The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP 08-01; Blue Condominiums; Site Development Plan (SDP) (2)o Pi Arc Pesign '^^Ce/vrgQ Project Description PIAI ^ARi o Blue Condominiums - 150-152 Cherry Ave. Carlsbad^^A/n Oi\}^^^ O/v These residences represent a programmatic collaboration of the client's needs and the City of Carlsbad Planned Development requirements, while engaging the unique features of the property. This soft contemporary residential condominium was designed to evoke a coastal design feeling while maintaining a sense of privacy for each individual owner. The final design resulted in a complex yet minimalist, transparent, and inviting duplex condominium. The hip roofs and exterior stucco treatments paired with site landscaping, strong geometric forms and contemporary details, such as the upper floor level bowed balcony with linear stainless steel railings and supporting geometric bracing elements, provide a precise coastal contemporary look. This particular site posed several challenges that included managing a small existing beach area lot, staying within the local height restrictions, and capturing the best ocean views. Both interior living areas are designed to maximize transparency enabling interior natural light and prevailing ocean breezes. Additionally, each unit will also have access to a private roof top deck via an individual stairway or elevator. All interior private spaces (i.e. bedrooms and bathrooms) are located toward the rear of the property, while the main living areas to maximize the best ocean views on the property. The below grade service areas and individual garages are split in two, providing ample access, and buffering the street view by avoiding the typical dominance of garage doors. Access to the individual interior living space from the covered parking areas will be provided by an interior stairway or the convenience of an elevator. The exterior wall surfaces will be multi-toned smooth finish stucco in light and medium colors. The main body of the structure and the property line privacy walls will be light beige colored stucco, while darker toned accent colors will be used for the stronger architectural elements (i.e. balconies and exterior elevator shaft walls). Balconies will incorporate stainless steel post and wire guardrails. Windows will be a black/brown matte fiberglass frame with "Sun Coat" Low-E glazing. The drive aisle will be a patterned colored concrete and compliment the color and texture of the private walkways. All exterior walls, roofs, porches and balconies display multiple offset building planes, and the exterior doors / windows are recessed from the stucco finish on the exterior building wall. Roofing materials are to be multi-color slate / concrete tile / asphalt shingle in a brown / gray / black tone with the rooftop caps on the elevator shafts being a dark steel standing seam roof. This duplex condominium will feature many state-of-the-art green features such as energy efficient wall systems, maximum attic area and roof cavity insulation, exterior low-e window glazing, energy efficient appliances and high efficiency air conditioning/heating systems. The open floor plans for each individual unit will connect multiple rooms to each other, creating a seamless flow from the living areas, kitchens and family rooms and tie each livable floor space to the ancillary spaces of the upper roof decks and lower floor covered parking areas. This transparent theme begins at the front door and extends all the way through to the exterior porches and views beyond via large framed glass doors and window areas. Each unit has been designed for the family, while flexible in the design for entertaining, and is entirely accessible to the fun outdoor activities the beach area represents. City of Carlsbad Faraday Center Faraday Cashiering 001 1207401-2 03/14/2012 98 Wed, Mar 14, 2012 12:10 PM Receipt Ref Nbr: R1207401-2/0019 PERMITS - PERMITS Tran Ref Nbr: 120740102 0019 0020 Trans/Rcpt#: R0088781 SET #: SDP08001 Amount; 1 i $84.15 Item Subtotal: $84.15 Item Total: $84.15 COPIES - COPIES, HANDOUTS Tran Ref Nbr: 120740102 0019 0021 Name: 3/14/12 Amount: 1 @ $1.50 Item Subtotal: $1.50 Item Total: $1.50 2 ITEM(S) TOTAL: $85.65 Credit Card (Auth# 903154) $85.65 Total Received: $85.65 Have a nice day! **************CUST0MER COPY************* city of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 I Applicant: PI ARC DESIGN Description SDP08001 150 CHERRY AV CBAD Amount 84 .15 Receipt Number: R0088781 Transaction ID: R0088781 Transaction Date: 03/14/2012 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Credit Crd VISA 84.15 Transaction Amount: 84.15 ^ DISCLOSURE Development Services STATEIVIENT Planning Division CITYOF Pi / ^^^^ Faraday Avenue PARI ^RAD (760)602-4610 I—^L^/\Lx www.carlsbadca.gov Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnersiiip, joint venture, association, social club, fratemai organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit." Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. 1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person /^Aie, Corp/Part /S2>-'/fl Z?/<F/gy^y. Title Af/fJUA^i/AJ/^ T^f/JfS^^ Title ^u>n^r Address IfSh /^r-£aH M /liy/sLj Address Oe^gyi Si. t^v7s4aJ fz^s 2. OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e., partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% ofthe shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person /fgyyj <f. ^/lu Corp/Part/J^ V/"^ e/uyt^^. /.UL Title ///ayjafmjf /J^et^/iM^ Title ^^^//.g/"- Address Zf-'^ cOcuijA /^i<y<gZ^ Address ///^ (^(U-a^ p-1 (A) Pagel of 2 Revised 07/10 NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non- profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. Non Profit/Trust /^//t Non Profit/Trust A^/A Title Title Address Address Have you had more than $500 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? • Yes ETNO If yes, please indicate person(s): NOTE: Attach additional sheets if I certify^aj^all the^boVe informati^ is trae and/correct Print or type name of applicant ^x'/gy /^/M^ >^.^//y^^ J77^wU2^ Print or type name of owner/ap|6fica«t's agent p-1 (A) Page 2 of 2 Revised 07/10 Ciiv of Carlsbad Faraday Center Faradav Cajihierlng 001 0806501-2 03/05/2008 1^ Wed Mar05,2008 0]-36 PM PERMITS - Pimm $4,045.00 Tran Nbr: 080650102 0072 0085 Trans/Rcpt#: R0068988 SET #; SDP08001 1 ITEM(S): TOTAL; $4,045,00 Check {Chk# 013142) $4,045.00 Total Received: $4,045,00 Have a nice day! :|c**.t4=t.********CUST0MER COPY************* City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA •lllliillllill 92008 Applicant: BUCK THOMPSON Description SDP08001 150 CHERRY AV CBAD Amount 4,045.00 Receipt Number: R0068988 Transaction Date: 03/05/2008 Transaction ID: R0068988 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 4,045.00 Transaction Amount: 4,045.00 City of Carlsbad Faraday Center Faraday Cashiering 001 0802301-3 01/23/2008 35 Wed ian23,2008 n-37 AM PERMITS - PERMITS $2,730.00 Tran Nbr: 080230103 -002 0003 Trans/Rcpt#: R006533i SET #: CP080001 PERMIIS - PERMITS $2,330.60 Iran Nbr: 080230103 0002 0004 Trans/Rcpt#: R0068390 SET #: CDP08004 2 ITEM(S): TOTAL: $5,060.60 Check (Chk# 012896) $5,060.60 Total Received: $5,060.60 Have a nice day! **************CUST0MER COPY************* City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA •lllliillllill 92008 Applicant: BUCK THOMPSON Description CP080001 150 CHERRY AV CBAD Amount 2,730.00 Receipt Number: ROO68391 Transaction Date: 01/23/2008 Transaction ID: RO068391 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 2,730.00 Transaction Amount: 2,73 0.00 CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION SK 1) APPUCATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECKBOXES) I I Administrative Permit I I Administrative Variance |N/1 Coastal Development Permit I I Conditional Use Permit Condominium Permit I I Environmental Impact Assessment I I General Plan Amendment I I Hillside Development Permit I I Local Coastal Program Amendment I I Master Plan I I Minor Conditional Use Permit I I Non-Residential Planned Development [vj Planned Development Permit (FOR DEPARTMENT ~ USEONLY) PUb 12-0 • • I I Planned Industrial Permit I I Planning Commission Determination Precise Development Plan Redevelopment Permit Site Development Plan I I Special Use Permit I I Specific Plan I I Tentative Parcel Map Obtain from Engineering Department I I Tentative Tract Map I I Variance I I Zone Change I I List other applications not specified (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) 2) 3) 4) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: PROJECT NAME: c^q • ^^>l-/o BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: ^^QQ^g:^- ^ . Bp^ . 5) OWNER NAME (Print or Type) ING ADDRESS MAILING, ^2i7Sd 6) APPLICANT MAlUg^D^S- ^^^^ CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE CITY AND STATE IP^- .^TELEPHONE-. EMAILADDRESS: EMAILADDRESS: p[QtcdWf) dChc^i^qlf]^ • I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL RePRESENTA<a»'E OF THE I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. SIGNA /'S DATE I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTA^CH/E OF THE OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. SIGNATURE DATE/ 7) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION (2^^^\ CrxAhhcLiL. NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULT(PUE ALLIGATIONS BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30 P.M. A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATION BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M. Form 14 Rev. 01/07 bE \/oUo^ PAGE 1 OF 5 8) LOCATION OF PROJECT: UIUAJL.. ON THE BETWEEN STREET ADDRESS SIDE OF (NC5RTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) ^ '{H'mE OF STREET) (NMEOF STREET) AND ^y (NAWE OF S" 9) 10) 13) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS TYPE OF SUBDIVISION 16) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE 19) GROSS SITE ACREAGE 22) EXISTiNG ZONING 11) NUMBER OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL UNITS 14) PROPOSED IND OFFICE/ SQUARE FOOTAGE 17) PROPOSED INCREASE . 20) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN RH ^•3 23) PROPOSED ZONING OF STREET) 12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS 15) PROPOSEDCOMM SQUARE FOOTAGE ,18) PROPOSED SEWER USAGE IN EDU 21) PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION 24) HABITAT IMPACTS IFYES, ASSIGN HMP# 25) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE. 26) PROPERTY OWNER ACKNOWLEDGES AND CONSENTS TO A NOTICE OF RESTRICTION FILED ON THE PROPERTY TITLE IF CONDITIONED FOR THE APPLICANT. CERTAIN APPROVALS (SUCH AS A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) RUN WITH THE LAND AND BIND ANY SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST. PRO^ERTY-eWNER SIGNATURE FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION APPLICATION TYPE TOTAL FEE REQUIRED FEE REQUIRED CP OOP ( ^5.0^ bn) fk^(tc y\/,j|ic£ to U 4 S^o(>0.co RECEIVED DATE CITY OF CARLSBAD DECEIVED PLANNING DEPT STAMP APPLTCATION I RECEIVED BY: Form 14 Rev. 01/07 PAGE 2 OF 5 PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION PROJECT NAME: APPLICANT NAME: r^^pTj/^^ Please describe fully the proposed project by application type. Inciude any details necessary to adequately explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may aiso include any background iQformation and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary. Description/Explanation: Project Description 10/96 Pagelofi Project Description The project application is for a residential air space condominium project and single lot Tentative Map in the Coastal Development area of the City of Carlsbad. The existing site is presently used as multi family residential with two single family dwelling units. The project proposal is to remove the two (2) existing structures and develop two new statutory air space condominiums. The two (2) new units range in size from 3,809 to 3,136 square feet with a subterranean garage, with private parking as well as guest parking. The parking garage will also be utilized as a collection area for storm water treatment and discharge. The system and how it functions is better identified as a supplement to the Stormwater Management Plan included in this application. The garage level area will also be the collection area for liquid waste (sewage), which will be pumped up to the gravity sewage system in Cherry Avenue. The lower level also contains two elevators, wash room, exercise room, storage areas, and mechanical rooms. From the ground level there are three (3) floors. The main floor is unit 'B' (ground level), the upper level is unit 'A', and above unit 'A' is the mezzanine level. The mezzanine level has two separate areas, divided for the exclusive use of both units. The mezzanine level contains sundeck areas, a shared barbeque area, and a bathroom facility. The two (2) elevators provide separate private access to the mezzanine for both units. The project is in the local Coastal Zone and will require a Coastal Development Permit. The site is located on Cherry Avenue between Carlsbad Boulevard and Garfield street approximately 400'± fi-om the Pacific Ocean. The close proximity of the site to the ocean will encourage the use of public access to the water to take advantage of coastal zones which are suitable for water oriented activities. As local policy encourages and requires, the public access opportunities will be implemented, and will remain as an integral part of the project. The project will be served by S.D.G. & E. for gas and electricity. Existing overhead lines will be converted to underground facilities from cormection points that presently exist. Both units will have separate metering for water, electrical, and gas use. The common areas will have a separate meter for landscaping and irrigation. Trash collection will be provided by the local collector. (Waste Management) Collection bins are provided for each unit in the lower level garage, and on collection day, the receptacles are placed at the roadside edge. (Cherry Avenue) Site grading will be conventionally done, however, due to the constrained limits of work area and the need for vertical structural elements, the interim grading will require safety slopes to maximize grading to reach stable depths satisfactory to geotechnical consultants. All residual material will be removed from site to a receiver site to be designated at a later date. All methods for storm water prevention will be in place during construction to the satisfaction of the City of Carlsbad. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan will be implemented and adopted by the local agency. iS|PRW|\^MER REQUIREMENTS APPLICABILITY CHECKLIST Project Adciress Assessors Parcel Number(s): 150/152 CHERRY AVENUE 204-231-10 Project # (city use only): Complete Sections 1 and 2 of the following checklist to determine your project's permanent and construction storm water best management practices requirements. This form must be completed and submitted with your permit application. Section 1. Permanent Storm Water BMP Requirements: If any answers to Part A are answered "Yes," your project is subject to the "Priority Project Permanent Storm Water BMP Requirements," and "Standard Permanent Storm Water BMP Requirements" in Section III, "Permanent Storm Water BMP Selection Procedure" in the Storm Water Standards manual. If all answers to Part A are "No," and any answers to Part B are "Yes," your project is only subject to the "Standard Permanent Storm Water BMP Requirements". If every question in Part A and B is answered "No," your project is exempt from permanent storm water requirements. Does the project meet the definition of one or more of the priority project categories?* Yes No 1. Detached residential development of 10 or more units. • 0 2. Attached residential development of 10 or more units. 1 3. Commercial development greater than 100,000 square feet. u \7\ 4. Automotive repair shop. 5. Restaurant. 1 6. Steep hillside development greater than 5,000 square feet. 171 7. Project discharging to receiving waters within Environmentally Sensitive Areas. 2 8. Parking lots greater than or equal to 5,000 ft or with at least 15 parking spaces, and potentially exposed to urban runoff. • 9. Streets, roads, highways, and freeways which would create a new paved surface that is 5,000 square feet or greater * Refer to the definitions section in the Storm Water Standards for expanded definitions of the priority project categories. Limited Exclusion: Trenching and resurfacing work associated with utility projects are not considered priority projects. Parking lots, buildings and other structures associated with utility projects are priority projects if one or more of the criteria in Part A is met. If all answers to Part A are "No", continue to Part B. Part B: Determine Standard Permanent Storm Water Requirements. Does the project propose: Yes No 1. New impervious areas, such as rooftops, roads, parking lots, driveways, paths and sidewalks? 0 2. New pen/ious landscape areas and irrigation systems? 0 3. Permanent structures within 100 feet of any natural water body? • 0 4. Trash storage areas? / 5. Liquid or solid material loading and unloading areas? • / 6. Vehicle or equipment fueling, washing, or maintenance areas? / 7. Require a General NPDES Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities (Except construction)?* • / 8. Commercial or industrial waste handling or storage, excluding typical office or household waste? / 9. Any grading or ground disturbance during construction? 0 10. Any new storm drains, or alteration to existing storm drains? 0 J *To find out if your project is required to obtain an individual General NPDES Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities, visit the State Water Resources Control Board web site at, www.swrcb.ca.gov/stormwtr/industrial.html Section 2. Construction Storm Water BMP Requirements: If the answer to question 1 of Part C is answered "Yes," your project is subject to Section IV, "Construction Storm Water BMP Performance Standards," and must prepare a Stomn Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). If the answer to question 1 is "No," but the answer to any of the remaining questions is "Yes," your project is subject to Section IV, "Construction Storm Water BMP Performance Standards," and must prepare a Water Pollution Control Plan (WPCP). If every question in Part C is answered "No," your project is exempt from any construction storm water BMP requirements. If any of the answers to the questions in Part C are "Yes," complete the construction site prioritization in Part D, below. Would the project meet any of these criteria during construction? Yes No 1. Is the project subject to California's statewide General NPDES Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated With Construction Activities? n w 2. Does the project propose grading or soil disturbance? 0 u 3. Would storm water or urban runoff have the potential to contact any portion ofthe construction area, including washing and staging areas? 0 4. Would the project use any construction materials that could negatively affect water quality if discharged from the site (such as, paints, solvents, concrete, and stucco)? 0 u Part D: Determine Construction Site Priority In accordance with the Municipal Permit, each construction site with constmction storm water BMP requirements must be designated with a priority: high, medium or low. This prioritization must be completed with this form, noted on the plans, and included in the SWPPP or WPCP. Indicate the project's priority in one of the check boxes using the criteria below, and existing and surrounding conditions of the project, the type of activities necessary to complete the construction and any other extenuating circumstances that may pose a threat to water quality. The City reserves the right to adjust the priority of the projects both before and during construction. [Note: The construction priority does NOT change construcfion BMP requirements that apply to projects; all constmction BMP requirements must be identified on a case-by-case basis. The construction priority does affect the frequency of inspections that will be conducted by City staff. See Section IV. 1 for more details on construction BMP requirements.] r~|AJ High Priority 1) Projects where the site is 50 acres or more and grading will occur during the rainy season 2) Projects 1 acre or more. 3) Projects 1 acre or more within or directly adjacent to or discharging directly to a coastal lagoon or other receiving water within an environmentally sensitive area 4) Projects, active or inactive, adjacent or tributary to sensitive water bodies [v^ B) Medium Priority 5) Capital Improvement Projects where grading occurs, however a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is not required under the State General Construction Permit (i.e., water and sewer replacement projects, intersection and street re-alignments, widening, comfort stations, etc.) 6) Permit projects in the public right-of-way where grading occurs, such as installation of sidewalk, substantial retaining walls, curb and gutter for an entire street frontage, etc., however SWPPPs are not required. 7) Permit projects on private property where grading permits are required, however. Notice Of Intents (NOIs) and SWPPPs are not required. I \c) Low Priority 8) Capital Projects where minimal to no grading occurs, such as signal light and loop installations, street light installations, etc. 9) Permit projects in the public right-of-way where minimal to no grading occurs, such as pedestrian ramps, driveway additions, small retaining walls, etc. 10) Permit projects on private property where grading permits are not required, such as small retaining walls, single-family homes, small tenant improvements, etc. Owner/Agent/Engineer Name (Please Print): ROBERT REINER (AGENT - WYNN ENGINEERING) Title: PROJECT ENGINEER Date: //'/3-oy TICOR TITL€ COMPANY 2878 camino Del Rio South #500 yrzz Z^-EP' San Diego, CA 92108 OF CALIFORNIA (619) 260-0015 Issuing Policies of Ticor Title Insurance Company ORDER NO.: 204651-PD Title Officer: Petra Doering Title Offlcer Phone: (619) 260-0015 xll3 BARRY BLUE Title Officer Fax: (619) 295-5241 2950 OCEAN STREET Title Officer Email: pdoering@ticortitle.com CARLSBAD, CA 92008 ATTN: BARRY BLUE YOUR REF: BLUE FAMILY TRUST PROPERTY: 150-152 CHERRY AVENUE, CARLSBAD, CA RECEIVED JAN 2 3 2008 PRELIMINARY REPORT CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPT In response to the application for a policy of title insurance referenced herein, Ticor Title Company hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a policy or policies of title insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an exception herein or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations or Conditions of said policy forms. The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage and Limitations on Covered Risks of said policy or policies are set forth in Attachment One. The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of Insurance is less than that set forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. Limitations on Covered Risks applicable to the CLTA and ALTA Homeowner's Policies of Title Insurance which establish a Deductible Amount and a Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability for certain coverages are also set forth in Attachment One. Copies ofthe policy forms should be read. They are available from the office which issued this report. This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating the issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby. Ifit is desired that liability be assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title insurance, a Binder or Commitment should be requested. The policy(s) of title insurance to be issued hereunder will be policy(s) of Ticor Title Insurance Company, a Califomia Corporation. Please read the exceptions shown or referred to herein and the exceptions and exclusions set forth in Attachment One of this report carefully. The exceptions and exclusions are meant to provide you with notice of matters which are not covered under the terms of the title insurance policy and should be carefully considered. It is important to note that this preliminary report is not a written representation as to the condition of title and may not list all liens, defects and encumbrances affecting title to the land. Ticor Title Company Ticor Title Insurance Company BY ATTEST "' • irized Signatory . ^(nM-*H-r—%.^ Secretary CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06) TICOR TITLG COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA PRELIMINARY REPORT EFFECTIVE DATE: December 26, 2007, 7:30am The form of policy or policies of title Insurance contemplated by this report is: ALTA Homeowners' Policy of Title Insurance for a One-to-Four Family Residence (10/17/98) 1. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO COVERED BY THIS REPORT IS: A FEE 2. TITLE TO SAID ESTATE OR INTEREST AT THE DATE HEREOF IS VESTED IN: BARRY J. BLUE AND MARY T. BLUE, TRUSTEES OF THE BLUE FAMILY TRUST UTD MARCH 30, 1999 3. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS REPORT IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF 2 CLTA Preliminary Report: Form - Modified (11-17-06) PRELIMINARY REPORT ^ ^ Ticor Title Company YOUR REFERENCE: BLUE FAMILY TRUST ORDER NO.: 204651-PD LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT "A" THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SFRJATED IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT K IN BLOCK 1 OF PALISADES HEIGHTS, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 1777, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO ON JANUARY 11, 1924. 3 CLTA Preliminary Report: Form - Modified (11-17-06) YOUR REFERENCE: BLUE FAMILY TRUST ORDER NO.: 204651-PD PRELIMINARY REPORT ^ ^ Ticor Title Company AT THE DATE HEREOF, ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED AND EXCEPTIONS TO COVERAGE IN ADDITION TO THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS IN SAID POLICY FORM WOULD BE AS FOLLOWS: A. Property Taxes, which are a lien not yet due and payable, including any assessments collected with taxes to be levied for the fiscal year 2008-2009. B. Property Taxes, including any personal property taxes and any assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 2007-2008 Assessor's Parcel Number 204-231-10-00. Code Area: 09000 1 st Installment: $7,633.02 PAID 2nd Installment: $7,633.02 OPEN Land: $1,407,600.00 Improvements: $51,000.00 Exemption: $0.00 HOMEOWNERS C. The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3.5 (Commencing with Section 75) of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California. 1. THE RECITAL CONTAINED IN THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE ON THE MAP OF SAID TRACT, WHICH AGREES TO ALLOW THE CROSS-ARMS OF POLES OR OTHER SIMIUR STRUCTURES PURGED ALONG THE RIGHT OF WAY OR CERTAIN HIGHWAYS ON SAID MAP TO OVERHANG THE ABUTTING PROPERTY. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as granted in a document; Granted to: AS THEREIN PROVIDED Purpose: RIGHT OF WAY FOR TELEPHONE AND/OR ELECTRIC POLES AND LINES AND FOR SEWER, WATER AND/OR GAS MAINS AND PIPE LINES IN, UNDER, OVER AND ACROSS SAID PROPERTY, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO ENTER ON SAID PROPERTY FOR PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCnONS, RECONSTRUCTION, REPAIRING AND/OR ALTERING ANY OF THE SAME Recorded: FEBRUARY 21, 1944 IN BOOK 1639 PAGE 95 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS Affects: THE EXACT LOCATION AND EXTENT OF SAID EASEMENT IS NOT DISCLOSED OF RECORD 2. A deed of trust to secure an indebtedness in the amount shown below, and any other obligations secured thereby Amount: $1,144,000.00 Dated: 11/30/2005 Trustor: BARRY J. BLUE AND MARY T. BLUE, TRUSTEES OF THE BLUE FAMILY TRUST UTD MARCH 30, 1999 Trustee: OLD REPUBLIC TITLE COMPANY Beneficiary: LA JOLLA BANK, FSB Loan Number: 1011022021 Recorded: DECEMBER 1, 2005 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 05-1037403 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS 3. Any invalidity or defect in the title of the Vestees in the event that the trust referred to herein is invalid or fails to grant sufficient powers to the trustee(s) or in the event there is a lack of compliance with the terms and provisions of the trust instrument. If title is to be insured in the trustee(s) of a trust, (or if their act is to be insured), this Company will require a Trust Certification pursuant to California Probate Code Section 18100.5. The Company reserves the right to except additional items and/or make additional requirements after reviewing said documents. A copy of the Trust Certification form Is attached hereto for your convenience. 4 CLTA Preliminary Report: Form - Modified (11-17-06) PRELIMINARY REPORT ^ ^ Ticor Title Company YOUR REFERENCE: BLUE FAMILY TRUST ORDER NO.: 204651-PD 4. This company will require a statement of information from the parties named below in order to complete this report, based on the effect of documents, proceedings, liens, decrees, or other matters which do not specifically describe said land, but which, if any do exist, may affect the title or impose liens or encumbrances thereon. After review of the requested Statement(s) of Information the Company may have additional requirements before the issuance of any policy of title insurance. Parties: BARRY J. BLUE AND MARY T. BLUE (Note: The statement of information is necessary to complete the search and examination of title under this order. Any title search includes matters that are indexed by name only, and having a completed statement of information assists the Company in the elimination of certain matters which appear to involve the parties but in fact affect another party with the same or similar name. Be assured that the statement of information is essential and will be kept strictly confidential to this file.) FAILURE TO PROVIDE THIS STATEMENT OF INFORMATION IN A TIMELY MANNER MAY DELAY THE CLOSING OF THIS TRANSACTION. END OF ITEMS 5 CLTA Preliminary Report: Form - Modified (11-17-06) PRELIMINARY REPORT YOUR REFERENCE: BLUE FAMILY TRUST Ticor Title Company ORDER NO.: 204651-PD NOTES 1. The current owner does NOT qualify for the $20.00 discount pursuant to the coordinated stipulated judgments entered in actions filed by both the Attorney General and private class action plaintiffs for the herein described property 2. None of the items shown in this report will cause the Company to decline to attach CLTA Endorsement Form 100 to an Extended Coverage Policy, when issued. 3. The Company is not aware of any matters which would cause it to decline to attach the CLTA Endorsement Form 116 indicating that there is located on said land a MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLING 4. Known as: In the 150-152 CHERRY AVENUE CFTY of CARLSBAD County of SAN DIEGO State of CALIFORNIA to an Extended Coverage Loan Policy. There are NO deeds affecting said land recorded within twenty-four (24) months of the date of this report. NOTE: The policy.of title insurance will include an arbitration provision. The Company or the insured may demand arbitration. Arbitrable matters may include, but are not limited to, any controversy or claim between the Company and the insured arising out of or relating to this policy, any service of the Company in connection with its issuance or the breach of a policy provision or other obligation. Please ask your escrow or title officer for a sample copy of the policy to be issued if you wish to review the arbitration provisions and any other provisions pertaining to your Title Insurance coverage. NOTE: Amended Civil Code Section 2941, which becomes effective on January 1, 2002, sets the fee for the processing and recordation of the reconveyance of each Deed of Trust being paid off through this transaction at $45.00. The reconveyance fee must be cleariy set forth in the Beneficiary's Payoff Demand Statement ("Demand"). In addition, an assignment or authorized release of that fee, from the Beneficiary to the Trustee of record, must be included. An example of the required language is as follows: "The Beneficiary identified atxjve hereby assigns, releases or transfers to the Trustee of record, the sum of $45.00, included herein as 'Reconveyance Fees', for the processing and recordation of the Reconveyance of the Deed of Trust securing the indebtedness covered hereby, and the escrow company or title company processing this pay-off is authorized to deduct the Reconveyance Fee from this Demand and forward said fee to the Trustee of record or the successor Trustee under the Trust Deed to be paid off in full." In the event that the reconveyance fee and the assignment, release or transfer thereof are not included within the demand statement, then Ticor Title Company may decline to process the reconveyance and will be forced to return all documentation directly to the Beneficiary for compliance with the requirements of the revised statute. If a county recorder, title insurance company, escrow company, real estate broker, real estate agent or association provides a copy of a declaration, governing document or deed to any person, California law requires that the document provided shall include a statement regarding any unlawful restrictions. Said statement is to be in at least 14-point bold face type and may be stamped on the first page of any document provided or included as a cover page attached to the requested document. Should a party to this transaction request a copy of any document reported herein that fits this category, the statement is to be included in the manner described. 6 CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06) PRELIMINARY REPORT ^ " Ticor Title Company YOUR REFERENCE: BLUE FAMILY TRUST ORDER NO.: 204651-PD NOTES (CONTINUED) WIRE INSTRUCTIONS - EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 1. 2004 When funds are wired to Ticor Title Company, please use the instructions below: Washington Mutual Bank 1201 3"* Avenue #1400 Seattle, WA 98101 ABA (routing number) 322 271 627 Account No: 0670711053 Account Name: Ticor Title Company San Diego Please credit Ticor Title Company - San Diego Title and reference our order number to avoid return of funds Funds received by Ticor Title Company via wire transfer may be disbursed upon receipt. Funds received by this Company via cashier's check or teller's check may be disbursed on the next business day after the day of deposit. If escrow funds (Including shortage checks) are disbursed to this company other than by wire transfer, cashier's check or teller's check, disbursement and/or closing will be delayed 3 to 7 business days. Questions concerning deposit and/or disbursement of escrow and sub-escrow funds and recording should be directed to your title officer, escrow officer or loan payoff officer. Outgoing wire transfers will not be authorized until we have confirmation of our recording and one (1) of the following: A. We have received confirmation of the respective incoming wire. B. Collection of a deposited check. PAYOFF INFORMATION NOTE: This company DOES require current beneficiary demands prior to closing. If the demand is expired and a current demand cannot be obtained, our requirements will be as follows: If this Company accepts a verbal update on the demand, we may hold an amount equal to one monthly mortgage payment. This hold will be over and above the verbal hold the lender may have stipulated. If this Company cannot obtain a verbal update on the demand, we will either pay off of the expired demand, or wait for the amended demand, at the discretion of the escrow. NOTE: On any open Line-of-Credit or Equity Credit Line loans: Ticor Title Company will require the borrower to turn in any unused checks to the lender and do whatever is necessary to have the lender freeze or terminate the account, otherwise their demand makes us responsible for any checks or cash withdrawals that are outstanding and we will be forced to hold the difference between the principal and the maximum that can be borrowed until the lender has received our payoff check and the account is zeroed. END OF NOTES Petra Doering/MG CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06) Ticor Title Company Fidelity National Financial Group of Companies' Privacy Statement (Rev. July 1, 2001) We recognize and respect the privacy expectations of today's consumers and the requirements of applicable federal and state privacy laws. We believe that making you aware of how we use your non-public personal information C'Personal Information"), and to whom it is disclosed, will form the basis for a relationship of trust between us and the public that we serve. This Privacy Statement provides that explanation. We resen/e the right to change this Privacy Statement from time to time consistent with applicable privacy laws. In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from the following sources: • From applications or other forms we receive from you or your authorized representative; • From your transactions with, or from the services being performed by, us, our affiliates, or others; • From our internet web sites; • From the public records maintained by governmental entities that we either obtain directly from those entities, or from our affiliates or others; and • From consumer or other reporting agencies. Our Policies Regarding the Protection of the Confidentiality and Security of Your Personal Information We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards to protect your Personal Information from unauthorized access or intrusion. We limit access to the Personal Information only to those employees who need such access in connection with providing products or services to you or for other legitimate business purposes. Our Policies and Practices Regarding the Sharing of Your Personal Information We may share your Personal Information with our afflliates, such as insurance companies, agents, and other real estate settlement service providers. We also may disclose your Personal Information: • to agents, brokers or representatives to provide you with services you have requested; • to third-party contractors or service providers who provide services or perform marketing or other functions on our behalf; and • to others with whom we enter into joint marketing agreements for products or services that we believe you may find of interest. In addition, we will disclose your Personal Information when you direct or give us permission, when we are required by law to do so, or when we suspect fraudulent or criminal activities. We also may disclose your Personal Information when othenwise permitted by applicable privacy laws such as, for example, when disdosure is needed to enforce our rights arising out of any agreement, transaction or relationship with you. One of the important responsibilities of some of our affiliated companies is to record documents in the public domain. Such documents may contain your Personal Information. Right to Access Your Personal Information and Ability to Correct Errors or Request Changes or Deletion Certain states afford you the right to access your Personal Information and, under certain circumstances, to find out to whom your Personal Information has been disclosed. Also, certain states afford you the right to request correction, amendment or deletion of you Personal Information. We reserve the right, where permitted by law, to charge a reasonable fee to cover the costs incurred in responding to such requests. All requests must be made in writing to the following address: Ticor Title Company Privacy Compliance Officer Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 4050 Calle Real, Suite 220 Santa Barbara, CA 93110 Multiple Products or Services If we provide you with more than one financial product or service, you may receive more than one privacy notice from us. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you. Privacy Policy (Rev 7-1-2001) o Notice You may be entitled to receive a $20.00 discount on escrow services if you purchased, sold or refinanced residential property in California between May 19, 1995 and November 1, 2002. If you had more than one qualifying transaction, you may be entitled to multiple discounts. If your previous transaction involved the same property that Is the subject of your current transaction, you do not have to do anything; the Company will provide the discount, provided you are paying for escrow or title services in this transaction. If your previous transaction involved property different from the property that is the subject of your current transaction, you must inform the Company of the earlier transaction, provide the address of the property involved in the previous transaction, and the date or approximate date that the escrow closed to be eligible for the discount. Unless you Inform the Company of the prior transaction on property that is not the subject of this transaction, the Company has no obligation to conduct an investigation to determine if you qualify for a discount. If you provide the Company information concerning a prior transaction, the Company is required to determine If you qualify for a discount. Effective through November 1, 2014 Request for $20.00 Discount - CA Settlement Use one form for each qualifying property. To: Ticor Title Company Date: From: (name) Current Address: I believe that I am qualified for the $20.00 discount pursuant to the coordinated stipulated judgments entered in actions filed by both the Attorney General and private class action plaintiffs. I have not previously received a cash payment or a discount from another Company on the property described below. Signed: Date: Mdress of qualifying property: Approximate date of transaction: THIS SECTION IS FOR TITLE DEPARTMENT USE ONLY. ' The above referenced party is entitled to receive a $20.00 discount on escrow services or title insurance pursuant to the coordinated stipulated judgments entered in actions filed by both the Attorney General and private class action plaintiffs. OR ' The above referenced party does NOT qualify for the $20.00 discount pursuant to the coordinated stipulated judgments entered in actions filed by both the Attorney General and private class action plaintiffs for the following reason: ' The party has previously received credit for the transaction described above. ' The transaction described above did not occur in the time period allowed by the stipulated judgments — May 19, 1995 to November 1, 2002. Titie Department; please fax your response to: Escrow No: Escrow OfTicer: Fax Number: ATTACHMENT ONE AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION RESIDENTIAL TITLE INSURANCE POLICY (6-1-87) EXCLUSIONS In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, you are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from: 1. Govemmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law or govemment regulation. This includes building and zoning ordinances and also laws and regulations conceming: • landuse • improvements on the land • land division • environmental protection This exclusion does not apply to violations or the enforcement of these matters which appear in the public records at policy date. This exclusion does not limit the zoning coverage described in Items 12 and 13 of Covered Title Risks. 2. The right to take the land by condemning it, unless: • a notice of exercising the right appears in the public records on the Policy Date • the taking happened prior to the Policy Date and is binding on you if you bought the land without knowledge of the taking 3. Title Risks: • that are created, allowed, or agreed to by you • that are known to you, but not to us, on the Policy Date — unless they appeared in the public records • that result in no loss to you • that first affect your title after the Policy Date — this does not limit the labor and material lien coverage in Item 8 of Covered Title Risks 4. Failure to pay value for your title. 5. Lack of a right: • to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in Item 3 of Schedule A or • in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch your land This exclusion does not limit the access coverage in Item 5 of Covered Title Risks. In addition to the Exclusions, you are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and the expenses resulting from: 1. Any rights, interests, or claims of parties in possession of the land not shown by the public records. 2. Any easements or liens not shown by the public records. This does not limit the lien coverage in Item 8 of Covered Title Risks. 3. Any facts about the land which a correct survey would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. This does not limit the forced removal coverage in Item 12 of Covered Title Risks. 4. Any water rights or claims or title to water in or under the land, whether or not shown by the public records. Attachment One (11/17/06) ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY - 1990 EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or govemmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location ofany improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area ofthe land or any parcel ofwhich the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or govemmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date ofPolicy. (b)Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters: (a) whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date ofPolicy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage or for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with the applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or tmth in lending law. 6. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the estate or interest insured by this policy or the transaction creating the interest of the insured lender, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency or similar creditors' rights laws. SCHEDULE B, PART I EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: PARTI 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the public records. Attachment One (11/17/06) ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY (10-17-92) WITH A.L.T.A. ENDORSEMENT-FORM 1 COVERAGE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or govenmiental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or govemmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b)Any govemmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the extent that this policy insures the priority of the lien of the insured mortgage over any statutory lien for services, labor or material or to the extent insurance is afforded herein as to assessments for street improvements under constmction or completed at Date ofPolicy); or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insvu"ed mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with applicable doing business laws ofthe state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or tmth in lending law. 6. Any statutory lien for services, labor or materials (or the claim of priority ofany statutory lien for services, labor or materials over the lien of the insured mortgage) arising from an improvement or work related to the land which is contracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance, 7. Any claim, which arises out ofthe transaction creating the interest of the mortgagee insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankmptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (i) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (ii) the subordination of the interest of the insured mortgagee as a result of the application of the doctrine of equitable subordination; or (iii) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instmment of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage: EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a pubfic agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedmgs, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (c) are shown by the public records. Attachment One (11/17/06) ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) 2006 AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN FOLICY (06-17-06) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attomeys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or govemmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or govemmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks. (b)Any govemmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11, 13, or 14); or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the inability or failure of an Insured to comply with applicable doing-business laws of the state where the Land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability in whole or in part of the lien of the Insured Mortgage that arises out of the transaction evidenced by the Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or tmth-in-lending law. 6. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankmptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction creating the lien of the Insured Mortgage, is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 13(b) of this policy. 7. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by govemmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the Insured Mortgage in the Public Records. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11 (b). The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage: EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attomeys' fees or expenses) that arise by reason of: (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession ofthe Land. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. Attachment One (11/17/06) ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY (10-17-92) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or govemmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or govemmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b)Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date ofPolicy, or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Any claim, which arises out ofthe transaction vesting in the insured the estate or interest insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankmptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (i) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (ii) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instmment of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage: EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attomeys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: 2. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens 3. by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. 4. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 5. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the public records. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (c) are shown by the public records. Attachment One (11/17/06) ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) 2006 AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCLVTION OWNER'S POLICY (06-17-06) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attomeys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. 2. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or govemmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment ofthe Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or govemmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. (b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; 5. (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 and 10); or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Title. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankmptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A, is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 9 of this policy. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by govemmental authority and created or attaching between Date ofPolicy and the date of recording of the deed or other instmment of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A. The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage: EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attomeys' fees or expenses) that arise by reason of: 2. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records ofany taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown in the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and that are not shown by the Public Records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. Attachment One (11/17/06) ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) CLTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (10-22-03) ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (10-22-03) EXCLUSIONS In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, You are not insured against loss, costs, attomeys' fees, and expenses resulting from: 1. Govemmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law or govemment regulation. This includes ordinances, laws and regulations conceming: a. building b. zoning c. Land use d. improvements on Land e. Land division f. environmental protection This Exclusion does not apply to violations or the enforcement of these matters if notice of the violation or enforcement appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 14,15, 16,17 or 24. 2. The failure of Your existing stmctures, or any part of them, to be constmcted in accordance with applicable building codes. This Exclusion does not apply to violations of building codes if notice of the violation appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date. 3. The right to take the Land by condemning it, unless: a. notice of exercising the right appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date; or b. the taking happened before the Policy Date and is binding on You if You bought the Land without Knowing of the taking. 4. Risks: a. that are created, allowed, or agreed to by You, whether or not they appear in the Public Records; b. that are Known to You at the Policy Date, but not to Us, unless they appear in the Public Records at the Policy Date; c. that result in no loss to You; or d. that first occur after the Policy Date - this does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 7, 8.d, 22, 23, 24 or 25. 5. Failure to pay value for Your Title. 6. Lack ofa right: a. to any Land outside the area specifically described and referred to in paragraph 3 of Schedule A; and b. in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch the Land. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 11 or 18. LIMITATIONS ON COVERED RISKS Your insurance for the following Covered Risks is limited on the Owner's Coverage Statement as follows: • For Covered Risk 14, 15, 16 and 18, Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A. The deductible amounts and maximum dollar limits shown on Schedule A are as follows: Covered Risk 14: Covered Risk 15: Covered Risk 16: Covered Risk 18: Your Deductible Ainount 1.00% ofPolicy Amount or $2,500.00 (whichever is less) 1.00% ofPolicy Amount or 55,000.00 (whichever is less) 1.00% ofPolicy Amount or $5,000.00 (whichever is less) 1.00% ofPolicy Amount or $2,500.00 (whichever is less) Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability $10,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $ 5,000.00 Attachment One (11/17/06) ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) ALTA EXPANDED COVERAGE RESIDENTIAL LOAN POLICY (10/13/01) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attomeys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or govemmental regulation (including but not limited to zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment ofthe Land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvements now or hereafter erected on the Land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or areas of the Land or any parcel of which the Land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or govemmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the Land has been recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy. This exclusion does not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 12, 13, 14, and 16 ofthis policy. (b)Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the Land has been recorded in the. Public Records at Date of Policy. This exclusion does not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 12, 13, 14, and 16 of this policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without Knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but BCjiown to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (this paragraph does not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 8, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 and 26); or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the inability or failure of the Insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with applicable doing business laws of the state in which the Land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury, except as provided in Covered Risk 27, or any consumer credit protection or tmth in lending law. 6. Real property taxes or assessments of any govemmental authority which become a lien on the Land subsequent to Date of Policy. This exclusion does not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 7, 8(e) and 26. 7. Any claim of invalidity, unenforceability or lack of priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage as to advances or modifications made afler the Insured has Knowledge that the vestee shown in Schedule A is no longer the owner of the estate or interest covered by this policy. This exclusion does not limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 8. 8. Lack of priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage as to each and every advance made after Date of Policy, and all interest charged thereon, over liens, encumbrances and other matters affecting the title, the existence of which are Known to the Insured at: (a) The time of the advance; or (b) The time a modification is made to the terms of the Insured Mortgage which changes the rate of interest charged, if the rate of interest is greater as a result of the modification than it would have been before the modification. This exclusion does not limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 8. 9. The failure of the residential stmcture, or any portion thereof to have been constmcted before, on or afler Date of Policy in accordance with applicable building codes. This exclusion does not apply to violations of building codes if notice of the violation appears in the Public Records at Date of Policy. Attachment One (11/17/06) Q TICOR TITLe COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA 2878 Camino Del Rio South #500 San Diego, CA 92108 (619) 260-0015 TRANSMITTAL TITLE OFFICER: Petra Doering ORDER NO.: 204651-PD DATE: January 4, 2008 1:26 PM PHONE: (619) 260-0015 xll3 EMAIL: pdoering@ticortitle.com FAX: (619) 295-5241 Attn: Your Ref: PROPERTY ADDRESS: 150-152 CHERRY AVENUE, CARLSBAD, CA BORROWER: Enclosed please find your Preliminary Report. Thank you - we appreciate your business! ^ ORDER NO.: 204651 PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA PROBATE CODE SECTION 18100.5 I (We), (Name of Trustee(s) Trustees of the (Name of Trust) (hereinafter referred to as 'The Trust"), confirm the following facts: 1. The Trust is currently in existence and was created on (date of creation of trust) 2. The Settlor(s) of The Trust are as follows: 3. The currently acting Trustee(s) of The Trust is (are): 4. The power of the trustee(s) includes a. The power to sell, convey and exchange: • Yes O No b. The power to borrow money and encumber the trust property with a deed of trust or mortgage: • Yes • No 5. The Trust is: (select one) • Revocable • Irrevocable And the following party(ies), if any, is/are identified as having the power to revoke the trust: 6. The Trust • does • does not have multiple trustees. If the trust has multiple trustees, the signatures of all the trustees or of any of the trustees is required to exercise the powers of the trust. 7. The Trust identification number is: (Social Security or Employee Identification Number) 8. Title to assets of The Trust shall be taken in the following fashion: The undersigned trustee(s) hereby declare(s) that the trust has not been revoked, modified or amended in any manner which would cause the representations contained herein to be incorrect. This certification is being signed by all of the currently acting trustees and is being executed in conformity with the provisions ofCalifornia Probate Code Section 18100.5, Chapter 530, Statutes of 1993. Dated: (This form must be acknowledged) PLEASE NOTE: Time limits on the processing of discretionary projects established by state law do not start until a project application is deemed complete by the City. The City has 30 calendar days from the date of application submittal to determine whether an application is complete or incomplete. Within 30 days of submittal of this application you will receive a letter stating whether this application is complete or incomplete. If it is incomplete, the letter will state what is needed to make this application complete^^hen the application is complete, the processing period will start upon the dite of the completion letter. Applicant Signature: >^ .J^^^^^ Staff Signature: f).Jrt>^ /^tiAvv Date: h^2 3/o^ To be stapled with receipt to application Copy for file CITY OF CARLSBAD APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR: COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (SINGLE FAMILY REGULAR AND MINOR) COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION (FOR ALL COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMITS) This supplemental application is to be filed for any development requiring a Coastal Development Permit issued by the City ofCarlsbad. **Application checklist for Non-Single Family Regular Coastal Development Permits covered under separate handout A proposed project requiring that multiple applications be filed must be submitted prior to 3:30 p.m. A proposed project requiring that only one appiication be filed must be submitted prior to 4:00 p.m. All joint application exhibits, i.e. Tentative Map and Planned Development Site Plan should be prepared at the same scale. (Use a scale no smaller than 1" = 40'.) This supplemental application is to be filed for any development requiring a Coastal Development Permit issued by the City of Carlsbad. I. GENERAL BACKGROUND A. Estimated Cost of Development: Development costing $60,000 or more does not qualify as a Minor Coastal Development Pennit. The Plaiming Director shall make the final determination regarding a project's cost of development. The primary basis for determining cost of development will be the application of dollar costs per square foot for different types of residential constmction. These costs are set by the Intemationai Conference of Building Officials (ICBO) and are applied throughout San Diego County. Please complete the following infonnation to assist in the determination of this project's cost of development (Contractor proposals may also be submitted for consideration by the Planning Director). Please refer to the current fee schedule for the appropriate $/square foot fee rate. =i> New Residential Square Footage: square feet x $ ls<\. ft. = $ Residential Addition Square Footage: square feet x $ ^/sq. ft. = $_ Any Garage Square Footage: square feet x $ ^/sq. ft. = $_ Residential Conversion Square Footage: square feet x $ /sq. ft. = $_ Please contact the City of Carlsbad Building Department for current fee rate for Non- Residential uses (i.e. Retail/Store; Restaurants; Office; and Manufacturing/Warehouse uses.) square feet x $ kc\. ft. = $ COST OF DEVELOPMENT ESTIMATE: $ Forai 13 Revised 04/04 Page 1 of 7 B. Do you wish to apply for: 1. A Minor Coastal Development Permit (Under $60,000 cost estimate) 0^ 2. A Regular Coastal Development Permit ($60,000 or more cost estimate) Q C. Street address of proposed development D. Assessor's Parcel Number of proposed development c^OM -J2>\'\0 E. Development Description: Briefly describe proiect: Qp>^f^^Qvl<l(7>tu•^0 .gv^o^^iiog^ tin liS n^nd mn^r/jd- '\>ai}^\n(h o^ojwuip pvi a 1000 -(4 F. Describe the present land uses (i.e. vacant land, single family homes, apartments, offices, etc.) that surround the proposed development to the: North: ^J^SidiiThoi South: East: West: 'QA^\&Xn\^(xS G. Is project located within a 100-year flood plain? •YCS 0^ No II. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY A. Are there existing stractures on the property? 0Yes • No If yes, please describe. . . " ^ ryiulVi -fiuwuL..^ ^Aw\\s -W\ctV (XYC -H \><- dimolishgd (XY>a ^L^\a(ji± -^IA(2N up^t^-aA^Yi (^miU^ Uhi4s. B. Will any existing stracture be removed/demolished? 0Yes • No If yes to either question, describe the extent of the demolition or removal, including the relocation site, if applicable (also show on plans). III. LOT COVERAGE A. * * * i Form 13 Existing and Proposed Existine New Proposed Total Building Coverage sq. ft. sq. ft. sq.ft. Landscaped Area sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. Hardscape Area sq.ft. sq.ft. sq. ft. Unimproved Area (Left Natural) sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. ********** Revised 04/04 ******** ********** • ••••• Page 2 of7 B. Parking: Number of existing spaces o? Number of new spaces proposed ^ Existing/Proposed TOTAL: dKC)(P) S" 7 Number of total spaces required Number of covered spaces f2 Number of uncovered spaces Number of standard spaces Number of compact spaces Is tandem parking existing? Q Yes # 0'NO Is tandem parking proposed? • Yes# [3NO C. Grade Alteration: Is any grading proposed? B^es QNO If yes, please complete the following: 1. Amount of cut 2JX>0 cu. yds. 2. Amount of fill cu. yds. 3. Maximum height of fill slope ^ feet 4. Maximum height of cut slope ID feet 5. Amount of import or export ^Odd C>^ cu.yds. 6. Location of borrow or disposal site iJlAk!M ClOU **************************************** Form 13 Revised 04/04 Page 3 of 7 The following materials shall be submitted for each application or for combined applications on a single project. I. REOUIRED PLANS (All reauired plans shall be collated into complete sets, stapled together, then folded to 9" x 12" with lower right hand corner of plan visible.) A. SITE PLAN - Four (4) copies for a Minor Coastal Development Permit, four (4) copies for a Single Family Regular Coastal Development Permit on 24" x 36" sheet(s). Each site plan shall contain the following information: 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Qa. Name, address, and phone number of registered civil engineer, licensed surveyor, landscape architect or land plarmer who prepared the maps/plans. Qb. Location, size and use of all easements. Qc. Dimensions and locations of: access, both pedestrian and vehicular, showing service areas and points on ingress and egress, off-street parking and loading areas showing location, number and typical dimension of spaces, and wheel stops. Qd. Distance between buildings and/or stractures. Qe. Building setbacks (front, rear and sides). Qf Location, height and materials of walls and fences. Qg. Dimensions/location of signs. Qh. A summary table of the following (if applicable to the application): Q(l) Street address and assessor's parcel number. •(2) Site acreage. Q(3) Existing Zone, and Land Use Designation. Q(4) Proposed land use. Q(5) Total building coverage. Q(6) Percent of site to be landscaped. Q(7) Number of parking spaces required/provided. Q(8) Square Footage of open or recreational space (if applicable). Q(9) Cubic footage of storage space (if applicable). Qi. All applicable Fire Suppression Zones as required by the City's Landscape Manual. B. GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANS: Grading and drainage plans must be included with this application. In certain areas, an engineering geology report must also be included. Please consuh the City Plarming and Engineering Department representative for a determination on any grading plan geotechnical requirements if the project is in an overlay zone. The following information shall be submitted at a minimum: Ql. Approximate contours at 1' intervals for slopes less than 5%; 2' intervals for slopes between 5% and 10%; and 5' intervals for slopes over 10% (both existing and proposed). Existing and proposed topographic contours within a 100-foot perimeter of the boundaries of the site. Extend contours sufficiently out from the site to adequately show the adjacent floodplain (if applicable). Q2. Earthwork volumes: cut, fill, import and export. Q3. Spot elevations at the comers of each pad. Q4. Method of draining each lot. Include a typical cross section taken parallel to the fi-ontage for lots with less than standard fi-ontage. Qs. Location, width and/or size of all watercourses and drainage facilities within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision; show location and approximate size of any proposed detention/retention basins. Q6. Clearly show and label the 100 year flood line for the before and after conditions for any project which is within or adjacent to a FEMA flood plain. *************************************** Form 13 Revised 04/04 Page 4 of 7 BUTiniPif TiLEVATIONS AND FLOOR PLANS - Four (4) copies for a Minor Coastal Development Permit and four (4) copies a Single Family Regular Coastal Development Permit prepared on 24" x 36" sheet(s). Each building elevation and floor plan shall include the following information: I 11. Location and size of storage areas. I |2. All buildings, stmcmres, wall and/or fences, signs and exterior lights. I |3. Existing and proposed constraction. I |4. Provide documentation demonstrating compliance with City Council Policy 44 - Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines (if applicable). D. II. NOTE COLORED SITE PLAN AND ELEVATION PLAN - Not required with first submittal. It is the Applicant's responsibility to bring one (1) copy of a colored site plan and one (1) set of colored elevations to the Planning Department by 12:00 noon, eight (8) days prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Do not mount exhibits. REOUIRED DOCUMENTS AND SUBMITTAL ITEMS A completed Land Use Review Application Form. Completed Coastal Development Permit Application. Enviroimiental Impact Assessment Part 1 with Regular Coastal Development Permits. Check with Planning staff regarding Minor Coastal Development Permits and Single Family Regular Coastal Development Permits for any environmental review requirements. Disclosure Statement. Two (2) copies of the Preliminary Title Report (current within the last six (6) months). Completed "Project Description/Explanation" sheet. Property Owner's List and Addressed Labels: WHEN THE APPLICATION IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD BY THE DECISION MAKING BODY, THE PROJECT PLANNER WILL CONTACT THE APPLICANT AND ADVISE HIM TO SUBMIT THE RADIUS MAP. TWO SETS OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS LIST AND LABELS. THE APPLICANT SHALL BE REQUIRED TO SIGN A STATEMENT CERTIFYING THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED REPRESENTS THE LATEST EQUALIZED ASSESSMENT ROLLS FROM THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE. THE PROJECT WILL NOT GO FORWARD UNTIL THIS INFORMATION IS RECEIVED. I. typewritten iist of the names and addresses of all property owners within a 600' radius of the subject property (including the applicant and/or owner). The list shall include the San Diego County Assessor's parcel number Irom the latest assessment rolls. 2. ITwo (2) separate sets of mailing labels of the property owners within a 600* radius of the subject property. The list must be typed in all CAPITAL LETTERS, left justified, void of punctuation. For any address other than single-family residence, an apartment, suite or building number must be included on a separate line. DO NOT include it on the street address line. DO NOT TYPE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER ON LABELS. DO NOT provide addressed envelopes - PROVIDE LABELS ONLY. Acceptable fonts are: Arial 10, Enterprise TM or Courier NEW (TT) no larger than 11 pt. Sample labels are as follows: UNACCEPTABLE Mrs. Jane Smith 123 Magnolia Ave., Apt. #3 Carlsbad, CA 92008 UNACCEPTABLE Mrs. Jane Smith 123 Magnolia Ave. Apt. #3 Carisbad, CA 92008 ACCEPTABLE MRS JANE SMITH APT 3 123 MAGNOLIA AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 Form 13 Revised 04/04 Page 5 of 7 o 3. 600' Radius Map: A map to scale not less than 1"=200' showing each lot within 600' of exterior boundaries of the subject property. Each of these lots shall be consecutively numbered and correspond with the property owners list. The scale of the map may be reduced to a scale acceptable to the Planning Director if the required scale is impractical. 4. lOV^ Radius Occupants/Address List and Labels (for coastal zone/CDPs only): One (1) list of the occupants/addresses located within a 100' radius ofthe project site; and two (2) sets of labels (as described in "A" above) ofthe addresses within a 100' radius. III. SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUIREMENTS - (May apply to single family, regular and minor coastal development permits). Coastal Overlay Zones require additional information to be submitted as follows: (refer to the Municipal Code for a fiill description) A. Coastal Agriculture Overlay Zone 1. Refer to the Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.202.060 for specific requirements. B. Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone 1. Slope analysis/mapping for 25% and greater subject to Section 21.203.040 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 2. Topographic and vegetation mapping/analysis subject to Subsection 21.203.040(B)(1) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, if project is located along the first row of lots bordering Buena Vista Lagoon including the lagoon mouth. 3. Topographic, drainage and wetland mapping subject to Subsections 21.203.040(B)(2)(a) and (b) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code if located east of Interstate 5 in the Batiquitos Lagoon watershed. 4. Drainage study subject to Subsection 21.203.040(B)(3) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code if project is located west of existing Paseo del Norte, west of Interstate 5 or along El Camino Real immediately upstream of existing storm drains. 5. Geologic report addressing landslides and slope stability subject to Subsection 21.203.040(B)(4) ofthe Carlsbad Municipal Code. 6. Geologic report addressing land slides and seismic hazards subject to Subsection • 21.203.040(C) and (D) ofthe Carisbad Municipal Code. C. Coastal Shoreline Development Overlay Zone 1. Geotechnical report subject to 21.204.110 if project is located adjacent to an existing seabluff edge between the sea and the first public road parallel to the sea; also may be required by Planning Director if deemed necessary consistent with Section 21.204.110 ofthe Carlsbad Municipal Code. 2. Show all stractures and decks on adjacent north and south properties to perform "stringline" test subject to Subsection 21.204.050(B) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 3. Unless otherwise submitted project in this zone must also be submitted with plans showing: a. Boundaries and topography b. Existing and proposed stractures c. Circulation d. Drainage e. Finished topography f Landscaping D. Coastal Resource Overlay Zone Mello I LCP Segment 1. Erosion, sedimentation and drainage report subject to Section 21.205.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code if project is located in the Batiquitos Lagoon watershed. Form 13 Revised 04/04 Page 6 of 7 rv. REQUIRED COASTAL PERMIT FINDINGS - Approval of a regular or minor coastal development permit is based on the ability to make three coastal related findings. These three fmdings are presented below for your review and information. 1. That the proposed development is in conformance with the Certified Local Coastal Program and all applicable policies. 2. That the development is in conformity with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act. 3. That the development conforms with any applicable decision pertinent to this proposal and/or site as set by the Coastal Commission on a previously related appeals decision per Public Resources Code §30604(c). Form 13 Revised 04/04 Page 7 of 7 WYNN ENGINEERI G, INC. 27315 Valley Center Road Valley Center, CA 92082-6538 (760) 749-8722 FAX (760) 749-9412 TO CITY OF CARLSBAD WE ARE SENDING YOU • Shop Drawings • Copy of letter • Attached • Prints 1-22-08 ATTN: PUVNNING DEPT RE: CHERRY AVE TPM 07-071 RECEIVFn • Under separate cover via • Plans • Samples JAN 2 j ?CnB pedfieations •' J UizH f • Change Order • Original Letter COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 LAND USE APPLICATION 1 COSTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION 1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 2 TTFLE REPORT 2 SOILS REPORT 1 HYDROLOGY REPORT 2 STORM WATER APPLICABILrTY CHECKLIST 1 WATER QUALFFY TECHNICAL REPORT 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 HAZARDOUS WATER AND SUBSTANCE STATEMENT 2 SITE PHOTO LOCATIONS MAP 1 DIGITAL COPY OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 1 EARLY PUBLIC NOTICE PACKAGE 7 SFTE PLAN / TPM 7 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW: • For approvai • For your use • As requested • For review and comment • FOR BIDS DUE • Approved as submitted • Approved as noted • Returned for corrections • • Resubmit. • Submit • Return . copies for approval _ copies for distribution . corrected prints • PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO: Rec'd By: SIGNED: Brenda Barnard If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. 01/21/2008 17:13 7Gt 9412 WYNN ENGINEE 5 INC PAGE 02 LETTER OF AGENCY JAN 2 2 2008 iBY: TV. of my behalf and sign all Cherry Ave TO Whom It May Concern. Engineering to act 1 am the o^^^r''^^^^f^oc^en^. necessary to secure app RECEIVED ' CITYOFCARLSBAD • PLANNING DEPT d im^nnrQwi/^f-n. -i^/Lr.n mz ii Nvr(]ni) mm HDV3g swivd NV330 woad EOest J. Dronenburg, JiO COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ASSESSOR/RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK ASSESSOR'S OFFICE 1600 Pacific Highway, Suite 103 SanDiego, CA 92101-2480 Tel. (619) 236-3771 * Fax (619) 557-4056 www.sdarcc.com RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE 1600 Pacific Highway, Suite 260 P.O. Box 121750 * San Diego, CA 92112-1750 Tel. (619)237-0502 * Fax (619)557-4155 Transaction #: 270074820120419 Deputy: HAYUYAO Location: COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 19-Apr-2012 11:47 FEES: 50.00 Qtyofl Fish and Game Filing Fee for Ref# 20120350 50.00 TOTAL DUE PAYMENTS: 50.00 Check 50.00 TENDERED SERYICES AVAILABLE AT OFFICE LOCATIONS Tax Bill Address Changes Records and Certified Copies: Birth/ Marriage/ Death/ Real Estate Fictitious Business Names (DBAs) Marriage Licenses and Ceremonies Assessor Parcel Maps Property Ownership Property Records Property Values Document Recordings SERVICES AVAILABLE ON-LINE AT www.sdarcccom Forms and Applications Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Grantor/ Grantee Index Fictitious Business Names Index (DBAs) Property Sales On-Line Purchases Assessor Parcel Maps Property Characteristics Recorded Documents State of California—The Resources flpmcy DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME 2012 ENVIRONMENTAL FILING FEE CASH RECEIPT SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE. TYPE OR PRINT CLEARIY RECEIPT* SD2012 0350 STATE CLEARING HOUSE # (ifapplicable) LEADAGENCY CITY OF CARLSBAD CITYOFCARLSBAD —APR 2 3 2012 DATE 04/19/2012 COUNTY/STATE AGENCY OF FILING SAN DIEGO DOCUMENTNUMBER *20120350* PROJECTTITLE SDP 08-01/CDP 08-04 - BLUE CONDOMINIUMS PLANNING DEPARTMENT PROJECTAPPLICANT NAME BARRY BLUE PROJECTAPPLICANTADDRESS CITY STATE ZIPCODE 2950 OCEAN STREET CARLSBAD CA 92008 PHONENUMBER 760/729-2493 PROJECTAPPLICANT (Check appropriate box): Q Local Public Agency Q School District Q Other Special District • State Agency • Private Entity CHECK APPLICABLE FEES: • Environmental Impact Report Q Negative Declaration Q Application Fee Water Diversion (Sfafe Water Resources Control Board Only) Q Projects Subject to Certified Regulatory Programs Q County Administrative Fee • Project that Is exempt from fees [3 Notice of Exemption Q DFG No Effect Determination (Form Attached) • Other PAYMENT METHOD: • Cash • Credit • Check • Other $2,919.00 $2,101.50 $850.00 $992.50 $50.00 $50.00 TOTALRECEIVED $50.00 SIGNATURE X H. Ayuyao TITLE Deputy llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll ORIGINAL - PROJECT APPLICANT COPY-DFG/ASB COPY-LEAD AGENCY COPY-COUNTY CLERK FG 753.6a (Rev. 7/08) State of California—The Resources ^ipihcy DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME 2012 ENVIRONMENTAL FILING FEE CASH RECEIPT SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE. TYPE OR PRINT CLEARK RECEIPT* SD2012 0350 STATE CLEARING HOUSEt(lfapplicable) LEADAGENCY CITY OF CARLSBAD DATE 04/19/2012 COUNTY/STATE AGENCY OF FILING SAN DIEGO DOCUMENTNUMBER *20120350* PROJECTTIUE SDP 08-01/CDP 08-04 - BLUE CONDOMINIUMS PROJECTAPPLICANT NAME BARRY BLUE PHONENUMBER 760/729-2493 PROJECTAPPLICANTADDRESS 2950 OCEAN STREET CITY CARLSBAD STATE CA ZIPCODE 92008 PROJECT APPLICANT (Check appropriate box): • Local Public Agency • School District • Other Special District • State Agency • Private Entity CHECK APPLICABLE FEES: Q Environmental Impact Report • Negative Declaration Q Application Fee Water Diversion (Sfafe Water Resources Control Board Only) • Projects Subject to Certified Regulatory Programs • County Administrative Fee Q Project that is exempt from fees E] Notice of Exemption Q DFG No Effect Determination (Form Attached) • Other PAYMENT METHOD: • Cash • Credit • Check • OtherJOII $2,919.00 $ $2,101.50 $ $850.00 $ $992.50 $ $50.00 $ $50.00 TOTALRECEIVED $50.00 SIGNATURE H. Ayuyao TITLE X Deputy lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllil ORIGINAL- PROJECTAPPLICANT COPY-DFG/ASB COPY-LEAD AGENCY COPY - COUNTY CLERK FG 763.5a (Rev. 7/08) Q NOTICE OF EXEMPTION To: SD County Clerk From: CITYOFCARLSBAD Attn: Linda Kesian Planning Division Mail Stop A-33 1635 Faraday Avenue 1600 Pacific Highway Carlsbad, CA 92008 SanDiego, CA 92101 Subject: Filing of this Notice of Exemption is in compliance with Section 21152b of the Public Resources Code (Califomia Environmental Quality Act). Project Number and Title: SDP 08-01/CDP 08-04 - Blue Condominiums Project Location - Specific: 150-152 Cherry Avenue Project Location - City: Carlsbad Project Location - County: San Diego Description of Project: Demolition of two single family dwellings and accessory structures and the construction of two attached residential air-space condominium units on a 0.16-acre infill lot generally located on the north side of Cherry Avenue, in between Garfield Street and Carlsbad Boulevard, within the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program and in Local Facilities Management Zone 1. Name of Public Agency Approving Project: Citv of Carlsbad IF D 0. 1 © Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project: Shannon Werneke Rmwi J Pronwburg. Jr. Recorder Couni\ cierk Nameof Applicant: Barry Blue APR 19 2Q12 Applicant's Address: 2950 Ocean Street Carlsbad. CA 92008 BY H. AvUVaO Applicant's Telephone Number; 760-729-2493 DSUTV Exempt Status: (Check Om) • Ministerial (Section 21080(b)(1); 15268); • Declared Emergency (Section 21080(b)(3); 15269(a)); • Emergency Project (Section 21080(b)(4); 15269 (b)(c)); ^ Categorical Exemption - State type and section number: 15332 ("Infill) • Statutory Exemptions - State code number: • General rule (Section 15061(b)(3)) Reasons why project is exempt: The project is consistent with the General Plan as well as with the Zoning Ordinance: the project site is within the city limits; is less than 5 acres in size and is surrounded by urban uses: there is no evidence that the site has value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species: approval of the proiect will not result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality: and the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. Lead Agency Contact Person: Shannon Werneke Telephone: (760) 602-4621 vLyL y-/7-/^ DON NEU, City Planner Date Date received for filing at OPR: Revised 06/10 . ru C3 O * J U.S. Postal Scr/co , CERTIFIED MAIL™ RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Pi For delivery intormation visit our website dt v.-v-jv.usos.coina Sent ro CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION STE 103 Sfreef, Apt. No.: orPOBoxNo. 7575 METROPOLITAN DR city,state.zip*4 5^,^ QIEGO CA 92108-4402 SENDER: COMPLETE THI V Complete items 1, 2, and 3. i<fso complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. IHOm 3Hi. 01 3d013AN3 dO dOI IV HSXOLLS lOVId COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON I 1. Article Addressed to: CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION STE 103 7575 METROPOLITAN DR SAN DIEGO CA 92108-4402 B,-Hfeceived by ( Printed'l, • Agent • Addressee C. Bate of Delivery Is delivery address different from item 1 ? • Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: d No 3. Service Type :S>Certltied Mail • Registered • Insured Mail • Express Mail "^^fleturn Receipt for MerchandiSbi • C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) • Yes 2. Article Number (Transfer from service label) 7D10 lb?D QDD2 M34fl S7Db 1 PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540 CO tr cr o a o 1=1 • ru ru cr o • U.S. Postal ServiceiM CERTIFIED MAIL™ RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage f- For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.comsi •H9 a Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postagf Postmark Here Sent To California Coastal Commission Attn: Toni Ross Suite 103 Sfreef, Apt No. orPOBoxNo 7575 Metropolitan Drive cJy:sSte.z/ft Qiggo CA 92108-4402 PS Form 3800. mmm See Reverse for Instructions SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DEUVERY j • Complete items 1, 2,« .3. Also complete Item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired. ( • Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front If space permits. A Siqnature / / // .^t>i^\/7^ t^/ '^•'/y-^ • Addressee j • Complete items 1, 2,« .3. Also complete Item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired. ( • Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front If space permits. B^TJeceived by ( Printpd Nk/n^j p. Date^Delivery lo/>o.> /M/TfTi// ^-'n-l^ j • Complete items 1, 2,« .3. Also complete Item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired. ( • Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front If space permits. D. Is delivery address different from Item 1 ? CI Yes If YES, enter delivery address tjelow: D No 1 1. Article Addressed to: California Coastal Commission Attn: Toni Ross Suite 103 D. Is delivery address different from Item 1 ? CI Yes If YES, enter delivery address tjelow: D No 1 7575 Metropolitan Drive San Diego, CA 92108-4402 3. Service Type ^EljDertmed Mall • Express Mail • Registered ^^HCRetum Receipt for Merchandise • Insursd Mail • C.O.D. 7575 Metropolitan Drive San Diego, CA 92108-4402 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) • Yes ZTZTservioelateO 7°°^ ^^SO OOOD flm^ ^17fl PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Retum Receipt 102595-O2-M-154O • i YAJ^ O O FILECOPY <C'2r|> CITY OF ^-(^./^ V CARLSBAD Community & Economic Development www.carlsbadca.gov NOTICE OF REOUEST FOR A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT Notice is hereby given that a planned development permit has been applied for to allow the demolition of two single family dwellings and an accessory structure for the construction of two attached residential air-space condominium units on a 0.16-acre infill lot located at 150-152 Cherry Avenue, Carlsbad, Califomia, and more particularly described as: Lot K in Block 1 of Palisades Heights in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of Califomia, according to map thereof No. 1777, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego on January 11, 1924. If you have any objections to the granting of this permit or wish to have an informal hearing to discuss the requested permits, please nofify the Planning Division, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, Califomia 92008, in writing within 10 days of the date of this notice. If you have any questions, please call Shaimon Werneke in the Planning Division at (760) 602-4621. CASE NO.: PUD 12-01 (associated with SDP 08-01/CDP 08-04) CASE NAME: Blue Condominiums DATE: April 6, 2012 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 © \m/ SITE MAP AA wor ro SCALE Blue Condominiums PUD 12-01 (associated witii SDP 08-01/CDP 08-04) ...... ' RLE COPV V'CARLSBAD Planning Division www.carlsbadca.gov PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF DECISION April 5, 2012 Pi Arc Design Attn: Buck Thompson 627 Bonair Way La Jolla, CA 92037 SUBJECT: SDP 98-01/CDP 08-04 - BLUE CONDOMINIUMS At the April 4, 2012 Planning Commission meeting, your application was considered. The Commission voted 6-0-1 to approve your request. The decision of tlie Planning Commission will become final on April 14, 2012. The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking judicial review must be filed in the appropriate court not later than the ninetieth day following the date which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the decision becomes final a request for the record of the proceedings is made accompanied by the required deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost of preparation of such record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Planner, Don Neu, Secretary of the Planning Commission, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008. If you have any questions regarding the final dispositions of your application, please contact your project planner Shannon Werneke at (760) 602-4621 orshannon.werneke@carlsbadca.gov. Sincerely, DON NEU, AICP City Planner DN:SW:bd c: Data Entry File enc: Planning Commission Resolution No. 6867, 6868 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 ® SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY • Complete Items 1,. ,d 3. Also complete item 4 If Restricted iSeilvery Is desired. • Print your name and address on the reverse / so that we can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front If space pennits. A Signature . . / Of ' L vf/ " • Agent "tV<^»' /^-/viyv ^ • Addressee • Complete Items 1,. ,d 3. Also complete item 4 If Restricted iSeilvery Is desired. • Print your name and address on the reverse / so that we can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front If space pennits. 7 / B. Received by (PrkitedNtrnk) C. Date of Delivery 1. Article Addressed to: California Coastal Comnnission Attn: Toni Ross Suite 103 D. Is delivery address different from Item 17 • Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: O No 7575 IVletropolitan Drive San Diego, CA 92108-4402 3. Service Type ;;:0Xertlfied Mail • Express Mail • Registered ^^^^Jletum Receipt for Merchandise • Insured Mail • C.O.D. 7575 IVletropolitan Drive San Diego, CA 92108-4402 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee^ • Yes "r^rrLrv^/abe^ 70°^ DDDD 641^ ^llb PS Form 3811, February 2004 [Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540 • This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2010 & 2011 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times- Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, for the City of Oceanside and the City of Escondido, Court Decree number 171349, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: March 23'^ 2012 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at Escondido, California On this 23^ day Marda^lZ CJL 51 ^ Jane Allshouse NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising CITYOFCARLSBAD MAR 2 8 2012 PUNNING DEPAHTMENT Proof of Publication of PLANNING CoimiSSION PUBUC HEARING r NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be -«»^ affected that the Planning Comt^iission of the City of Carlsbad will hc^Dubfc heir ng at the C^ Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, SlsL'Ji Californrat 6:M p.m. on Wednesday, April 4,2012, to considerthe following: 11 CUP 12-01 - CARLSBAD CROSSFIT - Request for a Conditional Use Per-mit toiltoirCa"riibiJC?5iiflt to operate a specialty fitness gym two vacant WOI square foot suites located within an existing oHice/industnal complex on propel^ toted at 6352 El Camino Real, Suites F & G, in the P-M Zone and in Local Facilities Management Zone 5. The project is exempt from the Califomia Environmental Quality Act SDP 08-01/ CDP 08-04 - BLUE nONDQIVIINIUMS - Request for approval of «Wi^itopl^t PiSR aWC"oastal Development Permit to demolish two linate fSy dwXgs and accessory structures and to allow for the construc- fr^n nf Ci attached residentia air-space condominium units on a 0.16-aore Sl tot ™'ySld o^the no^ of Cherry Avenue, in between Garf- e d StrSt Ind Carlsbad Boulevard, within the Mello 11 Segment of the Local Coastal Program and in Local Facilities Management Zone 1. The projeot is exempt from the Califomia Environmental Quality Act. This project is not located within the appealable area of the California Coastal Commission. 31 RP 11 -35/ CUP 11 -07 - SDG&E NORTH COUNTY OPS CENTER - Request gfofr>econvTiendation 6\'i^5^\ot a Redevelopment Permit and approval of ^a Co^dSTusf Permit to allow for the development of a 2,850 square foot 5 tempSrarr^oMe buMing on the 16.37 acre SDG&E Encina Power Plant prop-erti a 5016 Carlsbad Boulevard in the South Carlsbad Coasta ; ReLvelopment Area, the Agua Hedionda Segment of the Carlsbad Local vCoastal Prograrfi, and Local Facilities Management Zone 3. - " • • The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. : If vni 1 rhallpnnp these proiects In court, you may be limited to raising only those & ™u orfomlone Ssed at the pubiic hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or pnor to the public hearing. Copies of the environmental documents are available at Pi?"™"9 ' at 1635 Faraday Avenue during regular business hours frpm 7.30 am to 5.30 pm Monday through Thursday and 8:00 am to 5:00 pm Friday. Those oefsons wishing to speak on these proposals are cordially invited to St'heTubnc hearing. Copies of the staff reports will be ava, a^^^^^ t,ttrfei5h.H riraniriis cnmA/iewPublisher.php?yiewjds6 on o after the Fn aS^toTtoThe hearing date. H you have ^y questions, please call the Planning Division at 760-602-4600. PUBLISH: March 23, 2012 net 2311916 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION cr jr CO • Cl Ln ru ru cr • • U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL™ R (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance For delivery information visit our website at wvKw.usps.comfii Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endoisement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) SOP Total Postage Postmark Here Sent To California Coastal Commission Attn: Toni Ross Suite 103 Sfreet, Apt. No.. orPOBoxNo. 7575 Metropolitan Drive cifyisiiiSrzTp. San Diego, CA 92108-4402 PS Form 3800. August 2006 ec Heverse tor Instructions FILE COPY CITY OF V CARLSBAD Community & Economic Development www.carlsbadca.gov NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, April 4, 2012, to consider a request for the following: CASE NAME: SDP 08-01/ CDP 08-04 - Blue Condominiums PUBLISH DATE: March 23, 2012 DESCRIPTION: Request for approval of a Site Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit to demolish two single family dwellings and accessory structures and to allow for the construction of two attached residential air-space condominium units on a 0.16-acre infill lot generally located on the north side of Cherry Avenue, in between Garfield Street and Carlsbad Boulevard, within the Mello II Segment ofthe Local Coastal Program and in Local Facilities Management Zone 1. Those persons wishing to speal< on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing and provide the decision makers with any oral or written comments they may have regarding the project. Copies of the staff report will be available online at http://carlsbad.granicus.com/ViewPublisher.php7view id=6 on or after the Friday prior to the hearing date. If you have any questions, or would like to be notified of the decision, please contact Shannon Werneke in the Planning Division at (760) 602-4621, Monday through Thursday 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Friday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008. APPEALS The time within which you may judicially challenge these projects, if approved, is established by State law and/or city ordinance, and is very short. If you challenge this project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing. • Appeals to the Citv Council: Where the decision is appealable to the City Council, appeals must be filed in writing within ten (10) calendar days after a decision by the Planning Commission. • Coastal Commission Appealable Project: ^ This site is not located within the Coastal Zone Appealable Area. XI Application deemed complete: 11/09/2010 ^1 Where the decision is appealable to the Coastal Commission, appeals must be filed with the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days after the Coastal Commission has received a Notice of Final Action from the City of Carlsbad. Applicants will be notified by the Coastal Commission of the date that their appeal period will conclude. The San Diego office of the Coastal Commission is located at 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, California 92108-4402. CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 © SITEMAP NOT TO SCALE Blue Condominiums SDP 08-01/CDP 08-04 ATTACHIIEIIT "2" CERTtFICATlpN OF POSTING 1 certify that the "Notice of Prefect Application' has been posterf irt a ojnspfcumis teca«on on the site on 11 /^/lO . (DAtE) SIGNATURE PRINT NAME: Buck Thompson PROJECTNAME: Blue Condominiums PROJECT NUMBER: SDP 08-01 / CP 08-01 / CDP 08-04 (Related MS 08-01 LOCATION; >50/ 152 Cherry Ave. Carlsbad.CA 92008 RETURN TO; Shannon Werneke - Associate Planner (Planner) CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad. CA 92008-7314 p.21 Page 4 of 6 Rwtsetf 07/10 o FILE COPY, Citv of Carlsbad of Planning Department EARLY PUBLIC NOTICE PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: BLUE CONDOMINIUMS CP 08-01/CDP 08-04 This early public notice is to let you know that a development application to demolish two existing single-family homes and construct two (2) attached, residential air-space condominiums within your neighborhood was submitted to the City of Carlsbad on January 23, 2008. The project application is undergoing its initial review by the City. LOCATION: 150 &152 Cherry Avenue PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting approval of a Site Development Plan, Coastal Development Permit, and Condominium Permit for the demolition of two single-family homes and the construction of two (2) attached, residential air-space condominiums on a 0.16-acre site. The proposed project would include a two-story building with a mezzanine, and a semi-subterranean garage. Access to the project site would be taken off a proposed 12-foot-wide private driveway. Please keep in mind that this is an early public notice and that the project design could change as a result of further staff and public review. A future public hearing notice will be mailed to you when this project is scheduled for public hearing before the Planning Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION: If you have questions or comments regarding this proposed project please contact Shannon Werneke, Associate Planner at swern@ci.carlsbad.ca.us, (760) 602-4621, City ofCarlsbad Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us City of Carlsbad Blue Condominiums CP 08-01/CDP 08-04 Map created by the City of Carlsbad GIS. Portions of the DERIVED PRODUCT contain geographic information copyrighted by SanGIS. All Rights Reserved EXTEMOR mjEVKnOta OCMCRAL NOTES: J V blue - cherry project ISO / 1 52 CHERRY AVENUE, CARLSBAP, CALIFORNIA <^200a Mi ° -S l-o Ul -I 0 tc a. >-ti a. IU I o -1 IQ RENDERED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A.6 site Plan n—.™ A C«LCUL*TIONa FOR tOT 1 BUILnm cov.HAG, m. blue - cherry project 1 50 / 152 CHERRY AVENUE, CARLSBAP, CALIFORNIA «1200& 2 Hi 5 S i i" > \-o IU 1 0 IL V tc tc IU 1 o I Ui Z) -J CQ <^3 to r raOJKT PHMBn MU A.1 Ac.vo. ^ QFILE V^CARLSBAD Planninq Division www.carlsbadca.gov ^ NOTICE OF FINAL AaiON COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT The following project is located within the City of Carlsbad Coastal Zone. A coastal permit application for the project has been acted upon. SENT TO COASTAL COMMISSION ON APRIL 17, 2012 Application #: CDP 08-04 Filing Date: 4/17/12 Case Name: Blue Condominiums Decision Date: 4/4/12 Applicant: Barry Blue Agent (if different): Buck Thompson Address: 2950 Ocean Street, Carlsbad. CA 92008 Address; 627 Bonair Wav, La Jolla, CA 92037 Phone: 760-729-2493 Phone: 858-454-2720 Project Description: Approval of a Coastal Development Permit to demolish two single familv dwellings and accessory structures and to allow for the construction of two attached residential air-space condominium units on a 0.16-acre infill lot generallv located on the north side of Cherry Avenue, in between Garfield Street and Carlsbad Boulevard, within the Mello 11 Segment ofthe Local Coastal Program and in Local Facilities Management Zone 1. Project Location: 150-152 Cherry Avenue. Carlsbad. CA 92008 (APN: 204-231-10) , ACTION: • APPROVED 1^ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS • DENIED (Copy of final resolution/decision letter is sent to: Coastal Commission, any persons who specifically requested it, and the applicant). COASTAL COMMISSION APPEAL STATUS: IKI NOT APPEALABLE TO THE COASTAL COMMISSION. O APPEALABLE TO THE COASTAL COMMISSION pursuant to Coastal Act Section 30603. An aggrieved person may appeal this decision to the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days following Coastal Commission receipt of this notice. Applicants will be notified by the Coastal Commission as to the date the Coastal Commission's appeal period will conclude. Appeals must be made in writing to the Coastal Commission's district office at the following address: California Coastal Commission, 7575 Metropolitan Dr., Suite 103, San Diego, California 92108-4402, Telephone (619) 767-2370. Attachment: - Location Map to CCC for non-appealable CDPs - Staff Report to CCC for appealable CDPs The time within which judicial review ofthis decision must be sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedures, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 16. Any petition or other paper seeking judicial review must be filed in the appropriate court not later than ninety (90) days following the date on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten (10) days after the decision becomes final a request for the record of the proceedings accompanied by the required deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost of preparation ofsuch a record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended to not later than thirty (30) days following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California 92008. 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 © ^ w ^ riLt wr I <C'W ^'TY OF V CARLSBAD Planning Division www.carlsbadca.gov November 30, 2010 Mr. Buck Thompson Pi Arc Design 627 Bon Air Way La Jolla, CA 92037 SUBJECT: SDP 08-01/CP 08-01/CDP 08-04 - BLUE CONDOMINIUMS- CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) APPLICABILITY/PROCESS DETERMINATION This is to advise you that after reviewing the application for the project referenced above, the City has determined that the following environmental review process (pursuant to CEQA) will be required for the project: Ttie project is exempt from the provisions of CEQA, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301(1), Existing Facilities, and 15303(b), New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. No environmental review is required for the project. A Notice of Exemption will be filed after approval of the project with the San Diego County Clerk's Office which involves a filing fee. Please submit a check to the project planner in the sum of $50.00 payable to the San Diego County Clerk. For additional information related to this CEQA applicability/process determination, please contact the project planner, Shannon Werneke, at (760) 602-4621 or shannon.werneke@carlsbadca.gov. Sincerely, DON NEU, AICP Planning Director DN;SW;bd c: Barry Blue, 2950 Ocean Street, Carlsbad CA 92008 Chris DeCerbo Tecla Levy File Copy Data Entry 1535 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 750-602-4500 F 750-502-8559 @ Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT Consultation Of Lists of Sites Related To Hazardous Wastes (Certification of Compliance with Government Code Section 65962.5) Pursuant to State of California Government Code Section 65962.5, I have consulted the Hazardous Wastes and Substances Sites List compiled by the California Environmental Protection Agency and hereby certify that (check one): The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the State Government Code. • The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the State Government Code. APPLICANT Name: Address: (^7^6" VaL^ft^jV, ti Phone Number: {li/l)^ 1^^ • Vl^ PROPERTY OWNER Name: Address: OC/^Or) (5^/- Phone Numbe Address of Site: Local Agency (City and Countv^: ^ Q/QA I AIQ^UA Assessor's book, page, and parcel number: o^QL^ - .Z£ll ' / O Specify list(s): Regulatory Identification Number:. Date of List: Applicant Sigi^ature/Date Admin/Counter/HazWaste Property Owner Signature/Date 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 502-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 * www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us ^ The Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites (Cortese List) is a planning document used by the State, local agencies and developers to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act requirements in providing information about the location of hazardous materials release sites. Government Code section 65962.5 requires the California Environmental Protection Agency to develop at least annually an updated Cortese List. Below is a list of agencies that maintain information regarding Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites. Department of Toxic Substances Control www.dtsc.ca.qov/database/calsites Calsites Hotline (916) 323-3400 State Water Resources Control Board - — www.swrcb.ca.qov/cwphome/lustis County of San Diego Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) Mike Dorsey Chief, Hazardous Materials Division Department of Environmental Heaith Services Hazardous Materials Management Division Mailing address: P.O. 60x129261 San Diego, CA 92112-9261 (619) 338-2395 Call Duty Specialist for General Questions at (619) 338-2231 fax: (619).338-2315 www.co.san-dieqo.ca.us Integrated Waste Management Board www.ciwmb.ca.qov 916-255-4021 Environmental Protection Agency National Priorities Sites ("Superfund" or "CERCLIS") www.epa.qov/superfund/sites/cursites (800) 424-9346 National Priorities List Sites in the United States www.epa.qov/superfund/sites/npl/npl.htm 5/19/03 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To be Completed by Applicant) Date Filed: (To be completed by City) Application Number(s): General Information K\Clo Ml H 1. Name of project: 2. Name of developer or project sponsor: '^IXX.V)/~ iJ^ ^:>iv JL P Address: 0?<^^ 0^0 Qx.y^ SVreej- City, State, Zip Code: OaAjsjOfTLil^ QjK ^ Z^OS" Phone Number: Name of person to be contacted conceming this project: Address: d?'7a>A'g' VfX\VjLu\ (\^Viy\ Q^A City, State, Zip Code: v\<^jL^ djUrAxA , QjK ^ Phone Number: {lU^j^n^Oj ' f^l Address of Project: Assessor's Parcel Number: List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: 6. Existing General Plan Land Use Designation: 7. Existing zoning district: 1^^ ^ 8. Existing land use(s): AUci-hj- -^avWSj^'^^ ^t iO\ Adi Y\L A 9. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): Project Description 10. Site size: 11. Proposed Building square footage: 12: Number of floors of construction: 13. Amount of off-street parking provided: 2 02/22/06 14. Associated projects: (\3&TX€- 15. If residential, include the number of units and schedule of unit sizes: 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities: [\J j p\ 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities: r\l/A 18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project: j\)y/ /\ 19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use or rezoning applications, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required: (ij j l\ Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). Yes N' 20. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, or hills, or Q substantial alteration of ground contours. 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public Q 5^ lands or roads. 22. Change in pattem, scale or character of general area of project. Q ^ 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. 24. • ^ Change in dust, ash, smoke, fiimes or odors in vicinity. Q ^ 25. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or j I |^ alteration of existing drainage pattems. 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. Q 3 02/22/06 26. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or more. Q 'QJ 28. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic Q Rf substances, flammables or explosives. 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, f'l sewage, etc.). 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, LH etc.). ~ 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. LH [Sf Environmental Setting Attach sheets that include a response to the following questions: 32. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including infonnation on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. 33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information ori plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set-back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. Certification I hereby certify that the statements fumished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date: 02/22/06 Environmental Setting 32. The existing buildings are a two (2) unit multi-family rental property. The buildings are area typical for local Carlsbad beach residential. The structures are of 1940-1950 architecture which are the typical bungalow style unit which are in keeping with that period. The local topography is predominantly flat and is considered beach bluff area. The existing soils are terrace deposits of the bay point formation very common in the local coastal areas. These soils are typically stable soils and perform well as foundation for all structures. The natural plant and animal life are limited to field mice, rats, rabbits, and an influx of coyotes and nocturnal mammals such as skunks, opossums, and occasionally raccoons. Plant life is not of the native variety due to the dense residential development and the lack of use of non-native plant species. 33. There are no cultural or historical aspects associated to the project. The scenic aspect is the Pacific Ocean and the natural vista available to the property. The Pacific is and will always remain a true scenic impact along the coastal areas of Southem Califomia. The surrounding properties are medium to high density (15-23 units per acre) residential multi family dwelling units. The local plant community is non-native species due to the high density. There is not an opportunity for native plants to thrive in this environment due to the land use. Animal species are limited to field mice, rats, rabbits, and an influx of coyotes and nocturnal mammals such as skunks, opossums, and occasionally raccoons. Bird life ranges from seasonal migratory birds to the year round species of sparrows, blue jays, crows, and of course, the ever present sea gull as well as other associated sea birds. The building mass horizontally utilizes 48% of the site. Vertically there are three stories thirty feet in height, with a subterranean parking structure. Citv of Carlsbad Planning Oepartment HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT Consultation Of Lists of Sites Related To Hazardous Wastes (Certification of Compliance with Government Code Section 65962.5) Pursuant to State of Caljfornia Government Code Section 65962.5, I have consulted the Hazardous Wastes and Substances Sites List compiled by the California Environmental Protection Agency and hereby certify that (check one): • The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the State Govemment Code. • The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the State Government Code. APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER Name: , Name:TVl/ra^ ^\UJL Address:__ ; Address: C:fKA\s\^(kji i CA ^zm Phone Number: Phone Numbe Address of Site: Local Agency (City and County) Assessor's book, page, and parcel number:. ^ru- y?,\ -in Specify list(s): Regulatory Identification Number:. Date of List: Applicant Sigrtature/Date ' Property Owner Signature/Date Admin/Counter/HazWaste 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad. CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 » www.cl.carlsbad.ca.us ^ CITY OF ^ CARLSBAD Memorandum June 20, 2011 To: Shannon Werneke, Associate Planner From: Tecla Levy, Associate Engineer Re: CDP 08-04, SDP 08-01, MS 08-01 Blue Condominium APN 204-231-10 Engineering Department staff has completed a review ofthe above referenced project. Staff has reviewed the submittal for completeness and has determined that the application and plans submitted for the project are complete. Prior to next submittal, it is suggested the following items are adequately addressed. Additional items of concern maybe identified upon review next submittal. Remaining Issues: 1) According to Mr. Sukup's vehicle turn around study, vehicles from units A and B must make a 5-point turn and a 4-point tum respectively in order to get out of the proposed driveway facing forward. As previously verified by city staff, a turnaround movement is not feasible with the current parking garage layout. It is unlikely that a driver would risk damaging his/her car or any part of the building structure by making the tight 5-point turn maneuver. For this reason, staff can assume that the cars will be backing out of the driveway if no changes are made to the current proposed layout. As previously requested, please plot on the site plan, the line-of-sight of the driver backing out onto Cherry Street looking east and west. Indicate the available sight distance, measured in feet. Show that there are no obstructions within the line of sight. Make sure that the proposed site walls on either side ofthe driveway do not obstruct the sight distance. Caltrans sight distance is measured from a driver's position, assumed to be ten feet behind the projection ofthe curb. (Note that Mr. Sukup's sight distance exhibit shows the driver's position at 17 feet behind the curb, significantly limiting the available sight distance.) 2) Please avoid using pervious pavers on portions of the driveway where slopes exceeds 15%. Community & Economic Development 1635 Faraday Ave. I Carlsbad, CA 92008 I 760-602-2710 I 760-602-8560 fax www.carlsbadca.gov 1^- Blue Condominiums ^••^ June 20, 2011 Page 2 3) The driveway profile on sheet 2 shows 22% grade break. Please revise driveway grades to provide a smooth transition with grade breaks do not exceeding 14%. Please refer to the attached Design Standard, DS-7. 4) Comply with comments shown on red on the redlined plans. 5) Please include the following in the next submittal: a) Revised preliminary grading plan. b) Previous redlined plans. If you have any questions, please either see or call me at 760-602-2733. Attachment: redlined site plan cc: file CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR CONDITIONS DATE: JUNE 1. 2011 FINAL REVISED PLANS INCLUDED ^ TO: IEI LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING - TERIE ROWLEY n POLICE DEPARTMENT-J. SASWAY ^ FIRE DEPARTMENT - GREG RYAN • BUILDING DEPARTMENT-WILL FOSS n RECREATION - MARK STEYAERT n LANDSCAPE PLANCHECK CONSULTANT - PELA • PARKS/TRAILS - LIZ KETABIAN • M & O-CMWD - STEVE PLYLER •ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR CONDITIONS ON PROJECT NO(S): SDP 08-01/CDP 08-04/CP 08-01 PROJECTTITLE: BLUE CONDOMINIUMS APPLICANT: BUCK THOMPSON PROPOSAL: 1 LOT 2 UNIT OPEN SPACE CONDO COMPLEX Please review and submit written conditions to the PLANNING TRACKING DESK in the Planning Division at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by 6/22/11. If you have "No Conditions", please so state. Please note that time is of the essence, as the staff report preparation has begun. If you have any questions, please contact SHANNON WERNEKE. at 4621. THANKYOU COMMENTS: c: File Request for Conditions 3/10 Shi June 7,2011 TO: Shannon Wemeke, Associate Planner Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner Bridget Desmarais, Administrative Secretary Sabrina Michelson, Senior OfFice Specialist FROM: Michael Elliott, City of Carlsbad's Contract Landscape Architect RE: Landscape Architectural Review - Conceptual Review - 4* Review Blue Condominiums, CP08-01, CDP08-04 Cherry Avenue PELA file: 312 - Blue Condominiums - Con4 Landscape Architect: Darsono Design Associates, Phone: (858) 541-2007 All previous comments have been satisfactorily addressed. CITY OF CARLSBAD Q REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE: OCTOBER 22,2010 REVIEW NO: 3 TO: 1^ Engineering, Development Services - Terie Rowley • Police Department - J. Sasway 13 Fire Department - James Weigand • Building Department - Will Foss n Recreation - Mark Steyaert • Public Works Department (streets) - Thomas Moore • Water/Sewer District 13 Landscape Plancheck Consultant - PELA • School District • North County Transit District - Planning Department n Sempra Energy - Land Management n Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) • Parks/Trails - Liz Ketabian *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DIVISION REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON PROJECT NO(S): SDP 08-01/CP 08- 01/CDP 08-04 PROJECTTITLE: Blue Condominiums APPLICANT: Buck Thompson PROPOSAL: 1 lot 2 unit open space condo complex. Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to PLANNING TRACKING DESK, in the Planning Division at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by 11/11/10 . If you have "No Comments", please so state. Thank you COMMENTS DATE: t/p2-|r^ri PLANS ATTACHED Review & Comment 09/07 CARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT Fire Protection Services PROJECT REVIEW REPORT PROJECT NAME: Blue Condo: numms Date: 11/12/10 Project number: SDP 08-01 / CDP 08-04 Staff Planner: S. Werneke Engineer: Initial review: (Note: This report identifies fire protection issues associated with the project, and/or prescribes specific corrections or information needed to achieve Fire Department approval.) FIRE has reviewed this submittal and would offer the following comments: This project shall include the installation of a Fire Sprinkler system designed to National Fire Protection Association 13-R standards and if equal to or more than 100 sprinkler head count, shall also require that this system be monitored by a UL listed Central Station monitoring company, which will require the installation of a sprinkler monitoring system designed to NFPA 72 standards. This requirement shall also require that a separate and accessible location for the fire sprinkler riser and alarm panel be provided. Additionally, it is imperative that the w: ir supply for the fire sprinkler system be considered at this time so that the location of the backflow device is plotted with the appropriate easements, or if the sprink' i ; ? to be fed by the domestic supply that the proper meter size (Domestic + Sprinkler demand= GPM), boxes and easements are made. GR ^ CITY OF CARLSBAD W , , i REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO K^iA^iM^ DATE: OCTOBER 22.2010 REVIEW NO: 3 TO; ^ Engineering, Development Services - Terie Rowley O Police Department - J. Sasway I S-cL^-- K 3 Fire Department - James Weigand O Building Department - Will Foss O Recreation - Mark Steyaert O Public Works Department (streets) - Thomas Moore • Water/Sewer District 3 Landscape Plancheck Consultant - PELA • School District • North County Transit District - Planning Department n Sempra Energy - Land Management n Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) n Parks/T rails - Liz Ketabian *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DIVISION REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON PROJECT NO(S): SDP 08-01/CP 08- 01/CDP 08-04 PROJECT TITLE: Blue Condominiums APPLICANT: Buck Thompson PROPOSAL: 1 lot 2 unit open space condo complex. Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to PLANNING TRACKING DESK, in the Planning Division at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by 11/11/10 . If you have "No Comments", please so state. Thank you COMMENTS: DATE: It) \0 PLANS ATTACHED Review & Comment 09/07 ^ c o CITY OF ^ CARLSBAD Memorandum November 08, 2010 To: Shannon Werneke, Associate Planner From: Tecla Levy, Associate Engineer Re: CDP 08-04, SDP 08-01, MS 08-01 Blue Condominium APN 204-231-10 Engineering Department staff has completed a review ofthe above referenced project. Staff has reviewed the submittal for completeness and has determined that the application and plans submitted for the project are complete. Priorto next submittal, it is suggested the following items are adequately addressed. Additional items of concern maybe identified upon review next submittal. Remaining Issues: 1) Item no. 1 in the previous comment letter dated January 26, 2009 (see attached) is not sufficiently addressed. The revised driveway design showing a maximum grade of 20% is not in accordance with Engineering Standard Chapter 4.I.G. Please submit a letter of request for waiver of Engineering Standard Chapter 4.I.G for city engineer consideration. Include documentations to justify the waiver request. 2) Item no. 2 in the previous comment letter dated January 26, 2009 (see attached) is not sufficiently addressed. As confirmed by the vehicle drive aisle turnaround study shown on sheet A. 12, the proposed parking layout would potentially force guests and Unit B residents to make a three-point turn or to back out onto the public street with limited visibility if an obstruction or a car is parked in front ofthe Unit A garage and/or if the car has a turning radius larger than 22 feet. On sheet 2 of the preliminary grading plan, please show the line-of-sight of the driver backing out onto the Cherry Street looking east and west onto Cherry Avenue using Caltrans guidelines (corner sight distance). Show that there are no obstructions within the line of sight. Show that the proposed retaining walls in either side ofthe driveway do not obstruct sight distance. 3) Garage floor drains from unit "A" and "B" are shown connected to proposed storm drain storm drain at basement level. Floor drains within a covered building structure shall not be connected into street storm drain system. They may be connected to the sewer system. Community & Economic Development j^^P 1635 Faraday Ave. I Carlsbad, CA 92008 I 760-602-2710 I 760-602-8560 fax I www.carlsbadca.gov Blue CondominiunW ^ November 08, 2010 Page 2 4) Please comply with item no. 7 in the previous comment letter dated January 26, 2009 (see attached). Submit an updated Storm Water Standard Questionnaire. It appears that this project is not a priority project is not required to submit a SWMP. However, the project is required to incorporate Low Impact Design (LID) features in the development design. 5) The revised plan does not appear to comply with city SUSMP, standard storm water requirements. The revised plan does not show any "LID" facility. City SUSMP requires roof drains be routed to landscape area prior to discharge into a storm drain system. The revised plan shows that roof drains are directly connected to the basement level storm drain system. LID facility such as rain barrel and flow-through planters with under drain, (see attached) are feasible alternatives. They can be installed around the perimeter at the ground floor level where roof drains can be routed. Under drains can then be connected to street storm drain system. Incorporating LID features at the ground level will result in a significantly reduced volume of water proposed to be pumped into the street from the basement level. Note that only storm run-off from the exposed driveway must be pumped into the street. Pumping large volume of concentrated water into the street is not allowed unless volume is controlled so it does become a public hazard. Note that pumping untreated storm water from the basement directly into the street is prohibited. 6) Submit revised hydrology report to include revised storm drain system suggested above. 7) Show the location ofthe nearest fire hydrant. 8) Show the location of existing storm drain along Cherry Street. 9) Provide existing and proposed contours on-site and at least 50 feet beyond property lines. Show also existing adjacent structures. 10) Comply with comments on the red-lined site plan/grading plan. 11) Please include the following in the next submittal: a) Revised hydrology report. b) Revised storm water standard questionnaire. c) A letter of request for waiver of Engineering Standard Chapter 4.I.G. Include a sight distance exhibit showing the line-of-sight of the driver backing out onto Blue Condominiumlw'' November 08, 2010 Page 3 the Cherry Street looking east and west onto Cherry Avenue using Caltrans guidelines (corner sight distance). d) Revised preliminary grading plan that complies with the above comments. If you have any questions, please either see or call me at 760-602-2733. Attachment: redlined site plan cc: file October 28, 2010 TO: Shannon Wemeke, Associate Planner Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner Bridget Desmarais, Administrative Secretary FROM: Michael Elliott, City of Carlsbad's Contract Landscape Architect RE: Landscape Architectural Review - Conceptual Review - 3^** Review Blue Condominiums, CP08-01, CDP08-04 Cherry Avenue PELA file: 312 - Blue Condominiums - Con3 Landscape Architect: Darsono Design Associates, Phone: (858) 541-2007 Please advise the applicant to make the following corrections to the plans so that they will meet the requirements of the City of Carlsbad's Landscape Manual. Numbers below are referenced on the red line plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area ofthe comment concem. REPEAT COMMENTS I- 9 Completed. 10. Provide a Water Conservation Plan in conjunction with the Landscape Concept Plan. This plan shall demonstrate to thc City how the proposed development will use all practical means available to conserve water in tho landscape. Plans shall include but not be limited to: a. Extent of Planting Zone 1 (Lush)—Indicate percentage of Zone 1 planting (per Appendix A) of the total landscaped area (as defined in Appendix G). Provide justification for thc appropriateness of where Zone 1 plantings are used in terms of water conservation. (For example, are Zone 1 plantings in areas of shade where they will use less water and/or has thc soil been suitably amended so as to retain relatively greater moisture?) 2""^ Review: Turf is a zone I planting. Please revise water conservation plan and revise calculations accordingly. b-e Completed. II- 13 Completed. 14 RETURN REDLINES and provide 2 copies of all plans (concept, water conservation, and colored water use plan) on the next submittal. NEW COMMENTS 1 A. Please add a legend to sheet L.3.0 indicating the color blue as areas to be irrigated with domestic (potable) water. CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO i=aU5|a.2i^ DATE: OCTOBER 22.2010 REVIEW NO: 3 TO: 13 Engineering, Development Services - Terie Rowley [_a/M^ n Police Department - J. Sasway I S-'LA^- K 13 Fire Department - James Weigand • Building Department - Will Foss • Recreation - Mark Steyaert • Public Works Department (streets) - Thomas Moore • Water/Sewer District 13 Landscape Plancheck Consultant - PELA • School District ' ' • North County Transit District - Planning Department n Sempra Energy - Land Management O Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) • Parks/Trails - Liz Ketabian *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DIVISION REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON PROJECT NO(S): SDP 08-01/CP 08- 01/CDP 08-04 PROJECTTITLE: Blue Condominiums APPLICANT: Buck Thompson PROPOSAL: 1 lot 2 unit open space condo complex. Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to PLANNING TRACKING DESK, in tlie Planning Division at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by 11/11/10 . If you have "No Comments", please so state. Thank you COMMENTS: \0 DATE: PLANS ATTACHED Review & Comment 09/07 City of Carlsbad ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMORANDUM January 26, 2009 TO: Shannon Werneke, Planning FROM: Tecla Levy, Engineering SUBJECT: CDP 08-04, SDP 08-01 Blue Condominium APN 204-231-10 Engineering Department staff has completed a second review of the above referenced project. Staff has reviewed the submittal for completeness and has determined that the application and plans submitted for the project are incomplete. Additional items of concern maybe identified upon review next submittal. Prior to next submittal, it is suggested the following items are adequately addressed: INCOMPLETE ITEMS: 1) Please revise driveway design to show a maximum grade of 15% in accordance with Engineering Standard Chapter 4.1.G. Engineering staff cannot support a driveway slope variance from 15% to 21%. The proposed parking layout would potentially force guests and Unit B residents to back out onto the public street with limited visibility if an obstruction or a car is parked in front of the Unit A garage and/or if the car has turning radius larger than 21 feet. 2) Indicate the line-of-sight at the driveway entrance looking east and west onto Cherry Avenue using Caltrans guidelines (corner sight distance). Verify no conflicts exist. REMAINING ISSUES: 3) On the plan, indicate the location and elevation of the high point at the driveway entrance. The high point elevation must be higher than the existing top of curb elevation to ensure that no street drainage enters the driveway. 4) The driveway slope shown on the architectural plan does not agree with the driveway slopes shown on the civil plans. Please revise to be consistent. 5) Show details of the proposed storm water detention system on the plans. 6) Please comply with all minor comments shown on the red-lined plans. CDP 08-04, SDP 08-01 Blue Condominium 7) Please revise sheet 3 of the Storm Water Standard Questionnaire to include applicant's name and signature. Note to engineer: According to the project's Storm Water Standards Questionnaire, this project is a not a priority project. Non-priority projects not required to submit a Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) report (please see City of Carlsbad current Storm Water Manual). However, all projects are required to comply with the City storm water regulations including Low Impact Development (LID) design requirements as already shown on this plan. 8) The summary tables shown on page 3 and 4 of the hydrology report shows a Time of Concentration (TC) of 420 minutes. This appears to be incorrect or mislabeled. On the calculations shown on Appendix C, the 420 minutes appears to be the detention storage time and not time of concentration (Tc). Please check and revise as necessary for clarity. 9) Please comply with the red-lined comments shown on Appendix C, proposed conditions calculations. Some input data used in the calculations such as initial length of travel, slopes, manning's n appear incorrect (see comments shown in red). Please check and revise calculations as necessary. The revisions may not result in significant changes to the calculated Q's since all calculated initial Tc's were less than the 5 minutes minimum, which the program used in the calculations. 10) The redlined check print and hydrology report are enclosed for the applicant's use in making the requested revisions. Please return the redlined check print and hydrology report with the next submittal to facilitate continued staff review. This review does not constitute a complete review of the proposed project and additional items of concern, as well as comments on technical and design issues may be identified upon submission of the above items. If you have any questions, please either see or call me at 760-602-2733. Page 2 of2 January 15,2009 TO: Sharmon Wemeke, Associate Planner Michele Masterson, Senior Management Analyst Meghan Jacobson, Senior Office Specialist FROM: Michael Elliott, City of Carlsbad's Contract Landscape Architect RE: Landscape Architectural Review - Conceptual Review - 2"^ Review Blue Condominiums, CP08-01, CDP08-04 Cherry Avenue PELA file: 312 - Blue Condominiums - Con2 Landscape Architect: Darsono Design Associates, Phone: (858) 541-2007 Please advise the applicant to make the following corrections to the plans so that they will meet the requirements of the City of Carlsbad's Landscape Manual. Numbers below are referenced on the red line plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area of the comment concem. REPEAT COMMENTS I- 9 Completed. 10. Provide a Water Conser\^ation Plan in conjunction with the Landscape Concept Plan. This plan shall demonstrate to the City how the proposed development will use all practical moons available to conserve w^ater in the landscape. Plans shall include but not be limited to: a. Extent of Planting Zone 1 (Lush)—Indicate percentage of Zone 1 planting (per Appendix A) of the total landscaped area (as defined in Appendix G). Provide justification for the appropriateness of where Zone 1 plantings ore used in terms of water conser\^ation. (For example, are Zone 1 plantings in areas of shade where they will use less water and/or has the soil been suitably amended so as to retain relatively greater moisture?) 2"^ Review: Turf is a zone 1 planting. Please revise water conservation plan and revise calculations accordingly. b-d Completed. e. Colored water use plan separately outlining areas that wdll use either recycled or potable water. 2"'^ Review: Tlie plan has been forwarded to Public Works Maintenance and Operations for review. Any comments will be forwarded bacii to the applicant. II- 13 Completed. 14. RETURN REDLINES and provide 2 copies of all plans (concept, water conservation, and colored water use plan) on the next submittal. DATE: TO: CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO JANUARY 8. 2009 REVIEW NO: 2 FROM: 13 Engineering, Development Services - Terie Rowley • Police Department - J. Sasway 3 Fire Department - Greg Ryan • Building Department - Will Foss n Recreation - Mark Steyaert Q Public Works Department (streets) - Thomas Moore • ^Water/Sewer District 3 Landscape Plancheck Consultant - PELA • School District • North County Transit District - Planning Department n Sempra Energy - Land Management • Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) • Parks/Trails - Liz Ketabian *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON PROJECT NO(S): SDP 08-01/ CDP 08-04/ CP 08-01 PROJECT TITLE: BLUE CONDOMINIUMS APPLICANT: WYNN ENGINEERING PROPOSAL: 1 LOT 2 UNIT OPEN SPACE CONDO COMPLEX Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to MEGHAN JACOBSON. Senior Office Specialist in the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by 01/23/09 . If you have "No Comments", please so state. If you have any questions, please contact SHANNON WERNEKE , at X4621 . SMENTS: fluuu /ua O^^^/W^ (JT)n^Ji^ ^ PLANS ATTACHED Review & Comment 09/07 January 15, 2009 ^^'^'l^J^l^^ TO: Shannon Wemeke, Associate Planner Michele Masterson, Senior Management Analyst Meghan Jacobson, Senior Office Specialist FROM: Michael Elliott, City of Carlsbad's Contract Landscape Architect RE: Landscape Architectural Review - Conceptual Review - 2"** Review Blue Condominiums, CP08-01, CDP08-04 Cherry Avenue PELA file: 312 - Blue Condominiums - Con2 Landscape Architect: Darsono Design Associates, Phone: (858) 541-2007 Please advise the applicant to make the following corrections to the plans so that they will meet the requirements of the City of Carlsbad's Landscape Manual. Numbers below are referenced on the red line plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area of the comment concern. REPEAT COMMENTS I- 9 Completed. 10. Provide a Water Conservation Plan in conjunction with the Landscape Concept Plan. This plan shall demonstrate to the City how the proposed development will use all practical means available to conserve water in the landscape. Plans shall include but not be limited to: a. Extent of Planting Zone 1 (Lush)—Indicate percentage of Zone 1 planting (per Appendix A) of the total landscaped area (as defined in Appendix G). Provide justification for the appropriateness of where Zone 1 plantings are used in terms of water conservation. (For example, are Zone 1 plantings in areas of shade where they will use less water and/or has the soil been suitably amended so as to retain relatively greater moisture?) 2"*^ Review: Turf is a zone I planting. Please revise water conservation plan and revise calculations accordingly. b-d Completed. e. Colored water use plan separately outlining areas that will use either recycled or potable water. 2"'^ Review: The plan has been forwarded to Public Works Maintenance and Operations for review. Any comments will be forwarded back to the applicant. II- 13 Completed. 14 RETURN REDLINES and provide 2 copies of all plans (concept, water conservation, and colored water use plan) on the next submittal. City of Carlsbad ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMORANDUM January 26, 2009 TO: Shannon Werneke, Planning FROM: Tecla Levy, Engineering SUBJECT: CDP 08-04, SDP 08-01 Blue Condominium APN 204-231-10 Engineering Department staff has completed a second review of the above referenced project. Staff has reviewed the submittal for completeness and has determined that the application and plans submitted for the project are incomplete. Additional items of concern maybe identified upon review next submittal. Prior to next submittal, it is suggested the following items are adequately addressed: INCOMPLETE ITEMS: 1) Please revise driveway design to show a maximum grade of 15% in accordance with Engineering Standard Chapter 4.1.G. Engineering staff cannot support a driveway slope variance from 15% to 21%. The proposed parking layout would potentially force guests and Unit B residents to back out onto the public street with limited visibility if an obstruction or a car is parked in front of the Unit A garage and/or ifthe car has turning radius larger than 21 feet. 2) Indicate the line-of-sight at the driveway entrance looking east and west onto Cherry Avenue using Caltrans guidelines (corner sight distance). Verify no conflicts exist. REMAINING ISSUES: 3) On the plan, indicate the location and elevation of the high point at the driveway entrance. The high point elevation must be higher than the existing top of curb elevation to ensure that no street drainage enters the driveway. 4) The driveway slope shown on the architectural plan does not agree with the driveway slopes shown on the civil plans. Please revise to be consistent. 5) Show details of the proposed storm water detention system on the plans. 6) Please comply with all minor comments shown on the red-lined plans. CDP 08-04, SDP 08-01 Blue Condominium 7) Please revise sheet 3 of the Storm Water Standard Questionnaire to include applicant's name and signature. Note to engineer: According to the project's Storm Water Standards Questionnaire, this project is a not a priority project. Non-priority projects not required to submit a Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) report (please see City of Carlsbad current Storm Water Manual). However, all projects are required to comply with the City storm water regulations including Low Impact Development (LID) design requirements as already shown on this plan. 8) The summary tables shown on page 3 and 4 of the hydrology report shows a Time of Concentration (TC) of 420 minutes. This appears to be incorrect or mislabeled. On the calculations shown on Appendix C, the 420 minutes appears to be the detention storage time and not time of concentration (Tc). Please check and revise as necessary for clarity. 9) Please comply with the red-lined comments shown on Appendix C, proposed conditions calculations. Some input data used in the calculations such as initial length of travel, slopes, manning's n appear incorrect (see comments shown in red). Please check and revise calculations as necessary. The revisions may not result in significant changes to the calculated Q's since all calculated initial Tc's were less than the 5 minutes minimum, which the program used in the calculations. 10) The redlined check print and hydrology report are enclosed for the applicant's use in making the requested revisions. Please return the redlined check print and hydrology report with the next submittal to facilitate continued staff review. This review does not constitute a complete review of the proposed project and additional items of concern, as well as comments on technical and design issues may be identified upon submission of the above items. If you have any questions, please either see or call me at 760-602-2733. Page 2 of2 PLANNING DEPT CARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT JR^CKIHG OESK Fi>e Protection Services REC D'-^iJ^iH— PROJECT REVIEW REPORT PROJECT NAME: Blue Condominiums Date: 01/14/09 Project number: SDP 08-01 / CDP 08-04 Staff Planner: S. Werneke Engineer: Initial review: (Note: This report identifies fire protection issues associated with the project, and/or prescribes specific corrections or information needed to achieve Fire Department approval.) FIRE has reviewed this submittal and has no comments and or conditions at this time. GR CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE: JANUARY 24.2008 REVIEW NO: 1 TO: ^ Engineering, Development Services - Terie Rowley ^ Police Department - J. Sasway ^ Fire Department - Greg Ryan njiaiiilCrClfi^^ 13 Building Department - Will Foss ^jSH^SoF^ • Recreation - Mark Steyaert ^^5S?^2\0 *- • Public Works Department (streets) - Thomas Moor|88tyOv.i(-^ n Water/Sewer District ^ Landscape Plancheck Consultant - PELA • School District O North County Transit District - Planning Department • Sempra Energy - Land Management • Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) O Parks/Trails - Liz Ketabian *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON PROJECT NO(S): CP 08-01/CDP 08-04 PROJECT TITLE: BLUE CONDOMINIUMS APPLICANT: BUCK THOMPSON/ PI ARC DESIGN PROPOSAL: 1 LOT. 2 UNIT OPEN AIR SPACE CONDO Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to MEGHAN JACOBSON. Senior Office Specialist in the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, bv 02/13/08 . If you have "No Comments", please so state. If you have any questions, please contact SHANNON WERNEKE . at X4621 . Thank you ^ r . COMMENTS: ^^^i^^t fsuL B'\}iim(>- ^m^oi^ni<^. PtY^i/mm^ PLANS ATTACHED Review & Comment 09/07 February 13, 2008 Attn: Mr. Barry Blue 5138 Delaney Ct Carlsbad, CA 92008 MS 08-01: BLUE MINOR SUBDIVISION INCOMPLETE APPLICATION & INITIAL ISSUES REVIEW Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits within the City of Carlsbad. Engineering Department staff has reviewed the tentative parcel map as to its completeness for processing. The application is considered incomplete, as submitted. Although the initial processing of the application may have already begun, the technical acceptance date will be acknowledged at the date that the application is found complete. Staff may, in the course of processing the application, request that you clarify, correct, or othenwise supplement the basic information required for the application. ENGINEERING INCOMPLETE ITEMS: 1. Storm Water Management Plan must comply with the RWQCB 2007 order. "Low Impact Development" (LID) design must be incorporated into the plan. See issues of concern item 13 to 15. 2. Revise the Preliminary Hydrology Report to comply with comments below. See issues of concern item 9 to 12. ENGINEERING ISSUES: Tentative Map/ Site Plan: 1. Add MS 08-01 in the upper right hand corner. 2. Please identify all existing improvements along Cherry Avenue, including but not limited to (paving, access-holes, inlets, power poles, street lights, adjacent driveways, vaults, transformers, etc.). 3. Provide Cherry Avenue cross-section and show approximate locations existing utilities. 4. Provide adequate spot elevations to determine direction of drainage. Please field verify for any off-site drainage basins that may affect the site and include in the analysis as necessary. Topo shows that the adjacent property to the North drains towards the project site. 5. The site plan shows proposed retaining walls immediately adjacent to existing walls (labeled to remain) along the Northem and Southern property boundary. Please show how this is accomplished without impacts to existing walls and adjacent property. Provide multiple cross-sections of the site to demonstrate differences in grade and retaining wall heights (both proposed and existing). Obtain recommendations from the soil engineer. Show preliminary details of Temporary shoring if required by soil's engineer. 6. Show how passenger vehicles will maneuver in and out of the driveway and the parking stalls. Using the template of Caltrans for passenger design vehicle with a minimum of 24-foot turning radius, show the inside and outside tire tracks on all critical turns. 7. The plan shows washer and dryer are located at the underground parking level. This requires a pump sewer system. Please show and indicate location 8. Revise the design of driveway slopes to incorporate 10-foot vertical curves at all significant grade breaks to ensure vehicular clearances are maintained. Hydrology Report 9. The coefficient of run-off, C, used in calculating the storm water discharge rate appears incorrect. The C value was directly taken from Table 3-1 of the hydrology manual instead of calculating the C based on the actual percent impervious area as shown on the proposed plan. Please note that the values provided in the hydrology manual tables are based on average conditions to serve as guide for design engineers and its applicability to specific project requires good engineering judgment. Please review and revise accordingly. 10. On page 5 of the hydrology report, the Tc for Basin 1 appears incorrect (too high). The FAA equation is applicable to sheet flow conditions and appears not applicable in this case. The channel flow is more appropriate. Also, initial time of concentration for basin 1 was taken directly from the Table and appears incorrect. Please clarify where the initial drainage area and calculate the initial time of concentration based on the actual condition, (in this case appears to be roof gutter flow?). 11. It appears that there will be significant increase in run-off. Provide mitigations for any increases in run-off caused by the proposed development. Show that the post-development Q does not exceed the pre-development Q. 12. Please comply with all comments shown in red in the hydrology report. SWMP: 13. Please revise SWMP report to comply with the RWQCB order 2007. 14. Please incorporate "low Impact Development" (LID) in the project design as required by RWQCB order 2007. 15. The current SUSMP requirement classifies Filter Inserts as ineffective treatment BMP. Filterjnserts are no longer acceptable as numerically sized treatment BMP. It can be used as part of the treatment train. Please provide an acceptable BMP that will effectively treat the pollutants of concerns identified in this project. 16. Address redlined comments on the tentative parcel map. PLANNING ISSUES: 1. Planning Department comments will be provided with CDP 08-04 and CP 08- 01 comment letter. FIRE ISSUES: 1. Fire Department has reviewed this application and shall require that the applicant provide an Automatic Fire Sprinkler (NFPA 13D Standard). This requirement will include an appropriately sized water meter greater than or equal to one inch and water line sized to accommodate fire flow plus domestic (including landscape) demand. If you have any questions regarding the engineering issues of concern, please contact me, your project engineer, at (760) 602-2733. Tecla Levy, PE Associate Engineer Attach: Redlined Tentative Parcel Map Storm Water Requirements Applicability Checklist File David Hauser - Deputy City Engineer ^ .» CITY OF CARLSBAD "^^^ '{V^\<'1S •T**^ * REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE: JANUARY 24.2008 REVIEW NO: 1 TO: ^ Engineering, Development Services - Terie Rowley ^ Police Department-J. Sasway ^ Fire Department - Greg Ryan 3 Building Department - Will Foss • Recreation - Mark Steyaert • Public Works Department (streets) - Thomas Moore • Water/Sewer District ^ Landscape Plancheck Consultant - PELA • School District • North County Transit District - Planning DeiP||^||||||||0 OtfT n Sempra Energy - Land Management *f||ACKi|(0 • Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) nfg^ftt, ^ /1 / Q 6 • Parks/Trails - Liz Ketabian / *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON PROJECT NO(S): CP 08-01/CDP 08-04 PROJECT TITLE: BLUE CONDOMINIUMS APPLICANT: BUCK THOMPSON/ PI ARC DESIGN PROPOSAL: 1 LOT, 2 UNIT OPEN AIR SPACE CONDO Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to MEGHAN JACOBSON. Senior Office Specialist in the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by 02/13/08 . If you have "No Comments", please so state. If you have any questions, please contact SHANNON WERNEKE . at X4621 . Thank you COMMENTS: PLANS ATTACHED Review & Comment 09/07 nANNMGOBPI mi(Mm(mii January 30, 2008 ^^Egfl; 1j3l//1g TO: Shannon Wemeke, Associate Planner Michele Masterson, Management Analyst Meghan Jacobson, Senior Office Specialist FROM: Michael Elliott, City of Carlsbad's Contract Landscape Architect RE: Landscape Architectural Review - Conceptual Review - 1^ Review Blue Condominiums, CP08-01, CDP08-04 Cherry Avenue PELA file: 312 - Blue Condominiums - Conl Landscape Architect: Darsono Design Associates, Phone: (858) 541-2007 Please advise the applicant to make the following corrections to the plans so that they will meet the requirements of the City of Carlsbad's Landscape Manual. Numbers below are referenced on the red line plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area of the comment concem. 1. Please show and label all property lines, right-of-ways and easements on the plans. Insure no trees are located within easements. 2. Please indicate the proposed quantities of trees and shmbs in the legend. 3. All planting areas shall be outlined as one of the four planting zones below and described in Appendix A: Zone One Lush Zone Two Refined Zone Three Naturalizing/Transitional Zone Four Native 4. Indicate the following percentages: a. Percent of the total site used for landscaping. b. Percent of the landscaped area (as defined in Appendix G) of each planting zone as described in Section A.5-3 and Appendix A. 5. Outline the areas of landscape maintenance responsibilities (private, common area/homeovraers' association. City, etc.). 6. Show any bio-swales/detention basins or underground drainage collection systems (in or under planting areas that could impact the planting) and work these facilities into the design. 7. Landscaping consisting of ground cover, shmbs, and trees shall be used to screen elements of unsightliness and screen/soften new improvements. Landscaping shall be used to accentuate and enhance architecture. Please incorporate minimum medium size trees along the east and west sides of the building to soften and enhance the building elevations. A minimum of 3 groupings of 2-3 trees is needed. Please also incorporate a minimum of one medium size tree on the south side of the building. 8. Landscape elements over 30" in height (including planting measured at maturity) are not allowed at street comers within a triangular zone drawn from two points, 25' outward from the beginning of curves and end of curves. (See Appendix C.4). The same height Blue Condominiums, CP08-01, CDP08-04 January 30, 2008 Conceptual Plan Review Page 2 limitation applies at driveways 25' fi-om the edge of the apron outward along the curb then 45-degrees in toward the property. Please show sight lines on the plans and address landscaping. 9. All utilities are to be screened. Landscape constmction drawings will be required to show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. 10. Provide a Water Conservation Plan in conjunction with the Landscape Concept Plan. This plan shall demonstrate to the City how the proposed development will use all practical means available to conserve water in the landscape. Plans shall include but not be limited to: a. Extent of Planting Zone 1 (Lush) - Indicate percentage of Zone 1 planting (per Appendix A) of the total landscaped area (as defined in Appendix G). Provide justification for the appropriateness of where Zone 1 plantings are used in terms of water conservation. (For example, are Zone 1 plantings in areas of shade where they will use less water and/or has the soil been suitably amended so as to retain relatively greater moisture?) b. Proposed turf areas. (See limitations in IV.C.3-4.2) Give percentage of turf of the total landscaped area. c. Accommodations for reclaimed water (existing or future) and outline planting areas proposed to use reclaimed water. d. Written description of water conservation features including addressing xeriscape principles (see Appendix B) within the project. e. Colored water use plan separately outlining areas that will use either recycled or potable water. 11. Please identify all symbols in the legend. 12. It is being verified with the Engineering Department whether or not street trees will be allowed in the right-of-way. Direction will be provided with the next review. 13. Queen Palms are used as the street tree along the street to the east of this project. It is recommended that street trees be revised to Queen Palms to match. 14. RETURN REDLINES and provide 2 copies of all plans (concept, water conservation, and colored water use plan) on the next submittal. Q O City of Carlsbad Police Department Date: February 5, 2008 To: Meghan Jacobson, Planning From: J. Sasway, CPS - Police Department Subject: Blue Condominiums, CP 08-01/ CDP 08-04 Plan Review Recommendations Carlsbad Police Department's Crime Prevention Unit has provided the following optimal security recommendations. The purpose of this document is to safeguard property and public welfare by regulating and reviewing the design, construction, quality of materials, use and occupancy, location, and maintenance of all buildings and structures. The standards used in this document represent model international standards. Crime Prevention through Environmental Design The proper design and effective use of the built environment can lead to a reduction in the fear and incidence of crime and an improvement in the quality of life. The proper design influences this by positively affecting human behavior. The design includes the physical environment, the planned behavior of people, the productive use of space and an effective crime/loss prevention program. Natural Surveillance 1. Place and design physical features to maximize visibility. This will include building orientation, windows, entrances, walkways, landscape trees and shrubs, fences and any other physical obstruction. 2. Design the placement of persons and or activities to maximize surveillance possibilities. 3. Design lighting that provides for appropriate nighttime illumination of walkways, entrances and driveways. Natural Access Control 1. Use sidewalks, pavement, lighting and landscaping to clearly guide guests to and from selected entrances. 2. Use real or symbolic barriers like fences or landscaping to prevent and or discourage access to or from dark and or unmonitored areas. Provisions for territorial reinforcement 1. Use pavement treatments, landscaping and fences to define and outline ownership of property. Residential Recommendations Lighting 1. Keep in mind when creating a light plan: placement, intensity, reflection, balance, contrast, color and glare. Eyes see lighter colors better than dark. We loose 90% of the light we use if we place it around dark surfaces without anything to reflect the light. Unshielded lights cause a glare and reduce what they eye can see. 2. All vehicular drive surfaces, open parking areas and carports should be illuminated with 2560 Orion Way • Carlsbad, CA 92010-7240 • (760) 931-2100 • FAX (760) 931-8473 ^ a minimum maintained 1 foot-candle of light at ground level during the hours of darkness. 3. Recessed areas of building or fences, which have a minimum depth of two feet, a minimum height of five feet, and do not exceed 6 feet in width and are capable of human concealment, shall be illuminated with a minimum maintained 0.25 foot- candles of light at ground level during the hours of darkness. This requirement applies to defined recessed areas that are within 6 feet of the edge of designated walking surface with an unobstructed pathway to it, not hindered by walls or hedgerow landscaping a minimum of two feet in height. 4. Accessible luminaries utilized to meet the requirements of this section shall have vandal resistant light fixtures and be not less than three feet in height from the walking surface when used to illuminate walkways and a minimum of 78 inches in height above the driving surface when illuminating surfaces associated with vehicles. Light fixtures shall be deemed accessible if mounted within 15 feet vertically or 6 feet horizontally from any accessible surface or any adjoining roof, balcony, landing, stair tread, platform or similar structure. Landscaping Gates are recommended for the entrances of the units to go with the proposed railing. 1. Plan a landscaping design that enhanced surveillance and security. 2. Tree canopies should be no lower than six (6) feet and should not allow access to roofs or balconies. 3. Let landscaping augment, not deter from lighting and addressing. 4. Plant only low profile shrubs and maintain below two (2) feet. 5. Use security plants where necessary to prevent entering and tampering. 6. Install walls and fences that are see through for surveillance. 7. Install lockable gates that allow surveillance 8. Keep entranceways clear of clutter Addressing 1. Locate numerals where they are clearly visible from the front street. 2. They should be a contrasting color to the background on which they are affixed. 3. Numerals shall be no less than four (4) inches in height and illuminated during the hours of darkness. Entrances 1. Keep entranceways clear of clutter. 2. Ensure you allow vision from the front access street to front door entrance. 3. Protect other accessible first level doors with actual barriers to discourage access. Doors 1. Install wooden doors of solid core construction with a minimum thickness of one and three-fourths (1-3/4) inches or metal doors. This includes the garage or any other pedestriem door. 2. Further, equip all doors with a single cylinder dead-bolt lock using a 5-pin tumbler. Connect the deadbolt to the inner portion of the lock by connecting screws. Ensure the lock has a one-inch throw that can withstand a cutting tool attack. Choose a deadbolt that embeds at least one inch into the strike plate. 3. Arrange all entry and exit doors to dwelling units so that the occupant has a view of the area immediately outside the door without opening the door. Except doors requiring a fire protection rating that prohibits them, a door viewer having a field of view of not less than 190 degrees may provide such a view. Mounting height should not exceed fifty- four inches from the floor. Further, install no glass panels ivithin forty inches ofa locking device. Doors that are partially glass should have a single cylinder dead-bolt lock. Equip these doors with a burglar resistant glaze to prevent someone from breaking the glass to enter the home. Latch covers, deadbolts and hinge pins are suggested on all common area doors and/or garage area doors. Strike Plates Strike plates for deadbolts on all wood framed doors should be constructed of a minimum 16 U.S. gauge steel, bronze, or brass and secure to the jamb by a minimum of two screws, which should penetrate at least two inches into the solid backing beyond the surface to which the strike is attached. Keying 1. Upon occupancy by the owner, each single unit in a tract constructed under the same general plan, should have locks using combinations that are interchange free from locks used in all other separate dwellings. Windows 1. Choose movable windows with security hardware to prevent them from being lifted from the frame or forced to slide. 2. Storage doors should have deadbolt locks as defined earlier and reinforced strike plates. 3. Exterior hinges should have non-removable hinge pins. Parking Concern: The parking area is not controlled and has limited surveillance giving it a greater security risk for the vehicles parked in the area, the people accessing vehicles in the area and the other activities such as the workout room, bathrooms and storage units. Surveillance is the number one deterrent to crime. Where there is limited surveillance the areas should be controlled. Natural Surveillance 1. Natural surveillance is the most critical enclosed parking design issue. Lighting 1. Lighting is an importemt security feature in a parking area as it aides surveillance. The minimum illuminances in any one point should be a maintained minimum of 2 foot- candles. Position lights over vehicles or near beeims rather than in drive aisles to reduce glare. Or choose fixtures with built in shields to reduce glare. Garage Storage 1. Consider reinforcing the dry wall around the storage door to prevented forced entrance around the locking device. 2. Garage storage doors should be equipped with a deadbolt lock as described earlier, a reinforced strike plate and non-removable hinge pins. Access Control Garage area residential entrances doors such as elevators and stairways, as well as other common access doors should have resident access control devises. Mail Boxes I. Mailboxes should be located in highly visible areas adjacent to common areas. This information is a representation of information gathered on a national level. The purpose is to provide effective and consistent information. If you would like additional assistance concerning building security or employee security issues, please contact the Crin;ie Prevention Unit at (760) 931-2105. By, Jodeene R. Sasway Crime Prevention Specialist Carlsbad Police Department (619) 931-2195 CITY OF CARLSBAD laAfiMMOimK REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO Ugg^wu wgw^ DATE: JANUARY 24.2008 REVIEW NO: 1 TO: ^ Engineering, Development Services - Terie Rowley ^ Police Department - J. Sasway ^ Fire Department - Greg Ryan ^ Building Department - Will Foss Q Recreation - Mark Steyaert • Public Works Department (streets) - Thomas Moore O Water/Sewer District ^ Landscape Plancheck Consultant - PELA • School District • North County Transit District - Planning Department • Sempra Energy - Land Management • Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) Q Parks/Trails - Liz Ketabian *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON PROJECT NO(S): CP 08-01/CDP 08-04 PROJECT TITLE: BLUE CONDOMINIUMS APPLICANT: BUCK THOMPSON/ PI ARC DESIGN PROPOSAL: 1 LOT. 2 UNIT OPEN AIR SPACE CONDO Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to MEGHAN JACOBSON. Senior Office Specialist in the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, bv 02/13/08 . If you have "No Comments", please so state. If you have any questions, please contact SHANNON WERNEKE . at X4621 . Thank you PLANS ATTACHED Review & Comment 09/07 o January 30, 2008 TO: Shannon Wemeke, Associate Planner Michele Masterson, Management Analyst Meghan Jacobson, Senior Office Specialist FROM: Michael Elliott, City of Carlsbad's Contract Landscape Architect RE: Landscape Architectural Review - Conceptual Review - 1^' Review Blue Condominiums, CP08-01, CDP08-04 Cherry Avenue PELA file: 312 - Blue Condominiums - Conl Landscape Architect: Darsono Design Associates, Phone: (858) 541-2007 Please advise the applicant to make the following corrections to the plans so that they will meet the requirements of the City of Carlsbad's Landscape Manual. Numbers below are referenced on the red line plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area of the comment concem. 1. Please show and label all property lines, right-of-ways and easements on the plans. Insure no trees are located within easements. 2. Please indicate the proposed quantities of trees and shrubs in the legend. 3. All planting areas shall be outlined as one of the four planting zones below and described in Appendix A: Zone One Lush Zone Two Refined Zone Three Naturalizing/Transitional Zone Four Native 4. Indicate the following percentages: a. Percent of the total site used for landscaping. b. Percent of the landscaped area (as defined in Appendix G) of each planting zone as described in Section A.5-3 and Appendix A. 5. Outline the areas of landscape maintenance responsibilities (private, common area/homeowners' association, City, etc.). 6. Show any bio-swales/detention basins or underground drainage collection systems (in or under planting areas that could impact the planting) and work these facilities into the design. 7. Landscaping consisting of ground cover, shmbs, and trees shall be used to screen elements of unsightliness and screen/soften new improvements. Landscaping shall be used to accentuate and enhance architecture. Please incorporate minimum medium size trees along the east and west sides of the building to soften and enhance the building elevations. A minimum of 3 groupings of 2-3 trees is needed. Please also incorporate a minimum of one medium size tree on the south side of the building. 8. Landscape elements over 30" in height (including planting measured at maturity) are not allowed at street comers within a triangular zone drawn from two points, 25' outward from the beginning of curves and end of curves. (See Appendix C.4). The same height Blue Condominiums, CP08-01, CDP08-04 January 30, 2008 Conceptual Plan Review Page 2 limitation applies at driveways 25' from the edge of the apron outward along the curb then 45-degrees in toward the property. Please show sight lines on the plans and address landscaping. 9. All utilities are to be screened. Landscape constmction drawings will be required to show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. 10. Provide a Water Conservation Plan in conjunction with the Landscape Concept Plan. This plan shall demonsfrate to the City how the proposed development will use all practical means available to conserve water in the landscape. Plans shall include but not be limited to: a. Extent of Planting Zone 1 (Lush) - Indicate percentage of Zone 1 planting (per Appendix A) of the total landscaped area (as defined in Appendix G). Provide justification for the appropriateness of where Zone 1 plantings are used in terms of water conservation. (For example, are Zone 1 plantings in areas of shade where they will use less water and/or has the soil been suitably amended so as to retain relatively greater moisture?) b. Proposed turf areas. (See limitations in IV.C.3-4.2) Give percentage of turf of the total landscaped area. c. Accommodations for reclaimed water (existing or future) and outline planting areas proposed to use reclaimed water. d. Written description of water conservation features including addressing xeriscape principles (see Appendix B) within the project. e. Colored water use plan separately outlining areas that will use either recycled or potable water. 11. Please identify all symbols in the legend. 12. It is being verified with the Engineering Department whether or not street trees will be allowed in the right-of-way. Direction will be provided with the next review. 13. Queen Palms are used as the street tree along the sfreet to the east of this project. It is recommended that street trees be revised to Queen Palms to match. 14. RETURN REDLINES and provide 2 copies of all plans (concept, water conservation, and colored water use plan) on the next submittal. CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE: JANUARY 24,2008 REVIEW NO: 1 TO: ^ Engineering, Development Services - Terie Rowley ^ Police Department - J. Sasway ^ Fire Department - Greg Ryan ^ Building Department - Will Foss • Recreation - Mark Steyaert • Public Works Department (streets) - Thomas Moore • Water/Sewer District ^ Landscape Plancheck Consultant - PELA • School District O North County Transit District - Planning Department • Sempra Energy - Land Management • Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) • Parks/Trails - Liz Ketabian *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON PROJECT NO(S): CP 08-01/ CDP 08-04 PROJECT TITLE: BLUE CONDOMINIUMS APPLICANT: BUCK THOMPSON/ PI ARC DESIGN PROPOSAL: 1 LOT. 2 UNIT OPEN AIR SPACE CONDO Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to MEGHAN JACOBSON. Senior Office Specialist in the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, bv 02/13/08 . If you have "No Comments", please so state. If you have any questions, please contact SHANNON WERNEKE . at X4621 . Thank you COMMENTS: PLANS ATTACHED Review & Comment 09/07 <# CITYOF CARLSBAD Community & Economic Development May 2, 2012 www.carlsbadca.gov Barry J. Blue and Mary T Blue 2950 Ocean Street Carlsbad, CA 92008 PRELIMINARY DECISION LETTER OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP Project ID: MS 08-01 Project Name: Blue Condominiums APN: 204-231-10-00 The city engineer has completed a review ofthe application for a tentative parcel map located at 150 & 152 Cherry Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008. The city engineer has made a preliminary decision pursuant to Section 20.24.120 ofthe City of Carisbad Municipal Code to approve this tentative parcel map based on the findings and subject to the conditions listed below. Please review the following findings and conditions for this tentative parcel map. If you have concerns or comments, you may request a review of this preliminary decision in writing. Such request must be received by the city engineer within 10 calendar days of the date of this preliminary approval. Upon receiving such written request, the city engineer will arrange a time and place for such review. If after 10 days no request is made, or following a requested review ofthis preliminary approval, the city engineer will issue a final approval letter for this tentative parcel map. Findings: 2. That the city planner has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15315 (Minor Land Division) of the state CEQA Guidelines and will not have any adverse significant impact on the environment in that the property is in an urbanized area; zoned for residential; is being subdivided into four or fewer parcels; all services for the lots are available; the parcel was not part of a larger subdivision within the last two years; and the parcel does not have an average slope greater than 20 percent. The city engineer has determined that: a) The proposed map and the proposed design and improvement of the subdivision, as conditioned, is consistent with and satisfies all requirements of the General Plan, any applicable specific plans. Titles 20 and 21 ofthe Carlsbad Municipal Code and the State Subdivision Map Act, in that the lots being created satisfy all minimum requirements Land Development Engineering Division 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-2740 F 760-602-1052 ® Blue Condominium W' May 2, 2012 Page 2 of Title 20 regarding lot sizes and configuration and have been designed to comply with all other applicable regulations; and, b) The site is physically suitable for the type and density ofthe development proposed, in that the proposed subdivision meets all development standards for the creation of a standard lot in terms of access, minimum lot size, lot width and setbacks; and, c) The design of the subdivision and improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially and avoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat, in that the proposed development does not contain any significant habitat and no significant wildlife or habitat will be impacted by the project; and, d) The design of the subdivision and improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems, and the discharge of storm water from the subdivision complies with current California Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements and the City of Carlsbad Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) requirements, in thatthe developer has submitted a Storm Water Standards Questionnaire and determined that the project is not a Priority Development Project. The project is conditioned to comply with Standard Storm Water Requirements and incorporate Low Impact Design (LID) techniques; and, e) The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements of record or easements established by court judgment, or acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, in that the developer shall delineate and preserve on the parcel map, all existing easements of record; and, f) The property is not subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the Land Conservation Act of 1965 (Williamson Act); CONDITIONS: Unless specifically stated in the condition, all of the following conditions, upon the approval of this tentative parcel map, must be met prior to approval of a final parcel map, building permit, or grading permit, whichever is first. General 1. This approval is granted subject to the approval of SDP 08-01, CDP 08-04 and PUD 12-01 and is subject to all conditions for those other approvals. 2. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site within this project, developer shall apply for and obtain approval from the city engineer for the proposed haul route. 3. The project is approved with the express condition that building permits will not be issued for the development of the subject property unless the city/district engineer determines that sewer/water facilities are avaiiabie at the time of permit issuance and will continue to be Blue Condominium May 2, 2012 Page 3 available until time of occupancy. 4. Developer shall submit to the city engineer a reproducible 24" x 36" photo mylar of the tentative parcel map reflecting the conditions approved by the final decision-making body. The reproducible shall be submitted to the city engineer, reviewed, and, if acceptable, signed bythe city's project engineer and project planner prior to submittal ofthe building plans, parcel map, improvement plans, or grading plans, whichever occurs first. 5. Unless a standards variance has been issued, no variance from city standards is authorized by virtue of approval of this tentative parcel map. A standards variance has been approved for the 20% driveway grade. 6. Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and regulations in effect at the time building permits are issued. 7. If any condition for construction of any public facilities, or payment of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this project are challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section 66020. if any such condition is determined to be invalid, this approval shall be invalid unless the city engineer determines that this project without this condition complies with the requirements ofthe law. 8. Developer shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad, its council members, agents, officers, and representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claim and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees incurred by the city arising, directly or indirectly, from (a) city's approval and issuance of this tentative parcel map, (b) city's approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or non-discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, including an action filed within the time period specified in Government Code Section 66499.37 and (c) developer's installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby, including without limitation any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. 9. Developer shall submit to the city engineer an acceptable instrument via CC&R's and/or other recorded document addressing the maintenance, repair, and replacement of shared private improvements within this subdivision, including but not limited to private drive, storm drain facilities and private storm water sump pump, and to distribute the costs of such maintenance in an equitable manner among the owners of the properties within this subdivision. Fire 10. An automatic fire sprinkler system is required for each unit. Fees/Agreements 11. Developer is required to pay all required fees and deposits priorto approval ofthe parcel map. Blue Condominium 'w May 2, 2012 Page 4 12. Developer shall pay the Planned Local Drainage Area Fee priorto approval ofthe parcel map. 13. Developer shall pay or post security for park-in-lieu fees to the city prior to approval of the parcel map as required by Chapter 20.44 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 14. Developer shall cause property owner to execute and submit to the city engineer for recordation the city's standard form Geologic Failure Hold Harmless Agreement. 15. Developer shall cause property owner to execute and submit to the city engineer for recordation the city's standard form Drainage Hold Harmless Agreement regarding drainage across the adjacent property. 16. Prior to approval of any grading or building permits for this project, developer shall cause owner to give written consent to the city engineer for the annexation of the area shown within the boundaries of the subdivision into the existing City of Carlsbad Street Lighting and Landscaping District No. 1 and/or to the formation or annexation into an additional Street Lighting and Landscaping District. Said written consent shall be on a form provided by the city engineer. Grading 17. Based upon a review ofthe proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on the tentative parcel map, a grading permit for this project is required. Developer shall prepare and submit plans and technical studies/reports for city engineer review and shall pay all applicable grading plan review fees per the city's latest fee scheduie. 18. Developer shall apply for and obtain a grading permit from the city engineer. Developer shall pay all applicable grading permit fees per the city's latest fee schedule and shall post security per city code requirements. 19. Developer shall comply with the latest version of the city's stormwater regulations and shall implement best management practices at all times. Best management practices include, but are not limited to, pollution control practices or devices, erosion control to prevent silt runoff during construction, general housekeeping practices, pollution prevention and educational practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices or devices to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to stormwater, receiving water, or stormwater conveyance system to the maximum extent practicable. Developer shall notify prospective owners and tenants of the above requirements. 20. Developer shall complete and submit to the city engineer a Project Threat Assessment Form (PTAF) pursuant to City Engineering Standards. Concurrent with the PTAF, developer shall also submit the appropriate Tier level Storm Water Compliance form and appropriate Tier level Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) as determined by the completed PTAF, all to the satisfaction of the city engineer. Developer shall pay all applicable SWPPP plan review and inspection fees per the city's latest fee schedule. 21. Developer is responsible to ensure that all final design plans (grading plans, landscape plans, Blue Condominium ^*«^ May 2, 2012 Page 5 building plans, etc) incorporate all source control, site design, and Low Impact Design (LID) facilities. 22. Developer shall incorporate measures with this project to compiy with Standard Stormwater Requirements per the city's Standard Urban Stormwater Management Plan (SUSMP). These measures include, but are not limited to: 1) reducing the use of new impervious surfaces (e.g.: paving), 2) designing drainage from impen/ious surfaces to discharge over pervious areas (e.g.: turf, landscape areas), 3) and designing trash enclosures to avoid contact with storm runoff, all to the satisfaction ofthe city engineer. Dedications/Improvements 23. Developer shall cause owner to dedicate to the city for public utility and access purposes as shown on the tentative parcel map. The offer shall be made by a certificate on the parcel map. All land so offered shall be free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost to the city. Additional easements may be required at final design to the satisfaction of the city engineer. 24. Developer shall design the private drainage systems as shown on the tentative parcel map to the satisfaction of the city engineer. All private drainage systems (12" diameter storm drain and larger) shall be inspected by the city. Developer shall pay the standard improvement plancheck and inspection fees for private drainage systems. 25. Developer shall design all proposed public improvements including but not limited to sewer laterals, driveway, sidewalk, water services and meters, as shown on the tentative parcel map. These improvements shall be shown on one ofthe following, subject to city engineer approval: A. Grading plans processed in conjunction with this project; or B. Construction Revision to an existing record public improvement drawing. Developer shall pay plan check and inspection fees using improvement valuations in accordance with the city's current fee schedule. Developer shall apply for and obtain a right-of-way permit prior to performing work in the city right-of-way. 26. Prior to issuance of building permits, developer shali install separate sewer services to each unit proposed by this tentative parcel map. Sewer services shall be provided to the satisfaction of the city engineer. Non-Mapping Notes 27. Note(s) to the following effect(s) shall be placed on the parcel map as non-mapping data: A. Building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless the appropriate agency determines that sewer and water facilities are available. B. No structure, fence, wall, tree, shrub, sign, or other object may be placed or permitted to encroach within the area identified as a sight distance corridor as defined by City of Carlsbad Engineering Standards or line-of-sight per Caltrans standards. Blue Condominium W"- May 2, 2012 Page 6 C. The owner of this property on behalf of itself and all of its successors in interest has agreed to hold harmless and indemnify the City of Carlsbad from any action that may arise through any diversion of waters, the alteration of the normal flow of surface waters or drainage, or the concentration of surface waters or drainage from the drainage system or other improvements identified in the city approved development plans; or by the design, construction or maintenance of the drainage system or other improvements identified in the city approved development plans. D. The owner of this property on behalf of itself and all of its successors in interest has agreed to hold harmless and indemnify the City of Carlsbad from any action that may arise through any geological failure, ground water seepage or land subsidence and subsequent damage that may occur on, or adjacent to, this subdivision due to its construction, operation or maintenance. Utilities 28. Developer shall meet with the fire marshal to determine if fire protection measures (fire flows, fire hydrant locations, building sprinklers) are required to serve the project. Fire hydrants, if proposed, shall be considered public improvements and shall be served by public water mains to the satisfaction of the district engineer. 29. Prior to issuance of building permits, developer shall pay all fees, deposits, and charges for connection to public facilities. 30. Developer shall install potable water services and meters at locations approved by the district engineer. The locations of said services shall be reflected on public improvement plans. 31. The developer shall install sewer laterals and clean-outs at locations approved by the city engineer. The locations of sewer laterals shall be reflected on public improvement plans. 32. The developer shall design and construct public water and sewer facilities substantially as shown on the tentative parcel map to the satisfaction ofthe district engineer and city engineer. Code Reminders The project is subject to all applicable provisions of local ordinances, including but not limited to the following: 33. This tentative parcel map will expire twenty four (24) months from the date of the final approval notice issued by the city engineer. 34. Developer shall pay traffic impact and sewer impact fees based on Section 18.42 and Section 13.10 of the City of Carlsbad Municipal Code, respectively. The Average Daily Trips (ADT) and floor area shown on the tentative parcei map are for planning purposes only. Blue Condominium May 2, 2012 Page 7 NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a) and file the protest and any other required information with the city manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges; to planning, zoning, grading, or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project; or to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact the Project Engineer, Tecla Levy at 760- 602-2733. If you have any planning-related questions, please contact the Project Planner, Van Lynch, at 760-602-4613 Sincerely, Glen K. Van Peski, P.E., P.L.S. City Engineer cc: Project Engineer, Tecla Levy Project Planner, Shannon Werneke Fire Department, Gregory Ryan Senior Office Specialist, LDE Associate Analyst, LDE (scanned copy to MS File) MINOR SUBDIVISION MS 08-01 ONE LOT, 2 UNIT CONDOMINIUM. SUBDIVISION LOCATION MAP NQ SCALE THOM. BROS. PG. 1105 E-6 CITY OF ENCINH'AS VICINITY MAP MS 08-01 LEGAL DESCRIPTION UOT K IN BLOCK 1 OF PAUSADES HEIGHTS IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD. COUNTY OF SAN DIEOO, STATE OF CAUFORNIA. ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL MAP THEREOF NO. 1777, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SAN OIEGO COUNTY RECORDER ON JANUARY 11, 102+ UTILITIES (ALL UTILITIES ARE TO THE LOT) GAS AND ELECTRIC PRE SEWER WATER STORM DRAIN PHONE CABLE T.V. SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY OF CARLSSAD CARLSBAO WATER DISTRICT CITY OF CARLSBAD AT&T TIME WARNER GENERAL NOTES ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. = 204-231-10 NUMBER OF LOTS - EXISTING = 1 NUMBER OF LOTS - PROPOSED = 1 LOT. 2 CONDOMINIUM UNITS EXISTING ZONING =• R-3. MULTI FAMILY EXISTING GENERAL PLAN =• RH. RESIDENTIAL HIGH LOCAL FACIUTIES MANAGEMENT PLAN = 1 ESTIMATED DAILY TRIPS = 20 GROSS LOT SIZE - 0.16 ACRES NET LOT SIZE - 0.16 ACRES SCHOOL DISTRICT - CARLSBAD PROPERTY IS IN THE COASTAL ZONE NET DEVELOPABLE ACRES = 0.16 DENSITY PROPOSED - 12.3 DU/AC GROWTH MANAGEMENT CONTROL POINT (GMCP) - 19 DU/AC PER NET ACREAGE. GMCP = 0.16 X 19 = 3.04 MAXIMUM DENSITY ALLOWED IS 0.16 X 23 = 3.68 AVERAGE WATER DEMAND = 550 OPD/UNfT AVERAGE SEWER DEMAND - 220 SPD/UNfT PROPOSED GRADING CUT - 2000 C.Y. FILL - 0 CY. EXPORT - 2000 C.Y. REMEDIAL - 0 C.Y. PROPOSED LOT SIZES LOT 1 = 0.16 NET ACRES TOPOGRAPHY WALTERS LAND SURVEY 1807 SOUTH NEVADA STREET OCEANSIDE. CA 92054 (760) 722-1200 OWNER BARRY J. AND MARY T. BLUE TRUSTEES OF THE BLUE FAMILY TRUST 2950 OCEAN STREET CARISBAD, CA 92008 (658) 336-8249 (BUCK THOMPSON - ARCHIIECT) PREPARED BY THE SEA BRIGHT CO. 4322 SEA BRIGHT PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 (760) 720-0098 ROBERT 0. SUKUP. RCE 2a3?2 DATE CITY OF . CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SHEETS 4 ONE LOT MINOR SUBDIVISION: BLUE CONDOMINIUMS 150 & 152 CHERRY AVENUE CARLSBAD. CA 92003 APPROVED: CITY ENGINEER DWN BY: CHKD BY: RVWD BY: PROJECT NO. MS-08-01 DRAWING NO. 3UASUB_n-09-11 MINOR SUBDIVISION MS 08-01 ONE LOT, 2 UNIT CONDOMINIUM, SUBDIVISION MS 08-01 PRELIMINARY GRADING BASEMENT r=io' DRIVEWAY PROFILE LEGEND RETAINING WALL DOWN SPOUT GRATE CONCRETE / PAVERS O a ABBREVIATIONS FS - FINISHED SURFACE TC • FC - HNISHED CONCRETE TW • FG >= FINISH GRADE BW TG - TOP OF GRATE TF " HP = HIGH POINT GB • FL - FLOW UNE THW IE » INVERT ELEVATION TR • TP • TOP OF CURB : TOP OF WAa = BOnOM OF WALL TOP OF FOOTING . GRADE BREAK » TOP OF HEADWALL TOP OF RAIL TOP OF PILASTER SHEET 2 CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SHEETS 4 ONE LOTMINORSUBDMSION: BLUE CONDOMINIUMS 150 & 152 CHERRY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92006 APPROVEO: CITY ENGINEER EXPIRES OWN BY: CHKD BY: RVWD BY: PROJECT NO. MS-08-01 DRAWING NO. 314-ASUB_11-09-11 CITY OF V (CARLSBAD Planning Division ^^^^ QFILE www.carlsbadca.gov April 16, 2012 Mr. Barry Blue 2950 Ocean Street Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PUD 12-01 - BLUE CONDOMINIUMS The City has completed a review of the application for a Minor Planned Development Permit to demolish two single family dwellings and accessory structures and to allow for the construction of two attached residential air-space condominium units on a 0.16-acre infill lot located at 150-152 Cherry Avenue. It is the City Planner's determination that based on the attached conditions, the project is consistent with the City's Planned Development regulations (Chapter 21.45) and with all other applicable City Ordinances and Policies. Further, the project has been found to be categorically exempt from environmental review according to Section 15332 (Infill Development) of the California Environmental Quality Act and a Notice of Exemption will be filed upon project approval. This memo, including the listed findings and conditions, constitutes approval of Minor Planned Development Permit PUD 12-01. Findings: 1. The proposed project is consistent with the general plan, and complies with all applicable provisions ofthis chapter, and all other applicable provisions ofthe Carlsbad Municipal Code, in that the project is consistent with the General Plan, which allows for a mixture of residential uses, including condominiums, within the Residential High (RH) Density land use designation. Although the project's density of 12.5 dwelling units per acre is below the minimum RH density of 15 du/ac, the attached two-unit residential air-space condominium project can be found consistent with the General Plan pursuant to CMC Section 21.53.230. In addition, 1.04 dwelling units will be deposited into the City's Excess Dwelling Unit Bank. The proposed two- story structure will be appropriately integrated with the site surroundings as well as the environmental setting in that the adjacent projects to the north, south, east and west are also currently developed with two story, multi-family uses. In addition, the project complies with the Zoning Code, no Variances are required and the two airspace condominiums, which will generate 16 ADTs, will not adversely affect traffic circulation. 2. The proposed project will not be detrimental to existing uses, or to uses specifically permitted in the area in which the proposed use is to be located, and will not adversely impact the site, surroundings, or traffic, in that the project involves the demolition of two single family dwellings and accessory structures and the development of two residential air-space condominiums on a property that is adjacent to two-story multi-family uses and has all 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 © PUD 12-01 - BLUE CONDOMINltndS April 16, 2012 Page 2 necessary public facilities constructed or conditioned to be constructed. Primary access to the site will be provided from a private driveway located off of Cherry Avenue. Cherry Avenue is classified as a Local street and is designed to handle the 16 ADTs generated by the proposed condominiums. On-site circulation consists of a private drive aisle to provide direct access to two, side-loaded, two-car garages and one exterior visitor's parking space. In addition, the adjacent streets are operating at an acceptable Level of Service (LOS). Therefore, the street system serving the proposed use will not be impacted. 3. The project will not adversely affect the public health, safety, or general welfare, in that the project complies with all applicable development standards of the R-3 Zone (CMC Chapter 21.16) and the Planned Development Ordinance (CMC Chapter 21.45) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. In addition, the project is compatible with respect to the use as well as the bulk and scale of the adjacent high density, multi-family residential land uses. 4. The project's design, including architecture, streets, and site layout: a) contributes to the community's overall aesthetic quality; b) includes the use of harmonious materials and colors, and the appropriate use of landscaping; and c) achieves continuity among all elements of the project, in that the proposed two-story air-space condominiums are similar in bulk and scale to adjacent, existing, two-story, high density, multi-family residential projects to the north, south, east and, west. Architectural design elements include a variety of roof planes and materials, off-set building projections such as balconies, and varied window shapes and sizes, which are aesthetically pleasing and contribute to the overall character of the neighborhood. The project's landscaping consists of a variety of plant materials to enhance the visual appearance of the units and provide privacy along the property lines. All elements (i.e. site layout, architecture, landscaping) contribute towards the resulting continuity in the overall project design. 5. The project is consistent with the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 1 and all City public facility policies and ordinances. The project includes elements or has been conditioned to construct or provide funding to ensure that all facilities and improvements regarding sewer collection and treatment; water; drainage; circulation; fire; schools; parks and other recreational facilities; libraries; government administrative facilities; and open space, related to the project will be installed to serve new development prior to or concurrent with need. Specifically, a. The project has been conditioned to provide proof from the Carlsbad Unified School District that the project has satisfied its obligation for school facilities. b. The Public Facility fee is required to be paid by Council Policy No. 17 and will be collected prior to the issuance of building permit. c. The Local Facilities Management fee for Zone 1 is required by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.90.050 and will be collected prior to issuance of building permit. 6. That the City Planner has determined that the project belongs to a class of projects that the State Secretary for Resources has found do not have a significant impact on the environment, and it is therefore categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents pursuant to Section 15332 - In-fill Development ofthe state CEQA o PUD 12-01 - BLUE CONDOMINITTMS ^ April 16, 2012 Page 3 Guidelines. In making this determination, the City Planner has found that the exceptions listed in Section 15300.2 of the state CEQA Guidelines do not apply to this project. 7. That the project is consistent with the City's Landscape Manual (Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 14.28.020 and Landscape Manual Section I B). 8. The City Planner has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the degree ofthe exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project. Conditions: Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied priorto recordation ofthe final map for MS 08-01. 1. Approval is granted for Minor Planned Development Permit PUD 12-01 as shown on Exhibit(s) "A - U," dated April 4, 2012, on file in the Planning Division and incorporated herein by reference. 2. If any of the following conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation on the property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Planned Development Permit. 3. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections and modifications to the Planned Development Permit documents, as necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval. 4. Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 5. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project are challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section 66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with all requirements of law. 6. Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless the City of Cadsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and ^1^'^^^ ^^^^ PUD 12-01 - BLUE CONDOMINM/IS ^ April 16, 2012 Page 4 costs, including court costs and attorney's fees incurred by the City arising, directly or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this Planned Development Permit, (b) City's approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or non-discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and (c) Developer/Operator's installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby, including without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. This obligation survives until all legal proceedings have been concluded and continues even if the City's approval is not validated. 7. All conditions of Minor Subdivision MS 08-01 are incorporated herein by reference and shall be complied with in their entirety. 8. This approval is granted subject to the approval of SDP 08-01/CDP 08-04 and is subject to all findings and conditions contained in the Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 6867 and 6868 for the other approvals and are incorporated herein by reference. 9. Prior to the recordation of the associated Parcel Map (MS 08-01), Developer shall submit to the City a Notice of Restriction to be filed in the office of the County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction ofthe City Planner, notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad has issued Site Development Plan SDP 08-01, Coastal Development Permit CDP 08-04, and Minor Planned Development Permit PUD 12-01- BLUE CONDOMINIUMS on the property. Said Notice of Restriction shall note the property description, location of the file containing complete project details and all conditions of approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of Restriction. The City Planner has the authority to execute and record an amendment to the notice, which modifies or terminates said notice upon a showing of good cause by the Developer or successor in interest. If you have any further questions, please call Shannon Werneke in the Planning Division at (760) 602- 4621. Sincerely, CHRIS DeCERBO Principal Planner CD:SW:bd Buck Thompson, Pi Arc Design, 627 Bonair Way, La Jolla, CA 92037 Don Neu, City Planner Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner Tecla Levy, Associate Engineer File Copy Data Entry/DMS <%c,rvop ^ ^ a FILE V (CARLSBAD t-^rii-i- Planning Division www.carlsbadca.gov March 13, 2012 Pi Arc Design Attn: Buck Thompson 627 Bonair Way La Jolla, CA 92037 SUBJECT: SDP 08-01/CDP 08-04 - BLUE CONDOMINIUMS The preliminary staff report for the above referenced project will be sent to you via email on Wednesday, March 21, 2012, after 8:00 a.m. This preliminary report will be discussed by staff at the Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) meeting which will be held on March 26, 2012. A twenty (20) minute appointment has been set aside for you at 9:30 AM. If you have any questions concerning your project you should attend the DCC meeting. It is necessary that you bring the following required information with you to this meeting or provide it to your planner prior to the meeting in order for your project to go forward to the Planning Commission: 1. Unmounted colored exhibit(s) of your site plan and elevations; and 2. A PDF of your colored site plan and elevations. The colored exhibits must be submitted at this time to ensure review by the Planning Commission at their briefings. If the colored exhibits are not available for their review, your proiect could be rescheduled to a later time. The PDF of your colored site plan and elevations will be used in the presentation to the Planning Commission and the public at the Planning Commission Hearing. If you do not plan to attend this meeting, please make arrangements to have your colored exhibit(s) and the PDF here by the scheduled time above. Should you wish to use visual materials in your presentation to the Planning Commission, they should be submitted to the Planning Division no later than 12:00 p.m. on the day of a Regular Planning Commission Meeting. Digital materials will be placed on a computer in Council Chambers for public presentations. Please label all materials with the agenda item number you are representing. Items submitted for viewing, including presentations/digital materials, wil! be included in the time limit maximum for speakers. All materials exhibited to the Planning Commission during the meeting (slides, maps, photos, etc.) are part of the public record and must be kept by the Planning Division for at least 60 days after final action on the matter. Your materials will be returned upon written request. If you need additional information concerning this matter, please contact your Planner, Shannon Wemeke at (760) 602-4621. Sincerely, 6^/^ (£44 DON NEU, AICP City Planner DN:SW:sm File Copy Tecla Levy, Project Engineer 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 ® C'TY OF V (CARLSBAD Planning Division • FILE www.carlsbadca.gov February 8, 2012 Mr. Buck Thompson Pi Arc Design 627 Bon Air Way La Jolla, CA 92037 SUBJECT: SDP 08-01/CDP 08-01/PUD 12-01- BLUE CONDOMINIUMS Mr. Thompson, Your application has been tentatively scheduled for a hearing by the Planning Commission on April 4, 2012. However, for this to occur, you must submit the additional items listed below. If the required items are not received by March 5, 2012, your project will be rescheduled for a later hearing. 1. Please submit the following plans: A) 11 copies of your (civil and architectural site plans, landscape plans, building elevation plans, floor plans) on 24" x 36" sheets of paper, stapled in complete sets folded into 9" X 12" size. B) One VA" x 11" copy of your reduced site plan, building elevation and floor plans. These copies must be of a quality which is photographically reproducible. Only essential data should be included on plans. C) An electronic copy of the plans (civil, landscape and architectural, including colored renderings) in PDF format. D) Color and materials board; and E) One un-mounted color copy of the site/landscape plan and elevations (reflecting proposed color palette). 2. As required by Section 65091 of the California Government Code, please submit the following information needed for noticing and sign the enclosed form: A) 600' Owners List - a typewritten list of names and addresses of all property owners, including all forms of interval ownership, within a 600 foot radius of the subject property, including the applicant and/or owner. The list shall include the San Diego County Assessor's parcel number from the latest equalized assessment rolls. B) 100' Occupant List - (Coastal Development Permits Only) a typewritten list of names and addresses of all occupants within a 100 foot radius of the subject property, including the applicant and/or owner. 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 ® SDP 08-01/CDP 08-01/PUD 12-01- BLUE CONDOMINIUMS February 8, 2012 Page 2 C) Mailing Labels - If the number of owners within the 600 foot radius is 1,000 or greater, a display advertisement in two papers of general circulation will be placed in lieu of direct mailing and labels will not be required to be submitted. Ifthe number of owners within the 600 foot radius is less than 1,000, please submit two (2) separate sets of mailing labels of the property owners within a 600 foot radius and occupants within a 100 foot radius of the subject property. For any address other than a single-family residence, an apartment or suite number must be included. DO NOT provide addressed envelopes - PROVIDE LABELS ONLY. Acceptable fonts are: Arial 11 pt, Arial Rounded MT Bold 9 pt. Courier 14 pt. Courier New 11 pt, and MS Line Draw 11 pt. Sample labels are as follows: ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE (with APN) 209-060-34-00 Mrs. Jane Smith 123 Magnolia Ave., Apt #3 MRS JANE SMITH Carlsbad, CA 92008 APT 3 123 MAGNOLIA AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 D) Radius Map - a map to scale, not less than 1" = 200', showing all lots entirely and partially within 600 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property. Each of these lots should be consecutively numbered and correspond with the property owner's list. The scale ofthe map may be reduced to a scale acceptable to the City Planner ifthe required scale is impractical. E) Fee - a fee shall be paid for covering the cost of mailing notices. Such fee shall equal the current postage rate times the total number of labels. In the case of ownership list that is 1,000 or greater, the fee is equal to the current cost of publishing an 1/8 page ad in two newspapers of general circulation. Cash check (payable to the City of Carlsbad) and credit cards are accepted. Sincerely, (^Hj\AM/^^UJ ^ SHANNON WERNEKE Associate Planner SW:bd Att: Mailing label certification c: File Data entry I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS LIST AND LABELS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ON THIS DATE REPRESENT THE LATEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION FROM THE EQUALIZED ASSESSOR'S ROLES. APPLICATION NAME AND NUMBER APPLICANT OR APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE BY: DATE: RECEIVED BY DATE: <ii^ CITY OF V^CARLSBAD Planning Division www.carlsbadca.gov June 22, 2011 Mr. Buck Thompson Pi Arc Design 627 Bon Air Way La Jolla, CA 92037 SUBJECT: SDP 08-01/CP 08-01/CDP 08-04 - BLUE CONDOMINIUMS Your project was deemed complete on November 9, 2010. There are issues of concern with the project that remain to be resolved. The issues are listed on the attached page(s). All issues will need to be resolved prior to scheduling the project for a public hearing. At this time, the City asks that you provide 3 complete sets of the development plans (including landscape plans) so that the project can continue to be reviewed. Sincerely, SHANNON WERNEKE Associate Planner SW:bd enc: Engineering comments/redlines c: Barry Blue, 2950 Ocean Street, Carlsbad CA 92008 Bob Sukup, The Sea Bright Company, 4322 Sea Bright Place, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Tecla Levy, Project Engineer Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner File Copy Data Entry ^ 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 ® SDP 08-01/CP 08-01/CDP 08-03 - BLUE CONDOMINIUMS June 22,2011 Page 2 ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. Please submit a color and materials board for the project. Engineering: 1. According to Mr. Sukup's vehicle turn around study, vehicles from units A and B must make a 5- point turn and a 4-point turn, respectively, in order to get out of the proposed driveway facing forward. As previously verified by city staff, a turnaround movement is not feasible with the current parking garage layout. It is unlikely that a driver would risk damaging his/her car or any part of the building structure by making the tight 5-point turn maneuver. For this reason, staff can assume that the cars will be backing out of the driveway if no changes are made to the current proposed layout. As previously requested, please plot on the site plan, the line-of-sight of the driver backing out onto Cherry Street looking east and west. Indicate the available sight distance, measured in feet. Show that there are no obstructions within the line of sight. Make sure that the proposed site walls on either side of the driveway do not obstruct the sight distance. Caltrans sight distance is measured from a driver's position, assumed to be ten feet behind the projection of the curb. (Note that Mr. Sukup's sight distance exhibit shows the driver's position at 17 feet behind the curb, significantly limiting the available sight distance.) 2. Please avoid using pervious pavers on portions of the driveway where slopes exceed 15% (Planning Department follow-up comment: as an enhanced entry is required, please use another form of decorative pavement such as stamped concrete, within this area which is complimentary to the permeable pavers). o o 71 Pi Arc Design RECEIVED 621 &onair Way, La Jolla, Ca 203 T a5a.454.2T20 cell a5 8.33€>.824-'1 JUN 0 1 2Q11 DATE: 05-31-11 CITYOFCARLSBAD PLANNING DEPT Re: 3rd Review for CP 08-01/ CDP 08-04 Blue Condominiums Associate Planner: Shannon Werneke PROJECT: Blue Condominiums OWNER: BLUE FAIWILY TRUST ITEM# RESPONSE PLAN - SHEET LOCATION LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED - PLANNING: 1 Listed under Project Description is a note regarding stripping CS, A.2 & A.12 the driveway in front of Unit 'B' Garage for "No Parking". Also see Shts. A.2 & A. 12 for additional graphic and note. 2 Attached are small scale examples of the "Presentation Sheets", which will be 24" x 36", for the Planning Commission meeting when it is scheduled and prior to that date I will bring you "Color and Material Board" samples. 3 In reference to the Initial Review by Carlsbad Fire Department CS and requirements for installing fire sprinklers, dated 11-12-10, please find a note in this regard listed under the Project Description. 4 Attached please find a check for the filing of the CEQA "Notice of Exemption" ISSUES OF CONCERN - LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: 1-14 See revised Landscape Concept, Conservation & Water Use Plans & Response (attached) provided by Landscape Architect - Darsano Design Associates. ISSUES OF CONCERN - ENGINEERING: 1 - 8 See plans provided by Civil Engineer - The Sea Bright Company Should you have any questions or concerns please do not hesitate to contact me personally regarding this response and the revised plans as submitted. Sincerely, Buck Thompson 71 Pi Arc Design May 31, 2011 St^»asi Sea Bri<?l?t company^ RECEIVED City Engineer ... City of Carlsbad JUM 0 1 -^"11 llll^^!i%7^2mr CITY OF CARLSBAD Carlsbad, CA 92008 PLANNING DEPT Att: Tecla Levy - Project Engineer Ref: APN 204-231 - 10 Blue Property, MS 08 - 01 Dear Tecla, The above referenced proposed Minor Subdivision has been designed with a 20% driveway to service the two below grade garages for each of the units. The additional grade [20% instead of 15%] was necessary in order to eliminate some "creative" warping of the concrete to make grade at the garage door and pedestrian door and to also have adequate clearance below the structural beam above. The length of run of the 20% grade is only over a length of 34 feet which is not that long. The only people that will be using the driveway are the owners ofthe units and their occasional guests. No City vehicles or Fire trucks will be using the driveway. No parking signs are required to be posted in front of the 2 garage doors. This is being done in order to allow all users of the driveway to be able to back in towards the garage doors when leaving so they can exit while driving forward. You could back up the driveway, but it would be more difficult than driving out face forward. The proposed driveway with turn around capabilities should function fine for the owners and their occasional guests. You consideration of the 20% driveway is appreciated. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely Robert O. Sukup J bluedvwy Engineering Management General Contrncting Development 4.322 Sea Bright Place Carisbad, CA 9200B Teiephone/FAX 760-720-0098 Ax - - FILECOPY VXARLSBAD Planning Division www.carlsbadca.gov November 9, 2010 Mr. Buck Thompson Pi Arc Design 627 Bon Air Way La Jolla, CA 92037 SUBJECT: 3rd REVIEW FOR SDP 08-01/CP 08-01/CDP 08-04 - BLUE CONDOMINIUMS The items requested from you eariier to make your Site Development Plan, Condominium Permit, and Coastal Development Permit, application nos. SDP 08-01, CP 08-01 and CDP 08- 04, complete have been received and reviewed by the Planning Division. It has been determined that the application is now complete for processing. Although the initial processing of your application may have already begun, the technical acceptance date is acknowledged by the date ofthis communication. Please note that although the application is now considered complete, there may be issues that could be discovered during project review and/or environmental review. Any issues should be resolved prior to scheduling the project for public hearing. In addition, the City may request, in the course of processing the application, that you clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise supplement the basic information required forthe application. At this time, the City asks that you provide 3 complete sets of the development plans (including landscape plans) so that the project can continue to be reviewed. Sincerely, CHRIS DeCERBO Principal Planner CD:SW:lt Enc: Landscape comments Engineering comments/redlines c: Barry Blue, 2950 Ocean Street, Carlsbad CA 92008 Bob Sukup, The Sea Bright Company, 4322 Sea Bright Place, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Don Neu, City Planner Tecla Levy, Project Engineer Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner File Copy Data Entry 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 ® I lD3)l3)lbl/CP 08-01/ CDF^3t5-04 - BLUE CONDOMINIUMS November 9, 2010 Paqe 2 , ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. In order to facilitate/assist cars in backing out of the garage for Unit A (as demonstrated on Sheet A. 12, turning radius exhibit), the driveway area in front of Unit B will be required to be striped for "No Parking." Please revise the plans to include this note. 2. Please submit a color and materials board for the project. Engineering: / 1. -Engineering Item No. 1 in the previous comment ietter dated January 26, 2009 (see attached) is not sufficiently addressed. The revised driveway design showing a maximum grade of 20% is not in accordance with Engineering Standard Chapter 4.I.G. Please submit a letter of request for waiver of Engineering Standard Chapter 4.I.G for city engineer consideration. Include documentations to justify the waiver request. 2. Engineering Item No. 2 in the previous comment letter dated January 26, 2609 (see attached) is not sufficiently addressed. As confirmed by the vehicle drive aisle turnaround study shown on sheet A. 12, the proposed parking layout would potentially force guests and Unit B residents to make a three-point turn or to back out onto the public street with limited visibility if an obstruction or a car is parked in front of the Unit A garage and/or if the car has a turning radius larger than 22 feet. On sheet 2 of the preliminary grading plan, please show the line-of-sight of the driver backing out onto the Cherry Street looking east and west onto Cherry Avenue using Caltrans guidelines (corner sight distance). Show that there are no obstructions within the line of sight and that the proposed retaining walls on either side of the driveway do not obstruct the sight distance. 3. The garage fioor drains from unit "A" and "B" are shown connected to the proposed storm drain storm drain at basement level. Floor drains within a covered building structure shall not be connected into street storm drain system. They are required to be connected to the sewer system. 4. Please comply with Engineering Item No. 7 in the previous comment letter dated January 26, 2009 (see attached). Submit an updated Storm Water Standard Questionnaire. It appears that this project is not a priority project is not required to submit a SWMP. However, the project is required to incorporate Low Impact Design (LID) features in the development design. 5. The revised plan does not appear to comply with city SUSMP, standard storm water requirements. The revised plan does not show any "LID" facility. City SUSMP requires roof drains be routed to landscape area prior to discharge into a storm drain system. The revised plan shows that roof drains are directly connected to the basement level storm drain system. LID facility such as rain barrel and flow-through planters with under drain, (see attached) are feasible alternatives. They can be installed around the perimeter at the ground floor level where roof drains can be routed. Under drains can then be connected to street storm drain system. Incorporating LID features at the ground level will result in a significantty reduced volume of water proposed to be pumped into the street from the basement level. Note that only SDP 08-01/CP 08-01/CDNjfe-04-BLUE CONDOMINIUMS ^ November 9, 2010 Page 3 storm run-off from the exposed driveway must be pumped into the street. Pumping large volume of concentrated water into the street is not allowed unless volume is controlled so it does become a public hazard. Note that pumping untreated storm water from the basement directly into the street is prohibited. 6. Submit a revised hydrology report to include the revised storm drain system suggested above. 7. Show the location of the nearest fire hydrant. 8. Show the location of existing storm drain along Cherry Street. 9. Provide the existing and proposed contours on-site and at least 50 feet beyond property ' lines. Show also existing adjacent structures. 10. Comply with comments on the red-lined site plan/grading plan. 11. Please include the following in the next submittal: o Revised hydrology report. o Revised storm water standard questionnaire. o A letter of request for waiver of Engineering Standard Chapter 4.1.G. Include a sight distance exhibit showing the line-of-sight of the driver backing out onto the Cherry Street looking east and west onto Cherry Avenue using Caltrans guidelines (corner sight distance). o Revised preliminary grading plan that complies with the above comments. Landscaping: Numbers below are referenced on the red line plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area ofthe comment concern. REPEAT COMMENTS 1-9 Completed. 10. Provide a Water Consen/ation Plan in conjunction with the Landscape Concept Plan. This plan shall demonstrate to the City how the proposed development will use all practical means available to conserve water in the landscape. Plans shall include but not be limited to: a. Extent of Planting Zone 1 (Lush)—Indicate percentage of Zone 1 planting (per Appendix A) of the total landscaped area (as defined in Appendix G). Provide justification for the appropriateness of where Zone 1 plantings are used in terms of water conservation.—(For example, are Zone 1 plantings in areas of shado where they will use less water and/or has the soil been suitably amended so as to retain relatively greater moisture?) 2"" Review: Turf is a zone 1 planting. Please revise water conservation plan and roviso calculations accordingly. b-e Completed. SDP 08-01/CP 08-01/ CDfS6-04 - BLUE CONDOMINIUMS November 9, 2010 Page 4 11-13 Completed. 14. RETURN REDLINES and provide 2 copies of all plans (concept, water conservation, and colored water use plan) on the next submittal. NEW COMMENTS IA. Please add a legend to sheet L.3.0 indicating the color blue as areas to be irrigated with domestic (potable) water. Fire Any comments received from the Fire Department will be forwarded under a separate cover. ^ ^ FILE copy Citv of Carlsbaa Planning Department February 2, 2009 ' Mr. Gary Wynn Wynn Engineering, Inc. 27315 Valley Center Road Valley Center, CA 92082 SUBJECT: 2^^° REVIEW FOR SDP 08-01/CP 08-01/ CDP 08-04 (RELATED MS 08-01) - BLUE CONDOMINIUMS All of the items requested of you eariier have not been received and therefore your application is still deemed incomplete. Listed below are the item(s) still needed in order to deem your application as complete. This list of items must be submitted directly to your staff planner by appointment. All list items must be submitted simultaneously and a copy of this list must be included with your submittals, including five (5) sets of plans. No processing of your application can occur until the application is determined to be complete. When all required materials are submitted the City has 30 days to make a determination of completeness. If the application is detennined to be complete, processing for a decision on the application will be initiated. In addition, please note that you have six months from the date the application was initially filed, January 23, 2008, to either resubmit the application or submit the required information. Failure to resubmit the application or to submit the materials necessary to determine your application complete shall be deemeci to constitute withdrawal of the application. If an application is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn, a new application must be submitted. Please contact your staff planner, spiarmon Wemekej* at (760) 602-4621 or swern(S)ci.carisbad.ca.us. if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincerely, GARY T. BARBERIO Assistant Planning Director GTB:SW:sm Enc: Landscape comments/redlines Engineering comments/redlines & hydrology report c: Barry Blue, 2950 Ocean Street, Carisbad, CA 92008 Buck Thompson, Pi Arc Design, La Jolla, CA 92037 Darsono Cunninham, Darsono Design Associates, Inc., 5014 Mt. La Platta Drive, San Diego, CA 92117 Chris DeCerbo, Team Leader Tecla Levy, Project Engineer File Copy Data Entry 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us .SDP 08-01/CP 08-01/ CDP 08-04 - BLUE CONDOMINIUMS February 2, 2009 Page 2 LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION Planning: /I. The revisions to the Planned Development (PD) standards (C.M.C. Chapter 21.45) were approved by the California Coastal Commission (CCC) with modifications on January 8, 2009. However, the modificafions have not been approved by the City. Since the design of the proposed project relies on certain components of the revised PD standards, the application will remain incomplete until the modifications have been approved by City Council and effectively certified by the CCC. The anticipated effective date of the revised Planned Development standards by the City Council will likely be in March or April of 2009. In the interim, however, staff will continue to prepare the proposed project for consideration by the Planning Commission. 2; Please submit a color and materials board for the project. Engineering: 1. Please revise the driveway design to show a maximum grade of 15% in accordance with Engineering Standard Chapter 4.I.G. Engineering staff cannot support a driveway slope variance from 15% to 21%. The proposed parking layout would potenfially force guests and unit B residents to back out onto the public street with limited visibility if an obstruction or a car is parked in front of Unit A's garage and/or if the car has turning radius larger than 21 feet. 2. Indicate the line-of-sight at the driveway entrance looking east and west onto Cherry Avenue using Caltrans guidelines (corner sight distance). Please verify that no conflicts exist. ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: /1. Revise the architectural plans (Sheets CS-A.13) as follows: /a. Provide a detail of the proposed above-grade perimeter wall. The incorporafion of a decorative cap and/or accent band and pilasters at a minimum interval of 20 feet are , recommended; ^ b. Note the material of the proposed interior-facing retaining wall; and y c. Note the existing grade on all elevations. 2. Revise the conceptual Grading/Drainage Exhibit (Sheets 1-4) and Tentative Parcel Map Exhibit as follows: a. Add the symbols for the hardscape, landscaping, and proposed above-grade wall to both legends. Staff recommends utilizing a different symbol for the above-grade wall since it looks very similar to the symbol for the retaining wall. Please also note on the plans that the proposed perimeter wall is an above-grade six-foot-tall wall; b. Revise Sheet 1 of 4 to add several top-of-wall and bottom-of-wall measurements for the retaining wall (at all corners of the proposed structure and mid-points); SDP 08-01/CP 08-01/0^08-04-BLUE CONDOMINIUMS February 2, 2009 Paqe 3 c. Profile Section A-A (Sheet 4 of 4) indicates that the proposed guest space is 12-feet- wide, with the retaining wall at the property line. Sheet 1 of 4 depicts an offset of approximately 1-2 feet from the property line. The architectural plans note the retaining wall as being offset 1'4" from the property line and a proposed width of 10' for the guest space. Please reconcile the width of the guest parking space and location of the retaining wall and revise the plans accordingly; d. The square footage calculations for Unit A/B as well as the recreation and common area calculations do not correspond with what is presented on the Cover Sheet of the architectural plans. Please reconcile the inconsistency as appropriate; e. The footprint of the deck overhang (Grading Exhibit, Sheet 2 of 4, MS Exhibit Sheet 1) does not correspond to the architectural plan. Please revise the plans accordingly; y f. Remove the reference to the "Coastal Exhibit" on what is intended to be the Minor Subdivision Exhibit. The architectural and civil plans will be ufilized for the purposes of the Coastal Development Permit; y'g. Revise Profiles B-B, C-C, and D-D (Grading Exhibit, Sheet 4 of 4), to note the required safety railing on top of the retaining wall along the western property line; y h. The guest space is noted as being associated with Unit A. Please be advised that the required guest space is required to be available for the use of guests of both Unit A and B. Please revise the plans to note as such; i. The landscape plan notes small landscape pockets on the interior side of the above- grade wall and the retaining wall that is proposed along the eastern and western property lines, respectively. Please revise the plans accordingly to note the additional landscaping; j. The setback distance between the garage and the western property line (24') on the Tentafive Parcel Map Exhibit does not correspond with the architectural and grading exhibits (26'). Please reconcile the difference accordingly; k. Pursuant to CMC Secfion 21.45.060, Table C (C.5, Drive-aisles), driveways shall be accented with enhanced pavement. Please note that the drive aisle is required to be enhanced with decorative pavement on the Grading Exhibit (please add a symbol to plans/legend); and I. The graphic scale on the plans (both grading and tentative parcel map) does not match the scale which is noted as being 1" = 10'. Landscape Consultant Comments: Numbers below are referenced on the red line plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area of the comment concern. Repeat Comments: 1-9 Completed. 10. Provide a Water Conservation Plan in conjunction with the Landscape Concept Plan. This plan shall demonstrate to the City how tho proposed devolopmont will use all practical means available to conserve wator in tho landscape. Plans shall include but not be limited to: a. Extent of Planting Zono 1 (Lush) Indicate percentage of Zone 1 planting (per Appendix A) of the total landscaped area (as defined in Appendix G).—Provido justification for the appropriatonoss of where Zone 1 plantings are used in terms of SDP 08-01/CP 08-01/ CDP 08-04 - BLUE CONDOMINIUMS February 2, 2009 Page 4 water conservafion.—(For oxample, aro Zone 1 plantings in areas of shade where thoy will use less water and/or has the soil been suitably amended so as to retain relatively greater moisture?) Review: Turf is a zone 1 planting. Please revise water conservation plan and revise calculations accordingly. b-d Completed. e. Colored water use plan separately outlining areas that will use either recycled or potable water. 2"" Review: The plan has been forwarded to Public Works Maintenance and Operations for review. Any comments will be forwarded back to the applicant. 11-13 Completed. 14. RETURN REDLINES and provide 2 copies of all plans (concept, water conservation, and colored water use plan) on the next submittal. Engineering: 1. On the plan, indicate the location and elevation of the high point at the driveway entrance. The high point elevation must be higher than the existing top of curb elevation to ensure that no street drainage enters the driveway. 2. The driveway slope shown on the architectural plan does not correspond with the driveway slopes shown on the civil plans. Please revise to be consistent. 3. Please show the details of the proposed storm water detenfion system on the plans. 4. Please comply with all minor comments shown on the red-lined plans. 5. Please revise sheet 3 of the Storm Water Standard Questionnaire to include the applicant's name and signature. Note to engineer: According to the project's Storm Water Standards Questionnaire, this project is a not a priority project. Non-priority projects are not required to submit a Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) report (please see City of Carisbad current Storm Water Manual). However, all projects are required to comply with the City's storm water regulations including Low Impact Development (LID) design requirements as already shown on this plan. 6. The summary tables shown on page 3 and 4 of the hydrology report shows a Time of Concentration (TC) of 420 minutes. This appears to be incorrect or mislabeled. On the calculations shown on Appendix C, the 420 minutes appears to be the detention storage time and not fime of concentration (TC). Please check and revise as necessary for clarity. 7. Please comply with the red-lined comments shown on Appendix C, proposed conditions calculations. Some input data used in the calculations such as initial length of travel, slopes, manning's n appear incorrect (see comments shown in red). Please cheok and revise calculations as necessary. The revisions may not result in significant changes to the calculated Q's since all calculated initial TCs were less than the 5 minute minimum, which the program used in the calculafions. :Dro SDP 08-01/CP 08-01/ CDr08-04 - BLUE CONDOMINIUMS ^ February 2, 2009 Page 5 8. A red-lined check print and hydrology report are enclosed for the applicant's use in making the requested revisions. Please return this check print including second review red-lined check print and hydrology report with the next submittal to facilitate continued staff review. This review does not constitute a complete review of the proposed project and additional items of concern, as well as comments on technical and design issues may be identified upon submission of the above items. If you have any quesfions regarding the Engineering comments, please contact Tecla Levy, Project Engineer, at (760) 602-2733. 71 Pl Arc Design RECEIVED a 2.1 Bonair Way, La Jolla, Ca S 2 O 3 T a5a.4-54.2T20 cell a5a.336.a24-«1 QQj 21 2010 DATE: 10-20-10 CITYOFCARLSBAD PLANNING DEPT Re: 2nd Reviewfor CP 08-01/CDP 08-04 Blue Condominiums Associate Planner: Shannon Werneke PROJECT: Blue Condominiums OWNER: BLUE FAMILY TRUST ITEM# RESPONSE PLAN - SHEET LOCATION LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED - PLANNING: 1 Revisions have been made to the plan documents and are in compliance with the revised PD standards. CS & A. 1 -A. 12 2 A compact disk is attached with presentation quality renderings which graphically illustrate the scope of the Project, including the intended material types, placement and colors that will be used. I would like to request this Power Point Presentation file be shown at the scheduled Planning Commission Hearing where I believe it will provide staff and each Commissioner with a valuable visual experience and understanding of the proposed Project. A PDF file is also included which might better be used after the presentation. It will be easier to bring up a slide for reference should a Commissioner have any specific questions. Also a sheet listing the order of each slide has been provided for reference, or you can use the thumbnails of Acrobat. This digital presentation file has been provided in lieu of a poster board presentation and material samples. LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED - ENGINEERING: 1 On 06-02-09 this issue was discussed with Tecla, yourself, and other planners in attendance. The Drive Aisle has been revised to show a maximum 20% grade and reflects the comments dated 3-12-07 under Engineering - Item #10. During this meeting, the difficulty of providing a Drive Aisle to a subterranean parking area in a small lot PD was discussed and a resolution was agreed, by Planning & Engineering staff present, that the Drive Aisle as shown could be approved provided the slope did not exceed 20%. Revisions are consistent and reflected in this revised planning and engineering submittal. CS & A. 1 -A. 12 & Civil Engineer's Plans 2 See plans provided by Civil Engineer - The Sea Bright Company ISSUES OF CONCERN - PLANNING: 1 a-b See Site Yard Wall Details Sht A.3 1 c See Elevations for Exisfing & Finish Grades Shts A.7-A.9 2 a-c See plans provided by Civil Engineer - The Sea Bright Company 2 d Square footage calculations have been revised to match CS & A.2-A.5 2 e-f See plans provided by Civil Engineer - The Sea Bright Company 2 g See plans provided by Civil Engineer - The Sea Bright Company and architectural plans Shts A.1,A.S & A.7 2 h The plans show the guest parking space in a carport area adjacent to the Drive Aisle and is accessible to both Units 'A' & 'B'. Shts A.l,A.2 & A.9 2 i There will be 8" x 1 '-4" landscape pockets along the Drive Aisle retaining wall and along Unit A' Entry Walkway Shts A. 1 ,A.2 & A.3 2 j See plans provided by Civil Engineer - The Sea Bright Company 2 k See plans provided by Civil Engineer - The Sea Bright Company Also see Exterior Elevation General Notes on Elevation sheets Shts A.7 & A.B 2 I See plans provided by Civil Engineer - The Sea Bright Company ISSUES OF CONCERN - LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: 1-14 See revised Landscape Concept, Conservation & Water Use Plans & Response (attached) provided by Landscape Architect - Darsano Design Associates ISSUES OF CONCERN - ENGINEERING: 1 - 8 See plans provided by Civil Engineer - The Sea Bright Company Should you have any questions or concerns please do not hesitate to contact me personally regarding this response and the revised plans as submitted. Sincerely, Buck Thompson TC Pi Arc Design .^....o ..A9/oe ^ ^^^^^ City of Carlsbad Planning Department February 14, 2008 Mr. Ralph Gonzales Wynn Engineering, Inc. 27315 Valley Center Road Valley Center, CA 92082 SUBJECT: 1^^ REVIEW FOR CP 08-01/ CDP 08-04 (RELATED MS 08-01) BLUE CONDOMINIUMS Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carisbad. The Planning Department has reviewed your Condominium Permit and Coastal Development Permit, applications no. CP 08-01/CDP 08-04, as to its completeness for processing. The application is incomplete, as submitted. Attached are two lists. The first list is information which must be submitted to complete your application. This list of items must be submitted directly to your staff planner by appointment. All list items must be submitted simultaneously and a copy of this list must be included with your submittals, including five (5) sets of plans. No processing of your application can occur until the applicafion is determined to be complete. The second list is issues of concern to staff; When all required materials are submitted the City has 30 days to make a determination of completeness. If the application is determined to be complete, processing for a decision on the application will be inifiated. In addition, please note that you have six months from the date the application was initially filed, January 23, 2008, to either resubmit the application or submit the required informafion. Failure to resubmit the applicafion or to submit the materials necessary to determine your application complete shall be deemed to constitute withdrawal of the application. If an application is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn, a new applicafion must be submitted. Please contact your staff planner. Shannon Wemeke, at (760) 602-4621 or swern(5)ci.carisbad.ca.us. if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Smcerely, DON NEU Planning Director DN:SW:sm Enc: Hazardous Waste and Substances Statement Environmental Information Form Redlined landscape plans Policy 15 Police Department comments c: Barry Blue, 2950 Ocean Street, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Buck Thompson, Pi Arc Design, La Jolla, CA 92037 Darsono Cunninham, Darsono Design Associates, Inc., 5014 Mt La Platta Drive, San Diego, CA 92117 Chris DeCerbo, Team Leader Tecla Levy, Project Engineer File Copy Data Entry 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us Cf* 0l¥¥CBWlfe-b4, BLU^ONDOMINIUMS February 14 , 2008 Paoe 2 LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION Planning: / 1. A substantial revision to the current Planned Development (PD) standards (C.M.C. Chapter 21.45) was approved by the City Council in February, 2007. However, the revisions have not been approved by the California Coastal Commission (CCC) and are, therefore, not codified NjifiJ '/ ' ' at this fime. It is anticipated that the eariiest time in which the changes will be considered by the CCC is in the fall of 2008. Since the design of the proposed project relies on certain components of the revised PD standards, it is staffs understanding that you wish to process your project under the revised Planned Development Ordinance. Please be advised that your application will remain incomplete until the revisions are^ approved by the CCC. Although the project will be deemed incomplete, staff can continue to review and comment on the plans and any subsequent revisions against the proposed PD standards and prepare the project for review by the Planning Commission. If, however, after one year from the date of application submittal, the revisions have not been approved by the CCC, the application will need to be withdrawn or the project will need to be substantially revised to meet the current, more restrictive PD standards. In addifion, please be advised that should the CCC deny or revise any of the proposed changes, the project will need to be revised to address any changes. To confirm that you wish to process the proposed project undei* the proposed PD standards, please submit a written request. The request should acknowledge the above-noted discussion regarding the applicafion remaining incomplete for up to one year, etc. y 2. Pursuant to Section of 21.82.040 of the Carlsbad^Municipal Code, a Site Development Plan (SDP) is required. This is recognized on the project plans; however, a fee was not paid for an SDP at project submittal. Therefore, please pay the applicable fee in the sum of $4,045.00. ^^^^ Please submit a color and materials board for the building materials. / 4. The "Hazardous Waste and Substances Statement" submitted with the application is incomplete. Please see attached and identify whether the project site is identified on the Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List compiled by the California Environmental Protection Agency. J 5. Please certify the Environmental Information Form with a signature and a date (see attached). / 6. Please submit a roof plan for the proposed development. The roof design should include the ridges, hips, slope, slope direction, roof decks, etc. In addition, the roof plan shall depict the location of any anficipated rooftop equipment, such as air conditioning units. Please be advised that all rooftop equipment is required to be screened. J 7. Please complete and submit a statement of agreement to waive tentative parcel map time limits form. This agreement is required because the project involves concurrent processing of a discretionary planning application. 8. In order to accurately assess the grading impacts and analyze the proposed mass and scale of the project in relationship to adjacent properties, please provide east-west and north-south CP 08-01/CDP 08-04, BLU^ONDOMINIUMS February 14 , 2008 Page 3 cross sections drawn to scale. The cross sections should include the existing, adjacent residential development (driveways and structures) as well as the proposed development and any associated fences/ walls. Revise the Cover Sheet (Sheet CS) as follows: / a. Add the proposed project density (12.5 dwelling units per acre); /b. Add a project description. Please include the demolition of the two existing single-family homes and any other structures proposed to be demolished in the description; y c. Add the calculation for gross lot area in acreage (.16 acres); / d. Add the following case numbers to the plans: CP 08-01 and CDP 08-04. In addition please add the related MS case number in parentheses. Please note that an SDP case number will be assigned once the associated fees have been paid; y e. Change the project title to "Blue Condominiums" (on all sheets); and / f. Note the number of proposed parking spaces, whether spaces are covered/ uncovered, and identify what the requirement is pursuant to the proposed Planned Development Ordinance. 10. Revise the Site Plan (Sheet A. 1) as follows: /a. Label the types of existing adjacent uses and uses on the subject site (i.e. apartment, condominiums, single-family homes, etc.). Please also identify the location of the existing adjacent driveways; Jb. Label the location, species, and size of any existing trees (it may be helpful to provide an existing site plan as a separate exhibit); /c. Provide dimension for the distance between the garage door opening for Unit B and the western property line; Breakdown the landscaping calculation to distinguish between common and private area; and ^ CC'j"^'^'" ^ ^ ^ Identify any offsite fire hydrants located within 300 feet of the project boundary. 11. Revise the Basement Floor Plan (Sheet A.2) as follows: y a. Note the square footage of the recreation room; J b. Dimension the minimum 20' x 20' area to park two cars for each unit; /c. Provide dimension for the distance between the garage door opening for Unit B and the western property line; / d. Prove a dimension for each plane on the western elevation; y e. Provide turning radius for the guest space (please see Issues Comment # 4); and / f. Ufilize a different symbol for the proposed wall along the boundary of the property since it appears to be the same symbol as the interior/ exterior walls of the structure. 12. Revise the floor plans for Unit A (Sheet A.4) as follows: /a. Note the area of each deck (in square feet); and /b. Provide the linear setback dimension between all decks and the adjacent property line. CP 08-01/ CDP 08-04, BLU&tJONDOMINIUMS February 14 , 2008 Page 4 13. Revise the Tentative Parcel Map (Sheet 1) as follows: The lot coverage calculations do not correspond with the Cover Sheet of the architectural plans. Please reconcile the plans accordingly; Insert the square footage for the recreation area and provide a breakdown between private and shared space; Note the proposed density; Under "Existing/ Proposed Use" it is noted that the existing duplex units will be removed. Based on a review of the site plan and a site investigation, it appears that there are two detached single-family units located on the site. Please clarify and revise as needed; e. Clarify the types of residenfial uses adjacent to the site. At least two of the adjacent uses are apartments yet the site plan notes "(e) residence." In addition, please note the location of the existing adjacent driveways; Provide "BW" measurements for the proposed retaining wall; Provide dimension for the distance between the garage door opening for Unit B and the western property line; and h. Revise the TPM exhibit to take into account "Issues" comments below. 14. Revise the Grading/ Drainage Exhibit (Sheets 1-3) as follows: y a. Identify the location of the size and type of all mature trees on the site and note which are to be removed/ retained; /b. Clarify the types of residential uses adjacent to the site. At least two of the adjacent uses are apartments yet the site plan notes "(e) residence." In addition, please note the location of the existing adjacent driveways; c. Identify the height (TW/ BW) of existing wall to remain; / d. Provide "BW measurements for the proposed retaining wall; ye. Identify locations of patios, walls and any other structures at-grade; yf. Identify the spot elevations at the corners of pad; ng. j Provide dimension for the distance between the garage door opening for Unit B and the ^ western property line; and /h. Revise the Grading exhibit to take into account "Issues" comments below. Engineering: 1. Storm Water Management Plan must comply with the RWQCB 2007 order. "Low Impact Development" (LID) design must be incorporated into the plan. See issues of concern item 13 to 15. 2. Revise the Preliminary Hydrology Report to comply with comments below. See Engineering issues of concern item 9 to 12. CP 08-01/ CDP 08-04, BLUEXONDOMINIUMS February 14, 2008 Page 5 ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: Density 1. The request for a two-unit condominium has a proposed residential density of 12.5 dwelling units per acre. Although the density does not fall within the Residential High (RH) General Plan designafion range, (15-23 dwelling units per acre), the unit yield for 15.1 dwelling units per acre is 2.4 units. Pursuant to CMC Section 21.53.230, unit yields rounded down pursuant to this provision that result in a density below the minimum density of the applicable land use designation shall be considered consistent with the General Plan. Site Design & Parking J 2. Please revise the basement exhibit to demonstrate how it meets the definition of a basement pursuant to CMC Section 21.04.045. As designed, portions of the lowest floor of the structure do not qualify as a basement due to the fully exposed garage area on the western elevation. Staff is not able to verify if more than 75% of the perimeter of the building qualifies as a basement. The basement definition has been provided below for your reference: "Basement" means that portion of a building between floor and ceiling which is partiy below and partly above grade as measured along the exterior (immediately outside of "building coverage") perimeter of the structure but so located that the vertical distance from exterior grade to the adjacent interior floor beiow is more than the vertical distance from extenor grade to adjacent interior ceiling. This definition must apply to a minimum of seventy-five percent ofthe perimeter of buiiding coverage for a structure to qualify as a basement. The portion of a basement that is below existing grade is not included in the measurement of building height (as defined in Section 21.04.065). / Pursuant to CMC Section 21.045.060, Table C (C.5, Drive-aisles), a minimum 24-foot vehicle ^-^/^ back up area shall be provided in front of garages or carports. Based on a review of the (j^jie ' .« V basement floor plan and taking into account the requirement that each 2-car-garage area , ^ 7 needs to have a minimum dimension of 20' x 20' (CMC Secfion 21.45.080, Table E.7), the r UsW^-^ ^ minimum back up space requirement has not been met. Specifically, the western stall for CA'I" Ijpjt A and both stalls of Unit B have 19' and 22' of back up space, respectively. /Please be advised that pursuant to CMC Section 21.24.060, underground parking may be /Jocated within the setbacks of residentially-zoned property, provided that within the setback /area, all of the "subterranean parking structure" is completely underground and the setbacks Care fully landscaped. In order to address the 24' back up requirement for Unit B, staff recommends that the eastern edge of subterranean garage area for Unit B be pushed out 5' to the eastern property line. In conjunction with this change, staff also recommends shifting the retaining wall along the western property line 3-4 feet to the east to increase the width of the landscape area. To address the minimum 24' back up area for the western parking stall for Unit A, staff recommends the extension of the western wall and the garage opening in the basement. /A. Pursuant to the attached comments received from the Police Department ("Parking"), there V are concerns regarding the design of the basement/ garage since it is not controlled and has iimited surveillance, therefore providing a greater security risk for the vehicles parked in the CP 08-01/ CDP 08-04, BLU&^ONDOMINIUMS ^ February 14 , 2008 Page 6 area, the people accessing the vehicles, and the other activities such as the workout room, bathroom and storage units. To address these concerns, staff therefore recommends the incorporation of garage doors/ gates. In addition, with the inclusion of a garage door/ gate, it will bring the project into conformance with the storage space requirements which staff further discuss under #17 below. Staff has concerns regarding the location of the guest space since it will be inaccessible to visitors of Unit B. The visitor parking space shall be accessible to both units, at all times. In 4 J addition, it does not appear that there is adequate space for the guest space to back out in r one motion and pull fonward out of the garage in a 2""^ motion. The car cannot back out into 4f ^y^Q driveway. Therefore, staff recommends redesigning the basement floor plan so that a separate area, exclusive of the garage area of Unit A and B, is provided for the visitor parking stall. / 6. Pursuant to CMC Section 21.45.060, Table C (C.5, Drive-aisles), driveways shall be accented with enhanced pavement. Please note this requirement on all applicable plans and provide details on the type of pavement. y 7. Pursuant to CMC Section 21.45.080, Table E (E.5, Minimum Building Setbacks), garages facing directly onto a drive aisle shall be equipped with an automatic garage opener. If the garage area is going to be gated or if garage doors will be proposed, the elevatiojis shall be revised to address this requirement. Staff recommends the installation of garage doors to avoid nuisance issues. v/s. Pursuant to CMC Section 21.45.060, Table C (C.8, Screening of Parking Areas), open parking areas shall be screened from adjacent residences and public rights-of-ways by either a view- obscuring wall or landscaping. Please revise the landscape plan to provide better landscaping to screen the underground garage from the existing residential structures to the west as the properties will have views down to the parking area. y 9. The proposed project currently includes a 20-foot-deep front yard setback. Pursuant to CMC Section 21.45.080, Table E (E.5, Minimum Building Setbacks), since there is not a direct- entry garage off Cherry Avenue, the minimum front yard setback for the proposed structure is 10 feet. Given the requirement discussed under #9 below, you may wish to extend the southern elevation by 5-10 feet to the south. However, please ensure that the lot coverage remains under 60%. 10. Pursuant to CMC Section 21.45.080, Table E (E.5, Minimum Building Setbacks), all fioors which are not directly above the garage shall be setback a minimum of 5 feet from the driveway and shall be fully landscaped. In addition, all floors (including the deck area) directly above the garage cannot cantilever over the driveway. The floors must either be . flush with the wall of the garage (i.e., 0 setback when projecting over the front of a garage) or i^^ setback from the garage. With respect to the front portion of the home which is not located [Oh'" garage, the plans need to be revised to accommodate a 5-foot-wide landscaped setback off the 12-foot-wide driveway (this includes all supporting columns, stem walls, buttresses, etc). The landscape plans shall be revised as well to reflect this requirement. Staff recommends that trees be planted (in addition to groundcover and shrubs) to soften the ^western elevation. With respect to the deck area which cantilevers over the driveway, the V plans should be revised to eliminate the cantilevered area. CONDOMINIUMS February 14, 2008 Page 7 IHeight & Rooftop Decks '11. As submitted, the project exceeds the height limits allowed within the Beach Area Overiay Zone (BAOZ). Residential structures within the BAOZ may not exceed a building height of 30 feet and two stories (if a minimum 3/12 roof pitch), or 24 feet and 2 stories (if less than a 3/12 roof pitch). Building Height is deflned as the vertical distance of a structure measured from the more restrictive or lowest of finished or existing grade. The vertical distance is measured from all points at grade along and within the building coverage to the highest point of the ,cK structure directly above that point of measurement. In the areas where the basement is exposed, the height measurements shall be taken from the finish floor of the garage/ basement. Taking this standard into account, please revise the height ineasurements for the western elevafion. Based on a scaled review of the plans, the 30 foot height limitation is exceeded on the western elevation and revisions will be required. Pursuant to CMC Section 21.04.330 (Definition of a "Story"), mezzanines shall not be considered a story provided that they do not exceed 50% of the floor area of the story they are located within. Please provide an exhibit which demonstrates compliance with this requirement. Pursuant to Planning Department Policy No. 15, "Roof Decks," the total roof deck area shall be less than 25% of the building footprint. Therefore, please provide the square footage of all the roof decks and provide a calculafion for the roof deck-to-building footprint ratio. A copy of Policy No. 15 has been attached for your reference. y 14. Roof decks cannot exceed a height of 24 feet as measured from the more restrictive or lowest of finfshed or existing grade. Based on a scaled review of the western elevafions, the floor of the deck is 28 feet in height as measured from the flnished floor of the garage/ basement. Please provide the deck heights on all elevations from all points (lowest of exisfing or finished grade) arcujnd the building and revise the plans to address this requirement. P[j\Ud '^i^ b^dc -tr. eoj^-fo Omoply ^J[C^ 15. Pursuant to CMC Secfion 21.45.060, Table C (C.3, Permitted Intrusions into Setbacks), balconies are permitted to encroach no more than two feet into any required yard (CMC Sec. 21.46.120). Please revise the deck area on the south elevation of the structure to ensure consistency with the allowed maximum encroachment. Private Recreation Area/ Storage Space y 16. Submit an exhibit which provides a breakdown of all common and private recreation areas proposed on the site. The exhibit should include the type of use (i.e., deck, private patio, recreation room, private yard, etc), dimensions, as well as the size of each area (in square feet). The exhibit should also include an analysis of the project's compliance with the private recreation standards pursuant to Table E of the revised Planned Development Ordinance for Multiple-family dwellings (E.8, Private Recreafional Space). 17. Pursuant to CMC Secfion 21.45.060, Table C (C.13, Storage Space), a minimum of 480 cubic feet of separate storage space is required per unit. The required storage space shall be separately enclosed for each unit and be conveniently accessible to the outdoors. This requirement can be safisfied with the incorporation of a two-car garage for each unit (minimum dimension of 20' x 20', free and clear). However, since the proposed project does not currently propose garage doors or gates, this requirement has not been satisfled. Staff therefore recommends the incorporation of garage doors into the project design. This will not CP 08-01/ CDP 08-04, BLuktONDOMINIUMS ^ February 14 , 2008 Page 8 only assist in securing the basement area (addressing Police Department concerns) but will also fulfill the storage space requirement. Architecture / 18. Pursuant to CMC Section 21.45.080, Table E (E.2, Architectural Requirements), there shall be at least 3 separate building planes on all building elevations. The minimum offset in planes shall be 18 inches and shall include but not be limited to, building walls, windows, and roofs. In addition, all building elevations shall incorporate a minimum of four complimentary design elements (see table for list of elements). Please revise the floor plans and elevations to address this requirement. The floor plans shall note the linear offset of each plane and the elevations shall note all design elements so staff can confirm compliance with this standard. / other Items 19. Staff has concerns that the designated refuse areas located at the rear of the project will not be accessible to the refuse company. Please provide additional information on how you intend trash to be collected and provide a letter from the appropriate waste management company stating that the access to the trash receptacles is adequate. /20. To create a more invifing entrance to Unit A and soften the impacts of the eastern-elevation, odtd^ct recommends the addition of tree wells so Queen Palms (or other variety approved by City landscape consultant) can be planted adjacent to the walkway which runs along the eastern property line. | 21y Project perimeter walls should complement the project's architecture and should avoid monotony by using design elements with horizontal articulation (i.e. caps or contrasting c^ j^.V accent bands) and vertical articulation (periodic pilasters, insets, offsets, buttress, change in Q' \ material, etc.). Taking into consideration the above-noted design recommendations, please C^' submit a sample elevation of the proposed perimeter wall. 21. Infill residential projects with two or more dwelling units that: (1) require a discretionary / permit (i.e. Site Development Plan) and (2) are bordered on a minimum of two sides (property lines) by existing single-family residential development shall be required to: a. Submit project photo-simulation exhibits (for staff and Planning Commission) upon determination that the application is complete The photo simulation exhibits should be scaled representations of the project, as viewed from the adjacent street as well as the adjacent single family properties. /23. Please be advised that the City's Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (CMC Chapter 21.85) requires that a minimum of 15% of all approved units in any residential project be made affordable to lower income households. However, residential projects involving six or fewer dwelling units may satisfy their lower income inclusionary housing requirement by paying an in-lieu fee. Therefore, the project will be accordingly conditioned to pay an in-lieu fee prior to building permit issuance for each unit. Currently, the in-lieu fee per market rate dwelling unit is $4,515.00. This fee is subject to change based on yearly revisions to the fee schedule. Landscape Comments: Numbers below are referenced on the red line plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area ofthe comment concern. CP 08-01/ CDP 08-04, BLU^ONDOMINIUMS February 14 , 2008 Page 9 1. Please show and label all property lines, right-of-ways and easements on the plans. Insure no trees are located within easements. 2. Please indicate the proposed quantities of trees and shrubs in the legend. 3. All planting areas shall be outlined as one of the four planting zones below and described in Appendix A: Zone One Lush Zone Two Refined Zone Three Naturalizing/Transitional Zone Four Native 4. Indicate the following percentages: a. Percent of the total site used for landscaping. b. Percent of the landscaped area (as defined in Appendix G) of each planting zone as described in Section A.5-3 and Appendix A. 5. Outline the areas of landscape maintenance responsibilities (private,,, common area/homeowners' association. City, etc.) 6. Show any bio-swales/detenfion basins or underground drainage collection systems (in or under planting areas that could impact the planting) and work these facilities into the design. 7. Landscaping consisting of ground cover, shrubs, and trees shall be used to screen elements of unsightliness and screen/soften new improvements. Landscaping shall be used to accentuate and enhance architecture. Please incorporate minimum medium size trees along the east and west sides of the building to soften and enhance the building elevations. A minimum of 3 groupings of 2-3 trees is needed. Please also incorporate a minimum of one medium size tree on the south side ofthe building. 8. Landscape elements over 30" in height (including planting measured at maturity) are not allowed at street corners within a triangular zone drawn from two points, 25' outward from the beginning of curves and end of curves. (See Appendix C.4). The same height limitation applies at driveways 25' from the edge of the apron outward along the curb then 45-degrees in toward the property. Please show sight lines on the plans and address landscaping. 9. All ufilities are to be screened. Landscape construction drawings will be required to show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. 10. Provide a Water Conservation Plan in conjunction with the Landscape Concept Plan. This plan shall demonstrate to the City how the proposed development will use all practical means available to conserve water in the landscape. Plans shall include but not be limited to: a. Extent of Planting Zone 1 (Lush) - Indicate percentage of Zone 1 planting (per Appendix A) of the total landscaped area (as defined in Appendix G). Provide justification for the appropriateness of where Zone 1 plantings are used in terms of water conservation. (For example, are Zone 1 plantings in areas of shade where they will use less water and/or has the soil been suitably amended so as to retain relatively greater moisture?); CP 08-01/ CDP 08-04, BLUE CONDOMINIUMS February 14 , 2008 Page 10 b. Proposed turf areas. (See limitations in IV.C.3-4.2) Give percentage of turf of the total landscaped area; c. Accommodations for reclaimed water (existing or future) and outline planfing areas proposed to use reclaimed water; d. Written description of water conservation features including addressing xeriscape principles (see Appendix B) within the project; and e. Colored water use plan separately outlining areas that will use either recycled or potable water. 11. Please identify all symbols in the legend. 12. It is being verified with the Engineering Department whether or not street trees will be allowed in the right-of-way. Direction will be provided with the next review. 13. Queen Palms are used as the street tree along the street to the east of this project. It is recommended that street trees be revised to Queen Palms to match. 14. RETURN REDLINES and provide 2 copies of all plans (concept, water conservation, and colored water use plan) on the next submittal. Engineering: Tentative Map/S/te Plan: 1. Add MS 08-01 in the upper right hand corner. 2. Please identify all existing improvements along Cherry Avenue, including but not limited to (paving, access-holes, inlets, power poles, street lights, adjacent driveways, vaults, transformers, etc.). 3. Provide Cherry Avenue cross-section and show approximate locations existing utilities. 4. Provide adequate spot elevations to determine direction of drainage. Please field verify for any off-site drainage basins that may affect the site and include in the analysis as necessary. Topo shows that the adjacent property to the North drains towards the project site. 5. The site plan shows proposed retaining walls immediately adjacent to existing walls (labeled to remain) along the Northern and Southern property boundary. Please show how this is accomplished without impacts to existing walls and adjacent property. Provide multiple cross-sections of the site to demonstrate differences in grade and retaining wall heights (both proposed and existing). Obtain recommendations from the soil engineer. Show preliminary details of Temporary shoring if required by soil's engineer. 6. Show how passenger vehicles will maneuver in and out of the driveway and the parking stalls. Using the template of Caltrans for passenger design vehicle with a minimum of 24- foot turning radius, show the inside and outside tire tracks on all critical turns. 7. The plan shows washer and dryer are located at the underground parking level. This uVc CP 08-01/ CDP 08-04, BLUE CONDOMINIUMS February 14, 2008 Page 11 requires a pump sewer system. Please show and indicate location. 8. Revise the design of driveway slopes to incorporate 10-foot vertical curves at all significant grade breaks to ensure vehicular clearances are maintained. Hydrology Report: 9. The coefficient of run-off, C, used in calculating the storm water discharge rate appears incorrect. The C value was directly taken from Table 3-1 of the hydrology manual instead of calculating the C based on the actual percent impervious area as shown on the proposed plan. Please note that the values provided in the hydrology manual tables are based on average conditions to serve as guide for design engineers and its applicability to specific project requires good engineering judgment. Please review and revise accordingly. 10. On page 5 of the hydrology report, the Tc for Basin 1 appears incorrect (too high). The FAA equation is applicable to sheet fiow conditions and appears not applicable in this case. The channel flow is more appropriate. Also, initial time of concentration for basin 1 was taken directly from the Table and appears incorrect. Please clarify where the initial drainage area and calculate the initial time of concentration based on the actual condition, (in this case appears to be roof gutter flow?). 11. It appears that there will be signiflcant increase in run-off. Provide mitigations for any increases in run-off caused by the proposed development. Show that the post- development Q does not exceed the pre-development Q. 12. Please comply with all comments shown in red in the hydrology report. SWMP: 13. Please revise SWMP report to comply with the RWQCB order 2007. 14. Please incorporate "Low Impact Development" (LID) in the project design as required by RWQCB order 2007. 15. The current SUSMP requirement classifies Filter Inserts as ineffective treatment BMP. Filter inserts are no longer acceptable as numerically sized treatment BMP. It can be used as part of the treatment train. Please provide an acceptable BMP that will effectively treat the pollutants of concerns identified in this project. 16. Address redlined comments on the tentative parcel map (redlines are included with the Engineering MS comments package). Fire Department: 1. Automatic fire sprinklers are required. Police Department comments are attached. (01/27/2009) Shannon VVerneke-150-1^Cherry Ave DrivewaiyBacku^^ ^ Page 1 From: "piarcdesign" <piarcdesign(gsbcglobal.net> To: "Shannon Werneke" <swern@ci.carisbad.ca.us> Date: 01/27/2009 1:04 PM Subject: 150-152 Cherry Ave Driveway Backup Attachments: 150-152 Cherry Ave - Driveway Back-up.pdf; 0 Cherry Street Viewjpg; 1 Cher ry Street Viewjpg; 2 Cherry Street Viewjpg; 3 Cherry Street View.jpg; 4 C herry Driveway View.jpg Shannon, After giving much thought to the response from the Engineering Dept regarding the proposed Driveway/Drive Aisle located at 150-152 Cherry Ave I find that perhaps another review (for the 3rd time) would be prudent I have highlighted what I believe are the salient portions of the message from Tecla Levy and I have responded with additional information and backup to hopefully reach a resolution to this matter I have attached a Site Plan, Section and illustrations that support and substantiate my point of view regarding these matters. Engineering Standard Chapter 4, section 1 (B) supports CMC Section 21.44.05(C), provisions for backing up onto the street. The safety issue we've identified goes beyond literal interpretation of the said section of the engineering standard. Engineering staff determined that the proposed parking layout would force guest and unit B residents to back out into the street if an obstruction or car is parked in front of garage A and or if the car has turning radius larger than 21 feet A car backing up at 21% slope driveway will have zero sight distance and violates engineering intersection sight distance requirement. Chapter 3.S.B. This is a serious safety concern. Engineering Standard Chapter 4.I.G requires Low Use Driveways to have a maximum grade of 15%. Engineering staff will not support a driveway slope variance from 15% to 21% if sight distance standard requirement is not met (Chapter 3.19.4). Engineering staff discussed (for the second time) the current design proposal at the engineering staff meeting this morning and again concluded that the design is not acceptable. Engineering staff is requesting a redesign of the underground parking garage to meet engineering sight distance requirement, maximum driveway slope and adequate vertical curve length at the driveway entrance to accommodate large cars. Please let me know if you have addifional questions. Thanks, (01/27/2009) Shannon Werneke-150-1 pjCherry Ave Driveway Backup f ^ ^ _ ^ ^Page2" Tecla Levy, PE Associate Engineer Regarding the possible occurrence of the guest vehicle or a vehicle parked in Unit A Garage (not B -1 presume) having to back out into the street because a vehicle is parked in front of Unit B Garage: Obviously, this is a small private driveway servicing a two unit residenfial property. Should another vehicle temporarily find itself parked in the driveway (and I agree this circumstance could happen) then it would be difficult to not block the enfire driveway unless the vehicle should chose to maneuver into a parallel parked condition, under the overhanging balcony above, and directly blocking the entrance to Unit B Garage. But you have to ask yourself - why would this even happen? The living spaces are clearly on the Main and Upper Levels, as well as the entrances to each Unit, so it is more than likely not going happen and it won't be delivery vehicles or visifing guests. But, it might be the infrequent service vehicle temporarily on locafion for the maintenance or repair of equipment located in the Basement areas. Should this happen, then common courtesy should prevail and all Owners could be nofified of a temporary inconvenience and make the adjustments necessary. A sign could also be posted stating that "No Parking" is allowed in the Driveway/Drive Aisle. And, if a vehicle sfill decides to use the parallel parked condifion in front of Unit B Garage then Unit A and Guest vehicles could still back up the Driveway/Drive Aisle, as allowed under CMC Section 21.44.05(C); but then no vehicles would be able to exit Garage Unit B. These possible situations appear to be analyzing the infinite scenario of "what ifs", and it seems reasonable to me that it becomes impossible to predict the outcome if considerafion is given to all of the plausible circumstances of "what ifs", when what should be considered is the circumstance, exisfing constraint and the context of the situafion. This is not a multi-family project or large complex with mulfiple vehicles. Bottom line is it is just a small driveway, serving a small complex, consisfing of only two units, and a small lot that precludes maximizing the available land to satisfy an opfimum Drive Aisle; and this lot is typical for the Beach Area Overiay Zone. I am assuming this situafion was recognized and realized by the intent of CMC Section 21.44.05(C), all-the-while not acknowledging or allowing for the creafion of an unsafe condition. Regarding the perilous and unsafe condifion, as outlined in Tecla's (01/27/2009) Shannon Werneke - 150-152 Cherry Ave Driveway Backup Page 3 —-g— —' '''' • '— ' •—^ • —^ • •••••• ' —'—•' '-f^^—^— —— • • response, for a vehicle not having adequate sight line distance: In order to facilitate enclosed parking for all vehicles, accessibility and turn-around requirements on a standard size Beach Area Residenfial Lot and to achieve the minimum density ofthe General Plan, it almost necessitates the provision for underground parking to meet all other requirements and still have a viable project. As planned for this particular project, a vehicle exifing the property, or backing out of the Driveway/Drive Aisle should it chose to, is clearly on a 15-16% slope as it reaches the property line and not a 21% or greater slope condifion, as stated in Tecla's message. Safety and adequate visibility were given great considerafion to allow an exifing vehicle the ability to safely enter onto the street without endangering other moving vehicles or pedestrians while providing adequate sight light distance. Considerafion must also be given to the fact that a vehicle will be on plane prior to reaching the street curb, or entering the street, by traveling across a 12' +/- secfion of public right-of-way, consisfing of streetscape and sidewalk, and then an additional 7' +/- area provided for parallel parked vehicles. It does not appear that these condifions will ever change in the near future, or have an impact on a vehicle's ability to exit safely from the Driveway/Drive Aisle, because it would be in conflict with other City of Carisbad planning and neighborhood policies. It does not appear this was given proper analysis in reviewing the "exisfing condifions" for approval of this project and perhaps another review is necessary. I desire to have the Engineering Dept review this message, along with the attached Site Plan, Section and supporting illustrations demonstrafing my posifion, and reach a resolufion that this Project is a plausible and founded solufion given the existing constraints. Additionally, and without modifying the proposed plan for the Basement Parking and Driveway/Drive Aisle, modificafions can be achieved, and presented by the Civil Engineer, which can moderately adjust the Drive Aisle slope condifions and pitch breaks to achieve proper vertical curve criteria without jeopardizing vehicle clearances, safety and sight line distance requirements. Please forward this message to the appropriate parties. It is my understanding that you are in the process of reviewing the entire submittal for approval and I would like this addifional informafion considered prior to receiving your response. Should you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, (01/27/2009) Shannon Werrieke-150-1 ^^herry Ave Driveway Backup Page 4 Buck Thompson TT Pi Arc Design 627 Bonair Way La Jolla, Ca 92037 858.454.2720 cell 858.336.8249 71 PI Arc Design ezi Bonair Way, La Jolla, Ca '12O3T a5a.454.2T20 cell 353.336.324-1 DATE: 12-4-08 Re: 1" Review for CP 08-01/ CDP 08-04 Blue Condominiums Associate Planner: Shannon Werneke RECEIVED JAN 0 7 2009 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPT PROJECT: Blue Condominiums OWNER: BLUE FAMILY TRUST ITEM# RESPONSE PLAN - SHEET LOCATION LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED - PLANNING: J 1 /2 y4 J 5 JB J 7 & /9 10 11 12 13 14 Letter of acknowledgement attached $4,045.00 Site Development,Plan fee paid 03-05-08 Final color and materials presentafion board to be submitted prior to scheduled Planning Commission meeting See response from Civil Engineer - Wynn Engineering See response from Civil Engineer - Wynn Engineering Roof Plan submitted Previously submitted See response from Civil Engineer - Wynn Engineering Cover Sheet revised to reflect Items a. - f. Site Plan revised to reflect Items a. - e. Basement Floor Plan revised to reflect Items a. - f. (regarding item e. - see Unit 'A' - Drive Aisle Backup & Turn Around Study 'A' & 'B' and response from Wynn Engineering) Floor Plans revised to reflect Items a. - b. See response from Civil Engineer - Wynn Engineering See response from Civil Engineer - Wynn Engineering see attached Sht. A.6 Sht. CS Sht A.1 Sht A.2 Sht A. 13 Sht A.3 & A.4 ITEM# RESPONSE PLAN - SHEET LOCATION LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED - ENGINEERING: 1 See response from Civil Engineer - Wynn Engineering 2 See response from Civil Engineer - Wynn Engineering ISSUES OF CONCERN - PLANNING: / 1 Proposed Density approved See Basement Area - Diagram Sht A.2 ^ 3 See Revised Site Plan & Basement Floor Plan Sht A. 1 & A.2 yA Garage Doors added see revised Basement Floor Plan Sht A.2 f 5 / Guest Parking Space relocated see revised Basement Floor Plan Sht A.2 see Unit 'A' - Drive Aisle Backup & Turn Around Study A' & 'B' Sht A. 13 / 6 See "Scope of Wori<" regarding enhanced paving system Details to be determined Sht CS y 7 Garage Doors added see revised Basement Floor Plan Sht A.2 ys See revised Landscape Concept Plan Sht L. 1.0 y9 Proposed BIdg Setbacks are unchanged i/l 0 See revised Basement Floor Plan & Landscape Concept Plan regarding proposed landscape area adjacent to Drive Aisle Sht A.2 & L. 1.0 /l 1 Building height is consistent with BAOZ, additionally height has been indicated on East/West - Stainwell Section Sht A. 11 v/^ 12 Mezzanine is approx. 11 % of floor area located within See Mezzanine & Common Area Bathroom - Diagram Sht A.5 /13 Rooftop Sundecks are approx. 24% of Building Coverage See Unit 'A & Unit 'B' Rooftop Sundeck - Diagram Sht A.5 14 Rooftop Sundecks measure approx. 20'-0" from finish grade See Exterior Elevations Sht A. 8 & A. 9 15 Upper Floor Deck is consistent with setback requirements See Site Plan & Upper level Floor Plan Sht A. 1 & A.4 16 See Floor Plans and Diagrams for Common / Private Recreation Areas Sht A.2, A.S & A.4 2 ITEM# RESPONSE PLAN - SHEET LOCATION ISSUES OF CONCERN - PLANNING (con't): 17 Garage Doors added see revised Basement Floor Plan Sht A.2 18 Building plane offset dimensions are on Floor Plans and a note Sht A.2, A.S & A.4 describing proposed exterior architectural features and elements has been added Sht A.7, A.S & A.9 19 Refuse and recycle bins are located in each garage Sht A.2 It is proposed that bins will be transported to street for curb-side pick-up by each occupant 20 See revised Landscape Concept Plan & Response (attached) Sht L.1.0 21 Project perimeter walls are to be stucco finish with same color as main building wall color Due to existing grade differences between adjacent properties all side and rear perimeter walls will not exceed 6'-0" in height, and at the eastern and northem boundaries they will be 1' - S' less as viewed from the adjacent properties. See Site & Massing Studies Sht A. 12 (21) This project is not bordered by existing single family residences 23 Letter of acknowledgement attached see attached ISSUES OF CONCERN - LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: 1-14 See revised Landscape Concept Plans & Response (attached) Sht L.1.0 & L.2.0 ISSUES OF CONCERN - ENGINEERING: 1-4 See response from Civil Engineer - Wynn Engineering 5 On the Site Plan the note for exisfing retaining wall has been Sht A.1 amended to reflect that wall will be modified or removed under a separate agreement with the adjacent land owner. 6 See response from Civil Engineer - Wynn Engineering See Unit 'A - Drive Aisle Backup & Turn Around Study 'A & 'B' Sht. A. 13 This analysis is provided to demonstrate the ability of a standard passenger vehicle to maneuver safely and efficiently within a min. turning radius of 21 '-6" and a greater turning radius of 2S'-0". Average industry standard outside wheel turning radius is 21'-6". Because of the exisfing constraints of a small 50'-0" wide beach lot and in consideration of Carisbad Policies #44 & #66 - Architectural Design Guidelines & Livability Neighborhood Standards the use of the Caltrans Highway Design Manual standard minimum radius of 24'-0" should not apply. The issues of rate of speed, potential 3 ITEM# RESPONSE PLAN - SHEET LOCATION ISSUES OF CONCERN - ENGINEERING (con't): 6 (con't) vehicle overturn and associated safety concerns are not considerations in this particular applicafion. The issue is whether a vehicle, moving at a very slow rate of speed, can safely maneuver and exit the driveway in a forward mofion with a minimum of vehicle movement. This exhibit demonstrates that it can be accomplished safely and efficiently within the given parameters. 7-16 See response from Civil Engineer - Wynn Engineering ISSUES OF CONCERN - FIRE DEPARTMENT: 1 Automatic fire sprinklers are proposed for this project. See Project Data Note Sht CS ISSUES OF CONCERN - POLICE DEPARTMENT: 1 Garage Doors added see revised Basement Floor Plan Sht A.2 Please do not hesitate to personally contact me if you have any questions or comments regarding this response and the revised plans as submitted. Sincerely, Buck Thompson 71 Pi Arc Design RECEIVED civil engineerins structural design land surveying JAN 0 7 2009 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPT City of Carisbad January 6, 2009 Planning Department Job #07-071 Attn: Shannon Werneke, Staff Planner 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 Subject: Project Number: CP 08-01 / CDP 08-04 (related MS 08-01) Blue Condominiums 1^' Submittal Review Responses Dear Ms. Werneke, The following are Wynn Engineering, Inc. responses to your letter dated February 14, 2008 for the Blue Condominiums project. These responses are listed in the order in which they are in the City of Carisbad letter dated February 14, 2008. LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION: Planninq Items Items 1-3: These items are architectural in nature. Please refer to the Architect's response for further informafion. Item 4: The Hazardous Waste and Substance Statement has been revised. Please refer to the revised statement. Item 5: The project's Environmental Information Form has been revised. Please refer to the revised form. Items 5-12: These items are architectural in nature. Please refer to the Architect's response for further informafion. Item 13: This item has mulfiple items pertaining to the Tentafive Parcel Map (Sheet 1). Please see below: 13a: The lot coverage calculafion has been adjusted. Please refer to the revised Tentative Parcel Map. 13b: The requested area break down has been provided. Please refer to the revised Tentative Parcel Map. 13c: The density has been noted. Please refer to the revised Tentative Parcel Map. 13d: The land uses have been revised accordingly. Please refer to the revised Tentative Parcel Map. 27315 Valley Center Road • Valley Center, CA 92082 • (760) 749-8722 • Fax (760) 749-9412 Email: wynneng@wynnengineering.com • Los Angeles (310) 306-9728 • Fax (310) 306-2129 13e: The adjacent residential uses have been revised accordingly. Please refer to the revised Tentative Parcel Map. 13f: Bottom of wall call outs have been added. Please refer to the revised Tentafive Parcel Map. 13g: The dimension from the garage door opening for Unit B and the western property line has been added. Please refer to the revised Tentative Parcel Map. 13h: Addifional comments from the letter have been addressed as requested. Please refer to the additional comments in this response. Item 14: This item has multiple items pertaining to the Grading/Drainage Exhibit (sheets 1-3). Please see below: ^4a; All mature trees have been identified on the revised plans. Please refer to revised Sheets 1 and 2 of 4. 14b: The adjacent residenfial uses have been revised accordingly. Please refer to the revised Sheets 1 and 2 of 4. 14c: The existing wall that is adjacent to the property is on adjacent properties. It is a small CMU brick wall. The wall heights vary. Where the wall is to remain it is called out as to remain. Please refer to the revised Sheets 1 and 2 of 4. 14d: Bottom of wall call outs have been added. Please refer to the revised Sheets 1 and 2 of 4. 14e: Pafios, walls, and other at-grade structures have been called out. Please refer to revised Sheet 2 of 4. 14f: Spot elevations at pad corners have been added to revised Sheets 1 and 2 of 4. Elevafions on revised Sheet 2 are for pad and finished floor elevafions of the garage level. Elevations on revised Sheet 2 are for finished floor elevations on the first floor. Please refer to revised Sheets 1 and 2 of 4. 14g: The dimension from the garage door opening for Unit B and the western property line has been added. Please refer to the revised Sheets 1 and 2 of 4. 14h: Additional comments from the letter have been addressed as requested. Please refer to the addifional comments in this response. Engineering Items Item 1: The Storm Water Management Plan has been revised and the project has been redesigned to incorporate LID design elements and has been revised to comply with comments provided later in the letter. Please refer to the comments later in this response. In addifion, the report has been updated to the City of Carisbad Engineering Standards - Volume 4: Storm Water Standards Manual (2004 Edifion, rev 3/24/08 and 6/4/08). This manual update is dated after this letter was produced (2-13-08), but the revisions contained in the revised report meet the 'current' edition of the City Standards. Item 2: Jhe Preliminary Hydrology Report has been revised to comply with comments provided later in the letter. Please refer to the comments later in this response. ISSUES OF CONCERN (PLANNING): Items 1-23: These items are architectural in nature. Please refer to the Architect's response for further information. ISSUES OF CONCERN (LANDSCAPE COMMENTS) Items 1-14: These items pertain to landscaping issues. Please refer to the Landscape Architect's response for further information. ENGINEERING ISSUES OF CONCERN Tentative Map/Site Plan Item 1: MS 08-01 has been added to the top right of each sheet. Please refer to the revised plans. Item 2: The topographic features pertaining to Cherry Avenue have been expanded and the menfioned items have been specifically called out. Please refer to the revised Tentafive Parcel Map. Item 3: The cross section for Cherry Avenue has been added. Please refer to the revised Tentative Parcel Map. Item 4: Spot elevations have been added. In addition, the hydrology report illustrates and defines clear drainage paths. Please refer to the revised Tentafive Parcel Map and the revised Preliminary Hydrology Study. Item 5: Multiple cross sections have been added for the project site. These sections are not part of the Tentative Parcel Map, so please refer to Sheet S and 4 of the revised Conceptual Grading Plan. Item 6: This item has been addressed by the Architect in conjunction with the Planning Department. Please refer to sheet A.13 of the Architectural Plans for the project.\ Item 7: The project site will ufilize a sewer sump, grinder, and pump that will discharge to the City of Carisbad sanitary sewer system. This system will be designed more formally during the building permit phase by the project's mechanical designer. Notes and call outs have been added to the revised plans to illustrate this. Please refer to Construcfion Note 'F' on sheet 1 ofthe revised Conceptual Grading Plan. Item 8: The driveway has been redesigned accordingly. Please refer to sheet S of the revised Conceptual Grading Plan. Hydrology Report Item 9: The coefficients of run-off forthe pre- and post-development conditions have been re-evaluated. The please refer to the revised Preliminary Hydrology Report. Item 10: The revised hydrology study has been performed using CIVILCADD/CIVILDESIGN Engineering Software, © 1991-2006 version 7.7. This software is fully accepted by the County of San Diego as design software that meets the requirements and intenfions of the Hydrology Manual for hydrology design. In addifion: A. The basins in the existing and proposed conditions have been adjusted to account for inifial travel lengths and areas based on the ufilizafion of the software in the proper manner. B. Software output files have been included in the revised report for reference. C. The inifial basin areas have been cleariy defined on the revised Hydrology Study Exhibit. The revised exhibit clearly defines all drainage areas. D. In regards to the exisfing condifions the initial area is clearly defined and the sub- basin following channelizes the flow into the exisfing driveway areas in support of the software ufilizafion. E. In regards to the proposed condifions the inifial area is indeed 'roof areas. This has been cleariy delineated on the revised exhibit F. Please refer to the revise report for calculations, summary tables, software outputs, and the revised exhibit. Item 11: The original report called for an increase in Q of 0.57 cfs in the 100-Year condifions. The revised report now calls for a decrease of 0.54 cfs in the 100-Year conditions. The decrease is direct result of the addition of a 22.5X10X5 detention (retarding) basin designed into the garage spaces prior to the sump pump discharging to the curb and gutter. This decrease illustrates that the post construction discharge rate will be lower then the existing discharge rate. Please refer to the revised Preliminary Hydrology Report. Item 12: The following are responses to comments in red received from the hydrology report: A. Page 2 - The revised report calculates hydrology data using CIVILCADD/CIVILDESIGN Engineering Software instead of hand calculations. Table 3-1 is sfill being ufilized, but a more accurate value has been used. Please refer to page 2 and Attachment 2 of the revised hydrology report. B. Page 3 - The revised report calculates hydrology data using CIVILCADD/CIVILDESIGN Engineering Software instead of hand calculafions. Table S-1 is sfill being ufilized, but a more accurate value has been used. Please refer to page 2 and Attachment 2 of the revised hydrology report. C. Page 4 - The revised report calculates hydrology data using CIVILCADD/CIVILDESIGN Engineering Software instead of hand calculations. Table 3-1 is still being ufilized, but a more accurate value has been used. Please refer to page 2 and Attachment 2 of the revised hydrology report. D. Page 5 - The revised report calculates hydrology data using CIVILCADD/CIVILDESIGN Engineering Software instead of hand calculations. The % imperviousness has been ufilized along with Table 3-1, but a more accurate value has been used. Please refer to page S, Attachment 3, and the revised exhibit in the revised hydrology report. E. Page 6- The revised report calculates hydrology data using CIVILCADD/CIVILDESIGN Engineering Software instead of hand calculafions. Table 3-1 is still being utilized, but a more accurate value has been used. Please refer to page 3 and Attachment S of the revised hydrology report. Q F. Page 7- The revised report calculates hydrology data using CIVILCADD/CIVILDESIGN Engineering Software instead of hand calculations. Table 3-1 is sfill being ufilized, but a more accurate value has been used. Please refer to page 3 and Attachment 3 of the revised hydrology report. G. Page 10 - The revised report calculates hydrology data using CIVILCADD/CIVILDESIGN Engineering Software instead of hand calculations. The % imperviousness has been ufilized along with Table 3-1, but a more accurate value has been used. Please refer to page 3, Attachment S, and the revised exhibit in the revised hydrology report. H. Page 11 - The Engineer of work will sign and stamp the revised report. Please refer to page 5 of the revised report. I. Comments on Exhibit - The revised report calculates hydrology data using CIVILCADD/CIVILDESIGN Engineering Software instead of hand calculafions. The % imperviousness has been ufilized along with Table 3-1, but a more accurate value has been used. Please refer to page 3, Attachment 3, and the revised exhibit in the revised hydrology report. SIA^MP Item 13: The report has been updated to the City of Carisbad Engineering Standards - Volume 4: Storm Water Standards Manual (2004 Edition, rev S/24/08 and 6/4/08). This manual update is dated after this letter was produced (2-13-08), but the revisions contained in the revised report were performed to meet the 'current' edition of the City Standards. Please refer to the revised Water Quality Technical Report. Item 14: The report has been updated to the City of Carisbad Engineering Standards - Volume 4: Storm Water Standards Manual (2004 Edition, rev 3/24/08 and 6/4/08). The design has been revised to include LID design guidelines. Please refer to the revised report (Secfion 5) and the revised BMP Exhibit for further information on how LID has been applied to the project. Item 15: The report has been updated to the City of Carlsbad Engineering Standards - Volume 4: Storm Water Standards Manual (2004 Edition, rev S/24/08 and 6/4/08). This version of the Standards also provisions a revised Storm Water Standards Questionnaire. The project's Storm Water Standards Questionnaire is provided in the revised report in Attachment 2. The Storm Water Standards Quesfionnaire lists the project as only being required to perform to 'Standard' project requirements. Standard projects are not required to perform any Individual Priority Project or Treatment Control BMPs; however, as a show of good faith, the project has been re-designed to include an extended (dry) detention (retarding) basin that will discharge to project landscaping prior to discharging to the curb and gutter of Cherry Avenue. This should help to mitigate potential pollutants of concern as defined in the revised report. Item 16: This comment has been interpreted to mean comments on the Water Quality Technical Report. With that in mind, the following are responses to redline comments made to the submitted WQTR: A. Page 1 - Project size - The comment has been incorporated into the revised report. Please refer to page 1 of the revised report. o B. Page 2 - Floor drains should be connected to sewer lines when they are not exposed and are covered. In the current site plan the driveway run-off will be exposed runoff and will be collected in trench drains. The trench drains will then direct the storm water runoff to the proposed detention basin where it will then be sump pumped to the landscaping prior to discharging to the curb and gutter of Cherry Avenue. The driveway runoff cannot be directed to the sewer system. C. Page 3 - Please refer to response B. D. Page 4 - The approval date has been adjusted as the City of Carisbad has revised their standards, effective 6-4-08. Although 6-4-08 is well after the City comment letter date of 2-13-08, the 6-4-08 standards were utilized because they are the most current. Please refer to the revised report. E. Page 4 - LID has been incorporated in to the project design. Please refer to the revised report (Section 5) and the revised BMP Exhibit for further information on how LID has been applied to the project design. Please refer to the revised report. F. Page 4 - Table 1 from the current standards has been utilized per your request. Please refer to the revised report (Attachment 1). G. Page 5 - Per the project's current Storm Water Standard Questionnaire the project is not a priority project and does not need to include treatment control BMPs; however, treatment control BMPs are being ufilized and their design is outlined in the revised report. Please refer to the revised report (Section 8). H. Page 5 - Permanent BMPs has been listed throughout Sections 4-8 of the revised report. In addition, they are listed on the revised BMP Map as well as in the revised report. Please refer to the revised report (Section 10). I. Page 6 - Per the project's current Storm Water Standard Questionnaire the project is not a priority project and does not need to include treatment control BMPs; however, treatment control BMPs are being utilized and their design is outlined in the revised report (Section 8). Also, pollutants of concern are not required to be identified by the Standards for non-priority projects; however, these have been included in the revised report. Please refer to the revised report (Secfion 4). J. Page 7-A copy of the updated CWA list with the project's areas in not required to be included per the Standards because that analysis is not required for non- priority projects; however, this informafion is included as Sections 4.2.3 and 4.2.4 of the revised report, as well as a copy of the list being provided in Attachment 1 for reference. This was also provided in the original report in Attachment 2. Please refer to the revised report. K. Page 10 - The section commented on is the generalized description of what the report intends to provide with the verbiage following describing how it will be applied. Please refer to the revised report Section 5.0 and the revised BMP Exhibit for further information on how LID has been applied to the project design. Please refer to the revised report. L. Page 11 - Please refer to response K. M. Page 12 - Please refer to response K. N. Page 12 - Previous WQTR Section 6.1.1 would have been implemented as stated in the paragraph after your comment and will be applied as defined in the revised report. Please refer to the revised report (Section 5.1). O. Page 13 - The redline comments appear to be based on the reviewer not fully reading the submitted WQTR. The previous WQTR states the BMP from the Standards, then, in the next paragraph states if and how it applies, or why it does not apply to the project site. The revised report follows the same general principle. Please refer to the revised report. P. Page 14 - Please refer to response 0. Q. Page 15 - Please refer to response O. R. Page 16 - Please refer to response O. S. Page 17 - Please refer to response 0. T. Page 17 - Please refer to response D. U. Page 18 - Please refer to response O. V. Page 18 - The project's Storm Water Standards Questionnaire specifies that the project is a non-priority project. Non-priority projects are not required to provide treatment control BMPs; however, treatment control BMPs are being utilized and their designs are outlined in the revised report. Please refer to the revised report (Section 8). W. Page 21 - Please refer to response V. X. Attachment 2 - Table 1 -Table 1 from the current City of Carisbad Standards has been included in the revised report (Attachment 1). Please refer to the revised report. Y. Attachment 2 - Table 2 -Table 2 from the current City of Carisbad Standards has been included in the revised report (Attachment 1). Please referto the revised report. Z. Attachment 2 - Table 5 -Table 4 from the current City of Carisbad Standards has been included in the revised report (Attachment 1) and treatment control BMP designs are outlined in the revise report (Section 8). Please refer to the revised report. AA.Attachment 4 - SD-10 - This BMP is being ufilized to meet the current Standards for BMP-1 and BMP-4 as defined in the revised report. Please refer to the revised report. BB.Attachment 4 - KriStar Information - KriStar products are no longer being used and there materials have been removed from the report. CC. BMP Map Comments - The BMP Map has been revised and included in revised report. Please refer to the revised report (Attachment S). ISSUES OF CONCERN (FIRE DEPARTMENT): Items 1: This item is architectural in nature. Please refer to the Architect's response for further information. In closing, Wynn Engineering, Inc. has attempted to address all received comments, attended interim meetings with City Staff, and communicated with various City Staff in attempt to resolve all the above mentioned comments and issues. Please do not hesitate to contact me at (760) 749-8722 with any questions that you may have regarding this project. Respectfully submitted, <obert J. Reiner Project Engineer 07-071 - Blue (Cherry Ave) Tekia Levy Conversation Notes: Date: 12-11-08 Time: 2pm Per Tekla: 1. She spoke with her boss and her boss's boss at their staff meeting. 2. Engineering will not approve the Unit A layout due to the three point tuming || situation created outside Unit B. if there is a vehicle parked outside the garage of - Unit B or any other obstruction ofthe route at Unit B then the vehicle will have to» back out onto the street. 3. Engineer has not and will not approve a vehicle backing out onto the street as its only movement option due to life and safety concems, especially since the driver ^ will be blindly coming out of a subterranean parking area, backwards. 1 asked if posting Tire Lane, No Parking' signs and painting the area with red striping to match would allow us to utilize this option and she said no. There is still the possibility of obstructing the path and a vehicle being forced to back out onto the street. 1. CHERRY AVE CHERRY AVE Unit 'B' Garage - Drive Aisle Backup & Turn Around Study 'B' Unit 'B' Garage • Drive Aisle Backup & Turn Around Study 'A' CHERRY AVE Unit 'A' Garage - Drive Aisle Backup & Turn Around Study 'A' & 'B' VARIOUS VEHICLE MANUFACTURER TURNING RADIUS SPECIRCATIONS: SIHALL CAH STWDARO CAR TURNING RADIUS 17-4- FOROTAURUS TURNING RADIUS W-O" G RADIUS IB' - 1- MERC- BEHZ S-CLASS TURNING RADIUS 20'- a" HONDA ClVtC LARGE CAR; LINCOLN TOWN CAR TURN MO RADIUS 27'-' ROLLS ROyCE PHANTOM TURNING RADIUS ZT • STMOARD CAR MAXIMUM OUTSIDE TIRE TRACK APPR) LESS THAN RADIUS SHOWN LARGE CAR MAXIMUM ENVELOPE OUTSIDE TIRE TRACK APPROX. B" • 12" LESS THAN RADIUS SHOWN o cc: LU < Q E"7 U PROJECT NUMBER IM03 DRIVE AISLE TURN AROUND STUDY A.13 Barry Blue / Blue Family Trust 2950 Ocean St Carisbad, Ca 92008 March 5, 2008 City of Carisbad Planning Department 1635 Faraday Ave. Carisbad, CA 92008-7314 Subject: Blue Condominiums - Case #'s CP 08-01 / CDP 08-04 (related MS 08-01) To Whom It May Concern, Please allow this letter to acknowledge my desire to continue to process the application for the Blue Condominiums located at 150/152 Cherry Ave. Carisbad, CA 92008. It is my understanding that the revised Planned Development Standards, as approved by the City Council in February 2007, are currenfiy awaiting approval by the Califomia Coastal Commission (CCC) and are, therefore, not codified at this time. I acknowledge the City of Carisbad Planning & Engineering Departments cannot approve this project application at this time, but have agreed to continue with their respective review and comments in preparation for final project review before the Planning Commission. Additionally, I understand that after a one year period has lapsed from the inifial date of application (January 23, 2008) and the CCC has not approved the Planned Development revisions then this project application can either be withdrawn or revised to meet current standards. In addition, I understand that upon review and approval by the CCC there may also need to be additional changes based upon their revisions of the Planned Development Standards. It is my understanding that by continuing the application process with proper documentation, and should the CCC approve the revised PD Standards prior to the latest forecast date of Fall 2008, we shall be able to seek final approval by the Planning Commission at the eariiest possible date. It is also my understanding that components of the project as designed have previously relied upon substantive review and information provided by the City of Carisbad Planning Department during the Preliminary Review process. With this understanding, I wish to continue the current fomial applications as referenced above and do not wish to lose the cumulative value that was gained during this process. I understand and agree that the City's Inclusionary Housing Ordinance will accept an in-lieu fee, currently $4,515.00/per unit with annual adjustments, to satisfy the lower income inclusionary housing requirement, and that this fee shall be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. In closing, I wish to extend my gratitude and appreciation for the continued efforts, cooperation and m\k)QRessiyy-sM^R^!^^ to move fonwardjisuth4his-application. (08/18/2008) Shannon Werneke - Blue Condos- deck encroachment _ _^ y_ , Page 1 From: Shannon Werneke To: piarcdesign CC: Gary Barberio; wynneng@wynnengineering.com Date: 08/18/2008 4:04 PM Subject: Blue Condos- deck encroachment Buck- Pursuant to discussions with Gary Barberio, Assistant Planning Director, our determination re: deck encroachment/cantiliver remains the same. No encroachment will be allowed over what is considered to be the drive aisle. You have the option to apply for a Variance; however, it is highly unlikely that staff would support such a request due to the project's inability to meet the required findings. I therefore recommend that you redesign the deck so it is not encroaching into the drive aisle. Please call/email me with any questions. Thanks. Shannon Werneke Associate Planner City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Ph (760) 602-4621 Fax (760) 602-8559 swern@ci.carlsbad.ca.us ^'lUla.T-''' 71 PI Arc Pesign 62 7 Bonair Way, La Jolla, Ca '=\2031 &S&.434.2120 cell &5&.336.&24q March 4, 2008 Subiect: Blue Condominiums 03-05-08 Carlsbad Planning/Engineering Agenda Planning Comments: 1. Discussion regarding CCC approval of PD Standards, timeline, etc. and desire to go forward with review based on the revised PD ordinance standards. Acknowledgement and letter from Owner to follow. 2. Project is located within BAO Zone a Site Development Plan will be prepared and submitted by Wynn Engineering per CMC Section 21.82.040 3. Color & Materials board presentation to be submitted - when? 4. "Hazardous Waste & Substances Statement" to be revised and submitted by Wynn Engineering 5. Environmental Information Form to be certified. 6. Roof Plan to be submitted by Pi Arc Design Clarification - Do we need an additional form for TPM Time Limits? ^ 8. Cross sections to be submitted by Pi Arc Design 9. Cover Sheet to be revised and submitted by Pi Arc Design 10. Site Plan to be revised and submitted by Pi Arc Design. Unit 'B' Garage Door to Western P.L. = 21'5/2" 11. Discussion regarding recreation/exercise room (337 sq. ft.) and impact. Basement Floor Plan to be revised and submitted by Pi Arc Design 2 f ^ ^8 X^l 12. Unit A' Floor Plans to be revised and submitted by Pi Arc Design 13. Lot Coverage = 3,880 sq. ft. / 56%. TPM to be revised and submitted by Wynn Engineering 14. Grading/Drainage Exhibit to be revised and submitted by Wynn Engineering Engineering Comments: 1. To be reviewed and revisions as necessary by Wynn Engineering ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning Comments: 1. Verification of allowed/required density 2. See Item #11 above. Is the Exercise Rm. having impact on Basement definition vs Parking Garage and overall building height definifion? Basement Floor Plan exhibit to be revised (indicating that "basement deflnition" has been met) and submitted by Pi Arc Design --o . ~) S. Discussion regarding vehicle backup areas and underground parking 4. Garage doors to be added. Basement Floor Plan to be revised and submitted by Pi Arc Design 5. Discussion regarding "guest parking space" 6. Discussion regarding enhanced pavement: type, details, etc. 7. see Item #4 above 8. Discussion regarding landscape screening for parking areas. ^^^C^H^^I^^^^'^^'^^ ' 9. Discussion regarding fron^ard^tb^cj|CS, \^ lz''5fc7«>Ac(c-'^^^^A/*^ 0. Discussion reoardino dect< area above garaae doors and landscape area provided between driveway and home. 1. Discussion regarding building height limits. Basement facilitates underground parking 2. Discussion regarding "Mezzanine Area" S. Discussion regarding "Roof Decks" 4. See Item #1S above. Basement facilitates underground parking and drive isle only and should not be considered for overall building height. ^^^^S^larification of setbacks and "Upper Floor Level Balcony/Deck. Setback is 12'-0" Item #9 says front yard building setback can be 10'-O" and appears to in conflict with this statement. 16. Calcs to provided and submitted by Pi Arc Design 17. see Item #4 above \ ^ V^- Discussion regarding separate building planes 19. Discussion regarding trash locations & service 20. Landscape Plans to be revised and submitted by Darsono Landscape Design 21. Discussion regarding perimeter fence/walls ^ 22. ? no existing single family residences luF\u> etOt\it\rdp.'o^1 ' 23. Inclusionary Housing fee ok Landscape & Engineering Comments to be addressed