Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2019-11-19; Responses to Questions from the Nov. 18 Council Briefings; Lukey, Elaine
All Receive -Agtlr\11; item# J.Q For the ln for,mation of the: CITY COLJNC!L Date1fi_q /J"! CA _c._ CC &.. CM ~ co d !S_ iXiVl (3) ~ Nov. 19, 2019 Council Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor Hall and Members of th!City ,council From: {city of Carlsbad Memo ID# 2019132 Re: Elaine Lu key, Chief Operations Officer ~ · · Responses to Questions from the Nov. 18, 2019, Council Briefings Agenda Item No. 10 -Advertise for Bids for Traffic Signal at Poinsettia Lane and Cassia Road, and Traffic Signal at Poinsettia Lane and Oriole Court/Skimmer Court, CIP Project Nos. 6329 and 6330 (Project) Question 1: What were the results of the Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Study (Study) performed by LSA? Answer: The Study is included as Attachment A. Question 2: When was this Study requested, and was it competitively bid on its own or procured through a Master Agreement? Answer: Under a Master Agreement with LSA, dated Nov. 17, 2015, the city requested a scope for the Study and it was submitted by LSA on Jan. 5, 2018. The task order was executed on March 22, 2018, and is included as Attachment B. Question 3: What was included in the scope of the Study? Answer: The signed agreement, including the scope of work, is included as Attachment B. Question 4: Do we have any results from the November 2018 community meeting with the HOAs in the nearby neighborhoods? Answer: The public meeting for the Project was held on Nov. 7, 2018. All four affected HOAs and residents were invited to attend. The presentation for the public meeting is included as Attachment C. The public meeting notes are included as Attachment D. The minutes from the Planning Commission meeting on Feb. 1, 2017, are included as Attachment E, and the minutes from the City Council meeting on March 14, 2017, are included as Attachment F. Staff will be presenting the Study to the Traffic & Mobility Commission Dec. 2, 2019, and to City Council on Dec. 10, 2019. City Manager's Office 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive I Carlsbad, CA 92008 I 760-434-2820 t Honorable Mayor Hall and Members of the City Council Nov. 19, 2019 Page 2 Attachments: A. Traffic Investigation Poinsettia Lane Closure Nov. 2019 (a PDF file is attached as an electronic version, and a hard copy is available in the Office of the Executive Assistant to the City Council, as reference) B. Project Task Description and Fee Allotment with LSA of March 22, 2018 C. Presentation -Neighborhood Traffic Workshop Poinsettia Lane Completion Traffic Study Nov. 7, 2018 D. Notes -Poinsettia Lane Completion Project Resident Feedback Nov. 7, 2018 E. Planning Commission Minutes Feb. 1, 2017 Meeting F. City Council Minutes March 14, 2017 Meeting cc: Scott Chadwick, City Manager Celia Brewer, City Attorney Babaq Taj, Interim Transportation Director Amanda Guy, Deputy City Attorney Hossein Ajideh, Engineering Manager John Kim, City Traffic Engineer Jonathan Schauble, Senior Engineer Sheila Cobian, City Clerk Services Manager Attachment B CA1286 PROJECT TASK DESCRIPTION AND FEE ALLOTMENT NO. 3 Project Task and Fee Allotment, is entered into on -1--I-4=-""""::..:...:::~_,_,,,...._+->--z:::::>..<.!/......._ ______ , pursuant to an Agreement between LSA A SOCIATES, INC., a California corporation, ("Contractor") and the CITY OF CARLSBAD, ("City") dated November 17, 2015, (the "Agreement"), the terms of which are incorporated herein by this reference. 1. CONTRACTOR'S OBLIGATIONS 2. 3. Contractor shall provide Traffic analysis in accordance with the "Project Engineer's Manual", 2001 edition, as published by the City's Engineering Department, City "Standards for Design & Construction of Public Works Improvements in the City of Carlsbad," and the proposal dated January 5, 2018, ("proposal"), attached as Appendix "A" for the Poinsettia Traffic Study, (the "Project"). The Project services shall include a traffic analysis, a cut-through traffic evaluation, an intersection geometric analysis, and traffic calming recommendations. PROGRESS AND COMPLETION Contractor's receipt of this Project Task Description and Fee Allotment, signed by the City Manager or Director and a Purchase Order from the City's Purchasing Department, constitutes notification to proceed to the Contractor. Contractor shall begin work within ten (10) working days after receiving this fully executed document and a City Purchase Order. Contractor shall complete the work within sixty (60) working days thereafter. Working days are defined in section 6-7.2 "Working Day" of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (Green Book). Extensions of time for this Task Description may be granted if requested and agreed to in writing by the Director or City Manager. In no event shall Contractor work beyond the term or authorized compensation of the Master Agreement, as amended by this Project Task Description and Fee Allotment. FEES TO BE PAIDTO THE CONTRACTOR Contractor's compensation for the Project is shown in Table 1, "Fee Allotment", herein. Fees shall be paid on the basis of time and materials for each task group shown in Table 1. Progress payments shall be based on work days. Appendix "A", attached, prepared by Contractor and reviewed by City, shows the parties' intent as to the elements, scope and extent of the task groups. Contractor acknowledges that performance of any and all tasks by the Contractor constitutes acknowledgment by Contractor that such tasks are those defined in Appendix "A". Additional task groups, not shown in Table 1 or Appendix "A", will be performed by the Contractor only upon authorization of the City through the mechanism of a separate Project Task Description and Fee Allotment and Purchase Order. In the event that City directs Contractor to curtail or eliminate all, or portions of the task groups identified in Table 1 or Appendix A, then the Contractor shall only invoice the City for work actually performed. The maximum total cost of Contractor's services for this Project Task Description and Fee Allotment is $27,000. City Attorney Approved Version 7/19/17 CA1286 TABLE 1 FEE ALLOTMENT TRAFFIC STUDY OF THE AREA AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED POINSETTIA 'REACH E' BRIDGE ... ---· ·. TASK GROUP. Traffic Study TOT AL (Not-to-Exceed) CONTRACTOR LSA ASSOCIATES, INC., a California corporation By:~- (sln herk) A i kt. ]"oHa. 1 -Pres'ickn,t (print name/title) C ·• . TIME & MATERIALS LSA ASSOCIATES, INC., a California corporation (name of Contractor) By~~ere) (print name/title) $27,000 $27,000 If Contractor is a corporation, this document must be signed by one individual from each column: Column A Chairman, President or Vice-President Column B Secretary, Assistant Secretary, CFO or Assistant Treasurer Otherwise, the corporation must attach a resolution certified by the secretary or assistant secretary under corporate seal empowering the officer(s) signing to bind the corporation. CITY OF CARLSBAD, a municipal corporation of the State of California By: :Z.,-22 ; , e Date: __ ,.,,. _______ _ -lie Works Director APPROVED AS TO FORM: CELIA A BREWER, City Attorney BY:~~ Deputy City Attorney City Attorney Approved Version 7/19/17 2 LSA January 5, 2018 Craig Williams Transportation Planning and Mobility City of Carlsbad .1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Appendix "A" Subject: Professional Services Proposal: Poinsettia Lane "Reach E" Circulation Services Dear Mr. Williams: BERKELEY CARL5BAD FRESNO IRVINE LOS ANGELES PALM SPRINGS POINT RICHMOND RIVERSIDE ROSEVILLE SAN LUIS OBISPO LSA Associates, Inc., doing business as LSA, has prepared this professional services proposal to provide the City of Carlsbad (City) with circulation services regarding the extension of Poinsettia Lane ("Reach E"). This proposal includes four discrete tasks: a traffic analysis, a cut-through traffic evaluation,· an intersection geometric analysis, and traffic calming recommendations. Each task is described below. Traffic Analysis The Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) prepared for the Poinsettia 61 residential project by LSA includes traffic model data from the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) for 2035 conditions with the Poinsettia Gap Closure. In January 2017, LSA prepared a separate analysis examining the existing plus project impacts in the Viadana and Pavoreal neighborhoods. This analysis did not include 2035 or 2040 traffic projections. LSA will request from the City any model data prepared for the 2015 General Plan update, such as base year model data or 2035 conditions without the Poinsettia Gap Closure that could assist in establishing growth rates. LSA will apply growth rates to forecast 2040 roadway volumes and will apply National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCH RP) 225 methodology to forecast 2040 turn volumes. The recommended study area would include the following roadway segments: • Poinsettia Lane (Aviara Parkway to Ambrosia Lane) • Poinsettia Lane (Ambrosia Lane to Cassia Road) • Poinsettia Lane (Cassia Road to El Camino Real) • El Camino Real (Cassia Road to Poinsettia Lane) • El Camino Real (Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway) • Cassia Road (Poinsettia Lane to El Camino Real) • Ambrosia Lane (Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway) • Mimosa Drive (Oriole Court to Aviara Parkway) • Dove Lane (Moorhen Place to El Camino Real) I In addition, the study area would include the following intersections: • Ambrosia Lane/Poinsettia Lane • Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road • El Camino Real/Cassia Road • El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane • El Camino Real/Dove Lane • El Camino Real/Aviara Parkway • Ambrosia Lane/Aviara Parkway 20 Executive Park, Suite 200, Irvine, California 92614 949.553 .. 0666 www.lsa.net CA1286 LSA • Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane/Oriole Court • Mimosa Drive/Moorhen Place • Dove Lane/Moorhen Place • Mimosa Drive/Aviara Parkway LSA recommends collecting new 24-hour roadway volume data at all study roadway segments. LSA had previously collected traffic turn volume data at Ambrosia Lane/Poinsettia Lane, Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road, El Camino Real/Cassia Road, and El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane. However, new peak-hour turn volume data including bicycle and pedestrian data would be collected at all study intersections. Previously collected vehicle traffic volume data will be used to confirm the anticipated annual growth rate. LSA will request City accident data for the roadways and intersections in the study area. LSA will also query Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) and Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) data. The existing setting will include a summary of accident data including location and cause. As part of the existing setting, LSA will apply the City's multi-modal level of service (MMLOS) tool to score the roadways in the study area. It should be noted that the City's General Plan establishes different modal priorities for different classifications of roadways and LSA will account for these established priorities in the MMLOS analysis. LSA will comment on future multi-modal facility needs based on the existing MMLOS analysis and established modal priorities. As mentioned previously, LSA will use the NCHRP 225 methodology to forecast future (2040) traffic volumes. LSA will analyze existing plus Poinsettia Gap Closure and 2040 with Poinsettia Gap Closure traffic volumes with existing lane configurations according to Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology to calculate delay and level of service for the study intersections. At unsignalized locations, LSA will apply all-way stop control and traffic signal warrants and report on whether traffic volumes meet the warrants. LSA may also analyze roundabouts at certain locations such as Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road and Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane/ Oriole Court if requested by the City. Levels of service will be disclosed for roadways, intersections, and modal choices for the future conditions. Any improvements necessary to maintain satisfactory LOS will be identified. The comparisons for with and without "Reach E" will also be disclosed. LSA will review other Significance Thresholds and Neighborhood Traffic Context recommendations for acceptable increases in local and collector street traffic within neighborhoods· from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO), the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Complete Communities, Circulate San Diego, and others. These will be suggested as criteria for the community to consider when evaluating the change in traffic associated with "Reach E". Deliverable: Traffic Analysis, illustrating existing setting, future no extension and future extension traffic volumes, and levels of service. Cut-Through Traffic Evaluation LSA's report will contain a thorough explanation of methodology and conclusions in a section evaluating the potential for cut-through traffic with the completion of Poinsettia Lane. LSA will examine the difference in traffic assignment between the traffic models with Poinsettia Lane and those without Poinsettia Lane. In addition, LSA will have speed surveys conducted at five (S) locations in the area over a 48-hour period under existing conditions. These surveys will be conducted at the same time as the traffic counts are taken and may be 3/8/18 «Q:\Public Works\PW Common\Agreements & Contracts\Agreements\2018 Agreements\Project Tasks\CITY\LSA\Task 3· Poinsettia 51\SOW • Poinsettia 2 Reach E v3_180105.docx)> CA1286 LSA collected by pneumatic tubes. These locations could be on Cassia Lane, Ambrosia Lane, Min:,osa Drive, Poinsettia Lane east, or other sites at the direction of the City. This examination will show which roadway volumes are anticipated to increase and which are anticipated to decrease as a result of the gap closure. Comparing the traffic volumes will show the relative magnitude of change. The existing speed profile will illustrate the average and prima facia speeds along the five selected routes. LSA will also prepare an analysis of travel time savings for various potential cut-through routes. Routes with potential travel time savings would be more likely to contribute to cut-through traffic than routes with no time savings. The time savings analysis will help identify the origins and destinations of the traffic volume changes identified by the traffic model. The combination of these two methods will allow LSA to estimate turn volumes of cut-through traffic. LSA's conclusions regarding cut-through traffic will be added to existing traffic volumes. r The intersection of El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane was recently modified to convert the southbound right-turn lane to a third through lane. LSA will include a section in the report focusing on this intersection and movement. Restoring the southbound right-turn lane would remove a southbound through lane. Adding a southbound right- turn lane would require roadway widening. LSA will measure the width of the curb lane and observe its operation to help identify whether its existing configuration can operate as a de facto right-turn lane. LSA will identify whether the volume of southbound right-turning vehicles meet any established design guidelines for an exclusive right-turn lane. This section will present a comparison of intersection performance given three southbound configurations: one left, two through, and a through-right; orve left, two through, and a right; and one left, three through, and a right. This section will summarize a technical memorandum to be prepared by LSA biology experts describing the habitat adjacent to El Camino Real and potential environmental impacts of the roadway widening. This section will also summarize a technical memorandum to be prepared by an engineering partner providing a high-level cost estimate of roadway widening. Deliverable: Technical Memorandum, with graphics, showing comparisons of intersection geometrics on levels of service and cost, and gross level pote'ntial natural resource impacts of alternative southbound lane complements. Traffic Calming Recommendation LSA will review the Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program to determine the toolbox of potential traffic calming solutions and thresholds for application as they would apply to neighborhoods accessed by Mimosa Drive. LSA will request from the City the design and construction costs associated with completed traffic calming projects within the City. If the report recommends implementation of any traffic calming elements, LSA will include a summary of potential traffic diversion (benefit) and design and construction costs. If requested by the City, LSA will attend one meeting with neighborhood homeowners to review the quantity of cut-through traffic anticipated as a result of Poinsettia Lane "Reach E" and the potential traffic calming solutions. Feedback from neighborhood homeowners regarding the potential traffic calming solutions will be included in the final ~~ ' . Deliverable: One (1) Conceptual Drawing, of traffic calming recommendations for one roadway application (e.g., Mimosa Drive or Cassia Lane or Ambrosia Lane, etc.) overlaid on aerial photography for use by the City in meetings with homeowners. 3/8/18 «Q:\Public Works\PW Common\Agreements & Contracts\Agreements\2018 Agreements\Projec!Tasks\CIT'I\LSA\Task 3 • Poinsettia 61\SOW -Poinsettia Reach E v3_180105.docx» 3 CA1286 LSA OptieRal Task It is concei1,iable tl=tat issues A'la1; arise as a result of the analysis, tl=te presentation of tl=te analysis or the dialogue in the public outreach. To this end, LS/\ proposes an optional task for unanticipated A'latters that A'lay occur during tl=te '"''ark effort. LSA will be available on a tiA'le and n:laterials basis to address tl=tese n:latters with the City staff. LSA will only initiate ,•,•orlc on tl=tis optional task after a discussion witl=t City staff, and preparation anp approval of a 1.Yritten LSA Additional Work ReEJuest by tl=te City Project Manager. LS/\ will prepare a draft tecl=tnical letter (inclusi·,e of the four task deliverables) within 8 ,...,eelcs of receipt of tl=te traffic volun:le/speed and traffic model data. Tl=te letter will include color graphics and all analysis worlcsheets as attachn:lents. LS/\ will r=evise the draft technical letter based on one round of City re•,iiew. LS/\ will also n:lake one round of revisions after public review. LSA attendance at public hearings can be reEJuested on a tiA'le and materials basis outside of this Scope of Work. Based on this Scope of Work, a budget of $27,000 is required for preparation of the traffic study. This amount will be billed consistent with the attached terms and conditions. This amount will not be exceeded without prior authorization. Tl=te Optional Task will be billed on a tiA'le and A'laterials basis witl=t a n:la1ciA'lUA'l of $3,000. This an:lount will only be utilii!Cd after LSA prepares a written Additional Work ReEJuest and that reEJuest is approved by the City Project Manager. A draft traffic study will be submitted to the City for review within 8 weeks following receipt of data. Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal. LSA looks forward to working with you on this project. Sincerely, LSA Associates, Inc. ~,;;~ Principal Attachment Schedule of Standard Contract Provisions and Billing Rates THE ABOVE STATED TERMS ARE HEREBY ACCEPTED AND AUTHORIZED. CONSULTANT: CLIENT: LSA Associates, Inc. Company Company Anthony Petros Authorized Signature Principal ntle Title Date Date 3/8/18 «Q:\PubllcWorks\PW Common\Agreements & Contracts\Agreements\2018 Agreements\ProjectTasks\CITY\LSA\Task 3-Poinsettla 61\SOW -Poinsettia 4 Reach E v3_180105.doorn CA1286 --0 < ~ a .J::: 12 :..... ~ i.,J f§ C:'.:) -~ "t:s a a .J::: :..... a ...!:::) .J::: -~ CD < V) V) Q) u V) 0 V) ,_ Q) a. u b.O 0 Q) ,_ V) C a. 0 C +-' a. C ::::l ,_ a. ::::l co CL CL C • • • > cJ ::J +--' Li) u i.;:::: 4-ro I.... f-co C rl 0 0 N +--' (1J r---' Q. ,.__ E (1J ..D 0 E u (1J (1J > C 0 ro z _J ro +--' +--' (1J Vl C 0 0.... V) a. Q) +-' V) +-' X Q) z • CD E a i.,J -~ co ,_ -2 +-' u Q) a. V) Q) 0:::: ,_ Q) Q) C b.O C LJ.J ,_ 0 C Q) V) V), E co s b.O co ,_ u • ,_ ::::l u ..c +-' -~ ::::l "'Cl co ...0 V) ,_ co u -0 > +-' u 0 V) > ,_ 0 Q) +-' ..c +-' C +-' 0 co 0 t:'. +-' 0 +-' 0.. C E2 ,_ V) 0 a. ~ E ..c: V) s +-' QJ co u ..c ~ s co ,_ co -2 co a. u C ,_ CL co ..c V) > I E ~ • V) ,_ Q) C +-' ,_ co CL Q) ::::l b.O 0 co 0 V) +-' C Q) E Q) +-' co +-' V) Q) V) ,_ +-' ::::l co 0 > Q) ,_ C o E ...:.::: co Q) a. V) ...:.::: co Q) a. V) "'Cl C co +-' V) ,_ Q) "'Cl C ::::l 0 +-' C Q) +-' V) _J Attachment C C/:l V) ~ '"O ro Q.J !::: Q.J ·-C/:l !::: a ·-Q.J C V) V) -0 ... ~ Q.J 0.. Q.J ~ ...c 0 ...c ..... ... ..... ·-V) 0.. 0 ;:::i ... Q.J ' '"O C..'.J '"O :::::i C 0 ro !::: 'vi > C ... :::::i a 0 0 0 ·-Q.J u -> 4-...l :::::i C .:,,t. ... c:s OJ) 0 Vl ... 0 0 :::::i 0 -r: '+:; -5 Vl ro :::::i 0 .:,,t. ... ~ '"O 0 Q.J ..... 0 ' ~ Q.J V) ro Q.J C 5 ... V) !::: ...c Q.J -OJ) Q.J +-' 0 ..... a ..0 ro 0 ro C ro ..... V) '"O ...c ~ ·-C V) '"O ..... Q.J Q.J ro C +-' ro ... 0 Q.J ro ..... Q.J ..... '"O 0 0.. Vl ..... '+:; :::::i C Q.J ·u V) Q.J C :::::i '.j:i > '"O ... ro 0 OJ) ... C C <( -V) ro <( ro a.. 4-...l c:s ro ..... 4-...l Q.J ..c I;,_) ... OJ) ~ ro C ~ Q.J 0 ..c +-' ~ +-' ... C 0 -~ Q.J V) E C !::: 0 c:s +-' +-' '"O ro V) +-' C/:l ... C u ~ o---ro Q.J ~ ..0 '"O 0.. ...c 0 X a OJ) 0 Q.J ::i:: Q.J ..c '"O C ... C ... 0 ro :::::i ..0 V) 0 Q.J ..c Q.J > E OJ) 0.. ..... ro Q.J 0 Q.J z z :r: Q.J ~ • • • • • • • • s ~ ·-~ I ~ ~ ~ a 4-...l I;,_) ~ "'::--I a ~ 0... +-' > u Q.J C ..0 > . ---. 0 ro '"O '"O ... Q.J :::::i 0.. 0.. +-' ..... -... Q.J ... V) 0 Q.J 0.. ro u ..... E C 8:: > V) ... ro C ro 0 ~ 0 Q.J ... +-' u __J I-V) :r: • • • 0 ro (I) ·-0:::: -·-0 ...0 CJ C c:s E E !::: ::J ro ·-0 u c:s > 4-...l u LU C/:l (I) ::E 0 > ...... ;:::i ro ro Lf) C I... I... V) ...... ...... I 0 ...... "'O -...... ~ Vl CJ "'O ro ro (I) ...... > ...... u !::: s ro I... ~ Cl. co 0 c:s I Cl. (I) ...... "'O C Vl u ·v, ro ro C (I) 0 ...... ..0 (I) C ro ..0 ro Vl I... ...... > ~ I... ...... C I... ro CJ 0 u ro ro ...... "'O ...... c:s u Vl C V) ~ "'O ...... 0 (I) ...... CJ u E CJ C (I) E "'O b.O C '.j:i C C 'vi C ::J 0 ro (I) 0 ~ I... (I) 0 u ·;; ...... C ro • • • LU l/') • • • C.f'} -c::s s:: -~ +-' C +-' V; QJ u I...) E ,.__ QJ > ~ Q. E "'O 0 E ::l QJ +-' c::s > V) ~ ~ u QJ V) "'O "'O fE ""c::s rl C (tl ,.__ \.D (tl +-' ~ (tl "'O 4-s:: +-' 0 +-' 0::: u s:: +-' +-' QJ (tl QJ ,.__ c::s V) (tl C V) 0 Q. -V) ·.:::: 0... 0 (tl 0 V) Cl.. u (tl 0 ........_ ........_ "'O +-' (tl (tl QJ ,.__ QJ +-' +-' QJ u +-' +-' "'O C QJ QJ (tl V) V) V) ,.__ C C C +-' 0 0 C 0 LU Cl.. 0... u s:: a QJ ·-+-' -I-...) QJ I...) C Q. -(tl E .....i tl.O ""c::s QJ 0 a ..0 u QJ QJ ::..... C +-' tl.O -I-...) 0 QJ "'O s:: +-' Q. ·.:::: ........ u C E ..0 ::l ro ""c::s ,._ tl.O 0 "'O +-' QJ u C V) s:: C ..0 > ro c::s 0 > "'O > u "'O ::l (tl ~ "'O ::l +-' $ V) s:: (tl +-' "'O 0 V) u ·-fE ro -,.__ u 0 Q.) i,i:: (tl ,._ CX) 4-,._ E rl ro +-' 0 ,.__ 0 +-' CJ) N ·-N 0 E-CX) rl ,._ 0 N QJ rl N 4-E 0 0 N > E ,._ "'O ::l (tl ro C V) LL LU LU • • • • • • • • C.f'} Q.) ~ I...) ::..... ("\,, ::s V) s:: ~ ("\,-·-"'O ::..... QJ ("\,. C ~ > tl.O QJ ,.__ C ..c ~ QJ $ ~ V) 0 ..0 "'O C 0 +-' QJ I...) ::l 0 Q. 0-· 0 C Q. QJ ~ > ,._ (tl +-' QJ 0 ..c QJ c::s > tl.O 0 Q. ~ ("\,, ro C +-' E C ..c +-' 0 QJ V) 0 u u ::..... QJ "'O "'O QJ V) C V) Q. -~ ::s QJ ,._ X QJ ::l QJ QJ ~ ,.__ C 0 +-' > > u ,._ ::l (tl 0 _J QJ fE "'O > > QJ (tl ro (tl ,._ 0 +-' ..c ,._ (tl "'O +-' +-' QJ +-' +-' +-' +-' V) (tl (tl (tl (tl C ..c ..c ..c ..c s s s s 0 0... -I-...) 0-• 0 ~ +-' 0 C ..c ro 0-• +-' u V) 0-· ("\,. ,.__ V) +-' Q.) +-' +-' 0 > C ~ C C Q. ..0 QJ ro -I-...) (tl +-' E ,._ "'O +-' ,.__ ,._ (tl V) ::..... 0 0 +-' QJ QJ ~ Q. Q. V) C ,._ E E 0 ...... ,.__ E 0 0 C.f'} +-' 4-4-+-' Q.) V) V) V) +-' +-' ·-0 0 C C -I-...) E E +-' (tl (tl ro +-' +-' ·-..c ,._ ,._ ::..... V) V) $ 0 0 a +-' +-' Q. Q. ·-(tl ro C E E ::..... ..c ..c (tl 0... $ $ +-' +-' ,.__ V) V) ,._~ ,1-J +-' 0 0 V) QJ V) QJ E E > "'O u QJ V) V) ,._ > "'O u Q. +-' +-' ro (tl (tl ro (tl ..c ..c V) V) V) s s <( <( <( • • • • • • • • • V) 0... CD 4-..) V) 4-..) ~ < l/'l QJ ....., ro t) 0.. ::i > '--t) 0 ::i ·u -....., C ....., l./1_ ::i l/'l u ti= 0 '--u QJ ro > ....., '--....., ....., ...., QJ C u l/'l ..c. 5 ~ ....., u -~ QJ ro C ..0 QJ t) '--ro QJ ro E QJ ..c. LL V) LU • • • {city of Carlsbad Neighborhood Traffic Workshop Wednesday, November 7, 2018 Resident Feedback QUESTION: What brought you here? Concerns: • Current traffic • Noise • Noise from morning traffic on Cassia Attachment D Poinsettia Lane Completion Project • Aesthetics and noise of roadway completion -the way it is now is not a livable street • Traffic speeds • Safety • Bridge sightline • Need for traffic control • Timeline for project • Observation of accidents and near accidents • Northbound El Camino Real (ECR)/Poinsettia Lane (Poinsettia) going from three lanes to two which slows down high speed traffic • Danger of westbound Poinsettia traffic turning right at Black Rail Road (Black Rail) • Poinsettia reducing from two lanes to one past Aviara Parkway • Where Poinsettia goes from four lanes to two • Traffic lights on Poinsettia not alleviating traffic issues on Cassia Road (Cassia) • Lack of parking at Poinsettia 61 • Parking issue on Ambrosia Lane (Ambrosia) south of Poinsettia (where cars were abandoned during fire) • Available fire exit • Fire safety and emergency access • Need for more ingress and egress • Not safe for pedestrians (no sidewalk) west of Black Rail on Poinsettia • More traffic to Melrose Drive (Melrose) using Poinsettia • Dangerous curve on Skimmer and Oriole Courts at fast speed • Low visibility where Dove Lane (Dove) meets Moorhen Place (Moorhen) • Mitigate northbound traffic from cutting through residential neighborhoods • Drivers not stopping on Cassia • Lack of pedestrian crossing at Poinsettia/Cassia • Drivers not stopping on Ambrosia • Speeds and line of sight on Ambrosia • Access to Ambrosia off Docena Road and Calliandra Road • Would like to see speed limits of 35 mph or less • Dangerous crossings to get to the park currently and would get worse with completion of Poinsettia • Lack of bike lane • Bike lane safety • Traffic bottle neck at Poinsettia and Black Rail {city of Carlsbad Poinsettia Lane Completion Project • Unsafe traffic all times of day especially at rush hour • Lack of police response to current traffic conditions • Path of travel Cassia v. Poinsettia • Poinsettia will turn into Palmar Airport Road (PAR) • Concern regarding use by residents east of ECR adding to volume when they use Poinsettia to · access 1-5, coast, etc. • Lack of disclosure about road completion to new home buyers • Increased wildlife (coyotes, snakes, etc.) in the area resulting from construction • A need to study traffic east of ECR • Input process if the bridge is already "done" • Trucks • Event traffic platoons Hopes: • Speed control, signals, 4-lane expansion • Pedestrian access/crossing between Skimmer and Oriole Courts • Dedicated right turn lane from ECR to Poinsettia • Safe ingress and egress to/from neighborhoods • Increase line of sight distance at Cassia turning onto ECR • The city will listen to traffic experts and not solely rely on public input • Avoid confusion like with the roundabouts on Cassia Expectations and interest in learning about: • Relief of traffic on Cassia • Status of Cassia cut-through traffic • Extent of project •-Completion date • Planned traffic control • Speed of traffic on ECR • Speed limit on Poinsettia • Traffic volume on Poinsettia • Parking on Poinsettia • Accessibility to schools and churches • Practical solution for traffic concerns • Sound walls • Protection for vehicles entering residential area Suggestions and comments: • Close Oriole to prevent cut-through traffic to shopping center • Flashing pedestrian crossings • No current traffic/speeding concerns at Skimmer and Oriole {city of Carlsbad QUESTION: What have you observed? Poinsettia Lane Completion Project • Need for stop sign at Mimosa and Moorhen • Drivers using Moorhen as a cut through route to get to shopping center • School traffic cutting through Pavoreal and Viadana to get to the shopping center • Need for bumps or traffic calming at Mimosa/Oriole • Drivers ignoring existing stop sign at Mimosa/Oriole • More traffic at Skimmer and Oriole • Cut through traffic • Speeding and rude driving on ECR and Ambrosia • Impatient drivers • Parked cars on Ambrosia • Vehicle parked on sidewalk • Less traffic south, more traffic north • Drivers using Poinsettia as a thoroughfare to Melrose • Cut through traffic at Cassia and Oriole • Lack of pedestrian safety at Poinsettia/Black Rail • "Drag racing" on Poinsettia • Sidewalk access incomplete or lacking • Speeding down Mimosa and entire traffic study area • Kids on bikes at Black Rail • Cassia left turn lane to ECR (northbound) backs up • Speeding, too much traffic volume on Cassia • Speeding • Downhill speeding • Drivers not slowing to 35 mph at Black Rail • Backed up traffic at Poinsettia/Aviara going straight, no one in th.e two lanes to turn right • Unsafe crossings at Ambrosia from lack of sight line • Need for countdown/crosswalk at Poinsettia by the park • Need for speed bumps on Cassia • Gaining speed from right hand turns at Black Rail to Poinsettia • Commuter traffic • Cassia backs up in the morning • Speeds are too fast on Ambrosia and only one stop sign • Increased traffic with ViaSat expansion • Need for additional access to school off Ambrosia • Speeding on Poinsettia • Parking on Ambrosia • Church activity • School session • Bridge impacts homeless • Speed and line of sight • Parking violations • Need for regional buses more than once every hour • Need to consider lane with new shopping center open • Need to plan beyond 2018-19 J {city of Carlsbad Poinsettia Lane Completion Project • Hope that people continue using the roads they are used to and don't start taking side streets • Would love to see pillow bumps on Cassia • Dangerous speeds on Cassia/Ambrosia • Noisy on Fairlead Ave • Worried about crossings • Worried about increased traffic with Viasat • Need to plan for more people and traffic • Westbound on Cassia to northbound ECR is a concern • Access to Poinsettia at Skimmer could be difficult with speeds • Cut through traffic to shopping center • Southbound ECR traffic without righthand turn lane • Quiet traffic on Skimmer/Oriole • Truck/delivery {city of Carlsbad Poinsettia Lane Completion Project QUESTION: What should the city's priorities be or what should the city know thinking as a ... Driver • Bottle neck on Poinsettia • Less traffic signals • Parked cars on Ambrosia • Safety • Ability to get to work • Avoid ECR • Need for "adaptive traffic signals" (e.g. Poinsettia at ECR) • Help traffic at nearby streets • There need to be reasonable speeds Cyclist • Unsafe • Wide, dedicated bike lanes. • No sharrows • Want bike trails to school and open spaces • Turn trails into bike trails • Clean lines of sight • No parked cars • Good buffer • Speeds about the same as cars • Safe bike trails • Connections to schools and churches • Want cyclists to not ride in a row (blocking the lane) Pedestrian • Bottleneck • Sidewalks end and are limited • Safe sidewalks • Poinsettia should allow for multimodal use community road (not arterial) • Sidewalk completion ECR/Poinsettia • To be able to cross Poinsettia at Cassia • Trail connection offset from road along both sides of Poinsettia Resident • Less traffic and convenience • Road noise needs to be quieter • Need for dedicated right turn lane on ECR (south) to Poinsettia (west) • Less noise on Cassia .so we can sleep with windows open • Least amount of traffic through neighborhoods • Sound barriers/landscaping for safety • Maintaining the character of the neighborhood • Listen to residents and check-in • Enforcement on Cassia, increased patrols {city of Carlsbad Poinsettia Lane Completion Project • Recognize that there are residences on both sides • Maintain character of roadway • Concerns about cut through traffic heading south toward library Schools • Need direct paths to schools • No sign on Ambrosia that says 25 mph when kids are present • Emergency vehicles not able to get to school due to parked cars • Increased safety for crossing • Wider speed bumps on Ambrosia • Kids being able to get to school along trail • Need cross walks along Ambrosia • Crossing guards • New trail from development to school {city of Carlsbad Questions: Poinsettia Lane Completion Project • Did area churches contribute to any road improvements? • Will there be rubberized asphalt on the new s.ection of Poinsettia? • Can there be speed feedback devices on Poinsettia? • Where is the park going to be? • Will trails come off Poinsettia? • Will there be parking along the road? • Will there be a parking lot by trails? • What is the roadway going to look like? • Is it going to be two lanes the entire way? • How many lanes will it be? • Is it going to be a city or county road? • Will condos be completed before the road? • Will you put stop signs along Kalima Circle at Poinsettia Heights gate locations? • What measures will you take immediately to calm traffic on Cassia? • Bike lane needed on Cassia if Poinsettia is going to have bike lane? Suggestions/Comments: • Gate neighborhood but keep roads public • Signal will make it feel more like drivers are supposed to turn • Create something that appears like a neighborhood entry (median or guard shack) • No go on speed bumps/humps, other treatments could be considered (expanding curbs, etc.) • Don't want congestion • No left turn onto Cassia from Poinsettia during specific hours • More enforcement for speeding and trucks • Left turn signal too short at ECR/Poinsettia • Please consider increased police presence on Cassia to enforce speed limits • Dedicate one of the two right-turn lanes at Poinsettia/Aviara for straight traffic • Dedicate one lane to right-turn at Aviara/Ambrosia • Decrease speed limit on Poinsettia (40-45 mph) • Add yellow lane pocket to help traffic that backs up trying to turn right off Cassia to ECR • Flashing stop signs at Cassia/Poinsettia • New lights on Poinsettia = traffic stays on Cassia • Dedicated right turn lane from ECR onto Poinsettia (west) • Flashing crosswalk at Poinsettia/Fairlead Avenue • Poinsettia traffic should be optimized during heavy traffic periods • Consider flashing lights or other features to help access from intersections on Cassia • Segment without Black Rail Planning Commission Minutes Minutes of: Time of Meeting: Date of Meeting: Place of Meeting: CAl l TO ORDER February 1, 2017 PLANNING COMMISSION 6:00 p.m. February 1, 2017 COUNCIL CHAMBER Chairperson Segall called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Goyarts led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Attachment E Page 1 Present: Chairperson Segall, Commissioners Anderson, Black, Goyarts, L'Heureux, Montgomery and Siekmann Absent: None STAFF PRESENT Don Neu, City Planner Ron Kemp, Assistant City Attorney Teri Delcamp, Senior Planner Paul Dan, Associate Planner Jason Geldert, Engineering Manager Craig Williams, Transportation Manager PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA Robert Wilkinson, Suite I, 2911 State Street, shared his concerns with projects that come before the Commission for consideration prior to the final Village Master Plan regarding outdated standards, character, development in the core village area and parking issues. PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING Chairperson Segall a.sked Mr. Neu to introduce the first item and opened the public hearing on Agenda Item 1. 1. EIR 15-03/GPA 14-06/ZC 14-04/LCPA 14-06/CT 14-10/PUD 14-12/SDP 14-15/CDP 14-. 34/HDP 14-07/HMP 14-04 -POINSETTIA 61 -Request for the certification of an Environmental Impact Rep9rt, including the approval of Candidate Findings of Fact and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and a recommendation of approval of a General Plan Amendment from R-4 to R-8 (no change to project unit yield) and to adjust the boundaries of the open space and residential land use designations, a Zone Change from One family Residential (R-1) and Open Space to Residential Density-Multiple (RD-M) and Open Space (OS) and OS Land Use and zoning for an adjacent 10 acre site as mitigation land, a Local Coastal Program Amendment, Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Planned Development Permit, Site Development Plan (affordable housing component), Hillside Development Permit and a Habitat Management Plan permit for the development of a 50.8 acre site for a 123-unit single family detached condominium project and construction of the last remaining section of Poinsettia Lane ("Reach E"), all located south of Cassia Road, between the existing western and eastern segments of Poinsettia Lane, and east of Ambrosia Lane within the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program and Local Facilities Management Zone 21 . The project is not within the appealable area of the California Coastal Commission. Planning Commission Minutes February 1, 2017 Page2 Mr. Neu introduced Agenda Item 1 and stated Senior Planner Teri Delcamp would make the staff presentation assisted by Engineering Manager Craig Williams and Tim Gnibus with HDR Engineering Inc. Chairperson Segall asked if any of the Commissioners have ex parte communications to disclose for this item. Commissioner Anderson disclosed that she attended the public meeting on the Community Benefit Agreement held at the Faraday Administration building and she drove by the property. Commissioner Black disclosed that he viewed the site on Google Maps and drove by the property. Commissioner Goyarts disclosed that he also viewed the site on Google Earth, read an article dated February 1st in the Weekly Pulse County referencing a San Diego Union Tribune article and read an article in the Coast News. Commissioner L'Heureux disclosed that he viewed the site on Google Earth, walked around the premises and stated that he is a tenant with O'Day Consultants as they are the civil engineer on the project, although he has not discussed the project. Commissioner Montgomery disclosed that the walked around the site. Chairperson Segall disclosed that he walked and drove around the project, viewed the location on Google Earth and read media coverage. Ms. Delcamp, Mr. Gnibus and Mr. Williams gave a presentation and stated they would be available to answer any questions. Chairperson Segall asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Goyarts inquired about the number and type of electric charging stations available. Mr. Gnibus stated that there will be one charging station available for each home and also for general visitor parking. Commissioner Goyarts inquired about the plan and timing to pave the section of Poinsettia Lane that narrows down to one lane west of Black Rail Road so that, if approved, two lanes are available as the developer builds a bridge with traffic flowing down the artery west of the project. Mr. Williams stated that the city has a developer-build or widen roadways adjacent to planned development. He stated that the section of Poinsettia Lane has vacant parcels on both sides of the road. The developer of those vacant properties would be required to make those improvements as a condition of approval of their development. Mr. Williams concluded that the two lane section of the road currently has a fairly good distance between the two signals. The current capacity of the roadway is 8 thousand cars, however; the capacity of the roadway is close to 18 to 20 thousand cars. It is expected to see a rebalance of traffic when the roadway would open. · Commissioner Black asked how traffic management figures if the 4 traffic signals located on Cassia Lane and Poinsettia Lane, Ambrosia Lane, between streets A and B of the development and the existing signal on Oriole Court and Skimmer Court are not in tune with each other from a short driving distance. Mr. Williams replied stating that the signals will be carefully synchronized so that vehicles do not have to stop at each signal. He stated that it is important to have those signals to make sure pedestrians have a chance to cross the street in a safe manor. Commissioner Anderson asked if the synchronized lights are only good for one direction as the other direction will likely stop more often. Mr. Williams stated that traffic lights are generally synchronized for the inbound trips in the a.m. and the outbound trips in the p.m. and that there will be a reasonable balance. Commissioner Anderson asked if the roundabout on Cassia Lane is permanent or temporary. Mr. Williams stated that the traffic circles were put in on a pilot basis to address significant speeding concerns from the residents. He stated that they are effective for reducing speeding, from and 12 miles per hour, since they have been added to the roads and whether they stay in the manor that they are in now or whether they are converted to a curb section is yet to be determined. Planning Commission Minutes February 1, 2017 Page 3 Commissioner Montgomery asked if the city would be able to react quickly to stop overload from bypass traffic between Oriole Court and Dove Lane to access the shopping center. Mr. Williams replied stating that the trip time of both routes will be analyzed to propose a less desirable route as a cut-through. Commissioner Anderson asked if solar panels will be installed on the homes by the developer. Mr. Gnibus replied yes. Commissioner Black asked about the nature of inclusionary housing. Ms. Delcamp stated that projects are required to provide 15% of the units as affordable housing. Some projects end up building the units onsite, others have the ability to pay a fee if it is less than a certain number of housing that is being built and others purchase credits that have been built by someone else above and beyond as they are available as mitigation. She stated that there are provisions in the code for alternatives to be proposed and discussed with the Housing Policy Committee. 17 additional units have been proposed in the southern portion of this project that went away and were proposed to help meet the inclusionary housing requirements. Ms. Delcamp stated that the constraints associated with the existing canyon, the riparian habitat that requires buffers as well as preservation and the desire and the need to preserve as much habitat as possible adversely impact the feasibility of constructing the inclusionary units on-site. She added that the applicant proposed to provide the maximum number of 15 accessory dwelling units under the code and concluded that the requirement is to provide 19 units in total, 15 accessory dwelling units and the purchase of 4 inclusionary housing credits .. Chairperson Segall asked if there were any further questions of staff. Seeing none, he asked if the applicant wished to make a presentation. David Stern, Vice President of Acquisitions for Lennar Homes of California, John Baayoun and Andrew Han, Suite 300, 25 Enterprise, Aliso Viejo, Chris Texter, KTGY Architecture & Planning, Suite 200, 17911 Von Karman Avenue, Irvine, made the presentation and stated they would be available to answer any questions. Commissioner Black asked if the arrangements between Lennar Homes of California, North County Advocates and some of the environmental organizations were made to produce the park and the restoration etc. Mr. Han stated yes, it is an agreement that is being contemplated between the city, the developer as well as community groups and environmental advocacy groups. Commissioner Black asked if the agreement has been formalized. Mr. Han stated no. Commissioner Anderson inquired about the lifespan of solar panels. Mr. Baayoun stated that every home will be provided with a solar system through SunStreet Energy for 20 years at no cost to the home owner. He added that Sunstreet Energy will maintain all systems and the home owner will have a choice to either install an updated new system or to remove the system at the end of the 20 year cycle. Commissioner Anderson asked if Lennar pays for the removal if the homeowner chose to do so. Mr. Baayoun replied yes. Chairperson Segall asked if there were any further questions for the applicant. Seeing none, he asked if any members of the audience wished to address Agenda Item 1. Chairperson Segall opened public testimony. Josh Bourgeois, Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance, 2995 Gunsmoke Road, Corona, stated that the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is flawed and should be redrafted and recirculated. He stated that the EIR does not present any analysis of impacts or potential mitigation measures from potential overlap of construction phases. De'Ann Weimer, 6606 Fiona Place, representing Friends of Aviara and Aviara Premier Collection Homeowners Association, stated that she supports the project in terms of the addition and restoration of open space and what it means for the community for walkability. Carl Krumrei, 6839 Moorhen Place, stated that he is disappointed in the timeliness, completeness and accuracy of the response given by the city to questions raised by residents impacted by the proposed road completion and stated his concerns with traffic. Mark Tanner, 1777 Skimmer Court, stated his concerns with traffic and noise. Planning Commission Minutes February 1, 2017 Page4 Mel Peterson, 6847 Moorhen Place, stated her concerns with traffic mitigation, speed and safety of the community. Brett Porath, 6855 Moorhen Place, stated his concerns with traffic. John Vance, 7905 Vista Canela, stated that he supports the project. Paul Holdaway, 1760 Skimmer Court, stated that he is pleased to see signalized intersections for pedestrian crossing and shared concerns with noise and traffic. Jeremy Peyton, 1730 Fairlead Avenue, stated his concerns with safety and traffic. Theresa Perkins-Kirven, 6865 Mimosa Drive, stated her concerns with traffic and safety. George Showah, 1711 Camassia Lane, stated that he supports the project and the signalized intersections. Laure Brown, 1726 Oriole Court, shared her concerns with traffic, safety and noise. Jay Brandenburg, 1770 Oriole Court, stated his concerns with traffic and speed. Brian Connor, 4815 Windjammer Way, stated his concerns with traffic and commented that street parking for inclusionary housing has not been carefully evaluated. Chairperson Segall asked if any member of the audience wished to address Agenda Item 1. Seeing none, he opened and closed public testimony. RECESS Chairperson Segall called for a 10-minute recess at 9:56 p.m. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER Chairperson Segall called the meeting to order at 10:06 p.m. with all Commissioners present. Mr. Neu stated that staff is recommending that Agenda Item 2, be continued to a date certain of February 15, 2017. . 2. CT 14-11/PUD 16-02/CUP 14-10-CARLSBAD BOAT CLUB & RESORT-Request for a Tentative Tract Map, Nonresidential Planned Unit Development Permit and Conditional Use Permit for the demolition of a restaurant and single family residence and to allow the construction of a twenty (20) unit timeshare condominium project with underground parking on approximately one acre of land located at 4509 Adams Street, on the south side of Adams Street between Highland Drive and Park Drive, within the Agua Hedionda Segment of the Local Coastal Program (LCP) and in Local Facilities Management Zone 1. The City Planner has determined that the project belongs to a class of projects that the State Secretary for Resources has found do not have a significant impact on the environment, and it is therefore categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents pursuant to state CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 -In-fill Development Projects. The Agua Hedionda LCP Segment is in an area of deferred certification where the City of Carlsbad does not have permit authority to issue Coastal Development permits and thus, the project will need to obtain a Coastal Development Permit issued by the California Coastal Commission. Planning Commission Minutes February 1, 2017 Page 5 MOTION ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Montgomery and duly seconded by Commissioner L'Heureux that the Planning Commission continue Agenda Item 2 to a date certain of February 15, 2017. VOTE: 7-0 AYES: Chairperson Segall, Commissioner Anderson, Commissioner Black, Commissioner Goyarts, Commissioner L'Heureux, Comm issioner Montgomery and Commissioner Siekmann NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None AGENDA ITEM 1 CONTINUED Commissioner L'Heureux inquired about a time frame the city would have before the Via Donna neighborhood will start to experience actual impact. Ms. Delcamp stated that Lennar Homes of California envisions construction from 2018 to 2020. Commissioner Anderson asked how many street parking spaces are counted. Ms. Delcamp stated that on street parking along the private streets and one side of the main drive aisle will be available. Commissioner Anderson inquired about the number of single story units. Mr. Han replied stating 21 homes. Commissioner L'Heureux asked if the project will be phased. Mr. Baayoun stated yes, although the construction of the homes will be dependent on market conditions. Commissioner L'Heureux asked if the units will be allowed to be occupied before the bridge is completed and the timing of construction completion. Mr. Baayoun replied 36 months from approval of the subdivision agreement. DISCUSSION A motion was made by Commissioner Montgomery, which was seconded by Commissioner Goyarts, to recommend to the City Council consideration of a traffic signal at the intersection of Oriole Court/Skimmer Court and Poinsettia Lane that benefits primarily pedestrian crossing and a traffic signal at Cassia Road and Poinsettia Lane as part of the CIP ; the traffic department take a proactive role identifying existing traffic counts and patterns through the Via Donna neighborhood; and that there is outreach to the Homeowner's Association for any possible traffic calming measures that they would agree upon jointly with the city. The Commission voted 7-0. MOTION A motion was made by Commissioner Siekmann, which was seconded by Commissioner Black, to extend the meeting until 10:15 p.m. The Commission voted 7-0 to extend the meeting. Planning Commission Minutes February 1, 2017 Page6 MOTION ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Montgomery and duly seconded by Commissioner Siekmann that the Planning Commission adopt Pfanning Commission Resolution No. 7224 recommending that the City Council certify the Environmental Impact Report EIR 15-03, including the approval of Candidate Findings of Fact and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 7225 recommending approval of General Plan Amendment GPA 14-06, Zone Change ZC 14-04 and Local Coastal Program Amendment LCPA 14- 06, and adopt Planning Commission Resolution Number 7226 recommending approval of Carlsbad Tract Map CT 14-10, Planned Development Permit PUD 14- 12, Site Development Plan SOP 14-15, Coastal Development Permit CDP 1434, Hillside Development Permit HOP 14-07 and Habitat Management Plan Permit HMP 14-04 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein including the errata sheet as amended. VOTE: 7-0 AYES: Chairperson Segall, Commissioner Anderson, Commissioner Black, Commissioner Goyarts, Commissioner L'Heureux, Commissioner Montgomery and Commissioner Siekmann NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Chairperson Segall closed the public hearing on Agend~ Item 1. COMMISSION COMMENTS Chairperson Segall asked if there is a way to send public noticing to complete communities that will be impacted rather than the 600 foot radius. Mr. Neu stated that direction would be needed from the City Council as the state law requirement is only 300 foot radius from the subject property. CITY PLANNER COMMENTS Mr. Neu commented that the Commission should hold on to the Staff Report to the Carlsbad Boat Club and Resort as the item has been continued to February 15, 2017. CITY ATTORNEY COMMENTS None. ADJOURNMENT By proper motion, the Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of January 18, 2017 was adjourned at 10:12 p.m. ~~ DON NEU City Planner Farah Nisan Minutes Clerk I CALL TO ORDER: CITY COUNCIL Minutes March 14, 2017, 6 p.m. 6:00 p.m. Attachment F Council Chamber 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 ROLL CALL: M. Hall, K. Blackburn, M. Schumacher, C. Schumacher, M. Packard. INVOCATION: None. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Pro Tern Blackburn led the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes ofthe Regular Meeting held January 24, 2017. Minutes of the Joint Special Meeting held January 24, 2017. Minutes of the Special Meeting held February 14, 2017 Motion by Mayor Pro Tern K. Blackburn, seconded by Council Member M . Schumacher, to approve the minutes as presented. Motion carried, 5/0. PUBLIC REPORT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION: City Attorney Celia Brewer announced the City of Carlsbad and North County Advocates have reached a tentative resolution of the General Plan lawsuit. However that item is linked to and dependent upon the City Council's action on Item No. 5. The City Council has full authority to exercise its discretion on the item. PRESENTATION: None. CONSENT CALENDAR: Item No. 4 was pulled for discussion by Council Member Cori Schumacher. ACTION: Motion by Mayor Pro Tern K. Blackburn, .seconded by Council Member M. Schumacher, to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 through 3. Motion carried unanimously, 5/0. 1. APPOINTMENT TO THE CARLSBAD GOLF LODGING BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT BOARD -Adoption of Resolution No. 2017-039 reappointing Ulrich Samietz to the Carlsbad Golf Lodging Business Improvement District Board. (Staff contact: Tammy McMinn, City Clerk Department) 2. CONTRACT WITH RAN ENTERPRISES, INC. FOR THE CITY HALL ROOF REPLACEMENT AND HVAC REFURBISHMENT, PROJECT NO. 4718 -Adoption of Resolution No. 2017-040 accepting bids and awarding a contract to RAN Enterprises, Inc., in the amount of $681,490 for the City Hall roof replacement and HVAC refurbishment. (Staff contact: Steven Stewart, Public Works) March 14, 2017 Carlsbad City Council Regular Meeting Page 2 3. TERMINATION OF CITY MANAGER'S DECLARATION OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY -Adoption of Resolution No. 2017-041 declaring that the Local Emergency on the west side of Batiquitos Drive, 0.25 miles south of Poinsettia Lane is terminated, pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.28.120 and Public Contract Code 22050. {Staff contact: Elaine Lukey, Public Works) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM PULLED FOR DISCUSSION 4. AGREEMENT WITH SANDAG SERVICE BUREAU FOR EXPEDITED SERVICES WITH THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION -Adoption of Resolution No. 2017-042 reaffirming a commitmer;it to the full term of an agreement with the SAN DAG Service Bureau for expedited · services with the California Coastai Commission. {Staff contact: Don Neu, Community & Economic Development) In response to Council Member Cori Schumacher, City Planner Don Neu presented the staff report and stated that the list of projects for next fiscal year had not yet been finalized . Council Member C. Schumacher made a motion to approve and discuss, seconded by M. Schumacher. In response to Council Member Cori Schumacher's inquiry about using this agreement to only fund projects that were City initiated and City led, Mayor Matt Hall stated that he believed that private projects often also give to the greater good of the community. In response to Council Member Cori Schumacher's inquiry about adding a stipulation to prioritize public projects and projects with critical infrastructure over private projects, City Planner Don Neu stated that they have handled it in that manner and that in coordination with the Coastal Commission, they prioritize projects on a monthly basis. ACTION: Motion by Council Member C. Schumacher, seconded by M. Schumacher to adopt Resolution No. 2017-042. Motion carried unanimously, 5/0. ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION: None. ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION: None. PUBLIC COMMENT: Josephina Di Salvo requested that the ACLU's Model 9 state and local law enforcement policies and rules to protect local immigrant and refugees be adopted by the City Council. Laurie Boone spoke regarding the City Stuff program and the suggestion of the third grade participants that the City adopt an official city bird on the City's 60th anniversary. Fred Sandquist expressed concerns relating to the issues regarding SANDA G'S Measure A. Kim Trujillo spoke regarding concerns relating to vacation rentals and fairness. March 14, 2017 Carlsbad City Council Regular Meeting Page 3 Scott Engel spoke regarding decorum of the public and Council. He stated that he would like the common courtesy of feeling like his words were heard during the meeting. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Mayor Pro Tem Blackburn recused himself due to a potential conflictof interest and stepped down from the dais at 6:28 pm. Mayor Hall and Council Members M. Schumacher, C. Schumacher and M. Packard disclosed that they had met with the project applicant. This item was continued from the Regular Meeting of February 28, 2017. 5. POINSETTIA 61 (PROJECT NO. EIR 15-03/GPA 14-06/ZC 14-04/LCPA 14-06/CT 14-10/PUD 14- 12/SDP 14-15/CDP 14-34/HDP 14-07/HMP 14-04) -Introduce Ordinance No. CS-316 approving Zone Change ZC 14-04; and, Adopt Resolution No. 2017-043 to certify the Environmental Impact Report EIR 15-03 and Errata, including the Candidate Findings of Fact and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, approve General Plan Amendment 14- 06, Local Coastal Program Amendment LCPA 14-06, Vesting Tentative Tract Map 14-10, Planned Development Permit 14-12, Site Development Plan 14-15, Coastal Development Permit 14-34, Hillside Development Permit 14-07 and Habitat Management Plan Permit 14- 04 for the development of a 50.8 acre site for a 123-unit single family detached condominium project and construction of the last remaining section of Poinsettia Lane ("Reach E") located within the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program and Local Facilities Management Zone 21; and, Adopt Resolution No. 2017-044 to approve a Settlement and Community Benefit Agreement. (Staff contact: Teri Delcamp, Community & Economic Development) City Manager's Recommendation: Take public input, close the public hearing, introduce the ordinance and adopt the resolutions. Principal Planner Teri Delcamp and Assistant City Manager Gary Barberio presented the staff report and reviewed a PowerPoint presentation (on file in the Office of the City Clerk). The applicant's representative, David Sterne, reviewed a PowerPoint presentation (on file in the Office of the City Clerk) giving an overview of the project benefits. Mayor Hall opened the duly noticed Public Hearing at 7:08 p.m. Speakers in Support of staff's recommendation: Bronson Jacoway; John Beery; Stacie Greene; Ralph Williams; Marcela Escobar-Eck; Gayle Haye; Cheri Hoffman; Bob Gilbert; Jeremy Peyton; Fred Sandquist; Chance/or Shay; Howard Krauz; Robert Douglas Dentino; Lisa McAthen; De'Ann Weimer; Mary Anne Viney; Diane Ngaard; Everett Delano; Nicole. Speakers Neutral of staff's recommendation: Brian Connor; Brett Porath. Speakers in Opposition to staff's recommendation: Josh Bourgeois; Carl Krumrei; Theresa Perkins-Kirven. March 14, 2017 Carlsbad City Council Regular Meeting Page 4 Seeing no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Hall closed the Public Hearing at 8:04 p.m. In response to Council Member C. Schumacher, the applicant stated that the rules are if a homeowner wishes to rent out a secondary unit it has to be a qualified renter approved through the City's Housing Authority. In response to Council Member M. Schumacher, the applicant stated that there would be an endowment for the open space habitat area south of the project. In response to an inquiry from Mayor Hall, Transportation Manager Craig Williams explained that currently he is not aware of a project in the CIP to improve the right turn lane. In response to Mayor Hall, City Planner Neu explained that through annual reports, the road networks are evaluated to determine whether a roadway is meeting the City standards. Through this project, the developer will be conditioned to complete the segment of Poinsettia Lane. Council Member Packard confirmed with staff that adequate parking would be provided for the homes constructed within the proposed project site. In response to Council Member C. Schumacher, HDR Inc. EIR Consultant Tim Gnibus confirmed a hazardous materials study was prepared as part of the EIR and any materials such as tires and refrigerators would be removed from the project site. In response to Council Member C. Schumacher, Manager Williams explained that the City has a residential traffic management program that they use. He stated that there is a traffic signal evaluation policy that was approved by Council that is used to look at signal light needs. Council Member M. Schumacher asked the applicant how potential homeowners will be made aware of the impacts of the adjacent airport to the properties. In response, Mr. Stern explained the disclosures are provided with each home sale. Motion by Council Member C. Schumacher, seconded by Council Member M. Schumacher to direct staff to utilize the Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program to develop traffic- calming solutions to discourage pass-through traffic in the Viadana and Pavoreal neighborhoods concurrent with the completion of Poinsettia Lane; and complete a comprehensive traffic analysis in neighborhoods encompassed by the Viadana HOA, Pavoreal HOA, Poinsettia Heights HOA and Voscana HOA located along Poinsettia Lane, including Mimosa Lane, Oriole Court, Skimmer Court, Cassia Lane, and the El Camino Real southbound turn onto Poinsettia Lane. In response to an inquiry by Council Member M. Schumacher, Manager Williams stated that findings from staff's report will go through the Traffic Safety Commission and later be presented to Council. March 14, 2017 Carlsbad City Council Regula r Meeting Page 5 Council discussion ensued regarding their support for the project. City Attorney Celia Brewer titled the Ordinance. ACTION: Motion by Council Member M. Schumacher, seconded by Council Member C. Schumacher, to introduce Ordinance No. CS-316 and adopt Resolution Nos. 2017-043 and 2017-044. Motion carried 4/0/1 (Mayor Pro Tern Blackburn -Absent). ACTION: On a Minute Motion by ·council Member C. Schumacher, seconded by Council Member M. Schumacher, Council directed staff to utilize the Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program to develop traffic-calming solutions to discourage pass-through traffic in the Viadana and Pavoreal neighborhoods concurrent with the completion of Poinsettia Lane; and complete a comprehensive traffic analysis in neighborhoods encompassed by the Viadana HOA, Pavoreal HOA, Poinsettia Heights HOA and Voscana HOA located along Poinsettia Lane, including Mimosa Lane, Oriole Court, Skimmer Court, Cassia Lane, and the El Camino Real southbound turn onto Poinsettia Lane. Motion carried 4/0/1 (Mayor Pro Tern Blackburn -Absent). RECESS: Mayor Hall declared a recess at 8:54 p.m. Mayor Hall reconvened the meeting at 9:00 p.m. with all Council Members present. 6. PROP D CANNON ROAD AGRICULTURAL/OPEN SPACE ZONE (PROJECT NO. ZCA 16-04/ZC 16- 02/SP 207(L)/LCPA 16-03)-Adoption of Resolution No . 2017-045 approving an addendum to the Negative Declaration for Prop D Cannon Road Agricultural/Open Space Lands ZCA 09- 02/ZC 09-06/SP 207(1)/SP 144(K)/LCPA 09-05 and an amendment to the Local Coastal Program; and, Introduce Ordinance No. CS-317 approving an amendment to the Carlsbad Municipal Code Title 21 (Zoning Ordinance) to add Chapter 21.209 -Cannon Road Agricultural/Open Space Zone (CR-A/OS) and recommending approval of other related amendments to the Zoning Ordinance, Zoning Map, Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan, and the Local Coastal Program. (Staff contact: Carl Stiehl, Community & Economic Development) Associate Planner Carl Stiehl and City Planner Don Neu presented the staff report and reviewed a PowerPoint presentation (on file in the Office of the City Clerk). In response to Council Member Cori Schumacher's inquiry, Mr. Stiehl confirmed that Council would be able to revisit the south shore beach access during the next phase of the LCP apprehensive update. Mayor Hall opened the duly noticed Public Hearing at 9:08 p.m. Spoke in Support: Vicky Syage; Chris Calkins. Seeing no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Hall closed the Public Hearing at 9:12 p.m. March 14, 2017 Carlsbad City Council Regular Meeting Page 6 In response to Mayor Hall, Mr. Neu confirmed that the materials relating to this item were available prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Council Member C. Schumacher referenced pages 12 and 13 of the staff report and pointed out that the Coastal Commission made a change to the retail sales of goods and products related to a primary permitted open space use with a cumulative area of more than 500 square feet, changing it from the administrative hearing process to the Planning Commission process. She stated that she agreed with the change but also thought that there are two other areas where that same change should also be made. She stated she would like to see the secondary agricultural uses with retail sales of agricultural crops with a cumulative area of more than 1,000 square feet and food service including restaurants and cafes with a cumulative area of more than 500 square feet go to Planning Commission rather than an Administrative Hearing process. Council Member M. Packard spoke in support of staff's recommendation as opposed to forcing further review process. Council Member M. Schumacher and Mayor Pro Tern Blackburn concurred with Council Member Packard. Council discussion ensued regarding support for the agenda item. City Attorney Celia Brewer titled the Ordinance. ACTION: Motion by Mayor Pro Tern K. Blackburn, seconded by Council Member M. Schumacher, to introduce Ordinance No. CS-317 and adopt Resolution No. 2017-045. Motion carried unanimously, 5/0. DEPARTMENTAL AND CITY MANAGER REPORTS: 7. CONTRACT WITH MALLORY SAFETY & SUPPLY FOR A FIXED AND MOBILE LICENSE PLATE RECOGNITION SYSTEM -Adopt Resolution No. 2017-046 to enter into a contract with Mallory Safety & Supply for a fixed and mobile license plate recognition system in an amount not to exceed $807,025.20. (Staff contact: Cindy Anderson, Police Department) Captain Mickey Williams presented the report and reviewed a PowerPoint presentation (on file in the Office of the City Clerk). Council Member M. Packard encouraged staff to provide data relating to reduction in crime as a result of license plate recognition systems being used within a community. In response to Council Member C. Schumacher's inquiry regarding the width of the camera angle to capture the license plate, Captain Williams stated that the LPR's are designed to recognize and detect the license plate. March 14, 2017 Carlsbad City Council Regular Meeting Page 7 In response to an inquiry from Council Member M. Schumacher, Captain Williams explained that staff is recommending a one-year retention of the photographs. He further explained that other agencies within San Diego County also retain LPR images for one year. In response to Council Member C. Schumacher, Captain Williams gave an overview of the crime statistics from 2015 and 2016. Vicky Syage spoke in opposition to the proposed fixed 51 LPR's. Pat Amador expressed concerns relating to the personal data that would be acquired through the use of the LPR's. Noel Breen spoke in opposition to the proposed fixed 51 LPR's. Bill Fowler spoke in opposition to the proposed contract. Laura Drelleshak spoke in opposition to the proposed 51 fixed LPR's. Kasey Cinciarelli spoke in support of the mobile LPR's; however, spoke in opposition of the proposed fixed LPR's. In response to an inquiry from Council Member M. Schumacher, Captain Williams explained the source of funding for this request would be the City's Innovation Fund. Council Member C. Schumacher confirmed that the camera also captures the area around , the license plate and may capture photographs of people. In response to Council Member C. Schumacher, Captain Williams explained that the Vigilant solution maintains a nationwide database. He further explained that the ARJIS system is a San Diego County System. Mayor Pro Tern K. Blackburn spoke in support of the contract. Council Member M. Schumacher spoke in favor of giving officers the tools they need. Council Member M. Packard also spoke in support of the contract and the technology to protect Carlsbad residents. Council Member C. Schumacher expressed concerns relating to the collection of personal information and the lack of a cost benefit analysis being prepared for the proposed contract; therefore, would not be voting in support of the agenda item. Council Member M. Schumacher requested that the City Manager report back at a later date on the effectiveness of the cameras once the LP R's are implemented. March 14, 2017 Carlsba.d City Council Regular Meeting Page 8 Mayor Hall spoke in support of the contract. ACTION: Motion by Mayor Pro Tern K. Blackburn, seconded by Council Member M. Schumacher to adopt Resolution No. 2017-046. Motion carried 4/1 (C. Schumacher-No). COUNCIL REPORTS AND COMMENTS: Mayor Hall and Council Members reported on activities and meetings of some committees and sub-committees of which they are members. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: None. CITY ATTORNEY COMMENTS: None. ANNOUNCEMENTS: Mayor Hall announced that Council Members may be participating in the upcoming events: Saturday, March 18, 2017 -1:00 p.m. Council Goals Workshop -Public Comment Faraday Center 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA ADJOURNMENT: Meeting was adjourned at 11:00 p.m . City Clerk Services Manager November 2019 TRAFFIC INVESTIGATIO N POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA Attachment A November 2019 TRAFFIC INVESTIGATIO N POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA Submitted to: John Kim 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 Prepared by: LSA 20 Executive Park, Suite 200 Irvine, California 92614 (949) 553-0666 Project No. HCR1803 TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................... i FIGURES AND TABLES ............................................................................................................................ iii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ............................................................................................ iv INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................... 1 Study Area ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Study Area Intersections ............................................................................................................... 2 Study Area Roadway Segments (Classification and Priority Travel Modes) ................................. 2 Intersection LOS Methodology...................................................................................................... 4 Roadway Corridor Capacity ........................................................................................................... 4 Intersection Turning Movement Needs Assessments................................................................... 4 Vehicle Level of Service ................................................................................................................. 5 LOS Descriptions ................................................................................................................................. 5 Carlsbad Multimodal Level of Service ........................................................................................... 6 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS .................................................................................. 6 Roadway Volume........................................................................................................................... 6 Vehicle Speed ................................................................................................................................ 8 Poinsettia Lane between Ambrosia Lane and Cassia Road ................................................................ 8 Cassia Road ......................................................................................................................................... 8 Ambrosia Lane .................................................................................................................................... 8 Mimosa Drive ..................................................................................................................................... 9 Dove Lane ........................................................................................................................................... 9 Intersection Volume ...................................................................................................................... 9 Intersection Performance ........................................................................................................... 12 Multi-Modal Level of Service ...................................................................................................... 12 Collision Locations ....................................................................................................................... 13 VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED ......................................................................................... 15 GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT (2035) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITHOUT POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE .................................................................................................. 16 Roadway Volume......................................................................................................................... 16 Intersection Volume .................................................................................................................... 17 Intersection Performance ........................................................................................................... 17 GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT (2035) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITH POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE ........................................................................................................... 20 Roadway Volume......................................................................................................................... 21 Intersection Volume .................................................................................................................... 21 Intersection Performance ........................................................................................................... 22 TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) ii SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS .................................................................................... 25 Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road ....................................................................................................... 26 Warrant 1: Eight-Hour Vehicle Volume ............................................................................................ 27 Warrant 2: Four-Hour Vehicle Volume ............................................................................................. 27 Warrant 3: Peak-Hour Vehicle Volume ............................................................................................ 27 Warrant 4: Pedestrian Volume ......................................................................................................... 27 Warrant 5: School Crossing .............................................................................................................. 27 Warrant 6: Coordinated Signal System ............................................................................................ 27 Warrant 7: Crash Experience ............................................................................................................ 28 Warrant 8: Roadway Network .......................................................................................................... 28 Warrant 9: Intersection Near a [Railroad] Grade Crossing ............................................................... 28 Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane ............................................................................. 28 Warrant 1: Eight-Hour Vehicle Volume ............................................................................................ 29 Warrant 2: Four-Hour Vehicle Volume ............................................................................................. 29 Warrant 3: Peak-Hour Vehicle Volume ............................................................................................ 29 Warrant 4: Pedestrian Volume ......................................................................................................... 29 Warrant 5: School Crossing .............................................................................................................. 29 Warrant 6: Coordinated Signal System ............................................................................................ 29 Warrant 7: Crash Experience ............................................................................................................ 30 Warrant 8: Roadway Network .......................................................................................................... 30 Warrant 9: Intersection Near a [Railroad] Grade Crossing ............................................................... 30 EL CAMINO REAL/POINSETTIA LANE.......................................................................... 31 Collision Potential ........................................................................................................................ 31 Intersection Performance ........................................................................................................... 31 Engineering Constraints .............................................................................................................. 32 Biological Constraints .................................................................................................................. 33 CUT-THROUGH TRAFFIC EVALUATION ....................................................................... 33 CARLSBAD RESIDENTIAL TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PROGRAM .................................... 37 Speeding On Cassia Road ............................................................................................................ 38 Cut-Through Traffic on Oriole Court, Moorhen Place, and Dove Lane ....................................... 39 Cut-Through Traffic on Cassia Road ............................................................................................ 40 Enhanced Measures .................................................................................................................... 41 SUMMARY, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND MONITORING ............................................. 42 APPENDICES A: TRAFFIC VOLUME DATA AND SPEED SURVEYS B: EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS C: MULTIMODAL LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS D: 2035 WITHOUT POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS E: 2035 WITH POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS F: TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT WORKSHEETS G: POINSETTIA LANE BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT RESULTS TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) iii FIGURES AND TABLES FIGURES Figure 1: Study Area and Existing Geometrics and Traffic Control ........................................................ 3 Figure 2: Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ....................................................................................... 10 Figure 3: Collision Data 1/1/2008 to 4/12/2018 .................................................................................. 14 Figure 4: General Plan Buildout (2035) Without Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Peak Hour Traffic Volumes............................................................................................................................ 18 Figure 5: General Plan Buildout (2035) With Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ....................................................................................................................................... 23 TABLES Table A: Existing Daily Roadway Volume and Capacity .......................................................................... 7 Table B: Existing Peak-Hour Link Roadway LOS Summary ..................................................................... 7 Table C: Existing Travel Speed ................................................................................................................ 8 Table D: Intersection Turning Movement Needs Assessment ............................................................. 11 Table E: Existing Intersection LOS Summary ........................................................................................ 12 Table F: Existing Multi-Modal LOS Summary ....................................................................................... 13 Table G: Collison Data 2008–2018 ....................................................................................................... 15 Table H: Traffic Model Data and Traffic Growth Rates ........................................................................ 16 Table I: General Plan Buildout (2035) Without Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Daily Roadway Volume and Capacity ................................................................................................................... 17 Table J: 2035 Without Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Intersection Turning Movement Needs Assessment .................................................................................................................................. 19 Table K: 2035 Without Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Intersection LOS ................................................ 20 Table L: Traffic Model Data and Traffic Growth Rates ......................................................................... 21 Table M: General Plan Buildout (2035) Daily Roadway Volume and Capacity .................................... 22 Table N: 2035 With Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Intersection Turning Movement Needs Assessment .................................................................................................................................. 24 Table O: 2035 With Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Intersection LOS ..................................................... 25 Table P: Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road Traffic Control Comparison ...................................................... 26 Table Q: Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane Traffic Control Comparison ........................... 28 Table R: El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane Intersection Performance Comparison ............................... 32 Table S: Route Options from West Poinsettia Lane to Shopping Center ............................................. 35 Table T: Route Options from Cassia Neighborhoods to Shopping Center ........................................... 36 Table U: Route Options from North El Camino Real to West Poinsettia Lane ..................................... 36 Table V: Before Gap Closure (2018) Traffic Condition Summary ......................................................... 42 TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) iv LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS CEQA California Environmental Quality Act City City of Carlsbad HCM Highway Capacity Manual HMP (City of Carlsbad) Habitat Management Plan for Natural Communities ICU Intersection Capacity Utilization ITE Institute of Transportation Engineers LOS level(s) of service MMLOS Multimodal Level of Service mph miles per hour MUTCD California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices N/A not applicable NDS National Data and Surveying Services SANDAG San Diego Association of Governments SANTEC San Diego Traffic Engineers’ Council V/C volume-to-capacity TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 1 INTRODUCTION Poinsettia Lane from Carlsbad Boulevard to Melrose Drive has been a part of the Carlsbad planned roadway network since at least 1994. Poinsettia Lane is completed except for an approximately 1,800-foot segment between Aviara Parkway and Black Rail Road (where three of the planned four lanes are constructed) and an approximately 1,500-foot gap between Cassia Road and Oriole Court- Skimmer Court. Completion of Poinsettia Lane (including closure of the gap between Cassia Road and Oriole Court-Skimmer Court) was included in the Carlsbad General Plan Update adopted by the City Council on September 22, 2015, and had been included in previous General Plans. The General Plan Mobility Element section titled “Future Operations and Street Improvements” states the following: Most of the envisioned Carlsbad street system is built out. The remaining planned street improvements are summarized in Table 3-2; these facilities serve the needs of land uses identified in the Land Use and Community Design Element. The planned streets are identified on the Street Network map, Figure 3-1. One of the projects included in the referenced table and figure is Poinsettia Lane, which is described as “Complete improvements between Cassia Road and El Camino Real to connector street typology standards.” Completion of the Poinsettia Lane gap closure is funded in part from the Bridge and Thoroughfare District Fee Program. The proposed Poinsettia 61 residential development within and adjacent to the roadway gap provided additional funding. At this time, the City of Carlsbad (City) is preparing to close the gap in Poinsettia Lane. Although the completion of Poinsettia Lane has been planned for some time, the existing conditions have prevailed for so long so as to seem permanent. Residents of the Viadana and Pavoreal neighborhoods have also raised concerns regarding future cut-through traffic through the residential neighborhoods. This traffic investigation considers the potential effects of the gap closure on the surrounding roadway system and adjacent intersections and provides potential strategies for limiting the intrusion of cut-through traffic into the Viadana and Pavoreal neighborhoods. Importantly, this traffic investigation also establishes baseline conditions for the surrounding roadway network that can be used to determine the extent of intrusion if requests for additional intervention are pursued through the Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program. METHODOLOGY Study Area Approximately 1,000 feet west of the gap closure, Poinsettia Lane intersects Ambrosia Lane. Ambrosia Lane provides a connection to Aviara Parkway and a travel path around the current gap in Poinsettia Lane. About 0.25 mile east of the gap closure, Poinsettia Lane intersects El Camino Real, just north (0.50 mile) of the El Camino Real/Aviara Parkway intersection. These connections to Aviara Parkway and a path around the current gap were chosen as the bookends of the study area. Within this study area are the following intersections and roadway segments: TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 2 Study Area Intersections 1. Ambrosia Lane/Poinsettia Lane 2. Ambrosia Lane/Aviara Parkway 3. Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road 4. Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane 5. Mimosa Drive/Moorhen Place 6. Dove Lane/Moorhen Place 7. Mimosa Drive/Aviara Parkway 8. El Camino Real/Cassia Road 9. El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane 10. El Camino Real/Dove Lane 11. El Camino Real/Aviara Parkway Study Area Roadway Segments (Classification and Priority Travel Modes) 1. Poinsettia Lane between Aviara Parkway and Ambrosia Lane (Arterial Connector: vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle) 2. Poinsettia Lane between Ambrosia Lane and Cassia Road (Arterial Connector: vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle) 3. Poinsettia Lane between Cassia Road and El Camino Real (Arterial Connector: vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle) 4. El Camino Real between Cassia Road and Poinsettia Lane (Arterial Street: vehicle and transit) 5. El Camino Real between Poinsettia Lane and Aviara Parkway (Arterial Street: vehicle and transit) 6. Cassia Road between Poinsettia Lane and El Camino Real (Local/Neighborhood Street: pedestrian and bicycle) 7. Ambrosia Lane between Poinsettia Lane and Aviara Parkway (School Street: pedestrian and bicycle) 8. Mimosa Drive between Oriole Court and Aviara Parkway (Local/Neighborhood Street: pedestrian and bicycle) 9. Dove Lane between Moorhen Place and Black Skimmer Road (Local/Neighborhood Street: pedestrian and bicycle) Figure 1 illustrates the study area and the existing geometrics and traffic control for each study area intersection. Poinsettia LnPoinsettia LnI:\HCR1803\G\Geometrics&Traffic Control.cdr (3/19/2019)FEET10005000Study Area and ExistingGeometrics/Traffic ControlNSOURCE Google Earth, 2018:Poinsettia Lane Gap ClosureFIGURE 1LEGEND- Directional Travel Lane- Signal- Stop Sign TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 4 Intersection LOS Methodology In April 2018, the City adopted the City of Carlsbad Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines. These new guidelines reduce the emphasis of vehicle level of service (LOS) analysis at intersections. Traffic analyses are to consider the ability for existing and future roadways to carry through traffic. For the study area, the guidelines specify the following: corridor analyses based on roadway capacity, turning-movement needs assessments for signalized intersections, and signal warrant analyses for degraded unsignalized intersections. Because the report audience may be familiar with the previous analysis methodology of assigning performance letter grades, this traffic investigation includes intersection LOS for informational purposes. Roadway Corridor Capacity In February 2019, the City released the Roadway Capacity Tables Report for use in evaluating traffic conditions in environmental documents and monitoring transportation facilities consistent with the Growth Management Program. For 10 corridors within the City (including Poinsettia Lane and El Camino Real), the report includes roadway capacity specific to the physical conditions of those roadways, including the number of lanes, speed limit, and intersection spacing. The report also includes general capacity values that can be applied to other corridors. General roadway capacity values are provided in the table below. The analysis in this report applies the specific capacity values for Poinsettia Lane and El Camino Real, which have specific capacity values published in the Roadway Capacity Tables Report. Lanes Speed Limit (mph) Daily Street Segment Capacity Peak- Hour Single- Direction Capacity LOS C LOS D LOS E LOS C LOS D LOS E 2 35 (undivided) 4,200 13,700 17,200 180 590 740 35 (divided) 4,400 14,600 18,100 190 630 780 4 35 12,100 32,200 35,800 520 1,390 1,540 45 13,900 36,200 40,800 600 1,560 1,760 50 19,700 39,200 42,200 850 1,690 1,820 55 24,400 41,700 43,800 1,050 1,800 1,890 6 35 15,800 41,700 59,000 680 2,230 2,540 45 - - - 2,040 26,660 2,700 50 54,700 63,900 64,800 2,360 2,760 2,800 55 60,200 66,500 67,000 2,600 2,870 2,900 8 45 - - - 2,780 3,560 3,620 Source: Table 2, Roadway Capacity Tables Report (City of Carlsbad 2019). LOS = level of service mph = miles per hour Intersection Turning Movement Needs Assessments The City of Carlsbad Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines explicitly define intersection turning- movement needs: Left turn queue assessment: Compare the left-turn volume with the length of the left turn pocket(s). A general rule of thumb of one foot per left turning vehicle per lane may be used for this analysis. TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 5 Left-turn volume: If the left-turn volume exceeds 250 vehicles per hour, a second left-turn lane is recommended. Right-turn volume: If the right-turn volume exceeds 150 vehicles per hour, a dedicated right-turn lane is recommended. To enhance the criteria provided above, this traffic investigation also examined the turning- movement queues predicted by the traffic analysis software. Vehicle Level of Service Prior to the April 2018 adoption of the City of Carlsbad Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines, traffic studies in Carlsbad included calculations of intersection LOS. Two methodologies were used to calculate intersection performance. The Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology compares the amount of traffic an intersection is able to process (capacity) to the level of traffic during peak hours (volume). The resulting volume-to-capacity ratio (v/c) is expressed in terms of LOS. Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology calculates the average delay experienced by vehicles at intersections. The resulting calculation of average delay experienced by vehicles at the intersection is then used to determine the LOS at that location. LOS A represents free-flow activity, and LOS F represents overcapacity operation. LOS is a qualitative assessment of the quantitative effects of such factors as traffic volume, roadway geometrics, speed, delay, and maneuverability on roadway and intersection operations. LOS criteria are presented below. LOS Descriptions LOS A represents free flow travel for vehicles. Individual users are virtually unaffected by other vehicles in the traffic stream. LOS B represents stable flow, but the presence of other users in the traffic stream begins to be noticeable. LOS C represents a range in which the influence of traffic density on operations becomes noticeable. The ability to maneuver within the traffic stream and to select an operating speed is now clearly affected by the presence of other vehicles. LOS D borders on unstable flow. Speeds and ability to maneuver are severely restricted because of traffic congestion. LOS E represents unstable operating conditions at or near the capacity level where maneuverability is severely limited. LOS F is used to define forced or breakdown traffic flow. The relationship between LOS and the delay (in seconds) or v/c ratio at signalized intersections is as follows: TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 6 Level of Service Signalized Intersection Volume-to-Capacity (ICU Methodology) Signalized Intersection Delay in seconds (HCM Methodology) Unsignalized Intersection Delay in seconds (HCM Methodology) A < 0.60 < 10.0 10.0 B 0.61–0.70 > 10.0 and < 20.0 >10.0 and 15.0 C 0.71–0.80 > 20.0 and < 35.0 >15.0 and 25.0 D 0.81–0.90 > 35.0 and < 55.0 >25.0 and 35.0 E 0.91–1.00 > 55.0 and < 80.0 >35.0 and 50.0 F > 1.00 > 80.0 >50.0 HCM = Highway Capacity Manual ICU = intersection capacity utilization Carlsbad Multimodal Level of ServiceThe City’s General Plan Mobility Element developed the Carlsbad Multimodal Level of Service (MMLOS) that is used to evaluate the transportation facilities in the City. The City’s MMLOS methodology provides a qualitative grade assigned to prioritized travel modes in different street typologies, as identified in the City’s General Plan. The LOS ranges from LOS A to LOS F. The City General Plan requires LOS D or better for the travel modes prioritized on that street’s typology. The four travel modes the MMLOS evaluates are vehicles, pedestrians, bicycles, and transit. Vehicle LOS is determined by comparing roadway volume to capacity, as stated previously. Pedestrian, bicycle, and transit LOS are determined by using the City MMLOS criteria. The Carlsbad MMLOS evaluates pedestrian, bicycle, and transit LOS by assessing the attributes of the pedestrian, bicycle, or transit facility. Each attribute corresponds to a point system that adds together to correspond to an LOS grade, as summarized in the following table. Level of Service Point Score A 9.0–10.0 B 8.0–8.99 C 7.0–7.99 D 6.0–6.99 E 5.0–5.99 F 0–4.99 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Roadway Volume Roadway segment volumes were collected by National Data and Surveying Services (NDS), an independent survey company, on Tuesday, May 22, 2018, by pneumatic tube. Traffic data are provided in Appendix A. Data were collected for each direction of travel over a 24-hour period. Table A presents the existing daily traffic volume for each of the study roadway segments and compares that volume to the daily roadway capacity. As Table A shows, the roadway segments of Poinsettia Lane west of El Camino Real, Mimosa Drive between Oriole Court and Aviara Parkway, and Dove Lane between Moorhen Place and El Camino Real have existing traffic volumes that are a particularly low percent of the roadway capacity. TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 7 Table A: Existing Daily Roadway Volume and Capacity Roadway Segment Lanes Capacity at LOS D Existing Volume V/C Existing LOS D or Better Poinsettia Lane (Aviara Parkway to Ambrosia Lane) 4 39,200 10,330 0.26 Yes Poinsettia Lane (Ambrosia Lane to Cassia Road) 4 39,200 9,789 0.25 Yes Poinsettia Lane (Cassia Road to El Camino Real) 4 39,200 851 0.02 Yes El Camino Real (Cassia Road to Poinsettia Lane) 5 54,100 33,236 0.61 Yes El Camino Real (Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway) 6 54,100 38,647 0.71 Yes Cassia Road (Poinsettia Lane to El Camino Real) 4 32,200 9,290 0.29 Yes Ambrosia Lane (Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway) 2 13,700 3,321 0.24 Yes Mimosa Drive (Oriole Court to Aviara Parkway) 2 13,700 679 0.05 Yes Dove Lane (Moorhen Place to Black Skimmer Road) 2 13,700 368 0.02 Yes LOS = level of service V/C = volume-to-capacity Because traffic volumes were collected for each direction of travel, the volume of vehicles in each direction during the morning and afternoon peak commute hours could be determined. Table B presents the peak hour roadway link analysis. Similar to the analysis of daily traffic, Table B shows the roadway segments of Poinsettia Lane west of El Camino Real, Mimosa Drive between Oriole Court and Aviara Parkway, and Dove Lane between Moorhen Place and El Camino Real have existing traffic volumes that are a particularly low percent of the roadway capacity during the peak commute hours. For example, the portion of Poinsettia Lane west of El Camino Real has been built to arterial standards in preparation for the gap closure, but has no more than one vehicle per minute traveling in either direction during the busiest hour. Table B: Existing Peak-Hour Link Roadway LOS Summary Roadway Segment Direction Lanes Capacity at LOS D AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Volume V/C LOS D or Better Volume V/C LOS D or Better Poinsettia Lane (Aviara Parkway to Ambrosia Lane) Eastbound 2 1,700 385 0.22 Yes 460 0.26 Yes Westbound 2 1,700 350 0.20 Yes 445 0.25 Yes Poinsettia Lane (Ambrosia Lane to Cassia Road) Eastbound 2 1,700 514 0.29 Yes 397 0.22 Yes Westbound 2 1,700 422 0.24 Yes 463 0.26 Yes Poinsettia Lane (Cassia Road to El Camino Real) Eastbound 2 1,700 44 0.02 Yes 35 0.02 Yes Westbound 2 1,700 26 0.01 Yes 62 0.04 Yes El Camino Real (Cassia Road to Poinsettia Lane) Northbound 2 2,100 1,620 0.77 Yes 1,336 0.64 Yes Southbound 3 2,900 1,026 0.35 Yes 1,714 0.59 Yes El Camino Real (Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway) Northbound 3 2,580 1,782 0.69 Yes 1,709 0.66 Yes Southbound 3 1,920 1,408 0.73 Yes 1,854 0.97 Yes Cassia Road (Poinsettia Lane to El Camino Real) Eastbound 2 1,540 515 0.33 Yes 356 0.23 Yes Westbound 2 1,540 331 0.21 Yes 456 0.30 Yes Ambrosia Lane (Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway) Northbound 1 590 424 0.72 Yes 122 0.21 Yes Southbound 1 590 356 0.60 Yes 104 0.18 Yes Mimosa Drive (Oriole Court to Aviara Parkway) Northbound 1 590 34 0.06 Yes 28 0.05 Yes Southbound 1 590 60 0.10 Yes 35 0.06 Yes Dove Lane (Moorhen Place to Black Skimmer Road) Eastbound 1 590 22 0.04 Yes 19 0.03 Yes Westbound 1 590 8 0.01 Yes 23 0.04 Yes LOS = level of service V/C = volume-to-capacity TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 8 Vehicle Speed For five of the roadway segments included in the study, traffic survey data included collection of vehicle speed for 2 days. Vehicle speed surveys are provided in Appendix A. Table C summarizes the existing traffic speeds observed on the survey days. Because the 85th percentile speed (the speed not exceeded by 85th percent of vehicles) is used to set the speed limit for a street, Table C provides the 85th percentile speed. Table C also indicates whether vehicles were observed excessively exceeding this typical speed. Below is a brief discussion of the speed observations for each surveyed roadway. Table C: Existing Travel Speed Roadway Segment Posted Speed Limit 85th Percentile Speed Observations Exceeding 85th Percentile by mph 10 mph 15 mph 20 mph 25 mph Poinsettia Lane (Ambrosia Lane to Cassia Road) Day 1 50 33 4 0 0 0 Day 2 33 4 0 0 0 Cassia Road (Poinsettia Lane to El Camino Real) Day 1 35 29 30 16 5 0 Day 2 29 29 12 3 0 Ambrosia Lane (Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway) Day 1 40 33 5 0 0 0 Day 2 34 0 0 0 0 Mimosa Drive (Oriole Court to Aviara Parkway) Day 1 25 25 0 0 0 0 Day 2 25 0 0 0 0 Dove Lane (Moorhen Place to El Camino Real) Day 1 35 29 0 0 0 0 Day 2 30 0 0 0 0 mph = miles per hour Poinsettia Lane between Ambrosia Lane and Cassia Road The posted speed limit (west of Ambrosia Lane) is 50 miles per hour (mph). The observed 85th percentile speed was 33 mph. Of the 19,442 vehicles using this link over 2 days, eight were observed to exceed 45 mph. The highest speed vehicles were evenly spread between 6:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. Cassia Road The posted speed limit is 35 mph. The observed 85th percentile speed was 29 mph. However, of the 18,234 vehicles using this link over 2 days, 28 were observed to exceed 45 mph (of which 8 exceeded 50 mph). It should be noted that the 8 vehicles exceeding 50 mph were all traveling in the eastbound direction, which is downhill. The highest speed vehicles appear to be more common in the early evening hours. Ambrosia Lane While Ambrosia Lane is classified as a School Street in the Mobility Element, the speed limit of 25 mph is only in effect near the school when children are present. In the northern portion of Ambrosia Lane, where surveys were conducted, the posted speed limit is 40 mph. The observed 85th TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 9 percentile speed was 34 mph. Of the 6,609 vehicles using this link over 2 days, 5 were observed to exceed 45 mph, all of which were traveling in the southbound direction (downhill). These were evenly spread between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. Mimosa Drive The posted speed limit is 25 mph. The observed 85th percentile speed was 25 mph, consistent with the prima facie speed limit of a residential street. Of the 1,344 vehicles observed over 2 days, 10 were observed exceeding 30 mph. No vehicles were observed exceeding 35 mph. Dove Lane The posted speed limit is 35 mph. The observed 85th percentile speed was 30 mph. Of the 721 vehicles observed over 2 days, 6 were observed exceeding 35 mph. No vehicles were observed exceeding 40 mph. This is consistent with the posted 35 mph speed limit signs. Existing speed data for most of the surveyed roadways appear consistent with expectations based on posted speed limits and the prevailing speed of most vehicles. The exception is Cassia Road., which is the only surveyed roadway where vehicles were observed in excess of 5 mph over the posted speed limit on both surveyed days. Although a small percent of the total traffic volume, the presence of any vehicles traveling in excess of 20 mph faster than 85 percent of the other vehicles raises potential safety concerns. Strategies for addressing excessive speeding on Cassia Road will be discussed later in this report. Intersection Volume The independent survey company that collected roadway volume data also collected intersection turn-movement volumes at the 11 study intersections on Tuesday, May 22, 2018. Traffic volume data are provided in Appendix A. Figure 2 illustrates the existing turn volumes. These turning volumes were analyzed consistent with the Intersection Turning Movement Needs Assessment in the City of Carlsbad Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines. Table D examines whether right-turn volumes meet the City’s 150 vehicles per hour threshold for recommending a dedicated right-turn lane, whether left-turn volumes meet the City’s 250 vehicles per hour threshold for recommending dual left-turn lanes, and whether the left-turn queue is anticipated to exceed the available turn pocket. As Table D shows, right-turn volume at many of the intersections meets the threshold for recommending dedicated right-turn lanes. Four left-turn movements have single left-turn lanes but meet the threshold for recommending dual left-turn lanes. However, three of these movements could experience lower traffic volume with completion of the Poinsettia Lane gap closure. Six left- turn movements are estimated to have peak queues exceeding the turn pocket. Again, three of these movements may have lower traffic volume with completion of the Poinsettia Lane gap closure. Poinsettia LnPoinsettia Ln9/823/209/823/204/510/84/510/87/539/157/539/15103/86290/283664/294103/86290/283664/294137/4501416/1448200/536137/4501416/1448200/536102/1311564/139571/191102/1311564/139571/191178/144167/342280/330178/144167/342280/33069/5514/2958/7269/5514/2958/7227/901623/147426/5627/901623/147426/56114/2251624/153850/87114/2251624/153850/8776/1569/2436/7976/1569/2436/79234/13016/12438/290234/13016/12438/290446/4921326/108923/19446/4921326/108923/19149/2431354/160614/14149/2431354/160614/14 17/1410/143/517/1410/143/510/24491/71029/6510/24491/71029/6527/287/442/3727/287/442/3769/181/37/1669/181/37/1626/16509/58523/1926/16509/58523/1913/10104/68/1013/10104/68/10268/22370/60329/17268/22370/60329/17256/68329/56811/49256/68329/56811/49210/6811/5158/16210/6811/5158/169/63239/298168/699/63239/298168/69364/775/16216/47364/775/16216/4714/639/2822/4414/639/2822/446/46267/315184/1006/46267/315184/100404/444404/444495/398495/3985/327/195/327/198/45/68/45/63/194/1017/113/194/1017/11143/1981390/103111/14143/1981390/103111/14190/4041304/16808/15190/4041304/16808/15418/2344/2187/185418/2344/2187/1854/316/94/316/91/47/91/47/95/36/65/36/61/01/03/130/139/293/130/139/290/10/1I:\HCR1803\G\Existing Volumes.cdr (3/19/2019)FEET10005000Existing (2018) Peak Hour Traffic VolumesNSOURCE Google Earth, 2018:Poinsettia Lane Gap ClosureLEGEND- AM/PM Peak Hour VolumesXX YY/FIGURE 2 TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 11 Table D: Intersection Turning Movement Needs Assessment Intersection Right-Turn Volume1 Existing Dedicated Right?2 Left-Turn Volume1 Existing Dual Left?3 Calculated Queue Length1 Left-Turn Storage 1. Ambrosia Lane/Poinsettia Lane (s) NB 216 No 364 No 471 N/A SB 63 No 44 No 74 N/A EB 184 No 46 No 47 265 WB 63 No 168 No 197 265 2. Ambrosia Lane/Aviara Parkway (s) NB 13 No 10 No 178 N/A SB 158 No 210 No 504 N/A EB 29 No4 268 No 386 130 WB 256 No4 49 No 48 125 3. Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road (u) NB 0 No 0 No - N/A SB 0 No 495 No - 160 WB 444 No 0 No - N/A 4. Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane/ Oriole Court (u) NB 27 No 0 No 3 N/A SB 0 No 6 No 2 N/A EB 0 No 0 No 0 N/A WB 13 Yes 39 No 2 300 5. Mimosa Drive/Moorhen Place (u) NB 9 No 0 No 0 N/A SB 0 No 7 No 0 N/A WB 5 No 10 No 0 N/A 6. Dove Lane/Moorhen Place (u) NB 4 No 9 No 3 N/A EB 16 No 0 No 0 N/A WB 0 No 6 No 0 N/A 7. Mimosa Drive/Aviara Parkway (s) NB 42 No 28 No 34 N/A SB 69 No 16 No 28 N/A EB 23 No4 26 No 24 135 WB 24 No 65 No 46 195 8. El Camino Real/Cassia Road (s) NB 14 Yes 198 No 229 250 SB 404 No4 15 No 24 260 EB 187 No 418 No 538 270 WB 19 No 17 No 39 100 9. El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane (s) NB 492 Yes 23 Yes 15 250 SB 14 No 243 Yes 98 250 EB 5 No 17 Yes 12 315 WB 234 No 438 Yes 187 380 10. El Camino Real/Dove Lane (s) NB 56 No4 90 No 101 190 SB 225 No4 87 No 120 235 EB 79 No 156 No 252 60 WB 69 No 72 No 105 80 11. El Camino Real/Aviara Parkway (s) NB 536 No 450 Yes 239 265 SB 131 No 191 Yes 148 310 EB 330 Yes 178 Yes 114 150 WB 103 No 664 Yes 409 200 Note: Shaded cells do not meet guidelines. 1 Higher volume of either a.m. or p.m. peak hour 2 City of Carlsbad Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines state that a dedicated right-turn lane is recommended when volume exceeds 150. 3 City of Carlsbad Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines state that dual left-turn lanes are recommended when volume exceeds 250. 4 Dashed bicycle lane provides for a lane width of at least 19 feet indicating vehicles may treat this as a right-turn lane. (s) = signalized intersection (u) = unsignalized intersection EB = eastbound N/A = not applicable NB = northbound SB = southbound WB = westbound TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 12 Intersection Performance The traffic volumes illustrated on Figure 2 were analyzed using both the ICU and HCM methodologies at signalized intersections. Only the HCM methodology applies at unsignalized intersections. Table E presents the results of the intersection performance analysis. Analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix B. Table E: Existing Intersection LOS Summary Study Area No. Intersection Methodology AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour V/C Ratio or Delay LOS V/C Ratio or Delay LOS 1 Ambrosia Lane/Poinsettia Lane ICU 0.68 B 0.36 A HCM 27.7 sec D 13.3 sec B 2 Ambrosia Lane/Aviara Parkway ICU 0.72 C 0.35 A HCM 75.8 sec E 13.2 sec B 3 Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road (u) HCM 0.0 sec A 0.0 sec A 4 Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/ Poinsettia Lane (u) HCM 7.9 sec A 6.7 sec A 5 Mimosa Drive/Moorhen Place (u) HCM 8.9 sec A 8.7 sec A 6 Dove Lane/Moorhen Place (u) HCM 8.7 sec A 8.6 sec A 7 Mimosa Drive/Aviara Parkway ICU 0.30 A 0.34 A HCM 9.3 sec A 9.3 sec A 8 El Camino Real/Cassia Road ICU 0.76 C 0.77 C HCM 34.4 sec C 34.5 sec C 9 El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane ICU 0.52 A 0.53 A HCM 24.1 sec C 20.7 sec C 10 El Camino Real/Dove Lane ICU 0.48 A 0.57 A HCM 17.3 sec B 33.6 sec C 11 El Camino Real/Aviara Parkway ICU 0.78 C 0.72 C HCM 50.1 sec D 45.9 sec D Note = Shaded cells exceed LOS D. (u) = unsignalized intersection HCM = Highway Capacity Manual ICU = Intersection Capacity Utilization LOS = level of service sec = seconds V/C = volume-to-capacity Table E shows that most of the study intersections deliver a satisfactory LOS. Although, as shown in Table D, some individual movements may experience delay and queueing, overall the intersections are capable of accommodating the peak hour traffic volume. The exception is the intersection of Ambrosia Lane/Aviara Parkway in the a.m. peak hour. This intersection is used to access both Aviara Oaks Elementary School and Aviara Oaks Middle School. As such, traffic volume during the morning drop-off period is high and places strains on the intersection during the brief duration of school traffic. Multi-Modal Level of Service As described in the methodology section, the City’s Mobility Element identifies different travel modes that should be accommodated by different street types. Existing physical conditions were entered into the City’s multi-modal level of service (MMLOS) worksheets for each of the study roadways. Table F displays the resulting MMLOS for the modes applicable for each roadway TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 13 Table F: Existing Multi-Modal LOS Summary Roadway Segment Street Typology LOS for Accommodated Modes Vehicle Pedestrian Bicycle Transit Poinsettia Lane (Aviara Parkway to Ambrosia Lane) Arterial Connector A A B Poinsettia Lane (Ambrosia Lane to Cassia Road) Arterial Connector A A A Poinsettia Lane (Cassia Road to El Camino Real) Arterial Connector A A B El Camino Real (Cassia Road to Poinsettia Lane) Arterial Street C C El Camino Real (Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway) Arterial Street C C Cassia Road (Poinsettia Lane to El Camino Real) Neighborhood/ Local Street A A Ambrosia Lane (Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway) School Street A C Mimosa Drive (Oriole Court to Aviara Parkway) Neighborhood/ Local Street A A Dove Lane (Moorhen Place to Black Skimmer Road) Neighborhood/ Local Street A A LOS = level of service segment. MMLOS worksheets are included in Appendix C. As Table F shows, all of the study roadway segments achieve the City’s LOS D or better target for their accommodated travel modes. Collision Locations The City Public Works Department/Traffic & Mobility Division provided collision data for Poinsettia Lane, Cassia Road, El Camino Real, Ambrosia Lane, Dove Lane, and Mimosa Drive. These collision data were provided over a period of 10 years from January 1, 2008, to April 12, 2018. Figure 3 displays the locations of collisions in the study area over the last 10 years. As expected, collisions are clustered near intersections. Table G summarizes the collisions reported to the Carlsbad Police Department in the study area in the past 10 years. It should be noted that over half of the collisions in the study area occurred along El Camino Real (131 of 204). Of the 204 reported collisions, the most common (40 percent of the total) have been rear-end collisions. The second most common are broadside collisions (27 percent) followed by hit objects (15 percent). A total of four collisions involving pedestrians have been reported in the study area over the past 10 years. Statements regarding the frequency of broadside and hit objects collisions may be a little misleading because of the concentrations of this type of collision at specific intersections. In total, 28 percent of the broadside collisions occur at the intersection of El Camino Real/Cassia Road where that type of collision represents over half of the total collisions. In total, 40 percent of hit object collisions occur at the intersection of Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road where that type of collision represents two thirds of the total collisions. At both of these locations, the Poinsettia Lane gap closure has the potential to alter traffic volumes and patterns, potentially affecting the number and types of collisions. The Poinsettia Lane gap closure will construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road, which is likely to reduce the number of vehicles hitting objects at the intersection as it was recently configured. Poinsettia LnPoinsettia LnPoinsettia LnPoinsettia LnCassia RdCassia RdAviara PkwyAviara PkwyAviara P k w y Aviara P k w y I:\HCR1803\G\Collision_Data_Map_v2.cdr (3/14/2019)FEET10005000SOURCE Google Earth, 2018:Collision Data (1/1/2008 to 4/12/2018)Poinsettia Lane Gap ClosureNFIGURE 3LEGENDRear-EndSideswipeHit-ObjectOtherBroadsidePedestrianOverturnedHead-OnNot StatedUnsafe SpeedType of Collision:Crash Factor:Wrong Side of RoadUnsafe Starting & BackingImproper TurningD.U.I.Other Than DriverUnknownUnsafe Lane ChangeOther Hazardous MovementAuto/Ped R/W ViolationFollowing Too CloselyTraffic Signal and SignsEl Camino R e al El Camino R e alPoinsettia LnPoinsettia LnEl Camino RealEl Camino RealCassia RdCassia RdEl Camino R e a l El Camino R e a lDove LnDove LnEl Camino R e a l El Camino R e a lAlga RdAlga RdAviara PkwyAviara PkwyPoin s etti a Ln Poin s etti a Ln Cassia RdCassia RdPoinsettia LnPoinsettia LnAviara P k w y Aviara P k w y TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 15 Table G: Collison Data 2008–2018 Location Rear End Sideswipe Broadside Head On Hit Object Overturned Pedestrian Other Total Aviara Pkwy/ Poinsettia Ln 8 2 6 1 - 1 - - 18 Black Rail Ct/ Poinsettia Ln - 1 5 1 - - - - 7 Ambrosia Ln/ Poinsettia Ln 2 - - - - 1 - - 3 Poinsettia Ln/ Cassia Rd - - 1 - 12 1 - 4 18 El Camino Real/ Cassia Rd 7 - 15 2 - 2 1 - 27 El Camino Real/ Poinsettia Ln 13 3 11 1 4 - - - 32 El Camino Real/ Swallow Ln 8 - - - 2 - - - 10 El Camino Real/ Dove Ln 11 2 4 - 3 - - 1 21 El Camino Real/ Aviara Pkwy 15 1 9 1 1 - 2 - 29 Ambrosia Ln / Aviara Pkwy 1 - - - 1 - - - 2 Mimosa Dr/ Aviara Pkwy - - 2 1 - - - - 3 Along Poinsettia 1 - - - 2 - - - 3 Along Cassia 2 - 1 - 1 - 1 1 6 Along El Camino Real 11 1 - - - - - - 12 Along Ambrosia 3 4 - - 4 - - 1 12 Along Mimosa Dr - - - - - 1 - - 1 Total 80 14 54 7 30 6 4 7 204 Percent 40% 7% 27% 3% 15% 3% 2% 3% 100% Of note in the data is that only one reported collision occurred within the Viadana and Pavoreal neighborhoods. On a Saturday morning in March 2015, a vehicle traveling north on Mimosa Drive hit two parked vehicles and overturned. The police report indicates that the driver was under the influence of drugs or alcohol. The frequency of rear-end collisions at the southbound approach to El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane was also examined. Two collisions of this type occurred in 2008, two in 2009, and one in 2011. From the collision data, it does not appear that rear-end collisions have increased since the southbound right-turn lane was converted to a through/right-turn lane. VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED On December 28, 2018, the California Office of Administrative Law cleared revised California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines for use. Among the changes to the guidelines was the removal of vehicle delay and level of service from consideration under CEQA. With the adopted guidelines, transportation impacts are to be evaluated based on a project’s effect on vehicle miles traveled. Lead agencies are allowed to opt-in to the revised transportation guidelines, but the new guidelines must be used starting July 1, 2020. As discussed above, the City of Carlsbad Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines has eliminated vehicle delay from consideration, but the City has not yet established thresholds related to vehicle miles of travel. However, the State law provides sufficient guidance to evaluate the Poinsettia Lane gap closure impacts related to vehicles miles traveled. TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 16 California Public Resources Code Section 15064.3(b)(2) states that: Transportation projects that decrease vehicle miles traveled in the project area compared to existing conditions should be presumed to have a less than significant transportation impact. LSA measured the travel distances associated with the alternative paths used to divert around the gap in Poinsettia Lane. To travel from the intersection of Aviara Parkway/Poinsettia Lane to the intersection of El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane using existing Poinsettia Lane, Cassia Road, and El Camino Real requires 1.9 miles of travel. To travel from the intersection of Aviara Parkway/ Poinsettia Lane to the intersection of El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane using Aviara Parkway and El Camino Real requires 2.7 miles of travel. Upon completion of Poinsettia Lane, the distance required is 1.7 miles. For each vehicle taking a diverted route today, completion of the Poinsettia Lane gap closure results in 0.2 to 1.0 fewer miles traveled. Because the Poinsettia Lane gap closure decreases vehicle miles traveled in the project area compared to existing conditions, the project would be presumed to have a less than significant transportation impact under the revised CEQA guidelines. GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT (2035) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITHOUT POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE The San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) Transportation Forecast Information Center provides traffic forecast data using the regional travel demand model. Traffic projections using the Series 12 (land use based) model were compared between 2008 (without the gap closure), 2020 (with the gap closure), and 2035 (with the gap closure) to determine an annual traffic growth rate in the study area and the effect of the gap closure. Table H provides the raw traffic model data and calculations of annual growth rate. Table H: Traffic Model Data and Traffic Growth Rates Roadway Segment 2020 Model Projection (1,000s) 2035 Model Projection (1,000s) Annual Growth Rate Existing (2018) Traffic Volume Projected 2035 No Gap Closure Volume Poinsettia Lane (Aviara Parkway to Ambrosia Lane) 8.5 9.7 0.9% 10,330 11,983 Poinsettia Lane (Ambrosia Lane to Cassia Road) 4.6 5.8 1.7% 9,789 12,683 Poinsettia Lane (Cassia Road to El Camino Real) 5.1 6.2 1.4% 851 1,059 El Camino Real (Cassia Road to Poinsettia Lane) 31.2 33.8 0.6% 33,236 36,375 El Camino Real (Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway) 34.0 39.5 1.1% 38,647 45,732 Cassia Road (Poinsettia Lane to El Camino Real) 6.1 6.8 0.8% 9,290 10,498 Ambrosia Lane (Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway) 2.4 2.7 0.8% 3,321 3,791 Mimosa Drive (Oriole Court to Aviara Parkway) 1.3 1.6 1.5% 679 857 Dove Lane (Moorhen Place to Black Skimmer Road) 2.4 3.5 3.1% 368 559 Roadway Volume Model data in 2020 and 2035 were compared for each roadway segment to determine the annual growth rate. This annual growth rate was applied to existing traffic volumes collected in 2018 to estimate 2035 traffic volumes without the Poinsettia Lane gap closure (i.e., 2018 volume x [1 + annual growth rate x 17 years]). Table I analyzes the resulting 2035 roadway traffic volume. TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 17 Table I: General Plan Buildout (2035) Without Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Daily Roadway Volume and Capacity Roadway Segment Lanes Capacity at LOS D 2035 No Gap Closure Volume V/C LOS D or Better Poinsettia Lane (Aviara Parkway to Ambrosia Lane) 4 39,200 11,983 0.31 Yes Poinsettia Lane (Ambrosia Lane to Cassia Road) 4 39,200 12,683 0.32 Yes Poinsettia Lane (Cassia Road to El Camino Real) 4 39,200 1,059 0.03 Yes El Camino Real (Cassia Road to Poinsettia Lane) 5 54,100 36,375 0.67 Yes El Camino Real (Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway) 6 54,100 45,732 0.85 Yes Cassia Road (Poinsettia Lane to El Camino Real) 4 32,200 10,498 0.33 Yes Ambrosia Lane (Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway) 2 13,700 3,791 0.28 Yes Mimosa Drive (Oriole Court to Aviara Parkway) 2 13,700 857 0.06 Yes Dove Lane (Moorhen Place to Black Skimmer Road) 2 13,700 559 0.04 Yes LOS = level of service V/C = volume-to-capacity As Table I shows, the roadway segments of Poinsettia Lane west of El Camino Real, Mimosa Drive between Oriole Court and Aviara Parkway, and Dove Lane between Moorhen Place and El Camino Real would still have traffic volumes that are a particularly low percent of the roadway capacity in 2035 without the proposed Poinsettia Lane gap closure. Intersection Volume Annual growth rates calculated in Table H for roadway segments were applied to the corresponding approach for the study intersections. Figure 4 illustrates the resulting projected intersection turn volumes in 2035 without the Poinsettia Lane gap closure. These turning volumes were analyzed consistent with the Intersection Turning Movement Needs Assessment in the City of Carlsbad Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines. Table J examines whether right-turn volumes meet the City’s 150 vehicles per hour threshold for recommending a dedicated right-turn lane, whether left- turn volumes meet the City’s 250 vehicles per hour threshold for recommending dual left-turn lanes, and whether the left-turn queue is anticipated to exceed the available turn pocket. As Table J shows, right-turn volume at many of the intersections meets the threshold for recommending dedicated right-turn lanes. Compared to existing conditions, one additional movement (southbound right turns at El Camino Real/Aviara Parkway) would meet the City’s criteria for a dedicated right-turn lane. Four left-turn movements have single left-turn lanes but meet the threshold for recommending dual left-turn lanes, which is the same as existing conditions. Intersection Performance The traffic volumes illustrated on Figure 4 were analyzed using both the ICU and HCM methodologies at signalized intersections. Only the HCM methodology applies at unsignalized intersections. Table K presents the results of the intersection performance analysis. Analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix D. Poinsettia LnPoinsettia Ln11/1029/2511/1029/255/613/105/613/109/649/199/649/19114/95320/312732/324114/95320/312732/324163/5341681/1719237/636163/5341681/1719237/636121/1551856/165682/227121/1551856/165682/227196/159184/377309/364196/159184/377309/36469/5514/2958/7269/5514/2958/7232/1071927/175031/6632/1071927/175031/66135/2671928/182659/103135/2671928/182659/103116/23814/3755/121116/23814/3755/121286/15920/15535/354286/15920/15535/354529/5841574/129327/23529/5841574/129327/23164/2681492/177015/15164/2681492/177015/15 21/1712/174/621/1712/174/611/26541/78232/7211/26541/78232/7230/318/446/4130/318/446/4187/231/49/2087/231/49/2029/18561/64525/2129/18561/64525/2113/10104/68/1013/10104/68/10300/25414/67532/19300/25414/67532/19282/75363/62612/54282/75363/62612/54239/7712/6179/18239/7712/6179/1812/81308/384217/8912/81308/384217/89414/876/18245/53414/876/18245/5314/639/2822/4414/639/2822/447/53308/363212/1157/53308/363212/115521/572521/572562/452562/4526/434/246/434/248/45/68/45/63/194/1017/113/194/1017/11158/2181532/113612/15158/2181532/113612/15209/4451437/18519/17209/4451437/18519/17475/2665/2212/210475/2665/2212/2105/420/115/420/111/59/111/59/118/48/88/48/84/1648/374/1648/37I:\HCR1803\G\2035-No Gap Closure Volumes.cdr (3/14/2019)FEET10005000General Plan Buildout (2035)Without Poinsettia Lane Gap ClosurePeak Hour Traffic VolumesNSOURCE Google Earth, 2018:Poinsettia Lane Gap ClosureLEGEND- AM/PM Peak Hour VolumesXX YY/FIGURE 4 TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 19 Table J: 2035 Without Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Intersection Turning Movement Needs Assessment Intersection Right Turn Volume1 Existing Dedicated Right?2 Left Turn Volume1 Existing Dual Left?3 Calculated Queue Length1 Left Turn Storage 1. Ambrosia Lane/Poinsettia Lane (s) NB 245 No 414 No 594 N/A SB 63 No 44 No 50 N/A EB 212 No 46 No 42 265 WB 81 No 168 No 260 265 2. Ambrosia Lane/Aviara Parkway (s) NB 13 No 10 No 137 N/A SB 179 No 239 No 516 N/A EB 32 No4 300 No 392 130 WB 282 No4 54 No 51 125 3. Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road (u) NB 0 No 0 No - N/A SB 0 No 562 No - 160 WB 572 No 0 No - N/A 4. Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane/Oriole Court (u) NB 34 No 0 No 3 N/A SB 0 No 6 No 1 N/A EB 0 No 0 No 0 N/A WB 16 Yes 48 No 2 300 5. Mimosa Drive/Moorhen Place (u) NB 11 No 0 No 3 N/A SB 0 No 14 No 0 N/A WB 6 No 13 No 0 N/A 6. Dove Lane/Moorhen Place (u) NB 5 No 11 No 3 N/A EB 20 No 0 No 0 N/A WB 0 No 8 No 0 N/A 7. Mimosa Drive/Aviara Parkway(s) NB 46 No 31 No 36 N/A SB 87 No 20 No 30 N/A EB 29 No4 25 No 26 135 WB 26 No 72 No 49 195 8. El Camino Real/Cassia Road(s) NB 15 Yes 218 No 492 250 SB 445 No4 17 No 40 260 EB 212 No 475 No 600 270 WB 19 No 17 No 41 100 9. El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane(s) NB 584 Yes 27 Yes 21 250 SB 15 No 268 Yes 119 250 EB 6 No 21 Yes 18 315 WB 286 No 535 Yes 218 380 10. El Camino Real/Dove Lane(s) NB 66 No4 107 No 122 190 SB 267 No4 103 No 166 235 EB 121 No 238 No 428 60 WB 69 No 72 No 125 80 11. El Camino Real/Aviara Parkway(s) NB 636 No 534 Yes 409 265 SB 155 No 227 Yes 201 310 EB 364 Yes 196 Yes 120 150 WB 114 No 732 Yes 516 200 Note: Shaded cells do not meet guidelines 1 Higher volume of either a.m. or p.m. peak hour 2 City of Carlsbad Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines state that a dedicated right-turn lane is recommended when volume exceeds 150. 3 City of Carlsbad Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines state that dual left-turn lanes are recommended when volume exceeds 250. 4 Dashed bicycle lane provides for a lane width of at least 19 feet indicating vehicles may treat this as a right-turn lane. (s) = signalized intersection (u) = unsignalized intersection EB = eastbound N/A = not applicable NB = northbound SB = southbound WB = westbound TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 20 Table K: 2035 Without Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Intersection LOS Study Area No. Intersection Methodology AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour V/C Ratio or Delay LOS V/C Ratio or Delay LOS 1 Ambrosia Lane/Poinsettia Lane ICU 0.78 C 0.39 A HCM 43.4 sec D 12.5 sec B 2 Ambrosia Lane/Aviara Parkway ICU 0.79 C 0.38 A HCM 124.5 sec F 13.7 sec B 3 Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road (u) HCM 0.0 sec A 0.0 sec A 4 Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane (u) HCM 7.9 sec B 6.6 sec A 5 Mimosa Drive/Moorhen Place (u) HCM 9.0 sec A 8.8 sec A 6 Dove Lane/Moorhen Place (u) HCM 8.7 sec A 8.6 sec A 7 Mimosa Drive/Aviara Parkway ICU 0.33 A 0.37 A HCM 10.0 sec A 10.1 sec B 8 El Camino Real/Cassia Road ICU 0.84 D 0.85 D HCM 43.8 sec D 50.4 sec D 9 El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane ICU 0.61 B 0.62 B HCM 27.1 sec C 24.1 sec C 10 El Camino Real/Dove Lane ICU 0.57 A 0.70 C HCM 30.0 sec C 44.8 sec D 11 El Camino Real/Aviara Parkway ICU 0.88 D 0.83 D HCM 70.2 sec E 60.7 sec E Note: Shaded cells exceed LOS D. (u) = unsignalized intersection HCM = Highway Capacity Manual ICU = intersection capacity utilization LOS = level of service sec = seconds V/C = volume-to-capacity Table K shows that most of the study intersections are anticipated to continue to deliver a satisfactory LOS. Although, as shown in Table J, some individual movements may experience delay and queueing, overall the intersections are capable of accommodating the peak hour traffic volume. The intersection of Ambrosia Lane/Aviara Parkway would continue to be impacted by school traffic in the a.m. peak hour. The intersection of El Camino Real/Aviara Parkway is anticipated to degrade with increased traffic volumes in the future. GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT (2035) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITH POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE Comparisons between traffic projections using the SANDAG Series 12 (land use based) model were again used to project traffic conditions with the Poinsettia Lane gap closure. The annual growth rate calculated in Table H was applied to 2008 (without the gap closure) model data to determine the potential model data in the future without the Poinsettia Lane gap closure. These potential model data were compared to the model predicted traffic data in the same future year to identify the redistribution of traffic calculated by the traffic model. These calculations are shown in Table L. TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 21 Table L: Traffic Model Data and Traffic Growth Rates Roadway Segment 2008 Model Projection (1,000s) Annual Growth Rate 2020 Volume Based on Growth 2020 Model Projection (1,000s) Effect of Gap Closure Poinsettia Lane (Aviara Parkway to Ambrosia Lane) 8.8 0.9% 9.8 8.5 (1.3) (13.2%) Poinsettia Lane (Ambrosia Lane to Cassia Road) 4.8 1.7% 5.8 4.6 (1.2) (20.7%) Poinsettia Lane (Cassia Road to El Camino Real) 1.6 1.4% 1.9 5.1 3.2 171.8% El Camino Real (Cassia Road to Poinsettia Lane) 28.9 0.6% 30.8 31.2 0.4 1.2% El Camino Real (Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway) 28.7 1.1% 32.4 34.0 1.6 4.9% Cassia Road (Poinsettia Lane to El Camino Real) 7.8 0.8% 8.5 6.1 (2.4) (28.4%) Ambrosia Lane (Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway) 2.5 0.8% 2.8 2.4 (0.4) (12.7%) Mimosa Drive (Oriole Court to Aviara Parkway) 1.8 1.5% 2.1 1.3 (0.8) (39.0%) Dove Lane (Moorhen Place to Black Skimmer Road) 1.6 3.1% 2.2 2.4 0.2 9.8% As Table L shows, the traffic model predicts that the completion of the Poinsettia Lane gap closure would reduce traffic volumes on Cassia Road (28.4 percent lower) and Ambrosia Lane (12.7 percent lower) as using these routes around the existing gap will no longer be necessary. The traffic model similarly predicts that the Poinsettia Lane gap closure will reduce daily traffic volume along Mimosa Drive (specifically, south of Moorhen Place) possibly because access to Poinsettia Lane would have greater utility. The traffic model also predicts that traffic volumes along Dove Lane would increase by 9.8 percent, which is likely to mean that traffic volumes along Moorhen Place and Oriole Court would also increase. This could be due to either redistribution of neighborhood traffic or cut- through traffic. Although not included in Table L, the same exercise was conducted for Aviara Parkway. The traffic model predicts that the Poinsettia Lane gap closure would redistribute approximately 10 percent of traffic along Aviara Parkway. Roadway Volume The percent of change in traffic volume with the gap closure calculated in Table L was applied to the projected 2035 traffic volumes without the gap closure previously described in the report. For the segment of Dove Lane where traffic volumes are projected to increase, 55 additional daily trips are anticipated, which equates to 5 additional vehicles during a peak hour or 1 additional car every 12 minutes. In the case of the segment of Poinsettia Lane between Cassia Road and El Camino Real, traffic volumes were smoothed by applying the ratio of model data provided for the segments of Poinsettia Lane between Cassia Road and El Camino Real and Poinsettia Lane between Ambrosia Lane and Cassia Road. In other words, because the model predicted that the segment between Cassia Road and El Camino Real would have a higher traffic volume, this relationship was maintained when projecting future traffic volumes. Table M analyzes the resulting 2035 roadway traffic volume. Intersection Volume The effect of the gap closure identified in Table L was applied to the 2035 intersection turn volumes displayed on Figure 4. For intersections immediately adjacent to the gap closure, turning movements were directly shifted to account for new and potentially shorter travel paths. TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 22 Table M: General Plan Buildout (2035) Daily Roadway Volume and Capacity Roadway Segment Lanes Capacity at LOS D 2035 With Gap Closure Volume V/C LOS D or Better Poinsettia Lane (Aviara Parkway to Ambrosia Lane) 4 39,200 10,400 0.27 Yes Poinsettia Lane (Ambrosia Lane to Cassia Road) 4 39,200 10,056 0.26 Yes Poinsettia Lane (Cassia Road to El Camino Real) 4 39,200 10,750 0.27 Yes El Camino Real (Cassia Road to Poinsettia Lane) 5 54,100 36,815 0.68 Yes El Camino Real (Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway) 6 54,100 47,970 0.89 Yes Cassia Road (Poinsettia Lane to El Camino Real) 4 32,200 7,520 0.23 Yes Ambrosia Lane (Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway) 2 13,700 3,309 0.24 Yes Mimosa Drive (Oriole Court to Aviara Parkway) 2 13,700 522 0.04 Yes Dove Lane (Moorhen Place to Black Skimmer Road) 2 13,700 614 0.04 Yes LOS = level of service V/C = volume-to-capacity Figure 5 illustrates the resulting projected intersection turn volumes in 2035 with the Poinsettia Lane gap closure. These turning volumes were analyzed consistent with the Intersection Turning Movement Needs Assessment in the City of Carlsbad Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines. Table N examines whether right-turn volumes meet the City’s 150 vehicles per hour threshold for recommending a dedicated right-turn lane, whether left-turn volumes meet the City’s 250 vehicles per hour threshold for recommending dual left-turn lanes, and whether the left-turn queue is anticipated to exceed the available turn pocket. As Table N shows, right-turn volume at many of the intersections meets the threshold for recommending dedicated right-turn lanes. One of the movements where a right-turn lane would be recommended is southbound El Camino Real at Poinsettia Lane. Compared to without the gap closure, two fewer right-turn lanes would be deficient by this measure. Two left-turn movements have single left-turn lanes but meet the threshold for recommending dual left-turn lanes, which is two fewer than without the gap closure. More intersections comply with the City’s turning- movement needs assessment with the Poinsettia Lane gap closure. Intersection Performance The traffic volumes illustrated on Figure 5 were analyzed using both the ICU and HCM methodologies at signalized intersections. Only the HCM methodology applies at unsignalized intersections. Table O presents the results of the intersection performance analysis. Analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix E. As described in detail in the following section, concurrent with construction of the Poinsettia Lane gap closure, traffic signals would be constructed at the currently unsignalized intersections of Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road and Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane. The analysis presented in Table O reflects the future traffic signals at these locations. Poinsettia LnPoinsettia Ln7/670/377/670/373/48/63/48/620/1030/1220/1030/1299/82278/271635/28199/82278/271635/281141/4641763/1803249/667141/4641763/1803249/667105/1351947/173786/238105/1351947/173786/238170/138160/327268/316170/138160/327268/31669/5514/2958/7269/5514/2958/7234/1122021/183633/6934/1122021/183633/69142/2802022/191562/108142/2802022/191562/108117/24114/3756/122117/24114/3756/122286/15936/35519/334286/15936/35519/334529/5921531/1190176/221529/5921531/1190176/221166/2711510/1791185/364166/2711510/1791185/364 255/14241/42114/113255/14241/42114/11310/23470/67928/6210/23470/67928/6230/318/446/4130/318/446/4153/141/25/1253/141/25/1225/16487/56022/1825/16487/56022/1813/10104/68/1013/10104/68/10260/22359/58628/16260/22359/58628/16245/65315/54310/47245/65315/54310/47209/6710/5156/16209/6710/5156/1610/64244/305172/7110/64244/305172/71361/765/16214/46361/765/16214/4614/639/2822/4414/639/2822/446/46267/315184/1006/46267/315184/100193/197416/308193/197416/30834/96/441/3434/96/441/346/22/25/66/22/25/63/194/1017/113/194/1017/1130/401550/115012/1530/401550/115012/1553/1121613/22119/1753/1121613/22119/1785/484/138/3785/484/138/375/422/125/422/121/510/121/510/129/49/99/49/92/8346/56639/312/8346/56639/31222/6820/10222/6820/1010/15376/56210/15376/5622/8414/29520/152/8414/29520/15I:\HCR1803\G\2035-With Gap Closure Volumes.cdr (3/19/2019)FEET10005000General Plan Buildout (2035)With Poinsettia Lane Gap ClosurePeak Hour Traffic VolumesNSOURCE Google Earth, 2018:Poinsettia Lane Gap ClosureLEGEND- AM/PM Peak Hour VolumesXX YY/FIGURE 5 TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 24 Table N: 2035 With Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Intersection Turning Movement Needs Assessment Intersection Right Turn Volume1 Existing Dedicated Right?2 Left Turn Volume1 Existing Dual Left?3 Calculated Queue Length1 Left Turn Storage 1. Ambrosia Lane/Poinsettia Lane (s) NB 214 No 414 No 477 N/A SB 63 No 44 No 58 N/A EB 184 No 46 No 54 265 WB 64 No 168 No 188 265 2. Ambrosia Lane/Aviara Parkway (s) NB 13 No 10 No 174 N/A SB 156 No 239 No 483 N/A EB 28 No4 300 No 366 130 WB 245 No4 54 No 59 125 3. Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road (u) NB 15 No 0 No 95 N/A SB 0 No 197 No 108 160 WB 222 No 20 No 56 N/A 4. Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane/ Oriole Court (u) NB 41 No 34 No 34 N/A SB 6 No 6 No 11 N/A EB 20 No 8 No 11 50 WB 8 Yes 39 No 26 300 5. Mimosa Drive/Moorhen Place (u) NB 7 No 0 No 0 N/A SB 0 No 20 No 0 N/A WB 4 No 8 No 0 N/A 6. Dove Lane/Moorhen Place (u) NB 5 No 12 No 3 N/A EB 22 No 0 No 0 N/A WB 0 No 9 No 0 N/A 7. Mimosa Drive/Aviara Parkway (s) NB 46 No 31 No 37 N/A SB 53 No 12 No 23 N/A EB 22 No4 25 No 23 135 WB 23 No 62 No 44 195 8. El Camino Real/Cassia Road (s) NB 15 Yes 40 No 69 250 SB 112 No4 17 No 35 260 EB 38 No 85 No 68 270 WB 19 No 17 No 25 100 9. El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane (s) NB 592 Yes 221 Yes 151 250 SB 364 No 271 Yes 136 250 EB 114 No 255 Yes 80 315 WB 286 No 519 Yes 201 380 10. El Camino Real/Dove Lane (s) NB 69 No4 112 No 185 190 SB 280 No4 108 No 178 235 EB 122 No 241 No 320 60 WB 69 No 72 No 107 80 11. El Camino Real/Aviara Parkway (s) NB 667 No 464 Yes 317 265 SB 135 No 238 Yes 220 310 EB 316 Yes 170 Yes 130 150 WB 99 No 635 Yes 472 200 Note: Shaded cells do not meet guidelines. 1 Higher volume of either a.m. or p.m. peak hour 2 City of Carlsbad Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines state that a dedicated right-turn lane is recommended when volume exceeds 150. 3 City of Carlsbad Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines state that dual left-turn lanes are recommended when volume exceeds 250. 4 Dashed bicycle lane provides for a lane width of at least 19 feet indicating vehicles may treat this as a right-turn lane. (s) = signalized intersection (u) = unsignalized intersection EB = eastbound N/A = not applicable NB = northbound SB = southbound WB = westbound TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 25 Table O: 2035 With Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Intersection LOS Study Area No. Intersection Methodology AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour V/C Ratio or Delay LOS V/C Ratio or Delay LOS 1 Ambrosia Lane/Poinsettia Lane ICU 0.68 B 0.36 A HCM 27.7 sec C 23.8 sec C 2 Ambrosia Lane/Aviara Parkway ICU 0.70 B 0.34 A HCM 70.4 sec E 13.7 sec B 3 Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road (u) ICU 0.44 A 0.40 A HCM 10.5 sec B 26.8 sec C 4 Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane (u) ICU 0.26 A 0.27 A HCM 8.9 sec A 8.8 sec A 5 Mimosa Drive/Moorhen Place (u) HCM 9.2 sec A 8.8 sec A 6 Dove Lane/Moorhen Place (u) HCM 8.8 sec A 8.7 sec A 7 Mimosa Drive/Aviara Parkway ICU 0.28 A 0.33 A HCM 9.2 sec A 9.3 sec A 8 El Camino Real/Cassia Road ICU 0.60 A 0.61 B HCM 12.5 sec B 13.5 sec B 9 El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane ICU 0.72 C 0.74 C HCM 40.3 sec D 35.7 sec D 10 El Camino Real/Dove Lane ICU 0.60 A 0.73 C HCM 24.8 sec C 39.2 sec D 11 El Camino Real/Aviara Parkway ICU 0.84 D 0.83 D HCM 59.5 sec E 54.3 sec D Note: Shaded cells exceed LOS D. (u) = unsignalized intersection HCM = Highway Capacity Manual ICU = intersection capacity utilization LOS = level of service sec = seconds V/C = volume-to-capacity Table O shows that most of the study intersections are anticipated to continue to deliver a satisfactory level of service. No additional intersections would exceed LOS D compared to the scenario without the gap closure. Although the two intersections previously identified as exceeding LOS D (Ambrosia Lane/Aviara Parkway and El Camino Real/Aviara Parkway) would continue to exceed LOS D, the performance of these intersections is somewhat improved by the redistribution of traffic resulting from completion of the Poinsettia Lane gap closure. SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS Section 4C of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) establishes a framework for traffic control signal needs studies. These guidelines help to identify areas of consideration but do not establish mandates. The MUTCD specifically states, “The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal.” The reverse is also true. Ultimately, the decision on control and operation of an intersection lies with the engineering judgment of the local jurisdiction. The local jurisdiction is most familiar with circumstances not captured by the guidelines in the MUTCD. The nine areas identified in the MUTCD are the following: TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 26 Warrant 1, Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume Warrant 3, Peak Hour Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume Warrant 5, School Crossing Warrant 6, Coordinated Signal System Warrant 7, Crash Experience Warrant 8, Roadway Network Warrant 9, Intersection Near a [Railroad] Grade Crossing Other factors such as road grade, sight distance, the number of lanes crossed by vehicles exiting the minor street, and driver behavior may be extenuating circumstances. LSA considered traffic control options, the MUTCD signal warrants, and potential circumstances for the two intersections immediately adjacent to the Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure: Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road and Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane. Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road At the time existing conditions were collected for this report, this intersection was unsignalized with a stop sign on the Cassia Road approach. Completion of the Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure would result in a third leg at this intersection and introduce conflicting movements. Table P uses the traffic volume displayed in Figure 5 and identifies the intersection performance under different traffic control options. As Table P shows, any form of traffic control would result in a satisfactory level of service. Table P: Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road Traffic Control Comparison AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay (seconds) LOS Delay (seconds) LOS Roundabout 6.6 A 8.0 A Two-Way Stop Control 14.5 B 27.1 D All-Way Stop Control 12.8 B 34.3 D Traffic Signal 10.5 B 26.8 C LOS = level of service LSA used the gap closure growth rates identified in the traffic model data comparison above and applied it to existing intersection and roadway data to develop Existing plus Gap Closure traffic volumes for Signal Warrants 1, 2, and 3. This data set, existing pedestrian volumes, and the collision history displayed on Figure 3 were evaluated against the MUCTD signal warrants. Signal warrant worksheets are provided in Appendix F. The MUTCD establishes different thresholds for urban and rural settings. The rural setting may be used in the built-up area of an isolated community with a population of less than 10,000 or where the speed limit on a major street is greater than 40 mph. Although the City is an urban setting, the speed limit on Poinsettia Lane is 50 mph. Therefore, the rural settings were examined for Warrants 1, 2, and 3. TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 27 Warrant 1: Eight-Hour Vehicle Volume This warrant considers whether a large volume of minor street traffic is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic signal or whether traffic volume on the major street is so heavy that minor street traffic suffers extensive delay or conflict. The MUTCD states that this warrant is met if thresholds are exceeded for each of any 8 hours of a typical day. For the intersection of Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road, this warrant is satisfied. Warrant 2: Four-Hour Vehicle Volume This warrant considers whether the total volume of intersecting (i.e., conflicting) traffic is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic signal. The MUTCD states that this warrant is met if thresholds are exceeded for each of any 4 hours of a typical day. For the intersection of Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road, this warrant is satisfied. Warrant 3: Peak-Hour Vehicle Volume This warrant considers whether undue delay on the minor street during the busiest hour of the day is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic signal. This warrant is met applying either delay or volume thresholds. For the intersection of Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road, this warrant is satisfied based on volume. Warrant 4: Pedestrian Volume This warrant considers whether pedestrian volume is sufficiently high to be the sole reason for installing a traffic signal. In order to meet this warrant, pedestrian volume would have to exceed at least 93 crossings of the major street in an hour. For the intersection of Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road, no pedestrian crossings were recorded when surveys of the intersection were completed, and this warrant is not satisfied. Warrant 5: School Crossing The School Crossing warrant is intended for application where the need for schoolchildren to cross the major street is the principal reason in considering the installation of a traffic control signal. While some children may walk to school from these residential neighborhoods, the intersection of Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road is not part of a designated school route (identified by the use of yellow crosswalk markings); therefore, this warrant does not apply. Warrant 6: Coordinated Signal System This warrant may apply where maintaining platooning of vehicles through a coordinated system necessitates installing traffic control signals at intersections where other conditions would not otherwise meet warrants. The MUTCD specifies that this warrant should not be applied where the resultant spacing of signals would be less than 1,000 feet. Currently, the spacing between Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road and Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane is approximately 2,175 feet (with the gap closure). An additional traffic control signal will be constructed with the gap closure approximately 1,065 feet from the Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road intersection at Artemisia Court. However, spacing between the Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road intersection and the existing traffic TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 28 control signal at Ambrosia Lane/Poinsettia Lane is approximately 640 feet. Therefore, this warrant does not apply. Warrant 7: Crash Experience If an intersection experiences a high frequency and severity of collisions that could be alleviated by the installation of a traffic signal, then this warrant may apply. The threshold established in the MUTCD is a minimum of five collisions resulting in injury occurring within a 12-month period. The collision history illustrated in Figure 3 is for a 10-year period. The collision data shows no more than two collisions in a 12-month period. For the intersection of Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road, this warrant is not satisfied. Warrant 8: Roadway Network Installing a traffic control signal at some intersections might be justified to encourage concentration and organization of traffic flow on a roadway network. Examples given include the intersection of two major routes, locations with entering volume of more than 1,000 vehicles per hour for 5 hours outside of normal business hours, and rural highways entering or traversing a city. This warrant does not apply. Warrant 9: Intersection Near a [Railroad] Grade Crossing This warrant could be considered if an intersection is located near an at-grade crossing of railroad tracks. The intersection of Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road is not located near railroad tracks, and this warrant does not apply. While unsignalized traffic control could provide a satisfactory LOS, traffic volumes at the intersection of Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road meet Warrants 1, 2, and 3. Traffic signal control at Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road is recommended. Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane At the time existing conditions were collected for this report, this intersection was unsignalized with stop signs on the Oriole Court and Skimmer Court approaches. Completion of the Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure would result in a fourth leg at this intersection. Table Q uses the traffic volume displayed in Figure 5 and identifies the intersection performance under different traffic control options. As Table Q shows, any form of traffic control would result in a satisfactory level of service. Table Q: Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane Traffic Control Comparison AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay (seconds) LOS Delay (seconds) LOS Roundabout 5.1 A 4.4 A Two-Way Stop Control 15.4 C 18.8 C All-Way Stop Control 10.6 B 11.3 B Traffic Signal 8.9 A 8.8 A LOS = level of service TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 29 Signal warrant worksheets for this intersection are provided in Appendix F. Warrant 1: Eight-Hour Vehicle Volume This warrant considers whether a large volume of minor street traffic is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic signal or whether traffic volume on the major street is so heavy that minor street traffic suffers extensive delay or conflict. The MUTCD states that this warrant is met if thresholds are exceeded for each of any 8 hours of a typical day. For the intersection of Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane, the threshold is met for some, but not for 8 hours of the day, and the warrant is not satisfied. Warrant 2: Four-Hour Vehicle Volume This warrant considers whether the total volume of intersecting (i.e., conflicting) traffic is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic signal. The MUTCD states that this warrant is met if thresholds are exceeded for each of any 4 hours of a typical day. For the intersection of Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane, the threshold is met for 1 hour but not for 4 hours of the day, and the warrant is not satisfied. Warrant 3: Peak-Hour Vehicle Volume This warrant considers whether undue delay on the minor street during the busiest hour of the day is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic signal. This warrant is met applying either delay or volume thresholds. For the intersection of Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane, this warrant is not satisfied. Warrant 4: Pedestrian Volume This warrant considers whether pedestrian volume is sufficiently high to be the sole reason for installing a traffic signal. In order to meet this warrant, pedestrian volume would have to exceed at least 93 crossings of the major street in an hour. For the intersection of Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane, six pedestrian crossings were recorded when surveys of the intersection were completed, which does not satisfy this warrant. Warrant 5: School Crossing The School Crossing warrant is intended for application where the need for schoolchildren to cross the major street is the principal reason in considering the installation of a traffic control signal. While some children may walk to school from these residential neighborhoods, the intersection of Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane is not part of a designated school route (identified by the use of yellow crosswalk markings); therefore, this warrant does not apply. Warrant 6: Coordinated Signal System This warrant may apply where maintaining platooning of vehicles through a coordinated system necessitates installing traffic control signals at intersections where other conditions would not otherwise meet warrants. The MUTCD specifies that this warrant should not be applied where the resultant spacing of signals would be less than 1,000 feet. Currently, the spacing between Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road and Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane is approximately 2,175 feet (with the gap closure). An additional traffic control signal will be constructed at Artemisia Court TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 30 approximately 1,110 feet from the Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane intersection. This spacing would leave 1,065 feet between the Artemisia Court traffic signal and the intersection of Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road where this report recommends a traffic signal. The distance between the intersection of Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane and the existing traffic signal at El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane is approximately 1,400 feet. Therefore, this warrant could be considered at the intersection of Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane. The appropriate infrastructure is present along Poinsettia Lane for interconnection and coordination of traffic signals between Ambrosia Lane and El Camino Real. A traffic signal at the Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane intersection would maintain platooning of vehicles to facilitate this coordinated system. Therefore, this warrant is satisfied at the intersection of Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane. Warrant 7: Crash Experience If an intersection experiences a high frequency and severity of collisions that could be alleviated by the installation of a traffic signal, then this warrant may apply. The threshold established in the MUTCD is a minimum of five collisions resulting in injury occurring within a 12-month period. For the intersection of Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane, this warrant is not satisfied based on past collision history. Warrant 8: Roadway Network Installing a traffic control signal at some intersections might be justified to encourage concentration and organization of traffic flow on a roadway network. Examples given include the intersection of two major routes, locations with entering volume of more than 1,000 vehicles per hour for 5 hours outside of normal business hours, and rural highways entering or traversing a city. This warrant does not apply. Warrant 9: Intersection Near a [Railroad] Grade Crossing This warrant could be considered if an intersection is located near an at-grade crossing of railroad tracks. The intersection of Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane is not located near railroad tracks, and this warrant does not apply. While unsignalized traffic control could provide a satisfactory LOS, delay would be experienced by vehicles entering Poinsettia Lane from the adjacent residential neighborhoods. Traffic volumes exceed thresholds for some, but not all, of the hours specified in the signal warrants. Pedestrians cross Poinsettia Lane at this intersection, but not in sufficient quantity to meet the pedestrian signal warrant. The intersection has not been the location of traffic collisions, but the width and grade of the major roadway could contribute to increased collisions when paired with driver error. An additional factor that should be taken into consideration is driver expectation. The new intersection at Artemisia Court will be signalized, although the thresholds of the signal warrants are partially, but not fully, met. The only full-access unsignalized intersection along Poinsettia Lane would be at Brigantine Drive, and the neighborhood accessed by Brigantine Drive also has the option of using the signalized intersection at Black Rails Road to exit the neighborhood. Drivers on Poinsettia Lane may not be prepared for cross traffic at an unsignalized Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane intersection. Additionally, Warrant 6 is satisfied based on the distances TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 31 between signalized intersections and the necessity to maintain vehicle platooning through the coordinated traffic signal system. Based on these factors, a traffic signal at Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane is recommended. EL CAMINO REAL/POINSETTIA LANE In 2012 El Camino Real was widened to provide three southbound lanes between Cassia Road and Aviara Parkway. Prior to this project, the intersection of El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane provided two left-turn lanes, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane at the southbound approach. As part of the expansion, the exclusive right-turn lane was converted to a through lane. Right-turning vehicles share the outside lane with vehicles traveling through the intersection. In the existing condition, 14 vehicles make the southbound right-turn in either peak hour, which means that the outside lane primarily functions as a through lane. As Table N shows, the southbound right-turn meets the City’s intersection turning-movement needs assessment for a dedicated right-turn lane with the traffic volumes redistributed at completion of the Poinsettia Lane gap closure. This section examines the potential benefits and constraints of adding an exclusive southbound right-turn lane. Collision Potential As a further complication, El Camino Real slopes downhill as people travel south. The public has raised a concern that vehicles traveling straight through the intersection will require longer to stop if approaching a vehicle slowing to turn right – and that a higher risk of collision is present without an exclusive turn lane. Analysis of collision data from 2008 to 2018 indicated that southbound rear-end collisions have not increased since the southbound right-turn lane at this intersection was converted to a through/ right-turn lane. In fact, all five southbound rear-end collisions occurred prior to the 2012 conversion of the right-turn lane. It should be noted that El Camino Real provides a bicycle lane. At other intersections along El Camino Real with an exclusive right-turn lane, a bicycle lane is provided at the intersection with an appropriate transition in advance of the intersection. A similar treatment would be required if an exclusive right-turn lane were added at the southbound approach of El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane. This transition, however, requires bicycles to cross the vehicle path to remain in the bicycle lane. Other than collision history, concern regarding the potential for collisions should be tempered by the fact that turning vehicles likely have to slow when entering an exclusive turn lane. Drivers of through vehicles traveling in the outside lane always have to consider the potential that vehicles in front of them may desire to turn. The speed of vehicles traveling in the outside lane should take these possibilities into account. Intersection Performance Table E shows that the intersection of El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane functions at LOS D or better in existing conditions with the current lane configuration. Table O shows that the intersection of El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane is anticipated to continuing functioning at LOS D or better without the TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 32 addition of a southbound right-turn lane. However, to demonstrate the potential benefit of adding a southbound right-turn lane, the intersection was reanalyzed with that configuration. Table R displays a summary of previously disclosed intersection performance data and compares that to intersection performance with a dedicated southbound right-turn lane. Table R: El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane Intersection Performance Comparison Scenario Shared SBR Dedicated SBR Effect of Adding SBR Lane V/C Ratio or Delay LOS V/C Ratio or Delay LOS Existing AM ICU 0.52 A 0.52 A 0.00 HCM 24.1 sec C 23.8 sec C 0.3 sec Queue in Southbound Through Lanes 234 feet 231 feet 3 feet Existing PM ICU 0.53 A 0.53 A 0.00 HCM 20.7 sec C 20.3 sec C 0.4 sec Queue in Southbound Through Lanes 297 feet 293 feet 4 feet 2035 With Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure AM ICU 0.72 C 0.69 B 0.03 HCM 45.3 sec D 43.3 sec D 2.0 sec Queue in Southbound Through Lanes 407 feet 345 feet 62 feet 2035 With Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure AM ICU 0.74 C 0.68 B 0.06 HCM 35.7 sec D 31.6 sec C 4.1 sec Queue in Southbound Through Lanes 542 feet 397 feet 145 feet Note: Shaded cells exceed LOS D. (u) = unsignalized intersection HCM = Highway Capacity Manual ICU = intersection capacity utilization LOS = level of service SBR = southbound right-turn sec = seconds V/C = volume-to-capacity As Table R shows, adding a southbound right-turn lane would have minimal effect on the performance of the intersection in existing conditions. If southbound right-turn volume increases with the completion of Poinsettia Lane as anticipated, then adding a dedicated turn lane would provide some benefit to the intersection. It should be noted, however, that the benefit to the intersection does not improve any deficiency. The intersection is forecast to function at a satisfactory level of service with or without a dedicated southbound right-turn lane. Engineering Constraints The addition of an exclusive right-turn lane would require widening of El Camino Real by approximately 12 feet on the west side of the intersection. In order to accommodate the maximum anticipated queue, the turn pocket should provide approximately 80 to 100 feet of storage. While the west side of the intersection appears to be vacant land, some of the facilities near the roadway may present constraints. Some of the items needing relocation present a typical amount of effort for this type of widening project. These include the traffic signal controller, recycled water irrigation lines (and valves located approximately 110 feet from the back of curb return), and the cathodoic protection testing station for the in-street petroleum line. TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 33 Widening the roadway by 12 feet will extend beyond the currently graded area. An elevation difference of as much as 12 feet will require construction of a retaining wall as part of adding the right-turn lane. A retaining wall like the one required at this location is not unusual for this type of widening project in a hilly area. Also located on the west side of El Camino Real is an underground SDG&E natural gas line and a vault, which does not appear to have a traffic-rated lid. This vault will have to be rebuilt or relocated to complete the widening. The cost of addressing the vault depends on the whether SDG&E has an easement or prior rights associated with the natural gas line. The range in cost for the vault could be from $100,000–$500,000, bringing the total construction cost of adding an exclusive southbound right-turn lane at El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane to potentially $1.35 million. Biological Constraints Perhaps more significant than the engineering constraints are the biological constraints in the area west of El Camino Real that would be disturbed by the project adding a right-turn lane. A memorandum detailing existing conditions in that area is included as Appendix G. According to the Habitat Management Plan for Natural Communities in the City of Carlsbad (HMP), the area that would be disturbed by the addition of the southbound right-turn lane is within an existing hardline preserve (Preserve Number P/A#705) and is within the Coastal Zone. Because the area is within a hardline preserve, impacts to biological resources (such as the southern maritime chaparral that occurs on the site) are not allowed unless: (a) they are associated with a covered project as defined by the HMP, (b) an equivalency finding results in a minor amendment and adjustment to the hardline boundary, or (c) a major amendment to the HMP is approved. Approval of impacts to southern maritime chaparral within a hardline boundary requires 3:1 mitigation. Special-status species have the potential to occur in the area, and focused surveys for Orcutt’s brodiaea, Del Mar Mesa sand aster, and coastal California gnatcatcher would need to be performed (likely between May and July) to confirm the initial assessment that these species are absent from the site. The HMP provides additional conservation standards related to areas subject to the constraints of being within the California Coastal Zone. Permitting through the resource agencies will add to the total cost of adding an exclusive southbound right-turn lane at El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane. CUT-THROUGH TRAFFIC EVALUATION The Carlsbad General Plan Mobility Element defines the uses of different street classifications. Arterial Streets and Arterial Connectors connect people to different areas of the City and to different land uses. Local/neighborhood streets connect people to residential neighborhoods and local areas. This section examines the potential for cut-through traffic, which is arterial traffic using local streets. The section following provides options for reducing cut-through traffic. In the existing condition, the gap in Poinsettia Lane results in arterial traffic using Cassia Road (a Local/Neighborhood Street) and Ambrosia Lane (a School Street). This is cut-through traffic that occurs because the arterial connector is not yet available. As noted earlier, the Poinsettia Lane gap closure has the potential to redistribute traffic in the vicinity of the project. Traffic currently using Ambrosia Lane or Cassia Road to travel around the gap would be able to stay on Poinsettia Lane to TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 34 complete their trip. Analysis of traffic model data shows that the completion of Poinsettia Lane is anticipated to reduce traffic on Cassia Road (28.4 percent lower) and Ambrosia Lane (12.7 percent lower). The traffic model also predicts that traffic volumes along Dove Lane could increase by 9.8 percent, which is likely to mean that traffic volumes along Moorhen Place and Oriole Court would also increase. The traffic model data indicate the potential for cut-through traffic in the Viadana neighborhood. Cut-through traffic occurs where a local street provides time savings compared to remaining on the arterial network. Time savings is affected by distance, speed, and delay at intersections. These factors were measured to determine which cut-through routes may be attractive. Travel speeds were surveyed and reported in Table C. The speed data are summarized as follows: Poinsettia Lane: 50 mph posted speed limit; 33 mph typical speed Cassia Road: 35 mph posted speed limit; 29 mph typical speed Ambrosia Lane: 40 mph posted speed limit; 34 mph typical speed Mimosa Drive: 25 mph posted speed limit; 25 mph typical speed Dove Lane: 35 mph posted speed limit; 30 mph typical speed Aviara Parkway: 40 mph posted speed limit El Camino Real: 55 mph posted speed limit Not all possible routes have the potential to be attractive. Vehicles on Aviara Parkway can enter the Post Office/Library/Shopping Center area from a signalized driveway on Aviara Parkway or a right- in/right-out driveway. Vehicles on El Camino Real can enter the Post Office/Library/Shopping Center area from a signalized intersection with Dove Lane. Diverting from these direct paths and traveling through neighborhoods would not be attractive. Indeed, these alternatives are available today and cut-through traffic is not present. Many potential routes through the study area were evaluated in a screening process that considered distance and speed. Routes that far exceeded the travel time of direct routes were eliminated from consideration. Routes examined in detail due to their cut-through potential include the following: From the west on Poinsettia Lane to the Post Office/Library/Shopping Center along Oriole Court, Mimosa Drive, Moorhen Place, and Dove Lane instead of Poinsettia Lane, El Camino Real, and Dove Lane From the Cassia neighborhoods to the Post Office/Library/Shopping Center along Cassia Road, Poinsettia Lane, Oriole Court, Mimosa Drive, Moorhen Place, and Dove Lane instead of Cassia Road, El Camino Real, and Dove Lane From the north on El Camino Real to westbound Poinsettia Lane along Cassia Road and Poinsettia Lane instead of directly to Poinsettia Lane The analysis of route travel time included the distance and typical travel speed along each roadway on the route and average delay for each movement needed at intersections along the route. Calculations of intersection turning-movement delay come from the HCM analysis of future traffic TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 35 conditions. Therefore, the analysis presents a worst-case accounting for the potential for cut- through routes to increase in attractiveness as arterial traffic volumes increase. It should be noted that delay to vehicles traveling through the new traffic signal on Poinsettia Lane at the entry to the Poinsettia 61 residential project is accounted for in the analysis. Table S provides a summary of travel time for routes from West Poinsettia Lane to the Post Office/ Library/Shopping Center and the reverse trip. As Table S shows, the cut-through route is about 0.10 of a mile shorter and anticipated to save 1 minute of travel time. The reverse trip leaving the shopping center is anticipated to save 2 minutes of travel time due to the increased delay for making left turns at El Camino Real and Poinsettia Lane. This is sufficient time savings that some of the vehicles traveling between the shopping center and Poinsettia Lane to the west may desire to cut through the local streets. Table S: Route Options from West Poinsettia Lane to Shopping Center Route Segment Speed (mph) Distance (miles) Time (minutes) Intersection Delay (minutes) To Shopping Center on Arterials Poinsettia Lane 33 0.27 0.49 0.86 El Camino Real 55 0.32 0.35 0.78 Dove Lane 30 0.06 0.13 0.17 Total 0.65 2.78 To Shopping Center through Neighborhood Oriole Court-Mimosa Drive-Moorhen Place 25 0.31 0.74 0.42 Dove Lane 30 0.21 0.42 0.12 Total 0.52 1.70 From Shopping Center on Arterials Dove Lane 30 0.06 0.13 0.17 El Camino Real 55 0.32 0.35 1.56 Poinsettia Lane 33 0.27 0.49 1.29 Total 0.65 3.99 From Shopping Center through Neighborhood Dove Lane 30 0.21 0.42 0.25 Oriole Court-Mimosa Drive-Moorhen Place 25 0.31 0.74 0.57 Total 0.52 1.98 mph = miles per hour Table T provides a summary of travel time for routes from the neighborhoods around Cassia Road to the Post Office/Library/Shopping Center and the reverse trip. As Table T shows, the cut-through route is about 0.10 of a mile longer and anticipated to require about 15 seconds more to get to the shopping center. The reverse trip leaving the shopping center is anticipated to save 10 seconds of travel time due to the increased delay for making left turns at El Camino Real and Cassia Road. Some of the vehicles leaving the shopping center to go back to the neighborhoods along Cassia Road may choose to cut through the local streets rather than wait to turn left from Dove Lane to El Camino Real. Table U provides a summary of travel time for routes from El Camino Real north of Cassia Road to Poinsettia Lane west of Cassia Road and the reverse trip. As Table U shows, the cut-through route is about 0.50 mile shorter and anticipated to require about 1.4 minutes less time. The reverse trip traveling east on Poinsettia Lane and eventually north on El Camino Real is anticipated to save less TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 36 Table T: Route Options from Cassia Neighborhoods to Shopping Center Route Segment Speed (mph) Distance (miles) Time (minutes) Intersection Delay (minutes) To Shopping Center on Arterials Cassia Road 29 0.27 0.55 0.76 El Camino Real 55 0.67 0.73 0.78 Dove Lane 30 0.06 0.13 0.17 Total 1.00 3.12 To Shopping Center through Neighborhood Cassia Road 29 0.21 0.44 0.49 Poinsettia Lane 33 0.40 0.73 0.13 Oriole Court-Mimosa Drive-Moorhen Place 25 0.31 0.74 0.29 Dove Lane 30 0.21 0.42 0.12 Total 1.13 3.36 From Shopping Center on Arterials Dove Lane 30 0.06 0.13 0.17 El Camino Real 55 0.67 0.73 1.56 Cassia Road 29 0.27 0.54 0.87 Total 1.00 4.00 From Shopping Center through Neighborhood Dove Lane 30 0.21 0.42 0.25 Oriole Court-Mimosa Drive-Moorhen Place 25 0.31 0.74 0.41 Poinsettia Lane 33 0.40 0.73 0.29 Cassia Road 29 0.21 0.44 0.55 Total 1.13 3.83 mph = miles per hour Table U: Route Options from North El Camino Real to West Poinsettia Lane Route Segment Speed (mph) Distance (miles) Time (minutes) Intersection Delay (minutes) North to West on Arterials El Camino Real 55 0.32 0.35 0.87 Poinsettia Lane 33 0.67 1.23 0.55 Total 0.99 3.00 North to West through Neighborhood El Camino Real 55 0 0 0.25 Cassia Road 29 0.49 1.00 0.35 Poinsettia Lane 33 0 0 0 Total 0.49 1.60 West to North on Arterials Poinsettia Lane 33 0.67 1.22 1.13 El Camino Real 55 0.32 0.35 0.14 Total 0.99 2.84 West to North through Neighborhood Poinsettia Lane 33 0 0 0.38 Cassia Road 29 0.49 1.00 0.77 El Camino Real 55 0 0 0 Total 0.49 2.15 mph = miles per hour time (about 40 seconds) due to the increased delay for making left turns at Cassia Road and El Camino Real. Because the route is obviously shorter and drivers have been accustomed to traveling this route around the gap in Poinsettia Lane, many of the vehicles making this trip may choose to cut through Cassia Road. TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 37 Traffic model data reveal that cut-through traffic could increase traffic volumes along Oriole Court, Mimosa Drive, Moorhen Place, and Dove Lane by 10 percent. Cut through traffic on Cassia Road between El Camino Real and Poinsettia Lane occurs today due to the gap in Poinsettia Lane. Vehicles to/from South El Camino Real will use Poinsettia Lane, but vehicles to/from North El Camino Real may continue to use Cassia Road resulting in up to 400 vehicles per peak hour cutting through on Cassia Road. CARLSBAD RESIDENTIAL TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PROGRAM The Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program (Carlsbad, May 2011) was created to provide a process for minimizing disruptions to residential neighborhoods from excessive speeds and high volumes. The program only applies to residential streets and should not be directly applied to non- residential streets. No residential homes take access from Cassia Road. However, upon completion of the Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure, regional traffic will have alternative connections not relying on Cassia Road. At that time, the City may determine that traffic calming solutions outside of the Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program could apply to Cassia Road. As stated previously, the Carlsbad General Plan Mobility Element defines the purposes of different roadway classifications. Cassia Road, Oriole Court, Mimosa Drive, Moorhen Place, and Dove Lane are classified as Local/Neighborhood Streets and should be connecting people to residential neighborhoods. Connections to different areas and land uses of the City should occur on Arterial Streets or Arterial Connectors. This report identifies three potential disruptions to residential neighborhoods in the study area: Speeding issues on Cassia Road, particularly westbound (downhill) traffic Potential for cut-through traffic along Oriole Court-Moorhen Place-Dove Lane by vehicles traveling between the Post Office/Library/Shopping Center and Poinsettia Lane to the west Potential for cut-through traffic along Cassia Road by vehicles traveling from eastbound Poinsettia Lane to northbound El Camino Real and from southbound El Camino Real to westbound Poinsettia Lane This section describes potential measures to minimize neighborhood disruption. The Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program requires a high level of resident involvement to ensure that the measures being implemented are desired and accepted by a majority of the residents. Potential measures to be taken can fall into the categories of Education, Engineering, Enforcement, or Enhancement. The Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program defines these as: Education: Providing resource materials and information to residents to inform them about all aspects of traffic calming. Engineering: Physical measures and other techniques utilized in the traffic calming program that are based upon input and concurrence by residents, engineering principles, financial and environmental considerations. TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 38 Enforcement: Police presence and selective enforcement of vehicle code violations. Enhancement: Using special treatments in the physical measures through design and/or landscaping features to improve livability, aesthetics, community pride. A traffic calming toolbox is provided describing various strategies within these categories. Speeding On Cassia Road The posted speed limit is 35 mph, which is reinforced by four speed feedback signs. If vehicles are traveling at this speed, adequate sight distance (250 feet at 35 mph) is provided at intersections along Cassia Road. Most drivers are complying with the posted speed limit in the existing condition (the observed 85th percentile speed was 29 mph). However, many vehicles were observed exceeding the posted speed limit by 10 mph (with a few exceeding 15 mph over the posted speed limit). At these speeds, intersections on Cassia Road do not have sufficient stopping sight distance (430 feet at 50 mph). This pattern of majority compliance and several extreme outliers is consistent with observed patterns of cut-through traffic. The Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program lists several measures for reducing traffic speeds. Narrowing on Cassia Road (for the addition of bike lanes) has already been applied. Vertical traffic control measures, such as speed tables, work best when they are needed for speed reduction at a particular location, such as a pedestrian crossing. The downside is an increase in noise at the location of the vertical traffic control measure as vehicles brake and then accelerate to gain back the lost speed. Traffic Calming State of the Practice, (ITE 1999) describes many of the measures contained within the Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program toolbox. The Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program recommends 300 feet to 700 feet spacing between speed control devices for residential streets with a 25 mph speed limit. As each of these locations would generate increased noise, the most residents along Cassia Road would experience increased noise. Therefore, vertical traffic control measures are not recommended. The MUTCD provides warrants for the placement of stop signs and discourages use where warrants are not met. Traffic Calming State of the Practice discourages the addition of unwarranted stop signs to residential streets as compliance with these signs is low, an undeserved expectation of safety is introduced, and collisions increase as a result. The surveys taken for this report showed that outlying non-compliant speeds were most common traveling westbound (downhill) in the early evening hours of 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. Targeted police enforcement (Measure TB-5) during these times may have a positive influence on driver behavior. As the Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program reports, benefits are sometimes short- term without regular periodic enforcement. A new traffic signal at Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road may assist to reduce the number of vehicles exceeding the speed limit on Cassia Road. In the existing condition, vehicles traveling westbound (downhill) do not have opposing traffic at and might not comply with the stop sign at the intersection of Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road. Without an expectation of having to stop, some vehicles allow for the steady increase in speed as they travel downhill. This likely contributes to the concentration of hit object collisions at this intersection. The future traffic signal will require a complete stop on a red signal indication, which may moderate the number of vehicles traveling at TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 39 excessive speed. To that end, it is recommended that the traffic signal phasing defaults to green for through traffic on Poinsettia Lane and that detectors on Cassia be spaced so that vehicles traveling in excess of 35 mph would have to stop before the light turns green. Cut-Through Traffic on Oriole Court, Moorhen Place, and Dove Lane Upon completion of the Poinsettia Lane gap closure, cut-through traffic from the west on Poinsettia Lane to the Post Office/Library/Shopping Center is possible because of a moderate time savings while traveling to the shopping center and a greater time savings returning from the shopping center. Successful implementation of traffic volume-reducing measures is difficult due to the desire to maintain network connectivity. As the Oriole Court approach at the Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane is the entry into a residential area, the application of an Entry Treatment (TB-19) may be appropriate. The Entry Treatment is a combination of Textured Pavement (TB-18) and Center Island Narrowing (TB-20). By itself, textured pavement can provide a visual cue to drivers that they are entering a residential neighborhood. The narrower lanes resulting from adding the center island can reduce speeds upon entry to the neighborhood. Exhibit 1 provides an example of an Entry Treatment in the City of Carlsbad. To further support the Entry Treatment, it is possible to place a structure within the center island imitating a guard house for a private gated community. In combination, these features can present a less inviting entry at the beginning of the cut-through route. Source: Google Street View Exhibit 1: Example of Entry Treatment The City, through the Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program, can evaluate Oriole Court, and Moorhen Place to determine whether the criteria threshold for critical speed (i.e., 32 mph) is met or whether traffic volumes significantly exceed baseline volumes. If so, the public input steps outlined in the Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program can be followed to develop a traffic calming plan that could include measures such as speed cushions. Dove Lane could be evaluated outside of the Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program process if traffic volumes significantly exceed baseline volumes. Given the increased time savings for TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 40 vehicles leaving the shopping center, cut-through deterrents at the Dove Lane entry to the neighborhood are perhaps even more important than at the Oriole Court entry. Speed Cushions (TB-13) are a vertical traffic control device designed to reduce vehicle speeds, but can also lead to traffic volume reductions. Traffic Calming State of the Practice provides data that indicates these devices can reduce traffic volume by 20 percent. The deterrent effect of these devices would be enhanced by placing the first set of speed cushions just west of the intersection with Black Skimmer Drive and pairing it with a warning sign that would be visible to drivers exiting the shopping center intersection with Dove Lane. The City could explore signal-timing changes at the intersection of El Camino Real/Dove Lane that could reduce delay along the arterial route and thereby reduce the incentive to cut-through local roads. The westbound approach of Dove Lane has lower volume than the eastbound approach of Dove Lane. The City could consider either protected left-turn signal phasing that would reservice eastbound left turns and the end of the east-west phase or east-west split phasing with restriping to allow left turns from either eastbound lane. Either of these changes would increase the number of eastbound left turns per cycle, decrease delay for eastbound left turns, and reduce the incentive to cut through local roads. Cut-Through Traffic on Cassia Road Given the shorter distance and time savings for vehicles traveling between North El Camino Real and West Poinsettia Lane, Cassia Road is likely to continue to be used by drivers completing this trip. Because cut-through traffic is a possible source of existing speeding problems, measures that reduce cut-through traffic have the potential to reduce speeding concerns as well. For traffic traveling eastbound on Poinsettia Lane to northbound on El Camino Real, the time savings of the cut-through route is less than one minute. Changes to the delay experienced at the traffic signals along the route could impact the time-savings advantage and alter driver behavior. Specifically, if the delays experienced when making eastbound left turns at Cassia Road and at El Camino Real are less than the delay making an eastbound left-turn at El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane, than the time savings of the shorter travel path might be eliminated. As mentioned previously, the traffic signal at Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road should prioritize a green light for through traffic on Poinsettia Lane. In this configuration, vehicles approaching Cassia Road from eastbound Poinsettia Lane would encounter a red light for the left-turn lane. If the traffic signal changes westbound Poinsettia Lane to a red light so a green arrow can be provided to left turns onto Cassia Road, then delay is reduced. If the traffic signal is programmed to provide a green left- turn arrow only after the Cassia Road green light phase, then delay to the Poinsettia left turns is increased and this cut-through movement would be discouraged. Indeed, some drivers intending to cut through Cassia Road may give up on waiting for a green arrow and merge back into Poinsettia Lane through traffic. The time savings for cut-through traffic for southbound El Camino Real to westbound Poinsettia Lane is about 1.5 minutes. This advantage could not be overcome solely through signal timing, but traffic signal timing can moderate the time-savings advantage. It is possible that grade differences and a curve in Poinsettia Lane may prevent sufficient corner sight distance (550 feet at 50 mph). If a traffic signal is constructed at Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road, the City should investigate whether TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 41 sufficient corner sight distance is provided from Cassia Road to permit right turns on red. Since the traffic signal would default to a green light for Poinsettia Lane east-west traffic, if right turns on red are prohibited for Poinsettia Lane, then delay along the cut-through route would be increased and the attractiveness of the route would be somewhat reduced. Enhanced Measures While the Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program states that road closures are not recommended for use, the traffic calming toolbox includes many forms of road closure for traffic volume reduction such as Forced Turn Channelization, Median Barrier, Semi-Diverter, Partial Diverter, and Diagonal Diverter. If cut-through traffic continues to use Oriole Court-Moorhen Place- Dove Lane and Cassia Road, then road closures are an enhanced traffic-calming measure that would effectively eliminate the disruption to the residential neighborhoods. Road closures may be considered following the procedures found in the Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program if all other measures have failed to achieve their goals. Road closures could be designed to only prevent vehicle trips. Pedestrian and bicycle access could be maintained as in the example provided in Exhibit 2 from a road closure in Fullerton, California. There is a potential that access for fire trucks could also be maintained. Speed cushions facilitate fire truck access because fire trucks have a wider wheel base that can straddle a speed cushion while passenger vehicles roll over a speed cushion on at least one side. Instead of one bicycle access as shown in Exhibit 2, a road closure with two bicycle access lanes (spaced at the width of a fire truck axle) could facilitate through access by fire trucks in an emergency. Source: Google Street View Exhibit 2: Example of Road Closure TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 42 SUMMARY, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND MONITORING Poinsettia Lane from Carlsbad Boulevard to Melrose Drive has been a part of the Carlsbad planned roadway network since at least 1994. A project to complete Poinsettia Lane between Cassia Road and El Camino Real was included in the Carlsbad General Plan Mobility Element when it was adopted by the City Council in September 2015. At this time, the City is preparing to complete the gap closure of Poinsettia Lane. This traffic investigation considered the potential effects of the gap closure on the surrounding roadway system and adjacent intersections and provided potential strategies for limiting the intrusion of cut-through traffic into the Viadana and Pavoreal neighborhoods. Baseline conditions were also established that can be used to determine the extent of intrusion if requests for additional intervention are pursued through the Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program. Table V summarizes the baseline roadway volume, travel speed, and collision history for local/ neighborhood roads near the Poinsettia Lane gap closure. These data can be monitored to determine the effects of the Poinsettia Lane gap closure. Table V: Before Gap Closure (2018) Traffic Condition Summary Roadway Segment Roadway Volume Typical Speed >5 mph over Speed Limit? Collisions over Past 10 Years Poinsettia Lane (Ambrosia Lane to Cassia Road) 9,789 33 N 3 Cassia Road (Poinsettia Lane to El Camino Real) 9,290 30 Y 6 Ambrosia Lane (Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway) 3,321 34 N 12 Mimosa Drive (Oriole Court to Aviara Parkway) 679 25 N 1 Dove Lane (Moorhen Place to Black Skimmer Road) 368 30 N 0 mph = miles per hour This traffic investigation found that the Poinsettia Lane gap closure is not expected to alter travel patterns in a way that would cause a currently functioning intersection to operate at an unsatisfactory level of service. It is anticipated that the Poinsettia Lane gap closure will reduce some traffic on Ambrosia Lane, Aviara Parkway, and Cassia Road. However, not all cut-through traffic currently using Cassia Road would be removed after the Poinsettia Lane gap closure (while traffic to/from the south on El Camino Real would find Poinsettia Lane a shorter route, traffic to/from the north on El Camino Real would still find Cassia Road a shorter route). In addition, the Poinsettia Lane gap closure opens an opportunity for some traffic to cut through the Viadana neighborhood on their way to and from the shopping center at the northwest corner of El Camino Real/Aviara Parkway. A number of recommendations are made for consideration by the City. A speeding issue is present on Cassia Road which could be addressed with directed police enforcement focusing on westbound (downhill) traffic between 4:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. If constructed, a traffic signal at Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road should have signal timing supportive of the goals of deterring cut-through traffic and excessive speed: TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) 43 ○ The signal should default to providing a green light for east-west traffic on Poinsettia Lane; ○ The delay between detection of vehicles approaching on Cassia Road and a green light for Cassia Road should be timed so that vehicles approaching at a speed greater than 35 mph would be required to stop for the red light; ○ A green arrow for left turns from Poinsettia Lane to Cassia Road should be provided only after the Cassia Road phase; and ○ The City should consider whether sufficient corner sight distance is available to allow right turns on red from Cassia Road to Poinsettia Lane. Traffic calming features such as entry treatments (TB-19) and speed cushions (TB-13) may be considered based on the monitoring of traffic after completion of the Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure. Signal timing or striping at El Camino Real/Dove Lane could be modified to increase the number of eastbound left turns per cycle thereby reducing delay to vehicles traveling on arterials rather than cutting through local roads. This traffic investigation also examined the intersection of El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane to determine the following: how the operation of the intersection would be affected by the addition of a dedicated southbound right-turn lane, whether engineering constraints to adding a dedicated southbound right-turn lane are present, and whether constraints to adding a dedicated southbound right-turn lane are present. The traffic investigation found that adding a southbound right-turn lane would have minimal effect on the performance of the intersection in existing conditions and only some benefit after completion of Poinsettia Lane. The benefit to the intersection does not improve any deficiency. The intersection is forecast to function at a satisfactory level of service with or without a dedicated southbound right-turn lane. Construction of the southbound right-turn lane would face some ordinary engineering constraints and an additional constraint for reconstructing or relocating an SDG&E vault for a natural gas line. This portion of the construction could cost anywhere from $100,000–$500,000, bringing the total cost of construction to potentially $1.35 million. Construction of the southbound right-turn lane at El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane would also face constraints due to biological resources. The area of roadway widening is within a hardline preserve in the Habitat Management Plan for Natural Communities in the City of Carlsbad (HMP) and is within the Coastal Zone. Resource agency approval of impacts within a hardline boundary requires 3:1 mitigation. Permitting through the resource agencies will add to the total cost of adding an exclusive southbound right-turn lane at El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane. TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) APPENDIX A TRAFFIC VOLUME DATA AND SPEED SURVEYS Day:City:Carlsbad Date:Project #:CA18_4193_001 NB SB EB WB 0 0 5,073 5,257 AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB 00:00 9 8 17 79 65 144 00:15 6 1 7 62 53 115 00:30 9 3 12 77 80 157 00:45 3 27 3 15 6 42 83 301 60 258 143 559 01:00 4 0 4 76 74 150 01:15 4 3 7 84 58 142 01:30 5 1 6 55 60 115 01:45 7 20 1 5 8 25 95 310 71 263 166 573 02:00 1 1 2 90 80 170 02:15 1 2 3 84 164 248 02:30 2 0 2 84 111 195 02:45 1 5 2 5 3 10 116 374 108 463 224 837 03:00 1 0 1 101 109 210 03:15 2 2 4 90 110 200 03:30 0 0 0 76 124 200 03:45 0 3 4 6 4 9 113 380 105 448 218 828 04:00 0 5 5 99 95 194 04:15 1 7 8 75 86 161 04:30 6 10 16 89 106 195 04:45 8 15 15 37 23 52 105 368 81 368 186 736 05:00 7 20 27 108 109 217 05:15 12 20 32 133 143 276 05:30 13 22 35 114 103 217 05:45 19 51 35 97 54 148 98 453 100 455 198 908 06:00 27 41 68 100 82 182 06:15 22 40 62 95 70 165 06:30 42 60 102 104 81 185 06:45 60 151 82 223 142 374 111 410 67 300 178 710 07:00 51 99 150 102 82 184 07:15 99 115 214 69 62 131 07:30 109 161 270 51 47 98 07:45 74 333 131 506 205 839 56 278 43 234 99 512 08:00 103 137 240 54 29 83 08:15 84 125 209 66 32 98 08:30 75 88 163 52 49 101 08:45 117 379 78 428 195 807 51 223 55 165 106 388 09:00 75 96 171 40 17 57 09:15 68 77 145 38 20 58 09:30 56 78 134 30 17 47 09:45 60 259 60 311 120 570 25 133 16 70 41 203 10:00 57 72 129 25 14 39 10:15 54 64 118 12 16 28 10:30 56 59 115 16 8 24 10:45 66 233 43 238 109 471 16 69 6 44 22 113 11:00 73 56 129 19 13 32 11:15 53 63 116 13 9 22 11:30 66 86 152 7 8 15 11:45 62 254 78 283 140 537 5 44 5 35 10 79 TOTALS 1730 2154 3884 3343 3103 6446 SPLIT %44.5% 55.5%37.6%51.9% 48.1%62.4% NB SB EB WB 0 0 5,073 5,257 AM Peak Hour 07:15 07:30 07:15 16:45 14:15 17:00 AM Pk Volume 385 554 929 460 492 908 Pk Hr Factor 0.883 0.860 0.860 0.865 0.750 0.822 7 - 9 Volume 0 0 712 934 1646 0 0 821 823 1644 7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:30 07:15 16:45 17:00 17:00 7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 385 554 929 0 0 460 455 908 Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.883 0.860 0.860 0.000 0.000 0.865 0.795 0.822 VOLUME Prepared by NDS/ATD 13:15 13:30 13:45 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 16:15 16:30 14:00 14:15 14:30 5/22/2018 14:45 15:00 DAILY TOTALS PM Period 16:45 17:00 17:15 Tuesday 17:30 17:45 15:15 15:30 15:45 16:00 18:00 18:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 Poinsettia Ln Bet. Aviara Pkwy & Ambrosia Ln 21:30 21:45 22:00 Total 10,330 19:30 19:45 20:00 20:15 DAILY TOTALS 22:15 22:30 22:45 23:00 23:15 23:30 TOTAL 23:45 TOTALS Total 10,330 DAILY TOTALS 21:00 21:15 20:30 4 - 6 Peak Hour 4 - 6 Pk Volume SPLIT % TOTAL Pk Hr Factor PM Peak Hour PM Pk Volume Pk Hr Factor 4 - 6 Volume 20:45 Prepared by NDS/ATD Day:City:Carlsbad Date:Project #:CA18_4192_002 NB SB EB WB 0 0 4,979 4,810 AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB 00:00 0 0 4 3 7 0 0 84 62 146 00:15 0 0 5 1 6 0 0 63 45 108 00:30 0 0 4 2 6 0 0 66 68 134 00:45 0 0 2 15 1 7 3 22 0 0 75 288 74 249 149 537 01:00 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 89 62 151 01:15 0 0 1 2 3 0 0 69 46 115 01:30 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 64 56 120 01:45 0 0 4 14 0 2 4 16 0 0 67 289 77 241 144 530 02:00 0 0 1 2 3 0 0 63 91 154 02:15 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 146 108 254 02:30 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 111 100 211 02:45 0 0 0 4 3 7 3 11 0 0 118 438 100 399 218 837 03:00 0 0 3 1 4 0 0 108 97 205 03:15 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 83 110 193 03:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 81 127 208 03:45 0 0 0 4 4 6 4 10 0 0 85 357 121 455 206 812 04:00 0 0 1 2 3 0 0 78 105 183 04:15 0 0 1 3 4 0 0 76 60 136 04:30 0 0 5 4 9 0 0 93 83 176 04:45 0 0 9 16 11 20 20 36 0 0 88 335 98 346 186 681 05:00 0 0 10 12 22 0 0 85 136 221 05:15 0 0 18 14 32 0 0 111 106 217 05:30 0 0 16 11 27 0 0 113 100 213 05:45 0 0 19 63 27 64 46 127 0 0 77 386 100 442 177 828 06:00 0 0 30 21 51 0 0 72 106 178 06:15 0 0 34 27 61 0 0 74 96 170 06:30 0 0 48 49 97 0 0 83 118 201 06:45 0 0 78 190 53 150 131 340 0 0 81 310 73 393 154 703 07:00 0 0 57 57 114 0 0 110 80 190 07:15 0 0 96 128 224 0 0 55 55 110 07:30 0 0 139 126 265 0 0 48 60 108 07:45 0 0 153 445 91 402 244 847 0 0 29 242 53 248 82 490 08:00 0 0 115 77 192 0 0 34 36 70 08:15 0 0 107 95 202 0 0 61 35 96 08:30 0 0 91 60 151 0 0 74 30 104 08:45 0 0 88 401 114 346 202 747 0 0 46 215 43 144 89 359 09:00 0 0 102 72 174 0 0 25 24 49 09:15 0 0 74 70 144 0 0 30 22 52 09:30 0 0 70 83 153 0 0 21 22 43 09:45 0 0 65 311 56 281 121 592 0 0 25 101 17 85 42 186 10:00 0 0 62 58 120 0 0 18 16 34 10:15 0 0 62 53 115 0 0 14 16 30 10:30 0 0 59 47 106 0 0 15 4 19 10:45 0 0 49 232 36 194 85 426 0 0 12 59 6 42 18 101 11:00 0 0 70 62 132 0 0 9 7 16 11:15 0 0 48 57 105 0 0 4 9 13 11:30 0 0 60 65 125 0 0 6 8 14 11:45 0 0 57 235 72 256 129 491 0 0 10 29 7 31 17 60 TOTALS 1930 1735 3665 3049 3075 6124 SPLIT %52.7% 47.3%37.4%49.8% 50.2%62.6% NB SB EB WB 0 0 4,979 4,810 AM Peak Hour 07:30 07:15 07:15 14:15 15:15 14:15 AM Pk Volume 514 422 925 483 463 888 Pk Hr Factor 0.840 0.824 0.873 0.827 0.911 0.874 7 - 9 Volume 0 0 846 748 1594 0 0 721 788 1509 7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:15 07:15 16:45 17:00 16:45 7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 514 422 925 0 0 397 442 837 Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.840 0.824 0.873 0.000 0.000 0.878 0.813 0.947 4 - 6 Pk Volume Pk Hr Factor DAILY TOTALS PM Peak Hour Pk Hr Factor PM Pk Volume 4 - 6 Volume 4 - 6 Peak Hour 23:30 23:45 TOTALS Total 9,789 SPLIT % DAILY TOTALS 21:30 21:45 22:00 22:15 22:30 20:15 20:30 20:45 21:00 21:15 23:00 23:15 19:45 17:00 17:15 17:30 17:45 18:00 18:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 19:30 22:45 20:00 16:45 14:00 14:15 14:30 14:45 15:00 15:15 15:30 15:45 16:00 16:15 16:30 13:45 TOTAL PM Period TOTAL 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 13:15 13:30 DAILY TOTALS Total 9,789 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services VOLUME Poinsettia Ln Bet. Ambrosia Ln & Cassia Rd Tuesday 5/22/2018 Prepared by NDS/ATD Day:City:Carlsbad Date:Project #:CA18_4192_002 NB SB EB WB 0 0 4,985 4,668 AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB 00:00 0 0 8 5 13 0 0 58 67 125 00:15 0 0 10 4 14 0 0 82 59 141 00:30 0 0 4 3 7 0 0 60 55 115 00:45 0 0 0 22 3 15 3 37 0 0 62 262 77 258 139 520 01:00 0 0 1 3 4 0 0 88 57 145 01:15 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 68 49 117 01:30 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 75 62 137 01:45 0 0 3 6 2 7 5 13 0 0 77 308 86 254 163 562 02:00 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 64 82 146 02:15 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 142 100 242 02:30 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 106 94 200 02:45 0 0 1 6 1 1 2 7 0 0 126 438 99 375 225 813 03:00 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 94 82 176 03:15 0 0 3 1 4 0 0 72 94 166 03:30 0 0 1 2 3 0 0 81 81 162 03:45 0 0 1 7 1 5 2 12 0 0 85 332 101 358 186 690 04:00 0 0 2 2 4 0 0 75 96 171 04:15 0 0 4 3 7 0 0 81 101 182 04:30 0 0 11 4 15 0 0 84 93 177 04:45 0 0 6 23 8 17 14 40 0 0 100 340 112 402 212 742 05:00 0 0 6 12 18 0 0 83 109 192 05:15 0 0 19 11 30 0 0 93 124 217 05:30 0 0 21 12 33 0 0 100 109 209 05:45 0 0 24 70 25 60 49 130 0 0 60 336 89 431 149 767 06:00 0 0 26 21 47 0 0 72 115 187 06:15 0 0 40 37 77 0 0 84 94 178 06:30 0 0 58 45 103 0 0 77 91 168 06:45 0 0 78 202 60 163 138 365 0 0 88 321 68 368 156 689 07:00 0 0 61 66 127 0 0 66 62 128 07:15 0 0 95 99 194 0 0 46 60 106 07:30 0 0 159 101 260 0 0 54 49 103 07:45 0 0 124 439 80 346 204 785 0 0 46 212 50 221 96 433 08:00 0 0 103 95 198 0 0 73 54 127 08:15 0 0 125 77 202 0 0 66 65 131 08:30 0 0 86 62 148 0 0 56 44 100 08:45 0 0 112 426 102 336 214 762 0 0 37 232 35 198 72 430 09:00 0 0 111 69 180 0 0 35 34 69 09:15 0 0 71 52 123 0 0 20 38 58 09:30 0 0 78 55 133 0 0 28 21 49 09:45 0 0 71 331 71 247 142 578 0 0 19 102 28 121 47 223 10:00 0 0 69 51 120 0 0 19 18 37 10:15 0 0 49 56 105 0 0 15 11 26 10:30 0 0 62 50 112 0 0 16 13 29 10:45 0 0 62 242 42 199 104 441 0 0 17 67 2 44 19 111 11:00 0 0 61 57 118 0 0 10 8 18 11:15 0 0 61 48 109 0 0 12 6 18 11:30 0 0 55 59 114 0 0 10 6 16 11:45 0 0 49 226 55 219 104 445 0 0 3 35 3 23 6 58 TOTALS 2000 1615 3615 2985 3053 6038 SPLIT %55.3% 44.7%37.4%49.4% 50.6%62.6% NB SB EB WB 0 0 4,985 4,668 AM Peak Hour 07:30 07:15 07:30 14:15 16:45 14:15 AM Pk Volume 511 375 864 468 454 843 Pk Hr Factor 0.803 0.928 0.831 0.824 0.915 0.871 7 - 9 Volume 0 0 865 682 1547 0 0 676 833 1509 7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:15 07:30 16:45 16:45 16:45 7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 511 375 864 0 0 376 454 830 Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.803 0.928 0.831 0.000 0.000 0.940 0.915 0.956 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services VOLUME Poinsettia Ln Bet. Ambrosia Ln & Cassia Rd Wednesday 5/23/2018 DAILY TOTALS Total 9,653 TOTAL PM Period TOTAL 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 13:15 13:30 13:45 14:00 14:15 14:30 14:45 15:00 15:15 15:30 15:45 16:00 16:15 16:30 16:45 17:00 17:15 17:30 17:45 18:00 18:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 19:30 19:45 20:00 20:15 20:30 20:45 21:00 21:15 SPLIT % 21:30 21:45 22:00 22:15 22:30 22:45 23:00 23:15 23:30 23:45 TOTALS Pk Hr Factor DAILY TOTALS Total 9,653 PM Peak Hour PM Pk Volume DAILY TOTALS Pk Hr Factor 4 - 6 Volume 4 - 6 Peak Hour 4 - 6 Pk Volume Day:City:CarlsbadDate:Project #:CA18_4192_002Time < 15 15 - 19 20 - 24 25 - 29 30 - 34 35 - 39 40 - 44 45 - 49 50 - 54 55 - 59 60 - 64 65 - 69 70 + Total00:00 AM0 03 9 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 02201:000 0 3 3 8 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 01602:000 0 1 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01103:000 0 5 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01004:000 0 9 15 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 03605:000 1 20 42 42 16 6 0 0 0 0 0 012706:000 11 78 139 85 24 3 0 0 0 0 0 034007:005 58 253 446 71 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 084708:000 38 210 353 120 22 3 1 0 0 0 0 074709:001 25 150 248 145 17 6 0 0 0 0 0 059210:001 11 88 196 96 33 1 0 0 0 0 0 042611:000 5 112 237 100 31 6 0 0 0 0 0 049112:00 PM1 14 111 250 128 32 1 0 0 0 0 0 053713:000 17 141 222 117 27 5 1 0 0 0 0 053014:002 32 281 405 103 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 083715:004 43 222 356 155 29 3 0 0 0 0 0 081216:003 18 142 275 192 46 4 1 0 0 0 0 068117:002 37 196 383 176 31 3 0 0 0 0 0 082818:001 33 179 324 141 23 2 0 0 0 0 0 070319:000 22 128 220 100 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 049020:00014771499126110000035921:000 6 29 65 71 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 018622:001 1 18 37 34 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 010123:000382218900000006021 389 2464 4402 2022 432 55 497890% 4% 25% 45% 21% 4% 1% 0%100%7 149 932 1694 696 157 29100000 36650% 2% 10% 17% 7% 2% 0% 0%37%07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 09:00 10:00 05:00 08:00 07:005 58 253 446 145 3361 84714 240 1532 2708 1326 275 26300000 61240% 2% 16% 28% 14% 3% 0% 0%63%15:00 15:00 14:00 14:00 16:00 16:00 13:00 13:0014:004 43 281 405 192 4651 837 AM 7-9NOON 12-2PM 4-6Off Peak VolumesVolume% Volume% Volume% Volume%159416% 106711% 150915% 561957%SummaryADT9789PercentilesStreet NamePoinsettia Ln85th3395th3550th27Average2715th Direction22Prepared by National Data & Surveying ServicesSPEEDPoinsettia Ln Bet. Ambrosia Ln & Cassia Rd5/22/2018SummaryTotals% of TotalsAM Volumes% AMAM Peak HourAll SpeedsTuesdayVolumePM Volumes% PMPM Peak HourVolumeDirectional Peak Periods Day:City:CarlsbadDate:Project #:CA18_4192_002Time < 15 15 - 19 20 - 24 25 - 29 30 - 34 35 - 39 40 - 44 45 - 49 50 - 54 55 - 59 60 - 64 65 - 69 70 + Total00:00 AM0 13 15 11 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 03701:000 0 3 5 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 01302:000 0 2 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0703:000 0 4 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 01204:000 2 4 17 12 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 04005:000 4 14 55 37 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 013006:000 7 70 164 88 33 2 1 0 0 0 0 036507:0010 34 271 363 86 19 2 0 0 0 0 0 078508:001 30 201 345 143 36 6 0 0 0 0 0 076209:000 25 103 243 156 45 6 0 0 0 0 0 057810:000 14 79 205 118 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 044111:002 14 113 193 97 23 2 1 0 0 0 0 044512:00 PM1 17 113 245 110 30 4 0 0 0 0 0 052013:001 18 138 264 114 23 4 0 0 0 0 0 056214:003 34 276 377 105 15 3 0 0 0 0 0 081315:002 16 171 336 138 25 2 0 0 0 0 0 069016:002 45 180 309 171 31 3 1 0 0 0 0 074217:009 35 192 365 138 24 4 0 0 0 0 0 076718:003 30 186 331 120 18 1 0 0 0 0 0 068919:001 17 85 204 93 27 6 0 0 0 0 0 043320:002131141948719100000043021:000 1 48 86 66 17 4 1 0 0 0 0 022322:000 4 12 47 33 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 011123:000252416920000005837 363 2387 4393 1945 465 59 496530% 4% 25% 46% 20% 5% 1% 0%100%13 131 867 1611 754 213 24200000 36150% 1% 9% 17% 8% 2% 0% 0%37%07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 09:00 09:00 08:00 06:00 07:0010 34 271 363 156 4561 78524 232 1520 2782 1191 252 35200000 60380% 2% 16% 29% 12% 3% 0% 0%63%17:00 16:00 14:00 14:00 16:00 16:00 19:00 16:0014:009 45 276 377 171 3161 813 AM 7-9NOON 12-2PM 4-6Off Peak VolumesVolume% Volume% Volume% Volume%154716% 108211% 150916% 551557%SummaryPrepared by National Data & Surveying ServicesSPEEDPoinsettia Ln Bet. Ambrosia Ln & Cassia RdWednesday5/23/2018SummaryTotals% of TotalsAM Volumes% AMAM Peak HourVolumePM Volumes% PMPM Peak HourVolumeDirectional Peak PeriodsAll SpeedsStreet Name DirectionPercentiles15th 50thAverage85th95thADT359653Poinsettia Ln22272733 Day:City:Carlsbad Date:Project #:CA18_4193_003 NB SB EB WB 0 0 392 459 AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB 00:00 0 1 1 4 6 10 00:15 1 0 1 5 9 14 00:30 0 0 0 5 1 6 00:45 0 1 0 1 0 2 4 18 5 21 9 39 01:00 0 1 1 3 7 10 01:15 0 0 0 9 8 17 01:30 0 0 0 3 3 6 01:45 0 0 1 0 1 7 22 6 24 13 46 02:00 0 0 0 11 6 17 02:15 0 0 0 16 17 33 02:30 0 0 0 27 31 58 02:45 0 0 0 5 59 15 69 20 128 03:00 0 0 0 8 10 18 03:15 0 0 0 7 11 18 03:30 1 1 2 6 15 21 03:45 0 1 1 2 1 3 8 29 10 46 18 75 04:00 1 0 1 8 7 15 04:15 0 0 0 5 11 16 04:30 0 1 1 10 11 21 04:45 2 3 0 1 2 4 10 33 9 38 19 71 05:00 1 0 1 7 12 19 05:15 3 0 3 8 7 15 05:30 1 0 1 7 6 13 05:45 0 5 0 0 5 6 28 10 35 16 63 06:00 2 0 2 4 10 14 06:15 1 0 1 0 3 3 06:30 4 2 6 4 8 12 06:45 14 21 1 3 15 24 3 11 6 27 9 38 07:00 12 3 15 3 5 8 07:15 7 20 27 4 7 11 07:30 11 9 20 4 8 12 07:45 8 38 6 38 14 76 1 12 4 24 5 36 08:00 8 8 16 3 4 7 08:15 4 5 9 2 6 8 08:30 11 4 15 1 5 6 08:45 7 30 3 20 10 50 3 9 6 21 9 30 09:00 11 8 19 0 4 4 09:15 3 3 6 1 5 6 09:30 8 5 13 2 3 5 09:45 4 26 8 24 12 50 1 4 3 15 4 19 10:00 7 5 12 1 0 1 10:15 4 2 6 0 2 2 10:30 2 9 11 1 0 1 10:45 4 17 4 20 8 37 0 2 0 2 0 4 11:00 2 5 7 1 3 4 11:15 3 4 7 0 2 2 11:30 10 5 15 2 1 3 11:45 5 20 6 20 11 40 0 3 1 7 1 10 TOTALS 162 130 292 230 329 559 SPLIT %55.5% 44.5%34.3%41.1% 58.9%65.7% NB SB EB WB 0 0 392 459 AM Peak Hour 06:45 07:15 06:45 13:45 14:15 14:15 AM Pk Volume 44 43 77 61 73 129 Pk Hr Factor 0.786 0.538 0.713 0.565 0.589 0.556 7 - 9 Volume 0 0 68 58 126 0 0 61 73 134 7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:00 07:15 07:15 16:30 16:15 16:15 7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 38 43 77 0 0 35 43 75 Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.792 0.538 0.713 0.000 0.000 0.875 0.896 0.893 VOLUME Prepared by NDS/ATD 13:15 13:30 13:45 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 16:15 16:30 14:00 14:15 14:30 5/22/2018 14:45 15:00 DAILY TOTALS PM Period 16:45 17:00 17:15 Tuesday 17:30 17:45 15:15 15:30 15:45 16:00 18:00 18:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 Poinsettia Ln Bet. El Camino Real & Cassia Rd 21:30 21:45 22:00 Total 851 19:30 19:45 20:00 20:15 DAILY TOTALS 22:15 22:30 22:45 23:00 23:15 23:30 TOTAL 23:45 TOTALS Total 851 DAILY TOTALS 21:00 21:15 20:30 4 - 6 Peak Hour 4 - 6 Pk Volume SPLIT % TOTAL Pk Hr Factor PM Peak Hour PM Pk Volume Pk Hr Factor 4 - 6 Volume 20:45 Day:City:Carlsbad Date:Project #:CA18_4193_004 NB SB EB WB 16,228 17,008 0 0 AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB 00:00 19 12 31 233 239 472 00:15 6 14 20 220 251 471 00:30 8 10 18 255 297 552 00:45 4 37 8 44 12 81 297 1005 257 1044 554 2049 01:00 8 6 14 258 258 516 01:15 8 2 10 259 204 463 01:30 4 4 8 242 253 495 01:45 3 23 0 12 3 35 258 1017 218 933 476 1950 02:00 6 4 10 271 293 564 02:15 4 6 10 173 264 437 02:30 1 1 2 175 283 458 02:45 2 13 4 15 6 28 351 970 336 1176 687 2146 03:00 5 4 9 317 294 611 03:15 4 5 9 339 284 623 03:30 15 6 21 342 323 665 03:45 8 32 9 24 17 56 348 1346 302 1203 650 2549 04:00 12 11 23 346 381 727 04:15 15 13 28 365 410 775 04:30 20 17 37 347 409 756 04:45 40 87 40 81 80 168 318 1376 423 1623 741 2999 05:00 41 29 70 306 496 802 05:15 51 33 84 327 458 785 05:30 63 45 108 275 451 726 05:45 99 254 74 181 173 435 256 1164 427 1832 683 2996 06:00 114 77 191 255 300 555 06:15 124 113 237 252 311 563 06:30 189 151 340 209 294 503 06:45 214 641 251 592 465 1233 186 902 227 1132 413 2034 07:00 241 324 565 171 195 366 07:15 278 315 593 173 162 335 07:30 309 447 756 147 141 288 07:45 439 1267 364 1450 803 2717 108 599 126 624 234 1223 08:00 433 367 800 121 116 237 08:15 396 332 728 98 117 215 08:30 352 295 647 110 111 221 08:45 380 1561 284 1278 664 2839 88 417 105 449 193 866 09:00 298 292 590 82 75 157 09:15 290 244 534 73 77 150 09:30 290 208 498 76 65 141 09:45 246 1124 249 993 495 2117 60 291 59 276 119 567 10:00 238 227 465 62 43 105 10:15 194 202 396 45 32 77 10:30 194 224 418 52 47 99 10:45 236 862 206 859 442 1721 29 188 30 152 59 340 11:00 211 251 462 41 28 69 11:15 218 230 448 39 17 56 11:30 251 211 462 21 29 50 11:45 251 931 248 940 499 1871 20 121 21 95 41 216 TOTALS 6832 6469 13301 9396 10539 19935 SPLIT %51.4%48.6%40.0%47.1% 52.9%60.0% NB SB EB WB 16,228 17,008 0 0 AM Peak Hour 07:45 07:30 07:30 15:45 17:00 16:30 AM Pk Volume 1620 1510 3087 1406 1832 3084 Pk Hr Factor 0.923 0.845 0.961 0.963 0.923 0.961 7 - 9 Volume 2828 2728 0 0 5556 2540 3455 0 0 5995 7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:45 07:30 07:30 16:00 17:00 16:30 7 - 9 Pk Volume 1620 1510 0 0 3087 1376 1832 0 0 3084 Pk Hr Factor 0.923 0.845 0.000 0.000 0.961 0.942 0.923 0.000 0.000 0.961 4 - 6 Peak Hour 4 - 6 Pk Volume SPLIT % TOTAL Pk Hr Factor PM Peak Hour PM Pk Volume Pk Hr Factor 4 - 6 Volume 20:45 TOTAL 23:45 TOTALS Total 33,236 DAILY TOTALS 21:00 21:15 20:30 DAILY TOTALS 22:15 22:30 22:45 23:00 23:15 23:30 El Camino Real Bet. Cassia Rd & Poinsettia Ln 21:30 21:45 22:00 Total 33,236 19:30 19:45 20:00 20:15 18:00 18:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 16:45 17:00 17:15 Tuesday 17:30 17:45 15:15 15:30 15:45 16:00 16:15 16:30 14:00 14:15 14:30 5/22/2018 14:45 15:00 DAILY TOTALS PM Period VOLUME Prepared by NDS/ATD 13:15 13:30 13:45 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 Day:City:Carlsbad Date:Project #:CA18_4193_005 NB SB EB WB 19,255 19,392 0 0 AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB 00:00 21 15 36 265 259 524 00:15 8 11 19 249 305 554 00:30 7 10 17 296 339 635 00:45 6 42 7 43 13 85 348 1158 280 1183 628 2341 01:00 13 5 18 301 265 566 01:15 10 3 13 312 257 569 01:30 6 5 11 288 278 566 01:45 5 34 1 14 6 48 336 1237 248 1048 584 2285 02:00 7 3 10 353 341 694 02:15 4 7 11 355 293 648 02:30 1 1 2 370 307 677 02:45 3 15 5 16 8 31 404 1482 374 1315 778 2797 03:00 3 4 7 375 350 725 03:15 6 7 13 372 341 713 03:30 15 10 25 414 382 796 03:45 8 32 12 33 20 65 402 1563 340 1413 742 2976 04:00 13 17 30 386 406 792 04:15 16 17 33 459 418 877 04:30 20 22 42 420 441 861 04:45 39 88 56 112 95 200 396 1661 458 1723 854 3384 05:00 41 40 81 434 494 928 05:15 49 49 98 361 453 814 05:30 75 65 140 385 515 900 05:45 90 255 111 265 201 520 352 1532 415 1877 767 3409 06:00 118 112 230 314 353 667 06:15 134 174 308 331 310 641 06:30 207 216 423 294 289 583 06:45 220 679 342 844 562 1523 242 1181 242 1194 484 2375 07:00 266 401 667 214 222 436 07:15 311 438 749 199 183 382 07:30 416 523 939 175 166 341 07:45 509 1502 440 1802 949 3304 141 729 158 729 299 1458 08:00 458 407 865 160 112 272 08:15 399 427 826 133 118 251 08:30 385 364 749 135 115 250 08:45 390 1632 364 1562 754 3194 119 547 110 455 229 1002 09:00 331 286 617 119 79 198 09:15 300 297 597 95 85 180 09:30 296 275 571 87 61 148 09:45 278 1205 276 1134 554 2339 76 377 61 286 137 663 10:00 237 267 504 72 41 113 10:15 206 264 470 61 38 99 10:30 236 257 493 52 47 99 10:45 243 922 235 1023 478 1945 35 220 37 163 72 383 11:00 247 270 517 51 29 80 11:15 239 254 493 44 20 64 11:30 272 257 529 26 28 54 11:45 261 1019 283 1064 544 2083 22 143 17 94 39 237 TOTALS 7425 7912 15337 11830 11480 23310 SPLIT %48.4%51.6%39.7%50.8% 49.2%60.3% NB SB EB WB 19,255 19,392 0 0 AM Peak Hour 07:30 07:15 07:30 16:15 16:45 16:15 AM Pk Volume 1782 1808 3579 1709 1920 3520 Pk Hr Factor 0.875 0.864 0.943 0.931 0.932 0.948 7 - 9 Volume 3134 3364 0 0 6498 3193 3600 0 0 6793 7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:15 07:30 16:15 16:45 16:15 7 - 9 Pk Volume 1782 1808 0 0 3579 1709 1920 0 0 3520 Pk Hr Factor 0.875 0.864 0.000 0.000 0.943 0.931 0.932 0.000 0.000 0.948 VOLUME Prepared by NDS/ATD 13:15 13:30 13:45 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 16:15 16:30 14:00 14:15 14:30 5/22/2018 14:45 15:00 DAILY TOTALS PM Period 16:45 17:00 17:15 Tuesday 17:30 17:45 15:15 15:30 15:45 16:00 18:00 18:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 El Camino Real Bet. Poinsettia Ln & Aviara Pkwy 21:30 21:45 22:00 Total 38,647 19:30 19:45 20:00 20:15 DAILY TOTALS 22:15 22:30 22:45 23:00 23:15 23:30 TOTAL 23:45 TOTALS Total 38,647 DAILY TOTALS 21:00 21:15 20:30 4 - 6 Peak Hour 4 - 6 Pk Volume SPLIT % TOTAL Pk Hr Factor PM Peak Hour PM Pk Volume Pk Hr Factor 4 - 6 Volume 20:45 Prepared by NDS/ATD Day:City:Carlsbad Date:Project #:CA18_4192_006 NB SB EB WB 0 0 4,620 4,324 AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB 00:00 0 0 5 6 11 0 0 79 54 133 00:15 0 0 3 1 4 0 0 60 38 98 00:30 0 0 4 2 6 0 0 67 68 135 00:45 0 0 1 13 1 10 2 23 0 0 69 275 78 238 147 513 01:00 0 0 4 1 5 0 0 81 53 134 01:15 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 69 47 116 01:30 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 60 53 113 01:45 0 0 4 13 1 3 5 16 0 0 70 280 72 225 142 505 02:00 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 55 83 138 02:15 0 0 1 2 3 0 0 126 104 230 02:30 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 108 93 201 02:45 0 0 0 4 3 6 3 10 0 0 96 385 94 374 190 759 03:00 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 85 78 163 03:15 0 0 3 1 4 0 0 66 90 156 03:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 88 178 03:45 0 0 0 5 3 5 3 10 0 0 101 342 85 341 186 683 04:00 0 0 1 2 3 0 0 72 100 172 04:15 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 58 89 147 04:30 0 0 6 4 10 0 0 84 82 166 04:45 0 0 11 19 12 19 23 38 0 0 74 288 112 383 186 671 05:00 0 0 12 11 23 0 0 77 117 194 05:15 0 0 18 11 29 0 0 94 131 225 05:30 0 0 16 12 28 0 0 111 89 200 05:45 0 0 22 68 23 57 45 125 0 0 69 351 119 456 188 807 06:00 0 0 29 15 44 0 0 45 103 148 06:15 0 0 39 26 65 0 0 53 83 136 06:30 0 0 53 34 87 0 0 63 75 138 06:45 0 0 81 202 46 121 127 323 0 0 66 227 84 345 150 572 07:00 0 0 60 59 119 0 0 73 46 119 07:15 0 0 90 75 165 0 0 49 64 113 07:30 0 0 150 89 239 0 0 31 61 92 07:45 0 0 131 431 71 294 202 725 0 0 26 179 37 208 63 387 08:00 0 0 116 87 203 0 0 35 36 71 08:15 0 0 118 84 202 0 0 41 40 81 08:30 0 0 93 50 143 0 0 32 33 65 08:45 0 0 111 438 76 297 187 735 0 0 26 134 35 144 61 278 09:00 0 0 107 56 163 0 0 19 26 45 09:15 0 0 77 68 145 0 0 17 17 34 09:30 0 0 72 70 142 0 0 21 11 32 09:45 0 0 71 327 58 252 129 579 0 0 19 76 13 67 32 143 10:00 0 0 61 54 115 0 0 38 13 51 10:15 0 0 61 42 103 0 0 19 10 29 10:30 0 0 53 46 99 0 0 12 8 20 10:45 0 0 60 235 39 181 99 416 0 0 9 78 6 37 15 115 11:00 0 0 61 58 119 0 0 7 3 10 11:15 0 0 52 61 113 0 0 5 2 7 11:30 0 0 53 59 112 0 0 7 3 10 11:45 0 0 56 222 69 247 125 469 0 0 9 28 6 14 15 42 TOTALS 1977 1492 3469 2643 2832 5475 SPLIT %57.0% 43.0%38.8%48.3% 51.7%61.2% NB SB EB WB 0 0 4,620 4,324 AM Peak Hour 07:30 07:30 07:30 14:15 17:00 17:00 AM Pk Volume 515 331 846 415 456 807 Pk Hr Factor 0.858 0.930 0.885 0.823 0.870 0.897 7 - 9 Volume 0 0 869 591 1460 0 0 639 839 1478 7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:30 07:30 16:45 17:00 17:00 7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 515 331 846 0 0 356 456 807 Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.858 0.930 0.885 0.000 0.000 0.802 0.870 0.897 DAILY TOTALS Total 8,944 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services VOLUME Cassia Rd Bet. Poinsettia Ln & El Camino Real Tuesday 5/22/2018 13:45 TOTAL PM Period TOTAL 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 13:15 13:30 16:45 14:00 14:15 14:30 14:45 15:00 15:15 15:30 15:45 16:00 16:15 16:30 23:00 23:15 19:45 17:00 17:15 17:30 17:45 18:00 18:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 19:30 22:45 20:00 20:15 20:30 20:45 21:00 21:15 21:30 21:45 22:00 22:15 22:30 23:30 23:45 TOTALS Total 8,944 SPLIT % DAILY TOTALS 4 - 6 Pk Volume Pk Hr Factor DAILY TOTALS PM Peak Hour Pk Hr Factor PM Pk Volume 4 - 6 Volume 4 - 6 Peak Hour Prepared by NDS/ATD Day:City:Carlsbad Date:Project #:CA18_4192_006 NB SB EB WB 0 0 4,812 4,478 AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB 00:00 0 0 9 7 16 0 0 65 65 130 00:15 0 0 10 3 13 0 0 72 58 130 00:30 0 0 4 4 8 0 0 63 57 120 00:45 0 0 0 23 3 17 3 40 0 0 60 260 77 257 137 517 01:00 0 0 1 2 3 0 0 85 60 145 01:15 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 60 49 109 01:30 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 80 70 150 01:45 0 0 2 5 2 7 4 12 0 0 81 306 79 258 160 564 02:00 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 61 82 143 02:15 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 127 97 224 02:30 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 106 90 196 02:45 0 0 1 7 1 1 2 8 0 0 114 408 100 369 214 777 03:00 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 84 74 158 03:15 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 70 101 171 03:30 0 0 3 2 5 0 0 67 79 146 03:45 0 0 2 9 3 7 5 16 0 0 77 298 88 342 165 640 04:00 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 73 92 165 04:15 0 0 5 2 7 0 0 83 95 178 04:30 0 0 12 4 16 0 0 75 90 165 04:45 0 0 7 26 10 16 17 42 0 0 78 309 103 380 181 689 05:00 0 0 7 8 15 0 0 94 117 211 05:15 0 0 18 11 29 0 0 78 116 194 05:30 0 0 23 12 35 0 0 88 102 190 05:45 0 0 21 69 22 53 43 122 0 0 65 325 90 425 155 750 06:00 0 0 31 16 47 0 0 53 117 170 06:15 0 0 45 30 75 0 0 85 96 181 06:30 0 0 56 38 94 0 0 68 100 168 06:45 0 0 78 210 51 135 129 345 0 0 84 290 69 382 153 672 07:00 0 0 72 62 134 0 0 50 55 105 07:15 0 0 94 82 176 0 0 48 62 110 07:30 0 0 141 79 220 0 0 52 49 101 07:45 0 0 124 431 62 285 186 716 0 0 39 189 53 219 92 408 08:00 0 0 98 82 180 0 0 64 63 127 08:15 0 0 133 70 203 0 0 65 59 124 08:30 0 0 94 53 147 0 0 50 43 93 08:45 0 0 108 433 94 299 202 732 0 0 37 216 44 209 81 425 09:00 0 0 111 54 165 0 0 33 33 66 09:15 0 0 72 43 115 0 0 18 41 59 09:30 0 0 74 52 126 0 0 27 23 50 09:45 0 0 73 330 68 217 141 547 0 0 21 99 25 122 46 221 10:00 0 0 73 46 119 0 0 16 13 29 10:15 0 0 54 51 105 0 0 11 12 23 10:30 0 0 67 54 121 0 0 14 11 25 10:45 0 0 63 257 42 193 105 450 0 0 15 56 2 38 17 94 11:00 0 0 52 59 111 0 0 11 8 19 11:15 0 0 61 50 111 0 0 10 6 16 11:30 0 0 61 54 115 0 0 10 6 16 11:45 0 0 48 222 59 222 107 444 0 0 3 34 5 25 8 59 TOTALS 2022 1452 3474 2790 3026 5816 SPLIT %58.2% 41.8%37.4%48.0% 52.0%62.6% NB SB EB WB 0 0 4,812 4,478 AM Peak Hour 07:30 07:15 07:30 14:15 16:45 14:15 AM Pk Volume 496 305 789 431 438 792 Pk Hr Factor 0.879 0.930 0.897 0.848 0.936 0.884 7 - 9 Volume 0 0 864 584 1448 0 0 634 805 1439 7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:15 07:30 16:45 16:45 16:45 7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 496 305 789 0 0 338 438 776 Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.879 0.930 0.897 0.000 0.000 0.899 0.936 0.919 DAILY TOTALS Pk Hr Factor 4 - 6 Volume 4 - 6 Peak Hour 4 - 6 Pk Volume Pk Hr Factor DAILY TOTALS Total 9,290 PM Peak Hour PM Pk Volume 20:45 21:00 21:15 SPLIT % 21:30 21:45 22:00 22:15 22:30 22:45 23:00 23:15 23:30 23:45 TOTALS 19:30 19:45 20:00 20:15 20:30 18:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 17:00 17:15 17:30 17:45 18:00 15:45 16:00 16:15 16:30 16:45 14:30 14:45 15:00 15:15 15:30 13:15 13:30 13:45 14:00 14:15 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 DAILY TOTALS Total 9,290 TOTAL PM Period TOTAL Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services VOLUME Cassia Rd Bet. Poinsettia Ln & El Camino Real Wednesday 5/23/2018 Day:City:CarlsbadDate:Project #:CA18_4192_006Time < 15 15 - 19 20 - 24 25 - 29 30 - 34 35 - 39 40 - 44 45 - 49 50 - 54 55 - 59 60 - 64 65 - 69 70 + Total00:00 AM0 010 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02301:000 1 7 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01602:000 1 5 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 01003:000 3 4 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01004:000 3 11 22 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03805:000 5 35 67 17 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 012506:000 14 128 162 15 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 032307:003 34 383 283 19 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 072508:006 29 355 324 18 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 073509:002 12 272 273 17 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 057910:001 11 185 192 25 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 041611:001 21 215 218 10 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 046912:00 PM4 21 214 248 20 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 051313:002 17 237 221 23 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 050514:004 39 331 351 27 2 3 1 1 0 0 0 075915:000 8 304 341 28 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 068316:001 22 308 310 26 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 067117:006 35 352 376 32 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 080718:000 20 253 279 18 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 057219:000 7 167 185 22 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 038720:0001212713180000000027821:001 8 54 72 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 014322:000 7 53 49 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 011523:000621150000000004231 336 4031 4140 346 30 14 11 589440% 4% 45% 46% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0%100%13 134 1610 1562 129 105330000 34690% 1% 18% 17% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0%39%08:00 07:00 07:00 08:00 10:00 06:00 06:00 11:00 07:00 08:006 34 383 324 252121 73518 202 2421 2578 217 209820000 54750% 2% 27% 29% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0%61%17:00 14:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 12:00 14:00 17:00 14:0017:006 39 352 376 324331 807 AM 7-9NOON 12-2PM 4-6Off Peak VolumesVolume% Volume% Volume% Volume%146016% 101811% 147817% 498856%Summary% AMAM Peak HourAll SpeedsTuesdayVolumePM Volumes% PMPM Peak HourVolumeDirectional Peak PeriodsTotals% of TotalsAM VolumesPrepared by National Data & Surveying ServicesSPEEDCassia Rd Bet. Poinsettia Ln & El Camino Real5/22/2018SummaryADT8944PercentilesStreet NameCassia Rd85th2995th3050th25Average2515th Direction21 Day:City:CarlsbadDate:Project #:CA18_4192_006Time < 15 15 - 19 20 - 24 25 - 29 30 - 34 35 - 39 40 - 44 45 - 49 50 - 54 55 - 59 60 - 64 65 - 69 70 + Total00:00 AM0 017 17 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 04001:000 1 3 5 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 01202:000 2 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0803:000 2 9 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01604:000 2 15 24 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04205:000 0 31 72 18 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 012206:000 9 133 178 22 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 034507:0027 45 318 302 21 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 071608:000 23 329 356 22 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 073209:000 12 254 259 19 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 054710:000 18 190 223 17 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 045011:006 15 160 235 22 1 3 1 1 0 0 0 044412:00 PM0 15 221 256 22 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 051713:000 17 245 276 25 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 056414:000 40 322 387 22 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 077715:000 8 258 339 31 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 064016:002 17 262 378 26 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 068917:000 9 286 421 27 2 4 0 1 0 0 0 075018:000 12 246 393 18 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 067219:000 9 147 235 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 040820:00010203196151000000042521:000 16 79 111 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 022122:000 4 32 47 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 09423:001422275000000005936 290 3784 4746 380 25 17 9 392900% 3% 41% 51% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0%100%33 129 1461 1680 14997510000 34740% 1% 16% 18% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0%37%07:00 07:00 08:00 08:00 06:00 07:00 11:00 11:00 08:0027 45 329 356 222311 7323 161 2323 3066 231 16 10420000 58160% 2% 25% 33% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0%63%16:00 14:00 14:00 17:00 15:00 14:00 17:00 12:00 16:0014:002 40 322 421 315421 777 AM 7-9NOON 12-2PM 4-6Off Peak VolumesVolume% Volume% Volume% Volume%144816% 108112% 143915% 532257%Summary309290Cassia Rd21262529Street Name DirectionPercentiles15th 50thAverage85th95thADT% PMPM Peak HourVolumeDirectional Peak PeriodsAll SpeedsAM Volumes% AMAM Peak HourVolumePM VolumesSummaryTotals% of TotalsPrepared by National Data & Surveying ServicesSPEEDCassia Rd Bet. Poinsettia Ln & El Camino RealWednesday5/23/2018 Prepared by NDS/ATD Day:City:Carlsbad Date:Project #:CA18_4192_007 NB SB EB WB 1,825 1,463 0 0 AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB 00:00 0 1 0 0 1 9 16 0 0 25 00:15 0 0 0 0 19 10 0 0 29 00:30 0 0 0 0 13 12 0 0 25 00:45 0 0 1 0 0 1 15 56 17 55 0 0 32 111 01:00 0 0 0 0 13 30 0 0 43 01:15 0 0 0 0 29 23 0 0 52 01:30 0 0 0 0 23 28 0 0 51 01:45 0 0 0 0 19 84 54 135 0 0 73 219 02:00 0 0 0 0 35 57 0 0 92 02:15 0 0 0 0 145 51 0 0 196 02:30 0 1 0 0 1 104 55 0 0 159 02:45 0 0 1 0 0 1 68 352 34 197 0 0 102 549 03:00 0 1 0 0 1 50 20 0 0 70 03:15 0 0 0 0 42 18 0 0 60 03:30 0 0 0 0 24 19 0 0 43 03:45 0 0 1 0 0 1 29 145 22 79 0 0 51 224 04:00 1 0 0 0 1 26 16 0 0 42 04:15 0 0 0 0 17 18 0 0 35 04:30 0 0 0 0 27 17 0 0 44 04:45 1 2 1 1 0 0 2 3 21 91 18 69 0 0 39 160 05:00 0 0 0 0 20 27 0 0 47 05:15 2 0 0 0 2 33 18 0 0 51 05:30 0 4 0 0 4 31 32 0 0 63 05:45 3 5 8 12 0 0 11 17 19 103 20 97 0 0 39 200 06:00 4 5 0 0 9 18 13 0 0 31 06:15 4 3 0 0 7 19 15 0 0 34 06:30 3 17 0 0 20 31 28 0 0 59 06:45 8 19 12 37 0 0 20 56 36 104 12 68 0 0 48 172 07:00 37 40 0 0 77 25 13 0 0 38 07:15 133 119 0 0 252 21 5 0 0 26 07:30 155 108 0 0 263 14 10 0 0 24 07:45 85 410 48 315 0 0 133 725 8 68 5 33 0 0 13 101 08:00 78 75 0 0 153 7 2 0 0 9 08:15 58 13 0 0 71 8 6 0 0 14 08:30 15 12 0 0 27 8 22 0 0 30 08:45 21 172 10 110 0 0 31 282 5 28 6 36 0 0 11 64 09:00 11 14 0 0 25 3 3 0 0 6 09:15 10 20 0 0 30 1 10 0 0 11 09:30 8 16 0 0 24 4 4 0 0 8 09:45 10 39 18 68 0 0 28 107 3 11 2 19 0 0 5 30 10:00 23 14 0 0 37 3 2 0 0 5 10:15 14 19 0 0 33 3 2 0 0 5 10:30 10 11 0 0 21 1 0 0 0 1 10:45 8 55 19 63 0 0 27 118 2 9 2 6 0 0 4 15 11:00 10 10 0 0 20 4 5 0 0 9 11:15 14 18 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 11:30 28 14 0 0 42 0 0 0 0 11:45 16 68 10 52 0 0 26 120 0 4 3 8 0 0 3 12 TOTALS 770 661 1431 1055 802 1857 SPLIT %53.8% 46.2%43.5%56.8% 43.2%56.5% NB SB EB WB 1,825 1,463 0 0 AM Peak Hour 07:15 07:15 07:15 14:15 13:45 14:00 AM Pk Volume 451 350 801 367 217 549 Pk Hr Factor 0.727 0.735 0.761 0.633 0.952 0.700 7 - 9 Volume 582 425 0 0 1007 194 166 0 0 360 7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:15 07:15 16:45 17:00 16:45 7 - 9 Pk Volume 451 350 0 0 801 105 97 0 0 200 Pk Hr Factor 0.727 0.735 0.000 0.000 0.761 0.795 0.758 0.000 0.000 0.794 4 - 6 Pk Volume Pk Hr Factor DAILY TOTALS PM Peak Hour Pk Hr Factor PM Pk Volume 4 - 6 Volume 4 - 6 Peak Hour 23:30 23:45 TOTALS Total 3,288 SPLIT % DAILY TOTALS 21:30 21:45 22:00 22:15 22:30 20:15 20:30 20:45 21:00 21:15 23:00 23:15 19:45 17:00 17:15 17:30 17:45 18:00 18:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 19:30 22:45 20:00 16:45 14:00 14:15 14:30 14:45 15:00 15:15 15:30 15:45 16:00 16:15 16:30 13:45 TOTAL PM Period TOTAL 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 13:15 13:30 DAILY TOTALS Total 3,288 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services VOLUME Ambrosia Ln Bet. Poinsettia Ln & Aviara Pkwy Tuesday 5/22/2018 Prepared by NDS/ATD Day:City:Carlsbad Date:Project #:CA18_4192_007 NB SB EB WB 1,856 1,465 0 0 AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB 00:00 1 2 0 0 3 16 16 0 0 32 00:15 1 1 0 0 2 12 11 0 0 23 00:30 0 0 0 0 17 13 0 0 30 00:45 1 3 0 3 0 0 1 6 16 61 10 50 0 0 26 111 01:00 0 0 0 0 16 22 0 0 38 01:15 2 0 0 0 2 42 18 0 0 60 01:30 1 0 0 0 1 23 32 0 0 55 01:45 0 3 2 2 0 0 2 5 14 95 55 127 0 0 69 222 02:00 0 0 0 0 30 65 0 0 95 02:15 0 0 0 0 161 60 0 0 221 02:30 0 1 0 0 1 100 48 0 0 148 02:45 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 72 363 29 202 0 0 101 565 03:00 0 0 0 0 51 10 0 0 61 03:15 0 0 0 0 28 16 0 0 44 03:30 0 0 0 0 28 18 0 0 46 03:45 0 0 0 0 28 135 18 62 0 0 46 197 04:00 1 0 0 0 1 33 31 0 0 64 04:15 0 0 0 0 33 22 0 0 55 04:30 2 0 0 0 2 23 23 0 0 46 04:45 0 3 1 1 0 0 1 4 22 111 18 94 0 0 40 205 05:00 1 0 0 0 1 25 30 0 0 55 05:15 0 0 0 0 32 33 0 0 65 05:30 2 6 0 0 8 33 12 0 0 45 05:45 0 3 5 11 0 0 5 14 22 112 16 91 0 0 38 203 06:00 2 2 0 0 4 16 17 0 0 33 06:15 2 8 0 0 10 28 19 0 0 47 06:30 2 12 0 0 14 26 16 0 0 42 06:45 12 18 27 49 0 0 39 67 12 82 22 74 0 0 34 156 07:00 25 29 0 0 54 22 18 0 0 40 07:15 92 135 0 0 227 27 7 0 0 34 07:30 149 98 0 0 247 13 11 0 0 24 07:45 97 363 57 319 0 0 154 682 15 77 5 41 0 0 20 118 08:00 86 66 0 0 152 17 17 0 0 34 08:15 50 24 0 0 74 10 6 0 0 16 08:30 19 14 0 0 33 12 15 0 0 27 08:45 16 171 10 114 0 0 26 285 10 49 5 43 0 0 15 92 09:00 13 16 0 0 29 7 3 0 0 10 09:15 10 11 0 0 21 4 3 0 0 7 09:30 11 10 0 0 21 5 2 0 0 7 09:45 14 48 20 57 0 0 34 105 2 18 3 11 0 0 5 29 10:00 18 12 0 0 30 4 4 0 0 8 10:15 11 10 0 0 21 1 0 0 0 1 10:30 15 14 0 0 29 2 2 0 0 4 10:45 11 55 15 51 0 0 26 106 6 13 2 8 0 0 8 21 11:00 17 15 0 0 32 2 0 0 0 2 11:15 15 13 0 0 28 1 2 0 0 3 11:30 21 10 0 0 31 0 1 0 0 1 11:45 16 69 11 49 0 0 27 118 1 4 1 4 0 0 2 8 TOTALS 736 658 1394 1120 807 1927 SPLIT %52.8% 47.2%42.0%58.1% 41.9%58.0% NB SB EB WB 1,856 1,465 0 0 AM Peak Hour 07:15 07:15 07:15 14:15 13:45 14:00 AM Pk Volume 424 356 780 384 228 565 Pk Hr Factor 0.711 0.659 0.789 0.596 0.877 0.639 7 - 9 Volume 534 433 0 0 967 223 185 0 0 408 7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:15 07:15 16:45 16:30 16:30 7 - 9 Pk Volume 424 356 0 0 780 112 104 0 0 206 Pk Hr Factor 0.711 0.659 0.000 0.000 0.789 0.848 0.788 0.000 0.000 0.792 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services VOLUME Ambrosia Ln Bet. Poinsettia Ln & Aviara Pkwy Wednesday 5/23/2018 DAILY TOTALS Total 3,321 TOTAL PM Period TOTAL 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 13:15 13:30 13:45 14:00 14:15 14:30 14:45 15:00 15:15 15:30 15:45 16:00 16:15 16:30 16:45 17:00 17:15 17:30 17:45 18:00 18:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 19:30 19:45 20:00 20:15 20:30 20:45 21:00 21:15 SPLIT % 21:30 21:45 22:00 22:15 22:30 22:45 23:00 23:15 23:30 23:45 TOTALS Pk Hr Factor DAILY TOTALS Total 3,321 PM Peak Hour PM Pk Volume DAILY TOTALS Pk Hr Factor 4 - 6 Volume 4 - 6 Peak Hour 4 - 6 Pk Volume Day:City:CarlsbadDate:Project #:CA18_4192_007Time < 15 15 - 19 20 - 24 25 - 29 30 - 34 35 - 39 40 - 44 45 - 49 50 - 54 55 - 59 60 - 64 65 - 69 70 + Total00:00 AM0 00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0101:000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0002:000 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0103:000 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0104:000 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0305:000 1 2 6 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 01706:000 0 1 21 29 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 05607:000 3 106 443 159 13 0 1 0 0 0 0 072508:000 1 21 141 106 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 028209:000 0 14 50 38 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 010710:000 0 13 55 45 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 011811:000 0 12 53 47 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 012012:00 PM0 0 4 50 45 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 011113:000 4 18 111 80 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 021914:002 27 138 262 108 10 1 1 0 0 0 0 054915:000 3 6 99 98 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 022416:000 2 9 64 69 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 016017:000 0 6 81 96 13 3 1 0 0 0 0 020018:000 1 12 71 76 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 017219:000 0 7 42 47 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 010120:000082031500000006421:000 1 6 9 10 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 03022:000 0 3 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01523:000005430000000122 43 387 1594 1100 146 11 532880% 1% 12% 48% 33% 4% 0% 0%100%05 170 774 430 464200000 14310% 5% 24% 13% 1% 0% 0%44% 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 06:00 07:00 07:00 3 106 443 159 1321 7252 38 217 820 670 1007300000 18570% 1% 7% 25% 20% 3% 0% 0%56%14:00 14:00 14:00 14:00 14:00 15:00 17:00 14:0014:002 27 138 262 108 1831 549 AM 7-9NOON 12-2PM 4-6Off Peak VolumesVolume% Volume% Volume% Volume%100731% 33010% 36011% 159148%SummaryADT3288PercentilesStreet NameAmbrosia Ln85th3395th3550th29Average2915th Direction25Prepared by National Data & Surveying ServicesSPEEDAmbrosia Ln Bet. Poinsettia Ln & Aviara Pkwy 5/22/2018SummaryTotals% of TotalsAM Volumes% AMAM Peak HourAll SpeedsTuesdayVolumePM Volumes% PMPM Peak HourVolumeDirectional Peak Periods Day:City:CarlsbadDate:Project #:CA18_4192_007Time < 15 15 - 19 20 - 24 25 - 29 30 - 34 35 - 39 40 - 44 45 - 49 50 - 54 55 - 59 60 - 64 65 - 69 70 + Total00:00 AM0 01 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0601:000 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0502:000 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0203:000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0004:000 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0405:000 0 2 4 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 01406:000 0 4 32 29 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 06707:001 1 115 404 144 12 5 0 0 0 0 0 068208:000 2 15 142 111 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 028509:000 0 15 44 39 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 010510:000 0 14 45 46 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 010611:000 0 17 50 47 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 011812:00 PM0 1 7 42 54 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 011113:000 1 15 104 84 17 1 0 0 0 0 0 022214:008 17 145 258 124 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 056515:000 0 9 76 94 16 2 0 0 0 0 0 019716:000 1 6 68 109 20 1 0 0 0 0 0 020517:000 1 10 79 100 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 020318:000 1 7 67 67 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 015619:000 1 7 57 46 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 011820:000193839410000009221:000 0 4 14 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 02922:000 0 1 10 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 02123:00010340000000089 28 405 1543 1164 148 2433210% 1% 12% 46% 35% 4% 1%100%13 185 727 429 38 11000000 13940% 0% 6% 22% 13% 1% 0%42%07:00 08:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 08:00 07:00 07:0012 115 404 144 145 6828 25 220 816 735 110 13000000 19270% 1% 7% 25% 22% 3% 0%58%14:00 14:00 14:00 14:00 14:00 16:00 14:0014:008 17 145 258 124 202 565 AM 7-9NOON 12-2PM 4-6Off Peak VolumesVolume% Volume% Volume% Volume%96729% 33310% 40812% 161349%SummaryPrepared by National Data & Surveying ServicesSPEEDAmbrosia Ln Bet. Poinsettia Ln & Aviara Pkwy Wednesday5/23/2018SummaryTotals% of TotalsAM Volumes% AMAM Peak HourVolumePM Volumes% PMPM Peak HourVolumeDirectional Peak PeriodsAll SpeedsStreet Name DirectionPercentiles15th 50thAverage85th95thADT353321Ambrosia Ln25292934 Prepared by NDS/ATD Day:City:Carlsbad Date:Project #:CA18_4192_008 NB SB EB WB 309 356 0 0 AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB 00:00 0 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 9 00:15 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 7 00:30 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 7 00:45 0 0 0 0 3 14 4 16 0 0 7 30 01:00 0 0 0 0 6 10 0 0 16 01:15 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 10 01:30 0 0 0 0 6 3 0 0 9 01:45 0 0 0 0 3 20 6 24 0 0 9 44 02:00 1 0 0 0 1 4 8 0 0 12 02:15 0 0 0 0 11 9 0 0 20 02:30 0 0 0 0 10 18 0 0 28 02:45 0 1 0 0 0 1 14 39 9 44 0 0 23 83 03:00 1 0 0 0 1 6 11 0 0 17 03:15 0 0 0 0 6 8 0 0 14 03:30 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 7 03:45 0 1 0 0 0 1 7 21 6 30 0 0 13 51 04:00 1 1 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 5 04:15 0 0 0 0 7 8 0 0 15 04:30 0 0 0 0 4 7 0 0 11 04:45 1 2 0 1 0 0 1 3 8 24 4 19 0 0 12 43 05:00 0 2 0 0 2 4 5 0 0 9 05:15 1 1 0 0 2 5 5 0 0 10 05:30 0 0 0 0 8 6 0 0 14 05:45 0 1 1 4 0 0 1 5 6 23 6 22 0 0 12 45 06:00 2 3 0 0 5 4 5 0 0 9 06:15 2 4 0 0 6 6 3 0 0 9 06:30 1 8 0 0 9 4 3 0 0 7 06:45 2 7 4 19 0 0 6 26 4 18 3 14 0 0 7 32 07:00 1 5 0 0 6 6 1 0 0 7 07:15 6 20 0 0 26 1 3 0 0 4 07:30 6 16 0 0 22 2 2 0 0 4 07:45 9 22 10 51 0 0 19 73 2 11 6 12 0 0 8 23 08:00 13 14 0 0 27 3 0 0 0 3 08:15 0 3 0 0 3 1 2 0 0 3 08:30 10 3 0 0 13 4 5 0 0 9 08:45 3 26 4 24 0 0 7 50 1 9 1 8 0 0 2 17 09:00 7 3 0 0 10 0 2 0 0 2 09:15 4 6 0 0 10 1 1 0 0 2 09:30 5 4 0 0 9 1 0 0 0 1 09:45 8 24 6 19 0 0 14 43 2 4 0 3 0 0 2 7 10:00 9 11 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 10:15 7 4 0 0 11 1 1 0 0 2 10:30 3 6 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 10:45 3 22 5 26 0 0 8 48 1 2 0 1 0 0 1 3 11:00 4 6 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 11:15 5 5 0 0 10 0 1 0 0 1 11:30 4 6 0 0 10 1 0 0 0 1 11:45 4 17 1 18 0 0 5 35 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 TOTALS 123 162 285 186 194 380 SPLIT %43.2% 56.8%42.9%48.9% 51.1%57.1% NB SB EB WB 309 356 0 0 AM Peak Hour 07:15 07:15 07:15 14:15 14:15 14:15 AM Pk Volume 34 60 94 41 47 88 Pk Hr Factor 0.654 0.750 0.870 0.732 0.653 0.786 7 - 9 Volume 48 75 0 0 123 47 41 0 0 88 7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:15 07:15 16:45 16:15 16:15 7 - 9 Pk Volume 34 60 0 0 94 25 24 0 0 47 Pk Hr Factor 0.654 0.750 0.000 0.000 0.870 0.781 0.750 0.000 0.000 0.783 4 - 6 Pk Volume Pk Hr Factor DAILY TOTALS PM Peak Hour Pk Hr Factor PM Pk Volume 4 - 6 Volume 4 - 6 Peak Hour 23:30 23:45 TOTALS Total 665 SPLIT % DAILY TOTALS 21:30 21:45 22:00 22:15 22:30 20:15 20:30 20:45 21:00 21:15 23:00 23:15 19:45 17:00 17:15 17:30 17:45 18:00 18:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 19:30 22:45 20:00 16:45 14:00 14:15 14:30 14:45 15:00 15:15 15:30 15:45 16:00 16:15 16:30 13:45 TOTAL PM Period TOTAL 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 13:15 13:30 DAILY TOTALS Total 665 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services VOLUME Mimosa Dr Bet. Oriole Ct & Aviara Pkwy Tuesday 5/22/2018 Prepared by NDS/ATD Day:City:Carlsbad Date:Project #:CA18_4192_008 NB SB EB WB 320 359 0 0 AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB 00:00 0 0 0 0 6 8 0 0 14 00:15 1 0 0 0 1 6 3 0 0 9 00:30 0 0 0 0 3 7 0 0 10 00:45 0 1 0 0 0 1 8 23 9 27 0 0 17 50 01:00 0 0 0 0 7 4 0 0 11 01:15 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 12 01:30 0 0 0 0 7 7 0 0 14 01:45 0 0 0 0 4 24 10 27 0 0 14 51 02:00 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 11 02:15 0 0 0 0 14 12 0 0 26 02:30 0 0 0 0 12 15 0 0 27 02:45 0 0 0 0 10 38 4 40 0 0 14 78 03:00 0 0 0 0 6 10 0 0 16 03:15 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 10 03:30 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 11 03:45 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 5 22 5 25 0 0 10 47 04:00 0 1 0 0 1 8 7 0 0 15 04:15 1 1 0 0 2 3 6 0 0 9 04:30 0 0 0 0 8 4 0 0 12 04:45 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 4 6 25 7 24 0 0 13 49 05:00 0 0 0 0 4 12 0 0 16 05:15 2 1 0 0 3 6 10 0 0 16 05:30 0 1 0 0 1 12 6 0 0 18 05:45 0 2 1 3 0 0 1 5 4 26 6 34 0 0 10 60 06:00 0 2 0 0 2 8 4 0 0 12 06:15 0 6 0 0 6 13 3 0 0 16 06:30 1 1 0 0 2 3 4 0 0 7 06:45 1 2 9 18 0 0 10 20 4 28 3 14 0 0 7 42 07:00 0 4 0 0 4 6 3 0 0 9 07:15 5 24 0 0 29 3 4 0 0 7 07:30 5 13 0 0 18 2 2 0 0 4 07:45 8 18 10 51 0 0 18 69 3 14 2 11 0 0 5 25 08:00 8 9 0 0 17 5 1 0 0 6 08:15 5 2 0 0 7 2 4 0 0 6 08:30 4 3 0 0 7 6 3 0 0 9 08:45 5 22 3 17 0 0 8 39 0 13 1 9 0 0 1 22 09:00 3 1 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 09:15 5 3 0 0 8 2 5 0 0 7 09:30 6 6 0 0 12 1 0 0 0 1 09:45 4 18 8 18 0 0 12 36 2 9 2 7 0 0 4 16 10:00 3 2 0 0 5 1 1 0 0 2 10:15 3 2 0 0 5 3 0 0 0 3 10:30 1 3 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 1 10:45 3 10 4 11 0 0 7 21 1 6 0 1 0 0 1 7 11:00 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 11:15 3 5 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 11:30 5 6 0 0 11 1 1 0 0 2 11:45 6 15 7 19 0 0 13 34 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 TOTALS 91 139 230 229 220 449 SPLIT %39.6% 60.4%33.9%51.0% 49.0%66.1% NB SB EB WB 320 359 0 0 AM Peak Hour 07:15 07:15 07:15 14:15 13:45 14:15 AM Pk Volume 26 56 82 42 46 83 Pk Hr Factor 0.813 0.583 0.707 0.750 0.767 0.769 7 - 9 Volume 40 68 0 0 108 51 58 0 0 109 7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:15 07:15 16:45 16:45 16:45 7 - 9 Pk Volume 26 56 0 0 82 28 35 0 0 63 Pk Hr Factor 0.813 0.583 0.000 0.000 0.707 0.583 0.729 0.000 0.000 0.875 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services VOLUME Mimosa Dr Bet. Oriole Ct & Aviara Pkwy Wednesday 5/23/2018 DAILY TOTALS Total 679 TOTAL PM Period TOTAL 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 13:15 13:30 13:45 14:00 14:15 14:30 14:45 15:00 15:15 15:30 15:45 16:00 16:15 16:30 16:45 17:00 17:15 17:30 17:45 18:00 18:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 19:30 19:45 20:00 20:15 20:30 20:45 21:00 21:15 SPLIT % 21:30 21:45 22:00 22:15 22:30 22:45 23:00 23:15 23:30 23:45 TOTALS Pk Hr Factor DAILY TOTALS Total 679 PM Peak Hour PM Pk Volume DAILY TOTALS Pk Hr Factor 4 - 6 Volume 4 - 6 Peak Hour 4 - 6 Pk Volume Day:City:CarlsbadDate:Project #:CA18_4192_008Time < 15 15 - 19 20 - 24 25 - 29 30 - 34 35 - 39 40 - 44 45 - 49 50 - 54 55 - 59 60 - 64 65 - 69 70 + Total00:00 AM0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0001:000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0002:000 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0103:000 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0104:002 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0305:001 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0506:003 14 6 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02607:006 17 38 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07308:003 18 21 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05009:006 18 17 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04310:007 20 18 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04811:006 11 16 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03512:00 PM4 7 16 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03013:006 17 18 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04414:005 20 48 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08315:003 16 25 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05116:003 16 18 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04317:003 11 27 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04518:000 11 17 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03219:000 5 15 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02320:0028610000000001721:000 1 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0722:000 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0323:000110000000000260 213 316 69 76659% 32% 48% 10% 1%100%34 99 120 29300000000 2855% 15% 18% 4% 0%43%10:00 10:00 07:00 07:00 04:00 07:007 20 38 121 7326 114 196 40400000000 3804% 17% 29% 6% 1%57%13:00 14:00 14:00 14:00 16:0014:006 20 4892 83 AM 7-9NOON 12-2PM 4-6Off Peak VolumesVolume% Volume% Volume% Volume%12318% 7411% 8813% 38057%SummaryADT665PercentilesStreet NameMimosa Dr85th2595th2850th21Average2015th Direction16Prepared by National Data & Surveying ServicesSPEEDMimosa Dr Bet. Oriole Ct & Aviara Pkwy5/22/2018SummaryTotals% of TotalsAM Volumes% AMAM Peak HourAll SpeedsTuesdayVolumePM Volumes% PMPM Peak HourVolumeDirectional Peak Periods Day:City:CarlsbadDate:Project #:CA18_4192_008Time < 15 15 - 19 20 - 24 25 - 29 30 - 34 35 - 39 40 - 44 45 - 49 50 - 54 55 - 59 60 - 64 65 - 69 70 + Total00:00 AM0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0101:000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0002:000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0003:000 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0104:002 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0405:002 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0506:001 5 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02007:002 19 38 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06908:001 11 19 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03909:002 11 15 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03610:001 8 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02111:003 9 17 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03412:00 PM8 23 14 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05013:004 25 18 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05114:004 32 34 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07815:002 17 24 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04716:001 12 32 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04917:001 20 31 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06018:003 19 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04219:001 8 13 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02520:00281110000000002221:000 7 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01622:000 2 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0723:000110000000000240 240 316 80 36796% 35% 47% 12% 0%100%14 66 110 39100000000 2302% 10% 16% 6% 0%34%11:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 08:00 07:003 19 38 101 6926 174 206 41200000000 4494% 26% 30% 6% 0%66%12:00 14:00 14:00 14:00 14:0014:008 32 3471 78 AM 7-9NOON 12-2PM 4-6Off Peak VolumesVolume% Volume% Volume% Volume%10816% 10115% 10916% 36153%SummaryPrepared by National Data & Surveying ServicesSPEEDMimosa Dr Bet. Oriole Ct & Aviara PkwyWednesday5/23/2018SummaryTotals% of TotalsAM Volumes% AMAM Peak HourVolumePM Volumes% PMPM Peak HourVolumeDirectional Peak PeriodsAll SpeedsStreet Name DirectionPercentiles15th 50thAverage85th95thADT28679Mimosa Dr16212125 Prepared by NDS/ATD Day:City:Carlsbad Date:Project #:CA18_4192_009 NB SB EB WB 0 0 186 167 AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB 00:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 8 00:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 00:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 5 00:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 8 3 12 4 20 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 01:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 4 10 01:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 4 01:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 12 2 9 3 21 02:00 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 3 4 02:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 9 02:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 4 02:45 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 6 13 5 15 11 28 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 7 03:15 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 3 4 7 03:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 03:45 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 7 2 14 4 21 04:00 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 7 7 14 04:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 5 04:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 5 04:45 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 4 15 4 17 8 32 05:00 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 2 3 05:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 8 05:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 6 05:45 0 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 7 14 3 13 10 27 06:00 0 0 3 1 4 0 0 3 3 6 06:15 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 2 4 6 06:30 0 0 3 2 5 0 0 2 3 5 06:45 0 0 3 11 2 6 5 17 0 0 1 8 4 14 5 22 07:00 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 2 2 4 07:15 0 0 4 3 7 0 0 2 4 6 07:30 0 0 5 1 6 0 0 0 3 3 07:45 0 0 5 15 0 5 5 20 0 0 0 4 3 12 3 16 08:00 0 0 8 3 11 0 0 1 3 4 08:15 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 4 0 4 08:30 0 0 5 3 8 0 0 0 0 08:45 0 0 4 18 1 7 5 25 0 0 0 5 2 5 2 10 09:00 0 0 4 2 6 0 0 2 0 2 09:15 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 1 1 2 09:30 0 0 8 1 9 0 0 0 1 1 09:45 0 0 3 16 3 7 6 23 0 0 0 3 1 3 1 6 10:00 0 0 5 5 10 0 0 0 0 10:15 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 10:30 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 10:45 0 0 3 12 6 12 9 24 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 11:00 0 0 3 4 7 0 0 0 0 11:15 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 2 2 4 11:30 0 0 6 4 10 0 0 2 1 3 11:45 0 0 5 16 1 10 6 26 0 0 0 4 0 3 7 TOTALS 93 48 141 93 119 212 SPLIT %66.0% 34.0%39.9%43.9% 56.1%60.1% NB SB EB WB 0 0 186 167 AM Peak Hour 07:15 10:45 07:15 17:15 14:15 16:00 AM Pk Volume 22 15 29 16 17 32 Pk Hr Factor 0.688 0.625 0.659 0.571 0.850 0.571 7 - 9 Volume 0 0 33 12 45 0 0 29 30 59 7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:15 07:15 16:00 16:00 16:00 7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 22 7 29 0 0 15 17 32 Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.688 0.583 0.659 0.000 0.000 0.536 0.607 0.571 DAILY TOTALS Total 353 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services VOLUME Dove Ln Bet. Moorhen Pl & El Camino Real Tuesday 5/22/2018 13:45 TOTAL PM Period TOTAL 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 13:15 13:30 16:45 14:00 14:15 14:30 14:45 15:00 15:15 15:30 15:45 16:00 16:15 16:30 23:00 23:15 19:45 17:00 17:15 17:30 17:45 18:00 18:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 19:30 22:45 20:00 20:15 20:30 20:45 21:00 21:15 21:30 21:45 22:00 22:15 22:30 23:30 23:45 TOTALS Total 353 SPLIT % DAILY TOTALS 4 - 6 Pk Volume Pk Hr Factor DAILY TOTALS PM Peak Hour Pk Hr Factor PM Pk Volume 4 - 6 Volume 4 - 6 Peak Hour Prepared by NDS/ATD Day:City:Carlsbad Date:Project #:CA18_4192_009 NB SB EB WB 0 0 188 180 AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB 00:00 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 2 4 00:15 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 5 2 7 00:30 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 2 00:45 0 0 0 2 0 1 3 0 0 4 12 5 10 9 22 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 8 01:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 6 01:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 7 01:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 19 5 14 12 33 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 5 02:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 5 02:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 13 7 10 13 23 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 8 12 03:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 5 03:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 4 03:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 14 3 14 7 28 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 8 04:15 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 2 3 5 04:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 8 04:45 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 3 11 5 18 8 29 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 8 12 05:15 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 4 5 9 05:30 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 8 5 13 05:45 0 0 1 2 0 1 1 3 0 0 5 21 2 20 7 41 06:00 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 5 7 06:15 0 0 2 2 4 0 0 3 3 6 06:30 0 0 3 1 4 0 0 2 5 7 06:45 0 0 2 7 1 5 3 12 0 0 3 10 6 19 9 29 07:00 0 0 2 2 4 0 0 2 1 3 07:15 0 0 3 4 7 0 0 0 5 5 07:30 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 1 2 3 07:45 0 0 4 9 2 11 6 20 0 0 2 5 1 9 3 14 08:00 0 0 7 3 10 0 0 0 3 3 08:15 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 2 08:30 0 0 3 2 5 0 0 2 4 6 08:45 0 0 3 13 1 7 4 20 0 0 1 3 1 10 2 13 09:00 0 0 8 1 9 0 0 1 4 5 09:15 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 1 0 1 09:30 0 0 4 2 6 0 0 1 0 1 09:45 0 0 8 22 3 7 11 29 0 0 1 4 1 5 2 9 10:00 0 0 3 2 5 0 0 0 0 10:15 0 0 4 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 10:30 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 1 1 2 10:45 0 0 3 11 4 8 7 19 0 0 0 1 0 2 3 11:00 0 0 3 1 4 0 0 0 0 11:15 0 0 2 2 4 0 0 0 0 11:30 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 1 1 2 11:45 0 0 1 6 2 7 3 13 0 0 1 2 0 1 1 3 TOTALS 73 48 121 115 132 247 SPLIT %60.3% 39.7%32.9%46.6% 53.4%67.1% NB SB EB WB 0 0 188 180 AM Peak Hour 09:00 07:15 09:00 17:00 16:30 16:45 AM Pk Volume 22 12 29 21 23 42 Pk Hr Factor 0.688 0.750 0.659 0.656 0.719 0.808 7 - 9 Volume 0 0 22 18 40 0 0 32 38 70 7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:15 07:15 17:00 16:30 16:45 7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 14 12 26 0 0 21 23 42 Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.500 0.750 0.650 0.000 0.000 0.656 0.719 0.808 DAILY TOTALS Pk Hr Factor 4 - 6 Volume 4 - 6 Peak Hour 4 - 6 Pk Volume Pk Hr Factor DAILY TOTALS Total 368 PM Peak Hour PM Pk Volume 20:45 21:00 21:15 SPLIT % 21:30 21:45 22:00 22:15 22:30 22:45 23:00 23:15 23:30 23:45 TOTALS 19:30 19:45 20:00 20:15 20:30 18:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 17:00 17:15 17:30 17:45 18:00 15:45 16:00 16:15 16:30 16:45 14:30 14:45 15:00 15:15 15:30 13:15 13:30 13:45 14:00 14:15 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 DAILY TOTALS Total 368 TOTAL PM Period TOTAL Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services VOLUME Dove Ln Bet. Moorhen Pl & El Camino Real Wednesday 5/23/2018 Day:City:CarlsbadDate:Project #:CA18_4192_009Time < 15 15 - 19 20 - 24 25 - 29 30 - 34 35 - 39 40 - 44 45 - 49 50 - 54 55 - 59 60 - 64 65 - 69 70 + Total00:00 AM0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0001:000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0002:000 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0103:000 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0104:001 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0205:000 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0206:000 1 5 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 01707:000 1 5 8 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02008:000 6 6 7 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 02509:002 1 8 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02310:001 4 8 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02411:001 4 8 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02612:00 PM0 2 10 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02013:001 2 10 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02114:001 2 9 13 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02815:000 1 7 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02116:002 1 14 12 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03217:000 2 12 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02718:000 3 6 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02219:001 2 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01620:0002350000000001021:000 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0622:000 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0223:000142000000000710 38 126 141 35 33533% 11% 36% 40% 10% 1%100%5 19 40 55 2020000000 1411% 5% 11% 16% 6% 1%40%09:00 08:00 09:00 09:00 07:00 06:00 11:00268 1161 265 19 86 86 1510000000 2121% 5% 24% 24% 4% 0%60%16:00 18:00 16:00 14:00 14:00 21:0016:0023 14 1331 32 AM 7-9NOON 12-2PM 4-6Off Peak VolumesVolume% Volume% Volume% Volume%4513% 4112% 5917% 20859%Summary% AMAM Peak HourAll SpeedsTuesdayVolumePM Volumes% PMPM Peak HourVolumeDirectional Peak PeriodsTotals% of TotalsAM VolumesPrepared by National Data & Surveying ServicesSPEEDDove Ln Bet. Moorhen Pl & El Camino Real5/22/2018SummaryADT353PercentilesStreet NameDove Ln85th2995th3350th25Average2515th Direction20 Day:City:CarlsbadDate:Project #:CA18_4192_009Time < 15 15 - 19 20 - 24 25 - 29 30 - 34 35 - 39 40 - 44 45 - 49 50 - 54 55 - 59 60 - 64 65 - 69 70 + Total00:00 AM0 00 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0301:000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0002:000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0003:000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0004:000 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0205:000 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0306:001 0 7 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01207:000 0 11 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02008:000 3 4 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02009:001 1 8 13 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02910:000 1 5 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01911:000 0 3 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01312:00 PM2 1 8 8 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 02213:003 7 5 15 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03314:000 4 4 12 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02315:000 1 10 10 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 02816:000 6 11 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02917:000 2 15 20 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04118:000 1 11 15 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02919:001 2 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01420:0004351000000001321:000 1 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0922:000 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0323:00011010000000038 38 120 159 41 23682% 10% 33% 43% 11% 1%100%28 38 57 1600000000 1211% 2% 10% 15% 4%33%06:00 08:00 07:00 09:00 09:00 09:0013 11 136 296 30 82 102 2520000000 2472% 8% 22% 28% 7% 1%67%13:00 13:00 17:00 17:00 15:00 12:0017:0037 15 2061 41 AM 7-9NOON 12-2PM 4-6Off Peak VolumesVolume% Volume% Volume% Volume%4011% 5515% 7019% 20355%Summary33368Dove Ln20262530Street Name DirectionPercentiles15th 50thAverage85th95thADT% PMPM Peak HourVolumeDirectional Peak PeriodsAll SpeedsAM Volumes% AMAM Peak HourVolumePM VolumesSummaryTotals% of TotalsPrepared by National Data & Surveying ServicesSPEEDDove Ln Bet. Moorhen Pl & El Camino RealWednesday5/23/2018 TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) APPENDIX B EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS T R A F F I C I N V E S T I G A T I O N N O V E M B E R 2 0 1 9 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA P:\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation.docx (03/19/19) APPENDIX B EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS ICU Worksheets 01 Existing AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:21:22 Page 3-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Existing AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Ambrosia Ln / Poinsettia Ln ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.675 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 35 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Ambrosia Ln Poinsettia Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 364 5 216 22 9 14 6 267 184 168 239 9 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 364 5 216 22 9 14 6 267 184 168 239 9 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 364 5 216 22 9 14 6 267 184 168 239 9 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 364 5 216 22 9 14 6 267 184 168 239 9 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 364 5 216 22 9 14 6 267 184 168 239 9 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.62 0.01 0.37 0.49 0.20 0.31 1.00 1.18 0.82 1.00 1.93 0.07 Final Sat.: 996 14 591 782 320 498 1600 1894 1306 1600 3084 116 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.23 0.37 0.37 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.11 0.08 0.08 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 01 Existing AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:21:22 Page 4-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Existing AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Ambrosia Ln / Aviara Pkwy ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.715 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 39 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Ambrosia Ln Aviara Pkwy Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 8 104 13 210 11 158 268 370 29 11 329 256 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 8 104 13 210 11 158 268 370 29 11 329 256 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 8 104 13 210 11 158 268 370 29 11 329 256 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 8 104 13 210 11 158 268 370 29 11 329 256 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 8 104 13 210 11 158 268 370 29 11 329 256 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.06 0.84 0.10 0.55 0.03 0.42 1.00 1.85 0.15 1.00 1.12 0.88 Final Sat.: 102 1331 166 887 46 667 1600 2967 233 1600 1800 1400 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.01 0.18 0.18 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 01 Existing AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:21:22 Page 9-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Existing AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Mimosa Dr / Aviara Pkwy ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.299 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 17 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Mimosa Dr Aviara Pkwy Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 27 7 42 7 1 69 26 509 23 29 491 10 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 27 7 42 7 1 69 26 509 23 29 491 10 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 27 7 42 7 1 69 26 509 23 29 491 10 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 27 7 42 7 1 69 26 509 23 29 491 10 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 27 7 42 7 1 69 26 509 23 29 491 10 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.36 0.09 0.55 0.09 0.01 0.90 1.00 1.91 0.09 1.00 1.96 0.04 Final Sat.: 568 147 884 145 21 1434 1600 3062 138 1600 3136 64 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.02 0.17 0.17 0.02 0.16 0.16 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 01 Existing AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:21:22 Page 10-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Existing AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 El Camino Real / Cassia Rd ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.755 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 44 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: El Camino Real Cassia Rd Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 143 1390 11 8 1304 190 418 4 187 17 4 3 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 143 1390 11 8 1304 190 418 4 187 17 4 3 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 143 1390 11 8 1304 190 418 4 187 17 4 3 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 143 1390 11 8 1304 190 418 4 187 17 4 3 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 143 1390 11 8 1304 190 418 4 187 17 4 3 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.62 0.38 1.00 0.02 0.98 1.00 0.57 0.43 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 4190 610 1600 34 1566 1600 914 686 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.43 0.01 0.01 0.31 0.31 0.26 0.12 0.12 0.01 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 01 Existing AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:21:22 Page 11-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Existing AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #9 El Camino Real / Poinsettia Ln ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.524 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 25 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: El Camino Real Poinsettia Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 23 1326 446 149 1354 14 17 10 3 438 16 234 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 23 1326 446 149 1354 14 17 10 3 438 16 234 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 23 1326 446 149 1354 14 17 10 3 438 16 234 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 23 1326 446 149 1354 14 17 10 3 438 16 234 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 23 1326 446 149 1354 14 17 10 3 438 16 234 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.97 0.03 2.00 1.54 0.46 2.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3200 4800 1600 3200 4751 49 3200 2462 738 3200 1600 1600 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.28 0.28 0.05 0.29 0.28 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.01 0.15 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 01 Existing AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:21:22 Page 12-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Existing AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #10 El Camino Real / Dove Ln ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.478 Loss Time (sec): 0 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 44 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: El Camino Real Dove Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 27 1623 26 50 1624 114 76 9 36 58 14 69 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 27 1623 26 50 1624 114 76 9 36 58 14 69 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 27 1623 26 50 1624 114 76 9 36 58 14 69 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 27 1623 26 50 1624 114 76 9 36 58 14 69 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 27 1623 26 50 1624 114 76 9 36 58 14 69 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.95 0.05 1.00 2.80 0.20 1.00 0.20 0.80 1.00 0.17 0.83 Final Sat.: 1600 4724 76 1600 4485 315 1600 320 1280 1600 270 1330 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.34 0.34 0.03 0.36 0.36 0.05 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.05 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 01 Existing AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:21:22 Page 13-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Existing AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #11 El Camino Real / Aviara Pkwy ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.780 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 48 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: El Camino Real Aviara Pkwy Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 137 1416 200 69 1564 102 178 167 280 664 290 103 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 137 1416 200 69 1564 102 178 167 280 664 290 103 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 137 1416 200 69 1564 102 178 167 280 664 290 103 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 137 1416 200 69 1564 102 178 167 280 664 290 103 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 137 1416 200 69 1564 102 178 167 280 664 290 103 OvlAdjVol: 211 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 2.00 2.63 0.37 2.00 2.82 0.18 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.48 0.52 Final Sat.: 3200 4206 594 3200 4506 294 3200 3200 1600 3200 2361 839 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.34 0.34 0.02 0.35 0.35 0.06 0.05 0.17 0.21 0.12 0.12 OvlAdjV/S: 0.13 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 01 Existing PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:22:02 Page 3-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Existing PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Ambrosia Ln / Poinsettia Ln ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.355 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 19 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Ambrosia Ln Poinsettia Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 77 16 47 44 28 63 46 315 100 69 298 63 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 77 16 47 44 28 63 46 315 100 69 298 63 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 77 16 47 44 28 63 46 315 100 69 298 63 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 77 16 47 44 28 63 46 315 100 69 298 63 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 77 16 47 44 28 63 46 315 100 69 298 63 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.55 0.11 0.34 0.32 0.21 0.47 1.00 1.52 0.48 1.00 1.65 0.35 Final Sat.: 880 183 537 521 332 747 1600 2429 771 1600 2642 558 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.09 0.09 0.03 0.08 0.08 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.04 0.11 0.11 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 01 Existing PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:22:02 Page 4-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Existing PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Ambrosia Ln / Aviara Pkwy ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.346 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 18 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Ambrosia Ln Aviara Pkwy Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 10 6 10 68 5 16 22 603 17 49 568 68 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 10 6 10 68 5 16 22 603 17 49 568 68 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 10 6 10 68 5 16 22 603 17 49 568 68 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 10 6 10 68 5 16 22 603 17 49 568 68 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 10 6 10 68 5 16 22 603 17 49 568 68 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.39 0.23 0.38 0.76 0.06 0.18 1.00 1.95 0.05 1.00 1.79 0.21 Final Sat.: 615 369 615 1222 90 288 1600 3112 88 1600 2858 342 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.01 0.19 0.19 0.03 0.20 0.20 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 01 Existing PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:22:02 Page 9-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Existing PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Mimosa Dr / Aviara Pkwy ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.343 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 18 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Mimosa Dr Aviara Pkwy Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 28 4 37 16 3 18 16 585 19 65 710 24 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 28 4 37 16 3 18 16 585 19 65 710 24 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 28 4 37 16 3 18 16 585 19 65 710 24 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 28 4 37 16 3 18 16 585 19 65 710 24 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 28 4 37 16 3 18 16 585 19 65 710 24 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.40 0.06 0.54 0.43 0.08 0.49 1.00 1.94 0.06 1.00 1.93 0.07 Final Sat.: 649 93 858 692 130 778 1600 3099 101 1600 3095 105 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.19 0.19 0.04 0.23 0.23 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 01 Existing PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:22:02 Page 10-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Existing PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 El Camino Real / Cassia Rd ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.772 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 47 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: El Camino Real Cassia Rd Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 198 1031 14 15 1680 404 234 2 185 11 10 19 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 198 1031 14 15 1680 404 234 2 185 11 10 19 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 198 1031 14 15 1680 404 234 2 185 11 10 19 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 198 1031 14 15 1680 404 234 2 185 11 10 19 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 198 1031 14 15 1680 404 234 2 185 11 10 19 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.42 0.58 1.00 0.01 0.99 1.00 0.34 0.66 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3869 931 1600 17 1583 1600 552 1048 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.32 0.01 0.01 0.43 0.43 0.15 0.12 0.12 0.01 0.02 0.02 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 01 Existing PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:22:02 Page 11-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Existing PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #9 El Camino Real / Poinsettia Ln ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.530 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 25 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: El Camino Real Poinsettia Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 19 1089 492 243 1606 14 14 14 5 290 12 130 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 19 1089 492 243 1606 14 14 14 5 290 12 130 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 19 1089 492 243 1606 14 14 14 5 290 12 130 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 19 1089 492 243 1606 14 14 14 5 290 12 130 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 19 1089 492 243 1606 14 14 14 5 290 12 130 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.97 0.03 2.00 1.47 0.53 2.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3200 4800 1600 3200 4759 41 3200 2358 842 3200 1600 1600 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.23 0.31 0.08 0.34 0.34 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.01 0.08 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 01 Existing PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:22:02 Page 12-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Existing PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #10 El Camino Real / Dove Ln ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.574 Loss Time (sec): 0 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 53 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: El Camino Real Dove Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 90 1474 56 87 1538 225 156 24 79 72 29 55 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 90 1474 56 87 1538 225 156 24 79 72 29 55 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 90 1474 56 87 1538 225 156 24 79 72 29 55 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 90 1474 56 87 1538 225 156 24 79 72 29 55 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 90 1474 56 87 1538 225 156 24 79 72 29 55 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.89 0.11 1.00 2.62 0.38 1.00 0.23 0.77 1.00 0.35 0.65 Final Sat.: 1600 4624 176 1600 4187 613 1600 373 1227 1600 552 1048 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.32 0.32 0.05 0.37 0.37 0.10 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 01 Existing PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:22:02 Page 13-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Existing PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #11 El Camino Real / Aviara Pkwy ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.722 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 40 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: El Camino Real Aviara Pkwy Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 450 1448 536 191 1395 131 144 342 330 294 283 86 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 450 1448 536 191 1395 131 144 342 330 294 283 86 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 450 1448 536 191 1395 131 144 342 330 294 283 86 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 450 1448 536 191 1395 131 144 342 330 294 283 86 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 450 1448 536 191 1395 131 144 342 330 294 283 86 OvlAdjVol: 105 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 2.00 2.19 0.81 2.00 2.74 0.26 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.53 0.47 Final Sat.: 3200 3503 1297 3200 4388 412 3200 3200 1600 3200 2454 746 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.14 0.41 0.41 0.06 0.32 0.32 0.05 0.11 0.21 0.09 0.12 0.12 OvlAdjV/S: 0.07 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA T R A F F I C I N V E S T I G A T I O N N O V E M B E R 2 0 1 9 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA P:\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation.docx (03/19/19) APPENDIX B EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS HCM Worksheets HCM 6th TWSC 01 Existing AM.syn 5: Mimosa Dr & Moorhen Pl 03/15/2019 Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Synchro 10 Report LSA Analyst, AY Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.9 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT HCM 6th TWSC 01 Existing AM.syn 6: Dove Ln & Moorhen Pl 03/15/2019 Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Synchro 10 Report LSA Analyst, AY Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.8 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR HCM 6th TWSC 01 Existing PM.syn 5: Mimosa Dr & Moorhen Pl 03/15/2019 Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Synchro 10 Report LSA Analyst, AY Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.4 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT HCM 6th TWSC 01 Existing PM.syn 6: Dove Ln & Moorhen Pl 03/15/2019 Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Synchro 10 Report LSA Analyst, AY Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.6 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR T R A F F I C I N V E S T I G A T I O N N O V E M B E R 2 0 1 9 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA P:\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation.docx (03/19/19) APPENDIX B EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS Signal Queueing T R A F F I C I N V E S T I G A T I O N N O V E M B E R 2 0 1 9 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA P:\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation.docx (03/19/19) APPENDIX B EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS With Southbound Right-Turn at El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane MITIG8 - 01 Existing AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 18:17:20 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Existing AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #9 El Camino Real / Poinsettia Ln ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.524 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 25 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: El Camino Real Poinsettia Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 23 1326 446 149 1354 14 17 10 3 438 16 234 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 23 1326 446 149 1354 14 17 10 3 438 16 234 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 23 1326 446 149 1354 14 17 10 3 438 16 234 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 23 1326 446 149 1354 14 17 10 3 438 16 234 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 23 1326 446 149 1354 14 17 10 3 438 16 234 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 23 1326 446 149 1354 14 17 10 3 438 16 234 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 1.54 0.46 2.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600 3200 2462 738 3200 1600 1600 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.28 0.28 0.05 0.28 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.01 0.15 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA MITIG8 - 01 Existing PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 18:18:03 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Existing PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #9 El Camino Real / Poinsettia Ln ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.530 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 25 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: El Camino Real Poinsettia Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 19 1089 492 243 1606 14 14 14 5 290 12 130 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 19 1089 492 243 1606 14 14 14 5 290 12 130 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 19 1089 492 243 1606 14 14 14 5 290 12 130 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 19 1089 492 243 1606 14 14 14 5 290 12 130 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 19 1089 492 243 1606 14 14 14 5 290 12 130 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 19 1089 492 243 1606 14 14 14 5 290 12 130 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 1.47 0.53 2.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600 3200 2358 842 3200 1600 1600 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.23 0.31 0.08 0.33 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.01 0.08 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) APPENDIX C MULTIMODAL LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) PEDESTRIAN Roadway Direction EB WB * Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards?Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'):10 10 * Do sidewalks meet ADA requirements (e.g., cross-slope and trip hazards)?Yes Yes * Do ramps and landings meet ADA requirements?Yes Yes * Do the street light locations appear adequate?Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes:2 2 Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count)Yes Yes Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian facility and vehicle travel way:0' to 2'0' to 2' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way?No No Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings?No No Are there any permanent speed control devices installed?No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)?No No Are crosswalks high visibility?Yes Yes Are there intersection enhancements provided for pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)? Yes Yes Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings?No No Is there pedestrian scale lighting?No No Are there active building frontages on 80% of street curb line?No No Is the street furniture oriented towards businesses or attractions?No No Do the street trees provide shade over more than 50% of the sidewalk length?No No Poinsettia Lane Aviara Parkway Ambrosia Lane Arterial Connector *Indicates an item that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A EB SCORE | LOS 100 | A WB SCORE | LOS X ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) BICYCLE Roadway Direction EB WB *Are the roadway pavement conditions good (e.g., no pot holes)?Yes Yes *Is bike facility on roadway free of obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)?Yes Yes *Does the bicycle facility meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines?Yes Yes Is on-street parking provided?No No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan?Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection provided at intersections?Yes Yes Any bicycle racks are provided along segment?No No Bicycle Facility Provided:Bike Lane Bike Lane Lane Width (ft)Lane Width (ft) 5 5 Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) 0 0 Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Yes Yes Poinsettia Lane Aviara Parkway Ambrosia Lane Arterial Connector 80 | B EB SCORE | LOS 80 | B WB SCORE | LOS X ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) PEDESTRIAN Roadway Direction EB WB * Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards?Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'):10 10 * Do sidewalks meet ADA requirements (e.g., cross-slope and trip hazards)?Yes Yes * Do ramps and landings meet ADA requirements?Yes Yes * Do the street light locations appear adequate?Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):25 mph or lower 25 mph or lower Number of Through Lanes:1 2 Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count)No No Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian facility and vehicle travel way:0' to 2'0' to 2' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way?No No Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings?No No Are there any permanent speed control devices installed?No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)?No No Are crosswalks high visibility?Yes Yes Are there intersection enhancements provided for pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)? Yes Yes Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings?No No Is there pedestrian scale lighting?No No Are there active building frontages on 80% of street curb line?No No Is the street furniture oriented towards businesses or attractions?No No Do the street trees provide shade over more than 50% of the sidewalk length?No No Poinsettia Lane Ambrosia Lane Cassia Road Arterial Connector *Indicates an item that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A EB SCORE | LOS 100 | A WB SCORE | LOS X ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) BICYCLE Roadway Direction EB WB *Are the roadway pavement conditions good (e.g., no pot holes)?Yes Yes *Is bike facility on roadway free of obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)?Yes Yes *Does the bicycle facility meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines?Yes Yes Is on-street parking provided?No No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):25 mph or lower 25 mph or lower Does the bikeway on the study segment and side streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan?Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection provided at intersections?Yes Yes Any bicycle racks are provided along segment?No No Bicycle Facility Provided:Bike Lane Bike Lane Lane Width (ft)Lane Width (ft) 5 5 Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) 0 0 Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Yes Yes Poinsettia Lane Aviara Parkway Ambrosia Lane Arterial Connector 100 | A EB SCORE | LOS 100 | A WB SCORE | LOS X ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) PEDESTRIAN Roadway Direction EB WB *Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards?Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'):10 10 * Do sidewalks meet ADA requirements (e.g., cross-slope and trip hazards)?Yes Yes *Do ramps and landings meet ADA requirements?Yes Yes *Do the street light locations appear adequate?Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes:2 2 Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count)No No Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian facility and vehicle travel way:0' to 2'0' to 2' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way?No No Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings?No No Are there any permanent speed control devices installed?No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)?Yes No Are crosswalks high visibility?Yes Yes Are there intersection enhancements provided for pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)? Yes Yes Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings?No No Is there pedestrian scale lighting?No No Are there active building frontages on 80% of street curb line?No No Is the street furniture oriented towards businesses or attractions?No No Do the street trees provide shade over more than 50% of the sidewalk length?No No Poinsettia Lane Cassia Road El Camino Real Arterial Connector *Indicates an item that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A EB SCORE | LOS 100 | A WB SCORE | LOS X ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) BICYCLE Roadway Direction EB WB *Are the roadway pavement conditions good (e.g., no pot holes)?Yes Yes *Is bike facility on roadway free of obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)?Yes Yes *Does the bicycle facility meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines?Yes Yes Is on-street parking provided?No No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan?Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection provided at intersections?Yes Yes Any bicycle racks are provided along segment?No No Bicycle Facility Provided:Bike Lane Bike Lane Lane Width (ft)Lane Width (ft) 5 5 Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) 0 0 Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Yes Yes Poinsettia Lane Aviara Parkway Ambrosia Lane Arterial Connector 80 | B EB SCORE | LOS 80 | B WB SCORE | LOS X ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) TRANSIT Roadway Direction NB SB * Transit amenities available: Are the sidewalks or path to the transit stop ADA compliant?Yes Yes Do multiple transit routes stop on the study segment?No No Do any of the routes provide a direct link to a COASTER station or mobility hub?Yes Yes Do any of the routes provide a single transfer to reach a COASTER station or mobility hub?No No Closest distance to existing transit stop:<= 1/4 mile walk to bus only <= 1/4 mile walk to bus only What type of transit priority is present?None present None present Headways between 6:30-8:30 am and 4-6 pm on weekdays:30 minutes 30 minutes Is there commute shuttle service provided during the morning and afternoon commute periods?No No On weekends, are the headways no more than 1 hour headways between 9 am-5 pm?Yes Yes Is there bike parking available at the bus stop?No No Is the bus stop within 1/4 mile of a bike repair shop?No No Will there be TDM measures that result in a trip reduction of at least 15%?No No Are there documented TDM measures in place that promote ridesharing? Is the On Demand service at least 50% subsidized for trips to transit service? Is the study segment within FLEX service area? El Camino Real Cassia Road Poinsettia Lane Arterial Covered Bus Stop Bench Well-lit Stops Trash Cans Stop located within a Covered Bus Stop Bench Well-lit Stops Trash Cans Stop located within a 72 | C NB SCORE | LOS 77 | C SB SCORE | LOS X ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) TRANSIT Roadway Direction NB SB * Transit amenities available: Are the sidewalks or path to the transit stop ADA compliant?Yes Yes Do multiple transit routes stop on the study segment?No No Do any of the routes provide a direct link to a COASTER station or mobility hub?Yes Yes Do any of the routes provide a single transfer to reach a COASTER station or mobility hub?No No Closest distance to existing transit stop:<= 1/4 mile walk to bus only <= 1/4 mile walk to bus only What type of transit priority is present?None present None present Headways between 6:30-8:30 am and 4-6 pm on weekdays:30 minutes 30 minutes Is there commute shuttle service provided during the morning and afternoon commute periods?No No On weekends, are the headways no more than 1 hour headways between 9 am-5 pm?Yes Yes Is there bike parking available at the bus stop?No No Is the bus stop within 1/4 mile of a bike repair shop?No No Will there be TDM measures that result in a trip reduction of at least 15%?No No Are there documented TDM measures in place that promote ridesharing? Is the On Demand service at least 50% subsidized for trips to transit service? Is the study segment within FLEX service area? El Camino Real Poinsettia Lane Aviara Parkway Arterial Covered Bus Stop Bench Well-lit Stops Trash Cans Stop located within a Covered Bus Stop Bench Well-lit Stops Trash Cans Stop located within a 77 | C NB SCORE | LOS 77 | C SB SCORE | LOS X ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) PEDESTRIAN Roadway Direction EB WB * Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards?Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'):8 8 * Do sidewalks meet ADA requirements (e.g., cross-slope and trip hazards)?Yes Yes * Do ramps and landings meet ADA requirements?Yes Yes * Do the street light locations appear adequate?Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):35 mph 35 mph Number of Through Lanes:1 1 Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count)Yes Yes Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian facility and vehicle travel way:0' to 2'0' to 2' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way?Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings?No No Are there any permanent speed control devices installed?Yes Yes Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)?No No Are crosswalks high visibility?Yes Yes Are there intersection enhancements provided for pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)? Yes Yes Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings?No No Is there pedestrian scale lighting?No No Are there active building frontages on 80% of street curb line?No No Is the street furniture oriented towards businesses or attractions?No No Do the street trees provide shade over more than 50% of the sidewalk length?No No Cassia Road Poinsettia Lane El Camino Real Local/Neighborhood *Indicates an item that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A EB SCORE | LOS 100 | A WB SCORE | LOS X ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) BICYCLE Roadway Direction EB WB * Are the roadway pavement conditions good (e.g., no pot holes)?Yes Yes * Is bike facility on roadway free of obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes * Does the bicycle facility meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines?Yes Yes Is on-street parking provided?No No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):35 mph 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan?Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection provided at intersections?Yes Yes Any bicycle racks are provided along segment?No No Bicycle Facility Provided:Bike Lane Bike Lane Lane Width (ft)Lane Width (ft) 6 6 Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) 0 0 Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Yes Yes Cassia Road Poinsettia Lane El Camino Real Local/Neighborhood 100 | A EB SCORE | LOS 100 | A WB SCORE | LOS X ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) PEDESTRIAN Roadway Direction NB SB * Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards?Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'):10 10 * Do sidewalks meet ADA requirements (e.g., cross-slope and trip hazards)?Yes Yes * Do ramps and landings meet ADA requirements?Yes Yes * Do the street light locations appear adequate?Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):35 mph 35 mph Number of Through Lanes:1 1 Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count)Yes Yes Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian facility and vehicle travel way:0' to 2'0' to 2' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way?Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings?No No Are there any permanent speed control devices installed?No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)?No No Are crosswalks high visibility?Yes Yes Are there intersection enhancements provided for pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)? Yes Yes Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings?No No Is there pedestrian scale lighting?No No Are there active building frontages on 80% of street curb line?No No Is the street furniture oriented towards businesses or attractions?No No Do the street trees provide shade over more than 50% of the sidewalk length?No No Ambrosia Lane Poinsettia Lane Aviara Parkway Schools *Indicates an item that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A NB SCORE | LOS 100 | A SB SCORE | LOS X ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) BICYCLE Roadway Direction NB SB * Are the roadway pavement conditions good (e.g., no pot holes)?Yes Yes * Is bike facility on roadway free of obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes * Does the bicycle facility meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines?Yes Yes Is on-street parking provided?Parallel parking Parallel parking Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):35 mph 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan?Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection provided at intersections?Yes Yes Any bicycle racks are provided along segment?No No Bicycle Facility Provided: 18 18 Ambrosia Lane Poinsettia Lane Aviara Parkway Schools 70 | C NB SCORE | LOS 70 | C SB SCORE | LOS X ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) PEDESTRIAN Roadway Direction NB SB * Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards?Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'):9 9 * Do sidewalks meet ADA requirements (e.g., cross-slope and trip hazards)?Yes Yes * Do ramps and landings meet ADA requirements?Yes Yes * Do the street light locations appear adequate?Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):25 mph or lower 25 mph or lower Number of Through Lanes:1 1 Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count)Yes Yes Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian facility and vehicle travel way:0' to 2'0' to 2' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way?Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings?No No Are there any permanent speed control devices installed?No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)?No No Are crosswalks high visibility?Yes Yes Are there intersection enhancements provided for pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)? Yes Yes Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings?No No Is there pedestrian scale lighting?No No Are there active building frontages on 80% of street curb line?No No Is the street furniture oriented towards businesses or attractions?No No Do the street trees provide shade over more than 50% of the sidewalk length?No No Mimosa Drive Oriole Court Aviara Parkway Local/Neighborhood *Indicates an item that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A NB SCORE | LOS 100 | A SB SCORE | LOS X ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) BICYCLE Roadway Direction NB SB * Are the roadway pavement conditions good (e.g., no pot holes)?Yes Yes * Is bike facility on roadway free of obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes * Does the bicycle facility meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines?Yes Yes Is on-street parking provided?Parallel parking Parallel parking Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):25 mph or lower 25 mph or lower Does the bikeway on the study segment and side streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan?Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection provided at intersections?Yes Yes Any bicycle racks are provided along segment?No No Bicycle Facility Provided: Mimosa Drive Oriole Court Aviara Parkway Local/Neighborhood 100 | A NB SCORE | LOS 100 | A SB SCORE | LOS X ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) PEDESTRIAN Roadway Direction EB WB *Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards?Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'):10 10 * Do sidewalks meet ADA requirements (e.g., cross-slope and trip hazards)?Yes Yes *Do ramps and landings meet ADA requirements?Yes Yes *Do the street light locations appear adequate?Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):35 mph 35 mph Number of Through Lanes:1 1 Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count)Yes Yes Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian facility and vehicle travel way:0' to 2'0' to 2' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way?Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings?No No Are there any permanent speed control devices installed?No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)?No No Are crosswalks high visibility?Yes Yes Are there intersection enhancements provided for pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)? Yes Yes Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings?No No Is there pedestrian scale lighting?No No Are there active building frontages on 80% of street curb line?No No Is the street furniture oriented towards businesses or attractions?No No Do the street trees provide shade over more than 50% of the sidewalk length?No No Dove Lane Moorhen Place El Camino Real Local/Neighborhood *Indicates an item that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A EB SCORE | LOS 100 | A WB SCORE | LOS X ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) BICYCLE Roadway Direction EB WB *Are the roadway pavement conditions good (e.g., no pot holes)?Yes Yes *Is bike facility on roadway free of obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)?Yes Yes *Does the bicycle facility meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines?Yes Yes Is on-street parking provided?Parallel parking Parallel parking Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):35 mph 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan?Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection provided at intersections?Yes Yes Any bicycle racks are provided along segment?No No Bicycle Facility Provided:Bike Lane Bike Lane Lane Width (ft)Lane Width (ft) 5 5 Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) 0 0 Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? No No Dove Lane Moorhen Place El Camino Real Local/Neighborhood 100 | A EB SCORE | LOS 100 | A WB SCORE | LOS X TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) APPENDIX D 2035 WITHOUT POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS T R A F F I C I N V E S T I G A T I O N N O V E M B E R 2 0 1 9 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA P:\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation.docx (03/19/19) APPENDIX D 2035 WITHOUT POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS ICU Worksheets 02 Future No Ext AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:22:45 Page 3-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Future AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Ambrosia Ln / Poinsettia Ln ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.778 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 48 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Ambrosia Ln Poinsettia Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 414 6 245 22 9 14 7 308 212 217 308 12 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 414 6 245 22 9 14 7 308 212 217 308 12 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 414 6 245 22 9 14 7 308 212 217 308 12 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 414 6 245 22 9 14 7 308 212 217 308 12 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 414 6 245 22 9 14 7 308 212 217 308 12 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.62 0.01 0.37 0.49 0.20 0.31 1.00 1.18 0.82 1.00 1.92 0.08 Final Sat.: 996 14 589 782 320 498 1600 1895 1305 1600 3080 120 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.26 0.42 0.42 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.14 0.10 0.10 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 02 Future No Ext AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:22:45 Page 4-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Future AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Ambrosia Ln / Aviara Pkwy ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.786 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 49 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Ambrosia Ln Aviara Pkwy Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 8 104 13 239 12 179 300 414 32 12 363 282 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 8 104 13 239 12 179 300 414 32 12 363 282 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 8 104 13 239 12 179 300 414 32 12 363 282 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 8 104 13 239 12 179 300 414 32 12 363 282 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 8 104 13 239 12 179 300 414 32 12 363 282 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.06 0.84 0.10 0.55 0.03 0.42 1.00 1.86 0.14 1.00 1.13 0.87 Final Sat.: 102 1331 166 889 45 666 1600 2970 230 1600 1801 1399 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.19 0.14 0.14 0.01 0.20 0.20 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 02 Future No Ext AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:22:45 Page 9-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Future AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Mimosa Dr / Aviara Pkwy ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.332 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 18 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Mimosa Dr Aviara Pkwy Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 30 8 46 9 1 87 29 561 25 32 541 11 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 30 8 46 9 1 87 29 561 25 32 541 11 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 30 8 46 9 1 87 29 561 25 32 541 11 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 30 8 46 9 1 87 29 561 25 32 541 11 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 30 8 46 9 1 87 29 561 25 32 541 11 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.36 0.09 0.55 0.09 0.01 0.90 1.00 1.91 0.09 1.00 1.96 0.04 Final Sat.: 571 152 876 148 16 1435 1600 3063 137 1600 3136 64 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.01 0.06 0.06 0.02 0.18 0.18 0.02 0.17 0.17 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 02 Future No Ext AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:22:45 Page 10-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Future AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 El Camino Real / Cassia Rd ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.836 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 61 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: El Camino Real Cassia Rd Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 158 1532 12 9 1437 209 475 5 212 17 4 3 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 158 1532 12 9 1437 209 475 5 212 17 4 3 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 158 1532 12 9 1437 209 475 5 212 17 4 3 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 158 1532 12 9 1437 209 475 5 212 17 4 3 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 158 1532 12 9 1437 209 475 5 212 17 4 3 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.62 0.38 1.00 0.02 0.98 1.00 0.57 0.43 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 4191 609 1600 37 1563 1600 914 686 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.48 0.01 0.01 0.34 0.34 0.30 0.14 0.14 0.01 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 02 Future No Ext AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:22:45 Page 11-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Future AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #9 El Camino Real / Poinsettia Ln ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.614 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 30 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Street Name: El Camino Real Poinsettia Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 27 1574 529 164 1492 15 21 12 4 535 20 286 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 27 1574 529 164 1492 15 21 12 4 535 20 286 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 27 1574 529 164 1492 15 21 12 4 535 20 286 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 27 1574 529 164 1492 15 21 12 4 535 20 286 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 27 1574 529 164 1492 15 21 12 4 535 20 286 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.97 0.03 2.00 1.50 0.50 2.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3200 4800 1600 3200 4752 48 3200 2400 800 3200 1600 1600 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.33 0.33 0.05 0.31 0.31 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.17 0.01 0.18 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 02 Future No Ext AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:22:45 Page 12-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Future AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #10 El Camino Real / Dove Ln ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.574 Loss Time (sec): 0 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 54 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: El Camino Real Dove Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 32 1927 31 59 1928 135 116 14 55 58 14 69 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 32 1927 31 59 1928 135 116 14 55 58 14 69 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 32 1927 31 59 1928 135 116 14 55 58 14 69 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 32 1927 31 59 1928 135 116 14 55 58 14 69 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 32 1927 31 59 1928 135 116 14 55 58 14 69 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.95 0.05 1.00 2.80 0.20 1.00 0.20 0.80 1.00 0.17 0.83 Final Sat.: 1600 4724 76 1600 4486 314 1600 325 1275 1600 270 1330 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.41 0.41 0.04 0.43 0.43 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 02 Future No Ext AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:22:45 Page 13-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Future AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #11 El Camino Real / Aviara Pkwy ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.884 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 78 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: El Camino Real Aviara Pkwy Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 163 1681 237 82 1856 121 196 184 309 732 320 114 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 163 1681 237 82 1856 121 196 184 309 732 320 114 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 163 1681 237 82 1856 121 196 184 309 732 320 114 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 163 1681 237 82 1856 121 196 184 309 732 320 114 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 163 1681 237 82 1856 121 196 184 309 732 320 114 OvlAdjVol: 228 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 2.00 2.63 0.37 2.00 2.82 0.18 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.47 0.53 Final Sat.: 3200 4207 593 3200 4506 294 3200 3200 1600 3200 2359 841 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.40 0.40 0.03 0.41 0.41 0.06 0.06 0.19 0.23 0.14 0.14 OvlAdjV/S: 0.14 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 02 Future No Ext PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:23:25 Page 3-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Future PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Ambrosia Ln / Poinsettia Ln ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.394 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 20 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Ambrosia Ln Poinsettia Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 87 18 53 44 28 63 53 363 115 89 384 81 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 87 18 53 44 28 63 53 363 115 89 384 81 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 87 18 53 44 28 63 53 363 115 89 384 81 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 87 18 53 44 28 63 53 363 115 89 384 81 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 87 18 53 44 28 63 53 363 115 89 384 81 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.55 0.11 0.34 0.32 0.21 0.47 1.00 1.52 0.48 1.00 1.65 0.35 Final Sat.: 881 182 537 521 332 747 1600 2430 770 1600 2643 557 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.03 0.08 0.08 0.03 0.15 0.15 0.06 0.15 0.15 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 02 Future No Ext PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:23:25 Page 4-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Future PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Ambrosia Ln / Aviara Pkwy ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.380 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 19 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Ambrosia Ln Aviara Pkwy Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 10 6 10 77 6 18 25 675 19 54 626 75 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 10 6 10 77 6 18 25 675 19 54 626 75 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 10 6 10 77 6 18 25 675 19 54 626 75 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 10 6 10 77 6 18 25 675 19 54 626 75 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 10 6 10 77 6 18 25 675 19 54 626 75 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.39 0.23 0.38 0.76 0.06 0.18 1.00 1.95 0.05 1.00 1.79 0.21 Final Sat.: 615 369 615 1220 95 285 1600 3112 88 1600 2858 342 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.02 0.22 0.22 0.03 0.22 0.22 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 02 Future No Ext PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:23:25 Page 9-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Future PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Mimosa Dr / Aviara Pkwy ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.374 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 19 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Mimosa Dr Aviara Pkwy Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 31 4 41 20 4 23 18 645 21 72 782 26 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 31 4 41 20 4 23 18 645 21 72 782 26 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 31 4 41 20 4 23 18 645 21 72 782 26 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 31 4 41 20 4 23 18 645 21 72 782 26 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 31 4 41 20 4 23 18 645 21 72 782 26 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.41 0.05 0.54 0.43 0.08 0.49 1.00 1.94 0.06 1.00 1.94 0.06 Final Sat.: 653 84 863 681 136 783 1600 3099 101 1600 3097 103 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.21 0.21 0.05 0.25 0.25 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 02 Future No Ext PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:23:25 Page 10-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Future PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 El Camino Real / Cassia Rd ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.849 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 65 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: El Camino Real Cassia Rd Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 218 1136 15 17 1851 445 266 2 210 11 10 19 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 218 1136 15 17 1851 445 266 2 210 11 10 19 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 218 1136 15 17 1851 445 266 2 210 11 10 19 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 218 1136 15 17 1851 445 266 2 210 11 10 19 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 218 1136 15 17 1851 445 266 2 210 11 10 19 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.42 0.58 1.00 0.01 0.99 1.00 0.34 0.66 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3870 930 1600 15 1585 1600 552 1048 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.14 0.36 0.01 0.01 0.48 0.48 0.17 0.13 0.13 0.01 0.02 0.02 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 02 Future No Ext PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:23:25 Page 11-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Future PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #9 El Camino Real / Poinsettia Ln ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.617 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 30 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Street Name: El Camino Real Poinsettia Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 23 1293 584 268 1770 15 17 17 6 354 15 159 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 23 1293 584 268 1770 15 17 17 6 354 15 159 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 23 1293 584 268 1770 15 17 17 6 354 15 159 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 23 1293 584 268 1770 15 17 17 6 354 15 159 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 23 1293 584 268 1770 15 17 17 6 354 15 159 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.97 0.03 2.00 1.48 0.52 2.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3200 4800 1600 3200 4760 40 3200 2365 835 3200 1600 1600 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.27 0.37 0.08 0.37 0.37 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.01 0.10 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 02 Future No Ext PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:23:25 Page 12-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Future PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #10 El Camino Real / Dove Ln ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.704 Loss Time (sec): 0 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 77 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: El Camino Real Dove Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 107 1750 66 103 1826 267 238 37 121 72 29 55 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 107 1750 66 103 1826 267 238 37 121 72 29 55 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 107 1750 66 103 1826 267 238 37 121 72 29 55 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 107 1750 66 103 1826 267 238 37 121 72 29 55 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 107 1750 66 103 1826 267 238 37 121 72 29 55 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.89 0.11 1.00 2.62 0.38 1.00 0.23 0.77 1.00 0.35 0.65 Final Sat.: 1600 4626 174 1600 4188 612 1600 375 1225 1600 552 1048 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.38 0.38 0.06 0.44 0.44 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.05 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 02 Future No Ext PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:23:25 Page 13-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Future PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #11 El Camino Real / Aviara Pkwy ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.831 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 59 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: El Camino Real Aviara Pkwy Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 534 1719 636 227 1656 155 159 377 364 324 312 95 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 534 1719 636 227 1656 155 159 377 364 324 312 95 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 534 1719 636 227 1656 155 159 377 364 324 312 95 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 534 1719 636 227 1656 155 159 377 364 324 312 95 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 534 1719 636 227 1656 155 159 377 364 324 312 95 OvlAdjVol: 97 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 2.00 2.19 0.81 2.00 2.74 0.26 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.53 0.47 Final Sat.: 3200 3504 1296 3200 4389 411 3200 3200 1600 3200 2453 747 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.17 0.49 0.49 0.07 0.38 0.38 0.05 0.12 0.23 0.10 0.13 0.13 OvlAdjV/S: 0.06 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA T R A F F I C I N V E S T I G A T I O N N O V E M B E R 2 0 1 9 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA P:\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation.docx (03/19/19) APPENDIX D 2035 WITHOUT POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS HCM Worksheets HCM 6th TWSC 02 2035 without Poinsettia AM.syn 5: Mimosa Dr & Moorhen Pl 03/15/2019 Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Synchro 10 Report LSA Analyst, AY Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.2 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT HCM 6th TWSC 02 2035 without Poinsettia AM.syn 6: Dove Ln & Moorhen Pl 03/15/2019 Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Synchro 10 Report LSA Analyst, AY Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.8 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR HCM 6th TWSC 02 2035 without Poinsettia PM.syn 5: Mimosa Dr & Moorhen Pl 03/15/2019 Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Synchro 10 Report LSA Analyst, AY Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.4 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT HCM 6th TWSC 02 2035 without Poinsettia PM.syn 6: Dove Ln & Moorhen Pl 03/15/2019 Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Synchro 10 Report LSA Analyst, AY Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.5 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR T R A F F I C I N V E S T I G A T I O N N O V E M B E R 2 0 1 9 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA P:\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation.docx (03/19/19) APPENDIX D 2035 WITHOUT POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS Signal Queueing TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) APPENDIX E 2035 WITH POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS T R A F F I C I N V E S T I G A T I O N N O V E M B E R 2 0 1 9 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA P:\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation.docx (03/19/19) APPENDIX E 2035 WITH POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS ICU Worksheets 03 Future Ext AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:13 Page 3-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Future Plus Extension AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Ambrosia Ln / Poinsettia Ln ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.675 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 35 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Ambrosia Ln Poinsettia Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 361 5 214 22 9 14 6 267 184 172 244 10 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 361 5 214 22 9 14 6 267 184 172 244 10 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 361 5 214 22 9 14 6 267 184 172 244 10 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 361 5 214 22 9 14 6 267 184 172 244 10 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 361 5 214 22 9 14 6 267 184 172 244 10 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.62 0.01 0.37 0.49 0.20 0.31 1.00 1.18 0.82 1.00 1.92 0.08 Final Sat.: 996 14 590 782 320 498 1600 1894 1306 1600 3074 126 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.23 0.36 0.36 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.11 0.08 0.08 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 03 Future Ext AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:13 Page 4-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Future Plus Extension AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Ambrosia Ln / Aviara Pkwy ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.700 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 37 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Ambrosia Ln Aviara Pkwy Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 8 104 13 209 10 156 260 359 28 10 315 245 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 8 104 13 209 10 156 260 359 28 10 315 245 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 8 104 13 209 10 156 260 359 28 10 315 245 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 8 104 13 209 10 156 260 359 28 10 315 245 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 8 104 13 209 10 156 260 359 28 10 315 245 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.06 0.84 0.10 0.56 0.03 0.41 1.00 1.86 0.14 1.00 1.12 0.88 Final Sat.: 102 1331 166 892 43 666 1600 2968 232 1600 1800 1400 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.16 0.12 0.12 0.01 0.17 0.17 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 03 Future Ext AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:13 Page 5-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Future Plus Extension AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Cassia Rd / Poinsettia Ln ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.442 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 21 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Cassia Rd Poinsettia Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 20 0 222 193 416 0 0 376 10 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 20 0 222 193 416 0 0 376 10 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 20 0 222 193 416 0 0 376 10 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 20 0 222 193 416 0 0 376 10 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 20 0 222 193 416 0 0 376 10 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.92 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.95 0.05 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 132 0 1468 1600 3200 0 0 3117 83 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.15 0.12 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 03 Future Ext AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:13 Page 6-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Future Plus Extension AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Skimmer Ct-Oriole Ct / Poinsettia Ln ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.264 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 17 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Skimmer Ct-Oriole Ct Poinsettia Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 34 6 41 5 2 6 2 414 20 39 346 2 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 34 6 41 5 2 6 2 414 20 39 346 2 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 34 6 41 5 2 6 2 414 20 39 346 2 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 34 6 41 5 2 6 2 414 20 39 346 2 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 34 6 41 5 2 6 2 414 20 39 346 2 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.42 0.07 0.51 0.38 0.15 0.47 1.00 1.91 0.09 1.00 1.99 0.01 Final Sat.: 672 119 810 615 246 738 1600 3053 147 1600 3182 18 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.02 0.11 0.11 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 03 Future Ext AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:13 Page 9-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Future Plus Extension AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Mimosa Dr / Aviara Pkwy ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.282 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 17 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Mimosa Dr Aviara Pkwy Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 30 8 46 5 1 53 25 487 22 28 470 10 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 30 8 46 5 1 53 25 487 22 28 470 10 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 30 8 46 5 1 53 25 487 22 28 470 10 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 30 8 46 5 1 53 25 487 22 28 470 10 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 30 8 46 5 1 53 25 487 22 28 470 10 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.36 0.09 0.55 0.08 0.02 0.90 1.00 1.91 0.09 1.00 1.96 0.04 Final Sat.: 571 152 876 136 27 1437 1600 3062 138 1600 3133 67 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.16 0.16 0.02 0.15 0.15 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 03 Future Ext AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:13 Page 10-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Future Plus Extension AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 El Camino Real / Cassia Rd ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.598 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 29 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: El Camino Real Cassia Rd Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 30 1550 12 9 1613 53 85 4 38 17 4 3 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 30 1550 12 9 1613 53 85 4 38 17 4 3 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 30 1550 12 9 1613 53 85 4 38 17 4 3 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 30 1550 12 9 1613 53 85 4 38 17 4 3 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 30 1550 12 9 1613 53 85 4 38 17 4 3 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.90 0.10 1.00 0.10 0.90 1.00 0.57 0.43 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 4647 153 1600 152 1448 1600 914 686 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.48 0.01 0.01 0.35 0.35 0.05 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 03 Future Ext AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:13 Page 11-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Future Plus Extension AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #9 El Camino Real / Poinsettia Ln ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.717 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 39 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: El Camino Real Poinsettia Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 176 1531 529 166 1510 185 255 41 114 519 36 286 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 176 1531 529 166 1510 185 255 41 114 519 36 286 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 176 1531 529 166 1510 185 255 41 114 519 36 286 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 176 1531 529 166 1510 185 255 41 114 519 36 286 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 176 1531 529 166 1510 185 255 41 114 519 36 286 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.67 0.33 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3200 4800 1600 3200 4276 524 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.32 0.33 0.05 0.35 0.35 0.08 0.03 0.07 0.16 0.02 0.18 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 03 Future Ext AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:13 Page 12-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Future Plus Extension AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #10 El Camino Real / Dove Ln ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.597 Loss Time (sec): 0 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 57 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: El Camino Real Dove Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 34 2021 33 62 2022 142 117 14 56 58 14 69 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 34 2021 33 62 2022 142 117 14 56 58 14 69 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 34 2021 33 62 2022 142 117 14 56 58 14 69 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 34 2021 33 62 2022 142 117 14 56 58 14 69 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 34 2021 33 62 2022 142 117 14 56 58 14 69 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.95 0.05 1.00 2.80 0.20 1.00 0.20 0.80 1.00 0.17 0.83 Final Sat.: 1600 4723 77 1600 4485 315 1600 320 1280 1600 270 1330 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.43 0.43 0.04 0.45 0.45 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 03 Future Ext AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:13 Page 13-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Future Plus Extension AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #11 El Camino Real / Aviara Pkwy ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.843 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 63 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: El Camino Real Aviara Pkwy Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 141 1763 249 86 1947 105 170 160 268 635 278 99 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 141 1763 249 86 1947 105 170 160 268 635 278 99 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 141 1763 249 86 1947 105 170 160 268 635 278 99 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 141 1763 249 86 1947 105 170 160 268 635 278 99 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 141 1763 249 86 1947 105 170 160 268 635 278 99 OvlAdjVol: 198 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 2.00 2.63 0.37 2.00 2.85 0.15 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.47 0.53 Final Sat.: 3200 4206 594 3200 4554 246 3200 3200 1600 3200 2360 840 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.42 0.42 0.03 0.43 0.43 0.05 0.05 0.17 0.20 0.12 0.12 OvlAdjV/S: 0.12 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 03 Future Ext PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:39 Page 3-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Future Plus Extension PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Ambrosia Ln / Poinsettia Ln ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.356 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 19 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Ambrosia Ln Poinsettia Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 76 16 46 44 28 63 46 315 100 71 305 64 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 76 16 46 44 28 63 46 315 100 71 305 64 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 76 16 46 44 28 63 46 315 100 71 305 64 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 76 16 46 44 28 63 46 315 100 71 305 64 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 76 16 46 44 28 63 46 315 100 71 305 64 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.55 0.12 0.33 0.32 0.21 0.47 1.00 1.52 0.48 1.00 1.65 0.35 Final Sat.: 881 186 533 521 332 747 1600 2429 771 1600 2645 555 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.09 0.09 0.03 0.08 0.08 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.04 0.12 0.12 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 03 Future Ext PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:39 Page 4-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Future Plus Extension PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Ambrosia Ln / Aviara Pkwy ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.339 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 18 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Ambrosia Ln Aviara Pkwy Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 10 6 10 67 5 16 22 586 16 47 543 65 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 10 6 10 67 5 16 22 586 16 47 543 65 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 10 6 10 67 5 16 22 586 16 47 543 65 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 10 6 10 67 5 16 22 586 16 47 543 65 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 10 6 10 67 5 16 22 586 16 47 543 65 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.39 0.23 0.38 0.76 0.06 0.18 1.00 1.95 0.05 1.00 1.79 0.21 Final Sat.: 615 369 615 1218 91 291 1600 3115 85 1600 2858 342 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.01 0.19 0.19 0.03 0.19 0.19 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 03 Future Ext PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:39 Page 5-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Future Plus Extension PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Cassia Rd / Poinsettia Ln ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.402 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 20 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Cassia Rd Poinsettia Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 10 0 68 197 308 0 0 562 15 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 10 0 68 197 308 0 0 562 15 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 10 0 68 197 308 0 0 562 15 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 10 0 68 197 308 0 0 562 15 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 10 0 68 197 308 0 0 562 15 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.87 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.95 0.05 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 205 0 1395 1600 3200 0 0 3117 83 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.05 0.12 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 03 Future Ext PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:39 Page 6-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Future Plus Extension PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Skimmer Ct-Oriole Ct / Poinsettia Ln ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.268 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 17 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Skimmer Ct-Oriole Ct Poinsettia Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 9 4 34 6 2 2 8 295 15 31 566 8 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 9 4 34 6 2 2 8 295 15 31 566 8 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 9 4 34 6 2 2 8 295 15 31 566 8 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 9 4 34 6 2 2 8 295 15 31 566 8 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 9 4 34 6 2 2 8 295 15 31 566 8 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.19 0.09 0.72 0.60 0.20 0.20 1.00 1.90 0.10 1.00 1.97 0.03 Final Sat.: 306 136 1157 960 320 320 1600 3045 155 1600 3155 45 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.10 0.02 0.18 0.18 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 03 Future Ext PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:39 Page 9-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Future Plus Extension PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Mimosa Dr / Aviara Pkwy ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.334 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 18 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Mimosa Dr Aviara Pkwy Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 31 4 41 12 2 14 16 560 18 62 679 23 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 31 4 41 12 2 14 16 560 18 62 679 23 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 31 4 41 12 2 14 16 560 18 62 679 23 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 31 4 41 12 2 14 16 560 18 62 679 23 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 31 4 41 12 2 14 16 560 18 62 679 23 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.41 0.05 0.54 0.43 0.07 0.50 1.00 1.94 0.06 1.00 1.93 0.07 Final Sat.: 653 84 863 686 114 800 1600 3100 100 1600 3095 105 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.18 0.18 0.04 0.22 0.22 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 03 Future Ext PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:39 Page 10-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Future Plus Extension PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 El Camino Real / Cassia Rd ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.607 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 29 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Street Name: El Camino Real Cassia Rd Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 40 1150 15 17 2211 112 48 1 37 11 10 19 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 40 1150 15 17 2211 112 48 1 37 11 10 19 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 40 1150 15 17 2211 112 48 1 37 11 10 19 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 40 1150 15 17 2211 112 48 1 37 11 10 19 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 40 1150 15 17 2211 112 48 1 37 11 10 19 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.86 0.14 1.00 0.03 0.97 1.00 0.34 0.66 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 4569 231 1600 42 1558 1600 552 1048 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.36 0.01 0.01 0.48 0.48 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 03 Future Ext PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:39 Page 11-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Future Plus Extension PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #9 El Camino Real / Poinsettia Ln ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.743 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 42 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: El Camino Real Poinsettia Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 221 1190 592 271 1791 364 142 42 113 334 35 159 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 221 1190 592 271 1791 364 142 42 113 334 35 159 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 221 1190 592 271 1791 364 142 42 113 334 35 159 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 221 1190 592 271 1791 364 142 42 113 334 35 159 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 221 1190 592 271 1791 364 142 42 113 334 35 159 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.49 0.51 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3200 4800 1600 3200 3989 811 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.25 0.37 0.08 0.45 0.45 0.04 0.03 0.07 0.10 0.02 0.10 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 03 Future Ext PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:39 Page 12-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Future Plus Extension PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #10 El Camino Real / Dove Ln ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.730 Loss Time (sec): 0 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 85 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: El Camino Real Dove Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 112 1836 69 108 1915 280 241 37 122 72 29 55 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 112 1836 69 108 1915 280 241 37 122 72 29 55 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 112 1836 69 108 1915 280 241 37 122 72 29 55 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 112 1836 69 108 1915 280 241 37 122 72 29 55 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 112 1836 69 108 1915 280 241 37 122 72 29 55 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.89 0.11 1.00 2.62 0.38 1.00 0.23 0.77 1.00 0.35 0.65 Final Sat.: 1600 4626 174 1600 4188 612 1600 372 1228 1600 552 1048 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.40 0.40 0.07 0.46 0.46 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.05 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA 03 Future Ext PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:39 Page 13-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Future Plus Extension PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #11 El Camino Real / Aviara Pkwy ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.829 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 59 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: El Camino Real Aviara Pkwy Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 464 1803 667 238 1737 135 138 327 316 281 271 82 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 464 1803 667 238 1737 135 138 327 316 281 271 82 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 464 1803 667 238 1737 135 138 327 316 281 271 82 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 464 1803 667 238 1737 135 138 327 316 281 271 82 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 464 1803 667 238 1737 135 138 327 316 281 271 82 OvlAdjVol: 84 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 2.00 2.19 0.81 2.00 2.78 0.22 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.54 0.46 Final Sat.: 3200 3504 1296 3200 4454 346 3200 3200 1600 3200 2457 743 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.15 0.51 0.51 0.07 0.39 0.39 0.04 0.10 0.20 0.09 0.11 0.11 OvlAdjV/S: 0.05 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA T R A F F I C I N V E S T I G A T I O N N O V E M B E R 2 0 1 9 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA P:\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation.docx (03/19/19) APPENDIX E 2035 WITH POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS HCM Worksheets HCM 6th TWSC 03 2035 with Poinsettia AM.syn 5: Mimosa Dr & Moorhen Pl 03/14/2019 Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Synchro 10 Report LSA Analyst, AY Page 5 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.8 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT HCM 6th TWSC 03 2035 with Poinsettia AM.syn 6: Dove Ln & Moorhen Pl 03/14/2019 Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Synchro 10 Report LSA Analyst, AY Page 6 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.9 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR HCM 6th TWSC 03 2035 with Poinsettia PM.syn 5: Mimosa Dr & Moorhen Pl 03/14/2019 Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Synchro 10 Report LSA Analyst, AY Page 5 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.1 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT HCM 6th TWSC 03 2035 with Poinsettia PM.syn 6: Dove Ln & Moorhen Pl 03/14/2019 Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Synchro 10 Report LSA Analyst, AY Page 6 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.6 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR T R A F F I C I N V E S T I G A T I O N N O V E M B E R 2 0 1 9 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA P:\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation.docx (03/19/19) APPENDIX E 2035 WITH POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS Signal Queueing T R A F F I C I N V E S T I G A T I O N N O V E M B E R 2 0 1 9 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA P:\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation.docx (03/19/19) APPENDIX E 2035 WITH POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS With Southbound Right-Turn at El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane MITIG8 - 03 Future Ext AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 18:18:45 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Future Plus Extension AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #9 El Camino Real / Poinsettia Ln ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.691 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 36 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Street Name: El Camino Real Poinsettia Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 176 1531 529 166 1510 185 255 41 114 519 36 286 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 176 1531 529 166 1510 185 255 41 114 519 36 286 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 176 1531 529 166 1510 185 255 41 114 519 36 286 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 176 1531 529 166 1510 185 255 41 114 519 36 286 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 176 1531 529 166 1510 185 255 41 114 519 36 286 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 176 1531 529 166 1510 185 255 41 114 519 36 286 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.32 0.33 0.05 0.31 0.12 0.08 0.03 0.07 0.16 0.02 0.18 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA MITIG8 - 03 Future Ext PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 18:19:27 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803) Future Plus Extension PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #9 El Camino Real / Poinsettia Ln ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.680 Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 35 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Street Name: El Camino Real Poinsettia Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 221 1190 592 271 1791 364 142 42 113 334 35 159 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 221 1190 592 271 1791 364 142 42 113 334 35 159 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 221 1190 592 271 1791 364 142 42 113 334 35 159 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 221 1190 592 271 1791 364 142 42 113 334 35 159 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 221 1190 592 271 1791 364 142 42 113 334 35 159 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 221 1190 592 271 1791 364 142 42 113 334 35 159 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.25 0.37 0.08 0.37 0.23 0.04 0.03 0.07 0.10 0.02 0.10 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) APPENDIX F TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT WORKSHEETS California MUTCD 2014 Edition (FHW A's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 1 of 5) COUNT DATE --------CALC DIST co RTE PM CHK Major St: eoi":;ieH,·Q,.. Lo.n~ Critical Approach Speed Minor St: c ... ~~•·11,, '2.o~ d Critical Approach Speed Speed limit or critical speed on major street traffic> 40 mph ......................... @} or In built up area of isolated community of < 10,000 population ....................... D □ DATE DATE RURAL (R) URBAN (U) mph mph WARRANT 1 -Eight Hour Vehicular Volum e SATISFIED YES @ NO □ (Condition A or Condition B or combination of A and B must be satisfied) Condition A -Minimum Vehicle Volume MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (80% SHOWN IN BRACKETS) u R u R 100% SATISFIED YES @ NO □ 80% SATISFIED YES llf NO □ Page 841 APPROACH LANES Hour Both Approaches 500 Major Street (400) Highest A[iproach 150 Minor treet (120) Condition B -Interruption of Continuous Traffic 100% SATISFIED YES □ NO □ MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 80% SATISFIED YES □ NO □ (80% SHOWN IN BRACKETS) u R u R APPROACH 1 2 or More Ill/Ill H LANES our Both Approaches 750 525 900 630 Major Street (600) (420) (720) (504) Highest Approach 75 53 100 70 Minor Street (60) (42) (80) (56) Combination of Conditions A & B SATISFIED YES □ NO □ REQUIREMENT CONDITION ✓ FULFILLED A. MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME TWO CONDITIONS Yes D No 0 SATISFIED 80% AND, B. INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC AND, AN ADEQUATE TRIAL OF OTHER ALTERNATIVES THAT COULD CAUSE LESS DELAY AND INCONVENIENCE TO TRAFFIC HAS FAILED Yes D No □ TO SOLVE THE TRAFFIC PROBLEMS The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal. Chapter 4C -Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies Part 4 -Highway Traffic Signals November 7, 2014 California MlJTCD 2014 Edition (FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 2 of 5) WARRANT 2 -Four Hour Vehicular Volume SATISFIED* YES ri' NO □ Record hourly vehicular volumes for any four hours of an average day. 0 2 or 0/4.0%·¼·~ APPROACH LANES One More ,t-· -"'· ~ !!'-H our Both Approaches • Major Street I 8o't So't b-'60 iot. Higher Approach • Minor Street ✓ ?'>5 '+1-3 '-t~ 3 ?J-5° •All plotted points fall above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-1. (URBAN AREAS) Yes M No □ OR, All plotted points fall above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-2. (RURAL AREAS) Yes ~ No □ WARRANT 3 -Peak Hour SATISFIED YES liZ) NO 0 (Part A or Part B must be satisfied) PART A SATISFIED YES O NO 0 (All parts 1, 2, and 3 below must be satisfied for the same one hour, for any four consecutive 15-minute periods) 1. The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one-lane Yes O No D approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND 2. The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds Yes O No D 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes: 8J:ill. 3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches. PARTB SATISFIED our r 't -!' APPROACH LANES One 2 or ,.,:.: H More Both Approaches -Major Street I qob Higher Approach -Minor Street I ,bl> The plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-3. (URBAN AREAS) OR, The plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-4. (RURAL AREAS) Yes D No D YES i NO □ Yes !Y1 No □ Yes ~ No □ Page 842 The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal. Chapter 4C -Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies Part 4 -Highway Traffic Signals November 7, 2014 California MUTCD 2014 Edition (FHW A's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2, as amended for use in California) ~~~ Ei@~ ~T:__W~~@t.=2J=pu_t-Hour Vehicular Volume "\'"3 50Cr· -·---._.,n ----- 400 MINOR STREET 300 HIGHER- VOLUME APPROACH -200 VPH 100 300 MORE LANES & 1 LANE I I 1 LANE & 1 LANE 400 500 600 ~700 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES- VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) ·Note: 11 5 vph applies as the lower threshold volume tor a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 80 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. Figure 4C-2. Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume (70% Factor) (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 40 MPH ON MAJOR STREET) MINOR STREET HIGHER- VOLUME APPROACH - VPH 400 300 200 100 I I I I ORE LANE~ I 2 OR MORE LANf S & 1 LAN~ I I I 1 NE & 1 LANE Page 836 h,~h~ ~~ L...toQ All po:.,, h o.\o o-,/4!-C...U<ves so· 60' 200 300 400 500 600 ~ 700 800 MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES- VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) 900 'Note: 80 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 60 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. Chapter 4C -Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies Part 4 -Highway Traffic Signals 1000 November 7, 2014 California MUTCD 2014 Edition (FHW A's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour 600 ,---.----.,--.----.----.----.----.----.----.----.----.----.----.----, ? '8 MINOR STREET HIGHER- VOLUME APPROACH - VPH 500 f---t-3'o,..,-t---t--"' .... t----fL---t---t---t---+---+--+--+---+----I Page 837 7""-~-..;p-+--1 150' 100 1--1--1--1--i---U--i-.--i---i--_:~~~-~:::;:::-.~~ 1 oo· ''° 0 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES- VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) 'Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. Figure 4C-4. Warrant 3, Peak Hour (70% Factor) i,<,i (COMMUNITY LESS THAN1o,cioo POP ULATION oR\sovE 40 MPH ON MAJOR STREET) ~00 ,---~--~-~-~--~--'--~-~----~ 400 MINOR STREET 300 HIGHER- VOLUME APPROACH -200 VPH 100 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES- VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) 'Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. Chapter 4C -Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies Part 4 -Highway Traffic Signals November 7, 2014 California MUTCD 2014 Edition (FHW A's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 3 of 5) WARRANT 4 -Pedestrian Volume (Parts 1 and 2 Must Be Satisfied) A. B. Part 1 (Parts A or B must be satisfied) Hours ---> Vehicles per hour for any 4 hours Pedestrians per hour for any 4 hours Hours ---> Vehicles per hour for any 1 hour Pedestrians per hour for any 1 hour Part 2 0 SATISFIED YES O NO 00 Figure 4C-5 or Figure 4C-6 SATISFIED YES □ NO 0 Figure 4C-7 or Figure 4C-8 / SATISFIED YES O NO [ti SATISFIED YES O NO 0 Af:l.12, The distance to the nearest traffic signal along the major street is greater Yes D No 0 than 300 ft OR, The proposed traffic signal will not restrict progressive traffic flow along the major street. Yes D No 0 WARRANT 5 · School Crossing (Parts A and B Must Be Satisfied) SATISFIED YES O NO ~ a P rtA G SATISFIED YES O NO 0 ap/Minutes and # of Children Hou Gaps I Minutes Children Using Crossing vs I Minutes Number of Adequate Gaps Ga ps < Minutes School Age Pedestrians Crossing Street / hr AN __Q Children > 20/hr AND, Consideration has been given to less restrictive remedial measures. YES O NO 0 YES O NO 0 Yes D No D Part B SATISFIED YES O NO □ The distance to the nearest traffic signal along the major street is greater Yes □ No 0 than 300 ft QR, The proposed signal will not restrict the progressive movement of traffic. Yes □ No 0 Page 843 The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal. Chapter 4C -Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies Part 4 -Highway Traffic Signals November 7, 2014 California MUTCD 2014 Edition (FHW A's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2, as amended for use in California) 700 600 TOTAL OF ALL 5oo PEDESTRIANS CROSSING MAJOR STREET- PEDESTRIANS 400 300 PER HOUR (PPH) 200 100 Figure 4C-7. Warrant 4, Pedestrian Peak Hour ' ...... ' "' ... """ .............. -... i'-.... ......... ....._ --133· 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 100011001200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES- VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) 'Note: 133 pph applies as the lower threshold volume. Figure 4C-8. Warrant 4, Pedestrian Peak Hour {70% Factor) 500 400 TOTAL OF ALL PEDESTRIANS 300 CROSSING MAJOR STREET- PEDESTRIANS 200 PER HOUR (PPH) 100 200 ' 300 "-... ' "' .......... ~-.............. -......_ i--.... 93• 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES- VEH ICLES PER HOUR (VPH) 'Nole: 93 pph applies as the lower lhrest1old volume. Page 839 Chapter 4C -Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies Part 4 -Highway Traffic Signals November 7, 2014 California MUTCD 2014 Edition (FHW A's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 4 of 5) WARRANT 6 -Coordinated Signal System (All Parts Must Be Satisfied) SATISFIED YES O NO 0 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS DISTANCE TO NEAREST SIGNAL ;;: 1000 ft N __ ft, s __ rt, E __ tt, w __ rt Yes □ No□ On a one-way street or a street that has traffic predominantly in one direction, the adjacent traffic control signals are so far apart that they do not provide the necessary degree of vehicular platooning. Yes □ No□ ----------------------------------QR. On a two-way street, adjacent traffic control slgnals do not provide the necessary degree of platooning and the proposed and adjacent traffic control signals will collectively provide a progressive operation. WARRANT 7 -Crash Experience Warrant (All Parts Must Be Satisfied) SATISFIED YES O NO 0 Adequate trial of alternatives with satisfactory observance and enforcement has failed to reduce the crash frequency. Yes □ No□ REQUIREMENTS Number of crashes reported within a 12 month period susceptible to correction by a traffic signal, and involving injury Yes □ NoO or damage exceeding the requirements for a reportable crash. -------------------------------------------------5 OR MORE REQUIREMENTS CONDITIONS ✓ Warrant 1, Condition A - Minimum Vehicular Volume ONE CONDITION QR, Warrant 1, Condition B -Yes□ NoO SATISFIED 80% Interruption of Continuous Traffic QR, Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume Condition Ped Vol;;: 80% of Figure 4C-5 through Figure 4C-8 WARRANT 8 -Roadway Network (All Parts Must Be Satisfied) SATISFIED YES O NO 0 MINIMUM VOLUME ENTERING VOLUMES -ALL APPROACHES ✓ FULFILLED REQUIREMENTS During Typical Weekday Peak Hour Veh/Hr and has 5-year projected traffic volumes that meet one or more 1000 Veh/Hr of Warrants 1, 2, and 3 during an average weekday. Yes □ No□ ~-----------------------,__ OR During Each of Any 5 Hrs. of a Sal. or Sun __ Veh/Hr CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJOR ROUTES MAJOR MAJOR ROUTE A ROUTE B Hwy. System Serving as Principal Network for Through Traffic ~-------------------------------- Rural or Suburban Highway Outside Of, Entering, or Traversing a City ~-------------------------------- Appears as Major Route on an Official Plan Any Major Route Characteristics Met. Both Streets Yes □ No□ Page 844 The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal. Chapter 4C -Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies Part 4 -Highway Traffic Signals November 7, 2014 California MUTCD 2014 Edition (FHW A's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 5 of 5) WARRANT 9 -Intersection Near a Grade Crossing (Both Parts A and B Must Be Satisfied) SATISFIED YES O NO 0 PART A A grade crossing exists on an approach controlled by a STOP or YIELD sign and the Yes □ No□ center of the track nearest to the intersection is within 140 feet of the stop line or yield line on the approach. Track Center Line to Limit Line __ ft PARTS There is one minor street approach lane at the track crossing • During the highest traffic volume hour during which rail traffic uses the crossing, the plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-9. Major Street -Total of both approaches: __ VPH Minor Street -Crosses the track (one direction only, approaching the 1ntersect1on): __ VPH X AF (Use Tables 4C-2, 3, & 4 below to calculate AF) = __ VPH -----------------------------------Yes □ No□ QB, There are two or more minor street approach lanes at the track crossing - During the highest traffic volume hour during which rail traffic uses the crossing, the plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-10. Major Street -Total of both approaches : __ VPH Minor Street -Crosses the track (one direction only, approaching the intersection): __ VPH X AF (Use Tables 4C-2, 3, & 4 below to calcualte AF)= __ VPH The minor street approach volume may be multiplied by up to three following adjustment factors (AF) as described in Section 4C.10. 1-Number of Rail Traffic per Day _____________ Adjustment factor from table 4C-2 __ 2-Percentage of High-Occupancy Buses on Minor StreetApproach __ Adjustment factor from table 4C-3 __ 3-Percentage of Tractor-Trailer Trucks on Minor Street Approach ___ Adjustment factor from table 4C-4 __ NOTE: If no data is availale or known, then use AF = 1 (no adjustment) Page 845 Chapter 4C -Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies Part 4 -Highway Traffic Signals November 7, 2014 California MUTCD 2014 Edition (FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 1 of 5) COUNT DATE _________ _ CALC ____ _ DATE ____ _ DIST co RTE PM CHK ____ _ DATE ____ _ Major St: P Qjr-Se.H;o. L <1.r~ Critical Approach Speed Minor St: S k ,·a:-m « cJ: -Qr io I~ C. + Critical Approach Speed ------mph ______ mph Speed limit or critical speed on major street traffic> 40 mph ......................... ti} or In built up area of isolated community of< 10,000 population ....................... D □ RURAL (R) URBAN (U) WARRANT 1 -Eight Hour Vehicular Volume SATISFIED YES O NO 0 (Condition A or Condition B or combination of A and B must be satisfied) Condition A -Minimum Vehicle Volume MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (80% SHOWN IN BRACKETS) u R u R .t· r;r 00 100% SATISFIED YES 80% SATISFIED YES ~t 00 0 0 .. □ NO fi □ NO [ill' Page 841 APPROACH 2 or More LANES Hour Both Approaches 500 350 600 420 Major Street (400) (280) (480) (336 Highest Approach 150 200 140 Minor Street 120 (160) (112 Condition B -Interruption of Continuous Traffic MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (80% SHOWN IN BRACKETS) u R u R APPROACH LANES Both Approaches 750 Major Street (600) Highest Approach 75 Minor Street (60) Combination of Conditions A & B REQUIREMENT CONDITION A TWO CONDITIONS MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME SATISFIED 80% AND, 100% SATISFIED YES O NO @ 80% SATISFIED YES O NO li2( 0 0 _a;· Hour SATISFIED YES O NO 0 ✓ FULFILLED Yes D No 0 B. INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC AND, AN ADEQUATE TRIAL OF OTHER ALTERNATIVES THAT COULD Yes D No 0 CAUSE LESS DELAY AND INCONVENIENCE TO TRAFFIC HAS FAILED TO SOLVE THE TRAFFIC PROBLEMS The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal. Chapter 4C -Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies Part 4 -Highway Traffic Signals November 7, 2014 California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 842 (FHW A's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 2 of 5) WARRANT 2 -Four Hour Vehicular Volume SATISFIED* YES O NO ' Record hourly vehicular volumes for any four hours of an average da~ 0 0 our 2 or o/j·~·fa·? APPROACH LANES One More :t·: ... 1r· ,VJ .!!-H Both Approaches -Major Street ✓ ,, 21¾~ ·n'!> 1,qo 61.'f Higher Approach -Minor Street I 68 'to 3-6 '3't *All plotted points fall above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-1. (URBAN AREAS) Yes □ No OR, All plotted points fall above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-2. (RURAL AREAS) Yes □ No liZl WARRANT 3 -Peak Hour SATISFIED YES O NO 0 (Part A or Part B must be satisfied) PART A SATISFIED YES O NO 0 (All parts 1, 2, and 3 below must be satisfied for the same one hour, for any four consecutive 15-minute periods) 1. The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one-lane Yes O No O approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND ~--------------------------------------------------------------- 2. The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds Yes D No D 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND 3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches. .~ PARTS SATISFIED our 2 or ~~ H :,. APPROACH LANES One More 'V Both Approaches -Major Street ✓ I /Zi>l Higher Approach -Minor Street ✓ b3 Tl1e plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-3. (URBAN AREAS) OR, The plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-4. (RURAL AREAS) Yes O No D YES O NO 0 Yes □ No 0 Yes □ No ~ The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal. Chapter 4C -Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies Part 4 -Highway Traffic Signals November 7, 2014 California MUTCD 2014 Edition (FHW A's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) 500 400 MINOR ·sTREET 300 HIGHER- VOLUME APPROACH -200 VPH 100 6-& 'lg '3 '+ Figure 4C-1. Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume 2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES 2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE I I 1 LANE & 1 LANE 300 400 500 ool; ~oo~ 800 goo 1000 1100 1200 i 1300 1400 "' -:0 MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES-~ VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) "Note: 115 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 80 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. Figure 4C-2. Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume (70% Factor) (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 40 MPH ON MAJOR STREET) 400 MINOR STREET HIGHER- VOLUME APPROACH- VPH 300 2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE I I 200 1 LANE & 1 LANE 100 --·---- 200 ------ 300 400 500 eof i oo rt-800 soo MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES- VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) 'Note: 80 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 60 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. Chapter 4C -Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies Part 4 -Highway Traffic Signals 1000 Page 836 (.8 --, I I ' 0-:r N November 7, 2014 California MUTCD 2014 Edition (FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2, as amended for use in California) MINOR STREET HIGHER- VOLUME APPROACH - VPH Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour Page 837 ,--=1:::::~-F--+----f 150° 100 (--l--l--l--l--+--+--+--+--+-===~--¾-..;;;;::::..+-~ 100' €,3 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200~ 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 --MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES- VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) •Note: ·tso vph applies as tile lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or rnore lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. Figure 4C-4. Warrant 3, Peak Hour (70% Factor) (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 40 MPH ON MAJOR STREET) 400 MINOR STREET 300 HIGHER- VOLUME APPROACH -200 VPH 1----+-----.~t--2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES --;-----1 300 I I I I 2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE 1 LANE & 1 LANE 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 '<> 1300 l.r ,.. MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES-_ ... VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) 'Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approacll with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. Chapter 4C -Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies Part 4 -Highway Traffic Signals November 7, 2014 California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 843 (FHW A's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 3 of 5) WARRANT 4 -Pedestrian Volume (Parts 1 and 2 Must Be Satisfied) A. B. Part 1 (Parts A or B must be satisfied) Hours ---> Vehicles per hour for any 4 hours Pedestrians per hour for any 4 hours Hours ---> Vehicles per hour for any 1 hour Pedestrians per hour for any 1 hour Part 2 l,3il b SATISFIED YES O NO g Figure 4C-5 or Figure 4C-6 SATISFIED YES O NO □ Figure 4C-7 or Figure 4C-~ SATISFIED YES O NO hZI SATISFIED YES □ NO □ AND, The distance to the nearest traffic signal along the major street is greater than 300 ft Yes D No 0 OR, The proposed traffic signal will not restrict progressive traffic flow along the major street. Yes 0 No 0 WARRANT 5 -School Crossing (Parts A and B Must Be Satisfied} SATISFIED YES O NO 0 a P rtA G SATISFIED YES O NO □ ap/Minutes and # of Children Ho ur Gaps Minutes Children Using Crossing vs Minutes Number of Adequate Gaps Ga ps < Minutes School Age Pedestrians Crossing Street/ hr A ND Children > 20/hr AND, Consideration has been given to less restrictive remedial measures. YES O NO 0 YES O NO 0 Yes D No D Part B SATISFIED YES O NO □ The distance to the nearest traffic signal along the major street is greater than 300 ft Yes D No 0 OR, The proposed signal will not restrict the progressive movement of traffic. Yes 0 No □ The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal. Chapter 4C -Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies Part 4 -Highway Traffic Signals November 7, 2014 California MUTCD 2014 Edition (FHW A's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2, as amended for use in California) TOTAL OF ALL PEDESTRIANS CROSSING MAJOR STREET- PEDESTRIANS PER HOUR (PPH} 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 Figure 4C-7. Warrant 4, Pedestrian Peak Hour ' ~"'- "'-.. .... r---.. ... ~ r---..... r-,...__ .......... i-... 133' 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES- VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) •Note: 133 pph applies as the lower threshold volume. Figure 4C-8. Warrant 4, Pedestrian Peak Hour (70% Factor) 500 400 TOTAL OF ALL PEDESTRIANS 300 CROSSING MAJOR STREET- PEDESTRIANS 200 PER HOUR (PPH) 100 200 , .... 300 ............ r---...... "' r---.... r----... r-....... -93' 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES- VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) 'Note: 93 pph applies as the lower threshold volume. Page 839 Chapter4C-Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies Part 4 -Highway Traffic Signals November 7, 2014 California MUTCD 2014 Edition (FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions l & 2, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 4 of 5) WARRANT 6 -Coordinated Signal System (All Parts Must Be Satisfied) SATISFIED YES O NO 0 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS DISTANCE TO NEAREST SIGNAL ~ 1000 ft N __ ft. s __ rt, E __ ft, w __ R Yes □ No □ On a one-way street or a street that has traffic predominantly in one direction, the adjacent traffic control signals are so far apart that they do not provide the necessary degree of vehicular platooning. Yes □ No □ ----------------------------------QB, On a two-way street, adjacent traffic control signals do not provide the necessary degree of platooning and the proposed and adjacent traffic control signals will collectively provide a progressive operation. WARRANT 7 -Crash Experience Warrant (All Parts Must Be Satisfied) SATISFIED YES O NO □ Adequate trial of alternatives with satisfactory observance and enforcement has failed to reduce the crash frequency. Yes □ No □ REQUIREMENTS Number of crashes reported within a 12 month period Yes □ No□ susceptible to correction by a traffic signal, and involving injury or damage exceeding the requirements for a reportable crash. -------------------------------------------------5OR MORE REQUIREMENTS CONDITIONS ✓ Warrant 1, Condition A - Minimum Vehicular Volume ONE CONDITION QR, Warrant 1, Condition B -Yes □ No□ SATISFIED 80% Interruption of Continuous Traffic QB, Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume Condition Ped Vol ~ 80% of Figure 4C-5 through FigL1re 4C-8 WARRANT 8 -Roadway Network (All Parts Must Be Satisfied) SATISFIED YES □ NO □ MINIMUM VOLUME ENTERING VOLUMES -ALL APPROACHES ✓ FULFILLED REQUIREMENTS During Typical Weekday Peak Hour Veh/Hr and has 5-year projected traffic volumes that meet one or more 1000 Vel1/Hr of Warrants 1. 2. and 3 during an average weekday. Yes □ No□ --------------------------OR During Each of Any 5 Hrs. of a Sat. or Sun ___ Veh/Hr CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJOR ROUTES MAJOR MAJOR ROUTE A ROUTE B Hwy. System Serving as Principal Network for Through Traffic ---------------------------------Rural or Suburban Highway Outside Of, Entering, or Traversing a City --------------------------------- Appears as Major Route on an Official Plan Any Maior Route Characteristics Met. Both Streets Yes□ No□ Page 844 The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal. Chapter 4C -Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies Part 4 -Highway Traffic Signals November 7, 2014 California MUTCD 201 4 Edition (FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 5 of 5) WARRANT 9 -Intersection Near a Grade Crossing (Both Parts A and B Must Be Satisfied) SATISFIED YES □ NO □ PART A A grade crossing exists on an approach controlled by a STOP or YIELD sign and the Yes□ No □ center of the track nearest to the intersection is within 140 feet of the stop line or yield line on the approach. Track Center Line to Limit Line __ ft PARTB There is one minor street approach lane at the track crossing • During the highest traffic volume hour during which rail traffic uses the crossing, the plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-9. Major Street -Total of both approaches: __ VPH Minor Street -Crosses the track (one direction only, approaching the intersection): __ VPH X AF (Use Tables 4C-2, 3, & 4 below to calculate AF) = __ VPH ~----------------------------------Yes □ No □ QB, There are two or more minor street approach lanes at the track crossing - During the highest traffic volume hour during which rail traffic uses the crossing, the plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-10. Major Street -Total of both approaches : __ VPH Minor Street -Crosses the track (one direction only, approaching the intersection): __ VPH X AF (Use Tables 4C-2, 3, & 4 below to calcualte AF) = __ VPH The minor street approach volume may be multiplied by up to three following adjustment factors (AF) as described in Section 4C.10. 1-Number of Rail Traffic per Day _____________ Adjustment factor from table 4C-2 __ 2-Percentage of High-Occupancy Buses on Minor Street Approach __ Adjustment factor from table 4C-3 __ 3-Percentage of Tractor-Trailer Trucks on Minor Street Approach ___ Adjustment factor from table 4C-4 __ NOTE: If no data is availale or known, then use AF = 1 (no adjustment) Page 845 Chapter 4C -Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies Part 4 -Highway Traffic Signals November 7, 2014 TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION NOVEMBER 2019 POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA \\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic Investigation3.docx (11/12/19) APPENDIX G POINSETTIA LANE BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT RESULTS From: Sent: To: Subject: Patrick Somerville <psomerville@HNTB.com> Thursday, March 14, 2019 9:42 PM Arthur Black RE: Carlsbad Arthur, I swung by on my way back up from SD. That vault is for SDG&E gas and it appears that it does not have a traffic rated lid on it. It also may not be able to be adjusted to the new street grade without rebuilding the vault in its entirety (or relocate elsewhere). One of two things will happen…1) they are in franchise and all costs are on SDG&E or 2) they have an easement or prior rights and the City will pick up the tab of the work. It’s really difficult to understand what that cost might be…range might be $100k to $500k (or more for full relocation). There is a 16” Kinder Morgan petroleum line in the street. There is a cathodic protection testing station in the curb return, this is a simple adjust to grade. Traffic signal controller will be in the way and require relocation. Retaining wall will reach 12’ in height at the corner. This should be a typical/standard plan retaining wall. Assuming it’ll go this route instead of slope to minimize impact to mitigation area. I took some pics while I was out there, sent you a Dropbox link to them. Length Width- Depth Total- Conversion Unit Cost Cost Item 200 8 1600 $ 6.00 $ 9,600 SW 200 $ 30.00 $ 6,000 CG 2100 1 0.074 $ 150.00 $ 23,310 AC 2100 2 27 $ 75.00 $ 11,667 AB 3700 3 27 $ 50.00 $ 20,556 RX 200 8 $ 100.00 $ 160,000 Wall $ 100,000 TS Mod $ 2,500 S&S 500 $ 10.00 $ 5,000 Planting & Irrigation 20% $ 66,226 Misc Items $ 404,859 Subtotal Construction 30% $ 121,458 Soft Costs 2100 $ 50.00 $ 105,000 R/W 30% $ 189,395 Contingency $ 820,711 Total Estimate Pat This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are NOT the intended recipient and receive this communication, please delete this message and any attachments. Thank you. This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are NOT the intended recipient and receive this communication, please delete this message and any attachments. Thank you. CARLSBAD FRESNO IRVINE LOS ANGELES PALM SPRINGS POINT RICHMOND RIVERSIDE ROSEVILLE SAN LUIS OBISPO 703 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 260, Carlsbad, California 92011 760.931.5471 www.lsa.net LSA is a business name of LSA Associates, Inc. MEMORANDUM DATE: October 2, 2018 TO: The City of Carlsbad FROM: Jaime Morales, LSA Senior Biologist SUBJECT: Poinsettia Lane Reach E Project – Biological Resources Assessment Results (LSA Project No. HCR1803) This memorandum describes the results of a biological resources assessment performed at the project area at the northwestern corner of the intersection of Poinsettia Avenue and El Camino Real in the City of Carlsbad, California (see attached Figure 1 for project location; all figures attached). METHODOLOGY On September 18, 2018, LSA Senior Biologist Jaime Morales walked the entire study area (a larger area surrounding and including the impact footprint) and mapped vegetation communities according to the Habitat Management Plan for Natural Communities in the City of Carlsbad (HMP) vegetation classifications. Mr. Morales used a field map containing a recent aerial photograph to record vegetation communities on site. Mr. Morales documented all plant and wildlife species observed and/or detected during the assessment. RESULTS With respect to the HMP, the study area is within the Coastal Zone, within the eastern edge of the central section of Local Facilities Management Zone 21, and within an existing hardline preserve (Preserve Number P/A#705). A portion of the study area (southern end) is within a standards area that will be a future preserve. A very small portion (southeastern corner of the study area) closest to the intersection of El Camino Real and Poinsettia Lane is outside of existing hardline preserve and standards areas. Figure 2 displays the boundaries of the preserve and standards areas. Soils within the study area are composed of Loamy alluvial land-Huerhuero complex, 9 to 50 percent slopes, severely eroded. This complex occurs on old coastal ridges. The landscape is one of strongly sloping to steep, severely eroded soils and alluvial fill along drainage ways. There are barren exposures of soft marine sediments, sandstone, and shale. The vegetation within the study area was dominated by southern maritime chaparral that appeared to be recovering from a recent fire, as evidenced by the charred remains of several bushes. The southern maritime chaparral comprises the following species: Del Mar manzanita (Arctostaphylos glandulosa ssp. crassifolia; federally-listed as endangered, California Rare Plant Rank [CRPR] 1B.1, Narrow Endemic Species), summer holly (Comarostaphylis diversifolia ssp. diversifolia; CRPR 1B.2), 10/2/18 (P:\HCR1803\Bio\Bio Assessment Memo.docx) 2 coastal goldenbush (Isocoma menziesii), common sun rose (Helianthemum scoparium), virgated wreath plant (Stephanomeria virgata), bushmallow (Malacothamnus densiflorus), laurel sumac (Malosma laurina), deerweed (Acmispon glaber), brittlebush (Encelia farinosa), California buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum), black sage (Salvia mellifera), lemonadeberry (Rhus integrifolia), chamise (Adenostoma fasciculata), coyote brush (Baccharis pilularis), coastal prickly pear (Opuntia littoralis), and Mojave yucca (Yucca schidigera). A row of mostly mature coastal goldenbush and brittlebush shrubs occurs west of and adjacent to the sidewalk on the west side of El Camino Real (east of the eastern property fence). An area near the center of the study area lacks vegetation and was mapped as bare ground. Figure 2 displays the boundaries of vegetation communities within the study area. The following wildlife species were observed during the biological resources assessment: western tiger swallowtail (Papilio rutulus), western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentali), American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos), black phoebe (Sayornis nigricans), house finch (Haemorhous mexicanus), and mourning dove (Zenaida macroura). Del Mar manzanita and summer holly were the only special-status plant species observed during the biological resources assessment. No special-status wildlife species were observed or detected during the biological resources assessment. Based on a review of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) and the California Native Plant Society’s Online Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California, the following special-status plant and wildlife species have a potential to occur within the study area due to the presence of suitable habitat: Del Mar Mesa sand aster (Corethrogyne filaginifolia ssp. linifolia; CRPR 1B.1, Narrow Endemic Species), Orcutt’s brodiaea (Brodiaea orcuttii; CRPR 1B.1, Narrow Endemic Species), Nuttall’s scrub oak (Quercus dumosa; CRPR 1B.1), wart-stemmed ceanothus (Ceanothus verrucosus; CRPR 2B.2), coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica; federally-listed as threatened, CDFW Species of Special Concern), and northwestern San Diego pocket mouse (Chaetodipus fallax ssp. fallax; CDFW Species of Special Concern). Nuttall’s scrub oak and wart-stemmed ceanothus are conspicuous, perennial shrubs that would have been identified had they been on site. Orcutt’s brodiaea and Del Mar Mesa sand aster are perennial herbs that would be difficult to identify when not flowering. Orcutt’s brodiaea flowers between the months of May and July, while Del Mar Mesa sand aster flowers from March through September. Neither of these species was identified within the study area during the survey. A focused survey for Orcutt’s brodiaea and Del Mar Mesa sand aster would need to be performed to determine conclusively that these species are absent from the study area. Although coastal California gnatcatcher was not detected during the biological resources assessment, the southern maritime chaparral within the study area is suitable to support this species. A focused survey for coastal California gnatcatcher would need to be performed to determine conclusively that this species is absent from the study area. Because burrows were generally absent from the study area and the most recent occurrence of northwestern San Diego pocket mouse in the vicinity of the study area (per the CNDDB) was in 1992, this species is not expected to be present within the study area. 10/2/18 (P:\HCR1803\Bio\Bio Assessment Memo.docx) 3 No aquatic resources subject to City of Carlsbad or resource agency jurisdiction were identified within the study area during the biological resources assessment. CONCLUSION Portions of the study area are within existing hardline preserve and standards areas. Per the Guidelines for Biological Studies (Technology Associates 2008), impacts to biological resources are not allowed within hardline areas, unless (a) they are associated with a covered project, as defined by the HMP, (b) an equivalency finding results in a minor amendment and adjustment to the hardline boundaries, or (c) a major amendment to the HMP is approved. If impacts within hardline areas are approved, the HMP will require a 3:1 mitigation to impact ratio for impacts to southern maritime chaparral. An impact area that includes the workspace necessary to perform the proposed road improvement and all necessary access and staging areas will be required to quantify impacts to southern maritime chaparral and to determine the total mitigation requirement. Furthermore, because the project site is within the Coastal Zone, the project must comply with additional conservation standards in the HMP (Conservation Standards 7-1 to 7-14 on page D-114 of the HMP). Focused surveys for Orcutt’s brodiaea, Del Mar Mesa sand aster, and coastal California gnatcatcher should be performed to determine the presence/absence of these species. Please contact me at (760) 934-5471 or at Jaime.Morales@LSA.net if you have any questions or comments. ATTACHMENTS • Figure 1: Project Location Map • Figure 2: Vegetation Map Service Layer Credits: © 2018 Microsoft Corporation © 2018 DigitalGlobe ©CNES SOURCE: Bing Maps (2015)I:\HCR1803\GIS\ProjLoc.mxd (10/2/2018) FIGURE 1 Poinsettia Lane Reach E ProjectProject Location Project Vicinity 0 1000 2000 FEET LEGEND Project Location San DiegoCounty ÃÃ56 ÃÃ78 ÃÃ76 ProjectLocation §¨¦805 §¨¦15 §¨¦5 Project Vicinity Project Location Service Layer Credits: © 2018 Microsoft Corporation © 2018 DigitalGlobe ©CNES SOURCE: Bing Maps (2015)I:\HCR1803\GIS\Veg.mxd (10/2/2018) FIGURE 2 Poinsettia Lane Reach E ProjectVegetation Communities 0 50 100 FEET LEGEND Study Area Vegetation Bare Ground Southern Maritime Chaparral Carlsbad HMP Standards Area Existing Hardline Preserve