HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP 167; San Diego Pipeline Co.; Specific Plan (SP) (5)QatLSBAT) JOUHgA'L J
P.O. Box 248
Carlsbad, California 92008
(714) 729-2345
Proof of Publication
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
ss.
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid;
I am over the age of twenty-one years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled
matter.
I am principal clerk of the printer of The CsNsbad Journal, a newspaper of general circulation,
printed and published weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and
which newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general
character, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide sub-
scription list of paying subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published
at regular intervals in the said City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a
_ _ —- period exceeding one year next preceding
the date of publication of the notice hereinafter
referred to; and that the notice of which the
annexed is a printed copy, has been published
in each regular and entire issue of said news-
paper and not in any supplement thereof on
the following dates, ro-wit:
November _ _20 19 75
DECLARATION OP
NOT1J0E IS HEREBY GIVEN that tfte following.prqj6ctSiha*e submitted en-
vironmental impact information to the City of Carlsbad in accordance with the
Environmental Protection Ordinance of 1972 (Ord. 1150) and have been declared to
have a non-significant environmental impact. For further information, contact theCarlsbad Planning Department "' '
CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT'
APPLICANT
San Diego
Pipeline Co.
LOCATION
390' .E. of- El
Camino iReal
on the North
'side of Oliv-
.enhain Road. •
'ii7
CJ 254: November 20, 1975
' . , • t:
ACTIVITY
Construction of<a
Bboster Station to-
^increase thru put.of an existing pe-
troleum pipeline.
t
V
•REASON FOR
•' NEGATIVE
DECLARATION
'..!) Use of, pipeline is
the safest! i most
economical methbd-fortransporting petroleum
products. '
2) The booster station
will be enclosed and
screened by land-
scaping. '
3) Noise impacts will
be negligible. ;
4)' There will be no
emissions from the
project.
19 . .
19 . .
19 . . . .
19 . . . .
I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true
and correct. Executed at Carlsbad, County of San Diego,
State of California on the 20
day of.jfovamber 1Q75
Clerk of the Printer
NOTICE OF DECLARATION OF
NON-SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the following projects have submitted environmental
impact information to the City of Carlsbad in accordance with the Environmental
Protection Ordinance of 1972 (Ord. 1150) and have been declared to have a non-
significant environmental impact. For further information, contact the Carlsbad
Planning Department.
CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICANT LOCATION ACTIVITY REASON FOR NEGATIVE
DECLARATION
San Diego Pipeline Co. 390' E. of El Camino Real Construciton of a 1) Use of Pipeline
on the North side of Booster Station is the safest &
Olivenhain Road to increase thru most economical
put of an 'existing method for trans-
petroleum pipeline nortinq petroleum
• • . products.
2)The booster station
will be in-mm,
&6JJtUJUi enc1osed-o*i"uotu»nQ./ / and screened by
J landscaping.
3) Noise impacts will
be negligible
4) There will be no
emissions from the
project.
Publish: November 20, 1975
CITY OF CARLSBAD
.•ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ORDINANCE OK 1972
DECLARATION OF NEGATIVE (NON-SIGNIFICANT) ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT'
APPLICANT
TYPE OF APPLICATION: jgQxJ£. /&. *
PERMIT AND/OR FILE NO. J>j(l-tf^
THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED FOR:
PROJECT
PROJECTftOCATION ~ i
I declare that I have examined the information for the above project as submitted
by the applicant, and on the basis of the Environmental Impact Assessment
questionnaire on' file in my office as a public document, it is my determination
that this project will not have any significant impact upon the environment .
within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and the
Environmental Protection Ordinance of 1972 for the following reasons:
, ^-. ... .e Environmental Impact Assessment will be available for public review and comment
for FIVE DAYS from date.
DONALD A. AGATEP, Planning Director
DATED -.
/
Rev. 3/31/75 E.I.S. -Log No