HomeMy WebLinkAbout; 2380 Jefferson Street; Final Compaction Report of Grading; 2001-09-10FINAL COMPACTION REPORT OF GRADING
2380 JEFFERSON STREET
CARLSBAD, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
FOR
MULLEN CONSTRUCTION
2890 PIO PICO DRIVE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
W.O. 2864-B-SC SEPTEMBER 10, 2001
Alpha & Omega
2382 Camino Vida Roble, Suite F, Carlsbad, CA 92009
760-931-1792, 760-931-1892 FAX, Email: nservin(a)earthlink.net
September 7, 2001
City ofCarlsbad
Building Department
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Subject: Pad Certification of Jefferson Street Building for Walley Mullins
We have performed a site survey setting building and wall locations for the contractor on said residential construction site
previously. Today I made the last visit for pad certification.
The pad location and elevation are within acceptable limits pursuant to the approved grading plans, therefore, accept this
letter as certification for said pad.
Call me ifyou have any questions on this matter.
Sincerely,
NICK SERVIN, PE,Trincipai Engineer #33538
h^S^7
C :\My Documents\WP\STRUCT\Mullins_Pad_Cert.wpd
Geotechnical • Geologic • Environmental
5741 PalmerWay • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (760)438-3155 • FAX (760) 931-0915
September 10, 2001
W.O. 2864-B-SC
Mullen Construction
2890 Pio Pico Drive
Carlsbad, California 92008
Attention: Mr. Edgar H. IVIullen
Subject: Final Compaction Report of Grading, 2380 Jefferson Street, Carlsbad,
San Diego County, California
References: 1. "Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation. Parcel 20, East Side of Jefferson Street Carlsbad
California," W.O. 2864-A-SC, dated April 26, 2000, by GeoSoils, Inc.
2. "Uniform Building Code," Whittier. California. Vol. 1. 2. and 3. dated 1997 by
international Conference of Building Officials.
INTRODUCTION
This report presents/ summary of the geotechnical testing a^hd observation services
provided by GeoSojIfe, Inc. (GSI) during the rough earthworkSfase of development ofthe
subject site. E^thwork commenced August 20, 2Cf^and was completed on
August 22, 20^ Survey of line and grade and locating of the building footprint was
performed by others and not performed by GSI.
Based on the observations and testing performed by GSI, it is our opinion that the building
pad area appears suitable for its intended use.
PURPOSE OF EARTHWORK
The purpose of grading was to prepare a relatively level pad for the construction of a single
family residence.
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY
The geologic conditions exposed during the process of grading were regularly observed
by a representative from our firm. The geologic conditions encountered generally were as
anticipated and presented in our referenced report (GSI, 2000).
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING
Preparation of Existing Ground
1. Prior to grading, the major surficial vegetation was stripped and hauled offsite.
2. Removals consisted of existing fill and colluvium within the building area to at least
five feet outside the building footprint. Removals in this area varied up to
approximately 3 feet below pre-construction grades. Once removals were
completed, the exposed was reprocessed prior to fill placement.
Overexcavation
Where removals were less than a recommended fill blanket thickness of 3 feet,
overexcavation to a depth of 3 feet below pad grade was performed within the building
footprint, Overexcavation was completed to at least five feet beyond the building footprint
in accordance with the recommendations presented in our referenced report (GSI, 2000),
The actual location of the proposed footprint of the building was provided by others.
Fill Placement
1. Fill consisting of native soils were placed in 6- to 8-inch lifts, watered, and mixed to
achieve at least optimum moisture conditions, and compacted using earth moving
equipment to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent of the laboratory
standard.
2. Fills were not placed on surfaces steeper than 2:1 (horizontal to vertical).
3. Oversize materials (12 inches and greater) were placed outside of the limits of the
building in landscape areas or a pre-designated disposal area.
Mullen Construction W.O. 2864-B-SC
2380 Jefferson Street, Carlsbad September 10, 2001
File:e:\wp7\2800\2864b.fcr Page 2
GeoSoils, Inc.
FIELD TESTING
1. Field density tests were performed using nuclear densometer ASTM test methods
D-2922 and D-3017 and sand-cone ASTM test method ASTM D-1556. The test
results taken during grading are presented in the attached Table 1, and the
locations of the tests taken during grading are presented on Plate 1.
2. Field density tests were taken at periodic intervals and random locations to check
the compactive effort provided by the contractor. Based upon the grading
operations observed, the test results presented herein are considered
representative ofthe compacted fill.
3. Visual classification of the soils in the field was the basis for determining which
maximum density value to use for a given density test.
LABORATORY TESTING
Maximum Densitv Testing
The laboratory maximum dry density and optimum moisture content for the major soil type
within this construction phase were determined according to test method ASTM D-1557.
The following table presents the results:
SOIL TYPE
MAXIMUM DENSITY
(pcn
MOISTURE CONTENT
(PERCENT)
A - Orange Brown Silty Sand 127.5 10.5
Expansion Index
Expansive soil conditions have been evaluated for the site. A representative sample of the
soils near pad grade was recovered for expansion index testing. Expansion index testing
was performed in general accordance with Standard 18-2 ofthe Uniform Building Code
(International Conference of Building Officials, 1997). The test results indicate an
expansion index of <5, and the corresponding expansion classification of very low.
Mullen Construction W.O. 2864-B-SC
2380 Jefferson Street, Carlsbad September 10,2001
Flle:e:\wp7\2800\2864b.fcr Page 3
GeoSoils, Inc.
Corrosivity
Typical samples ofthe site materials were analyzed for corrosion/soluble sulfate potential.
The testing included determination of pH, soluble sulfates, and saturated resistivity. At the
time of this report the results were not available. An addendum to this report will be issued
when the testing is complete.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Unless superseded by recommendations presented herein, the conclusions and
recommendations contained in the referenced report (GSI, 2000) remain pertinent and
applicable.
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
Processing of original/existing ground and placement of compacted fills under the purview
of this report have been completed under the observation of and with selective testing
provided by representatives of GSI and are found to be in general compliance with the
requirements of the City of Encinitas, California.
Our findings were made in conformance with generally accepted professional engineering
practices, and no further warranty is implied or made, GSI assumes no responsibility or
liability for work, testing, or recommendations performed or provided by others. This report
is subject to review by the controlling authorities for this project.
Mullen Construction W.O. 2864-B-SC
2380 Jefferson Street, Carlsbad September 10.2001
File:e:\wp7\2800\2864b.fcr Page 4
GeoSoils, Inc.
We appreciate this opportunity to be of service. If you have any questions, please call us
at (760)438-3155.
Respectfully submitted,
GeoSoils, Inc.
^^TTVOSS*^
Staff Geologist
Reviewed by:
n f>. Ran
ngineering Geologist
BV/JPF/DWS/jh
Reviewed by:
Civil Engineer,
Attachments: Table 1 - Field Density Test Results
Plate 1 - Field Density Test Location Map
Distribution: (4) Addressee
Mullen Construction
2380 Jefferson Street, Carlsbad
Flle:e:\wp7\2800\2864b.fcr
W.O. 2864-B-SC
September 10, 2001
Pages
GeoSoils, Ine.
Table 1
FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
TEST S:::P*T£::::: TEST LOCATION ELEVATION MOISTURE DRY RELATIVE TEST SOIL
NO. OR CONTENT:: ::DENSITY: COMPACTtON: ::METH0D: TYPE:
DEPTH (ft) t%) (pcQ CM
1 8/20/01 SOUTH END PAD AREA 74.0 10.8 114.8 90.3 ND A
2 8/20/01 NORTH END PAD AREA 75.0 10.2 115.6 91.0 ND A
3 8/22/01 SOUTH PAD AREA FG 12.3 118.2 93.0 SC A
4 8/22/01 NORTH PAD AREA FG 10.6 114.8 90.3 ND A
Legend:
ND - Nuclear Densometer
SC - Sand Cone
Mullen Construction
File:e:Vexcel\tables\2800\2864b
W.O. 2864-B-SC
Pagel
GeoSoils, Ine.