The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSP 159; La Costa Vale No. 2; Specific Plan (SP) (2)MEMORANDUM July 5, 1974 TO: FROM: CASE NOS.: APPLICANT: The Planning Commission The Planning Department Specific Plan - 159, Tentative Map CT 74-11 LA COSTA PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT II 9215 Spring Street, Suite 320, La Mesa, Ca. 92041 I. Request: The applicant is requesting approval of a Specific Plan and Tentative Map to allow 48 condominium units on 4.44 acres located at the end of Velero Court and described as Lots 261 and 262 of La Costa Vale Unit #2. II. Recommendation: Staff is recommending that SP-159 and CT 74-11 be continued to the meeting of July 23, 1974 for the following reasons: 1. Staff has not yet received a letter from San Dieguito High School District stating that facilities will be available to serve the project; 2. The park dedication requirements for La Costa Vale Unit #2 have not yet been met. SAN DIEGUITO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 2151 NEWCASTLE, CARDIFF, CALIFORNIA 92007 June 25, 1974 714-753-6491 tutu smn soum BUCH Vft * Carl Wimtt If High N 2 Planning Commission City of Carlsbad c/o Mr. Don Agatap 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 Dear Mr. Agatap DITY OF CARLSBAD ilannfng Department RE: SP-159 La Costa Vale, Unit #2 l have been asked to comment on the possible effect that the proposed Carlsbad Tract Mo. SP-159 will have on school facilities in the San Dieguito Union High School District. At the present time secondary school facilities are extremely overcrowded within the district. The Trustees of the San Dieguito Union High School District cannot assure the availa- bility of school facilities concurrent with need without some type of assistance on the part of the developer. At the present time there has been no agreement.reached between the district and the developer that such assistance will be previded. Very truly yours /John Jf/Daily SSusines^s Manager BOARD OF TRUSTEES: ADMINISTRATION: David H. Thompson, President Douglas M. Fouquet, Vice President William A. Berrier, Superintendent Jack. R. Stevens, Clerk Robert A. Morton, Assistant Superintendent Daniel J. Rodriguez Don W. Mitchell John J. Daily, Business Manager PLANNING CONSULTANTS AND CIVIL ENGINEERSRICK ENGINEERING COMPANY 509 ELM AVENUE • CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 TELEPHONE • AREA CODE 714 • 729-4987 June 6, 1974 Ms . Dana Hield City Planning Department City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 RE: APPROVAL OF BORROW AREA FOR LA COSTA VALE UNIT NO. 3 Dear Dana, Enclosed is a print of the borrow plan for La Costa Vale Unit No. 3. Borrow Site No. 1 is within the boundaries of CT 73-2, Santa Fe Glens. The export from this site will not adversly effect the develop- ment proposed on the Santa Fe Glens tentative map. Borrow Site No. 2 is located within the Planned Community Zone of the La Costa Master Plan. The Master Plan shows this area as low, medium density at 6.5 dwelling units per acre. The export of material from this site will not have an adverse effect on the future develop- ment of this property. Sincerely, Frank Fitzpatrick FF:fm Enclosures •i^*sar^^araseyjf°~3sssimrgga'ia <9F CA-RLSBAD PLANNING DEPT APPLICANT LA COSTA PACIFIC DEV. CORP. II CASE NO SPECIFIC PLAN -159 DATE JULY 9, 1974 Q: 11 a?>raK&aac*EW<uu(9jac%sxp*i«Ma*^^3MMzr3SM^«ittt3tg)n 'gcr.ta^HiEE8i^»ipMwxi^M5to»*reiavB»a M»aa-. >•* May 22, 1974 IF) COStfl Dr. Robert L. Brickman Superintendent Encinitas Union School District 189 Union Avenue Encinitas, California 92024 Bear Dr. Brickman: As you are aware, some confusion exists regarding the need for elementary school letters for the builders of condominiums in our subdivision Vale II. You are aware, of course, that the Vale II subdivision is one of those included under our agreement and that our buyers therefore need not pay you a fee. It would seem to me that it would save considerable trouble if you were to send a letter to the City of Carlsbad stating that satisfactory school arrangements had been made for Vale II and for any condominium development which might take place in that subdivision; and that indi- vidual letters for each condominium subdivision should not be necessary. I am sure this will save you a considerable amount of work. Thank you, Sincerely, LA COSTA LAND COMPANY FJM/eem cc: City Manager City Attorney City Engineer Fred J. M a COSTA DEL MAR ROAD CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA 92OO3 AREA CODE 714 TELEPHONE 729-9111 * •;?•£••'V-J^VL--"-^f ' »*.-•-..:* ••' •.lu^fc jr^u-*Xj«—; ^T«V v* * LBCQSft?May 2, 1974 ^ Dr. Robert L. Brickman Superintendent Encinitas Union School District 189 Union Avenue Encinitaj, California 92024 Dear Dr. Brickman:?/^r,\This is an attempt to bring both of us up-to-date concerning our /TC/* school agreement. . • 12 In simple terms, our agreement is that you will give satisfactory reports for subdivisions with 3300 allowable dwelling units. This is approximately .1/3 of the total units expected on La Costa land In your district. (This does not include the La Costa South sub- divisions No. 1 to 7). When we "use up" the 3300 dwelling units allowance, it will be necessary for us to consummate another agree- ment, presumably - a school site for favorable reports on another "•3300 dwelling units. It appears that xvhen you have written letters to the City for those 'projects pending approval (and then letters to the Real Estate Commission), you will have carried out your part of the agreement. I now request that you send such letters for those projects now pending approval, . . A summary of the situation follows: Already approved: * ' Total Approved: Pending Approval: a) Vale I b) Vale II c) Spanish Village I 295 D. U. 778 D. U. 107 D. U. 1160 D.U. a) Spanish Village II&III 1052 D. U. b) Vale III 855 D. U. c) Santa Fe Glens 233 D. U . 2140 D. U COSTA DEL MAR ROAD CARLSBAD. CALIFOrtNiA 92OO8 ARE* CODc 71/1 (Continued) TCLCPHONE 7J13-OIII 3enn. Robert L. Brickman, Supenntendent, • . Pago -2- Encinitas Union School District, . May 2, 1974 Encinitas, California ' [| -. ' •' • T \Vhen appropriate we will request that you send appropriate letters to the Real Estate Commission. Sincerely, . • LA COSTA LAND COMPANY . Fred J. FJM/eem " P.S. I re-ernphasize that the actual number of dwelling units to be built will almost undoubtedly be less than the maximum allowed.