HomeMy WebLinkAboutZC 194; Elm & I-5 Zone Change; Zone Change (ZC)C I·TY OF CA.RLSBAD. .
~11!'"'' ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ORDINANCE 01-'1972
DECLARATION OF NEGATIVE (NON-StGNIFICANT) ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT -
TYPE 0 F A P P L I CAT I ON : --==Z=o:....!.n~-R..!>..-_<:_.=.,b'-'-""'"'-'-"-Vl-l-"<j::r->-~-----------
p E R t~ IT AND I 0 R F I L E N 0 • _..:Z~C~· _\~9:..-..Lf--!.---__________ _
THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED FOR:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Z,ol/\~ ~~d.V\CO£ ~ f.,.'DVV\ ( ... J... -i-c
PROJECT LOCATION 8-~ . .-\-weeY\. 21""1 Au.{). $ Gra"'d Au~.
Wc?St-0 f I-s.
I-declare that I ha"e examined the information for the above project
as submitted by the applicant, and on the basis of the Environmental
Impact Assessment questionaire on file in my office. as a public
document, it is my determination that this project wi'll not have any
significant impact upon the environment within the meaning of the
California ·Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and the Environmental
Protection Ordinance of 1972 for the following reasons:
1) "Jhg. ZO'I\ R <:. bo.f\~ ~ ~ mGU'\dd. +~J U'-' d ~t +h..Q.
tlO'-''$.\Or\S o.J? .£~~~\OV\ ~5 iC.O 0~ -\'-"f CJou9(V\\N\PI\}-
CccJ.~.
-4-The Zosll-e ~ttV\~e w.l! V\O-\-q.f-f'~cf: +~'< €..XlSf.J~-
eiAL.J\COV\VV\eV\. +-.
The Environmental Imapct Assessment will be available for public
-review and comment for FIVE DAYS from date.
DATED: (o/~177 I I
REV. 3/16/77
FORM PLANNING 42
Planning Director
E.I.S. Log No. 3Cf3
-...._____.,__--··~ .
NOTICE OF DECLARATION OF
NONSIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
.. ' NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the following projects have submitted environmental
impact information to the City of Carlsbad in accordance with the Environmental
Protection Ordinance of 1972 (Ord. 1150) and have been declared to have a non-
significant environmental impact.
Cartsbad Planning Deparbnent.
For ·further information, contact the
-~~
APPLICANT LOCATION
CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ACTIVITY REASON FOR NEGATIVE
DECLARATION
1. Robert Levi Lots 331 & 332 1-lot condo-a)
minium map for
4 units
Area is within
urbanized envir-
onment.
2.
3.
4 •
M.S. 308
\
La Costa Meadows #2
ad Between Elm·
Ave. & Grand Ave.
just west of I-5
City of Carlsbad East line
(ZC195) Carlsbad Blvd.·
between Elm and
Walnut
C1ty of Carlsbad 3 parcels located
(ZC 196) on and near the
~ southeast corner
of El Camino Real
and La Costa Ave.
'
Zone Change
from C-2 to
OT 2
Zone Change
from C-2 and
to CTQ.
Zone Change
from C-2 to
CTQ and RPQ
b) Lots have already
been gradeq.
a) The zone change is
mandated un¢er the
provisions of sectior
76860 of the Gov't .
code.
b) Th~ Zone change will
not affect the existir
-~ environment.
a): The zone change is
R-3 mandated under the
provisions of Sectio.
65860 of the Gov' t
Cede.
b) The Zone change \\7ill
not affect the
• • t • ruasting envi.rOn-
rrent.
a) . The zone change 1s mandated unaer
the provisions of
of Section 65860
of the Gov't Ccx1e.
b) The Zone change
will not affect the
existing environ-
. nent.
,_., ~ __ )
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM
Receipt No. EIA NO. ---
Date: 0~ 3 /?1'71 I I
Name of Applicant: C t-1--v <( CMIS h?J I
Address: r-a....oo C(M 1/vc
Permit App 1 i ed For: 292"' c CJA.cz ""-o/< -4-r:>V~.--? C-)._ to C T &.
Case Nos.: 2 C t q Y
Location of Proposed Activity: 8~-1:'-t)f!e"? Clvw. 4 cad Gr/'Q. vtJ·
/tNO
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
1.·, Give a brief description of the proposed activity (attach _
any preliminary development plans).
fl r -f l (...(..)If~ C\ +:1 . I "'-I .,_( a..:t-< c;l( 2-. 0<-> < c_ \A« k. q -e. 0 c..o VI-\ p t.;
+l-t c_ 65oua.\) Vl ~I!~ <t c.s.~{ '¢1. (. S" ~G.v)
2. Describe the activity area, including distinguishing
natural and manmade characteristics; also provide precise
slope analy~is when appropriate. f ·
I.Jo St~VId;,c..s<At V'lo..~~r~( c.._\....~CI!<!.t-c\r't tC..J-a-rt~
Itt«}' to<.(!. tA ~·~&~
3. Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into
the design and/or operation of the project.
'' •,1
I
(
ENVIRONMENTAL-JMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM
II. Environmental Impact Analysis
Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate
space.
)
Yes
1. ·could the project significantly ch~nge present land uses
in the vicinity of the activity?
2. Could the activity affect the use of a recreational
area, or area of important aesthetic value?
3. · Could the activity affect the functioning of an
established community or neighborhood?
4. Could the activity result in the displacement of
community .residents?
5. Are any of the natural or man-made features in the activity
. area unique, that is, not.found in other parts of the
County, State,· or nation?
6. .Could the activity significantly affect a hi storica 1 or
archaelogical site or its setting?
7• Could the activity significantly affect the potential
use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural res-
ource?
8. Does the activity area serve as a habitat, food source
nesting place, source of water, etc. for-rare or endangered
wildlife o~ fish species?
9. Could the activity significantly affect fish, wildlife or
plant 1 ife?
10. Are there any rare or endangered plant species in the
activity.area?.
11. Could the activity change existing features of any.of
the city's lagoons, bays, or tidelands?
12. Could the activity change existing features of any of
the City's beaches?
13. Could the activity result in the erosion or elimination
of .agricultural lands?
14~ Could the activity serve to encourage dev·elopment of
.~resently undeveloped areas or intensify development
of already developed areas?
No
/
/
I
/
I
(
/.
/
/
/
7
(7
17 --(
}
15. ~lill the activity require a variance from established environmental
standards (air, water, noise, etc)? ·
. .
16. Will the activity require certification, authorization or issuance
of a permit by any local, State or Federal environmental control
agency? ·
17. Will the activity require issuance of a variance or conditional
use permit by the City?
18. Will the activity involve the application, use, or disposal of
potentially hazardous materials? ·
19. · Will the activity involve construction of facilities in a flood
·vlain?
20. Will the activity involve construction of facilities on a slope of
25 percent or greater?
21. ~lill the activity involve construction of facilities in the
area of an active fault?
22. Could the activity result in the generation of significant
amounts of noise? ·
23. Could the activity result in the generation of significant
amounts of dust?
24. Will the activity involve the burning of brush, trees, or
other materials? .
. 25. Could the activity result in a significant change in the .
quality of any portion of the region's air or· water resources?
(Should note surface, ground water, off-shore).
26. Will there be a significant change to existing land form?
(a) · indicate estimated grading to be done in cubic yards. JJ/A
I
(b) percentage of alteration to the present land form. A) /ft
I
(c) maximum height of cut or fill slopes. A·J I(\ • f-t
.27. Will the activity result in substantial increases in the use of utilities,
sewers, drains or streets?
III. State of No Significant Environmental Effects
If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in Section II but you
think the activity will have no significant environmental effects, indicate your
reasons below:
· No
/
7
.,
IV:
)
' ..
. . ...
Comments or Elaborations to Any of the Questions in Section II.
. .
(If additional space is needed for answering any questions, attach additional
sheets as may be needed.) . . .
Signature ~f) (},(. . .
. · . ~Person completing report)
Da.te Signed: dAM£ 3 , / ?'0'7 . "" . 7 7
Conclusions (To be completed by the Planning Director). Place a check
in the appropriate box:
( ) Further information is required.
( ) It has been determined that the project will not have significant
environmental effects. ( ) You.must submit a preliminary environmental
impact statement by the following date . ( ) You
should make an appointment with the Planning Director to discuss
further process~ng of your project, in accordance with Chapter 19.04
of the Municipal Code.
DATE RECEIVED:_· -------
Revised 7·/3/74 ·
FORM PlANNING 40
BY:--.:-..----:--.::--;---:----Planning Director, or,
STAFF REPORT
DATE: JUNE 22, 1977
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE NO: ZC-194
APPLICANT: CITY OF CARLSBAD
REQUEST: CITY INITIATED ZONE CHANGE FROM C-2 TO CTQ ON PARCELS
LOCATED BETWEEN ELM AND GRAND AND I-5 AND THE ALLEY
JUST TO THE WEST, FOR GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY.
SECTION I. RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that ZC-194 be APPROVED for the following reasons:
1. General Plan Consistency: The proposed zone change is consistent
with the general plan because:
a. The Land Use Plan Map designates this area as Travel Service.
b. The zone change will have no adverse affect on any element
of_the general plan.
2. Environment: The proposed zone change is consistent with the
Carlsbad Environmental Protection Ordinance of 1972 because a
Negative Declaration has been issued for the following reasons:
a. The zone change is mandatory under the provisions of Section
65860 of the government code.
b. The zone changes will not effect the existing environment.
3. Public Facilities: The proposed zone change is consistent with
applicable City public facility policies and ordinances because
the subject change will not result in impacts on City Public
Facility availability.
SECTION II. BACKGROUND .
1. Location and Description of Property: (See Exhibit A & B)
The area of the proposed zone is made up of 15 parcels just
west of I-5 between Elm and Grand. The area is generally flat
but slopes slightly at the east end. The area contains a number
of structures both residential and commercial.
2. Existing Zoning:
Subject Property:
North:
C-7 R~3 & I-~ Freeway
South: C-2
East:
West:
I-5 Freeway
C-2 & R-P
3. Related Cases: The City has been pursuing G~neral Plan con-
sistency by r~zoning as an on-going program since the adoption
of the Land Use Element in 1974 (ZC-155, 156, 160, 161, 162,
167, 168 and 191).
4. Environmental Impact Information:
issued because the zone change is
the government code and will have
environment.
A Negative Declaration was
mandated by Section 65860 of
no effect on the existing
5. General Plan Information: The zone change will bring this area
~nto conformance with the general plan. A number of uses which
are non-conforming in the current zone will remain non-conforming
in the proposed zone.
6. Travel Service Commercial: The general Plan Land Use Element
contains a Travel Service Commercial category (TS), which is a
relatively specific land use, intended to serve tourists and
the traveling public.
Travel Service areas, including motels, highway oriented service
stations, and restaurants, serve businesses and industrial areas
as well as the traveling pu~lic.
7. Commercial Tourist Zone: This zone was adopted early in 1977 to
implement the Travel Service category of the General Plan tand
Use Elements. The purpose of this zone is to provide for the
development and use by certain types of commercial businesses
near transportation centers, recreation areas or in close prox-
imity to highways and freeways used by interregional traffic.
Three basic uses are permitted in the CT Zone; hotel; motels and
restaurants. A number of accessory uses are also permitted in-
cluding the following businesses: apparel, bakery, beauty and
barber shops, dry cleaning, florist, health clubs, novelty shops,
stationery, and travel agencies. Five other uses are permitted
by CUP which include service stations, bus terminals, produce
stoves, recreation facilities, and take-out food restaurants.
8. Major Planning Considerations: Will the zone change negatively
effect the subject or surrounding properties? •
SECTION III. DISCUSSION
Please see summary sheet and map for discussion (Exhibit A)
At ta.chmen ts:
Exhibit A, dated 6/9/77
Exhibit B, dated 5/31/77
CDG:ar
6/10/77 -2-
J
R-P
Apts.
::t:
0
.~ . m
Fast EOOi I
C-2 I
Serv. sta_:-r
DISCUSSION:
,.
R-3
SFR
GRANV AVENUE -
I C..?,.. '71 1':0. t'/
ELM AVENUE
C-2
Shopping Center
~-.
REST. 0
ZONE CHAt.tGL19E
'!he General Plan designates the entire block as Travel Sel:vice. The area is cur-
rently zoned C-2 and contains a variety of uses both commercial and residential.
'!he locations of the uses in this area is such that the block can be divided into
two subareas. Section "A" is cx::>rrprised of strictly cornrercial uses and except for
I '""
a small real estate office current uses are ccxrpatible with the Corrrrercial Tourist Zone.
Section "B" is residential and contains a number of single-family residences, a
duplex, and a small apart:Irent cx::>rrplex. This section poses a nurriber of problems
from a planning standpoint. Since zoning is C-2, Section "B" contains non-conform-
ing residential uses which may make it difficult for this section to ever becorre a
well developed co111rercial area unless the property is purchased and developed as a
single unit. Another problem is the poor access this section has fran Elm Avenue.
Good vehicular access would be essential if it is to be developed as a commercial
area. To ensure cohesive develo:prent of this section and the entire block the rom-
mission should consider the use of the Q-Overlay· Zone. This would provide a compre-
hensive develo:Pnent scheme for the entire area including Im.ltuhl parking, driveway$
and proper building locations.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is reoommended that this area be rezoned c-~ for the following reasons:
.\
1) '!he CT Zope provides consistency between zon.ing and the General Plan.
2) '!he Q-Overlay Zone will ensure that 'any building or develotxrent will be in con-
junction with each other with the General Plan. ~
I
. . .
ZC-194
FROM C-2
TO C-T-Q
... , r'
' -r'
'./ --
<t_ HARDING ST
R -7 -... )
,-, .-J
\ -.... _, L-
0 100'
t:l ===:::II
ZONE CHANGE 194 FROM C-2 TO C-T-Q COMPILED FROM FROM
DATA SHOWN IN SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR BOOK 203 PAGE 32
PARCELS 2,3.4,5,6,:.:~ ,12,20,21,23~ 32,33, 34,35,36 a 37
PARCEL MAPS 1311 S 2868, R.O.S. 2855 AND PORTION OF TRACT
117 MAP 1661
J
MEM)RANDUM -Mi'l.Y 25 I 1977
TO:
RE:
PLANNING cnMMISSION
PLANNING DEPARIMENT
RESOLuriON OF INTENTION OOs. 151 (ZC-194 1 CT Zone)
154 (ZC-195 1 CT Zone)
155 (ZC-196, CT Zone)
REOOMMENDATION
It is reoammended that the Planning Commission APPROVE Resolutions of Intention
f \ -.• l
No. 151, 154 & 155 to hold public hearings to consider the reclassification of certain
areas to the cr Zone.
BACKGROUND
ZC-194, 195 & 196 are City initiated zone change resulting from the City Council's
recent adoption of ZCA-83 1 a zone code amendment creating the Commercial Tburist (CT).
The new zone is intended to provide consistency between the Zoning Ordinance and
the Land Use Element of the General Plan which designates a number of locations
in the C'ity as Travel Service. These areas \vill provide for certain types of
ccmrercb.l businesses to service transportation centers 1 recreation areas or
travellers on highways and freeways used by interregional traffic.
The General Plan designates 16 acreas as Travel Service. Staff is requesting that
only three of these areas be considered for rezoning at this time. The areas not
considered are either in the County, less than 3 acres, zoned P-C, or presently
have specific plans which should be reviewed and possibly deleted before rezoning.
Please see summary sheets for.discussion.
COO:ar
Attachrrents:
'lhree surrrnary sheets
Resolutions of Intention No. 151, 154, 155
I
MEMORANDUM
May 16, 1977
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Departmental Coordination Committee
Bud Plender, Assistant Planning Director
Resol~tion of Intention Nos. lSl(ZC-194, CT Zone)
154(ZC-195, CT Zone)
lSS(ZC-196, CT Zone)
The subject Resolution of Intentions will be discussed
.,
at the Departmental Coordination Committee meeting tomorrow,
May 17th.
RSP:s
}
R-3
-I /
f I
-, @@s I @ 1 2 rJiJ I G) I (Q) ill
A 1 F I S I S I S I 2 Ill () !OC.,
R-P
C-2
DISCUSSICN:
REST. P R 1 F
1
F I F 1 s
T I_ -R_ R I R F Ill I
I BIR .~ 2FR C-21 I I REST •1,
tv SFR I ~cTh--II!
___ ~I Ill c-2 ---~.o~ I
~~ FRoM C-2 To C-T ">()!\
-~ COMPI LEV FROM VATA SHOWN
@ '"', rt IN SAN VIEGO COUNTY ASSES-
----• 111 . --
FAST @1~ iiiiii.lti SERV.
FOOD IRE I STATION
ES I A I AT • I
11@1@1
.'-',e SOR'S BOOK 203 PAGE 32
~ PARCELS 12,21,23,32,33,34,
~ 35 & 37.
ELM AVENUE
C-2
The General Plan designates the entire block as Travel Service. The area is cur-
rently zoned C-2 and contains a variety of uses both oamrnercial and residential.
The locations of the uses in this area is such that the block can be divided into
two subareas. Section "A" is CXJirprised of strictly oamrnercial uses and except for
a small real estate office current uses are canpa.tible with the Ccmrercial 'Iburist Zone.
Section "B" is residential and contains a number of single-family residences, a
duplex, and a small apart::nent c:onplex. This section poses a number of problems
from a planning standpoint. Since zoning is C-2, Section "B" contains non-conform-
ing residential uses which may make it difficult for this section to ever became a
well developed cx:>mrercial area unless the property is purchased and developed as a
single unit. Another problem is the poor access this section has fran Elm Avenue.
G::>od vehicular access would be essential if it is to be developed as a comrercial
area. 'Ib ensure cohesive develo:prent of this section and the entire block the cam-
mission should consider the use of the Q-Overlay Zone. This would provide a compre-
hensive develo:prent sch.erre for the entire area including mutual parking, driveways
and proper building locations.
TENTATIVE RECOMMENDATION:
It is recomrended that this area be rezoned C-T-Q for the following reasons:
1) The CT Zone provides consistency between zoning and the General Plan.
2) The Q-Overlay Zone will ensure that any building or develo:prent will be in con-
junction with each other with the General Plan.
CDG:ar
I c Kh• btT t.:)
l ~ ~ C R<") -· 1 (L•<l•')
_J)> '3?>'1·'4 '~'1.17 I < L--~6 .---·-1 l42:eo'.,.J GRAND AVE fT1 ~-· · · • -~~'----..., .~·-.
15 \ I I l I t. 58
r' r' -I ~ I I 1 I 1 . 1
1 ·.
r\ -!-I o_l I : I I I
ZC-194
FROM C-2
TO C-T-Q
,., r'
I -,~
'./
I }j_.L_I l I I L_T_
I I I I I I
I I l--(-_j I
(JJ I I ,· I I o_---L --1 ~ - - - -· ~ ~
I 11 1 I O)Cif /;'
I I h1 ~ I I . :t:;.
_ _j \ +-------v 180.17/
.I ELM AVE .
<t_ HARD.ING ST
0 100'
+-J -----tl
.
ZONE CHANGE 194 FROM C-2 TO. C-T-Q COMPILED FROM FROM
DATA SHOWN IN SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR BOOK 203 PAGE 32
PARCELS 2,3,4,5,6, ,12,20,21,23,32,33,34,35,36 a 37 ....
PARCEL MAPS 1311 a 2868, R.O.S. 2855 AND PORTION OF TRACT
117 MAP 1661
0
..
Carlsbad Journal
Decreed A legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County
3088 PIO PICO AVENUE e P.O. BOX 248 e CARLSBAD, CA 92008 e 729-2345
Proof of Publication
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid;
I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter.
I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal a newspaper of general circulation ,
printed and published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and
which newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general
character, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription
list of paying subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular
intervals in the said City of Carlsbad , County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
ZONICHANO
NOTICI II HilDY QIVIN thai lht Plaaalnl ComiiiRIIIII or lht CIIF or
Carlabld wlllllokl 1 lultlle Htarlllltllllt CIIJ Couaell CIIMibtrl. 1 .. 11111 Av· tnut. Carlabld, CIIIIWDIItn':OO P.ll. 1111 Wtdatldar,Juat .. ll'rr, loGCIIIIIdtr an !P,J1.IIOIIIIIII (Dr ID!mMIOttiOIIt ohlllll toll C·l (Gtltrtl CoiiiJitrelal Zont) to
1;1'Q <Colllllltnlal-Tourlet -Qulllfttd Dtvtlopmtnt OvtrltF lont) on propertf
ltntnll7 loallld 11111111 wtlt tldt or IDitntalt I bttwttllllm Avenue and Orand
A¥111Ut llld IIIIIOWI aelllt IIIIObtclmap. '1'11011 Jlinae• wllblq ao tptall 111111111 propoallan oordlal!F ll•lltd to attend lilt Publle Rtarln,lfreu "-" 1111 qutlllllllt, pltaH eaU .,..llllaad 1111 tor tht Plannlnl Dtparlllltnl. Appllctnl: CITY Or CAIWIIAD CITY Or CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ZC-194
FROM C·2
·TO C-T-Q
ELM AVE
~ HARDING ST
R-:;
Zone Chanae 1841'rom C-2 to C·T-Q compiled rrom datuhown in San Diego County Au~SIOr Book203, Page 32, Parcels2,3,4,5,8,8,12,20,21,23,32,33,34,35,381o 37,
Parcel Maps 1311 1o 2861i, R.O.S. 2855 and portion of Tract 117, Map 1881.
CJ 808w: June 8, 19'77
one year next preceding the date of publication of
the notice hereinafter referred to; and that the
notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has
been published in each regular and entire issue of
said newspaper and not in any supplement
thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
June .. B ........................ 19. 77.
................................. 19 ....
................................. 19 ....
................................. 19 ....
................................. 19 ....
I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true
and correct. Executed at Carlsba~ County of San Diego,
State of California on _ __..t .... h.._.e..__~~ut ... h.._ __ --=-:::-:=-dayof !f~ ~ ~a/---~~
Clerk of the Printer
·~' NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING "..t
ZONE CHANGE (ZC-194)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of
Carlsbad will hold a Public Hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm
Avenue, Carlsbad, California at 7:00P.M. on Wednesday, June 22, 1977, to
consider an·application for approval of a zone change from C-2 {General
Commercial Zone} to CTQ {Commercial Tourist -Qualified Development Overlay
Zone) on property generally located on the west side of Interstate 5
between Elm Avenue and Grand Avenue and as shown on the attached map.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited
to attend the Public Hearing. If you have any questions, please call 729-1181
and ask for the Planning Department.
APPLICANT: CITY OF CARLSBAD
PUBLISH: JUNE 8, 1977 CITY OF CARSLBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
GRAND AVE
ZC-194
FROM C-2
TO C-T-0
'"" r' I -_," '"' ,__
ELM AVE
-"'1 -, I-<" -.... , I \ ... ..
I
142.80 '.J
I
I
I
I I I
I 1 l
I L_j
l
I
L-~-
1
I t---,
I I r-----· ~
I ~~ n:fi? I ~~ I . :t:;
\
I
I 0 1-~oo'
<t_ HARDING ST ,-, ,-, \_,-,:_
2 TO c-T-Q COMPILED FROM FROM ~~~! ~~~~~~N19S~:R~~Gg-COUNTY ASSESSOR BOOK 203 PAGE 32
PARCELS 2,3,4.5,6,8,128,6280,2RI,023S,3ia;;·~~g5p~~~~O~ OF TRACT
PARCEL MAPS 1311 S 2 • · · ·
117 MAP 1661
Plaaalag Commissloa
Clt.f ot Carlsbad
Carlsbad, Calif.
2022 so Freeuf Oceaas1ae, caJ.l •
July 10, 1977
Subject: Case No. ZC-194, City ot Carlsbad
Dear Commissloaers:
Please accept this letter as the expressloa ot
Rudy al'ld Jaae Somtemaa opposing tae proposed
Zone Cka~e-194.
We on property at tke coner ot Elm &lld I-.5
UDder ~. loDg term lease to Standard Oil. We kaTe
co•seated to a long term sub-lease by Standard Oil
to Joan aBd Mary Graat oa tke property bekiad the
serTice statio• to be used exclusiTely tor parkiag
oaly tor S&Ddy 1s Restauraat.
There is •o geauine beaetit to be der1Ted by tae
people or Carlsbad tor this Zoalag Ckaage whick
would not, aad is not, already aTailable uader
the existiag C-2 Zoaiag. Ia tact, to approTe a
dow.a-zoaiag trom C-2 to CTQ would be to depriTe
tke property ow.aers ot tae more flexible and
reasoB&ble deTelopme•t or tke property tor tae
belletit ot all iacludimg tourists.
Please g1Te tais re,oaiag matter your taorougk
consideratioa aad allow tae laad to stay zoaed C-2.
•
:< (· c c ·; ; ~ 0 . -------
'"APPLICATION NO. ZONE CHANG't" \9Y
CITY OF CARLSBAD
( P 1 ease Type or P r i n t) Date : tJ\ f>.."J ) l.o 1 ( 1 '7~ _.._)-..-/ . Q..
1. REQUEST: Zone Change f~om the pre sent existing L-1--'if?~~ 'i;;:~,
c.-r /"':'\ J Jl) .,_. ) 'y .' ~·~-------([Jr'-·'~f'-~·-~ "" zone(s) to the,~'0<. .·' -r-·;, ..... ,~ .-.""--' ,•v· .. (L->-r·· .... ·-' zone('()
ch.·• .).,. o 11n ....
2. LOCATION: The subject property is generally located on the
side of :r-s between e;/VVI ~--=-------~----~~~---
3.
and (?,~
ASSESSOR'S NUMBER: Book 'd-DJ Page -;·J-Parcelj
I 'A 'b t 2... 3 7 1-.. 3 ] J 'f.., ·5 f ;/ T IJ_ I I I I I 1 r Book Page Parcel ---
4. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE ADDRESS CITY ZIP --------------~------=--PHONE
5. APPLICANTS SIGNATURE:
I hereby declare that all information contained within this
application is true.
Name AC:dress City Zip Phone
Representing (Company or Corporation)
Relationship to Property Owner(s)
6. Is this request consistent with the General Plan and applicable
Specific Plans? __ ~~R~JL=------------------------------------------
Please note: As per Section 21.520.30 of the City Code, the
Planning Director must find that this request is consistent
with the General Plan or applicable Specific Plans, or the
application shall not be accepted. This determination may
be_appealed to the Planning Commission and City Council.
The City of Carlsbad Planning Department would appreciate the oppor-
tunity to work with the applicant throughout the Planning Stages of
the proposed development. In an effort to aid the applicant, the
Planning Department requests that it be given an opportunity to
evaluate and discuss the application and plans prior to submittal.
This request is not a requirement; however, it may avoid major re-
drafting or revision of the plan which only serves to lengthen the
processing time.
ATTACHMENTS:
Supplemental Information Form-Planning 21
Preparation Check list-Planning 30-(2)
Procedures-Planning 36
FORM Planning 3-(2) Date of· Planning Commission Approval ____ _
' ~
\
1 )
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
s'trPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR~M ...
CHANGE OF ZONE
Gross Acre~ (or square footage if less than acre) --------
Present Zone __ ~----~--------Proposed Zone_C:_~~Q~--------
General Plan Land Use Designation T>auL---1 S.t?-'-r~.J_,_i-=c._"'""~=--------
So u r c e of Water S u p p 1 y C. r ±y :{; Ca r { ,· 6 ~ j
Method of Sewage Disposal is Cc±c-J o..e (0ar/)bt:!J
Types of Protective Covenants to be Recorded -------------
Transportation Modes Available to Service the Development ---
AlA +o -Ira{/\ s ,· t LwSf?S
8) School District Serving the Property Co..~"h l::oa.d (_)_,, J2'"J?k
9) Are Sch~ol Facilities Capable of Serving this Project LjeJ'
(I m p o r t a n t -'Iff r i t t e n c o n f i r m a t i o n o f t h i s r e q u i rem e n t m u s t b e s u b -
mitted prior to Planning Commission hearings or request may be
continued or denied).
10) This Application for a Change of Zone is supported by the
Following Reasons:
FORH
a)
b)
c)
d)
Such a Zone Chage is warranted because ~~ rS MN-/OA fc_ D f3, V G.YJe.t d 1/f/\C:t/1 f COde __ _;____.,L_ ______ _
I
Such a Zone Change will be in the interest of furtherance
ofl Publ i_c Welfare because Zot;nn(f q tt,e ~ene.nM P on. wt\\ be. <:oNs·,sre ·"'1-
The permitted uses in this proposed reclassification will
not be detrimental in any way to surrounding propert~es ~au s e +bona./ w. v1 0 v t\O ;?t'SV\ r~\-.I!.!V(t c..t<tM:J e.d 'n c.~n c c Yl ±
The property in this application is mora suitable for the
proposed zone than the existing zone because~l~t~0~-----
lo c Ate~ \ rA Q{ V) a re.a. 0 ePiQ f((a_±e +o Se r()Q ·tk-
e) What were the original deed restriction, if any, concerning
the type and class of permitted uses on the subject prorerty?
(Give expiration date of these restrictions). ____________ __
r ·1 il n n i n n f' 1 . --..,/ nil t (' (1 f r 1 a n n ·j n q c ()Ill ill i s c; i () n 1\ p p \' (l v a l -------. --.. --'(})
• • I
PREPARATION CHECK LIST
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/ZONE CHANGE
DOCUMENTS REQUIRED FOR SUBMITTAL:
)
1) Application with ·supplemental information sheet completed.
2) Environmental Impact Statement or Report with Fees (if required).
3) FEE: $100.00 plus $5.00 per ~ot.-
4) 300 Friot Radius Map -A map to scale not less than 1"=200 1
. showing each lot within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of .
the subject property, and each lot within 3aO feet of the
exterior boundaries of the subject property shail be . consecutively numbered to correspond with the property owner's
list.
5) Property Owner's list -A typewritten list showing the number
of each lot within 300', followed by the Owner's name and
-address. This list must be accurate and taken from the
latest equalized assessment roll on file in the office of the
Assessor of San Dieg9,'~600 Pacific Highway, Room 103,
San Diego, California 236-3771
..
fORM Pl anni.ng 10 ·
" . .
PROCEDURES
1) Application to Planning Commission: In an effort to aid th£
applicant, the Planning Department requests that it be given
an opportunity to evaluate and discuss the application in its
various stage"s of development prior to submittal. It is more
effective if applicant meets directly with staff; however,
written or telephone communication is acceptable. It is the
responsibility of the applicant to make the initial contact
for such meeting.
2) Submittal: Application will be accepted only if the applica-
tion, plans and other pertinent materials are complete~
Generally, the date application will be heard will be deter-
mined by the submittal date as indicated within the approved
Planning Commission calendar.
3) Planning Commission Calendar: The Planning Commission adopts
an·annual calendar that indicates application closing dates,
staff review dates, staff report completion dates, and Plan-
ning Commission hearing dates. You may acquire this calendar
at the Planning Commission Department.
4) Staff Review:· On the date as indicated on the Planning Commission
Calendar, City Staff conducts a review meeting on all items on
the Planning Commission agenda. The applicant is invited to
attend and to explain the project and respond to staff preliminary
recommendations. Upon completion of this review, Staff will pre-
pare final staff recommendations to be sumbitted to the Planning
Commission. The fin9l report with recommendations will be
available at the Planning Department five days prior to the
Planning Commission hearing (Friday afternoon prior to the
Pl~nning Commission meeting date).
5) Hearing: The Planning CommissioD meets every 2nd and 4th
Wednesday of the month at 7:30 p.m. or as indicated on the
Planning Commission calendar. Depending on the type of appli-
cation, the Planning Commission will either make a finding
and forward to City .Council or make final action.
6) Appeals: Final action by Planning Commission may be appealed
to the City Council,. provided such appeal is filed within ten
(10) days after the Planning Commission action. The applicant
should review with staff the procedure on the various types of
applications. ·
7) Final Decision: The City will notify the applicant and property
owner of the final decision.
FORM:· .. ~-l-~l2n_i .. ll9 .. ~£~ Date of P 1 "n n in g Comm i ~. s ion 1\p pro v a l __ .. JJB/7 ~-
' J
I