Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDU 99-10; Rancho Carrillo Village K Lot 68; Second Dwelling Unit (SDU) (9)c rn Planning Hofman Planning Project Management Fiscal Analysis November 5, 1999 Gary Wayne City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: RANCHO CARRILLO -VILLAGE K SECOND DWELLING UNITS Dear Gary: The purpose of this letter is to clarify the findings on the attached approval letter for a second dwelling unit in Village K which addresses the rental requirement of the second dwelling units in Rancho Carrillo. Finding 4A states: “Pursuant to attachment “A”: The owner/applicant agrees to rent the second dwelling unit at a monthly rental rate which shall not exceed an amount equal to 30% of the gross monthly income of a low-income household, adjusted for household, adjusted for household size, at 80% of the San Diego County median income.” As this finding reads, “the owner/applicant agrees to rent the second dwelling unit”, is misleading in that it appears that it is a requirement for the owner/applicant to rent the unit at all times. Section 21.10.015 (3)(J) ofthe Carlsbad Municipal Code begins “The second dwelling unit may be rented...“, making it clear that the owner/applicant has a choice as to whether or not they wish to rent the unit. Based on this section, the above referenced finding should read as follows to accurately reflect the intent of Section 21.10.01 5 (3)(J) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code: “Pursuant to attachment “A”: The owner/applicant is not required to rent the second dwelling unit. However, if rented, the owner/applicant agrees to rent the second dwelling unit at a monthly rental rate which shall not exceed an amount equal to 30% of the gross monthly income of a low- income household, adjusted for household, adjusted for household size, at 80% of the San Diego County median income.” There is also need for clarification on Finding 4C which states: “Pursuant to attachment “A”: The owner agrees to continually occupy either the primary dwelling unit or the second dwelling unit. For the purposes of 5900 Pasteur Court Suite 150 Carlsbad CA 92008 (760) 438-1465 Fax: (760) 438-2443 ~~ this requirement, a lessee shall also be considered an owner if the leasehold includes both the main dwelling unit and second dwelling unit. The lessee, at their discretion, may sub-lease the second unit. The findings and conditions of approval for all future Second Dwelling Unit permits should be worded as suggested above. This would alleviate a lot of confusion and apprehension on the part of people purchasing homes with Second Units. I realize that this wording may not reflect the exact wording of the Second Unit Ordinance, however, I believe it would be easier for the average person to understand. It is not the intent of any of the developers in Rancho Carrillo to get around their lnclusionary requirement or rent the Second Units for more money than allowed by the Second Unit Ordinance. However, the findings of approval are misleading and do not accurately reflect the requirements of the Municipal Code. This has led to some confusion on the part of people purchasing homes with Second Units as to what they can and can not do. It has created some significant problems in the marketing of these units. This confusion could be resolved if you could sign below agreeing that the information in this letter accurately reflects the requirements of the Carlsbad Municipal Code in regards to the requirements for the rental of Second Units and occupancy requirements for homes with Second Units. Please call me at 760-438-1465 if you disagree with any of the above statements or have any questions. Your cooperation in cleaning up this matter is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Mike Howes I agreeyih the-cpfntents of this letter cc: Van Lynch Dave Lother attachments