HomeMy WebLinkAbout; LA COSTA DOWNS OVERCROSSING; LA COSTA DOWNS OVERCROSSING STATE BRIDGE REPORTS; 1984-06-06a
STATE OF CA_.cORNIA
OEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SUPPLEMENTARY BRIDGE REPORT
OH-OS N19 IREV. If741
57C-213 BridgeNo........................................................................................
Location .............11—SD-C.S—Cbd .
DI.t - Co - Rt. - PU - CItV
Date of Invest ISM ion ._...j4.fle....
LA COSTA DOWNS OVERCROSSING (Over Carlsbad Blvd., FAU-S101--0 8 mile
Name
Southerly of Palomar Airport Rd.
CONDITION RATING: APPRAISAL RATING:
8 8 8 8
Deck Superstructure Substr. & Pipes Overall
N . N Channel & Channel Protection Retaining Walls
PRIORITY
Widenable? Yes No Conditional G . A - Immediate Action
B - Early Scheduling
Action Required by City Yes U No D C - Routine Maint.
0 - For Record Only
WORK NOT DONE:
The concrete spalls along the southerly edge of the deck slab
have not been repaired.
CONDITION OF STRUCTURE:
The southerly bridge railing is badly deteriorating, due to the
corrosion of the bar reinforcing steel. 14
The structure is in good condition.
WORK RECOMMENDED:
Repair the concrete spalls along the southerly edge of the deck
slab. B
RECOMMENDED POSTING:
None
FJW: pdh
cc: DRHiggins (2) Frank J. Walliser
City of Carlsbad (2) C-19767
(1)
STATE OF CAUFORNIA Bridge No
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION -
s SUPPLEMENTARY BRIDGE REPORT Location _:_..........
OH.05MI9(REV. 11741 - Dist -Co. Rte -PM-City .
Date of Investigation JUIV-8, 1982
Name LN-dOSTA DOWNS OVERCROSSING (Over Carlsbad Blvd.,FAU-SlOr-0. Mir
Southerly of PaIomar..Air CONDITION RATING: APPRAISAL RATING:- port 'R
8 8 8 8 . Deck Superstructure Substt. &Pipes Overall
& N Channel Channel ProtectIon Retaining Walls
Widenable? Yes No Conditionial-01 . . . City - -
Action Required by bI1]1X Yes No 0 .
SEISMIC RETROFIT:
This is a three continuous span bridge and does not rerruire
seismic retrofitting.
CONDITION OF STRUCTURE:
There are concrete spalls along the southerly edge of the southerly
exterior girder over the traveled way. Otherwise, the structure
is in good condition.
RECOMMENDATION:
Repair the concrete spalls along the southerly edge of the southerly
exterior girder. -
RECOMMENDED POSTING:
None
/249Jfr4I4
Frank J. WllIser ;
c-19767 . .5
FJW: pdh
cc: DRHiggins (2)
City of Carlsbad (2)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENTOFTRANSPO ON 4 BRIDGE REPORT Bridge No
DS,-M58 LREV. 1/75)
OtherNo..............................................................................................
P.U.C. No...........................................................................................
REVISED Location bd
Diet - Co - Rte - PM - City
Date of Investigation ...Qt01?.r .9..]980
Name
Lat. ..°....P.6...L Long. ..W..°—...
STRUCTURAL DATA AND HISTORY
Year ...... B Division of Highways
Date of Revisions ..............................................................
Designedby: GD. .....................................................
Ly •
of Palomar Airport
Contract No.....
Plans Avail. @ ......B•.D..
Description: Continuous RC slab spans on RC column (3) bents on
spread footing and RC diaphragm abutments on RC piles (4).
Spans................1ft t..52i...1 .@...2.6..3..cLc..............................................................................
Length ...... 107 .............. Skew ........... .None Design LL ........1644 .
Ratings: Inventory .RS....3.6/LLF................_Operating 6.LLLF. ........... Permit ...JPLI.F.........................
DESCRIPTION — ON STRUCTURE
Bridge Width ....... cMj...2.6...Jr
Total Width ..........................32 .Lanes ........ . ............ _Tracks..M9e...........
Median..............................................................................................Rail Type ...
Vert. Cleaiance over deck .........P.iUD id Appr. Rdwy. Width .............................................
WearingSurface ............................................................Deck Seal .........................................................................
Alignment ......................iflt .
DESCRIPTION - UNDER STRUCTURE
Roadway Section ...gteril.5..
Clearances: Vert ....... 3'..-.5."...................... Horiz.; ......... 1L. ................ Lt. ............... 2.5 ................................ Rt.
Lanes ........ 2 Tracks..L0e. ....... . ...... Pumpplant: None See Or. No. ..........................................................
Facilities Crossed ......... .ç 1ba.4. Boulevard (F!J-5191.)
cc:
(1) CONT.
STArE CLIFOPNIA
I
(IrPApTMLNT OF TRANSPOF )N BRIDGE REPORT
Bridge No ................... ...................................................i3 .. DS-MSB* REV I 75
Date ..........................P8Q
ii
DESCRIPTION — HYDRAULICS
ChannelXoxXe ................................................................................
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Navigable: Yes 0 No CR Clearances: . Vert. ................... . ..................................... .Horiz. ............................
MAINTENANCE
Custodian ..... City ...of ... Carlsbad Owner ...............aite . ORIGINAL . . . ORIGINAL CONDITION RATING
. APPRAISAL
Deck 8 - Overall 8._ Superstructure
- _8 Deck Geometry ......_.(4) -- Substructure & Pipes 8 Underclearances Vert. 7 Channel & Channel Protection N Horiz. (4) Retaining Walls N Safe Load Capacity 9 Approach Rdwy. Alignment (9) Waterway Adequacy
_-- -- Estimated Remaining Life 50 Approach Rdwy.. Alignment (9)
City Widenable? Yes No D Conditional Action Required by rjqt . Yes No
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
— 1000 (Estimated 1980)
BYPASS DETOUR LENGTH
— 8. miles
CONDITION OF STRUCTURE
— The northerly concrete bridge railing has numerous cracks and spalls. The northerly ed
g
e
o
f
t
h
e
d
e
c
k
s
l
a
b
o
v
e
r
the right (easterly) lane has some concrete sp
a
l
l
s
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
s
o
f
f
i
t
due to being struck by overheight loads. Other
w
i
s
e
the structure is in good condition.
LOAD CAPACITY — The inventory, operating and permit ratings show
n
were obtained throuth the "Frame Rate" program
u
s
i
n
g
t
h
e
l
o
a
d
f
a
c
t
o
r
(bF) method of analysis.
RECOMMENDATIONS — Repair the concrete 3paUe along the soffit of the deck slab at the northerly edge of the deck sla
b
.
RECOMMENDED POSTING
— None. Qria1 signed by
FRANK J. WALLISER ** .c019767 FJW:ll
cc:DRHiggifls
Dist. 11 Local Assistance
(2) City of Carlsbad (2)
'-
1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA- NESS AND TRANSPORTATION AGENCY DfIAIF1 bAf!A.I
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
1120 N Street
: Sacramento, California 95814 *7
July 19, 1973
CVE
JUL 23 197
City Manager
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Street
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Dear Sir:
Attached for your files are two copies each
of the bridge reports for three structures
in your city that are included in the 1968
Federal Bridge Inventory and Appraisal
Program.
The structures are all capable of carrying
legal loads or greater.
Sincerely,
DALE F. DOWNING
Chief, Office of Structures
By
D. R. Hig '
Bridge Maintenance Section
Attachments
STATE OF CLlFORMA
BRIDGE REPORT
Sheet ........................of ..........2
Bridge No
Date of Investigation ..73
Location 11-SD-FAU6004-16.60
)IST-CO.-RTE.
Name COSTA .DOWNSOVE.RCROSSING ...
Location_ .....sbad .Blvd.between ..Costa Ave .AirportRd near
117 0- 19.3 1
Carlsbad
Latitude ..330-06.81. Longitude ....DOD Rd ..........................Br.........................
SECTION LETTER
Custodian ....... CitY Owner ....CAty...Qf... Carlsbad -
CLASSIFICATION
Federal Aid System ..............14................... Administrative ...........4. .................... ...Functional ..........3..............
STRUCTURAL DATA AND HISTORY
Year Built ...19.5.2....By...........State.................. Cont. No. FAP No...............................
Designed by .....Plans Avail .......ye .........at ... ........ ta.te..4BD.)....................
Spans _....J®26.3. 52.0 ......i...@...6.3 Length..iQ.............Skew........0....
Description ................. —•....RC QD....pIe.ad.............
footings .and .0 .d hrgmnds .qn .c.L4):...pies............................
On Structure
Roadway Section ...... @13 .. Total Width
RC Window
Rail Type Lt. .................. Rt.....RC JdOW . Median ..Qfl?.....Lanes ..2........Tracks.......0....
Clearances: Vert. ......... Horiz. j9 ...................PUC No.....................................
Design LL...6-44 Capacity Rating .......................--.
.
.............. ........
Under Structure
5'Sh 2 ' 12' 8' sh Roadway Section .................................................................................Lanes .... ......Tracks ............ NO NO.
Clearances: Vert .......1.5 ...A.....................Horiz. ....................... PUC No...................................
HYDRAULIC STRUCTURE
Report? Yes El No. Nay. Control Yes F] No. Clear. Diag. Yes [J N El
ReliefStructures .........................................................................................................................................................
APPRAISAL OF NON-STRUCTURAL FACTORS .
DeckGeometry ..................9..........................................Approach Alig'pent ................................S..........................
Waterway Adequacy ................ N/A .............................. Clearances: Vert . ............ 7 ............ Horiz.......................
,-,,.n,,, 191 I4BO.M10 (II7I)
SheeL .......2of .........2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
• Bridge No. 721.
BRIDGE REPORT Date of Investigation •.4J]1/7.3
ADT ........ Year ......19..
RATING OF CONDITION:
Deck 8 Substructure 8
Superstructure 8 Overall • 8
PREVIOUS REPORTS:
Refer to report dated February 18, 1968 by R. A. Wagner
and supplements dated through. 1967.
CONDITION OF STRUCTURE:
The RC.windowrailiflg is cracked and starting to spall.
There is a longitudinal hairline crack near the center-
line in the slab soffit.
The RC slab has been hit by high vehicles near the south
face. The damage is minor. • •
The concrete is of good quality.
CAPACITY: •
This structure is safe for legal loads by design and
inspection.
W. R. Schott
CE Lic. No.13592
FORM I4BD.M70A
WRS/g S