The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP 84-04; Palomar Venture; Site Development Plan (SDP)CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING . ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES LAND PLANNING AND SURVEYING. May 28, 1985 W.O. #08-84-25 Page 1 of 2 City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 ATTN: Marty Bouman RE: Carlsbad Pacific Center (PD-246) Parcel States - AP Nos 210-010-08 & 09 RECEIVED MAY 3 0 1985 CITY OF CARLSBAD TOURING DEPARTMENT Dear Mr. Bouman: On August 27, 1984 Caliber Development retained C M Engineering to prepare an American Land Title Association Survey Map on the above referenced property. We were provided a title policy prepared by First American Title Insurance Company dated: August 3, 1984, a copy is enclosed for your reference, (see attachment No. 1). The original parcel was created as a remainder parcel by the State of California in June, 1963 with their Interstate 5 R/W acquisition, (see attachment No. 2). In February 1982 Paul Ecke Sr. et al conveyed title to this parcel to Palomar Venture as a single metes and bounds parcel, (see attachment No. 3). In Feburary, 1985 Palomar Venture con- veyed title to Pacific Center Associates as a single metes and bounds parcel, (see Attachment No. 4) Mr. Jerry McDaniels of First American Title Company researched the origin of the assessor parcels at the County Assessors office. He was informed that this property was located in two different tax rate areas and this was the reason for the two tax parcels. The County Assessor provided to Mr. McDaniels a form, (see attachment No. 5), for the owner's use to combine the two tax parcels into a single parcel. A close review of this form shows that property falling in two different tax rates cannot be combined for taxation purposes. Since the current owners have an A.L.T.A. Title Policy for a single parcel of land, and the two tax parcels have been created for taxation purposes only; we are of the opinion that the requirement for a parcel map is not justified. We request your acknowledgement and concurrence in this regard. 5 550 West Vista Way • Melrose Center • Vista, California 92083 • Phone (714) 758-3680 225 E. Airport Dr. • P.O. Box 6087, San Bernardino, California 92412 • Phone (714) 884-8804 or (714) 825-9562 May 28, 1985 Page 2 of 2 Should you have any questions, please contact us at (619) 758-3680. Sincerely, C M ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE Donald R. Campbel Principal Surveyor 0022/k/LDRCl cc: W/Enclosures to: Jim Bosler - Caliber Development Walter Brown, Marty Bouman, Charlie Grimm, Mike Holzmille - City of Carlsbad, Monica Olson - Allen, Matkins, Leek Gamble & Mai lory Tony Martin - Grant Construction Sam Tapia, Gail Pickort - RBF Bob Gil ley, Robert S. Kraft - Architects, Nancie Weiss - First American Title Insurance Co. — / <f _ _ If -f t MEMORANDUM DATE: SEPTEMBER 24, 1985 TO: LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE FROM: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: JVP-P-EAL- OF CONDITIONS, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION C~""NO. 2326 - Upon further review of this appeal and discussion with the previous City Engineer, staff feels Condition No. 29 should remain as written. Engineering Department recently engaged a consultant to review (independently) the alignment of Palomar Airport Road from Carlsbad Boulevard to 1-5. The result agreed with the applicant's engineer as to the alignment of Palomar Airport Road. Staff feels, with the setback variation of this development, the road should be built now, including necessary retaining wall (20+ feet). The adjacent project to the east (Grosse & Watkins) also has the same type of condition, requiring adjacent improvements of Palomar Airport Road (although the site is not as low as the Newport National site). While our memorandum of August 16, 1985, may npss the point of appeal, our position remains the same. Another note is, memo from Ron Beckman, dated December 14, 1984, reiterates the same position. If you have any further questions, please contact this office. CW:ad NEE.PS OAJ CoiOvJUMCTfOjo CUlTH . t 3d ft YV- A!) » 33 OF ft* T \/ 5H*r, The developer shall agree to participate in the formation of and shall participate in a Bridge and Major Thoroughfare District or such other funding mechanism as may be satisfactory to the City of Carlsbad such as an Assessment District, State of California Funding or other grants of aid to fund, design and construct the following improvements including but not limited to: a) Signalization of the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and Avenida Encinas b) Realignment of the 1-5 on/off ramp at Palomar Airport Road c) Signalization of the 1-5 on/off ramps at Palomar Airport Road d) Interconnection of traffic signals on Palomar Airport Road between Paseo Del Norte and Avenida Encinas e) Realignment of the northbound Carlsbad Boulevard access ramp and Solamar Drive f) Widening of the 1-5 Freeway overpass for Palomar Airport Road to four lanes and pedestrian walkways g) Realignment and widening of Carlsbad Boulevard in the vicinity of the Palomar Airport Road interchange h) Signalization of the intersection of Palomar Airport road and Carlsbad Boulevard i) Realignment of the north and south merging lanes of Carlsbad Boulevard south of Palomar Airport Road j) Widening of the Palomar Airport road railroad overpass to four lanes and pedestrian walkways k) Realignment, widening and reconstruction of Palomar • • Airport Road from the railroad overpass to Carlsbad Boulevard .1) Construction of a beach access extension of Palomar Airport Road m) Construction of an access road from Carlsbad Boulevard to the property laying south and east of the intersecion of Palomar Airport Road and Carlsbad Boulevard n) Other improvements necessary to integrate the preceeding items. SHT. 3 x" Should the Bridge and Major Thoroughfare District fail to be established prior to issuance of the first building permit for this project,/including, but not limited to, the following JBffcgM&aCftft&l^ shall be installed by the developer and approved by the City Engineer. The developer shall obtain approval of the plans from the City Engineer and pay all associated fees and performance guarantees prior to issuance of any Building permit, "fhe developer shall install said improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or occupancy of any portion of the project for any purpose. To wit: o) Palomar Airport Road *ngancjjyrifflffrBIiffl'teTlBftaTftP along its frontage with the project and continuing to the centerline of Avenida Encinas to full width major arterial standards. All onsite area lighting shall be directed downward. The type, output location and style of lights shall be submitted for the City Engineer's approval with the grading plans. DEVELOPMENTAL ff.^nm.j^l 12°0 ELM AVENUE SERVICES WT^SK' • CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008-1989 LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE ^^i.!^jm (619) 438-5591 City of Cartetmb May 23, 1984 Palomar Venture 31877 Del Obispo Street San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 RE: SDP 84-VV-360 (PALOMAR VENTURE) The Director of Building and Planning> the City Engineer and the Land Use Planning Manager have reviewed the application you submitted for the above-referenced project. Based upon this review, it has been determined that there are major problems associated with your application which must be addressed before this application can be scheduled for a Planning Commission hearing. The problems or issues are listed below. Also, the name of the project planner and project engineer is provided. You should set-up a meeting to discuss the issues with the appropriate staff member. Once the problems/issues have been addressed, your application will then be scheduled for a hearing. Problems/Issues Project Planner 1) Street widening (Palomar MIKE HOWES Airport Road) Project Engineer 2) Compliance with PM Zone WALTER BROWN standards. 3) Driveway location on Avenida Encinas. DATE: TO ' <xy Planning Department Engineering Department FROM: Fire Department CONDITIONS FOR PROJECT # STANDARD CONDITIONS 4. 6. 7. 11. Prior to the issuance of building permits, complete building plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Fire Department. Additional public and/or on site fire hydrants shall be provided if deemed necessary by the Fire Marshal. The applicant shall submit two (2) copies of a site plan showing locations of existing and proposed fire hydrants and on site roads and drives to the Fire Marshal for approval. An all weather access road shall be maintained throughout construction. All required fire hydrants, water mains and appurtenances shall be operational prior to combustible building materials being located on the project site. Proposed security gate systems shall be provided with "Knox" key operated override switch, as specified by the Fire Department. All private driveways shall be kept clear of parked vehicles at all times, and shall have posted "No Parking/Fire Lane-Tow Away Zone" pursuant to Section 17.04.040, Carlsbad Municipal Code. Fire retardant roofs shall be required on all structures. Brush clearance shall be maintained according to the specifications contained in the City of Carlsbad Landscape Guidelines Manual. All fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, extinguishing systems, automatic sprinklers, and other systems pertinent to the project shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to construction. All roof-top appurtenances shall be architecturally integrated into the design of the building and shielding to prevent noise and visual impacts, subject to approval before issuance of permit. Building exceeding 10,000 sq. ft. aggregate floor area shall be sprinklered or have four-hour fire walls with no openings therein which shall split the building into 10,000 sq. ft. (or less) areas. ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS/COMMENTS Review and Comment Memo MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: Engineering Department Fire Department Building Department Parks and Recreation Department Land Use Planning Office SUBJECT: Request for Review and Comment on Application No .' S & - g><V <, / V-360 Proposal ; Project Planner; \*\\ This item has been tentatively scheduled for the Planning Commission meeting of _ ; _ . Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the Land Use Planning Office by j^«- / £?2r^/ _ . If not_ received by that date, it will be assumed that you have no comment and the proposal has your endorsement as submitted. Thank you. Conunent: ATTACHMENTS Review and Comment Memo MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: Engineering Department Fire Department Building Department Parks and Recreation Department Land Use Planning Office SUBJECT: Request for Review and Comment on Application NO. Proposal: Project Planner; This item has been tentatively scheduled for the Planning Commission meeting of _ . Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the Land Use Planning Office by j^<- / ^^^^/ _ . If not_ received by that date, it will be assumed that you have no comment and the proposal has your endorsement as submitted. Thank you. Comment : ft/ ATTACHMENTS Review and Comment Memo MEMORANDUM DATE TO: FROM Engineering Department Fire Department Building Department Parks and Recreation Department Land Use Planning Office SUBJECT: Request for Review and Comment on Application NO.' Proposal; Project Planner; ]v|i * This item has been tentatively scheduled for the Planning Commission meeting of _ . Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the Land Use Planning Office by j««-«- / ^^2r^/ . If not_ received by that date, it will be assumed that you have no comment and the proposal has your endorsement as submitted. Thank you. Comment:2" /?-£. &-£ 9.72? ~#-./>xiZv» A /c* o 'V ATTACHMENTS CITY OF CARLSB PROJECT IDENTIFICATION:. PROJECT NAME: ~P/t 1-o/nSI/Z. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS V ~ PROJECT LOCAT I ON ; PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ^ENGINEER: ASSIGNED PLANNER: INITIAL CHECKLIST RECEIVED FROM: REVIEWED BY: FORWARD TO: AJ/A/ . FIRST SUBMITTAL SECOND SUBMITTAL PLAN QUALITY Non Not Non [Accept | Accept [Addressed I Accept | Accept I Not | |Addressed | 1. Name and address of the Owner whose property is proposed to be developed. 2. Name and address of the Developer. 3. Name, address, and registration number of the Architect or Registered Civil Engineer who is in responsible charge of the project. 4. North point and scale of the plans. 5. Date of preparation and revision of the plan. 6. The street address(es) and Assessor's Parcel Number(s) of the lot(s) proposed to be developed. 7. Location of the following facilities and physical features, labeled "existing" or "proposed", that are within 100 feet of the project: A. Driveways and Alleys Street Intersections ,- ., _c-.j_ Curb and Gutter GeUeVUMJLY NoT 5HOUJN Sidewalks Roadway Position and Name Roadway Cross-Section Median Islands Buildings Utility FacilitiesExisting Contours] Proposed Contours] [I1 5%, intervals for slopes less than 2' intervals for slopes between and 5' 10%.] intervals forand 10%, [slopes over Drainage Facilities Water Courses Traffic Control Facilities Other Improvements (Swimming Pools, Retaining Wai Is,Etc 8. The location of the following facilities and physical fea- tures, labeled "existing" or "proposed" on the project site: Items enumerated in Item 7, atfove Major vegatation with size and type Free-standing signs. Parking stalls and facilities Landscaping 9. Locations(s) and use(s) of easements 10. Quantities of soil import, export, and total quantity moved,[ in cubic yards. 11. A Vicinity Map ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS PROJECT IDENTIFICATION: PROJECT NAME:l/E AJ TU R.£ S INITIAL ASSESSMENT NO. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 1 ' flnsuiFfT-Degree of Concern ITEM ' lent Data I Mild Normal Severe LAND TITLE: A. Existing Easements B. Required Easements C. Project Access 0. Access to Public Resources TRAFFIC: A. Count B. Street CapacityC. Intersection Capacity D. Generation By Project E. Sight Distance F. Accident History G. Control Devices H. Conformance with General Plan I. Intersection Distance J. Street Width K. Horizontal Curves POTABLE WATER: A. Project Distribution Adequacy B. Fire Protection C. Conformance with General Plan SANITARY SEWER: A. Treatment Facility Adequacy B. Trunk System Adequacy C. Project SystemJWequacy D. Pump Station Requirements E. Other Disposal Methods F. Conformance with General Plan GEOLOGY: A. Hazards B. Slopes C. Grading D. Cut/Fill Balance E. Erosion Control F. SiUation G. Soils Report STORM WATER: A. On-Site Facility Adequacy B. Off-Site Facility Adequacy C. Proposed Discharge Type D. Discharge Quality E. Discharge Treatment F. Master Drainage Plan CONSTRUCTION CONTROL: A. Project Phasing B. Project Scheduling C. Off-Site Haulage D. Project Access (during construction) E. Materials Stockpiling SITE AMENITIES: A. Street Trees B. Irrigation Water C. Park Site (as it relates to Eng'r) D. School Site F. Street Lighting 1 \mmmmm II 1 1 ^•••••1 ••••••M fmmmmmm mmatmmm, mammmm „___ > > •Mi^M» " ••^••Ht r n _. ij " !••••••< 1 •' "•» 1 ••••—' MHMMMK ' 4MMBMBMK «••''••< » •uMMM __ «»»«».. •MMMM *«mi ^^^••B«••••••• •••••••• mmm*mmi^ «•••••••• "'Ml H •! •••••••1 ••••K. «••••» ii • 1 ;~ ."• "• n RE ST R.K.T E, 17, H EAST OF AV£KH{?* Resuir IN CONFLICTS