HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP 126; Colonial Mall Ltd.; Specific Plan (SP) (2)V
Affi(davit of Publication
STATE OF CALIFORNIA \
County of San Diego ^
Patricia Manning .i j. i • .i n • • t r-i i „ , says TiiaT she is tho Principal Cisric
of Tho Carlsbad Journal, a weekly newspaper of general circulafion, printed and published in •list-
City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, and Stato of California, and that the notice of v/hicli ihe
annexed is a true copy, was published i!.?- times in said newspaper, commencing on tl!e...f.:^-
tlay of Sept* - , A.D. 19 namely on the following dates:
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN
that the Planning Commission
of the City of Carlsbad, Cali-
forni, will bold a Public Hear-
ing on September 13,1973, at
7:30 P.M., in the City Council
Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue,
Carlsbad, Califomia, to con-
sider the following:
IP*liitOLONIAL
application filed by Robert L.
Watson requesting Adoption of
a Specific Plan to allowaCom-
mercial/professional develop-
ment on property generally lo-
cated on tbe south side of Elm
Avenue between Pio Pico Drive
and Highland Drive, and more
particularly described as:
That portion of Lots 17 to 24
inclusive, in Block 86 ofthe
Town of Carlsbad, in the
County of San Diego, State of
Califomia, according to map
thereof No. 535, filed in the
office of the County Re-
corder of San Diego County,
May 2, 1888: TOGETHER
WITH a portion of Tract 115
of the Town of Carlsbad,
County of San Diego, State
of Califomia, according to
map thereof No. 775, filed in
the Office of the County Re-
corder of San Diego County,
February 15,1894.
Those persons desiring to
comment on the proposed Spe-
cific Plan are cordially invit-
ed to attend the Public Hearing.
CARLSBAD CITY
PLANNING COM-
MISSION
Sept. 13,1973
13
Signed at Carlsbad, California this „
day of _ , 19 ...1?
I hereby doclare under penalty of pcviury
that tho foregoing is true and con ect.
^U.:.C.y:!^...^22l.a-:2i::.21zy:^ir,
MEMORANDUM 4 August 29, 1973
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: PLANNINR COMMISSION
SUBJECT: PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ON APPLICATIONS OF
THE MALONE CO. (RICK ENGINEERING CO.) CASE NO.ZC-122 &
ROBERT L. WATSON (COLONIAL MALL LTD.) CASE NO.ZC-121
The Planning Commission heard the subject applications July 10,1973
and continued their decision to August 14, 1973 after a motion to
table the applications,until the General Plan revision was presented
to the City,had ended in a tie vote of the six commissioners nresent.
Motions to deny the Change of Zone requests were approved by a 4-3
vote and the two Specific Plans were tabled by a 4-3 vote. The
decisions to deny the applications were based upon the incomoatibi1ity
of the land uses proposed to the General Plan, and inadequate circu-
lation. The discussion had as a basis the following prior actions
orpriorstudies:
1. The City Council and Planning Commission Resolutions 606 and
607 in 1959 denied an application on Elm Avenue for rezoning from
R-l to C-1 and Adoption of a Specific Plan (Oceanside National Bank).
The basis for denial was -
a. That the proposed reclassification would
zoninq of commercial in a residential area.
constitute soot
b. That the pronosed use may generate a severe traffic problem
on Elm Avenue, which is a major boulevard in the City and will
carry increased traffic in the future.
2, The Pio Pico Land Use Amendment initiated by the Staff in
late 1971, early 1972, recommended a Specific Area Plan for the area
generally between Elm Avenue and Tamarack Avenue, and between Pio
Pico Drive and Adams Street. The proposed plan would have -
a. Limited residential densities to 20 du/ac. or less.
b. Specified land uses which could have been employed adjacent
to a freeway, and which would be compatible with the surrounding
residential neighborhoods.
This program was never taken to public hearing because the
Planning Commission felt it should be incorporated into the existing
General Plan revision^program.
3. The City Council in May of 1972 imposed a 3 months mori-
torium on any reclassification in the vicinity of City Hall until
such time as a "Civic Center Overlay" Study and accompanying zoning
recommendations could be presented to the Planning Commission and
City Council. The purpose of the Overlay Study was to assess the
Malone & Watson Memo
August 29, 1973
Page 2
requirements of City Hall expansion and at the same time recommend
land uses and zoning for the surrounding properties. To date,
that study has not been accomplished, and the Planning Commission
was of the opinion again that the decision on the Malone-Rick and
Watson applications should be held in abeyance, or denied, until
such time as a viable Civic Center Study can be accomplished. This
study would, of necessity, be a portion of the General Plan Land
Use Amendment recommendations.
An additional concern addressed the City's existing commercial
commitment to the downtown, and the impact of the proposed commercial
applications to that commitment.
The Commission was in basic agreement that land uses other than
residential should be employed adjacent to City Hall (i.e.professional)
However, because of the lack of a defined Civic Center Circulation
and Land Use Plan, and the inability of existing zoning ordinances
to curb the development of unplanned commercial activities in the
Civic Center area, denial was an appropriate course of action. Until
such Dlans, programs and ordinances are developed, any activity east
of the freeway, and adjacent to the Civic Center Complex, should not
be considered.
Respectfully submitted.
DONALD A. AGATEP,
Planning Director
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT FOR
SEPTEMBER 25,' 1973
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
REPORT ON: CONSIDERATION OF CHANGE OF ZONE
CONSIDERATION OF SPECIFIC PLAN
CASE NO: ZC - 121
SP - 126
APPLICANT: COLONIAL MALL^ LTD.
Robert L. Watson, General Partner
P.O. Box 275
Carlsbad, California 92008
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
A. - Background: The -Plann ing Oammiss tori did consider these
matters at a public hearing on July 10, 1973 and again on August 14,
1973. The final action taken by the Planninq Commission on August 14,
1973 was to deny the Change of Zone request and to table the specific
plan. The applicant did subsequently appeal the Planning Commission
denial of the Change of Zone to the City Council. On September 4,
1973 the City Council did consider the appeal and did overturn the
Planning Commission denial of a Change of Zone from R-l and C-1 to
C-2 by a 4 to 1 vote and referred the matter back to the Planning
Commission for a study and report. As a part of the City Council
referral to the Planning Commission, the City Council did Indicate that
the Civic Center overlay concept should be initiated by the Planning
Commission. It seemed to be the feeling of a majority of the City
Council that this area would be appropriate for other than residential
-2-
uses. A majority of the City Council indicated that the proposed
commercial and professional building is an appropriate use, but
there Is no zone other than the C-2 Zone designation that would allow
the proposed development. It seemed to be the City Council's
opinion that the specific plan approved on this project should Include
conditions that limit the potential uses in the subject building to those
indicated by the applicant.
The subject property is generally Tocated at the southeast corner
of the Intersection of Pio Pico Drive and Elm Avenue. Said property
has a frontage on Pio Pico Drive of approximately 132 feet and 102
feet on Elm Avenue.
B. Additional Information: Refer to attached staff report,
dated August 14, 1973, for additional information.
II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
A. Regarding the Change of Zone: The City .Council at Its meeting
of September 4, 1973 did approve an appeal of the Planning Commission
denial of a change of zone request from R-l and C-1 to C-2 on the
subject property.- This action has been referred back to the Planning
Commission for study and report. It is staff's recommendation that the
Planning Commission take the following actions;
1. That it be moved that the Planninq Commission report
back to the City Council that the final action of approval of the
Change of Zone from R-3 to C-2 BE TAKEN. Justification Is based upon:
a. The influence of the Civic Center development
could reasonably extend along Pio Pico southerly to Oak Avenue. In
addition, the impact of the freeway and the estimated traffic on
Pio Pico could effect the subject parcel to the degree that the site
would not be considered appropriate for a residential activity. A
profess 1onal/commerc1al activity, on the other hand, would be less
affected.
b. As a pa.rt of the upcoming General Plan Revision
and Zoning Ordinance Revision, staff envisions the establishment of a
civic center overlay zone concept on all the property surrounding the
civic center area. A majority of the restrictions of this zone will
deal with design and such an application on the subject property will
further gua^r-an-tee the compatibility of any deveTopment to the sur-
rounding development.
c. The existence of commercial zoning and uses to the
west of the subject parcel and its location adjacent to a frontage road
of a state freeway and a collector street (Elm Avenue) are considered
to be sufficient reasons for a finding that the present General Plan
commitment for the area is not realistic. In that this Incompatibility
Is part of a larg-er area of tnGompatibi 1 ity whlch^ Includes the Civic
Center area and the full length of Pio Pico Drive, Staff would not
recommend a General Plan amendment for just the subject site at this
time. Rather, as a part of the pending total general plan revision,
all these inconsistencies will be eliminated.
d. The uses permitted under the proposed C-2 zone district
is considered to be a suitable transition from the ex 1sting^s1ngle-fami 1y
development to the southeast and the freeway activity to the west.
E. That the Planning Commission initiate proceedings to
begin the implementation of a Civic Center Overlay Zone for that
property between Highland Drive and the Freeway and between the
property, one lot north of Laguna Drive to one lot south of Elm Avenue.
B. Regarding the Specific Plan: The Planning Commission did
on August 14, 1973 consider and table a specific plan on the subject
-4-
property. Along with the reconsideration of the rezoning request, staff
has brought the specific plan back for the Planning Commission review.
Staff's recommendation is outlined in the attached staff report
dated August 14, 1973 (starting on Page 2).
Staff would suggest that the approximate square footage allocations
for professional and commercial uses could be changed to place more
emphasis on professional use. Other than that, staff's recommendation
would not change.
ATTACHMENT:
•Staff analysis to the Planning Commission, dated August 14, 1973
concerning ZC-121 and SP-126.
-Letter from Robert L. Watson (2)
-Memorandum to the Planning Commission from the Planning Department.
-Resolution No. 942.
- Letter from Robert L. Watson dated August 20, 1973.
- Memorandum to the City Council from the Planning Commission.
-Minutes from the City Council meeting of September 4, 1973.
^ CITY OF CARLSDAD
PLANiUNG DEPARTMENT
ANALYSI-S FOR
JULY 10, T973
CONTINUED TO AUGUST 14, 1973
i 7 /
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
REPORT ON: CONSIDERATION OF ZONE CHANGE
CONSIDERATION OF SPECIFIC PLAN
-CASE NO: ZONE CHANGE NO. 121
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 126
APPLICANT: COLONIAL MALL LTD.
Robert L. Watson, General Partner
P.O.Box 275
Carlsbad, California, 92008
GENERAL INFORMATION:
A. Request: The applicant is requesting approval of a zone change from R-l and
C-'l, to C-2", adoption of a Specific Plan and amendment to the City's General
Plan on property generally located on the southeast corner of Elm Avenue and
Pio Pico Drive.
B. Background: The proposed development is related to the recently approved
(May, 1977rwayside Inn Restaurant by location and developer. Circumstances
confronting this application are similar to those experienced by the applications
for the restaurant (i.e. General Plan amendment, 'land-use, circulation, etc).
The vicinity map shows the relationship betv/een the proposed development and
the existing restaurant.
C. Zoning and General Plan;
1. Zoning: Existing: R-l
Proposed: C-2
Adjacent: East: R-l
South: R-l
West: C-1 & C-2
North: R-l (Civic Center)
2- General Plan: The adopted General Plan designates the area as "Low
Density" residential T3-7 d.u./acre). There is some question as to whether or
not this development falls within the definition of "freev/ay service facility".
If it does, then the project v/ould be in basic confonr.ity to the text of the
General Plan.
^' Publ ic Notification: Tiie required public notices have been published
and mailed regarding these items.
^• Environmental Impact Considerations:
The applicant has submitted en environmental impact assessment per City
requirements; and t-ie project has been declared to have a "non-significant"'
impact on the environment. Justification was- based on the adequacy of services
circulation and adjoining' land-uses. _ .- ••
CONSIDER.ATJON OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 121
1\. Description of Project: The proposed zone change from R-l to C-2 is
on tv.'o parcels of land, consisting of approximately .64 acres, at the southeast
corner of Pio Pico Drive and Elm Avenue. Surrounding land uses include:
West (across Pio Pico): service station
South: restaurant and single-family house
East: single-family house ..
North: City Hall.
^- Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Cominission
recommend to the City Council that Zone Change No. 121 BE APPROVED .
Justification is based upon, staff's interpretation that:
1, The site and proposed develo.pment,,partially falls within the definition
-Of a "freev.'ay service faci 1 i ty".
2. The proposed zoning is the only appropriate zoning that v/ould permit
those uses normally associated with civic centersand their environs.
If the Planning Commission disagrees with Staff's interpretation of the project,
the logical alternative v/ould be to continue (table) this application until the
adoption of the new General Plan expected sometime in 1974.--
CONSIDERATION OF SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 126 *
A. Description of Project: The enclosed plot plan shows a tv/o-story
complex consisting of approximately 15,000 sq. ft. The Proposed uses include
a mixture of commercial and professional activities. The attached letter from
the applicant defines the types of tenants he will be seeking.
Tn addition to the 52 parking spaces shown on-site, i:he applicant requests that
the Planning Commission "consider a joint use as it relates to ingress and egress
and parking" with the Wayside Inn Restaurant and Cocktail Lounge (letter attached).
The parking area on tlie east side of the lot will be approximately 8 ft, above the
elevation of the first story of the structures along Pio Pico. There are a
total of four stairways end ramps to the second story. Ingress end Egress is
proposed from Elm Avenue end through an existing drive off Pio Pico.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIO!!: Staff recom:r;finds that the Planning Co.mmission re-
coinmend to the City Council that Specific Plan No. 126 BE APPROVED. Obviously
this recommendation is predicated upon an approval of the Zone Change.
Justification is based upon:
1. The development would be consistent with uses thought to be appropriate
within a civic center overlay zone.
2. The proposed uses v.'ould be computable with existing uses in the area.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Any approval should be subject to the following
conditions:
1. The Specific Plan is granted for the land as described in the application
and any attachments thereto, as shown on the plot plan submitted, labeled
Exhibit ''"A". ...
2. Unless the construction of the structure or facility is commenced
not later than one year after the date the approval is granted and is
diligently pursued thereafter, this approval will automatically become
null and void.
3. All requiroinents of any law, ordinance or regulation of the State of
California, City of.Carlsbad, and any other governmental entity shall be
complied with.
" --4. -Ho'-signs-or-^odvertisiTig-of any "type v/hatso ever sliall te'erected or
installed until plans therefore have been approved by the City of Carlsbad.
5. Prior to obtaining a building permit and within 30 days hereof, the
applicant shall file with the Secretary of the Planning Commission written
acceptance of-the conditions stated herein.
6. Compliance v.'ith and execution of all conditions listed hereon shall
be necessary (unless otherwise specified) prior to obtaining final building
inspection clearance. Deviation from this requirement shall be permitted
only by v.ritten consent of the Planning Director.
7. Any mechanical and/or electrical equipment to be located on the roof of
the structure shall be screened in a manner acceptable to the Planning
Director. Detailed plans for said screening shall be submitted, in
triplicate, to the Planning Director.
8. All lighting shall be arranged to reflect away from adjoining
properties and streets.
of
9. An incombustible trash enclosure shall be provided/a size and location
acceptable to the Planning Director, and said area shall be enclosed witli
a fence and/or wall of sufficient fieight to adequately shield the area.
Said fence end/or wall shall include a solid gate.
• 10. Interior landscaping of perking areas shell be provided in a manner
acceptable to the Planning Director. Said minimum area of landscaping
siiall bo equivalent to 3'a of the area of the lot, excluding required
perimeter landscaping.
11. A detaileo landscape and sprinkler plan prepared by a landscape architect
shall be submitted to the Planning Director for consideration and approval.
12. Prior to final building inspection clearance, all landscaping shall be
installed. Said landscaping shall-, at all times, be maintained in a manner ,
acceptable to ttie Planning Director.
13. Full street improvements shall be installed along Pio Pico.
14. A parcel map shall be recorded in accordance with the State Map Act.
15. The building shall be provided with underground utility service.
16. A grading plan shall be submitted and approved by the City prior to the
issuance of an^y building permits.
17. A six-foot high vievz-obscuring fence shall be installed along the east
and south property lines.
18. The letter dated May 29, 1973-from Colonial Mall, Ltd. and signed by
Robert L. Watson, that refers to proposed uses and expected tenants shall
be included ss a part of this Specific Plan. The Planning Director shall be
responsible for the enforcement of this condition.
19. Prior to the issuance of eny permits, the City shall duly process
the request for a General Plan Amend;nent.
^20. Proper signing shall be installed to restrict "right-turn only" ingress
•and egress along Elm Avenue if the Public 'Works Director determines there is a
need for such a restriction.
Respectfully submitted.
MI CHAEt^CTZAi'fDER;
Assistant Plann'gr
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING DEPAF.TMENT
ANALYSIS FOR
JULY 10, 1973
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
REPORT ON: CONSIDERATION OF ZONE CHANGE
CONSIDERATION OF SPECIFIC PLAN
CASE NO: ZONE CHANGE NO. 121
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 126
APPLICANT: COLONIAL MALL LTD.
Robert L. Watson, General Partem
P.O.Box 275
Carlsbad, California, 92008
GENERAL INFORMATION:
1^' Request: The applicant is requesting approval of a zone change from R-l and
C-1, to C-2, adoption of a Specific Plan and amendment to the City's General
Plan on property generally located on the southeast corner of Elm Avenue and
Pio Pico Drive.
B. Background: The proposed development is related to the recently approved
(May, 1972) Wayside Inn Restaurant by location and developer. Circumstances
confronting this application are similar to those experienced by the applications
for the restaurant (i.e. General Plan amendment, land-use, circulation, etc).
The vicinity map shows the relationship between the proposed development and
the existing restaurant.
C. Zoning and General Plan:
^- Zoning: Existing: R-l
Proposed: C-2
Adjacent: East:
South
West:
North
R-l
R-l
C-1 & C-2
R-l (Civic Center)
2' General Plan: The adopted General Plan designates the area as "Low
Density" residential (3-7 d.u./acre). There is some question as to whether or
not this development falls within the definition of "freeway service facility".
If It does, then the project would be in basic conformity to the text of the
General Plan.
•1-
D. Public Notification: The required public notices have been published
and mailed regarding these items.
E. Environmental Impact Considerations:
The applicant has submitted an environmental Impact assessment per City
requirements, and the project has been declared to have a "non-significant"
Impact on the environment. Justification was based on the adequacy of services,
circulation and adjoining land-uses.
CONSIDERATION OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 121
^' Description of Project: . The proposed zone change from R-l to C-2 is
on two parcels of land, consisting of approximately .64 acres, at the southeast
corner of Pio Pico Drive and Elm Avenue. Surrounding land uses include:
West (across Pio Pico): service station
South: restaurant and single-family house
East: single-family house
North: City Hall.
B. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
recommend to the City Council that Zone Change No. 121 BE APPROVED .
Justification is based upon staff's interpretation that:
1. The site and .proposed development partially falls within the definition
of a "freeway service facility".
2. The proposed zoning is the only appropriate zoning that would permit
those uses normally associated with civic centersand their environs.
If the Planning Commission disagrees with Staff's interpretation of the project,
the logical alternative would be to continue (table) this application until the
adoption of the new General Plan expected sometime in 1974.
CONSIDERATION OF SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 126
A. Description of Project: The enclosed plot plan shows a two-story
complex consisting of approximately 15,000 sq. ft. The Proposed uses include
a mixture of commercial and professional activities. The attached letter from
the applicant defines the types of tenants he will be seeking.
In addition to the 52 parking spaces shown on-site, the applicant requests that
the Planning Commission "consider a joint use as it relates to Ingress and egress
and parking" with the Wayside Inn Restaurant and Cocktail Lounge (letter attached),
The parking area on the east side of the lot will be approximately 8 ft. above the
elevation of the first story of the structures along Pio Pico. There are a
total of four stairways and ramps to the second story. Ingress and Egress is
proposed from Elm Avenue and through an existing drive off Pio Pico.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission re-
commend to the City Council that Specific Plan No. 126 BE APPROVED. Obviously
this recommendation is predicated upon an approval of the Zone Change.
Justification is based upon:
1. The development would be consistent with uses thought to be appropriate
within a civic center overlay zone.
2. The proposed uses would be compatable with existing uses In the area.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Any approval should be subject to the following
conditions:
1. The Specific Plan is granted for the land as described in the application
and any attachments thereto, as shown on the plot plan submitted, labeled
Exhibit "A".
2. Unless the construction of the structure or facility is commenced
not later than one year after the date the approval is granted and is
diligently pursued thereafter, this approval will automatically become
null and void.
3. All requirements of any law, ordinance or regulation of the State of
California, City of Carlsbad, and any other governmental entity shall be
complied with.
4. No signs or advertising of any type whatsoever shall be erected or
Installed until plans therefore have been approved by the City of Carlsbad.
5. Prior to obtaining a building permit and within 30 days hereof, the
applicant shall file with the Secretary of the Planning Commission written
acceptance of the conditions stated herein.
6. Compliance with and execution of all conditions listed hereon shall
be necessary (unless otherwise specified) prior to obtaining final building
inspection clearance. Deviation from this requirement shall be permitted
only by written consent of the Planning Director.
7. Any mechanical and/or electrical equipment to be located oji the roof of
the structure shall be screened in a manner acceptable to the Planning
Director. Detailed plans for said screening shall be submitted, in
triplicate, to the Planning Director.
8. All lighting shall be arranged to reflect away from adjoining
properties and streets.
of
9. An Incombustible trash enclosure shall be provided/a size and location
acceptable to the Planning Director, and said area shall be enclosed with
a fence and/or wall of sufficient height to adequately shield the area.
Said fence and/or wall shall include a solid gate.
10. Interior landscaping of parking areas shall be provided in a manner
acceptable to the Planning Director. Said minimum area of landscaping
shall be equivalent to 3% of the area of the lot, excluding required
perimeter landscaping.
n. A detailed landscape and sprinkler plan prepared by a landscape
architect, shall be submitted to the Planning Director for consideration
and approval.
12. Prior to final building inspection clearance, all landscaping shall
be Installed. Said landscaping shall, at all times, be maintained in a
manner acceptable to the Planning Director.
13. Full street improvements shall be Installed along Pio Pico.
14. A parcel map shall be recorded in accordance with the State Map Act.
15. The building shall be provided with underground utility service.
16. A grading plan shall be submitted and approved by the City prior
to the Issuance of any building permits.
17. A six-foot high view - obscuring fence shall be Installed along
the east and south property lines.
18. The letter dated May 29, 1973 from Colonial Mall, Ltd. and signed
by Robert L. Watson, shall be included as a part of this Specific Plan.
The Planning Director shall be responsible for the enforcement of this
condition.
19. Prior to tbe issuance .of any permits^ the City shall duly process
the request for a General Plan Amendment.
Respectfully submitted.
MICHAEL C. ZANLp/
Assistant Planner
-4-
[
CITY OF CARLSBAD
APPLICATION FOR ADOPTION OF
SPECIFIC OR MASTER PL/AN
DATE:M^y ?Q, 197-^
FILING FEE RECEIPT NO
SPECIFIC PLAN NO
(for official use)
• « 1» te 1» « « * « « « « « « « « * * * « « « ir
I. A REQUEST IS HEREBY MADE TO ADOPT A Specific
(Specific or Master Plan)
FOR PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS: (exact legal description)
Intersection of Elm and Pio Pico bv address 1217 Elm Avenue (see attached)
II.
THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN IS ADDRESSED Aa217 Elm Avenue
AND IS LOCATED ON THE South
SIDE OF Elm Avenue
(Name of Street)
Highland
(Name of Street)
We
( I, We)
(North, South, East, West)
BETWEEN Pio Pico AND
(Name of Street)
The undersigned state that we are
the Owners
(Owner/Owners)
( I AM, WE ARE )
_of the property described herein and hereby
give Our
(My, Our)
Name : Colonial/l^ll. L (Typed br/^r^'niled( as shown on Recorded Deed)
Signature: <^ VyTXA^ ^ JHfr^^?^ ^.ft
Name: Rober6\L, Watson, General Partner
authorization to the filing of this application;
"Hubert L. VJatson, General Partner
( Typed or)Printed as shown on Recorded Deed)
Signature:
Name:
(Typed or Printed as shown on Recorded Deed)
Signature:
Name:
(Typed or Printed as shown on Recorded Deed)
Signature:
Specific/Master Plan An^ncation Page Two
III. EXISTING ZONE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY 7,500 - C-1
HAS A MASTER PLAN BEEN APPROVED? Yes, No.
DATE:
OWNER AND/OR OWNER'S AUTHORIZED AGENT
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO) SS
CITY OF (?^^^yiJ> )
I, (we), (3c/-oA/,^i,
(name)
declare to the best of
(my, our )
and correct under the penalty of purjury:
being duly sworn depose and
EXECUTED AT
DATE
(City)
_knowledge that the foregoing is true
(State)
/97yf
(Month)(Day)
APPLICANT, OWNER AND/OR OWNER'S AUTHORIZED AGENT:
(Year)
ijal M^ll, Ltd. ](Pr/irvt^Nante)
Post Office Box 275
(Mailing Address)
Carlsbad, California 92068
(City and State) (Zip)
( 714) 729-4901
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS
(Notary Public)
(Area Code)
DAY OF
(Telephone Number)
OFFICIAL SEAL ?
LAILY G. SCHRADER 5
NOlAiiV PUiCJO • CALII-OliNIA jj
['Ki^iCir'hL OiriCE IN I
SArt Uii'iO GJUMIY 5
My Ccmmisslon Expi.es Octslisr 16, 1.976 J
•»k^.--x^...rH} y^yy/