HomeMy WebLinkAboutZC 316; Roberts Group Property; Zone Change (ZC)LAND USB PLANNING APPLICATION
DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS
REQUEST
0 Zone Change D Specific Plan
Q General Plan Amendment QSite Development Plan
O Tentative Tract Map OConditional Use Permit
O Major Planned Development OVariance
Q Master Plan Q Planning Commission Determination
D Major Redevelopment Permit Q Special Use Permit
Q Minor Redevelopment Permit Q Structure Relocation
Q Precise Development Plan
(checK otner coxes it appropriate)
Complete Description of Project (attach additional sheets if necessary)
See Attachment A
'
•
Legal Description (complete)
Complete legal description of the property is attached
Asses
21Zone General Plan ExistRD-M Medium density v
OS Residential (RM)
Proposed Zone Proposed General Plan Site
on .. Medium density _RU~L residential (RM) '"
Owner
lame (Print or Type) Name
The Roberts Group, Inc.
isors Parcel Nunber
5-020-01:ing Land Use
cant
Acreage
0 acres
Applicant
(Print or Type)
Same
tailing Address Mailing Address
P.O. Box 1749 Same
City and State Zip Telephone City
Simi Valley, CA 93062 (805) 581-3651
and State zip Telephone
Same
I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL Otitk AND I CtkllFY THAT I AM nit. (JWNEK'S KtfKbJaCWjaKl'lvt
IHAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE
hND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
SIGNATURE DATE SIGNATURE DATE'^•^^r^^ . \ \QJ
^^ Vfsso u\W\
}*^0 J ml if^^lOfl^**™**^* ^^«^4t^^V Bw W^^*t IW/v
• /f ~* " _ \ X\ S^\s 1 1 s- *-\ r1 IA ^ ^^ (P$V^ %^o-
^tf ACDJInk^lfm Ttec'4 VrnK mMixMd
-
jivM ,, f MMBlpt HO.
^7 S9 —~3/t
I? 'after the information . ou have submitted has been rev ,«ed, it is determined
that further information is required, you will be so advised.
APPLICANT : The Roberts Group, Inc., a California Corporation _
Name (individual, partnership, joint venture, corporation, syndication)
Wood Ranch/ P.O. Box 1749, Simi Valley, CA 93062 _
Business Address
(805) 581-3651 _
AGENT:
MEMBERS:
Telephone Number
Franklyn R. Elfend. Elfend Associatesr Inc.
Name
1601' Dove Street,- Suite 160. ,Newport Beach'. CA 92660
Business Address '
(714) 476-2211
Telephone Number
Bruce Tripp. President
Name -(individual, partner, joint
venture, corporation, syndication)
Boa* Address
Business Address
Telephone Nuaber Telephone number
Bone Addre«s
Business Address
Telephone Ncaber Telephone Suober
(Attach more sheets If necessary)
ZA'e dsclar* under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this dis-
closure is tru* and correct and that it will remain true and correct and nay b«*
relied upon as being true and correct until amended.
ATTACHMENT A
Project Description
The project is a zone change from OS (Open Space) to RD-M
(Residential Density - Multiple) for a 7.0-acre site. The site
is part of a larger 36.2-acre parcel (otherwise zoned RD-M)
which is located immediately south of the Palomar Airport
Business Park and west of El Camino Real. The zone change is
requested to:
o Establish zoning for the site in conformance with the
existing General Plan;
o Provide flexibility in site planning and sensitive environ-
mental design opportunities for the entire 36.2-acre
property; and
o Allow the development of a maximum of 362 dwelling units
on the site consistent with the Medium Density Residential
(4-10 du/acre) general plan land use designation.
Project Background
The 36.2-acre site has been the subject of an earlier general
plan amendment and zoning request which is summarized below:
o In June of 1983, general plan amendment and prezoning
actions were initiated for the site (GPA/LU 83-2 and ZC-281)
to permit the development of 296 to 516 residential units
and recreational uses. The proposal included medium density
residential (southern portion-existing), high density
:residential (northwest portion) and open space recreational
(northeast corner) designations for the site. The open
space recreational designation for the northeasterly 7 acres
was proposed with consideration of commercial recreational
uses. Correspondence between the City and the applicant
regarding this request indicated the need for an EIR as well
as staff's support of the application.
o A comprehensive EIR (83-7) evaluating the proposed GPA and
zone change was prepared and subsequently certified by the
City (incorporated by prior compliance for the current
request).
o City planning staff recommended that the Planning Commission
deny the GPA request, but approve prezoning the entire
36.2-acre site RD-M to achieve consistency with the
underlying general plan designation (Medium Density
Residential).
o In considering the project, the Planning Commission found
that the site would be suitable for higher density
residential uses and therefore approved the Medium High
Density Residential designation (10-20 du/acre). Also
approved by the Commission were the Open Space general plan
and zoning designations for the northeast portion of the
site and RD-M zoning over the remainder of the parcel.
o The City Council did not approve the GPA for the site as
recommended by the Planning Commission, nor the original GPA
request. The existing Medium Density Residential desig-
nation was retained for the entire site; however, the City
Council approved RD-M zoning for all but the northeast
portion of the site. The OS zoning was instead adopted by
the Council for this 7.0-acre area without any change in the
existing general plan for this or any other portion of the
site. ;
/
Subsequent to this hearing, the applicant assumed that the
requested actions were denied and the existing general plan
and zoning designations were retained to provide the
flexibility necessary to implement the underlying general
plan. Subsequent discussions with City staff revealed
that the OS zoning had been retained for the northeast
portion of the site.
o Discussions concerning a zone change to RD-M for the
northeast portion of the site, as previously recommended by
the planning staff, were initiated with the City. Staff
indicates their support of this request and concurs that the
zone change is appropriate and will not result in signifi-
cant environmental effects.
o Notwithstanding this zone change request, portions of this
7.0-acre site will not be developed due to the existing
SDG&E transmission easement. Therefore, the intent of this
request is to provide design flexibility over the entire
36.2 acres.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP
12 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN
DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, AND
BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 23, AS SHOWN ON
RECORD OF SURVEY HAP NO. 6269, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER
OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, SEPTEMBER 25, 1963, THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE
OF SAID SECTION 23, SOUTH 00°00'11" EAST, 1171.08 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG
THE BOUNDARY OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AS
FOLLOWS: NORTH 39°54'45"' EAST, 1343.31 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF TH2 SOUTHWEST QUARTER; AND NORTH 00°00'22"
WEST, 1169.91 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE
ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE SOUTH 89°57'43" WEST, 1348.24 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
ELFEND AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Project Processing, Management and Environmental Analysis
August 28, 1984
Mr. Paul Klukas
Land Use Planning Office
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Subject: Roberts Group Property Zone Change
Dear Paul:
In accordance with our previous discussions, we have filed a zone
change for the northeasterly 7 acres of the Roberts Group
property near the Palomar Airport Business Park. As you are
aware, the requested change is from open space recreation to
multiple family residential to establish zoning consistency with
the existing general plan and to provide flexibility in site
planning and sensitive environmental design opportunities for the
larger 36.2-acre property.
In preparing the supporting Environmental Impact Assessment
Form, we have indicated that the property has been the subject of
a previous development proposal and comprehensive prior EIR
(83-7). Consequently, we believe that a determination of prior
EIR compliance should be granted for the current request based on
Sections 15162 and 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines.
The CEQA processing for the current Roberts Group zone change is
identical to that of the recent GPA request for Area F of the
Kelly Ranch property. The City granted a determination of prior
EIR compliance for the Kelly Ranch GPA which was supported by a
previously prepared EIR on the property. It was later determined
by the State Office of Planning and Research that no further
review of the prior compliance determination was necessary as the
proposal was identical to that addressed in the previous EIR.
The Roberts Group CEQA processing requirement is identical
to the Kelly Ranch and, therefore, we believe a determination of
prior EIR compliance is appropriate without public review.
1601 Dove St., Suite 160 • Newport Beach, CA 92660 • (714) 476-2211
Mr. Paul Klukas
City of Carlsbad
August 28, 1984
Page Two
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not
hesitate to call. We look forward to continuing our relationship
with you on this project.
Sincerely,
ELFEND AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Robert
Associate
FRE:lh
ble
DEVELOPMENTAL • J^t M 1200 ELM AVENUE
SERVICES W4WM CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1989
LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE ^fyjj^r (619) 438-5591
Citp of Carteirab
November 2, 1984
Franklyn R. Elfend
Elfend Associates, Inc.
1601 Dove Street, Ste. 160
Newport Beach, California 92660
SUBJECT: ZC-316 - Roberts Group Preliminary Staff Report
The preliminary staff report for the above referenced project has
been completed. A copy of the report, including the recom-
mendation and conditions, is enclosed. This preliminary report
will be discussed by staff at the Development Coordinating
Committee (D.C.C.) meeting which will be held on November 6,
1984, beginning at 9:00 a.m. If you have any questions
concerning the report, you may attend the D.C.C. meeting.
If you need additional information concerning this matter, please
contact the Land Use Planning Office at 438-5591.
CITY OF CARLSBAD
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
Land Use Planning Manager
By: jutf /
Land Use Planning Office
MJH:ad
Enclosure
LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE <619>
Citp of
DEVELOPMENTAL • ^^ M 1200 ELM AVENUE
SERVICES •»£• JM CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1989
November 2, 1984
The Roberts Group, Inc.
Wood Ranch
P. 0. Box 1749
SUBJECT: ZC-316 - Roberts Group Preliminary Staff Report
The preliminary staff report for the above referenced project has
been completed. A copy of the report, including the recom-
mendation and conditions, is enclosed. This preliminary report
will be discussed by staff at the Development Coordinating
Committee (D.C.C.) meeting which will be held on November 6,
1984, beginning at 9:00 a.m. If you have any questions
concerning the report, you may attend the D.C.C. meeting.
If you need additional information concerning this matter, please
contact the Land Use Planning Office at 438-5591.
CITY OF CARLSBAD
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
Land Use Planning Manager
By;
Land Use Planning Office
MJH:ad
Enclosure
DEVELOPMENTAL
SERVICES
LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008-1989
(619) 438-5591
of Carlsbab
September 18, 1984
Mr. Robert B. Kemble
ELFEND AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
1601 Dove Street, Suite 160
Newport Beach, California 92660
Subject: Robert's Group Zone Change
Having just received your letter of September 13, 1984, I will
again repeat and clarify the status of the Robert's Group
project. At the planning staff meeting, no significant concerns
regarding the re-zone were identified. Thorough analysis of
environmental impacts and planning issues will be conducted by
the project planner, Mike Howes, between now and the public
hearing. Your direct communication with him as he is conducting
such analysis would be to your benefit. In addition, I stated
that the project could be placed on the October 24th Planning
Commission Agenda, at the earliest. The actual agenda the
project is placed upon will be decided by Mike Howes and Mike
Holzmiller.
Please call if you need further clarification.
Paul J. Klukas
PJK:ad
Copy: Mike Howes
ELFEND AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Project Processing. Management and Environmental Analysis
September 13, 1984
Mr. Paul Klukas
Land Use Planning Office
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Subject: Roberts Group Property Zone Change
Dear Paul:
Thank you for taking the time yesterday to discuss the status of
the Roberts Group zone change application. As discussed,
Planning staff's review of the application indicated no signifi-
cant concerns and the request could be scheduled for the Planning
Commission meeting on October 24, 1984. In addition, you
indicated that the project has been assigned to Mr. Michael
Howes.
We look forward to our continuing relationship with the City of
Carlsbad on the Roberts Group project. If there are questions
concerning the zone change request or if we can be of assistance
at any time during the processing period, please do not hesitate
to give Frank Elf end or myself a call.
Very truly yours,
ELFEND AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Robert B. Kemble
Associate
RBK:lh
cc: Michael Howes
1601 Dove St., Suite 160 • Newport Beach, CA 92660 • (714) 476-2211
R^:--!-;;:-J
PIM^G°"IGI%
/*" ^r'lflQl #
SIDE/KUBOTA & ASSOCIATES, INC.
•NOINBKRS
2565 Pio Pico Drive. P.O. Box 1095- Carlsbad, California 92008- (619) 729-1194
September 28, 1984
HAND DELIVERED
Land Use Planning Office
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Attention: Paul Klukas
Subject: ZC 316 -- Roberts Group
Costa Real Municipal Water District
Gent!emen:
The subject development project has been reviewed by the Costa Real
Municipal Water District to determine if there will be any transmission
facilities necessary to be constructed as a direct result of the proposed
development project. Additionally, the evaluation has included the
necessity for any relocation of existing transmission facilities.
The District's review indicates that the development will be directly
involved with transmission facilities of the Water District so that the
Water District will review the public water system requirements for the
entire subdivision and be directly responsible for the approval of all
engineering construction drawings and the contract administration and
construction inspection for the entire water system project.
As we have previously reported to you, public water service will be
provided to this new proposed development area from existing facilities
of the Water District and new facilities that will be the responsibility
of the development for construction. We point out to you that the District
has an existing 18-inch steel transmission main which traverses the entire
property from east to west so that any design considerations for the land
form will want to take into account the existence of this major facility.
In the event you have any questions regarding public water service for
the proposed project, please contact the undersigned.
you
J^aclT/Y. Kpot'a, District Engineer
C'b-s-fa Real Municipal Water District
cc: Mr. William Meadows, Costa Real Municipal Water District
Mr. Kurt Musser, Costa Real Municipal Water District
The Roberts Group In Orange County, Santa Ana
JYK:paf
CMWD 83-409
STATE OF CALIFORNIA—OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor
OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH
1400 TENTH STREET
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
November 13, 1984
Mr. Mike Howes
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Subject:SCH# 84101311, ZC-316, The Roberts Group, Inc.
Dear Mr. Howes:
The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named proposed Negative Declaration
to select state agencies for review. The review period is closed and the com-
ments of the individual agency(ies) is(are) attached. If you would like to
discuss the concerns and recommendations in their comments, please contact the
staff from the appropriate agency(ies).
You may formally respond to the commenting agency(ies) by writing to them, in-
cluding the State Clearinghouse number on all such correspondence. You should
attempt to resolve any concerns of the state agencies before taking further ac-
tion on the project. Once you have responded to the comments, state review of
your draft environmental document will be complete.
If the project requires discretionary approval from any state agency, the Notice
of Determination must be filed with the Secretary for Resources as well as with
the County Clerk. Please contact Mark Boehme at (916) 445-0613 if you have any
questions about the environmental review process.
Sincerely,
John B. Ohanian
Chief Deputy Director
cc: Resources Agency
Attachment
MEMORANDUM
Engineering, Fire Department, Building, and Parks
and Recreation
PlanninglDepartment
Request for' Review and
No.
unment on Application
DATE:
TO:
FROM: '
SUBJECT:
Proposal
Project Planner
This item has been tentatively scheduled for the Planning
Commission meeting of . Please
review and'submit written comments and/or conditions to the
Planning Department by ^f/?f £*& t tflf*/ • -"-^ not
received by that date, it will oe 4issume^. that you have no
comment and that the proposal has your endorsement as sub-
mitted. Thank you.
Comment :
ATTACHMENTS
Location Map
Project map or plans (if any)
Mil: jt
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM: '
SUBJECT:
Proposal
Project Planner
Engineering, Fire Department, Building, and Parks
and Recreation
Planning~l)epartment
Request for' Review and
No.
imment on Application
This item has been tentatively scheduled for the Planning
Commission meeting of . Please
review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the
Planning Department by S^y^f f*^f *?^*/ " If not
received by that date, it will oe ^ssumda that you have no
comment and that the proposal has your endorsement as sub-
mitted. Thank you.
Comment
ATTACHMENTS
Location Map
Project map or plans (if any)
MH:jt
J__LV i__L_X—.TT \ >. T N
LOCATION MAP
THE ROBERTS GROUP
PEE: $100
RECEIPT NO:
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - Part I
(To Be Completed by APPLICANT)
CASE NO:
DATE: 7/2/84
Applicant: The Roberts rirnnp, Tnn.
Address of Applicant: wood Kannh. P.O.'Box 1749. Simi Valley, CA ' 93062
Phone Number: ( 805 ) 581-3651 _
• Name, address and phone number of person" to be contacted (if other than
Applicant): Franklyn R. Elfend, Elfend and Associates/ Inc., 1601 Dove St.,
' GENERAL
Description of Project: See Attachment A
Project Location/Address: 7.0 acres located 'immediately south of the
«
Palomar Airport Business Park, west of El Camino Real (see attached
Location Map).
Assessor Parcel Number: 215 ~ 020 - 01
Zone of Subject Property: open Space (OS)
Proposed Use of Site: Residential, RD-M (Residential Density-Multiple)
Zone.
List all other applicable applications related to this project:
Local Agency Formation Commission •
Coastal Commission
2 <?--3/t
ATTACHMENT A
Project Description
The project is a zone change from OS (Open Space) to RD-M
(Residential Density - Multiple) for a 7.0-acre site. The site
is part of a larger 36.2-acre parcel (otherwise zoned RD-M)
which is located immediately south of the Palomar Airport
Business Park and west of El Camino Real. The zone change is
requested to:
o Establish zoning for the site in conformance with the
existing General Plan;
o Provide flexibility in site planning and sensitive environ-
mental design opportunities for the entire 36.2-acre
property; and
o Allow the development of a maximum of 362 dwelling units
on the site consistent with the Medium Density Residential
(4-10 du/acre) general plan land use designation.
Project Background
The 36.2-acre site has been the subject of an earlier general
plan amendment and zoning request which is summarized below:
o In June of 1983, general plan amendment and prezoning
actions were initiated for the site (GPA/LU 83-2 and ZC-281)
to permit the development of 296 to 516 residential units
and recreational uses. The proposal included medium density
residential (southern portion-existing), high density
residential (northwest portion) and open space recreational
(northeast corner) designations for the site. The open
space recreational designation for the northeasterly 7 acres
was proposed with consideration of commercial recreational
uses. Correspondence between the City and the applicant
regarding this request indicated the need for an EIR as well
as staff's support of the application.
o A comprehensive EIR (83-7) evaluating the proposed GPA and
zone change was prepared and subsequently certified by the
City (incorporated by prior compliance for the current
request).
o City planning staff recommended that the Planning Commission
deny the GPA request, but approve prezoning the entire
36.2-acre site RD-M to achieve consistency with the
underlying general plan designation (Medium Density
Residential).
o In considering the project, the Planning Commission found
that the site would be suitable for higher density
residential uses and therefore approved the Medium High
Density Residential designation (10-20 du/acre). Also
approved by the Commission were the Open Space general plan
and zoning designations for the northeast portion of the
site and RD-M zoning over the remainder of the parcel.
o The City Council did not approve the GPA for the site as
recommended by the Planning Commission, nor the original GPA
request. The existing Medium Density Residential desig-
nation was retained for the entire site; however, the City
Council approved RD-M zoning for all but the northeast
portion of the site. The OS zoning was instead adopted by
the Council for this 7.0-acre area without any change in the
existing general plan for this or any other portion of the
site. ;
Subsequent to this hearing, the applicant assumed that the
requested actions were denied and the existing general plan
and zoning designations were retained to provide the
flexibility necessary to implement the underlying general
plan. Subsequent discussions with City staff revealed
that the OS zoning had been retained for the northeast
portion of the site.
o Discussions concerning a zone change to RD-M for the
northeast portion of the site", as previously recommended by
the planning staff, were initiated with the City. Staff
indicates their support of this request and concurs that the
zone change is appropriate and will not result in signifi-
cant environmental effects.
o Notwithstanding this zone change request, portions of this
7.0-acre site will not be developed due to the existing
SDG&E transmission easement. Therefore, the intent of this
request is to provide design flexibility over the entire
36.2 acres.
2. Describe the activity area, including distiguishing natural and man-
made characteristics; also provide precise slope analysis when
appropriate.
See Attachment B
3. Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the design
and/or operation of the project.
Compliance with Title 24 of the California Administrative Code,, as
applicable, will occur at a minimum.' Other energy conservation
measures will be considered during more specific planning and design
stages.
4. if residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes.,
. range of sale prices or rents, and- type of household size expected.
Residential uses are proposed as part of a larger 36.2-acre parcel
to allow the development of up to 362 units on the entire site in
conformance with the general plan (RMf 4-10 du/acre). Precise
development plans (i.e., specific residential.product types, site
plans, grading, etc.). are not available at this time. However, such
plans will be submitted for City review during subsequent planning
and processing stages.
5. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or
regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading
facilities.
No Commercial Uses are Proposed
6. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and
loading facilities.
No Industrial Uses are Proposed
7. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per
shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits
to be derived from the project.
No Institutional Uses are Proposed
ATTACHMENT B
Setting
The 7.0-acre project area encompasses the eastern portions of a
plateau rising from the southern end of the Palotnar Airport
Business Park and Las Palmas Drive. The site is characterized by
level to rolling terrain intermittently covered by mixed
chaparral and disturbed, weedy vegetation. The property is
vacant except for SDG&E electric transmission line towers and
easements crossing the western margins.
Land uses surrounding the site include industrial and business
park developments to the north; commercial to the east along El
Camino Real; and vacant fields to the south and west. With the
exception of the industrial areas to the north, the surrounding
properties are planned for medium density residential uses.
I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate
space. (Discuss all items checked "yes*. Attach additional sheets as
necessary.)
See Attachment C for responses to checklist. yES MAYBE NO
1) Could the -project significantly change present
land uses in the vicinity of the activity? . x
7) Are any of the natural or man-made features in the
activity area unique, that isf not found in other
parts of the county, state or nation?
10) Does the activity significantly affect the
potential use, extraction, or conservation of a
scarce natural resource?
2) Could the activity affect the use of a recreational
area, or area of important aesthetic value? x_
3) Could the activity affect the functioning of an
established community or neighborhood? x_
i
4) Could the activity result in the displacement of
community residents? X
-5) Could the activity increase the-number of low and
modest cost housing units in the city?. X
6) Could the activity decrease the number of low and
modest cost housing units in the city?
8) Could the activity significantly affect an
historical or archaeological site or its settings? x_
9) Could the activity significantly affect the
potential use, extraction, or conservation of a
scarce natural resource? x
11) Could the activity significantly affect fish,
wildlife or plant life? x
12) Are there any rare or endangered plant species
in the activity area? • x
13) Could the activity change existing features of
any of the city's lagoons, bays, or tidelands? x
14) Could the activity change existing features of
any of the city's beaches? x
15) Could the activity result in the erosion or
elimination of agricultural lands? ' X
16) Could the activity serve to encourage development
of presently undeveloped areas or intensify develop-
ment of already developed areas? x
YES MAYBE" NO
17) Will the activity require a variance from
established environmental standards (air, water,
noise, etc.)?
18) Will the activity require certification, authoriza-
tion or issuance of a permit by any local, state or
federal environmental control agency? x_
19) Will the activity require issuance of a variance
or conditional use permit by the City? ~ •
20) Will the activity involve the application, use, or
disposal of potentially hazardous materials?
23) Will the activity involve construction of
facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater?
24) Could the activity result in the generation of
significant amounts of noise?
21) Will the activity involve construction of ,
facilities in a flood plain? * x_
22) Will the activity involve construction of
facilities in the area of an active fault? X
25) Could the activity result in the generation of
significant amounts of dust? x_
26) Will the activity involve the burning of brush,
trees, or other materials? . x
27) Could the activity result in a significant change
in the quality of any portion of the region's air
or water resources? (Should note surface, ground
water, off-shore.) >
28) Will the project substantially increase fuel
consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)? >
29) Will there be a significant change to existing
land form? x
(a) Indicate estimated grading to be done in .
cubic yards: Not Available
(b) Percentage of alteration to the present
land form: Not Available
(c) Maximum height of cut or fill slopes:
Not Available ; .
30) Will the activity result in substantial increases
in the use of utilities, sewers, drains or streets? x_
31) Is the activity carried out as part of a larger
project or series of projects? x_
-4-
ATTACHMENT C
Environmental Checklist Responses
As mentioned previously, a comprehensive EIR (83-7) was prepared
to evaluate earlier general plan amendment and zoning proposals
for the site. The impacts discussed below were addressed in this
previous EIR (incorporated by prior compliance for the current
request) which was certified by the City of Carlsbad on October
28, 1983.
5. Residential development is expected to include condominiums,
townhomes, apartments and/or zero lot line product types
which may increase the stock of low and modest cost housing
units within the City of Carlsbad.
18. The City of Carlsbad will be responsible for approval of the
zone change request and subsequent precise plans for
development of the site. The San Diego Local Agency
Formation Commission (annexation) and Coastal Commission
(Mello II LCP) also will be involved in the permitting of
development on the site.
23. As discussed in the prior EIR, some localized slopes of 25%
or more may be graded in connection with development of the
site. Preliminary grading plans have not yet been
developed. However, these plans will incorporate the
requirements of the City's grading code and the recom-
mendations of the project geologist to insure proper slope
stability, building pad design and drainage.
29. As discussed in the prior EIR, major changes to existing
landforms within the site are not expected to occur as a
result of project grading due to the existing electrical
towers and easements. Subsequent grading and development
plans for the site will require review by SDG&E.
STATEMENT OF NON I GUI FI CANT ENVIRONMENTAL FECTS
If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in Section
I but you think the activity will have no significant environmental
effects, indicate your reasons below:
Environmental impacts associated with the project can be
reduced to acceptable levels through application of the
mitigation measures specified in EIR. 83-7 and incorporated
• into subsequent development plans.
III. COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE QUESTIONS IN SECTION I
(If additional space is needed for answering any questions, attach
additional sheets as needed.)
Signature
Date Signed
(Person Completing Report)
Franklyn R. Elfend, Elfend and Associates, Inc.
-«M
-5-
LOCATION MAP
THE ROBERTS GROUP
Mail to: State Clmrdighouse, 14CO Tenth Street, Rai. 121, Sacramento, CA 95314 -- 916/445-0613
TICF -f COMPLETION AND ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT ~ M
ZC-316 The Roberts Group, Inc.
See NOTE Below
SCH I
C.i +- nf Carlsbad
1. Project
2. Lead Agency:
3a. street Addr»is: 1200 Elm Avenue
3c. County: San Dieqo 3d. Zip: 92008^
3. Contact Person; Mike Howes
3D. city: Carlsbad
PROJECT LOCATTCN *. County:_San Dieao
. 3e. Phone; 619-438-5591
. City/Conwunity: Carlsbad
4b.(opt1onal) Assessor's Parcel No._
Sa. Cross Strsecs:
4c. Section Twp._Range_
,. For Rural,
°' Nearest Comunity:_
6. Within 2 miles of: a. State Hwy No. b. Airports Palomar c. Waterways
7. DOCUMENT TY°E
CEQA
01 MOP
02 Early Cons
03 XNeg Dec
04 Draft EIR
05 Supplement/
Subsequent EIR
(if so, prior SCH *
)
NEPA
06 Notice of Intent
07 Envir. Assessment/
FONSI
08 Draft EIS
3. LOCAL ACTION TYPE
01 General Plan Update
02' New Element
03 General Plan Amendment
04 Master Plan
05 Annexation
06 Specific Plan
07 Redevelopment
OS X Rezone
09 Land Division
(Subdivision. Parcel Map.
Tract Map, etc. )
10 Use Permit
11 Cancel Aq Preserve
12 Other
10.
01
02
03
04
OS
06
07
03
09
DEVELOPMENT TYPE
Residential: Units
Office: Sq.Ft.
Acres
Shopping/Commercial :
Acres
Industrial: Sq.Ft.
Acres
Sewer: HGO
Water: MGO
Transportation: Type
Acres
Employees
So. Ft.
Employees
Employees
Mineral Extraction: Mineral
Power Generation: Wattaqe
Type:
OTHER
09 Information Only
10 Final Document
11 Other
10 Other:
9. TOTAL ACRES:
IL
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
12.
13.
PROJECT ISSUES DISCUSSED IN
Aesthetic/Visual
Agricultural Land
Air Quality
Archaeological /Historical
Coastal
Fire Hazard
Fl oodl ng/Orai nage
FUflOINGUoprox.) Federal $
PRESENT LAND USE AND ZONING
DOCUMENT
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
.
Geologic/Seismic
Jobs/Housing Balance
Minerals
Noise -
Public Services
Schools
Septic Systems
State S
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Sewer Capacity
Soil Erosion
Solid Waste
Toxic/Hazardous
Traffic/Circulation
Vegetation
Water Quality
Total S
22
23_
24
25
26
27
23
Water Supply
Wetland/Riparian
Wildlife '
Growth Inducing
Incompatible Landuse
Cumulative Effects
Other
Present Zoning - 0-S, Open Space
Present land use - vacant
14. PROJECT 3ESCai?TION:
Zone Change from 0-S, Open Space to RD-M, Residential Density Multiple
to bring the zoning into conformance with the General Plan designation
of R-M, Residential Density Multiple, 4-10 du/ac. A previously
certified focused EIR, State Clearinghouse No. »3offl.¥26 discussed
biology, archaeology, grading.and traffic.
15. SIGNATURE CF LEAD AGEHCY REPRESENTATIVE:.„„.
NOTE: Clearinghouse -ill assign identification numbers for all new projects. If a SCH Number already exists for a project
(e.g. from a Notice of ?<-»oarat1on or previous draft document) please fill it m.
DEVELOPMENTAL ffi « rTJ 1200 ELM AVENUE
SERVICES H^^^H CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008-1989
LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE WHflf,#M (619) 438-5591^^Hp"^4y
Citp of Cartetmb
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: Immediately south of the Palomar Airport
Business Park approximately a 1/4 of a mile west of El Camino Real.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Zone Change from 0-S, Open Space to RD-M,
Residential Density Multiple for a vacant seven acre parcel.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the
above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation
of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental
Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said
review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not
have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the
subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the
Land Use Planning Office.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on
file in the Land Use Planning Office, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue,
Carlsbad, CA. 92008. Comments from the public are invited. Please
submit comments in writing to the Land Use Planning Office within ten
(10) days of date of issuance.
DATED: October 4, 1984
MICHAEL^jrTOLZMIl
CASE NO: ZC-316 Land Use Planning Manager
APPLICANT: The Roberts Group, Inc.
PUBLISH DATE: October 13, 1984
ND-4
5/81
DEVELOPMENTAL
SERVICES
LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE
County Clerk
County of San Diego
Attn:" Mail Drop C-11
220 West Broadway
San Diego, CA 92101
City of Cartefcab
NOTICE OF DETERMINATION
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1989
(619) 438-5591
This is to advise that the City of Carlsbad on December 18,, 1984, approved
the following project:
Project Description: Zone change from 0-S, Open Space to RD-M,
Residential Density Multiple for vacant seven acre parcel.
Project Address/Location: Immediately south of Palomar Airport Business
Park approximately a quarter of a mile west of El Camino Real.
The City made the following determinations regarding the environmental
impact of the above described project:
1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supporting document is available
for public review at the Land Use Planning Office, City Hall, 1200 Elm
Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008.
DATE: December 24, 1984
CASE NO: ZC-316
APPLICANT: Roberts Group
MICHAEL T. HOLiftlLLER
Land Use Planning Manager
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will
hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad,
California, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, November 14, 1984, to consider approval
of a request for a Zone Change from O-S, Open Space to RD-M, Residential Density
Multiple with a Q Overlay for a seven acre site on property generally located
immediately south of Palomar Airport Business Park approximately a quarter of a
mile west of El Camino Real and more particularly described as:
A portion of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section
23, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend
the public hearing. If you have any questions please call the Land Use Planning
Office at 438-5591.
CASE FILE:
APPLICANT:
PUBLISH:
ZC-316
The Roberts Group
November 3, 1984
CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
LOCATION MAP
SITE
FROM OS to RDM-Q
ROBERTS GROUP I ZC-316
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 28, 1984
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Land Use Planning Office
SUBJECT: ZC-316 - ROBERTS GROUP - Request for a Zone Change from
O-S, Open Space to RD-Mr Residential Density Multiple
with a Q Overlay for a seven acre site immediately
south of Palomar Airport Business Park approximately a
quarter of a mile west of El Camino Real.
This item was continued from the Planning Commission hearing of
November 14, 1984. This continuance allowed staff the
opportunity to review a letter from the Department of
Transportation that was sent to the State Clearinghouse
regarding the Negative Declaration prepared for this project. A
copy of this letter is attached to this memo.
It appears that the Department of Transportation was not aware
that this site already had a General Plan designation of R-M,
Residential Medium, (4-10 du/ac) and that an Environmental
Impact Report for a 36 acre parcel which included the subject
property was certified. This EIR addressed the issues brought
up in the Department of Transportation's letter. In addition,
the subject property is approximately 3/4 of a mile south of
Palomar Airport and outside the boundaries of the airport
influence area.
Staff, therefore, recommends that the Commission approve the
Negative Declaration and recommend approval of the Zone Change
as detailed in the Staff Report of November 14, 1984.
ATTACHMENTS
1) Letter, dated October 18, 1984
2) Staff Report, dated November 14, 1984 with attachments
MH:bw
11/20/84
State of CoWowlo
Memorandum
TiflHSpOWCHIOII CMC! HOUMHQ
To: Terry Roberts , Manager
State Clearinghouse Unit
Office of Resources, Energy,
and Permit Assistance
1400 Tenth Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
Data October 18, 1984
File:
From: D€PARTMIMT OF TRANSMUTATION
OMttON Of AMOMAU1ICS
Subject- The Roberts Group, Inc., ZC-316, City of Carlsbad, SCH
#84101311
The Division has considered the above-referenced document with
respect to those areas germane to its statutory responsibilities.
The following suggestions are offered for your consideration.
The draft EIR should address the impact of airport noise and/or
safety on the project as well as the impact of the project itself
on the safety of airport operations. Consideration should also
be given to the issue of compatible land uses in areas adjacent
to the airport. This should help to relieve future conflict
between airports and their surroundings.
Thank you for the oppportunity of reviewing and commenting on
this proposal.
JACK D. KEMMERLY, Acting
Division of Aeronautics
Chief
Sari Tucker, Chief
Air Transportation
MOV 131984
state 8l*aftsgbcmse
APPLICATION SUBMITTAL DATE: i,i
AUGU'"" 29, 1984
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 14, 1984
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Land Use Planning Office
SUBJECT: ZC-316 - ROBERTS GROUP - Request for a Zone Change from
0-S, Open Space to RD-M, Residential Density Multiple
with a Q Overlay for a seven acre site immediately south
of Palomar Airport Business Park approximately a quarter
of a mile west of El Camino Real.
I. RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission APPROVE the
Negative Declaration issued by the Land Use Planning Manager and
ADOPT Resolution No. 2380 recommending APPROVAL of ZC-316 based
on the findings contained therein.
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The applicant is requesting that the zoning of the above
mentioned site be changed from 0-S to RD-M(Q). The proposed
zone change would effect approximately 7 acres of sloping
hillside that is covered with disturbed native vegetation. A
San Diego Gas and Electric easement runs northwest to southeast
through the site.
This site is part of a 36 acre parcel, see Exhibit "A", that was
brought before the Planning Commission for a General Plan
Amendment and Preannexational Zoning in October 1983. At that
time, the Planning Commission approved a General Plan Amendment
to RMH on the northwest corner and OS, Open Space on the
northeast corner of the 36 acre parcel. The Commission also
approved a preannexational zoning of RD-M(Q) on the majority of
the site and OS for the northeast corner. The applicant's
intent was to have recreational uses in the Open Space area with
the approval of a conditional use permit.
The City Council, subsequently, denied the general plan
amendments and approved the preannexational zoning of RD-M(Q)
and OS.
The applicant is now requesting that the seven acre site in the
northeast corner that was prezoned 0-S, Open Space be rezoned to
RD-M(Q), Residential Density Multiple with a Q Overlay. The
proposed zoning of RD-M(Q) would be consistent with the existing
general plan designation of RM, Residential Density Multiple 4-
10 du/ac.
III. ANALYSIS
Planning Issues
1) Is the proposed RD-M(Q) zone consistent with the RM General
Plan designation?
2) Is the proposed RD-M(Q) zone and the uses allowed within
this zone consistent with surrounding zoning and land uses?
Discussion
The proposed RD-M(Q) zone is consistent with the RM, Residential
Medium Density (4-10 du/ac), general plan designation since the
RD-M zone is the implementing zone for the RM general plan
designation.
Staff believes that the proposed RD-M(Q) zone and the uses
allowed within this zone would be consistent with the
surrounding zoning and land uses. The RD-M(Q) zone will allow
the subject property to be developed with single family or
multiple family units.
The Q Overlay requires Planning Commission approval of a site
development plan prior to issuance of a building permit. Staff
believes that this will ensure that any development proposed
will be compatible with other future development in the area.
In addition, the Q Overlay will ensure that any development that
does occur on this site will be adequately buffered from the
existing industrial development to the north.
In conclusion, staff believes that the proposed RD-M(Q) zone is
consistent with the general plan designation of the subject
property and the zone and the uses allowed within the zone will
be consistent with surrounding zoning and land uses. Therefore,
staff recommends approval of ZC-316.
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Land Use Planning Manager has determined that this project
will not have a significant impact on the environment and,
therefore, has issued a Negative Declaration on October 4, 1984.
Attachments
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2380
2. Location Map
3. Background Data Sheet
4. Disclosure Form
5. Environmental Documents
6. Exhibit "A" dated October 25, 1984
MH:ad
10/31/84
— 2—
.OCATION MAP
PALOMAR AIRPORT
SITE
FROM OS to RDM-Q
ROBERTS GROUP ZC-316
-If after the information u have submitted has baen re* -«d, it is
that further information is required, you will be so advised.
APPLICANT: The Roberts Group, Inc., a. California Corporation
Nane (individual, partnership, joint venture, corporation, syndication)
Wood Ranch, P.O. Box 1749, Simi Valley, CA 930P2
Business Address —— "
(805) 581-3651
AGENT:
MEMBERSt
Telephone Nuaber
Franklyn R. Elfend. Elfend Associates. Inc.
Naae
1601 Dove Street,-Suite 160. .Newport Beach'. CA 92660
Business Address <
(714) 476-^2211
Telephone Nuaber
Bruce Tripp. President
Name -(individual, partner, joint
venture, corporation, syndication)
Boa* Addres*
Business Address
Telephone Nuaber Telephone Hunber
Hoo» Address
3usineas Address
Telephone Ncaber Telephone Suaber
(Attach «ore sheet* if necessary)
IA'» declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this dis-
closure is true and correct and that it will reaain true and correct and nay b«*
relied upon as being true and correct until aaanded.
Applicant
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: ZC-316
APPLICANT: Roberts Group
REQUEST AND LOCATION: Zone change from O-S to RD-M(Q) south of Palomar Airport
Business Park approximately 1/4 of a mile west of El Camino Real
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of the NW/quarter of the SW quarter of Section 23
South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian APN; 215-020-01
Acres 7 Proposed No. of Lots/Units
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation RM
Density Allowed 4-10 Density Proposed —————
Existing Zone O-S Proposed Zone RD-M(Q)
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:
Zoning Land Use
Site OS Vacant
North P-M Industrial
South RD-M(Q) Vacant
East County Vacant
West RD-M(Q) Vacant
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District Carlsbad Water Carlsbad Sewer Carlsbad EDU's
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated May 31, 1983
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
X Negative Declaration, issued October 4, 1984
E.I.R. Certified, dated
Other,
EXHIBIT A
SCALE: 1' = 500 FEET
ZC-316
THE ROBERTS GROUP
CASE NO.:
APPLICANT:
DATE RECEIVED:
REQUEST: /3e?>-g-
ENVIRONMENTAL
EXEMPT OR EXCEPTED:_
Posted:
Filed:
Prior CJonpliance:Piiblished:
Filed:
NEGATIVE DECLARATION:_
Posted:Published:
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT:
Notice of
Preparation:
Notice of
Completion:
Notice of Determination:
Notice of
Determination:
PLANNING COMMISSION
1. Date of Hearing:
2. Publication:
3. Notice to Property Owners; //-
4. Resolution No.
(Continued to:
5. Appeal:
Date;ACTION:rat)
} l-
CITY COUNCIL
1. Date of Hearing:
2. Notices to City Clerk;
3. Agenda Bill:
4. Resolution No.
5, Ordinance No.
ACTION
Date:
CORRESPONDENCE
Staff Report to Applicant:
Resolution to Applicant:
Carlsbad Journal
Decreed a Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County
31 38 ROOSEVELT ST. • P.O. BOX 248 • CARLSBAD, CA 92008 • 729-2345
Proof of Publication
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid;
I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter.
I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal a newspaper of general circulation,
published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which
newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and
which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying
subscribers, and which newspaper has been established and published at regular intervals in the said
City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year
next preceding the date of publication of the
notice hereinafter referred to; and that the notice
of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been
published in each regular and entire issue of said
newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on
the following dates, to-wit:
OF PUBLIC
HEARING
N.OT1CE IS HEREBY GIVEN thatthe Planning Commission of the
CHy: of Carlsbad will hold a public
hearing at the City Council Cham-
bers. 1200 Elm Avenue. Carlsbad.
California, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednes-
day. November 14.1984. to consider
approval of a request for a Zone
Criansc from 0-S. Open Space to
RU-M. Residential Density Multi
pie''with a Q Overlay for a seven
acre site on property generally lo-
cated immediately south of Palo-
mar Airport Business Park approx-
imately a quarter of a mile west ofEl Camino Real and more particu-larly described as:A portion of the Northwest Quar-
ter of the Southwest Quarter of Sec-
tion 23. Township 12 South. Range 4
West. San Bernardino Meridian.
Those persons wishing to speak
on this proposal are cordially in-
vited to attend the public hearing.If you have any questions, pleasecall the Land Use Planning Office
at 438-5591
Case File: ZC-316Applicant: The Roberts GroupCITY OF CARLSBADPLANNING COMMISSION
19
LOCATION MAP
ROBERTS GROUP 1 ZC-316
19
19
19.
19
I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true
and correct. Executed at Carlsiad, County of San Diego,
State of California on •' ^'\ f
day of '"''''" ' •"•- '-' * "- i-i:
CJ S646 November 3. 1984
Clerk
,-yuc-^
Of Mle Printer
Carlsbad Journal
Decreed a Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County
3138 ROOSEVELT ST. • P.O. BOX 248 • CARLSBAD, CA 92008 • 729-2345
Proof of Publication
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid;
I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter.
I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal a newspaper of general circulation,
published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which
newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and
which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying
subscribers, and which newspaper has been established and published at regular intervals in the said
City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year
next preceding the date of publication of the
notice hereinafter referred to; and that the notice
of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been
published in each regular and entire issue of said
newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on
the following dates, to-wit:
NEGATIVE
DECLARATION
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCA-
TION: Immediately south of the
Palomar Airport Business Parkapproximately a Vt of a mile west ofEl Camino Real.PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ZoneChange trom O-S. Open Space to
RD-M, Residential Density Multi-
ple for a vacant seven acre parcel.• The City of Carlsbad has con-ducted an environmental review ofthe above described project pur-suant to the Guidelines for Imple-
mentation of the California Envi-
ronmental Quality Act and the En-
vironmental Protection Ordinance
of the City of Carlsbad. As a result
of said review, a Negative Declara-
tion (declaration that the project
will not have a significant impact
on the environment) it hereby
issued for the subject project Justi-fication for this action is on file inthe Land Use Planning Office.A copy of the Negative Declara-tion with supportive documents is
on file in the Land Use Planning
Office, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue,
Carlsbad, CA. 92008. Comments
from the public ire invited. Please
submit comment* in writing to the
tand Use Planning Office within
ten (10) days of date of issuance.
Dated: October 4,1984
Case No: ZC-316Applicant: The Robert* Group, Inc.MICHAEL J. HOLZJCLLER
Land Use Planning Manager
CJ SfllO: October 13,1984
.October. 1.^ 19.84.
19
19
19.
19,
I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true
and correct. Executed at Carlsbad, County of San Diego,
State of California on _±ne 1 ytbOctober 1984
2M-4/82 Clerk/of the Printer
From:Office of the Governor
Office of Planning and Research
State Clearinghouse
UOO - IOth Street, Room 121
Sacramento, C/\ 95811*
TO: OoT B84
MIKE HOWES
CARLSBAD CITY
1200 ELM AV
CARLSBAD
State o£ California
Project Notification and Review System
State Clearinghouse
(916) 445-0613
ZC-316 ROBERTS GRP CARLSBAD
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER: 84101311
REVIEW STARTS: 10/12/84
REVIEW ENDS: 11/12/84
CONTACT: CHRIS GOGGIN
(REVIEW STARTS ON NEXT DAY WHEN DOCUMENT IS
RECEIVED AFTER 10:00 A.M.)
Please use Ute State Clearinghouse Number on future correspondence with thisoffice and with agencies approving or reviewing your project.
This card does not verify ccog>l lance with environmental review requirements.
A letter containing the State's comments or a Jetter confirming no Statecomments will be forwarded to you after tne review is complete.