The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About; As-Graded Report North Comml Pad Golf Course; As-Graded Report North Comml Pad Golf Course; 2008-02-28AS-GRADED REPORT OF ROUGH GRADING FOR THE NORTH COMMERCIAL PAD AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE CRIBLOCK RETAINING WALL, CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: CITY OF CARLSBAD c/o Dudek Engineering and Environmental 1645 South Rancho Santa Fe Road, Suite 202 San Marcos, California 92078 Project No. 841363-009 February 28, 2008 ' 1 Leighton and Associates, inc. I A LEIGHTON GROUP COMPANY Leighton and Associates, Inc. A LEIGHTON GROUP COMPANY February 28, 2008 Project No. 841363-001 To: City of Carlsbad c/o Dudek Engineering and Environmental 1645 South Rancho Santa Fe Road, Suite 202 San Marcos Califomia 92078 Attention: Mr. George Litzinger Subject: As-Graded Report of Rough Grading for the North Commercial Pad and Construction of the Criblock Retaining Wall, Carlsbad Municipal Golf Course, Carlsbad, Califomia hi accordance with the request and authorization of representatives of the City of Carlsbad, we have performed geologic observation and documentation services during the rough grading of the north commercial pad and geotechnical observation and testing services during the constmction activities for the Criblock retammg wall at the Carlsbad Municipal Golf Course project in located in Carlsbad, Califomia. The accompanying report summarizes our geologic and geotechnical observations, field and laboratory test results, and the geotechnical conditions encountered during the grading and/or construction operations for the north commercial pad and the associated Criblock retaining wall, hi addition, the accompanying report presents our geotechnical conclusions and preliminary recommendations concerning the future commercial development on the north commercial pad. The gradmg and constmction operations for the north commercial pad and the associated Criblock retaining wall were performed in general accordance with the project geotechnical reports (Appendix A), geotechnical recommendations made during grading, and the City of Carlsbad requirements. As of the date of this report, the rough grading and constmction operations for the north commercial pad are essentially complete. It should be noted that a site specific geotechnical investigation should be performed for any proposed future development on the pad. 3934 Murphy Canyon Road, Suite B205 a San Diego, CA 92123-4425 858.292.8030 a Fax 858.292.0771 841363-009 If you have any questions regarding our report, please contact this office. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Respectfully submitted, LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. William D. Olson, RCE 45283 Associate Engineer Randall K. Wagner Principal Geologist n— r, qEG 1612 Distribution: (4) Addressee Leighton I 841363-009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page l.OINTRODUCnON ^ 1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ^ 2.0 SUMMARY OF GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS 4 2.1 SITE PREPARATION AND REMOVALS 4 2.2 FILL SLOPE KEY 5 2.3 SUBDRAINS 5 2.4 FILL PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION 5 2.5 FIELD DENSITY TESTING s 2.6 LABORATORY TESTING 6 3.0 ENGINEERING GEOLOGIC SUMMARY 7 3.1 AS-GRADED GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS 7 3.2 GEOLOGIC UNITS 7 3.2.1 Previously-Placed Artificial Fill (Unmapped) 7 3.2.2 Topsoil (Unmapped) 7 3.2.3 Colluvium (Unmapped) 8 3.2.4 Santiago Formation (Map Symbol-Tsa) 8 3.3 GEOLOGIC STRUCTURE s 3.4 FAULTING !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! s 3.5 sasMicHY 9 3.6 GROUNDWATER """I."!"!!!!!!."!."!!.""!!!!.!."!!!!!!!!!]9 3.7 EXPANSION AND SULFATE CONTENT TESTING OF REPRESENTATIVE FINISH GRADE Soi'LS.'.'...'.."..".".".. 'io 4.0 CONCLUSIONS 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 ADDITIONAL GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION 13 5.2 EXCAVATIONS 13 5.3 FILL PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION 13 5.4 SUBDRAIN OUTLET MAINTENANCE 14 5.5 SLOPE MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES 14 5.6 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION AND TESTING 15 6.0 QMITAnONS jg Leighton 841363-009 TABLE OF CONTENTS rContinued^ FIGURE FIGURE 1 - SITE LOCATION MAP - PAGE 2 PLATES PLATE 1 - AS-GRADED GEOTECHNICAL MAP - IN POCKET PLATES 2 AND 3 - CRIBLOCK WALL DENSITY TEST LOCATION MAP - IN POCKET APPENDICES APPENDIX A - REFERENCES APPENDIX B - SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS APPENDIX C - LABORATORY TESTING PROCEDURES AND TEST RESULTS APPENDIX D - COMMERCIAL PAD COMPACTION TESTING REPORT BY TESTING ENGINEERS APPENDIX E - GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS Leighton 841363-009 1.0 INTRODUCTION hi accordance with the request and authorization of representatives of the City of Carlsbad, we have performed geologic observation and documentation services during the rough grading of the north commercial pad and geotechnical observation and testing services during the constmction activities for the Criblock retaming wall at the Carlsbad Municipal Golf Course located m Carlsbad, Califomia (Figure 1). This as-graded report summarizes our geologic and geotechnical observations, geologic mapping, field and laboratory test results, and the geotechnical conditions encountered during the course of our services for the project. Based on the contract for the development of the Carlsbad Municipal Golf Course, Leighton performed the duties of the geologic/geotechnical consultant of record while Testing Engineers performed the all of the geotechnical services associated with the fill placement and compaction operations. The only exception was that Leighton performed all of the geotechnical services related to the constmction of the Criblock retainmg wall which included observation and testmg of the retaining wall backfill. As of this date, the grading activities for the north commercial pad are essentially complete. However, the site is only sheet-graded and will still need to be fine graded in order to constmct the future proposed commercial building pad(s), driveways/parking areas, and other anticipate site improvements, hi addition, it should be noted that a site specific geotechnical investigation should also be performed for any proposed future development (i.e., the design and constmction of buildings and other site improvements) of the site as indicated in Section 5.0. The grading plans and Criblock retaining wall constmction plans for the project, prepared by P&D Consultants and Retaming Walls Company North, respectively, were utilized as the base maps to present the as-graded geologic/geotechnical conditions and approximate locations of the field density tests associated with the constmction of the retaining wall. The As-Graded Geotechnical Map (Plate 1) and the Criblock Wall Density Test Location Map (Plates 2 and 3) are presented in the pocket at the rear of the text. 1.1 Project Description The Carlsbad Municipal Golf Course is bounded by Palomar Airport Road on the south. Hidden Valley Road and the Grand Pacific Carisbad Resort on the west, Faraday Avenue on the north, and the Palomar Airport and Business Park on the east in Carlsbad, Califomia. College Boulevard bisects the golf course in an approximately southwest to northeast direction. The subject site (i.e. the north commercial pad) is located on the eastern side of the golf course and north of College Boulevard as indicated on Figure 1. ^ Leighton Carlsbad Municipal Golf Course Carlsbad, California SITE LOCATION MAP Project No. 841363-009 Date February 2008 Figure 1 841363-009 Based on the project grading plans, the proposed grade of commercial pad ranges fi-om approximately 257 feet mean sea level (msl) at the southwest comer of the pad to 266 feet msl in the eastem portion of the pad. The original topography ranged from approximately 190 feet msl along the northwest side of the pad to approximately 310 feet msl in the southwestern portion of the pad. In order to increase the size of the pad, a relatively large fill slope (up to approximately 140 feet in height) and a Criblock retaining wall were constmcted along the north side of the pad. The slope was constmcted at a 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) slope inclination with 3 benches. The upper part of the slope was replaced with a Criblock retaining wall that was approximately 1,325 feet in length and ranged from approximately 20 to 40 feet in height. However, due to the recommended minimum embedment depth of 5 to 10 feet, the exposed height of the retaining wall ranged from approximately 15 to 30 feet. -3- Leighton 841363-009 2.0 SUMMARY OF GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS The grading operations for the north commercial pad were performed by SEMA Constmction between November 2005 and June 2006. The grading operations, prior to constmction of the Criblock retaming wall, were geologically observed and documented by Leighton while the fill placement and compaction operations were observed and tested by Testing Engineers (TE, 2007). Documentation related to Testing Engineers' observations and testing is presented in Appendix D of this report, hi summary, during the rough grading operations. Testing Engineers' field technicians were on site full-time durmg the grading operations while a Leighton field and/or project geologist were on site on a periodic basis. During the Criblock retaining wall constmction operations, a Leighton field technician was on site fiill time during the retaining wall backfill and compaction operations. Grading of the site included: 1) the removal of potentially compressible desiccated previously placed artificial fill soils, topsoil, colluvium, and weathered formational material; 2) the excavation of a fill slope key; 3) preparation of areas to receive fill; 4) the placement of canyon and retaining wall subdrains; 5) excavation of formational material; 6) the placement of retaining wall backfill, and 7) the placement of compacted fill soils. Up to approximately 50 feet of cut was excavated and a maxunum of approximately 80 vertical feet of fill was placed within the grading limits of the site. The as-graded geotechnical conditions are presented on the As-Graded Geotechnical Map (Plate 1). 2.1 Site Preparation and Removals Prior to gradmg, the area was stripped of surface vegetation and debris and disposed of off site. Removals of unsuitable and potentially compressible soils (including desiccated previously placed artificial fill soils [associated with the constmction of College Boulevard], topsoil, colluvium, and weathered formational material) were made to competent material. The removals of potentially compressible material were performed in accordance with the recommendations of the project geotechnical report (Appendix A) and geotechnical recommendations made durmg the course of grading. Specifically, removals of the potentially compressible material included approximately 2 to 20 feet of desiccated fill soils, topsoil, colluvium, and weathered formational material. After the removals were made, the removal bottoms and/or areas flatter than 5:1 (horizontal to vertical) were scarified a nummum of 12 mches. The steeper natural hillsides were benched mto competent material as fill was placed. Representative bottom elevations in the removal areas are shown on the As-Graded Geotechnical Map (Plate 1). Due to the need to utilize low expansive granular soils as the backfill soils within the Criblock retaining wall cells, the western portion of the north commercial pad was used as a borrow site. We understand that some fill soils have been placed in the borrow area; -4- Leighton 841363-009 however, the area was left low (i.e. the existmg grades are lower than the proposed pad grade elevations shown on the grading plans). 2.2 Fill Slope Key Prior to the placement of the fill slope along tiie north side of the commercial pad, a fill slope key was constiiicted. The fill slope key was excavated at least 2 feet into competent formational soil along the toe-of slope and constioicted a minimum of 15 feet wide with the key bottom angled at least 2 percent into-the-slope. 2.3 Subdrains Canyon and retaining wall subdrains were placed under the observation of a representative of Leighton during grading and tiie Criblock retaining wall constiiiction operations. After the potentially compressible material m the tiibutary canyons were removed to competent formational material or when compacted fill was placed over competent material to obtain flow to a suitable outiet location, a subdrain was installed along tiie canyon bottom. The canyon subdrains consisted of a 6-inch diameter perforated pipe surrounded by a minimum of 9-cubic feet (per linear foot) of cmshed 3/4-inch gravel wrapped m Mirafi 140N filter fabric. A retaining wall subdrain system consisting of two subdrams was installed behind the Criblock retaining wall. The first subdrain was installed directly behind the lowest-most Criblock member at the back of the retainmg wall while the second subdrain was placed along the bottom of the wall backcut which was at least 10 to 15 feet behind the back of the Criblock wall. The retaining wall subdrains consisted of a 4-inch diameter perforated pipe surrounded by a minimum of 3-cubic feet (per linear foot) of cmshed 3/4-inch gravel wrapped in Mirafi MON filter fabric. The location of the subdrains placed during the grading and retainmg wall constmction operations were surveyed by the project civil engmeer. The approximate subdrain locations presented on tiie As-Graded Geotechnical Map (Plate 1). 2.4 Fill Placement and Compaction As discussed above. Testing Engineers observed and tested tiie compacted fill placed during tiie rough gradmg operations (TE, 2007). These areas included the large north-facing fill slope, the area beneath tiie Criblock retaining wall, and the fills associated with tiie commercial pad. A summary of tiiese observations and testmg services are presented in tiie Commercial Pad Compaction Testing Report presented in Appendix D. Subsequent to tiie rough grading operations, Leighton performed observation and testing services associated witii the Criblock retaining wall subgrade foundation, backfilling of tiie Leighton I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 841363-009 Criblock retaining wall cells, and placement of the compacted fill behind the Criblock retaining wall stmcture. In general, the fill was generally spread in 4- to 8-inch loose lifts; moisture conditioned as needed to attain near-optimum moisture content, and compacted with either heavy-duty constmction equipment and/or hand operated compaction equipment. Field density test results performed during the grading operations indicated the fill soils were compacted to at least 90 or 95 percent of the maximum dry density in accordance with ASTM Test Method D1557, as required. As recommended in the project geotechnical documents (Appendix A), the fill soils comprising the large north-facing fill slope including tiie area beneath the Criblock retaining wall were compacted to a minimum 95 percent relative compaction (in accordance with ASTM Test Metiiod D1557) while the fill soils on the pad and the retaining backfill soils were compacted to a minimum 90 percent relative compaction. Areas of fill in which field density tests indicated compactions less than the recommended relative compaction or where the soils exhibited nonuniformity or had field moisture contents less than approximately 2 to 3 percent below the laboratory optimum moisture content, were reworked. The reworked areas were recompacted, and re-tested until the recommended minunum 90 or 95 percent relative compaction and near-optimum moisture content was achieved. 2.5 Field Densitv Testing Field density testing was performed using tiie Nuclear-Gauge Metiiod (ASTM Test Metiiods D2922 and D3017). The approximate test locations are shown on the As-Graded Geotechnical Map (Plate 1) and Criblock Wall Density Test Location Map (Plates 2 and 3). The results of the field density tests are summarized in Appendix B. The field density testmg was performed in general accordance witii the applicable ASTM Standards, the current standard of care in the industry, and the precision of the testing method itself Variations in relative compaction should be expected fi-om the results documented herein. 2.6 Laboratory Testing Laboratory maximum dry density tests of representative on-site soils were performed in general accordance with ASTM Test Method D1557. Laboratory tests were also performed to evaluate the fill soil gradation and plastic mdex properties. The laboratory test results are presented in Appendix C. Leighton 841363-009 3.0 ENGINEERING GEOLOGIC SUMMARY 3.1 As-Graded Geologic Conditions The geologic and/or geotechnical conditions encountered during the rough grading and Criblock retaining wall constmction operations were essentially as anticipated. A comprehensive summary of tiie geologic conditions (including geologic units, geologic stmctiire, and faulting) is presented below. The as-graded geologic conditions are presented on the As-Graded Geotechnical Map (Plate 1). 3.2 Geologic Units The geologic units encountered during the rough grading of the north commercial pad consisted of previously placed artificial fill soils, topsoil, colluvium, and the Santiago Formation. Due to tiie potentially compressible natiire of tiie desiccated fill soils, topsoil, colluvium, and weathered formational material, these soils were removed to competent material during the rough grading operations. The approxunate limits of tiie as-graded geologic units encountered during the grading operations are presented on tiie As-Graded Geotechnical Map (Plate 1) and discussed (youngest to oldest) below. 3.2.1 Previously-Placed Artificial Fill ^Unmapped) Previously-placed artificial fill associated with tiie constiiiction of College Boulevard was encountered in the soutii eastem portion of the site. The upper 1 to 2 feet of tiie fill was found to be desiccated and was removed prior to the placement of additional fill. 3.2.2 Topsoil (Unmapped) A relatively thm veneer of topsoil was removed from the majority of the site. The topsoil, as encountered, consisted predominately of a brown, damp to moist, loose, sandy clay and mmor clayey to silty sand. The topsoil was generally massive, porous, and contained scattered roots and organics. Topsoil removal thicknesses were on the order 1 to 4 feet thick. During the gradmg operations, tiie topsoil was observed to have been removed within the limits of grading. Leighton 841363-009 3.2.3 Colluvium (Unmapped) Colluvium was encountered during the rough grading in the two tributary canyons and on the lower portion of the hillside near the bottom of the large north-facing fill slope. As encountered, the colluvium consisted of dark brown, moist, loose to stiff, clayey sand, sandy clay, and silty sand. Where encountered, the colluvium was removed to competent material. Up to approximately 20 feet of colluvium was removed during the rough grading operations. 3.2.4 Santiago Formation fMap Svmbol-Tsal The Tertiary-aged Santiago Formation, as encountered during the rough grading operations, consisted primarily of a massively bedded sandstone with minor interbedded siftstones. The sandstone generally consisted of orange-brown (iron oxide staining) to light brown, damp to moist, dense to very dense, silty very fine to medium grained sandstone. The siltstone interbeds were generally olive-brown, damp to moist, stiff to hard, and occasionally fractured and moderately sheared. 3.3 Geologic Structure The general stioicture of tiie formational material appears to be near horizontal. Based on our geologic mapping during the rough grading operations relative to tiie north commercial pad, bedding within the Santiago Formation generally exhibited somewhat variable bedding with strikes ranging from northwest to north and dips typically 2 to 7 degrees (or less) to the southwest and west. Jointmg on-site was observed to be very variable, but predomuiantly tiended subparallel to the existmg slopes. Jointing dips were found to be generally moderately to steeply dipping. Jointmg was mamly encountered in tiie upper portion of the bedrock becoming less pronounced with depth. 3.4 Faulting hiactive normal faults that offset the Santiago Formation were identified during the project geotechnical investigations (Appendix A). No evidence of any faulting was encountered during the rough grading of the north commercial pad; however, inactive faulting was encountered during the grading of the golf course in areas outside the limits of the commercial pads. -8-Leighton 841363-009 3.5 Seismicity Our discussion of tiie seismicity of the site is prefaced witii a discussion of Califomia legislation and state policies concemmg tiie classification and land-use criteria associated with fauhs. By definition of tiie Califomia Mining and Geology Board, an active fault is a fault that has had surface displacement witiiin Holocene time (about tiie last 11,000 years). The State Geologist has defmed a potentially active fault as any fault considered to have been active during Quatemary time (last 1,600,000 years) but that has not been proven to be active or inactive. This defmition is used in delmeating Fault-Ruptiire Hazard Zones as mandated by tiie Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act of 1972 and as most recently revised in 2007. The intent of this act is to assure that unwise urban development does not occur across the tiaces of active faults. Based on our review of tiie Fault-Rupture Hazard Zones, the site is not located within any Fault-Rupttire Hazard Zone as created by the Alquist-Priolo Act (Bryant and Hart, 2007). San Diego, like the rest of soutiiem Califomia, is seismically active as a resuh of being located near tiie active margin between the North American and Pacific tectonic plates. The principal source of seismic activity is movement along tiie northwest-tiending regional fault zones such as tiie San Andreas, San Jacinto and Elsinore Faults Zones, as well as along less active faults such as the Rose Canyon Fault Zone. The nearest known active fault is tiie Rose Canyon Fault Zone, which is located approximately 5.7 miles (9.2 kilometers) west of the site, and has a Site Classification of C based on tiie 2007 Califomia Building Code (CBC). Because of the lack of known active faults on the site, tiie potential for surface mpttire at tiie site is considered low. Shallow ground mpttire due to shaking from distant seismic events is not considered a significant hazard, although it is a possibility at any site. Liquefaction and dynamic settlement of soils can be caused by strong vibratory motion due to earthquakes. Both research and historical data indicate that loose, saturated, granular soils are susceptible to liquefaction and dynamic settlement. Liquefaction is typified by a loss of shear strength in the affected soil layer, thereby causing the soil to act as a viscous liquid. This effect may be manifested by excessive settlements and sand boils at the ground surface. The fill and formational materials underiying the site are not considered liquefiable due to their fine-grained nature, dense physical characteristics, and unsaturated condition. 3.6 Ground Water Ground water was not encountered during the rough grading or retaining wall constinction operations. Since subdrains were installed in the tiibutaiy canyon bottoms and behind the retaming wall, ground water conditions should not be a constiaint to fiiture development. Leighton 841363-009 However, unanticipated seepage conditions may occur and steps to mitigate the seepage should be made on a case-by-case basis. 3-7 Expansion and Sulfate Content Testing of Representative Finish Grade Soils Expansion potential and soluble sulfate content tests were not performed on representative fmish grade soils of the sheet-graded pad. However, we anticipate that the representative finish grade soils have a very low to possibly medium expansion potential and have a negligible to moderate soluble sulfate content per the Uniform Building Code criteria. Additional laboratory testing is recommended to determine the actual expansion potential and soluble sulfate content of the site. -10- . , Leighton 841363-009 4.0 CONCLUSIONS The rough gradmg and Criblock retaining wall backfill operations for tiie north commercial pad were performed in general accordance with tiie project geotechnical reports (Appendix A), geotechnical recommendations made during gradmg, and tiie City of Carlsbad requirements. The following is a summary of our conclusions concemmg the grading and constiiiction operations. • Geotechnical conditions encountered during gradmg were generally as anticipated. • Site preparation and removals were geotechnically observed. • The geologic units encountered during the rough grading of the site consisted of artificial fill, topsoil, colluvium, and the Santiago Formation. • Desiccated previously placed artificial fill soils and unsuitable topsoil, colluvium, and weathered formational material were removed to competent material within the limits of grading. • Subdrains were placed in the tributary canyons and behind the Criblock retainmg wall. The fill slope on the north side of tiie north commercial pad was constmcted witii a fill slope key. The key was constiiicted a mmimum of 15 feet wide, excavated at least 2 feet into competent material along tiie toe-of-slope and tiie bottom inclmed 2 percent into the slope. Fill soils were derived from on-site soils. Fills soils comprising tiie large north-facmg fill slope including tiie area beneath tiie Criblock retaining wall were compacted to a minimum 95 percent relative compaction (m accordance with ASTM Test Metiiod D1557) while tiie fill soils on tiie pad and tiie retainmg backfill soils were compacted to a muiimum 90 percent relative compaction. Field density testing indicated tiiat the fill soils were placed and compacted to at least a 90 or 95 percent relative compaction (based on ASTM Test Method D1557) and near- optimum moistijre contents in accordance witii tiie recommendations of Leighton and Associates and tiie requirements of the City of Carlsbad. The results of the field density tests performed by Leighton are summarized m Appendix B while the density tests performed by Testuig Engineers is included in Appendix D. The cut/fill ttansition condition present on tiie commercial pad was not mitigated during tiie gradmg operations. Cut/fill transition conditions present witiiin the limits of any proposed buildmgs should be mitigated by the overexcavation of the cut portion of tiie building pad or by special foundation design. Additional subsurface evaluation will be -11- Leighton I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 841363-009 necessary to identify tiie location of the cut/fill ti-ansition and to develop design recommendations for future site improvements or development. No evidence of faulting was encountered during tiie rough grading operations for the north commercial pad. However, minor uiactive faults were encountered during the Carlsbad Golf Course gradmg outside the lunits of the commercial pads. Ground water was not encountered during the rough grading or retaining wall constmction operations. Due to the dense nature of tiie onsite soils, it is our professional opmion tiiat the liquefaction hazard at the site is considered low. The expansion potential of representative finish grade soils of the sheet-graded pad was not tested during site grading. However, very low to possibly medium expansive soils should be anticipated. Further geotechnical investigation should be performed for tiie futiire site development, and the representative fmish grade soils should be tested to determine tiie actiial expansion potential of the soils. The potential for soluble sulfate attack of the finish grade soils was not tested during site grading. However, negligible to moderate soluble sulfate contents are anticipated. As discussed above, further geotechnical mvestigation should be performed for the future site development, and the representative finish grade soils should be tested to determine tiie actiial potential for soluble sulfate attack of the soils. It is our opmion that the slopes of tiie nortii commercial pad possess a static factor of safety of at least 1.5 to resist deep-seated failure (under normal irrigation/precipitation pattems), provided the recommendations in the project geotechnical reports are mcorporated into the post-grading, constiiiction, and post-constiaiction phases of site development. Because the Criblock retaining wall was not designed to support additional loads (i.e. loads other than the assumed level backfill zone behmd the retaining wall), a stmctural setback is recommended and will limit the buildable area of the commercial pad. The setback limit was determined by projecting a 1:1 (or 45-degree angle) from the bottom back portion of the Criblock cell up to tiie proposed finish grade surface on the pad. The setback limits are presented on the As-Graded Geotechnical Map (Plate 1). -12- , . , Leighton I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 841363-009 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 Additional Geotechnical Investigation We anticipate tiiat future development of tiie site will consist of site preparation, remedial grading for tiie mitigation of cut/fill ttansitions, fme grading, utility trench excavation and backfill, retaming wall backfill, and driveway and parking area pavement section preparation and compaction. Based on the current as-graded condition of tiie site, we recommend that a site specific geotechnical investigation be performed for any proposed future development. It should be noted that a stiaicttiral setback lunit is recommended for fiittire development of tiie north commercial pad. The stmcttiral setback limit, rangmg from approximately 10 to 60 feet from top of slope (i.e. top of Criblock retaining wall) was determined by projecting a 1:1 (or 45-degree angle) from the bottom back portion of the Criblock retaining wall cells up to the proposed fmish grade surface on tiie pad. Factors that determmed this setback was the type of retaining wall, the location of Criblock wall foundation, tiie slope height, and tiie type of soil used as backfill. It should be noted tiiat tiie setback zone may be revised by tiie geotechnical consultant on a case-by-case basis if tiie geotechnical conditions are different tiian anticipated. For planning purposes any improvement or additional load (such as additional fill, placement of buildings, vehicle loading, etc.) on tiie retaining wall will need to be evaluated and either kept out of the setback zone or founded below tiie 1:1 projection Ime. 5.2 Excavations Excavations of tiie on-site materials may generally be accomplished witii conventional heavy-duty earthwork equipment. It is not anticipated tiiat blasting will be required or tiiat significant quantities of oversized rock (i.e. rock with maximum dimensions greater tiian 8 inches) will be generated during fiitiire gradmg. However, localized cemented zones witiim tiie cut areas may be encountered on tiie site tiiat may require heavy ripping and/or removal. If oversized rock is encountered, it should be placed m accordance witii tiie recommendations presented in Appendix E, hauled offsite, or placed in non-stiiicttiral or landscape areas. 5.3 Fill Placement and Compaction The on-site soils are generally suitable for use as compacted fill provided they are free or organic material, debris, and rock fragments larger tiian 8 inches in maximum dimension. We do not recommend tiiat high or very high expansive soils be utilized as fill for the building pads or as retaining wall backfill. -13- Leighton I i I I I I I I I 1 I 841363-009 All fill soils should be brought to 2-percent over the optunum moisture content and compacted in uniform lifts to at least a 90 percent relative compaction based on the laboratory maximum dry density (ASTM Test Metiiod D1557). The optimum lift tiiickness required to produce a uniformly compacted fill will depend on the type and size of compaction equipment used, hi general, fill should be placed in lifts not exceedmg 8 inches in compacted thickness. Placement and compaction of fill should be performed in general accordance with Appendix E, the current City of Carlsbad grading ordinances, sound constmction practices, and the geotechnical recommendations presented herein. 5.4 Subdrain Outlet Maintenance The approximate location of the subdrains and subdrain outlets constmcted during tiie rough grading operations are identified on the As-Graded Geotechnical Map (Plate 1). All subdrain outiets should be periodically cleared of soil cover or otiier potential blockage that may have occurred smce initial subdrain constmction. In open space areas, it is recommended that the Property Owner or Management Company further maintain these outiets, as well as retaining wall drainage outiets to prevent further blockage. 5.5 Slope Maintenance Guidelines ft is the responsibility of the owner to maintain the slopes, including adequate planting, proper irrigation and maintenance, and repair of faulty irrigation systems. To reduce the potential for erosion and slumping of graded slopes, all slopes should be planted with ground cover, shmbs, and plants that develop dense, deep root stmctures and require minimal irrigation. Slope planting should be carried out as soon as practical upon completion of grading. Surface-water runoff and standing water at the top-of slopes should be avoided. Oversteepening of slopes should be avoided during constmction activities and landscaping. Maintenance of proper lot drainage, undertaking of property improvements in accordance with sound engineering practices, and proper maintenance of vegetation, including regular slope irrigation, should be performed. Slope irrigation sprinklers should be adjusted to provide maximum uniform coverage with minimal of water usage and overlap. Overwatering and consequent runoff and ground sattiration should be avoided. If automatic sprinklers systems are installed, their use must be adjusted to account for rainfall conditions. Trenches excavated on a slope face for any purpose should be property backfilled and compacted in order to obtain a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction, in accordance with ASTM Test Method D1557. Observation/testing and acceptance by the geotechnical consuftant during trench backfill is recommended. A rodent-control program should be -14- Leighton I I I I I I I 841363-009 established and maintained. Prior to planting, recentiy graded slopes should be temporarily protected against erosion resulting from rainfall, by the implementing slope protection measures such as polymer covering, jute mesh, etc. 5.6 Construction Observation and Testing Constiiiction observation and testing should be performed by the geotechnical consultant during futtire gradmg operations or excavations and foundation or retaining wall constiiiction. Additionally, footmg excavations should be observed and moisttire determination tests of subgrade soils should be performed by tiie geotechnical consultant prior to tiie pouring of concrete. Fme grade and foundation plans should also be reviewed by the geotechnical consultant prior to site development. -15- Leighton I 841363-009 6.0 LIMFTATIONS The presence of our field representative at the site was intended to provide tiie owner with professional advice, opinions, and recommendations based on observations of tiie contractor's work. Altiiough the observations did not reveal obvious deficiencies or deviations from project specifications, we do not guarantee the contractor's work, nor do our services relieve the contractor or his subcontiactor's work, nor do our services relieve tiie contractor or his subcontiactors of their responsibility if defects are subsequentiy discovered in their work. Our responsibilities did not include any supervision or direction of the actual work procedures of tiie confractor, his personnel, or subcontractors. The conclusions in this report are based on test resufts and observations of the grading and earthwork procedures used and represent our engineering opinion as to the compliance of the results with the project specifications. -16- Leighton 841363-009 APPENDIX A References Bryant, W.A., and Hart E.W., 2007, Special Publication 42, Fauft Rupttire Hazard Zones in Califomia, Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fautt Zoning Act witii hidex to Earthquake Fault Zone Maps, Interim Revision 2007. Califomia Building Standards Commission (CBSC), 2007 Califomia Building Code, Based on 2006 Intemational Building Code. Califomia Geological Survey (CGS) formally Califomia Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG), 1996a, Geologic Maps of the Northwestem Part of San Diego County, Califomia, CDMG Open-File Report 96-02, Plate 1, Geologic Map of the Oceanside, San Luis Rey, and San Marcos 7.5' Quadrangles, San Diego County, Califomia, Scale 1:24,000. , 1998, Maps of Knovra Active Fault Near-Source Zones in Califomia and Adjacent Portions of Nevada, to be used with the 1997 Uniform Building Code, Intemational Conference of Building Officials, dated Febmary 1998. Dudek, 2005, Grading Plans for Special Exhibit Drawing, Carlsbad Municipal Golf Course Phase 2, Carlsbad, Califomia, Drawing No. 381-4A, Sheet 18 of 46, dated October 6, 2005. Leighton and Associates, hic, 1998, Geotechnical Investigation for the Proposed Carlsbad Municipal Golf Course, Carlsbad, Califomia, Project No. 841363-006, dated Febmaiy 16 1998. , 2005a, Geotechnical Review of Criblock Retaining Wall Plan and Calculations, Carlsbad Municipal Golf Course, Carlsbad, Califomia, Project No. 841363-009, dated November 18, 2005, revised November 29,2005. , 2005b, Summary of Geotechnical Conditions Related to Criblock Retaining Wall of the Commercial Pad and North Facing Fill Slope North of College Boulevard, Carlsbad Municipal Golf Course, Carlsbad, Califomia, Project No. 841363-009, dated December 14 2005. —, 2005c, Second Geotechnical Review of Criblock Retammg Wall Plan and Calculations, Carlsbad Municipal Golf Course, Carlsbad, Califomia, Project No. 841363- 009, dated December 28,2005. A-i 841363-009 APPENDIX A (Continued) , 2006a, Thkd Geotechnical Review of Criblock Retaining Wall Plan and Calculations, Carlsbad, Municipal Golf Course, Califomia, Project No. 841363-009, dated January 5' 2006. 2006b, Addendum Remedial Grading Recommendations Concerning the Backfill Behind the Western Portion of the Criblock Retaining Wall Project Memorandum, Carlsbad Municipal Golf Course, Carlsbad, Califomia, Project No. 841363-009, dated May 5, 2006. , Undated, Unpublished In-House Geotechnical Data. P&D Consultants, 2005, Grading Plans for Carlsbad Municipal Golf Course Phase 2, Carlsbad, Califomia, Drawing No. 381-4A, 99 Sheets, dated April 15, 2005. Retaining Walls Company North, 2005, Cribwall Plans, Carlsbad Municipal Golf Course, Carlsbad, Califomia, Job No. 05-03-07, dated December 5, 2005. Tan, S.S., and Kennedy, M.P., 1996, Geologic Maps of the Northwestem Part of San Diego County, Califomia: Califomia Division of Mines and Geology, DMG Open-File Report 96- 02, 2 Plates. Tan, S.S., and Giffen, D.G., 1995, Landslide Hazards in the Nortiiem Part of tiie San Diego Mefropolitan Area, San Diego County, California, Landslide Hazard Identification Map No. 35, Division of Mines and Geology, Open-File Report No. 95-04. Testing Engineers San Diego, hic. (TE), 2007, Supplemental Compaction Testing Report, Carlsbad Municipal Golf Course, Carlsbad, Califomia, Contract No. 108078, dated March 19 2007. A-2 841363-009 APPENDIX B Explanation of Summary of Field Densitv Tests Test No. Test of Prefix Test of Abbreviations (none) GRADING Natural Ground NG Original Ground OG Existing Fill EF Compacted Fill CF Slope Face SF Finish Grade EG (S) SEWER (SO) STORM DRAIN (AD) AREA DRAIN (W) DOMESTIC WATER (RC) RECLAIMED WATER (SB) SUBDRAIN (G) GAS (E) •ELECTRICAL (T) TELEPHONE (J) JOINT UTILITY (I) IRRIGATION Bedding Material B Shading Sand S Main M Lateral L Crossmg X Manhole MH Hydrant Lateral HL Catch Basin CB Riser R Inlet I (RW) RETAINING WALL (CW) CRIB WALL (LW) LOFFELL WALL (SF) STRUCT FOOTING Footing Bottom F Backfill B - Wall Cell C Test No. Prefix (SG) (AB) (CB) (PB) (AC). Test of SUBGRADE AGGREGATE BASE CEMENT TREATED BASE PROCESSED BASE ASPHALT CONCRETE Curb Gutter Curb and Gutter Cross Gutter Street Sidewalk Driveway Driveway Approach Parking Lot Electric Box Pad Test of Abbreviations (P) (IT) C G CG XG ST SW D DA PL EB PRESATURATION Moisture Content INTERIOR TRENCH Plumbing Backfill Electrical Backfill M N S 15A 15B "0" represents nuclear gauge tests that were perforated in general accordance with most recent version of ASTM Test Methods D2922 and D3 017. represents sand cone tests that were performed in general accordance with most recent version of ASTM Test Method Dl 556 represents first retest of Test No. 15 represents second retest of Test No. 15 in Test Elevation Column represents test was taken at the ground surface (e.g. fmish grade or subgrade) in Test Elevation Column represents test was taken one foot below the ground surface B-1 SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No. Test Date Test Of Location Test Soil Lot # Elev (ft) Type Dry Density Field Max Moisture (%) Field Opt. Relative (%) Compaction Remarks 27 6/7/06 CF N. Commercial Pad West Side 28 6/7/06 CF N. Commercial Pad West Side 29 6/7/06 CF . N. Commercial Pad West Side 30 6/7/06 CF N. Commercial Pad West Side 31 6/7/06 CF N. Commercial Pad West Side 32 6/7/06 CF N. Commercial Pad West Side 33 6/8/06 CF N. Commercial Pad West Side 34 6/8/06 CF N. Commercial Pad West Side 254.0 5 114.7 119.0 18.6 . 13.0 96 249.0 5 110.2 119.0 15.1 13,0 93 251.0 5 112,3 119.0 14,4 , 13.0 94 254.0 5 113.1 119.0 13.9 13.0 , 95 254.0 5 • 107.2 119.0 .14.9 13.0 90 255.0 5 111.7 119.0. 15:7 13.0 94 252.0 5 in.7 119.0 13.8 13.0 • 94 253.0 3 • ' 103.2 114.5 17.2 12.5 90 Project Number: Project Name: Project Location: Client: 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 Page 2 of2 3/9/2007 1 •:>9-17PM Test No. SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test Date Test Of Location Lot# Test Elev (ft) Soil Type CW 1 1/20/06 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #5 Station 9+70 CW • 2 1/20/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #5 Station 10+10 CW 3 1/20/06 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #4 Station 9+65 CW 4 1/20/06 C Crib Wall #r Cell #4 Station 10+00 CW 5 1/20/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 9+79 CW 6 1/20/06 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Station 10+17 CW 7 1/20/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 9+75 CW 8 1/20/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 9+92 CW 9 1/20/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 9+72 CW 10 1/20/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 10+10 CW 11 1/23/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #5 Station 11+08 CW 12 1/23/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Station 11+23 CW 13 1/23/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #5 Station 11+40 CW 14 1/23/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #4 Station 11+60 CW 15 1/23/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Station 11+30 CW 16 1/23/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 11+20 CW 17 1/23/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 11+50 CW 18 1/23/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 11+65 CW 19 1/23/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Station 11+15 CW 20 1/23/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 11+50 CW 21 1/24/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #5 Station 9+60 CW 22 1/24/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #4 Station 9+85 CW 23 1/24/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Station 9+75 CW 24 1/24/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 9+65 CW 25 1/24/06 c Crib Wall # I Cell#l Station 9+90 CW 26 1/24/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #4 Station 10+38 CW 27 1/24/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Station 10+62 CW 28 1/24/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #5 Station 10+85 CW 29 1/24/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 10+50 CW 30 1/24/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 11+00 CW 31 1/24/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Station 11 + 10 CW 32 1/24/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Station 11+43 Dry Density Field Max Moisture (%) Relative (%) Field Opt. Compaction Remarks Project Number: Project Name: Project Location: Client: 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 Page 1 of39 218.0 3 103.1 114,5 16.3 12,5 90 219.0 1 112.6 120,0 13,6 12,0 94 219.0 3 102.8 114,5 18,7 .12.5 90 220.0 1 112.1 120.0 14,4 12,0 93 219.0 3 102.9 114.5 21,1 12.5 90 220.0 1 111.4 120.0 12.2 12.0 93 220.0 3 103.1 1.14.5 18.9 12.5 90 221.0 1 112.0 .120,0 15.1 12,0 93 222.0 3 103,9 114,5 18.6 12,5 91 223.0 1 109.0 120,0 15,3 12,0 91 217.0 1 107,6 120.0 15.1 12,0 90 218.0 1 107.6 120.0 16,7 12,0 90 217.0 1 108,4 120,0 16.9 12,0 90 218.0 1 109.4 120.0 14,3 12,0 91 219.0 4 107.9 !I6,0 16,0 13,0 93 221.0 4 106.4 116.0 17,7 13,0 92 221.0 4. 107.1 • 116.0 16,9 13,0 92 222.0 1 108.5 120.0 14,6 12,0 90 222.0 4 107.5 116.0 16,4 13,0 93 221.0 1 108.4 120.0 13,9 12.0 90 218.0 4 108.0 116.0 15,8 13.0 93 219.0 3 102,6 114,5 14,8 12,5 90 220.0 3 103.4 114,5 14.4 12.5 . 90 221.0 3 102.7 114,5 14,0 12.5 90 222.0 3 103.3 114.5 15,7 12.5 90 220.0 3 104.0 114,5 13,5 12.5 91 221.0 3 104.4 114,5 15.9 12,5 91 219.0 3 105,4 114,5 14.7 12,5 92 222.0 3 104.1 114.5 13.6 . 12.5 91 223.0 3 104,2 114.5 12,9 12.5 91 221.0 4 105.1 , 116.0 13,9 13,0 91 220.0 4 105.3 116,0 13,6 13.0 91 3/9/2007 1 -^snoPN/f SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No. CW 33 CW 34 CW 35 CW 36 CW 37 CW 38 CW 39 CW 40 CW 41 CW 42 CW 43 CW 44 CW 45 CW 46 CW 47 CW 48 CW 49 CW 50 CW 51 CW 52 CW 53 CW 54 CW 55 CW 56 CW 57 CW 58 CW 59 CW 60 CW 61 CW 62 CW 63 CW 64 Test Date Test Of Location Lot# C C C C C C C C C C c 1/24/06 1/24/06 1/25/06 1/25/06 1/25/06 1/25/06 1/25/06 1/25/06 1/25/06 1/25/06 1/25/06 1/25/06 C 1/25/06 C 1/25/06 1/25/06 1/25/06 1/25/06 1/25/06 1/26/06 1/26/06 1/26/06 1/26/06 1/26/06 1/26/06 1/26/06 1/26/06 1/26/06 1/26/06 1/26/06 1/26/06 1/26/06 1/26/06 C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C Project Number: Project Name: Project Location: Client: Crib Wall #1 Cell #5 Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Crib Wall#l Cell #5 Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Crib Wair#l Cell #2 Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall #1 Cell #5 Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall #1 Cell #5 Crib Wall#l Cell #5 Crib Wall#l Cell #5 Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Crib Wall#l Cell #4 . Crib Wall #1 Cell #4 Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell #3, Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall #1 Cell #5 Crib Wall #1 Cell #4 841363-009 Carisbad Golf Course 0 d Station 11+62 Station 11+55 Station 9+60 Station 9+95 Station 10+32 Station 10+55 Station 10+85 Station 10+18 Station 11+20 Station 11+35 Station 11+00 . Station 10+90 Station 10+60 Station 11+55 . Station 11+60 Station 9+78 Station 10+67 Station 11+45 Station 11+25 Station 11+00 Station 10+75 Station 9+75 Station 10+50 Station 11+55 Station 11+12 Station 10+80 Station 9+55 Station 9+85 Station 10+40 Station 9+90 Station 10+22 Station 10+05 Test Elev (ft) 219.0 222.0 222.0 221.0 223.0 224.0 223.0 223.0 221.0 222.0 223.0 224.0 225.0 222.0 225.0 222.0 222.0 222.0 223.0 224.0 223.0 223.0 224.0 225.0 226.0 225,0 224.0 225.0 226.0 226.0 223.0 224.0 Soil Type 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Dry Density Field Max Moisture (%) Field Opt. Relative (Vo) Compaction Remarks 105,4 104,9 104.2 102.8 103.8 107.0 103.1 103.0 104,0 106.5 104,4 102,5 103,5 104,5 103,2 103.9 103.5 104.1 103.7 104.2 105.4 103.1 105,1 104.0 102,6 103.2 102.8 103.5 102,8 103.0 102.9 102.6 116.0 116,0 114,5 114.5 114,5 114.5 114.5 114.5 114,5 114,5 114,5 114,5 114,5 114.5 114.5 114.5 114,5 114.5 114.5 114.5 114.5 114.5 114,5 114.5 114.5 114,5 114,5 114,5 114.5 114.5 114,5 114,5 13,9 12,7 16,8 17,0 16,4 15,6 15,3 16,2 17,3 17.7 15,6 17.7 17.2 15,9 16,4 16.4 17.4 17.0 17.2 18.0 17.5 17.2 16.9 16.3 16.7 18,0 17.4 16.4 17.5 15.7 17.6 18.0 13,0 13,0 12,5 12,5 12,5 12,5 12.5 12,5 12,5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12,5 12.5 12,5 12,5 12.5 12,5 12,5 12,5 12,5 12.5 12.5 12,5 12,5 12,5 12,5 12,5 91 90 91 90 91 93 90 90 91 93 91 90 90 91 90 91 90 91 91 91 92 90 92 91 90 90 • 90 90 90 90 90 90 Page 2 of39 3/9/2007 SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No. Test Date Test Of Location Lot# Test Elev (ft) Soil Type Dry Density Field Max Moisture (%) Field Opt. Relative (%) Compaction Remarks CW 65 1/26/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #3 CW 66 1/27/06, C Crib Wall #1 Cell #5 CW 67 1/27/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #4 CW 68 1/27/06 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 CW 69 1/27/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #5 CW 70 . 1/27/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #2 CW 71 1/27/06 C Crib'Wall #1 CeH#l CW 72 1/27/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #2 CW 73 1/27/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW 74 1/27/06 c Crib Wall # I Cell #5 CW 75 1/27/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 CW 76 1/27/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 CW 77 1/27/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 CW 78 1/27/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW 79 1/30/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l jew 80 1/30/06 c Crib Wall#i Cell #2 CW 81 1/30/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #5 CW 82 1/30/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #5 CW 83 1/30/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #5 CW 84 1/30/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 CW 85 1/30/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 CW 86 1/30/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 CW 87 1/30/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 CW 88 1/30/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 CW 89 1/30/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 CW 90 1/30/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 lew 91 1/30/06 c, . Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 CW 92 1/30/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 CW 93 1/30/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW 94 1/30/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW 95 1/30/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW 96 1/30/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #5 Station 9+70 Station 10+55 Station 10+27 Station 10+10 Station 11+00 Station 10+00 Station 10+22 Station 10+46 Station 10+95 Station 11+35 Station 11+50 Station 11+30 Station 11+20 Station 10+35 Station 9+35 Station 9+45 Station 9+83 Station 10+43 Station 11+08 Station 9+80 Station 10+60 Station 11+42 Station 9+65 Station 10+72 Station 11 + 17 Station 9+95 . Station 10+80 Station 11+50 Station 9+80 Station 10+40 Station 11+25 Station 9+55 225.0 223.0 224.0 225.0 223.0 226.0 227.0 226.0 227.0 223.0 224.0 225.0 226.0 227.0 219.0 221,0 224.0 224.0 224.0 225.0 225.0 225.0 226.0' 226.0 226.0 227,0 227.0 227.0 228.0 228.0 228.0 220.0 3 4 4 4 • 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 4 1 1 3 3 3 3 103.4 104.1 106,4 106,8 105.4 103,1 103,5 102,8 107,3 106,2 107.0 106.4 105,6 104,3 103.5 102,6 . 103,8 103,1 103,5 104,1 103,0 103,0 105,6 103,5 102.8 105.5 107,6 107,8 103.2 102,9 105,3 104,3 114,5 116.0 116,0 116,0 116,0 114,5 114,5 114,5 116,0 116,0 116.0 116,0 116,0- 116,0 114,5 114,5 114,5 114,5 114.5 114.5 114.5 114.5 116.0 114,5 114.5 116.0 120.0 120.0 114,5 114,5 114.5 114.5 16.4 13.3 16.0 15,4 13,5 16,1 15,0 18,2 15,4 14,5 13,4 14,0 14,6 14.3 13,4 17,0 15,7 14,6 14,0 15.6 16,4 14.8 15.2 13.5 15.3 15.8 13.9 13.2 15.0 14.1 13.2 • 17.4 12.5 .13.0 13,0 13,0 13,0 12,5 12,5 12,5 13.0 13,0 13.0 13.0 13,0 13.0 12.5 12,5 12.5 12.5 12,5 12,5 12,5 12,5 13,0 - 12,5 12,5 13,0 12,0 12,0 12.5 12,5 12,5 12,5 90 90 92 92 91 90 90 90 93 92 92 92 91 90 90 90 91 90 90 91 90 90 91 90 90 91 90 90 90 90 92 91 Project Number: Project Name: Project Location: Client: 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 Page 3 of 39 1 -T^-mDA/f SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No. Test Date Test Of Location CW 97 1/30/06 C Crib WaII#l Cell #3 CW 98 1/30/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW 99 1/31/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #4 CW 100 1/31/06 c •Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 CW 101 1/31/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #5 CW 102 1/31/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #5 CW 103 1/31/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #5 CW 104 1/31/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #4 CW 105 1/31/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 CW 106 1/31/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #4 CW 106A 1/31/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 CW 107 1/31/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 CW 108 1/31/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 CW 109 1/31/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 CW 110 1/31/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 CW 111 1/31/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 CW 112 1/31/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 CW 113 1/31/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 CW 114 1/31/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 CW 115 1/31/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW 116 1/31/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #5 CW 117 1/31/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 CW 118 1/31/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW 119 2/1/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #5 CW 120 2/1/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 CW 121 2/1/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 CW 122 2/1/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 CW 123 2/1/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW 124 2/2/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 CW 125 2/2/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 CW 126 2/2/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 CW 127 2/2/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Project Number: Project Name: Project Location: Station 9+40 Station 9+27 Station 9+45 Station 9+25 Station 11+26 Station 10+70 Station 10+00 Station 11+45 Station 10+85 Station 9+75 Station 9+75 Station 11+10 Station 10+50 Station 9+60 Station 11+20 Station 10+80 Station 10+05 Station 11+50 Station 10+55 Station 9+90 Station 9+50 Station 9+35 Station 9+42 Station 9+57 Station 9+50 Station 9+38 Station 9+65 Station 9+45 Station 11+25 Station 10+75 Station 10+15 Station 11+00 Lot# Test Elev (ft) 222.0 224.0 222.0 224.0 225.0 225.0 225^0 226.0 226.0 226.0 226.0 227.0 . 227.0 227.0 228.0 228.0 228.0 229.0 229.0 229.0 221.0' 223.0- 225.0 222.0 223.0 224.0 225.0 226.0 228.0 228.0 228.0 229.0 Soil Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 Dry Density Field Max 105.0 103.6 104.7 103.8 103.9 102.7 102.9 103.2 106.3 97.4 105.5 106.0 102.6 108.6 103.6 102.9 103.2 103.8 104.1 103.7 104.1 102.9 103.9 103.9 103.6 104.0 104.9 104.8 108.2 112.4 108.6 108.3 114.5 114.5 114.5 114.5 114.5 114.5 114.5 11'4.5 116.0 114.5 114,5 116,0 114,5 114,5 114,5 114,5 114,5 114.5 114.5 114,5 114,5 114.5 114.5 116.0 114.5 116.0 116.0 116,0 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 Moisture (%) Field Opt. Relative r%) Compaction 16.6 18.2 17.2 18,1 14.1 , , 14,7' 17,2 17.2 13.6 15.5 14.6 15,4 16,5 15':i 17,8 18.6 .17.1 16.3 16.1 15.0 17.4 16.7 17.7 16.3 17.0 15.3 15.1 15.0 11.5 13.9 13.4 13.4 Remarks 12.5 12,5 12,5 12,5 12,5 ,1-2.5 12.5 •; 12.5 13.0 12.5 12.5 13,0 12,5 12,5 12,5 , 12,5 • 12,5 12,5 12,5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 13.0 12.5 13.0 13.0 13,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 92 90 91 91 91 90 90 90 •" 92 85 92 91 90 95 • 90 90 90 91 91 91 91 90 91 90 90 90 90 90 90 94. 90 90 Retest on 106A Retest of 106 ^/Q/9nn7 SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No. Test Date Test Of Location CW 128 2/2/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 10+60 CW 129 2/3/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 10+18 CW 130 2/3/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #5 Station 9+87 CW 131 2/3/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 9+85 CW 132 2/3/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 10+45 CW 133 2/3/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 11+10 CW 134 2/3/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 10+10 CW 135 2/6/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 11+35 CW 136 2/6/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 9+50 CW 137 2/6/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #5 Station 9+40 CW 138 2/6/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Station 9+20 CW 139 . 2/7/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Station 11+40 CW 140 2/7/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Station 10+95 CW 140A 2/7/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #4 . Station 10+95 CW 141 2/7/06. c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Station 10+00 CW 142 2/7/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 11+15 CW 142 A 2/7/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 11+15 CW 143 2/7/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 10+70 CW 144 2/7/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Station 10+22 CW 145 2/7/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 11+29 CW 145A 2/7/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 11+29 CW 146 2/7/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 10+70 CW 147 2/7/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 9+90 CW 148 2/7/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 11+30 CW MSA 2/7/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#r Station 11+30 CW 149 2/7/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 10+80 CW 150 -2/7/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Station 10+15 CW 151 2/7/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #5 Station 9+52 CW 152 2/7/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #4 Station 9+40 CW 153 2/7/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 9+70 CW 154 2/7/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 9+60 CW 155 2/8/06 c. Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 9+00 Project Number- Project Name: Project Location: Client: 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 Lot# Test Soil Dry Density Moisture (%) Relative (Vo) Elev (ft) Type Field Max Field Opt. Compaction Remarks 229.0 1 108.1 120,0 14,0 12,0 90 • 229.0 1 109.1 120,0 13,3 12.0 . 91 227.0 1 107.7 120,0 14,8 12.0 90 230.0 1 108.6 120,0 14,9 12.0 90 230.0 1 108.6 120,0 12,1 12.0 ' 90 230.0 1 109.3 120.0 11.3 .. 12.0 91 231.0 4 -104.6 116.0 15.7 13.0 90 231.0 4 104.6 116.0 13.7 13.0 90 229.0 3 104,7 114.5 15.2 12.5 91 227.0 3 103,9 114.5 18,0 12.5 91 228.0 3 103.2 114,5 15,0 12.5 . 90 229.0 4 105.1 116,0 16,1 13.0 91 229.0 3 98.2 114,5 17,0 12.5 86 229.0 3 104.8 114,5 13,3 12,5- ' 92 229.0 1 109.4 120.0 13,0 12,0 91 230.0 3 98.3 114.5 14,7 12.5 86 230.0 1 107.4 120.0 11,6 12.0 90 230.0 1 109,8 120.0 12,3 12.0 92 230.0 4 106,6 116.0 12.5 13,0 92 231.0 3 98.3 114.5 14.6 12.5 86 231.0 3 103.8 114,5 13.2 12.5 91 231.0 3 104.8 114.5 12.4 12,5 92 231.0 3 104.6 114.5 14.3 12,5 91 232.0. 3 99.0 114,5 14.0 • 12,5 86 232.0 3 104.6 114.5 13.3 12,5 91 232.0 3 103.7 114.5 13.1 12,5 91 232.0 3 104.7 114.5 11,0 12,5 91 227.0 3 104.1 114.5 13,0 12,5 91 228.0 3 103.6 114.5 13.5 12.5 90 229.0 3 104.9 114.5 14.3 . 12,5 92 230.0 3 103,7 114.5 16.2 12,5 91 226.0 1 111.8 120.0 14.3 12.0 93 Retest on 140A Retest of 140 Retest on 142A Retest of 142 Retest on 145A Retest of 145 Retest on MSA Retest of 148 Page 5 of39 1:35:02PM SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No. Test Date Test Of Location Lot# Test Elev (ft) Soil Type Dry Density Field Max Moisture (%) Field Opt. Relative (%) Compaction Rerfiarks CW.156 2/8/06 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 9+10 CW 157 .2/8/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Station 9+18 CW 158 2/8/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 8+95 CW 159 2/8/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #5 Station 9+25 CW 160 2/8/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Station 9+12 CW 161 . 2/8/06 C' Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Station 9+17 CW 162 2/8/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 9+27 CW 163 2/8/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 9+5 CW 164 2/9/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #5 Station 9+80 CW 165 2/9/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #5 Station 9+45 CW 166 2/9/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #4 Station 9+55 CW 167 2/9/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Station 9+16 CW 168 2/9/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Station 8+85 CW 168A 2/9/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #4 Station 8+85 CW 169 2/9/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 9+14 CW 170 2/9/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 9+08 CW 171 2/9/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 9+35 CW 172 2/9/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 9+30 CW 173 2/9/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Station 8+85 CW 174 2/9/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Station 9+28 CW 175 2/9/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Station 9+75 CW 176 2/9/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Station 9+00 CW 177 2/9/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 8+87 CW 178 2/9/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 9+45 CW 179 2/9/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 9+20 CW 180 2/9/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 8+85 CW 181 2/10/06 c Crib Wall,#1 Cell #4 Station 10+00 CW 182 . 2/10/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Station 10+45 CW 183 2/10/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 10+73 CW 184 2/10/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 11+10 CW 185 2/10/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #4 Station 11+35 CW 186 2/10/06 c Crib Wall #I Cell #3 Station 11+00 Project Number: Project Name: Project Location: Client: 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 228.0 1 109.2 120,0 14.0 12.0 91 226.0 1 112.3 120.0 14.3 12.0 94 228.0 1 108.6 120,0 14.0 12,0 90 226.0 4 104.7 116,0 16.4 13,0 90 227.0 4 105.6 116,0 16.9 13,0 91 228.0 1 110.0 120,0 13.8 12,0 92 229.0 4 104,6 116,0 17.0 13,0 90 230.0 4 105,1 116,0 16,1 13.0 91 228.0 4 104,2 116,0 15,2 .13.0 90 228.0 4 105,7 116,0 12,5 13,0 91 229.0 4 104.8 .116,0 16,3 13,0 90 228.0 4 104,1 116,0 14,2 13.0 90 228.0 4 100,6 .116.0 14,0 13,0 87 228.0 4 106,3 116.0 14,1 13.0 92 227.0 . 4 . 103,9 116.0 . 14,2 13,0 •. 90' 230.0 4 105,3 116.0 • .12,3 , 13,0 91 229.0 4 106.2 116.0 13,3 13,0 92 .230.0 4 104.3 116.0 13.5 13,0 90 230.0 4 104.9 116.0 11.2 13,0 90 229.0 1 • 108.4 120.0 12.4 12,0 • 90 229.0 1 107.6 120.0 12,6 12,0 -90 229.0 1 108.5 1-20.0 11,6 , 1:2.0 • 90 230.0 4 104.4 116.0. 12,8 •. 13.0 90 230.0 1 112,4 120.0 M.O 12,0 94 231.0 1 109.3 120.0 12,0 • 12.0 91 231.0 1 108.6 120.0 12.6 12.0 . 90 230.0 1 116.7 120.0 12,7 12.0 97 231.0 1 108.4 120.0 12,7 12,0 90 232.0 4 105.0 116.0 13.6 13,0 91 233.0 1 109.7 120.0 14.1 12,0 91 230.0 1 108,7 120.0 13.0 12,0 91 231.0 1 108.6 120.0 14.4 12.0 90 Retest on 168A Retest of 168 Page 6 of39 1 •'!•^.n')D^/f SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No. Test Date Test Of Location Lot# Test Elev (ft) Soil Type Dry Density Field Max Moisture (%) Field Opt. Relative (%) Compaction Remarks CW 187 2/10/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 10+55 CW 188 2/10/06 C Crib Wall #l Cell#l Station 9+95 CW 189 2/10/06 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #4 Station 9+70 CW 190 2/10/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 9+85 CW 193 2/13/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #4 Station 10+65 CW 194 2/13/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 10+80 CW 195 2/13/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 11+15 CW 196 2/13/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Station 11+35 CW 197 2/13/06 c Crib Wall#l Gell#l Station 10+50 CW 198 2/13/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 10+22 CW 199 2/14/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 9+90 CW 200 2/14/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #4 Station 9+75 CW 201 2/14/06 c Crib Wall # I Cell#l Station 9+55 CW 202 2/14/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 9+40 CW 203, 2/14/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Station 9+25 CW 204 2/14/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #4 Station 9+10 CW 205 2/14/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Station 8+88 CW 206 2/14/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 8+80 CW 207 2/14/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 8+75 CW 208 2/14/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Station 8+63 CW 209 . 2/14/06 c Crib Wall#r Cell #4 Station 11+05 CW 210 2/14/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 11+30 CW 211 2/14/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 10+90 CW 212 2/14/06. c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 10+60 CW 213 2/15/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #4 Station 10+50 CW 214 2/15/06 • c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 10+95 CW 215 2/15/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 9+60 CW 216 2/15/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Station 10+00 CW 217 2/15/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Station 9+90 CW 218 2/15/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 9+50 CW 219 2/15/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 9+27 CW 220 2/15/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 9+37 Project Number: Project Name: Project Location: Client: 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 232.0 4 104.8 116,0 14,0 13.0 90 233.0 4 106.3 116.0 13.7 13.0 92 230.0 4 104.4 116,0 14.6 13.0 90 231.0 4 104.2 116,0 14,5 13,0 90 231.0 1 108,3 120,0 12,2 12,0 90 232.0 1 109,4 120.0 15,0 12,0 91 233.0 1 110,3 120.0 12.5 12.0 92 234.0 1 109.1 120.0 13,6 12.0 ,91 234.0 1 108.0 120,0 12.9 12,0 90 233.0 1 108,0 120,0 11,7 12.0 90 232.0 1 108.2 120.0 16,4 12,0 90 231.0 1 112,2 120,0 14,2 12,0 94 234.0 1 108.9 120.0 17,1 12,0 91 233.0 1 107.6 120.0-1 1,0 12,0 90 232.0 1 109.1 120,0 12.0 12,0 91 231.0 1 112.3 120,0 11.1 12,0 94 234.0 1 108.3 120,0 13.1 12.0 90 233.0 4 104,5 116,0 16.7 13.0 90 232.0 1 108,4 1.20.0 13.1 12.0 90 231.0 1 108,0 120.0 13.0 ,12.0 90 232.0 4 104.S 116.0 17.0 13.0 90 233.0 1 107.6 120.0 12.6 ; 12.0 90 234.0 1 .107.6 120.0 16.7 • 12.0 90 235.0 1 108.9 120.0 14.2 • 12,0 91 232.0 1 -108.2 120.0 13:8 ' 12,0 90 233.0 1 108.5 120.0 12.6 12,0 90 234.0 1 108.0 120.0 16.9 12,0 90 235.0 1 108.6 120.0 15.4 12,0 90 232.0 4 104.2 116.0 17.5 13,0 90 233.0 4 104.5 116.0 13.5 13,0 90 234.0 4 104.3 116.0 16.4 13,0 90 235,0 4 104.9 116.0 15.2 13,0 90 Page 7 of 39 3/9/2007 I :^5-n7PM SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test Test T( No. Date OI CW 221 2/15/06 e CW 222 2/15/06 c CW 223 2/15/06 c CW 224 2/15/06 c CW 225 2/15/06 c CW 226 2/15/06 c CW 227 2/15/06 c CW 228 2/15/06 c CW 228A 2/15/06 c CW 229 2/15/06 c CW 230 2/15/06 c CW 231 2/15/06 c CW 232 2/15/06 c CW 233 2/15/06 c CW 234 2/15/06 c CW 235 2/16/06 c CW 236 2/16/06 c CW 237 2/16/06 c CW 238 2/16/06 c CW 239 2/16/06 c CW 240 2/16/06 c CW 241. 2/16/06 c CW 242 2/16/06 c CW 243 2/16/06 c CW 244 2/16/06 c CW 245 2/16/06 c 'cW 246 2/16/06 c CW 247 2/16/06 c CW 248 2/17/06 c CW 249 2/17/06 c CW 250 2/17/06 c CW 251 2/17/06 c Location Lot# Test Elev (ft) Soil Type Dry Density Field Max Moisture (%) Field Opt. Relative C/o) Compaction Remarks Project Number: Project Name: Project Location: Client- Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall#l Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall#l Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall#l Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall#l Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Cell #3 Cell #2 Cell#l Cell #4 Cell #3 Cell #4 Cell #3 Cell #3 Cell #2 Cell #2 Cell#l Cell#l Cell #2 Cell#l Cell #4 Cell #4 Cell #3 Cell #3 Cell #2 Cell #2 Cell#l Cell#l Cell#l Cell #4 Cell #3 Cell #2 Cell#l Cell #4 Cell #4 Cell #4 Cell #3 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 Station 8+85 Station 8+62 Station 8+75 Station 8+65 Station 11+00 Station 11+20 Station 10+70 Station 10+40 Station 10+40 Station 10+25 Station 10+65 Station 10+35 Station 10+80 Station 10+36 Station 11+10 Station 9+40 Station 8+62 Station 9+65 Station 8+95 Station 8+68 Station 9+13 Station 9+30 Station 9+00 Station 8+55 Station 10+78 Station 11 + 10 Station 11+20 Station 10+97 Station 10+40 Station 10+15 Station 9+70 Station 10+60 232.0 4 104.3 116.0 14,4 13.0 90 233.0 1 108,2 120.0 18,0 12,0 90 234.0 1 108,9 120,0 14,2 12,0 91 235.0 4 104,6 116.0 15.0 13,0 90 233.0 1 111,3 120,0 18,8 12,0 93 234.0 1 109,6 120.0 17,1 12,0 91 233.0 1 108,2 120,0 15,6 , 12,0 90 - 234.0 1 104,7 120.0 12,6 12,0 87 234.0 1 108.9 120,0 13,1 12,0 91 235.0 1 108.0 120,0 14,2 12,0 90 235.0 1 107,5 120,0 18,3 12,0 90 236.0 1 110.9 120,0 12,6 12,0 92 236.0 1 108.6 120.0 14,4 " 12,0 90 235.0 1 108.5 120.0 14,5 12.0 90 236.0 1 109,3 120.0 14,0 12.0 91 233.0 1 109,4 120.0 12,8 12,0 91 233.0 1 109,0 120.0 12,9 12,0 91 234.0 1 108.3 120.0 15.1 12.0 90 234.0 1 108.8 120.0 .16,8 12.0 91 235.0 1 110.5 120.0 14,3 12.0 92 235.0 1 109.2 120.0 14.8 12.0 91 236.0 1 108.7 120.0 14.5 12.0 91 236.0 1 109.7 120.0 14.2 12,0 • 91 236.0 1 108.4 120.0 14.5 12,0 90 234.0 1 108.2 120.0 12.2 12,0 90 235.0 1 110.4 120.0 13.4 12,0 92 236.0 1 107.8 120.0 12.8 12,0 90 237.0 1 108.8 120,0 12.4 12.0 91 234.0 1 108.3 120,0 10.7 12,0 90 234.0 1 111.3 120,0 11.1 12.0 93 234.0 3 104.6 114,5 13.6 12.5 91 235,0 1 110.2 120,0 13.5 12.0 92 Retest on 228A Retest of 22 8 Page 8 of39 3/9/2007 :35-n2PM SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No. CW 252 CW 253 CW 254 CW 255 CW 256 CW 257 CW 258 CW 259 CW 260 CW 261 CW 262 CW 263 CW 264 CW 265 CW 266 CW 267 CW 268 CW 269 CW 270 CW 271 CW 272 CW 273 CW 274 CW 275 CW 276 CW 277 CW 278 CW 279 CW 280 CW 281 CW 282 CW 283 Test Date Test Of Project Number: Project Name: Project Location: Client: C C c c 2/17/06 2/17/06 2/17/06 2/17/06 2/17/06 2/17/06 C 2/17/06 C 2/17/06 2/17/06 2/17/06 2/17/06 2/17/06 C 2/17/06 C 2/17/06 2/17/06 2/22/06 2/22/06 2/22/06 2/22/06 2/22/06 2/22/06 2/22/06 2/22/06 2/22/06 2/22/06 2/22/06 2/22/06 2/22/06 2/22/06 2/23/06 2/23/06 2/23/06 C C c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c Location Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Crib Wall #1 Cel[#l Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell #3 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 Station 10+25 , Station 9+85 Station 10+55 Station 10+10 Station 9+79 Station 10+67.- Station 10+20 Station 9+35 Station 9+95 Station 8+87 Station 9+60 Station 8+65 Station 8+50 Station 8+42 Station S+80 Station 11+00 Station 10+65 Station 10+00 Station 9+80 Station 9+50 Station 9+00 Station 8+55 Station 9+25 Station 11+17 Station 10+92 Station 10+57 Station 10+50 Station 10+25 Station 10+70 Station 9+85 Station 9+75 Station 9+55 Lot# Test Elev (ft) Soil Type Dry Density Field Max Moisture (%) Field Opt. Relative (%) Compaction Remarks 235.0 1 108,2 120.0 11,4 12.0 90 235.0 1 110,7 120,0 1 1.6 12,0 92 236.0 1 107,9 120,0 13.6 12.0 90 236.0 1 107,7 120,0 11.6 12.0 90 236.0 1 108,4 120,0 12.2 12.0 90 237.0 1 108,8 120.0 I 1.1 12,0 91 237.0 1 108,7 120.0 10,1 12.0 91 236.0 1 108.5 120,0 1 1,0 12.0 90 237.0 1 107,7 120,0 11,3 12,0 90 236.0 1 109,1 120.0 11,9 12.0 91 237.0 3 104,6 114.5 13,0 12,5 91 234.0 1 108.0 120,0 11,7 12,0 90 235.0 1 109.1 120.0 12,6 12,0 91 '236.0 1 108.6 120,0 12,3 12,0 90 237.0 1 109.4 120.0 13.2 12.0 91 237.0 1 108.1 120,0 13.6 12,0 90 238.0 1 110.7 120.0 13.1 12,0 92 236.0 1 107.7 120.0 12.2 12,0 90 235.0 1 110.7 120.0 11.3 12,0 92 238.0 1 108.9 120,0 10.3 12,0 91 237.0 1 108.5 120,0 .11.4 12.0 90 236.0 1 107.6 120,0 13.5 12,0 90 235.0 1 109.1 120,0 13.2 12,0 91 239.0 1 108.2 120.0 12.0 12,0 90 237.0 1 111.7 120.0 10.3 12,0 93 238.0 1 109.6 120,0 13.6 12,0 91 239.0 1 110.7 120,0 13.9 12,0 92 237.0 1 107.8 120.0 12.0 12,0 90 238.0 1 108.0 120,0 13.7 12,0 90-239.0 1 112.5 120,0 12.2 12,0 94 238.0 1 108.8 120,0 16.5 12,0 91 237,0 1 107.4 120,0 16.1 12,0 90 Page 9 of 39 3/9/2007 1 •'?5n9PM SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No. Test Date Test Of Location Lot# Test Elev (ft) Soil Type Dry Density Moisture (%) Relative (%) Field Max Field Opt. Compaction Remarks CW 284 2/23/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Station 9+15 CW 285 2/23/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 8+90 CW 286 2/23/06 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 8+70 CW 287 2/23/06 c , Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Station 8+50 CW 288 2/23/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 8+40 CW 289 2/23/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #l Station 8+30 CW 290 2/23/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 11+00 CW 291 2/23/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 10+50 CW 292 2/23/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 10+00 CW 293 2/23/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 9+50 CW 294 2/23/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Station 9+00 CW 295 2/23/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 8+42 CW 296 2/23/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 11+08 CW 297 2/23/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Station 10+82 CW 298 2/23/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 10+42 CW 299 2/23/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 10+20 CW 300 2/23/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 9+95 CW 301 2/23/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 9+67 C W 302 2/23/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 9+55 CW 303 2/23/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Station 9+35 C W 304 2/23/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 9+12 CW 305 2/24/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 8+85 CW 306 2/24/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 8+57 CW 307 2/24/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 10+95 CW 308 2/24/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 10+70 CW 309 2/24/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 10+45 'cW 310 2/24/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 10+25 CW 311 2/24/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 10+00 CW 312 2/24/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 9+75 CW 313 2/24/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 9+50 CW 314 2/24/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 9+25 CW 315 2/24/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Station 9+15 Project Number: Project Name: Project Location: Client: 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 236.0 1 110,4 120,0 13.9 12.0 92 239.0 1 108,1 120,0 13.1 12.0 , 90 238.0 1 108,4 120,0 14.0 12,0 ' 90 237.0 1 108,7 120,0 12.0 12,0 91 238.0 1 109,7 120,0 13.0 12,0 91 239.0 1 108.2 120,0 !3.8 ,12,0 90 238.0 1 107.6 120,0 . 14,8 12.0 90 238.0 1 . • 110,7 120,0 14.2 12,0 92 238.0 1 109,1 120,0 16.9 12.0 91 238.0 1 109,7 120,0 13.2 12,0 91 238.0 1 111,8 120.0 12.8 12,0 93 238.0 1 111,3 120.0 14.7 12,0 93 239.0 1 108,0 120.0 13,4 12,0 90 240.0 1 107.6 120.0 16.4 12,0 90 239.0 1 108,6 120.0 16.1 " 12,0 , 90 240.0 1 109,3 120.0 15.1 12,0 91 239.0 1 108.3 120.0 13.8 12,0 90 240.0 1 108.6 120.0 14.6 12,0 90 239.0 1 108.7 120,0 15.0 12,0 91 240.0 1 110.5 120,0 14.4 12,0 92 239.0 1 107.8 120.0 15.5 12,0 90 239.0 1 110.6 120.0 14.3 12,0 92 240,0 1 111.2 120.0 16.3 12,0 93 241.0 1 111.1 120.0 12.8 12,0 93 240.0 1 113.2 120.0 13.7 12.0 94 239.0 1 111.5 120,0 13.2 12,0 93 241.0 1 109.5 120,0 13.7 12.0 91 240.0 1 108.6 120,0 14.6 12.0 90 239.0 1 108.2 120,0 13.0 12.0 90 241.0 1 109.4 120,0 13.6 12,0 91 240.0 1 108.3 120,0 15.2 12.0 90 229,0 1 109.6 120.0 13.7 12,0 91 Page 10 of 39 3/9/2007 1 -T^nOPA/f SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No. CW 316 CW 317 CW 318 CW 319 CW 320 CW 321 CW 322 CW 323 CW 324 CW 325 CW 326 CW 327 CW 328 CW 329 CW 330 CW 331 CW 332 CW 333 CW 334 CW 335 CW 336 CW 337 CW 338 CW 339 CW 340 CW 341 CW 342 CW 343 CW 344 CW 345 CW 346 CW 347 Test Date Test Of Location Lot# Test Elev (ft) 2/24/06 2/24/06 2/24/06 2/24/06 2/25/06 C c c c c 2/25/06 C Project Number: Project Name: Project Location: Client: C C C c c c. c c c c c c 2/25/06 2/25/06 2/25/06 2/25/06 2/25/06 2/25/06 2/25/06 2/25/06 2/25/06 2/25/06 2/27/06 2/27/06 2/27/06 C 2/27/06 C 2/27/06 C 2/27/06 C 2/27/06 C 2/27/06 C 2/27/06 2/27/06 3/2/06 3/2/06 3/2/06 3/2/06 3/2/06 3/2/06 C C c c c c c c Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall # I Crib Wall#l Crib Wair#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall#l Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Cell #2 Cell#l Cell #3 Cell #3 Cell #2 Cell#l Cell #3 Cell #2 Cell#l Cell #3 Cell #2 Cell#l Cell #3 Cell #2 Cell #1 Cell #2 Cell #1 Cell #3 Cell #2 Cell#l Cell#l Cell #2 Cell #3 Cell#l Cell #2 Cell #3 Cell #2 Cell #1 Cell #3 Cell #2 Cell#l 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 Station 8+75 Station 8+50 Station 8+25 Station 8+18 Station 10+60 Station 10+80 Station 11+00 Station 9+60 Station 9+80 Station 10+12 Station 9+55 Station 9+20 Station 9+07 Station 8+62 Station 8+32 Station 8+19 Station S+40 Station 9+15 Station 9+43 Station 9+90 Station 10+45 Station 10+90 Station 10+65 Station 10+40 Station 10+35 Station 10+15 Station 9+85 Station 9+65 Station 9+40 Station 9+00 Station 8+90 Station 8+70 239,0 240.0 241.0 239.0 240.0 241.0 242.0 240.0 241.0 242.0 240.0 241.0 242.0 240.0 241.0 242.0 242.0 243.0 241.0 242.0 243.0 244.0 243.0 • 242.0 244.0 243.0 242.0 243.0 244,0 241.0 242.0 243.0 Soil Type Dry Density Field Max Moisture (%) Relative (%) Field Opt. Compaction Remarks 110.1 120.0 14,1 12.0 92 108.5 120.0 14,0 12.0 • 90 108,3 120.0 13,9 12,0' 90 110.9 120.0 12,0 12,0 92 109.9 120.0 12,4 12,0 .92 108,7 120.0 13,8 12,0 91 110.3 120.0 14,3 12,0 92 U0.9 120.0 12,7 12,0 92 108,4 120,0 14,6 12.0 90 110,8 120,0 13,8 12.0 92 109.1 120,0 14,4 12.0 91 112.1 120,0 13,2 12,0 93 109,6 120.0 13,4 12,0 91 107,8 120.0 14,6 12,0 90 108,1 120,0 12,0 12,0 90 107,9 120.0 13,0 12,0 90 108,0 120,0 13,0 ' 12,0 90 107,6 120.0 8,9 , 12,0 90 108,5 120,0 9,3 1-2,0 90 107.8 120,0 12,8 12.0 90 10S.4 120,0 8,2 12.0 90 108.0 120,0 12.2 12.0 90 108.7 120,0 12.2 12,0 91 110.3 120,0 11.8 12,0 92 109.1 120,0 12:9 12,0 91 108.3 120.0 11.8 12,0 90 108.7 120.0 11.2 12,0 91 107.9 120.0 15.0 12,0 90 107.7 120,0 18.0 12,0 90 111.0 120.0 14.2 12,0 93 108.6 120,0 14.2 12,0 90 107.8 120,0 12.8 12,0 90 Page 11 of39 1 -^s-noPM SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No. Test Date Test Of Location Lot# Test Soil Dry Density Moisture (%) Relative ("A) Elev (ft) Type Field Max Field Opt. Compaction Remarks CW 348 CW 349 CW 349A CW 350 CW 351' CW 352 CW 353 CW 354 CW 355 CW 356 CW 357 CW 358 CW 359 CW 360 lew 361 CW 362 CW 363 , CW 364 CW 365 CW 366 CW 367 CW 368 CW 369 CW 370 lew 371 CW 372 CW 373 CW 374 CW 375 CW 376 lew 377 CW 378 3/2/06 3/2/06 3/2/06 3/2/06 3/2/06 3/2/06 3/2/06 3/2/06 3/2/06 3/3/06 3/3/06 3/3/06 3/3/06 3/3/06 3/3/06 3/3/06 3/3/06 3/3/06 3/3/06 3/3/06 3/3/06 3/6/06 3/6/06 3/6/06 3/6/06 3/6/06 3/6/06 3/6/06 3/6/06 . 3/6/06 3/6/06 3/6/06 C e c c c c c c . c c e c e c e c c c e c c e c c e c e c e c e c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall#l eell#l Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Crib Wall#l Cell #2 • Crib Wall #1 eeH'#l Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 8+50 Station 8+30 Station 8+30 Station 8+20 Station 7+80 Station 7+60 - Station 7+40 Station 7+20 Station 7+10 Station 8+60 Station 8+40 Station 8+03 Station 7+70 Station 7+38 Station 7+50 Station 10+60 Station 10+22 Station 10+00 Station 9+80 Station 9+50 Station 9+40 Station 8+85 Station 8+50 Station 8+15 Station 8+00 Station 7+84 Station 7+45 Station 7+25 Station 7+28 Station 7+19 Station 7+10 Station 10+77 241.0 242.0 242.0 243.0 241.0 242.0 243.0 241.0 .242.0 242.0 243.0 244.0 243.0 242.0 245.0 243.0 244.0 245.0 243.0 244.0 245.0 243.0 244.0 245.0 244.0 245.0 244.0 244.0 242.0 243.0 243.0 245.0 108.7 102.4 107.8 109.3 107.8 108,0 108.5 109.3 107.9 111.9 107.7 108.7 107,6 108,4 109,4 108,0 111,3 107,6 109.3 108.3 109,1 108.6 109.0 108.0 108.4 102.9 106.2 110.4 108.0 108.4 108.6 108.0 120,0 120.0 120,0 120,0 120,0 120,0 120.0 120.0 120,0 120.0 120.0 120.0 120,0 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0, 114.5 114.5 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 13.9 12.5 13,3 14,6 15,8- 11,7 14,0 11.7 14.1 10.1 10.5 11.6 13.2 11.6 1 1.8 15,9 11,3 15.2 12.5 15,1 9,7 10,7 12,1 10,5 12,9 11,5 12,6 12.1 11.2 12.3 13.1 ..12,0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.5 12.5 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 91 85 90 91 90 90 90 91 90 93 90 91 90 90 91 90 93 90 91 90 91 90 91 90 90 90 93 92 90 90 90 90 Project Number: Project Name: Project Location Client: 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 Retest on 349A Retest of 349 Page 12 of 39 3/9/2007 1 •^5-n9PA/f SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No. CW 379 CW 380 CW 381 CW 382 CW 383 CW 384 CW 385 CW 386 CW 387 CW 388 CW 389 CW 390 CW 391 CW 392 CW 393 CW 394 CW 395 CW 396 CW 397 CW 398 CW 399 CW 400 CW 401 CW 402 CW 403 CW 404 jew 405 jcw 406 CW 407 CW 408 , Jew 409 CW 410 Test Date 3/6/06 3/6/06 3/6/06 3/6/06 3/6/06 3/6/06 3/6/06 3/6/06 3/6/06 3/7/06 3/7/06 3/7/06 3/7/06 3/7/06. 3/7/06 3/7/06 3/7/06 3/7/06 3/7/06 3/7/06 3/7/06 3/7/06 3/7/06 3/8/06 3/8/06 3/8/06 3/8/06 3/8/06 3/8/06 3/S/06 3/8/06 3/8/06 Test Of Location Lot# Project Number: Project Name: Project Location: Client: C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C • Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 C , , Crib Wall #1 Cell#l C Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 C Crib Wall #1 Cell#l C Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 e Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 Station 10+55 Station 10+30 Station 10+00 Station 9+72 Station 9+48 Station 9+10 Station 9+00 Station 8+67 Station 8+30 Station 7+93 Station 7+75 Station 7+48 Station 10+60 Station 10+20 Station 9+90 Station 9+40 Station 9+15 Station 8+80 Station 8+52 Station 8+10: Station 7+90 Station 7+60 Station 7+41 Station 10+80 Station 10+50 Station 10+28 Station 10+05 Station 9+77 Station 9+55 Station 9+32 Station 9+10 Station 8+75 Test Elev (ft) 246.0 245.0 246.0 244.0 245.0 244.0 246.0 245.0 246.0 346.0 345.0 346.0 347.0 346.0 347.0 346.0 347.0 346.0 347.0 246.0 247.0 246,0 247.0 248.0 247.0 248.0 247.0 248.0 247.0 248.0 247.0 248.0 Soil Type Dry Density Field Max Moisture (%) Field Opt. Relative (%) Compaction Remarks 108.6 108.3 108.4 109.5 108.1 • 109.6 109.5 108,0 108,4 108.2 109.9 108,3 108,4 108,3 . 109,4 109,6 108,0 108,2 108.1 109.3 108.6 109.1 108.0 109.3 107.7 106.4 105.9 106.2 106.4 106.2 107.0 106,4 120,0 120,0 120,0 120,0 120,0 120,0 120,0 120,0 120,0 120,0 120,0 120,0 120,0 120,0 120,0 120,0 120.0 120.0 120.0 120,0 120.0 120,0 120.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118,0 118,0 118,0 118,0 118,0 118,0 12,2 12,3 11.8 13,4 13,5 14.3 13,6 12,2 12,6 12,8 . 13.4 13.6 16.0 13,0 13,0 13,7 13.4 12.6 14.2 •' 13.4 15.0 13.5 14.6 10.2 10.2 11.6 10.9 11.5 11.0 13.5 12.5 13.5 12.0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12.0 - 12.0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 . 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 90 90 90 91 90 91 91 90 90 90 92 90 90 90 91 91 90 90 90 91 90 91 90 93 91 90 90 90 90 90 • 91 90 Page 13 of39 3/9/2007 1 f^-nnviti/i SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No. Test Date Test Of Location Lot# Test Elev (ft) Soil Type Dry Density Field Max Moisture (%) Field Opt. Relative (%) Compaction Remarks CW 411 3/8/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 8+45 CW 412 3/8/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 8+20 CW 413 3/8/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 7+97 CW 414 3/8/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 7+76 CW 415 3/8/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 7+55 CW 416 3/8/06 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 7+37 CW 417 3/8/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 7+20 CW 418 3/8/06 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 7+05 CW 419 3/8/06 C Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Station 6+89 CW 420 3/8/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 6+25 CW 421 3/8/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 6+50 CW 422 3/8/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 6+28 CW 423 3/8/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #2 . Station 6+15 CW 424 3/9/06 C Crib Wall #1 Cell# l Station 10+50 CW 425 3/9/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 10+00 CW 426 3/9/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 9+50 CW 427 3/9/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 9+00 CW 428 3/9/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 8+50 CW 429 3/9/06 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 8+00 CW 430 3/9/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 7+50 CW 431 3/9/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Station 7+00 CW 432 3/9/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 6+75 CW 433 3/9/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 6+50 CW 434 3/9/06 . c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 6+10 CW 435 3/10/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 7+23 CW 436 3/10/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 7+00 CW 437 3/10/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 6+65 CW 438 3/10/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 6+70 CW 439 3/10/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 6+50 CW 440 3/14/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 10+65 CW 441 3/14/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 10+30 CW 442 3/14/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 9+80 Project Number: Project Name: Project Location: Client: 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 247.0 248.0 247.0 248.0 247.0 248.0 240.0 241.0 242.0 240.0 241.0 242.0 241.0 249.0 248.0 249.0 248.0 249.0 248.0 249.0 243.0 . 244.0 245.0 244.0 246,0 245,0 244.0 246.0 245.0 250.0 249.0 250.0 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 1 7 7 7 7 1 1 7 7 7 7 1 7 7 7 107,0 107,6 109,6 108.8 109.3 108.6 106,5 107,2 107,6 106.1 106.9 106.4 107,4 109.3 108.5 106.8 107,5 106,1 107.8 109.5 107.2 107.8 106.4 109.3 116.6 109.4 108.0 108.0 107.7 106.3 106.2 106.1 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118,0 118,0 118.0 118.0 120.0 118,0 118,0 118,0 118,0 120,0 120.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 120,0 118,0 118,0 118.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 120,0 118,0 118,0 118,0 14.2 13.1 13.6 14.8 14,0 13,9 11.6 12.7 12.2 15.0 12.9 12.2 13.4 14.0 13.8 12.0 1 1.6 13.5 14.2 12.7 13.9 13.1 13.6 14.4 8.9 15.4 15.3 15.8 14.7 13.7 16.5 14.4 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 91 91 93 92 93 92 90 91 90 90 91 90 91 91 90 91 91 90 91 91 91 91, 90 91 97 91 90 • 90 90 90 90 90 Page 14 of 39 3/9/2007 1 •^5n9PM SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No. Test Date Test Of Location Lot# CW 443 3/14/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 9+40 CW 444 3/14/06 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 9+20 CW 445 3/14/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 9+90 CW 446 3/14/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Station 8+70 CW 447 3/14/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 8+40 CW 448 3/14/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 8+10 CW 449 3/14/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 7+80 CW 450 3/14/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 7+65 CW 451 3/14/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 7+48 CW 452 3/14/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 7+25 CW 453 3/14/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 6+95 CW 454 3/14/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell # I Station 6+75 CW 455 3/14/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 6+50 CW 456 3/15/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 5+55 CW 457 3/15/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 5+40 CW 458 3/15/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 5+25 CW 459 3/15/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 5+00 CW 460 3/15/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 4+75 CW 461 3/15/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 4+50 CW 462 3/15/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Station 4+60 CW 463 3/16/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 5+90 CW 464 3/16/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 5+70 CW 465 3/16/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 5+40 CW 466"^ 3/16/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 5+10 CW 467 3/16/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 4+80 CW 468 3/16/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 4+55 CW 469 3/16/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Station 4+35 CW 470 3/16/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 4+10 CW 471 3/16/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 3+80 CW 472 3/16/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 3+50 CW 473 3/16/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Station 3+30 CW 474 3/17/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Station 5+97 Project Number: Project Name: Project Location: Client: 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 Test Soil Dry Density Moisture (%) Relative (Vo) Elev (ft) Type Field Max Field Opt. Compaction Remarks 249,0 1 110.7 120.0 14,0 12,0 92 250,0 1 112,6 120,0 12,2 12,0 94 249.0 1 108,6 120,0 16,0 12,0 90 250.0 1 107,7 120.0 14,2 12,0 90 249.0 1 108.5 120.0 14,2 12,0 90 250.0 7 . 106,1 118.0 15,0 12,0 90 249.0 7-106.7 118.0 13,5 12,0 90 250.0 7 106,5 118.0 13,5 ' 12,0 90 249.0 7 106,6 118.0 14,9 12,0 90 246.0 7 106,4 118.0 13,5 12,0 90 245.0 7 105,7 118,0 10,7 12,0 90 246.0 7 - 106,5 118,0 11,6 12.0 90 245.0 7 107,3 118.0 11,8 12.0 91 241.0 7 106,7 118.0 13,9 12.0 90 242,0 1 109,2 120.0 15,9 12.0-91 243,0 1 112,8 120.0 13,7 12.0 94 241.0 1 113,3 120.0 12,6 12.0 94 242.0 1 109,0 120.0 11,7 12.0 91 243.0 1 107.8 120.0 12.9 12.0 90 240.0 1 110.2 120.0 12,8 12.0 92 244.0 1 107.7 120.0 . 11,3 12.0 90 243.0 1 107.4 120.0 11,6 12.0 90 242.0 1 108.0 120,0 12,4 • 12,0 90 244.0 1 107,7 120,0 12,5 12,0 90 243.0 7 106,0 118,0 12,0 12,0 90 242.0 7 107,9 118,0 12,1 12,0 91 341.0 1 107.4 120,0 13,0 12,0 90 342.0 1 108.3 120,0 11.9 12,0 90 343.0 1 110.7 120,0 11.2 12,0 92 344.0 1 108,0 120,0 12.2 12,0 90 341.0 1 108.4 120,0 12.6 12,0 90 243.0 1 10S.4 120,0 10.7 12,0 90 Page 15 of 39 3/9/2007 1 •'! "i.mDA/f SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No. CW 475 CW 476 CW 477 CW 478 CW 479 CW 480 CW 481 CW 482 CW 483 CW 484 CW 485 CW 486 CW 487 Jew 488 CW 489 CW 490 CW 491 CW 492 CW 493 CW 494 CW 495 CW 496 CW 497 CW 498 Jew 499 CW 500 CW 501 CW 502 CW 503 CW 504 CW 505 CW 506 Test Date Test Of Location Lot# 3/17/06 3/17/06 3/17/06 3/17/06 3/17/06 3/17/06 3/17/06 3/17/06 '- 3/17/06 3/17/06 3/17/06 3/17/06 3/17/06 C 3/17/06 C 3/17/06 C 3/17/06 C 3/20/06 C 3/20/06 C 3/20/06 C 3/20/06 C 3/20/06 3/20/06 3/20/06 3/20/06 3/20/06 3/20/06 3/20/06 3/20/06 3/20/06 3/22/06 Project Number: Project Name: Project Location: Client: C C c c c c c c c c c c c c c c 3/20/06 C C C C C C C 3/22/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall #1 eeir#l Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wal!.#l Cell #3 Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Crib Wall #1 Cell #2' Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Crib Wall #l Cell #3 Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Crib Wall #1 Cell #4 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 . Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall#l CeH #l Crib Wall#l Cell #2 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 Station 5+65 Station 5+52 Station 5+30 Station 5+00 Station 4+70 Station 4+45 Station 4+30 Station 4+20 Station 4+00 Station 3+80 Station 3+60 Station 3+40 Station 3+20 Station 3+00 Station 2+80 Station 2+90 Station 10+00 Station 9+70 Station 9+40 Station 9+10 Station 10+20 Station 10+40 Station 10.+60 Station 10+75 Station 8+90 Station 8+60 Station 8+20 Station 7+90 Station 7+60 Station 7+48 Station 3+85 Station 3+55 Test Elev (ft) 244.0 245.0 244.0 243.0 245.0 244.0 243.0 244.0 245.0 243.0 244.0 245.0 242.0 243.0 244.0 242.0 251.0 250.0 251.0 250.0 250.0 251.0 250.0 251.0 251.0 250.0 251:0 250.0 251.0 250.0 245.0 244.0 Soil Type I 1 . 1 ,1. 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 • 7 "7 7 7 1 Dry Density Field Max Moisture (%) Field Opt. Relative (%) Compaction Remarks 108.1 107.8 110.0 107,6 106,4 107,5 109,1 105,9 105,7 107.3 106.3 106.0 106,8 106,2 108,2 107,4 106,5 106,5 106,9 107.0 108,6 109.5 108.1 109.1 107.8 109,4 106,9 108,6 108,3 106,6 106,3 106.4 120,0 120,0 120,0 120.0 118.0 118.0 118,0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118,0 118,0 118,0 . 118.0 118,0 118.0 118.0 118.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 120,0 120,0 118,0 120,0 120,0 118.0 118.0 118,0 11.9 10.3 10,8 1 1,5 12,7 11,4 9,0 14,4 14,0 12.4 13,0 14.0 14.8 10.9 13.6 13.5 10.3 15.8 15,7 12,6 14,8 11,8 13,2 14,7 12.0 12.3 10.3 9.4 9.6 11.6 10.2 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12,0 12,0, 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12,0 ,12,0 .12,0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12.0 90 90 92 90 . 90 91 92 90 90 • 91 90 90 91 90 92 91 90 90 91 91 90 91 90 - 91 90 91 91 90 90 90 90 90 Page 16 of 39 3/9/2007 1 •'!5•^^D^/r SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No. Test Date Test Of Location Lot# Test Elev (ft) Soil Type Dry Density Field Max Moisture (%) Field Opt. Relative (%) Compaction Remarks CW 507 3/22/06 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Station 3+30 CW 508 3/22/06 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 3+05 CW 509 3/22/06 c . Crib Wall #1 Cell #4 Station 3+10 CW 510 3/22/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 2+95 CW 511 3/22/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 2+77 CW 512 3/22/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 2+50 CW 513 3/22/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Station 5+90 CW 514 3/22/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 5+65 CW 515 3/22/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 5+35 CW 516 3/22/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 4+98 CW 517 3/22/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 4+77 CW 518 3/22/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 4+57 CW 519 3/23/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Station 4+25 CW 520 3/23/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 3+90 CW 521 3/23/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 3+65 CW 522 3/23/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 3+10 CW 523 3/23/06, c Crib Wall#l Cell#l • Station 2+85 CW 524 3/23/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 2+65 CW 525 3/23/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Station 2+35 CW 526 3/23/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Station 2+10 CW 527 3/23/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 1+90 CW 558 3/24/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 4+00 CW 559 3/24/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 3+50 CW .560 3/24/06 . c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 3+00 CW 561 3/24/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Station 2+50 CW 562 3/24/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 2+00 CW 563 3/24/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 1+50 CW 564 3/24/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 1+00 CW 565 3/24/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Station 5+76 CW 566 3/24/06 c Crib Wal[#l Cell #2 Station 5+25 CW 567 3/24/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Station 4+75 CW 568 3/24/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 4+25 Project Number: Project Name: Project Location: Client: 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 243.0 7 107,2 118,0 1 1,5 12,0 91 245.0 7 107,0 118,0 12,6 12,0 91 242.0 7 106,0 118,0 13,0 12,0 90 243.0 7 107.4 118,0 11,6 12.0 91 243.0 7 -106,8 118,0 14,3 12,0 91 245.0 7 • 107,4 118,0 14,1 12,0 91 244.0 7 108.0 118,0 11,1 12.0 92 245.0 7 108,8 118,0 11,7 12.0 92 246.0 ' 7 106,3 118,0 11,2 12,0 90 244.0 - 7 107,8 118,0 13,3 12,0 91 246.0 7 106,1 118,0 11,6 12,0 90 245.0 7 106,8 118,0 12,2 12,0 91 244.0 7 106,5 118,0 .11,4 12,0 90 246.0 7 106,0 118,0 18,0 12,0 90 245.0 7 106,2 1 IS.O 12,7 12,0 90 244.0 7 106.3 118.0 12,2 12,0 90 246.0 7 106.5 118,0 10,3 12,0 90 245.0 7 106.5 118.0 12,4 12,0 90 244.0 1 110.3 120.0 11,0 12,0 92 246.0 1 108.2 120.0 14,9 12.0 90 245.0 1 108.0 120,0 -13,3 12,0 90 245.0 1 108.8 120.0 10,8 12,0 91 246.0 i 108.1 120.0 13,5 12,0 90 247.0 1 108.0 120.0 14,3 . 12,0 90 245.0 7 106.4 118.0 11,0 12,0 90 246.0 1 113,1 120.0 12.8 12,0 94 247.0 1 109,3 120,0 12.5 12.0 91 246,0 1 108.4 120,0 13.4 12.0 90 248,0 1 108.6 120,0 1 1.5 12.0 90 247.0 7 105,8 118,0 11.3 12.0 90 246.0 3' -104.4 114.5 13.7 12.5 91 248.0 7 107,1 118,0 12.6 12.0 91 Page 17 of 39 3/9/2007 1 ••^S-07PM SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No. Test Date Test Of Location CW 569 3/24/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 3+75 CW 570 3/27/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 3+25 CW 571 3/27/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 2+75 CW 572 3/27/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Staton 2+25 CW 573 3/27/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 2+08 CW 574 . '3/27/06' c. Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 1+87 CW 575 3/27/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 1+50 CW 576 3/27/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 1+00 CW 577 3/27/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 0+50 CW 578 3/30/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 7+25 CW 579 3/30/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 7+00 CW 580 3/30/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 6+75 CW 581 3/30/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 6+50 CW 582 3/30/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 6+25 CW 583 3/30/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 6+00 CW 584 3/30/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 5+75 CW 585 3/30/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 5+50 CW 586 3/30/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 5+20 CW 587 3/30/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 3+00 CW 588 3/30/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 4+75 CW 589 3/30/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 4+50 CW. 590 3/30/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 4+70 CW 591 3/30/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 4+00 CW 592 3/30/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 3+75 CW 593 ' 3/30/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 3+50 CW 594 3/30/06 c Crib Wall #l Cell #3 Station 3+25 CW 595 3/30/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 3+00 CW 596 3/30/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 2+65 CW 597 3/30/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Station 2+42 CW 598 3/30/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 2+20 CW 599 3/30/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Station 1+95 CW 600 3/30/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 1+75 Project Number: Project Name: Project Location: Client: 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 Lot# Test Elev (ft) 247.0 246.0 248.0 247.0 246.0 248.0 247.0 248.0 247.0 248.0 249.0 248.0 249.0 248.0 249.0 248.0 249.0 248.0 249.0 247.0 248.0 249.0 247.0 248.0 249.0 247.0 248.0 249.0 247.0 248.0 249.0 248.0 Soil Type 7 7 7 7 7 7 - 7 7 1 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Dry Density Field Max 107,0 106.9 106.6 106,4 - 108,7 105,8 ' 107.1 108,0 115,0 109,9 109,9 108,1 107,7 108,7 110.9 109.6 106,1 106.0 106.4 107.7 108.0 106.1 105.9 108.0 107.1 107,0 108,3 106,9 108,5 107.2 110.6 109.7 118,0 118,0 118,0 118,0 118,0 118,0 118,0 118,0 120.0 120.0 120,0 120.0 120,0 120.0 120.0 120.0 118,0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 • 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118,0 118,0 118,0 Moisture (%) Relative (%) Field Opt. Compaction Remarks 13,2 12.7 10.8 10.6 14.4 13.5 13.7 15,8 1 1,6 17,0 14,5 13,3 17,8 16,4 14,4 15,1 13,1 14,3 12,7 12,4 12,8 , 12,0 , 12,8 13,1 12,0 17,9 15,1 12,2 12,0 15,4 14,6 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12.0 • 12.0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 . 12,0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 91 91 90 90 92 90 91 92 96 92 92 90 90 91 92 91 90 90 90 91 92 90 90 92 91 91 92 91 92 91 94 93 Page 18 of 39 1 •15-n9PM SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No. CW 601 CW 602 CW 603 CW 604 CW 605 CW 606 . CW 607 CW 607A CW 608 CW 608A CW 609 CW 610 CW 611 CW 612 CW 613 CW 614 CW 615 CW 616 CW 617 CW 618 CW 619 CW 620 CW 621 CW 622 CW 623 CW 624 CW 625 CW 626 CW 627 CW 628 CW 629 CW 630 Test Date Test Of Location Lot# 4/3/06 4/3/06 4/3/06 4/3/06 4/3/06 4/3/06 4/3/06 4/3/06 4/3/06 4/3/06 4/3/06 4/3/06 4/3/06 4/3/06 4/3/06 4/3/06 4/3/06 4/4/06 4/4/06 4/4/06 3/30/06 3/30/06 3/30/06 3/31/06 3/31/06 3/31/06 3/31/06 C , 4/3/06 • C 3/31/06 C 3/31/06 C 3/31/06 C 3/31/06 C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C Project Number: Project Name: Project Location: Client: Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wan #l Cell #2 • Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell #T Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall#r Cell #3 Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall #l Cell#l Crib Wall #1 Cell #3' Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell #2 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 Station 1+50 Station 1+25 Station 1 + 10 Station 0+90 Station 0+70 Station 0+57 Station 7+35 Station 7+35 Station 7+15 Station 7+15 Station 6+90 Station 6+65 Station 6+45 Station 6+25 Station 6+05 Station 5+85 Station 5+55 Station 5+00 Station 4+70 Station 4+50 Station 4+25 Station 4+05 . Station 3+80 Station 3+55 Station 3+30 Station 3+00 Station 2+60 Station 2+20 Station 1+95 Station 1+75 Station 1+50 Station 1+25 Test Elev (ft) 249,0 248.0 248.0 249.0 248.0 249.0 250.0 250.0 249.0 249,0 250.0 249.0 250.0 249.0 250.0 249.0 250.0 249.0 250.0 249.0 248.0 249.0 250.0 248.0 249.0 250.0 248.0 249.0 250.0 249.0 250.0 249.0 Soil Type 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 •7 7 7 7 7 "7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 ,7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Dry Density Field Max Moisture (%) Field Opt. Relative (%) Compaction Remarks 106.7 107.4 106.1 109.2 106.8 110.2 104.2 106.7 106.6 106.5 106.5 108.2 106.0 106.2 106.0 107.4 106.2 105.8 106.4 107.6 108.1 106.3 106.0 105.7 107,3 . 106.7 108.6 107.4 106,0 107.3 107J 108,1 118,0 118,0 118,0 118.0 118,0 , 118,0 118,0 118,0 118.0 118,0 118.0 118,0 118,0 118,0 118.0, 118,0 118,0 118,0 118,0 118,0 118.0 118.0 118,0 118,0 118,0 118,0 118,0 118,0 118,0 118,0 118,0 118,0 16,1 14,4 14,1 13,0 12,5 12,1 ^9,0 tl,2 10,2 13,3 13,9 12,0 13,1 12.6 11,1 13,3 11,3 14,7 11,5 16,0 12,1 .11,8 11,2 12,7 13,6 13,1 14,6 14,0 12,0 13,6 12,1 12.0 12,0 12,0 12,0 -12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 90 91 90 93 91 93 88 90 90 90 90 92 90 90 90 91 90 90 90 91 92 90 90 90 91 90 92, 91 90 91 91 92 Retest on 607A Retest of 607 • Retest on 608A Retest of 608 Page 19 of 39 3/9/2007 I •'^5•n9P^.f Test No. SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test Date Test Of Location Lot# Test Elev (ft) Soil Type Dry Density Field Max Moisture (%) Field Opt. Relative (%) Compaction Remarks CW 631 4/4/06 C Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Station 1+00 CW 632 4/4/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 0+75 CW 633 4/4/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 0+50 CW 634 4/4/06 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 0+35 CW 635 4/4/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 0+88 CW 636 4/4/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 1+40 CW 637 4/4/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 1+85 CW 638 4/4/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 2+37 CW 639 4/4/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 2+80 CW 640 4/4/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 6+29 CW 641 4/4/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 6+50 CW 642 4/4/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 6+75 CW 643 4/4/06 c . Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 7+00 CW 644 4/4/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 7+25 CW 645 4/4/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 7+40 CW 646 4/4/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 6+00 CW 647 4/4/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 5+75 CW 648 4/4/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 5+50 CW 649 4/4/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 3+10 CW 650 4/4/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 3+60 CW 651 4/4/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 4+10 CW 652 4/7/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 10+73 CW 653 4/7/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 10+53 CW 654 4/7/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 10+33 CW 655 4/7/06 c Crib WaH #l Cell #2 Station 10+13 CW 656 4/7/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 9+83 CW 657 4/7/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 9+63 CW 658 4/7/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 9+43 CW 659 4/7/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 9+23 CW 660 4/7/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 9+03 CW 661 4/7/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 8+73 CW 662 4/7/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 8+53 Project Number: Project Name: Project Location: Client: 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 250.0 7 108.8 118,0 15.2 12,0 92 249.0 .7 108.5 118,0 13,0 12,0 92 250.0 7 107.3 118,0 15,7 12,0 91 251.0 7 106.7 118,0 16,0 12,0 90 250.0 7 107.8 118,0 16,7 12,0 91 251.0 7 106.9 118,0 15,1 12.0 91 250.0 7 106.6 118,0 17,1 12.0 90 251.0 7 106.8 118.0 16,6 12.0 91 250.0 7 108.8 118,0 13,6 12,0 92 251.0 7 106.0 118,0 12,0 12,0 90 250.0 7 106.7 118,0 12,5 12,0 90 251.0 7 108.6 118,0 12,0 12,0 , 92 250.0 7 107.7 118,0 14,4 12,0 91 251.0 7 105.7 118.0 11,0 12,0 90 250.0 7 106.3 118.0 12.6 12,0 90 251.0 7 106.4 118.0 12.7 12,0 90 250.0 7 108.9 118.0 12.0 12,0 92 251.0 7 108.7 118,0 15.2 12,0 92 249.0 7 106.4 118.0 12.9 12,0 90 250.0 7 106.1 118.0 17.3 12,0 90 251.0 7 108.5 118.0 12.9 12,0 92 253.0 7 106.9 118.0 16.7 12.0 91 252.0 7 107.1 118.0 13.1 12.0 91 253.0 7 107,6 118,0 12.1 12.0 91 252.0 7 110,1 118,0 12,8 12.0 93 253.0 1 110.5 120.0 11,8 12,0 92 252.0 1 108.3 120.0 17,1 12,0 90 253.0 1 107.8 120,0 13.5 12.0 90 252.0 1 108.0 120.0 13.9 12,0 90 253.0 1 108,0 120,0 13.3 12.0 90 252.0 1 108,4 120.0 17.3 12,0 90 253.0 1 107,5 120.0 12.1 12,0 90 Page 20 of 3 9 ^/Q/9007 1 -K-niUT^A SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No, Test Date Test Of Location Lot# Test Soil Dry Density Moisture (%) Relative (Vo) Elev (ft) Type Field Max Field Opt. Compaction Remarks CW 663 CW 664 CW 665 CW 666 CW 667 CW 668 CW 669 CW 670 CW 671 CW 672 CW 673 CW 674 CW 675 CW 676 Jew 677 CW 678 CW 679 CW 680 CW 681 CW 682 CW 683 CW 683A CW 684 CW 684A CW 685 CW 686 CW 687 CW 688 CW 689 CW 690 CW 691 CW 692 4/7/06 4/7/06 4/7/06 4/7/06 4/7/06 4/7/06 , 4/7/06 4/7/06 4/7/06 4/8/06 4/8/06 4/8/06 4/8/06 | C 4/8/06 4/8/06 4/8/06 4/8/06 4/8/06 4/8/06 4/8/06 4/8/06 4/8/06 4/8/05 4/9/05 4/8/05 4/8/05 4/8/05 4/8/05 4/8/05 4/8/05 4/8/05 4/8/05 Project Number: Project Name: Project Location: Client: C - Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 C Crib Wall #1 Cell tfl C Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 -C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Crib Wall#l Cell #2 C Crib Wall #1 Cell#l C Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #i Cell#l C Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l C Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 Station 8+33 Station 8+10 Station 7+80 Station 7+60 Station 7+40 Station 7+20 Station 7+00 Station 6+75 Station 6+50 Station 6+02 Station 5+75 Station 5+50 Station 5+25 Station 5+00 Station 4+75 Station 4+50 Station 4+25 Station 4+00 Station 3+75 Station 3+50 Station 3+25 Station 3+25 Station 3+00 Station 3+00 Station 2+70 Station 2+45 Station 2+15 Station 2+00 Station 1+75 Station 1+50 Station 1+00 Station 0+50 252.0 253.0 252.0 253.0 252.0 253.0 252.0 253.0 262.0 253.0 252.0 253.0 252.0 253.0 252.0 253.0 252.0 253.0 252.0 253.0 251.0 251.0 253.0 253.0 252.0 253.0 252.0 253.0 252.0 253.0 252.0 - 233.0 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 109.1 108.9 108.1 110.1 107,9 108.3 107.8 109.6 108,4 108,0 107,3 106,6 105,7 105,9 107,0 106,4 105,9 106,2 106.9 107.0 102.2 106.5 105.8 106.9 107.1 108,6 107.5 106.8 107.3 107.2 108.3 107,9 120,0 120,0 120,0 120,0 120,0 120.0 120.0 120,0 120,0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118,0 118,0 118,0 118,0 14,0 17,4 17,6 13.1 12,5 13,6 13,6 13,0 13,9 14,1 13,1 12,1 11,9 11,5 12.1 14.7 12.9 11.9 12.3 12.0 9.6 12.0 10:2 13.2 12.2 13.1 12.2 14.4 11.7 12.3 12.0 11.7 12,0 12,0 12,0 • 12,0 12,0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12,0 91 91 90 92 90 - 90 90 91 90 92 91 90 90 90 91 90 90 90 91 91 87 90 90 91 91 92 91 91 91 91 92 91 Retest on 683A Retest of 683 Retest on 684A Retest of 684 Page 21 of 39 3/9/2007 1 •^5-n9PM SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No. Test Date Test Of Location Lot# Test Elev (ft) Soil Type Dry Density Field Max Moisture (%) Field Opt. Relative (Vo) Compaction Remarks CW 693 4/10/05 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 0+65 CW 694 4/10/05 c Crib Wall#l eell#l Station 10+45 CW 695 4/10/05 e Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 10+25 CW 696 4/10/05 c Crib Wall #1 Cell # I Station 10+00 CW 697 4/10/05 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 9+75 CW 698 4/10/05 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 9+50 CW 699 4/10/05 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 9+25 CW 700 4/10/05 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Station 9+00 CW 701 4/10/05 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 8+80 CW 702 4/10/05 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Station 8+50 CW 703 4/10/05 c Crib Wall#l eell#l Station 8+25 CW 704 4/10/05 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 8+00 CW 705 4/10/05 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 7+80 CW 706 4/10/05 e Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 7+50 jew 707 4/10/05 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 7+10 CW 708 4/11/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 6+90 CW 709 4/11/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Station 6+65 CW 710 4/11/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 6+35 CW 711 4/11/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 5+90 CW 712 4/11/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 5+65 CW 713 4/11/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 5+40 CW 714 4/11/06 e Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 5+10 CW 715 4/11/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l. Station 4+90 CW 716 4/11/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 4+65 CW 717 4/11/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Station 4+40 CW 7.18 4/11/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 4+15 CW 719 4/11/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Station 3+90 lew 720 4/11/06 e Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 3+65 CW 721 . 4/11/06-c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Station 3+40 CW 722 4/11/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 3+20 CW 723 4/11/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 2+90 CW 724 4/11/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 2+60 Project Number: Project Name: Project Location: Client: 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 253.0 1 110.9 120.0 12.3 12.0 92 254.0 1 108,9 120.0 12.0 12.0 91 253.0 1 109,3 120.0 12.5 • 12,0 , 91 '254.0 7 108,6 118.0 15.3 12,0 92 253.0 7 ',..107.6 118.0 12.7 12:0 91 254.0 7 106.1 118.0 13.4 ', - " 12.0 90 253.0 7 106.5 118,0 12.3 - 12.0 90 254.0 : 7 106,8 118.0 14,7 12,0 91 253.0 7 107,0 118.0 16,1 12,0 91 254.0 7 107,5 118.0 12,0 12,0 91 254.0 7 107,0 118.0 13,1 12,0 91 254.0 7 108,0 118.0 12,3 •12.0 92 254.0 7 106.1. 118,0 13,0 12,0 90 253.0 7 106.8 118,0 17,6 • 12,0 91 254.0 7 106.9 118,0 16.1 12,0 91 253.0 . 7 -107.0 118,0 15.5 12,0 91 254.0 1 110.6 120.0 13:7 12,0 , 92 253.0 1 108.1 120,0 1 1.6 12,0 90 254.0 7 106.9 118,0 13,4 12,0 91 253.0 7 106.0 118,0 11,0 12.0 ,90 254.0 7 106.3 118.0 12,0 12.0 90 253.0 7 107.0 118.0 14,7 ' 12.0 91 254.0 7 -107.8 118.0 12,0 12,0 91 253.0 7 : 107,6 118,0 13,1 12,0 91 254.0 7 107.0 .118,0 11.8 12,0 91 253.0 7 106.9 118,0 11.4 12,0 91 254.0 7 110.5 118.0 12.3 12,0 94 253.0 -7 110.5 118.0 12.7 12,0 94 254,0 7 108.7 118.0 14.4 12,0 92 253.0 7 108.3 118.0 11,9 12,0 92 254.0 7 107.1 118.0 11,8 12,0 91 253,0 7 106.8 118.0 11.0 12.0 91 Page 22 of 39 1 •t'^-nnm^ SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No. Test Date Test Of Location Lot# CW 725 4/11/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW 726 4/11/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #2 CW 727, 4/11/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW 728 4/11/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 CW 729 4/11/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 CW 730 4/11/06 c. . Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 CW 731 4/11/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l CW 732 4/11/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 CW 733 4/11/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW 734 4/11/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW 735 4/11/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW 736 4/11/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 CW 737 4/11/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW 738 4/11/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 CW 739 4/11/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW 740 4/11/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 CW 741 4/11/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW 742 4/12/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW 743 4/12/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 CW 744 4/12/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW 745 4/12/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW 746 4/12/06 c Crib Wall #l Cell#l CW 747 4/12/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l CW 748 4/12/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW 749 4/12/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 CW 750 4/12/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#r CW 751 4/12/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW 752 4/12/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l CW 753 -4/12/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l CW 754 4/12/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW 755 4/12/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW 756 4/12/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Project Number: Project Name: Project Location: Client: 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 Station 2+30 Station 2+05 Station 1+88 Station 1+62 Station 1+40 Station 1+15 Station 0+85 Station 0+60 Station 0+40 Station 0+20 Station 10+50 Station 10+00 Station 9+50 Station 9+00 Station 8+50 Station 8+00 Station 7+50 Station 7+00 Station 6+50 Station 6+00 Station 10+37 Station 10+12 Station 9+89 Station 9+57 Station 9+32 Station 8+90 Station 8+65 Station 8+30 Station 7+92 Station 7+65 Station 7+35 Station 7+07 Test Elev (ft) 254.0 253.0 254.0 - 253.0 253.0 253.0 254.0 254.0 254.0 254.0 255.0 254.0 255.0 254.0 255.0 254.0 255.0 255.0 254.0 255.0 257.0 257.0 257.0 257.0 257.0 257.0 257.0 257.0 257.0 257.0 257.0 257.0 Soil Type 7 7 7 7 7 7 1- 1 7 7 7 . 7 7 7 • 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7: 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Dry Density Field Max Moisture (%) Field Opt. Relative (%) Compaction Remarks 107.4 106.2 106.8 108.5 106.2 106.4 108.5 106.7 106.8 107.0 106.2 105.8 - 105.9 106,2 108,5 106.4 107,7 106,3 107,4 107.0 110.5 106.4, 107,0 106,6 105,8 106,0 107.3 107.5 109.9 107.2 106.6 106.7 118.0 118.0 118.0 118,0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118,0 118,0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118,0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118,0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118,0 118,0 118,0 13.6 12,9 12.2 16,8 14,4 16.2' 16,0 16,2 1 1.5 13.3 14,0 12,8 15,5 13,9 15,3 14,3 15,1 15.4 13.6 14.4 15.8 17.5 12,6 16,3 14,5 15,0 14,6 12,0 13,9 14,9 15,0 14,5 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 ' 12,0 12,0 12,0 . 12,0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12,0 12,0 91 90 91 92 90 90 92 90 91 91 90 90 90 90 92 90 91 90 91 91 94 90 91 90 90 90 91 91 93 91 90 90 Page 23 of 39 3/9/2007 l-^5-09PM SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No. Test Date Test Of Location Lot# Test Soil Dry Density Moisture (%) Relative (Vo) Elev (ft) Type Field Max Field Opt. Compaction Remarks CW 757 4/12/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 6+82 CW 758 4/12/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 6+60 CW 759 4/12/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 6+33 CW 760 4/12/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Station 6+12 CW 761 4/12/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 5+50 CW 762 4/12/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 5+00 CW 763 4/12/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 4+50 CW 764 4/12/06 c Crib Wall#rCell#l Station 4+00 CW 765 4/12/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 3+50 CW 766 4/12/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 3+00 CW 767 4/12/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 2+50 CW, 768 4/13/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 2+00 CW 769 4/13/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 1+50 Jew 770 4/13/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 1+00 CW 771 4/13/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 0+50 CW 772 4/13/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 5+85 CW 773 4/13/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 5+60 CW 774 4/13/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 5+35 CW 775 4/13/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 5+05 CW 776 4/13/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 4+85 CW 777 4/13/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 4+60 CW 778 4/13/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 4+35 CW 779 4/13/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 4+10 CW 780 4/13/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 3+84 CW 781 4/13/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 3+60 'cW 782 4/13/06 c Crib Wair#l Cell #2 Station 3+33 CW 783 4/13/06 c Crib Wall#rCell#l Station 3+13 CW 784 4/13/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 2+83 CW 785 4/13/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l , Station 2+62 CW 786 4/13/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 2+36 CW 787 4/13/06 G Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 2+09 CW 788 4/13/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 1+83 Project Number: Project Name: Project Location: Client: 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 257.0 7 106.3 118.0 13,1 12.0 90 257.0 7 106.0 118,0 14,1 . 12.0 90 257.0 7 105.9 118,0 12,5 12,0 90 257.0 7 106.3 118,0 13,6 • 12,0 90 255.0 7 105.7 118,0 14,7 12,0 90 256.0 7 106.6 118,0 12.2 . 12,0 90 255.0 7 109,7 118,0 14,1 ' 12,0 93 256.0 7 107,2 - 118,0 15.7 12,0 91 255.0 7 107,8 118,0 14,0 12,0 91 256.0 7 106,4 118,0 15,1 12,0 90 255.0 7 . 106,9 118.0 13,6 12,0 91 256.0 7 107,3 118,0 14,2 12,0 91 256.0 7 • 107,0 118,0 14,0 12,0 91 256.0 7 108,1 118,0 13,4 12,0 92 256.0 7 . 107,6 118,0 15,1 . 12,0 91 256.0 7 • 106,3 118,0 16,0 12,0 90 257,0-7 109,6 118,0 12,0 12.0 93 256.0 7 105,9 118,0 11,9 12,0 • 90 257.0 7 106.9 118,0 12,0 12.0 91. 256.0 7 106,1 118,0 15,0 12.0 90 257.0 !• • 106,6 118,0 12,8 12.0 90 256.0 1: ,105,9 118.0 17.0 12.0 90 257.0 7 109,5 118.0 13.3 12.0 93 256.0 7 106.8 118.0 17.0 12.0 91 257.0 7 ' 106.5 118.0 12.0 12,0 90 256.0 7 107.8 118.0 12.3 12,0 91 257.0 7 108.8 118.0 . 12.5 12,0 , 92 256.0 7 107.3 118.0 13.3 12,0 91 257.0 7 106.6 118.0 • 13.1 12,0 90 256.0 7 110.5 118.0 13.0 12,0 94 257.0 7 106.4 118,0 13.2 12.0 90 256.0 7 107.1 118,0 14.1 12.0 91 Page 24 of 3 9 3/9/2007 1:35:09PM SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No. Test Date Test Of Location Lot# Test Soil Dry Density Moisture (%) Relative (Vo) Elev (ft) Type Field Max Field Opt. Compaction Remarks CW 789 4/13/06 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 1+57 CW 790 4/13/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 1+30 CW 791 4/13/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 1+09 CW 792 , 4/14/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 10+60 CW 793 4/14/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 10+10 CW 794 4/14/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 9+70 CW 795 4/14/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 9+13 CW 796 4/14/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 8+62 CW 797 4/14/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #I Station 8+12 CW 798 4/14/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Station 7+58 CW 799 4/14/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 7+20 CW 800 4/14/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 6+73 CW 801 4/14/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 6+25 CW 802 4/14/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 5+95 CW 803 4/14/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 5+45 CW 804 4/14/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 4+95 CW 805 4/17/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 4+45 CW 806 4/17/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 3+95 CW 807 4/17/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 3+45 CW 808 4/17/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 2+95 CW 809 4/17/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 2+45 CW 810 4/17/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 1+95 CW 811 4/17/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 1+45 CW 812 4/17/06 c Crib Wall#rCell#l Station 0+95 CW 813 4/17/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 0+45 CW . 814 4/17/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 StatioriO+10 'cw 315 4/17/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 10+22 CW i ?16 4/17/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 9+98 cw I 517 4/17/06 c . Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 9+72 cw { !18 4/17/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 9+48 CW f 19 4/17/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 9+25 cw 820 4/17/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 8+97 Project Number- Project Name: Project Location: Client: 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 257.0 7 106.9 118,0 13.6 12.0 91 257.0 7 107.7 118,0 14.3 12.0 91 257.0 7 108.3 118,0 15.1 12.0 92 258.0 7 108.2 118,0 12.5 12.0 ,. 92 258.0 7 106.6 118.0 11.5 • 12.0 90 258.0 7 107.6 118.0 12.2 12.0 . 91 258.0 7 106,3 118,0 13:0 12,0 90 258.0 7 106.1 118.0 12.0 12,0 90 258.0 7 107,1 118.0 12.3 12,0 91 258.0 7 106.9 118.0 13.1 12,0 91 258.0 7 105.9 118.0 13.7 12,0 90 258.0 7 107.4 118.0 13.6 12,0 91 258.0 7 106.3 118.0 14.5 - 12,0 90 258.0 7 107.7 118.0 11.9 12.0 91 258.0 7 106.6 118.0 13.2 12.0 90 257.0 7 106,9 118.0 15.1 . 12.0 91 258.0 7 110,2 118.0 12.8 12.0 93 257.0 7 107.2 118.0 14.2 12.0 91 258.0 7 • 107.7 118.0 12.3 12.0 91 257.0 7 106.8 118,0 13.4 • 12.0 91 258.0 7 106.4 118.0 12.2 12.0 , • 90 257.0 7 106.6 118.0 12.0 12.0 90 258.0 7 106.2 118.0 13.7 12.0 90 258.0 7 111.1 118.0 12.2 . 12.0 94 258.0 7 106.7 118.0 11.6 12.0 90 258.0 7 106.2 118.0 12.4 12.0 90 258.0 7 108.5 118.0 11.1 12.0 92 258.0 7 106.7 118.0 13,8 12.0 90 258.0 7 105.8 118'.0 12.9 12.0 90 258.0 7 107.0 -118.0 15.2 12,0 91 258.0 7 108,1 118.0 11.9 12,0 92 259.0 I 110,4 120.0 14.5 12,0 92 Page 25 of 39 3/9/2007 1 •'?5-n9PA/f SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No. Test Date Project Number: Project Name: Project Location: Client: Test Of Location CW 821 4/17/06 C CW 822 4/17/06 C CW 823 4/17/06 c CW 824 4/1-7/06 c CW 825 4/18/06 c CW 826 4/18/06 c CW 827 4/18/06 c CW 828 4/18/06 c CW 829 4/18/06 c CW 830 4/18/06 c CW 831 4/18/06 c CW 832 4/18/06 c CW 833 4/18/06 c CW 834 4/18/06 c CW 835 4/18/06 c CW 836 4/18/06 c CW 837 4/18/06 c CW 838 4/18/06 c CW 839 4/18/06 c CW 840 4/18/06 c CW 841 4/18/06 c CW 842 4/18/06 c CW 843 • 4/18/06 c CW 844 4/18/06 c CW 845 4/18/06 c CW 846 4/18/06 c CW 847 4/18/06 c CW 848 4/18/06 c CW 849 4/18/06 c CW 850 4/18/06 c CW 851 4/18/06 c CW 852 4/18/06 c Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall#l Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall#l Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall#l Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Cell#l Cell#l Cell#l' Ceil #1 Cell#l Cell#l Cell#l Cell #1 Cell #1 Cell#l Cell#l Cell #1 Cell#l Cell #1 Cell #1 Cell #2 Cell#l Cell #2 Cell#l Cell #2 Cell#l Cell #2 Cell#l Cell #2 Cell #1 Cell #2 Cell#l Cell#l Cell #1 Cell#l Cell #1 Cell#l 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 • Station 8+75 Station 8+50 Station 8+23 Station 8+00 Station 7+75 Station 7+50 Station 7+25 Station 7+00 Station 6+75 Station 6+50 Station 6+25 Station 6+00 Station 5+75 Station 5+50 Station 5+25 Station 5+00 Station 4+75 Station 4+50 Station 4+25 Station 4+00 Station 3+75 Station 3+50 Station 3+25 Station 3+00 Station 2+75 Station 2+50 Station 2+25 Station 2+00 Station 1+75 Station 1+50 Station 1+25 Station 1+00 Lot# Test Elev (ft) 259.0 259.0 259.0 259.0 259.0 259.0 259.0 259.0 259.0 259.0 259.0 258.0 258.0 258.0 258.0 257.0 258.0 257.0 258.0 257.0 258.0 257.0 258.0 257.0 258.0 257.0 258.0 258.0 258.0 258.0 258.0 258.0 Soil Type 1 1 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7. 7 7 • 7 7 7 - 7 7 Dry Density Field Max 109,0 108,1 108,6 109.8 109,3 108,6 110.4 110,6 110,7 108,9 107.8 109.0 107.6 108.6 108,6 107,0 107,7 106,9 105,9 108,3 107.1 109.1 110,9 109,6 106,0 106.4 106.3 106.3 106.8 106.4 106.1 106.0 120,0 120,0 120,0 120,0 120,0 120.0 120,0 120,0 120,0 120,0 120,0 120,0 120.0 120,0 120,0 118,0 118,0 118,0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118,0 118,0 118,0 118,0 118,0 118,0 118,0 118,0 118,0 Moisture (%) Field Opt. Relative (Vo) Compaction 12,8 13,5 15,3 13,6 14,2 13,6 14,7 • 13,2 12,0 14,8 13,6 11,4 13,9 12,0 15,6 15,0 12,0 11,9 13,3 12,4 13,8 12,9 11.9 13.4 12.6 12.0 12.5 11.1 11.6 12.2 12.0 12.7 Remarks 12.0 12.0 -12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12,0 91 90 90 92 91 90 92 92 92 91 90 91 90 90 90 91 91 91 90 92 91 92 94 93 90 90 90 90 91 90 90 90 Page 26 of 3 9 1 •'?5-n9PM SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No. CW 853 CW 854 CW 855 CW 856 CW 857 CW 858 CW. 859 CW 860 CW 861 CW 862 CW 863 CW 864 CW 865 CW 866 CW 867 CW 868 CW 869 CW 870 CW 871 CW 872 CW 873 CW 874 CW 875 jcw 876 CW 877 CW 878 CW 879 CW 880 CW 881 CW 882 CW 883 CW 884 Test Date Test Of Location Lot# 4/18/06 C 4/18/06 C 4/18/06 C 4/18/06 C 4/19/06 C 4/19/06 4/19/06 C C 4/19/06 C 4/19/06 4/19/06 4/19/06 4/19/06 4/19/06 4/19/06 4/19/06 4/19/06 4/19/06 4/19/06 C 4/19/06 C 4/19/06 4/19/06 4/19/06 4/20/06 4/20/06 4/20/06 4/20/06 4/20/06 4/20/06 4/21/06 4/21/06 4/21/06 C 4/21/06 C C C C C C C C C C C C C C c c c c c c c Project Number: Project Name: Project Location: Client: Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell # I Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Crib Wall#l Celltfl Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell#r 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 Station 0+75 Station 0+50 Station 0+25 Station 0+05 Station 6+10 Station 5+65 Station 5+40 Station 5+15 Station 4+90 Station 4+65 Station 4+35 Station 4+05 Station 3+85 Station 3+60 Station3+35 Station 3+10 Station 2+85 Station 2+60 Station 2+35 Station 2+10 Station 1+85 Station 1+60 Station 1+35 Station 1+10 Station 0+75 Station 0+40 Station 0+15 Station 0+02 Station 8+55 Station 8+05 Station 7+55 Station 7+05 Test Elev (ft) 258.0 258.0 258.0. 258.0 259.0 259.0 259.0 259.0 258.0 259.0 258.0 259.0 258.0 259.0 258.0 259.0 258.0 259.0 259.0 259.0 259.0 259.0 259.0 259.0 259.0 259.0 259.0 259.0 260.0 260.0 260.0 261,0 Soil Type 1 1 7 7 7 7 7 3 3 3 3 7 7 7 7 7 7 3 7 7 I 1 1 1 1 1 7 7 7 Dry Density Field Max Moisture (%) Field Opt. Relative (Vo) Compaction Remarks 106.7 110,5 108,4 108,6. 106,4 106,4 106,0 105,9 106,3 103,4 103,3 105,5 104,6 107.5 106.5 107.1 106,7 105,7 106,0 103,2 107,9 106.6 109,9 108,3 110,2 109.1 107.6 108.0 106,9 107,4 106,3 111.8 118,0 120.0 120.0 120.0 118,0 118,0 118.0 118,0 118,0 114,5 114,5 114,5 114,5 118,0 118.0 118,0 118.0 118,0 118,0 114,5 118.0 118.0 120,0 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 118,0 118,0 118,0 120,0 .11,6 12,8 12,3 13.1 13,8 17,8 14,3 13,7 12.9 12.4 15.6 12.8 14,1 12,8 12,0 13,7 12.2 13.3 14.1 17.5 13.8 11.6 13.4 15.9 14.7 15.2 14.6 12.2 13.9 13.8 12.2 13.5 12.0 12,0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12,5 12,5' 12,5 12,5 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12,5 12.0 12,0 12,0 . 12,0 ' 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12.0 90 92 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 92 91 91 90 91 90 90 90 90 91 90 92 • 90 92 91 90 90 91 91 90 93 Page 27 of 3 9 1 /Q/onm SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No. CW 885 CW 886 CW 887 CW 888 CW 889 CW 890 CW 891 CW 892 CW 893 CW 894 CW 895 Jew 896 CW 897 CW 898 CW 899 CW 900 CW 901 CW 902 CW 903 CW 904 CW 905 CW 906 CW 907 CW 908 CW 909 CW 910 CW 911 Jew 912 CW 913 CW 914 CW 915 CW 916 Test bate Test Of Location Lot# C C C C C C C C C 4/21/06 4/21/06 4/21/06 4/21/06 4/21/06 4/21/06 4/21/06 4/21/06 4/21/06 4/21/06 C 4/21/06 C 4/21/06 4/21/06 4/21/06 . 4/21/06 4/21/06 4/21/06 4/21/06 4/21/06 4/21/06 C 4/25/06 C >. 4/25/06 4/25/06 4/25/06 4/25/06 4/25/06 4/25/06 4/25/06 4/25/06 4/25/06 4/25/06 4/25/06 Project Number: Project Name: Project Location: Client: C C c c e c e c c c e c c e e c c c e Crib Wall#l eell#l Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Crib Wall#i Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wali#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Crib Wall#l Ceir#l Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Crib Wall#l Cell#l Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Crib Wall #1 Cell#l 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 Station 6+60 Station 6+05 Station 5+55 Station 5+05 Station 4+55 Station 4+17 Station 3+55 Station 3+05 Station 2+55 Station 2+05 Station 2+15 Station 2+70 Station 3+17 Station 3+72 Station 4+25 Station 4+75 Station 5+25 Station 5+75 • Station 6+25 Station 6+70 Station 6+55 Station 6+00 Station 5+50 Station 5+00 Station 4+60 Station 4+12 Station 3+65 Station 3+10 Station 3+40 Station 2+90 Station 2+40 Station 1+90 Test Elev (ft) 260.0 260.0 260.0 260.0 260.0 260.0 259.0 260.0 260.0 260.0 261.0 261.0 261.0 261,0 261.0 261.0 261,0 261.0 261,0 261.0 262.0 262.0 262.0 262.0 262.0 262.0 262.0 262.0 262.0 262.0 262.0 262.0 Soil Type 7 7 7 7 7 7 7- 7 7 7 7 7 .7 :7 7 7 7 7 7 7 3 3 3 3 7 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 Dry Density Field Max Moisture (%) Field Opt. Relative (%) Compaction Remarks 106.4 107.9 110.4 107,7 106,5 106,9 108.3 105,9 106.8 107.4 108.1 108,3 107.2 106.0 106,1 108,6 109.0 109.4 108,2 107,4 102,5 104.3 106.4 104.3 108.4 108.9 108.1 103.8 105.5 104.3 104,4 103.7 1: ;ij 8,0 8,0 8,0 8,0 8,0 ,0 118.0 118,0 118,0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118,0 118,0 118,0 118,0 114,5 • 114,5 114,5 • 114,5 118.0 120.0 120.0 114.5 114.5 114.5 114.5 114.5 12.0 12.6 12,0 12.9 16.4 15.9 13.0 17.3 15.2 14.6 14.0 15.0 16.5 1 1.6 , 1 1.9 16.1 13.4 12.1 15.0 14.3 13.5 12.5 - 14.3 14.6^ 14.6 '13.5 14.5 16.2 15.7 14.6 15.1 14.2 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 1.2.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,5 12,5 12,5 12,5 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 90 91 94 91 90 , 91 92 90 91 91 92 92 91 90 90 92 92 93 92 91 90 91 93 91 92 91 90 91 92 91 91 91 Page 28 of 39 3/9/2007 1 -T^-mDA^^ SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No. Test Date Test Of Location Lot# Test Elev (ft) Soil Type Dry Density Field Max Moisture (%) Field Opt. Relative (%) Compaction Remarks CW 917 4/25/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 1+50 CW 918 4/25/06 C . Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 1+70 CW 919 4/25/06 c, Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 2+20 CW 920 4/25/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 2+70 CW 921 4/25/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #1, Station 3+20 CW 922 4/25/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Station 3+70 CW 923 4/25/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Station 4+20 CW 924 4/25/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 4+70 CW 925 4/25/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 5+20 CW 926 4/25/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 5+70 CW 927 4/25/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Station 6+20 CW 928 4/26/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Station 5+40 CW 929 4/26/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 5+15 CW 930 4/26/06 c Crib Wall #l Cell#l Station 4+90 Jew 931 4/26/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 4+65 CW 932 4/26/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 4+35 CW 933 4/26/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 4+10 CW 934 4/26/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 3+85 CW 935 4/26/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 3+50 CW 936 ,4/26/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 3+25 CW 937 4/26/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 3+00 CW 938 4/26/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 2+75 CW 939 4/26/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 2+50 CW 940 4/26/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 2+10 CW 941 4/26/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 2+35 CW 942 4/26/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 ' Station 2+85 CW 943 4/26/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 3+35 CW 944 4/26/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 3+70 CW 945 4/26/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 4+20 CW 946 4/26/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 4+70 CW 947 4/26/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 5+20 CW 948 4/27/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 4+00 Project Number Project Name: Project Location: Client: 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 262.0 3 104,2 114,5 13.4 12,5 91 263.0 7 107,7 11 8.0 13.3 12,0 91 263.0 7 107,2 11 8.0 11.0 12,0 91 263.0 7 107.4 11 8,0 1 1.0 12.0 91 263.0 7 106,3 11 8.0 13.7 12.0 90 263.0 7 105.9 11 8.0 16.2 12.0 90 263.0 7 107.8 11 8.0 15.0 12,0 91 263.0 7 107,9 11 8.0 15.3 12,0 91 263.0 1 111,7 120,0 14.6 12,0 93 263.0 1 108.9 120,0 12.6 12,0 91 263.0 1 108,0 120.0 16.1 12,0 90 264.0 7 106,5 11 8.0 13.7 12,0 90 264.0 7 106,3 11 8.0 15.5 12,0 90 264.0 7 107,0 11 S.O 14.4 12.0 91 264.0 7 106,0 11 5.0 15.3 12,0 90 264.0 7 105,9 Hi i.O 13,0 12,0 90 264.0 7 106,1 in 5.0 17,3 12,0 90 264.0 7 107,1 ii{ 5.0 13,9 12,0 91 264.0 7 105.8 115 5.0 16.4 12,0 90 264.0 7 106.0 lis .0 15.5 12.0 90 264.0 7 107.5 lis .0 15.2 12.0 91 264.0 7 107.2 118 ,0-14.3 • 12.0 91 264.0 7 105.9 118 .0 17.4 12.0 -. 90 264.0 7 107.3 118 .0 14.3 12,0 91 265.0 7 109.6 118 .0 14.2 12,0 93 265.0 7 106,8 118 .0 16.4 12,0 91 265.0 7 109.6 118 ,0 12.5 12,0 93 265.0 7 108.5 118 ,0 14.4 12,0 92 265.0 7 107.3 118 0 15.2 12,0 91 265,0 7 106.9 118 0 14,3 12,0 91 265,0 7 107.5 118 0 15,4 12,0 91 266,0 7 109.3 118 0 12,0 12,0 93 Page 29 of 3 9 3/9/2007 1:35-09PM Test No. SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test Date Test Of Location CW 949 4/27/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 3+60 CW 950 4/27/06 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 3+00 CW 951 4/27/06 c Crib Wall #l Cell#l Station 2+60 CW 952 4/27/06 c. Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 3+89 CW 953 4/27/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 3+27 CW 954 4/27/06 c Crib Wall#l Ceir#l Station 2+88 CW 955 4/27/06 B Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 9+50 CW 956 4/27/06 B Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Station 9+00 CW 957 4/27/06 B Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 8+70 CW 958 4/27/06 B Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Station 0+20 CW 959 4/27/06 B Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 0+65 CW 960 4/27/06 B Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 0+90 CW 961 4/27/06 B Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 1+15 CW 962 4/27/06 B Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 8+40 CW 963 4/27/06 B Crib Wal|#l Cell#l Station 8+15 CW 964 4/27/06 B Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 7+85 CW 965 4/27/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 7+60 CW 966 4/27/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 7+10 CW 967 4/27/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 6+60 CW 968 4/28/06 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 6+10 CW 969 4/28/06 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 5+88 CW 970 4/28/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 5+60 CW 971 4/28/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 4+84 CW 972 4/28/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 4+42 CW '973 4/28/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 4+15 CW 974 4/28/06 C Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Station 3+80 CW 975 4/28/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 3+44 CW 976 4/28/06 C Crib Wall #l Cell#l Station 3+15 CW 977 4/28/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 2+95 CW 978 4/28/06 C Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Station 2+67 CW 979 4/28/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Station 2+27 CW 980 4/28/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 2+03 Project Number Project Name: Project Location: Client: 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 Lot# Test Elev (ft) Soil Type Dry Density Field Max Moisture (%) Field Opt. Relative (Vo) Compaction Remarks 266.0 7 107.4 118,0 12.7 12.0 • 91 266.0 7 106.9 118,0 14.7 12,0 91 266.0 7 107.3 118,0 15.7 12,0 91 267.0 7 107.3 118,0 14.0 12,0 91 267.0 7 106.5 118,0 12.1 12,0 90 267.0 7 109.8 118,0 13,1 12.0 . 93 259.0 1 ' 110.8 120,0 13,1 12,0 92 260.0 1 109.3 120,0 15,0 • 12,0 91 260.0 1 107.5 120,0 14,8 12,0 90 260.0 1 110.1 120,0 13,1 12,0 92 261.0 1 108.2 120,0 14,8 12,0 90 261.0 1 108.0 . 120,0 13,0 12,0 90 262.0 1 108.6 120.0 15,1 12,0 90 261.0 1 107.4 120.0 14,6 12,0 90 261.0 7 105.7 118.0 11,7 12,0 90 261.0 7 108.8 118.0 12,8 12,0 92 262.0 7 105.9 118,0 15,2 12,0 90 262.0 7 107.1 118,0 15,4 12,0 91 263.0 7 105.9 118,0 14,1 12,0 90 264.0 1 107.8 120,0 12.8 12,0 90 264.0 1 111.4 120.0 13,3 12,0 93 264.0 1 114.2 120.0 13,5. . 12,0 95 266.0 1 . 110.9 120,0 13,4 12,0 92 266.0 1 108.2 120,0 12,5 "l2,0 90 267.0 1 109.1 120,0 13,6 12,0 91 268.0 7 106.4 118.0 16,4 12,0 90 268.0 1 109.2 120.0 13,7 12,0 • 91 269.0 1 108.1 120,0 12.0 12.0 90 268.0 1 108.1 120.0 14.0 12.0 90 267.0 1 112.6 120,0 13,6 12.0 94 266.0 7 105.9 118,0 16,9 12.0 90 265.0 7 106.3 118,0 14.6 12.0 90 Page 30 of 39 ^/o/9nm SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test Test Test — L No. Date Of CW 981 4/28/06 C Crib Wall #1 Ceim CW 982 5/2/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW 983 5/2/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l CW 984 5/2/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 CW 985 5/2/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW 986 5/2/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW 987 5/2/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 CW 988 5/2/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW 989 5/2/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW 990 5/2/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW 991 5/2/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW 992 5/2/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW 993 5/2/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l CW 994 5/2/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW 995 5/2/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 CW 996 5/2/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 CW 997 5/2/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 CW 998 5/2/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW 999 5/2/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CWIOOO 5/2/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CWlOOl 5/2/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW1002 5/2/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW1003 5/3/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW1004. 5/3/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW1005 5/3/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l CW1006 5/3/06 c Crib Wall #l Cell#l CW1007 5/3/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 CW1008 5/3/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 CW1009 5/3/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l CWlOlO 5/3/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CWlOll 5/3/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l CW1012 5/3/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Location Lot# Project Number Project Name: Project Location: Client: Station 1+82 Station 9+40 Station 9+08 Station 8+65 Station 8+00 Station 7+70 Station 7+30 Station 6+87 Station 6+40 Station 6+05 Station 5+60 Station 5+10 Station 4+60 Station 4+10 Station 3+55 Station 3+08 Station 2+55 Station 2+10 Station 1+60 Station 1+10 Station 0+60 Station 0+02 Station 9+80 Station 9+30 Station 8+80 Station 8+30 Station 7+80 Station 7+20 Station 6+80 Station 6+30 Station 5+80 Station 5+30 Test Elev (ft) 264.0 260.0 261.0 262.0 262.0 262.0 263.0 263.0 264.0 265.0 265.0 266.0 267.0 268.0 269.0 270.0 269.0 266.0 264.0 263.0 262.0 261.0 262.0 263.0 263.0 263.0 263.0 264,0 265,0 265.0 266.0 267.0 Soil Type 7 7 ,7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 , 7 ,7 7 7 7 7 7 7 1 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Dry Density Field Max Moisture (%) Field Opt. Relative (Vo) Compaction Remarks 105,9 106,6 ,108,9 106,0 106,8 107.2 107.7 108,0 109,9 107,8 106.3 108,2 107.2 106,5 107.6 106.4 106.0 106,1 106,7 106,0 107,8 108.2 107,1 109,5 108,3 107,8 110,6 108,0 108,1 107,8 107.7 108.8 118,0 118,0 118,0 118,0 118,0 118,0 118,0 118,0 120,0 120,0 118,0 118,0 118,0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118,0 118,0 118.0 118,0 118.0 120.0 118.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 120,0 120,0 120,0 120,0 120,0 120,0 12,0 13.4 12.2 16.0 12.6 13.0 13.5 15.5 13.5 15.0 14.0 13.1 12.7 ,13,5 14,7 16,0 14,0 14,5 15,8 13,7. 15,2 12,9 13,9 12,0 15,4 14,7 15,4 15,1 14,3 14,5 13.5 14.8 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 . 90 90 92 90 91 91 91 92 92 90 90 92 91 90 91 90 90 90 90 90 91 90 91 91 90 90 92 90 90 90 90 91 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 Page 31 of 39 3/9/2007 1:35-09PM SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS j Test Test Test No. Date Of CW1013 5/3/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 4+80 CW1014 5/3/06 c • Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 4+30 CW1015 5/3/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 3+70 CW1016 5/3/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 3+30 CW1017 5/3/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 2+80 CW1018 5/3/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 2+30. CW1019 5/3/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 1+80 CW1020 5/3/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 1+30 CW1021 5/3/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 0+80 CW1022 5/3/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 0+30 CW1023 5/3/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 0+35 CW1024 5/3/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 1+35 jcW1025 5/3/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 2+35 CW1026 5/3/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 3+50 CW1027 5/3/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 4+50 CW1028 5/4/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 5+50 CW1029 5/4/06 c Crib Wall#l CeH#l Station 6+50 CW1030 5/4/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 7+50 CW1031 5/4/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 8+50 CW1032 5/4/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 9+50 CW1033 5/9/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 11+75 CW1034 5/9/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 11+90 CW1035 5/9/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Station 12+05 CW1036 5/9/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 12+20 'CW1037 5/9/06 c Crib WaH#l Cell#l Station 12+35 CW1038 5/9/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #5 Station 12+30 ICW1039 5/9/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Station 12+12 CW1040 5/9/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Station 11+98 CW1041 5/9/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 11+83 CW1042 5/9/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 12+40 CW1043 5/10/06 c Crib Wall # I Cell #5 Station 11+75 CW1044 5/10/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Station 11+85 Lot# Project Number Project Name: Project Location: Client: 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 Test Elev (ft) Soil Type Dry Density Field Max Moisture (%) Field Opt. Relative (Vo) Compaction Remarks 267.0 7 106.6 118,0 16,9 12,0 90 268.0 7 106,3 118,0 12.5 12,0 90 270.0 7 106.0 118.0 16.2 12.0 90 270.0 7 106.5 118,0 13.6 12,0 90 269.0 7 106,6 118.0 15.1 12,0 90 268.0 1 109,3 120.0 12.2 .12,0 91 266.0 1 108.1 120.0 12.9 12,0 90 264.0 1 108.2 120,0 12.5 12.0 90 263.0 1 107,8 120,0 12.0 12,0 90 262.0 1 109,1 120,0 14.2 12.0 91 0.0 1 113,7 120.0 1 1.0 12,0 95 0.0 1 107,6 120,0 15.1 12.0 90 0.0 1 108,0 120.0 13.4 12.0 90 0.0 1 110,2 120.0 1 1.2 12,0 92 0.0 1 109,5 120.0 10.9 12,0 91 0.0 1 107,8 120.0 10.7 12.0 90 0.0 1 108,7 120.0 10.5 12,0 91 0.0 1 110.3 120.0 11.5 12,0 92 0.0 1 109.6 120,0 12.3 12,0 91 0.0 1 110.6 120.0 12.5 12,0 92 217.0 7 106.8 118.0 12.1 12,0 91 218.0 7 106.6 118,0 11.6 .' 12,0 90 219.0 7 106.2 118.0 11.7 12.0 90 220.0 7 106.1 118.0,. 12.7 12,0 90 221.0 7 107.0 118.0 12.3 12.0 91 217.0 7 106.6 118,0 13.9 12,0 90 219.0 7 107.3 118,0 14.2 12,0 91 220.0 7 106,9 118,0 13.7 12,0 91 221.0 7 107,1 118,0 13.0 12,0 91 222.0 7 106,8 118,0 12.8 12,0 91 219.0 7 107.4 118,0 13.9 12,0 91 220.0 7 106.4 118,0 14.4 12,0 90 Page 32 of 39 1/9/9007 1 •T^.n9DA/t SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No. Test Date Test Of Location Lot# Test Soil Dry Density Moisture (%) Relative (Vo) Elev (ft) Type Field Max Field Opt. Compaction Remarks CW1045 5/10/06 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Station 12+05 221.0 7 CW1046 ' 5/10/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 12+20 222.0 7 CW1047 5/10/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 12+35 223.0 7 CW1048 5/10/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #5 Station 11+80 220.0 7 CW1049 5/10/06 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #4 Station 11+90 221.0 7 CW1050 5/10/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 12+00 222.0 7 CW1051 5/10/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 12+15 223.0 7 CW1052 5/10/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 12+30 224.0 7 CW1053 5/11/06 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #5 Station 11+73 221.0 7 CW1054 5/11/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Station 11+83 222.0 7 CW1055 5/11/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Station 12+03 223.0 7 CW1056 5/11/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 12+18 224.0 7 CW1057 5/11/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 12+33 225.0 7 CW1058 5/11/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #5 Station 11+80 222.0 7 CW1059 5/11/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Station 11+90 223.0 7 CW1060 5/11/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 12+10 224.0 7 CW1061 5/11/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 12+22 225.0 7 CW1062 5/11/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 12+32 226.0 7 CW1063 5/12/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #5 Station 11+75 223.0 7 CW1064 5/12/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Station 11+85 224.0 7 CW1065 5/12/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Station 11+95 225.0 7 CW1066 5/12/0,6 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 12+10 226.0 7 CW1067 5/12/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 12+20 227.0 7 CW1068 5/12/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #5 Station 11+70 224.0 7 • CW1069 5/12/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Station 11+80 225.0 7 CW1070 5/12/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Station 11+90 226.0 7 CW1071 5/12/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 12+15 227.0 7 CW1072 5/12/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 12+30 228.0 7 CW1073 5/15/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Station 11+85 226.0 7 CW1074 5/15/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 11+95 227.0 7 CW1075 5/15/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 12+10 228.0 7 CW1076 5/15/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 12+25 229.0 7 Project Number Project Name: Project Location: Client: 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 107.1 106.5 106.6 106.9 106.4 107.3 106,8 107,5 106.4 106.7 107,} 106,6 106,5 107,2 107,4 107,2 106,9 106,5 107,1 107,3 106,6 106,5 107.5 107.2 106,3 106.5 107.4 106.5 106.5 106,4 106.3 106,6 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118,0 118,0 118,0 118,0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 118.0 13.7 14.2 15,1 15,8 13,4 14,2 13.8 12,2 13,2 13,0 12,1 12,0 1 1,7 12,2 12.1 13,2 13,3 1 1,5 15,3 14,1 14,5 15,3 15,5 14,6 13,8 13,5 15,2 15,0 15,2 15,5 16,3 15,1 12.0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 91 90 90 91 90 91 91 91 90 90 91 90 90 91 91 91 91 90 91 91 90 90 91 91 90 90 91 90 90 90 90 90 Page 33 of 39 1 •T509PM Test No. SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test Date Test" Of Location CW1077 5/15/06 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #4 Station 11+80 CW1078 5/15/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 11+95 CW1079 5/15/06 C Crib Wall#rCell #2 Station 12+05 CW1080 5/15/06 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 12+20 CW1081 5/16/06 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #4 Station 11+75 CW1082 5/16/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 11+95 CW1083 5/16/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 12+15 CW1084 5/16/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 12+33 CW1085 5/16/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Station 11+80 CW1086 5/16/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 11+90 CW1087 5/16/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 12+05 CW1088 5/16/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 12+20 CW1089 5/17/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Station 11+74 CW1090 5/17/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 11+95 CW1091 5/17/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 12+14 CW1092 5/17/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 12+32 CW1093 5/17/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Station 11+75 CW1094 5/17/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 11+95 CW1095 5/17/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 12+15 CW1096 5/17/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 12+33 CW1097 5/18/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Station 12+35 CW1098 5/18/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 12+00 CW1099 5/18/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 11+85 CWllOO 5/18/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 11+65 CWllOl 5/18/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Station 12+47 CW1102 5/18/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 12+55 CW1103 5/18/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 12+60 CW1104 5/19/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #4 Station 11+40 CW1105 5/19/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 11+55 CW1106 5/19/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 11+75 CW1107 5/19/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 11+45 CW1108 5/19/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #4 Station 11+80 Project Number Project Name: Project Location: Client: 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 Lot# Test Elev (ft) Soil Type Page 34 of 39 Dry Density Field Max Moisture (%) Field Opt. Relative (Vo) Compaction Remarks 227.0 7 107,3 118.0 14,8 12,0 91 228.0 7 106,3 118.0 15,0 12,0 90 229.0 7 106,1 118.0 14.4 12,0 90 230.0 7 106,5 118.0 15,3 12,0 90 227.0 ,7 107,3 118.0 13.7 12,0 91 228.0 7 107,0 118.0 15.9 12,0 91 229.0 7 106,5 118.0 16.1 12,0 90 230.0 7 107,5 118.0 15.1 12.0 91 228.0 7 106,3 118.0 14.4 12,0 90 229.0 7 106,6 118.0 15.3 12,0 90 230.0 7 107,2 118.0 14.9 12.0 91 231.0 7 107,7 118.0 16.3 12.0 91 228.0 7 107,8 118.0 13.9 12,0 91 229.0 7 108,3 118.0 17.0 12,0 92 230.0 7 107,5 118.0 14.0 12,0 91 231.0 7 108,7 118.0 15.1 12,0 92 229.0 7 107,6 118.0 15.0 12,0 91 230.0 7 110,5 118.0 16.5 12.0 94 231.0 7 108,1 118.0 15.8 12,0 92 232.0 7 109.8 118.0 14.1 12,0 93 230.0 7 107.1 118.0 15.6 12,0 91 231.0 7 108,0 118.0 14.0 12,0 92 232.0 7 111,1 118.0 14.5 12,0 94 233.0 7 111,3 118.0 14,8 ,12.0 94 230.0 7 113.3 118.0 15,7 12,0 96 231.0 7 109.4 118,0 15,5 12,0 93 232.0 7 109,2 118,0 15,1 12.0 93 232.0 1 112.5 120,0 12.1 12.0 94 233.0 1 111.7 120.0 13,9 12,0 93 234.0 1 111.0 120,0 13.9 12,0 93 235.0 1 108.7 120,0 14.6 12,0 91 232.0 1 115.2 120,0 12.7 12,0 96 35:02PM SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No. Test Date Test Of Location Lot# Test Elev (ft) Soil Type Dry Density Field Max Moisture (%) Field Opt. Relative (Vo) Compaction Remarks CW1109 5/19/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 12+18 CWlllO 5/19/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 12+55 CWllll 5/19/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 12+00 CW1112 5/19/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 11+60 CW1113 5/19/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 11+90 CW1114 5/19/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Station 12+30 CW1115 5/19/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Station 11+40 CW1116 5/19/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 12+00 CW1117 5/19/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 12+25 CW1118 5/23/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Station 12+15 CW1119 5/23/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#r Station 12+70 CW1120 5/23/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 12+43 CW1121 5/23/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 12+30 CW1122 5/23/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Station 12+62 CW1123 5/23/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 12+50 CW1124 5/23/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 11+20 CW1125 5/23/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 11+50 CW1126 5/23/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 11+85 CW1127 5/23/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 12+05 CW1128 5/23/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 11 + 18 CW1129 5/23/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 11+45 CW1130 5/23/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 11+70 CW1131 5/23/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 12+10 CW1132. 5/23/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Station 12+40 CW1133 5/23/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 12+58 CW1134 5/23/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 12+75 CW1135 5/23/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Station 11+58 CW1136 5/23/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 11+95 CW1137 5/23/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 12+60 CW1138 5/23/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 11+35 CWM39 5/23/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 11+79 CW1140 5/23/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 12+50 Project Number Project Name: Project Location: Client: 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 233.0 234.0 235.0 237.0 236.0 235.0 235.0 236.0 237.0 238.0 238.0 237.0 237.0 236.0 236.0 237.0 238.0 237.0 238.0 239.0 239.0 239.0 239.0 237.0 238.0 239.0 238.0 238,0 238.0 239.0 239.0 239,0 113.0 120.0 12,4 12.0 94 109.6 120.0 14.3 12.0 91 109,6 120.0 13,2 12.0 91 108,6 120.0 13,3 12.0 90 108.1 120.0 12,5 12.0 90 109.6 • 120,0 12,6 12.0 91 111.6 120.0 12,9 12.0 93 110.6 120.0 13,8 12.0 92 110.4 120.0 15,6 12:0 92 113.7 120.0 12,0 12.0 95 110.4 120.0 12,4 12.0 92 112.4 120.0 13,4 12.0 94 111.4 120.0 13.6 12.0 93 113.3 120.0 13.4 12.0 94 112.0 120,0 13.6 12.0 93 114.9 120,0 14.0 12.0 96 112.6 120,0 13.8 12.0 94 110.5 120,0 14.6 12.0 92 109.6 120,0 14.8 12.0 91 107.9 120,0 16.2 12,0 90 112,1 120,0 15.7 12,0 93 111,6 120,0 15.0 12,0 93 110,4 120,0 15.5 12.0 - 92 108,2 120,0 17.4 12.0 90 107,6 120,0 16.8 12.0 90 107,7 120,0 16.2 12.0 90 110,0 120,0 16,3 12.0 92 115,3 120,0 13,2 12.0 96 114,0 120,0 14,6 12.0 95 111.4 120,0 16,4 12.0 93 112.0 120,0 16.0 12.0 93 112.6 120,0 16.3 12.0 94 Page 35 of 39 T/Q/9007 1 .-3 •^.mD^,^ SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No. Test Date Test Of Location CW1141 5/23/06 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 11+30 CW1142 5/23/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 11+90 CW1143 5/23/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 12+42 CW1144 5/24/06 C . Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Station 11+27 CW1145 5/24/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 11+67 CW1146 5/24/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 12+08 CW1147 5/24/06 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Station 12+47 CW1148 5/24/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 11+20 CW1149 5/24/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 11+62 CW1150 5/24/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 11+93 CW1151 5/24/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 12+67 CW1152 5/24/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 11+41 CW1153 5/24/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 11+82 CW1154 5/24/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 12+25 CW1155 5/24/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 12+58 CW1156 5/25/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 11+75 CW1157 5/25/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 12+00 CW1158 5/25/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 11+47 CW1159 5/25/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 12+35 CW1160 5/25/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 12+52 CW1161 5/25/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 11+55 CW1162 5/25/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #3 Station 11+25 CW1163 5/25/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 11+00 CW1164 . 5/25/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 11+50 CW1165 5/25/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 11+75 CW1166 5/25/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 12+00 CW1167 5/25/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #3 Station 12+10 CW1168 5/25/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 12+50 CW1169 5/25/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 11+15 CW1170 5/25/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Station 11+67 CW1171 5/25/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 12+25 CW1172 5/25/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 12+72 Project Number Project Name: Project Location: Client: 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 Lot# Test Elev (ft) Soil Type Dry Density Field Max Moisture (%) Relative (Vo) Field Opt. Compaction Remarks 240.0 1 110.4 120,0 15,5 12,0 92 240.0 1 110.9 120,0 16,0 12,0 92 240.0 1 113.1 120.0 16,9 12,0 94 239.0 1 114.7 120.0 14,7 12,0 96 239.0 1 112.1 120,0 14.0 12,0 93 239.0 1 107.8 120,0 13,4 12,0 90 239.0 1 108.6 120.0 13.0 12.0 90 240.0 1 110,8 120.0 14,2 12,0 92 240.0 1 109,2 120.0 14,8 12,0 91 240.0 1 109,8 120.0 14,0 12,0 92 240.0 1 110,0 120.0 13,6 12,0 92 241.0 1 111.2 120.0 13,2 12,0 93 241.0 1 109.6 120.0 14,5 12,0 91 241.0 1 108.9 120.0, • 13,0 12.0 91 241.0 1 111.7 120,0 15,3 12.0 . 93 242.0 1 110,4 120,0 14,6 12,0 92 242.0 1 110,0 120.0 16,1 12.0 92 241.0 1 109,6 120.0 15,8 12,0 91 241.0 1 111.3 120.0 15,0 12,0 93 240.0 1 110,7 120.0 14,3 12.0 92 240.0 1 108,4 120.0 14,0 12,0 90 242.0 1 111.1 120.0 12,5 12,0 93 243,0 1 109.8 120.0 13,0 12,0 92 243.0 1 110.2 120.0 15,3 12,0 92 242.0 1 112,6 120,0 14,0 12,0 94 245.0 1 108,2 120,0 14.7 12,0 90 242.0 1 109.0 120,0 14,0 12,0 91 245.0 1 111,6 120,0 15,0 12,0 93 244.0 1 109,7 120,0 15,8 12,0 91 244.0 1 114,4 120.0 14,3 12,0 95 244.0 1 109,3 120.0 18,7 12,0 91 244.0 1 107,9 120.0 15,8 12,0 90 Page 36 of 39 3/9/2007 1:35:02PM SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Lot# Test Elev (ft) Soil Type Dry Density Field Max Moisture (%) Relative (Vo) Field Opt. Compaction Remarks CW1173 5/25/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 12+62 CW1174 5/26/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 10+98 CW1175 5/26/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 11+23 CW1176 5/26/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 11+47 CW1177 5/26/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 11+73 CW1178 5/26/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 11+97 CW1179 5/26/06 c Crib Wall#l Gell#l Station 12+23 CW1180 5/26/06 c Crib Wall #l Cell #2 Station 12+45 CW1181 5/26/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 12+70 CW1182 5/26/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 12+90 CW1183 5/27/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 11+05 CW1184 5/27/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 11+30 CW1185 5/27/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 11+55 CW1186 5/27/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 11+80 CW1187 5/27/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 12+05 CW1188 5/27/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 12+30 CW1189 5/27/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 12+55 CW1190 5/27/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 12+80 CW1191 5/27/06 c Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 10+95 CW1192 5/27/06 c Crib Wall#l Gell#l Station 11+20 CW1193 5/27/06 G Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 11+45 CW1194 5/27/06 G Crib Wall#l Gell#l Station 11+70 CW1195 5/27/06 c Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 Station 11+95 CW1196 5/27/06 G Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 12+20 CW1197 5/27/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 12+45 CW1198 5/27/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 12+70 CW1199 5/27/06 G Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 12+95 CW1200 5/30/06 G Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 10+85 CW1201 5/30/06 G Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 11 + 10 CW1202 5/30/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 11+35 CW1203 5/30/06 G Crib Wall#l Cell #2 Station 11+60 CW1204 5/30/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 11+85 Project Number: Project Name: Project Location: Client: 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 243.0 1 108.4 120.0 15,0 12,0 90 245.0 1 111.5 120.0 14,9 12.0 • 93 246.0 1 110.0 120.0 15,5 12.0 92 245.0 1 109.9 120.0 13,9 .. 12,0 92 246.0 1 112.7 120.0 14,4 12.0 94 245.0 1 109.4 120.0 14,6 12,0 91 246.0 1 113.7 120,0 15,5 12,0 95 245.0 1 113.0 120,0 13,9 12.0 94 246.0 1 109,6 120,0 15,0 12.0 91 245.0 1 110,3 120,0 14,6 12.0 92 248.0 1 107,9 120,0 11,5 12.0 90 247.0 1 108,0 120.0 11,7 12.0 90 248.0 1 107,6 120.0 11,4 12,0 90 247.0 1 109,1 120.0 12,1 12,0 91 248.0 1 108,4 120,0 13,1 12,0 90 247.0 1 107.7 120,0 13,0 12,0 90 248.0 1 108.6 120.0 15,2 12.0 90 247.0 1 109.2 120.0 15.6 . 12.0 91 249.0 1 108.7 120.0 16.9 12,0 91 250.0 1 107.6 120.0 15.6 12,0 90 249.0 1 107.8 120.0 11,5 12,0 90 250.0 1 107.6 120.0 12,5 12,0 90 249.0 1 108.4 120,0 13,9 12,0 90 250.0 1 108.0 120,0 14,2 12.0 90 249.0 1 107.9 120,0 13,7 12,0 90 250.0 1 109.7 120.0 15,8 12,0 91 250.0 1 109.9 120,0 13,6 12,0 92 252.0 1 107.4 120,0 12,6 12,0 90 251.0 1 108.3 120.0 14,1 12,0 90 252,0 1 109.5 120,0 14,0 12,0 91 251,0 1 108.5 120,0 13.4 12,0 90 252.0 1 • 110.5 120,0 15.2 12,0 92 Page 37 of 39 1 :'!5-09PM SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No. Test Date Test Of Location Lot# Test Soil Dry Density Moisture (%) Relative (Vo) Elev (ft) Type Field Max Field Opt. Compaction Remarks CW1205 GW1206 CW1207 GW1208 CW1209 CW1210 CW1211 CW1212- CW1213 CW1214 GW1215 CW1216 CW1217 CW1218 CW1219 CW1220 GW1221 CW1222 CW1223 CW1224 GW1225 CW1226 CW1227 CW1228 GW1229 CW1230 CW1231 CW1232 CW1233 GW1234 GW1235 CW1236 5/30/06 5/31/06 5/31/06 5/31/06 5/31/06 6/1/06 6/1/06 6/1/06 6/1/06 6/1/06 6/1/06 6/1/06 6/1/06 6/1/06 6/1/06 6/1/06 6/1/06 6/2/06 6/2/06 6/2/06 6/2/06 6/2/06 6/2/06 6/2/06 6/2/06 6/2/06 6/2/06 6/2/06 6/2/06 6/2/06 6/2/06 6/2/06 Project Number Project Name: Project Location: Client: G Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 G Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 G Crib Wall #1 Cell #2 G Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 G Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 G Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 G Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 G Crib Wall#l Gell#l C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 G Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 G Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 G Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 G Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall # I Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 G Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 C Crib Wall #1 Cell#l C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 G Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 G Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 Station 12+10 251.0 1 107.9 120.0 12,0 12.0 90 Station 12+35 252.0 1 108.4 120.0 13,6 12^0 90 Station 12+60 251.0 1 108,9 120,0 14,1 12.0 91 Station 12+85 252.0 1 109,0 120.0 13,0 12.0 91 Station 13+05 252.0 1 108,6 120.0 13,2 12.0 90 Station 11+00 253.0 1 107,4 120.0 13,9 12.0 90 Station 11+50 253.0 1 108.9 120.0 17,6 12.0 91 Station 12+00 253.0 1 107.9 120.0 14,0 12.0 90 Station 12+50 253.0 1 108.6 120.0 13,6 12.0 90 Station 13+00 253.0 1 109.3 120.0 15,5 12.0 91 Station 13+10 254.0 1 108.1 120,0 11,8 12.0 90 Station 12+72 254.0 1 110.3 120.0 14,3 12,0 92 Station 12+37 254.0 1 107.6 120.0 12.3 12.0 90 Station 12+18 254.0 1 108.7 120.0 16,4 12.0 91 Station 11+70 254.0 1 109.1 120.0 14.7 12.0 91 Station 11+23 254.0 1 108.4 120.0 14.0 12.0 90 Station 10+92 254.0 1 109.2 120.0 14.2 12,0 91 Station 10+78 256.0 1 108.0 120,0 16,5 12,0 90 Station 11+02 256.0 1 109.3 120,0 13,6 12.0 91 Station 11+28 256.0 1 107.9 120,0 12,5 12,0 90 Station 11+52 256.0 1 109.8 120.0 14,4 12,0 92 Station 11+77 256.0 1 112.4 1.20.0 11,4 12.0 94 Station 12+02 256.0 1 108.6 120.0 17,6 12.0 90 Station 12+28 256.0 1 111.1 120.0 12,1 12.0 ,93 Station 12+50 256.0 1 107.9 120.0 18,5 12.0 90 Station 12+75 256,0 1 112.3 120.0 14,1 12,0 94 Station 13+00 256,0 1 110.0 120,0 16,3 12,0 92 Station 13+20 256,0 1 109.4 120,0 15,4 12,0 91 Station 13+18 258,0 1 109.2 120,0 12.4 12,0 91 Station 12+82 258,0 1 109.9 120,0 12.0 12,0 92 Station 12+57 258,0 3 104.3 114,5 17.2 12,5 91 Station 12+33 258.0 3 107.5 114,5 17.5 12,5 94 Page 38 of 39 1/0/9007 SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No. Test Date Test Of Location Lot# Test Elev (ft) Soil Type Dry Density Field Max Moisture (%) Field Opt. Relative (Vo) Compaction Remarks GW1237 6/2/06 C Crib Wall#l Gell#l Station 12+08 GW1238 6/2/06 G Crib Wall #1 Cell#l Station 11+87 CW1239 6/2/06 G Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 11+68 GWI240 6/2/06 C - Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 11+42 GW1241 6/2/06 C Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 11 + 18 GW1242 6/2/06 G Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 10+93 CW1243 6/2/06 G Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 10+67 CW1244 6/5/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 10+50 CW1245 6/5/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 11+00 CW1246 6/5/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 11+50 CW1247 6/5/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 12+00 CW1248 6/5/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 12+50 GW1249 6/5/06 C . Crib Wall #1 Cell #1 Station 13+00 GW1250 6/5/06 C Crib Wall#l Gell#l Station 13+15 GW1251 6/5/06 C Crib Wall #1 Gell#l Station 12+70 GW1252 6/6/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell #1 Station 10+49 IGW1253 6/6/06 G Crib Wall #1 Gell#l Station 10+70 CW1254 6/6/06 G Crib Wall#l Gell#l Station 11+21 GW1255 6/6/06 G Crib Wall#l Gell#l Station 11+72 CW1256 6/6/06 G Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 12+22 CW1257 6/6/06 C Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 12+42 GW1258 6/6/06 G Crib Wall#l Cell#l Station 10+88 CW1259 6/6/06 C Crib Wall#l Gell#l Station 12+62 258.0 1 111.3 120.0 11.9 12.0 93 258.0 1 107.7 120,0 16.3 12,0 90 258.0 1 109.2 120,0 12,4 12.0 91 258.0 1 108.3 120.0 14,3 12.0 90 258.0 1 108.7 120.0 14,0 12.0 91 258.0 1 107.9 120,0 15,1 12,0 90 258.0 1 109.6 120,0 12,6 12,0 91 259.0 1 109.2 120,0 16.0 12,0 91 259.0 1 108.3 120,0 16.4 12,0 90 259.0 1 108.7 120,0 16.6 12,0 91 259.0 1 - 110.5 120,0 13.8 12,0 92 259.0 1 109.2 120.0 14.4 12,0 91 259.0 1 112.5 120.0 14,1 12,0 94 259.5 1 108.5 120.0 16,1 12,0 90 259.5 1 112,1 120.0 13,9 -12,0 93 261.4 1 '.110.4 120.0 13.1 12,0 92 261.4 1 108.3 120.0 16,0 12,0 90 260.4 1 108.0 120.0 12.3 12,0 90 260.4 1 110.3 120.0 12.1 12,0 92 260.4 1 108.9 120.0 12.8 12,0 91 260.4 1 111.4 120.0 12.8 12.0 93 260.4 1 112.3 120.0 13.3 12,0 94 260.4 1 109.6 120.0 14.0 12,0 •',91 Project Number Project Name: Project Location: Client: 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 Page 39 of 39 3/9/2007 1:35:02PM SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No. Test Dalte Test Of Location Lot# Test Soil Dry Density Moisture (%) Relative (%) Elev (ft) Type Field Max Field Opt. Compaction Remarks SB 1 1/14/06 L Crib Wall#l Station 9+67 216.0 3 SB 2 1/14/06 L Crib Wall#l Station 9+67 • 217.0 3 SB 3 1/14/06 L Crib Wall#l Station 9+67 219.0 2 SB 4 1/14/06 L •Crib Wall #I Station 9+67 221.0 3 SB 5 1/14/06 L Crib Wall#l Station 9+67 223.0 3 SB 6 1/14/06 L Crib Wall #1 Station 9+67 220.0 3 SB 7 1/14/06 L Crib Wall#l Station 9+69 225.0 2 SB 8 1/24/06 L Crib Wall#l Station 0+50 237.0 3 SB 9 1/24/06 L Crib Wall#l Station 0+50 239.0 3 SB 10 1/24/06 L Crib Wall#l Station 0+50 241.0 3 SB 11 1/24/06 L Crib Wall#l Station 0+50 243.0 3 SB 12 1/24/06 L Crib Wall#l Station 0+50 241.0 3 SB 13 1/24/06 L Crib Wall#l Station 0+50 245.0 3 SB 14 1/25/06 L Crib Wall#l Station 4+00 237.0 3 SB 15 1/25/06 L Crib Wall #1 Station 4+00 339.0 3 SB 16 1/25/06 L Crib Wall#l Station 4+00 241.0 3 SB 17 1/25/06 L Crib Wall #1 Station 4+00 ' 243.0 3 SB 18 2/22/06 L Crib Wall#l Station 12+35 216.0 1 SB 19 2/22/06 L Crib Wall#l Station 12+35 220.0 3 SB 20 2/22/06 L Crib Wall#l Station 12+35 214.0 3 SB 21 2/22/06 L Crib Wall#l Station 12+35 218.0. 3 SB 22 . 2/22/06 L Crib Wall#l Station 12+35 222,0 3 Project Number: Project Name: Project Location: Client: 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 109.1 108.7 106.3 108.8 109.1 108.5 106.1 110,9 110,5 110,2 109,4 109,1 111,6 108,8 109,2 110.7 109.1 115,7 110,5 111,6 109.4 109,7 114,5 114,5 111,0 114,5 114,5 114,5 111,0 114,5 114.5 114,5 114.5 114.5 114,5 114,5 114,5 114.5 114.5 120,0 114,5 114,5 114.5 114.5 17.1 16.3 19,8 17,6 16,4 16,6 19,6 15,7 14,6 15,1 14,6 15,1 16,2 15,2 16,2 14,3 11.9 10,7 13.1 13.6 11.1 12,0 12,5 12,5 14,0 12,5 12,5 12,5 14,0 12,5 12.5 12.5 12,5 12,5 12,5 12,5 12,5 12.5 12,5 12,0 12,5 12,5 12.5 12.5 95 95 96 95 95 95 96 97 97 96 96 95 97 95 95 97 95 96 97 97 96 96 Page 1 of 1 SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No. Test Date Test Of Location Lot# Test Elev (ft) Soil Type Dry Density Field Max Moisture (%) Field Opt. Relative (Vo) Compaction Remarks 2 3 4 5 6 7 RW RW RW RW RW RW RW RW 8 RW 9 RW 10 RW 11 RW 12 RW 13 RW 14 RW 15 RW 16 RW 17 RW 18 RW 19 RW 20 RW 21 RW 22 RW 23 RW 24 RW 25 RW 26 RW 27 RW 28 RW 29 RW 30 RW 31 RW 32 1/25/06 B 1/25/06 B 1/25/06 2/3/06 2/3/06 2/3/06 2/3/06 2/3/06 2/3/06 2/3/06 2/7/05 2/7/05 2/7/05 2/10/06 B 2/10/06 B 2/10/06 B 2/17/06 2/17/06 2/17/06 B 2/23/05 B 2/23/06 2/23/06 2/25/06 B 2/25/06, B 2/25/06 2/25/06 2/25/06 2/25/06 2/25/06 3/3/06 3/3/06 3/3/06 B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B Project Number: Project Name: Project Location: Client: Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall#l Crib Wall #1 Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l Crib Wall#l 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 Station 10+15 Station 10+75 Station 11+50 Station 11+25 Station 9+55 Station 11+15 Station 9+25 Station 10+80 Station 9+85 Station 9+25 Station 11+30 Station 9+40 Station 10+65 Station 11+70 Station 9+75 Station 10+45 Station 11+00 Station 10+00 Station 9+00 Station 8+90 Station 9+90 Station 10+70 Station 9+30 Station 9+90 Station 10+30 Station 9+16 Station 10+00 Station 10+30 Station 10+75 Station 9+40 Station 10+50 Station 8+50 218.6 220.0 220.0 222.0 222,0 224,0 224,0 226,0 226,0 225,0 228.0 228.0 230.0 230.0 231.0 231.0 233.0 233.0 233.0 , 235.0 234.0 234.0 237.0 237.0 236.0 239.0 238.0 240,0 239,0 240,0 240,0 242,0 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 1 1 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 5 5 5 109,4 105,3 107,5 109,8 104,3 102,7 104,6 107.3 106,5 105,8 106,4 106,6 113,2 110,4 105,4 104,7 103,0 105,1 105,6 104,6 104,2 104,5 104.5 105.2 105,4 106,9 108,2 102.6 ' 103,5 109,1 ' 108,6 111,3 114,5 114,5 114,5 116,0 116,0 114,5 114,5 116,0 116,0 116,0 116,0 116,0 120.0 120,0 116,0 116,0 114,5 116,0 116,0 116,0 116,0 116.0 116,0 116,0 116,0 116,0 116,0 114,5 114.5 119.0 119,0 119,0 15,6 15,6 16,4 12,6 12,8 12,7 16,3 14,2 14,2 14,1 13,5 14,2 11,6 12,3 14,1 13,1 9,9 10,8 9,1 18,0 19,3 18,9 14,3 12,6, 13,4 13,6 11,0 12.8 13.8 13.6 14.6 15.3 12.5 12.5 12.5 13.0 13.0 12.5 12.5 13.0 13.0 13,0 13,0 13,0 12,0. 12.0 13.0 13.0 12.5 13.0 13.0 , 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 ' 13.0 13.0 12.5 12.5 13.0 13.0 13.0 96 92 94 95 90 90 91 93 92 91 92 92 94 92 91 90 90 91 91 90 90 90 90 91 91 92 93 90 90 92 91 94 Page 1 of 7 3/11/2007 SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test Test Test No. Date Of JLiUCdiiun —— RW 33 3/7/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 10+30 RW 34 3/7/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 9+45 RW 35 3/7/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 8+10 RW 36 3/8/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 9+95 RW 37 3/8/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 8+60 RW 38 3/8/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 8+00 RW 39 3/8/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 7+50 RW 40 3/14/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 6+70 RW '41 3/14/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 7+90 RW 42 3/14/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 9+40 RW 43 3/14/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 10+10 RW 44 3/16/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 6+50 RW 45 3/16/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 7+05 RW 46 3/16/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 7+75 RW 47 3/20/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 6+00 RW 48 3/20/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 5+10 RW 49 3/20/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 3+90 RW 50 3/22/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 9+70 RW 51 3/22/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 8+70 RW 52 3/22/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 7+50 RW 53 ' 3/24/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 6+80 RW 54 3/24/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 6+15 RW 54A 3/24/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 6+15 RW 55 3/24/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 4+98 RW 56 3/24/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 4+00 RW 57 3/27/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 0+87 RW 58 3/27/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 2+08 RW 59 3/27/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 3+30 RW 60 3/27/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 4+25 RW 61 4/3/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 6+65 RW 62 4/3/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 5+50 RW 63 4/3/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 4+50 Project Number: Project Name: Project Location: Client: 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 Lot# Test Elev (ft) Soil Type Dry Density Field Max Moisture (%) Field Opt. Page 2 of 7 Relative (Vo) Compaction Remarks 241.0 5 110,3 119.0 16.3 13.0 • 93 242.0 5 114,4 119,0 14.1 13.0 . 96 242.0 1 114,2 . 120,0 11.1 12.0 95 245.0 2 102.5 111,0 15.2 14.0 • 92 244.0 2 104,9 111,0 12.1 14.0 95 244.0 . 5 107,3 119,0 12.3 13.0 90 243.0 5 109,6 1,19,0-14.3 13.0-92 241.0 5 107,9 119.0 11.0 13.0 91 245.0 5 106,9 119.0 13.0 13.0 90 244.0 5 110,1 119,0 12.4 13.0 93 244.0 2 103,6 111,0 14.0 14.0 93 244.0 1 112,0 120,0 11.1 12.0 93 246.0 4 105,2 116,0 12.2 13.0 91 247.0 , 5 113,9 119,0 11.2 13,0 96 242.0 4 106,3 116,0 13.9 13,0 92 240.0 4 107,6 116,0 16.4 13,0 93 239.0 4 106,6 116,0 17.3 13,0 92 247.0 4 106,8 116.0 11.8 13,0 92 248.0 5 110,0 119.0 16.0 13,0 92 248.0 4 106,4 116.0 13.8 13,0 92 245.0 5 110,4 119.0 11.0 13,0 93 245.0 5 103,4 119.0 13.0-13,0 87 245.0 5 107.6 119:0 13.3 13,0 90 241.0 5 108.3 119.0 12.2 13,0 91 241.0 1 M5.6 120.0 9.2 12.0 96 245.0 5 110.8 119.0 13.5 13,0 93 244.0 5 107.6 119.0 14.6 13,0 90 245.0 3 103.2 114.5 13.6 12,5 90 243.0 5 108.7 119.0 14.1 13,0 91 247.0 5 110,9 119.0 15.0 13,0 93 246.0 5 107,8 119.0 17.7 13,0 91 246.0 5 109,6 119.0 15.2 13,0 92 Retest on 54A Retest of 54 3/11/2007 9T1:16AM SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test Test Test Location Test No. Date Of Lot # Elev (ft) RW 64 4/3/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 3+50 246.0 RW 65 4/8/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 2+00 246.0 RW 65A 4/8/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 2+00 246.0 RW 66 4/8/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 1+00 245.0 RW 67 4/8/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 0+50 246.0 RW 68 4/8/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 2+50 249.0 RW 69 4/8/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 1+50 248.0 RW 70 . 4/8/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 0+60 248.0 RW 71 4/10/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 10+25 248.0 RW 72 4/10/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 9+00 249.0 RW 73 4/10/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 8+20 249.0 RW 74 4/10/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 7+80 249.0 RW 75 4/11/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 6+50 249.0 RW 76 4/11/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 5+50 249.0 RW 77 4/11/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 4+50 249.0 RW 78 4/11/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 3+50 248.0 RW 79 4/11/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 2+50 249.0 RW 80 4/11/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 1+50 249,0 RW 81 4/12/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 10+00 251,0 RW 82 4/12/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 8+50 253.0 RW 83 4/12/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 7+50 253.0 RW 84 4/12/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 5+75 253.0 RW 85 4/13/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 4+65 252.0 RW 86 4/13/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 3+25 252.0 RW 87 4/13/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 2+25 251.0 RW 88 4/13/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 9+95 255.0 RW 89 4/13/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 8+85 254.0 RW 90 4/13/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 7+50 254.0 RW 91 4/13/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 6+35 254,0 RW 92 4/13/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 0+70 252,0 RW 93 4/13/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 0+50 254,0 RW 94 4/14/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 9+30 254,0 Soil Type Dry Density Field Max Moisture (%) Relative (%) Field Opt. Compaction Remarks Project Number: Project Name: Project Location: Client: 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 108,7 103,1 108,6 107,4 108,0 108,6 109,4. 107,4' 107,6 111,6 110.4 109,4 112,5 111.4 108.6 107,3 104,5 106.5 111.6 112,3 109,4 108.6 109.9 109.6 107.6 112.6 107.6 108.2 114.0 109.5 107.3 107,0 119,0 119,0 119,0 119,0 119.0 119.0 119,0 119,0 119,0 119.0 119,0 119,0 119,0 119.0 119.0 119,0 114,5 114,5 119,0 119,0 119,0 119,0 119.0 119,0 119.0 119,0 119,0 119,0 119,0 119,0 119,0 119,0 15,7 16,7 16,0 17,6 16,8 12,3 14,1 15,0 13,5 16,1 14,2 14,0 14,0 13,6 15,1 12,6 14,3 16,6 12,5 12,2 11,6 13,6 14,7 • 15,2 16,3 14,1 12,4 14,4 15,2 15.6 16.7 12.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13,0 13,0 13,0 13,0 13,0 13,0 13,0 13,0 13,0 13,0 13,0 13,0 12,5 12,5 13,0 13,0 13,0 13,0 13,0 13,0 13.0 13.0 13,0 13,0 13,0 13,0 13,0 13,0 91 87 91 90 91 91 92 90 90 94 93 92 95 94 91 90 91 93 94 94 92 91 92 92 90 95 90 91 96 92 90 90 Retest on 65A Retest of 65 Page 3 of 7 9:31:16AM SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test Test Test No. Date Of i-rOcation RW 95 4/14/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 7+60 RW 96 4/14/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 5+90 RW 97 4/17/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 5+25 RW 98 4/17/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 4+25 RW 99 4/17/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 3+10 RW 100 4/17/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 1+50 RW 101 4/17/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 0+50 RW 102 4/19/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 1+50 RW 102A 4/19/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 1+50 RW 103 4/19/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 2+50 RW 104 4/19/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 4+50 RW 105 4/19/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 5+80 RW 106 4/19/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 7+00 RW 107 4/20/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 9+30 RW 108 4/20/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 8+50 RW 109 4/20/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 7+50 RW 110 4/20/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 6+50 RW 111 4/20/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 5+50 RW 112 4/20/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 4+50 RW 113 4/20/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 2+00 RW 114 4/20/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 3+00 RW 115 4/20/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 0+50 RW 116 4/25/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 7+85 RW 116A 4/25/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 7+85 RW 117 4/25/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 5+25 IRW 117A 4/25/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 5+25 RW 118 4/25/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 4+00 RW 119 4/25/06 B Crib Wall#r Station 2+00 RW 120 4/25/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 0+25 RW 121 4/26/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 6+20 RW 122 4/26/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 5+20 RW 123 4/26/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 3+40 Lot# Project Number Project Name: Project Location: Client: 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 Test Elev (ft) 254.0 254.0 254.0 253.0 254.0 253,0 255.0 255.0 255.0 254.0 254.0 254.0 255.0 256.0 257.0 257.0 256.0 257.0 257.0 257.0 257.0 256.0 259.0 259.0 260.0 260.0 260.0 260.0 258.0 262.0 262,0 262,0 Soil Type 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 5 2 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 1 5 7 7 5 5 5 5 1 4 4 5 Dry Density Field Max 108,2 111,7 111,8 109,0 106,7 107,5 111,8 97.1 108.4 103.2 108.7 109,3 108,3 106,9 110,7 108,6 109,9 104,1 108.0 rii.i 111.3 108.4 105.2 107.9 105.1 108,0 107.6 108,2 113.3 107,5 104,8 , 110,0 Moisture (%) Field Opt. Relative (Vo) Compaction Remarks 119,0 14,0 13.0 91 119,0 16,5 13.0 94 119,0 15,7 13.0 94 119,0 18,1 13.0 92 119,0 17,3 13,0 90 119,0 14,2 13,0 90 119.0 13,8 13,0 94 111,0 12,2 14.0 87 119,0 14,6 13.0 91 111.0 14,0 14.0 93 119.0 12,5 13.0 91 119.0 14,2 13.0 92 119.0 13,1 13.0 91 119.0 12.5 13.0 90 119.0 10.1 13.0 93 119.0 1 1.9 13.0 91 119,0 12.5 13.0 92 116,0 14.0 13.0 90 119,0 14.1 13.0 91 119,0 12.0 13.0 93 120,0 11.0 12.0 93 119,0 14.6 13.0 91 118,0 8.7 12,0 89 118,0 13,9 12,0 91 119,0 11,0 13,0 88' 119,0 12,7 13,0 91 119,0 13,6 13.0 90 119,0 16,3 13.0 91 120,0 11,7 12.0 94 116,0 14,9 13.0 93 116,0 13.6 13.0 90 119,0 14.6 13.0 92 Retest on 102A Retest of 102 Retest on 116A Retest of 116 Retest on 117A Retest of 117 Page 4 of 7 3/11/2007 9:31:16AM SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test Test Test No. Date Of LfUL-diion ——— RW 124 4/26/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 1+60 RW 125 4/26/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 2+35 RW 126 4/26/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 5+10 RW 127 4/26/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 4+00 RW 128 4/26/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 2+50 RW 129 4/27/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 0+55 RW 129A 4/27/06 B Crib Wair#l Station 0+55 RW 130 4/27/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 2+10 RW 131 4/27/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 4+00 RW 132 4/27/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 6+00 RW 133 4/28/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 3+50 RW 134 4/28/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 1+50 RW 135 4/28/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 5+45 RW 136 4/28/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 1+50 RW 137 4/28/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 3+00 RW 138 4/28/06 B CribWalltfl Station 5+00 RW 139 4/28/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 6+50 RW 140 4/28/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 8+50 RW 141 5/1/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 2+00 RW 142 5/1/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 4+00 RW 143 5/1/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 6+00 RW 144 5/1/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 8+00 RW 145 5/1/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 9+25 RW 146 5/2/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 7+10 RW 147 5/2/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 3+40 RW 148 5/11/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 11+62 RW 149 5/11/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 11+22 RW 150 5/15/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 10+85 RW 151 5/15/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 11+55 RW 152 5/16/06 B Crib Wail #1 Station 10+80 RW 53 5/16/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 11+65 RW 54 5/17/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 11+60 Project Number Project Name: Project Location: Client: 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 Lot# Test Elev (ft) Soil Type Dry Density Field Max Moisture (%) Field Opt. Page 5 of 7 Relative (Vo) Compaction Remarks 262.0 5 108.4 119,0 13.6 13,0 91 258.0 4 105.2 116.0 13.4 13,0 91 259.0 5 107.8 119,0 14.9 13,0 91 259.0 5 111.0 119,0 13.7 13,0 93 260.0 5 110.1 119,0 12.3 13,0 93 262.0 5 103.2 119,0 15.3 13,0 • 87 262.0 5 108.3 119,0 15.9 13,0 91 262.0 3 105.4 114,5 15.7 12,5 92 262.0 3 106.7 114,5 13.3 12,5 93 262.0 5 112.3 119.0 12.9 13,0 94 264.0 5 108.5 119.0 13.2 13,0 91 263.0 3 105.5 114,5 16.2 12.5 92 260.0 5 108.5 119,0 12.5 13,0 91 264.0 5 110.1 119,0 12.7 13,0 93 263.0 5 107.9 119,0 12,3 13,0. 91 262.0 5 107,8 119,0 13,8 13,0 91 260.0 2 103,8 111,0 17,4 14,0 94 256.0 5 113,9 119,0 14,2 13.0 96 264.0 5 110,8 119,0 14,8 13.0 93 264.0 5 109,7 119,0 15,0 13.0 92 263.0 5 • 107,6 119,0 14,8 13.0 90 259.0 5 109,1 119,0 12,7 13,0 92 257.0 5 ' 108,4 119.0 11.2 13,0 91 261.0 5 108,7 119,0 12.2 13,0 • 91 265.0 5 110,9 119.0 12.3 13,0 93 224.0 5 108,1 119.0 13.0 13,0 91 224.0 5 107,8 119.0 12.8 13,0 91 226.0 5 108,2 119.0 14.2 13,0 91 226.0 5 108,1 119.0 13.6 13,0 91 228.0 5 108.3 119.0 13.0 13,0 91 228.0 5 109,1 119.0 12.5 13,0 92 229,0 5 108,2 119.0 13.0 13,0 91 Retest on 129A Retest of 129 3/11/2007 SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test Test Test No. Date Of RW 155 5/17/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 12+20 RW 156 5/19/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 12+00 RW 157 5/19/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 11+35 RW 158 5/19/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 12+15 RW 158A 5/20/06 ' B Crib Wall#l Station 12+15 RW 159 5/19/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 11 + 19 RW 159A 5/20/06 B Crib Wall # I Station 11+19 RW 160 5/20/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 11+95 RW 161 5/20/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 11+15 RW 162 5/23/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 12+00 RW 163 5/23/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 12+75 RW 164 5/23/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 12+90 RW 165 5/23/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 13+00 RW 166 5/24/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 13+00 RW 167 5/24/06 B ' Crib Wall #1 Station 11+80 RW 168 5/24/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 11+40 RW 169 5/24/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 11+00 RW 170 5/24/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 11+90 RW 171 5/24/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 12+90 RW 172 5/25/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 11+40 RW 173 5/25/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 12+10 RW 174 5/26/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 13+10 RW 175 5/26/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 11+75 RW 176 5/26/06 B Crib Wall#r Station 13+20 RW 177 5/26/06 B Crib Wall #1 . Station 13+00 RW 178 5/27/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 11+25 RW 179 5/27/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 12+20 'RW 180 5/30/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 10+80 RW 81 5/30/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 11+98 RW 82 5/30/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 13+15 RW 82A 5/30/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 13+15 RW 1 83 6/1/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 11+30 Project Number Project Name: Project Location: Client: 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 Lot# Test Elev (ft) Soil Type Dry Density Field Max Page 6 of 7 Moisture (%) Field Opt. Relative (Vo) Compaction 229.0 5 108.3 119.0 13,2 13.0 91 232.0 5 - 108.4 119,0 12,7 13.0 91 232.0 5 112.0 119,0 12,1 13.0 94 233.0 1 104.9 120,0 9,3 12,0 87 233.0 1 110.0 - 120,0 12,8 12,0 ' 92 232.0 1 105.8 , 120.0 11,2 12,0 88 232.0 1 109,6 , 120.0 13,2 12.0 91 235.0 1 113,9 120,0 13,1 12.0 95 235.0 5 111,2 119,0 13,6 13,0 93 229.0 5 112,2 119,0 14,1 13,0 94 231.0 1 113,0 120,0 12,9 12,0 94 234.0 5 108,7 1 19,0 15,0 13,0 91 234.0 5 108,0 119.0 15,9 13,0 91 236.0 3 106,0 114.5 I 1,5 12,5 93 236.0 3 107,6 114.5 12,2 12,5 94 237.0 5 1:10,4 119.0 13,6 13,0 93 239.0 5 107,5 119,0 13,3 13,0 90 238.0 5 107.2 119,0 14,2 13,0 90 238.0 5 108,1 119,0 14,0 13,0 91 241.0 1 113.3 120,0 13,1 12,0 94 240.0 1 109,6 120,0 13.3 12,0 91 240.0 1 109.6 120,0 13.6 12,0 91 243.0 1 111.6 120,0 14.1 12,0 93 243.0 1 112.3 120,0 12.8 12,0 94 243.0 i 110.6 120,0 15.1 12,0 92 245.0 5 109.3 119,0 16.4 13,0 92 245.0 5 108.6 119,0 -16.0 13,0 91 247.0 1 118.0 120,0 9.9 12,0 98 247.0 1 113.2 120,0 12.6 12,0 94 247.0 1 102.7 120.0 10.6 12,0 . 86 247.0 1 108.0 120,0 13.6 12.0 90 -250.0 1-104.9 120,0 7.2 12.0 87 Remarks Retest on 158A Retest of 158 Retest on 159A Retest of 159 Retest on 182 A Retest of 182 Retest on 183 A 3/11/2007 9:31:1fiAM SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No. Test Date Test Of Location Lot# Test Soil Dry Density Moisture (%) Relative (Vo) Elev (ft) Type Field Max Field Opt. Compaction Remarks RW 183 A 6/1/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 11+30 250,0 1 RW 184 6/1/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 12+50 250.0 1 RW 185 6/1/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 13+00 252.0 •"4 RW 186 6/1/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 12+00 252.0 4 RW 187 6/1/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 11+00 252.0 4 RW 188 . 6/2/06 . B Crib Wall #1 Station 11+40 254.0 ' 1 RW 189 6/2/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 12+40 254.0 4 RW 190 6/5/06 -B Crib Wair#l Station 10+60 256.0 1 RW 191 , 6/5/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 11+55 256.0 1 RW 192 6/5/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 12+10 256.0 1 RW 193 7/11/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 12+70 215.0 5 RW 194 7/11/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 11+60 220.0 5 RW 195 7/11/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 10+65 220.0 5 RW 196 7/11/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 9+70 230.0 5 RW 197 7/11/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 8+65 230.0 5 RW 198 7/1*1/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 7+60 235.0 5 RW 199 7/11/06 B Crib Wall#l Station 6+55 240.0 5 RW 200 7/11/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 5+65 245.0 5 RW 201 7/lil/06 B Crib Wall #1 Station 5+65 245.0 5 Project Number Project Name: Project Location: Client: 841363-009 Carlsbad Golf Course 0 0 111.0 110,1 105,2 106,6 107.3 110.6 105,6 110,3 114,2 112,1 110,7 110,9 108,8 111,7 111,7 110,5 110,0 109,6 110.4 120.0 120,0 116,0 116,0 116,0 120,0 116,0 120,0 120,0 120,0 119,0 119,0 119,0 119,0 119.0 119.0 119.0 119.0 119,0 13,6 13,4 16,3 12,6 14,6 14,3 13,3 17,0 12,9 1 1,2 13,6 13,4 13,2 12,8 12,7 13.9 14,1 13,5 13.0 12,0 12.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 12.0 13.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 13.0 13,0 13,0 13,0 13,0 13,0 13,0 13.0 13,0 93 92 91 92 93 92 91 92 95 93 93 93 91 94 94 93 92 92 93 Retest of 183 Page 7 of7 9:31:16AM 841363-009 APPENDIX C Laboratory Testing Procedures and Test Results Maximum Densitv Tests: The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of typical soils were determined m accordance with ASTM Test Method D1557. Tlie results of these tests are presented in the table below: Sample Number Sample Description Maximum Dry Derisity (pcf) Optimum Moisture Content (%) 1 Yellowish-brown silty clayey SAND 120.0 12.0 2 Olive-brown clayey SAND 111.0 14.0 3 Brovwi silty SAND 114.5 12.5 4 Gray-green silty SAND 116.0 13.0 5 Yellow-brown silty SAND 119.0 13.0 6 Yellow-brown silty SAND 121.0 11.5 7 Gray silty SAND 118.0 12.0 8 Brown silty SAND 122.5 11.0 9 Dark gray silty SAND 119.5 12.5 ^^^1 o^? Atterberg Limits were determmed in accordance with ASTM Test Method D4318 for engineenng classification of the fine-grained materials and presented in the table below: Sample Number Liquid Limit - (%) Plastic Limit (%) Plastic Index (%) USCS Soil Classification 1 — — NP SP-SM 2 45 17 28 SC 3 — NP SM C-l 841363-009 APPENDIX C (Continued) ^Tcx^^^ffl^^L^"" ^"'"""^ ^^''^S Sieve analysis was performed according to AS 1M Dl 140. The percent fine particles from these analyses are summarized below. Sample Number Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve 3 22 5 42 6 29 7 13 8 32 9 47 Classification or Grain Size Tests: Typical materials were subjected to mechanical grain-size analysis by sievmg from U.S. Standard brass screens (ASTM Test Methods D4318 D422) The data was evaluated in determining the classification of the materials. The grain-size distribution for gravel, sand, fines and the Unified Soil Classification (USCS) are presented below Sample Number % Gravel % Sand % Fines USCS Soil Classification 1 0 88 12 SC-SM 2 0 66 34 SC I I C-2 mmmm VERITAS I I I I I H n D I I I we„ed by TKD from Nove„,ber 28. 2«35 .„ J™™^7S K sh^M L „„" report refers lo testing performed on two commercial pad areas located on the west end of th stte, north and sooth of College Boulevard. The p^ose of this report is to lupplement I "n""' Number 2) that i^cl„ded^ough gradtag fTte " ™n™ercial pads as well as other areas of the golf course. 8 aumg tor these n tuK'T'^'"" °' "1' "T'^" ""Sh 8"<lins and placement of on-site and import fill soils n wt hin the comn^rcal pads. AU fill areas were tested in accordance wid, the prt,ject"pSflc.ta udess odterwtse directed by the Geotechnical Engineer of Recotd (i.e. Leighton aaj AssSt) U The approMinate site location and features are presented on Figures 1 and 2 resnectivel. Locattons of field density testing are presented on Figure 3. Sum4ries of laLL^Md field I compactton test, results are provided in Appendix A, Tables 1 and 2, respectively OnTte and mport matenal was used as fiU for the new development. Fill was placed, compacted and tested ZtS^""" ™"™ • ''^ "^-d on AITM DTSSV as It should be noted that the precision of the field and laboratoiy maximum dry density test results are subject to vanation inherent with testing procedures and heterogen^L mSeri IH charactenstics. Quantitative values of testing precision have been documented by the Ame Lan Society of Testmg and Materials. For example, results indicate the accuracy of the ASTM D Testing Engineers San Diego, Inc. A Bureau Veritas Company 700, r- c . ' Main: (858) 715-5800 7895 l.x>nvoy Court, Suite 18 _ ^ ^, Fa^ (858715-5810 San Diego, CA 92111 www.us.bureauveritas.com City of Carlsbad u . 5950 El Camino Real P t TT'' Carlsbad, CA 92009 - Contract No.: 108078 Attention: Mr. Skip Hammann Subject: Supplemental Compaction Testing Report Project: Commercial Sites Carisbad - Municipal Golf Course Palomar Airport Road/ Palomar Oaks Way Carlsbad, CA Reference: 1. "Contract Documents and Supplemental Provisions" far Carlsbad Municipal Golf Course Project. Project No. 39721-1 dated June 13, 2005. 2. "Compaction Testing Report, Carlsbad Municipal Golf Course" prepared by Testing Engineers - San Diego, dated July 18, 2006. Dear Mr. Hammann: I I n » I I I I n fl D D D I I I I D n « « City of Carlsbad Municipal Golf Course Contract No.: 108078 1557 test to be plus or minus 2 percent of the mean density. Based on this information relative Survey lines and elevations relative to grMe modifications, final design grades, locations of various elements, etc., were established by others. iucauons or Field Monitoring services provided by this office, consisting of visual observation of compaction operations aiid random m-place density testmg, are intended as assistance to the owner/cHent nd Geotechnical Engineer of Record (i.e. Leighton and Associates) in monitorinfaplem reasonable compliance with the project earthwork specifications. The presence of our fidd epresentative during the work progress did not involve any direcf supervision "f contractor/subcontractor,, nor any recommendations in a geotechnical capacity. Technical adv ce and suggestions were provided upon request based upon the results of the test's and ob ervatt s hi any case, no waixanty or responsibility for the contractor's performance is intended or implied LTsiS'atS) 7?5-T8^^^^^^ ^'^^ ~ P'-- - - die Sincerely, Testing Engineers - San Diego, Inc. A Bureau Veritas Company Nick Tracy, EIT Staff Engineer Van W. Olin, G.E. Principal Geotechnical Engi NTA^O:mm Attachments: Distribution: Figure 1; Site Location Map Figure 2: Overall Exhibit Drawing Figure 3: Plot Plan Appendix A: Table 1 and Table 2 .*(4) Addressee * Includes copies for building department submitted As graded H I I I I n D 0 I I I I 0 0 fl I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I i 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I I 1 City of Carlsbad Municipal Golf Course Contract No.: 108078 TABLE 1 RESULTS OF MAXIMUM DENSITY TESTS (ASTM-D-1557) e , ^ ^ . Maximum Dry Optimum Moisture Sample # Descnption Density (PCF) Content (%) 1. On-site: Grayish Silty Sand 127,5 9.5 2. Import: Mixed Gray Silty Sand 123.5 11.0 3. On-site: Red Brown Clayey Sand 124.0 12.0 4. On-site: Yellowish Brown Silty Sand 114,5 14.5 5. On-site: Greenish Brown Silty Sand 124,5 11.0 6. On-site: Mbced Brown Silty Sand 123.0 10.5 7. On-site: Dark Green & Brown 126.0 10.0 Clayey Sand 8. On-site: Brown Silty Sand 128.5 9.5 9. On-site: Tan Clayey Sand 119.0 13.5 10. On-site: Brown Clayey Sand 121.5 10.5 11. On-site: Brown Sandy Clay 124.5 10.5 12. On-site: Yellow Silty Sand I17.0 13.0 Print Date: Project Number: Project Name: Location: Table 2 March 12. 2007 COMPACTION TEST DATA 108078 Carlsbad Municipal Golf Course Palomar Airport Road and Palomar Oaks Way Carlsbad, California Test # Test Date Test Location 38 9/28/2005 Plate 2 Keyway" 39 9/28/2005 Plate 2 Keyway 40 9/28/2005 Plate 2 41 9/28/2005 Plate 2 42 9/28/2005 Plate 2 73 10/7/2005 Plate 2 74 10/7/2005 Plate 2 75 10/7/2005 Plate 2 108 10/19/2005 Plate 2 Bottom Right on Plate 109 10/19/2005 Bottom Right of Plate 2 166 11/3/2005 Plate 2 Commercial Pad 167 11/3/2005 Plate 2 Commercial Pad 168 11/3/2005 Plate 2 Commercial Pad 187 11/10/2005 Plate 2 Hole 16 188 11/10/2005 Plate 2 Hole 16 189 11/10/2005 Plate 2 Hole 16 190 11/10/2005 Plate 2 Hole 16 191 11/10/2005 Plate 2 Hole 16 192 11/10/2005 Plate 2 Hole 16 193 11/10/2005 Plate 2 Hole 16 281 11/23/2005 Plate 2 Central Fill Slope South Side 282 11/23/2005 Plate 2 Central Fill Slope North Side 11/23/2005 Retest of #282 11/23/2005 Plate 2 NE Comer Area of Fill Scope West of College 11/23/2005 Retest of #284 11/23/2005 Plate 2 Lower Commercial Pad 11/23/2005 Plate 2 Lower Commercial Pad 11/23/2005 Plate 2 Commercial Pad 11/23/2005 Plate 2 Commercial Pad 11/23/2005 Retest of 286, 287 &288 11/28/2005 Plate 2 Commercial Pad West 11/28/2005 Plate 2 Commercial Pad West 11/28/2005 Retest #292 11/28/2005 Plate 2 Commercial Pad West 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 292A 293 I Elev. Jft) 252.0 256.0 258.0 261.0 260.0 268.0 282.0 280.0 283.0 282.0 284.5 285,0 287.0 132.5 134.0 135.0 138,0 128.0 126,0 138,0 154.0 Moisture Field f Optimum 13.6% 14.5% 13.6% 14.5% 13.6% 14.5% 13.6% 14.5% 13.6% 11.0% 11-1% 9.5% 12.3% 11.0% 12.3% 11.0% 9.8% 10.5% 9.8% 10;5% 11.1% 10.5% 12.3% 10.5% 11.1% 10.5% 11.1% 10.5% 12.3% 14.5% 12.3% 14.5% 12.3% 10.5% 12.3% 10.5% 12.3% 14.5% 12.3% l4.5o/„ 11,1% 14.5% 154.0 16.3% 14,5% 154.0 247.0 247.0 153.0 152.0 247.0 152.0 152.0 155.0 157.0 .137.0 158.0 13.6% 17.0% 16.3% 13.'2% 13.8% 13.9% 13.3% 12.3% 14.5% 13.2% 12.4% 13.6% 14.5% 14.5% 13.5% 11.0% 11.0% 11.0% 11.0% 11.0% 11.0% 11.0% 11.0% 11.0% Field I Maximum" 110.3 114.5 110.0 114.5 110.0 114.5 110.0 114.5 118.9 124.5 124.5 128.0 120.9 127.0 120.0 124.5 118.0 123.0 119.2 123.0 117.4 123.0 117.1 123.0 119.3 123,0 115.7 123.0 112.6 114.5 112.8 114,5 114.6 123,0 114.7 123.0 117.3 123.0 115.8 123.0 106.6 114.5 100.9 106.7 100.5 105.0 118.3 115.7 115.2 120.9. 120.3 121.3 119.2 121.9 117.6 114.5 114.5 114.5 119.0 127.0 127.0 127.0 127.0 127.0 127.0 127.0 127.0 127.0 Obtained | 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 97% 95% 96% 96% 97% 95% 95% 97% 94% 98% 99% 93% 93% 95% 94% 93% 88% 93% 88% 88% 93% 91% 91% 95% 95% 96% 94% 96% 93% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% Conform Non-Confonn Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Non-conform Conform Conform Non-conform 1 Non-conform 1 Conform Non comform 1 Non-conform Non-conform Non-conform Non comform Non-conform Non-conform Non-conform Non-conform Conform Non comform Conform Non-conform Conform Non-conform Print Date: Project Number: Project. Name: Location: Table 2 March 12,2007 "^^^''^ COMPACTION TEST DATA 108078 Carlsbad Municipal Golf Course Palomar Airport Road and Palomar Oal<s Way Carlsbad, Califomia Test Date 293A 11/28/2005 294 11/28/2005 295 11/28/2005 299 11/29/2005 300 11/30/2005 301 11/28/2005 302 11/28/2005 Retest #293 Plate 2 Commercial Pad West Plate 2 Commercial Pad West Plate 2 Commercial Pad West Plate 2 Commercial Pad West Retest of #285 Plate 2 NE Corner Area of Mail Fill Slope. West Adj. to College Ave. 158.0 160.0 160.0 152.0 154.0 247.0 253.0 12.8% 11.0% 11.5% 10.7% 11.5% 10.1% 12.9% 307 11/29/2005 Plate 2 Commercial Pad West 308 11/29/2005 Plate 2 Commercial Pad West . 309 11/29/2005 Plate 2 Commercial Pad West 309A 11/29/2005 Retest of #309 310 11/29/2005 Plate 2 Commercial Pad West 311 11/29/2005 Plate 2 Commercial Pad West 311A 11/29/2005 Plate 2 Commercial Pad West 312 11/29/2005 Plate 2 Commercial Pad West 313 11/29/2005 Plate 2 Commercial Pad West 314 11/29/2005 Plate 2 Commercial Pad West 315 11/29/2005 Plate 2 Commercial Pad West 316 11/29/2005 Plate 2 Commercial Pad West 316A 11/29/2005 Retest of #316 317 11/29/2005 Plate 2 Commercial Pad West 318 11/29/2005 Plate 2 Commercial Pad West 319 11/29/2005 Plate 2 Commercial Pad West 330 11/30/2005 Plate 2 East Area Main Slope Fill 331 11/30/2005 Plate 2 East Area Main Slope Fill 331A 11/30/2005 Plate 2 East Area Main Slope Fill 346 12/1/2005 Plate 2 Commercial Pad East Area 347 12/1/2005 Plate 2 Commercial Pad East Area 348 12/1/2005 Plate 2 Commercial Pad East Area 348A 12/1/2005 Retest of #348 156.0 158.0 160.0 160.0 162.0 164.0 164.0 165.0 167.0 168.0 170.0 171.0 171.0 173.0 174.0 176.0 253.0 10.3% 9.5% 10.3% 9.9% 9.1% 8.9% 10.7% 11.1% 11.5% 9.9% 12.4% 12.9% 12.4% 11.5% 11.1% 10.7% 14.9% 11.0% 11.0% 11.0% 9.5% 9.5% 14.5% 13.5% 9.5% 9.5% 9.5% 9.5% 9.5% 9.5% 9.5% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 11.0% 11.0% . 11.0% 11.0% 11.0% 11.0% 13.5% 122,3 121.7 123.1 121.9 121.8 109.3 110.5 124.7 123.2 119.8 124.0 124.4 115.6 122.1 121.2 122.1 120.1 122.3 119.2 121.8 123.2 123.2 122.7 108.0 255.0 15.4% 13.5% 104,5 255.0 13.2% 13.5% 110,5 258.0 11.7% 11.0% 113.4 259.0 13.8% 11.0% 114.2 260.0 13.0% 11.0% 111.3 260.0 11.8% 11.0% 114,5 127.0 127.0 127.5 127,5 114.5 119.0 127,5 127.5 127.5 127.5 127.5 127,5 127.5 126.0 126.0 126.0 127.0 127.0 • 127.0 127.0 127.0 127.0 119,0 119,0 96% 96% 97% 96% 96% 95% 93% 98% 97% 94% 97% 98% 91% 96% , 96% 97% • 95% 96% 94% 96% 97% 97% 97% 91% 88% 93% 91% 92% 88% 90% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 90% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Non-conform Conform Conform Non-conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Non-conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Non-conform Conform Conform Conform 90% Non comform 90% Conform Print Date: Project Number- Project Name: Location: March 12, 2007 108078 Carlsbad Municipal Golf Course Palomar Airport Road and Palomar Oaks Way Carlsbad, California Table 2 REPORT OF COMPACTION TEST DATA Tests Test Date 349 12/1/2005 350 12/1/2005 351 12/1/2005 352 12/1/2005 358 12/2/2005 359 12/2/2005 360 12/2/2005 ,361 12/2/2005 362 12/2/2005 Test Location Elev. Moisture Dry Density (pcf) I Relative Compactlnn Area Plate 2 Commercial Pad East Area Plate 2 Commercial Pad East Area Plate 2 Commercial Pad East Area Plate 2 Commercial Pad East Area 363 12/2/2005 Plate 2 Commercial Pad East Area 364 12/2/2005 Plate 2 Commercial Pad East Area 365 12/5/2005 Plate 2 Hole 16 Commercial Pad 366 12/5/2005 Plate 2 Hole 16 Commercial Pad 365A 12/5/2005 Retest of #365 366A 12/5/2005 Retest of #366 367 12/5/2005 Plate 2 Hole 16 Commercial Pad 368 12/5/2005 Plate 2 Hole 16 Commercial Pad 367A 12/6/2005 Retest of #367 368A 12/6/2005 Retest of #368 369 12/5/2005 Plate 2 East Area Commercial Pad 370 12/5/2005 Plate 2 East Area Commercial Pad 373 12/6/2005 Plate 2 Hole 16 Commercial Pad 374 12/6/2005 Plate 2 Hole 16 Commercial Pad 373A 12/6/2005 Retest of #373 180.0 10.3% 182.0 11.1% 184.0 12.4% 250.0 12.5% 11.0% 11.0% 11.0% 11.0% 11.0% 119.5 121.6 122.5 122.6 115.5 124.5 127.0 127,0 127.0 124.5 96% 96% 96% 97% 93% 95% 95% 95% 95% 90% Conform Non-Conform | Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform 252.0 13.0% 11,0% 116.1 124.5 93% 90% Conform 254.0 11.6% 11.0% 115,3 124.5 93% 90% Conform 256.0 11.3% 11.0% 121.4 127.0 96% 90% Conform 258.0 12.2% 11.0% 119.3 127.0 94% 90% Conform 260.0 13.0% 11.0% 114.6 124.5 92% 90% Conform 262.0 10.9% 11.0% 115,3 124.5 93% 90% Conform 196.0 17.3% 14.5% 103.5 114,5 90% 95% Non-conform 197.0 17.1% 14.5% 104.5 114.5 91% 95% Non-conform 196.0 17.0% 197.0 17.2% 198.0 14.8% 14,5% 14.5% 14.5% 109.9 111.1 104.8 114,5 114.5 114,5 96% 97% 92% 95% 95% 95% Conform Conform Non-conform 198.0 17.6% 14.5% 103.1 114,5 90% 95% Non-conform 198.0 14.9% 198.0 15.8% 263.0 13.9% 14.5% 14.5% 10.0% 109.9 108.8 114.0 114.5 114.5 124.5 96% 95% 92% 95% 95% 90% Conform Conform Conform' 258.0 16.0% 14.5% 104.8 114.5 92% 90% Conform 198.0 16.4% 13.5% 105.8 119.0 89% 95% Non comform 198.0 14.7% 198.0 15.1% 13.5% 13.5% 107.8 115.4 119.0 119.0 91% 97% 95% 95% Non-conform Conform Print Date: Project Number: Project Name: Location: Table 2 March 12, 2007 °' COMPACTION TEST DATA 108078 Carlsbad Municipal Golf Course Palomar Airport Road and Palomar Oaks Way Carlsbad, California 374A 375 376 377 380 380A 381 382 383 384 385 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 404 Test Date 12/6/2005 12/6/2005 12/6/2005 12/6/2005 12/7/2005 12/7/2005 12/7/2005 12/7/2005 12/7/2005 12/7/2005 12/7/2005 12/7/2005 12/7/2005 12/8/2005 12/8/2005 12/8/2005 12/8/2005 12/8/2005 12/8/2005 12/9/2005 12/9/2005 Test Location Retest of #374 404A 405 405A 406 406A 407 408 409 12/9/2005 12/9/2005 12/9/2005 12/9/2005 12/9/2005 12/9/2005 12/9/2005 12/9/2005 Plate 2 Hole 16 Commercial Pad Plate 2 Hole 16 Commercial Pad Plate 2 Hole 16 Commercial Pad Plate 2 Hole 16 Commercial Pad Retest of #380 Plate 2 Hole 16 Commercial Pad Plate 2 Hole 16 Commercial Pad Plate 2 Hole 16 Commercial Pad Plate 2 Hole 16 Commercial Pad Plate 2 Hole 16 Commercial Pad Plate 2 Hole 16 Commercial Pad Plate 2 Hole 16 Commercial Pad Plate 2 Hole 16 Commercial Pad Plate 2 Hole 16 Commercial Pad Plate 2 Hole 16 Commercial Pad Plate 2 Hole 16 Commercial Pad Plate 2 Hole 16 Commercial Pad Plate 2 Hole 16 Commercial Pad Plate 2 Hole 16 Commercial Pad Plate 2 Hole 16 Commercial Pad South Side Retest of #404 Plate 2 Hole 16 Commercial Pad South Side Retest of #405 Plate 2 Hole 16 Commercial Pad North Side Retest of #406 Plate 2 Hole 16 Commercial Pad North Side Plate 2 Hole 16 Commercial Pad South Side Plate 2 Hole 16 Commercial Pad North Side Elev. jft) 198.0 202.0 202.0 204.0 200.0 200.0 200.0 204.0 204.0 206.0 206.0 207.0 208.0 211.0 211.0 211.0 211,0 213.0 213.0 212.0 216.0 14.0% 14.5% 15.1% 15.3% 13.0% 12.8% 10.7% 9.7% 10.2% 7.2% 7.9% 11.5% 8.9% 11.2% 13.9% 14.1% 12.9% 18.7% 19.1% 18.0% 14.6% 13.5% 13.5% 13.5% 13.5% 13.5% 13.5% 13.5% 13.5% 13.5% 13.5% 13.5% 13.5% 13.5% 13.5% 14.5% 13.5% 14.5% 13.5% 13.5% 13.5% 13.5% Field 114.2 115.4 115.4 107.1 110.7 113.1 117.1 114.2 115.4 114.7 113.1 113,1 116.2 113.1 108.8 114,2 108.8 105.9 98.7 96.0 103.0 Maximum 119.0 119.0 119.0 119.0 119,0 119.0 119.0 119.0 119.0 119.0 119.0 119.0 119.0 119,0 114.5 119.0 114.5 119.0 119.0 119.0 119.0 Relative I Obtained 96% 97% 97% 90% 93% 95% 98% 96% 97% 96% 95% 95% 98% 95% 95% 96% 95% 89% 83% 81% 87% Compaction I Conform Required |^Non-Confonn | Conform 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% Conform Conform Non-conform Non-conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Non conform Non-conform Non-conform 2 Non-conform 2 216.0 216.0 13.6% 16.8% 13.5% 14.5% 113.5 101.5 119.0 114.5 95% 89% 95% 95% Conform Non-conform 216.0 216.0 15.4% 12.9% 14.5% 14.5% 109.9 102.7 114.5 114.5 96% 90% 95% 95% Conform Non-conform 216.0 217.0 15.7% 12.3% 14.5% 13.5% 108.8 114.2 114.5 119.0 95% 96% 95% 95% Conform Conform 219,0 11.3% 13.5% 106.3 119.0 89% 95% Non-conform 219.0 11.7% 13.5% 108.3 119.0 91% 95% Non-conform Print Date: Project Number- Project Name: Location: Table 2 March 12, 2007 "^''^''^ COMPACTION TEST DATA 108078 Carlsbad Municipal Golf Course Palomar Airport Road and Palomar Oaks Way Carlsbad, Califomia Test# Test Date 408A 12/10/2005 409A 12/10/2005 41 OA 12/10/2005 411A 12/10/2005 412 12/10/2005 412A 12/10/2005 413 12/10/2005 413A 412B 412C 414 413B 415 414A 416 417 418 431 12/10/2005 12/10/2005 12/12/2005 12/10/2005 12/12/2005 12/13/2005 12/12/2005 12/13/2005 12/13/2005 12/13/2005 12/13/2005 432 12/13/2005 433 12/14/2005 434 12/14/2005 435 12/14/2005 436 12/14/2005 437 12/14/2005 438 12/14/2005 439 12/15/2005 440 12/15/2005 441 12/15/2005 442 12/15/2005 Plate 2 Hole 16 Commercial Pad North Side Plate 2 Hole 16 Commercial Pad South Side Retest of #408 Retest of #409 Retest of #410 Retest of #411 Plate 2 Hole 16 Commercial Pad Center & West Edge Retest of #412 Plate 2 Hole 16 Commercial Pad South Side Retest of #413 Retest of #412A Retest of #412B Plate 2 Commercial Pad Center Retest of #413A Plate 2 Commercial Pad Retest of #414 Plate 2 Commercial Pad Plate 2 Commercial Pad Plate 2 Commercial Pad Commercial Pad 90% Area Plate 2 Commercial Pad 90% Area Plate 4 Plate 2 Commercial Pad Plate 2 Commercial Pad Plate 2 Commercial Pad Plate 2 Commercial Pad Plate 2 Commercial Pad Plate 2 Commercial Pad Commercial Pad Plate 2 Commercial Pad Plate 2 Commercial Pad Plate 2 Retest of #439 219.0 14.6% 219.0 11.0% 13.5% 219.0 219.0 219.0 219.0 221.0 221.0 221.0 221.0 221.0 221.0 221.0 221.0 226.0 221.0 226.0 226.0 226:0 237.0 13.9% 14.1% 12.9% 11.3% 12.6% 17.3% 18.1% 15,6% 12,1% 11.1% 15.1% 14.1% 14.0% 14.8% 14.3% 14.0% 14.4% 14.2% 240,0 13.8% 235.0 240.0 244.0 257.0 253.0 258.0 260.0 258.0 261.0 260.0 14.6% 15.1% 13.4% 15.1% 14.7% 15.2% 13.4% 12.7% 12.0% 12.7% 13.5% 105,9 119.0 89% 13.5% 113,1 119.0 95% 13.5% 113.1 119.0 95% 13.5% 114.2 119.0 96% 13.5% 113.1 119.0 95% 13.5% 105.1 119.0 88% 13.5% 101.9 119.0 86% 13,5% 102.4 119.0 86% 13.5% 104.1 119.0 87% 13.5% 105.8 119.0 89% 13.5% 108.3 119.0 91% 13.5% 102.9 119.0 86% 13.5% 107.1 119,0 90% 13.5% 109.5 119.0 92% 13.5% 108,3 119.0 91% 13.5% 110.7 119.0 93% 13.5% 109,5 119,0 92% 13.5% 109,5 119.0 92% 13,5% 109,8 119.0 92% 13,5% 109.1 119.0 92% 13.5% 13.5% 13.5% 13.5% 13.5% 13.5% 11.0% 11.0% 11.0% 11.0% 108.6 110.8 109.8 110.8 107.5 109,6 106,3 109,1 107,2 111.9 119.0 119,0 119,0 '119.0 119.0 119.0 123.5 123.5 123.5 123.5 91% 93% 92% 93% 90% 92% 86% 88% 87% 91% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% Non-conform Non-conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Non-conform Non-conform Non-conform Non-conform Non-conform Conform Non-conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform • Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Non-conform Non-conform Non-conform Conform Print Date: Project Number: Project Name: Location: Table 2 March 12, 2007 REPORT OF COMPACTION TEST DATA 108078 Carlsbad Municipal Golf Course Palomar Airport Road and Palomar Oaks Way Carlsbad, Califomia Test # Test Location Moisture 443 444 445 446 447 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 12/15/2005 12/15/2005 12/15/2005 12/15/2005 12/15/2005 1/5/2006 1/5/2006 1/5/2006 1/5/2006 1/5/2006 1/5/2006 1/5/2006 1/6/2006 1/6/2006 1/6/2006 1/6/2006 Retest of #440 Retest of #441 Commercial Pad Plate 2 Commercial Pad Plate 2 Commercial Pad Plate 2 Plate 2 Fainway 5 Repair Slope Retest of #525 Plate 2 Fairway 5 Repair Slope Plate 2 Fairway 5 Repair Slope Retest of #528 Plate 2 Fairway 5 Repair Slope Plate 2 Fairway 5 Repair Slope Plate 2 Fainvay 5 Repair Slope Plate 2 Fainvay 5 Repair Slope Plate 2 Fain/vay 5 Repair Slope Plate 2 Fairway 5 Repair Slope I Elev. (ft) I Field I Optimum 258.0 12.4% 11.0% 261.0 11.8% 11.0% 262.0 12.6% 13.5% 264.0 14.2%' 13.5% 263.0 14.6% 13.5% 276.0 12.2% 13.0% 276.0 12.0% 13.0% 277.0 13.2% 13.0% 279.0 13.4% 13.0% 279.0 12.6% 13.0% 280.0 12.8% 13.0% 282.0 13.3% 13.0% 284.0 12.6% 13.0% 284.0 12.1% 13.0% 285.0 13.0% 13.0% 285.0 12.6% 13.0% Field I Maximum 113.7 123.5 111.6 123.5 109.0 119.0 109.8 119,0 109.8 119.0 111.0 119.0 113.6 119,0 114.6 119.0 109.5 119,0 113.5 119,0 115.7 119.0 114.6 119.0 114.7 119,0 113.2 119.0 114.6 119.0 114.5 119.0 1 Areas reworked and non-confonning density tests are waived 2 Density tests approved by Randy Wagner of Leighton and Associates 3 Relative compaction requirement reduced from 95% to 90% by Leighton and Associates Obtained | 92% 90% 92% 92% 92% 93% 95% 96% 92% 95% 97% 96% 96% 95% 96% 96% Required 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% Conform Non-Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Non-conform Conform Conform Non comform Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform Conform I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Leighton and Associates, Inc. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPEaPICATIGNS Page 1 of 6 LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROUGH GRADING 1.0 General 1.1 Intent: These General Earthwork and Grading Specifications are for the grading and earthwork shown on the approved grading plan(s) and/or indicated in the geotecimical report(s). These Specifications are a part of the recommendations contained in the geotechnical report(s). In case of conflict, the specific recommendations in the geotechnical report shall supersede these more general Specifications. Observations of the earthwork by the project Geotechnical Consultant during the course of grading may result in new or revised recommendations that could supersede these specifications or the recommendations in the geotechnical report(s). 1-2 The Geotechnical Consultant of Record: Prior to commencement of work, the owner shall employ the Geotechnical Consultant of Record (Geotechnical Consultant). The Geotechnical Consultants shall be responsible for reviewing the approved geotechnical report(s) and accepting the adequacy of the preliminary geotechnical findings, conclusions, and recommendations prior to the commencement of the grading. Prior to commencement of grading, the Geotechnical Consultant shall review the "work plan" prepared by the Earthwork Contractor (Contractor) and schedule sufficient personnel to perform the appropriate level of observation, mapping, and compaction testing. During the grading and earthwork operations, the Geotechnical Consultant shall observe, map, and document the subsurface exposures to verily the geotechnical design assumptions. If the observed conditions are found to be significantly different than the interpreted assumptions during the design phase, the Geotechnical Consultant shall inform the owner, recommend appropriate chan ges in design to accommodate the observed conditions, and notify the review agency where required. Subsurface areas to be geotechnically observed, mapped, elevations recorded, and/or tested include natural ground after it has been cleared for receiving fill but before fill is placed, bottoms of all "remedial removal" areas, all key bottoms, and benches made on sloping ground to receive fill. The Geotechnical Consultant shall observe the moisture-conditioning and processing of the subgrade and fill materials and perform relative compaction testing of fill to determine the attained level of compaction. The Geotechnical Consultant shall provide the test results to the owner and the Contractor on a routine and frequent basis. 3030.1094 I Leighton and Associates, Inc. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPECIFIG\TIONS Page 2 of 6 1-3 The Earthwork Contractor: The Earthwork Contractor (Contractor) shall be qualified, experienced, and knowledgeable in earthwork logistics, preparation and processing of ground to receive fill, moisttire-conditioning and processing of fill, and compacting fill. The Contractor shall review and accept the plans, geotechnical report(s), and these Specifications prior to commencement of grading. The Contractor shall be solely responsible for performing the grading in accordance with the plans and specifications. The Contractor shall prepare and submit to the owner and the Geotechnical Consultant a work plan that indicates the sequence of earthwork grading, the number of "spreads" of work and the estimated quantities of daily earthwork contemplated for the site prior to commencement of grading. The Contractor shall inform the owner and the Geotechnical Consultant of changes in work schedules and updates to the work plan at least 24 hours in advance of such changes so that appropriate observations and tests can be planned and accomplished. The Contractor shall not assume that the Geotechnical Consultant is aware of all grading operations. The Contractor shall have the sole responsibility to provide adequate equipment and methods to accomplish the earthwork in accordance with the applicable grading codes and agency ordinances, these Specifications, and the recommendations in the approved geotechnical report(s) and grading plan(s). If, in the opinion of the Geotechnical Consultant, unsatisfactory condifions, such as unsuitable soil, improper moisttire condition, inadequate compaction, insufficient buttress key size, adverse weather, etc., are resulting in a quality of work less than required in these specifications, the Geotechnical Consultant shall reject the work and may recommend to the owner that construction be stopped until the conditions are rectified. 2.0 Preparation of Areas to be Filled 21 Clearing and Grubbing: Vegetation, such as brush, grass, roots, and other deleterious material shall be sufficiently removed and properly disposed of in a method acceptable to the owner, governing agencies, and the Geotechnical Consultant. The Geotechnical Consultant shall evaluate the extent of these removals depending on specific site conditions. Earth fill material shall not contain more than 1 percent of organic materials (by volume). No fill lift shall contain more than 5 percent of organic matter. Nesting of the organic materials shall not be allowed. If potentially hazardous materials are encountered, the Contractor shall stop work in the affected area, and a hazardous material specialist shall be informed immediately for proper evaluation and handling of these materials prior to continuing to work in that area. As presently defined by the State of Califomia, most refined petroleum products (gasoline, diesel fiiel, motor oil, grease, coolant, etc.) have chemical constittients that are considered to be hazardous waste. As such, the indiscriminate dumping or spillage of these fluids onto the ground may constittite a misdemeanor, punishable by fines and/or imprisonment, and shall not be allowed. I I 3030.1094 I I Leighton and Associates, Inc. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPEaPICATIONS Page 3 of 6 2.2 Processing: Existing ground that has been declared satisfactory for support of fill by the Geotechnical Consultant shall be scarified to a minimum depth of 6 inches. Existing ground that is not satisfactory shall be overexcavated as specified in the following section. Scarification shall continue until soils are broken down and free of large clay lumps or clods and the working surface is reasonably uniform, flat, and free of uneven features that would inhibit uniform compaction. 2-3 Overexcavation: In addition to removals and overexcavations recommended in the approved geotechnical report(s) and the grading plan, soft, loose, dry, saturated, spongy, organic-rich, highly fractured or otherwise unsuitable ground shall be overexcavated to competent ground as evaluated by the Geotechnical Consultant during grading. 2.4 Benching: Where fills are to be placed on ground with slopes steeper than 5:1 (horizontal to vertical units), the ground shall be stepped or benched. Please see the Standard Details for a graphic illustrafion. The lowest bench or key shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide and at least 2 feet deep, into competent material as evaluated by the Geotechnical Consultant. Other benches shall be excavated a minimum height of 4 feet into competent material or as otherwise recommended by the Geotechnical Consultant. Fill placed on ground sloping flatter than 5:1 shall also be benched or otherwise overexcavated to provide a flat subgrade for the fill. 2-5 Evaluation/Acceptance of Fill Areas: All areas to receive fill, including removal and processed areas, key bottoms, and benches, shall be observed, mapped, elevations recorded, and/or tested prior to being accepted by the Geotechnical Consultant as suitable to receive fill. The Contractor shall obtain a written acceptance from the Geotechnical Consultant prior to fill placement. A licensed surveyor shall provide the survey control for determining elevations of processed areas, keys, and benches. 3.0 Fill Material 3.1 General: Material to be used as fill shall be essentially free of organic matter and other deleterious substances evaluated and accepted by the Geotechnical Consultant prior to placement. Soils of poor quality, such as those with unacceptable gradation, high expansion potential, or low strength shall be placed in areas acceptable to the Geotechnical Consultant or mixed with other soils to achieve satisfactory fill material. 3.2 Oversize: Oversize material defined as rock, or other irreducible material with a maximum dimension greater than 8 inches, shall not be buried or placed in fill unless location, materials, and placement methods are specifically accepted by the Geotechnical Consultant! Placement operations shall be such that nesting of oversized material does not occur and such that oversize material is completely surrounded by compacted or densified fill. Oversize material shall not be placed within 10 vertical feet of finish grade or within 2 feet of future utilities or underground construction. 3030,1094 I I I I I I I I I I I I Leigiiton and Associates, Inc. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPEaRCATlONS Page 4 of 6 3.3 Import: If importing of fill material is required for grading, proposed import material shall meet the requirements of Section 3.1. The potential import source shall be given to the Geotechnical Consultant at least 48 hours (2 working days) before importing begins so that its suitability can be determined and appropriate tests performed. 4.0 Fill Placement and Compaction 4.1 Fill Layers: Approved fill material shall be placed in areas prepared to receive fill (per Section 3.0) in near-horizontal layers not exceeding 8 inches in loose thickness. The Geotechnical Consultant may accept thicker layers if testing indicates the grading procedures can adequately compact the thicker layers. Each layer shall be spread evenly and mixed thoroughly to attain relative uniformity of material and moisture throughout. 4-2 Fill Moisture Conditioning: Fill soils shall be watered, dried back, blended, and/or mixed, as necessary to attain a relatively uniform moisture content at or slightly over optimum. Maximum density and optimum soil moisture content tests shall be performed in accordance with the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM Test Method D1557-07). 4-3 Compacfion of Fiji: After each layer has been moisture-conditioned, mixed, and evenly spread, it shall be uniformly compacted to not less than 90 percent of maximum dry density (ASTM Test Method Dl557-07). Compaction equipment shall be adequately sized and be either specifically designed for soil compaction or of proven reliability to efficiently achieve the specified level of compaction with uniformity. 4-4 Compaction of Fill Slopes: In addition to normal compaction procedures specified above, compaction of slopes shall be accomplished by backrolling of slopes with sheepsfoot rollers at increments of 3 to 4 feet in fill elevation, or by other methods producing satisfactory results acceptable to the Geotechnical Consultant. Upon completion of grading, relative compaction of the fill, out to the slope face, shall be at least 90 percent of maximum density per ASTM Test Method D1557-07. 4-5 Compaction Testing: Field tests for moisttire content and relative compaction of the fill soils shall be performed by the Geotechnical Consultant. Location and frequency of tests shall be at the Consultant's discretion based on field conditions encountered. Compaction test locations will not necessarily be selected on a random basis. Test locations shall be selected to verify adequacy of compaction levels in areas that are judged to be prone to inadequate compaction (such as close to slope faces and at the fill/bedrock benches). 4-6 Frequency of Compaction Testing: Tests shall be taken at intervals not exceeding 2 feet in vertical rise and/or 1,000 cubic yards of compacted fill soils embankment. In addition, as a guideline, at least one test shall be taken on slope faces for each 5,000 square feet of slope face and/or each 10 feet of vertical height of slope. The Contractor shall assure that fill construction is such that the testing schedule can be accomplished by the Geotechnical Consultant. The Contractor shall stop or slow down the earthwork construction if these minimum standards are not met. 3030.1094 I I Leighton and Associates, Inc. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS Page 5 of 6. 4-7 Compaction Test Locations: The Geotechnical Consultant shall document the approximate elevation and horizontal coordinates of each test location. The Contractor shall coordinate with the project surveyor to assure that sufficient grade stakes are established so that the Geotechnical Consultant can determine the test locations with sufficient accuracy. At a minimum, two grade stakes within a horizontal distance of 100 feet and vertically less than 5 feet apart from potential test locations shall be provided. 5.0 Subdrain Installafion Subdrain systems shall be installed in accordance with the approved geotechnical report(s), the grading plan, and the Standard Details. The Geotechnical Consultant may recommend additional subdrains and/or changes in subdrain extent, location, grade, or material depending on conditions encountered during grading. All subdrains shall be surveyed by a land surveyor/civil engineer for line and grade after installation and prior to burial. Sufficient fime should be allowed by the Contractor for these surveys. 6.0 Excavation Excavations, as well as over-excavation for remedial purposes, shall be evaluated by the Geotechnical Consultant during grading. Remedial removal depths shown on geotechnical plans are estimates only. The actual extent of removal shall be determined by the Geotechnical Consultant based on the field evaluation of exposed conditions during grading. Where fill-over-cut slopes are to be graded, the cut portion of the slope shall be made, evaluated, and accepted by the Geotechnical Consultant prior to placement of materials for construction of the fill portion of the slope, unless otherwise recommended by the Geotechnical Consultant. 3030.1094 I I Leighton and /Associates, Inc. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS Page 6 of 6 7.0 Trench Backfills 7.1 The Contractor shall follow all OHSA and Cal/OSFTV requirements for safety of trench excavations. 7.2 All bedding and backfill of utility trenches shall be done in accordance with the applicable provisions of Standard Specifications of Public Works Construction. Bedding material shall have a Sand Equivalent greater than 30 (SE>30). The bedding shall be placed to 1 foot over the top of the conduit and densified by jetting. Backfill shall be placed and densified to a minimum of 90 percent of maximum from 1 foot above the top of the conduit to the surface. 7.3 The jetting of the bedding around the conduits shall be observed by the Geotechnical Consultant. 7.4 The Geotechnical Consultant shall test the trench backfill for relafive compaction. At least one test should be made for every 300 feet of trench and 2 feet of fill. 7:5 Lift thickness of trench backfill shall not exceed those allowed in the Standard Specifications of Public Works Construction unless the Contractor can demonstrate to the Geotechnical Consultant that the fill lift can be compacted to the minimum relative compaction by his alternative equipment and method. 3030.1094 FILL SLOPE PROJECTED PLANE 1 TO 1 MAXIMUM FROM TOE OF SLOPE TO APPROVED GROUND EXISTING GROUND SURFACE BENCH HEIGHT (4' TYPICAL) REMOVE UNSUITABLE MATERIAL 2 MIN.—I KEY DEPTH LOWEST BENCH (KEY) FILL-OVER-CUT SLOPE EXISTING GROUND SURFACE OMPACTED: T l-BENCH HEIGHT (4' TYPICAL) REMOVE UNSUITABLE MATERIAL CUT-OVER-FILL SLOPE -CUT FACE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO FILL PLACEMENT TO ASSURE ADEQUATE GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS EXISTING GROUND SURFACE PROJECTED PLANE 1 TO 1 MAXIMUM FROM TOE OF SLOPE TO APPROVED GROUND 2' MIN.- KEY DEPTH CUT FACE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO FILL PLACEMENT OVERBUILD AND TRIM BACK REMOVE UNSUITABLE MATERIAL BENCH HEIGHT (4' TYPICAL) FOR SUBDRAINS SEE STANDARD DETAIL C LOWEST BENCH (KEY) BENCHING SHALL BE DONE WHEN SLOPE'S ANGLE IS EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 5-1 MINIMUM BENCH HEIGHT SHALL BE 4 FEET AND MINIMUM FILL WIDTH SHALL BE 9 FEET KEYING AND BENCHING GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS STANDARD DETAILS A FINISH GRADE SLOPE FACE * OVERSIZE ROCK IS LARGER THAN 8 INCHES IN LARGEST DIMENSION. * EXCAVATE A TRENCH IN THE COMPACTED FILL DEEP ENOUGH TO BURY ALL THE ROCK. * BACKFILL WITH GRANULAR SOIL JETTED OR FLOODED IN PLACE TO FILL ALL THE VOIDS. GRANULAR MATERIAL TO BE' DENSIFIED IN PLACE BY FLOODING OR JETTING. DETAIL • DO NOT BURY ROCK WITHIN 10 FEET OF FINISH GRADE. • WINDROW OF BURIED ROCK SHALL BE PARALLEL TO THE FINISHED SLOPE. -JETTED OR FLOODED GRANULAR MATERIAL TYPICAL PROFILE ALONG WINDROW OVERSIZE ROCK DISPOSAL GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS STANDARD DETAILS B I BENCHING REMOVE UNSUITABLE MATERIAL SUBDRAIN TRENCH SEE DETAIL BELOW CALTRANS CLASS 2 PERMEABLE OR #2 ROCK (9FT''3/FT) WRAPPED IN FILTER FABRIC FILTER FABRIC (MIRAFI 140N OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT)' •^nji^^^-ij^ll 4" MIN. BEDDING COLLECTOR PIPE SHALL BE MINIMUM 6" DIAMETER SCHEDULE 40 PVC PERFORATED PIPE. SEE STANDARD DETAIL D FOR PIPE SPECIFICATIONS SUBDRAIN OFTAii DESIGN FINISH GRADE NONPERFORATED 6"0 MIN PERFORATED 6" 0MIN. PIPE FILTER FABRIC (MIRAFI MON OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT) CALTRANS CLASS 2 PERMEABLE OR #2 ROCK (9FT"3/FT) WRAPPED IN FILTER FABRIC DETAIL OF CANYON SUBDRAIN OUT! FT CANYON SUBDRAINS GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS STANDARD DETAILS C 15' MIN. OUTLET PIPES 4" 0 NONPERFORATED PIPE '100' MAX. O.C. HORIZONTALLY, 30' MAX O.C. VERTICALLY BACK CUT 1:1 OR FLATTER -±1'\ -1 COMPACTED'RLbX-: SEE SUBDRAIN TRENCH DETAIL LOWEST SUBDRAIN SHOULD BE SITUATED AS LOW AS POSSIBLE TO ALLOW SUITABLE OUTLET -KEY DEP (2' MIN.) :-2% MIN. •:-:vCj KEY WIDTH AS NOTED ON GRADING PLANS TH (15' MIN.) 12" MIN. OVERLAP- FROM THE TOP HOG RING TIED EVERY 6 FEET CALTRANS CLASS PERMEABLE OR #2 ROCK (3 FT"3/FT) WRAPPED IN FILTER FABRIC r-4" 0 \ NON-PERFORATED \ OUTLET PIPE PROVIDE POSITIVE SEAL AT THE JOINT T-CONNECTION FOR COLLECTOR PIPE TO OUTLET PIPE 6" MIN, COVER 4" 0 PERFORATED PIPE FILTER FABRIC ENVELOPE (MIRAFI 140 OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT) 4" MIN. BEDDING SUBDRAIN TRENCH DETAII SUBDRAIN INSTALLATION - subdrain collector pipe sholl be installed with perforation down or unless otherwise designated by the geotechnical consultant. Outlet pipes shall be non-perforated sSl be f/4" ttT/2''" f T^.'r °' ' perforations uniformly's'paced per fooL ZZuo. least 2% YolarS \il outlet'" °" "^^'^ ° ^^^^^^ "Sn^O^f SDR ^fftK^'r, '"In o^, ''•^™ 23.5 or ASTM D1527. Schedule 40, or AbIM D3034, SDR 23.5. Schedule 40 Polyvinyl Chloride Plastic (PVC) pipe. All outlet pipe shall be placed in o trench no wide than twice the subdrain pipe. Pipe shall be in sol backfill ' °' '""^ 5 f^^* «'ich shaS be nafive BUTTRESS OR REPLACEMENT FILL SUBDRAINS GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS STANDARD DETAILS D I I SOIL BACKFILL. COMPACTED TO 90 PERCENT RELATIVE COMPACTION BASED ON ASTM 01557 RETAINING WALL WALL WATERPROOFING PER ARCHITECT'S SPECIFICATIONS WALL FOOTING FILTER FABRIC ENVELOPE (MIRAFI HON OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT)*' 3/4" TO 1-1/2" CLEAN GRAVEL 4" (MIN.) DIAMETER PERFORATED PVC PIPE (SCHEDULE 40 OR EQUIVALENT) WITH PERFORATIONS ORIENTED DOWN AS DEPICTED MINIMUM 1 PERCENT GRADIENT TO SUITABLE OUTLET 3" MIN. COMPETENT BEDROCK OR MATERIAL AS EVALUATED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT NOTE: UPON REVIEW BY THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT COMPOSITE DRAINAGE PRODUCTS SUCH AS MIRADRAIN OR ' J-DRAIN MAY BE USED AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO GRAVEL OR CLASS 2 PERMEABLE MATERIAL. INSTALLATION SHOULD BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DETAIL I GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS STANDARD DETAILS E