HomeMy WebLinkAboutZC 201; Hunt; Zone Change (ZC)INITIAL SUMMARY STUDY
January 24, 1979
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Discussion
James Hagaman, Planning Director
David Abrams, Assis'tant Planner
Zone ChangeQ SDP 78-4, Hunt; Environment~view, Log. No. 524
The proposed project is a Zone Change and Site Development
Plan for property located at the northeast corner of Pio
Pico Drive and Stratford Lane. The property is three lots
totalling about one-half acre in size. The proposed develop-
ment is a 10,000 square foot professional office building with
accompanying parking facilities.
The property is presently zoned R-1-7500. It is currently
vacant of structures, but has several avocado trees on the
southwest corner of the site. Other vegetation consists of
native weeds and grasses about one foot high, covering the
property. No major wildlife appears to inhabit the site.
The topography is virtually flat with just a slight slope
upward from west to east.
Approval of the proposed zone change and site development plan
will ultimately result in the removal·of the existing trees
and vegetation. The property will be developed with an
office structure and paved parking area. Additional traffic
will be generated on the surrounding street system.
The Carlsbad General Plan Land Use Element identifies the
subject property for professional and related co1mnercial land
use. The proposed zone change and development is consistent
with the General Plan designation. The requested Q-Overlay
Zone will provide city staff with additional control to
insure cocipatibility with the surrounding neighborhood. Pio ·
Pica Drive and additional public facilities other than sewer,
are adequate to accommodate the project. The development will
utilize a septic sewage system approved by County Public
Health Department. The developer will install substantial
plantings and landscaping to replace the trees to be removed.
The project will occur in an urbanized area adjacent to a
freeway and near the City Administration Building.
Also, to be considered in the Zone Change application is the
lot immediately to the north of the subject request. This
property has substantial frontage on Pio Pico Drive and is
similarly designated in the General Plan for professional and
......
Initial Summary Study
Page Two (2)
January 24, 1979
related commercial land use. No proposal for development has
been submitted at this time. The Zone Change of this adjacent
property is city initiated to bring the zoning in conformance
with the General Plan designation. Any further development
would require a Site Development Plan and additional environ-
mental review.
Recommendation
It is recommended a Declaration of Negative (Non-Significant)
Environmental Effect be made regarding this project.
Justification
1} The proposed zone·change and development is compatible
with the Carlsbad General Plan.
2} The project will occur in an already urbanized area.
3} The site development plan required for this project will
be modified by city staff to insure compatibility with
the surrounding neighborhood and other environmental factors.
4} The applicant will replace the trees to be removed with a
complete landscaping plan that will be reviewed and approved
by city staff.
5} The northern lot being included in the zone change request,
will be subject to further environmental review and require
a site development plan at the time that development occurs.
DA/ar
;·
NOTICE OF DECLr\PATION OF
NONSIGNIFICANr HNIRONMENTAL Il\1PACf
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Carlsbad has issued
Negative Declarations for the following projects:
Case No. ZC-201, SDP 78-4, Log No. 524: Zone Change to R-P-Q
to conform with the General Plan. The property is 3 lots
totalling about one-half acre in size. The proposed devel6pment
is a 10,000 square foot pr~fessional office building with
~ccompanying parking facilities. Zone Change is also proposed
for the adjacent lot to the south for general plan conformance.
The property is located at the northeast corner of Pio Pica
Drive and Stratford Lane.
Applicant: California Western Concepts.
-· ......
A copy of the subject Negative Declarations Hith supportive
infonnation is available for public revie\v at the Plaru1ing Department,.
City-Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad. Comments from the public are
invited. Please submit comments in 1vriting to the Plarilling
Department lvithin five (S) days frorri.the date of tllis notice.
PUBLISH: Llan 27, 1979
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALIFO.RNI/\ 92008
.
Qtitp of <!artsbab
NOTICE OF DETE~~INATION
TELEPHONE:
(714) 729·1181
TO: COUNIY CLERK SECRETARY FOR FESOURCES
1416 Ninth Street
LOG NO. 524
Room 1311
Cm.mty of San Diego
220 West Broadway
San Diego, CA 92101 Sacramento, CA 95814
PROJEC."T TITLE: ZONE c;HAN;E AND SI1E DEVELOPMENI' PLAN
PROJECT ADDRESS: Northeast corner of Pio Pico Drive and
Stratford Lane.
PERMIT APPLICANT: California Westen1 Concepts
ENVIRONMENTAL . IMPACT OF· T.HE PRQi"ECT
0 WILL NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICMl'f EFFECT
,0 WILL/MAY HAVE A SIGNIFICA1\1T EFFECT
STATUS OF PROJECT
0 APPROVED
D DENIED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
0 NONE COi\1PLETED PURSU.AJ"JT TO CEQA
0 COMPLETED PURSUANT TO CEQA
·-------
A copy of the 0 Negative Declaration 0 EIR with supporting
doct.nnents is available for public review at the Planning Department,
City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008.
DATE: SIGNED: -------------------------------------JAMES C. HAGJ\M~,
Planning Director
':,
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
· .. ([itp of ~arlsbab
NEGATIVE DEX:LAJ?ATION
ProJECT TI'Fill: Zone Change and Site Development Plan
TELEPHONE:
(714) 729-1181
PROJEX:T LOCATION: Northeast corner of· Pio Pico Drive and Stratford LarLe.
p~ DESCRIPTION: Zone Change to R-P-Q to confonn to the General Plan. The
property is 3 lots totalling about one-half acre in size. The proposed dev-
elopment is a 10,000 square foot professia1al office buildi11g with accompanying
parking facilities. Zone change also proposed for adjacent lot to the south, .
"for general plru1 confppranc.;>.. -
PRQ.TECT _ PROPOW' .• J:'l'r: Ca.J..itomla Western Concepts . -------------------------------------------
ux; NO: ---------------------------524 PERMIT/FILE NO: _z.C-201 & SDP 78-(±___..
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an envirol'lil'Bntal review of the above
described project pux~uant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the
; · California Envi:ronmental Quality Act and the Envirornrental Protection Ordinance
of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a draft Negative
Declaration (Declaration of Non-Significant Impact) is hereby issued for the
subject project. Justification for this action is attached to this docunent.
A copy of the Negative Declaration \'lith supp:)rtive docurrents is on file in the
. Planning Deparbnent, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, CA. CoiTYrent.s from
the public are invited. Please submit con1IT!2nt:s in writing to the Planning
Departrrent within. fiv"e (5) days of date of publicatj_on 1/27/79 ---~~-----------------
DATED: ! --I 9--z 9' -----4~---~~---~,~----------
,...,..
~ STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 14, ·1979
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Department
RE: ZC 201,
SDP 79-1
APPLICANT: James F. Hunt
..
REQUEST: ZONE CHANGE FROM R-1 TO RESIDENTIAL-PROFESSIONAL-
QUALIFIED (R-P-Q); AND APPROVAL OF A SITE DEVELOPMENT
PLAN.
BACKGROUND
Location and Description of Property
The site of the requested ~one change is located at the north-
east corner of Pio Pico Drive and Stratford Lane. This property
consists of .46· acres of level, vacant land. An-additional
parcel adjacent to the subject is being included in the zone
change application, at City request. This parcel is at the south-
east corner of Pio Pico and Knowles Avenue. It consists of
about one-quarter acre .and presently has a single family dwelling
and garage. ·
Existing Zoning
Subject Parcel:
North:
South:
East:
West:
· Existing Land Use
Subject Parcel:
North:
South:
East:
West:
R-1
R-1, 0-S
R-P-Q
R-1
No zone -freeway ·
Vacant, single family residence
Single family residence, open-space
Vacant
Single family residence
Freeway
Environmental Impact Information
An Environmental Impact Assessment was filed and a Negative
Declaration issued for the proposed project, for the following
reasons:
1.
2.
3.
r: """" The proposed zone ~ange and development is c~patible with
the Carlsbad General Plan.
The project will occur in an already urbanized area.
The Site Development Plan required for this project will
be modified by City staff to insure compatibility with the
surrounding neighborhood and other environmental factors.
4. The applicant will replace the trees to be removed with a
complete landscaping plan that will be reviewed and approved
by City staff.
5. The northern lot being included in the zone change request,
will be subject to further environmental review and require
a Site Development Plan at the time that development occurs.
General Plan Information
The Land Use Plan Map designates both these sites for professional
and related commercial. The propose9 zone change is therefore in
compliance with the General Plan.
Public Facilities .
All necessary public facilities are available to serve the property
and proje9t as proposed, except the City sewer system. The develop-
ment will initially utilize a septic tank and seepage·pit sewering
system approved by the Gounty Department of Public H.ealth and the
City Engineering Department.
Past History and Related Cases
On January 24, 1979, the Planning Commission directed that the
adjacent parcel at the southeast corner·of Pio Pica Drive ahd
Knowles Avenue be included in the Zone Change request, if the
property owner indicated his approval of this action. Attached
is a letter from Mr. John Bagley, confirming his support for the
zone change of his property.
ZC-199, Jerry Bryan, Ordinance No. 9511. On November 7, 1978, the
City Councll adopted an'ordinance granting a zone change from
R-1-7500 to R-P-Q for pioperty located east of Pio Pico Drive
between Laguna Drive and Stratford Lane. The zone change was in
conformance with the General Plan Land Use Designation of Profes-
sional and Related Commercial. The Planning Commission found the
Qualified Overlay Zone (Q) was needed to insure orientation to
and access from Pio Pico Drive, and to preserve the existing
residential neighborhood to the east. A similar situation exists
with the subject property, which is located immediately to the
north.
,
SDP-78-2, Jerry Bryan. Resolution No. 1472. On September 8, 1978,
the Planning Commission approved a Site Development Plan
for a 7,000 square foot professional office building on the east
side of Pio Fico between Laguna Drive and Stratford Lane. Conditions
included a requirement that landscaping, irrigation and public
improvements be installed prior to occ~pancy. In addition, the
view of residential properties to the east from second story
office windows shall be screened. The owner ·was granted a septic
system permit to supplement the existing sewer capacity on the
property.
ZC-184, K. David Minnich, Ordinance No. 9475. The City Council
adopted an ordinance on February 1, 1977, granting to the
applicant a zone change from R-1-7500 to R~P-Q for property on
both sides of Elm Avenue, between I-5 and Highland Avenue. This
property was designated in the General Plan as either Governmental or
Professional and Related Commercial land use. Staff had suggested
that properties to the north along Pio Pico Drive, that are de-
signated for office use, also be changed from R-1 to R-P-Q. These
properties include the subject parcels. Due to a staff oversight
the additional properties were not included in the environmental
review for the zone change, and were therefore deleted from the
action.at that .time • .
SDP 77-3, Minnich, Resolution No. 1356. The Planning Commission
approved 9n April 13, 1977, a Site Development Plan for a
. side of Elm Avenue between Pio Pico Drive and Highland Avenue.
Conditions applied included a requirement for landscape and
irrigation plans to be submitted, approved, and improvements
installed prior to final occupancy. Also, a comprehensive sign
program was required prior to issuance of any sign permits, and
removal of an existing house prior to issuance of building permits.
Major Planning Considerations
1. Is the zone requested consistent with the General Plan?
2. Will the permitted uses in the requested zone or the develop-
ment proposed, adversely impact the adjoining land uses and
street systems?
3. Does the development plan provide for the. eventual, compatible
development of the adjoining property to the east?
Discussion
This agenda items contains two separate projects requiring two
separate actions by the Commission. Both projects have the same
applicant and are closely related. Thus they are both included
in a combined report for joint consideration. You should consider
the.zone change first, for you should not approve the site
development plan unless you first recommend approval of the Zone
Change. Even then, a condition of approval for the site develop-
ment plan must be that the City Council approves the Zone Change.
,
""" -,~,
The City has previousl~considered changing the z~ng designation
of certain properties along Pio Pico Drive. The subject property
is one of ·them. The general plan land use designation has already
been.changed to "professional-and related" which is the general
plan counter part for the proposed new zone designation.
The Commission should examine the compatibility of the proposed
zone and use with adjoining development. In staff's opinion
they are compatible. The R-P zone is specifically designed to
be compatible with adjoining residential. Section 21.18.010
of the code states:
"21.18.010. Intent and Pu~po~e. The intent and pu~po~e
o6 the R-P ~e~ldentlal-p~o6e~~lonal zone i~ to:
(1) P~ovide a~ea~ 6o~ the development o6 ee~tain low
inten~ity bu~ine~~ and p~o6~~~ional o66iee~ and ~elated
u~e~ in loeation~ in eonjunetion with o~ adjaeent to
~e~idential a~ea~; and
(2) P~ovide t~an~itional light t~a66ie-gene~ating eom-
me~eial a~ea~ between e~tabli~hed ~e~idential a~ea~ and
nea~by eomme~eial o~ indu~t~ial development.
The "Q" overlay is intended to allow the Commission to impose
development conditons to further insure compatibility. The "Q"
overlay is also intended to provide for general plan compatibility,
regard for environmental factors, specific conditions attached to
uses· and for public improvements necessitated by the development
of the site (Ref. Section 21.06.010, Carlsbad Municipal Code).
Those mechanisims should be adequate to insure compatibility
of the developm~nt with neighboring properties and ajoining
public right-of-way.
The parcel to the north of the subject property is being included
in the zone change action at the request of staff and approval of
the property owner. City policy traditionally has been to include
appropriate adjacent parcels in zone change requests. The parcel
in question has frontage along Pio Pico Drive af!.d the same
general plan designation as the Hunt property. The parcel
currently has a single family house and garage, which would be
consistent with the R-P zone. The proposed office building on the
adjacent Hunt property to the south, has been designed so that later
development of this parcel can be done compatibly. Any future
development on this site would require a site development plan and
approval of sewering capability.
Staff Recommendation
Two separate motions and actions are required. One for the
zone change and one for the site development plan.
1. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward a
recommendation of approval of Zone Change 201 to the City Council
based on the following findings:
I
-------------------------
A. The proposed zone change is consistent with the general
plan ·because:
1) The site is designated for "Professional and Related"
uses op the general plan land use map.
2) The "Residential/Professional" zone implements the uses
permitted in the "Professional and Related" general
plan designation.
3) The zone change will have no adverse impact on
any element of the general plan.
B. It has been determined that the zone change will not
have a significant adverse impact on the environment
because:
1) The proposed zone change is compatible with the
Carlsbad General Plan.
2) The "Q" overlay process will insure compatibility
of future development with the existing neighborhood • . •
C. The proposed zone change. is -consistent with applicable
City Public Facilities Policies and Ordinances because:
Most public facilities exist on the site. Any additional
public facilities needed will be required as part of the
"Q" overlay development process.
2. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission APPROVE Site
Development Plan 79-1 based on the following findings and subject
to the following conditions:
Findings
1. The proposed development is compatible witn the surrounding
residential neighborhood because:
A. All vehicular access is from Pio Pico Drive. No
vehicular access will be allowed from residential streets.
B. The building is oriented to Pio Pico Drive.
c. A six foot masonry wall will separate the office use from
the adjoining residential zone district.
2. This application has been subjected to environmental review
pursuant to the Carlsbad Environmental Protection Ordinance and the
State EIR Guidelines and a declaration of non-significant impact was
issued.
3. The proposed development.is consistent.with the general plan
beca~se the land use designation for the subject site is "Profe$sional
and Related". ,
Conditions for SDP 79-1
1. Development of the site shall occur substantially as shown
on the site development plan labeled Exhibit A and elevation plan
labeled Exhibit C, both dated February 14, 1979.
2. All necessary public improvements shall be installed per
the requirements of the City Engineer prior to occupancy.
3. Prior to the issuance of building permits the applicant
shall submit landscape and irrigation plans to the Planning
Department for review and approval.
4. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed prior to
occupancy.
5. Final approval of the subject site development plan shall
not be granted:until Zone Change 201 fbr the subject property is
in effect.
6. An adjustment plat will be completed establishing a legal
lot over the site as shown on Exhibit A dated February 14, 1979
prior to issuance of building permits. Any lot resulting from
said adjustment sha~l conform to the requirements of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code.
7. . Applicant will install a city standard street light at the
northeast corner of Pio Pico Drive and Straftord Lane to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to occupancy.
8. Prior to application for any developmental permit, the applicant
shall obtain approval for a septic tank installation report from
the County Department of Public Health, to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer.
9. All vehicular access to the subject lots to be zoned R-P-Q
shall have access from Pio Pico Drive only.
Attachments
Location map
Letter to adjacent property owner, dated January 17, 1979
Letter from adjacent property owner, dated January 23, 1979
2/8/79
ms
....
2C 201
SOP 79-1
HUNT
2-JLf-79 STRATFOR!7 LANE
I
\
I
CASE NO • .ZC.. 201• 5DP71-/ Date Rec'd __________ DCC Pate: 2.jf&./7CJ PC Date :z-,/t'l_.hCJ_~
< )
l
Description of Request: ZONE. C.~ANGe. FROM R-\ TO R-P-Q b'ND ~rTF DEYt;lo?MEM'l
RAN. :ro oE'iELOf' ·A 2-~ oFr\c.P. ~2lL:D!:"-.I..\.IN.l,;G."'-------------------
Address or Location of Request: EAsT S\DE ·or E\O _E}c.C )?~:ntif~'t'l!-O!::C.::.::.S.:::.__·_·_· ____ _
AND STRA:T FORD
Applicant: Jf\~ES fZ": HIJ~\ 1?3'} KNOWLt=S A'/E. CARL5~PtD
Engr. or Arch.CAL-V'JESTEB~ <:PNCE:'f'JS* R.i?. BoWITZ; 1 ..2-l'-il GL.CANINQ.~£;AL,OCEANs\.lE
Brief Legal: f'/\B.C.EL I) fCKf\QN oF PI\"RCE-L ~ 1 PM NO '17/) N\111 l(</ .. o~. S.~T\oN G7 J
-r tz_s J RY WE::..r, sl?.B. M.
Assessor Book: IS"k · Page: · lt..'/. Pa.rcel :_2;....,J...t~~8.._, ~~<J~---
General Plan Land. Use Description:~.~O~F~r~I~C~E~-~-------~--------------------------
Exis ting Zone: · R-1 Px-6posed Zone : ~-p-Q · · · · · · ·
Acres: • '"I (t, No. of Lots: 3 · DU s -&-DU/Acre .e-_;:_ __
School District: CARLSBl\t> UNIFIED · · · · · · · · · .
l-later District: crry oE CAB.VS.Dft.I?
Coast Permit Area: NO
~~--------------------------~--------~---------------
Sanitation District:ClT'tol= CARLSS!l>.D
FORM PLANNING 52
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
Mr. John R. Bagley
1225 Knowles Avenue
Carlsbad, California
~--··
· Qtitp of Q!:arlsbaa
January 17, 1979
Subject: Request to allow rezoning of your property at
1225 Knowles Avenue, Carlsbad, Assessors Parcel
No. 156-164-01
Dear Mr. Bagley:
TELEPHONE:
1714) 72g.118l
,
Recently the City has received an application for a zone change
from the existing R-1, single family residential, tc:i R-P·-Q,
residential/professional,: on the.property immediately to the
south of your lot. The City·Council and Planning Commission
usually encourage adjacent property owners to join in the rezon-
ing application, so as to avoid the tendency to uspot-zone"
specific individual parcels within the city. The purpo~ of this
letter is to request that you include your property in this zone
change application.
The new R-'P-Q zone will be consistent with the Office designa-
tion of this area in the General Plan. There is no cost to yon.
in allowing your property to be rezoned to R-P. Your property
would continue to be entirely consistent with the new zone. In
fact, the R-P zone would allow many more uses to be located on
your. property, should you desi:r:e to change the use on your propert:y
in the future.
The City '\vould appreciate your cooperation in this matter.. As
mentioned, the City is currently processing the rezone applica-
tion, and there is a limited amount of time available.. We there-
fore request that you contact the Planning Department regarding
your decision. If you need further information~ please feel free
to call 729-1181, extension 25, or come into the Planning Office
at City Hall,· 1200 Elm Avenue ..
Sincerely,
~tR-~
BRIAN R. SMITH
Planning Department
DRS: jd
enc. Permitted Uses in R-P zone
--
··-···-·····.··-·· ~) ~ . --
------------·-·---------------_______________ / ;l:?~k/)/~_4/LeJ -~ -·---------
-JAN 2 2 1979
________________________________ CITY OF CARI_$8/,'
Planning Dcpan; ;_;,~
~~ ?29~-~?s--
,. ,.
•;
"''"' If after the irl""'mu. tion you have submit ted has been ...._,.iewcd, it is
that further i;~mation is required, you. will be so advised.
determined
APPLicANT: c.~u ~~-~~ 1.., LU~Te12.N Couc.~ .
Name (~nd~ v~dual, pilrtncrslup, JO~nt venture, corporat~on 1 synd~ca t~on)
Telephone Number
AGENT: ~ Name
-~ ~() __ tPbiPfi£
Business Address
MEI.-!BERS:
~---3--2(-3-3-9:2.: 1t-~-ttt?C
~elephone Number c:.-~1~. DJG-5~n..N cJ)~~t~n__ '~otle-''
Name (individual, partner, joint Home Address ·
venture, corporation, syndication)
., A-t?t2J)_~\'
Business Addres=----s----------------------·----
Telephone Number
3 57 ":c'~\JjtrA.S 1 Home Address
~ ,, A::J6 () tJ 6: .
Business Address
-~4--Z~__l_Z.t, Z
Telephone Number Telephone Numbe:-
DA-re-b F 'I ~c.,
Cof4.P. Uo.
jA-U 1 201 fq 2)
G/~173
(l;ttach more sheets if necessary)
I/\•1e declare unc.1,,.. n<>n:>lt-u nf ,.,..,,.;""'" t-h;ot-t-h<> infnrm,.t-irm ,-,nnt-;tinPc'l in !·.his rlis-
clo:;ure is true
relied upon as t
.· •.... ·
Carls ad Journal
Decreed A Le gal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County
3088 PIO PICO AVENUE e P.O. BOX 248 • CARLSBAD, CA 92008 • 729-2345
Proof of Publication
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid;
I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter.
I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal a newspaper of general circulation,
printed and published twice weekly i n the City of Carlsbad , County of San Diego, State of California, and
which newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general
character, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription
list of paying subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular
intervals in the said City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California , for a period exceeding
NOTICE
OF DECLARATION OF
NONSIGNIFICANT
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN tbat the
L oty of Carlsbad bu Issued Negative
O~clarations for the followin& projects:
GASE NO. ZC-201, SDP 78-4, LOG. NO.
>24: Zone Chance to R-P-Q to conform
with the General Plan. The proper-Q' is3
lots totallina about one-half acre in
size. The propoaed development is a -.ooo square foot professional office
liuildlll& with accompanying parkin& 'lk~bance is also propoaed ,..._ 1M to tile south for gen-eflll ~doi«t>rmance. The proper(y is
located at the aortb-.t eGJ'IIIII' of Pie
Pieo Drive •nd Stratford Lane.
Ap licant: Caji,Cornla Western Con-rte
• Qllll¥tllili IUbjlet "·~ M-laratiMIWflla ~ ~
11 llllldlalllf lor pnblle revl4tW at'*
l'lannlnl Department, City Hall, 1200
Elm Av•U., Carlnad. Co10111ents rro..
the pullftc are Invited. Pleaae submit
conull• In wrltln& to lhe Plannin&
Department within ftve (5) days from
the date or tbls notice.
CJ 51,43: January 2'1, 111711
one year next preceding the date of publication of
the notice hereinafter referred to; and that the
notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has
been published in each regular and entire issue of
said newspaper and not in any supplement
thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
..... -! ~!1-~~~Y. _2_7_. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 .79 .
. -............................... 19 ... .
................................. 19 ....
................................. 19 ....
................................. 19 ....
I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true
and correct. Executed at Carlsbad, County of San Diego,
State of C.alifornia on ----,-.,...,J~""--'----,____.,..w... _____ _
d J anuar
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
zc -201
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission
of the City of Carlsbad will hold a Public Hearing at the
City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California,
at 7:00 P.M. on Wednesday, February 14, 1979, to consider a
Zone Change from R~l to Residential-Professional-Qualified
(R-P-Q) on property located at the southeast corner of Pio
Pice between Knowles and Stratford and more particularly
described as:
Parcel No. 1, a portion of Parcel No. 2 of Parcel
Map No. 471 of the Northwest one-quarter of Section
6, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, SBBM in the City
of Carlsbad, County of San Deigo, State of California.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordial~y
persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially
to attend the public hearing. If you have any questions,
please call 729-1181, and ask for the Planning Department.
APPLICANT: James F. Hunt
PUBLISH: February 3, 1979
CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
zc 201
SOP 79-J
liUf·~T
2.-JL.f-79
CURRt=~tr
~01-\,E.
c. t-\At-t G--'5. !lTRAl FORv' LA!-:S
.. . .
Carls ad Journal
Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of Son Diego County
3088 PIO PI CO AVENUE e P.O. BOX 248 • CARLSBAD, CA 92008 e 729-2345
Proof of Publication
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid;
I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter.
I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal a newspaper of general circulation,
printed and published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad , County of San Diego, State of California, and
which newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general
character, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription
list of paying subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular
intervals in the said City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding
NOTI~E OF PUBLIC
REARING
ZC-201
~OTICE IS HSREBY GIVEN that the
Planning Coauaiuion of the City of
Carlsbad will hokl a Public Hearing at
tbe City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm
AYenue, Carlsbed, California, at 7:00
P.ll. on Wednesday, February 14, 1979,
to consider a Zone Change from R·l to
Residential-Professional-Qualified
(R·P·Ql on property located at tbe
sputheast comer of Plo Plco between
Knowles and Stratf'ord and more par-
ticularly aeacribed as:
Parcel No. I, a portion of Parcel No.2
of Parcel llap No. 471 ortbe Northwest
one-quarter of Section 8, Township 12
South, Range 4 West, SBBM in the City
of Carlsbad. County of San Diego, SlaW
or CaliiWaia. •
Tbole persona wiabilli to speak
this proposal are cordially invited toaf:
tend the public hearina. lfyou have rlfJi
questions, please call.,..ll81. and ull
for the,Pblnnilli Department.
Applicant: JAMES F. HUNT
crl'YOP'CARLSBAD
PLANNING COIOIISSION
CJ SUJO: February 3, 1979
one year next preceding the date of publication of
the notice hereinafter referred to; and that the
notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has
been published in each regular and entire issue of
said newspaper and not in any supplement
thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
... F.e PT'~<H'Y . .3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 .79.
................................. 19 ....
................................. 19 ....
................................. 19 ....
................................. 19 ....
I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true
and correct. Executed at Carlsbad, County of San Diego,
State of California on -:-:t!:.'Jh~e~3.ur....~d..~.....-_____ _
da of ~~~~~~~U-L---.r-------
TRUAX & ASSOCIATES
LAND PLANNING· LAND SURVEYING
2640 Oceanside Blvd. • Oceanside, California 92054
Phone 433-3392
HUNT ~ CALIFORNIA WESTERN CONCEPTS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
P~rrel No 1, a 9o-tion of Parcel No. ' of PPrcel M~p No 471
of the North~'e<'t one-··uarter of Section r-;, Tor-'n~hip 1 '> Soutl,,
R.<>nge 4 We~t, S.B.B. M. in the City of Carl~b~d, County of
s~n Diego, State of CPlifornia, more particul~rly dercribed
I'IF! follOT•'S:
Be~inninq, Pt the Southea~t corner of ~aid Parcel No. 1~ thence
~long tae E·· ~terly lif'e of said Par,.el No. 1 a''d0 Parcel No. ?,
No··th 0 1"'''8" Wert 147.,? feet, thence North 8-:' 06'3311 West
~' 84 feet to the Westerly line of said P ~reel No ?~ thence
North 8<3°51:' '0311 West 5:-.70 feet to a point in the Easterly
line of Pio Pir-o Drive, also being a point in A ~"~,970 foot
radiu~ curve roncave Ea~terly, a radial to ~hich bears South
670?3' c;o" 'tiTest~ thence along Pio Pico Drive and along the arc
Of Said :'"'Urve 160.81 feet: th-rough 8 central angle Of 0°51 13011
to a point of compound curvatu':"e v'i th a ')0. 00 foot Tadius curve
con,.ave Northerly· thenre along the arr of r-aid curve ?'l 08
feet through a central angle of 83°18'01" to a point of reverse
curvature ~·ith a 546. ?4 foot radiu.~ curve ~on rave Southerly,
being a point on Stratford Lane: thence along the arc of said
ur.ve 7 .r:... 16 feet, through 8 central 111ngde of 7053 '0011 to the
True Point of Beginning.
J N 1037
7..;?~·78
HLT
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
~itp of Qearlsbab
February 28, 1979
R.B. Bowitz
Cal Western Concepts
2141 El Camino Real
Oceanside, Ca. 92054
Re: ZC-201, Hunt
The subject zone change will be heard by the Carlsbad City
Council on !-iarch 6, 1979. Normally the ordinance adopting
the Council action is approved at the following regular
meeting (March 20).
Your request may be delayed slightly because we wish to hold
final action on t~ordinance until the lot line adjustment
is completed. This will allow the lot lines to become legally
recorded prior to the zoning being completed.
I discussed this with the City
is doing the adjustment plot.
with this arrangement, in fact
not be a delay at all.
BUD PLENDER
Assistant to the
Planning Director
BP:ms
cc: Mr. Truax
Mr. Hunt
City Engineer
Engineer and Hr. Truax, who
There appears to be no problem
if all goes quickly there may
TELEPHONE:
(714) 729-1181
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
Harry L. Truax
TRUAX & ASSOCIATES
212 North Freeman
Oceanside, CA 92054
ftitp of ftarlsbab
November 13, 1978
Re: Zone Change for Property on the East Side of Pio Pico
Drive between Knowles Avenue and Stanford Lane
Dear Mr. Truax:
TELEPHONE:
(714) 729-1181
This letter is to confirm our telephone conversation on November
8, 1978. You informed me that your clients still have some un-
certainties to be resolved regarding their proposed office build-
ing development on Pio Pico Drive. You requested the Zone Change
application for the property to be withdrawn at this time. We
both agreed if your clients could get their difficulties rectified,
a future resubmittal of a Zone Change application, accompanied by
a Site Development Plan application, would be the proper course
of action.
I am enclosing a Request for Refund form for your convenience.
Simply sign the form and return to our office, and we will begin
processing a refund of the $165.00 fee you previously submitted.
I am also returning your Zone Change application and Environmental
Impact Assessment form.
If you have further questions regarding procedure or requirements,
please call or find me here at the Planning Department.
y]:;:~
DAVE ABRAMS,
Current Plannin~
DA:adm
Attachments
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
August 14, 1978
Harry Truax
c
Truax & Associates
(tCitp of (tCarl~bab
2460 Oceanside Blvd., Suite A
Oceanside, California 92054
Subject: Use of Septic Tank System on Proposed Office Building to Be
Located at the Northeast Corner of Pio Pico & Stratford Lane
TELEPHONE:
(714) 729-1181
As I explained at our meeting at the counter August 9, 1978, this
office must approve all requests for the use of septic tank systems. Up-
on submittal of a plot plan showing the proposed building, building area
and proposed use(s) along with a proposed grading plan, soil and percola-
tion rate data, this office will review the material and set a minimum
flow for the septic system if the submitted material is approved. f.or
offices, the City will require a minimum flow of 15 gallons/day/100 square
feet of gross floor area. ·
.Until the above material is submitted to the City Engineer and ap-
proved, the Planning Department will not be able to accept your appl ica-
tion for a zone change on the subject property.
If you have any questions on the above matter, please do not hesi-
tate to~c:~~-#
'{ ~&--??tff~-e'~ ere die -
Civil Engineer
CC: Bud Plender, Planning Department
~---··-~---·~~---
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
Harry L. Truax
TRUAX & ASSOCIATES
212 North Freeman
Oceanside, CA 92054
€itp of €arlsbab
November 13, 1978
Re: Zone Change for Property on the East Side of Pio Pico
Drive between Knowles Avenue and Stanford Lane
Dear Mr. Truax:
TELEPHONE:
(714) 729-1181
This letter is to confirm our telephone conversation on November
8, 1978. You informed me that your clients still have some un-
certainties to be resolved regarding their proposed office build-
ing development on Pio Pico Drive. You requested the Zone Change
application for the property to be withdrawn at this time. We
both agreed if your clients could get their difficulties rectified,
a future resubmittal of a Zone Change application, accompanied by
a Site Development Plan application, would be the proper course
of action.
I am enclosing a Request for Refund form for your convenience.
Simply sign the form and return to our office, and we will begin
processing a refund of the $165.00 fee you previously submitted.
I am also returning your Zone Change application and Environmental
Impact Assessment form.
If you have further questions regarding procedure or requirements,
please call or find me here at the Planning Department.
YJ:::~
DAVE ABRAMS,
Current Plannin~
DA:adm
Attachments
r
CITY OF CARLSBAD
REQUEST FOR REFUND
.1/5 oo
REFUHD HAS BEEN REQUESTED IN THE AMOUNT .OF.$ .~b;;__. _-:._X_,)C:,.__, -·-------'-
BY
FOR ------------------------------~-----------------------------------
3.32.030 REFUND
(A) WHEN NOT OTHERWISE PROHIBITED BY LAW, THE CITY COUNCIL MAY AU-
THORIZE~ REFUND OF ALL OR PART OF ANY FEE COLLECTED PURSUANT
TO THE CARLSBAD MUNIC1PAL CODE IN ACCORD WITH THE PROCEDURES
OF THIS SECTION. .
...
(B) A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR REFUND SIGNED BY THE PERSON PAYING THE·
FEE SHALL BE FILED I-liTH HIE CITY t·1ANf\GER SETTING FORTH THE
FACi"S AND REASOI--JS V.'H I CH JUSTIFY THE REQUEST.
(C) THE CITY MANAGER SHALL INVESTIGATE THE REQUEST AND FORWARD IT
TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH HIS RECOMMENDATION.
(D) ·THE CITY COUNCIL MAY GRANT THE REQUES~ IN WHOLE OR IN PART IF
THEf FIND THAT:
{1) THE FEE HAS PAID UNDER A 1<\ISTAKE OF LA\'/ OR FACT; OR
(2) THE CONSIDERATION FOR WHICH .THE FEE WAS PAID HAS NOT
BEEN RECEIVED AND THE CITY HAS NO MORAL CLAIM TO THE
HONEY; OR
(3) IT IS INAPPROPRIATE AND .INEQUITf-\BLE TO RETAIN .TilE .FEE,
_ WHICH IN GOOD CONSCIENCE, EQUITY AND JUSTICE SHOULD BE
· RETURNED i OR
(4) A REFUND IS NECESSARY TO PREVENT AN EXTREME HARDSHIP
UPON THE PERSON PAYING THE FEE FOR WHICH SUCH PERSON
IS NOT RESPONSIBLE.
(E) UPON RECEIPT OF AN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE CITY COUNCIL, THE
CITY TREASURER SHALL MAKE. THE REFUND. (ORD. 118~ S 1, 1975).
X SIGW\TURE OF APPLICANT DATE
DEPARTMENT HEAD DATE
CTfY ~11\NAGER DATE
..
: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM
. .
• ..
EIA NO.
)
D~te: .7 L/, /78
Name of App 1 i cant: C 4-l.ll="& tl.f,J.tA t.A/-e :."Len'!..f...J Cu~I..S
Addr~ss: Z.l4-/ ~ ~ILJQ ft..EFif-,_1 O~tDfiL ~ <?.l,o0-4
. · P.erm1 t Applied For.: z=ou. 5 ~'±A h.IG.S"'
Case Nos.: ----------~------------------
location of Proposed Activity: N.on...TJ+-E~=r-·/7o/J..LJCf"le_
· Pt o J?, ~o ~ S-r:r?..---rr;::::;oiLD t .. -A-"-J es-
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
1.·. Give a ·b~i~f description of the proposed activity (attach
any prel1m1nary development plans).
zo,(./G Cu,uua-a-7a ,e-p ~~uFZJJGH'{
--.,.-I o--G e:;tU ~ tt-4-t-. t1 ~ ~ .4--'-.._ci w C.~u:tJ6 );u, r'L.iG tA'/ e:><t ~ r )-f/ ·f'~Jt--t'I'DH/
··~~ e&YHP~L:/ ~ s.o ~A--r;,ft!~"~~~~
2 • Des c rl 'be the a c t 1 v 1 t y are a , i n c ffii n g p ifft' fn~ u i s ~ •
n
1
atura1 and ~anmade characteristics; also provide precise
s ope analys1s when appropriate. ·pn~ PtStt--rq E vii-C-~,. . ..4-V.P
ffM:. t3~~A/ ):-.oiL. JUA.Ur Y~/G..S
t/E::Yl-£1 SL.-tGtTT ~t-opSf"
3. Describ~ energy conservation measures incorporated into
the des1gn and/or operation of the project.
s ()~M-.j).A er-A-:StJ a-13 s ~ / ~ "'
· f6 ~ . I u a.. . $ <::;;~ow .L( CJ~
/f3 ~ o c; p._A-IJ s (j) 7/W B
(J F-Su ~ ~ 1 /T""A-L -~~;;
n. ~~ D~~
.. ..
·.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM
II .. Environmental Impact Analysis
Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate
space.
)
Yes
1. ·could the project significantly ch~nge present land uses
in the vicinity of the activity?
2. Could the activity affect the use of a recreational
area, or area of important aesthetic value?
3. ·Could the activity affect the functioning of an
established community or neighborhood?
4. Could the activity result in the displacement of
community .residents?
5. Are any of the natural or man-made features in the activity
, area uniqQe, that is, not·found in other parts of the
County, State, or nation?
6 •. Could the activity significantly affect a historical or
archaelogical site or its setting?
7• Could the activity significantly affect the potential
use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural res-
ource?
8. Does the activity area serve as a habitat, food source
nesting place, source of water, etc .. for.rare or endangered
wildlife on fish species?
9.· Could the activity significantly affect fish, w·ildlife or
plant life?
10. Are there any rare or endangered plant species in the
activity area?.
11. Could the activity change existing features of any. of
the city's lagoons, bays, or tidelands?·
12. Could the activity change existing features of any of
the City's beaches?
13. Coold the activity result in the erosion or elimination
of .agricultural lands? . '
14. Could the activity serve to encourage development of
.presently undeveloped areas or intensify development
of already developed areas? ·
' I
No
./
~
l v I v I
v
11!.
....
'· '
15. Will the activity require a variance from established environmental
standards (~ir, water, noise, etc)? . . .
. 16. Will the activity require certification, authorization or issuance
of a permit by any local, State or Federal environmental control
agency? · ·
17. Will the activity require issuance of a variant~ or conditional
use permit by the City?
18. Will the activity involve the application~ use, or disposal of
potentially hazardous materials?
19. ~lill.the activity involve construction of facilities in a flood
·!Jlain?
20. Will the activity involve construction of facilities on a slope of
25 percent or greater? ·
21. ~fill the activity involve construction of facilities in the
area of an active fault?
22. Could the activity result in the generation of significant
amounts of noise?
23. Could the activity result in the generation. of significant
amounts of dust?
24. Will the activity involve the burning of brush, trees, or ·
other mater.ials? .
. 2'5. Could the activity result in a significant change in the .
quality of any portion of the region's air or· water resources?
(Should note surface, ground water, off-shore). ·
26. Will there be a significant change to exist·ing land fm~m?
' fes ,~--
(a) indicate estimated grading to be do.ne in cubic yards._-+-_ _,.,._
(b) percentage of alteration to the present land form. ·--J.-~~--·
(c) maximum height of cut or fill slopes .
. 27. \~ill the activity result in substantial increases in the use of utilities,
sewers, drains or streets?
State of No Significant Envitonmental Effects
If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in Section II but you
think the activity will have no significant environmental effects, indicate your
reasons below:
'·
v
v
.. v/
I I . j
I vr
.I vi ---J
vi vi
' I I
!
15 . 'Fj, /(.. z= ~;u""' c~.
•. -r;; . G s-x/ ·/c-4-U
. .. .
. ,
'• )
..
IV; Comments or Elaborations to Any of the Questions in Section II.
attach additional (If additional space is needed for answeringz:ny ·estions, sheets as may be ne ded.) · . .
Signature · l
Person completing report
Date Signed :_--::;7__,/f!--2_t"--~--t-7;........-?;..___ __ .... ____ _
Conclusions (To be completed by the Planning Director). Place a check
in the appropriate box." ·
( ) Further information iS required.
( ) It has been determined that the project will not have significant
environmental effects. { ) You.must submit a preliminary environmental
impact statement by the follovling date . ( ) You
· . should make an appointment with the Planning Director to discuss
further processing of your project, in a~cordance with Chapter 19.04
of the Municipal Code.
DP.TE RECEIVED:· ------
•.
Revised 7/3/74
FORM PLANNING 40
· BY:--::-.;-"'-.-__...,~__,---Planning Director, or,
. ..
..
. .
.... i''~ (.,.,..,
~-;
I
CITY OF CARLSBAD
1200 ELM AVENUE e CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
729-1181
RECEIVED FRoM -~r. ·'• · , . 1 ~1 Ou,..~--r::__. .
/
•') T' ) ; /~
., I=~"'==D=O=R=ES:;:;S==I =(::;:! .z=0=iJ=/=.!;=/=t=~"=t1.=._,..=· =·='~=-i=-='=/=0=: =.?========r======
f ____ A_I_c_._N_o_. __ +-__________ D_E_s_c_R_IP_T_to_N ____________ +-__ A_M_o_urN-T __
~ -!JfH, L)Y,'rJ I -, /!_\ .'C
,'
--------------------------------------------" ---
APPLICATION NO. ZONE Cf!ANGEc:/0/
CIT'( OF CARLSBAD
(Please Type or Print) Date:_7,&.bcP
1. REQUEST: Zone Change from the present existing !<-(
zone(s) to the R -P-Q_.._ __ ~-----zone(s)
2. LOCATION: The subject prciperty is g~nerally located on the
-~A-~'-\ side of_f?,_~ __ tl}t e..Q ___ between~.w._c..ws
and __ 4Q -rtZ--A ,..-,:::-4' IZ.,P
3 . AS S E S S 0 R ' S NUMB E R : Boo k ~~-P a g e 16 f-. P a ~~ c e 1 2-
Bookl$~--Page lt.f Parcel 4-~ (If more, please list
I St;. l.lt-4--4Cf_ on bottom of tH1s ~age).
4. PROPERTY 0\mD_'_$ SIGtifHIJ_f1:f: ___ _!l~'lc}TI_ss City Zip Phon~ ···--[kn,/LJ~ __ b:A1~.~.-o bt ~nual~~'l
~ ~-/~ }! __ ~~ , , ,, __ :_:___ ____ ,, ----=--L-I ~
5. APPLICANTS SIGNATURE:
I hereby declare that all information contained within this
application is true.
Address City Zin Phone _-=-:_r:: ____ . __
CAtL t F"tPILNtA CA.lc-s-re::--12.~~ ......... .--...:o--..-X:~·--
Re 1 a tj_o.ns ~J'!:.Qj>_e rty Owner ( s ) 0o a UH-A-:.gj2.
6. Is this request consistent with the General Plan and applicable
Specific Plans? __ -}te:..S
Please note: A:; per Section 21.52030 of the C·ity Code, the
Planning Director must find that this request is consistent
with the General Plan or applicable Specific Plans, or the
application shall not be accepted. This determination may
be appealed to the Planning Commission and City Council.
The City of Carlsbad Planning Department would appreciate the appor-
t u n i t :,· t o ~~: u r' k ·~1 -~ t h t h 2 o p p l i c a n t t h r· c: L! ~; h o u t t h e P 1 3 n n i n ~~ S t c. g e s o f
the proposed development. In an effort to aid the applicant, the
Planning Department requests that it be given an opportunity to
evaluate and discuss the app·l·ication and plans priol~ to submittal.
This request is not a requirement; however~ it may avoid major re-
drafting or revision of the pldn which only serves to lengthen the
processing time.
/\ T T /\ C H ~1 E N T S :
SuppleJiH~rtliJ.! Infurmat·!on t(;rt:, ·"F1dlli1·lng 21
P r c p cl. Y' cl. t ·i o n C h e c k L i s t -P I r• 11 n i n g 3 0
r· r u c e d u te s ·· r 1 ann ·i n ~~ 3 6
n c~ t t:· of F' ·i i] n n i n ~; C tJ 1 hi ·j -:: ~. ·i on /\ p p' n '' d "! -·· -· __ ··-. _
1 )
2)
3)
4)
5 )
SU,WLEMENTAL , iORMATION FORM~~
CHANGE OF ZONE
Gross Acres (or square footage if less than acre)
Present Zone __ ~~------~( ________ Proposed Zone
General Plan Land Use Designation t) -
S o u r c e o f W a t e r S u p p 1 y ________ ...: -f---1..,..e:=----:=---311111B.L.3...,J:.--. ...... !...Aoll!
Method of Sewage Disposal
6) Types of Protective Covenants to be Recorded ---------------
-------------~~·~l'~~~e=: _______________________ __
7) Transportation Modes Available to Service the. Development ---
8 ) Schoo 1 D i s t r i c t S e r v i n g the Property C. 4..at , s J$Ao-j) U N,ll::) 17.1)
9 ) Are S c h o o 1 Fa c i 1 i t i e s C a p a b 1 e o f S e r v i n g t h i s P r o j e c t ____ W , ~ .
. Ars t?fLA?&11--T ~ IS b ge: Ustil!tJ ro..i>~ {Written confirmat1on of thisrequirement must be subm·itted prior
to .Planning Commission hearing).
10) This Application for a Change of Zone is supported by the
Following Reasons:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
Zone Change is warranted
Such a Zone Change will be
of Public welfare because __ -'~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The permitted uses in this proposed reclassification will
not be detrimental in any way to surrounding properties
bes4.~iJ:e ~-Cn#~Lt:iLd IJ//'-'
The property in this application is more suitable for the
pro posed zone than the exist i n9 zone because A.-l)~~aT =co E::/L~tV~ ;::;ni.!U..r:.~t-wli J:apA-o L W_!~U n~i~i?!:tii ~j},(!~~r&
What were the original deed restriction~ if any, concerning
the type and class of permitted uses on the subject property?
( G i v e ex p i r a t i o n d a t e of these res t ric t i on s ) • -·-·-___ _ b\ 0 J-t ~L-::--_ _. ___ _
F 0 Rfvi ______ Pl~~-r~:Lt:!i!_2L_ nate of P 1 u n n i n g C ornm i s s ion Appro v a 1 ____________________ ...... .
~VENUE
~--------~~~-----
~RTIO!..i OF' K..<.A:::>IA../L.£5 AVE W
DEDICATED 70 CITy-' OF
CARLSBAD. PER OOC,A/Q35'081 0
REC. Z4FEB../971 0 ..
SCALE
78.32 1
PARCEL 2
i\i 1\J
(5'\
1\l '<
~
~
....... \s> ...
&
' ...
:· .. : .. ..... . ·. . . ···-·
··· .. !
-.. ·~
:··· .. . ··· .. · :··· .. .. ·
t:·: :··.:
.. .. i·· .. .. · ... ·
1--------· ..... : .......
\0
\()
' ........
""' '
....... ..... ·· .... ::::
. ... : ..
~-. .. .....
·-:· .. .. .,.· .. :
AR'EA "' 8!72 .3a;) FT NET
10,124 59-fl. GROSS
:· ..... .. , :
! ,··.
rj·~ :·· ..
OW.t{IE..e":
TAX ASSESSORJ.S PARCEL NUMBERS
.Rtlla:EL 2 -/SG -/60-02
PARCEL3 -/56-/60-03
TRUST DEED: FIL£ NO. /0-5466
TRI.JSTEE: OCEANSIDE FINANCE CO.
•: .. :
'
h, ... -.
! · . . :
B4SIS OF BEARINGS
TJ...IE WESTL:7i?L Y PROPERTY L/A/E
PER PM471,/~.1 .S0°c3'/0"W
LEGEND
EXIST. 80UAIDARY
TO /.3£ C/.IANGED -------
PROPOSED NEW 80/JNOARY ----
~. ()_A;>/?/dwnT ~ ~~~-J~~~N~£_U~~~W~T~-------------.
/ ~~ ~ -40Jl1STMENT PLAT -CITY OF CARLSBAD
REQUESTED BY: PREPARED BY:
GRACE. C. /-/(.JIVT
PAl. 729...:... 7824
CITY ENGINEER
/8426
!" RGG. NO. D~7E
NO. /27
DRAWING REFERENCE NO.
STREET: -------
SEWER:
WATER: