Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP 14-05; Julie Sun Deck; Site Development Plan (SDP)<^0}:' ^ CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION P-1 Development Services Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue (760) 602-4610 www.carlsbadca.gov APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES) Develooment Permits (FOR DEPT. USE ONLY) Lealslative Pennits |~| Administrative Permit O General Plan Amendment (FOR DEPT. USE ONLY) ^ Coastal Development Permit (*) IS Minor • Conditional Use Permit (*) r~l Minor Q Extension r~l Environmental Impact Assessment [~l Habitat Management Permit CH Minor n Hillside Development Permit (*) r~1 Planned Development Permit n Residential Q Non-Residential Q Planned Industrial Permit I I Planning Commission Determination r~] Site Development Plan l~l Special Use Permit I I Tentative Tract IMap/Parcel Map r~l Variance d] Administrative r~l Local Coastal Program Amendment (*) n MasterPlan CI]Amendment cn Specific Plan CH Amendment n Zone Change (*) I I Zone Code Amendment Sootfi Cadsbad Coastal Review Area Permits I I Review Permit r~l Administrative CD Minor CD Major Villaae Review Area Permits n Review Permit CU Administrative CD Minor CD Major (*) = eligible for 25% discount NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30 P.M. A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPUCATION MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M. ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: PROJECT NAME: 7Jia .Ctyyj ' Dtok. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: nfm«,i/^ ^ ^U^.'U lou^^ J^cl -A i^/fA BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION: S ^ M jeoS No.ZP.LL •nm^.-iU^ LUJc ^tsWL of- g/ocJL 1^ LOCATION OF PROJECT: ON THE: SIDE OF STREET ADDRESS (NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) BETWEEN (NAME OF STREET) (NAME OF STREE AND (NAME OF STREET) P-1 Page 1 of 6 Revised 11/12 OWNER NAME (Print): MAILING ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP: TELEPHONE: EMAIL ADDRESS: APPLICANT NAME (Print): S-ffpU^Hie L^4^i^ MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. 6^iC ZZlU CITY, STATE, ZIP: S<iK M<^rtx>5 ^ *?2oTy TELEPHONE: Ibc-ZT.-^-^lo'^ EMAIL ADDRESS: I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOyyLEDGE. _ -7/7.//3 I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MV KNOWLEDGE. DATE SIGNATURI DATE APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE (Print): MAILING ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP: TELEPHONE: EMAIL ADDRESS: I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE APPLICANT AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. SIGNATURE DATE IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THiS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE. NOTICE OF RESTRICTION: PROPERTY OWNER ACKNOWLEDGES AND CONSENTS TO A NOTICE OF RESTRICTION BEING RECORDED ON THE TITLE TO HIS PROPERTY IF CONDITIONED FOR THE APPLICANT. NOTiCE OF RESTRICTIONS RUN WITH THE LAND AND BIND ANY SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST. PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE FOR CITY USE ONLY RECEIVED JUL 0 2 2013 CITY OF GARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED RECEIVED BY: P-1 Page 2 of 6 Revised 11/12 CITYOF CARLSBAD PROJECT DESCRIPTION P-1(B) Development Services Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue (760) 602-4610 www.carlsbadca.gov PROJECTNAME: 3v/IU 9^ - Qec^ APPLICANT NAIVIE: g4e|gkAv%l^ L/^-Kwx Please describe fully the proposed project by application type. Inciude any details necessary to adequately explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include any background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary. Description/Explanation: P-1(B) Pago 1 of 1 Revised 07/10 Development Services ^. MINOR COASTAL <^Cm>' DEVELOPMENT PERMIT/ V CITY OF SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Planning Division ^ . . Aoni ir^A-rtrsKi 1635 Faraday Avenue CARLSBAD APPLICATION ,760)602.46:O www.carlsbadca.gov A proposed project requiring multiple applications must be submitted prior to 3:30 p.m. A proposed project requiring only one application must be submitted prior to 4:00 p.m. All joint application extiibits, i.e. Tentative Map and Planned Development Site Plan should be prepared at the same scale. (Use a scale no smaller than 1" = 40'.) I. GENEIAL BACKGROUND A. Estimated Cost of Development: Development costing $60,000 or more does not qualify as a Minor Coastal Development Permit. The City Planner shall make the final detennination regarding a project's cost of development. The primary basis for determining cost of development will be the application of dollar costs per square foot for different types of residential construction. These costs are set by the International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO) and are applied throughout San Diego County. Please complete the following information to assist in the detennination of this project's cost of development (Contractor proposals may also be submitted for consideration by the City Planner). Please refer to the cun'ent fee schedule for the appropriate $/square foot fee rate. => New Residential Square Footage: square feet x $ Isq. ft. = $ Residential Addition Square Footage: square feet x $ Isq. ft. = $_ Any Garage Square Footage: square feet x $ Isq. ft. = $_ Residential Conversion Square Footage: square feet x $ /sq. ft. = $_ Please contact the City of Carlsbad Building Division for current fee rate for Non- Residential uses (i.e. Retail/Store; Restaurants; Office; and Manufacturing/Warehouse uses.) square feet x $ isq. ft. = $ COST OF DEVELOPMENT ESTIMATE: $ B. Do you wish to apply for: 1. A Minor Coastal Development Permit (Under $60,000 cost estimate) 2. A Coastal Development Permit ($60,000 or more cost estimate) CD C. Street address of proposed development 3o^l OcUl^G^i' p-6 Page lof 6 Revised 05/12 D. Assessor's Parcel Number of proposed development E. Development Description: Briefly describe proiect: YtWM>\it WtfiA- F. Describe the present iand uses (i.e. vacant iand, singie family homes, apartments, offices, etc.) that surround the proposed development to the: North: South: SFyt^ East: $P»^ West: PMi^C 06g)1>i G. Is project located within a 100-year flood plain? CD Yes ^No il. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY A. Are there existing structures on the property? ^ Yes • No If yes, please describe. B. Will any existing structure be removed/demolished? ^Yes CD No If yes to either question, describe the extent of the demolition or removal, including the relocation site, if applicable (also show on plans). ill. LOT COVERAGE A. Existing and Proposed Existing Proposed Total Building Coverage 2.(??'o sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. % Landscaped Area sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. % Hardscape Area IKSo sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. t.'L Unimproved Area (Left Natural) 7^2.^^ sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. H^.la B. Parking: Number of existing spaces 7^ Number of new spaces proposed Existing/Proposed TOTAL: Number of total spaces required _ Number of covered spaces Number of uncovered spaces Number of standard spaces p-6 Page 2 of 6 Revised 05/12 Number of compact spaces Is tandem parl<ing existing? CH Yes # CH No Is tandem parking proposed? CD Yes # CD No Grade Alteration: Is any grading proposed? CD Yes ^ No Ifyes, please complete the following: 1. Amount of cut cu. yds. 2. Amount of fill cu. yds. 3. Maximum height of fill slope ^feet 4. Maximum height of cut slope feet 5. Amount of import or export cu. yds. 6. Location of borrow or disposal site p-6 Page 3 of 6 Revised 05/12 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Applicant: LIPTON STEPHANIE Description Amount HDP14002 918.00 3053 OCEAN ST CBAD Receipt Number: R0100933 Transaction ID: R0100933 Transaction Date: 04/14/2014 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 918.00 Transaction Amount: 918.00 bF City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 llllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Applicant: LIPTON STEPHANIE Description Amount SDP14005 4,712.00 3053 OCEAN ST CBAD Receipt Number: R0100934 Transaction ID: R0100934 Transaction Date: 04/14/2014 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 4,712.00 Transaction Amount: 4,712.00 City of Carlsbad Faraday Center Faraday Cashiering 001 1410401-2 04/14/2014 149 flon, Apr 14, 2014 09:53 AH Receipt Ref Nbr: R1410401-2/0007 PERl·IITS -PERI-IITS Ti'an Ref Nbr: 141040102 0007 0009 Trans/RcptU: R0100933 SET #: HDP14002 .1\fl{·. It=· -~.· ~ERMITS ~ $916.00 $918.00 $918.00 , . o· -'•br: 141040102 0007 0010 Trans/Rcotll: R0100934 SET #: SDPiil005 Amount: J tern Sub tot c 1 : Item ,.0ta 1: ';I Check ( Chk# 1)0:31 J Total Received: Have a nice day! cr $4,712.00 $4,712.00 $4,712.00 $5,630.00 $5,630.00 $5,630.00 **'***********CUSTONER COPY************* City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 9200! Applicant: LUPTON STEPHANIE Description Ainount CDP13019 832.44 3053 OCEAN ST CBAD Receipt Number: R0095824 Transaction ID: R0095824 Transaction Date: 07/02/2013 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Credit Crd VISA 832.44 Transaction Amount: 832.44 City of Carlsbad Faraday Center Faraday Cashiering 001 1318301-1 07/02/2013 32 Tue, Jul 02, 2013 01:04 PM Receipt Ref Nbr: R1318301-1/0010 PERMITS - PERMITS Iran Ref Nbr: 131830101 0010 0010 Trans/Rcpt#: R0095824 SET #: CDP13019 Amount: 1 @ $832.44 Item Subtotal: $832.44 Item Total; $832.44 1 ITEM(S) TOTAL: $832.44 Credit Card (Auth# 02503A) $832.44 Total Received: $832.44 Have a nice day! **************CUST0MER COPY************* ^ DISCLOSURE Development Services v^C -i STATEMENT planning Division "'*!^ CITY OF p -l/A\ 1635 Faraday Avenue r"ARI ^RAD (750)602-4610 V-.AArVLJLIAAL-' www.carlsbadca.gov Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, finm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fratemal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit' Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. 1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person S^^K^wlc Lo||Ho'^ Corp/Part Title 1>e^i<>y\e<' Title Address motZZlU Marios ^t<ri^ Address 2. OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e., partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, indude the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% ofthe shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person X^lit Sow Corp/Part Title own<r Title Address llo^ fiMhSCom^ Address. p-1 (A) Page 1 of 2 Revised 07/10 NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non- profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary ofthe. Non Profit/Trust Non Profit/T rust Title Title Address Address Have you had more than $500 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? EH Yes ^^^No If yes, please indicate person(s): NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Sigriature of owner/date Signature qf applicant/date Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent P-1 (A) Page 2 of 2 Revised 07/10 CITY OF CARLSBAD HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT P-1(C) Development Services Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue (760) 602-4610 www.carlsbadca.gov Consultation of Lists of Sites Related to Hazardous Wastes (Certification of Compliance with Government Code Section 65962.5) Pursuant to State of California Government Code Section 65962.5, I have consulted the Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List compiled by the California Environmental Protection Agency and hereby certify that (check one): ^ The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 ofthe State Government Code. CD The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the State Government Code. APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER Name: S4f^kA«^e Ujy4-«>< Name: TJ*^ Sv^ Address: f.o.ft^x ZT^iU Address: \lo& HAViiLayi^ tV Phone Number: Phone Number: 1(sO-Z2A' '"^lo^ Address of Site: ^oS3> 0<^\^ S-V Local Agency (City and Countv): dks^ A-F C^r^%.\oa^^ ^^>v4^ o-p ^^^^ Assessor's book, page, and parcel number: 3 - ZS'/-o6 Specify list(s): ITT^d (A/a(gs^W -Ha-i^r-i/owts ^^'iM ^ngf ^w>U$Wc<5 St'^ Lijf Regulatory Identification Number: Date of Ust: "//^/l^ Applicant i/Date rty OwrWf Signature/Date The Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List (Cortese List) is used by the State, local agencies and developers to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act requirements in providing information about the location of hazardous materials release sites. P-1(C) Page 1 of 2 Revised 02/13 /\ HAZARDOUS WASTE Development Services CITYOF <^^'^^y AND SUBSTANCES planning Division CARLSBACr^ STATEMENT ''''TmloZll P-1(C) www.carlsbadca.gov Per the California Environmental Protecfion Agency's website, "While Government Code Section 65962.5 [refen'ed to as the Cortese List] makes reference to the preparafion of a "list," many changes have occurred related to web-t}ased information access since [the amended statute's effective date in] 1992 and this information is now largely available on the Internet sites of the responsible organizations. Those requesting a copy of the Cortese "list" are now referred direcfiy to the appropriate informafion resources contained on the Internet web sites of the boards or departments that are referenced in the statute." Below is a list of agencies that maintain information regarding hazardous waste and substances sites. Department of Toxic Substances Controi www.calepa.ca.gov/sitecleanup/CorteseList/default.htm www.calepa.ca.gov/database/calsites www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public EnviroStor Help Desk (916) 323-3400 State Water Resources Control Board http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health Services www.co.san-diego.ca.us/deh Hazardous Materials Division www.sdcountv.ca.gov/deh/hazmat/hazmat permits.html Mailing Address: County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health P.O. Box 129261 San Diego, CA 92112-9261 Call Duty Specialist for technical questions at (858) 505-6880, fax (858) 505-6868 (fax) Environmental Protection Agency National Priorities Sites ("Superfund" or "CERCLIS") www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/cursites (800) 424-9346 or (702) 284-8214 National Priorifies List Sites in the United States www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/npl/npl.htm P-1(C) Page 2 of 2 Revised 02/13 Slate of California, Edmund G. Brc Jr., (jouernor California Coastal Commission San Diego District 6154 Mission Gorge Road, Suite 220 San Diego, California 92120 (714) 280-6992 ATSS 636-5868 Filed: 49th Day: 180th Day: Staff: Staff Report: Hearing Date: September 7, 1982 October 26, 1982 March 6, 1983 DNL:e1 September 28, 1982 October 13-15, 1982 STAFF REPORT: ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM Application No.: 6-82-392 Applicant: International Real Estate Development Corp. SEE SM^QriMf-Fj- P., Agent: Nenad Gligoric Description: Construction of a 760 sq.ft., cantilevered deck over slope on site with an existing single-family residence. Zoning Plan designation Ht abv fin grade R-3 Residential-high density (20-30 dua) 10 feet maximum (deck) Site; 3053 Ocean Street, Carlsbad, San Diego County. APN 203-251-06 Siibstantive File Docimients: Carlsbad LCP EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S ACTION I. Approval with Conditions. The Executive Director hereby grants a permit for the proposed development, subject to the conditions below, on the grounds that, as conditioned, the development will be in conformity with the provisions of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act of 1976, will not prejudice the ability of the local government having jurisdiction over the area to prepare a Local Coastal Program conforming to the provisions of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act, and will not have any significant adverse impacts on the environment within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act. II. Standard Conditions. See page 5. III. Special Conditions. The permit is subject to the following conditions: 6-82-392 Page 2 1. Waiver of Public Liability. Prior to the issuance of a coastal development permit, the applicant shall submit to the Executive Director a deed restriction for recording free of prior liens except for tax liens, that binds the applicant and any successors in interest. The form and content of the deed restriction shall be siibmitted to the review and approval of the Executive Director. The deed restriction shall provide (a) that the applicant understands that the site may be subject to extraordinary hazard from erosion and from landslides and the applicant assumes the liability from those hazards; (b) the applicant unconditionally waives any claim of liability on the part of the Commission or any other regulatory agency for any damage from such hazards; and (c) the applicant understands that construction in the face of these known hazards may make them ineligible for public disaster funds or loans for repair, replacement, or rehabilitation of the property in the event of storms. 2. Lateral Access. Prior to the issuance of the permit, the Executive Director shall certify in writing that the following condition has been satisfied. The applicant shall execute and record a document, in a form and content approved in writing by the Executive Director of the Commission irrevocably offering to dedicate to a ptiblic agency or private association approved by the Executive Director, an easement for public access and passive recreational use along the shoreline. The document shall also restrict the applicant from interfering with present use by the public of the areas subject to the easement prior to acceptance of the offer. Such easement shall be located over and throughout the subject site seaward of the toe of the existing slope as shown on Exhibit No. 4. Such easement shall be recorded free of prior liens except tax liens and free of prior encimibrances which the Executive Director determines may affect the interest being conveyed. The offer shall run with the land in favor of the People of the State of California, binding successors and assigns of the applicant or landowner. The offer of dedication shall be irrevocable for a period of 21 years, such period running from the date of recording. 3. Oceanfront Alignment. Prior to the issuance of the permit, the applicant shall submit &• revised site plan indicating that the most seaward extent of the proposed deck shall not encroach beyond an alignment drawn between the most seaward extent of the adjacent decks, patios or other appurtenances associated with the adjoining residences to the north and south. The revised site plan shall document the adjoining structures' building footprints and deck/patio alignments and it shall be siabmitted to, reviewed and determined adequate in writing by the Executive Director. 4. Open Space Easement. Prior to the issuance of the permit, the applicant shall record a restriction against the subject property, free of prior liens and encumbrances except for tax liens, and binding on the permittee's successors in interest and any subsequent purchasers of any portion of the real property. The restriction shall prohibit any alterations of landforms, placement or removal of existing vegetation, or erection of structures of any type, unless approved by the California Coastal Commission or its successors in interest, over that area of the site's bluff face as shown on Exhibit No. 5. Evidence of recordation of t±iis restriction shall be submitted to and acknowledged in writing by the Executive Director prior to transmittal of the permit. 6-82-392 Page 3 IV. Findings and Declarations. 1. Detailed Project Description/Geologic Stability. The applicant proposes to construct a 760 sq.ft., wooden member deck which will be cantilevered over one of the subject site's sloping terraces. Presently, there is an existing residence with a small patio on the site. The site's western area consists of three, gently sloping terraces which support established vagetation leading down to a pebble berm along the shoreline. An existing staircase connects the patio, past an existing retaining wall, with an upper slope terrace. The applicant proposes to construct the redwood deck, incorporating the existing stairs, over the terrace with ten concrete footings, post supports and 44" high railings. No grading is proposed. The certified Carlsbad LCP specifies the need for new development to submit geologic reviews, to limit shoreline structures and to execute waivers of public liability. Additionally, Policy 4-4 specifies "no development shall be permitted on,;any sand or rock beach or on the face on any ocean bluff, with the exception of accessways to provide pi±)lic beach access and of limited public recreation facilities." These LCP policies represented the incorporation of the Act's policies (Sections 30235 and 3025 3) into the general plan. As submitted, the subject project did not provide any site-specific geological information to assure structural stability and the site's geological integrity; however, no grading or bliiff face alteration is proposed, except for footings construction. Additionally, the silie possesses gently sloping, already disturbed terraces, as opposed to natiural ocean bluffs, and is buffered by an existing pebble berm along its shore- front. Irregardless of the site's present stability and character, absent any site-specific geological reviews to assure geologic stability and recognizing tlie potentially adverse impacts of any alteration to natural landforms, the certified LCP requires the execution of waivers of liability for such developments. Therefore, as set forth in Special Condition No. 1, the applicant shall be required to execute a disclaimer of piiblic liability. Additionally, in order to document the Commission's concern and interest about geologic stability and any future proposals for additional bluff development, the recordation of an open space easement has also been required pursuant to attached Special Condition 4. This restriction will also serve to provide necessary notice of the Commission's interest to any subseqiient property owners. Generally, the Commission does not and the certified LCP does not endorse the construction of private recreational facilities involving substantial alteration of natural ocean bluffs. However, in this instance, the subject site contains sloping terraces and an existing stairway which facilitate residents to simply access the beach or bluff areas directly over the present slopes. Therefore, in order to concentrate access and recreational use and discourage random disturbance of the bluffs, the proposed deck on this site will be more protective of coastal resources than its elimination. Additionally, Policy 7-12 of the certified Carlsbad LCP provides that new development along the Ocean Street shoreline may be permitted as long as it observes, at a minimum, an ocean set±)ack based on a "stringline" method of measurement. While there are decks, patios and other structures situated further seaward than the proposed deck within the project vicinity, the applicant has not demonstrated the proposed deck will conform to the established stringline of development between the adjoining northern and southern residential uses, as required by the certified LCP. Therefore, pursuant to Special Condition 3, the applicant shall be required to revise the site plan or 6-82-392 Page 4 document its conformity with the established development stringline. The stringline measurement specifies, in this instance, no decks or other appurtenances shall be permitted further seaward than those on adjacent structures to the north and south. Thus, given the almost continual alignment of seawalls throughout Carlsbad and Oceanside and other existing decks, patios or development existing further seaward than the subject proposal, any potential for future development of similar structures would not be highly precedential or prejudicial. Therefore, given the site's character, the nature of surrounding development, the stringline restriction, the project's open design and minimal landform alteration, the Commission finds project approval, as conditioned, will minimize coastal erosion precipitated by uncontrolled access and should not adversely impact the site's geological stability. With these findings, the Coiranission determines the project, as conditioned, will be consistent with the certified LCP and applicable Coastal Act policies; and^ it will not establish any adverse precedent for future development. 2. -»gtfclic .ACig^ss. Sections 30210 and 30212 of the Coastal Act of 1976 require that piiblic access to the shoreline and along the coast be maximized and provided in all new developments located between the ocean and first parallel public road. In recognition of this mandate, the certified Carlsbad LCP requires the execution of offers to dedicate lateral and vertical access easements where necessary to maximize or protect public access opportunities and the establishment of a development stringline. The subject site is located on the beachfront along Ocean Street, the first coastal roadway, between Elm and Oak in Carlsbad. There is improved public beach access at the Carlsbad State Beach facility situated approximately 500 feet to the south and at Elm Avenue located approximately 200 feet to the north. Public parking is also provided at the State Beach. These existing accessways provide adequate vertical public access to the beach. Although the proposed development will not obstruct existing piiblic access opportunities, the development could certainly inhibit lateral access along the shoreline either indirectly by its proximity and seaward encroachment or directly through private attempts to restrict lateral access or the creation of use conflicts. Therefore, in order to be consistent with the certified LCP, to maintain public beach access, recognize and protect the informal use of the shoreline area. Special conditions have been attached to require the provision of a lateral access easement along the shoreline and adherence to the existing development alignment. Therefore, as conditioned, the Commission finds the proposed development consistent with applicable LCP and Coastal Act policies since adequate vertical access already exists and the project will formalize and maintain lateral access opportunities and prevent incremental encroachments further seaward by private development which could precipitate use conflicts between private residents and beach visitors or cumulatively result in physical impediments to public beach access and recreation. Further, as specifically required by Section 30504(c) of the Act, the Commission finds the proposed development conforms with all the public access and recreation policies of the Act. 3. Local Coastal Planning. Section 30604(a) of the Act provides that a coastal development permit shall be issued only if the permitted development will not prejudice the ability of the appropriate local government to prepare a certifiable local coastal program (LCP). However, special legislation (AB 1971) was passed which authoz-ized the Commission to prepare the local coastal program for the City of Carlsbad. In accordance with the legislation, the Commission 6-82-392 Page 5 funded the LCP preparation, reviewed it, made some modifications and certified 1±ie local coastal program. The legislation provided that the LCP would be certified, even without the local government's concurrence. Since the City of Carlsbad has refused to accept the certification, permit authority remains with the Coastal Commission. As cited above, the proposed development, as conditioned, is consistent with applicable Coastal Act and LCP policies. Therefore, project approval, as conditioned, will serve to provide positive direction to the City of Carlsbad for implementation of its certified local coastal program. STANDARD CONDITIONS: 1. Notice of Receipt and Acknowledgement. The permit is not valid and construction shall not commence until a copy of the permit, signed by the permittee or authorized agent, acknowledging receipt of the permit and acceptance of the terms and conditions, is returned to the Commission office. 2. Expiration. If construction has not commenced, the permit will expire tv/o years from the date on which the Commission voted on the application. Construction shall be pursued in a diligent manner and completed in a reasonable period of time.. Application for extension of the permit must be made prior to the expiration date. 3. Compliance. All construction must occur in strict compliance with the proposal as set forth in the application for permit, subject to any special conditions set forth below. Any deviation from the approved plans must be reviewed and approved by the staff and may require Coiranission approval. 4. Interpretation. Any questions of intent or interpretation of any condition will be resolved by the Executive Director or the Commission, 5. Inspections. The Commission staff shall be allowed to inspect the site and the development during construction, subject to 24-hour advance notice. 6. Assignment. The permit may be assigned to any qualified person, provided assignee files with the Commission an affadavit accepting all terms and conditions of the permit. 7. Terms and Conditions Run with the Land. These terms and conditions shall be perpetual, and it is the intention of the Commission and the permittee to bind all future owners and possessors of the subject property to the terms and conditions. COMMISSION ACTION ON 0^"^' ' ^ 1982 ^^Appro'.-ed e.s Recommended • Denied as Recommended • Approved vvith Ch&ng&s • Denied • Other Si, SI FOHEST! EXHIBIT NO. ^ APPLICATION NO. California Coastai Commission — J \ 5 State of Calirornia, Edmund G. Brown Jr.. Gouemo Jr.. Governor {J U ^ California Coastal Commission San Diego Distnct 6154 Mission Gorge Road, Suite 220 San Diego, California 92120 (714) 280-6992 ATSS 636-5868 On October 14, 1982 COASTAL DEVELOPm^ PEMT NO.. 6-82-392 Page 1 of 3 , The California Coastal Commission granted to International Real Estate Development Corp. this permit for the development described below, subject to the attached Standard and Special conditions. Description: Construction of a 760 sq.ft., cantilevered deck over slope on site with an existing single-family residence, Zoning Plan designation Ht abv fin grade R-3 Residential-high density (20-30 dua) 10 feet maximum (deck) Site I 3053 Ocean Street, Carlsbad, San Diego County. APN 203-251-06 Issued on behalf of the California Coastal Commisanoft by MICHAEL L. FISCHER Executive Director and ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The undersigned permittee acknowledges receipt of this permit and agrees to abide by all terms and conditions thereof. Date Signature of Permittee 5/81 COASTAL EEVELORm PERMIT NO. 6-82-392 Page 2 of 3. STANDARD CONDITIONS: 1. Notice of Receipt and Acknowledgement. The permit is not valid and development shall not commence until a copy of the permit, signed by the permittee or authorized agent, acknowledging receipt of the permit and acceptance of the terms and conditions, is returned to the Commission offi ce. 2. Expiration. If development has not commenced, the permit will expire two years from the date on which the Commission voted on the application. Development shall be pursued in a diligent manner and completed in a reasonable period of time. Application for extension of the permit must be made prior to the expiration date. 3. Compliance. All development must occur in strict compliance with the proposal as set forth below. Any deviation from the approved plans must be reviewed and approved by the staff and may require Commission approval. 4. Interpretation. Any questions of intent or interpretation of any condition will be resolved by the Executive Director or the Commission. 5. Inspections. The Commission staff shall be allowed to inspect the site and the development during construction, subject to 24-hour advance notice. 5. Assignment. The permit may be assigned to any qualified person, provided assignee files with the Commission an affidavit accepting all terms and conditions of the permit. 7. Terms and Conditions Run with the Land. These terms and conditions shall be perpetual, and it is the intention of the Commission and the permittee to bind all future owners and possessors of the subject property to the terms and conditions. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. Waiver of Public Liability. Prior to the issuance of a coastal development permit, the applicant shall submit to the Executive Director a deed restriction for recording free of prior liens except for tax liens, that binds the applicant and any successors in interest. The form and content of tlie deed restriction shall be submitted to the review and approval of the Executive Director. The deed restriction shall provide (a) that the applicant understandsthat the site may be subject to extraordinary hazard from erosion and from landslides and the applicant assumes the liability from those hazards; (b) the applicant unconditionally waives any claim of liability on the part of the Commission or any other regulatory agency for any damage from such hazards; and (c) the applicant understands that construction in the face of these known hazards may make them ineligible for public disaster funds or loans for repair, replacemient, or rehabilitation of the property in the event of storms. COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 6-82-39:2 Page 3 of 3 SPECIAL CONDITIONS - continued: 2. Lateral Access. Prior to the issuance of the permit, the Executive Director shall certify in writing that the following condition has been satisfied. The applicant shall execute and record a document, in a form and content approved in writing by the Executive Director of the Commission irrevocably offering to dedicate to a piiblic agency or private association approved by the Executive Director, an easement for pi±ilic access and passive recreational use along the shoreline. The document shall also restrict the applicant from interfering with present use by the pviblic of the areas subject to the easement prior to acceptance of the offer. Such easement shall be located over and throughout the subject site seaward of the toe of the existing slope as shown on Exhibit No. 4. Such easement shall be recorded free of prior liens except tax liens and free of prior encumbrances which the Executive Director determines may affect the interest being conveyed. The offer shall run with the land in favor of the People of the State of California, binding successors and assigns of the applicant or landowner. The offer of dedication shall be irrevocable for a period of 21 years, such period running from the date of recording. 3. Oceanfront Alignment. Prior to the issuance of the permit, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan indicating that the most seaward extent of the proposed deck shall not encroach beyond an alignment drawn between the most seaward extent of the adjacent decks, patios or other appurtenances associated with the adjoining residences to the north and southThe revised site plan shall document the adjoining structures' building footprints and deck/patio alignments and it shall be si±imitted to, reviewed and determined adequate in writing by the Executive Director. 4. Open Space Easement. Prior to the issuance of the permit, the applicant shall record a restriction against the subject property, free of prior liens and encumbrances except for tax liens, and binding on the permittee's successors in interest and any subsequent purchasers of any portion of the real property. The restriction shall prohibit any alterations of landforms, placement or removal of existing vegetation, or erection of structures of any type, unless approved by the California Coastal Commission or its successors in interest, over that area of the site's bluff face as shown on Exhibit No. 5. Evidence of recordation of this restriction shall be submitted to and acknowledged m writing by the Executive Director prior to transmittal of the permit. COUNTY. ASSESSOR ,SXN-b»eGO CO.CAUFORNIA RESIDENTIAL BUILDING RECORD ADDRESS -SosS OC^AA/ •SY. DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING PARCEL SHEET— .OF. .SHEE a. 03- 9.£-/ - C-i Ci JNSTRUCTIOM tTRUCTURAL EXTERIOR ROOF LI9HTIN6 AIR CONDITION ROOM ANO FINISH OETAIL Light Frame Stocco on Flat A Pitch y Wiring y Heating Cooling ROOMS FLOORS FLOOR FINISH TRIM INTERIOR FINISH Sub'Stondord "x -. ' 6oble tfii K.T. ConduH Forced Oean'g ROOMS B 1 2 Moierlol Grade TRIM Walls Ceilings ' A/tCHrrECTURE Standard Slieothing Siding "x ' Hip A B.K. Coble GroYity HuBiid. All A/? A bert -Stondord Concrete Block Shed 4 Fixtures / Wall Unit r4jV^ r/Se/:a. Spteiol 5.6. B. 1 ra 6. Cut Up Few Cheap Ent. Hall TYPE Bn'elt Sltiogle l>ormers " V Avg. JC Med. Floor Unit Living 1 use 1 oes(< in FOUNOATIOM Adobe Shake Raft -X - -Maai Special Zone Unit Dining 1 )< Concrete Floor Joitt.-BBB.\ \r.io. Gutters y Cenfral' Ftu^Rty 7~r Ooubit Reinfereed >< 1"! % • PLUIIBIN6 Bed > , Dupltx Sr/elt 2- \ ' Brick Shingle P*H-*'I*'I ^ Bed Apart mmt Wood Svi-F/eor Stone Shake Oil Burner m J^lai- Court Pien y Conerete Floor WINDOWS Tile Sink w Wo/a/ 0.». 1 \Castineni Tite Trim / Laundrtf 1 Insatoted Ceilings 1 Metal Soiti Coaipo.; / 'Mater Hf'r.-Auta Fireplace Kitchen / / Li<it>t\ \Htovi Insuloied Wolh Screens ConpaShiogle Woter~Softner Droin Bd. Moteriol: ^y. Lgth: Ft Sp/osh: CONSTRUCTION RECORD Permit Ato. For Amoimt Dale EFFEC. YEAR APPR. YEAR NORMAL % GOOD Age '^'9 Table Ve RATING (E,G,A,F,P) BATH DETAIL Cand. Arch. A ftr. Fonc. Plan Con- form Slaroge Space Cupb'd Chset WorK n'oshp Fl. No. FINISH Floors Walla Wc. la. hb FIXTURES Grade Sf. 2T. ftfl SHOWER Finis. 7 nan V »o -4-20-.d.y. 7/ /96' 11. Ml 8^ 1 7WT 21. (Lt. 3J_ At. A. A SPECIA L FEATURES Book Cases dut/f in eerrm. Venetian Blinds Shutters 7iig^yc JUffdm " DraltujtLsher- OMPUTATION O Appraiser fi Date Cott TTSTT COJf Unit \ t ' Cost 'Unit Cost Unit •4^ Cott Cott Cott Cost Cott ott Cott Cott mit Cott Cott J?4 9' fot 0 PCJUfOtt^ "9.1//) ^7 (,^17 ^50 /OOP y^Sf.fr^^3^ Ml-.00 3.00 lof 3.00 7?y 77^ 00 /SO //ss .^.00 00 'tll ADO 3/S 31^ no TOTAL NORMAL % GOOD sa-il R.C.L.N.D 77 M "i' T in Structur§ Pounti toftft srifwcri/tf* . i*r^-3r !- t t J.J. 4> I il (lfl • ^ III i yf^/yyfyj/. FAT/OWS ; -y-y^ r 4-4^ „ I LA....fiJ.M.. -I -^l^ - M.m^ •.M.3.Ji.f. m£^4^.Jj^. ^ >Lr.£^..-r 7^.. i«^:y^<io,: a^..J. ^^^^ XA.^ l^*^ii£?L : ? • pm^ #^»?^4gj^--^^)^4^-—. 044^y^iJ^»^rA. M^ sf .<^r.*f ^^/ms a^., '•iii.L:-L./:._.ii_::. ) Lmixm Technical Field Services, Inc. CJ\ i! Engineering & Inspection WATER QUALITY STUDY/STD STORM WATER BMP REPORT , PROPOSED QIN ADDITION, 3053/3057 OCEAN STREET, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 PREPARED FOR: Ms. Sun 1704 Hanscom Drive South Pasadena, Califomia 91030 PREPARED BY; Technical Field Services, Inc. 1199 Tamarack Avenue Carlsbad, Califomia 92008 February 7,2014 ProjectNo. 4231 1199 Tamarack Averiiie. Carlsbad. Caiifornia 92008 (160) 497-l2t.-J Technical Field Services, Inc. Civil Engineering & Inspection February 7, 2014 ProjectNo. 4231 Ms. Julie Sun 1704 Hanscom Drive South Pasadena, Califomia 91030 Subject: Water Quality Technical Report/Standard Storm Water BMP Report, Deck Addition, 3053/3057 Ocean Street, Carlsbad, Califomia 92008 Dear Ms. Sun: Transmitted herewith is our Standard Storm Water BMP Report for the subject project, dated February 7, 2014. The proposed project wdll be to facilitate a deck addition. This report presents the findings of our study, and measures to adequately handle the anticipated conditions. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service and look forward to continued involvement with your project. Should you have questions, please contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, Technical^ield Services, Inc. Christe^nei;/!;. finnow Principal Engiijeer CP/rs Distribution: (2)Addressee 1 !99 Tamarack Avenue. Carlsbad. Caiifornia 92008 (760) 497-1264 Sun Deck Addition February 7,2014 3053/3057 Ocean Street Project No. 4231 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. SITE ASSESSEMENT AND WATERSHED CONDITIONS 1 3. SITE POLLUTANTS OF CONCERN 1 4. LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT BMP'S 2 5. SOURCE CONTROL BMP'S 2 6. LIMITATIONS 4 7. SELECTED REFERENCES 4 4231 SunBMPRept Sun Deck Addition Febmary 7,2014 3053/3057 Ocean Street, Carlsbad Project No. 4231 1. INTRODUCTION In response to your request and authorization, we have provided this Standard Storm Water BMP Report, listed as a Water Quality Technical Report for the proposed project. The purpose of this plan is to identify pollutants of concem firom Ihe Project area, and address how the 5 possible Low Impact Development BMP's and 15 possible Source Control BMP's have been incorporated into the project to reduce or eliminate the introduction of pollutants to storm-water runoflf and/or dis- charge. 2. SITE ASSESSEMENT AND WATERSHED CONDITIONS The subject site is located at 3053/3057 Ocean Street, within the City of Carlsbad in San Diego County. The property is an existing legal lot of 1.9 acres (82,726 sq. ft.). The site is within two hundred feet of the Pacific Ocean, a listed environmentally sensitive area. The site is bound by residential property to the South, beach access stairway to the North, the public beach portion of the parcel and Pacific Ocean shoreline to the West, and Ocean Street to the East The site has an existing duplex residential stmcture with covered patio of approximately 2,650 s.f,, and two deck stmctures which terrace down an approxi- mate 2:1 slope. The elevation at the toe of slope O^eachhead) is approximately +12 feet MSL. The top of slope elevation is approximately +33 feet MSL, and the street access elevation is qjproximately +44 feet MSL. The area described is approximately 7,500 s.f, and is the only allowable buildable portion of the 1.9 acre site, as the remainder is public beach easement Drainage of tiie site currentiy allows runoff to flow down the slope and infiltrate into a vegetated bio-swale at the toe of slope, which acts as a filter of water prior to any flow on to the beach. A portion of the lower deck encroaching the easraient is sub- ject to removal. The upper deck increase in area is required to be permitted. Access to the site is made through the existing driveway on Ocean Stneet. 3. SITE POLLUTANTS OF CONCERN The proposed project falls under the Detached Residential category of anticipated pollutants. Those anticipated pollutants include Sediments, Nutrients, Trash & Debris, Oxygen Demanding Substances, Oil 8c Grease, Bacteria and Viruses, and Pesticides. The LID and Source Control BMP applications help reduce those pollutants fi"om entering the receiving waters outside the properties boimdaries. The following sections explain which measures are appropriate to apply. Teetnuicsil FisSdl SsnrSiBSS, Inc. Sun Deck Addition Febraary 7, 2014 3053/3057 Ocean Street, Carlsbad Project No. 4231 4. LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT BMP'S The objectives of the LID BMP requirements are to detain and filter runoflf using natural features. LID strategies include optimizing site layout, minimize impervious footprint, dispersing runoflf to adjacent landscaping, construction considerations and site stabilization measures. The site layout for new development will be optimized by utilizing the same general footprint for the new addition as the existing footprint. The existing driveway and courtyard area will remain, along with existing landscape zones around the existing house and down the slope, in order to maintain non-connected impervious areas, reduce existing impervious areas, and provide bio- filtration cutoff zones for storm water runoff to flow through prior to entering the beachhead. All ofthe listing slope landscape will continue to remain landscape areas. The rooftop drains for the east portion ofthe existing house are drained to the courtyard landscaping prior to entering the drain system. Deck areas will drain through to the terraced (flat) area beneath and drain of through landscaped areas. This minimizes sediment and erosion. 5. SOURCE CONTROL BMP'S Everyday activities, such as washing of vehicles, taking out the trash, applying herbicides and pesticides to our gardens, generate pollutants that can eventually drain to the storm water con- veyance system, ending up downstream in sensitive bodies of water. The 15 Source Controls, as outlined in the Storm Water Standards Manual, are discussed below, and the applicability to this redevelopment project. 3.1.1 Maintenance Bays - There are no specific maintenance bays. 3.1.2 Vehicle and Equipment Wash Areas - There is no area to wash vehicles. 3.1.3 Outdoor Processing Areas - There are no outdoor processing activities conducted on the property. 3.1.4 Retail and Non-Retail Fueling Areas - There are no refueling areas on the property. 3.1.5 Steep Hillside Landscaping - The existing established trees and vegetation on the property will remain in place. 3.1.6 Efficient Irrigation Systems & Landscape Design - Landscape design is implement- ing rain shutoff devices, flow reducers or shutoff valves in the event of damaged piping, efficient watering allocations and pattems. Drain inlets in landscaped areas will be surroimded by a gravel buffer zone to help prevent transport of lawn and garden care products into the drainage system. 3.1.7 Trash Storage Area - The trash storage area is located along the South side of the garage. The surface is concrete, and the trash receptacles are covered with attached lids. 3.1.8 Outdoor Material Storage Areas - There are no materials stored on the property. 3.1.9 Loading Docks - There are no loading docks located on the property. 3.1.10 Integrated Pest Management - The Integrated Pest Management in an ecosystem based pollution prevention strategy that helps minimize pests and the damage they cause through 2 TeehifiiilaDl Fteld Strwlees, Hne. Sun Deck Addition February 7, 2014 3053/3057 Ocean Sti-eet, Carlsbad Project No. 4231 utilization of resistant plant varieties, habitat manipulation, biological controls and good house- keeping of landscape and other outdoor areas. Pesticide use will be minimized and proper applications will be as a last line of defense. 3.1.11 Storm Water Conveyance System Stamping and Signage - The inlet grates of all new storm water drains will be stamped witii tiie phrase," NO DUMPING -1 LIVE IN THE OCEAN". 3.1.12 Fire Sprinkler Discharges - Any new fire sprinkler system, if required, will be de- signed to contain discharges firom its operational and testing and convey them to the sanitary sewer system. 3.1.13Air Conditioning Condensate - Air conditioning condensate produced fi'om the A/C system will be discharged to the landscape. 3.1.14 Non-Toxic Roofing Materials - The new roofing materials will not contain galva- nized steel or copper in their makeup. 3.1.15 Other Source Control Requirements - Post constmction re-vegetation and land- scaping will be completed after constmction within the areas of disturbance. Pet waste will be disposed of with the normal household waste. Good housekeeping will be employed throughout the property on a regular basis. Through implementation of the foregoing Best Management Practices, and maintenance of the Storm Water Drainage System, the objective of detaining and filtering, and reducing quantities of pollutants flowing into the public storm water system can be accomplished. Maintenance of the Storm Water Drainage System also will help reduce water runoff onto the adjacent downstream properties. Teetinlleal Fistd Services, I Sun Deck Addition February 7,2014 3053/3057 Ocean Sti-eet, Carlsbad Project No. 4231 6. LIMITATIONS The Engineering services outlined in this report have been conducted in accordance with current practice and the standard of care exercised by Civil Engineering consultants performing similar tasks in this area. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made regarding fhe observations and conclusions expressed in this report. The reported calculated results represent values at the locations studied using current available data. It is important to note that the precision of estimated variables is not exact and variations should be expected. Further accuracy is not unplied. 7. SELECTED REFERENCES City of San Diego, Storm Water Standards Manual, January 20,2012 The County of San Diego, Low Impact Development Handbook, December 31,2007 CASQA, Califomia Stormwater BMP Handbook, New Development and Redevelopment, Janu- ary, 2003. TeehnlODO IFieDd Seimlces, im. Teichnical Field Services, Inc. ' ^Cl Civil EiigiBeenng & inspection - LIMITED GEOLOGIC HAZARDS EVALUATION, SUN PROPERTY, 3053/3057 OCEAN STREET, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 PREPARED FOR: Mrs. Julie Sun 1704 Hanscom Drive South Pasadena, California 91030 PREPARED BY: Technical Field Services, Inc. 1199 Tamarack Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 March 28, 2014 Project No. 4231 1199 Tamarack Avenue, Carlsbad. California 92008 (760) 497-1264 Technical Field Services, Inc. Civil Engineering & lnspecti<)n LIMITED GEOLOGIC HAZARD EVALUATION 3053 OCEAN STREET CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 28 March 2014 Ms. Julie Sun 1704 Hanscom Drive South Pasadena, Califomia 91030 Subject: Lunited Geologic Hazard Evaluation, APN 203-251 -06, 3053 Ocean Sti-eet, Carlsbad, Califomia 92008 Dear Ms. Sun: In accordance with the your request and authorization, Phillip S. Rosenberg, PG 5536, EG 1721, CHg 658 has conducted a limited geologic hazard evaluation of the subject site (Site). The purpose of the smdy was to evaluate geologic conditions and the potential presence of geologic hazards, specifically landslides and liquefaction, and their effects on the Site. Based on our review ofthe available data (references), field reconnaissance, and engineering geology analysis, there are no significant geologic hazards impacting the site. The most significant elements of this smdy are summarized below: No landslides or adverse geologic stmcture, associated with deep-seated landsliding, were encoimtered during this evaluation. The formational earth materials (i.e., paralic deposits) that underlie the site are typically moderately to well indurated and do exhibit adverse geologic stracture, based on the available data. The potential for deep-seated landslides to adversely affect the proposed development is considered very low. However, the onsite earth materials are considered erosive. Thus, there is some potential for shallow, surficial slope failures to occur along the bluff 1199 Tamarack Avenue. Cari.sl5a(l. Caiifornia 92008 (760) 497-1264 Technical Field Services, Inc. Civii Eiigineerin" & Insoection The site currently has a very low potential for liquefaction, due to the relatively dense nature of the paralic deposits and underlying Santiago Formation, and the depth to the regional water table below the lowest site elevation. The beach deposits located adjacent to the west of the Site, however, may be subject to liquefaction. The potential for seismic densification to affect the existing stracture at the Site is considered very low. The evaluation indicates there are no known active faults crossing the site. In addition, other than moderate to strong seismic shaking produced from an earthquake on a nearby active fault, other geologic and secondary seismic hazards have a very low potential to affect the site. Adverse geologic features were not encountered or observed. The opportunity to be of service is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concemmg this not hesitate to contact the undersigned. I!99 Tamarack Avenue. CarJsbad. California 92008 (760) 497-i 264 Technical Field Services, Inc. , . —t 1 ^rm Civii Engineering & Inspection *• •' LIMITED GEOLOGIC HAZARD EVALVATION 3053/3»5TtK:EAN STREET CARLSBAD, CALIFORNLi 92008 SCOPE OF SERVICES The scope of services conducted for this limited smdy has included the following: • Review of the available geologic literature for the site, including published geologic maps, reports, and aerial photographs. Documents reviewed are listed under references. • Geologic site reconnaissance. • Geologic analysis of data collected. • Preparation of this report presenting preliminary findings and conclusions. SITE DESCRIPTION The subject site is located at 3053/3057 Ocean Street in the City of Carlsbad, San Diego County, Califomia. The property consists of approximately 1.9 acres, and has been designated Assessor's Parcel Number 203-251-06 by the County of San Diego Assessor's office. Current development at the site includes a 2-story single family residence, wdth decks on the west side. It is our understanding that the lowermost deck wdll be removed to satisfy a City of Carlsbad code violation. The site is bounded on the north by property owned by the Carlsbad Inn, on the south by a single family residence, on the east by Ocean Street, and on the west by a pubhc beach and the Pacific Ocean. Elevations at the site range fi-om approximately 10 feet above mean sea level (MSL) along the westem property line to approximately 44 feet MSL at the entrance along Ocean Street. REGIONAL GEOLOGY The subject property lies within the coastal plains physiographic region of the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province of southem Califomia. This region consists of dissected, mesa-like terraces that graduate inland to rolling hills. The encompassing Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province is characterized as elongated mountain ranges and valleys that trend northwesterly (Norris and Webb, 1990). This geomorphic province extends firom the base ofthe east-west aligned Santa Monica - San Gabriel Mountains, and continues south into Baja Califomia. The mountain ranges are underlain by basement rocks consisting of pre-Cretaceous metasedimentary rocks, Jurassic metavolcanic rocks, and Cretaceous plutonic rocks of the southem Califomia batholith. ! !99 Tamarack Avenue. Carlsbad, Caiifornia 92008 (760) 497-1264 In the San Diego County region, deposition occurred during the Cretaceous Period and Cenozoic Era in the continental margin of a forearc basin. Sediments, derived from Cretaceous-age plutonic rocks and Jurassic-age volcanic rocks, were deposited into the narrow, steep, coastal plain and continental margin of the basin. These rocks have been uplifted, eroded, and deeply incised. During early Pleistocene time, a broad coastal plain was developed. During mid- to late-Pleistocene time, this plain was uplifted, eroded, and incised. Alluvial deposits have since filled the lower valleys, and young marine sediments are currently being deposited/eroded within coastal and beach areas. Regional geologic mapping by Kermedy and Tan (2005) indicates that the contact between yoimger and older paralic deposits, formerly termed terrace deposits, occurs near the site's easterly margin. The paralic deposits are underlain by the Santiago Formation at depth. SITE GEOLOGIC UNITS The site geologic units observed during the Site reconnaissance included small, localized areas undocumented artificial fill, beach deposits, Quatemary-age colluvium (topsoil), younger and older Quatemary-age paralic deposits (weathered and unweathered), and the Santiago formation. The earth materials are generally described below from the youngest to the oldest. Artificial Fill Artificial fill is present in limited areas across the Site. The undocumented fill appeared to consist of a dark yellowish brown silty sand. The fill appeared dry, loose, and non-uniform. The thiclaiess of the undocumented fill may be on the order of 1 foot thick, where encountered. Beach Deposits Quatemary-age beach deposits are present along the westem boundary of the Site and on the public beach to the west. Beach sediments generally consist of fine to medium grained, poorly graded sand, grading to cobbles with depth, and were off-white to brown, slightly moist to saturated, and loose to medium dense. This unit may be subject to liquefaction. Quaternary-age Colluvium Quatemary-age colluvium (topsoil) generally consists of a brown and dark brown silty sand wdth local minor clay to a dark brown very fine-grained sand with silt. The colluvium was generally dry to moist. Quatemary-age Paralic Deposits Quatemary-age younger paralic deposits are present underlying the surficial soils across the Site. Where weathered, the younger parahc deposits typically consisted of a dark yellowish brown silty sand to a very fine-grained sand with silt. The weathered younger paralic deposits were generally dry to wet and medium dense. Unweathered younger paralic deposits generally consisted of a dark yellowish brown sand with cobble to sandy cobbles, a dark yellowish brown clayey sand, and a dark yellowish brown and gray sandy clay. The unweathered younger paralic deposits were typically moist to wet and dense/stiff. Older paralic deposits generally consisted of a dark yellowish brown and reddish yellow silty sand to very fine-grained sand wdth silt, a gray, dark yellowish brown, and reddish yellow clayey sand, and a reddish yellow and dark yellowish brown sandy clay. The older paralic deposits were generally damp to moist and dense to very dense/very stiff. Tertiary Santiago Formation Sedimentary rock belonging to the Tertiary-age Santiago Formation, underlies the older paralic deposits at depth. This unit is not exposed at the Site. The Santiago Formation generally consists of highly oxidized reddish brown and light brown, damp to moist, fine-to medium-grained clayey sandstone to silty sandstone. These materials are medium dense/medium stiff and become dense/stiff with depth. GEOLOGIC STRUCTURE As observed in nearby outcrops, primarily along nearby coastal bluffs, the younger and older paralic deposits were thickly bedded to massive and regionally sub-horizontal to horizontal. Clayey interbeds within the underlying Santiago Formation displayed relatively horizontal contacts wdthin the bounding sandstone units. Based on the available data, adverse geologic stractures are not anticipated to unfavorably impact the Site. GROUNDWATER Regional groundwater was not observed during the Site recoimaissance. Regional groundwater is anticipated to generally be coincident with mean sea level (MSL). Due to the nature of the Site earth materials, seepage and/or perched groundwater conditions may develop throughout the Site in the future, especially along boundaries of contrasting permeabilities. Perched groundwater likely exists along the geologic contact between the older paralic deposits and underlying Santiago Formation. Based on regional geologic mapping by Tan and Kennedy (1996), the elevation of this contact is approximately 60 feet Mean Sea Level (MSL) in the vicinity of the site. Tan and Kennedy (1996) show this contact dipping in a westerly direction. Regional groundwater is anticipated to generally be coincident with Mean Sea Level (MSL), especially along boundaries of contrasting permeabilities (i.e., clayey and sandy fill lifts, fill/paralic deposits and younger and older paralic deposits contacts, joints/fi-actures, discontinuities, etc.), and should be anticipated. LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY According to regional landsUde susceptibility mapping by Tan and Giffen (1995), the site is located wdthin landslide susceptibility Subarea 4-1 which is characterized as being "most susceptible" to landsliding. No landslides were mapped at or immediately adjacent to the Site. Based on review of Kennedy and Tan (2005), no landslide debris has been mapped at or immediately adjacent to the Site. Geomorphic expressions indicative of deep-seated landslides was not noted during review of available aerial photographs. Furtiier, landslide debris or adverse geologic stracture were not observed during the field reconnaissance. Given the above evidence,' and the moderately to well indurated nature of the younger and older paralic deposits that underhe the Site, the potential for deep-seated landslides to adversely affect the Site is considered very low. However, the onsite earth materials are considered erosive. Thus, there is some potential for shallow, surficial slope failures to occur along slopes, including the coastal bluff. FAULTING AND REGIONAL SEISMICITY Local and Regional Faults The review conducted indicates that there are no known active faults crossing this site, and the site is not wdthin an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone (Bryant and Hart, 2007). However, the site is situated in an area of active faulting. These include, but are not limited to: the San Andreas fault; the San Jacinto fault; the Elsinore fauh; the Coronado Bank fault zone; and the Newport-Inglewood - Rose Canyon fault zone (NIRCFZ). Portions of the nearby NIRCFZ are located in an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone (Bryant and Hart, 2007). According to Blake (2000a), the closest known active fault to the site is the offshore segment of the Newport- Inglewood fauh which located at a distance of approxunately 5.3 miles [mi] (8.5 kilometers [km]). According to Cao, et al. (2003), the offshore segment of the Newport-Inglewood fault is capable of producing a maximum magitimde (Mw) 7.1 earthquake. The possibility of ground acceleration, or shaking at the site, may be considered as approximately similar to the southem Califomia region as a whole. SEISMIC RELATED HAZARDS Liquefaction Potential Liquefaction describes a phenomenon in which cyclic stresses, produced by earthquake-induced ground motion, create excess pore pressures m relatively cohesionless soils. These soils may thereby acquire a high degree of mobility, which can lead to vertical deformation, lateral movement, lurching, sliding, and as a result of seismic loading, volumetric strain and manifestation in surface settiement of loose sediments, sand boils and other damaging lateral deformations. This phenomenon occurs only below the water table, but after liquefaction has developed, it can propagate upward into overlying non-saturated soil as excess pore water dissipates. One of the primary factors controlling the potential for liquefaction is depth to groundwater. Typically, liquefaction has a relatively low potential at depths greater than 50 feet and is unlikely and/or will produce vertical strains well below 1 percent for depths below 60 feet when relative densities are 40 to 60 percent and effective overburden pressures are two or more atmospheres (i.e., 4,232 psf [Seed, 2005]). The condition of liquefaction has two principal effects. One is the consolidation of loose sediments with resultant settlement of the ground surface. The other effect is lateral "sliding. Significant permanent lateral movement generally occurs only when there is significant differential loading, such as fill or natural ground slopes wdthin susceptible materials. No such loading conditions exist at the site. Liquefaction susceptibility is related to numerous factors and the following five conditions should be concurrentiy present for liquefaction to occur: 1) sediments must be relatively young in age and not have developed a large amount of cementation; 2) sediments must generally consist of medium- to fine-grained, relatively cohesionless sands; 3) the sediments must have low relative density; 4) free groundwater must be present in the sediment; and 5) the site must experience a seismic event of a sufficient duration and magnimde, to induce straining of soil particles. Only about one to two of these concurrently necessary conditions have the potential to affect the Site. The beach deposits adjacent to the west of the Site generally consist of unconsolidated sand, and may be subject to liquefaction. Seismic Densification Seismic densification is a phenomenon that typically occurs in low relative density granular soils (i.e., United States Soil Classification System [USCS] soil types SP, SM, and) that are above the groundwater table. These unsaturated granular soils are susceptible if left in the original density (unmitigated), and are generally dry of the optimum moisture content (as defined by the ASTM D 1557). During seismic-induced ground shaking, these natural or artificial soils deform under loading and volumetrically strain, potentially resulting in ground surface settlements. Tsunamis Tsunamis are waves generated by submarine earthquakes, landslides, or volcanic action. Lander, et al. (1993) discusses the fi-equency and magnitude of recorded or observed tsunami in the southem Califomia area. Houston (1980) predicts a tsunami of less than 5 feet for a 500-year recurrence interval for this area. Legg, et al. (2003) examined the potential tsunami wave run up in southem Califomia. While Legg's smdy is not specific to the subject Site, it provides a first order analysis for the area. Legg, et al. (2003) show tsunami run up in the southem Califomia bight. Relatively new Tsunami Inundation Maps (State of California, 2009), try to identify a credible upper bound to inundation fi-om tsunami, subject to limitations in the accuracy and completeness of data and methods/models. The Site area is mapped as being wdthin a Tsunami Inundation Area. Seiche Since the site is not m an enclosed or semi-enclosed basin (lake, bay, or harbor), the potential for seiche to be generated by an earthquake and effect the site is considered low. Other Geologic/Secondary Seismic Hazards The following includes other geologic/seismic related hazards that have been considered during the limited evaluation of the Site. The hazards listed are considered negligible and/or mitigated as a result of site location, soil characteristics, and the existing Site development: o Subsidence o Dynamic Settlement o Surface Fault Rupture o Ground Lurching or Shallow Ground Rupture Susceptibility of the site to experience damaging deformations from seismically-induced liquefaction and densification is relatively low owing to the dense, nature of the younger and older paralic deposits that underlie the site in the near-surface and the depth to the regional water table. The potential for the Site to be affected by significant seismic densification or liquefaction of offsite soils may be considered low. PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS The primary geologic concems wdth respect to the Site are primarily related to regional seismic activity. In the event of an upper bound or maximum credible earthquake occurring on any of the nearby major faults, strong ground shaking would occur in the subject site's general area. Potential damage to any stracture(s) would likely be greatest from the vibrations and impelling force caused by the inertia of a stracture's mass than fi-om those induced by the hazards considered above. The potential at the Site would be no greater than that for other existing stractures and improvements in the immediate vicinity that comply wdth current and adopted building standards. REFERENCES Blake, Thomas F., 2000a, EQFAULT, A computer program for the estimation of peak horizontal acceleration firom 3-D fault sources; Wmdows 95/98 version. , 2000b, EQSEARCH, A computer program for the estimation of peak horizontal acceleration from Califomia historical earthquake catalogs; Updated to December 2009, Windows 95/98 version. Bozorgrua, Y., Campbell K.W., and Niazi, M., 1999, Vertical ground motion: Characteristics, relationship with horizontal component, and building-code implications; Proceedings of the SMIP99 seminar on utiUzation of strong-motion data, September 15, Oakland, pp. 23- 49. Bryant, W.A., and Hart, E.W., 2007, Fault-rapture hazard zones in California, Alquist-Priolo earthquake fault zoning act with index to earthquake fault zones maps; Califomia Geological Survey, Special Publication 42, interim revision, Califomia Building Standards Commission, 2010, Califomia building code, Califomia Department of Boating and Waterways and the San Diego Association of Govemments, 1994, Shoreline Erosion Assessment and Atias of the San Diego Region, Volumes I and II, Map 12B, December, Houston, J,R,, 1980, Type 19 flood insurance study: Tsunami predictions for southem California, USACOE Technical Report HL, Intemational Conference of Building Officials, 2001, Califomia building code, Califomia Code of Regulations title 24, part 2, volume 1 and 2, , 1998, Maps of known active fault near-source zones in Califomia and adjacent portions of Nevada. Jennings, CW,, 1994, Fault activity map of Califomia and adjacent areas: Califomia Division of Mines and Geology, Map Sheet No, 6, scale 1:750,000, Kennedy, M,P, and Tan, S,S, 2005, Geologic map of the Oceanside 30' x 60' quadrangle, Califomia, United States Geological Survey, Lander, J.F., Lockridge, P,, and Kozuch, M,, 1993, Tsunamis affecting the west coast ofthe US, 1806-1992, NOAA National Geophysical Data Center publication. Legg, M.R., Borrero, J.C, and Synolakis, C.E., 2003, Evaluation of tsunami risk to southem Califomia coastal cities, in The 2002 NEHRP Professional Fellowship Report, January. Leighton and Associates, Inc. and David Evans and Associates, Inc., 1992, City of Carlsbad, Geotechnical Hazards Analysis and Mapping Stady, Carlsbad, Califomia, November. Seed, 2005, Evaluation and mitigation of soil liquefaction hazard "evaluation of field data and procedures for evaluating the risk of triggering (or inception) of liquefaction", in Geotechnical earthquake engineering; short course, San Diego, California, April 8-9. State of California, 2009, Tsunami inundation map for emergency planning, Oceanside and San Luis Rey Quadrangles, San Diego County; produced by Califomia Emergency Management Agency, California Geological Survey, and University of Southem Califomia - Tsunami Research Center; dated June 1,2009, mapped at 1:24,000 scale Tan, S.S., and Giffen, D.G., 1995, Landslide hazards in the northeim part of the San Diego Metropolitan area, San Diego Coimty, California, Landslide hazard identification map no. 35, Plate 35 A, Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, DMG Open File Report 95-04. Tan, S.S,, and Kennedy, M,P,, 1996, Geologic maps of the northwestem part of San Diego County, Califomia: CaUfomia Division of Mines and Geology, Open File Report 96-02. United States Geological Survey, 2011, Seismic hazard curves and uniform hazard response spectra - v5.1.0, dated February 2 , 1999, San Luis Rey quadrangle, San Diego County, California, 7.5 minute series, 1:24,000 scale. LIMITATIONS This smdy was limited to evaluating geologic hazards that may impact the Site, specifically landslides, liquefaction, and other seismic related hazards. This study did not evaluate coastal bluff retreat, or other geotechnical factors impacting this Site. In addition, this smdy did not evaluate existing geotechnical conditions, or environmental issues that may impact the property. The preliminary conclusions presented in this report were based on an observation of surface conditions and a review of maps and publications in the public domain. No subsurface evaluations, including exploratory borings or test pits, or laboratory testing of materials was conducted. The materials observed at the Site and utilized for our analysis are believed representative of the area; however, soil and bedrock materials vary in character between excavations and natural outcrops or conditions exposed. Site conditions may vary due to seasonal changes or other factors. Inasmuch as our smdy is based upon our review and geologic analyses, the preliminary conclusions presented in this report are professional opinions. These opinions have been derived in accordance wdth current standards of practice, and no warranty, either express or implied, is given. Standards of practice are subject to change wdth time. Use of this report constimtes an agreement and consent by the user to all the limitations outimed above, notwithstanding any other agreements that may be in place. In addition, this report may be subject to review by the controlling authorities. Technical Field Services, Inc. Civil Engineering & Inspection HYDROLOGY REPORT, SUN PROPERTY, 3053/3057 OCEAN STREET, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 PREPARED FOR: Ms. Julie Sun 1704 Hanscom Drive South Pasadena, Califomia 91030 PREPARED BY: Technical Field Services, Inc. 1199 Tamarack Avenue Carlsbad, Califomia 92008 March 14, 2014 ProjectNo. 4231 1199 Tamarack Avenue. Carlsbad. Caiifornia 92008 (760) 497-1264 Technical Field Services, Inc. Civil Engineering & Inspection March 14, 2014 ProjectNo. 4231 Ms. Julie Sun 1704 Hanscom Drive South Pasadena, Califomia 91030 Subject: Hydraulics Study, Existing Deck Addition, 3053/3057 Ocean Sti-eet, Carlsbad, Califomia 92008 Dear Ms, Sun: Transmitted herewith is our PreUminary Hydrology Report for the subject project, dated March 14,2014. The proposed project consists of removing a portion of deck encroaching on pubUc easement, and per- mitting unauthorized additions to existing decks. This report presents the findings of our study, and measures to adequately handle the anticipated conditions. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service and look forward to continued involvement with your project. Should you have questions, please contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, Tecluifidal Field Services, Inc. ClkdM^eN^. Pinnow ml:': r. Principal Engineer |~p ^P'^j^lf^ - CP/rs Distribution: (2)Addressee i f 99 Tamarack .A venue. CarLsiiad. California 92008 (760) 49"-i264 Sun Deck Addition March 14, 2014 3053/3057 Ocean Street, Carlsbad Project No. 4231 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. SITE DESCRIPTION 1 3. FIELD EVALUATION 1 4. CALCULAIIONS 1 5. CONCLUSIONS 2 6. LIMITATIONS 2 7. SELECTED REFERENCES 3 Illustrations Figure 3-1 - Intensity /Duration Design Chart Figure 2 - Hydrograph data Figure 3- Site map Appendix Appendix - 100 Year, 6 hour Rainfall Isopluvial 100 Year, 24 hour Rainfall Isopluvial 4231 Sun Hydrology Sun Deck Addition March 14, 2014 3053/3057 Ocean Sti-eet, Carlsbad Project No, 4231 1. INTRODUCTION In response to your request and authorization, we have provided Hydrologic evaluation and calcula- tions pertaining to the runoff characteristics for the site. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the existing and post-constraction storm-water runoff. 2. SITE DESCRIPTION The subject site is located at 3053/3057 Ocean Stieet, within the City of Carlsbad m San Diego County, The property is an existing legal lot of 1,9 acres (82,726 sq, ft,). The site is within two hundred feet of the Pacific Ocean, a Usted environmentally saisitive area. The site is bound by residential property to the South, beach access stairway to the North, the public beach portion of the parcel and Pacific Ocean shoreUne to the West, and Ocean Street to the East. The site has an existing duplex residential stincture with covered patio of approximately 2,650 s.f „ and two deck structures which terrace down an approxi- mate 2:1 slope. The elevation at the toe of slope (beachhead) is approxunately +12 feet MSL, The top of slope elevation is approximately +33 feet MSL, and the street access elevation is approximately +44 feet MSL. The area described is approximately 7,500 s.£, and is the only allowable buildable portion of fhe 1.9 acre site, as the remainder is public beach easement A portion of the lower deck encroaching the easement is subject to removal. The upper deck increase in area is required to be permitted. Access to the site is made through the existing driveway on Ocean Street, 3. FIELD EVALUATION Drainage of the site currentiy allows runoff to flow down the slope and infiltrate into a vegetated bio- swale at the toe of slope, which acts as a filter of water prior to any flow on to the beach. The deck structures which are terraced up the slope, are constmcted with wood planks spaced l/8"apart fi-om each other. Although the decks would be considered a hard surface, they should not be considered an impervious surface. The gap between planks are such that rain would be captured and dripped softly to the ground beneath, reducing erosion. Flow quantities for this study wdll only consider the 7,500 s,f area containing the existing stmctures and slope, due that the remaining beach infiltrates all storm wa- ter. The site does not receive runoff fi-om adjacent properties. 4. CALCULATIONS Hydrology calculations herein were performed using the San Diego County Hydrology Design Manual, Rational Method, for a maximum probable storm occurring once in 100 years, for a six hour period. The peak flow, Q, is calculated using the formula: TeclnnSciill IFEsld SenfSces, Ons. Sun Deck Addition March 14, 2014 3053/3057 Ocean Sti-eet, Carlsbad Project No. 4231 Q = C*I*A Where, C = 0.90(%imperviouse) + Cp(l-%imperviouse) Cp = 0,49, for HDR2.9DU/Acre, soU type B I = 6.59 inches/hour for 5,0 min, time of concentration Sub-area A = 7,500 s.f = 0.172 Ac. For this site, approximately 3,000s,f, or 40% of the sub-area is impervious, Q = [0.90(0,40) +0,49(1- 0,40)]* 6.59 * 0.l72ac. = 0.74 cfs Total runoff: Q = 0.654 * 6.59 * 0,172 ac, = 0.74 cfs at peak flow 5. CONCLUSIONS Based on our observations and the results of our calculations, the change in total runoff due to the deck stractures is negligible. In fact, the decks will help prevent erosion of the slope. Runoff from the East side of the property will contiliue to dram to the existing drainage system. The run- off fi-om the east side wdll be collected and filtered through vegetative swale prior to infiltrating into the beachhead. The peak runoff for this part of the property during the 100 year storm fre- quency is calculated to be 0.74 cfs, and occurs at 246 muiutes from storm beginning. 6. LIMITATIONS The Engineering services outlined in this report have been conducted in accordance wdth current practice and the standard of care exercised by Civil Engineering consultants performing similar tasks in this area. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made regarding the observations and conclusions expressed in this report. The reported czdculated results represent values at the locations smdied using current available data. It is important to note that the precision of estimated variables is not exact and variations should be expected. Further accuracy is not implied. TeehniaDll Field iervSees, im. Sun Deck Addition March 14, 2014 3053/3057 Ocean Street, Carlsbad Project No. 4231 7. SELECTED REFERENCES County of San Diego, Hydrology Manual, San Diego, dated September, 2003. TeehBsScsill FMsD Seirvlces, One. 20 30 Minutes 40 50 1 Duration Directions for Appiication: (1) From precipitation maps determine 6 hr and 24 hr amounts for the selected frequency. These maps are included in the County Hydrology Manual {10,50, and 100 yr maps included in the Design and Procedure Manual). (2) Adjust 6 hr precipitation (if necessary) so that if is within the range of 45% to 65% of the 24 hr precipitation (not applicaple to Desert). (3) Plot 6 hr precipitation on the right side of the chart. (4) Draw a line through the point parallel to the plotted lines. (5) This line is the intensity-duration curve for the location being analyzed. Application Form: (a) Selected frequency iOO year (b) Pg = 2 b in.. = H O = <^>^ %(2) 24 in. (c) Adjusted Pg*^' = (d) ^y^ = Si min. (e) 1 = 4 in./hr. Note: This chart replaces the Intensity-Duration-Frequency curves used since 1965. P6 Duration 1 S 2.63 7 2.12 10 1.68 15 1.30 20 1.08 25 0.93 30 0.83 40 0.69 SO 0.60 60 0.53 90 0.41 120 0.34 150 0.29 180 0.26 240 0.22 300 0.19 360 0.17 1.5 I 3.95 5.27 3.18 4.24 2.53'3.37 1.95'2.59 1.62'2.15 1.40 1.87 1.24 1.66 1.03: 1.38 0.90' 1.19 0.80" 1 06 0 61'0 82 0.51 0.68 0.44! 0.59 0.39' 0.52 0.33'0-43 0.28 0.38 0.25 0.33 2.5 3 I I 16^7 3.5 I 4.5 I 5.30 4.21 3.24 2 69' 2.33 2,07: 1 72 1.49 1.33 1.02 0.85 : 0.73' 0,65 0.54" 0.47 0.42" 90 9 22 36 7.42 05 5.90 89 4.54' 23'3.77' 80'3.27: 49'2,90; 07 2.41 79'2.09 59 1 86 23' 1.43 02' 1.19! 88 1.03 78 0.91' 65 0.76' 1.56'0.66: 50 0.58 10.54 8.48 6.74 • 5 19 ' 4.31 ' 3.73 3.32 ' 2,76 2,39 2,12 1.63 1,36 1.18 ' 1 04 0.87 ' 0,75 0.67 ' 11.86 9.54 7.58 584 4.85 4.20 3.73 3 10 2.69 239 1 84 1,53 1.32 1 18 0.98 0,85 0.75 5.5 I 13.17 10.60 8,42 ' 6.49 ' 5,39 ; 4.67 • 4.15 • 3,45 ' 2.98 2,65 • 2,04 1.70 • 1,47 1,31 1.08 ' 0,94 0.84 14.49 11.66 9.27 7.13 5.93 5.13 4.56 3.79 3.28 2.92 2,25 1.87 1.62 1.44 1.19 1,03 0.92 15,81 12,72 10,11 7,78 6.46 5,60 4,98 4,13 358 3 18 245 204 1 76 1.57 1 30 1,13 1,00 FIGURE Intensity-Duration Design Chart - Template Cafe Topes O Cafe Panini W Board & Brew 3053 Ocean St 0 \| \^ pinfe ey-The Sea saw 32°45' 32°30' 32*30' County of San Diego Hydrology Manual Rainfall Isopluvials 100 Year Rainfall Event - 24 Hours Isopluvial (Inches) GIS SftiiCjfIS TIW IW IS PfUVSED WTTHOUT M«nUKTY OF ANV NW. ErTHSI EXPR£^ m BiPUB). MCUCWQ, nrr HOT UkfTED TO. Tt« MHJB) WARRAHTIE8 OF liCtCtWrmnY (WO FmffiSSPORAtWtnCUUR PURPOSE. 3 0 3 Miles 32°30' 32°30' County of San Diego Hydrology Manual Rainfall Isopluvials 100 Year RainfaU Event - 6 Hours Isopluvial (Inches) DPW ^GIS SanGIS N nts IMP IS Pft•^^DED WTTHOVT WmtAHTY OF ANV lOM). EnHSt EXPRESS on Muai, Mcunn, BUT NOT LJMraa TO, THE iimja} vv^^ OF MEiwHMmaiurr AM) FnNssranAP/iinicuLAR PURPOSE. TMl pmludi m^anUn »«niaaen torn M aMM Ritfnl C >*iiiiHjiiawl»nn*W>wnnclb»in»oducrtiii»iBu<f ^ wWMlptmMDnotSMCMQ. 3 0 3 Technical Field Services, Inc. 1 C,i\1l Engineering & Inspection ' PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SUN PROPERTY, 3053 OCEAN STREET, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 PREPARED FOR: Mrs. Julie Sun 1704 Hanscom Drive South Pasadena, California 91030 PREPARED BY: Technical Field Services, Inc. 1199 Tamarack Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 February 25, 2014 Project No. 4231 i 199 Tamarack Avenue. Carlsiwd. C:aiifo™ia <)2008 (76«) 497-1264 Technical Field Services, Inc. Civil Engineering & inspection February 25, 2014 Project No. 4231 Mrs. Julie Sun 1704 Hanscom Drive South Pasadena, California 91030 Subject: Geotechnical Evaluation and Recommendations, Sun Property Deck Addition 3053 Ocean Street, Carlsbad, California 92008 A.PN.: 203-251-06 Dear Mrs. Sun: Transmitted herewith is our Geotechnical Report forthe subject project, dated February 25,2014. The pro- posed project will facilitate existing undocumented deck structures. The soils evaluation services as authorized by you includes: site evaluation of existing soils, evaluation ofthe existing bluff, local conditions which may have adverse effect on slope stability, and recommendations for foundation design and construction. This report pre- sents our evaluations and recommendations. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service and look forward to continued involvement with your project. Should you have questions, please contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted; Technical Field Services, Inc^.'^,^ , Christ6ph"tei:^. Pinnow Principal Engirhs^er CP/rs NO.CS2262 ^ \ ! Tamsiracli .'Iveiuit. Carisbiid. C'aliforoi:! «2{,M)8 (760} -l9''-f 2f.4 Sun Property 3053 Ocean Street, Carlsbad February 25,2014 Project No. 4231 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. SITE DESCRIPTION 1 3. SUMMARY OF FIELD EVALUATION 1 4. LABORATORY TESTING 2 5. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS 2 6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3 7. LIMITATIONS 4 8. SELECTED REFERENCES 5 Illustrations Figure 1 - Site Location Map Tables Table 1 - Moisture-Density Test Results Table 2 - In-situ Density Test Results Appendix Appendix A - Recommended Earthwork Specifications Appendix B - Limited Geologic Hazard Evaluation Appendix C - USGS Design Maps Report 4231 Sun Gtch Sun Property February 25, 2014 3053 Ocean Street, Carlsbad Project No. 4231 1. INTRODUaiON In response to your request and authorization, we have provided geotechnical evaluation services forthe proposed project. The purposes of our services were to evaluate existing geotechnical conditions based on an onsite inspection in addition to a review ofthe general character ofthe area, and provide recommenda- tions, if any, for the existing deck structures. We performed field and laboratory tests of representative material samples to evaluate suitability ofthe existing underlying soils at the site. Our findings and conclusions are presented herein. 2. SITE DESCRIPTION The subject site is located at 3053/3057 Ocean Street, within the City ofCarlsbad in San Diego County. The site is bound by residential property to the South, beach access stairway to the North, the public beach portion of the parcel and Pacific Ocean shoreline to the West, and Ocean Street to the East. The site has an existing duplex residential structure, and two deck structures which terrace down an approximate 2:1 slope. The elevation at the toe of slope (beachhead) is approximately +12 feet MSL The top of slope elevation is approximately +33 feet MSL, and the street access elevation is approximately +44 feet MSL. The area described is the only allowa- ble buildable portion ofthe 1.9 acre site, as the remainder is public beach easement. A portton ofthe lower deck encroaching the easement is subject to removal. The upper deck increase in area is required to be permit- ted. Access to the site is made through the existing driveway on Ocean street. 3. SUMMARY OF FIELD EVALUATION Our engineers conducted the field investigation on February 10,2014. Soils encountered were consisting of medium to light brown silty Sand with fines(SP-SM), identified as marine terrace deposits. It was ob- served that across much ofthe site, the upper 12" to 18" appears to be artificial fill and/or eroded slope wash material consisting of on-site native soils. Soils were probed and found to be firm and of medium density. A sample was taken for in-situ density evaluation. Soils were visually and texturally classified ac- cording to the field identification procedures set forth in ASTM D 2487. The existing deck and stairs are founded on post and pier support footings. Beneath the decks, the slope area has been terraced into the formation of the slope. The support footings have been founded into this material, and do not appear to be degraded or undermined at present condition. Theie is no indic9- tion that the existing deck and stair structures have had any detrimental effect upon the bluff stability. Erosion ofthe slope has been minimized by the growth of grasses and plants on the slope and iceplant along the toe of the siope, which acts as a bio-filter and sediment retention zone between the slope and the beach. A Limited Geologic Hazard Evaluation has been prepared for this project, is made a part of this report, and is included in Appendix B. Groundwater was not encountered during the course of our investigation. Groundwater is anticipated at depth consistent with mean sea level(MSL). We do not anticipate groundwater to affect the proposed development, however, there is potential for water seepage from the bluff and/or perched groundwater 1 Serelcss, toe. 1 Sun Property 3053 Ocean Street, Carlsbad February 25, 2014 Project No. 4231 conditions to develop in the future. Based on the consistency of soil deposits, and the absence of shal- low groundwater, it is our opinion that the potential for liquefaction ofthe hillside is low. 4. UBORATORY TESTING Laboratory tests were perfbrmed on a representative sample ofthe existing material to evaluate opti- mum moisture-density relationship. The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content tests were performed in general accordance with ASTM D1557, and the results are presented in Table 1. 5. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS A review of available geologic hazards pertaining to the site indicates the existence of the Elsinore fault zone approximately 50 miles to the northeast, the Newport-Coronado fault approximately 5 miles to the west, and the Rose Canyon fault zone approximately 15 miles to the South of the site. These faults, or any other major active faults in the region have the potential to produce moderate to strong ground shaking. It is likely that the site will experience the effects of at least one moderate to large magnitude earthquake during the life ofthe proposed structure. We used computer program output, provided by the USGS to compute the seismic design criteria in ac- cordance with the 2012 California Building Code (2013 CBC; Based on the 2012 International Building Code [IBC]), Chapter 16 Stuctural Design, Section 1613 Earthquake Loads. Table 3 below summarizes site-specific design criteria obtained from the 2013 California Building Code. The short spectral response uses a period of 0.2 seconds TABLE 3 SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS Parameter Value IBC-12 Reference Site Class D Table 1613.3.2 Spectral Response - Class D (short), Ss 1.169g Figure 1613.3.1(1) Spectral Response - Class D (1 sec) Si 0.448g Figure 1613.3.1(2) Site Coefficient, Fa 1.032 Table 1613.3.3(1) Site Coefficient, Fv 1.552 Table 1613.3.3(2) Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Re- sponse Acceleration (short), Sms 1.207g Section 1613.3.3 (Eqn 16-37) TscDmleal Fielld Soreicss, 1^ 2 Sun Property 3053 Ocean Street, Carlsbad February 25, 2014 Project No. 4231 Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Re- sponse Acceleration (1 sec), Smi 0.696g Section 1613.3.3 (Eqn 16-38) 5% Damped Design Spectral Response Acceleration (short), Sds 0.805g Section 1613.3.4 (Eqn 16-39) 5% Damped Design Spectral Response Acceleration (1 sec), Sdi 0.464g Section 1613.3.4 (Eqn 16-40) 6. CONaUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on our observations and the results of our field and laboratory tests, it is our opinion that the deck has been constructed with adequate foundation support and embedment into the existing slope. It is our professional opinion that the development will neither be subject to, nor will it contribute to signifi- cant geologic instability throughout its lifespan. Removal ofthe lower deck will expose the slope to erosional forces and should be protected with natural vegetation. The proposed structure falls under Seismic Use Group 1. The Site Class D is assigned based on the exist- ing soil profile. The Seismic Design Category D analysis procedures as identified in CBC Table 1616.6.3 shall be used in design. A value of 150 psf for lateral bearing capacity may be used. The equivalent fluid pressure of 55 pcf should be used for retaining wall design, with a friction coefficient of 0.25 against lat- eral sliding. Grading and Earthwork There is no grading anticipated for the project. All footings for the project have been founded in com- petent formational soils. Any site grading to return the lower deck's terrace to original slope shall be performed in accordance with standard grading procedures outlined in the appendix A, and minimum requirements of the City of Carlsbad. An allowable soils bearing value of 1500 pounds per square foot may be used when designing continu- ous and spread footings founded a minimum of 18 inches into firm natural formation, as set forth in the 2012 I.B.C. table 1804.2. It is anticipated that over time, the underlying soils have a potential for settlement of no more than 1/8 inch, and potential for differential settlements of as much as 1/8 inch. Drainage Adequate measures shall be implemented to properly finish grade the site after the structure and other improvements are removed or revised, such that the drainage water within the site and adjacent Tsctaliiesii FI@M Ssrvteiss, Carlsbad Cypress Ave ^ O % % It's 4 G/ind Coffee hloKse > U 'C5 Vl • \ 3 \ 3053 Ocean St Carlsbad, CA 92008-2958 United States Sun Property February 25,2014 3053 Ocean Street, Carlsbad Project No. 4231 properties is directed away from the foundations, retaining walls, footings, floor slabs and the tops of slopes by the use of swales and subsurface drains towards the natural drainage ofthe lot. Proper sur- face and subsurface drains shall be used and maintained to minimize the potential of water seeking the level of bearing soils under the foundations, footings and floor slabs. Planting and watering within 18 inches ofthe structure is not recommended, however may be implemented with proper drainage and limiting water within the 18 inch perimeter zone. 7. LIMITATIONS The geotechnical services outlined in this report have been conducted in accordance with current prac- tice and the standard of care exercised by geotechnical consultants performing similar tasks in this area. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made regarding the observations and conclusions expressed in this report. The reported test results represent values at the locations tested. It is important to note that the preci- sion of field and laboratory tests is not exact and variations should be expected. The reported locations and elevations ofthe tests are estimated based on correlations with the site plans. Further accuracy is not implied. Tsctmllcfll FltoDidl Seirvlless, Dmc. Sun Property February 25, 2014 3053 Ocean Street, Carlsbad Project No. 4231 8. SELECTED REFERENCES American Public Works Association, 2003, "Greenbook" Standard Specifications for Public Works Con- struction. City of San Diego, 2005, Supplement Amendments to the Standard Specifications for Public Works Con- struction, San Diego. California Building Code, 2013, Ch's 16,18, Seismic Engineering Design Provisions. Tecllmllcall FM S«rallc«s, Siw. Sun Property 3053 Ocean Street, Carlsbad February 25,2014 Project No. 4231 Table 1 - Maximum Density Test Results Material Maximum Optimum Type No. Description Dry Density Moisture Content Type No. (pcf) (%) 1 Brown silty Sand (SP) 124.5 8.0 Table 2 - In-Situ Density Test Results Material Type No. Dry Density Moisture content % of Maximum 1 112.4 6.5% 90.28 4231 Sun Gtch APPENDIX A RECOMMENDED EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS 1. General Description The intent of these specifications is to obtain unifomiiry and adequate strength in filled ground so that the proposed structures may be safely supported. The procedures include the clearing and preparation of the land to be filled, processing the fill soils, the spreading, and compaction ofthe filled areas to conform with the hnes and grades as shovvn on the approved plans. The owner shall retain a Civil Engineer qualified in soil mechanics (herein referred to as engineer) to inspect and lest earthwork in accordance with these specifications. The engineer shall advise the owner and grading contractor immediately if any unsatisfactor>' conditions are observed to exist and shall have the authorit>' to reject the compacted filled ground until such time that corrective measures are taken, necessary to comply with the specifications. It shall be the sole responsibility ofthe grading contractorto achieve the specified degree of compaction. 2. Preparing .Ajeas to be Filled (a) .A.11 brush, vegetation and any biodegradable refuse, shall be removed or otherwise disposed of so as to leave the areas to be filled free of vegetation and debris. Any uncompacted filled ground or loose compres.sibie natural ground shall be removed unless the report recommends otherwise, .^ny buried tanks or other siruciures shall be removed and the depression backfilled to the satisfaction of the engineer. (b) The natural ground which is detennined to be satisfactorv- for the support of the filled ground shall then be plowed or scarified to a depth of at least 12 inches (12"). (c) Alter tlie natural ground has been prepared, it shall then be brought to the proper moisture content and compacted to not less tlian 90 percent of maximum diy dcnsitv in accordance with ASTMD 1557-91. (d) Where fills are made on slopes greater than 20 percent, horizontal benches shall be cut into the firm naiural ground. The initial bench at the toe of the fill shall be at least 15 feet in width on firm undi-sturbed natural ground. The width of all succeeding benches shall be at least 6 feet. APPENDIX A 3. Fill Materials All material shall be approved by the engineer and shall consist of materials free from vegetable matter, and other lumps greater than 6 inches in diameter. If. during grading operations, soils are found which were not encountered and tested in the preliminary investigation, tests on these soils shall be perfonned to determine their physical characteristics. Any special treatment recommended in the preliminar>' or subsequent soils reports not covered herein shall become an addendum to these specifications. 4. Placing and Compacting Fill Materials (a) When the moisiure content of the fill material is below that specified, water shall be added until ihe moisture content is near optimum to assure unifonn mixing and effective compaction. fb) When the moisture content of the fill materials is above that specified, the fill material shall be aerated by blading and scarifv'ing or other satisfactory' methods until the moisture content is near optimum as specified. (c) After processing, the suitable fill materials shall be placed in layers which, when compacted, shall not e.Kceed six inches (6"). Each layer shall be spread evenly and shall be thoroughly mixed during the spreading insure uniformit\- of malerials and moisture in each layer. (d) After each layer has been placed, mixed and spread evenly, it shall be thoroughly compacted to not less than tlie density set forth in paragraph 2 (c) above. Compaction shall be accomplished with approval types of compaction equipment. Rolling shall be accomplished while the fill material is at the specified moisture content. In place density tests shall be performed in accordance with .A.STM D1556-90. (e) The stufaces ofthe fill slopes shall be compacted by means of sheepsfoot rollers or olher suitable equipment. Compacting operations shall be continued until the slopes are stable and until there is no appreciable amoimt of loose soil on the slopes. 5. Inspection Sufticient inspection by our firm or the Soil'.s Engineer of record and/or his/her representative shall be maintained during the filling and compacting operalions so that he/she can verify- that the fill was constructed in accordance wiih the accepted specifications. 5. Seasonal Limits No fill material shall be placed, spread, or rolled if weather conditions increase the moisture content above permissible limits. When the work is inten-upted by rain, fill operations shall not be resumed until ihe moisture content and densii}' of fill are as previously specified. All recommendations presented in the attached report are a part of these specitications. Appendix B > * Technical Field Services, Inc. Civi! Engineering & Inspection ' LIMITED GEOLOGIC HAZARDS EVALUATION, SUN PROPERTY, 3053/3057 OCEAN STREET, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 PREPARED FOR: Mrs. Julie Sun 1704 Hanscom Drive South Pasadena, California 91030 PREPARED BY: Technical Field Services, Inc. 1199 Tamarack Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 March 28, 2014 Project No. 4231 1199 Tamarack Aveiiue. Carlsbad. Caiifornia nom (760) 497-1264 Technical Field Services, Inc. Civi! Engineering & Inspection LIMITED GEOLOGIC HAZARD EVALUATION 3053 OCEAN STREET CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 28 March 2014 Ms. Julie Sun 1704 Hanscom Drive South Pasadena, Califomia 91030 Subject: Limited Geologic Hazard Evaluation, APN 203-251 -06, 3053 Ocean Stteet, Carlsbad, Califomia 92008 Dear Ms. Sun: In iiccordance with the your request and authorization, Phillip S. Rosenberg, PG 5536, EG 1721, CHg 658 has conducted a limited geologic hazard evaluation of the subject site (Site). The puipose of the study was to evaluate geologic conditions and the potential presence of geologic hazards, specifically landslides and liquefaction, and their effects on the Site. Based on our review of the available data (references), field reconnaissance, and engineering geology analysis, there are no significant geologic hazards impacting the site. The most sigindficant elements of this study are summarized below: No landslides or adverse geologic stmcture, associated with deep-seated landsliding, were encountered during this evaluation. The formational earth materials (i.e., paralic deposits) that underlie the site are typically moderately to well indurated and do exhibit adverse geologic structure, based on the available data. The potential for deep-seated landslides to adversely affect the proposed development is considered very low. However, the onsite earth materials are considered erosive. Thus, there is some potential for shallow, surficial slope failures to occur along the bluff. I! 'M) Tamarack .Avenue. Carlsbad, Caiifornia 92008 (760) 407-1264 Technical Field Services, Inc. C\\il Engineering & Inspection Th<; site currently has a very low potential for liquefaction, due to the relatively dense nature of the paralic deposits and underlying Santiago Formation, and the depth to the regional water table below the lowest site elevation. The beach deposits located adjacent to the west of the Site, however, may be subject to liquefaction. The potential for seismic densification to affect the existing stmcture at the Site is considered very low. The evaluation indicates there are no known active faults crossing the site. In addition, other than moderate to strong seismic shaking produced from an earthquake on a nearby active fault, other geologic and secondary seismic hazards have a very low potential to affect the site. Adverse geologic features were not encountered or observed. Th(; opportunity to be of service is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions conceming this report, or if we may be of fiirther assistance, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, Phillip S. Rosenberg, PG 5536, C^'l^ Consulting Engineering Geologist 119') Tamarack .A venue. Carisliad. California 92008 i'760) 497-1264 Technical Field Services, Inc. Civil Engineering & liispection LIMITED GEOLOGIC HAZARD EVALUATION 3053/3057 OCEAN STREET CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 SCOPE OF SERVICES The scope of services conducted for this limited study has included fhe following: • Review of the available geologic literature for the site, including published geologic maps, reports, and aerial photographs. Documents reviewed are listed under references. • Geologic site reconnaissance. • Geologic analysis of data collected. • Preparation of this report presenting preliminary findings and conclusions. SITE DESCRIPTION The subject site is located at 3053/3057 Ocean Street in the City of Carlsbad, San Diego County, Califomia. The property consists of approximately 1.9 acres, and has been designated Assessor's Parcel Number 203-251-06 by the County of San Diego Assessor's office. Current de^^elopment at the site includes a 2-story single family residence, with decks on the west side. It is our understanding that the lowermost deck will be removed to satisfy a City of Carlsbad code violation. The site is bounded on the north by property owned by the Carlsbad Inn, on the south by a single family residence, on the east by Ocean Street, and on the west by a public beach and the Pacific Ocean. Elevations at the site range from approximately 10 feet above mean sea level (MSL) along the westem property line to approximately 44 feet MSL at the entrance along Ocean Street. REGIONAL GEOLOGY The subject property lies within the coastal plains physiographic region of the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province of southem Califomia. This region consists of dissected, mesa-like tenraces that graduate inland to roUmg hills. The encompassing Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province is characterized as elongated mountain ranges and valleys that trend northwesterly (Norris and Webb, 1990). This geomorphic province extends fi'om the base of the east-west alij^ned Santa Monica - San Gabriel Mountains, and continues south into Baja Califomia. The mo untain ranges are underlain by basement rocks consisting of pre-Cretaceous metasedimentary rocks, Jurassic metavolcanic rocks, and Cretaceous plutonic rocks of the southem Califomia batholith. 1 \ 99 Tamarack Avenue. Carlsbad. Caiifornia 9200S (760) 497-1264 In the San Diego County region, deposition occurred dming the Cretaceous Period and Cenozoic Era. in the continental margin of a forearc basin. Sediments, derived from Cretaceous-age plutonic rocks and Jurassic-age volcanic rocks, were deposited into the narrow, steep, coastal plain and continental margin of the basin. These rocks have been uplifted, eroded, and deeply incised. During early Pleistocene time, a broad coastal plain was developed. During mid- to late-Pleistocene time, this plain was uplifted, eroded, and incised. Alluvial deposits have since filled the lower valleys, and young marine sediments are currently being deposited/eroded within coaistal and beach areas. Rejponal geologic mapping by Keimedy and Tan (2005) indicates that the contact between yoimger and older paralic deposits, formerly termed terrace deposits, occurs near the site's easterly margin. Hie paralic deposits are underlain by the Santiago Formation at depth. SITE GEOLOGIC UNITS The; site geologic units observed during the Site reconnaissance included small, localized areas undocumented artificial fill, beach deposits, Quatemary-age colluvium (topsoil), younger and older Quatemary-age paralic deposits (weathered and unweathered), and the Santiago formation. Th(; earth materials are generally described below firom the youngest to the oldest. Artificial Fill Artificial fill is present in limited areas across the Site. The undocumented fill appeared to consist of a dark yellowish brown silty sand. The fill appeared dry, loose, and non-uniform. The thickness of the undocumented fill may be on the order of 1 foot thick, where encountered. Beach Deposits Quatemary-age beach deposits are present along the westem boundary of the Site and on the public beach to the west. Beach sediments generally consist of fine to medium grained, poorly graded sand, grading to cobbles with depth, and were off-white to brown, slightly moist to saturated, and loose to medium dense. This unit may be subject to liquefaction. Qu aternary-age Colluvium Quatemary-age colluvium (topsoil) generally consists of a brown and dark brown silty sand with local minor clay to a dark brown very fine-grained sand v^dth silt. The colluvium was generally dry to moist. Ouiatemary-age Paralic Deposits Quatemary-age younger parahc deposits are present underlying the surficial soils across the Site. Wliere weathered, the younger paralic deposits typically consisted of a dark yellovdsh brown silty sand to a very fine-grained sand with silt. The weathered younger paralic deposits were generally dry to wet and medium dense. Unweathered younger paralic deposits generally consisted of a dark yellowish brown sand with cobble to sandy cobbles, a dark yellowish brown clayey sand, and a dark yellowish brown and gray sandy clay. The unweathered younger paralic deposits were typically moist to wet and dense/stiff. Older paralic deposits generally consisted of a dark yellowish brown and reddish yellow silty sand to very fine-grained sand with silt, a gray, dark yellov^sh brown, and reddish yellow clayey sand, and a reddish yellow and dark yellowish brown sandy clay. The older paralic deposits were generally damp to moist and dense to very dense/very stiff. Tertiary Santiago Formation Sedimentary rock belonging to the Tertiary-age Santiago Formation, underlies the older paralic de])osits at depth. This unit is not exposed at the Site. The Santiago Formation generally consists of highly oxidized reddish brown and Ught brown, damp to moist, fine-to medium-grained clayey sandstone to silty sandstone. These materials are medium dense/medium stiff and become dense/stiff with depth. GEOLOGIC STRUCTURE As observed in nearby outcrops, primarily along nearby coastal bluffs, the younger and older pai'alic deposits were thickly bedded to massive and regionally sub-horizontal to horizontal. Clayey interbeds within the underlying Santiago Formation displayed relatively horizontal contacts within the bounding sandstone units. Based on the available data, adverse geologic structures are not anticipated to unfavorably impact the Site. GROUNDWATER Regional groundwater was not observed during the Site reconnaissance. Regional groundwater is anticipated to generally be coincident with mean sea level (MSL). Due to the nature of the Site earth materials, seepage and/or perched groundwater conditions may develop throughout the Site ui the future, especially along boundaries of contrasting peimeabilities. Perched groundwater likely exists along the geologic contact between the older pai-alic deposits and underlying Santiago Formation. Based on regional geologic mapping by Tan and Kennedy (1996), the elevation of this contact is approximately 60 feet Mean Sea Level (MSL) in the vicinity of the site. Tan and Kennedy (1996) show this contact dipping in a westerly diiection. Regional groundwater is anticipated to generally be coincident with Mean Sea Level (M[SL), especially along boundaries of contrasting permeabilities (i.e., clayey and sandy fill lifts, fill/paralic deposits and younger and older paralic deposits contacts, joints/firactures, disicontinuities, etc.), and should be anticipated. LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY According to regional landslide susceptibility mapping by Tan and Giffen (1995), the site is located within landslide susceptibility Subarea 4-1 which is characterized as being "most susceptible" to landsliding. No landslides were mapped at or immediately adjacent to the Site. Baised on review of Kennedy and Tan (2005), no landslide debris has been mapped at or immediately adjacent to the Site. Geomorphic expressions indicative of deep-seated landslides was not noted during review of available aerial photographs. Further, landsUde debris or adverse geologic structure were not observed during the field reconnaissance. Given the above evidence, and the moderately to well indurated nature ofthe younger and older paralic deposits that underlie the Site, the potential for deep-seated landslides to adversely affect the Site is considered very low. However, the onsite earth materials are considered erosive. Thus, there is some potential for shallow, surficial slope failures to occur along slopes, including the coastal bluff. FAULTING AND REGIONAL SEISMICITY Local and Regional Faults The review conducted indicates that there are no known active faults crossing this site, and the site is not within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone (Bryant and Hart, 2007). However, the site is situated in an area of active faulting. These include, but are not limited to: the San Andreas fauh; the San Jacinto fault; the Elsinore fault; the Coronado Bank fault zone; and the Newport- Inglewood - Rose Canyon fault zone (NIRCFZ). Portions of the nearby NIRCFZ are located in an Alc[uist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone (Bryant and Hart, 2007). According to Blake (2000a), the closest known active fault to the site is the offshore segment ofthe Newport-Inglewood fault which located at a distance of approximately 5.3 miles [mi] (8.5 kilometers [km]). According to Cao, et al. (2003), the offshore segment of the Newport-Inglewood fault is capable of producing a ma>cimum magnitude (Mw) 7.1 earthquake. The possibility of ground acceleration, or shaking at the site, may be considered as approximately similar to the southem Califomia region as a whole. SEISMIC RELATED HAZARDS Liquefaction Potential Liquefaction describes a phenomenon in which cyclic stresses, produced by earthquake-induced ground motion, create excess pore pressures in relatively cohesionless soils. These soils may thereby acquire a high degree of mobility, which can lead to vertical deformation, lateral movement, lurching, sliding, and as a resuh of seismic loading, volumetric strain and manifestation in surface settlement of loose sediments, sand boils and other damaging lateral deformations. This phenomenon occurs only below the water table, but after liquefaction has developed, it can propagate upward into overlying non-saturated soil as excess pore water dissipates. One of the primary factors controlling the potential for liquefaction is depth to groundwater. Ty]3ically, liquefaction has a relatively low potential at depths greater than 50 feet and is unlikely and/or will produce vertical strains well below 1 percent for depths below 60 feet when relative densities are 40 to 60 percent and effective overburden pressures are two or more atmospheres (i.e., 4,232 psf [Seed, 2005]). The condition of liquefaction has two principal effects. One is the consolidation of loose sediments vdth resultant settlement of the ground surface. The other effect is lateral sliding. Significant permanent lateral movement generally occurs only when there is significant differential loading, such as fill or natural ground slopes within susceptible materials. No such loading conditions exist at the site. Liq[uefaction susceptibility is related to numerous factors and the following five conditions should be isoncurrently present for liquefaction to occur: 1) sediments must be relatively young hi age and not have developed a large amount of cementation; 2) sediments must generally consist of medium- to fine-grained, relatively cohesionless sands; 3) the sediments must have low relative density; 4) free groundwater must be present in the sediment; and 5) the site must experience a seismic event of a sufficient duration and magnitude, to induce straining of soil particles. Only about one to two of these concurrently necessary conditions have the potential to affect the Site. The beach deposits adjacent to the west of the Site generally consist of unconsolidated sand, and may be subject to liquefaction. Seismic Densification Seismic densification is a phenomenon that typically occurs in low relative density granular soils (i.e.. United States Soil Classification System [USCS] soil types SP, SM, and) that are above the groundwater table. These unsaturated granular soils are susceptible if left in the original density (unmitigated), and are generally dry of the optimum moisture content (as defined by the ASTM D 1557). During seismic-induced ground shaking, these natural or artificial soils deform under loading and volumetrically strain, potentially resulting in ground surface settlements. Tsunamis Tsimamis are waves generated by submarine earthquakes, landslides, or volcanic action. Lander, et £il. (1993) discusses the frequency and magnitude of recorded or observed tsunami in the sotithera Califomia area. Houston (1980) predicts a tsunami of less than 5 feet for a 500-year recurrence interval for this area. Legg, et al. (2003) examined the potential tsunami wave run up in southem Califomia. Wliile Legg's study is not specific to the subject Site, it provides a first order analysis for the area. Legg, et al. (2003) show tsunami run up in the southem Califomia bight. Relatively new Tstmami Inundation Maps (State of California, 2009), try to identify a credible upper bound to inundation from tsunami, subject to limitations in the accuracy and completeness of data and methods/models. The Site area is mapped as being vithin a Tsunami Inundation Area. Seiche Since the site is not m an enclosed or semi-enclosed basin (lake, bay, or harbor), the potential for seiche to be generated by an earthquake and effect the site is considered low. Other Geologic/Secondary Seismic Hazards Th<; following includes other geologic/seismic related hazards that have been considered during the limited evaluation of the Site. The hazards listed are considered negligible and/or mitigated as a result of site location, soil characteristics, and the existing Site development: o Subsidence o Dynamic Settlement o Surface Fault Rupture o Groimd Lurching or Shallow Ground Rupture Susceptibility of the site to experience damaging deformations from seismically-induced hquefaction and densification is relatively low owing to the dense, nature of the younger and older paralic deposits that underlie the site in the near-surface and the depth to the regional water table. The potential for the Site to be affected by significant seismic densification or liquefaction of offsite soils may be considered low. PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS The primary geologic concems with respect to the Site are primarily related to regional seismic activity. In the event of an upper bound or maximum credible earthquake occurring on any of the nezirby major faults, strong ground shaking would occur in the subject site's general area. Potential damage to any stmcture(s) would likely be greatest fi-om the vibrations and impelling force caused by the inertia of a stmcture's mass than from those induced by the hazards considered above. The potential at the Site would be no greater than that for other existing stractures and improvements in Ihe immediate vicinity that comply with current and adopted building standards. LIMITATIONS This study was limited to evaluating geologic hazards that may unpact the Site, specifically landslides, liquefaction, and other seismic related hazards. This study did not evaluate coastal bluff retreat, or other geotechnical factors impacting this Site. In addition, this study did not evaluate existing geotechnical conditions, or environmental issues that may impact the property. The; preliminary conclusions presented in fhis report were based on an observation of surface conditions and a review of maps and pubUcations in the public domain. No subsurface evaluations, including exploratory borings or test pits, or laboratory testing of materials was conducted. The materials observed at the Site and utilized for our analysis are believed representative of the areji; however, soil and bedrock materials vary in character between excavations and natural outcrops or conditions exposed. Site conditions may vary due to seasonal changes or other factors. Inasmuch as our study is based upon our review and geologic analyses, the preliminary conclusions presented in this report are professional opinions. These opinions have been derived in accordance witli current standards of practice, and no warranty, either express or unplied, is given. Standards of practice are subject to change with tune. Use of this report constitutes an agreement and consent by the user to all the limitations outlined above, notwithstanding any other agreements that may be in place. In addition, this report may be subject to review by the controUmg authorities. REFERENCES Blake, Thomas F., 2000a, EQFAULT, A computer program for the estimation of peak horizontal acceleration from 3-D fault sources; Windows 95/98 version. , 2000b, EQSEARCH, A computer program for the estimation of peak horizontal acceleration from Califomia historical earthquake catalogs; Updated to December 2009, Windows 95/98 version. Bozorgnia, Y., Campbell K.W., and Niazi, M., 1999, Vertical ground motion: Characteristics, relationship with horizontal component, and building-code implications; Proceedings of the SMIP99 seminar on utilization of strong-motion data, September 15, Oakland, pp. 23- 49. Brj^ant, W.A., and Hart, E.W., 2007, Fault-mpture hazard zones in California, Alquist-Priolo earthquake fault zoning act with index to earthquake fault zones maps; Califomia Geological Survey, Special Publication 42, interim revision. Califomia Building Standards Commission, 2010, Califomia building code. Califomia Department of Boating and Waterways and the San Diego Association of Govemments, 1994, Shoreline Erosion Assessment and Atlas of the San Diego Region, Volumes I and II, Map 12B, December. Houston, J.R., 1980, Type 19 flood insurance study: Tsunami predictions for southem Califomia, USACOE Technical Report HL. Int<;mational Conference of Building Officials, 2001, Califomia building code, Califomia Code of Regulations title 24, part 2, volume 1 and 2. , 1998, Maps of known active fault near-source zones in Califomia and adjacent portions of Nevada. Jennings, C.W., 1994, Fault activity map of Califomia and adjacent areas: Califomia Division of Mines and Geology, Map Sheet No. 6, scale 1:750,000. Kennedy, M.P, and Tan, S.S, 2005, Geologic map of the Oceanside 30' x 60' quadrangle, Califomia, United States Geological Survey. Lander, J.F., Lockridge, P., and Kozuch, M., 1993, Tsunamis affecting the west coast of the US, 1806-1992, NOAA National Geophysical Data Center publication. Legg, M.R., Borrero, J.C, and Synolakis, C.E., 2003, Evaluation of tsunami risk to southem Califomia coastal cities, in The 2002 NEHRP Professional Fellowship Report, January. Leighton and Associates, Inc. and David Evans and Associates, Inc., 1992, City of Carlsbad, Geotechnical Hazards Analysis and Mapping Study, Carisbad, California, November. Seed, 2005, Evaluation and mitigation of soil liquefaction hazard "evaluation of field data and procedures for evaluating the risk of triggering (or inception) of liquefaction", in Geotechnical earthquake engineering; short course, San Diego, Califomia, April 8-9. State of California, 2009, Tsunami inundation map for emergency planning, Oceanside and San Luis Rey Quadrangles, San Diego County; produced by Califomia Emergency Management Aj'ency, Califomia Geological Survey, and University of Southem Califomia - Tsunami R(;search Center; dated June 1,2009, mapped at 1:24,000 scale Tan, S.S., and Giffen, D.G., 1995, Landslide hazards in the northem part of the San Diego Metropolitan area, San Diego County, California, Landslide hazard identification map no. 35, Plate 35 A, Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, DMG Open File Report 95-04. Tan, S.S., and Kennedy, M.P., 1996, Geologic maps of the northwestem part of San Diego County, Califomia: Califomia Division of Mines and Geology, Open File Report 96-02. United States Geological Survey, 2011, Seismic hazard curves and uniform hazard response spectra - v5.1.0, dated February 2 , 1999, San Luis Rey quadrangle, San Diego County, California, 7.5 minute series, 1:24,000 scale. Appendix C BesiignAlaps Summary Report Page 1 of2 SUSiGS Design Maps Summary Report User-Specified Input Report Title 3053 Ocean Street, Carlsbad Tue April 1, 2014 19:14:25 UTC Building Code Reference Docuinent 2012 International Building Code (which utilizes USGS hazard data available in 2008) Site Coordinates 33.1566°N, 117.35241°W Site Soil Classification Site Class D - "Stiff Soil" Risk Category I/II/III I ^ 2mi 3 5000m Vista ma|3quest USGS-Provided Output ® MapQuest Ss= 1.169 g Sl = 0.448 g S„s = 1.207 g S„i = 0.696 g SDS = 0.805 g SDI = 0.464 g For Information on how the SS and Sl values above have been calculated from probabilistic (risk-targeted) and determiaistic ground motions in the direction of maximum horizontal response, please return to the application and select the "2009 NEHRP" building code reference document. MCER Response Spectrum Design Response Spectrum 0.00 0.20 0 *0 O.SO 0.80 1.00 1.20 l.iO 1.60 1.80 2.00 Period, T (sec) ffl 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.10 1.60 1.80 2.00 Period, T (sec) http://<;hp3-earthqiiake.wr.usgs.gov/designmaps/us/summary.php?template=minimal&latitu... 4/1/2014 Design Maps Summary Report Page 2 of 2 Although this information is a product of the U.S. Geological Survey, we provide no warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy of the data contained therein. This tool is not a substitute for technical subject-matter knowledge. http://ehp3-eartiiquake.vvr.usgs.gov/designmaps/us/summary .php?template=minimal&latitu... 4/1/2014 De^ign^Maps Detailed Report Page 1 of 4 Design Maps Detailed Report 2012 International Building Code (33.1566°N, 117.35241°W) Site Class D - "Stiff Soii", Risk Category I/II/III Section 1613.3.1 — Mapped acceleration parameters Note: Ground motion values provided below are for the direction of maximum horizontal spectral response acceleration. They have been converted from corresponding geometric mean ground motions computed by the USGS by applying factors of 1.1 (to obtain Ss) and 1.3 (to obtain Si). Maps in the 2012 International Building Code are provided for Site Class B. Adjustments for other Site Classes are made, as needed, in Section 1613.3.3. From Figure 1613.3.1(1)"' Ss= 1.169 g From Figure 1613.3.1f 2)Si = 0.448 g Section 1613.3.2 — Site class definitions The authority having jurisdiction (not the USGS), site-specific geotechnical data, and/or the default has classified the site as Site Class D, based on the site soil properties in accordance with Section 1613. 2010 ASCE-7 Standard - Table 20.3-1 SITE CLASS DEFINITIONS Site Class N or W.. Su A. Hard Rock >5,000 ft/s N/A N/A B. Rock 2,500 to 5,000 ft/s N/A N/A C. Very dense soil and soft rock 1,200 to 2,500 ft/s >50 >2,000 psf D. Stiff Soil 600 to 1,200 ft/s 15 to 50 1,000 to 2,000 psf E. Soft clay soil <600 ft/s <15 <1,000 psf Any profile with more than 10 ft of soil having the characteristics: • Plasticity index PI > 20, • Moisture content w > 40%, and • Undrained shear strength s„ < 500 psf F. Soils requiring site response See Section 20.3.1 analysis in accordance with Section 21.1 For SI: Ift/s = 0.3048 m/s lib/ft^ = 0.0479 kN/m^ http://ehp3-earthquake.wr .usgs.gov/designmaps/us/report.php?template=minimal&latitude=... 4/1 /2014 X)e§ignJVIaps Detailed Report Page 2 of4 Section 1613.3.3 — Site coefficients and adjusted maximum considered earthquake spectral response acceleration parameters TABLE 1613.3.3(1) VALUES OF SITE COEFFICIENT F. Site Class Mapped Spectral Response Acceleration at Short Period Ss < 0.25 Ss = 0.50 Ss = 0.75 Ss = 1.00 Ss > 1.25 A 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 B 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 C 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 D 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.0 E 2.5 1.7 1.2 0.9 0.9 F See Section 11.4.7 of ASCE 7 Note Use straight-line interpolation for intermediate values of Ss For Site Class = D and Ss = 1.169 g, F. = 1.032 TABLE 1613.3.3(2) VALUES OF SITE COEFFICIENT F. Site Class Mapped Spectral Response Acceleration at 1-s Period Sl < 0.10 Sl = 0.20 S, = 0.30 Sl = 0.40 Sl > 0.50 A 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 B 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 C 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 D 2.4 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.5 E 3.5 3.2 2.8 2.4 2.4 F See Section 11.4.7 of ASCE 7 Note: Use straight-line interpolation for intermediate values of Si For Site Class = D and Si = 0.448 g, F, = 1.552 http://ehp3-earthquake.wr.usgs.gov/designmaps/us/report.php?template=rninimal&latitude=... 4/1/2014 OesigntMaps Detailed Report Page 3 of 4 Equation (16-37): S„s = FaSs = 1.032 x 1.169 = 1.207 g Equation (16-38): SMI = F„Si = 1.552 x 0.448 = 0.696 g Section 1613.3.4 — Design spectral response acceleration parameters Equation (16-39): SDS = % SMS = % x 1.207 = 0.805 g Equation (16-40): SDI = % S„, = x 0.696 = 0.464 g http://ehp3-earthquake.wr.usgs.gov/desigimiaps/us/report.php?template===mmimal&latitude= .. 4/1 /2014 S^esign Maps Detailed Report Section 1613.3.5 — Determination of seismic design category TABLE 1613.3.5(1) SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY BASED ON SHORT-PERIOD (0.2 second) RESPONSE ACCELERATION Page 4 of 4 VALUE OF SDS RISK CATEGORY VALUE OF SDS I or II III IV SDS < 0.167g A A A 0.167g < SDS < 0.33g B B C 0.33g S SDS < O.SOg C C D O.SOg < SDS D D D For Risk Category = I and Sos = 0.805 g. Seismic Design Category = D TABLE 1613.3.5(2) SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORV BASED ON 1-SECOND PERIOD RESPONSE ACCELERATION VALUE OF SDI RISK CATEGORY VALUE OF SDI Ior II III IV SDI < 0.067g A A A 0.067g S SDI < 0.133g B B C 0.133g < SDI < 0.20g C C D O.ZOg S SDI D D D For Risk Category = I and Soi = 0.464 g. Seismic Design Category = D Note: When Si is greater than or equal to 0.75g, the Seismic Design Category is E for buildings in Risk Categories I, II, and III, and F for those in Risk Category IV, irrespective of the above. Seismic Design Category = "the more severe design category in accordance with Table 1613.3.5(1) or 1613.3.5(2)" = D Note: See Section 1613.3.5.1 for alternative approaches to calculating Seismic Design Category. References 1. Figure 1613.3.1(1): http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/designmaps/downloads/pdfs/IBC-2012- Figl613p3pl(l).pdf 2. Figure 1613.3.1(2): http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/designmaps/downloads/pdfs/IBC-2012- Figl613p3pl(2).pdf http://ehp3-earthquake.wr.usgs.gov/designmaps/us/report.php?template==mmimal&latitude=... 4/1/2014 FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK AUG 2 0 2014 San Diego County on . Posted AUG 2 0 2014 Removed SEP 2 2 2014 =~~~.....---- FILEcdfY Ccityof Carlsbad NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT The following project is located within the City of Carlsbad Coastal Zone. A coastal permit application for the project has been acted upon. SENT TO COASTAL COMMISSION ON Julv 29, 2014 Application #: SDP 14-05/CDP 13-19/HDP 14-02 Filing Date: April 14. 2014 Case Name: Julie Sun Deck Decision Date: Julv 16. 2014 Applicant: Stephanie Lupton Agent (if different): N/A Address: PO Box 2216, San Marcos, CA 92079 Address: N/A Phone: (760) 224-9704 Phone: N/A Project Description: The proiect consists of rectifying an active code violation/enforcement case pending since Februarv 25, 2013 whereas the propertv owner expanded the size of an existing permitted deck, constructed a separate lower level deck, and made repairs to an existing staircase and landing area without receiving the appropriate permits. The following actions will take place with the approval ofthe above mentioned permits: 1) removal ofthe lower level non-permitted deck, 2) legally permit a 670 square foot addition to the upper-level deck, and 3) approve the reconstructed/repaired stairs and landing in kind to an existing two-unit residential apartment building. Project Location: 3053 Ocean Street, Carlsbad, CA 92008 ACTION: • APPROVED 1^ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS • DENIED (Copy of fmal resolution/decision letter is setit to: Coastal Commission, any persons who specifically requested it, and ttie applicant). COASTAL COMMISSION APPEAL STATUS: • NOT APPEALABLE TO THE COASTAL COMMISSION. 13 APPEALABLE TO THE COASTAL COMMISSION pursuant to Coastal Act Section 30603. An aggrieved person may appeal this decision to the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days following Coastal Commission receipt of this notice. Applicants will be notified by the Coastal Commission as to the date the Coastal Commission's appeal period will conclude. Appeals must be made in writing to the Coastal Commission's district office at the following address: California Coastal Commission, 7575 Metropolitan Dr., Suite 103, San Diego, California 92108-4402, Telephone (619) 767-2370. Attachment: - Location Map to CCC for non-appealable CDPs - Staff Report to CCC for appealable CDPs The time witiiin wiiicii judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedures, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the City of Carisbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 16. Any petition or other paper seeking judicial review must be filed in the appropriate court not later than ninety (90) days following the date on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten (10) days after the decision becomes final a request for the record of the proceedings accompanied by the required deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost of preparation of such a record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended to not later than thirty (30) days following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written request forthe preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the CityClerk, Cityof Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Viilage Drive, Carlsbad, California 92008. Community & Economic Development Planning Division 1635 FaradayAvenue I Carlsbad, CA92008 I 760-602-4600 I 760-602-8560fax .... e. AAnt. V City Of FILE COPY Catlsbad ADMINISTRATIVE SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT/HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NOTICE OF PENDING DECISION DATE: May 30, 2014 APPLICATION NUMBER AND NAME: SDP 14-05/CDP 13-19/HDP 14-02 - JULIE SUN DECK PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting the approval of a Minor Site Development Permit, Minor Coastal Development Permit and Hillside Development Permit. The project consists of rectifying an active code violation/enforcement case that has been pending on the project site since February 25, 2013. The applicant expanded the size of an existing permitted deck, constructed a new lower level deck, and reconstructed/repaired existing stairs and landing area without receiving the appropriate permits. The following actions will take place with the approval of the above mentioned permits: 1) removal of the lower level non-permitted deck, 2) legally permit the upper level deck expansion by complying with the interior side yard and string-line setback requirements, and 3) approve the replacement of existing stairs and landing with in-kind. The original upper level deck received a coastal development permit (No. 6-82-392) issued by the California Coastal Commission in 1982. A copy of the permit is on file with the California Coastal Commission and the City of Carlsbad. LOCATION: 3053 Ocean Street APN: 203-251-06-00 The proposed development is located within the Coastal Zone. No formal public hearing is required for this application, and a public hearing will onlv be held upon written request, within 10 calendar days from the date of this notice. Failure to request a hearing may result in loss of the ability to appeal to the Coastal Commission any action taken by the City on the Administrative Coastal Development Permit application. The Citv Planner will determine this application 10 calendar davs after the date of this notice if no public hearing is requested. Written requests for a public hearing should be addressed to the City Planner, City of Carlsbad Planning Division, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008. Ifyou have any questions, comments or concerns regarding this application please contact Greg Fisher, at the City of Carlsbad Planning Division, (760) 602-4629, Monday through Thursday - 7:30 a.m. - 5:30 p.m., or 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Friday. Community & Economic Development Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue I Carlsbad, CA 92008 I 760-602-4600 I 760-602-8560 fax CJ Certified Fc'b CJ Rewm Receipt Fee• CJ (Endorsement Required) CJ Restricted De !ivory Fee CJ (Endorsement Required) rn , ......•........ , Jl ru ~ r .Sent 1-s---·-- CJ siiiie£'A'Pr~iila::---· £"-or PO Box No. citi?fiiiie.-zrts:;:;r California Coastal Commission 7575 IVIetropoiitan Dr., Suite 103 ·------· San Diego, California 92108-4402 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Certified Mail•"'•"'""'"''"'" Ill A.maillng receipt ill A unique identifier for your mailpiece ill! A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: w Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail® or Priority Mail®. lili Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. Ill NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS' PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. II! For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be· requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 38i i) to the article and a,9cj applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS® postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is reqwred. Ill For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent Advjse the.clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery". " Ill If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at tile post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certifi€ld Mail ' receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and maiL , IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, August 2006 (Reverse) PSN 7530-02-000-9047 j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j I I First-Class Mail Postage & Fees Paid USPS Permit No. G-10 • Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4® in this box• City of Cartsb~ OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT AUG 0 1 2014 ·1635 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008-7314 Plannlntl Division 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. Ill Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. II Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: California Coastal Comr(lission 7575 Metropolitan Dr., Suite 103 San Diego, California 92108-4402 D. Is delivery address different from item If YES, enter delivery address below: 3. Service Type ~Certified Mail® D Registered D Insured Mail 4. Restricted 2. Article Number (Transfer from service fabeQ 7013 2630 DODO 2714 5106 PS Form 3811, July 2013 Domestic Return Receipt Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® J^mplate 5160® 203-233-03 Bearbeau Partners LLC 2950 Ocean St Carlsbad, CA 92008 • Feed Paper Bend along line to expose Pop-Up Edge™ 203-234-05 Marx Wesley Trust 2995 Ocean St Carlsbad, CA 92008 AVERY® 8160® Occupant 3145 Carlsbad Blvd 102 Carlsbad, CA 91915 Occupant 3100 Ocean St Carlsbad, CA 92008 Occupant 3015 Ocean St Carlsbad, CA 92008 203-251-03 Evergreen Hebron Lp 1821 S Coast Hwy Oceanside, CA 92054 Occupant 3021 Ocean St Carlsbad, CA 92008 203-251-04 Palma De La Playa LLC PO Box 1102 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 203-251-05 Carlsbad Inn PO Box 4068 Carlsbad, CA92018 Occupant 3075 Carlsbad Blvd Carlsbad, CA 92008 Occupant 3065 Ocean St Carlsbad, CA 92008 203-251-07 Elizabeth Reuss 1939 ECrary St Pasadena, CA91104 Occupant 3075 Ocean St Carlsbad, CA 92008 203-251-08 EJ & ME Quirk Rev Trust 7859 Bermuda Dunes Ave LasVegas NV89113 Occupant 3001 Ocean St Carlsbad, CA 92008 Occupant 3009 Ocean St Carlsbad, CA 92008 Occupant 3083 Ocean St Carlsbad, CA 92008 Occupant 3085 Ocean St Carlsbad, CA 92008 Occupant 3093 Ocean St Carlsbad, CA 92008 Occupant 3045 Carlsbad Blvd Carlsbad, CA 92008 Etiquettes fadles k peler Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 5160® Occupant 3095 Ocean St Carlsbad, CA 92008 A notice has been mailed to all property owners/occupants listed herein. , Date: <r(^//^ Signature Cop iS^i^lHvl ^Sens de Repliez h la hadiure afin dei reveler le rebord Pop-UpT" i Occupant 3097 Ocean St Carlsbad, CA 92008 www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY ^CARLSBAD Community & Economic Development www.carisbadca.gov EARLY PUBLIC NOTICE PROJECTNAME: JULIE SUN DECK PROJECT NUMBER: CDP 13-19 This early public notice is to let you know that a development application for a Coastal Development Permit (CDP) project within your neighborhood has been submitted to the City of Carlsbad on July 2, 2013. The project application is undergoing its initial review by the City. LOCATION: 3053 Ocean Street PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The CDP application is to allow for the previously constructed decks and stairways to remain that were built without permit. Please keep in mind that this is an early public notice and that the project design could change as a result of further staff and public review. A future public hearing notice will be mailed to you when this project is scheduled for public hearing before the Planning Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION: If you have questions or comments regarding this proposed project please contact Greg Fisher, Assistant Planner at greg.fisher@carlsbadca.gov, 760-602-4629, City of Carlsbad Planning Division, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008. Planning Division 1635 Faraday Ave. 1 Carlsbad, CA 92008 1 760-602-4600 I 760-602-8558 fax PACIFIC OCEAN NOT TO SCALE SITE MAP Julie Sun Deck CDP 13-19 Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 5160® I Feed Paper Bend along line to expose Pop-Up Edge^ AVERY® 8160® DA DODSON LIFE TRUST 3085 OCEAN ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 BK BOREYKO 3083 OCEAN ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 EJ & MR QUIRK REVOCABLE TRUST 3075 OCEAN ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 E REUSS 3065 OCEAN ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD INN LTD 3075 CARLSBAD BLVD CARLSBAD CA 92008 PALMA DE LA PLAYA LLC 3021 OCEAN ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 EVERGREEN HEBRON LP 3015 OCEAN ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 A notice has been (nailed to ail property owners/occupants IWed herein., , Date: e/<//3 Signature ' •CARLSBAD FM COW Community & Economic Development www.carisbadca.gov July 2, 2014 Stephanie Lupton PO Box 2216 San Marcos, CA 92079 SUBJECT: SDP 14-05/CDP 13-19/HDP 14-02 - JULIE SUN DECK - CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Aa (CEQA) APPLICABILITY/PROCESS DETERMINATION AND TARGET DECISION DATE CEQA Determination: This is to advise you that the City Planner has determined that the project belongs to a class of projects that the State Secretary for Resources has found do not have a significant impact on the environment, and it is therefore categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents pursuant to Section 15301 and 15303 (Existing Facilities and New Construction of Small Structures) Class 1 and 3 respectively. Categorical Exemption of the State CEQA Guidelines. No additional environmental review is required. A Notice of Exemption will be filed after approval ofthe project with the San Diego County Clerk's Office which involves a filing fee. Please submit a check to the project planner in the amount of $50.00 made out to the San Diego County Clerk. The check should be submitted approximately one week prior to the City Planner decision date. Target Decision Date: In the interest of expeditiously processing your application consistent with the State Permit Streamlining Act (California Government Code Section 65950), an administrative decision to approve or deny the project should be determined by September 2, 2014. For additional information related to this CEQA applicability/process determination or should you have any questions regarding an application extension or would like to withdraw your application, please contact Greg Fisher at 760-602-4629 or by email at greg.fisher@carlsbadca.gov. Sincerely, DON NEU, AlCP City Planner DN:6F:bd c: Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner Steve Bobbett, Project Engineer Michele Masterson, Senior Management Analyst File Copy Data Entry Planning Division 1635 FaradayAvenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 i%c..o. • FILE COPY ViCARLSBAD Community & Economic Development www.carlsbadca.gov MINOR SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT/HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NOTICE OF DECISION July 16, 2014 Stephanie Lupton PO Box 2216 San Marcos, CA 92079 RE: SDP 14-05/CDP 13-19/HDP 14-02 - JULIE SUN DECK The City has completed a review of the application for a Minor Site Development Plan, Minor Coastal Development Permit, and Hillside Development Permit. The project consists of rectifying an active code violation/enforcement case pending since February 25, 2013 whereas the property owner expanded the size of an existing permitted deck, constructed a separate lower level deck, and made repairs to an existing staircase and landing area, all without receiving the appropriate permits. The following actions will take place with the approval of the project: 1) removal of the lower level non-permitted deck, 2) legally permit a 670 square foot addition to the upper-level deck, and 3) approve the reconstructed/repaired stairs and landing in kind to an existing two-unit residential apartment building located at 3053 Ocean Street within the Mello II Segment ofthe Local Coastal Program. It is the City Planner's determination that the project SDP 14-05/CDP 13-19/HDP 14-02 - JULIE SUN DECK, is consistent with the City's applicable Qualified Development Overlay Zone Regulations (Chapter 21.06), the City's Coastal Development Regulations (Chapters 21.201 - 21.205), the City's Hillside Development Ordinance (Chapter 21.95), and with all other applicable City ordinances and policies. The City Planner, therefore, APPROVES this request based upon the following: Minor Site Development Plan Findings (SDP 14-05) 1. That the proposed development or use is consistent with the general plan and any applicable master plan or specific plan, complies with all applicable provisions of Chapter 21.06, and all other applicable provisions of Title 21, in that the project site consists of a 0.37-acre previously developed infill lot improved with a two-unit residential apartment building located on the seaward side of Ocean Street between Carlsbad Village Drive and Oak Avenue. The proposed deck expansion and reconstruction ofthe staircase and landing area is an accessory residential use that is consistent with the Residential High General Plan Land Use designation and compatible with existing multi-family, two-family and single-family residences that are located in the beach area. Furthermore, the project will not be detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the area in which the use is located in that, the existing two-unit residential apartment building and deck addition including the reconstruction of the staircase and landing area is a use permitted within the R-3 zone. Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 O.fBP F^05/qDR 13-19/HDP 14U2 - JULIE SUN DECK Page 2 2. That the requested development or use is properly related to the site, surroundings and environmental settings; will not be detrimental to existing development or uses or to development or uses specifically permitted in the area in which the proposed development or use is to be located, and will not adversely impact the site, surroundings or traffic circulation, in that the proposed deck addition including the reconstruction ofthe staircase and landing area to an existing two-unit residential apartment buiiding with a Residential High General Plan Land Use designation is compatible with existing residential uses that are located throughout the area. Furthermore, the proposed deck addition will not be detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the area in which the use is located in that, the deck addition to the existing two-family residential project is a use permitted within the R-3 zone and is compatible with the residential uses to the north and south. The existing two-unit residential apartment building is properly related to the site surroundings and environmental settings in that the project with the removal of the non-permitted lower level deck complies with all development standards of the R-3 zone and Mello II LCP and will result in no environmental impacts. The project will not adversely impact the site, surroundings, or traffic circulation in that the project complies with all applicable development standards and the deck addition will not result in an increase in ADT. 3. That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, in that the project complies with all development standards of the Beach Area Overlay Zone (BAOZ), Coastal Shoreline Development Overlay Zone, and Residential Multiple-Family Zone (R-3), including side yard setbacks, coastal "stringline" setback, lot coverage, and height restrictions. 4. That all yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features necessary to adjust the requested development or use to existing or permitted future development or use in the neighborhood will be provided and maintained, in that the project has been designed in compliance with the development and design standards ofthe Beach Area Overlay Zone and R- 3 Zone ofthe Carlsbad Municipal Code as well as complying with the costal "stringline" setback. The project is compatible with existing permitted uses. The deck addition project has been designed to meet the required interior side yard and coastal "stringline" setback. No alterations to the existing landscaping are proposed. However, the removal of the non-permitted lower level deck will expose the slope to erosional forces and will be required to be vegetated. 5. That the street system serving the proposed development or use is adequate to properly handle all traffic generated by the proposed use, in that the existing street system will continue to adequately handle the 12 ADT generated by the two-unit residential apartment building. Ocean Street is identified as an alternative design street and does not require street improvements. Coastai Development Permit Findings (CDP 13-19) 6. That the total cost ofthe proposed development is less than $60,000. 7. That the development is in conformity with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act, in that the addition of 670 square feet to the westerly deck of an existing two-unit residential apartment project does not interfere with the public's right of access to the sea and the residentially designated site is not suitable for use as public recreation. Furthermore, public access to the beach is available immediately to the north of the project site. SDP 14-05/CDP 13-19/HDP 14-02-JULIE SUN DECK July 16, 2014 Page 3 8. The proposed development will have no adverse effect on coastal resources, in that the site is already developed with a two-unit residential apartment building. Additionally, the project is located in an area that is already disturbed and therefore will not have an adverse effect on coastal resources. 9. That the proposed development is in conformance with the Certified Local Coastal Program and all applicable policies in that consistent with the Mello II Land Use and Zoning designation of RH and R-3, respectively, the site is developed with a two-unit residential apartment building and the project consists of the addition of 670 square feet to the existing westerly deck and reconstruction of the staircase and landing area which conforms to all applicable zoning standards, including the coastal "stringline" set back. In addition, no agricultural activities, sensitive resources, geological instability, flood hazard or vertical coastal access opportunities exist onsite. Further, as no vertical improvements are proposed in the side-yard setbacks, the project does not obstruct views of the coastline as seen from public lands or public right-of-way or otherwise damage the visual beauty of the coastal zone. With the removal of the non- permitted lower-level deck, the project will be consistent with the Certified LCP. 10. The project is consistent with the provisions of the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone (Chapter 21.203 ofthe Zoning Ordinance) in that the project will adhere to the City's Master Drainage Plan, Grading Ordinance, Storm Water Ordinance, Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), and Jurisdictional Urban Runoff Management Plan (JURMP) to avoid increased urban runoff, pollutants, and soil erosion. The project will not impact the existing coastal bluff. Otherwise, no other steep slope or native vegetation is located on the subject property and the site is not located in an area prone to landslides, or susceptible to accelerated erosion, floods, or liquefaction due to the existing "iceplant" slope protection. 11. The project is consistent with the provisions of the Coastal Shoreline Development Overlay Zone (Chapter 21.204 of the Zoning Ordinance) in that the geotechnical report prepared for the proposed project (Technical Field Services, Inc. February 25, 2014) determined that the deck addition is feasible and will have no adverse effect on the stability of the bluff and the proposed extension of the deck complements the design of the existing two-family residential structure. Ocean views will be preserved to the maximum extent feasible as the project complies with the side yard setback requirements. In addition, the project adheres to all coastal "stringline" setback requirements, specifically with respect to the adjacent development to the north and south, no grading is required, and all natural features will be preserved to the maximum extent feasible. 12. That the request for a minor coastal development permit was adequately noticed at least ten (10) calendar days before the date ofthis decision pursuant to Section 21.201.080(B) and (C) ofthe Carlsbad Coastal Development Regulations. Hillside Development Permit Findings (HDP 14-02) 13. Hillside conditions have been properly identified on the constraints map which show existing and proposed conditions and slope percentages. 14. Undevelopable areas of the project, i.e. slopes over 40%, have been properly identified on the constraints map. SDP 14-05/CDP 13-19/HDP 14^ - JULIE SUN DECK July 16, 2014 Page 4 15. The development proposal is consistent with the intent, purpose and requirements ofthe Hillside Ordinance, Chapter 21.95 in that a) the project is consistent with the Land Use and Open Space/Conservation elements of the General Plan since the site has been previously graded and developed with a two-unit residential apartment building, and no undevelopable natural hillsides or sensitive resources are located on the site; b) the existing hillside conditions have been properly identified and incorporated into the project review; c) the project design will preserve and enhance the aesthetic qualities of the existing slope as no grading is proposed; and d) there will be no impact on the lagoons, riparian ecosystems, or the ocean in that the project has been conditioned to provide vegetation on the exposed portion of the slope where the non-permitted deck is to be removed and the project will comply with the NPDES permit requirements as required by the Regional Water Quality Board and the City of Carlsbad. 16. The proposed grading and development will not occur in the undevelopable portions of the site in that no grading is proposed and the project is not located within an area defined as undevelopable by Section 21.53.Z30(b) ofthe Carlsbad Municipal Code. 17. The grading design minimizes disturbance of hillside lands in that the project requires no grading. 18. The project design substantially conforms to the intent of the concept illustrated in the Hillside Development Guidelines Manual in that no new slopes are being proposed. 19. That the project is consistent with the City's Landscape Manual (Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.50.030 and Landscape Manual Section I B). General Findings: 20. That the City Planner has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15301 and 15303 (Existing Facilities and new construction of small structures) of the State CEQA Guidelines and will not have any adverse significant impact on the environment. 21. The City Planner has reviewed each ofthe exactions imposed on the Developer contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project. Conditions: 1. The City Planner does hereby APPROVE the Minor Site Development Plan, Minor Coastal Development Permit, and Hillside Development Permit SDP 14-05/CDP 13-19/HDP 14-02, forthe project entitled Julie Sun Deck (Exhibits "A" - "F"), dated July 16, 2014, on file in the Planning Division and incorporated by this reference, subject to the conditions herein set forth. 2. If any of the following conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation on the property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their 4^-SDP 14-05/CDP 13-19/HDP 14-02 - JULIE SUN DECK July 16, 2014 Pages compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Minor Site Development Plan, Minor Coastal Development Permit, and Hillside Development Permit. 3. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections and modifications to the Minor Site Development Plan, Minor Coastal Development Permit, and Hillside Development Permit documents, as necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval. 4. The Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 5. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project are challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section 66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with all requirements of law. 6. Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees incurred by the City arising, directly or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this Minor Site Development Plan, Minor Coastal Development Permit, and Hillside Development Permit, (b) City's approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or nondiscretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and (c) Developer/Operator's installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby, including without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. This obligation survives until all legal proceedings have been concluded and continues even if the City's approval is not validated. 7. Developer shall submit and obtain City Planner approval of a Final Landscape and Irrigation Plan showing conformance with the approved Preliminary Landscape Plan and the City's Landscape Manual. Developer shall construct and install all landscaping and irrigation as shown on the approved Final Plans. All landscaping shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. All irrigation systems shall be maintained to provide the optimum amount of waterto the landscape for plant growth without causing soil erosion and runoff. 8. The Landscape Plan should specially address the exposed slope located underneath the non- permitted deck that is to be removed. 9. The first submittal of Final Landscape and Irrigation Plans shall be pursuant to the landscape plancheck process on file in the Planning Division and accompanied by the project's building, improvement, and grading plans. 10. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within 24 months from the date of project approval. SDP 14-05/CDP 13-19/HDP 14^ - JULIE SUN DECK July 16, 2014 Page 6 11. Developer shall pay the citywide Public Facilities Fee imposed by City Council Policy #17, the License Tax on new construction imposed by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.030, and CFD #1 special tax (if applicable), subject to any credits authorized by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.040. Developer shall also pay any applicable Local Facilities Management Plan fee for Zone 3, pursuant to Chapter 21.90. All such taxes/fees shall be paid at issuance of building permit. If the taxes/fees are not paid, this approval will not be consistent with the General Plan and shall become void. 12. Prior to the issuance of the building permit, Developer shall submit to the City a Notice of Restriction to be filed in the office of the County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the City Planner, notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad has issued a Minor Site Development Plan, Minor Coastal Development Permit, and Hillside Development Permit on the property. Said Notice of Restriction shall note the property description, location ofthe file containing complete project details and all conditions of approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of Restriction. The City Planner has the authority to execute and record an amendment to the notice which modifies or terminates said notice upon a showing of good cause bythe Developer or successor in interest. 13. A building permit shall be submitted to the City within 30 days from the date of approval to avoid further City Enforcement actions. 14. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided herein. Engineering 15. Developer shall comply with the city's Stormwater Regulations, latest version, and shall implement best management practices at all times. Best management practices include but are not limited to pollution control practices or devices, erosion control to prevent silt runoff during construction, general housekeeping practices, pollution prevention and educational practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices or devices to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to stormwater, receiving water or stormwater conveyance system to the maximum extent practicable. Developer shall notify future owners and/ or tenants ofthe above requirements. 16. Developer is responsible to ensure that all final design plans (building plans, landscape plans, etc.) incorporate all source control, site design, and Low Impact Design (LID) facilities. 17. Developer shall incorporate measures with this project to comply with Standard Stormwater Requirements per the city's Standard Urban Stormwater Management Plan (SUSMP). These measures include, but are not limited to reducing the use of new impervious surfaces (e.g.: paving) and designing drainage from impervious surfaces to discharge over pervious areas (e.g.: turf, landscape areas to the satisfaction ofthe city engineer. 4^-SDP 14-05/CDP 13-19/HDP 14-02 - JULIE SUN DECK July 16, 2014 Page 7 NOTICE This decision may be appealed by you or any member of the public to the Planning Commission within ten days of receipt of this letter. Appeals must be submitted in writing to the Planning Commission at 1635 Faraday Avenue in Carlsbad, along with a payment of $651.00 plus notice fees. The filing of such appeal within such time limit shall stay the effective date of the order of the City Planner until such time as a final decision on the appeal is reached. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact Greg Fisher at (760) 602-4629. Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similarto this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. CITY OF CARLSBAD CHRIS DeCERBO Principal Planner CD:GF:bd c: Julie Sun, 1704 Hanscom Drive, Pasadena, CA 91030 Don Neu, City Planner Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner Steve Bobbett, Project Engineer File Copy Data Entry California Coastal Commission (NoFA) •CARLSBAD fILE COPY Community & Economic Development www.carlsbadca.gov May 20, 2014 Stephanie Lupton PO Box 2216 San Marcos, CA 92079 SUBJECT: 2nd REVIEW FOR SDP 14-05/CDP 13-19/HDP 14-02 - JUUE SUN DECK The items requested from you earlier to make your Site Development Plan, Coastal Development Permit, and Hillside Development Permit, application nos. SDP 14-05/CDP 13-19/HDP 14-02 complete have been received and reviewed by the Planning Division. It has been determined that the application is now complete for processing. Although the initial processing of your application may have already begun, the technical acceptance date is acknowledged by the date ofthis communication. Please note that although the application is now considered complete, there may be issues that could be discovered during project review and/or environmental review. Any issues should be resolved prior to scheduling the project for public hearing. In addition, the City may request, in the course of processing the application, that you clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise supplement the basic information required for the application. At this time, the City asks that you provide two complete sets of the development plans so that the project can continue to be reviewed. The Citv will complete the review of vour resubmittal within 25 davs. In order to expedite the processing of your application, you are strongly encouraged to contact your Staff Planner, Greg Fisher, at (760) 602-4629, to discuss or to schedule a meeting to discuss your application and to completely understand this letter. You may also contact each commenting department individually as follows: • Land Development Engineering Division: Steven Bobbett, Associate Engineer, at (760) 602-2771. • Fire Department: Gregory Ryan, Fire Inspections, at (760) 602-4661. Sincerely, CHRIS DeCERBO Principal Planner CD:GF:fn c: Julie Sun, 1704 Hansconi Drive, South Pasadena, CA 91030 Don Neu, City Planner Steven Bobbett, Project Engineer Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner Michele Masterson, Senior Management Analyst File Copy Data Entry Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 © SDP 14-05/CDP 13-19/HDP 1^2 - JULIE SUN DECK ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. Please include the City's assigned project numbers within the upper-right hand portion of the plans (SDP 14-05/CDP 13-19/HDP 14-02). VXARLSBAD Community & Economic Development www.carisbadca.gov July 31, 2013 Stephanie Lupton PO Box 2216 San Marcos, CA 92079 SUBJECT: 1st REVIEW FOR CDP 13-19 - JULIE SUN DECK Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Division has reviewed your Coastal Development Permit, application no. CDP 13-19, as to its completeness for processing. The application is incomplete, as submitted. Attached are two lists. The first list is information which must be submitted to complete your application. The second list is project issues of concern to staff. In order to expedite the processing of your application, the "incomplete" items and your response to the project issues of concern to Staff must be submitted directly to your staff planner; therefore, please contact your staff planner directly to scheduie a re-submittal appointment. As part of your re-submittal package, please prepare and include with your re-submittal: (1) a copy of these lists, (2) a detailed letter summarizing how all identified incomplete items and/or project issues have been addressed; and (3) five (5) sets of revised plans. No processing of your application can occur until the application is determined to be complete. When all required materials are submitted, the City has 30 days to make a determination of completeness. If the application is determined to be complete, processing for a decision on the application will be initiated. In addition, please note that you have six months from the date the application was initially filed, July 2, 2013, to either resubmit the application or submit the required information. Failure to resubmit the application or to submit the materials necessary to determine your application complete shall be deemed to constitute withdrawal of the application. If an application is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn, a new application must be submitted. In order to expedite the processing of your application, you are strongly encouraged to contact your Staff Planner, Greg Fisher, at (760) 602-4629, to discuss or to schedule a meeting to discuss your application and to completely understand this letter. You may also contact each commenting department individually as follows: • Land Development Engineering Division: Steven Bobbett, Associate Engineer, at (760) 602-4629. • Fire Department: Gregory Ryan, Fire Inspections, at (760) 602-4661. Sincerely, CHRIS DeCERBO Principal Planner CD:GF:fn Attachments Julie Sun, 1704 Hanscom Drive, South Pasadena, CA 91030 Don Neu, City Planner Steve Bobbett, Project Engineer Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner File Copy Data Entry Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad. CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 CDP 13-19^ JULIE SUN DECK LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION Planning: 1. This project is located in the City's Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone (CMC Section 21.203), Coastal Shoreline Development Overlay Zone (CMC Section 21.204), and the Mello II Segment of the City's Local Coastal Program (LCP). Please refer to the attached Development Service Check List P-7, Coastal Development Permit Supplemental Application, for specific project requirements listed under Section I (B and C) and required Coastal Permit Finding listed under Section II. Please provide the required information to the City. In addition, this project is within the appealable area ofthe California Coastal Commission. The Coastal Commission ensures that lateral beach access is protected and enhanced to the maximum degree feasible, and will continue to formalize shoreline prescriptive rights. Irrevocable offers of dedication for lateral accessways between the mean high tide line and the base ofthe coastal bluffs will be required with this project and any new development consistent with Section 30212 of the California Coastal Act of 1976. As such, the "mean high tide line" must be identified and plotted on the site plan for purposes of determining a lateral public access easement pursuant to Section 21.204.060(A)1 ofthe Carlsbad Municipal Code (CMC). 2. Please provide a geotechnical report prepared and signed by a professional civil engineer with expertise in soils and foundation engineering. A geotechnical report is required as part of the Coastal Development Permit application for development located within the Coastal Shoreline Development Overlay Zone (Section 21.204.110 of the CMC). The minimum information that the geotechnical report shall consider, describe and analyze is referenced in Section 21.204.110(8)1-15 ofthe CMC. 3. The project may require the approval of a Hillside Development Permit pursuant to CMC Section 21.95.030 (A). No person shall grade, erect, or construct into or on top of a slope which has a gradient of fifteen percent or more and an elevation differential greater than fifteen feet without first obtaining a Hillside Development Permit. The development of one single-family dwelling unit on a residentially zoned lot need not obtain a hillside development permit, provided that the development complies with Section 21.95.120 of the CMC and the city's Hillside Development and Design Guidelines. Although the subject property has been identified as a single family dwelling on the plans, previously approved city development permits have identified the residential structure as a two-family dwelling use which is not exempt from the requirements of a Hillside Development Permit. A copy of the Hillside Development Permit check list (Form P-5) has been provided for your convenience if it is determined that the existing use is other than a single family dwelling. 4. Pursuant to Section 21.48.030 (Non-Conforming Buildings and Uses) of the CMC, it is the responsibility ofthe property owner to prove to the city that all existing structures or uses were lawfully established. Therefore, please provide documentation (issuance of a Coastal Development Permit) for the existing wood deck and attached above grade staircases. Based on historical photos of the project site, the wood deck and wood stairs providing access to the beach were constructed sometime after 1979 and prior to 1987. If legally permitted, a Coastal Development Permit would have been issued by the California Coastal Commission (CCC). The CCC local San Diego office can be contacted directly at 619-767-2370. CDP 13-19 - JULIE SUN DECK July 31, 2013 Page 3 5. The project site is located in the Beach Area Overlay Zone. Pursuant to Section 21.82.040 (Beach Area Overlay Zone) of the CMC, no building permit or other entitlement shall be issued for any use in the beach area overlay zone unless there is a valid site development plan approved for the property processed pursuant to Section 21.06 (Q-Overlay Zone) unless the property is a single-family dwelling. A copy ofthe Site Development Permit check list (Form P-2) has been provided for your convenience. If it is determined that the existing use is other than a single-family dwelling, please submit an application for a Site Development Permit. 6. Please provide a separate "stringline" exhibit consistent with Section 21.204.050 (B) of the CMC. This exhibit should clearly demonstrate compliance with the "stringline" setback with the adjacent decks to the north and south. Refer to issue No. 1 below for more information. Engineering: None CDP 13-19 - JULIE SUN DECK July 31, 2013 Page 4 ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. New development fronting the ocean must observe at a minimum, an ocean setback based on a "stringline" method of measurement as outlined in Section 21.204.050(B) of the CMC (Coastal Shoreline Development Overlay Zone). This section specifies that no enclosed portions of a structure be permitted further seaward than those allowed by a line drawn between the adjacent structure to the north and to the south. It also requires that no decks or other appurtenances be permitted further seaward than those allowed by a line drawn between those like structures on the adjacent properties to the north and south. As such, staff has concerns with the project's stringline exhibit, and the project's consistency with the stringline provisions. Specifically, the structure representing the "adjacent structure to the north", forthe purpose of establishing a stringline setback, is not correctly identified on the site plan. Based on a site visit and a review of aerial photos ofthe project site, the structure representing the "adjacent to the north" is a shower and therefore inconsistent with the "stringline" method of measurement. As identified on Sheet SP.l, the existing deck located seaward of the gazebo and situated on the Carlsbad Inn property (APN: 203-251-05) should be used to represent the adjacent structure to the north for the stringline measurement. With that said, it appears that a significant portion, if not all, of the existing lower deck area and wood stairs are located seaward of the stringline setback for similar structures to the north and south and must be removed to comply with the Coastal Shoreline Development Overlay Zone and stringline method of measurement unless a Coastal Development Permit has been issued by the CCC, as discussed in incomplete item No. 4 above. 2. The existing decks are located within the side yard setback. Pursuant to Section 21.16.060 (A) 1(g) of the CMC, decks over 30 inches above grade must comply with additional development standards when located within a lot's required setback areas. As proposed, the decks exceed the maximum allowable building (or building coverage) area (440 square feet) per structure. Please either reduce the size of the proposed deck(s) to comply with the maximum building coverage area of 440 square feet or provide a minimum interior side yard setback requirement pursuant to Section 21.16.050(A)1 of 7% feet (10% ofthe lots width). 3. Please verify if the subject site consists of a single family dwelling or a two-family dwelling. 4. Regarding the exhibits, please address the following comments as discussed at our 7/29/2013 meeting: a) clearly distinguish between the existing and proposed structures (include balconies, decks and stairs), b) provide the correct stringline measurement as discussed above in issue item No.l, c) label all onsite structures including the residence, raised wood deck, stairs, balconies, etc., as proposed or existing and if legally permitted, d) label the public access easement area, e) show the lOO-year flood line, f) show and dimension the mean high tide line, and g) show existing sea walls and/ or rip rap (make a note if there are none). 5. Sheets SP.l, SV-1 and A.1 all reference an existing wood deck to remain located directly behind the residential structure. Please confirm this information as there does not appear to be a wood deck at this location as seen from aerial photos. 6. Please label all deck support beams/footings as existing or proposed. CDP 13-19 - JULIE SUN DECK July 31, 2013 Page 5 7. Based on historical photos, it appears that the upper-level balcony, which is not clearly identified on the drawings, may have been extended seaward. Please provide evidence of a Coastal Development Permit and building permit for the balcony extension. If there are none, include this within the scope of work. 8. Please include the City's project number on future submittals in the upper right hand corner of the plans. 9. Please provide the following information on Sheet SP.l: General Plan Land use designation (OS/RH); R-3 Zone designation; lot coverage (includes decks); correct lot size; and update the scope ofwork and areas ofwork listed within the project data. 10. Staff would be happy to meet with you again to discuss the items needed to complete the application and the issues of concern. Engineering: None CITY OF ViCARLSBAD Community & Economic Development www.carlsbadca.gov July 31, 2013 Stephanie Lupton PO Box 2216 San IVIarcos, CA 92079 SUBJECT: 1st REVIEW FOR CDP 13-19 - JULIE SUN DECK Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Division has reviewed your Coastal Development Permit, application no. CDP 13-19, as to its completeness for processing. The application is incomplete, as submitted. Attached are two lists The first list is information which must be submitted to complete your application. The second list is project issues of concern to staff. In order to expedite the processing of your application, the "incomplete" items and your response to the project issues of concern to Staff must be submitted directly to your staff planner; therefore, please contact your staff planner directly to schedule a re-submittal appointment. As part of your re-submittal package, please prepare and include with your re-submittal: (1) a copy of these lists, (2) a detailed letter summarizing how all identified incomplete items and/or project issues have been addressed; and (3) five (5) sets of revised plans. No processing of your application can occur until the application is determined to be complete. When all required materials are submitted, the City has 30 days to make a determination of completeness. If the application is determined to be complete, processing for a decision on the application will be initiated. In addition, please note that you have six months from the date the application was initially filed, July 2, 2013, to either resubmit the application or submit the required information. Failure to resubmit the application or to submit the materials necessary to determine your application complete shall be deemed to constitute withdrawal of the application. If an application is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn, a new application must be submitted. In order to expedite the processing of your application, you are strongly encouraged to contact your Staff Planner, Greg Fisher, at (760) 602-4629, to discuss or to schedule a meeting to discuss your application and to completely understand this letter. You may also contact each commenting department individually as follows: • Land Development Engineering Division: Steven Bobbett, Associate Engineer, at (760) 602-4629. " Fire Departrrier.t: Gregory Ryan, Tire Inspections, at (760) 602-4G61. Sincerely, CHRIS DeCERBO Principal Planner CD:GF:tn Attachments c: Julie Sun, 1704 Hanscom Drive, South Pasadena, CA 91030 Don Neu, City Planner Steve Bobbett, Project Engineer Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner File Copy Data Entry Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue. Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 ® CDP 13-19 - JULIE SUN DECK July 31, 2013 Page 2 UST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION Planning: 1. This project is located in the City's Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone (CMC Section 21.203), Coastal Shoreline Development Overlay Zone (CMC Section 21.204), and the Mello II Segment of the City's Local Coastal Program (LCP). Please refer to the attached Development Service Check List P-7, Coastal Development Permit Supplemental Application, for specific project requirements listed under Section I (B and C) and required Coastal Permit Finding listed under Section II. Please provide the required information to the City. In addition, this project is within the appealable area of the California Coastal Commission. The Coastal Commission ensures that lateral beach access is protected and enhanced to the maximum degree feasible, and will continue to formalize shoreline prescriptive rights. Irrevocable offers of dedication for lateral accessways between the mean high tide line and the base ofthe coastal bluffs will be required with this project and any new development consistent with Section 30212 of the California Coastal Act of 1976. As such, the "mean high tide line" must be identified and plotted on the site plan for purposes of determining a lateral public access easement pursuant to Section 21.204.060(A)1 ofthe Carlsbad Municipal Code (CMC). 2. Please provide a geotechnical report prepared and signed by a professional civil engineer with expertise in soils and foundation engineering. A geotechnical report is required as part of the Coastal Development Permit application for development located within the Coastal Shoreline Development Overlay Zone (Section 21.204.110 of the CMC). The minimum information that the geotechnical report shall consider, describe and analyze is referenced in Section 21.204.110(8)1-15 ofthe CMC. 3. The project may require the approval of a Hillside Development Permit pursuant to CMC Section 21.95.030 (A). No person shall grade, erect, or construct into or on top of a slope which has a gradient of fifteen percent or more and an elevation differential greater than fifteen feet without first obtaining a Hillside Development Permit. The development of one single-family dwelling unit on a residentially zoned lot need not obtain a hillside development permit, provided that the development complies with Section 21.95.120 of the CMC and the city's Hillside Development and Design Guidelines. Although the subject property has been identified as a single family dwelling on the plans, previously approved city development permits have identified the residential structure as a two-family dwelling use which is not exempt from the requirements of a Hillside Development Permit. A copy of the Hillside Development Permit check list (Form P-5) has been provided for your convenience if it is determined that the existing use is other than a single family dwelling. 4. Pursuant to Section 21.48.030 (Non-Conforming Buildings and Uses) of the CMC, it is the responsibility of the property owner to prove to the city that all existing structures or uses were lawfully established. Therefore, please provide documentation (issuance of a Coastal Development Permit) for the existing wood deck and attached above grade staircases. Based on historical photos of the project site, the wood deck and wood stairs providing access to the beach were constructed sometime after 1979 and prior to 1987. If legally permitted, a Coastal Development Permit would have been issued by the California Coastal Commission (CCC). The CCC local San Diego office can be contacted directly at 619-767-2370. CDP 13-19-JULIE SUN DECK July 31, 2013 Page 3 5. The project site is located in the Beach Area Overlay Zone. Pursuant to Section 21.82.040 (Beach Area Overlay Zone) of the CMC, no building permit or other entitlement shall be issued for any use in the beach area overlay zone unless there is a valid site development plan approved for the property processed pursuant to Section 21.06 (Q-Overlay Zone) unless the property is a single-family dwelling. A copy of the Site Development Permit check list (Form P-2) has been provided for your convenience. If it is determined that the existing use is other than a single-family dwelling, please submit an application for a Site Development Permit. 6. Please provide a separate "stringline" exhibit consistent with Section 21.204.050 (B) of the CMC. This exhibit should clearly demonstrate compliance with the "stringline" setback with the adjacent decks to the north and south. Refer to issue No. 1 below for more information. Engineering: None CDP 13-19-JULIE SUN DECK July 31, 2013 Page 4 ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. New development fronting the ocean must observe at a minimum, an ocean setback based on a "stringline" method of measurement as outlined in Section 21.204.050(B) of the CMC (Coastal Shoreline Development Overlay Zone). This section specifies that no enclosed portions of a structure be permitted further seaward than those allowed by a line drawn between the adjacent structure to the north and to the south. It also requires that no decks or other appurtenances be permitted further seaward than those allowed by a line drawn between those like structures on the adjacent properties to the north and south. As such, staff has concerns with the project's stringline exhibit, and the project's consistency with the stringline provisions. Specifically, the structure representing the "adjacent structure to the north", for the purpose of establishing a stringline setback, is not correctly identified on the site plan. Based on a site visit and a review of aerial photos ofthe project site, the structure representing the "adjacent to the north" is a shower and therefore inconsistent with the "stringline" method of measurement. As identified on Sheet SP.l, the existing deck located seaward of the gazebo and situated on the Carlsbad Inn property (APN: 203-251-05) should be used to represent the adjacent structure to the north forthe stringline measurement. With that said, it appears that a significant portion, if not all, ofthe existing lower deck area and wood stairs are located seaward of the stringline setback for similar structures to the north and south and must be removed to comply with the Coastal Shoreline Development Overlay Zone and stringline method of measurement unless a Coastal Development Permit has been issued by the CCC, as discussed in incomplete item No. 4 above. 2. The existing decks are located within the side yard setback. Pursuant to Section 21.16.060 (A) 1(g) of the CMC, decks over 30 inches above grade must comply with additional development standards when located within a lot's required setback areas. As proposed, the decks exceed the maximum allowable building (or building coverage) area (440 square feet) per structure. Please either reduce the size of the proposed deck(s) to comply with the maximum building coverage area of 440 square feet or provide a minimum interior side yard setback requirement pursuant to Section 21.16.050(A)1 of 7 Vz feet (10% ofthe lots width). 3. Please verify if the subject site consists of a single family dwelling or a two-family dwelling. 4. Regarding the exhibits, please address the following comments as discussed at our 7/29/2013 meeting: a) clearly distinguish between the existing and proposed structures (include balconies, decks and stairs), b) provide the correct stringline measurement as discussed above in issue item No.l, c) label all onsite structures including the residence, raised wood deck, stairs, balconies, etc., as proposed or existing and if legally permitted, d) label the public access easement area, e) show the lOO-year flood line, f) show and dimension the mean high tide line, and g) show existing sea walls and/ or rip rap (make a note if there are none). 5. Sheets SP.l, SV-1 and A.1 all reference an existing wood deck to remain located directly behind the residential structure. Please confirm this information as there does not appear to be a wood deck at this location as seen from aerial photos. 6. Please label all deck support beams/footings as existing or proposed. CDP 13-19 -JULIE SUN DECK July 31, 2013 Page 5 7. Based on historical photos, it appears that the upper-level balcony, which is not clearly identified on the drawings, may have been extended seaward. Please provide evidence of a Coastal Development Permit and building permit for the balcony extension. If there are none, include this within the scope of work. 8. Please include the City's project number on future submittals in the upper right hand corner of the plans. 9. Please provide the following information on Sheet SP.l: General Plan Land use designation (OS/RH); R-3 Zone designation; lot coverage (includes decks); correct lot size; and update the scope ofwork and areas ofwork listed within the project data. 10. Staff would be happy to meet with you again to discuss the items needed to complete the application and the issues of concern. Engineering: None