Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-08-08; HCD Announcment - Progress Reported in Annual Housing Program Reports; |Fountain, Debbie| Barberio, Gary|To th~ members of the: 0 ~~£OUNCI~ Date ~CA ✓ CC ✓ CM ✓coo .v-7□cM (3} ✓ August 8, 2019 Council Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor Hall and Members of the City Council {cityof Carlsbad Memo ID# 2019089 From: Via Re: Debbie Fountain, Community and Economic Development Director Gary Barberio, Deputy City Manager t:. Elaine Lu key, Chief Operations Officer HCD Announcement -Progress repor d in Annual Housing Program Reports This memorandum shares information from the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) dated July 8, 2019 regarding progress by jurisdictions in meeting goals for housing production as set forth in the Annual Housing Progress Reports; the HCD press release and the Senate Bill 35 (SB35) Statewide Determination Summary are attached for information purposes. Background Each region's housing need is determined every 5 to 8 years through the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) process. Once the need is determined, cities and counties must show they have appropriately zoned enough land for housing to accommodate families and individuals at all income levels and submit this site inventory with its Housing Element for approval by HCD. In the past, there was little attention given by the State to progress in actual production of the housing as long as adequate sites were identified to accommodate the RHNA. However, in the past couple of years, new legislation has been approved which focuses much more attention on the efforts of cities and counties in also permitting and building the needed housing at various income levels. For example, Senate Bill 35 (2017) has resulted in the tracking of progress by cities and counties in permitting sufficient housing to meet their housing needs at all income levels. When cities or counties do not meet housing targets, they are subject to Senate Bill 35 streamlined approval requirements. Discussion The State of California mandates that all California cities and counties submit an annual progress report on housing production and other programs to provide affordable housing opportunities as set forth in the required Housing Elements. Per the press release from HCD dated July 8, 2019, the State indicates that 86 percent of California cities and counties have submitted the required annual progress report for 2018 (Carlsbad included), but the reports indicate that the vast majority of those cities and counties have not built enough housing to meet their planning targets at various income levels. This is important as it relates to requirements set forth in Senate Bill 35 Community & Economic Development Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue I Carlsbad, CA 92008 I 760-602-4600 I 760-602-8560 fax Honorable Mayor Hall and Members of the City Council Aug.8,2019 Page 2 adopted in 2017 and the applicability of streamlined permit approval processes for new residential developments for those cities and counties that do meet housing production targets. It is important to note, however that the pace of permitting/building housing is beyond the city's control and the city did not "cause" a shortage of housing to be built within the city. Market forces (such as available land, financing and product demand) primarily drive housing development. It is difficult for the city to have much of an impact on these market forces. As indicated in the attached SB 35 Statewide Determination Summary, the City of Carlsbad is 1 of 213 jurisdictions that are subject to SB 35 streamlining for proposed developments with 50% or more homes affordable to lower income households. When jurisdictions have made insufficient progress toward their Lower income RHNA (Very Low and Low income), these jurisdictions are subject to the streamlined ministerial approval process (SB 35 (Chapter 366, Statutes of 2017) streamlining approvals) for proposed developments with at least 50% affordability. Next Steps The determination of the State requires the city to comply with SB 35 streamlining for developments with at least 50 percent affordability for lower income households. To qualify for expedited approvalin a city or county that is subject to SB 35 streamlining, it must, among other things be: 1. 2 or more multi-family units in an urbanized area zoned or planned for residential use. 2. Meets all objective standards. 3. Meets affordable housing and labor requirements. 4. Not in Coastal Zone. Staff will monitor and apply the required SB 35 streamlined approval process to eligible projects as set forth in State Law. Because the city has been designated as subject to the Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process by the Department of Housing and Community Development, it shall be required to provide information, in a manner readily accessible to the general public, about the city's process for applying and receiving ministerial approval, any materials required for an application, and relevant objective standards to be used to evaluate the application for residential development that provide at least 50 percent affordability for lower income households. These developments will be eligible if they meet all criteria set forth in SB 35. Attachments: 1) HCD Announcement, dated July 8, 2019 2) SB 35 Statewide Determination Summary cc: Celia Brewer, City Attorney Scott Chadwick, City Manager Don Neu, City Planner David de Cordova, Principal Planner Corey Funk, Associate Planner Press Release: More Jurisdictions Submitting Annual Housing Progress Reports But Alm... Page 1 of 3 a I Ll-e NNOU FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Date: July 08, 2019 Contact: Karen C. Naungayan Office: (916) 263-7400 Mobile: (916) 207-9132 Karen.Naungayan@hcd.ca.gov Attachment 1 CE ENT More Jurisdictions Submitting Annual Housing Progress Reports But Almost All Falling Far Short of Goals SACRAMENTO -A record 86 percent of California's cities and counties have submitted state-mandated annual progress reports on housing for 2018, according to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). But the vast majority are not building enough housing to meet their planning targets. Due each April, the annual progress reports reflect back on the previous year's data to show how well jurisdictions are performing in meeting the housing needs within their communities. With the passage of Senate Bill 35 in 2017, cities and counties that don't turn in annual progress reports are automatically required to provide a streamlined approval process for new housing developments. "We're pleased that nearly 90 percent of cities and counties have turned in reports, up from 50 percent just a few years ago," Said HCD Director Ben Metcalf. "But the numbers show only 16 of California's 539 jurisdictions, or three percent, are on pace to build enough housing at all income levels to meet their planning targets. And when it comes to lower-income housing, only 29, or about five percent, are meeting their goals." · Using figures from the annual progress reports, HCD released an updated list showing which California cities and counties are subject to streamlined housing approvals for certain housing projects under Senate Bill 35. HCD offers an online interactive map that allows users to quiQkl y view detailed data for each jurisdiction, including whether or not the city or county: • Has an HCD-approved housing plan ("housing element"); http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?m=l l20322818772&ca=227bdb13-72d9-... 7/11/2019 Press Release: More Jurisdictions Submitting Annual Housing Progress Reports But Alm... Page 2 of 3 • Is subject to streamlined housing approvals; and • Has been submitting its annual progress reports. The map also shows the number of housing permits issued to build homes affordable td people in each income category and how those permits stack up against the city/county's housing need. The following updated documents are available on HCD's website: • Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process (SB 35) Statewide Determination Summary -Summary of which jurisdictions are not · currently subject to the streamlined ministerial approval process (SB 35 streamlining), which are currently subject to SB 35 streamlining for developments with at least 10 percent affordability, and which are currently subject to SB 35 streamlining for developments with at least 50 percent affordability. • Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process (SB 35) Determination Methodology and Background Data -Additional detail on the determination methodology and background data. • Housing Element Implementation Tracker -Shows detailed status of cities' and counties' housing elements, whether cities and counties have zoned enough land for housing, whether they have adequately planned for emergency shelters and housing with supportive services, and whether they have submitted their Annual Progress Reports from 2013-2018. • 5th Cycle Annual Progress Report Permitting Summary -Shows how well cities and counties are progressing toward meeting their housing goals. SB 35 (2017) Background Each region's housing need is determined every five to eight years through the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) process. Once the need is determined, cities and counties must show they have zoned enough land for housing to accommodate families and individuals at all income levels. These plans, known as housing elements, must be submitted to HCD for approval and incorporated into the city's or county's general plan. SB 35 looks beyond planning to see if cities/counties are on track to permit sufficient housing to meet their needs. When they have not, they are subject to SB 35's streamlined approval requirements. In order for a proposed development to qualify for expedited approval in a city or county that is subject to SB 35 streamlining, it must, among other things: • Be located on an infill site. • Follow residential and mixed-use zoning laws. • Dedicate at least 10 percent of housing units for lower-income residents if the city/county has not made sufficient progress toward their above- moderate income housing need, or at least 50 percent of housing units for http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?m=1120322818772&ca=227bdbl3-72d9-... 7/11/2019 Press Release: More Jurisdictions Submitting Annual Housing Progress Reports But Alm... Page 3 of 3 lower-income residents if the city/county has not mad e sufficient progress toward their very-low and low-income housing need. The California Department of Housing and Community Development is dedicated to the preservation and expansion of safe and affordable housing, so more Californians have a place to call home. Our team works to ensure an adequate supply of housing for Californians and promotes the growth of strong communities through its leadership, policy and program development. For more information, please visit www.hcd.ca.qov and follow us on Twitter, @California_HCD and Facebook, @CaliforniaHCD. ### Copyright © 2019 California Department of Housing and Community Development communications@hcd.ca.qov I hcd.ca .qov I (916) 263-7400 2020 W. El Camino Avenue, Sacramento, CA 95833 http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?rn= 11203 22818772&ca=227bdb 13-72d9-... 7/1 112019 Attachment 2 SB 35 Statewide Determination Summary Cities and Counties Not Currently Subject to SB 35 Streamlining Provisions This determination represents Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR) data received as of June 25, 2019. The following 28 jurisdictions have met their prorated Lower (Very-Low and Low) and Above-Moderate Income Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) for the Reporting Period and submitted their latest APR (2018). These jurisdictions are not currently subject to the streamlined ministerial approval process (SB 35 (Chapter 366, Statutes of 2017) streamlining), but the jurisdictions are still encouraged to promote streamlining. All other cities and counties beyond these 28 are subject to at least some form of SB 35 streamlining, as indicated on the following pages. For more detail on the proration methodology or background data see the SB 35 Determination Methodology. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ••~l~~lo.'"1ll•-■[en•1 ATHERTON BEVERLY HILLS CALISTOGA CARPINTERIA CORONADO CORTE MADERA EL CERRITO FOSTER CITY GUADALUPE HILLSBOROUGH INDUSTRY LAGUNA NIGUEL LEMON GROVE MENLO PARK MILL VALLEY MONTE SERENO MONTEREY COUNTY ROHNERT PARK SAINT HELENA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SANTAANA SANT A CLARA COUNTY SANT A MONICA SOLVANG SONOMA COUNTY UKIAH !WEST HOLLYWOOD !WOODSIDE June 2019 Page 1 of6 SB 35 Statewide Determination Summary Cities and Counties Subject to SB 35 Streamlining Provisions When Proposed Developments Include~ 10% Affordability When jurisdictions have insufficient progress toward their Above Moderate income RHNA and/or have not submitted the latest Housing Element Annual Progress Report (2018), these jurisdictions are subject to the streamlined ministerial approval process (SB 35 (Chapter 366, Statutes of 2017) streamlining) for proposed developments with at least 10% affordability. These conditions currently apply to the following 298 jurisdictions: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 •1■1:◄h."1IIIN.[eJ~I ADELANTO ALAMEDA COUNTY ALHAMBRA ALISO VIEJO ALPINE COUNTY ALTURAS AMADOR CITY A.NGELS CAMP A.PPLE VALLEY A.RCADIA A.RCATA ARROYO GRANDE ARVIN AVALON AVENAL AZUSA BAKERSFIELD BANNING BARSTOW BEAUMONT BELL BELL GARDENS BELVEDERE BENICIA BIGGS BISHOP BLUE LAKE BLYTHE BRADBURY BRAWLEY BURBANK BUTTE COUNTY CALAVERAS COUNTY CALEXICO CALIFORNIA CITY CALIMESA CALIPATRIA CARMEL CARSON CATHEDRAL June 2019 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 ... . /::m1:◄h."1l11-■re1d,;:\.,. " CERES CHOWCHILLA CITRUS HEIGHTS CLAYTON CLEARLAKE CLOVERDALE COACHELLA COLFAX COLMA COLTON COLUSA COLUSA COUNTY COMMERCE COMPTON CONCORD CORCORAN CORNING COVINA CRESCENT CITY CUDAHY DEL NORTE COUNTY DEL REY OAKS DELANO DESERT HOT SPRINGS DINUBA DORRIS DOS PALOS DUARTE DUNSMUIR EAST PALO AL TO EL CAJON EL CENTRO EL MONTE EL SEGUNDO ESCALON ESCONDIDO ETNA EUREKA EXETER FAIRFAX 81 82 · 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 ··: :,:;'~:◄h."1111N.[eJ~I FARMERSVILLE FERNDALE FILLMORE FIREBAUGH FORT JONES FORTUNA FOUNTAIN VALLEY FOWLER FRESNO COUNTY GARDEN GROVE GLENN COUNTY GONZALES GRAND TERRACE GRASS VALLEY . GREENFIELD GRIDLEY GUSTINE HALF MOON BAY HANFORD HAWAIIAN GARDENS HAYWARD HEMET HESPERIA HIDDEN HILLS HIGHLAND HOLTVILLE HUMBOLDT COUNTY HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON PARK HURON IMPERIAL IMPERIAL COUNTY INGLEWOOD INYO COUNTY IRWINDALE ISLETON JURUPA VALLEY KERMAN KERN COUNTY KINGS COUNTY Page 2 of6 SB 35 Statewide Determination Summary Cities and Counties Subject to SB 35 Streamlining Provisions When Proposed Developments Include ;;:: 10% Affordability When jurisdictions have insufficient progress toward their Above Moderate income RHNA and/or have not submitted the latest Housing Element Annual Progress Report (2018), these jurisdictions are subject to the streamlined ministerial approval process (SB 35 (Chapter 366, Statutes of 2017) streamlining) for proposed developments with at least 10% affordability. These conditions currently apply to the following 298 jurisdictions: ... , .. ~~ .... ,,1,a111111i.•1: ·"-; KINGSBURG LA HABRA HEIGHTS LA MIRADA LA PUENTE LA VERNE LAKE COUNTY LAKE ELSINORE LAKEPORT LANCASTER LASSEN COUNTY LATHROP LAWNDALE LEMOORE LINCOLN LINDSAY LIVE OAK LIVINGSTON LOMA LINDA LOMPOC LONG BEACH LOOMIS LOS ALAMITOS LOS ANGELES COUNTY LOS GATOS LOYALTON LYNWOOD MADERA MADERA COUNTY MANTECA MARICOPA 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 . MARIPOSA COUNTY MARTINEZ MARYSVILLE MAYWOOD MCFARLAND MENDOCINO COUNTY MENDOTA MENIFEE MERCED MERCED COUNTY June 2019 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 ·I; 1:u:11 ,-■r11~1 MILLBRAE MODESTO MODOC COUNTY MONTAGUE MONTCLAIR MONTEBELLO MONTEREY MONTEREY PARK MORENO VALLEY MORRO BAY MOUNT SHASTA NATIONAL CITY NEEDLES NEVADA CITY NEVADA COUNTY NEWMAN NORCO NOVATO OCEANSIDE OJAI ONTARIO ORANGE COVE ORLAND OROVILLE OXNARD PACIFIC GROVE PACIFICA PALMDALE PALOS VERDES ESTATES PARADISE PARAMOUNT PARLIER PASO ROBLES PATTERSON PICO RIVERA PINOLE PLEASANT HILL PLYMOUTH POMONA PORTERVILLE JURISDICTION 201 PORTOLA 202POWAY 203 RED BLUFF 204 REDLANDS 205 REDONDO BEACH 206REEDLEY 207RIALTO 208 RICHMOND 209 RIDGECREST 210RIO DELL 211 RIPON 212 RIVERBANK 213 RIVERSIDE 214 RIVERSIDE COUNTY 215 ROLLING HILLS 216 ROSEMEAD 217 ROSS 218 SACRAMENTO 219 SACRAMENTO COUNTY 220 SALINAS 221 SAN BERNARDINO 222 SAN BRUNO 223 SAN DIEGO COUNTY 224 SAN DIMAS 225 SAN FERNANDO 226 SAN JACINTO 227 SAN JOAQUIN 228 SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 229 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 230 SAN LEANDRO 231 SAN MATEO COUNTY 232 SAN PABLO 233 SAN RAFAEL 234 SAND CITY 235SANGER 236 SANTA CLARITA 237 SANTA CRUZ COUNTY 238 SANTA MARIA 239 SANTA PAULA 240 SANTA ROSA Page 3 of6 SB 35 Statewide Determination Summary Cities and eounties Subject to SB 35 Streamlining Provisions When Proposed Developments Include~ 10% Affordability When jurisdictions have insufficient progress toward their Above Moderate income RHNA and/or have not submitted the latest Housing Element Annual Progress Report (2018), these jurisdictions are subject to the streamlined ministerial approval process (SB 35 (Chapter 366, Statutes of 2017) streamlining) for proposed developments with at least 10% affordability. These conditions currently apply to the following 298 jurisdictions: 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 :-. •■1■1~ .... ,.1,-i11•i.·1 SANTEE SARATOGA SAUSALITO SEASIDE SEBASTOPOL SELMA SHAFTER SHASTA COUNTY SHASTA LAKE SIERRA COUNTY SIGNAL HILL SISKIYOU COUNTY SOLANA BEACH . SONOMA SONORA SOUTH GATE SOUTH LAKE TAHOE STOCKTON SUISUN CITY SUSANVILLE SUTTER CREEK TAFT TEHACHAPI TEHAMA TEHAMA COUNTY TEMPLE CITY TORRANCE TRINIDAD TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY TULELAKE TUOLUMNE COUNTY TURLOCK TWENTYNINE PALMS UPLAND VALLEJO VENTURA COUNTY VERNON VICTORVILLE VILLA PARK June 2019 EST SACRAMENTO ESTLAKE VILLAGE ESTMORLAND HEATLAND HITTIER ILLIAMS ILLITS ILLOWS INDSOR OODLAKE 293 OLO COUNTY 294 REKA UBACITY USA COUNTY UCAIPA UCCAVALLEY Page 4 of6 SB 35 Statewide Determination Summary Ci ties and Counties Subject to SB 35 Streamlining Provisions When Proposed Developments Include ~ 50% Affordability When jurisdictions have insufficient progress toward their Lower income RHNA (Very Low and Low income), these jurisdictions are subject to the streamlined ministerial approval process (SB 35 (Chapter 366, Statutes of 2017) streamlining) for proposed developments with at least 50% affordability. If the jurisdiction also has insufficient progress toward their Above Moderate income RHNA, then they are subject to the more inclusive streamlining for developments with at least 10% affordability. The following list includes the 213 jurisdictions that are not subject to SB 35 streamlining for proposed developments with 2: 10% affordability, but are subject to SB 35 streamlining for proposed developments with 2: 50% affordability. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 ; ••■t~~!;ilJIN■le"" AGOURA HILLS !ALAMEDA ALBANY AMADOR COUNTY !AMERICAN CANYON !ANAHEIM ANDERSON ANTIOCH ARTESIA !ATASCADERO !ATWATER IAUBURN BALDWIN PARK BELLFLOWER BELMONT BERKELEY BIG BEAR LAKE BREA BRENTWOOD BRISBANE BUELLTON BUENA PARK BURLINGAME CALABASAS CAMARILLO CAMPBELL CANYON LAKE CAPITOLA CARLSBAD CERRITOS CHICO CHINO CHINO HILLS CHULA VISTA CLAREMONT June 2019 ·: 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 (,. _.{:/ ~■IIISaL--.■J•--•r•h'I :f+. -· CLOVIS COALINGA CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CORONA COSTA MESA COTATI CULVER CITY CUPERTINO CYPRESS DALY CITY DANA POINT DANVILLE DAVIS DEL MAR DIAMOND BAR DIXON DOWNEY DUBLIN EASTVALE EL DORADO COUNTY ELK GROVE EMERYVILLE ENCINITAS FAIRFIELD FOLSOM FONTANA FORT BRAGG FREMONT FRESNO FULLERTON GALT GARDENA GILROY GLENDALE GLENDORA 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 : ,:·/ ,;_ -•~l>•..,,-,■,.-•••h'I )tb-,: GOLETA GROVER BEACH HAWTHORNE HEALDSBURG HERCULES HERMOSA BEACH HOLLISTER HUGHSON IMPERIAL BEACH INDIAN WELLS INDIO IONE IRVINE JACKSON KING CITY LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE LA HABRA LAMESA LA PALMA LA QUINTA LAFAYETTE LAGUNA BEACH LAGUNA HILLS LAGUNA WOODS LAKE FOREST LAKEWOOD LARKSPUR LIVERMORE LODI LOMITA LOS ALTOS LOS ALTOS HILLS LOS ANGELES LOS BANOS MALIBU Page 5 of6 SB 35 Statewide Determination Summary Cities and Counties Subject to SB 35 Streamlining Provisions When Proposed Developments Include ~ 50% Affordability When jurisdictions have insufficient progress toward their Lower income RHNA 0fery Low and Low income), these jurisdictions are subject to the streamlined ministerial approval process (SB 35 (Chapter 366, Statutes of 2017) streamlining) for proposed developments with at least 50% affordability. If the jurisdiction also has insufficient progress toward their Above Moderate income RHNA, then they are subject to the more inclusive streamlining for developments with at least 10% affordability. The following list includes the 213 jurisdictions that are not subject to SB 35 streamlining for proposed developments with :::: 10% affordability, but are subject to SB 35 streamlining for proposed developments with :::: 50% affordability. 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 ,._,.;:,._.,. -~~11,-,11e1~1 · .,;:j;,""'t MAMMOTH LAKES MANHATTAN BEACH MARIN COUNTY MARINA MILPITAS MISSION VIEJO MONO COUNTY MONROVIA MOORPARK MORAGA MORGAN HILL MOUNTAIN VIEW MURRIETA NAPA NAPA COUNTY NEWARK NEWPORT BEACH NORWALK OAKDALE OAKLAND OAKLEY ORANGE ORANGE COUNTY ORINDA PALM DESERT PALM SPRINGS · PALO ALTO PASADENA PERRIS PETALUMA PIEDMONT PISMO BEACH PITTSBURG PLACENTIA PLACER COUNTY PLACERVILLE PLEASANTON June 2019 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 . \. -•••~l~l"-•••h'I . PLUMAS COUNTY POINT ARENA PORT HUENEME PORTOLA VALLEY RANCHO CORDOVA RANCH.O CUCAMONGA RANCHO MIRAGE RANCHO PALOS VERDES RANCHO ST. MARGARITA REDDING REDWOOD CITY RIO VISTA ROCKLIN ROLLING HILLS ESTATES ROSEVILLE SAN ANSELMO SAN BENITO COUNTY SAN BUENAVENTURA SAN CARLOS SAN CLEMENTE SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO SAN GABRIEL SAN JOSE SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO SAN LUIS OBISPO SAN LUIS OBISPO CO. SAN MARCOS SAN MARINO SAN MATEO SAN RAMON SANTA BARBARA SANTA BARBARA COUNTY SANTA CLARA SANTA CRUZ SANTA FE SPRINGS SCOTTS VALLEY 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 .·,'.', . . ··.· •1■1~l~IJ1-■1ei.,1 SEAL BEACH SIERRA MADRE SIMI VALLEY SOLANO COUNTY SOLEDAD SOUTH EL MONTE SOUTH PASADENA SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO STANISLAUS COUNTY STANTON SUNNYVALE SUTTER COUNTY TEMECULA THOUSAND OAKS TIBURON TRACY TRUCKEE TULARE . TUSTIN UNION CITY VACAVILLE VISALIA !VISTA WALNUT WALNUT CREEK WASCO WATSONVILLE WEST COVINA WESTMINSTER W!LDOMAR WINTERS WOODLAND !YORBA LINDA YOUNTVILLE Page 6 of6