Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-11-04; Ballot PamphletsCounty of ) San Diego, California es Sample Ballot & Voter Information Pamphlet GENERAL ELECTION TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1986 POLLS OPEN AT 7 A.M. AND CLOSE AT 8 P.M. THE LOCATION OF YOUR POLLING PLACE . IS SHOWN ON THE BACK COVER Inlormation concerning Ihe State Propositions will be nailed by ttie Secretary o( State in a separate pamphlet Spanish translation of this pamphlet is available upon request from the Office of the Registrar of Voters. Este folleto esiA disponible en espanol previa peticibn al Registrador de Votantes. Compiled and Distributed by: REGISTRAR OF VOTERS 5201-1 Ruffin Road San Diego, CA 32123 (619)565-5800 415 ;1 •i; VOTER INFORMATION PAMPHLET The following pages contain CANDI DATE'S STATEM ENTS together with BALLOT MEASURES, ANALYSES, ji ARGUMENTS AND REBUTTALS (whichever Is applicable to your ballot) Some of the following pages may contain proposed charter amendments. The portions to be deleted are printed in «(nke'Out type, and the portions to be added are underlined. Argunwnts in support of or in opposition to the proposed iaws are the opinions of the authors and have not been checked for accuracy by any official agency. CANDIDATE'S STATEMENTS Although all local nonpartisan candidates had the opportunity to submit a statement, the foilowing pages may not contain a complete list of statements. A complete list of candidates appears on the sample ballot. Each statement is volunteered by the candidate. The statements are the opinions of the authors and have not been checked for accuracy by any official agency. 41S-13 FP-2 2) Ciry OF CARLSBAD Mayor CLAUDE "BUD" LEV\^IS Age: 55 * Teacher - Varsity Coach As your Councilman for the past sixteen years, I have responded to your concerns in the devetopment of our city. Our need for more roads, schools, and parks has been evident. I have repeatedly voted against any development v/hich would put additional strain on these facilities. As Vice Mayor, I pushed for a strict Growth Management Plat, where facilities and services must be in place prior to development I believe the City's plan, which I co-authored, is the best solution to the growth problems facing our city. I have insisted upon and encouraged the council to approve a significant reduction in the overall density ol our city. This will allow for an inweased allotment for open spaces. Another achievement was my work on the recently revised traffic circulation plan. The Growth Management Plan includes this and also states that adequc*e circulation mtjst be in place prfor to devetopment I will continue to work to prevent any expansion of Pal,, mar Airport. Myofhor priorities will bo the construction of a Sentor Citizen's Center, a permanent library in South Carlsbad, and city-wide park faciiities. Support me as your Mayor. I have the experience and connfritment to orovide the leadership whtoh Carlsbad needsl CITY OF CARLSBAD Mayor BOB PRESCOTT Community Activist/Businessman Education and Qualiricattons: Graduate - University ol New Hampshire. Lt Col. USMC, Ret Family owned and operated travel agency. \ ^ .15 years in elected office as Presiden* & Member of MiraCosta College Board of Trustees and Carlsbad City Councilmember. Service on many local, regional, state and federal committees and commisstons. Leader in Fight to Stop Bullet Train. Carlsbad has been our family's hometown since 1961. Throughout the yea's, I ha\'s been active in the community, working for better educatton, parks, libraries, poltoe and fire servtoes, and the best in environmental quality. ji As we detemnine our course into the future, Carisbad will need a full time mayor. 1 can fill that need, providing the city with stable and responsive leadership. I wili be available to represent this city on the many regional and state agem ie;; which make decisions that . vitally effect our community. I win work to: (l)Regulate Growth <2)lmprove Traffk: Circulatton (3)Provide Adequate Sentor Facilities (4)E)^dlte Development of our Parks and Ball Fields (5)Protect our Beaches and Lagoons. I will work to Unite the community and wori< to develop a strong unity of purpose. !} I ask for your vote on November 4th. ; t /t NCS-022.1 41S-2J .t CITY OF CARLSBAD Member of the City Council LOIS HUMPHREYS Age: 40 Director, Leucadia County Water As a tong time community activist and present officeholder on the Loucadia County Water District, I feel I am well qualified to be on the Carlsbad City Council. I have woiked diligentty In Carisbad to see that our tax dollars are spent wisely. I led the election which defeated a satellite sewage treatment facility which would have been located near to residential homes and cost millions in wasted tax money, i helped other citizens pressure the City Courx;il into passing more open and honest campaign disctosure laws. I worked to protect reside.nts from the danger and noise of trucks passing through our neighborhood streets. I worked with Concerned Citizens to gather signatures for the Citizens Stow Growth Initiative, and I wholeheartedly support that measure. The future of Cartsbad will depend on elected officials with experience in tocal government and who can plan intelligently for thei future. As your elected Council member, you will have a leader who will respond to citizens' concerns and who will help Carisbad grow sensitively, gracefully and sensibly into a community in whtoh we will alt be proud to live. CITY OF CARLSBAD Member of the City Council PAT HOLZEMER-RUNSVOLD Age: 48 Teacher; Administrative Assistant I believe as a tong time resident of Carisbad that I can more truly represent the larger group of our citizens that dermnd and expect reasonable and economtoal soluttons to our city's current problems. I am an Educatton graduate of the Columtxjs, Ohio Dominican College. 1 have taught in Ohto, California and overseas for the Department of Defense. I am married to a native California businessman and we have four children who have attended Cartsbad Schools. I subscribe to tocal newspapers and am conversant with the woridngs of our city council and the Coastal Commisston. I am a very active representative of the city neighborhood where my family resides. My principal concerns for Carisbad are: 1. To represent all citizens equally, fairly and with courtesy ... 2. Insist on tighter control of building growth and development to prevent toss of planning control and excess cost burden to current citizens ... 3. Institute neighborhood 'lown-meetings" whtoh will address, update and represent the needs and desires of the citizens to the City Council... 4. Insist that La Costa area families have full ropresentatton In Carisbad planning for Integratton of southern areas ... 5. Listen to the wisdom of senior citizens ... 6. Clean and adequate supply of water for a growing city. NCS-022.2 415-24 CITY OF CARLSBAD Member of the City Council ROGER BURKE Age: 50 Training Administrator My wife Elizabeth and I have lived in Carisbad with our four child^on «or the past , seventeen years. I My concern for the future of Carlsbad and my pride in what it has t>een and can be led me i to fite for this office. During the next few short yea^s Carisbad will take its final ( configuration. This is the most vital point in our city's history. I want to make sure that the ^ special features of our city are retained. The most important of these are our remaining I Eucalyptus groves, our beaches and our lagoons. We must make sure that each step we take now toads to enhancement of these key features, as well as, to selectton of the most beautiful addittonal projects that can be designed. Whito Assistant Principal at Carisbad High School and an President of the Optimist Club of Cartsbad, I provided leadership to foster a cooperative, cost effective approach with other I • comnxinity service organizations and city officials on many civte projects. One of the most memorable of those projects was the Carisbad Bicentennial Celebratton which I had the privilege to direct. I wish to continue my public service as your councilman and I enlist your support. f: I: i I CITY OF CARLSBAD Member of !he City Council MARYLYNN BROWN-BELLMAN (MBB) Age: 44 Community Planner/Consuitant/Businesswoman B.A., Anthropok>gy; MA, Urban/Environmental Planning Memberships include: The Carisbad Historic Society and Chamtjer of Commerce, The Buena Vista and Batiquitos Lagoon Foundations. 10 years professional experience in Community Planning overseas, S.D. County and tocal City Planner/Consultant. As a 12 year resident of our community, I recognize and understand the unique complexities faced by our growing populace. My goals will be: Growth Management - Controlling the rate and pace of growth is an absolute must that I support. The future appearance of our City however, has not yet been addressed. I will therefore vigorously wort( to imptoment a system of cleariy understandable guidelines tor tocal devetopment consistent with our citizens' desires. Publto Facilities - I will Insure the timely completi'^n of a new full-service Senior Citizens Center. Library Facilities must be expanded at the main branch and full services extended I j to the community's southern areas. A new City Hall is needed. The new facility should be ;; built in a more centrally tocated area, thereby saving money while promoting unification of •i\ our community. ! i As a City Councilmember, I will resolutely pursue the goals of our Communiiy while preserving the quality of life we now enjoy. NCS-022.3 , II • r ir— — T 1 IT '•'——•-«'•-—•—-— ill I Ml CITY OF CARLSBAD Member of the City Council DENNIS BRANOMEYER Age: 39 Self-employed Real Estate Broker/Remodel Construction Carlsbad is ready for new leadership, free from special interest control and not obligated ; by campaign contributions. I have started and managed two successful businesses In Carlsbad, one with over 150 emptoyees. My two small children attend our city schools i and frequently play on our beaches. I will wori< tor my family's future as well as yours. i Educatton and experience: 1966-68 USMA West Point pre-engineering, graduated 1971 ; UCLA BA Political Science with minor in Economics, 1972-74 LBCC Aviation Maintenance i Technology. 1974-80 Aircraft mechanic with experience as part-time Jr. college i maintenance instructor, International Technical Representative for Beech Aircraft, FAA ,| Authorized Inspector and Private Pitot. 1980-83 founder Medical Staffing Services of i ,: Carisbad. 1983-present self-employed Calif. Real Estate Broker with small rennodel 1 construction business. Involved with ocean sports since 1961. | I support the general concensus that any future development should improve our | community. We need performance standards, a controlled rate of building and a i population total lower than tlie 135,000 projected by the city's general plan. A conservative j i fiscal poltoy must be adopted to prevent dependency on excessive growth to balance our I city's budget I will be committed to responsible city management with a realistic j perspective on all issues. \ CITY OF CARLSBAD ! I i Member of the City Council j ALBERT MENDOZA \ Retired i I I am a second generation native Californian, born and raised in San Francisco. Following ^ i nny WWIi combat servtoe in the U.S. Arnny Air Corp I graduated with a B.S. degree in Business Administi'ation from the University of San Francisco. I gained valuable ^ • experience In a variety of private sector settings before entering government service. I j j retired after 26 years with the State of California, Emptoyment Development Department > ; ; As a high level Administi^ator I had responsibility for San Diego, Imperial and Riverside i l counties; worited in Sacramento, San Francisco and Los Angeles; was appointed by then \ ' Governor Reagan's Administi'ation to oversee a special employment program. ] I am a nr>ember of the Board of Directors for North County United Way, the Board of j • Directors for SER, A volunteer for North County Association of Retarded Citizens, 1 ; President of the Beca Scholarship Foundation - an Hispanic scholarship organization, 3 i Treasurer of the Concerned Citizens, Also a member of North Coastal Veteran's j Emptoyment Committee. ! I will bring to the City Council position a unique perspective based on my extensive j successful administt^ative background, a genuine commitinent to community service and a - ; real concern for the preservation of a beautiful and solvent Carisbad. I will listen and represent all of Carlsbad's citizens capably and compassionately. ' NCS-022.4 4l5-2« CITY OF CARLSBAD Member of the City Council SUSAN MILLER-REPASKY Age: 46 3M Static Analyst Electronic Specialist We cannot direct the future of those who live and work in Carisbad by chance, only by a commitment to excellence ~ no nrtore medtocrityl 1 put myself fon^ard as a teader and servant of the- people. I offer a completely new alternative to city government My promise to the citizens of Carlsbad is based on the othto of everyday men and women who strive for a relationship with their God, peace of mind, exceltonce of character, and positive attitudes toward who they are and who they choose to beconne. I am responsible, creative, driven, and committed to excellence. I keep my commitinents, have concern for all peopto, and respect their needs and viewpoints. I have pursued many vocations: sales/marketing, servtoe station ownership, executive secretary to Corporate Presidents/Hollywood Producers, Personnel Director, Paralegal, and presentiy 3M Static Analyst I have raised 4 children, presentiy raising 2 (enrolled at La Costa Meadows Elementary). I am dedicated to sbuctured growth, a safe city for all reasonable walks of life, daycare centers, green belts, education, and a drug free convnunity. Whether you help me or not, I'll continue to help you but I can do more and better things for you when elected. CITY OF CARLSBAD Member of the City Council JOHN J. MAMAUX Age: 54 Business Consultant Mamaux has a 22 year history of commitinent to and caring for Carisbad. j : John served for nine years as a Carisbad School District Trustee. He is uniquely honored i as 'Trustee Emeritus." I John was instrumental In establishing a multi-million dollar annual tax base and public convenience for Carisbad with Car Countiy and Plaza Camino Real. \ Mamaux has received many community recognitions, including "Carisbad Citizen of the Year" (1977) and "Man and Boy Award" (1975) when he was president of the Carlsbad 4 Boys and Giris Club. : Mamaux has a Masters in Government Administratton from Wharton Graduate School and i earned a Pels Fellowship and a Public Achievement Award. John studied Urban Policy with the Brookings Institute. ' Mamaux wants facilities now, for those of us already here. With Mamaux, deficiencies will ; be corrected before new development occurs. Pari<s, libraries, recreational facilities, and a ! Sentor Citizens Center will be built to servo our residents. Better relationships will exist .1 between schools and poltoe to improve drug education and enforcement Roads and I : intersections will be upgraded and maintained. ;] ', Mamaux, as a member of City Council, will bring improved city management, intelligent 1 ': planning, and tough growth controls. Mamaux has demonstratod that, he cares for > ; Carlsbad. NCS-022.5 415-27 CITY OF CARLSBAD i Member of the City Council ERIC LARSON Age: 37 Agricultural Cooperative Manager Schools: San Dieguito High School; Mira Costa Community College; California State Polytechnte, San Luis Obispo. Since arriving in Carisbad in 1971 I have had the opportunity to serve the City as a member of the Parks and Recreation Commission and the Planning Commission. This has given me a clear understanding of the City's responsibilities to the residents. Just as important has been my work as a volunteer. Service as a director of the Carlsbad Friends of the Library, the Buena Vista Lagoon Foundation and the Carisbad Educational Foundation has shown me the spirit that makes Carisbad such a fine community. Insuring that Carisbad remains the type of community it is today serves as my only inspiration for becoming a Council candidate. CITY OF CARLSBAD Member of the City Council RICHARD L REPASKY. Age: 43 President of Buckeye Investigations, Inc. Serving three tours in Vietnam as a Naval Officer, and serving Presidents Nixon, Ford, and Carter, as a Special Agent with the U.S. Secret Service reinforced \r. me the Love of this Country whtoh I see returning to our Youth. Serving as a Director of the Cardiff Chamber of Commerce and a Director of the Cardiff Town Council showed me how to get the job done in meeting the daily needs of tlie Peopto, and I believe that my desire for Stowed Growth, Ctoan Oceans, better Traffic Conti'ol, and Improved Law Enforcement, will enable me to serve the needs and desires of the People of Carisbad as City Councilman. Cartsbad is rapidly building out and It is time to slow down growth and return that Quality of Life, whtoh we all want to enjoy here. Schools, Parks, Sti'eets and Lighting need to improve, with No New Taxes. A Vote for Richard L Repasky will ensure that the interests of the Peopto are placed above those of the Big Business or the Big Developer. A Vote for Rtohard L Repasky is a Vote for a rettjrn to Common Sense, Honesty, and Integrity. NCS-022.e 415-28 CITY OF CARLSBAD Member of the City Council MARK PETTINE City Councllmember/Attorney Mark Pettine, the citizen's candidate, kept his promises to the voters of Carisbad. Mark has co-Sf>onsored the Growth Management Plan. He has also sponsored the Economto Monitoring Plan, the Beach Erosion Committee, and the Campaign Spending " Reform Ordinance. Additionally, he has supported the efforts of the Senior Citizens to obtE^n a permanent center, and supported the City's efforts to provide nwre parks and playing fields. Mari< has opened up city government to all people by holding open monthly fomms so that citizens may express their concerns. Mart( Pettine is also woriting to establish a North County Regional Planning Board that .would address environmental issues, such as adequate roads, schools, open space, parks, etc. .- - Mark Pettine is a native Californian. He is a graduate of the University of California and the Univeraty of the Pacific Law School. >le entered public servtoe in 1976 as a Deputy District Attorney for San Diego County and is c^n'entiy in private practice. Mark's record during the past two years on the City Council cleariy shows that he has I done and continues to do those things the people elected him to do. He has earned your i. support f Vote to re-elect Mark Pettine, the citizen's candidate. .« i'- 415-29 NCS-022.T CITY OF CARLSBAD Treasurer WILLIAM C. ESTERLINE Age: 67 Carlsbad City Treasurer I am the Incumbent City Treasurer, having been appointed to that position in June, 1983. Prior to that time I was emptoyed as a Registered Representative with a New York Stock Exchange member firm for 15 years. After graduation from the University of Southern California, I served 27 years as a United States Marine. My wife Betty and I have lived in Carisbad for 20 years. We have two daughters and four grandchildren. I am a member and Past President of the Carisbad Rotary Club. i ! CITY OF CARLSBAD I • Treasurer :i i RUTH L COYLE Age: 55 I Business Consultant j j Ruth L Coyle, president of General Managers Associates, a Carisbad based financial j I consulting finn, would bring over 25 years of financial management experience to the City ? • Treasurer office. After serving 17 years as an executive wnth the George S. May Company, Fluor Utah International and three other national organizations, the prominent community leader opened her own firm here in 1978. She was honored as Woman of the Year in business and finance by the national American Business Women's Association In 1982. She Is very familiar with city government, having served on the 1S85 Land Use Element Commitlee that studied Carisbad's growth problems. She was a volunteer In former mayor Ron Packard's successful write-in i campaign for Congress. In 1985 she received the coveted President's Award for I i Distinguished Community Servtoe from the Carisbad Chamber of Commerce. ; With Master of Business Administi-ation and Bachelor of Science degrees, her corporate i ! and consulting responsibilities often included directing m<jlti-Million dollar investinent I • programs. j ; Ruth L Coyte has the time, energy, desire and experience to help Carisbad during the j ! busy years ahead. Her goal Is to earn the highest rate possible for the city's more than i ' $33 millton of inactive funds with a minimum of risk. I ; 415-30 t NCS-022.8 ! ; CITY OF CARLSBAD Proposition E (This proposition will appear on the ballot In the following forni.) E Shall an ordinance t>e adopted to provide as a part of the 1986 growth management plan that 1) NO DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE APPROVED by the City of Carisbad unless it is guaranteed that concurrent with need all necessary public facilities be provided as required by said plan with emphasis on ensuring good ti'affic circulation, schools, parks, libraries, cpen space and recreational amenities; and 2) the City Council shall not approve residential devetopment whtoh would increase the number of dwelling units beyond the limit in said cdinance WITHOUT AN AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF THE CITIZENS. The C.ly may add additional publto facilities. The City shall not reduce publto facilities v\rithout a con^esponding reduction In the residential dwelling unit limit PROPOSED ORDINANCE The Peopto of the City of Carisbad do ordain as follows: A. That Ihe Carisbad general plan shall be amended by the amendment of the Public Facilities and Land Use Elements to add the following: 'The City of Carisbad In implementing its public facilities element and growth management plan has made an estimate of the number of dwelling units that vtrill be built as a result of the application of the density ranges in the Land Use Element to individual projects. The City's Capital Improvement Budget, growth management plan, and public facilities plans are all based on this estimate. In order to ensure that all necessary public facilities will be available concunrent with need to serve new devetopnwnt it is necessary to limit the number of residential dwelling units which can be constructed In the City to that estimate. For that purpose the City has been divided into four quadrants along El Camino Real and Patomar Airport Road. The maximum number of residential dwelling units to be constructed or approved in the City after November 4, 1986 is as foltov«: Northwest Quadrant 5,844; Northeast Quadrant 6,166; Southwest Quadrant 10,667; Southeast Quadrant 10,801. The City shall not approve any General Plan amendment, zone change, tentative subdiviston map or other discretionary approval for a devetopment which could result in devetopment above the limit In any quadrant. In order to ensure that devetopment does not exceed the limit the following growth management conti^ol points are established *or the Land Use Element density ranges. ALLOWED DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE General Plan Growth Management Density Ranges Control Point RL 0 - 1.5 1.0 RLM 0 - 4.0 3.2 RM 4 - 8.0 6.0 RMH 8 - 15.0 11.5 RH 15 - 23.0 19.0 (Continued on next page) Pn-001.1 415-38 ! The C':ty shall not approve any residential development at a density that exceeds the growth management control point for the applicable density, range without making the j following findings: ] 1. That the project will provide sufficient additional public facilities for the density in ' excess of the control point to ensure that the adequacy of the City's public facilities plana ! will not be adversely Impacted. 2. That there have been sufficient developments approved in the quadrant at ' densities betow the conti'ol point to cover the units in the project above the conti^ol point .! so the approval will not result in exceeding the quadrant limit. The City Manager shall monitor all approvals and report to the Planning Commission and City Council on an annual basis to ensure that the construction of residential units . j • within each quadrant, on a cumulative basis, will be at or below the grovrth management control points and that the overall quadrant limits are being maintained. If the annual j report indtoates in any way that it is likely that the limit may be exceeded, the Council shall take appropriate action by revising the growth management plan and the City's zoning ', code to ensure that the ceilings will be maintained. r • ;« The City Council or the Planning Commission shall not find that all necessary public facilities will l5e available concurrent with need as required by the Public Facilities Element ') and the City's 1986 grovt^h management plan unless the proviston ol such facilities is ; guaranteed. In guaranteeing that the facilities will be provided emphasis shall be given to : i ensuring good ti'affic circulation, schools, pari<s, libraries, open space and reaeattonal . amenities. Public facilities may be added. The City Council shall not materially reduce > publto facilities without making con'esponding reductions in residential densities. I Nothing In this section shall be construed as changing the requirenrwnt that any specific residential density above the minimum allowed by Ihe Land Use Element density ranges and the appltoable zoning shall be justified according to the requirements of the appropriate General Plan and zoning provisions. (Continued on next page) Pn-001.2 415-38 B. The zoning map of the City of Carisbad shall be amended to provide that building permits Issued or approved lor residential dwelling units in the City after November 4, 1986 shall not exceed the limits established in the map in this section. The numbers on the map shall not be increased without an affirmative vote of the people. C. The City Council shall adopt anr>endments to Chapter 21.go of Muntoipal Code (Growth Management) as necessary to imptonwnt the amendment of Section A and the Map of Section B. 0. This ordinance is Inconsistent with and Intended as an alternative to any initiative ordinance whtoh would place an annual numerical limitation on the rate of residential constiuction. If this ordinance and any such Initiative ordinance are both passe'.: by a majority voting thereon then the one with the mosX votes shall prevail." PH-001.3 415-40 ;» ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF PROPOSITION E \ VOTE YES ON PROPOSITION E ; Most peopto agree that the pace of growth In Carisbad has been so fast that a moratorium on building was needed. The moratorium gave Carisbad time to find an intelligent way to plan future growth. The result is Proposition E, which puts strict oiles on • the books—rules that can't change unless you, the voter, change them. Propositton E puts a permanent cap on the total number of residential units that can ; be built in Cartsbad; reduces the overall density of the city and guarantees that we will \ always be a low density residential community with 40% open space. NO DEVELOPMENT ; SHALL BE APPROVED unless all required public facilities are provided up front. I Proposition E guarantees that the cost of needed public facilities will be paid by land developers and future homeowners—not by current Carisbad taxpayers. Proposition E gives us conti'olled growth without increased taxes and without destroying our property I values or beautiful comffiunity. i- Proposition E was put on the ballot by the City Council and is endorsed by the Carlsbad Unified School Distiict. Now is the time to put sti^ict limits on development and a cap on our future growth. Vote to preserve Carisbad. ^QTE YES ON PROPOSITION E MARY H. CASLER RICHARD J. CHICK ANN J. KULCHIN . " CLAUDE A. LEWIS I HOWARD C. HARMON i REBUTTAL TO THE ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF PROPOSITION E The City concedes the pace of growth was so fast a moratorium was needed and yet, it concocted a scheme that does nothing to slow down the pace of growth. , i Proposition E together with the growth management ordinance that is not on the ballot will, I'i if faithfully implemented, provide public facilities. But that's not the problem. The problem } I is too much growth, too fast And Proposition E does nothing to cure the cancer of ix ever-irK:reasing growth. That cancer will eventually kill the quality of life nrwst of us came - j to find. j Proposition E puts a cap on the number ot residential units, but that cap Is neither • -t permanent nor does it stow down the rate of growth. f As stated In the ballot question Proposition E is an amendment lo the 1986 growth j management ordinance, whtoh is not on the ballot That ordinance contains a j self-destruct date of June 30, 2001, fifteen years from now. That proviston kills the claim of pennanence. And how does Proposition E and the associated ordinance slow the pace of grovrth, which the city agrees is out of conti^ol? The city and the developers would like you to believe that by tying growrfi to the 'oviston of publto facilities, growth will slow down. But, will it, really? What h ihe city and developers build the facilities faster than needed? Obviously, growth will be sp ^eded up instead of slowed. If you want EXPLOSIVE GROWTH vote for E. If you want GRADUAL GROWTH vote for G. COL A. J. SKOTNICKI, USMC Ret THOMAS WILLIAM SMITH Secretary, Association of Co-Chairman, Concerned Citizens Carisbad Taxpayers ! i L Pfl-001.4 415-41 • I ARGUMENT AGAINST PROPOSITION E There are VMO ballot propositions on growth on the ballot. One is the CITIZENS' SLOW GROWTH INITIATIVE, PROPOSITION G. The other is City Hall's PROPOSITION E. if you want the growth rate slowed down, PROPOSITION G will do it. It limits grovrth to 1000 new dwelling units In 1987 — 750 In 1988 and 500 a year for the next 8 years. That's a drastic much-needed cut from the growth binge of 2500 to 3000 dwelling units ir recent years. So, if you want SLOW GROWTH, vote YES on PROPOSITION G. Only the voters can change it — City Hall can't You want facilities up front? That's already provided by City Hall's growth managoment plan — it became law Aug. 1,1906 and IS NOT ON THE BALLOT. What does City Hall's PROPOSITION E give you? Actually, it's a trick to contuse thousands of voters who want SLOW GROWTH. It fixes a "cap" of 34,600 more dwelling units. It does not SLOW GROWTH. It permits .^AST GROWTH* PROPOSITION E also contains a killer clau.<>e lo kill the Citizens' Slow Growth Initiative. Be aware that City Hall has shanriefully approved a propaganda campaign using tax dollars to manipulate voters. Thus, if you want SLOW GROWTH and FACILITIES UP FRONT, you get both by voting YES on PROPOSITION G and NO on PROPOSITION E. If you doni vote this way, then in ten years you'll get up to 82,700 more people in Carisbad — an average minimum of 138,400 additional car trips per day. We'll need 9 more etementary schools. Developers and City Hall wont save Carisbad from becoming L. A. South — the voters will have to do It. You can do it by voting YES on PROPOSITION G and NO on PROPOSITION E. It may be your last chance to save the Carisbad we tove. NELSON ALDRICH ALBERT MENDOZA Co-Chairman, Concerned Citizens Treasurer, Concerned Citizens Carisbad City Council Candidate THOMAS WILLIAM SMITH COL A. J. SKOTNICKI, USMC Ret Co-Chalrman, Concerned Citizens Secretary, Association of Carisbad Taxpayers PR-001.5 415-42 ..•J.1- .- 1r-•^:•^•K^•;^•^ I REBUTTAL TO THE ARGUMENT AGAINST PROPOSITION E Fact: PROPOSITION E places a limit on the number of homes that can EVER be built in Carlsbad. This limit can ONLY t>e changed by a VOTE of the people. There is j no such limit under Proposition Q. Fact: PROPOSITION E IS A PLAN FOR THE ORDERLY LONG-TERM DEVELOPMENT OF CARLSBAD. PROPOSITION E provides that NO ( DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE APPROVED without all public facilities being required up front. This means the roads, schools, parks, libraries and open space have already been planned, and a method for their financing and time table lor their installation has been approved t^etore any construction starts. Fact Density has been towered throughout the City while open space has been greatly increased. Fact PROPOSITJON E is a l>lueprint for the orderty development of Carisbad over the next 20 years so you will know exactiy where, when and how development is going to occur. Proposition G does not give you any such answers. . Fact PROPOSITION G IS NO PLAN AT ALL The opponents of PROPOSITION E contend that if you vote tor PROPOSITION E you will be authorizing an increase of over 82,000 new people to Cartsbad within the next 10 years. RIDiCULOUSI The City has only grown to 52,000 in its 100 years of existence. PROPOSITION E is supported by a large number of responsible electors who have stijdied the issues. It is a thoughtful, far-reaching masterplan lor the future of Carisbad over the next two decades. VOTE YES ON PROPOSITION E JEANNE B. MC FADDEN. Co-chair HOWARD C. HARMON Carisbad Association of Vice-president Responsibto Electors Senior Citizens Association Co-chair Carlsbad Association of Responsible Electors STEPHEN M. L'HEUREUX JULIE NYGAARD, Trustee President Carisbad Unified School Distiict - Cartsbad Chamber of Commerce SEENATRIGAS Trustee, Carisbad Library PR-001.6 CITY OF CARLSBAD Proposition F (This proposition will appear on the ballot in the following form.) F Bond Propositton: Shall the City of Carisbad, Calitornia, Incur a bonded indebtedness In the principal amount of $5,950,000 for the purpose of the acquisition by said City of a certain muni- cipal improvement, to wit approximately 52.68 acres of undeveloped land known as Hosp Grove to be acquired for pari( and open space purposes, and for the payment of all costs and expenses In connection with such acquisition and the issuance of the bonds? PH-001.7 415-44 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF PROPOSITION F Ttie Hosp Grove bond issue offers voters an historic opportunity to preserve this I. ti'easured Carisbad landmark. For over two decades, concerned citizens have been trying I to protect from further development' a rustic stand of woods and wildlife dear to generations of Carisbad residents. I Hosp Grove's value to the community goes far beyond its scenic function as i northern gateway to the city and majestic backdrop to the urban mall and Buena Vista Lagoon. The forest harbors a rich population of small animals and tree-nesting birds. It is ! a nature area in the heart of the city—a buffer between commercial and residential areas, i between the lagoon and the inevitable pollutants of urban development And it is a living i ' symbol of the endangered Carisbad we all cherish. j The bond issue is our last chance to preserve intact the grove's remaining unspoiled ^ acres. Under terms of the development-purchase agreement approved by the city I council, tf>e grove's owners will be allowed to develop the slopes adjacent to Monroe and i Marron sti'eets (across from Plaza Camino Real) should the bond issue fall to pass by a i 2/3 majority. The agreement also commits the city (If the bonds fail) to pursue a nearly \ million-dollar purchase of a lesser parcel, nrost of which is already protected as designated open space or dedtoated pari< land. This agreement has limited the public's options on Hosp Grove. Foreclosing the possibility of alternate solutions, it requires voters to choose now between approving I • bonds for outright purchase of the forest or accepting the extensive commercial and I residential development permitted by the agreement. Given these ctratoes, it is clear that only a YES vote on the bonds will accomplish the tong desired goal. Propositton F is the last chance to save our beloved Hosp Grove for our own and future generations. MARK PETTINE CLAUDE LEWIS City Council Memlser City Council Member City of Carisbad City of Carlsbad I KAY F. CHRISTIANSEN JULIE FISH , Historteal Preservation Neighborhood Alliance ; Commission tc Save Hosp Grove { O. B. ADAMS j Co-Founder La Costa Community Awareness Group REBUTTAL TO THE ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF PROPOSITION F NONSENSE! The real issue is whether the City should spend $5,950,000 to buy Hosp Grove when the City presently has the right to buy the majority of the Grove for $975,000. THERE IS MO COMMUNITY-WIDE BENEFIT to spending nearty 5 millton additional dollars, since the nxjst visible and environmentally sensitive parts of the Grove will tie preserved under the temns of the development-purchase agreement. VOTE NO in order to retain Carisbad's financial ability to buy other open space and park lands of txoader community k>enefit. RUTH L. COYLE Pn-001.8 415-45 ARGUMENT AGAINST PROPOSITION F Vote NO on the Ballot Proposition! The proposal to acquire 52.68 acres of Hosp Grove for $5,950,000 would be a waste of taxpayers' money, and would raise the property taxes of every property owner In Carlsbad. The majority of Hosp Grove Is too steep to be usable, and its acquisition would benefit only a small number ot nearby residents. What Carisbad needs Is more usable park land that can be usod for Uttie League, soccer, Softball, and other recreational activities. Six million dollars could buy a large amount of flatter, more appropriate park land for use by all Carlsbad residents. There is an alternative to spending $5.950.0001 The City Council has already approved a proposal that could be implemented if this ballot measure fails. Under this proposal, the City would acquire more than half of Hosp Grove for 1/6 the cost of acquiring the 52.68 acres. This proposal Irwiudes the City acquisition of 9 acres of Hosp Grove land on Jefferson Street, across from the popular duck-feeding area of Buena Vista Lagoon, for $975,000. In addition, the City would receive approximately 18.8 acres of dedicated open space In Hosp Grove free, should a specialty comnnercial center at the corner of Monroe and Marro.n Sti'eets, and a residential development off Hosp Way be approved. Instead of paying increased taxes to acquire mostiy unusable land which benefits only a few people, the alternative proposal allows the City of Carlsbad to acquire the most usable and visible areas of Hosp Grove for 1/6 of the price, at no cost lo taxpayers. Vote NO on the Ballot Proposition! RUTH L COYLE REBUTTAL TO THE ARGUMENT AGAINST PROPOSITION F The value of Hosp Grove cannot be measured by the same use-factor criteria as active sports parks—such as Stagecoach Park and Calaveras Hills Park, lx)th of which will feature ample playing fields when completed. Like other nature parks, such as Yosemite and Sequoia hlational Forest the value of Hosp Grove lies In the visual grandeur of its wooded slopes—enjoyed by everyone who passes—and in its presence as a nature area in the heart of the city. Unless Proposition F passes, the entire hillside east of the Monroe and Manon Intersection (poross from the mall) will be bulldozed flat for a shopping center; and the slopes west of the Intersection will be selectively graded for office buildings. Proposition F allows us to retain the present vrooded hillsides at that corner, rather than add more commercial development with more commercial traffic. In stilct financial ternts, the alternative proposal is a bad bargain for taxpayers, because we would be paying a disproportionate price for development rights, without commensurate benefits. Moreover, ttie "No" argunrtent does not make clear that the slopes across from the duck-landing area (whtoh is protected by the Department ol Fish and Game) are Included in the Proposition F bond issue. We have one last chance lo save this historic Cartsbad landmark: Vote Yes on F. JULIE FISH Neighborhood Alliance to Save Hosp Grove pn-001.9 415-46 il CITY OF CARLSBAD Proposition G (This proposition will appear on the baltot In the following fonn.) G Shall an Initiative ordinance be adopted adding Chapter 21.64 lo the Carisbad Muntoipal Code whtoh would RESTRi-,r THE RATE OF CONSTRUCTION OF RESIDENTIAL DWELUNvi UNITS in the City for ten years commencing January 1, 1987 to not more than 1,000 units In 1987, 750 units In 1988 and 500 units each year thereafter through 1996 with exceptions for the replacement of damaged or desti'oyed units and for tow income or senior citizen projects. The City of Carisbad shall vigorously defend any challenge to the validity or constitutionality of this ordinance inasmuch as this ordinance represents the desires of a majority of the voters of Carisbad. PROPOSED ORDINANCE • The Peopto of the City of Carisbad do ordain as follows: That TWe 21 of the Carisbad Municipal Code shall be amended by the addition of Chapter 21.64 to restilct the rate of constiojction of residential dwelling units in the City for I ten years commencing January t, 1987. j 1. The City of Carisbad is experiencing intense residential development which is '•j adversely affecting the capacity of schools to accommodate students, thn capacity of city sti'eets and tocal h'eeway systems to meet traffic needs, the semirural character of the : • community and ttie quality of life prevalent In Carisbad. The people of Carlsbad are very ! much concerned about the City's rapid growth. • It Is the intent of this chapter to obtain a tower rate of residential development; to .! permit effective advance planning and establishment of adequate municipal services such . J as schools, streets, parks, wafer, sewage, police and fire protection, and other customary ^ servtoes; to provide for a desirable amount of open space; to ensure availability of housing ^ for a broad spectrum of population; and to prevent the deterioration of the quality of lile f prevalent In Carisbad. I In approving development priority shall be given to the construction of residential 'li dwelling units whtoh have the toast adverse impact upon the publto facilities and services as well as the quality of life prevalent in Carisbad as described in this section. f 2. Commencing January 1, 1987 and continuing through December 31, 1996, the City of Carisbad shall not allow the start of construction of wore than 1,000 residential j i dwelling units In 1^37, 750 residential dwelling units In 1988, and 500 residential dwelling .' • units each year thereafter through 1996. 1:^ 3. The limitations of Section 21.64.020 shall not apply to: a) Projects replacing damaged or destroyed dwellings on a one-for-one basis; b) Remodeling or additions to existing dwellings whtoh do not result in an Increase in the number of dwelling units; and ! ? c) Dwelling units of any low income or senior citizen projects funded or subsidized '. pursuant to the provisions of applicable federal or state law. 4. This chapter may be amended or repealed only by a majority of the voters voting i at an election thereon. I (Continued on next page) i i •i 415-4/ 1 PH-001.10 5. If any section, sentence, clause, phrase, part, or portion of this chapter is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this chapter. It is hereby declared that this chapter and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part, or portton thereof, would have been adopted or passed irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, sentences, clauses, phrases, parts, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. 6. a) This chapter shall expire and be of no further force and effect on January 1, 1997; and b) The City Council shall place a measure on the ballot of the November 1996 general municipal election asking the City's electors if this chapter shall be extended until December 31, 2000 wilh a restriction on the construction of dwelling units not to exceed 500 units per year. 7. This chapter represents the will of a majority ol the voters of Carlsbad and the City Council shall take all steps necessary to vigorously defend any challenge to the validity or constitutionality of this chapter." PR-001.11 415-48 I ! ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF PROPOSITION G 1 : For years, plans of developers have been placed above desires of Carlsbad citizens. As a j result, the growth rate Is raging out of control. The majority of the City Council refuses to I - take effective action against this rampant rate ol grovrth. j j PROPOSITION G is a Citizens' Initiative, designed by Citizens, to respond to Citizens' desire to slow growth in Carlsbad. PROPOSITION G was circulated by your neighbors I and was placed on the ballot by the signatures of 5,100 Citizens, I The aim of PROPOSITION G is to curb growth the next ton years. It allows about 1000 j dwe'ling units to be built in 1987, 750 in 1988, and 500 units per year thereafter for 8 years, I when It w^ll be submitted to the Citizens for a vote. It will reduce the number of people I jamn^ng our streets, beaches, parks, schools, playing fields and other public and private facilities. This will allow City planners to absorb the extraordinary grovrth of recent years. PROPOSITION G Is a reasonable slow growth plan similar to those approved in San Clemente and many other California communities. PROPOSITION G tells the City Council what Citizens want in clear temns. It allows a limited number of new dwellings every year. Developers mus. compete for the right to build, insuring better quality projects. PROPOSrriON G would altow only 13,800 more people In Carisbad in the next (on yoars. City Hall and developer plans would allow up to 82,700 people in the next ten years. PROPOSITION G focuses on the issue direcfly affecting the quality of life of the Citizens; too many people, packed Into too little space, too fasti PROPOSITION G is our last chance to choose bet.veen a qua;.iy of lile like that of L A. or what we enjoy in Carlsbad. Vote YES on PROPOSmON G to save Carlsbad. NELSON ALDRICH ALBERT MENDOZA Co-Chairman, Concerned Citizens Treasurer, Concerned Citizens Carisbad City Council Candidate THOMAS WILLIAM SMITH COL. A. J. tKCTNICKI, USMC Rot Co-Chairman, Coiicernod Citizens Secretary, Association of Cartsbad Taxpayers MARK PETTINE Carlsbad City Councilman PR-001.12 415-49 REBUTTAL TO THE ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF PROPOSITION G j The proporients of Proposition G would have you believe tiiat lis passage will solve all of Carlsbad's problems. THIS IS FALSE. Proposition Q does NOT provide for the construction of roads, schools, parks, libraries and open space. Where will the City get the needed funds? PROPOSITION G IS NO PLAN AT ALL ' PROPOSITION G WILL PROMOTE UNLIMITED LOW INCOME AND SUBSIDIZED \ HOUSING. It also allov« only a limited number of housing units each year of the type j which mc3f Carisbad residents prefer. Do you really want Carisbad to develop this way? | Proposition G is BAD for Carisbad and its economy. Where will your children live? | If Proposition G passes. It probably will not be In Carisbad. Proposition G will NOT » encourage the development of a quality community vnth housing opportunities for all. |. Propositton G will encourage low income housing which will dramatically affect the "quality } ol lite" in Carisbad. j Proposition G requires the City to defend all lenal challenges to its conslittitionality. I The cost of such lawsuits could be ti-emendous. This will mean less monies available for ! other projects. Defeat of Proposition G will protect the City from years of litigation and j save your dollars. 1 Proposition G will NOT produce a balanced community of homos. Industry, j commercial and open space areas which we all want. PROPOSITION G IS A POORLY CONCEIVED INITIATIVE WHICH WILL ONLY HARM AND DIVIDE OUR CITY RATHER THAN SOLVE ITS PROBLEMS. VOTE NO ON PROPOSITION G i » JEANNE B. McFADDEN, Co-chair HOWARD C. HARMON, Vice-president j Carisbad Association of Senior Citizens Association , Responsible Electors Co-chair, Carisbad Association of '. Responsible Electors 1 1 STEPHEN M. L'HEUREUX JULIE NYGAARD, Trustee President Carlsbad Unified School District Carlsbad Chamber of Commerce i SEENATRIGAS Trustee, Carisbad Library PR-001.13 415-50 ARGUMENT AGAINST PROPOSITION G VOTE NO ON PROPOSITION G Proposition G sounds tough but it really Isn't. Supporters of Proposition G want you to bslieve that this one page document provides a blueprint tor Carlsbad's dovelopmont for the next ten years, but it does not. Proposition G will produce pressure for zone changes and general plan amendments and result in an unbalanced community. Proposition G leaves Carlsbad open to industrial, commercial and low income housing development, creating unlimited traffic and no way to pay for schools. Arbiti'ary numerical limitations on growth will not work. Thoy make it impossible for the City to raise the money for necessary public facilities. If passed. The City will bo sued by the building Industiy and developers. The cost of defense will be substantial and will have to be paid from taxpayers' funds. Recent rulings of the Supreme Court have said '• that numerical growth limitations must bo jusfifi'id by objective facts. No such justification i has l>een presented in this measure. \ None of us wants the kind of grovrth and development that Propositon G permits. I Proposition G is pooriy written and full of loopholes; it's a legal nightinaro and a lawyer's f dream. : - VOTE NO ON PROPOSITION G I MARY H. CASLER RICHARD J. CHICK ! ANN J. KULCHIN CLAUDE A. LEWIS I, HOWARD C. HARMON REBUTTAL TO THE ARGUMENT AGAINST PROPOSITION G . VOTE YES ON G Sounds tough? If G isn't as tougi. as it sounds, why are all the developers and the city council majority fighting it so much? It's tough, all right, and they know it. Proposition G makes no pretenses about being anything except a resti-iction on the construction of dwelling units in the next ten years. In itself, G creates no imbalance in development. Only if the city council illegally disturbs that balance by allowing zone changes or too many low income housing developmenls would there be an unbalanced community. Providing the necessary public facilities is not the problem. L.A. has adoquate public facilities. Do you want to live there? The problem is too many people, too fast There are adequate funds available to provide the necessary public facilities for the new dwellings Proposition G allows. However, there will never be enough public facilities lo maintain our existing quality of life under the city/developer plan. Proposition E. The City Is beselged with growth problems. Therefore, there is a substantial legal justification for Proposition G. In fact, the City Council has already made the necessary legal findings to support justification by enacting the so-called growth management plan. The council majority is trying to deceive us when they claim there is no justification, since they have already found it to/be true. Initiatives like Proposition G have already been subjected lo legal challenge and been upheld. Vole YES on G, Gradual Growth, and NO on E, Explosive Growth. THOMAS WILLIAM SMITH NELSON ALDRICH Co-Chairman, Concerned Citizens Co-Chairman, Concerned Citizens COL A. J. SKOTNICKI, USMC Ret. ALBERT MENDOZA Secretary, Association of Treasurer, Concerned Citizens Carlsbad Taxpayers 415-51 pn-001.14 CITY OF CARLSBAD | Proposition H | (This propositton will appear on the ballot in the foltowing form.) j H Shall an initiative ordinance be adopted as follows: "During the ; catondar years 1987 and 1988 the City of Carisbad, California shall (must) build in the Macarto Canyon Park, ail of the • following: 1) Five (5) baseball/softball fields, each with a minimum distance from home plate to any outfield ferx^e of three hundred feet and each field lighted lor night use; 2) four (4) rectangular soccer/football fields, each I with minimum measurements of two hundred feet wide and three hundred fifty feet tong, each field will be lighted for night use; 3) One (1) i community center, containing a gymnasium large enough to house an otftolal fun sized basketball court, plus spectator seating; 4) A tot tot ! ptonto area, and adequate publto facilities (resti'ooms, pari<lng tots, btoachers, etc.) to servtoe the entire Ballfield and Sports Comptox facility. '• We beltove the esti'mated cost of this project to be approximately Ttiree i and One-Half Millton Dollars ($3,500,000.00) and feel that It Is a good J Investment In our City's future. i ' ~ ^ ^ i PROPOSED ORDINANCE The People of the City of Cartsbad do ordain as follows: i "During the calendar years 1987 and 1988 the City of Carlsbad, California shall (must) build In the Macarto Canyon Park, all of the foltowing: 1. Five (5) baseball/softball fields, each with a minimum distance from tiome plate to any outfield fence of three hundred feet and each field lighted for night use; 2. Four (4) rectangular soccer/football fields, each with minimum measurements of two hundred feet wide and three hundred fifty feet tong, each field will be lighted for night use; 3. One (•<) community center, containing a gymnasium large enough to house an otflc'tl full sized basketball court, plus spectator seating; I 4. A tot tot, ptonic area, and adequate publto facilities (resti'ooms, parking lots, • bleachers, etc.) to servtoe the entire Ballfield and Sports Complex facility. We t)elteve the estimated cost of this project to be approximately Three and One-Half Millton Dollars ($3,500,000.00) and feel that It is a good Investment in our City's future. Severability Clause. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or J portion of this Ordinance Is for any reason held to be Invalid or unconstitutional by a final j judgement of any court of competent jurisdtetion, such deciston shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance, which shall remain in full force and effect" Pn-001.15 '15-52 i ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF PROPOSITION H i • I' ;; There is an extreme shortage of Ballfields And Active Recreation Facilities in the City of >! Carlsbad. ;; This Pleasure will require the City to fulfill its promises lo provide the much needed Sports , J & Recreation Facilities in the City of Carisbad's existing Macario Canyon Paric. * * " '; It is our opinion that the city has sufficient funds to provide these facilities for the Citizens •.] of Carlsbad. j I JAMES A. COURTNEY ANN J. KULCHIN j I Chairman, C./V,RA Councilwoman t^l , Cartsbad Athletic Recreation Assn. City of Carisbad President Indoor Soccer of,Carisbad DANNY SHERLOCK " JOHN J. MAMAUX Executive Director Candidate for City Council V Carisbad Boys and Giris Club I . • " • ^% • 13' ! t REBUTTAL TO THE ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF PROPOSITION H 1! 11 I -i Proposition H ignores the fact that with completion of construction at Stagecoach and Calavera Hills Parks the City will meet the standards set for pari<s and reaeation fields. •\ Proposition H wants development of Macario Canyon now — when there are no roads or I utilities servtoing the site. This does not make good economic sense. j The City has a Master Plan for Macario Canyon and the park will be developed when ! 'i more immediate park needs are satisfied. To use existing funds for this development ' i would deprive Cairisbad citizens of park development nearer their homes. VOTE NO ON PROPOSITION H. 1 ? JAMES M. POPOVICH BARBARA B. DONOVAN n ; CATHY REGAN MARJORIE A. MORRISON FB-OOI.ie 415-53 VllKM'. mHJl?'. JMJ'A.'.- ARGUMENT AGAINST PROPOSITION H VOTE NO ON PROPOSITION H | I Development of Macarto Canyon is premature and would bo an unwise investment of city funds at this time. There are many obstacles to improving the canyon; there are no ', roads or utilities into the area; there are sig.iificanl environmenlai concerns v;hich must be • resolved before development can occur. The total cost of building Ihe proposed roads, ; utilities, ballfields and gymnasium Is estimated to be l^etwoen $5.6 million and $7.1 million, not the $3.5 million indicated in the petition. Even if the project could t>e approved as proposed, it would take more than two years to complete. • This 300 acre canyon was acquired by the City in 1981 lor future development. A .' master plan study done in 1982 suggested a 15 year development program. In 1984, the ; City toased the land to a farmer as a way of saving money until development is timely. ; The City does not need Macario Canyon Park at this time. The City has a program j to spend available funds to build park and recreation facilities in areas close to existing . housing such as Calavera Hills and La Costa. If Macario Canyon is devetopecl ahead of j schedule, it means that other needed projects will be delayed for years or a bond issue i will be needed. If we wait and follow the City park plan, then developers fees and private < funding sources will be used. > VOTE NO ON PROPOSITION H for good park planning and wise use cl City funds. CLAUDE A. LEWIS RICHARD J. CHICK SCOTT WRIGHT MARY H. CASLER ] REBUTTAL TO THE ARGUMENT AGAINST PROPOSITION H No rebuttal to the argument against the proposition was tiled in the office of the City Cler<. 415-54 PR-001.17