HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP 115A; Carlsbad Palisades; Specific Plan (SP)March 9, 1977
MEI'lGKnriDUM
TO:
FROM:
CASE NO:
APPLICANT:
REQUEST:
SUBJECT:
PLANNING COMMISSION
PL/JNiN,I|^(^^D EPARTMENT
SP 115" (A) , CT 76--15, PUD-6
^DMLASS SOUTHWEST CORPORATION
Amendment of Specific
of CT 76-15 and
family detached
Plan 115 and approva'
PUD-6, to allow 135 single-
dwellings on 4 3.99 acres,.
CT 76-15 and PUD-6 have been returned to the
Planning Commission and staff by the City Council
for further study and report. The applicant and
staff have worked to resolve problems as noted
in previous i-ep0rts and hearings. This report
reflects the applicants and staff efforts. The
applicant is requesting portions of SP-115 be
deleted to be replaced by PUD.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that SP-115(A), CT 76-1-5 and PUD-6 be _AJM^ROVE£
based on the following findings and subject to the following con-
ditions:
1)
2)
SP^-mj-A) FINDINGS
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the
General Plan because:
a) The Land Use Map of the General Plan shows the subject
property as RKi (Residential Medium Density 4-10 du. per
acre). The proposed project is consistent with that
designation.
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the City
of Carlsbad Environmental Protection Ordinance of 1972 because:
a) The previous certification of EIR-129 combined with the
submission of supplemental information meets the ordinance
through Prior Compliance,
fed project conforms to applicable City policies, and
es dealing with public facilities because:
ability of public facilities have been assured by
0 p r i a t e agencies.
^1
1)
SP-115(A) CONDITIONS
The approval for deletion of portions of SP-115 is granted for
the land described in the application and any attachments thereto,
and as shown on the plot plan labeled Exhibit A, dated January
25, 1977.
76-15 FINDINGS
1) The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan because:
a) The Land Use Flan designates the subject site for Residential
Medium Density (4-10 du. per acre). The subject project
will provide approximately 3 du. per acre.
2) The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is con-
sistent with the General Plan because:'
a) The development of the proposed project will provide a nec-
essary link in the establishment of a portion of Tamarack
Avenue.
b) Conditions of approval will insure the above.
3) The site is physically suitcble for the type of development
because:
a) The currently requested project will require less grading
than previously approved projects for the site.
b) Most of the site has been rough graded,
c) No significant vegetation exists on the site.
The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of
development because:
a) The currently requested project.will result in fewer units
than previously approved requests.
b) Proposed dwelling units per acre do not exceed the General
P1 a n m i n i m u m,
5) The design of the subdivision or the imposed improvements are not
likely to cause substantial environmental damage substantially
and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because:
a) An Environmental Impact Report has been certified for previous
approvals,
b) Staff has been supplied with adequate supplemental information
to cover project changes..
2-
6) The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are
not likely to cause serious public health problems because:
a) Conditions of approval will insure the above.
7) The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will
not conflict with easements required by the public at large
for access through or use of property within the proposed sub-
division because:
a) Conditions of approval will insure the above,
8) The subdivision will not prohibit reasonable access to public
waterways, rivers, streams, lakes, reservoirs , coastlines , or
shorelines because:
a) The subdivision does not front on any of the above.
CT 76-15 CONDITIONS:
1) The approval is granted for the land described in the application
and any attachments thereto, and as shown on the plot plan sub-
mitted labeled Exhibit E, dated February 22, 1977.
2) Lots 116 and 117 shall include the remnant property adjacent to them
unless, prior to final map approval, the adjacent property (shown as
not-a-part) cen be incorporated in the subdivision to allow proper lot
configuration,
3) Street names as shown are not approved. Street names shall be submitted to
the Planning Director for approval pursuant to the street name policy
(City Council Policy No. 20) prior to approval of the final map,
4) In order to provide for reasonable fire protection during the construction
period, the subdivider shall maintain passable vehicular access to all
buildings and adequate fire hydrants with required fire flows shall be in-
stalled as recommended by the Fire Department.
5) Ornamental street lighting shall be provided for as required by Municipal
Ordinance. The developer shall depost cash in the amount necessary to
energize said street lights for an eighteen month period after construction,
to permit the. incorporation of the subdivision into a maintenance district,
6) All land and/or easements required shall be granted to the City of Carlsbad
without cost to the City, and free of all liens and encumbrances. No ease-
ments shall be recorded prior to recordation of the final map unless approved
by the City Engineer,
7) The improvement and grading plans shall include a report of a geological
investigation and a complete grading plan of the entire site, when required
by the City Engineer. The report and plan shall be prepared by civil
engineers licensed by the State of California, and experienced in erosion
control, who shall be acceptable to the City Engineer, They shall certify
that they have investigated the site and prepared data with full considera-
tion of the consequences to the included, and neighboring properties and in
conformance with the Geologic and Seismic Safety Element of the General Plan,
8) El Camino Real shall be deditcit';d and improved along the subdivision
frontage on the basis of a 126 foot street section, according to City
of Carlsbad Standards.
9) Prior to issuance of a grading permit for Unit 3, a 40 foot water line
easement centered on the existing 14" water line crossing Unit 3 shall
be granted to the City between the proposed Tamarack Avenue and Skyview
Drive.
10) Slopes adjacent to public streets shall be 2:1 maximum.
11) The stonn drain system is not specifically approved as shown;
designs of storm drains, ditches, Crossgutters and other appurtenances
shall be as approved on the improvement plans.
12) All contractors' and construction material suppliers' vehicles shall take
all access from El Camino Real during the construction of the improvements
related to this tentative map.
13) Proposed Palisades Drive, proposed Terrace Drive, between Palisades and
SkyvieWj and proposed Skyview Drive, between Terrace Drive and Tamarack
Avenue shall be dedicated and improved on the basis of a 60 foot street
section according to City of Carlsbad Standards. —
14) The proposed three units shall be recorded and constructed in sequentation
order as shown on the tentative map.
15) Prior to or concurrent with the recordation of the final map for Unit No. 1:
a) Tamarack Avenue shall be dedicated and improvements shall be secured
within the subdivision boundary on the basis of a modified 84 foot
street section as approved on the amended Tentative Map, within the
subdivision boundary,
b) Tamarack Avenue right of way and improvements shall be secured to its
intersection with Skyline Drive, The right of way width, street
section width and general alignment of Tamarack Avenue in the vicinity
of its intersection with Skyline Drive shall be as shown on Exhibit
"A", of City Council Resolution No: 3855,
c) The applicant shall enter into a secured agreement to install a north-
bound left turn lane on El Camino Real at Tamarack Avenue as approved
by the City Engineer;
d) The applicant shall deposit funds for the stripping of the left turn
pocket required in c. above) and in Tamarack Avenue fi^om El Camino Real
to Skyline Drive, as approved on the improvement plans.
e) The applicant shall provide revised water system calculations, prepared
by a Registered C-'vil Engineer, for the entire 3-Unit tentative map area.
They shall be based on current design criteria to be furnished by the City,
and lines shall be sized according to fire flow requirements and hydrant
locations approved by the Fire Marshall;
16) Prior to or concurrent with the recordation of the final map for Unit no, 2,
the applicant shal1: .
a) Dedicate and improve El Camino Real per Condition No. 19 above,
along the subdivision frontagebased on approved improvement plans
for El Camino Real.
b) Dedicate a 15' wide sewer easement across lot 93 from Palisades Circle
to the northwest corner of the lot.
17) If the existing 14 inch waterline lies under or within 4' of the curb,
gutter and sidewalk of Skyview Drive, as approved on the improvement plans
for Unit No. 3, the applicant shall deposit funds and/or enter into a secured
agreement to relocate the line to an alignment to conform with City of
Carlsbad Standards.
18) Waterline improvements for each unit shall include any loop system outside
the unit boundary and interim appurtenances, such as blowoffs, as required
by the City Engineer, based on the engineer's calculations required in
Condition 15 (e) above, or supplements thereto.
19) Dedication of El Camino Real and Tamarack Avenue shall include a waiver
• of direct access rights from the lots shown on each final map as abutting
thereon.
20) Prior to recordation of the final map for Unit No. 3, the applicant shall
provide for the future abandonment of the sewer proposed to cross lot 115
when construction of the offsite sewer connection in Skyview Drive occurs.
PUD-6 FINDINGS :
1) The proposed use at the particular location is necessary and
desirable to provide a service or facility which will contribute
to the general well-being of the neighborhood and the community
because:
a) The development will allow the subject property to be de-
veloped to its allowable potential and density as provided
in the General Plan.
2) The use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general
welfare of the persons residing or working in the vicinity or
injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity because:
a) The proposed PUD will be developed in a. manner similar to
the anticipated development in the area.
b) The proposed PUD will provide a necessary link in the cir-
culation system for the City (secondary arterial. Tamarack).
3) The design criteria set forth in Section 21.45.110 and all
minimum development standards set forth in Section 21.45.020
will be met because:
a) The plot plan and additional exhibits include all development
aspectsrequired..
b) The plot plan and additional exhibits include adequate pro-,
visions for open space, recreational facilities, circulation
and parking,
c) The project will be developed in a manner to be compatible
with surrounding development,
d) Internal circulation is acceptable to the City Engineer as
shown on the plot plan and by conditions of approval.
e) Private recreational facilities are readily accessible.
f) Dwelling unit density does not exceed the density allowed
in the underlying zone (P-C witii Master Plan),
PUD-6 CONDITIONS:
1) The approval is granted for the land described in the application
and any attachments thereto, and as shown on the plot plan sub-
mitted labeled Exhibit F, dated February 22, 1977, and additional
exhibits labeled Exhibit G, H and I, dated February 22, 1977,
The location of all roadways, parking areas, landscaping and
other facilities or features shall be located substantially as
shown on Exhibit F,G,H and I unless otherwise provided therein.
2)
3)
4)
5)
10)
11)
All cond i t i on s^j^ia 11 be appropriately
commenced within 18 months from final com'
C i ty
"e t e d and
action.
the project
All lot demens ions,
(extended) as shown
requi rements.
size and setbacks south of Tamarack Avenue
on Exhibit F shall conform to the R-l zone
All lot demensions, size and setbacks shall
to the plot plan, Exhibit F and the typical
shown on Exhibit B and I. In no case shall
forth in Title 21, Section 21.45.120 No. 13
No, 2 be superceeded.
generally conform
representations
the standards set
A,B,C and 21.45.120
Structures to be
shall ma i ntai n a
5 feet from any rear
built in excess of three feet above pad level
minimum of 3 feet from any side lot line and
lot line.
Building height shall not exceed 30 feet.
Lot coverage, including building and structures shall not
exceed 4 0% of the lot.
A uniform fencing plan to provide fencing at the top of slope
for those lots containing slopes dropping down to lower elevations'
shall be submitted tc and approved by the Planning Director, prior
to issuance of final occupancy for residences in Unit 1.
Fencing shall be provided according to the approved plafi prior
to occupancy for each affected residence.
Prior to issuance of grading permits, the City Engineer shall
approve a plan submitted by the applicant for interim erosion
control on all man-made slopes in excess of 3 feet within the
boundaries of this subdivision. Prior to this issuance of grading
permits, the applicant sii a 11 post bonds and agreements ensuring
the installation and maintenance of the erosion control system
until permanent landscaping is installed and maintained.
issuance of
a permanent
Prior to the
shall submit
Parks and Recreation
include all artificial slopes
by the following standards as
Open Space Maintenance Policy
any building permits, the applicant
landscaping and irrigation plan to the'
Director for his approval. The plan shall
These slopes shall be landscaped
set forth in the City Council
No. 23,
a) Restored Native Vegetation,
1) All interior slopes
2) These slopes will be maintained by the Homeowner's
Association for a minimum of 3 years,
3) At the end of 3 years the Homeowner's Association
may elect to return maintenance responsibilities to
the individual lot owners.
b) Supplemental Native Vegetation.
1) All slopes adjacent to Tamarack Avenue (extended).
2) These slopes shall be maintained by Homeowner's
Association.
-7-
c) R e f i n e d V e g e t a t i 0 n
1) All slopes adjacent to El Camino Real.
2) These slopes shall be maintained. by Homeowner's Association.
d) IntensiveVegetation
1) All parks sites as designated on Exhibit F,G,I.
2) These areas shall be maintained by Homeowner's Association',
12) Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed on all lots identified
in Condition llbefore any of those lots are occupied. If res-
idential construction occurs' in units, this condition shall be
met on a unit-by-unit-basis with the exception of those lots with
slopes adjacent to Tamarack Avenue (extended) and ECR. Final
landscaping and irrigation shall be completed on those slopes
adjacent to Tamarack and El Camino Real prior to issuance of
final occupancy for the first homes in unit 1.
13) CC&R's for the project shall be submitted to the Planning Director
for approval prior to issuance of building permits.
14) A.final Recreation Vehicle Storage Area Plan showing fencing,
stripping, paving speci fi c-i.ti ons and access shall be submitted '
to and approved by the Planning Director, Parks and Recreation
Director and City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits
for the Unit 1.
15) Recreational vehicle parking shall be provided and available
to residents prior to the first final occupancy permits for
Unit 1,
a) If the applicant does not wish to buiId the permanent RV
Storage lot as shown on Exhibit F and G prior to occupancy
for Unit 1, a temporary facility may be established to
the satisfaction of the Planning Director, Parks and Rec-
reation Director and City Engineer.
b) A plan for this temporary facility must be submitted to
and approved by those mentioned in (a) above prior to
occupancy of any residence in Unit 1.
15) The Recreational Vehicle Storage facility shall be made available
to only those homeowners within the PUD area,
17) A Final Parks plan for all 3 park areas (shown in Exhibit F,G,I)
and approved by the Parks and Recreation Director prior to
issuance of building permits on Unit 1.
18) On lots north of Tamarack Avenue, 5 foot access easements, shall
be granted between property owners adjacent to a zero lot line
to allow for building maintenance.
BACi(GROUND:
The Planning Commission denied CT 76-15 and PUD-6 (Planning Commission
Resolution 1307)on December 22, 1976.
The basic concern of the Commission was the Tamarack frontage road
concept, as presented by the applicant. A number of potential prob-
lems stemming from the frontage road design was presented in the
staff report dated December 22, 1976.
The staff report also pointed out certain deficiencies in RV parking,
usable open space and guest parking along Tamarack. However, it was
noted in the report that these problems could be worked out as a
function of minor project redesign.
At the City Council meeting of January 18, 1977, the City Council
noted four distinct problems, the primary one being the potential
conflicts resulting from the frontage road. They sent the problems
_back to the Planning Commission, staff and the applicant to work out;
'they were:
1) Frontage road design problems.
a) Pedestrian, motor vehicle, bicycle conflicts.
b) No separation of frontage road and secondary aruerial.
c) Sight distances on frontage road and secondary arterial.
d) Parking conflicts on frontage road.
e) Service vehicle conflicts on frontage road,
f) Driveways onto secondary arterial,
2) Recreational Vehicle Storage area (adequacy under PUD requirements)
3) Location-size-adequacy of usable open-space (adequacy under PUD
requirements).
4) Open Space Maintenance,
Because of the many questions and concerns resulting from the frontage
road concept, the applicant has redesigned the subdivision and
eliminated the frontage road completely. Staff feels that the current
subdivision design is a much more workable one than the previous pro-
posals.
The elimination of the frontage road solves the majority of the pro-
blems raised at the staff. Planning Commission and City Council levels.
No residences will front on the secondary arterial (Tamarack), The
land on the north side of Tamarack will slope down to residences.
The land on the south of Tamarack will slope up to residences. The
applicant lost 2 lots (136 to 134) from the previous subdivision
design.
The Recreational Vehicle Storage area has been redesigned and relo-
cated (See Exhibit G). The area has been combined with a recreation
area using a common access. The RV area is in. a location that is
physically and visually separated from residences and public streets.
staff feels this is a good location for the combined RV storage and
recreation area. Required RV Storage area under the PUD ordinance
is 5400 sq. ft. The propcsed RV Storage area is approximately 9000
square feet, excluding access road.
The applicant has worked with the Planning Department and the Parks
and Recreation Director on location^ size and adequacy of usable open
space for the project. The applicant, as a result, has redesigned
the project to show three recreational areas (See Exhibits, F,G,I).
These recreational areas are located to serve three distinct areas in
t h e s u b d i V i s i 0 n ,
The required size for alV usable recreational facilities under PUD
requirements is 600 square feet of space for each residence. The
subject request is therefore required 81000 square feet or 1.86
acres of recreation area. The proposed net square footage for the
three park areas is 77,600 square feet or 1,78 acres (See CT Exhibit
E). The PUD ordinance allows up to 50% eredit ' towards the usable
open space requirement for scenic natural facilities, vistas, etc.
Staff feels that the usuable open space area, as proposed, is adequate
to meet the needs of the future residents. Staff also feels that
credit for the additional 3400 square feet (4% of 1.86 acres) can be
given for the potential scenic value that will be created by the
creation of Tamarack Avenue. Views to eastbound travel on Tamarack
will be unimpared with tI'le absence of iiouses fronting on the north
sideofthestreet.
City Council Policy #2 3 (open space maintenance) establishes categories
for various levels of landscaping and maintenance. Staff and the
applicant have discussed the various categories in Policy #23 and have
come to an agreement regarding which areas in the subdivision should
fall under the various categories.
The applicant has indicated that a ilomeown e r' s Association will be
created, and that they will be responsible for maintenance. However,
if at some future date the Homeowner's Association wishes to work
with the City in creating an Open Space Maintenance District, the
existing landscaping will have bee n i n s t a 11 e o u n d e r c a't e g o r i e s e s t. a b -
lished by the City (See PUD Condition No. 8).
Additional Questions Raised at City Council
Master Plan Consistency
The existing Master Plan srsows areas of specific density. These areas
range from 7,7 du. per acre to 2.5 du. per acre with an overall
density of 5.9 du. per acre. Staff feels that because the overall
density of the proposal has been lowered significantly (to 3 du. per
acre) that the specific areas designated for specific densities need
not be strictly adhered to.
Connection of Noblina Drive
A local property owner expressed concern over the ultimate traffic
connection of Neblina Drive to Tamarack Avenue.
•10-
Neblina Drive is a collector street, and therefore, is planned to
carry surface traffic from residential areas to higher volume streets-
The ultimate development of the connection will result in more
efficient traffic flows in, the area.
The previously approved Specific Plan (SP-115) and Tract Map (CT 73-8)
show Neblina Drive to ultimately link up to a street connecting
with Tamarack. The current map does not modify previously approved
plans in this regard.
P a n handle L o t s
The previous request for subdivision icluded some panhandle lots.
The current request does not include [J a n h a n d 1 e lots.
Lot Width, distance between buildings, usable PUD area
The r edesigned subdivision and PUD use the zero--lot -line concept and
incorporate lots with rather limited street frontage, (one reason
for use of zero-1ot-1ine design), some with 44 feet at the street.
The average width at the street for lots north of Tamarack is
a b 0 u t 5 0 f e e t.
The PUD ordinance requires the following setbacks under 21.45.120(13).
A) Ihj di stance between any building used for human habitation and
any other building shall no'L be less than 10 feet.
B) Distance between any uninhabited 'buildings or structures shall
be not less than 5 feet.
C) The distance between wings or courts of a building shall not be
less tiian 10 feet.
Conditions of approval will insure the.se standards (SEE PUD Conditions #4).
The lot size and actual buildable pad size may be substantially
different because- of the presence of rough topography. For example',
lot #78 on Tract Map, Exhibit- E, is about 9000 square feet, however,
the actual building pad size is about 3500 square feet. Lot No. 122,
Exiiibit E is about 12,400 square feet, however, the actual pad size
is about 5500 square feet. This limited flat area limits the amount
of usable lot area. A policy determination has not been made as to
the requirement of usable lot area in relation to actual lot size.
This situation occurs, however, in other areas of the City with steep
slopes or rough topography.
The Building Department has indicated the following standards for zero
lot line construction. Staff assumes the developer is aware of these
Uniform Building Code requirements:
1) One hour wall is required when a structure is placed less than
3 feet from property line.
•11-
2 ) No openi ngs a re
property line.
permitted in walls closer than 3 feet from
To avoid these requirements the developer may wish to maintain, a 3
foot setback from the affected property line.
View blockaqe prob1 em
At the City Council hearing, a local property owner expressed concern
about a small hill in the area blocking his view. Staff has deter-
mined that the hill in question is not on the subject property, and
cannot be considered with this subject request.
PUD Development Standa 1"ds
Staff has reviewed all requirements under' Section 21.45.120 (Develop-
ment standards) and has found that by design or conditions of approval
all of tiie requirements have been adequately met.
Most requirements have been discussed in the proceeding discussion.
Guest parking spaces will be supplied on-street, at one-guest- '
per-unit ratio. Staff has analyzed street parking in
areas and found parking availability adequate. Guest
provided off a private drive for 6 units, see CT Exhibit E
no, 70. Sidewalks will be provided on all public
standards.
Cul-de-sac
spaces are
1 ot
stree;:s to City
TH:ar
(3/4/77)
Attachmen
Exhibit
E X h i b i t
Exhibit
Exhibit
Exhibit
dated
dated
dated
dated
dated
2/22/77
2/22/77
2/22/77
2/22/777
2/22/77
Memorandum to City Manager, dated 1/10/77
Planning Commission Resolution no. 1307
Staff Report, dated 12/22/76
•12-
Carlsbad Joumal
Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County
3088 PIO PICO AVENUE • P.O. BOX 248 • CARLSBAD, CA 92008 • 729-2345
Proof of Publication
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, js.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
1 am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid;
I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter.
1 am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Joumal a newspaper of general circulation,
printed and published twice weekly in the City of Carisbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and
which newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general
character, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription
list of paying subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular
intervals in the said City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding
one year next preceding the date of publication of
the notice hereinafter referred to; and that the
notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has
been published in each regular and entire issue of
said newspaper and not in any supplement
thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
NOTICE OP PUBLIC HEARING SP-iiS(A)
NOTICE 18 HEREBY SIVEN,th«t the Planning CommlHi^ d^'tiiVCity ,ot Carlsbad will hoM i ptilitie kearinj tt the' City Council Chunben, llM. Ebn^ Avenue, Carllbad, .Calitoni<«,<)it^jW|^ P.M. on Wedneiday, HfU!M,<LSlVni(''M
consider an application b(%M^ll^oa 9tc a speciflc plan iim^ndment. to d«t^-
certain areas trom Speciflc Plan No. 115
on property located on both sides of
Tamarack Avenue between El Camino
Real and Skyline Drive, and ,as shown
on the map below.
Those persons wishing to speak on
this proposal are cordially invited to at-
Wiod th«pult)ic hearing. If youhave any
qtte8tioii|,^^Ue c«U WllSl and ask
forthe Flanqing Department.
Applicant: JOHN G. DdOGLASS, JR.
CITYOFCARLSBAD
PLANNING COMMISSION .F.e.brvar.y ..^.6. 19.77.
19 .
19 . .
19
19
SPllSA
Compiled by City of Carlsbad Plan-
ning Dept. from data shown in San Diego County Assessor Book 207, Page
1^242,60'
20 Parcel 9 and Applicant, JOHN C.
DOUGLASS JR.
CJ 226s: Febraary 26,1977
I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true
and correct. Executed at Carlsbad, County of San Diego,
State of California on the 23th of Febru:,a''y 1 977 day
Clerk of the Printer
-, Rece i pt No
APPLICATION NO. SPECIFIC PLAN
CITY OF CARLSBAD
(Please Type or Print) Date:
^MEKP^AeKT
1) REQUEST: ^^Specific Plan 'U'l iUM,If.--1 ify- OF CARljS6A>C> -ffcAo-r
Tbriefly expTalrT)
2) LOCATION: The subject property is generally located on the
BoTK side^of TA^A AfZAC JC»
between
GLCA»/\IKO \^g:AL~ and t^vCVUlKe. RD-
3) ASSESSOR'S NUMBER: Book Page Parcel
Book Page Parcel (If more, please list on
bottom of thi s page).
4) OWNER (S): Name Address City Zip Phon'e
Ro. -Bc/ic il\4^, ^A(2.t-Sr5AP. OA- ^7,voB
5) PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR PREPARATION CF PLAN:
% Name Address Ci ty Zip,, .Phone
6) REGISTRATION OF LICENSE NO: 1
7) APPLICANTS SIGNATURE:
I hereby declare that all information contained within this
application is true; and that all standard conditions as
•fsated on the attachment have been read, understood and
agre/d, to.
'ess City Zip P-hone
Representing (Company or Corporation)
J)ou^L A5s *SouTHu><gs-r Qp(^<^.
Relationship to Property Owner(s) F'Rg.'*>>Dg/^T' <::OKAP/^N^IC'
The City of Carlsbad Planning Department would appreciate the
opportunity to work 'with the applicant throughout the Planning
Stages of the proposed development. In an effort to aid the
applicant, the Planning Department requests that it be given
an opportunity to evaluate and discuss the application and
plans prior to submittal. This request is not a requirement;
however, it may avoid major redrafting or revision of the plan
which only serves to lengthen the processing time.
ATTACHMENTS: Supplemental Information Form - Planning 5-1
Standard Conditions - Planning 6-?
Preparation Check List - Planning 7-1
Procedures - Planning 3-2
FORM: Planning 4-2 Date of Planning Commission Approval
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
SPECIFIC PLAN/TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT/SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
SPECIAL USE PERMIT .
44^ 1. Gross Acres (or square footage if less than acre)
2. Number of Lots
3. Type of Development ^Rfefb*C?s.<^"n<^C. .
XResidential , Commercial, Industrial )
4. Present Zone Proposed Zone
(if change requested)
5. General Plan Land Use Designation
6. Source of Water Supplyd-nf o(=ClA^4,S^AP
7., Method of Sewage Disposal
8. Types of Protective Covenants to be RecordedQ^^a(L~TV(^
9. Transportation Modes Available to Service the Development
^^\<rATg AUTe?T/\g)^l '
10. If residential development.please complete the following:
a) School District Serving the propertyCl]A^L5gA£^ CLi>AlF«gl7
b) Are school facilities capable, of serving this project
(Written confirmation of this requirement must be
received by the Planning Department at least one
week prior to Planning Commission hearing. If not
received by this time the request will be denied.)
11. Methods proposed to reduce sound levels
12. Methods proposed to conserve energy_
Additional sheets may be attached if necessary to answer any of the
above questions.
FORM Planning 5-1 Dato of Planning Commission Approval ^""^"^^