be a clear delineation between existing and proposed. 66. On the preliminary grading plan, identify the fire service connection. The site plan indicates the backflow for the fire sprinklers near the southwest corner of the proposed structure. Revise the schematic location so the backflow device is closer to the proposed 8-inch public main. The lateral leading to the backflow is considered public, and this long lateral would need a profile and easement extension as currently designed. 67. Perform research to verify the pressure zones in Palomar Airport Road and Laurel Tree Lane are the same. The hydraulic grade lines for each existing main and proposed main should be listed on the preliminary grading plan. 68. Perform additional utility research for Palomar Airport Road. There are additional water mains and sewer mains that are not depicted. This is especially critical to ensure the wrong pressure zone is not being connected to. 69. On the preliminary grading plan, identify the size, type, HGL, and reference drawing number for the existing waterline connected to on Laurel Tree Lane. 70. Clarify if there is fire hydrant required at the northerly terminus of Laurel Tree Lane. Meet with the Fire Marshal to determine to approximate location of all proposed fire hydrants. Sewer 71. Add a note to the preliminary grading plan to identify a private sewer backflow preventer will be installed on the lateral. This is required due to the potential back-gas of the system when peak flows occur in the truck main. 72. Revise the preliminary grading plan to indicate a clean-out installed on the sewer lateral in the center of the drive aisle as shown on the returned plans. 73. Revise the preliminary grading plan to indicate a proposed public sewer easement that encompasses the proposed sewer lateral as shown on the returned plans. The easement should extend just to the edge of the clean-out in the center of the drive aisle. The clean-out should be located outside the easement edge per City Standards. 74. Revise the preliminary grading plan to indicate the limits of the existing public sewer easement listed in the title report. This will help understand where the proposed easement must extend to. Enclosed is a redlined check-print of the project. This check print must be returned with the revised plans to facilitate continued staff review. If you have any Engineering questions, please call Jeremy Riddle at telephone (760) 602-2737. Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department November 30, 2000 Smith Consulting Architects Scott Cairns 12220 El Camino Real San Diego CA 92130 SUBJECT: PRE 00-77 - PACIFICA PALOMAR APN: 212-040-25-00 A preliminary review of your project was conducted on November 30, 2000. Listed below are the issues raised by staff. Please note that the purpose of a preliminary review is to provide you with direction and comments on the overall concept of your project. The preliminary review does not represent an in-depth analysis of your project. Additional issues of concern may be raised after your application is submitted and processed for a more specific and detailed review. Planning: 1. The City should be provided with a copy of correspondence from the California Department of Fish and Game, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the California Coastal Commission regarding the habitat buffer. This document should be included with a formal application submittal to the City. 2. Because the proposed building height (45') exceeds the requirements of the zone, additional standards apply including increased landscape setbacks and a requirement for City Council approval of the project. Please provide a Concept Landscape Plan adhering to the City's landscape manual and requirements with a formal submittal. 3. The project site is within the Airport Influence Area for McClellan-Palomar Airport. The northern portion of the site is within the 70 - 75 CNEL Contour and the remainder of the site is within the 65 - 70 CNEL Noise Contour. The airport land use plan indicates that the proposed uses are incompatible within the 70 - 75 CNEL noise contour. Within the 65 - 70 CNEL Noise Contour the proposed use is conditionally compatible provided the interior noise level is attenuated to 50 CNEL based on an acoustical study and various notices are recorded against the property. Please contact Jack Koerper at SANDAG to have the noise contours plotted on the project site showing the contour lines in relation to proposed building locations. 4. There is insufficient information regarding the proposed outdoor eating area to determine if this area complies with the requirements of the zone. Please provide square footage of each proposed area with the formal submittal. 5. Rooftop equipment will not be permitted because of the topography of the area and the surrounding existing and future residential land uses. The rooftop equipment issue for 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us PRE 00-77-PACIFICA^LOMAR ^ November 30, 2000 Page 2 this site will be treated the same as it was for the Kelly Corporate Center (SDP 97-25). You are advised to review the approved plans and the condition of approval addressing rooftop equipment for SDP 97-25. The color of the rooftop will also need to be neutral in color. 6. The cooling tower and trash enclosure need to be screened with decorative concrete or masonry walls which are architecturally compatible with the main building. 7. Because of the properties location along a prime arterial, building elevations and signage will be a focus area of review. A high quality design and building materials including such items as stone accents should be part of the design. 8. Development of the site requires the approval of a Planned Industrial Permit, Site Development Plan and a Coastal Development Permit A General Plan Amendment will be required to change the general plan open space boundary of the property. 9. Please incorporate landscaping and mounding to screen from public view the entry driveway section that is adjacent and parallel to Palomar Airport Road. Please refer to the landscape manual for the arterial streetscape theme for Palomar Airport Road. 10. A street name change application would be required to change the street name from Laural Tree Road to Pacifica Place. 11. Staff has no comment on the proposed architecture as no elevation drawings were submitted. However, because of the properties high visibility location along a prime arterial street, staff recommends a high quality design incorporating articulation and relief into the design. Engineering: Engineering Department staff has completed a preliminary review of the above subject. For the applicants benefit we have broken down our issues into two sections. The first section identifies "Significant Issues" and the second section lists "General Issues". Prior to formal application submittal the following items must be adequately resolved/addressed: Significant Issues 1. The updated National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit is nearing approval, and would involve significant changes to this project and other projects processed throughout the San Diego region. It is our understanding that these changes will not include a grandfather clause for projects. This means that this project and all other projects will be impacted pursuant to the approved NPDES requirements, no matter what stage of the project are in. We encourage you to review the draft permit requirements so that you understand the nature of our comments when they are made on projects. In order to facilitate the compliance of this project, the following are some criteria that should be incorporated into the design of the project: A. Post development run-off should not exceed pre-development run-off. This shall be proved via engineering calculations in a project hydrology/hydraulic report. B. On parking lot areas, include additional measures required to capture anticipated pollutants from the site. More often than not, grass-lined swales should be PRE 00-77 - PACIFICAmLOMAR November 30, 2000 Page 3 utilized to filter storm water before entering inlets. These tend to be the most efficient filter for pollutants. C. Offsite and downstream siltation would not be permitted at any time during the project (long term or near term). This may include utilizing the onsite basin until all disturbed soil has been fully landscaped or paved according to the approved plans. D. Submittal of a construction and post-development storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) would be required prior to project approval. 2. Please indicate all existing and proposed utilities along Laurel Tree Road and Palomar Airport Road (i.e., storm drain, water, sewer, etc.) that will serve the development. Depict looping of public water facilities from Laurel Tree Lane to Palomar Airport Road. Indicate gravity flow sewer facilities with invert elevations. The submitted plan does not depict any facilities. 3. Depict the extent of existing improvements on Laurel Tree Road (per drawing 368-1), and all proposed improvements to Laurel Tree Road that are required to serve this project. 4. Depict the extent of proposed sidewalk, median hardscape, and median landscaping along frontage of Palomar Airport Road. 5. Meet with the Fire Department to identify the necessary fire protection measures required for this project (access, fire hydrants, sprinklering, etc.). All proposed fire hydrants must be served by public water mains. 6. There is insufficient information to make a determination if a Grading Permit will be required. Provide grading quantities of cut/fill/export/import/remedial (in cubic yards) and depict existing and proposed topography. 7. A Public Improvement Plan will be required for the extension of Laurel Tree Road the public utilities required to serve the project. All onsite public utilities must be reflected on public improvement plans. 8. This project will require the acquisition of offsite right-of-way, slope and grading easements in order to construct Laurel Tree Road. 9. Regarding the extension of Laurel Tree Road, submit a letter from SDG&E stating their support for the proposed use within their easement A joint-use agreement will be required for this crossing. 10. This project will be constrained for exiting vehicles during an emergency. This project must provide two points of access. Revising the project entrance to include two 20- feet wide driveways off Laurel Tree Road may accommodate this. Consider all options to best fit this project (and adjacent properties). 11. No access will be permitted from Palomar Airport Road, except the emergency access road pursuant to Fire Department considerations. 12. Revise the plans to indicate the proposed relinquishment of access rights to and from Palomar Airport Road. Access for this site shall be from Laurel Tree Road. PRE 00-77 - PACIFICA WLOMAR November 30, 2000 Page 4 13. This project will be required to pay their fair-share cost for the design and construction ofthe traffic signal at Aviara Parkway and Laurel Tree Road. 14. It is outside the scope of a preliminary review for staff to approve technical studies. A draft copy of a traffic study for this project was provided during our review. All project documents will be reviewed upon a formal application to the City of Carlsbad. 15. Provide a preliminary hydrology study which identifies the "before" development discharge and the "after" development discharge flows. Identify measures required to ensure post-development flows do not exceed pre-development flows. Identify the 100-year inundation limits crossing the subject property. 16. Submit a preliminary Geotechnical report that provides recommendations on the proposed project. General Issues 17. Please note that this project has undergone a number of preliminary reviews and there are repeated issues that were listed in our previous review. 18. Please be advised that in order to make a more in-depth review of the proposed development, a more complete design ofthe project is required. 19. Dimension the drive aisles site plan throughout the parking lot (minimum 24' width). 20. Provide cross-sections of the site parallel and perpendicular to Palomar Airport Road. This is required to establish elevation differences between existing and proposed topography and how it relates to Palomar Airport Road. 21. Provide sufficient dimensions to establish all parking lot aisle widths (typical). 22. Ensure that the project includes 5-foot offsets at each corner parking stall enabling vehicles to back out if another overhangs (typical) 23. Revise the plan to indicate the ADT (traffic), EDU's (sewer), GPM (potable water), and GPM (reclaimed water) generated or required by the proposed development. 24. Depict water, sewer, and irrigation laterals required to serve the project. 25. Show all existing and proposed topography and drainage patterns for the site. Revise the plans to indicate how on-site surface runoff is controlled. Identify the location, alignment, and discharge of any proposed drainage system. Depict the limits of 100-year inundation crossing the property. 26. Indicate the legal description of the proposed development and all adjacent properties. 27. Provide a Vicinity Map on the site plan. 28. Submit the site plan at either a 1" = 40', or, 1" = 20' scale. PRE 00-77 - PACIFICA WLOMAR November 30, 2000 Page 5 29. If slopes are proposed off-site, a private slope easement must be obtained from the adjacent property owner. 30. Show typical street sections for Laurel Tree Road and Palomar Airport Road. Indicate existing and proposed improvements on the typical sections. 31. Depict all proposed public easements (sewer, water, storm drain, access, etc.) on the site plan. 32. Identify how refuse trucks will maneuver throughout the site. 33. Indicate 42' (Caltrans 407-E) turning radii on the plan to verify a truck will circulate safely throughout the site. . 34. A recent Preliminary Title Report (PR) (issued within 6 months of formal application submittal) will be required for the proposed project. 35. All easements and encumbrances as identified in Schedule "B" of the PR must be indicated on the site plan. The future disposition of any easements and encumbrances must also be identified. 36. The complete property boundary must be shown on the site plan, which must include all bearings and distances. 37. Indicate how National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) criteria will be met. This could include, but not be limited to, doing one or a combination of the following: directing surface run-off through vegetated swales prior to discharge to a storm drain or the public right of way, constructing a gravel/sand/fossil filter system, constructing de-pollutant basins, etc. Also, any loading areas that are located in a sump must have pump facilities to direct drainage to a pollutant mitigation area. 38. This preliminary review does not constitute a complete review of the proposed project. Additional items of concern may be identified upon formal project application submittal. 39. A redlined check print is enclosed for the applicants use in making the requested revisions. This check print should be returned with the formal application submittal to facilitate continued staff review. PRE 00-77 - PACIFICA WLOMAR November 30, 2000 Page 6 Fire: 1. Entire structure must be protected by an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. 2. Access proposed is inadequate. Applicant must provide information regarding routine access. The emergency access proposed may not mitigate the need for a second point of ingress and egress. Please contact Greg Fisher at (760) 602-4629 if you have any questions. SincereK GARY E. WAYNE Assistai^tTlanning Director GEW:GF:cs Attachments c: Chris Decerbo Jeremy Riddle Mike Smith Bill Plummer File Copy Data Entry GregFisher - Pacifica Palomar Prelim.dofi^ Page 1 City of Carlsbad ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMORANDUM November 16, 2000 TO: Greg Fisher, Planning FROM: Jeremy Riddle, Engineering SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF PACIFICA PALOMAR PRE 00-77 NEAR LAUREL TREE ROAD (APN: 212-040-25) Engineering Department staff has completed a preUminary review of the above subject. For the applicants benefit we have broken down our issues into two sections. The first section identifies "Significant Issues" and the second section lists "General Issues". Prior to formal application submittal the following items must be adequately resolved/addressed: Significant Issues 1. The updated National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) pennit is nearing approval, and would involve significant changes to this project and other projects processed throughout the San Diego region. It is our understanding that these changes will not include a grandfather clause for projects. This means that this project and all other projects will be impacted pursuant to the approved NPDES requirements, no matter what stage of the project are in. We encourage you to review the draft permit requirements so that you understand the nature of our comments when they are made on projects. In order to facilitate the compliance of this project, the following are some criteria that should be incorporated into the design of the project: a) Post development run-off should not exceed pre-development run-off. This shall be proved via engineering calculations in a project hydrology/hydraulic report. b) On parking lot areas, include additional measures required to capture anticipated pollutants from the site. More often than not, grass-lined swales should be utilized to filter storm water before entering inlets. These tend to be the most efficient filter for pollutants. c) Offsite and downstream siltation would not be permitted at any time during the project (long term or near term). This may include utilizing the onsite basin until all disturbed soil has been fiilly landscaped or paved according to the approved plans. d) Submittal of a construction and post-development storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) would be required prior to project approval. 2. Please indicate all existing and proposed utilities along Laurel Tree Road and Palomar Airport Road (i.e., storm drain, water, sewer, etc.) that will serve the development. Depict looping of public water faciUties from Laurel Tree Lane to Palomar Airport Greg Fisher - Panlflca Palnmar Prftllm rin^ ^ Page 2 PRE 00-77, Pacifica Palomar Page 2 of4 November 16, 2000 Road. Indicate gravity flow sewer faciUties with invert elevations. The submitted plan does not depict any facilities. 4. Depict the extent of existing improvements on Laurel Tree Road (per drawing 368-1), and all proposed improvements to Laurel Tree Road that are required to serve this project. 5. Depict the extent of proposed sidewalk, median hardscape, and median landscaping along frontage of Palomar Airport Road. 6. Meet with the Fire Department to identify the necessary fire protection measures required for this project (access, fire hydrants, sprinklering, etc.). All proposed fire hydrants must be served by public water mains. 7. There is insufficient information to make a determination if a Grading Pennit will be required. Provide grading quantities of cut/fill/export/import/remedial (in cubic yards) and depict existing and proposed topography. 8. A Public Improvement Plan will be required for the extension of Laurel Tree Road the pubUc utilities required to serve the project. All onsite public utilities must be reflected on public improvement plans. 9. This project will require the acquisition of offsite right-of-way, slope and grading easements in order to construct Laurel Tree Road. 10. Regarding the extension of Laurel Tree Road, submit a letter from SDG&E stating their support for the proposed use within their easement. A joint-use agreement will be required for this crossing. 11. This project will be constrained for exiting vehicles during an emergency. This project must provide two points of access. Revising the project entrance to include two 20-feet wide driveways off Laurel Tree Road may accommodate this. Consider all options to best fit this project (and adjacent properties). 12. No access will be permitted from Palomar Airport Road, except the emergency access road pursuant to Fire Department considerations. 13. Revise the plans to indicate the proposed reUnquishment of access rights to and from Palomar Airport Road. Access for this site shall be from Laurel Tree Road. 14. This project will be required to pay their fair-share cost for the design and construction of the ttaffic signal at Aviara Parkway and Laurel Tree Road. 15. It is outside the scope of a preliminary review for staff to approve technical studies. A draft copy of a ttaffic study for this project was provided during our review. AU project documents will be reviewed upon a formal apphcation to the City of Carlsbad. 16. Provide a preUminary hydrology study which identifies the "before" development discharge and the "after" development discharge flows. Identify measures required to ensure post-development flows do not exceed pre-development flows. Identify the 100-year inundation limits crossing the subject property. Greg Fisher - Pacifica Palomar Prelim.do^ , A Page 3 PRE 00-77, Pacifica Palomar Page 2 of4 November 16, 2000 17. Submit a preliminary Geotechnical report that provides recommendations on the proposed project General Issues 1. Please note that this project has undergone a number of preUminary reviews and there are repeated issues that were listed in our previous review. 2. Please be advised that in order to make a more in-depth review of the proposed development, a more complete design of the project is required. 3. Dimension the drive aisles site plan throughout the parking lot (minimum 24' width). 4. Provide cross-sections of the site parallel and perpendicular to Palomar Airport Road. This is required to establish elevation differences between existing and proposed topography and how it relates to Palomar Airport Road. 5. Provide sufficient dimensions to establish all parking lot aisle widths (typical). 6. Ensure that the project includes 5-foot offsets at each comer parking stall enabling vehicles to back out if another overhangs (typical). 7. Revise the plan to indicate the ADT (ttaffic), EDU's (sewer), GPM (potable water), and GPM (reclaimed water) generated or required by the proposed development. 8. Depict water, sewer, and irrigation laterals required to serve the project. 9. Show all existing and proposed topography and drainage pattems for the site. Revise the plans to indicate how on-site surface mnoff is conttoUed. Identify the location, aUgnment, and discharge of any proposed drainage system. Depict the limits of 100- year inundation crossing the property. 10. Indicate the legal description of the proposed development and all adjacent properties. 11. Provide a Vicinity Map on the site plan. 12. Submit the site plan at either a 1" = 40', or, 1" = 20' scale. 13. If slopes are proposed off-site, a private slope easement must be obtained from the adjacent property owner. 14. Show typical street sections for Laurel Tree Road and Palomar Airport Road. Indicate existing and proposed improvements on the typical sections. 15. Depict all proposed public easements (sewer, water, storm drain, access, etc.) on the site plan. 16. Identify how refuse tmcks will maneuver throughout the site. 17. Indicate 42' (Calttans 407-E) turning radii on the plan to verify a tmck will circulate safely throughout the site. . 18. A recent Preliminary Title Report (PR) (issued within 6 months of formal application Greg Fisher - Pacifica Palomar Prelim.d^^ A ,^ Page 4 PRE 00-77, Pacifica Palomar Page 2 of4 November 16, 2000 submittal) will be required for the proposed project. 19. All easements and encumbrances as identified in Schedule "B" of the PR must be indicated on the site plan. The future disposition of any easements and encumbrances must also be identified. 20. The complete property boundary must be shown on the site plan, which must include all bearings and distances. 21. Indicate how National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) criteria will be met. This could include, but not be Umited to, doing one or a combination of the following: directing surface mn-off through vegetated swales prior to discharge to a storm drain or the pubUc right of way, constmcting a gravel/sand/fossil filter system, constmcting de-pollutant basins, etc. Also, any loading areas that are located in a sump must have pump facilities to direct drainage to a pollutant mitigation area. 22. This preliminary review does not constitute a complete review of the proposed project. Additional items of concem may be identified upon formal project apphcation submittal. 23. A redlined check print is enclosed for the applicants use in making the requested revisions. This check print should be returned with the formal apphcation submittal to facilitate continued staff review. If you or the appUcant has any questions, please either see or call me at 760-602-2737. Attachment c: Skip Hammann, Senior Engineer Mike Smith, Fire Marshal PRKLTMINARY REVIEW APPLICATTON PROJECT NAME: Pj^Oi'^tZ^ _/^/d /»g^^ OWNER (Print or type) . City, State & Zip 3^ln t?i'SjjA/^ hff. <f-^/^^ Telephone. Signature^ APPLICANT (Pnnt ortype) • atj^ 5tate Telephone. Signature. *Owner's signature indicates permission to conduct a preliminary review for a development proposal PROJF.CT ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERCSl fAPN1: '7A ^ /<^~ DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL (ADD ATTACHMENT IF NECESSARY): ^ Ar.\rl.(ini/^) ^rH. f^hLyiij '^^ri^l^ ^^AZ/'aTg z(. WOULD YOU LIKE TO OR-^LY PRESENT YOUR PROPOSAL TO YOUR ASSIGNED STAFF PLEASE LIST THE NAMES OF ALL STAFF MEMBERS YOU HAVE PREVIOl REGAJRDING TIHS PROJECT. IF NONE. PLEASE SO STATE. FOR CITY USE ONLY ^ _ PROJECT NUMBER; f^(J^ I ^ FEE REQUIRED.'DATE FEE PAID: ^^20 RECEIPT NO.: RECEIVED BY:. I Routing: Plaiming — Engineerinc Fire 'ater, Ot'ner :. t ' i v u V-' City of Carlsbad Public Works - Engineering August 16, 2000 Urban Systems Associates, Inc. Attn: Andrew P. Schlaefli 4540 Kearney Villa Road, Ste. 106 SanDiego, CA. 92123-1573 SUBJECT: TRAFFIC REPORT ISSUE FOR PRE 00-43, PACIFICA CARLSBAD Dear Mr. Schlaefli: This letter serves as a response to your letter dated July 31, 2000 (Attached). We appreciate your letter and wish to clarify any misunderstanding for the current requirements of a traffic study prepared for projects within the City of Carlsbad. The draft traffic study prepared for Pacifica Carlsbad included the 2005 model scenario. When preparing traffic reports within the City of Carlsbad, build out models should include the 2020 traffic model, aitemative 5. The 2005 (near-term) approach is not an acceptable approach for analyzing long-term capacities for public infrasttucture. I understand you wanted to be consistent with the report prepared for the Kelly Corporate Center, however, the previous traffic study was performed before all of the 2020 build-out model information was made available. Since the information is now available, it should be used in all current reports. It is not appropriate to dismiss the information, since a neighboring project did not have to include it in the past. In reading John Kim's e-mail, he itemized the content and approach for the traffic study of this project. On one of the scenarios, John indicated that the report should include "build out conditions". As noted above, the build out scenario is the 2020 model. As noted in his e-mail he also stated that the 2005 model should not be included in this project report. I hope this clarifies this issue. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (760) 602- 2737. renw mouie As^ocN^t^, Engineer Skip Hammann, Senior Engineer John Kim, Associate Engineer 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-2720 • FAX (760) 602-8562 URBANSYSTEMmiSSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING & TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, MARKETING i PROJECT SUPPORT CONSULTANTS TO INDUSTRY AND GOVERNMENT July 31, 2000 Mr. Gary Wayne; Assistant Planning Director City of Carlsbad Planning Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 pi)''KV>*" lit Phone: (760) 602-2747 Fax: (760) 602-8562 Dear Gary: Thank you for your early review and comments on our preliminary traffic study for the Pacifica Carlsbad project on Palomar Airport Road. - PRE 00-43, comment #30, copy attached. We appreciate your identification ofthe access issues and street width of Laurel Tree Lane at this time so we can prepare a full and complete traffic report for the project. With regard to your request for use ofthe Year 2020 traffic model, we raised this issue and discussed it with engineering staff before the pre-application. We did this before our review ofthe submittal because we did not want to have a report which contained information which was not consistent with the Kelly Corporate Center project at the time it went to the City Council for approval. Attached is a copy ofthe E-mail message we received from John Kim. The E-mail confirms the technical approach and alternatives to be evaluated. We will incorporate both John's and your requested edits to the preliminary report. This approach will assure a complete traffic study upon first submittal. Again, Thank You for your prompt and thorough review of our preliminary traffic report during your pre-application review. Sincerely, Andrew P. Schlaefli. P.E Attachments: 2 cc: John Kim, City of Carlsbad Ali Shapouri, Shapouri £r Associates Paul Holling, Pacifica Enterprises #001 wo Page 1 of 1 a \ OFFICE_2000\ Trans, fax. 2000\1WO- 72800-aps 4540 KEARNY VILLA ROAD, SUITE 106 • SAN DlEGO, CA 92123-1573 • (858) 560-4911 • FAX (858) 560-9734 PRE 00-43 - PACjFICA ft OMAR July 20, 2000 PAGES . 26. A recent Preliminary Title Report (PR) (issued within 6 months of foonal appiication submittal) will be required for the proposed project. 27. All easements and encumbrances as identified in Schedute "B" of the PR must be indicated on thfr site plan. The- future disposition of any easements and encumbrances must also be identified. 28. The complete property boundary must be shown on the site plan, which must include ail bearings and distances. 29. Indicate how Niationat PDllutartt Discharge EliminatTon System (NPDES) criteria will be met. This could Include, but not be limited to, doing one or a combination of the foltowing: directingl surface njn-ofT through vegetated swales pri9rto discharge to a storm drain or the public right of way, constructing a gravel/sand/fossil filter system, constnjcting de-polFutant basins, etc. Also, any loading areas that are located in a sump must have pump facilities to direct drainage to a pollutant mitigation area. A draft copy^ of a- traffic study^ for this project was provided cfunn^ our review. Since this document was not completed, oiir review cannot be conskiered complete. However, comments were made directly on the document that i^nust be addressed. The study shall include an analysis of the AOT and peak traffic (of this project) contn'buting to the signalized intersection of Poinsettia t^ne an(|l Laurel Tree Lane. The study shall also include an analysis on whether the existing improvements to Lauret Triee Lane are sufficient to accommodate the anticipated traffic from the project (and the Laurel Tree apartments). Revise the study to utilize the 2020 model as the buiid-out, not 2005. This document will be reviewed in detail by engineering and traffic staff, once a formal application is submitted. 3t. Provide a preliminary hydrbfogy study which identffTes the "before" development discharge and the "after" development discharge flows. Identify if detention basins are warranted. The study should also identify preliminary reconjmendatlons on the antidpated storm drain infrastructure required as part of the development. Identify the 100-year inundation limits crossing the subject property. 32. Submit a preliminary. Geotectmical ceport that provides recommendations on the proposed project. 33. This pretiminary review does not constitute a complete revie^w of the proposed project. Additional items of concern may be identified upon formal project application submittal. 34. A redlined check print is enclosed for the applicants use in making the requested revisions. This check print shoutif t>e returned with the formal application suiMnittal to facilitate continued staff review. Please cor)taot Van Lynch at (7607B02-46tJiTyou have any questions. Sincerely, GARY E. WAYNE Assistant Planning Director John Kim, 02:23 FM 6/2/2000, Pacifica Carlsbad Traffic Repo X-From_: Jkim@ci.cadsbad.ca.us Fri Jun 2 14:10:07 2000 Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2000 14:23:58 -0700 From: "John Kim" <Jkim@d.carisbad.ca.u$> To: <aps@urbansystenis.net> Cc: "Dave Stillman" <Dstil@d.carlsbad.ca.us> Subject: Pacifica Carlsbad Traffic Report Content-Disposition: inline X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ohmaha.inetwortd.net id OAA10344 Andrew, I don't think there would be a problem in using the Kelly Corporate Center Traffic Report as a foundation for the Padfica Report but please note the following. The required scenarios to be contained in the report would be: 1. Existing Conditions 2. Existing Conditions + Project 3. Existing Conditions + Project + Cumulative Projects 4. Buildout Conditions 5. Buildout Condtions + Projed A Year 2005 scenario, as contained in the Kelly report, is not necessary and should not be a part of the Pacfica Report, Also, Project Distribution must account for the singular projed access on Aviara Parkway (which is different from the Kelly Corporate Center, which had access points on Aviara Parkway and Hidden Valley Road). If you have any other questions, give me a call at (760) 602-2757. Sincerely John T. Kim, P.E. Assodate Engineer City of Carisbad Transportation Division Printed for Sandee <usai@urbansystems.oet> ity of Carlsbad Planning Department August 1,2000 Smith Consulting Architects Bill Sharon 12220 El Camino Real San Diego CA 92130 SUBJECT: PRE 00-43 - PACIFICA PALOMAR APN: 212-040-25-00 A preliminary review of your project was conducted on July 20, 2000. Listed below are the issues raised by staff. Please note that the purpose of a preliminary review is to provide you with direction and comments on the overall concept of your project The preliminary review does not represent an in-depth analysis of your project. Additional issues of concern may be raised after your application is submitted and processed for a more specific and detailed review. Planning: 1. The California Department of Fish and Game, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the California Coastal Commission shall be consulted regarding the proposal to reduce the riparian buffer. The City should be provided with a copy of correspondence from the above-mentioned agencies that shows concurrence with a reduced buffer. 2. Please delineate the habitat areas and the habitat buffers separately on the plans. These areas shall also be delineated separately on the constraints map as part of the formal submittal. 3. Please provide for trail segment 31 as described in the Open Space and Conservation Resource Management Plan. This trail segment could start on the western portion of the property just north of the creek and traverse through the upper half of the buffer zone over to Palomar Airport Road. 4. The biological report needs to address the crossing of the drainage channel and associated impacts and mitigation measures associated with the crossing. . 5. The drive isle that provides access to lots one and two should not be loaded with parking spaces. 6. Because no building elevations were provided, please refer to Zoning Ordinance Section 21.34.070(1) for the building height requirements of the zone. Additional standards apply for buildings over 35 feet in height including increased landscape setbacks and a requirement for City Council approval ofthe project. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 PRE 00-43 - PACIFIC0PALOMAR August 1,2000 Page 2 7. The project site is within the Airport Influence Area for McClellan-Palomar Airport. The northern portion of the site is within the 70 - 75 CNEL Contour and the remainder of the site is within the 65 - 70 CNEL Noise Contour. The airport land use plan indicates that the proposed uses are incompatible within the 70 - 75 CNEL noise contour. Within the 65 - 70 CNEL Noise Contour the proposed use is conditionally compatible provided the interior noise level is attenuated to 50 CNEL based on an acoustical study and various notices are recorded against the property. Please contact Jack Koerper at SANDAG to have the noise contours plotted on the project site showing the contour lines in relation to proposed building locations. 8. The Planned Industrial (P-M) Zone has a minimum lot size requirement of 1 acre. Proposed lots must meet this requirement, unless a Non-Residential Planned Development Permit is processed. 9. A Non-Residential Planned Unit Development Permit is not required for the project provided all required standards, including parking and landscaped setbacks, for each building are all located on the same lot as the building. The proposed shared access between the lots will require a reciprocal access and maintenance agreement. 10. If separate lots are created, landscaped setback areas are required from the property lines and all required parking for each building must be located on the same lot as the building. Please refer to the Planned Industrial Zone ordinance. 11. Section 21.34.070(2)(F) of the Planned Industrial Zone requires that 10 percent of the required parking area inclusive of driveways be landscaped. Landscaping in the building setback areas is not counted toward meeting this requirement. 12. Development of the property must comply with the requirements of the P-M zone. A fifty- foot (50) setback is required from the ultimate right-of-way line for Palomar Airport Road and the maximum lot coverage is fifty (50) percent. 13. Should a private street be proposed to create access to the separate lots the Section 21.34.070(2)(B) ofthe Planned Industrial Zone has a landscaped setback requirement of 35 feet average and 25 feet minimum from the private street. Please refer to the Planned Industrial Zone. 14. The proposed outdoor eating areas appear to comply with the area requirements of the zone. Please provide square footage of each area with the formal submittal. 15. Rooftop equipment will not be pennitted because of the topography of the area and the surrounding existing and future residential land uses. The rooftop equipment issue for this site will be treated the same as it was for the Kelly Corporate Center (SDP 97-25). You are advised to review the approved plans and the condition of approval addressing rooftop equipment for SDP 97-25. The color of the rooftop will also need to be neutral in color. 16. Cooling towers and trash enclosure locations, which are not shown on the plans, should be on the south side of the site behind the buildings so as not to be visible from Palomar PRE 00-43 - PACIFIcj^^ALOMAR August 1, 2000 Page 3 Airport Road. Decorative concrete or masonry walls, which are architecturally compatible with the main buildings, will be required to screen the cooling towers. 17. Because of the properties location along a prime arterial building elevations and signage will be a focus area of review. A high quality design and building materials including such items as stone accents should be part of the design. 18. Development of the site requires the approval of a Planned Industrial Permit, Site Development Plan, Coastal Development Permit and a Tentative Parcel Map. A General Plan Amendment will be required to change the general plan open space boundary ofthe property. Depending on site design as noted above (items 8, 9 and 10), a Non-residential Planned Development Permit could also be required. 19. Provide pedestrian paths to Palomar Airport Road at each end of the project site. This may be incorporated with the trail segment on the eastern end of the project. 20. Please increase the size of the buffer on the eastern end of the project site to Palomar Airport Road. This is an important habitat link to the north and needs to be as wide as possible. 21. Please incorporate landscaping and mounding to screen from public view the entry driveway section that is adjacent and parallel to Palomar Airport Road. Please refer to the landscape manual for the arterial streetscape theme for Palomar Airport Road. 22. The parking area adjacent to Palomar Airport Road (Lot 1) appears to have overhang into the setback. Parking overhang into landscape areas shall not occur in required setbacks and should be kept to a minimum in other locations. 23. A street name change application would be required to change the street name from Laural Tree Rd. to Pacifica Place. Engineering: 1. Please be advised that in order to make a more in-depth review of the proposed development, a more complete design ofthe project is required. 2. Please indicate all existing and proposed utilities along Laurel Tree Road and Palomar Airport Road (i.e., stonn drain, water, sewer, etc.) that will serve the development. Depict looping of public water facilities from Laurel Tree Lane to Palomar Airport Road. Indicate gravity flow sewer facilities with invert elevations. The submitted plan does not depict any facilities, except a few stonn drains. 3. Depict the extent of existing improvements on Laurel Tree Road (per drawing 368-1), and all proposed improvements to Laurel Tree Road required to serve this project. 4. Depict the extent of proposed sidewalk, median hardscape, and median landscaping along frontage of Palomar Airport Road. 5. Revise the plan to indicate the ADT (traffic), EDU's (sewer), GPM (potable water), PRE 00-43 - PACIFI^PALOMAR August 1,2000 Page 4 6. Meet with the Fire Department to identify the necessary fire protection measures required for this project (access, fire hydrants, sprinklering, etc.). All proposed fire hydrants must be served by public water mains. 7. Show all existing and proposed topography and drainage patterns for the site. Revise the plans to indicate how on-site surface runoff is controlled. Identify the location, alignment, and discharge of any proposed drainage system. Depict the limits of 100-year inundation crossing the property. 8. Indicate the legal description of the proposed development and all adjacent properties. 9. Provide a Vicinity Map on the site plan. 10. Submit the site plan at either a 1" = 40', or, 1" = 20' scale. 11. There is insufficient infonnation to make a determination if a Grading Permit will be required. Provide grading quantities of cut/fill/export/import/remedial (in cubic yards) and depict existing and proposed topography. 12. A Public Improvement Plan will be required for the extension of Laurel Tree Road the public utilities required to serve the project. All onsite public utilities must be shown on public improvement plans as well. 13. Acquisition of offsite right-of-way, slope and grading easements must be secured in order to construct Laurel Tree Road. 14. Regarding the extension of Laurel Tree Road, submit a letter from SDG&E stating their support for the proposed use within their easement. A joint-use agreement will be required for this crossing. 15. If slopes are proposed off-site, a private slope easement must be obtained from the adjacent property owner. 16. This project must provide two points of access. Revising the project entrance to include two 20-feet wide driveways off Laurel Tree Road may accommodate this. Consider all options to best fit this project (and adjacent properties). 17. Show typical street sections for Laurel Tree Road and Palomar Airport Road. Indicate existing and proposed improvements on the typical sections. 18. Revise the plans to indicate the proposed relinquishment of access rights to and from Palomar Airport Road. Access for this site shall be from Laurel Tree Road. 19. It appears a minor subdivision is proposed. If so, submit for a tentative parcel map. Depict lot line dimensions, lot areas, and easements on the property. 20. Depict all proposed public easements (sewer, water, storm drain, access, etc.) on PRE 00-43 - PACIFK^ALOMAR August 1,2000 Page 5 the site plan. 21. Depict the limits of proposed private access and utility easements on the site plan for the benefit of Parcels 1,2 and 3. 22. This project will be required to pay their fair-share cost for the design and construction of the traffic signal at Aviara Parkway and Laurel Tree Road. 23. Dimension the drive aisles site plan throughout the parking lot (minimum 24' width). 24. Depict the location of trash enclosures required to serve the development. Call-out enclosures per Carisbad Standard drawing GS-16. Identify how refuse trucks will maneuver throughout the site. 25. Indicate 42' (Caltrans 407-E) turning radii on the plan to verify a truck will circulate safely throughout the site. . 26. A recent Preliminary Title Report (PR) (issued within 6 months of fonnal application submittal) will be required for the proposed project. 27. All easements and encumbrances as identified in Schedule "B" of the PR must be indicated on the site plan. The future disposition of any easements and encumbrances must also be identified. 28. The complete property boundary must be shown on the site plan, which must include all bearings and distances. 29. Indicate how National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) criteria will be met This could include, but not be limited to, doing one or a combination of the following: directing surface run-off through vegetated swales prior to discharge to a storm drain or the public right of way, constructing a gravel/sand/fossil filter system, constructing de-pollutant basins, etc. Also, any loading areas that are located in a sump must have pump facilities to direct drainage to a pollutant mitigation area. 30. A draft copy of a traffic study for this project was provided during our review. Since this document was not completed, our review cannot be considered complete. However, comments were made directly on the document that must be addressed. The study shall include an analysis of the ADT and peak traffic (of this project) contributing to the signalized intersection of Poinsettia Lane and Laurel Tree Lane. The study shall also include an analysis on whether the existing improvements to Laurel Tree Lane are sufficient to accommodate the anticipated traffic from the project (and the Laurel Tree apartments). Revise the study to utilize the 2020 model as the build-out, not 2005. This document will be reviewed in detail by engineering and traffic staff, once a formal application is submitted. 31. Provide a preliminary hydrology study which identifies the "before" development discharge and the "after" development discharge flows. Identify if detention basins are warranted. The study should also identify preliminary recommendations on the anticipated storm drain infrastructure required as part of the development. Identify PRE 00-43 - PACIFld^ALOMAR August 1,2000 Pages anticipated storm drain infrastmcture required as part of the development. Identify the 100-year inundation limits crossing the subject property. 32. Submit a preliminary Geotechnical report that provides recommendations on the proposed project. 33. This preliminary review does not constitute a complete review of the proposed project. Additional items of concern may be identified upon formal project application submittal. 34. A redlined check print is enclosed for the applicants use in making the requested revisions. This checic print should be returned with the formal application submittal to facilitate continued staff review. Fire: 35. Access is inadequate as proposed. Please indicate circulation routes by which emergency responders will access. 36. Five on-site fire hydrants will be required. 37. All buildings must be protected by automatic fire sprinkler systems. Please contact Van Lynch at (760) 602-4613 if you have any questions. Sincerelyp^ tRY E^AYNE Assistarit Planning Director GEWVLcs Attachments c: Chris Decerbo Jeremy Riddle Mike Smith Bill Plummer File Copy Data Entry PRELIMINARY REVIEW APPLICATION PROIECTNAME: OWNER (Print or type) Address City, state & Zip gv<ki . 60 P'^i^O Telephone -l^^'O^K^ Signature ('^OrJic^oA -jA^C^l e/v.(l>C). Print Name APPLICANT (Print or type) Address City, State & Zip ^V^^, CA ^I^O Telephone g ^ ' 7^ ^ - Y^T? Signature,^ Print Name ^Owner's signature indicates permission to conduct a preliminary review for a development proposal. PROJECT ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S) (APN): XV q - OH Q - 'TS^' DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL (ADD ATTACHMENT IF NECESSARY): Wii^i/}ip. Z- STD^V ^/,om si^ s>fec. Office I^ILDM. WOULD YOU LIKE TO ORALLY PRESENT YOUR PROPOSAL TO YOUR ASSIGNED STAFF PLANNER/ENGINEER? YM NO • PLEASE LIST THE NAMES OF ALL STAFF MEMBERS YOU HAVE PREVIOUSLY SPOKEN TO REGARDING THIS PROJECT. IF NONE, PLEASE SO STATE. FOR CITY USE ONLY PROJECT NUMBER: f(2^ ^H-^ FEE REQUIRED/DATE FEE PAID: RECEIPT NO.: RECEIVED BY: Routing: Planning Q Engineering Q Fire O Water Q Other, FRM0025 12/99 PAGE 3 of 3 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 9200S Applicant: SMITH CONSULTING ARCHITECTS Description PRE00043 7\mount 420.00 17^2 0&/20/QZ 0001 01 §2 C-PRMT' 420.. 00 Receipt Number: R0013414 Transaction Date: 06/30/2000 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 72881 420.00 Transaction Amount: 420.00 Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department March 14, 2000 Scott Cairns Smith Consulting Architects Ste 220 12220 El Camino Real San Diego CA 92130 SUBJECT: PRE 00-12 - PACIFICA ENTERPRISES, LLC APN: 212-040-25 A preliminary review of your project was conducted on March 9, 2000. Listed below are the issues raised by staff. Please note that the purpose of a preliminary review is to provide you with direction and comments on the overall concept of your project. The preiiminarv review does not represent an in-depth analysis of vour project. Additional issues of concern mav be raised after your application is submitted and processed for a more specific and detailed review- Planning: 1. A Biology Report which assesses the following is required to be submitted with the applications for the project: A. The biological resources on the site. B. Whether the area around Encinas Creek is a wetland or riparian area and establish the limits of this resource for purposes of establishing if a 100 foot wetland or 50 foot riparian buffer will be required. The limit delineation is required to plot the points of measurement for the required buffer. C. Determine the presence or lack of least Bell's Vireo in the project area particulariy near Encinas Creek. This will affect the time of the year for which grading is prohibited. D. Evaluate the proposed limits of development of the Hardline Preserve Areas of the City's Habitat Management Plan against the proposed area of site disturbance. The HMP Preserve boundary should be delineated on the project plans. E. Determine whether the existing open space easement adjacent to the northern and eastern limits of the site will be encroached upon and if so the impact and proposed mitigation. Please plot the easement location on the project plans and provide a copy of the recorded easement document with the application submittal. F. Biological impacts and any recommended mitigation for improvements related to the crossing of Encinas Creek. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 ^ PRE 00-12 - PACIFICA ENTERPRISES, INC. March 14, 2000 Page 2 It is recommended that the Biologist preparing the report consult with representatives of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department of Fish and Game and the Army Corps of Engineers prior to finalizing a report for submittal to the City of Carisbad. A letter of concurrence with the findings of the Biology Report submitted with the project applications would assist in reducing the application processing time. 2. Development of the site will need to comply with the agricultural conversion policy of the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program. One of the conversion options requires the payment of an agricultural conversion mitigation fee. 3. The project site is within the Airport Influence Area for McClellan-Palomar Airport. The northern portion of the site is within the 70 - 75 CNEL Contour and the remainder of the site is within the 65 - 70 CNEL Noise Contour. The airport land use plan indicates that the proposed uses are incompatible within the 70 - 75 CNEL noise contour. Within the 65 - 70 CNEL Noise Contour the proposed use is conditionally compatible provided the interior noise level is attenuated to 50 CNEL based on an acoustical study and various notices are recorded against the property. Please contact Jack Koerper at SANDAG to have the noise contours plotted on the project site showing the contour lines in relation to proposed building locations. 4. The Planned Industrial (P-M) Zone has a minimum lot size requirement of 1 acre. Proposed lots must meet this requirement. 5. A Non-Residential Planned Unit Development Permit is not required for the project provided all required standards including parking for each building are all located on the same lot as the building. As a result of the proposed shared access between the lots a reciprocal access and maintenance agreement will be required. 6. Trail Segment Number 31 of the Open Space and Conservation Resource Management Plan must be included in the project design. The trail could potentially be allowed in the second half of the required buffer area along the southern portion of the site. 7. Section 21.34.070(2)(F) of the Planned Industrial Zone requires that 10 percent of the required parking area inclusive of driveways be landscaped. Landscaping in the building setback areas is not counted toward meeting this requirement. 8. The design of parking lot landscape planters must comply with the requirements of Appendix E-1 of the City of Carisbad Landscape Manual. 9. Development of the property must comply with the requirements of the P-M zone. A fifty (50) foot setback is required from the ultimate right-of-way line for Palomar Airport Road and the maximum lot coverage is fifty (50) percent. 10. If separate lots are created landscaped setback areas are required from the property line and all required parking for each building must be located on the same lot as the building. Please refer to the Planned Industrial Zone. PRE 00-12 - PACIFICA ENTERPRISES, INC. March 14, 2000 Page 3 11. Should a private street be proposed to create access to the separate lots the Section 21.34.070(2)(B) of the Planned Industrial Zone has a landscaped setback requirement of 35 feet average and 25 feet minimum from the private street. Please refer to the Planned Industrial Zone. 12. The proposed outdoor eating areas must comply with the area requirements of the zone. In addition, the eating areas are proposed to far into the buffer area and a lot line is proposed through the center of two others. Please revise. 13. Rooftop equipment will not be permitted because of the topography of the area and the surrounding future land uses. The rooftop equipment issue for this site will be treated the same as it was for the Kelly Corporate Center (SDP 97-25). You are advised to review the approved plans and the condition of approval addressing rooftop equipment for SDP 97-25. The color of the rooftop will also need to be neutral in color. 14. Cooling tower and trash enclosure locations should be on the south side of the site behind the buildings so as not to be visible from Palomar Airport Road. Decorative concrete or masonry walls which are architecturally compatible with the main buildings will be required to screen the cooling towers. 15. Refer to Zoning Ordinance Section 21.34.070(1) for the building height requirements of the zone. Additional standards apply for buildings over 35 feet in height including increased landscape setbacks and a requirement for City Council approval of the project. 16. Because of the properties location along a prime arterial building elevations and signage will be a focus area of review. A high quality design and building materials including such items as stone accents should be part of the design. 17. A survey should be completed by an archaeologist regarding the potential for archaeological resources to be located on areas of the site which will be impacted by construction. 18. A proposal for development of only a portion of the site which would utilize all the potential traffic generation capacity for the property while leaving fifty percent or more of the property for future development will not be supported by the Planning Department. In addition, by utilizing this approach while creating additional lots could result in lots with no or very minimal development potential setting up a possible "takings" scenario. 19. Development of the site require the approval of a Site Development Plan, a Coastal Development Permit and a Tentative Parcel Map. 20. A stockpile grading plan can be proposed prior to approval of the Site Development Plan and other discretionary approvals for the project. Approval of a Coastal Development Permit and Environmental Review will be required for a proposed stockpile. Engineering: 1. Site plan should show, topography within 100 feet of the project boundary, widths and grades of adjacent streets or alleys, street cross-sections, proposed/existing street PRE 00-12 - PACIFICA^TERPRISES, INC. March 14, 2000 Page 4 improvements and utilities (sewer, water, storm drain) and all items indicated in the submittal checklists. 2. Provide a vicinity map on the site plan. 3. Dimension the site plan fully, including sidewalks and parking spaces. 4. Show proposed grades and spot elevations. 5. A recent Preliminary Title Report (PR) (issued within 6 months of formal application submittal) will be required for the proposed project. All easements and encumbrances as identified in Schedule "B" of the PR must be indicated on the site plan. The future disposition of any easements and encumbrances must also be identified. 6. Please indicate the amount of grading proposed for the project in cubic yards of cut/fill and import/export. 7. Indicate how National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) criteria will be met. This could include, but not be limited to, doing one or a combination of the following: directing surface run-off through vegetated swales prior to discharge to a storm drain or the public right of way, constructing a gravel/sand/peat filter system, constructing depollutant basins, etc. 8. Show typical street sections for Laurel Tree Road and Palomar Airport Road. 9. Refer to settlement agreement between City and Kelly for the disposition of Laurel Tree Road. The City will not be constructing the improvements - refer to document for particulars. Coordination will be required to provide access to your site. If your project goes first and constructs the street, upgrading of the storm drain culvert my require permits from State and Federal wildlife agencies. 10. No access to Palomar Airport Road will be permitted. 11. A traffic study will be required to analyze the project impacts on the circulation elements of the area. Be aware that the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real is at or near capacity. This project will contribute directly to the intersection and will have an impact. Compliance with Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 5 could require additional mitigation to develop this site. 12. Indicate project's proposed ADT on the site plan. 13. A biology report should be submitted with the formal application indicating limits of wetlands and riparian habitat. 14. Project will be required to extend drainage improvements to the existing creek. Permits from State and Federal wildlife agencies may be required. 15. Check truck turning movements onsite to make sure adequate room is provided. PRE 00-12 - PACIFICA^TERPRISES, INC. March 14, 2000 Page 5 16. A Stockpile Permit for importing dirt onto the site can be applied for. The application will be a full grading plan with all the required attachments. Please check with the Engineering Department Counter staff for further details. It takes several months to process a grading plan. The grading plan must be signed by the Planning Department and may require permits issued by the Planning Department. 17. This preliminary review does not constitute a complete review of the proposed project. Additional items of concern may be identified upon formal project application submittal. A red-lined checkprint is enclosed for the applicants use in reviewing the preliminary comments. This check print should be returned with the formal application submittal to facilitate continued staff review. Please contact Don Neu at (760) 602-4612 if you have any questions in regard to the Planning Department comments or Glen Van Peski at 941-9500. Sincer GARY E. WAYN! Assistant Planning Director GeW:DN:cs • c: Michael J. Holzmiller Adrienne Landers Glen Van Peski, Consultant Land Use Engineer Mike Smith Bill Plummer File Copy Data Entry Paul Hollings, Pacifica Enterprises, 12780 High Bluff Drive, Suite 160 San Diego, CA 92130 -7P City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 9200! Applicant: SMITH CONSULTING ARCHIT 0120 02/17/00 0001 01 02 420»00 Description PRE00012 Amount 420.00 Receipt Number: ROOIOOOO Transaction Date: 02/17/2000 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 71358 420.00 Transaction Amount: 420.00 PRFXTMINARY REVIEW APPLICATTON PROIECTNAME: OT'NER (Print or type). . :; APPLICANT rPrint or .type) 1 City, State & 7^4jft PtM/ft/W, 'flf^ ' City; State & Zi.. ^cj/^ VliM^M.^^Wb^ Telephone, Telephone. -^Signature ^» jL^A^I [^J^^ *Owner's signature indicates permission to conduct a preliminary review for a development proposal PROJTECT ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NimiBERrS) fAPN): ^( ^ - d 4(0 - DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL (ADD ATTACHMENT P NECESSARY): t/.K^M.f /^fiTHftrJvfi -j-iU-Uji? AffiYjL H^^- ^fgwnyt) ^.fr^3 ^fiTVif l^..,,/!." IM L n,^^../.LA I'.lL til, ^Cr.Vl 'LA^'^ >^I... N vy V . ..CM. , ^ v?^([|4<' -fgAnc^h/l (iMirih. f//f -fe(|y -j"^ WOULD YOU LIKE TO ORALLY PRESENT YOUR PROPOSAL TO YOUR ASSIGNED STAFF PLEASE LIST THE NAMES OF ALL STAFF MEMBERS YOU HAVE PREVIOUSLY SPOKEN TO REGAJyPING THIS PROJECT. IF NONE, PLEASE SO STATE. FOR CITY USE ONLY PROJECT NUMBER: _ FEE REQUIRED/DATE FEE PAID: RECEIPT NO.: . > RECEIVED BY: H Routing; Plamimg Q Engineerinc L] Fire Q Water ri Other_ 11/9:5 FILE COPY Citv of Carlsbad Planning Departnnent April 5, 1999 Scott Caims Smith Consulting Architects 12220 El Camino Real, Suite 200 SanDiego, CA92130 SUBJECT: PRE 99-24 - PACIFICA CARLSBAD APN: 212-040-25 A preliminary review of your project was conducted on March 25, 1999. Listed below are the issues raised by staff. Please note that the purpose of a preliminary review is to provide you with direction and comments on the overall concept of your project. The preliminary review does not represent an in-depth analysis of your project. Additional issues of concern may be raised after your application is submitted and processed for a more specific and detailed review. Planning: 1. Health and athletic clubs require the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. 2. The parking rate for health and athletic clubs is 1 space/35 square feet of gross floor area. 3. The City of Carlsbad Traffic Model assumed an industrial park traffic generation rate of 8 trips per 1,000 square feet of building area for the properties. Health clubs have a traffic generation rate of 40 trips per 1,000 square feet of building area and standard commercial office has a rate of 20 trips per 1,000 square feet of building area. A traffic study is required to analyze the impacts of the proposed additional traffic on impacted street segments and intersections. Recent traffic studies indicate that several area intersections are close to falling below the growth management program level of service of "D" during the peak hour. In addition, the recent traffic monitoring report indicated that the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real fails the level of service standard. Therefore, staff believes it is highly unlikely that there is available capacity to accommodate the increased traffic that the proposal would generate. 4. A Biology Report is needed to define the limits of the riparian area, quantify any impacts to the mitigation planting adjacent to Palomar Airport Road, and the impacts ofthe street crossing Encinas Creek. The report should propose mitigation for project impacts. It is recommended that the biologist preparing the report consult with representatives of the 2075 La Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (760) 438-1161 • FAX (760) 438-0894 ^ PRE 99-24 - PACIFIC CARLSBAD APRIL 5, 1999 PAGE 2 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Army Corps of Engineers and Califomia Department of Fish and Game. A related item is the Local Coastal Program requirement for a 50 foot setback from riparian areas. 5. Development of the site would need to comply with the agricultural conversion policy of the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program. One of the conversion options requires the payment of an agricultural conversion mitigation fee. 6. A 50 foot landscaped setback is required from Palomar Airport Road and a 35 foot landscaped setback is required from Aviara Parkway. 7. There is an SDG&E easement crossing the western parcel. Constmction of any improvements in the easement including required parking requires written approval from SDG&E which must be submitted with any development applications for the property. 8. The Engineering Department will not support the proposed access to Palomar Airport Road and the driveway to Aviara Parkway. Since all access will be from the proposed street to the south the onsite circulation would need to be revised to provide adequate circulation through the parking area to all buildings. 9. Trail segment number 31 of the Open Space and Conservation Resource Management Plan must be included in the project design. The trail could be constmcted in the second 25 feet of the required 50 foot riparian buffer. 10. The project site is within the Airport Influence Area for McClellan-Palomar Airport. The northem portion ofthe site is within the 70 CNEL noise contour and the remainder of the site is within the 65 CNEL noise contour. The airport land use plan indicates that the proposed uses are incompatible within the 70 CNEL noise contour and within the 65 CNEL noise contour must be attenuated to an interior noise level of 50 CNEL based on an acoustical study. It is recommended that SANDAG be consulted in regard to accurately plotting the location ofthe noise contours on the property. 11. Development of the properties must comply with the requirements of the P-M zone. Because of the conceptual nature of the plan submitted a detailed review for compliance with the requirements of the P-M zone could not be done. 12. The western lot is not a separate legal lot. The area is part of a lot that extends to the west side of Aviara Parkway. A subdivision is required to split the area from the property to the west of Aviara Parkway. 13. Development of the site requires the approval of a Site Development Plan and a Coastal Development Permit in addition to a Conditional Use Permit which is required for the fitness center. PRE 99-24 - PACIFIC CARLSBAD APRIL 5, 1999 PAGE 3 14. Because of the high visibility of the site along a prime arterial building elevations and signage must receive special attention to design. Engineering: 15. Please be aware that the parcel adjacent to Aviara Parkway is not a legal parcel. It is currently a portion of a larger parcel that includes some land on the west side of Aviara Parkway. That land, and therefore the portion in your proposal, is currently under discretionary review for SDP 97-25 the Kelly Corporate Center. 16. The access shown from Palomar Airport Road and from Aviara Parkway will not be allowed. As part of the condemnation agreement the abutter's rights of access from both streets will be waived. Access to the site will be via Street "A" at the south side at the existing property line. 17. The cul-de-sac for Sfreet "A" will probably have to be located across the creek within the proposed development. It is suggested that the circulation scheme for all the proposed uses be designed to include two or three access points off the cul- de-sac bulb. 18. The traffic generation for the proposed uses will most likely require a full traffic study to analyze its impacts on the circulation elements of the area. Be aware that the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real is at or close to capacity. This project will contribute directly to the intersection and will have an impact. Compliance with Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 5 could require additional mitigation to develop this site. 19. Prior to approval of any development encroaching into the existing SDG&E easement, a letter from SDG&E will be required agreeing to the proposed use of their easement. 20. Since no existing or proposed grades are shown, it cannot be determined if a grading permit will be required. Please show existing and proposed contours. 21. A minimum clear distance of 5 ft. is required when adjacent parking stalls are located perpendicular or at an angle to each other. 22. The trash enclosures need to be shown. As part of the circulation design, please verify that a tmck with a 42-ft tuming radius (CalTrans 407E) will be able to maneuver to pick up the trash. 23. Indicate how National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System criteria will be 1 PRE 99-24 - PACIFIC C^CRLSBAD APRIL 5, 1999 PAGE 4 met. Show parking lot water flow through a filtering system prior to discharge into a storm drain. 24. This preliminary review does not constitute a complete review of the proposed project, additional items of concem may be identified upon formal project application submittal. Fire: 25. Site Design with respect to emergency access is acceptable but should be improved by providing access across the proposed property line separating Buildings B and C. 26. Public water mains and on-site fire hydrants must be provided. 27. All buildings must be protected by automatic fire sprinklers. 28. Revegetation planned for slope adjacent to Building C must conform to fire protection requirements of the landscape manual. Please contact Don Neu at (760) 438-1161, extension 4446 if you have any questions conceming the Planning Department comments or Frank Jimeno at (760) 438-1161, extension 4501. Sincerel GARWE. WAYNE Assistant Planning Director GEW:DN:mh c: Michael J. Holzmiller Adrienne Landers Don Neu Frank Jimeno Mike Smith Bill Plummer Bobbie Hoder File Copy Data Entry PROJECT ASSESSOR'S PAICEL NLLMBER(S) rAPNV ^/ l^-gf^' ^S" DESCPJPTION OF PROPOSAL (ADD AlTACHMENT IF NECESSARY): PRELIMINARYRKVTF.W APFUCATlOiN PROJECTNAME: /^<^C^f/ft^ C^lrf^h^ Address. OWNER (Print or type) Address. City, State & Zip Vi 'iAO^ fijt. HWO Telephone ((o/^)lf?^^2^ :i±r ciiVtiatiirr^^^^^Z)^^ Signature. APPLICANT (Print or type) City, State & 7ip Ul^iS^^ a -•Owner's signature indicates permission to conduct a preliminary review for a development proposal. WOULD YOU LIKE TO ORALLY PP-ESENT YOUR PROPOSAL TO YOUR ASSIGNED S l AFF PLANNT£R/ENGINEER? ilS MQ • _ PLEASE LIST THE NAMES OF ALL STAFF MEMBERS YOU HAVE PREVIOUSLY SPOKEN TO REG.A„RDTNG THLS PROJECT. IF NONE, PLEASE SO STATE. /i/(rytx^ FOR cm' USE ONLY PROJECT NUMBER;. FEE REQUIRED/DATE FEE PAID RECEIPT NO : _ RECi-:iVED BY: Routing: Planning • Engineering • Fire Q Water Q Other FRM0D25 um PAGE 3 Of 3 MAR 1 5 1999 CiTY Qt CARLSeAD PLANN!^IG DEPT. I PROJECT NUMBER; _ — I 1 _ _ _ _ . I RECEIPT NO.: ~ —. . . — 1 c —~—~—~ i The City of Carlsbad Planning Departi>Tent A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Item No. P.C. AGENDA OF: September 19,2001 Application complete date: September 19, 2001 Project Planner: Van Lynch Project Engineer: Jeremy Riddle SUBJECT: GPA 01-05/CDP 01-02/SDP 01-01 - PACIFICA PALOMAR OFFICE BUILDING - Request for the recommendation of adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration, addendum, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and the recommendation of approval for a General Plan Amendment and Coastal Development Permit and the approval of a Site Development Plan to constmct a three-story multi-tenant office building with a total area of 120,000 square feet, with subterranean and at-grade parking, on a 15.69 acre site located adjacent to and on the south side of Palomar Airport Road and east of Aviara Parkway in the Coastal Zone and Local Facilities Management Zone 5. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5040, 5043, 5042 RECOMMENDING ADOPTION of a Mitigated Negative Declaration, addendum, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GPA 01-05 and CDP 01-02 and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 5041, APPROVING SDP 01-01, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II. INTRODUCTION These applications propose developing one lot with a three-story multi-tenant office building having a total area of 120,000 square feet. A total of 489 parking spaces will be provided. The General Plan Amendment is to adjust the boundary of the Open Space and Plarmed Industrial land use designations based on a biological survey of the property. The proposed land use is permitted by the Planned Industrial, Qualified Development Overlay Zone (P-M-Q) for the property, subject to the approval of a Site Development Plan. The property is located within the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program requiring the approval of a Coastal Development Permit. The project includes extending Laurel Tree Lane to the project site over the existing private Laurel Tree Road alignment. Fifty foot landscaped setbacks will be provided along Palomar Airport Road and from Encinas Creek located along the southem boundary of the site. The project is in compliance with all city requirements. A Planned Industrial Permit is also required for the project and will be acted upon by the Plarming Director after Plarming Commission and Council decisions. A Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed containing mitigation measures for biological resources and noise. GPA 01-05/CDP 01-02/S]^31-01 - PACIFICA PALOMAR OFFlTE BUILDING September 19, 2001 Page 2 III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting that the Planning Commission recommend approval of a General Plan Amendment and Coastal Development Permit and approve a Site Development Plan for the Pacifica Palomar Office Building project. The project site is a total area of 15.69 acres located adjacent to and south of Palomar Airport Road and 500 feet east of Aviara Parkway. The project consists of a three-story office building totaling 120,000 square feet. Parking will be provided at-grade and in a subterranean parking garage with a total of 489 parking spaces. Indoor and outdoor employee eating areas are proposed. An outdoor eating area on the east side of the building will have tables, chairs, frash container and cloth shade stmcture. A fully enclosed mechanical equipment yard located immediately to the east of the building, thereby minimizing the amount of rooftop equipment necessary for the building. The mechanical equipment enclosure will be 12 feet tall and will be constmcted with split-face masonry block. As depicted on the exhibits, the project contains significant landscaped building setbacks around the perimeter of the development area. A fifty-foot landscape setback is proposed from Palomar Airport Road and Encinas Creek. The Encinas Creek buffer will include a citywide pedestrian trail and retention basins in addition to naturalized landscaping. Vehicular access is provided to the site from the proposed extension of Laurel Tree Lane off of Aviara Parkway. The new road will follow the old alignment of Laurel Tree Road improvements and will require the replacement of the culvert for Encinas Creek under the existing Laurel Tree Road. No access is provided from Palomar Airport Road, except for an emergency access point located on the easterly portion of the site. The project will provide frontage improvements, including median paving, median landscaping median irrigation, and sidewalk along Palomar Airport Road. No roadway improvements are required for Aviara Parkway. The building is rectangular in shape with glass reentrant comers and a central evergreen tinted convex curved glass entry. The third level is primarily a jade colored glass wall with the first and second floors having large evergreen tinted picture windows with aluminum muUions surrounded by a red sandstone veneer. Metal panels and louvers also accent the building. The building height is 45 feet and the highest architectural feature is 55 feet tall. Grading for the project consists of 24,026 cubic yards of cut and 19,305 cubic yards of fill with a net export of 4,721 cubic yards of material. At the completion of grading, the first floor level will be six feet lower than the elevation of Palomar Airport Road and two feet higher than the existing grade. The following table lists the general plan, zoning and existing land use for the site and adjacent properties: GPA 01-05/CDP 01-02/SDP 01-01 - PACIFICA PALOMAR OFFICE BUILDING September 19,2001 Page 3 General Plan, Zoning & Existing Land Use for the Site and Ad jacent Property GENERAL PLAN ZONING EXISTING LAND USE Site PI and OS P-M-0, OS, Vacant North PI P-M Vacant - City Golf Course/Industrial Site South OS, RL, and RLM LC and OS Open Space East PI and OS P-M-0 Vacant West OS and OS P-M-Q Vacant Site Description The northem developable portion of the site is relatively flat and has been used for agricultural purposes. On-site elevations range from 100 feet to 106 feet in the low-lying area and up to 160 feet above MSL on the southem slope. The majority of the site is disturbed habitat, with native vegetation communities (including southem willow scmb and southem mixed chaparral) existing along the length of the Encinas Creek drainage and on the steep slope along the southem boundary ofthe parcel. The site has street frontage on Palomar Airport Road. Applicable Regulations The proposed project is subject to the following plans, ordinances and standards as analyzed within the following section of this staff report: A. Planned Industrial (PI) and Open Space General Plan Land Use Designations; B. Planned Industrial, Qualified Development Overlay Zone (P-M-Q); C. Site Development Plan findings required by the Qualified Development Overlay Zone - Carlsbad Municipal Code, Chapter 21.06, Section 21.06.020; D. Comprehensive Land Use Plan for McClellan-Palomar Airport; E. Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program, the Coastal Agricultural Overlay Zone - Carlsbad Municipal Code, Chapter 21.202 and the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone - Carlsbad Municipal Code, Chapter 21.203; and F. Growth Management Ordinance (Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 5). IV. ANALYSIS The recoimnendation of approval for this project was developed by analyzing the project's consistency with the applicable policies and regulations listed above. Therefore, this section will cover the project's compliance with each of the regulations listed above in the order in which they are presented. GPA 01-05/CDP 01-02/SD September 19, 2001 Page 4 01-01 - PACIFICA PALOMAR OFFICE BUILDING A. General Plan As shown on Exhibit "S", the General Plan designation for the proposed development area of the project site is Planned Industrial (PI) and Open Space (OS). The Open Space area (6.3 acres) is generally located along Encinas Creek. The remainder of the lot and small portion of the site (3.1 acres) south of Encinas Creek are designated as PI. The General Plan map shows the OS area encroaching into the developable portion of the lot. The General Plan amendment is to adjust the boundaries between the PI and OS areas to have them coincide with the physical and environmental constraints of the property. The proposed OS area is equal in area to the existing OS area (6.3 acres). The property has been biologically surveyed to determine the sensitive and developable portion of the property. The new proposed OS boundary will follow the northem extent of the proposed 50-foot riparian buffer for Encinas Creek and existing open space easements. The PI portion on the south side ofthe site, south of Encinas Creek, is also proposed to be changed to OS. This area of southem mixed chaparral is adjacent to other open space property and is of better habitat quality than the disturbed PI area. An amendment to the Open Space and Conservation Map will also be made to reflect the amendment. The project complies with all elements of the General Plan as illusfrated in the table below: GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE ELEMENT USE, CLASSIFICATION, GOAL, OBJECTIVE OR PROGRAM PROPOSED USES & IMPROVEMENTS COMPLY? Land Use Development area is designated as PI Office uses proposed Yes Circulation New development shall dedicate and improve all public right-of-way for circulation facilities needed to serve development Additional dedication for a public road. Laurel Tree Rd. and frontage improvements to Palomar Airport Rd. Yes Noise Utilize noise standards contained in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for Palomar Airport The project includes mitigation measures to achieve the required interior noise levels Yes GPA 01-05/CDP 01-02/SDP 01-01 - PACIFICA PALOMAR OFFI September 19, 2001 Page 5 BUILDING GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE ELEMENT USE, CLASSIFICATION, GOAL, OBJECTIVE ORPROGRAM PROPOSED USES & IMPROVEMENTS COMPLY? Open Space & Conservation Designate as buffers portions of land next to sensitive enviroimiental areas The project includes a 50-foot buffer from Encinas Creek Yes Proposed Open Space area equal or greater than depicted on map Existing 6.3 acres Proposed 6.3 acres Yes Environmental quality equal or greater Replace disturbed habitat with southem mixed chaparral Yes Contiguous with Open Space as shown on Official Open Space Map Adjacent to Open Space as shown on Official Open Space Map Yes B. P-M-Q Zoning Regulations The development area of the project site is zoned Planned Industrial, Qualified Development Overlay Zone (P-M-Q). The project complies with all requirements of the P-M Zone as demonstrated in the following table: P-M ZONE COMPLIANCE STANDARD REQUIRED PROPOSED Permitted Use Business & Professional Offices Multi-tenant office use proposed Building Height 35 feet/ 45 ft.*; 55 ft. for allowed protmsions 45 ft. maximum; 55 ft. for allowed protmsions Setbacks Palomar Airport Road - 50 ft. (+ 10 feet*) Interior Side Yard -10 ft. (+ 10 feet*) Rear Yard -10 ft. (+ 10 feet*) Palomar Airport Road - 80 ft. Interior Side Yard - 320 ft. Rear Yard-215 ft. Parking 480(1:250) 489(1:244) Parking area landscaping 10% of the required parking area 10% of the required parking area Minimum Lot Area 1 acre 15.69 acres (one lot) Lot Coverage 50% maximum 10.8% 1^1 GPA 01-05/CDP 01-02/SDP 01-01 - PACIFICA PALOMAR OFFICE BUILDING September 19, 2001 Page 6 P-M ZONE COMPLIANCE STANDARD REQUIRED PROPOSED Employee Eating Areas 4,320 sq. ft. 4,460 sq. ft. Outdoor Equipment Enclose by a concrete or masonry wall not less than 6 ft. in height Mechanical equipment enclosure built to 12ft. tall with masonry block * Increase setbacks one foot for every foot of building height over 35 feet. The increase in building height from 35 feet to 45 feet complies with Section 21.34.070, PM Development Standards, in that the building is not more than three stories; all setbacks have been increased the amount of the increase in building height; and the building will conform with Section 18.04.170 of the Carlsbad Mimicipal Code (regarding fire sprinklers, smoke alarms and elevators). The increase in height for architectural features from 45 to 55 feet complies with Section 21.34.070, PM Development Standards, in that the architectural features do not function to provide usable floor area; do not accommodate and/or screen mechanical equipment; do not adversely impact adjacent properties; and are necessary to ensure the building's design excellence. The building has very large setbacks; no adjacent neighbors on three sides; and topographic separation to the south. The architectural elements provide vertical relief and add interest to the building's elevations. C. Site Development Plan Findings Required by the Qualified Development Overlay Zone The Qualified Development Overlay Zone (Q-Overlay), which is a part of the zoning designation for the property, requires that a site development plan be approved for the proposed use prior to the issuance of any building permit. The Q-Overlay Zone requires four findings. The required findings with justification for each are contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 5041. This section summarizes the necessary findings and support for each. The requested use is properly related to the site, surroundings and environmental setting as the project design complies with the requirements ofthe P-M zone as discussed above. All required building setbacks are provided, lot coverage is well below the maximum permitted, and landscaping in excess of the zone requirements will be provided. Adequate separation is provided from adjacent uses and the required 50-foot buffer from Encinas Creek has been incorporated into the site design. The site is also adequate in shape to accommodate the use as all other applicable code requirements have been met, including the parking standard in addition to building coverage. Nine parking spaces over the required number are planned and building coverage is less than one fourth of the maximum permitted. Ten percent of the parking area is landscaped which meets the minimum 10 percent requirement. As shown on Exhibit "K", all features necessary to adjust the use to existing and permitted future uses will be provided. Landscaping is proposed to screen the parking areas from public roadways. Adequate vehicle circulation has been provided to accommodate tmck-tuming movements. Laurel Tree Road, a public street off of Aviara Parkway, will provide access to the site. The planned street system is adequate to handle all traffic (1,889 average daily trips) generated by the use. GPA 01-05/CDP 01-02/SDP 01-01 - PACIFICA PALOMAR OFFICE BUILDING September 19, 2001 Page 7 D. Comprehensive Land Use Plan for McClellan - Palomar Airport The project site is located approximately 3,000 feet southwest of the airport and within the Airport Influence Area for McClellan - Palomar Airport. The site is inside the 65 CNEL noise contour with an area in the northwest comer located within the 70 CNEL noise contour. No buildings are proposed within the 70 CNEL noise contour. The airport land use plan identifies the use as being conditionally compatible within the 65 and 70 CNEL noise contour provided interior noise levels are attenuated to an indoor level of 50 CNEL. The project was sent to the Airport Manager in addition to SANDAG staff With the application of the noise mitigation measures proposed, the project was found to be in conformance with the airport land use plan. E. Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program, the Coastal Agricultural Overlay Zone and the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone As designed, the project is consistent with the relevant policies of the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program (LCP), the Coastal Agricultural Overlay Zone (Zoning Ordinance Chapter 21.202) and the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone (Zoning Ordinance Chapter 21.203). The project includes the required 50-foot riparian buffer from the edge ofthe riparian habitat of Encinas Creek. The project proposes to reduce the 100-foot wetland buffer to 50 feet, coincident with the riparian buffer. A retention basin is proposed within the buffer area to control the rate of storm water mnoff and improve water quality from the site and existing storm drains from Palomar Airport Road. The buffer area is presently a disturbed habitat containing exotic, primarily weedy, species. The objective of the buffer is to protect water quality and associated biological resources by providing a filtering mechanism for runoff before it enters the riparian zone. The proposed retention basins within the 50-foot buffer would provide better protection to regional and local biological resources than a larger buffer as noted in the Biological Report prepared for the project. No direct impacts are proposed to the wetland or riparian resources as dictated by Policy 3-7 of the LCP. Pursuant to Policy 3-8 of the LCP, the Califomia Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service were consulted on the determination of the adequacy of the 50-foot buffer. The buffer was determined to be acceptable with the following conditions: that all maintenance of the proposed detention basin be done manually; the public trail be placed between the building and basin; the public frail not be paved and will have a permeable surface; and that the basin be planted with native vegetation. Please see attached letter dated June 8,2001 for reference. The buffer zone will be protected by the execution of an open space easement and general plan open space designation. No activity other than seasonal maintenance will occur within the basin. The project either incorporates these conditions or has been conditioned to incorporate them. The proposed pedestrian trail, a passive recreational use, is located in the upper half of the buffer zone as allowed per Policy 3-8 of the LCP. Although the Fish and Game and Fish and Wildlife Service have endorsed the placement of the retention basin within the buffer area, the Califomia Coastal Commission has not fully endorsed the concept. In the event the Coastal Commission does not approve the basin, the project can provide adequate retention on-site. The on-site basin(s) would displace exfra parking spaces and would only treat the mnoff from the site. The basin within the buffer area was designed to accommodate the project runoff as well as the runoff from Palomar Airport Road and is environmentally superior. GPA 01-05/CDP 01-02/SDP 01-01 September 19, 2001 Page 8 PACIFICA PALOMAR OFFICE BUILDING The property is designated as coastal agricultural land and has been conditioned to pay the agricultural conversion mitigation fee. Because of the potential for least Bell's vireos to be impacted by grading noise levels, a condition providing for modification of the coastal grading timeframe, if necessary, is proposed. This condition will provide for the potential to grade the site during the normal coastal grading prohibition period (winter grading) so as not to impact the least Bell's vireo if present. Please refer to the mitigated negative declaration for more detail. The project site is LCP Landuse designated as Planned Industrial (PI) and LCP Zoned as Plarmed Industrial with the Qualified development overlay (P-M-Q). The site does not have any LCP Open Space designations. The City is working on a comprehensive General Plan and Zoning consistency program that will bring the designations into consistency. A subsequent comprehensive LCP A will make the City's General Plan and Zoning consistent with the LCP as a comprehensive action. F. Growth Management Ordinance (LFMP Zone 5) The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 5 in the southwest quadrant. The impacts on public facilities created by this project and compliance with the FACILITY IMPACTS COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS City Adminisfration N/A Yes Library N/A Yes Wastewater Treatment 67 EDU Yes Capacity Parks $.40/sq. ft. Yes Drainage Basin C Yes Circulation 1,889 ADT Yes Fire Station 4 Yes Open Space N/A Yes Schools Payment of non-residential school fee at bldg. permit issuance Yes Sewer Collection System 67 EDU Yes Water Distribution System 67 EDU Yes V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed project has been reviewed pursuant to the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff prepared an initial study for the project and concluded that potentially significant impacts could result in the areas of air quality, circulation, biological resources and noise. The project is within the scope of the City's Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR) which was utilized to address the project's cumulative air quality and circulation impacts. Project specific mitigation measures are proposed for biological resources and noise. Please see the Environmental Impact Assessment Form - Part II for a detailed description ofthe mitigation measures and the expanded justification for the recommendation to approve the GPA 01-05/CDP 01-02/SDP 01-01 - PACIFICA PALOMAR OFFlftBUILDING September 19, 2001 Page 9 Mitigated Negative Declaration. In consideration of the foregoing, on July 5, 2001 the Planning Director issued a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed project. Subsequent to the issuance of the Mitigated Negative Declaration, additional discussion was added regarding the adequacy of the MEIR. This addendum does not require the Mitigated Negative Declaration to be re-circulated for public review because it does not constitute a substantial revision according to Califomia Environmental Quality Act Guideline 15073.5. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5040 (Mit. Neg. Dec) 2. Plarming Commission Resolution No. 5043 (GPA) 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5042 (CDP) 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5041 (SDP) 4. Location Map 5. Background Data Sheet 6. Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form 7. Disclosure Statements 8. Letter dated June 8, 2001 9. Reduced exhibits 10. Full Size Exhibits "A" - "S", dated September 19, 2001 VL.csimh SITE PACIFICA PALOMAR OFFICE BUILDING GPA 01-05/SDP 01-01/CDP 01-02 BACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NO: GPA 01-05/ CDP 01-02/ SDP 01-01 CASE NAME: PACIFICA PALOMAR OFFICE BUILDING APPLICANT: PACIFICA ENTERPRISES ISLAND REALTY I. L.P. REQUEST AND LOCATION: Development of a 120.000 square foot office building located on south and adjacent to Palomar Airport Road east of Aviara Parkway LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That portion of that certain parcel of land shown and designated as description No. 3. 78.01 acres on record of survey map no. 5715, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego Countv. December 19. 1960. being a portion of Lot G of the Rancho Agua Hedionda. according to map thereof No 823. filed in the office of the Countv Recorder of San Diego County, November 16. 1896. in the City of Carlsbad. County of San Diego. State of Califomia. lying southerly of the centerline of Palomar Airport Road, as shown on County of San Diego Road Survey No. 1534. on file in the office of the County Surveyor of said County APN: 212-040-25-00 Acres: 15.69 Proposed No. of Lots/Units: 1 GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation: Planned Industrial/Open Space Density Allowed: n/a Density Proposed: n/a Existing Zone: Planned Industrial (PM-Q) Proposed Zone: Plaimed Industrial Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use: Zoning General Plan Current Land Use Site PM-Q PI Vacant North PM PI Vacant South LC/OS RL/RLM/OS Vacant East PM PI Vacant West PM-Q PI Vacant PUBLIC FACILITIES School District: Carlsbad Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Carlsbad Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 67 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Negative Declaration, issued July 5, 2001 I I Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated. I I Other, CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO: PACIFICA PALOMAR OFFICE BUILDING - GPA 01-05/ CDP 01- 02/ SDP 01-01 LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 5 GENERAL PLAN: Planned Industrial ZONING: Planned Industrial DEVELOPER'S NAME: Pacifica Enterprises Island Realty I. L.P. ADDRESS: 12780 High Bluff Drive. Suite 160. San Diego. CA 92130 PHONE NO.: (858) 755-0216 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 212-040-25-00 QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC, SQ. FT., DU): 120.000 sq ft ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: unknown A. City Administrative Facilities: B. Library: C. Wastewater Treatment Capacity D. Park: E. Drainage: F. Circulation: G. Fire: H. Open Space: I. Schools: J. Sewer: K. Water: L. The project is Demand in Square Footage Demand in Square Footage (Calculate with J. Sewer) Demand in Acreage Demand in CFS = Identify Drainage Basin = Demand in ADT = Served by Fire Station No Acreage Provided = Demands in EDU Identify Sub Basin = Demand in GPD = n/a n/a 67 EDU $ .40/sq. ft. 68.56 C - Encinas Creek 1.889 - 4 7.2 acres Carlsbad 67 Buena/V allecitos 14.740 _units the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance. (Not Applicable) 0an-2A-01 03:15P P. 02 City of Carlsbad Planning Department DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on ail applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project caniiot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-pannership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in ttiis and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other poliucal subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit." Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and propeny owner must be provided below. I, APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON- APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW- If a publiclv-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) PersonPario DeLuca/Robert Colucci Title Manager Address 12780 High Bluff Drive Suite 160 Corp/Part PACIFICA ENTERPRISES LLC Title Address San Diego, CA 92130 OWNER (N ot the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e, partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% ofthe shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv- owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person Island Realty 1 LP Title Address 12780 High Bluff Drive Suite 160 San Diego, CA 92130 Corp/Part Albert Colucci/Salvatore Colucci Title Partner Address Barron Global RE Limited/Universal Highland Assurance Company Albert Colucci owns 100% Barron Global RE/Barron Global own.Q '^LJ island Realty 1 Salvatore Colucci owns 100% Universal Highland/UniversalHighlandOwns 45% Island Realy 1 LP CBC Investments, Inc. General Partner 1% 2075 Las Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad. CA 92009-1576 • (760) 438-1161 - FAX (760) 438-0894 J. 03:15P NON-PROFIT ORj^NIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (I) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. Non Profit/Trust. Titie Non Profit/Trust_ Title Address Address Have you had more than S2S0 worth of business transacted with any member of Cit> staff Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? I [ Yes |5^No If yes, please indicate person(s):. NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. 1 certify that all/the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge Signature of owner/date re of applicant/date Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant Signature of owner/applicant's applicable/date Print or type name of owner/appiicant's agent H.ADMIN\COUNTER\OISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2 US Fish and Wildlife Service Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office 2730 Loker Avenue, West Carlsbad, CA 92008 (760) 431-9440 FAX (760) 431-9624 In Reply Refer To: FWS-SDG-1497.1 Mr. Van Lynch, Associate Planner City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 9200-7314 California Department of Fish and Game 4949 Viewridge Avenue San Diego, CA 92123 (858) 467-4201 FAX (858) 467-4299 Re: Pacifica Carlsbad Project 50-foot wetland buffer Dear Mr. Lynch: The Califomia Department of Fish and Game (Department), and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), hereafter collectively referred to as the Wildlife Agencies, have reviewed the project environmental documents and a recent map product (Grading and Drainage Plan, dated 1/28/01) provided by Shapouri and Associates, the consultant to the project, depicting a 50-foot wetland buffer along a portion of Encinitas Creek that is within the property boundary. The project site is 15.7 acres in the City of Carlsbad, south of Palomar Airport Road, west of College Boulevard and Laurel Tree Lane. The proposed project includes a 120,000-square foot office building and parking lot. As part of the project mitigation, 4.63 acres of habitat, including the portion of Encinitas Creek and its associated riparian vegetation, will be placed into open space and protected by a conservation easement. Additionally, a 50-foot wetland buffer separating the developed portion from the creek is required as a mitigation element. Based on thc site's geometry and project configuration, the applicant has requested that an encroachment into the buffer area be allowed for placement of a proposed vegetated swale for filtration/desilting, and a lO^foot wide (unpaved) public trail. The swale is required to address water quality impacts from the development and existing runoff from Palomar Airport Road. The Wildlife Agencies have reviewed the placement of these structures in the wetland buffer and agree that they are acceptable with the following conditions: (1) all sediment removal/swale maintenance will be accomplished manually, not using motorized equipment that requires placement in the buffer or wetlands; (2) the public trail will be placed between the building and the basins; (3) the public trail will not be paved, and will have a permeable surface; and (4) the filtration/desiltation swale will be planted with native vegetation. Mr. Van Lynch This letter reflects the Wildlife Agencies' opinion regarding acceptability of the placement of structures in the 50-foot riparian buffer zone. Other aspects of the project will be addressed in our review of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) environmental document. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact John Martin of the Service at (760) 431-9440. Sincerely, Nancy Gilbert Assistant Field Supervisor Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service William E. Tippets Habitat Conservation Supervisor South Coast Region Califomia Department of Fish and Game cc: Ali Shapouri Shapouri and Associates 16089 San Dieguito Road, Suite H-102, P.O. Box 676221 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067-6221 Bill Ponder Califomia Coastal Commission SEE SHEET: A2 SEE SHEET; A3 CtTY OF CARLSBAD PERMH* NUMBERS QPA# 01-06 SDP# 01-01 PIP# 01-02 CDP# 01-02 SITE PLAN tiATGK cmja» ntaa^iL IUIER ammct •T0W1DIUM arrercMUMHO SCHCOta. DMUBW INPCD SCUOCL DiamcT CO 1 o CD . g ijfll CO (0 13 M TI (0 O (0 o H- mmm U (0 A (M.IM1 A Ot.22.01 A 0a.l5i)l A PknOwdt WSat Can*udbnSrt 0I.22X)I OndtBr HSB Sc* SDP^I SITE PLAN Kay Not— i 6 )v.«-HMHuaMiftr>w>wD <j>l <3>1 <3>! e<3> ' onet DOcnpnaHft « CML otumu WUMA <WCWr LMMTW <3> <S>: CO ] 8 j £ lllll CO w TI (0 O (0 o U (0 Q. A^ A" A" E 0&IS.OI SDP-A2 I CO J CO o cu o < i ' iifll DOETMGPKracrrurc PALOMAR AIRPORT RD EMftrNBKATIIC E CO •a CO n m TI (0 O (0 u O (0 A^ A" SITE PLAN SDP-A3 1: DETAIL OP PARKINO SPACE ®®©®® ®® ®QO®® FLOOR AREA-41.400 FLOOR PLAN SUBTERRANEAN PARKING CO 3 S J! 5 lllll E CO "D Q n TI (0 O (S u U (0 D. A A 04.IU)I A 0U2.0I A A IMMOI«H DMIVDMMI PhnOwdt n«rt iUSai PMirKSrt CoMkudknSi t Dnwlr«Mi OmNnbf HSB l/IP-l'-fl' JobNunter 0(035 0(035 SDP-A4 ®®®®® ®(>® ®Q®®Q FLOOR AREA-41,300 FLOOR PLAN GROUND LEVEL CO 3 » I Z Ijfll o < E CO •a to n w (5 O (0 u mwam O (B Q. SI 0U2.0I WSat SDP-A5 CO 3 ? I o ®®©®® ®o® ®o®®® E CO •a (0 £t W (5 O (Q O *^ O (D Q. A" zr FLOOR AREA-30,400 FLOOR PLAN SECOND LEVEL SDP-A6 ®®®®® ®® ®o®®® FLOOR AREA-30,300 FLOOR PLAN THIRD LEVEL CO 3 8 i CD ^—•* o < 6". lllll E CO •a CO n w (5 O (B O O (0 Q. CorakudgnSit SDP-A7 CO 3 ? i :g lllll E CO •a (B n w TI (S O (B U t— U (B Q. ^ ^ 01.22.01 A ROOF PLAN SDP-A8 WEST ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION CO 3 B i < E CO •o (B n tn TI CB o CB U mmm U CB Q. A A 04.I«J)I A OUIOI A A IMDM D^Omdop rrwi PlKChMfc CorakudianSil DraMtr«DMi 0I.22X)I HSB Sc* lfl^l'.(r 00235 SDP-A9 W 1 5 4 -C lllll E CO TJ CB n CO MTIO - HOHTH BCWmOM MHO - MUTH uwmoH CB O CB O O CB A" A" zr i -<«> 1 1 JL. COOUNQ tOWR - EAVr UVKTION COOUHQ TOWR • MUTH EUVATKM COCXJHQ TOMR - MST ELEWmON SDP^IO PACIFICA PACIFICA Ericjincksi I27S0 I liliiil Dr., Suilo IdO 7=>S-02l(i I .i\ (dl'i) 7=;^-1212 Project Management Services ENGl.\EERING • IN F O R M AT IO N S Y S T E M S • PLASNI>IG Michael Shapouri, PE PRINCIP.IL ENGINEER Phone: (SSS) 756-8340 Fax: (SSS) 7S6-S344 160S9 San Dieguito Road, Suite H-102, P.O. Box 676221 Rancho Santa Fe, California 92067-6221 www.shapourLcom