The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutZC 272; Del Mar Financial; Zone Change (ZC)IJ F La u V-j is Ll k^im \J WJ REQUEST . ^^B^one CliGiice • C<?nerc.^l Plan .^iiX'nr'fTient • Tentat-ive Tract Itip • Major Planned Development OMiJior Planned D3w.lopcr£3:it • roaster Plan • Major Planned Developmait Conversion • Precise Development Plan Specific Plan Site Development Plan • Conditional Use Pennit • Varicince • P.lanning CcErmission Determination • Special Use Permit O Ad'Ttinistrative Variance GorapleLe Description of project (att^ich additional sheets if necessary) _P££gPIll-.approxlmately 83 acr^S J;ft-^T-l-(pP) , Rn_&-£E- lixjation of Project Noerheast corner of El Camino Real and College Boulevard j_eg£il De.scripti.on (conplete) Portion of Lot B of Map 823, Rancho Agua Hedionda Assessors Parcel K^uriber 209-060-26,43, 44, 50, 56 & 57 Zone County R.R.2 County M-52 Proposed /!one R-l-(PD) RC, RP City General Plan City - RH/O/C Proposed General Plan City - RH/O/C Existing land Usa Vacant, 1 SINGLE FAMILY, LIGHT MANUFACTORfi^ Sxte Acreage 83^ AC+ QvTier App3.icant Name (Print or 'Jype) See Attached Forms Mailing Address Name (Print or 'rype) Mike O'Hara Mailing Address Del Mar Financial 6351 Yarrow Drive City and State Zip Tte3.ephona City and State ZJ.p Telephone Carlsbad, CA 92008 (714) 438-4313 I CERTm' T!iAT I AM TIE J^CAL a«^NER AL.T) •IHAT ALL THE /^iBOVE IbJFOimTlOT IS 'miZ lAI'ID CORRECT '10 THE BEST OF MY KNOt^USDGE ^ ' I CERTHT T51AT I JiM TtlE CWNEIVS Riir!?RF5Fi<m\?E AND T^mT AIL THE ABO'JE INFORIVIATION IS TRUE AIO CORRECT TO THE EEST OF ML' KNavLEDGE SIGNATURE -ftH^U— Date Tvopli cation Rcc^l PKnceivcrl h-j DATE Fx»-iIpt"?o. i.ViUj Sis';!.! i': I \ «) n n n^"" A 'f? 1 fr'^s'^ ... .... • QM 1.1 I^-k y [j LJ'^£.3 v;. '.I KECl;EST n Gcn£;ral Pl^in .^ST'onc'iment • Tentat.ive Tract I'fep • Major- Planned tevelopTtient O .^L;.nor Planned Dc-vc^]opme,nt • faster Plan DMcijor Planned Developi-aait Conversion n Precise DevelocKnent Plan >pecj.f.ic Plaii Site Developnent Plan • Qjnditional Use Permit • Vca-iai'jce • Pl5Ji)ii.ng CoaiTU.ssion Devterraination • S|3ecial Use Permit • :Act!riini.strative. Variance Gonip.leLe Descripti.on of project (attach additional sheets if necessary) in p t..-;:.,;iii Jiezpjie_a_2£ro3yin^^^ location of Project Noerheast corner of El Camino Real and College Boulevard Legal De.scripti,on (coirLolete) J Por11 Lot B of Map 823, Rancho Agua Hed^xdida^ Zone Assessors Paxcel Kiiinbc-ir 209-060-26,43, 44, 50, 56_&_57 'County R.R. 2 County M-52 Proposed ZOne R-l-(PD) RC, RP City General Plan City - RH/O/C Proposed Genera.). Plan City - RH/O/C EKistincj land Usa Vacant, 1 SINGLE FAMILY, LIGHT -WcNWAerORi-Ne-— Site Acreage 83.2 AC+ (Xvner Maire (Print or 'Sype) See Attached Forms iytiilinq .Mdress C.5.ty and State Zip Te3.ephor)c I CERl-IF/ TFAT I AM THE LECAL O^iSEP. ATvD 'JIIAT ALL Tm: PSOVE IWORMATiaNf IS TOUE At,'D CORRI^CT TO im BEST OF JvIY Fm'CEiXai; D2VIE Appl .i cant Name (Print or 'IVpf;) Mike O'Hara Mailing Adchress Del Mar Financial 6351 Yarrow Drive City and State. Zip Carlsbad, CA 92008 Itelephone (714) 438-4313 I CERTTfY TIIAT I AM THE QWNER'S R^PRESFI^fmiL AMJ T'HAT AIL THE ABOW:: INFOPrnTION IS TRUE MD CmRECT ID TIIE Pi^ST OF K«V.LEDGE: D;\TS j.*^ RBG-'EST ^^B^one Cliange • Gcnsural Plan -ATen^lment • Tentative Tract tlip • M^jor Planned Development • Mirxor Planned DeveloFirent • r'jaster Plan • Miijor Planned Developmant Conversion • Precise Development Plan Specific Plan Site Development Plam • Conditional Use Permit • Variance • Planning Qstmission Determination • Special Use Permit • Adirdnistrative Variance OompleLe Description of project (attrich additional sheets if riecessary) Prezone approximatelv 83 acres to R-l-rpP) / Rr. <; BP Ltxiation of Project Noerheast corner of El Camino Real and College Boulevard i.egal Description (coirplete) Portion of Lot B of Map 823, Rancho Agua Hedionda I. Assessors Parcel Kuinber 209-060-26,43, 44, 50, 56 & 57 Zone, I 'County R.R. 2 County M-52 Propcsed /!lone R-l-(PD) RC, RP City General Plan City - RH/O/C Proposed General Plan City - RH/O/C Existing land Usa Vacant, 1 SINGLE FAMILY. LIGHT MANUPACT^Rf^ffi Site Acreage 8312 AC+ avTTier Ajylicant Kame (Print or 'Jype) See Attached Forms Mailing Address Name (Print or 'lype) Mike O'Hara Mailing Address Del Mar Financial 6351 Yarrow Drive City and State Zip Ifelephona City and State Zip Carlsbad, CA 92008 Telephone (714) 438-4313 I CERH-IFY TimT I AM TIE LEGAL a-SSER At® TOAT ALL THE ABOVE IlNFORTvlATiaNl IS THUE [LEDGE I CERIUM IHAT I m THE OWNER'S RiSPRESELCTRTi; AND I^IAT AIL THE ABO'TE INFOR^^ATION IS TRUE Ato CORRECT TO THE BEST OF VK lO^aiLEDGE DATE Ftx-s 'i cix-ed Fj>Cf'dj..-t' >.o. 2C NAME: MAILING ADDRESS Homer L. & Nina Eaton 652 Neptune Avenue Leucadia, CA 92024 I certify that I am the legal owner and that all the information shown on the application is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. NAME: Gerald Frankel MAILING ADDRESS: 1365 Regal Row Dallas, TX 75247 I certify that I am the legal owner and that all the information shown on the application is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 0 Signature Date FEl^lOO.OO ly^iQiTPT NO: E.N\aRONIv«;iNTA.L JMVACT ASSESSMENT FORM - Part I (To be Completed by APPLJCTVNT) CASE NO: DATE: Applicant: DEL MAR FINANCIAL Address of Applicant: 6351 Yarrow Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone Number: (714) 438-4313 Name, address and phone mjir.ber of person to be contacted (i£ other than Applicant) Mike 0'Kara (Address and Phone Same As Above) GENERAI. TNPOPM/VrION: Description of Project: of land. Perform prezone on approximately 83 acres Project Locat ion/Address: Northeast corner of El Camino Real and College Boulevard. ^ Assessor Parcel Nuniber: 209 060 26, 43, 44, 50, 56 & 57 Zone of Subject Property: RR2 & M-52 County Designations Proposed Use of Site: Mix of residential, commercial and professional uses. List all other applicable applications related to this project: ND 1 EIR 1 ,4 Describe the activity area, including distinguishing natural and man-made characteristics; also provide precise slope analysis when appropriate. The project area is predominately vacant land except for one single family residence and one small manufacturing facility. Property generally slopes toward the Agua Hedionda Creek which runs in a northwesterly direction through the project. Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the design and/or operation of the project. (For a more specific discussion of energy conservation requirements, see of the city's EIR Guidelines). None proposed as part of this project. Information will be available when more specific development plans are proposed. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. This information will be available when more specific develop- ment plans are proposed. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities. This information will be available when more specific develop- ment plans are proposed. 6. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. N/A If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. N/A -2- I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate space. (Discuss all items checked "yes". Attach additional sheets as necessary.) 1) Could the project significantly change present land uses in the vicinity of the activity? 2) Could the ac' ivity affect the use of a recre- ational area, or area of important aesthetic value? 3) Could the activity affect the functioning of an established community or neighborhood? 4) Could the activity result in the displacement of community residents? 5) Could the activity increase the number of low and modest cost housing units in the city? 11) Could the activity significantly affect fish, wildlife or plant life? 13) Could the activity change existing features of any of the city's lagoons, bays, or tidelands? •3- YES NO XX XX XX XX XX 6) Could the activity decrease the number of low and modest cost housing units in the city? XX 7) Are any of the natural or man-made features in thc activity area unique; that is, not found in other parts of the County, State or Nation? XX 8) Could the activity significantly affect a historical or archaeological site or its settings? XX 9) Could the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural resource? XX 10) Does the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural resource? XX XX 12) Are there any rare or endangered plant species in the activity area? xx XX 14) Could the activity change existing features of any of the city's beaches? XX 15) Could the activity result in the erosion or elimination of agricultural lands? XX 16) Could the activity serve to encourage develop- ment of presently undeveloped areas or intensify development of already developed areas? 17) Will the activity require a variance from established environmental standards (air, water, noise, etc.)? 20) Will the activity involve the application, use, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials? 28) Will the project substantially increase fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)? 29) Will there be a significant change to existing land form? XX XX 18) Will the activity require certification, authorization or issuance of a permit by any local, state or federal environmental control agency? XX 19) Will the activity require issuance of a variance or conditional use permit by the city? XX XX 21) Will the activity involve construction of facilities in a flood plain? xx 22) Will the activity involve construction of facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater? xX 23) Will the activity involve construction of facilities in the area of an active fault? xX 24) Could the activity result in the generation of significant amounts of noise? XX 25) Could the activity result in the generation of significant amounts of dust? XX 26) Will the activity involve the burning of brush, trees, or other materials? XX 27) Could the activity result in a significant change in the quality of any portion of the region's air or water resources? (Should note, surface, ground water, off-shore). XX XX N/A -4- (a) indicate estimated grading to be done in cubic yards N/A (b) percentage of alteration to the present . land form (c) maximum height of cut or fill slopes N/A 30) Will the activity result in substantial increases in the use of utilities, sev/ers, drains, or streets? XX 31) Is the activity carried out as part of a larger project or series of projects? XX This activity is a portion of a larger project to develop the project site. This specific activity deals with a zone change to allow RP, RC and R-l-(PD) zoning of the project site. Future development plans would include specific plans, tenta- tive and final maps, grading plans. The future development process will require additional environmental analysis. At that time more detailed information on the exact development would be available. II. STATEMENT OF NON-SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in Section I but you think the activity will have no significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons below: #1.6 The zone change would cause the property to develop sooner as the zone would be consistent with the land use and would allow development more consistent with surrounding developments. III. COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE QUESTIONS IN SECTION I (If additional space is needed for answering any questions, attached additional sheets as may be needed.) Signature (Person completing report) Len Schatzmann, MANITOU ENGINEERING COMPANY 455 N. Hale Avenue, Escondido, CA 92025 Date Signed ^/^^/^^ -6- November 28, 1983 TO: LAND USE PLANNING MANAGER FROM: Acting City Engineer SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR DEL MAR FINANCIAL CENTER (O'HARA) According to the Planning Code, the City Engineer must make a report to the Land Use Planning Manager concerning the extent of flood hazard at the project site and whether the property is clearly and wholly within the flood plain. In order to make this report, it will be necessary to know the existing flood limits and to determine the effect any proposed improvements will have on the flood limits. Since the proposed College Boulevard is required to make this project work and its construction will definitely impact the flood limits within the project site, we will require its inclusion in the flood plain study. We are aware this bridge is also an offsite requirement for the Mandana and Barnes Projects, and will likely be built through an assessment district. However, this project is definitely within the flood plain zone and any effects caused by the bridge will impact this project. This being the case, we will need to have the developer submit a hydraulic report substantiating their claim that the proposed improvements will have no or little effect on their proposed development. A» HEC-2 Program is the preferred means of providing the necessary hydraulic data; however, we are open to other acceptable engineering studies that accomplish the same task. DAVID HAUSER Acting City Engineer DH:vi •XICTOBER 6, 1982 TO: PAUL KLUKAS, ASSISTANT PLANNER FROM: Richard Allen, City Engineer SUBJECT: ' WERSHING PROPERTY (GPA-62E) The proposed GPA from RL-M to General Commercial causes the Engineering Depart- ment concern for two reasons: 1. Interruption of the flow of traffic: El Camino Real is a prime arterial and as such is designed to move large volumes of traffic through the City at high speeds. Estimates of the ultimate traffic volume on this street are at least 38,000 vehicles per day. Both Circulation Element of the General Plan and Engineering Design Standards require street intersections on El Camino Real to be no closer than one-half mile and prohibit access to the street from driveways. College Boulevard is a major arterial with an estimated ultimate traffic volume of at least 24,000 vehicles per day. Intersection spacing should be no less than 1200 feet and driveway access is prohibited. Intersection spacing closer than 1200 feet may be considered rf a "T" intersection is used. The property on the east side of College Boulevard is already zoned for some commercial and, due to geographical constraints may-be required to have a street intersection closer than 1200 feet from El Camino Real. If this turns out to be necessary, it would be desirable to have the first intersection to the west about 1800 feet or more from El Camino Real and have both of these intersections be "T's." A signalized four-way intersection less than 1200 feet from El Camino Real will reduce capacity and speed on the street, create operational problems and poten- tially increase accidents. Changing this property from residential to commercial will put enormous pressure on the City to grant accesses onto the two arterials in violation of our standards, Driveways on arterials and intersection spacing less than our standard reduce the capacity of the street. 2. Increase in traffic volume: Assuming this 18-acre parcel was fully developed to the maximum density permitted by the RL-M designation, 760 trips would be generated by this site. If the site were all office, approximately 5700 trips would be generated and if it v/ere all commercial, up to 15,000 trips might be generated depending on.the exact type of use. Therefore, the potential exists to increase traffic by as much as 20 times if the general plan is changed. 7 • / Page -2- WERSHING PROPERTY (GPA-62E) October 6, 1982 The potential increase is significant because with traffic projections from the existing general plan, we are already estimating a failing level of service at El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road. The intersection of College Boulevard and El Camino Real is recommended for special design (extra lanes) in tne Circulation Element Study just completed due to the high volumes of^Jeft turns anticipated. The increase in traffic at the corner site coupled with^reduced intersection spacing would have an adverse impact on the level of service ot this intersection. Conclusion: The Engineering Department recommends that the-proposed general plan amendment be denied. RICHARD ALLEN RHA:mmt C: Dave Hauser San Diego ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS Suite 524 Security Pacific Plaza 1200 Third Avenue San Diego, California 92101 (619) 236-5300 May 7, 1984 Michael Holzmiller 1200 Elm Avenue Carbbad, CA 92008-1989 Dear Mr. Holzmiller: SANDAG staff has reviewed the tentative map for Del Mar Financial as it relates to the provisions of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for Palomar Airport. The following comment has not been reviewed by the SANDAG Board of Directors acting as the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) for the San Diego Region. The southeast comer of the subject property is within the C-1 hazard zone for Palomar Airport. The CLUP for Palomar Airport on page 27 indicates that office and service industry land uses are "restricted new developments" within the C-1 zone. After reviewing the tentative map it is our opinion that the proposed de- velopment meets the C-1 zone criteria because the office buildings are surroimded by sufficient "open" areas (e.g., parking lots, street rights-of-way, and landscaping areas). Additionally, the restauraint proposed for building A-3 would be better suited on the groimd floor rather than the top floor of the office building. If SANDAG can be of fiirther aussistance, please call me at 236-5372. If you wish this matter to be reviewed by the SANDAG Board of Directors, please let me know. Sincerely, JACK KOERPER Specijd Projects Director JK/rw MEMBER AGENCIES: Cities of Carlsbad, Chula Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, El Cajon, Escondido, Imperial Beach, La Mesa, Lemon Grove, National City, Oceanside, Poway, San Diego, San Marcos, Santee and Vista ADVISORY/LIAISON MEMBERS; Calif. Dept. of Transportation/U.S. Dept. of Defense and Tijuana/Baja Calif. Norte November 28, 1983 TO: LAND USE PLANNING MANAGER FROM: Acting City Engineer SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR DEL MAR FINANCIAL CENTER (O'HARA) According to the Planning Code, the City Engineer must make a report to the Land Use Planning Manager concerning the extent of flood hazard at the project site and whether the property is clearly and wholly within the flood plain. In order to make this report, it will be necessary to know the existing flood limits and to determine the effect any proposed improvements will have on the flood limits. Since the proposed College Boulevard is required to make this project work and its construction will definitely impact the flood limits within the project site, we will require its inclusion in the flood plain study. We are aware this bridge is also an offsite requirement for the Mandana and Barnes Projects, and will likely be built through an assessment district. However, this project is definitely within the flood plain zone and any effects caused by the bridge will impact this project. This being the case, we will need to have the developer submit a hydraulic report substantiating their claim that the proposed improvements will have no or little effect on their proposed development. A» HEC-2 Program is the preferred means of providing the necessary hydraulic data; however, we are open to other acceptable engineering studies that accomplish the same task. DAVID HAUSER Acting City Engineer DH :vi MEMORANDUM DATE: August 2, 1983 TO: FROM! Ron Beckman, ACM/DS Roy Kackley, City Engineer David Hauser, Associate Civil Engineer Roger Greer, Director/Utilities & Maint. Dan Hentschke, Assistant City Attorney Michael Holzmiller, Land Use Planning Manager Charlie Grimm, Principal Planner Catherine Nicholas>^Land Use Planning Office SUBJECT: DRAFT EIR 83-1 DEL MAR FINANCIAL Attached for your review is a copy of the draft environmental impact report for the proposed widening and extension of Poinsettia Lane. The draft environmental impact report has just entered the 45-day public review period. This period will terminate on or about September 16, 1983. Please address any comments, to my attention, prior to that date. CDN/ar Attachment DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008-1989 (619) 438-5591 Citp of CarlsJbab August 2, 1983 TO: RESPONSIBLE/OTHER AGENCIES SUBJECT: EIR 83-1 DEL MAR FINANCIAL Enclosed for your review is a copy of the draft environmental impact report for the prezoning, specific plan, tentative map and annexation of 111 acres located on the northeast side of El Camino Real, north and south of the proposed extension of College Boulevard. The project area is planned for residential, hotel/condominium, commercial and office/professional development. Pursuant to Section 15084 of the State Environmental Impact Report Guidelines, we are requesting comments from responsible and other agencies. Please address your comments, at my attention, to the Land Use Planning Office, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, CA., 92008. If no comments are received by September 16, 1983, it will be assumed that your agency concurs with the analysis and mitigation measures described in the draft. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (619) 438-5591. We will look forward to receiving your comments. CITY OF CARLSBAD CATHERINE D. NICHOLAS Land Use Planning Office CDN/ar Enclosure Hall to: State Cleirfnghouse, 1400 Tenth Street, Rra. 121, Sacramento. CA 95314 — 9I6/445-0SB NOTICE iaBtp.MPLETION ANO EHVIRONMSTTAL D0CUJ1E.NT FORM DEL MAR FINANCIAL See NOTE 3s!aw scH# 83042705 1. Project T1tle:_ 2. Lead Agency: City of Carlsbad 3a. Street Address: 1200 Elrn Avenue 3c. County: San Dieqo PROJECT LacAT::s 4. County: San Diego 3d. zip: 92008 3. Contact Person: Catherine Nicholas , 3b. City: Carlsbad 3e. Phone: (619) 438-5591 4a. City/ccCTunity: COuntv of San Dieqo 4b.(optional) Assessor's Parcel do. 4c. Section 10 & H Twp. 12 S _Range_ 4 West Sa. Cross streats:El Csmino Real & College Blvd^ nearest CoCTnun'ity: . 6. Within 2 ailes of: a. State Kwy No. 1-5/ B\?y7Sb. Airports Paloxar c. WaterwaysAqua Hedionda LaqOCai 7. DOCUMENT TY.'E CEQA 01 .HOP 02 Early Cons 03 Neg Dec 04 X Draft EIR 05 Supplement/ Subsequent EIR (if so, prior SCH # ) NEPA Jlotice of Intent _Envir. Assessment/ FONSI 05 . 07 08 09 10 U 11. ^Draft EIS OTHER'" ^Information Only Final Oooj.nent Other 8. LOCAL ACTION TYPE 01 General Plan Update 02 flew Element 03 General Plan Amendnient 04 Master Plan 05 X Annexation 06 X Specific Plan 07 Redevelopment 03 ^ Rezone 09 X Land Division (Subdivision, Parcel Hap. Tract Hap, etc.) 10 Use Pemit 11 Cancel Ag Preserve 12 Other 10. D-VELOPHgNT TYPE ' Acres 36 01 X Residential: Units 164 02 X Office: Sq.Ft. 423,000 Acres 23 Employees 03 X Shoppinq/CoinBereial: Sq.Ft. 180,000 19 . 5 Emp I oy ees 04 05 05 07 03 09 10 Acres Jndustrtal: Sq.Ft._ Acres _Employaes' _Sewsr: HGD_ Water: H6D _Transportat1on: Type_ _Hinaral Extraction: Hin9ral_ _?ower Gsnaration: Wattage TOTAL ACRES: 111 Acres Type: - Other: Hotol/Condo- 120 Rooms 13 Acres PROJECT ISSUES DISOISSED I.N DOCUMENT 01 X Aesthetic/Visual 08 X Geologic/Seismic 15 Sewer Capacity 22 Water Supply 02 X Agricultural Land 09 Jobs/Housing Balance 16 X Soil Erosion . 23_ _X_W.etland/aiparian 03 X Air Quality 10 Hinerals 17 X Solid Waste 24 X Wildlife' 04 X Archaeological/Historical li ^ Noisa 18 Toxic/Hazardous 25 X Growth Inducing 05 Coastal 12 X Public Services 19 X Traffic/Circulation 25 X Incompatible Lar.duse 06 Fire Hazard 13 ^ Schools 20 Vegetation 27 X Cumulative Effects 07 12. X Flocding/Orainage FUriDING(approx.) Federal 5 14 Septic Systems State S 21 X Watar Quality Total S 23 Uti li ties/Energy 13. PRESENT UND USE AND ZONING: , . . . Vacant, agriculture, two residences, two trailers, residential care facility. 14. PROJECT DESC.'^IPTION: Preannexational Zone Change, a Specific Plan and annexation to the City of Carlsbad for 111 acres ultimately proposed -for office/ccnmercial, general commercial, residential and hotel/condcminium developirent- The project proposes to designate approximately 13 acres of riparian habitat as open space. The project nroposes a 180,000 sq.ft. shopping center, a hotel/ condcminium with 9 tennis courtis and a 10,000 sq.ft. clubhouse/restaurant, 164 attached SFR's and 423,000 sq.ft. of of-Pice/commercial development. SIGilATiJRE CF LEAO AGEIICY REPRESENTATIVE: . ^ Date 15. .NOTE Clearinghcusa will assign identif ic"3TTSn numbers for all new projectfs. If a SCH Number already exists for a prajacc (e.g. frcm a Notice of .'i-soaration or previous draft docisnent) please fill it in. WILLIAM H. DAUDNEY NICHOLAS C. BANCHE LAW OFFICES OF DAUBNEY AND BANCHE PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS 702 FOURTH STREET POST OFFICE BOX 390 OCEANSIDE. CAUFORNIA S2054 AREA CODE 619 TELEPHONE 723-1881 \\ ^ ^^^^ \'' July 19, 1983 Michael Holzmiller Planning Department City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 RE: O'Hara Development Dear Mike: As you are no doubt aware, I have been attempting to assist Mike O'Hara with regard to his Carlsbad development. You might also recall that his plan was placed in partial jeopardy as the result of the Agatep project off Sunny Creek Road. I ara pleased to report that Mr. O'Hara and his con- sultants have met with Mr. and Mrs. Rusty Grosse on a number of occasions, and have-been able to satisfy their legitimate concerns with regard to the effects of the O'Hara project on the-Grosse property. Specifically, with 2 amendments, the Grosses are pre- pared to support the O'Hara plan. Those 2 amendments, and incidentally, amendments to which Mr. O'Hara readily accedes, involve the placing of a gate which vjould prevent occupants of the hotel from intruding into the serenity of the canyon, and, secondly, the reduction in density of the residential area to 1 structure per acre. I would hope that Staff would look favorably upon this plan, with the described modifications. I look forward to discussing this application with you at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, HOLAS C. BANCHE NCB:jp D€L m\i fmrno^i GROUP INC. ai4) 438-4313 6351 wmow Dme. me "A" June 15, 1983 Mr. Mike Holzmiller Land Use Planrving Manager City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, Califomia 92008 Reference: Waiver of CEQA Section 21083.2 for the Del Mar Financial Project Dear Mr. Holzmiller: Archaeology was identified as a significant environmental issue for the Del Mar Financial draft EIR and, therefore, is subject to archaeological investigations in compliance with Section 21083.2 of CEQA. Having re- viewed this section, I find that it may be possible to waive the section and complete environmental processing under previously accepted pro- cedures. Subdivision (j) of Section 21083.2 states that: . . . This section shall not apply to any project described in subdivision (c) of Section 21065 if the applicant and the lead agency jointly elect to comply with all other applicable pro- visions of this devision. I understand that it is the opinion of city counsel that this section does allow waiver of Section 21083.2, with the understanding that it will result in the requirement for impact mitigation to archaeological resources prior to final project approval and without the protections of Section 21083.2. Therefore, I am hereby requesting a waiver of Section 21083.2. I understand that this will pennit the draft EIR to begin public review without completion of determinations of uniqueness as required in Section 21083.2. Sincerely H. D. "Mike" O'Hara HD0:klr Dei nm mmoAi GROUP inc. (714)433-4313 6351V/1RROW dme. SUITE-fr May 10, 1983 Ms. Catherine D. Nicholas Land Use Planning Office City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 SUBJECT: ZC-272-O'Hara-PREANNEXATIONAL ZONING AND ANNEXATION Ms, Nicholas, Enclosed please find a check in the amount of $350.00 to cover the additional cost of adding the Barlow and the Pillsbury Property to the EIR. Respectfully submitted. V Cs, H.D. "Mike" O'Hara HD0:klr CITY OF CARLSBAD I 200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 (714) 729-1 lat #6 PURCHASE ORDER CHANGE REGUEST Vendor No. Vendor _£ECON- 109 4 Cudahy Place #20 4 San Diego, CA 92110 Reason For Change: Applicant has requested the addition of approximately 8.5 acres to scope of EIR analysis. Purchase Order No. Account No. 80-92-45-0519 Date May 31, 1983 Change Adding $350.00 to account #80-92-45- 0519 EIR trust account for Del Mar .Financial TEIR 83-1) . Approved WHITE • Vendor - YELLOW • Finance Purchasing Agent::^ PiNK - Purchasing - GOLDENROD - Department # CITY OF CAHLSBAD 12C0 ELM AVENUE • CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 9'<iC08 (714) 438-5551 RECEIVED FROM_ . DATE ADDRESS A/C. NO. DtSCRIPTION A,MOUNT •' 7 -y. - : - '-.-^H TOTAL 1- DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA 92008-1989 (619) 438-5591 Citp of Cartebab April 28, 1983 Mike O'Hara Del Mar Financial 6351 Yarrow Drive, Suite A Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: ZC-272 - DEL MAR FINANCIAL PROCESSING/DEVELOPMENT FEES The following is a schedule of major fees you may anticipate in the processing and development of the Del Mar Financial Project. As there is some uncertainty in the processing mechanisms you may choose, I have listed all fees I believe may be relevant. APPLICATION PROCESSING FEES Zone Change Specific Plan Tentative Parcel Map Tentative Subdivision Map (will be required to accompany PD) Planned Development Permit (single-family and/or condo portion of project) Conditional Use Permit (Time-Shares) 500.00 1,000.00 300.00 500.00 750.00 1,000.00 200.00 400.00 (1-25 lots) (26-100 lots) (100+ lots) FINAL MAPS Final Subdivision Map Final Parcel Map Duplicate Tracing Deposit Improvement Plan Check $ 100 + $2.00 per/lot 100.00 100.00 (refundable) Approximately 3% of the cost of improvements (includes plan check and inspection fees) April 28, 1983 Page Two DEVELOPMENT FEES School Fees Public Facilities Fees Park-in-Lieu Fees Drainage Fees Street Light Energy Fees Water Service Sewer Fees EDU's BY USE Retail Uses Office Uses Restaurants Hotels/Motel I hope this list is of assistance, information, please contact me. •Sincerely, CATHERINE D. NICHOLAS Land Use Planning Office Contact Carlsbad Unified School District (letter of availability required prior to zoning) 2% building cost valuation (payable at time of building permits) $464.00 per residential unit (payable prior to final map) $2,858 per acre (payable prior to final map) $150.00 per light Contact water district $1000.00 per EDU 1 EDU/3400 gross sq. ft. 1 EDU/1800 gross sq. ft. 2.67 EDU's and 1 EDU per seven seats 1 EDU/per room Should you require additional CDN:bw DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES • Assistant City Manager (714) 438-5596 • Building Department (714) 438-5525 D Engineering Department (714) 438-5541 • Housing & Reclevelopment Department 3096 Harding St. (714)438-5611 ^ Planning Department (714) 438-5591 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 Citp of CadfiJbab February 28, 1983 Mike O'Hara 6351 Yarrow Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Re: PFF Agreements for Del Mar Financial (ZC-272) The enclosed Public Facilities Fee Agreements are being returned for the following reasons. 1. Page 7 - Frankel must sign as trustee for Parcel 4. The notary acknowledgement must reflect trusteeship. - H.D. O'Hara's signature must be typed under name. 2. Page 8 - Last page - Make sure parcel number on legal description agrees with parcel number on title report. Indicate number on both. Return the agreement to me by March 8, 1983. If you have any questions, please call me at 438-5591. Sincerely, ADRIENNE M. LANDERS Land Use Planning Office AML:kb Enclosure MEMO TO FILE Meeting - January 11, 1983 O'Hara Project - Attendees - O'Hara, Ballou, Arndt, Allen, Kackley, Holzmiller, Grimm, Nicholas, & Ballou's Assistant Issues Traffic - (1) Spacing - College to Collector A Issue addressed in EIR (2) O'Hara has no control over R-T-in RT-0 at south end of property - Proposed middle R-T-in, RT-0 would mitigate but problems are associated with this access- a) interrupts traffic flow, b) curb creates hazardous situation - EIR (3) Right-T-in RTO between El Camino Real and Collector A on College - Restaurant location is the problem. Some trips will be crossing 3 lanes of traffic in a very short distance. (4) EIR Covers Wershing, Barber, O'Hara. (5) Phasing map is on the way. CDG:kb D€L m\i mma^i GROUP IMC. (714)438-4313 6351 YARROW DRNG, 9UIT€ "Vl' CmMD. CflLIf ORMIfl 9Q008 January 27, 1983 Ms. Catherine Nicholas City of Carlsbad - Palnning Department 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 iiij i_i JAN 2 81983 CITY OF CARLSBAD Planning Department Subject: ZC -272 - O'Hara - Preannexation Zoning Dear Ms. Nicholas, Enclosed you will find the two public facility fee agreements with the Del Mar Financial Corporate Seal. Mr. Frankel's was notarized and he is the owner of the property, not a trustee. The Barber property is not to be included in the zoning but we intend to have the property included in the E.I.R. There is no Smith and Wernick interest in the Eaton property and a title report will be forth coming next week to establish this ownership and all of the others. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. If you have nay problems or questions in this matter please give me a call at the number above. Sincerely, H. D. "Mike" O'Hara Enclosures DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES n Assistant City Manager (714)438-5596 • Building Departnnent (714) 438-5525 • Engineering Dsjjrtrtment (714) 438-5541 • Housing & Redevslopment Department 3096 Harding SL (714) 438-,'i611 0^lam'mg Department (714) 438-5691 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 Citp of €axl^hati January 14, 1983 Mike O'Hara Del Mar Financial 6351 Yarrow Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Subject: ZC-272 - O'Hara - Preannexational Zone Change The following is a summary of preliminary traffic comments from the Engineering Department to the traffic study and development plan submitted for the above referenced project. The following major traffic-related project issues, and how they relate to the City's Design Criteria in the Circulation Element of the General Plan, are to be addressed by the EIR; 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) The precise location and configuration of the College Boulevard/"A" Street intersection. The proposed right-turn entrance off College Bouleard. The proposed right-turn in and out driveway off El Camino Real. The proposed public street right-turn in and out off El Camino Real approximately equidistant between College Boulevard and Palmer Way. The connection of "A" Street to the proposed Barber property access continuing to Impala Street. The EIR will address the amount of development which can be accommodated by "A" Street prior to the necessity of this connection. Project impacts of the El Camino Real/College Boulevard intersection. The traffic study submitted utilized year 1990 figures as opposed to a year 2,000 build-out. Additionally, all anticipated project vicinity traffic was not incorporated in the study. (A detailed list of projects can be provided.) January 14, Page Two 1983 Minor discrepancies were found between generation rates utilized in the traffic study and those required by the City, as follows: 1) Office Use - Required rate - 20 trips per 1,000 square feet Utilized rate - 16 trips per 1,000 square feet 2) Commercial (Wersching) - Required rate - 80 trips per 1,000 square feet Utilized rate - 70 trips per 1,000 square feet The Engineering Department has also requested a current breakdown of restaurant, financial and office square footage, and 24-hour volumes as well as peak hour volumes on all streets, to complete their review. I anticipate some additional comments may be forthcoming from the Engineering Department. I will forward all comments as received. Sincerely, CATHERINE NICHOLAS Land Use Planning Office CDN:kb cc: Roy Kackley Richard Allen Kent Whitson Charles Grimm D Assistant City Manager (714) 438-5596 DEVELOPMENTAL i^^s^!^ 1200 ELM AVENUE SERVICES B^^^B CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 ° fitfZslT'^""' Citp of Carlsfbati (714) 438-5525 • Engineering Department (714) 438-5541 • Housing & Redevelopment Department 3096 Harding St. (714)438-5611 Ji^!''P\sm^T\g Department (714) 438-5591 January 14, 1983 Mike O'Hara Del Mar Financial 6351 Yarrow Dr. Carlsbad, CA 9 2008 Subject: ZC-272 - O'Hara - Preannexation Zoning The Land Use Planning Office has reviewed your application for preannexational zoning and determined that it is not complete. The following information is needed to complete the application: 1) Current preliminary title reports for all properties involved. 2) Executed public facility fee agreements for all property owners involved. If the Barber property is to be included in the request for zoning, a signed application, public facility fee agreement and preliminary title report will be necessary. The documents will be required for the Smith and Wenker interest in the Eaton property. I am returning the two public facility fee agreements submitted, Both agreements need the Del Mar Financial corporate seal. The Frankel public facilities fee agreement needs to be notarized. The notary should acknowledge that Frankel is signing as a trustee. Should you have any questions or require assistance, please contact me. Sincerely, CATHERINE NICHOLAS Land Use Planning Office CDNikb Enclosures DEVELOPMENTAL fiNjaSJ^Ia 1200 ELM AVENUE SERVICES if M CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 D Assistant City Manager (714) 438-5596 • Building D9partrn«nt fiZfZ^tT'^''' Citp of Carl£(bab • Engineering Dewi"nent (714) 438-5541 Q Housing & Redevelopment Department 3096 Harding St. (714)438-5611 Planning Department (714) 438-5591 January 13, 1983 Mike O'Hara Del Mar Financial 6351 Yarrow Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: ZC-272 - O'HARA - PREANNEXATIONAL ZONING AND ANNEXATION Pursuant to our meeting of January 11th, I have drafted some suggested language for your "letter of permission" to the City of Carlsbad. I authorize the City of Carlsbad to proceed with the hiring of a consultant to prepare an Environmental Impact Report on behalf of Del Mar Financial. I would request that the EIR consultant fully analyze the Wersching and Barber properties, as a part of the EIR, in addition to the Del Mar Financial project site. Del Mar Financial will assume financial responsibility for the consultant's costs incurred in preparing the EIR. Requests for Proposals, for preparation of the EIR, will be sent out when a letter of permission is received. I will be forwarding traffic comments under separate cover to allow the Engineering Department the opportunity to review the letter. Sincerely, CATHERINE D. NICHOLAS Land Use Planning Office CDN:bw ^|jpi^||Carlsbad Unified School District 801 Pine Avenue, Carisbad, California 92008 729-9291 'Excellence In Education" BOARD OF TRUSTEES THOMAS L CURTIN, M.D. President JOHN J. MAMAUX Vice President JUUANNE L NYGAARD Clerk W. ALLAN KELLY Member J. EDWARD SWITZER, JR. Mennber DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION PHILIP GRIGNON, Ed.D. District Superintendent SUSAN H. LARGEN Instructional Services DAVID WM. BATES, SR. Employee Relations JAMES M. STARK Comptroller RICHARD A. SHALER Information Systems K.C. DUN LAP Facilities/Services November 16, 1982 Mr. Vernon Farrow, Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California Attention: Mr. James Hagaman, City Planning Director Gentlemen: It has come to our attention that Del Mar Financial has applied for a zone change on a parcel of land located generally at the corner of El Camino Real and College Boulevard. Inasmuch as this request would have no direct impact upon the enrollment of students in the Carlsbad Unified School District, we will not require an agreement or contributions from Del Mar Financial as a result of the zone change. However, when development of the property is proposed, we would need that information for further evaluation. It is highly possible that school contributions would be required at that time. Very truly yours. James Stark, Comptrol ler cc Del Mar Financial ac KECEIVED f'.10V17l982 Cir/ OF CARLSBAD STAFF REPORT DATE: March 28, 1984 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Land Use Planning Office SUBJECT: EIR 83-1/ZC-272/ZC-274/SP-190/CT 83 I. FINANCIAL - Certification on an Env Report and request for approval of zoning of C-2 (General Commercial)/ 20,000 and OS (Open Space); a Speci Subdivision Map and Non-Residential on the northeast side of El Camino south of the proposed extension of RECOMMENDATION -36/CP-273 - DEL MAR ironmental Impact preannexational 0 (Office), R-1- fic Plan; Tentative Condominium Permit Real, north and College Boulevard. It is recommended that the Planning Conunission ADOPT Resolution No. 2266, recommending CERTIFICATION of EIR 83-TT It is also reconunended that the Planning Conunission ADOPT Resolution Nos. 2267 and 2268, recommending APPROVAL of ZC-272 and ZC-274; Resolution No. 2269, recommending APPROVAL of SP-190; and Resolution Nos. 2270 and 2271, recommending APPROVAL of CT 83- 36/CP-273; based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is proposing to develop a 99 acre project comprised of a professional office complex, hotel and tennis club, commercial shopping center and residential development, located as described above. To provide for this development, the applicant is requesting: 1 ) 2) 3) 4) 5) Certification of an Environmental Impact Report Approval of preannexational zoning of: a) 0 - Office and Professional b) C-2 - General Conunercial c) R-1-20,000 d) OS - Open Space Approval of a Specific Plan Approval of a Tentative Subdivision Map Approval of a Non-Residential Condominium Permit The subject property is located in an unincorporated island on the east side of El Camino Real, approximately 0.7 miles north of Palomar Airport Road. The site is roughly L-shaped and bisected by the Agua Hedionda Creek. The area northeast of the creek, ultimately proposed for residential development, is characterized by a steep-sided ridge covered with coastal sage scrub and grassland. The area southwest of the creek is depressed below El Camino Real. Vegetation in this portion of the site is primarily grassland with riparian oak woodland covering the steep north-facing slope adjacent to the creek. A well-developed riparian habitat exists along the Agua Hedionda Creek. The project site surrounds a 3.43 acre parcel, the Pillsbury property and residence, which is not a part of these applications. Existing land uses include two residences and two office trailers on the project site. Surrounding land uses consist of Rancho Carlsbad Mobilehome Community and golf course to the northwest, scattered residences and agricultural fields to the northest and east; the Madonna Hills Guest Home to the southeast and the Palomar Tech Centre beyond to the southeast. The Carlsbad Research Center is undergoing development to the southwest. The Mandana Carlsbad Ridge project was recently approved, adjacent to the northeast corner of the project, was recently approved for estate development. For the purposes of this report, the project will be discussed in its five component requests, III. EIR 83-1 The major impacts of the project from eventual development and possible mitigation measures, as identified in the Environmental Impact Report, are summarized below: A, Traffic A total of 32,146 average daily trips will be generated by development in accordance with the proposed conceptual land use plan. The results of the EIR traffic study indicates that there will be a signifcant adverse impact at the El Camino Real/College Boulevard and College Boulevard/A Street intersections, if the roads are constructed in accordance with the City's General Plan. In addition, the intersection spacing proposed along College Boulevard is in conflict with the City's intersection spacing policy. By completing the mitigation measures recommended in the EIR, all of the intersections in the vicinity of the project will be at level of service D or better. The City of Carlsbad generaly requires intersections to be designed for level C or better. The El Camino Real/College Boulevard intersection, however, will operate at level D even without this project, as will several of the intersections in the vicinity of the Palomar Airport, -2- B. Land Use A portion of the proposed hotel development is located within the Cl, Limited Crash Hazard, airport impact zone for Palomar Airport. This land use is not in conformance with the Palomar Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP), which specifies that additional transient lodging should not occur within the Cl airport impact zone. The CLUP is , however, outdated and is scheduled to be updated if funding can be obtained. Portions of the proposed project could result in potential land use conflicts with adjacent property. This potential for land use conflicts is associated with (1) the commercial-recreational shopping area proposed in the northwestern portion of the site and future residential uses allowed by the City's General Plan to the north; and (2) the proposed residential development at a density of approximately four dwelling units, adjacent to the approved Carlsbad Ridge estate development project and the R-A-2-acre zoning to the east. Appropriate buffering of the proposed land use from future land uses should mitigate potential impacts. C. Topography and Visual Aesthetics Future development in accordance with the proposed conceptual land use plan would result in significant change in the character of the area from rural to urban. Although detailed grading plans have not been prepared, the conceptual land use plan indicates that the office- professional and hotel complex will be terraced into the hillsides to reduce the amount of grading and the height of manufactures slopes. The proposed open space area along the creek would preserve most of the trees associated with the riparian woodland along the creek, which are considered to be the most significant topographic resource on the property. Enlarging the proposed open space area to preserve the steep hillsides south of the creek, as described in the EIR would reduce impacts to an acceptable level, D. Air Quality Future development of the project site will result in an incremental increase to basin-wide accumulation of air pollutants. Development in accordance with the -3- proposed zoning and conceptual land use plan will increase the use of energy and subsequent pollutant emissions beyond those anicipated by the Regional Air Quality Strategies (RAQS). In that this represents an unanticipated increment, the impact to the RAQS must be considered significant. E. Archaeology All five archaeological sites that were recorded within the project area will be directly impacted by development in accordance with the proposed conceptual land use plan. A two-stage data recovery program is reconunended to mitigate impacts to all five sites within the project area. F. Biology The project, as proposed in the conceptual land use plan, would have significant adverse effects on biological resources. The significance of these effects is based on the loss of about 60 acres of natural habitat supporting several populations of rare and declining plant and animal species. Because the riparian woodland is the most significant biological resource on the project area, full protection of this area would be considered adequate mitigation to reduce project impacts to a level of insignificance. Preservation of the riparian woodland would involve enlarging the proposed open space area along Agua Hedionda Creek, G. Paleontology Moderately to highly significant paieontological resources would be directly impacted by development of the project area. These impacts can be beneficial in terms of fossil discovery and salvage provided that paieontological monitoring occurs during grading. Staff believes that EIR 83-1 was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and has adequately identified and discussed the environmental impacts. For these reasons, staff is recommending certification of EIR 83-1, IV. Zone Changes ZC-272/ZC-274 Requests for preannexational zoning for the subject property were made under two separate applications, as referenced above. -4- As future development of the properties will be governed by the same specific plan and potential impacts were evaluated together in EIR 83-1, consideration of the zoning requests has been combined. The proposed zoning by area and the respective general plan designations are as follows: TABLE 1 AREA GENERAL PLAN PROPOSED (Existing) ZONING A RLM R-1-20,000 B RH/C/O C-2 C RH/C/O 0 D C C-2 E RH/C/O OS Please See Exhibit X Planning Issue 1) Are the proposed zones consistent with the General Plan, appropriate for the site and compatible with surrounding land uses? Discussion Staff believes that the proposed zones are consistent with the General Plan, appropriate for the site and compatible with surrounding land uses. Area A is designated RLM, Residential Low-Medium Density, 0-4 du's/ac. The applicant is proposing to zone this area R-1-20,000, The specific plan would further restrict density not to exceed 2 du's/ac. The proposed zone would, therefore, be consistent with the General Plan, Staff also believes that the zone is appropriate for the site. The 29 acre subject property is adequate in size and shape to accomodate R-1-20,000 development. The zone is consistent with the density indicated in the proposed Sunny Creek Specific Plan and compatible with the intended rural atmosphere. The future residential area would be adequately buffered from the proposed tennis club/hptel condominium by the riparian open space, C-2 zoning is requested for Area B, the 8,8 acre proposed hotel and tennis club site. The Sycamore Creek Specific Plan would limit uses to recreational and health club facilities, restaurant, hotel and accessory uses. Staff believes, that with the development restrictions and guidelines of the specific plan, the zone is appropriate for the site and would be compatible with the proposed office development and sufficiently buffered to avoid impacts on neighboring residential uses. -5- The proposed C-2 zone would be consistent with the C land use designation of Conununity Conunercial, indicated by the property's combination district. Zoning, therefore would be consistent with the General Plan. The proposed office development. Area C would be implemented by the City's new 0, Office, zone. The 0 zone would be consistent with the 0, Office and Related Conunercial land use designation of the combination district. Staff believes that the 19.4 acre site, adjacent to El Camino Real, is appropriate for the zone. This new zone was developed for larger, high quality office complexes. Use of this zone was particularly anticipated in the Palomar Airport area. The Office zone would be compatible with the adjoining C-2, hotel/tennis club, use and buffered by open space from residential uses. The site is bordered on two sides by El Camino Real and College Boulevard, a prime and major arterial, A minor incompatibility may be created between the proposed office development and the existing Madonna Hill residential care facility, adjacent to the southeast. Staff would, however, anticipate the incompatibility to be minor and the Madonna Hill . use is transitional. Area D is proposed for C-2 zoning. The General Commercial zone would implement the, C, Community Conunercial, land use designation of the general plan. Anticipated development of the site is a community shopping center with office uses. The C-2 zone would be appropriate for the 18 acre site bounded by El Camino Real and College Boulevard, Setbacks and buffering provisions of the specific plan should ensure compatibility with adjoining uses to the north and west. Finally, the riparian habitat, associated with Agua Hedionda Creek is proposed to be zoned OS, Open Space. Pursuant to the Sycamore Creek specific plan, 14,8 acres would be dedicated in an open space easement. Staff believes that the open space zone is the most appropriate zone for the sensitive biological habitat comprising Area E, Overall, staff believes that the requested zones, indicated in Table 1, are consistent with the General Plan, appropriate for the properties and compatible with surrounding land uses, V, Specific Plan - SP-190 Planning Issues 1) Does the specific plan adequately ensure high quality development? 2) Does the specific plan mitigate potential significant environmental impacts? -6- Discussion Staff believes that the proposed specific plan provides adequate development guidelines to ensure a high quality, mixed use development while mitigating environmental concerns. The Specific Plan is a requirement for this development because it is located in the Airport Influence Area and because the property contains a Combination District. The specific plan would modify the zoning, providing stricter standards for development. The Sycamore Creek Specific Plan would be consistent with both the proposed Sunny Creek Specific Plan and El Camino Real Scenic Preservation Overlay Zone. The proposed specific plan provides for development of the 99 acre site in ten phases. Comprehensive development standards are included for Areas B and C to accomodate immediate development of the hotel/tennis club facility and phased development of the office complex. Staff believes that these guidelines, including setbacks, landscaping, signage, architectural theme and a detailed schedule of improvements will ensure quality development of these areas. General development guidelines are included for areas A and D, the residential and commercial/office portions of the site, since specific development plans are not known. Future development of these areas will require amendments to the specific plan. These subsequent amendments would enable the Planning Conunission and City Council to review future development plans, uses, site design, landscaping and architecture to guarantee quality of design and compatibility. Staff believes that, through redesigns performed by the applicant and safeguard provisions of the specific plan, all potential significant impacts associated with the proposed project would be mitigated. Subsequent to the release of the draft EIR, the project has undergone a series of revisions in an attempt to mitigate those environmental impacts identified in that document, Of primary concern to staff, were potential impacts upon traffic. The EIR predicts a level of service D at the intersection of El Camino Real and College Boulevard at full project buildout. The City generally requires intersections to be designed for level C or better. The traffic analysis contained in the EIR, however, indicates that this intersection will operate at level D even without this project, as will several of the intersections in the vicinity of Palomar Airport. Staff believes the schedule of improvements contained in the EIR, including lane improvements to El Camino Real, auxiliary lanes on College Boulevard and extension of "A" street south to connect with Palmer Way will enable this intersection to operate at an acceptable level of service. -7- The specific plan additionally includes a provision requiring a traffic study prior to development of Area D, the conunercial/office site. Initially proposed for purely conunercial development, this area was projected to generate 45% of the overall site traffic. The future traffic study will allow evaluation of impacts based on specific uses when development plans are known. The specific plan provides that no uses or development shall be approved which reduces the levels of service below acceptable levels. The site plan has also been revised to mitigate potential land use impacts. The proposed hotel site has been relocated out of the crash hazard impact zone. Landscaped setback buffers, required by the specific plan, for the commercial/office site should mitigate impacts on future adjoining land uses. Residential compatibility would be ensured by density restrictions contained in the specific plan. The plan further requires an amendment prior to residential development in Area A, allowing future review to guarantee compatibility when more specific development plans are available. Site redesign has mitigated some identified impacts to topography, biology and visual aesthetics. The proposed riparian open space area was enlarged and is protected from development by the specific plan, which will require dedication of an open space easement. The proposed hotel was resited off the Oak-Woodland covered slopes, which are now included in open space. Provisions would be included in the specific plan requiring development to be consistent with the El Camino Real Scenic Preservation Overlay Zone. Requirements for heavy landscaping, including the use of many mature specimen trees are also included in the specific plan. The transition from a rural to an urban environment is an unavoidable impact of the project. Staff does believe, however, that anticipated impacts would be lessened by special landscaping treatment required by the specific plan. Satisfactory mitigation of potential impacts upon archaeology are provided for in the specific plan. Mitigation would involve a two-step recovery program outlined in the specific plan. As a function of the specific plan, the applicant is requesting approval of height in excess of 35 feet for the proposed hotel in Area B, (zoned C-2), and for five office buildings (Buildings C, D, E, P, & G, as shown on Exhibit C), in Area C, (zoned 0). As shown in Exhibits M2 and M3 of the specific plan, the requested height for all of the buildings would be 45 feet. To comply with the restrictions of the C-2 and 0 zones, staff has modified the specific plan and added a condition of approval that all of the buildings be redesigned not to exceed a maximum height of 35 feet. The options available to the Planning Commission are: -8- 1) Leave the specific plan as it is presented, denying the request for the increased height, and leaving intact the provisions of the specific plan and conditions of approval requiring redesign to 35 feet. The underlying zone, would permit the developer to request the City Council to approve additional height, as he develops the site. 2) Reconunend approval to the City Council of the requested height. This would require a change to the Specific Plan to reflect the applicant's request. Overall, staff believes that the proposed specific plan provides for high quality development, adequate opportunities for future review and mitigates potential environmental impacts, VI, CT 83-36 Planning Issues 1) Does the proposed subdivision comply with all requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Map Act? 2) Are the proposed lots suitable in size and shape to accomodate development permitted in the zone and specific plan? Discussion The proposed tentative map would subdivide the subject property into twelve lots and a remainder parcel. Lots A-1 through A-7 would be created for office development of Area C, Lots B-1, B-2 and B-3 would accomodate the hotel, tennis club and associated facilities contained in Area B, Lot C-1, isolated by "A" Street, "B" Street and the Pillsbury property would be reserved for future development. Lot D-1 would correspond with Area D, the future commercial/office site. Finally, a 44 acre Remainder Parcel would be created encompassing the open space and future residential area. The lot lines indicated on the tentative map would correspond with the proposed phases of the specific plan. A detailed schedule of improvements was developed for each phase/lot to stand on its own is contained in the Specific Plan. Staff believes that all of the proposed lots would comply with the minimum size, width, frontage and other requirements of the underlying zones and Subdivision Map Act. All of the proposed lots would be suitable in size and shape to accomodate development permitted in the zone. The office lots, A-1 through A-7, are designed to accomodate the proposed office -9- A-1 through A-7, are designed to accomodate the proposed office development. Lot D-1 would be adequate to accommodate community commercial/office development, as permitted in the zone and specific plan. Hotel and tennis club development would be adequately provided for in Lots B-1, B-2 and B-3. CP-273 The applicant is requesting approval of a non-residential condominium permit for the proposed hotel. The 122 rooms would be subdivided into condominium units. As proposed by the applicant, each unit would be sold to a single owner. The owner would be entitled to use of the room for a limited number of days per year. The rooms would be rented out as hotel rooms, by an operating-management company, for the balance of the year. Staff has reconunended, as a condition of approval, that the developer enter into agreement with the City for operation of the hotel. Planning Issues 1) will the granting of this permit be consistent with the code, the general plan, applicable specific plans, master plans, and all adopted plans of the City and other governmental agencies? 2) Is the proposed use at the particular location necessary and desirable to provide a service or facility which will contribute to the general well-being of the neighborhood and the community? 3) Will such use be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity? 4) Does the proposed non-residential planned development meet all of minimum development standards of the underlying zone, except for lot area? The proposed condominium hotel would be consistent with the Zoning Ordinance, General Plan and proposed specific plan, all of which provide for conunercial development of the site. Staff believes that the project site, near Palomar Airport and the City's industrial core, would provide a desirable service to this growing area and visiting executives. The developer would, further, be required to enter into agreement with the City to ensure appropriate operation of the hotel and consistency with the City's Transient Occupancy Taxation policies. The proposed use would be compatible with the adjoining office development. The riparian open space would provide a buffer between the hotel and residential uses. Staff, therefore, believes that the proposed use would not be detrimental to public welfare or adjoining properties, -10- Lastly, the proposed non-residential planned development meets all of the minimum development standards of the C-2 zone. The proposed development, as outlined in the specific plan, would exceed all required development standards. Summary Overall, staff believes that the proposed zones are consistent with the General Plan, appropriate for the site and compatible with surrounding land uses; that the proposed specific plan adequately ensures high-quality development and mitigates potential environmental impacts; that the proposed tentative map complies with all requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Map Act and that all of the lots created are adequate to accomodate development permitted in the zone and that the proposed hotel project satisfies all required findings for approval of a non-residential condominium permit. Approval of the proposed project would require three variances to the City street standards, two requested by the applicant and one recommended by the City, A report by the City Engineer, discussing these variances and the required findings, is attached, ATTACHMENTS 1) Report, City Engineer 2) Planning Conunission Resolution Nos, 2266, 2267, 2268, 2269, 2270 and 2271 3) Location Map 4) Background Data Sheet 5) Disclosure Form CDN:bw 3/20/84 -11- ENGINEERING DEPARTNENT STANDARDS VARIANCE REPORT MARCH 19, 1984 TO: THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: City Engineer CARLSBAD TRACT 83-36, SPECIFIC PLAN 190 Section 18 of the Street Design Criteria of the City of Carlsbad Standards provides for Street Width and Improvements Standards' variances provided certain findings can be made. No formalized procedure has been established for the attainment of a Standard's variance. The Standards' variance procedure provides only that the Planning Commission shall have the authority as an administrative act to grant a variance to the Standards where the literal interpretation and enforcement of the Standards would result in practical difficulties, environmental degradation, or results Inconsistent with the general purpose of the Standards. Before any variance may be granted, the following findings must be found: 1. That there are extraordinary or unusual circumstances or conditions applicable to the situation of surrounding property necessitating a variance of the Standards. 2. That the granting of such variance will not cause substantial drainage problems. 3. That the granting of such variance will not conflict with existing or future traffic and parking demands, or pedestrian or bicycle use. 4. That the granting of such variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare, or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity in which the variance is granted. 5. That the granting of such variance will not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan. The Applicant for the subject project requires three (3) individual variances to the City Standards in order to accomplish the project. The first two variances were requested by the Developer. The third is a recommendation of the City Engineering staff. The variance requests are as follows: 1. Reduction of intersection spacing on College Blvd., between El Camino Real and the proposed "A" Street, from the required 1200 feet minimum to approximately 800 feet. MARCH 19, 1984 CARLSBAD TRACT 83-36, SPECIFIC PLAN 190 Page 2 2. Addition of eight feet of pavement section and right-of-way on College Blvd., between El Camino Real and the proposed "A" Street, to accommodate one additional lane of traffic. 3. Addition of twelve feet of pavement section and right-of-way on the proposed "A" Street, between College Blvd. and the proposed "B" Street, to accommodate one additional lane of traffic. The three variance requests are Inter-related and will be treated as one request in the report. The project site is located immediately adjacent to the Agua Hedionda Creek and flood plain. In determining the location of the proposed "A" Street, a strict interpretation of City Standards would have placed "A" Street well within the flood plain. For Engineering and environmental reasons, a request was made to reduce the required intersection spacing to approximatly 800 feet so as to locate the intersection at the edge of the flood plain area. Since the proposed "A" Street/College Blvd. intersection is to be signalized, this put an added burden on the ability of College Blvd. to handle the ultimate traffic flow it is intended to handle. The traffic report contained within the Environmental Impact Report indicates that the addition of a third lane of traffic for north-bound traffic will relieve much of the pressure on College Blvd. caused by the reduced intersection spacing. The City's Traffic Engineering Consultant has further recommended an additional lane of traffic on "A" Street at its Intersection with College Blvd. to accommodate left turns. It is felt this additional lane will improve efficiency at the intersection, thereby reducing the overall effect of the reduced College Blvd. Intersection spacing. Engineering staff feels each one of the proposed variance requests meet all five of the required findings. Each is required by an extraordinary or unusual circumstance or condition. No drainage problems will result. None of the requests will cause a conflict with existing or future traffic, parking, or pedestrian use. There will be no detrimental consequence resulting from any of the variance requests and the granting of these variances will not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan. RONALD A. BECKMAN RAB:DH:hmj BACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NO: EIR 83-1/ZC-272/ZC-274/SP-190/CT 83-36/CP-273 APPLICANT: Pel Mar Financial REQUEST AND DOCATICXJ: Certification of an EIR; Preannexational Zc»ie Change to 0, C-2, R-t-20,000 & OS, a Specific Plan, a Tentative Subdivision Map & Ncxi- ~ Residential Qyidoininium Pemut CTI the east side of El Camino Real, north & south of the proposed extension of College Boulevard. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of Lots B & E of Randx) Agua Hedicmda, according to Map thereof No, 823, filed in the Office of the County Recorder, County of San Dieqo, State of Califomia, May 1, 1915. APN; 209-060-26,32,43,"50 Acres 99 Pressed No, of Lots/Units 12 GENERAL PIAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation C/O/RH/RLM Density Allowed 20-30/0-4 du/ac Density Proposed 2 du/ac Existing Zone County Proposed Zone C-2/0/R-1 -20, OOO/OS Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: Zoning Land Use Site County SFR's/Office North County Rancho Carlsbad Golf Course/ Mobilehome Comnunity South R-A-10,000/M-Q Madonna Hills Guest Home/ Palomar Tech Centre East County SFR's/AG West C-M/(jOunty Carlsbad Research Center/ Vacant PUBLIC FACILITIES School District Carlsbad Water Carlsbad Sewer Carlsbad EDU's Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated October 29, 1982, November 19, 1982, February 25, 1983 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Negative Declaration, issued X E,I,R. Certified, dated Other, LOCATION MAP WERSCHING SITE \\\ Wl 118 O'HARA SITE EIR 83-1 ZC-272/274 CP-273 O'HARA / WERSCHING SP-190 If attar the information you hav& sub^r.itted has bae-.i reviewed, it is dete^mir.e'a I'r.at further infonaation 'Required, you will be so adv APPLICANT: AGENT: DEL MAR FINANCIAL Name (indiv.idual, partnership, joint venture, corporation, syndication) 6351 Yarrow Drive. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Businass Address (714) 438-4313 Telephona Nu.Tibe.c Mike O'Hara Name Same as Above Business Addreas (714) 438-4313 Telephone NuEi-sr Wane -(individual, partnar, joint venture, corporation, syndicacicn) Eome TiddresK Business Address Telephone Nv^iibar Tel ap hone Isutnber ['elapho.na Nusber OWNERS: Gerald Frankel 1365 Regal Row Dallas, TX 75247 EoDia iiddrtss Telephone-? Naraber -R.OSS & Mgbel Barber 5352 El Camino Real Carlsbad, CA 92008 Homer,Se Nina Eaton 652 NeptuneAvenue Leucadia, CA 92024 (?ittach more sheets if necessary) 1/We declare under penalty of perjury that ths infonnation contained in this dis- closure is true and correct and that it will remain true and corred: and inay be* roLic'd upon as being true and correct until amended. Appliccmt Acjent, Cnvner, rdrtn^r If after ths infonaation you have submitted has been reviewed, it is detennined • that further information Required, you will be so ad^ APPLICANT: AGENT: Jakob & Maria Wersching (Individuals) Name (individual, partnership, joint venture, corporation, syndication) 30772 Via La Cresta StPalos Verdes, CA 92074 Business Address (2-13) 377-8703 Telephone Mumber Name Business Address Telephone Nufflber MStSEBS: Name '(individual, partner, joint: Horn* Address venture, corporation^ syndication) Business Address Telephone Nuaber Telephone Niunber !Iaae Bomm Address 3usiness Address Telephone Ncaber Telephone iiuober (Attach more sheets if necessary) lA/e declare under penalty of perjury that the infonaation contained in this dis- closure is trus and correct and that it will remain true and correct and may be* relied upon as being true and correct until amended. Jakob & Maria Wersching Applicant ^^M-id AA% xir,, ~. • Acjentx Oiifner, Parbner -X STAFF REPORT DATE: April 11, 1984 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Land Use Planning Office SUBJECT: I. ZC-272/ZC-274/SP-190/CT 83-36/CP-273 - DEL MAR FINANCIAL Request for approval of preannexational zoning of C-2 (General Commercial), 0 (Office), R-1-20,000 and OS (Open Space); a Specific Plan; Tentative Subdivision Map and Non-Residential Condominium Permit on the northeast side of El Camino Real, north and south of the proposed extension of College Boulevard. RECOMMENDATION It is reconunended that the Planning Commission ADOPT Resolution Nos. 2267 and 2268, recommending APPROVAL of ZC-272 and ZC-274; Resolution No. 2269, reconunending~R?PROVAL of SP-190; and Resolution Nos. 2270 and 2271, recommending APPROVAL of CT 83- 36/CP-273; based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II. DISCUSSION At their meeting of March 28, 1984, the Planning Commission continued ZC-272, ZC-274, SP-190, CT 83-36 and CP-273, so that staff could make changes to the height sections of the specific plan. Also, the phasing section and Resolution 2270 needed to be modified based on wording from the City Attorney's office which addressed future access and development of the Pillsbury property which was shown as "not a part" on the Specific Plan. These changes have been made and are attached for the Commission's review. New wording has been underlined. Also, included is a Resolution of Intention to amend the C-2 zone to allow an increase in height. This will be necessary before the applicant can construct the hotel in Area B. ATTACHMENTS 1) Page 4, SP text as amended 2) Page 9, SP text as amended 3) Page 11, SP text as amended 4) Page 14, SP text as amended 5) Change to Resolution No. 2270 6) Resolution of Intention 7) Phasing Plan CG:bw 4/6/84 best information available at the time of adoption of this plan. Market conditions could greatly effect the order of development beyond Phase 1. As a result, the phasing of this project has been tied to a specific public facility and improvement program to also provide for orderly development in a non-sequential fashion. "All public facilities and other improvements for each phase of development in the specific plan area shall be provided by the developer. Further, all facilities and other improvements specified in Table II shall be provided by the developer. Public facilities include, but are not limited to, streets, medians, sidewalks, landscaping, sewer and drainage facilities, and electrical, gas, telephone and cable television facilities. Specific improvement plans for public facilities and other improvements shall be prepared and submitted as a condition of development of each phase. These specific improvement plans shall be consistent with the provisions of the specific plan. Phases 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, and 9 may be developed independently provided that all public facilities and other improvements required for those phases are provided in a manner which is satisfactory to the Land Use Planning Manager and the City Engineer and further provided that the public facilities listed in Table II are provided. The specific improvements required before any of these phases may be developed independently are shown graphically in Exhibits F - L and are listed in Table II. Phases 8, 9 and 10 shall not be developed in any event without an amendment to the specific plan."" TABLE II The following public facilities and improvements are required in addition to the improvements contained within each particular phase. A. Phase I (Exhibit F) 1. Streets/utilities/drainage a) Lane improvements to El Camino Real, including half- width generation of more than 16,500 vehicles per day as determined by Table B (Phased Traffic Generation Forecast) of the Linscott, Law and Greenspan Supplemental Traffic Report. 2. Landscaping a) All landscaping within the streetside setback, as illustrated in Exhibit 0, of the street segments required for this Phase. GENERAL NOTES ON PHASING "The parking and improvements for Phase 6 are dependent upon development of Phase 4. Therefore, Phase 6 shall be developed only in conjunction with or subsequent to Phase 4, In addition, the access road from "A" Street through Phase 7 to Phase 6 shall' be provided concurrently with development of Phase 6.^ "Phases 8, 9 and 10 are designated for future development. Development plans for these areas have not yet been prepared. Amendments to this specific plan are required prior to development of Phases 8, 9 and 10. If feasible, the specific plan amendment for Phase 10 shall include and shall specifically plan the area adjacent to Phase 10 designated "not a part," Public improvement requirements and development standards for Phases 8, 9 and 10 including access requirements to the area adjacent to Phase 10 designated "not a part", except as otherwise provided herein, shall be determined at the tTme of the specific ^lan amendments. The specific plan amendments shall be consistent with and shall become a part of this" specific plan."^ E, OPEN SPACE There are approximately 14.7 ac. of riparian woodland preserved for environmental protection. An open space easement shall be granted to the City of Carlsbad covering the area indicated as Area E on Exhibit B. The land shall remain in private ownership in a natural and undisturbed state. Maintenance of this area shall be the responsibility of the landowner. III. SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The intent of this section is to provide the maximum opportunity for creative site planning and building design while ensuring that development proceeds in a high quality integrated manner. AREA A RESIDENTIAL/R-1-20,000 ZONE The permitted density of the residential portion of this Specific Plan is based on a maximum of 2 du/ac calculated on 44.1 acres. 14.8 acres however. 11 5) Other uses may be permitted which are consistent with the above uses, subject to approval of the Land Use Planning Manager. B. Uses Permitted by Conditional Use Permit The following uses and structures may be permitted by conditional use permit, subject to the provisions of Chapter 21.42 and 21.50 of the Carlsbad zoning code: 1) Bars, cocktail lounges and other licensed (on-sale) liquor dispensing operations not meeting the definition of a bonafide eating establishment. 2) Packaged liquor stores, C. Setbacks No structure may be located within 20 feet of "A" street or 10 feet of an adjacent property line, private or public street. D. Height The maximum building height for Area B shall be 35 feet unless the City Council approves an amendment to the C-2 zone which permits a greater height. If such an amendment is approved, the maximum height of buildings in Area B shall be 45 feet and shall be constructed substantially as shown on the site plan and Exhibits P-6 and P-8. E. Site Coverage Maximum building coverage excluding parking shall not exceed 50% of the lot area. r 14 The setbacks along El Camino Real and College Boulevard may be varied up to five feet if the average setback equals or exceeds the stated requirement. The following improvements are specifically permitted in the streetside setback: a) Walks; b) Paving and associated curbing for ingress and egress except that on-grade, single-level vehicle parking areas shall be permitted within 30 feet of the El Camino Real streetside property line. c) Landscaping; d) Planters, architectural fences, or walls not exceed 42 inches in height. In the case of through lots extending from street to street, both street frontages shall be treated as a streetside setback. e) Architectural projections such as eaves, columns, awnings, of 5 feet in setbacks over 30 feet and 3 feet in setbacks less than 30 feet. D. HEIGHT The maximum height of structures within Area C shall not exceed the height as shown on Exhibits P-1, P-2, P-3, and P-4. These buildings shall be located and constructed substantially as shown on the site plan and on Exhibits P-1, P-2, P-3, P-4, P- 5, P-6, P-7 and P-8. Any buildings constructed in excess of 35 feet in height shall provide an additional one (1) foot of setback for each one (1) foot of building height in excess of 35 feet. To mitigate the impact of the increase in height, all landscaping shall be installed as shown on the landscape plan prior to occupancy of each building. Any change to development as shown on the site~ plan or on Exhibit P-1, P-2, P-3, P-4, P-5 and P-7 shall require an amendment to this Specific PlanT Change to Resolution No. 2270 Condition 37 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2270 should be revised to read: "Area C-1 and D-1 shall not be developed without an amendment to Specific Plan 190. The dedication and improvement requirements for those areas including provisions for access to the property adjacent to Area C-1 designated "not a part", shall be determined at the time of the specific plan amendment." DELMARFMAN^ CARLSBAIX CAUPOfMA PROPOSED ZONING BY AREA ^ EXHIBIT X MARCH 28.1984 % CAS.E NO.: ZC-272 DATE RECEIVED: December 14, 1982 APPLIO\NT: Mike O'Hara (Del Mar Financia 1) IW-EST: Prezone approx. 83 acres to R-l-(PD), RC, RP. Northeast corner of El Camino Real and College Boulevard. " iSXlU'lPT OR EXCEPTED: " Posted: Prior Compliance: Published: Filed: Filed: tJEGATIVE DECLARATION: Posted; EITVIROMMSITAL IMPACT REPORT: _ Notice of Preparcition: Published: Notice of Completion: L'lotice of Determination: Notice of Determination: PIAIJNING COMMISSION 1. Date of Hearing: 2. Publication: 3. Notice to Property Q.«iers: 4. fle.solution NO. ({.Continued to: _ 5. Appeal: ' Date: ACTION: Cir/ COUNCIL 1. Date of Hearing: 2. Notices to City Clerk: 3. Agenda Bill: 4. Resolution NO. Ordinance No. Date: 1. ACTION Date: rORRESPCJ^mCE Staff Report to Applicant: Resolution to Applicant: A EIR 83-1 DEL MAR FINANCIAL LOCATION MAP FIGURE 1 PROPOSED ZONING BY AREA EXHIBIT X MARCH 28,1984