Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout; La Costa Oaks S Neighborhood 3.12 3.13; Villages of La Costa The Oaks S. Neighborhood 3.12 3.13; 2003-11-12O J H\i(:>\. DN E FINAL REPORT OF TESTING AND OBSERVATION SERVICES PERFORMED DURING SITE GRADING VILLAGES OF LA COSTA - THE OAKS SOUTH NEIGHBORHOODS 3.12 AND 3.13 LA COSTA AVENUE STATION 142+84 TO 156+80 AND CAMINO JUNIPERO STATION 31+00 TO 39+50 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR REAL ESTATE COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY c/o MORROW DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA NOVEMBER 12, 2003 GEOCON INCORPORATED GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS ProjectNo. 06105-52-06 November 12, 2003 Real Estate Collateral Management Company ^lo Morrow Development Incorporated 1903 Wright Place, Suite 180 Carlsbad, Califomia 92008 Attention: Mr. Tim O'Grady Subj ect: VILLAGES OF LA COSTA - THE OAKS SOUTH NEIGHBORHOODS 3.12 AND 3.13 LA COSTA AVENUE STATION 142+84 TO 156+80 AND CAMINO JUNIPERO STATION 31+00 TO 39+50 CARLSBAD, CAL1F0RNL\ FINAL REPORT OF TESTING AND OBSERVATION SERVICES PERFORMED DURING SFTE GRADING Gentlemen: hi accordance with your request and our proposal dated May 3, 2002, we have provided compaction testing and observation services during the grading ofthe subject site. Our services were performed during the period of December 4, 2002 through October 30, 2003. The scope of our services included the following: • Observing the grading operation, including the removal and/or processing of topsoil, colluvium, alluvium, landslide debris, undocumented fill, and undercutting of transition lots. • Performing in-place dry density and/or moisture tests in fill placed and compacted at the site. • Performing laboratory tests to aid in evaluating maximum dry density and optimum moisture content and shear strength of the compacted fill soils. Additionally, laboratory tests were performed on samples of soil present at finish-grade to evaluate expansion characteristics and water-soluble sulfate. • Preparing an "As-Graded" Geologic Map. • Preparing this final report of grading. The purpose ofthis report is to document that the grading for Neighborhoods 3.12 and 3.13, which includes 91 single-family residential pads, a passive park site (Lot 92), La Costa Avenue Station 146+84 to 156+80 and Camino Junipero Station 31+00 to 39+50, has been performed in substantial conformance with the recommendations of the project geotechnical report and that fill 6960 Flanders Drive • San Diego, California 92121-2974 • Telephone (858) 558-6900 • Fax (858) 558-6159 materials have been properly placed and compacted. Lots 1 through 27 are located in Neighborhood 3.12 and Lots 28 through 91 are located in Neighborhood 3.13. Lots 180 and 184 are slope zones within a riparian area along the common boundary of the two neighborhoods. Lots 180 and 184 are located in Neighborhoods 3.12 and 3.13, respectively. Lot 97 is a slope zone located at the easterly end of Corte Defmio in Neighborhood 3.13. It should be noted that a portion of Lot 97 is comprised of a fill slope that supports Neighborhood 3.14 of The Oaks South development. As such, this fill portion of Lot 97 is not addressed in this report, but is included in the report for Neighborhood 3.14. The grading operations for Neighborhoods 3.12 and 3.13 and the subject sections of roadway were performed concurrently with other neighborhoods and the new alignment of Rancho Santa Fe Road within the Oaks South project. GENERAL The grading contractor for the project was Erreca's Incorporated of Lakeside, Califomia. Grading plans for the project were prepared by Hunsaker and Associates and are entitied Grading and Erosion Control Plans for Villages of La Costa, Sheet Nos. 1 through 20, City of Carlsbad approval dated January 16, 2002 and Grading and Erosion Control Plans for Villages of La Costa, Oaks South Neighborhood 3.12 and 3.13, City ofCarlsbad approval dated May 1, 2003. An electronic version of the grading plans was used as the base map for our "As-Graded" Geologic Map (Figures 1 through 5, map pocket). The project geotechnical report is entitled Update Geotechnical Lnvestigation, Villages of La Costa - The Oaks, Carlsbad, California, dated August 3, 2001 (ProjectNo. 06105-12-04). References to elevations and locations herein were based on surveyor's or grade-checker's stakes in the field and/or interpolation fi-om the referenced Grading Plans. Geocon Incorporated does not provide surveying services and, therefore, has no opinion regarding the accuracy of the as-graded elevations or surface geometry with respect to the approved grading plans or proper surface drainage. GRADING The Villages of La Costa - The Oaks South Neighborhoods 3.12 and 3.13 are located north of the future La Costa Avenue alignment, south of an SDG&E utility line easement, and east of the adjacent M.A.G. property. Prior to grading, the Neighborhood 3.12 and 3.13 site primarily consisted of a north-south trending ridge and tributary canyon that ultimately intersected Encinitas Creek along the southern boundary of The Oaks South development. Also, east-west trending tributary canyons existed along the northem and southem edges of Neighborhood 3.13. Grading for the site consisted of daylight cuts and fills to achieve the finish grade elevations. Grading began with the removal of brush and vegetation fi-om the area to be graded. The brush was then exported. Topsoils, slopewash, landslide debris, undocumented fill, and alluvial soils were Project No. 06105-52-06 - 2 - November 12,2003 removed to expose formational material. Within these areas, and prior to placing fill, the exposed (overexcavated) ground surface was scarified (where possible), moisture conditioned and compacted. Areas of remedial grading that exposed metavolcanic rock were not scarified. Fill materials derived from on-site excavations were then placed and compacted in layers until the design elevations were attained. In addition, fill was placed as a result of the undercutting of the cut portion of cut-fill transition lots and lots where metavolcanic rock, topsoil or clay was exposed at grade. Roadway and parkway undercuts were also performed where metavolcanic rock was exposed. Roadway undercuts consisted of undercutting to a depth of approximately 1 foot below the deepest utility. Parkway undercuts consisted of undercutting to a depth of approximately 6 feet below finish grade. Lot undercuts consisted of undercutting to a depth of at least 3 feet below finish grade. It should be noted that an area of alluvium could not be entirely removed due to the presence of groundwater at the time of grading. This area is generally located beneath La Costa Avenue, just east of the intersection with Sitio Lima. The area is identified on the "As-Graded" Geologic Map (Figures 1 through 5). Fiil Materials and Placement Procedures The on-site fill materials generally varied between angular gravels and boulders produced by onsite blasting of hard metavolcanic rock to clayey fine sands, sandy to silty clay and sandy to clayey gravels. Stmctural fill placed and compacted at the site consisted of material that can be classified into three zones: (1) Zone A - Material placed within 3 feet from pad grade, 6 feet from parkway grade, and within roadways to at least 1 foot below the deepest utility consisted of "soil" fill with a maximum particle dimension of 6 inches. (2) Zone B - Material placed within 10 feet from pad grade and below Zone A consisted of "soil-rock" fill with a maximum particle dimension of 12 inches. In addition, material placed on the outer 6 feet of fill slopes and 2 feet below Zone A for fills in roadways and parkways consisted of "soil-rock" fill with a maximum particle dimension of 12 inches. (3) Zone C - Material placed below Zone B consisted of "soil-rock" fill and "rock" fill with a maximum particle dimension of 48 inches. It should also be noted that larger rocks with a maximum dimension of approximately 8 feet were buried individually during "rock" fill grading operations. Placement procedures for "soil-rock" and "rock" fills consisted of spreading and compacting the material with a D9 or larger Caterpillar bulldozer with a maximum lift size of 3 feet. Materials placed as "soil-rock" and "rock" fills were watered heavily during spreading to help properly fill voids with finer material. During the placement of each lift, compactive effort was applied to the fill by wheel-rolling with loaded rock tmcks such that the entire lift was compacted. Project No. 06105-52-06 - 3 - November 12, 2003 Soil fills were placed in lifts no thicker than would allow for adequate bonding and compaction. The soil was moisture conditioned as necessary, mixed during placement, and then compacted utilizing conventional heavy-duty compaction equipment. During the grading operations, compaction procedures were observed and in-place density tests were performed to evaluate the dry density and moisture content of the "soil" and "soil-rock" fill material. The in-place density tests were performed in general conformance with ASTM Test Method D 2922-91, Standard Test Method for Density of Soil and Soil-Aggregate in Place by Nuclear Methods. Test excavations in "soil-rock" and "rock" fills containing larger rock particles typically resulted in significant soil disturbance yielding unreliable in-place density test results. When this occurred, test pits were excavated and observed for the condition of the rock and soil matrix with respect to "seating" and void content. In-place density testing was not practical at these disturbed locations. As such, in-place moisture tests were performed on the "soil-rock" and "rock" fill materials. These in-place moisture tests have been summarized with a prefix "M" to designate an in- place moisture content test only. The results ofthe in-place dry density and moisture content tests are summarized on Table I. Grading for Neighborhoods 3.12 and 3.13 and the subject roadway sections was performed concurrently with Neighborhoods 3.8 through 3.11, 3.14 and 3.15 of the Villages of La Costa - The Oaks South development. The results presented on Table 1 are for Neighborhoods 3.12 and 3.13, La Costa Avenue, and Camino Junipero only. As such, the test numbers are not in consecutive order. It should also be noted that the test numbers for La Costa Avenue and Camino Junipero are located at the end of Table 1. Furthermore, the test numbers for Camino Junipero represented on Table I are for the entire alignment within The Oaks South development. Only those tests within the subject section of the Camino Junipero alignment apply to this report. Any tests taken outside of Camino Junipero Station 31+00 to 39+50 will be addressed in reports for other neighborhoods within The Oaks South. Using methods suggested by AASHTO T224-86, corrections were made to the laboratory maximum dry density and optimum moisture content on fill soils being tested containing rocks larger than % inch. The values of maximum dry density and optimum moisture content presented on Table I reflect these corrections. In general, the in-place density test results indicate that the fill soil has a dry density of at least 90 percent of the laboratory maximum dry density near to sUghtly above optimum moisture content at the locations tested. In addition, moisture tests performed in "soil-rock" or "rock" fills generally indicate moisture contents at or above optimum. The approximate locations of the in-place density and moisture content tests are shown on the "As-Graded" Geologic Map (Figures 1 through 5). Project No. 06105-52-06 - 4 - November 12, 2003 Laboratory tests were performed on samples of material used for fill to evaluate moisture-density relationships, optimum moisture content and maximum dry density (ASTMD 1557-00), expansion potential (ASTM D 4829-95), shear strength (ASTM D 3080-98), and water-soluble sulfate content (Califomia Test No. 417). The results ofthe laboratory tests are summarized on Tables n through V. Slopes The project slopes consisted of cut and fill slopes constmcted with maximum heights of approximately 40 and 35 feet, respectively. Some sections of cut slope on the eastem side of Camino Junipero were cut to an approximate inclination of 1.5:1 (horizontahvertical) or flatter. The remaining slopes within the site were constmcted at inclinations of 2:1 or flatter. It should be noted that vertical cuts up to 6 feet in height exist at the toe of some slopes within Neighborhoods 3.12 and 3.13. It is our understanding that these vertical cuts will accommodate the constmction of retaining walls along the rear property line of some lots. All slopes should be planted, drained and maintained to reduce erosion. Slope irrigation should be kept to a minimum to just support the vegetative cover. Surface drainage should not be allowed to flow over the tops ofthe slopes. Subdrains Subdrains were installed at the general locations shown on the "As-Graded" Geologic Map (Figures 1 through 5). In addition, the subdrains were "as-built" for location and elevation by the project civil engineer. The subdrains generally consisted of a 6- to 8-inch-diameter PVC perforated pipe placed in cmshed aggregate surrounded by Mirafi 140N (or equivalent) filter fabric. The drains were typically placed at least 15 feet below grade and constmcted at a gradient of at least 1 percent. During constmction, the subdrains were generally outiet into storm drain stmctures. The final subdrain system that services Neighborhoods 3.12 and 3.13 ultimately outiets near La Costa Avenue at an energy dissipater headwall. Two subdrains were installed during the grading operations for the subject section of La Costa Avenue. A subdrain was installed within the toe keyway along the southem edge of the La Costa Avenue embankment. This subdrain was installed so that the northem portion drains northward and outiets at the above-mentioned energy dissipater headwall. The southem portion drains southward and daylights within the riprap placed at a storm drain outiet stmcture. The second subdrain that services the La Costa Avenue embankment was installed at the exfreme southem end ofthe subject section. This subdrain flows into a storm drain inlet stmcture near the intersection of La Costa Avenue and Camino De Los Coches. All subdrain outiets should be maintained regularly to prevent sediment and debris from obstinicting the free flow of water out of the subdrain system. Project No. 06105-52-06 - 5 - November 12, 2003 Finlsli Grade Soil Conditions Observations and laboratory test results indicate that the prevailing soil conditions within the upper approximately 3 feet of finish grade have an expansion potential of "very low" to "high" (Expansion hidex of 130 or less) as defmed by Uniform Building Code (UBC) Table 18-I-B. Table VI presents a summary of the indicated Expansion Index of the prevailing subgrade soil conditions for each lot. It should be noted that although rocks larger than 6-inch diameter were not intentionally placed within the upper 3 feet of pad grades, some larger rocks may exist at random locations. Some samples obtained for expansion testing were also subjected to water-soluble sulfate testing to evaluate the amount of water-soluble sulfates within the finish grade soils. These test results are used to determine the potential for sulfate attack on normal Portland Cement concrete. The test results indicate sulfate contents that correspond to "negligible" to "severe" sulfate exposure ratings. Geocon Incorporated does not practice corrosion engineering. Therefore, results of these tests should be reviewed by a corrosion consultant and appropriate recommendations should be implemented during design and constmction of proposed improvements. The results of the soluble-sulfate tests are summarized on Table V. SOIL AND GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS The soil and geologic conditions encountered during grading were found to be similar to those described in the project geotechnical report. Santiago Peak Volcanics (Jsp) and Santiago Formation (Ts) were exposed at grade on cut slopes and within cleanouts in pad undercuts, cut areas within street right-of-ways, or in canyon cleanouts. Compacted soils were placed in areas of fill and are designated as Qcf on Figures 1 through 5. In addition, compacted fill soil placed in imdercut areas is designated as Que. Table VII presents a summary of As-Graded Building Pad Conditions for each lot. The enclosed "As-Graded" Geologic Map (Figures 1 through 5) depicts the general geologic conditions observed. No soil or geologic conditions were observed during grading that would preclude the continued development of the property as planned. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1.0 General 1.1 Based on observations and test results, it is the opinion of Geocon Incorporated that the grading to which this report pertains has been performed in substantial conformance with the recommendations ofthe previously referenced project soils report and the geotechnical requirements of the grading plans. Soil and geologic conditions encountered during Project No. 06105-52-06 - 6 - November 12, 2003 grading that differ from those anticipated in the project soils report are not uncommon. Where such conditions required a significant modification to the recommendations of the project soils report, they have been described herein. 1.2 No soil or geologic conditions were observed during grading that would preclude the continued development of the property as planned. Based on laboratory test results and field observations, it is the opinion of Geocon Incorporated that the fill soils observed and tested as part of the grading for this neighborhood were generally compacted to a dry density of at least 90 percent of the laboratory maximum dry density near to slightly above optimum moisture content. 2.0 Future Grading 2.1 Any additional grading performed at the site should be accomplished in conjunction with our observation and compaction testing services. Grading plans for any future grading should be reviewed by Geocon Incorporated prior to finalizing. All trench and wall backfill should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the laboratory maximum dry density near or above optimum moisture content. This office should be notified at least 48 hours prior to commencing additional grading or backfill operations. 3.0 Update Geotechnical Report 3.1 An update geotechnical report should be prepared by Geocon Incorporated for Neighborhoods 3.12 and 3.13. The report should include foundation recommendations for reducing the detrimental effect of expansive soil and differential fill settlement across individual stmctures. In addition, retaining wall recommendations and seismic design criteria should be included, as well as other considerations such as swimming pools and concrete flatwork. Additional water-soluble sulfate laboratory testing should also be performed on finish grade soils to verify sulfate exposure. 4.0 Slope Maintenance 4.1 Slopes that are steeper than 3:1 (horizontahvertical) may, under conditions that are both difficult to prevent and predict, be susceptible to near-surface (surficial) slope instability. The instability is typically limited to the outer 3 feet of a portion of the slope and usually does not directly impact the improvements on the pad areas above or below the slope. The occurrence of surficial instability is more prevalent on fill slopes and is generally preceded by a period of heavy rainfall, excessive irrigation, or the migration of subsurface seepage. The disturbance and/or loosening of the surficial soils, as might result from root growth, soil expansion, or excavation for irrigation lines and slope planting, may also be a signifi- Project No. 06105-52-06 - 7 - November 12, 2003 cant contributing factor to surficial instability. It is therefore recommended that, to the maximum extent practical: (a) disturbed/loosened surficial soils be either removed or properly recompacted, (b) irrigation systems be periodically inspected and maintained to eliminate leaks and excessive irrigation, and (c) surface drains on and adjacent to slopes be periodically maintained to preclude ponding or erosion. It should be noted that although the incorporation of the above recommendations should reduce the potential for surficial slope instability, it will not eliminate the possibility and, therefore, it may be necessary to rebuild or repair a portion of the project's slopes in the future. 5.0 Drainage 5.1 Adequate drainage provisions are critical to the future performance ofthe project. Under no circumstances should water be allowed to pond. The building pads and sheet-graded areas should be properly finish graded so that drainage water is directed away from foundations, pavements, concrete slabs, and slope tops to contiolled drainage devices. 5.2 All underground utilities should be leak free. Utility and irrigation lines should be checked periodically for leaks for early detection of water infilfration and detected leaks should be repaired promptiy. Detrimental soil movement could occur if water is allowed to infilfrate the soil over a prolonged period of time. 5.3 Landscaping planters adjacent to paved areas are not recommended due to the potential for surface or irrigation water to infilfrate the pavement's subgrade and base course. We recommend that subdrains to collect excess irrigation water and fransmit it to drainage sfructures or impervious above-grade planter boxes be used. In addition, where landscaping is planned adjacent to the pavement, we recommend constmction of a cutoff wall along the edge of the pavement that extends at least 6 inches below the bottom of the base material. LIMITATIONS The conclusions and recommendations contained herein apply only to our work with respect to grading and represent conditions on the date of our final observation, October 30, 2003. Any subsequent grading should be done in conjunction with our observation and testing services. As used herein, the term "observation" implies only that we observed the progress of the work with which we agreed to be involved. Our services did not include the evaluation or identification of the potential presence of hazardous or corrosive materials. Our conclusions and opinions as to whether the work essentially complies with the job specifications are based on our observations, experience and test results. Subsurface conditions, and the accuracy of tests used to measure such conditions, can vary Project No. 06105-52-06 - 8 - November 12, 2003 A greatiy at any time. We make no warranty, expressed or implied, except that our services were performed in accordance with engineering principles generally accepted at this time and location. We will accept no responsibility for any subsequent changes made to the site by others, by the unconfrolled action of water, or by the failure of others to properly repair damages caused by the unoonfrolled action of water. The findings and recommendations of this report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside our confrol. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of three years. Should you have any questions regarding this report, or if we may be of further service, please contact the undersigned at your convenience. Very tmly yours, GEOCON INCORPORATED Shane Rodacker RCE 63291 SR:AS:JH:dmc (6/del) Addressee CEG 1778 JottfHi6ohs CEG 1524 ProjectNo. 06105-52-06 November 12, 2003 Project No. 06105-12-06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Test Elev. Plus Max. Opt. Field Field Field Req'd or 3/4" Dry Moist. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel. Depth Curve Rock Dens. Cont. Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp. No. Date Test Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (% 1440 10/30/02 3 12 LOT 180 271 9 44 137 5 6 9 130 9 10 3 95 90 1516 11/07/02 3 12 LOT 180 261 9 40 136 5 7 2 122 8 10 9 90 90 1585 12/02/02 3 12 LOT 180 272 9 40 136 5 7 6 125 8 7 8 92 90 M 1597 12/05/02 3 12 LOT 24 296 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 8 0 0 0 1598 12/05/02 3 12 LOT 180 290 8 60 139 8 5 8 130 0 6 7 93 90 M 1606 12/09/02 3 12 LOT 180 300 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 8 7 0 0 M 1707 12/28/02 3 12 LOT 180 314 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 9 0 0 0 M 1721 12/30/02 3 12 LOT 180 328 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 7 2 0 0 1726 12/30/02 3 12 LOT 180 329 8 50 136 8 6 8 124 9 8 1 91 90 M 1845 01/10/03 3 12 LOT 22 305 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 8 1 0 0 1846 01/10/03 3 12 LOT 23 303 8 60 139 6 5 9 127 8 7 1 92 90 M 1849 01/10/03 3 12 LOT 180 305 8 80 0 0 5 9 0 0 9 9 0 0 1853 01/09/03 3 12 LOT 180 298 8 10 125 8 10 8 117 8 14 1 94 90 1854 01/09/03 3 12 LOT 180 295 8 10 125 8 10 8 117 0 12 9 93 90 M 1855 01/11/03 3 12 LOT 24 306 8 80 0 0 5 9 0 0 9 6 0 0 1856 01/11/03 3 12 LOT 23 305 8 60 139 6 5 9 130 9 10 9 94 90 M 1857 01/11/03 3 12 LOT 23 308 8 80 0 0 5 9 0 0 10 0 0 0 M 1858 01/11/03 3 .12 LOT 22 309 8 80 0 0 5 9 0 0 6 9 0 0 M 1859 01/11/03 3 .12 LOT 180 308 8 80 0 0 5 9 0 .0 7 3. 0 0 1865 01/13/03 3 .12 LOT 23 309 8 60 139 6 5 9 125 .9 8 .6 90 90 1866 01/13/03 3 .12 LOT 24 310 8 60 139 8 5 8 129 .5 6 . 9 93 90 1868 01/14/03 3 .12 LOT 24 298 9 60 141 3 5 7 128 .0 10 .9 91 90 1869 01/14/03 3 .12 LOT 25 303 9 60 141 3 5 .7 129 .3 7 .3 92 90 1879 01/23/03 3 .12 LOT 26 297 8 20 128 5 9 7 119 .4 12 .3 93 90 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No 06105-12 -06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Elev. Plus Max. Opt. Field Field Field Req'd or 3/4" Dry Moist. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel. Test Depth Curve Rock Dens. Cont. Dens . Cont. Comp. Comp. No. Date Test Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (% ) (pcf) (%) (%) (%) 1880 01/14/03 3 .12 LOT 25 300 9 60 141. 3 5 . 7 130 . 7 9 0 92 90 M 1881 01/14/03 3 .12 LOT 180 299 8 80 0 . 0 5 . 9 0 . 0 12 7 0 0 M 1895 01/15/03 3 .12 LOT 180 300 9 80 0 . 0 5 . 7 0 . 0 10 9 0 0 1896 01/15/03 3 .12 LOT 26 308 8 60 139 . 8 5 . 8 131. 1 10 0 94 90 1897 01/23/03 3 .12 LOT 180 320 8 50 136 . 8 6. 8 130 . 0 9 0 95 90 1899 01/15/03 3 .12 LOT 180 270 8 60 139. 8 5 . 8 129. 0 7 3 92 90 1901 01/16/03 3 .12 LOT 180 280 8 60 139 . 8 5. 8 136. 8 5 9 98 90 M 1902 01/16/03 3 . 12 LOT 180 282 9 80 0 . 0 5 . 7 0 . 0 6 9 0 0 M 1929 01/21/03 3 . 12 LOT 180 315 9 80 0 . 0 5. 7 0 . 0 12 8 0 0 M 1930 01/21/03 3 .12 LOT 180 313 9 80 0 . 0 5 . 7 0. 0 13 2 0 0 1945 01/22/03 3 .12 LOT 25 298 8 20 128 . 5 9 . 7 117 . 5 11 6 91 90 1946 01/22/03 3 .12 LOT 180 317 8 60 139. 8 5. 8 129 . 7 10 3 93 90 1947 01/23/03 3 .12 LOT 180 308 8 40 134 . 1 7 . 7 124 . 1 12 7 93 90 1948 01/23/03 3 .12 LOT 19 320 8 60 139. 8 5 . 8 130 . 3 10 0 93 90 M 1949 01/23/03 3 .12 LOT 180 318 9 80 0 . 0 5 . 7 0 . 0 13 7 0 0 1956 01/24/03 3 .12 LOT 180 314 8 50 136 . 8 6 . 8 123 . 9 13 9 91 90 1957 01/24/03 3 .12 LOT 180 318 8 60 139. 8 5 . 8 128 . 8 10 0 92 90 M 1958 01/24/03 3 .12 LOT 180 323 9 80 0 . 0 5 . 7 0 . 0 16 1 0 0 1965 01/27/03 3 . 12 LOT 180 320 8 50 136. 8 6 . 8 123 . 9 4 6 91 90 1965A 01/27/03 3 . 12 LOT 180 320 8 50 136 . 8 6 . 8 125 . 6 8 5 92 90 1967 01/27/03 3 .12 LOT 16 324 8 60 139. 6 5 . 9 130 . 6 7 .5 94 90 1968 01/28/03 3 . 12 LOT 17 325 8 60 139 . 8 5 . 8 127 . 3 5 . 9 91 90 1969 01/28/03 3 .12 LOT 15 327 9 60 141. 3 5 7 135 . 5 6 .4 96 90 1970 01/28/03 3 .12 LOT 20 317 8 60 139. 8 5 8 127 . 8 8 .9 91 90 - Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 06105-12-06 TABLE I. FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Test No. Date Test Location Elev. Plus Max. Opt. Field Field Field Req'd or 3/4" Dry Moist. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel. Depth Curve Rock Dens. Cont. Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp. (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%) M M M M M M 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 2119 2179 2184 2195 2196 2197 2214 2292 2299 2314 2315 2323 2324 2345 2346 2347 2348 2379 2380 01/28/03 01/29/03 01/29/03 01/29/03 01/28/03 03/14/03 03/25/03 03/27/03 03/27/03 03/27/03 03/27/03 04/01/03 04/10/03 04/11/03 04/18/03 04/11/03 04/18/03 04/18/03 04/21/03 04/21/03 04/21/03 04/21/03 04/24/03 04/24/03 3.12 LOT 19 3 .12 LOT 21 3.12 LOT 22 3.12 LOT 18 3.12 LOT 16 3.12 LOT 92 3.12 LOT 1 3.12 LOT 180 3 .12 LIMA 11-1-15 3.12 LOT 180 3 .12 LIMA 12-f35 3.12 LOT 27 3 .12 LIMA 10-f95 3.12 LOT 180 3.12 LOT 180 3 .12 LIMA ll-f90 3 .12 LIMA 12-1-00 3.12 LOT 180 3.12 LOT 92 3.12 LOT 180 3 .12 LIMA lO-hSO 3.12 LOT 26 3.12 LOT 1 3 .12 LOT 92 319 319 317 330 331 278 288 275 277 280 282 285 279 281 295 284 287 285 289 289 287 302 287 290 8 8 8 8 9 9 8 9 9 9 9 8 8 8 9 9 8 8 8 9 8 8 60 60 60 60 80 40 30 80 80 50 80 40 40 30 30 20 80 80 30 30 40 20 40 60 139 . 8 139 . 8 139 . 8 139.6 0 . 0 136 . 5 131.3 0 . 0 0 . 0 138 . 9 0 . 0 134 .1 134 .1 131.3 131.3 128.5 0.0 0.0 131.3 131.3 134 .1 131.7 134.1 139 . 6 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.9 5.7 7.2 8.7 5 . 7 5.7 6.4 5.7 7 . 7 7.7 8.7 8.7 9.7 5.7 5.7 8.7 8.7 7 . 7 8 . 9 7.7 5.9 128 . 9 133 .6 129.0 129.3 0.0 123 .6 118 .4 0.0 0.0 127 .4 0.0 122 . 0 124.8 118 .4 119.0 117.6 0.0 0 . 0 120 . 6 120 .6 126 .2 120 .1 120.9 125 .4 10.9 6.9 5 . 7 6.3 11.7 7.0 12 . 0 14 .2 11.8 7.7 10 .9 7.9 10 .3 10.3 10 .1 11.7 13.1 13 .4 10.0 10 . 0 7.5 9.7 8 . 8 8 . 0 92 96 92 93 0 91 90 0 0 92 0 91 93 90 91 92 0 0 92 92 94 91 90 90 90 90 90 90 0 90 90 0 0 90 0 90 90 90 90 90 0 0 90 90 90 90 90 90 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 06105-12-06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Elev. or Plus 3/4" Max. Dry Opt. Moist, Field Dry Field Moist. Field Rel. Req'd Rel. Test No. Date Test Location Depth (ft) Curve No. Rock (%) Dens. (pcf) Cont. (%) Dens. (pcf) Cont. (%) Comp. (%) Com (%) 2381 04/25/03 3 12 LOT 1 292 8 50 136 8 6 8 124 6 6 . 3 91 90 2382 04/25/03 3 12 LOT 92 294 8 20 128 5 9 7 115 2 6 . 2 90 90 2382A 04/25/03 3 12 LOT 92 294 8 40 134 1 7 7 121 3 8 . 8 90 90 2383 04/25/03 3 12 LOT 1 297 8 30 131 3 8 7 120 2 11. 8 92 90 2384 04/25/03 3 12 LOT 92 299 8 30 131 3 8 7 119 5 10 . 1 91 90 M 2400 04/30/03 3 12 LOT 15 328 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 14 . 6 0 0 M 2401 04/30/03 3 12 LOT 15 332 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 12 . 9 0 0 M 2402 04/20/03 3 12 LOT 15 334 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 13 . 6 0 0 M 2403 04/20/03 3 12 LOT 18 0 326 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 11. 1 0 0 2404 05/01/03 3 12 LOT 15 336 8 50 136 8 6 8 123 7 9 . 3 90 90 SZ 2405 05/01/03 3 12 LOT 15 332 8 30 131 3 8 7 121 6 10 . 0 93 90 SZ 2406 05/02/03 3 12 LOT 15 334 8 10 125 8 10 8 113 0 12 . 6 90 90 2430 05/05/03 3 12 LOT 5/6 306 8 30 131 3 8 7 118 8 9 . 4 90 90 2431 05/05/03 3 12 LOT 8 310 9 50 138 9 6 4 130 2 6 . 6 94 90 2435 05/08/03 3 12 LOT 5 309 8 20 128 5 9 7 118 1 11. 3 92 90 2436 05/08/03 3 12 LOT 6 310 8 20 128 5 9 7 115 7 8 . 9 90 90 2466 05/10/03 3 12 TAMARINDO llH-0 0 281 8 30 131 3 8 7 120 2 10 . 1 92 90 2467 05/10/03 3 12 TAMARINDO 11-FOO 284 8 0 123 0 11 9 113 . 0 14 . 1 92 90 2468 05/10/03 3 12 TAMARINDO 11-hOO 287 8 20 128 5 9 7 115 .6 10 . 3 90 90 2542 05/29/03 3 .12 LOT 12 316 8 30 131 3 8 7 118 .7 8. 0 90 90 2544 05/30/03 3 .12 LOT 12 319 8 30 131 3 8 7 118 .1 10 . 7 90 90 2545 05/30/03 3 .12 LOT 1 303 8 30 131 3 8 .7 120 .4 8. 3 92 90 2550 05/30/03 3 . 12 LOT 12 321 8 50 136 8 6 .8 125 . 9 8 . 3 92 90 2551 06/02/03 3 . 12 LOT 12 320 8 50 136 8 6 . 8 122 .7 7 . 0 90 90 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 06105-12-06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Elev. or Plus 3/4" Max. Dry Opt. Moist. Field Dry Field Moist. Field Rel. Req'd Rel. Test Depth Curve Rock Dens . Cont. Dens. Cont. Comp. COIT No. Date Test Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%) 2552 06/02/03 3 12 LOT 1 305 8 30 131. 3 8. 7 122 . 9 10 . 4 94 90 2559 06/03/03 3 12 LOT 12 321 8 50 136. 8 6. 8 125. 0 7. 5 91 90 2564 06/04/03 3 12 LOT 12 322 8 50 136 . 8 6 8 122 . 8 7 3 90 90 2566 06/05/03 3 12 LOT 12 323 8 50 136 8 6 8 123 2 8 5 90 90 SZ 2610 06/24/03 3 12 LOT 92 311 8 40 134 1 7 7 120 8 8 3 90 90 SZ 2611 06/24/03 3 12 LOT 92 312 8 40 134 1 7 7 125 1 7 2 93 90 SZ 2612 05/24/03 3 12 LOT 92 314 8 40 134 1 7 7 121 3 7 4 90 90 2614 05/25/03 3 12 LOT 11 324 8 40 134 1 7 7 120 5 8 2 90 90 2615 06/25/03 3 12 LOT 12 323 8 40 134 1 7 7 120 5 8 8 90 90 2653 07/03/03 3 12 LOT 5 309 33 0 135 4 7 5 121 5 8 8 90 90 2654 07/03/03 3 12 LOT 7 310 33 0 135 4 7 5 122 3 8 0 90 90 2661 07/07/03 3 12 LOT 4 310 33 0 135 4 7 5 121 5 8 0 90 90 2662 07/07/03 3 12 LOT 9 322 33 0 135 4 7 5 123 6 7 1 91 90 2678 07/10/03 3 12 LIMA 19+40 314 33 0 135 4 7 5 129 1 8 3 92 90 2679 07/10/03 3 12 ESPINO 11-1-60 312 33 0 135 4 7 5 121 9 5 0 90 90 2680 07/10/03 3 12 LIMA 16-t-70 302 33 0 135 4 7 5 124 5 8 8 92 90 2706 07/16/03 3 .12 LIMA 18-1-90 316 33 0 135 4 7 5 124 0 9 3 92 90 2707 07/16/03 3 .12 ESPINO 11-hlO 315 33 0 135 4 7 .5 122 .8 8 .9 91 90 2718 07/18/03 3 .12 ESPINO 10+60 317 33 0 135 4 7 .5 121 . 7 8 .6 90 90 2719 07/18/03 3 .12 ESPINO 11+60 320 33 0 135 4 7 .5 124 . 9 8 .3 92 90 2730 07/22/03 3 .12 LOT 16 331 8 30 131 .3 8 .7 119 .5 9 .4 91 90 2732 07/22/03 3 .12 LOT 17 328 8 20 128 .5 9 .7 116 .3 11 . 0 90 90 2733 07/23/03 3 .12 LOT 180 294 8 10 129 .8 10 . 8 112 .9 13 .3 90 90 2734 07/23/03 3 .12 LOT 15 335 8 30 131 . 3 8 .7 120 .2 8 .1 91 90 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 06105-12-06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Test No. Date Test Location Elev. Plus Max. Opt. Field Field Field Req'd or 3/4" Dry Moist. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel. Depth Curve Rock Dens. Cont. Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp. (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%) 2735 07/23/03 3.12 LOT 17 2736 07/23/03 3.12 LOT 20 2737 07/23/03 3.12 LOT 21 2738 07/23/03 3.12 LOT 23 2739 07/24/03 3.12 LIMA 14+65 2740 07/24/03 3.12 LIMA 20+15 2741 07/24/03 3.12 LIMA 18+00 2742 07/24/03 3.12 LIMA 16+40 2748 07/28/03 3.12 LOT 15 2749 07/28/03 3.12 LOT 17 2750 07/28/03 3.12 LIMA 13+20 2753 07/28/03 3.12 TAMARINDO 11+00 2754 07/28/03 3.12 TAMARINDO 11+00 2755 07/29/03 3.12 LOT 16 2756 07/29/03 3.12 LOT 17 2760 07/30/03 3.12 LOT 25 FG FG 2761 07/30/03 3 12 LOT 27 2761A 07/30/03 3 12 LOT 27 2801 08/06/03 3 12 LOT 2 2801A 09/15/03 3 .12 LOT 2 FG 2802 08/06/03 3 12 LOT 3 FG 2803 08/06/03 3 12 LOT 4 FG 2804 08/06/03 3 .12 LOT 5 FG 2804A 09/15/03 3 .12 LOT 5 332 8 30 131 3 8. 7 118 . 3 8 . 5 90 90 325 33 0 135 4 7 . 5 123 . 1 8. 5 91 90 322 33 0 135 4 7 . 5 125 . 5 9 3 93 90 313 33 0 135 4 7 5 123 0 7 6 91 90 302 8 10 125 8 10 8 113 7 9 9 90 90 321 8 10 125 8 10 8 115 2 10 0 92 90 313 33 0 135 4 7 5 127 6 8 1 94 90 305 33 0 135 4 7 5 124 0 6 6 91 90 335 8 10 125 8 10 8 113 3 11 8 90 90 339 8 10 125 8 10 8 114 8 12 0 91 90 303 8 10 125 8 10 8 114 8 12 0 91 90 288 8 10 125 8 10 8 114 4 13 1 91 90 290 8 10 125 8 10 8 113 0 11 7 90 90 338 8 10 125 8 10 8 114 4 11 6 91 90 336 8 10 125 8 10 8 116 3 10 2 92 90 309 8 10 125 .8 10 8 113 1 10 .5 90 90 307 8 10 125 . 8 10 .8 110 .5 9 .3 88 90 307 8 10 125 . 8 10 .8 114 . 1 10 .6 91 90 309 33 0 135 .4 7 . 5 120 . 9 5 .4 89 90 309 33 0 135 .4 7 .5 122 .2 4 .6 90 90 310 33 0 135 .4 7 .5 122 .9 6 .6 91 90 310 33 0 135 .4 7 .5 125 .7 6 .5 93 90 311 33 0 135 .4 7 .5 121 .5 5 .2 90 90 310 33 0 135 .4 7 .5 120 .7 5 .8 89 90 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 06105-12-06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Elev. or Plus 3/4" Max. Dry Opt. Moist. Field Dry Field Moist. Field Rel. Req'd Rel. Test Depth Curve Rock Dens . Cont. Dens . Cont. Comp. Com No. Date Test Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%) FG 2804B 10/30/03 3 12 LOT 5 311 33 0 135 4 7 5 127 3 5 5 94 90 FG 2805 08/06/03 3 12 LOT 6 312 33 0 135 4 7 5 126 3 7 3 93 90 FG 2806 08/06/03 3 12 LOT 7 313 33 0 135 4 7 5 127 5 6 7 94 90 FG 2807 08/06/03 3 12 LOT 8 315 33 0 135 4 7 5 119 9 6 1 89 90 FG 2807A 09/15/03 3 12 LOT 8 315 33 0 135 4 7 5 119 9 5 5 89 90 FG 2807B 10/30/03 3 12 LOT 8 315 33 0 135 4 7 5 123 6 5 9 91 90 2810 08/06/03 3 12 LOT 14 347 10 30 133 8 7 4 120 1 8 0 90 90 2825 08/08/03 3 12 LIMA 17+60 314 33 0 135 4 7 5 119 1 4 0 88 90 2825A 08/27/03 3 .12 LIMA 17+60 314 33 0 135 .4 7 5 122 9 8 2 91 90 2826 08/08/03 3 .12 LIMA 13+50 307 33 0 135 .4 7 5 120 1 4 7 89 90 2826A 08/27/03 3 .12 LIMA 13+50 307 33 0 135 .4 7 5 121 4 6 6 90 90 2827 08/08/03 3 12 LOT 1 307 33 0 135 4 7 5 121 5 6 7 90 90 2828 08/08/03 3 12 LOT 27 309 33 0 135 .4 7 5 122 3 6 6 90 90 2833 08/11/03 3 12 LOT 13 349 10 30 133 .8 7 4 120 2 8 0 90 90 2834 08/11/03 3 12 LOT 14 350 10 30 133 8 7 4 121 3 7 1 91 90 2846 08/12/03 3 12 LOT 13 354 10 30 133 . 8 7 4 118 2 5 4 88 90 2846A 08/12/03 3 12 LOT 13 344 10 30 133 8 7 4 120 8 8 5 90 90 2847 08/12/03 3 12 LOT 14 354 10 30 133 .8 7 4 119 3 6 3 89 90 2847A 08/12/03 3 12 LOT 14 354 10 30 133 .8 7 4 121 1 7 4 90 90 2854 08/13/03 3 12 LOT 13 349 10 30 133 8 7 4 124 5 8 0 93 90 2855 08/13/03 3 12 LOT 14 358 10 30 133 8 7 4 122 .9 7 2 92 90 2856 08/14/03 3 12 LOT 14 362 33 0 135 .4 7 5 122 4 8 4 90 90 2857 08/14/03 3 .12 LOT 13 353 33 0 135 .4 7 .5 121 .5 6 7 90 90 FG 2863 08/14/03 3 .12 LOT 9 323 33 0 135 .4 7 5 121 .4 6 6 90 90 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 06105-12-06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Elev. Plus Max. Opt. Field Field Field Req'd or 3/4" Dry Moist. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel. Test Depth Curve Rock Dens . Cont. Dens . Cont. Comp. Comp. No. Date Test Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (% ) (%) (%) FG 2864 08/14/03 3 . 12 LOT 10 325 33 0 135 .4 7.5 123 . 0 6. 8 91 90 FG 2865 08/14/03 3 12 LOT 11 325 10 30 133 .8 7.4 127. 0 6 . 9 95 90 FG 2866 08/14/03 3 12 LOT 12 325 10 30 133 . 8 7.4 123 . 9 8 . 1 93 90 FG 2867 08/14/03 3 12 LOT 19 330 33 0 135 .4 7.5 122 . 3 6 . 9 90 90 FG 2868 08/14/03 3 12 LOT 20 327 33 0 135 .4 7.5 125 . 0 7 . 3 92 90 FG 2869 08/14/03 3 12 LOT 21 323 33 0 135 .4 7.5 121. 9 6 . 6 90 90 FG 2870 08/14/03 3 12 LOT 22 319 33 0 135.4 7.5 122 . 7 7. 0 91 90 FG 2871 08/14/03 3 12 LOT 23 315 33 0 135 .4 7.5 123 . 8 6 . 5 91 90 FG 2872 08/14/03 3 12 LOT 24 312 10 10 128 . 9 9.2 117 . 7 8. 5 91 90 FG 2873 08/14/03 3 12 LOT 25 312 10 10 128 . 9 9.2 116 . 5 9 . 1 90 90 FG 2874 08/14/03 3 12 LOT 26 311 10 10 128 . 9 9.2 120 . 4 8 . 2 93 90 FG 2875 08/14/03 3 12 LOT 27 310 10 10 128 . 9 9.2 119 . 0 8 . 2 92 90 2882 08/18/03 3 12 LOT 14 363 33 0 135 .4 7.5 124 . 0 8 . 1 92 90 2891 08/19/03 3 12 LIMA 25+15 349 8 10 125 . 8 10 . 9 Ill. 7 8 . 4 89 90 2891A 08/19/03 3 . 12 LIMA 25+15 349 8 10 125 . 8 10 . 9 113 . 3 11 . 7 90 90 2892 08/19/03 3 . 12 LIMA 24+45 341 8 10 125.8 10.9 114 . 2 10 . 3 91 90 SZ 2924 08/25/03 3 .12 LOT 180 337 10 10 128 . 9 9.2 116 . 5 11. 0 90 90 2935 08/25/03 3 .12 LIMA 22+80 333 10 20 131.3 8.3 118 . 6 8 7 90 90 2936 08/25/03 3 .12 LIMA 21+75 329 10 20 131. 3 8.3 120 . 0 9 5 91 90 2937 08/26/03 3 .12 LIMA 21+40 328 10 20 131.3 8.3 119. 9 8 1 91 90 2945 08/26/03 3 .12 LIMA 23+35 339 10 20 131.3 8.3 120 . 4 9 6 92 90 2946 08/27/03 3 . 12 LIMA 22+50 336 10 20 131. 3 8 . 3 123 . 7 9 9 94 90 2957 08/28/03 3 . 12 LIMA 23+30 340 10 20 131.3 8.3 119 8 10 6 91 90 2973 09/02/03 3 .12 LIMA 24+20 345 33 0 135 .4 7 . 5 123 7 7 4 91 90 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 06105-12-06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Elev. or Plus 3/4" Max. Dry Opt. Moist. Field Dry Field Moist. Field Rel. Req'd Rel. Test No. Date Test Location Depth (ft) Curve No. Rock (%) Dens . (pcf) Cont. (%) Dens. (pcf) Cont. (%) Comp. (%) Comp (%) 2974 09/02/03 3 12 LIMA 24+50 331 33 0 135 4 7 . 5 122 5 8 3 90 90 2988 09/03/03 3 12 LIMA 23+70 343 33 0 135 4 7 . 5 121 8 9 0 90 90 3000 09/04/03 3 12 LOT 15 342 8 30 131 3 8 . 7 120 4 7 5 92 90 3001 09/04/03 3 12 LOT 15 344 8 30 131 3 8 . 7 118 3 9 1 90 90 3002 09/04/03 3 12 LOT 16 340 8 30 131 3 8 . 7 118 5 8 8 90 90 3028 09/08/03 3 12 LIMA 20+90 331 8 30 131 3 8. 7 118 0 9 9 90 90 FG 3029 09/08/03 3 12 LOT 15 346 10 30 133 8 7 . 4 125 3 6 5 94 90 FG 3030 09/08/03 3 12 LOT 16 342 10 30 133 8 7 . 4 123 7 7 4 92 90 FG 3031 09/08/03 3 12 LOT 17 338 10 30 133 8 7 . 4 122 0 8 0 91 90 FG 3032 09/08/03 3 12 LOT 18 333 10 30 133 8 7 . 4 120 4 7 4 90 90 FG 3033 09/08/03 3 12 LOT 13 364 33 0 135 4 7 . 5 123 8 7 2 91 90 FG 3034 09/08/03 3 12 LOT 14 355 33 0 135 4 7 . 5 126 1 6 4 93 90 3035 09/08/03 3 12 LIMA 19+50 324 8 30 131 3 8. 7 118 5 10 7 90 90 3061 09/11/03 3 12 LOT 92 297 3 30 128 4 8. 9 116 3 11 .5 91 90 SZ 3067 09/12/03 3 12 LOT 92 301 3 30 128 4 8 . 9 118 6 10 7 92 90 3068 09/12/03 3 12 LOT 92 305 3 30 128 4 8 . 9 115 .4 11 .5 90 90 FG 3151 09/18/03 3 .12 LOT 1 308 33 0 135 4 7 . 5 125 .0 7 .7 92 90 3172 09/23/03 3 .12 LOT 2 303 8 30 131 3 8 . 7 118 .4 10 .5 90 90 3175 09/23/03 3 .12 LOT 2 306 8 30 131 3 8 . 7 119 . 8 9 . 0 91 90 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No 06105-12 -06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Elev. Plus Max. Opt. Field Field Field Req'd or 3/4" Dry Moist. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel. Test Depth Curve Rock Dens. Cont. Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp. No. Date Test Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%) 965 09/13/02 3 . 13 LOT 46 356 8 0 123 . 0 11 9 111. 4 15 1 91 90 966 09/13/02 3 . 13 LOT 47 353 8 0 123 . 0 11 9 110 . 7 17 3 90 90 M 976 09/16/02 3 . 13 LOT 46 361 8 80 0 . 0 5 9 0 . 0 18 3 0 0 M 977 09/16/02 3 . 13 LOT 47 371 8 80 0 . 0 5 9 0 . 0 13 6 0 0 M 978 09/16/02 3 . 13 LOT 48 375 8 80 0 . 0 5 9 0 . 0 15 1 0 0 M 984 09/17/02 3 . 13 LOT 46 365 8 80 0 . 0 5 9 0 . 0 16 7 0 0 985 09/17/02 3 . 13 LOT 48 375 8 30 131. 3 8 7 119. 0 8 5 91 90 M 986 09/17/02 3 . 13 LOT 49 378 8 80 0 . 0 5 9 0 . 0 20 0 0 0 M 987 09/17/02 3 . 13 LOT 48 377 8 80 0 . 0 5 9 0 . 0 7 4 0 0 M 987A 09/17/02 3 . 13 LOT 48 377 8 80 0 . 0 5 9 0 . 0 14 7 0 0 M 988 09/17/02 3 . 13 LOT 48 375 8 80 0 . 0 5 9 0 . 0 18 3 0 0 M 989 09/17/02 3 . 13 LOT 47 371 8 80 0 . 0 5 9 8. 0 19 7 0 0 SZ 1002 09/18/02 3 . 13 N OF LOT 48 376 8 60 139. 6 5 9 126 . 6 12 0 91 90 1003 09/18/02 3 . 13 LOT 49 382 8 60 139. 6 5 9 128 . 3 11 6 92 90 1005 09/18/02 3 . 13 LOT 49 382 8 50 136. 8 6 8 126. 5 10 7 92 90 1006 09/18/02 3 . 13 LOT 48 380 8 50 136 . 8 6 8 124 . 8 11 6 91 90 1010 09/19/02 3 . 13 LOT 50 394 8 60 139. 6 5 9 125 . 1 10 .9 90 90 1054 09/23/02 3 . 13 LOT 50 396 8 10 125 . 8 10 8 116 . 7 15 . 0 93 90 SZ 1055 09/23/02 3 . 13 N OF LOT 49 386 11 20 116. 3 14 2 105 . 3 20 .8 91 90 M 1221 10/09/02 3 . 13 LOT 45 349 8 80 0 . 0 5 9 0 . 0 17 . 1 0 0 1222R 10/09/02 3 . 13 LOT 45 350 8 20 128 . 5 9 .7 113 6 6 . 8 88 90 1225 10/09/02 3 . 13 LOT 49 386 8 40 134 . 1 7 7 117 9 4 .5 88 90 1225A 10/10/02 3 . 13 LOT 49 386 8 40 134 . 1 7 .7 124 6 9 .2 93 90 1226 10/09/02 3 . 13 LOT 49 388 8 20 128 . 5 9 .7 113 1 3 .8 88 90 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 06105-12-06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Elev. or Plus 3/4" Max. Dry Opt. Moist. Field Dry Field Moist. Field Rel. Req'd Rel. Test Depth Curve Rock Dens . Cont. Dens. Cont. Comp. Com No. Date Test Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%) 1226A 10/10/02 3 13 LOT 49 388 8 20 128 5 9 . 7 120 3 11 2 94 90 1227 10/10/02 3 13 LOT 50 392 8 10 125 8 10 . 8 115 1 13 8 . 91 90 1228 10/10/02 3 13 LOT 49 395 8 10 125 8 10 . 8 115 8 13 6 92 90 1229 10/10/02 3 13 LOT 45 345 10 50 138 7 5 . 7 127 8 10 9 92 90 1245 10/10/02 3 13 LOT 45 348 8 20 128 5 9 . 7 120 8 14 2 94 90 1249 10/11/02 3 13 LOT 44 343 9 50 138 9 6. 4 130 8 9 7 94 90 1250 10/11/02 3 13 LOT 45 353 9 40 136 5 7 . 2 126 1 8 1 92 90 1256 10/11/02 3 13 LOT 45 352 9 40 136 5 7 . 2 126 1 10 1 92 90 1257 10/11/02 3 13 LOT 46 356 9 50 138 9 6 . 4 128 0 9 7 92 90 1263 10/14/02 3 13 LOT 46 360 10 60 141 1 5 . 0 130 5 9 5 92 90 1264 10/14/02 3 13 LOT 46 364 10 10 128 9 9 . 2 117 2 14 1 91 90 1265 10/14/02 3 13 SEQUOIA 65+75 354 10 50 138 7 5 . 7 128 6 7 8 93 90 1266 10/14/02 3 13 LOT 45 353 10 50 138 7 5 . 7 126 0 8 9 91 90 1267 10/14/02 3 13 SEQUOIA 66+45 355 10 50 138 7 5 . 7 129 4 10 1 93 90 1282 10/15/02 3 13 LOT 47 368 8 50 136 8 6 . 8 125 4 12 7 92 90 1283 10/15/02 3 13 LOT 47 366 8 50 136 8 6 . 8 124 5 10 0 91 90 1284 10/15/02 3 13 LOT 45 356 8 50 136 8 6. 8 123 4 11 8 90 90 1285 10/15/02 3 13 LOT 45 358 8 40 134 1 7 . 7 122 4 14 6 91 90 1306 10/16/02 3 13 LOT 46 369 8 60 139 6 5 . 9 127 2 7 5 91 90 1307 10/16/02 3 13 LOT 47 375 8 60 139 6 5 . 9 128 .9 6 .4 92 90 1308 10/16/02 3 13 LOT 47 378 8 60 139 6 5 . 9 127 .5 12 . 6 91 90 1309 10/16/02 3 .13 LOT 48 381 8 60 139 6 5 . 9 126 .7 13 .1 91 90 1327 10/18/02 3 .13 LOT 184 267 8 60 139 6 5 . 9 129 .4 10 .8 93 90 1328 10/18/02 3 .13 LOT 184 269 8 50 136 8 6 . 8 126 . 9 10 .3 93 90 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No 06105-12 -06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Elev. Plus Max. Opt. Field Field Field Req'd or 3/4" Dry Moist. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel. Test Depth Curve Rock Dens. Cont. Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp. No. Date Test Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (% ) (%) (%) 1329 10/18/02 3 .13 LOT 184 271 8 40 134 . 1 7 7 122 . 9 11. 0 92 90 1330 10/21/02 3 .13 LOT 48 384 8 40 134 . 1 7 7 120 . 8 10. 4 90 90 SZ 1332 10/21/02 3 .13 LOT 185 400 10 0 126 . 4 10 1 115 . 7 14 . 5 92 90 1334 10/21/02 3 .13 LOT 50 402 8 60 139 . 6 5 9 128 . 2 7 . 7 92 90 1339 10/22/02 3 .13 LOT 51 406 8 40 134 . 1 7 7 120 . 5 9 . 1 90 90 1340 10/22/02 3 .13 LOT 49 396 8 40 134 . 1 7 7 120 . 2 9. 0 90 90 1341 10/22/02 3 .13 LOT 48 390 8 60 139 . 6 5 9 131. 0 5 . 8 94 90 1342 11/22/02 3 .13 LOT 47 384 8 60 139 . 6 5 9 128 . 6 11. 5 92 90 1343 10/22/02 3 .13 LOT 29 270 9 60 141. 3 5 7 137 . 5 7 . 4 97 90 1344 10/22/02 3 .13 LOT 184 270 9 50 138 . 9 6 4 128 . 3 10 . 8 92 90 1345 10/22/02 3 .13 LOT 184 268 8 60 139 . 6 5 9 127 . 9 6 . 6 92 90 1346 10/22/02 3 .13 LOT 184 271 8 40 134 . 1 7 7 122 . 5 9. 4 91 90 1361 10/23/02 3 .13 LOT 28 271 8 20 128 . 5 9 7 113 . 5 6 . 3 88 90 1361A 10/24/02 3 .13 LOT 28 271 8 20 128 . 5 9 7 118 . 6 10. 2 92 90 1362 10/23/02 3 .13 LOT 184 271 8 50 135 . 8 6 8 127 . 5 10. 0 93 90 1363 10/23/02 3 .13 LOT 184 270 8 40 134 . 1 7 7 124 . 7 10 . 3 93 90 1364 10/23/02 3 . 13 LOT 29 272 8 50 136. 8 5 8 125. 4 11. 6 92 90 1355 10/23/02 3 .13 LOT 184 272 8 50 136 . 8 5 8 125. 3 9. 6 92 90 1356 10/24/02 3 .13 LOT 44 342 8 60 139. 6 5 9 127 . 2 9 . 8 91 90 1367 10/24/02 3 .13 LOT 184 274 8 60 139. 6 5 9 128 . 7 13 . 3 92 90 1368 10/24/02 3 .13 LOT 184 274 8 60 139 . 5 5 9 127 . 9 9. 2 92 90 1369 10/24/02 3 .13 LOT 184 273 9 60 141. 3 5 7 134. 9 9 . 6 95 90 1375 10/24/02 3 .13 LOT 184 346 8 60 139. 6 5 9 127. 6 7 . 1 91 90 1376 10/25/02 3 .13 LOT 184 352 8 50 136 . 8 6 8 125 . 7 9. 7 92 90 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 06105-12-06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS M M M M Elev. Plus Max. Opt. Field Field Field Req' or 3/4" Dry Moist. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel. Test Depth Curve Rock Dens. Cont. Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp No. Date Test Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%) 1377 10/25/02 3 13 LOT 44 352 8 50 135 . 8 6.8 123 .5 12 .3 90 90 1392 10/25/02 3 13 LOT 184 273 8 60 139. 6 5.9 126 .4 12 . 0 91 90 1393 10/25/02 3 13 LOT 30 277 8 60 139. 6 5.9 127 .2 11.4 91 90 1394 10/25/02 3 13 LOT 184 280 8 40 134 . 1 7.7 121.1 13 .0 90 90 1395 10/25/02 3 13 LOT 184 278 8 60 139. 6 5.9 125 . 8 9.3 90 90 1415 10/28/02 3 13 LOT 184 277 8 50 136 . 8 5.8 128 .7 10 . 9 94 90 1416 10/28/02 3 13 LOT 29 282 8 30 131. 3 8.7 121.8 13 .9 93 90 1417 10/28/02 3 13 LOT 184 283 8 40 134 . 1 7 . 7 125 . 7 12 . 0 94 90 1426 10/29/02 3 13 LOT 184 284 10 40 136 . 2 6.5 127 . 9 10 .1 94 90 1427 10/29/02 3 13 LOT 184 281 10 30 133 . 8 7.4 127 .1 13 . 8 95 90 1428 10/29/02 3 13 LOT 184 280 9 80 0 . 0 5 . 7 0 . 0 18 .3 0 0 1429 10/29/02 3 13 LOT 184 282 9 80 0 . 0 5.7 0.0 19.0 0 0 1430 10/30/02 3 13 LOT 42 326 8 40 134 . 1 7.7 122.9 10 .4 92 90 1433 10/30/02 3 .13 LOT 43 334 9 60 141. 3 5 . 7 136 . 8 10.0 97 90 1434 10/30/02 3 .13 LOT 43 337 8 50 139 . 5 5.9 127.9 6.4 92 90 1436 10/30/02 3 .13 LOT 43 337 8 60 139. 6 5 . 9 125 . 5 7.1 91 90 1437 10/30/02 3 .13 LOT 43 339 8 50 139 . 6 5.9 130 .2 8.9 93 90 1438 10/30/02 3 .13 LOT 184 270 9 40 136 . 5 7.2 129.1 9.1 95 90 1439 10/30/02 3 .13 LOT 180 268 9 60 141. 3 5.7 135.5 6.9 96 90 1443 10/31/02 3 .13 LOT 41 320 8 60 139. 6 5.9 125.7 9.7 90 90 1445 10/31/02 3 .13 LOT 30 274 9 80 0 . 0 5.7 0.0 19.5 0 0 1446 10/31/02 3 . 13 LOT 31 272 9 40 136 . 5 7.2 126 . 7 10 .7 93 90 1447 10/31/02 3 .13 LOT 31 268 8 30 131. 3 8.7 121.8 11.0 93 90 1448 10/31/02 3 .13 LOT 32 268 9 80 0 . 0 5 . 7 0 . 0 18 . 6 0 0 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No 06105-12-06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Elev. Plus Max. Opt. Field Field Field Req'd or 3/4" Dry Moist. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel. Test Depth Curve Rock Dens. Cont. Dens . Cont. Comp. Comp. No. Date Test Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%) M 1449 10/31/02 3 .13 LOT 184 267 9 80 0 . 0 5 7 0 . 0 14 5 0 0 1450 10/31/02 3 .13 LOT 3 9 310 8 60 139. 6 5 9 129. 6 10 1 93 90 1464 11/01/02 3 .13 LOT 40 326 8 50 136 . 8 6 8 125. 6 9 9 92 90 1465 11/01/02 3 .13 LOT 34 287 8 40 134 . 1 7 7 121. 0 9 1 90 90 1466 11/01/02 3 .13 LOT 33 285 8 60 139. 6 5 9 133 . 6 8 1 95 90 M 1470 11/01/02 3 .13 SEQUOIA 55+50 285 9 80 0 . 0 5 7 0 . 0 17 7 0 0 M 1471 11/01/02 3 .13 LOT 32 286 9 80 0 . 0 5 7 0 . 0 19 3 0 0 1472 11/01/02 3 .13 LOT 36 293 9 60 141. 3 5 7 133 . 5 7 0 94 90 1473 11/04/02 3 .13 SEQUOIA 59+80 301 8 40 134 . 1 7 7 121. 2 8 3 90 90 1474 11/04/02 3 .13 LOT 35 292 8 30 131. 3 8 7 118 . 0 8 8 90 90 1475 11/04/02 3 .13 LOT 3 8 307 8 60 139 . 6 5 9 128 . 8 8 9 92 90 1476 11/04/02 3 .13 LOT 34 291 8 40 134 . 1 7 7 121. 8 9 4 91 90 1477 11/04/02 3 .13 LOT 36 301 8 60 139. 6 5 9 131. 2 8 4 94 90 1486 11/04/02 3 .13 LOT 184 273 8 60 139 . 6 5 9 128 . 6 9 4 92 90 1492 11/05/02 3 .13 LOT 37 307 8 30 131. 3 8 7 118 . 4 9 5 90 90 1493 11/05/02 3 .13 LOT 35 300 8 60 139. 6 5 9 125. 8 8 4 90 90 1494 11/05/02 3 .13 LOT 39 317 8 30 131. 3 8 7 118 . 9 9 5 91 90 1498 11/06/02 3 .13 LOT 34 291 8 60 139 . 6 5 9 133 . 6 6 2 95 90 1499 11/05/02 3 .13 LOT 35 300 8 50 139. 5 5 9 127 . 0 7 6 91 90 1500 11/06/02 3 .13 LOT 36 309 8 50 139 . 5 5 9 126 . 4 8 4 91 90 1506 11/06/02 3 .13 LOT 35/35 308 8 60 139. 6 5 9 137. 0 7 .0 98 90 1507 11/06/02 3 .13 SEQUOIA 59+60 312 8 60 139. 6 5 9 128 . 1 5 .8 92 90 1508 11/06/02 3 .13 SEQUOIA 50+80 317 8 60 139. 6 5 9 129. 9 7 .2 93 90 1509 11/07/02 3 .13 SEQUOIA 61+00 320 8 60 139 . 6 5 . 9 128 . 2 7 . 0 92 90 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 06105-12-06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Elev. or Plus 3/4" Max. Dry Opt. Moist. Field Dry Field Moist. Field Rel. Req'd Rel. Test Depth Curve Rock Dens. Cont. Dens . Cont. Comp. Coi No. Date Test Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (% 1510 11/07/02 3 .13 SEQUOIA 59+90 317 8 50 139 6 5 9 130 6 6 9 94 90 1512 11/07/02 3 .13 LOT 39 326 8 50 139 5 5 9 125 9 8 4 90 90 1513 11/07/02 3 .13 LOT 37 320 8 60 139 5 5 9 125 5 7 9 91 90 1517 11/12/02 3 .13 LOT 35 302 8 60 139 6 5 9 125 5 7 4 90 90 1518 11/12/02 3 .13 LOT 77 293 8 60 139 6 5 9 126 7 7 2 91 90 1519 11/12/02 3 .13 LOT 78 288 8 60 139 6 5 9 129 8 6 9 93 90 1521 11/12/02 3 .13 LOT 28 287 9 40 136 5 7 2 129 1 9 5 95 90 1522 11/12/02 3 . 13 LOT 28 289 9 20 131 7 8 9 120 6 10 2 92 90 1523 11/12/02 3 .13 LOT 30 289 9 40 136 5 7 2 125 4 9 3 92 90 1524 11/12/02 3 .13 LOT 31 290 9 20 131 7 8 9 121 5 9 4 92 90 1525 11/13/02 3 . 13 LOT 33 292 8 50 135 8 6 8 125 4 6 7 92 90 1527 11/13/02 3 . 13 LOT 34 298 8 40 134 1 7 7 122 5 7 6 91 90 1528 11/13/02 3 .13 LOT 35 305 8 60 139 6 5 9 131 1 7 1 94 90 1529 11/13/02 3 .13 LOT 28 280 8 10 125 8 10 8 118 4 11 4 94 90 1530 11/13/02 3 .13 LOT 29 283 8 50 136 8 6 8 125 4 10 3 92 90 1531 11/13/02 3 .13 LOT 30 291 8 40 134 1 7 7 120 4 9 3 90 90 1532 11/13/02 3 .13 LOT 31 293 8 40 134 1 7 7 120 2 8 9 90 90 1533 11/14/02 3 .13 LOT 31 294 8 60 139 6 5 9 128 .6 9 9 92 90 M 1534 11/14/02 3 .13 LOT 32 291 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 . 0 10 .8 0 0 M 1535 11/14/02 3 . 13 LOT 33 294 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 .0 11 .2 0 0 1536 11/14/02 3 .13 LOT 34 302 9 40 136 .5 7 2 126 .9 9 .5 93 90 M 1537 11/14/02 3 .13 LOT 31 295 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 . 0 14 .0 0 0 1538 11/14/02 3 . 13 LOT 32 293 10 40 136 .2 6 .5 127 .8 10 . 0 94 90 1539 11/15/02 3 .13 LOT 31 298 8 50 136 .8 5 8 128 .4 9 .4 94 90 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 06105-12-06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Test No. Date Test Location Elev. Plus Max. Opt. Field Field Field Req'd or 3/4" Dry Moist. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel. Depth Curve Rock Dens. Cont. Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp. (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%) M M M M 1541 11/15/02 3.13 SEQUOIA 53+90 1542 11/15/02 3.13 SEQUOIA 53+10 1543 11/15/02 3.13 SEQUOIA 54+95 1544 11/15/02 3.13 LOT 32 1545 11/18/02 3.13 LOT 28 1545 11/18/02 3.13 LOT 184 1547 11/18/02 3.13 LOT 30 1548 11/18/02 3.13 SEQUOIA 55+50 1549 11/18/02 3.13 LOT 32 1550 11/18/02 3.13 LOT 34 1551 11/18/02 3.13 LOT 35 1553 11/18/02 3.13 LOT 35 1554 11/19/02 3.13 SEQUOIA 57+95 1555 11/19/02 3.13 SEQUOIA 58+45 1556 11/20/02 3.13 LOT 30 1557 11/20/02 3.13 LOT 28 1558 11/20/02 3.13 LOT 28 1558A 11/21/02 3.13 LOT 28 1559 11/20/02 3.13 LOT 30 1559A 11/21/02 3.13 LOT 30 1550 11/20/02 3.13 LOT 29 1560A 11/21/02 3.13 LOT 29 1561 11/21/02 3.13 SEQUOIA 57+50 1561A 11/22/02 3.13 SEQUOIA 57+50 285 286 291 300 291 293 291 303 304 310 313 318 320 325 297 294 296 296 298 298 299 299 316 316 9 8 8 9 9 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 50 60 40 60 40 20 20 40 60 60 50 40 50 40 80 80 40 60 40 40 60 60 80 80 139.8 139.8 135.5 139.8 134 .1 131. 7 131. 7 136 .5 139.8 139 . 8 135.8 134 .1 136 . 8 134 .1 0.0 0 . 0 136.5 141.3 136.5 135.5 139.8 139.6 0.0 0 . 0 5 . 8 5.8 7.2 5.8 7.7 8.9 8.9 7.2 5.8 5 . 8 5.8 7.7 6.8 7.7 5.7 5.7 7.2 5.7 7.2 7.2 5 . 8 5.9 5.7 5.7 134 .1 130 .4 127 .5 131.9 120 . 6 119.6 118 .5 125.6 128 .1 129.6 127.3 125.6 129 .5 126.7 0.0 0.0 112 .4 133.9 120 . 8 128 . 7 118 .7 134.7 0 . 0 0.0 6 . 9 8.3 9.4 5.9 10 .2 12 . 7 9.5 8.9 8.3 8.7 10 . 0 10 .2 7.2 9.6 10.8 11.3 2.8 10 .3 5 . 0 10.9 3.1 9.6 4.1 11.0 95 93 93 94 90 91 90 92 92 93 93 94 95 95 0 0 82 95 88 94 85 95 0 0 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 0 0 90 90 90 90 90 90 0 0 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 05105-12-06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Test No. Date Test Location Elev. Plus Max. Opt. Field Field Field Req'd or 3/4" Dry Moist. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel. Depth Curve Rock Dens. Cont. Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp. (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%) 1562 11/21/02 3 13 LOT 33 305 8 30 131 7 8 7 118 5 10 3 90 90 1563 11/21/02 3 13 LOT 32 303 8 40 134 1 7 7 124 6 9 5 93 90 1564 11/22/02 3 13 LOT 31 305 8 60 139 6 5 9 135 1 8 4 97 90 1565 11/22/02 3 13 LOT 29 301 8 60 139 5 5 9 132 4 7 5 95 90 M 1566 11/22/02 3 13 SEQUOIA 56+40 310 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 8 8 0 0 M 1567 11/22/02 3 13 LOT 30 305 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 9 0 0 0 M 1568 11/22/02 3 13 LOT 29 298 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 8 6 0 0 M 1572 11/25/02 3 13 LOT 33 308 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 15 5 0 0 M 1573 11/25/02 3 13 LOT 32 305 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 11 4 0 0 1574 11/25/02 3 13 LOT 30 301 8 60 139 8 5 8 125 8 10 2 90 90 M 1575 11/25/02 3 13 LOT 29 303 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 16 4 0 0 1576 11/26/02 3 13 LOT 31 308 9 60 141 3 5 7 135 0 7 9 96 90 1577 11/26/02 3 13 LOT 184 270 8 60 139 8 5 8 129 5 6 9 93 90 1578 11/25/02 3 13 LOT 184 272 8 60 139 8 5 8 128 3 7 9 92 90 M 1579 11/26/02 3 13 LOT 29 305 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 16 3 0 0 1580 11/27/02 3 13 LOT 28 301 9 50 141 3 5 7 130 1 6 6 92 90 M 1581 11/27/02 3 13 LOT 28 298 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 14 1 0 0 1584 12/02/02 3 13 LOT 184 273 9 50 141 3 5 7 134 8 5 8 95 90 1586 12/02/02 3 13 LOT 184 275 9 38 135 0 7 4 126 7 8 6 93 90 1587 12/02/02 3 13 LOT 184 270 9 44 137 5 6 9 127 7 8 7 93 90 M 1588 12/03/02 3 13 LOT 184 310 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 8 3 0 0 M 1589 12/03/02 3 13 LOT 29 312 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 .0 4 7 0 0 M 1589A 01/06/03 3 13 LOT 29 312 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 .0 9 1 0 0 M 1590 12/03/02 3 13 SEQUOIA 53+00 310 9 80 0 .0 5 7 0 .0 9 .0 0 0 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 06105-12-06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Elev. Plus Max. Opt. Field Field Field Req'd or 3/4" Dry Moist. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel. Test Depth Curve Rock Dens. Cont. Dens . Cont. Comp. Comp. No. Date Test Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%) M 1591 12/03/02 3 13 LOT 2 8 309 9 0 0 . 0 10 . 7 0 . 0 9 . 8 0 0 M 1594 12/04/02 3 13 LOT 184 293 9 80 0 . 0 5.7 0 . 0 8 . 3 0 0 M 1595 12/04/02 3 13 LOT 184 295 9 80 0 . 0 5.7 0 . 0 10 . 5 0 0 M 1596 12/05/02 3 13 LOT 184 298 9 80 0 . 0 5.7 0 . 0 8 . 8 0 0 1599 12/05/02 3 13 LOT 184 289 8 60 139. 6 5.8 132 . 1 7 . 8 95 90 M 1600 12/06/02 3 13 LOT 184 303 9 80 0 . 0 5 . 7 0 . 0 14 . 1 0 0 M 1601 12/06/02 3 13 LOT 184 305 9 80 0 . 0 5.7 0 . 0 6. 8 0 0 M 1601A 12/06/02 3 13 LOT 184 305 9 80 0 . 0 5 . 7 0 . 0 10 . 9 0 0 1602 12/06/02 3 .13 LOT 184 302 8 60 139 . 8 5.8 126 . 8 10 . 4 91 90 1603 12/06/02 3 .13 LOT 184 300 9 60 141. 3 5.7 136. 4 5 . 9 96 90 M 1604 12/09/02 3 13 LOT 184 304 9 80 0 . 0 5.7 0 . 0 4 . 3 0 0 M 1604A 12/09/02 3 .13 LOT 184 304 9 80 0. 0 5.7 0 . 0 8 . 3 0 0 M 1605 12/19/02 3 13 LOT 184 297 9 80 0 . 0 5.7 0 . 0 9. 0 0 0 1609 12/09/02 3 13 N OF LOT 46 370 5 0 116 . 4 15.1 98 . 2 11. 6 84 90 1609A 12/09/02 3 .13 N OF LOT 46 370 5 0 116 . 4 16.1 102 . 7 12 . 3 88 90 1609B 12/09/02 3 13 N OF LOT 46 370 5 0 116 . 4 16 .1 104 . 8 15 . 4 90 90 1610 12/09/02 3 13 N OF LOT 50 402 5 0 116 . 4 16.1 104 . 6 16. 3 90 90 1611 12/09/02 3 .13 N OF LOT 47 371 5 0 116 . 4 16 .1 108. 9 15. 5 94 90 1612 12/09/02 3 .13 N OF LOT 45 369 5 0 116 . 4 16 .1 105. 4 16 . 3 91 90 1613 12/10/02 3 .13 LOT 49 400 5 0 115 . 4 16.1 107 . 2 15 . 6 92 90 1614 12/10/02 3 .13 LOT 45 373 5 0 116 . 4 16.1 106 . 9 18 . 7 92 90 1615 12/10/02 3 .13 LOT 184 315 8 40 134 . 1 7.7 123 . 8 7 . 6 92 90 1516 12/10/02 3 .13 LOT 184 310 8 40 134 . 1 7.7 120 . 8 7 . 4 90 90 1617 12/10/02 3 .13 LOT 184 308 8 40 134 . 1 7.7 114 . 3 4 . 1 85 90 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 06105-12-05 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Test Elev. Plus Max. Opt. Field Field Field Req'd or 3/4" Dry Moist. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel. Depth Curve Rock Dens. Cont. Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp. No. Date Test Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (% 1517A 12/10/02 3 13 LOT 184 308 8 40 134 1 7 . 7 122 3 8 3 91 90 M 1618 12/10/02 3 13 LOT 184 312 9 80 0 0 5 . 7 0 0 11 7 0 0 1619 12/11/02 3 13 SEQUOIA 70+15 400 5 0 116 4 16. 1 108 3 17 9 93 90 1520 12/11/02 3 13 SEQUOIA 58+20 384 5 10 119 8 14 . 6 109 9 18 4 92 90 1621 12/11/02 3 13 SEQUOIA 65+40 351 5 20 123 2 13 . 2 111 2 15 8 90 90 1525 12/11/02 3 13 LOT 184 290 8 50 • 139 8 5 . 8 135 8 6 3 97 90 1625 12/11/02 3 13 LOT 184 280 8 50 139 8 5 . 8 130 5 6 9 93 90 1627 12/11/02 3 13 LOT 184 288 8 40 134 1 7 . 7 125 8 10 9 94 90 1628 12/11/02 3 13 LOT 184 291 8 50 139 8 5 . 8 128 0 7 0 92 90 M 1631 12/12/02 3 13 LOT 184 280 9 80 0 0 5 . 7 0 0 11 7 0 0 1632 12/12/02 3 13 LOT 34 293 8 60 139 8 5 . 8 128 7 7 5 92 90 1533 12/12/02 3 13 LOT 184 308 8 60 139 8 5 . 8 130 0 10 1 93 90 1534 12/12/02 3 13 LOT 184 285 8 60 139 8 5. 8 125 8 4 0 90 90 1634A 12/13/02 3 13 LOT 184 285 8 60 139 8 5. 8 126 4 10 4 90 90 1635 12/12/02 3 13 LOT 184 280 8 40 134 1 7 . 7 124 0 9 8 92 90 M 1635 12/13/02 3 13 LOT 184 315 9 80 0 0 5 . 7 0 0 11 7 0 0 M 1637 12/13/02 3 13 LOT 184 320 9 80 0 0 5 . 7 0 0 12 6 0 0 M 1538 12/13/02 3 13 LOT 184 310 9 80 0 0 5 . 7 0 0 10 9 0 0 M 1539 12/13/02 3 13 LOT 184 302 9 80 0 0 5 . 7 0 0 12 . 9 0 0 1640 12/13/02 3 .13 LOT 184 290 8 60 139 6 5 . 9 128 . 0 10 . 0 92 90 M 1641 12/14/02 3 .13 LOT 31 309 9 80 0 0 5 . 7 0 . 0 10 .6 0 0 M 1642 12/14/02 3 .13 LOT 33 315 9 80 0 0 5. 7 0 . 0 11 . 7 0 0 M 1643 12/14/02 3 .13 LOT 184 309 9 80 0 0 5 . 7 0 .0 13 .0 0 0 M 1644 12/14/02 3 .13 LOT 184 321 9 80 0 . 0 5 . 7 0 . 0 10 . 1 0 0 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 06105-12-06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Elev. or Plus 3/4" Max. Dry Opt. Moist. Field Dry Field Moist. Field Rel. Req'd Rel. Test Depth Curve Rock Dens. Cont. Dens. Cont. Comp. Cor No. Date Test Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (% SZ 1648 12/16/02 3 13 LOT 184 302 8 0 123 0 11.9 115 0 11 0 93 90 M 1549 12/16/02 3 13 LOT 31 315 9 80 0 0 5.7 0 0 9 8 0 0 M 1657 12/16/02 3 13 SEQUOIA 63+15 328 9 80 0 0 5 . 7 0 0 12 3 0 0 1658 12/18/02 3 13 LOT 69 336 9 50 138 9 6.4 127 9 8 1 92 90 M 1659 12/18/02 3 13 LOT 43 334 9 80 0 0 5.7 0 0 13 6 0 0 1660 12/18/02 3 13 LOT 184 315 1 0 119 5 13 .7 109 3 14 5 91 90 1661 12/18/02 3 13 LOT 184 318 1 0 119 5 13 .7 106 8 12 9 89 90 1561A 12/18/02 3 13 LOT 184 318 1 0 119 5 13 .7 107 3 14 7 90 90 M 1665 12/19/02 3 13 SEQUOIA 59+75 324 9 80 0 0 5 . 7 0 0 12 8 0 0 M 1666 12/19/02 3 13 LOT 3 6 325 9 80 0 0 5 . 7 0 0 14 8 0 0 M 1670 12/18/02 3 13 LOT 41 333 9 80 0 0 5 . 7 0 0 10 8 0 0 M 1671 12/18/02 3 13 LOT 70 338 9 80 0 0 5 . 7 0 0 11 9 0 0 1675 12/18/02 3 13 SEQUOIA 54+95 342 9 50 138 9 6.4 127 6 7 7 92 90 M 1576 12/19/02 3 13 LOT 70 339 9 80 0 0 5.7 0 0 12 8 0 0 M 1677 12/19/02 3 13 LOT 44 344 9 80 0 0 5.7 0 0 14 3 0 0 1678 12/19/02 3 13 LOT 41 338 9 40 136 5 7.2 128 1 8 0 94 90 M 1680 12/23/02 3 13 LOT 32 320 9 80 0 0 5.7 0 0 7 5 0 0 1681 12/23/02 3 13 LOT 34 324 9 50 138 9 6.4 130 3 9 3 94 90 1684 12/24/02 3 13 DELFINIO 10+60 314 8 60 139 8 5 . 8 135 1 6 3 97 90 M 1685 12/24/02 3 .13 LOT 29 315 9 80 0 0 5.7 0 0 7 9 0 0 M 1686 12/24/02 3 .13 LOT 30 318 9 80 0 0 5.7 0 .0 8 .6 0 0 1587 12/26/02 3 .13 LOT 32 323 9 60 141 3 5.7 129 . 9 9 .7 92 90 1688 12/25/02 3 .13 SEQUOIA 55+00 326 8 0 123 0 11.9 110 .0 8 .3 89 90 1688A 12/27/02 3 .13 SEQUOIA 56+00 326 8 0 123 0 11.9 112 .1 13 . 1 91 90 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 06105-12-06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Elev. or Plus 3/4" Max. Dry Opt. Moist. Field Dry Field Moist. Field Rel. Req'd Rel. Test Depth Curve Rock Dens. Cont. Dens. Cont. Comp. Coi No. Date Test Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (% 1589 12/26/02 3 13 LOT 29 320 9 60 141 3 5 7 130 8 10 0 93 90 SZ 1700 12/25/02 3 13 LOT 184 325 8 0 123 0 11 9 105 7 11 8 87 90 SZ 1700A 12/27/02 3 13 LOT 184 325 8 0 123 0 11 9 115 0 12 3 93 90 1701 12/27/02 3 13 SEQUOIA 55+00 323 8 0 123 0 11 9 113 7 12 0 92 90 M 1703 12/27/02 3 13 LOT 184 300 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 9 3 0 0 M 1704 12/27/02 3 13 LOT 184 289 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 10 5 0 0 SZ 1705 12/27/02 3 13 LOT 184 328 8 30 131 7 8 7 115 7 7 9 88 90 SZ 1705A 01/02/03 3 13 LOT 184 328 8 30 131 7 8 7 118 7 8 9 90 90 M 1706 12/28/02 3 13 LOT 184 315 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 8 3 0 0 1708 12/28/02 3 13 LOT 184 308 9 60 141 3 5 7 130 9 6 3 93 90 M 1709 12/30/02 3 13 LOT 184 318 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 7 9 0 0 1713 12/26/02 3 13 LOT 53 420 8 30 131 3 8 7 118 0 11 2 90 90 1714 12/26/02 3 13 LOT 53 424 9 50 138 9 6 4 132 6 8 1 95 90 1715 12/26/02 3 13 LOT 54 427 9 40 135 5 7 2 125 4 10 6 92 90 M 1720 12/30/02 3 13 LOT 184 325 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 6 0 0 0 1722 12/30/02 3 13 LOT 184 327 8 50 135 8 6 8 133 1 7 7 97 90 1723 12/30/02 3 13 LOT 184 328 8 50 135 8 6 8 129 4 6 0 95 90 M 1724 12/30/02 3 13 LOT 184 324 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 5 8 0 0 M 1725 12/30/02 3 13 LOT 184 325 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 9 3 0 0 1727 12/30/02 3 13 LOT 184 330 8 50 136 8 5 8 124 9 8 1 91 90 M 1728 12/30/02 3 13 LOT 184 330 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 8 5 0 0 M 1729 12/30/02 3 13 LOT 184 331 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 7 5 0 0 M 1740 12/30/02 3 13 LOT 184 315 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 8 9 0 0 M 1741 12/30/02 3 13 LOT 184 320 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 6 9 0 0 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 06105-12-06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Elev. or Plus 3/4" Max. Dry Opt. Moist. Field Dry Field Moist. Field Rel. Req'd Rel. Test Depth Curve Rock Dens. Cont. Dens. Cont. Comp. Coir No. Date Test Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%) 1742 12/30/02 3 13 LOT 78 291 8 60 139 8 5 . 8 126 9 10 7 91 90 1743 12/30/02 3 13 DELFINIO 11+3 5 285 8 60 139 8 5 . 8 130 1 6 9 93 90 1745 12/31/02 3 13 LOT 78 295 8 60 139 8 5 . 8 125 0 4 1 89 90 1745A 01/13/03 3 13 LOT 78 295 8 60 139 8 5 . 7 133 3 7 3 95 90 1746 12/31/02 3 13 LOT 78 299 8 60 139 8 5 . 8 120 9 3 9 86 90 1746A 01/13/03 3 13 LOT 78 299 8 60 139 8 5 . 7 131 3 6 3 94 90 M 1747 12/31/02 3 13 LOT 184 334 9 80 0 0 5 . 7 0 0 10 7 0 0 1748 01/02/03 3 13 LOT 74 338 8 50 139 8 5 . 8 123 8 4 0 89 90 1748A 01/03/03 3 13 LOT 74 338 8 60 139 8 5 . 8 130 1 7 1 93 90 M 1749 01/02/03 3 13 LOT 37 330 9 80 0 0 5 . 7 0 0 9 0 0 0 1751 01/02/03 3 13 LOT 184 328 8 30 131 3 8 . 7 110 3 11 4 84 90 1751A 01/31/03 3 13 LOT 184 328 8 30 131 3 8 . 7 12 0 6 9 9 92 90 1760 01/02/03 3 13 LOT 38 345 9 60 141 3 5 . 7 134 2 10 1 95 90 1761 01/02/03 3 13 LOT 39 352 8 50 139 8 5 . 8 130 0 6 0 93 90 1762 01/03/03 3 13 LOT 40 350 8 60 139 8 5 . 8 132 8 6 8 95 90 1763 01/03/03 3 13 LOT 38 335 9 60 141 3 5. 7 130 4 10 0 92 90 1764 01/03/03 3 13 LOT 39 349 9 60 141 3 5 . 7 131 8 9 9 93 90 1765 01/03/03 3 13 LOT 39 355 8 50 139 8 5 . 8 128 9 7 9 92 90 1766 01/03/03 3 .13 LOT 72 338 9 60 141 3 5 . 7 131 .7 10 3 93 90 1767 01/06/03 3 .13 LOT 72 351 8 50 139 6 5 . 9 130 .5 7 8 94 90 1768 01/06/03 3 .13 LOT 71 356 8 60 139 6 5 . 9 127 .8 10 8 92 90 M 1770 01/02/03 3 .13 LOT 184 332 9 80 0 0 5. 7 0 .0 8 1 0 0 M 1771 01/02/03 3 .13 LOT 184 333 9 80 0 0 5 . 7 0 . 0 6 6 0 0 M 1772 01/02/03 3 .13 LOT 184 335 9 80 0 0 5 . 7 0 . 0 7 5 0 0 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 06105-12-06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Elev. or Plus 3/4" Max. Dry Opt. Moist. Field Dry Field Moist. Field Rel. Req'd Rel. Test Depth Curve Rock Dens . Cont. Dens. Cont. Comp. COIT No. Date Test Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%) M 1773 01/02/03 3 13 LOT 184 336 9 80 0 0 5 . 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 M 1790 01/06/03 3 13 LOT 184 346 8 80 0 0 5. 9 0 0 5 7 0 0 M 1791 01/06/03 3 13 LOT 184 331 8 80 0 0 5 . 9 0 0 7 1 0 0 M 1792 01/07/03 3 13 LOT 184 334 8 80 0 0 5 . 9 0 0 5 2 0 0 M 1793 01/07/03 3 13 LOT 184 335 8 80 0 0 5 . 9 0 0 5 2 0 0 M 1794 01/07/03 3 13 LOT 184 337 8 60 0 0 5 . 9 0 0 3 9 0 0 M 1794A 01/07/03 3 13 LOT 184 337 8 60 0 0 5. 9 0 0 6 4 0 0 M 1805 01/08/03 3 13 LOT 184 339 8 80 0 0 5 . 9 0 0 7 3 0 0 1806 01/08/03 3 13 LOT 184 340 8 50 136 8 6 . 8 123 9 8 1 91 90 1807 01/08/03 3 13 LOT 41 343 8 50 136 8 6 . 8 127 0 6 5 93 90 M 1808 01/08/03 3 13 LOT 42 344 8 80 0 0 5 . 9 0 0 5 8 0 0 M 1809 01/08/03 3 13 LOT 40 348 8 80 0 0 5 . 7 0 0 5 3 0 0 1820 01/08/03 3 13 LOT 184 345 8 50 136 8 6 . 8 126 5 7 0 92 90 1821 01/08/03 3 13 LOT 41 346 8 50 136 8 6 . 8 131 3 5 9 95 90 M 1822 01/09/03 3 13 LOT 184 348 8 80 0 0 5 . 9 0 0 5 2 0 0 1823 01/09/03 3 13 LOT 42 349 8 60 139 5 5 . 9 135 6 4 9 98 90 1824 01/09/03 3 .13 LOT 41 352 8 60 139 6 5 . 9 128 2 7 . 0 92 90 1840 01/09/03 3 .13 LOT 41 355 8 60 139 8 5. 8 133 .8 6 .2 96 90 1841 01/09/03 3 .13 LOT 42 356 8 60 139 6 5 . 9 130 .1 5 . 8 93 90 1875 01/15/03 3 .13 LOT 42 351 8 30 131 3 8 . 7 120 .4 10 .3 92 90 1876 01/15/03 3 .13 LOT 44 366 8 50 135 .8 6 . 8 123 .8 9 . 0 90 90 1898 01/15/03 3 .13 LOT 25 309 8 60 139 8 5 . 8 126 .9 12 .3 91 90 M 1900 01/15/03 3 .13 LOT 184 274 9 80 0 0 5 . 7 0 . 0 5 . 8 0 0 1903 01/16/03 3 .13 LOT 184 276 8 50 139 .8 5 . 8 127 . 0 10 . 0 91 90 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 06105-12-06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Elev. Plus Max. Opt. Field Field Field Req' or 3/4" Dry Moist. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel. Test Depth Curve Rock Dens. Cont. Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp No. Date Test Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (% ) (%) (%) 1904 01/17/03 3 13 LOT 180 275 9 60 141. 3 5 . 7 131. 6 10 . 0 93 90 1905 01/17/03 3 13 LOT 184 280 9 50 141. 3 5 . 7 129. 3 7 . 9 92 90 1915 01/06/03 3 13 LOT 73 349 8 60 139. 8 5. 8 128 . 0 11. 1 92 90 1916 01/20/03 3 13 LOT 68 368 8 60 139 . 8 5 . 8 128 . 9 8. 9 92 90 1917 01/20/03 3 13 LOT 69 365 8 50 136 . 8 6. 8 125 . 0 9. 1 91 90 1918 01/20/03 3 13 LOT 73 345 8 40 134 . 1 7 . 7 120 . 7 9. 1 90 90 1919 01/20/03 3 13 LOT 74 343 8 60 139. 6 5 . 9 130 . 7 6 . 7 94 90 1920 01/20/03 3 13 LOT 75 341 8 60 139. 8 5 . 8 125 . 4 6. 9 90 90 1931 01/21/03 3 13 LOT 76 330 8 50 139. 8 5 . 8 126 . 2 13 . 2 90 90 1932 01/21/03 3 13 LOT 77 329 8 50 139 . 8 5 . 8 131. 1 10 . 5 94 90 1933 01/21/03 3 13 LOT 78 310 8 60 139 . 8 5 . 8 128 . 7 11. 3 92 90 1934 01/22/03 3 13 LOT 184 323 8 60 139 . 8 5 . 8 127 . 3 12 . 2 91 90 1935 01/22/03 3 13 LOT 184 319 8 60 139 . 8 5 . 8 132 . 7 9 . 2 95 90 M 1950 01/23/03 3 13 LOT 184 320 9 80 0 . 0 5. 7 0 . 0 14 . 1 0 0 M 1959 01/24/03 3 13 LOT 184 322 9 80 0 . 0 5 . 7 0 . 0 13 . 1 0 0 M 1960 01/24/03 3 13 LOT 184 321 9 80 0 . 0 5 . 7 0 . 0 10 . 7 0 0 1961 03/03/03 3 13 LOT 83 332 8 50 136 . 8 6. 8 125 . 9 7 . 0 92 90 1962 03/03/03 3 13 LOT 82 334 8 60 139 . 8 5 . 8 128. 0 5 . 5 92 90 M 1963 03/03/03 3 13 LOT 80 335 9 80 0 . 0 5 . 7 0 . 0 11. 6 0 0 M 1964 03/04/03 3 13 LOT 81 337 9 80 0 . 0 5 . 7 0 . 0 14 . 3 0 0 1966 01/27/03 3 13 LOT 184 325 8 50 136 . 8 5. 8 127 . 1 6 . 1 93 90 1976 01/28/03 3 13 LOT 71 355 9 50 138 . 9 6. 4 128 . 3 7 . 0 92 90 1977 01/30/03 3 13 SEQUOIA 59+25 339 8 0 123 . 0 11. 9 113 . 6 13 . 1 92 90 1978 01/30/03 3 13 SEQUOIA 61+10 346 8 10 125 . 8 10 . 8 115 . 0 92 . 0 92 90 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 06105-12-05 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Elev. Plus Max. Opt. Field Field Field Req'd or 3/4" Dry Moist. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel. Test Depth Curve Rock Dens. Cont. Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp. No. Date Test Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%) 1979 01/30/03 3 13 SEQUOIA 50+15 345 8 0 123 .0 11.9 110 .9 14 .6 90 90 M 1980 01/29/03 3 13 LOT 184 320 9 80 0 . 0 5.7 0.0 13 . 0 0 0 1981 01/30/03 3 13 LOT 184 340 8 60 139.8 5.8 130 . 5 8.5 93 90 M 1982 01/30/03 3 13 LOT 184 338 9 80 0 . 0 5 . 7 0.0 11. 9 0 0 M 1983 01/30/03 3 13 LOT 184 325 9 80 0 . 0 5.7 0 . 0 10 . 5 0 0 1984 01/31/03 3 13 LOT 184 327 8 60 139.8 5.8 131.1 7.9 94 90 1985 01/31/03 3 13 LOT 184 331 8 50 139.6 5.9 128.9 10 .9 92 90 M 1985 01/31/03 3 13 LOT 184 353 9 80 0 . 0 5.7 0.0 10 .6 0 0 1989 02/01/03 3 13 SEQUOIA 52+15 358 8 20 128 . 5 9.7 115 .5 11.7 90 90 1990 02/03/03 3 13 LOT 38 351 8 0 123 . 0 11. 9 108 .0 9.0 88 90 1990A 02/03/03 3 13 LOT 3 8 351 8 0 123 . 0 11.9 112 .3 11.7 91 90 1991 02/03/03 3 13 LOT 35 346 8 20 128 .5 9.7 115.5 10 .3 90 90 1992 02/03/03 3 13 LOT 41 355 9 40 136 . 5 7.2 128 .2 7.9 94 90 1993 02/03/03 3 13 LOT 40 357 9 60 141.3 5 . 7 128 .7 6.4 91 90 1994 02/03/03 3 .13 LOT 184 335 8 30 131.3 8.7 124 . 8 11.6 95 90 M 1995 02/04/03 3 .13 LOT 81 320 9 80 0.0 5.7 0.0 12.9 0 0 1999 02/06/03 3 .13 SEQUOIA 66+00 358 9 60 141.3 5.7 128 .0 7 . 7 91 90 SZ 2000 02/01/03 3 .13 LOT 184 345 8 60 139 .5 5.9 133.8 4.8 96 90 SZ 2001 02/01/03 3 .13 LOT 184 350 8 60 139 . 5 5.9 126 .4 7.7 91 90 2002 02/01/03 3 .13 LOT 184 346 8 40 134 .1 7.7 122 .2 8.5 91 90 2003 02/01/03 3 .13 LOT 184 347 8 40 134.1 7.7 125.6 7.2 94 90 SZ 2004 02/01/03 3 .13 LOT 36 349 8 60 139.8 5.8 127 .7 5.0 91 90 2020 02/06/03 3 .13 SEQUOIA 67+85 281 9 50 141. 3 5.7 129.9 5.5 92 90 2021 02/06/03 3 .13 SEQUOIA 59+15 341 8 30 131.3 8.7 118 .4 13 .1 90 90 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 06105-12-06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Test Elev. Plus Max. Opt. Field Field Field Req'd or 3/4" Dry Moist. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel. Depth Curve Rock Dens. Cont. Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp. No. Date Test Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (% 2022 02/07/03 3 13 LOT 89 310 9 50 138 9 6 . 4 130 . 2 7 . 0 94 90 M 2023 02/07/03 3 13 LOT 80 323 9 80 0 0 5 . 7 0 . 0 13 . 1 0 0 M 2024 02/07/03 3 13 DELFINIO 14+65 312 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 11 6 0 0 2041 02/24/03 3 13 DELFINIO 14+55 328 8 40 134 1 7 7 122 9 8 3 92 90 2042 02/24/03 3 13 LOT 81 332 8 60 139 8 5 8 131 2 5 2 94 90 M 2043 02/27/03 3 13 DELFINIO 15+45 330 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 13 7 0 0 M 2044 02/27/03 3 13 LOT 81 326 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 12 8 0 0 M 2045 02/20/03 3 13 LOT 88 320 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 10 9 0 0 2046 02/20/03 3 13 LOT 81 325 9 60 141 3 5 7 130 2 5 9 92 90 2047 02/20/03 3 13 LOT 82 323 9 60 141 3 5 7 128 0 6 1 91 90 2048 02/20/03 3 13 LOT 80 327 9 50 138 9 6 4 125 8 7 7 91 90 M 2049 02/21/03 3 13 LOT 83 325 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 11 8 0 0 M 2050 02/21/03 3 13 LOT 80 330 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 13 0 0 0 2051 03/04/03 3 13 LOT 184 341 8 30 131 3 8 7 121 3 8 1 92 90 2052 03/04/03 3 .13 LOT 184 347 8 50 136 8 6 8 127 0 7 8 93 90 2053 03/04/03 3 .13 LOT 43 353 8 50 135 8 5 8 124 4 8 5 91 90 2054 03/04/03 3 .13 LOT 42 362 8 40 134 1 7 7 121 .0 8 .3 90 90 2055 03/04/03 3 .13 LOT 67 376 8 50 136 .8 6 8 123 .2 8 .4 90 90 M 2056 03/04/03 3 .13 DELFINIO 15+80 335 9 80 0 . 0 5 .7 0 .0 12 . 8 0 0 M 2057 03/04/03 3 .13 LOT 81 339 9 80 0 .0 5 .7 0 . 0 13 . 0 0 0 M 2058 03/05/03 3 .13 LOT 83 338 9 80 0 .0 5 .7 0 .0 15 .0 0 0 2059 03/05/03 3 .13 LOT 81 342 9 60 141 .3 5 .7 130 .8 5 . 9 93 90 2060 03/05/03 3 .13 LOT 82 344 11 20 116 .3 14 .2 109 . 0 15 .7 94 90 2061 03/05/03 3 .13 LOT 51 399 8 50 136 .8 6 .8 128 .8 6 .2 94 90 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 06105-12-06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Elev. or Plus 3/4" Max. Dry Opt. Moist. Field Dry Field Moist. Field Rel. Req'd Rel. Test Depth Curve Rock Dens. Cont. Dens. Cont. Comp. Coir No. Date Test Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%) 2062 03/05/03 3 13 LOT 52 404 8 50 135 8 6 . 8 123 7 7 . 7 90 90 2053 03/05/03 3 13 LOT 50 402 8 50 136 8 6. 8 129 5 7 . 0 95 90 2064 03/05/03 3 13 LOT 51 407 8 50 136 8 6. 8 125 1 5 . 9 91 90 2066 03/06/03 3 13 LOT 87 330 11 30 120 5 12 . 3 109 7 17 . 8 91 80 2069 03/07/03 3 13 LOT 77 333 9 40 136 5 7 . 2 122 7 10 . 1 90 90 2070 03/07/03 3 13 LOT 76 335 3 0 119 0 12 . 7 108 4 15. 5 91 90 SZ 2082 03/10/03 3 13 LOT 184 356 8 30 131 3 8 . 7 118 7 9. 5 90 90 2086 03/07/03 3 13 LOT 79 335 3 20 125 3 10 . 1 114 6 13 . 6 91 90 2087 03/07/03 3 13 LOT 77 334 3 0 119 0 12 . 7 107 5 15 . 6 90 90 2088 03/07/03 3 13 LOT 91 323 8 40 134 1 7 . 7 125 7 8 . 3 94 90 2089 03/07/03 3 13 LOT 91 326 3 10 122 1 11. 4 111 8 14 . 0 92 90 2090 03/10/03 3 13 LOT 79 337 3 50 137 8 5 . 5 130 1 8 . 1 94 90 2091 03/10/03 3 13 LOT 82 346 3 40 131 5 7 . 7 121 1 11. 4 92 90 2092 03/10/03 3 13 LOT 80 342 3 0 119 0 12 . 7 110 7 15 . 9 93 90 2096 03/11/03 3 13 LOT 184 340 8 20 128 5 9. 7 115 5 13 . 0 90 90 2097 03/11/03 3 13 LOT 184 347 8 50 136 8 5 . 8 124 0 7 . 3 91 90 2098 03/11/03 3 13 LOT 184 335 8 10 125 8 10 . 8 117 2 11. 9 93 90 2099 03/12/03 3 13 LOT 184 342 8 50 136 8 6 . 8 123 3 7 . 0 90 90 2102 03/11/03 3 13 LOT 39 355 8 30 131 3 8 . 7 118 5 10 . 4 90 90 2104 03/12/03 3 13 LOT 36 347 8 20 128 5 9. 7 117 7 9 . 4 92 90 2117 03/13/03 3 13 LOT 74 352 8 40 134 1 7 . 7 121 3 10 . 8 90 90 2118 03/13/03 3 .13 LOT 73 357 8 30 131 3 8 . 7 124 .4 8. 3 95 90 M 2124 03/18/03 3 .13 LOT 90 332 9 80 0 0 5 . 7 0 .0 12 . 0 0 0 2130 03/18/03 3 .13 LOT 89 335 9 50 141 .3 5 . 7 130 .8 6. 0 93 90 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 06105-12-06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Elev. or Plus 3/4" Max. Dry Opt. Moist. Field Dry Field Moist. Field Rel. Req'd Rel. Test Depth Curve Rock Dens. Cont. Dens. Cont. Comp. Cot No. Date Test Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (% M 2131 03/18/03 3 13 LOT 89 338 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 14 . 1 0 0 M 2132 03/18/03 3 13 LOT 88 341 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 10 . 9 0 0 M 2144 03/21/03 3 13 LOT 89 344 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 12 . 8 0 0 M 2145 03/21/03 3 13 LOT 88 347 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 10 . 9 0 0 M 2146 03/21/03 3 13 LOT 89 349 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 13 . 7 0 0 2147 03/21/03 3 13 LOT 83 350 9 60 141 3 5 7 134 2 7 . 0 95 90 214 8 03/21/03 3 13 DELFINIO 15+05 344 9 50 138 9 6 4 131 2 5 . 1 94 90 214 9 03/21/03 3 13 LOT 87 348 9 50 141 3 5 7 128 0 5 . 8 91 90 M 2150 03/21/03 3 13 DELFINIO 15+20 353 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 11. 8 0 0 M 2151 03/21/03 3 13 LOT 84 356 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 13 . 6 0 0 M 2152 03/24/03 3 13 LOT 84 354 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 10 . 9 0 0 M 2153 03/24/03 3 13 LOT 85 360 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 12 . 8 0 0 M 2154 03/24/03 3 13 LOT 86 363 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 12 . 4 0 0 2175 03/24/03 3 13 LOT 82 352 8 30 131 3 8 7 120 4 10 . 5 92 90 2176 03/25/03 3 13 LOT 87 365 8 20 128 5 9 7 115 9 11. 2 90 90 2177 03/25/03 3 13 LOT 83 360 8 20 128 5 9 7 118 8 13 . 1 92 90 2178 03/25/03 3 13 LOT 85 370 9 40 135 5 7 2 125 9 8 . 5 92 90 M 2180 03/26/03 3 13 LOT 91 333 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 11. 2 0 0 2181 03/26/03 3 13 LOT 86 372 8 20 128 5 9 7 118 .4 10 . 5 92 90 2182 03/26/03 3 .13 LOT 90 340 8 0 123 .0 11 9 115 .8 13 . 3 94 90 2183 03/26/03 3 .13 LOT 90 343 8 40 134 .1 7 .7 121 .2 9 . 7 90 90 M 2198 03/28/03 3 13 LOT 88 340 9 80 0 . 0 5 .7 0 .0 14 . 1 0 0 M 2199 03/28/03 3 .13 LOT 87 345 9 80 0 .0 5 .7 0 .0 12 . 0 0 0 2210 03/31/03 3 .13 LOT 87 364 8 40 134 . 1 7 .7 120 . 9 10 . 3 90 90 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 06105-12-06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS FG Elev. Plus Max. Opt. Field Field Field Req' or 3/4" Dry Moist. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel. Test Depth Curve Rock Dens . Cont. Dens . Cont. Comp. Comp No. Date Test Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%) 2211 03/31/03 3 13 LOT 89 354 8 20 128 . 5 9 . 7 118 . 4 10 . 1 92 90 2212 03/31/03 3 13 LOT 91 340 8 20 128 . 5 9. 7 115 . 9 12 8 90 90 2213 03/31/03 3 13 LOT 88 363 8 40 134 . 1 7 . 7 125 . 6 9 3 94 90 2215 04/01/03 3 13 LOT 87 369 8 20 128 . 5 9 . 7 116 . 7 10 3 91 90 2215 04/01/03 3 13 LOT 90 349 8 0 123 . 0 11. 9 112 . 8 14 3 92 90 2217 04/01/03 3 13 LOT 89 357 8 30 131. 3 8 . 7 118 . 0 10 6 90 90 2256 04/02/03 3 13 LOT 48 393 17 20 124 . 1 10 . 6 109 . 5 14 8 88 90 2256A 04/11/03 3 13 LOT 48 393 17 20 124 . 1 10 . 6 112 . 5 13 5 91 90 2257 04/02/03 3 13 LOT 44 369 8 30 131. 3 8. 7 121. 1 10 0 92 90 2258 04/03/03 3 13 LOT 88 365 8 50 136. 8 6. 8 125 . 0 7 1 91 90 2260 04/03/03 3 13 LOT 41 351 8 30 131. 3 8 . 7 119 . 1 10 0 91 90 2261 04/03/03 3 13 LOT 43 367 8 30 131. 3 8 . 7 118 . 3 9 1 90 90 2262 04/04/03 3 13 LOT 86 357 8 50 136 . 8 6 . 8 123 . 3 7 5 90 90 2263 04/04/03 3 13 LOT 85 370 8 50 136 . 8 6 . 8 119 . 1 4 4 87 90 2253A 04/09/03 3 13 LOT 86 370 8 50 136. 8 6 . 8 123 . 1 7 7 90 90 2266 04/07/03 3 13 LOT 52 416 8 40 134 . 1 7 . 7 121. 9 8 7 91 90 2268 04/08/03 3 13 LOT 53 425 8 40 134 . 1 7 . 7 121. 5 9 3 91 90 2305 04/09/03 3 13 LOT 38 355 8 30 131. 3 8 . 7 119. 0 9 . 9 91 90 2305 04/09/03 3 13 LOT 41 . 361 8 30 131. 3 8 . 7 118 . 4 9 .7 90 90 2309 04/10/03 3 13 LOT 63 420 8 40 134 . 1 7 . 7 122 . 5 6 . 8 91 90 2310 04/10/03 3 13 LOT 62 429 8 40 134 . 1 7 . 7 126 0 5 . 9 94 90 2311 04/10/03 3 .13 LOT 55 449 8 40 134 . 1 7. 7 121. 8 7 .5 91 90 2312 04/10/03 3 .13 LOT 57 461 8 40 134. 1 7 . 7 120 7 8 .1 90 90 2325 04/21/03 3 . 13 LOT 33 340 8 30 131. 3 8 . 7 120 6 9 .8 92 90 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 06105-12-06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Elev. Plus Max. Opt. Field Field Field Req' or 3/4" Dry Moist. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel. Test Depth Curve Rock Dens . Cont. Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp No. Date Test Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%) FG 2326 04/21/03 3 13 LOT 32 337 8 30 131. 3 8 . 7 118 .5 10 .3 90 90 FG 2327 04/21/03 3 13 LOT 31 334 8 30 131. 3 8 . 7 118.9 9.1 91 90 FG 2328 04/21/03 3 13 LOT 3 0 331 8 20 128 . 5 9 . 7 117 .7 12 .4 92 90 FG 2329 04/21/03 3 13 LOT 2 9 340 8 30 131. 3 8. 7 120 . 5 9 . 8 92 90 FG 2333 04/22/03 3 13 LOT 3 6 351 8 40 134 . 1 7 . 7 120 .6 6.5 90 90 FG 2334 04/22/03 3 13 LOT 37 354 8 30 131 . 3 8 . 7 118.3 9.0 90 90 FG 2335 04/22/03 3 13 LOT 38 356 8 40 134 . 1 7 . 7 121.3 7.4 90 90 FG 2336 04/22/03 3 13 LOT 39 359 8 40 134 . 1 7 . 7 125.6 8.7 94 90 FG 2337 04/22/03 3 13 LOT 40 361 8 50 136 . 8 6 . 8 130 .0 5.7 95 90 FG 2338 04/22/03 3 13 LOT 41 364 8 40 134 . 1 7 . 7 128 .4 9.0 96 90 FG 2339 04/22/03 3 13 LOT 42 366 8 30 131. 3 8 . 7 122 . 9 10 . 5 94 90 FG 2340 04/22/03 3 13 LOT 43 369 8 30 131. 3 8 . 7 118.3 9 . 8 90 90 FG 2341 04/22/03 3 13 .LOT 44 372 8 30 131 . 3 8 . 7 118.1 11. 9 90 90 2358 04/24/03 3 13 LOT 62 434 8 30 131. 3 8 . 7 119 .7 8.5 91 90 2369 04/24/03 3 13 LOT 63 424 8 30 131 . 3 8. 7 119.3 11.1 91 90 2374 04/25/03 3 13 LOT 4 9 399 3 40 131 . 5 7 . 7 118 .5 6.2 90 90 2389 04/28/03 3 13 DELFINIO 10+80 324 8 30 131. 3 8 . 7 118 . 0 10 .6 90 90 2521 05/22/03 3 13 LOT 51 410 8 40 134 . 1 7 . 7 121.5 8.2 91 90 2522R 05/22/03 3 13 LOT 52 417 8 50 135 . 8 6. 8 120 .3 8.0 88 90 2528 05/23/03 3 13 LOT 66 386 26 0 138 . 5 6 . 9 125 . 9 8.5 91 90 2536 05/28/03 3 13 LOT 77 336 25 0 138. 5 6 . 9 131.3 6.4 95 90 2537 05/28/03 3 13 LOT 78 333 26 0 138. 5 6 . 9 125.0 7.2 90 90 2538 05/29/03 3 13 LOT 79 345 26 0 138 . 5 6 . 9 124 .4 9 . 0 90 90 2539 05/29/03 3 13 LOT 81 353 26 0 138 . 5 6 . 9 127.2 8.3 92 90 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 05105-12-06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Test No. FG FG Date Test Location Elev. Plus Max. Opt. Field Field Field Req'd or 3/4" Dry Moist. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel. Depth Curve Rock Dens. Cont. Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp. (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%) 2540 05/29/03 3 .13 LOT 83 366 26 0 138 5 5 . 9 125 8 7 1 91 90 2541 05/29/03 3 .13 LOT 76 341 26 0 138 5 5 9 124 8 8 4 90 90 2546 05/30/03 3 .13 LOT 84 375 26 0 138 5 6 9 127 7 8 1 92 90 2547 05/30/03 3 .13 LOT 80 346 25 0 138 5 6 9 130 2 6 5 94 90 2548 05/30/03 3 .13 LOT 82 359 25 0 138 5 5 9 125 8 6 2 91 90 2549 05/30/03 3 .13 LOT 81 354 25 0 138 5 6 9 124 4 8 1 90 90 2567 06/05/03 3 .13 LOT 80 347 25 0 138 5 6 9 131 1 6 5 95 90 2568 06/05/03 3 .13 LOT 77 337 26 0 138 5 6 9 126 2 7 8 91 90 2569 06/05/03 3 .13 DELFINIO 11+0 0 340 25 0 138 5 6 9 124 9 8 4 90 90 2745 07/25/03 3 .13 LOT 57 379 33 0 135 4 7 5 122 9 5 9 91 90 2746 07/25/03 3 .13 LOT 65 392 33 0 135 4 7 5 122 0 5 8 90 90 2747 07/25/03 3 .13 TAMARINDO 11+00 376 7 0 122 8 11 0 112 9 14 2 92 90 2771 07/31/03 3 . 13 LOT 88 365 33 0 135 4 7 5 125 9 7 5 93 90 2772 07/31/03 3 .13 LOT 90 349 33 0 135 4 7 5 121 8 8 0 90 90 2774 08/01/03 3 .13 LOT 84 377 33 0 135 4 7 5 125 0 6 1 92 90 2775 08/01/03 3 .13 LOT 87 372 33 0 135 4 7 5 122 .3 5 .6 90 90 2776 08/01/03 3 .13 LOT 88 367 33 0 135 .4 7 5 123 .5 7 .2 91 90 2777 08/01/03 3 .13 LOT 85 379 33 0 135 .4 7 5 121 .8 6 .9 90 90 2800 08/06/03 3 .13 LOT 28 325 8 30 131 .3 8 7 122 .3 7 . 7 93 90 2811 08/05/03 3 .13 DELFINIO 13+40 343 33 0 135 .4 7 .5 122 .2 8 . 1 90 90 2812 08/06/03 3 .13 DELFINIO 15+70 359 33 0 135 .4 7 . 5 124 .4 5 . 9 92 90 2813 08/06/03 3 .13 DELFINIO 14+3 0 350 33 0 135 .4 7 . 5 121 .8 8 .3 90 90 2839 08/12/03 3 .13 DELFINIO 14+50 353 33 0 135 .4 7 .5 122 .2 8 .9 90 90 2840 08/12/03 3 .13 DELFINIO 16+70 359 33 0 135 .4 7 .5 120 . 0 5 . 8 89 90 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 06105-12-06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Elev. or Plus 3/4" Max. Dry Opt. Moist. Field Dry Field Moist. Field Rel. Req'd Rel. Test Depth Curve Rock Dens. Cont. Dens. Cont. Comp. Com No. Date Test Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%) 2840A 08/13/03 3 13 DELFINIO 16+70 359 33 0 135 4 7 5 123 5 7 0 91 90 2841 08/12/03 3 13 DELFINIO 15+20 351 33 0 135 4 7 5 118 1 4 5 87 90 2841A 08/13/03 3 13 DELFINIO 15+20 361 33 0 135 4 7 5 121 8 7 2 90 90 2911 08/21/03 3 13 LOT 97 395 33 0 135 4 7 5 124 1 7 4 92 90 2950 08/27/03 3 13 LOT 85 380 8 10 125 8 10 8 113 1 7 6 90 90 2950A 08/27/03 3 13 LOT 85 380 8 10 125 8 10 8 113 8 10 4 90 90 2979 09/02/03 3 13 LOT 54 436 8 30 131 3 8 7 119 2 9 8 91 90 2980 09/02/03 3 13 LOT 55 449 8 30 131 3 8 7 118 2 10 4 90 90 2990 09/03/03 3 13 LOT 52 420 8 30 131 3 8 7 118 5 7 9 90 90 2991 09/03/03 3 13 LOT 53 428 8 30 131 3 8 7 120 2 8 3 91 90 2992 09/03/03 3 13 LOT 97 386 8 40 134 1 7 7 117 3 4 9 87 90 2992A 09/04/03 3 13 LOT 97 386 8 40 134 1 7 7 121 7 9 5 91 90 2998 09/04/03 3 13 LOT 50 407 8 30 131 3 8 7 119 2 8 3 91 90 2999 09/04/03 3 13 LOT 51 413 8 30 131 3 8 7 118 0 8 3 90 90 FG 3003 09/04/03 3 13 LOT 34 343 8 30 131 3 8 7 126 8 5 2 97 90 FG 3004 09/04/03 3 13 LOT 35 347 8 30 131 .3 8 7 125 9 5 5 96 90 FG 3005 09/05/03 3 13 LOT 70 365 33 0 135 .4 7 5 125 4 7 .4 93 90 FG 3006 09/05/03 3 13 LOT 69 370 33 0 135 .4 7 5 123 9 5 .6 91 90 FG 3007 09/05/03 3 13 LOT 58 376 33 0 135 .4 7 5 118 7 5 .2 88 90 FG 3007A 09/30/03 3 .13 LOT 68 375 33 0 135 .4 7 5 131 .2 5 .7 97 90 FG 3008 09/05/03 3 .13 LOT 67 382 33 0 135 .4 7 5 124 . 8 8 .1 92 90 FG 3009 09/05/03 3 .13 LOT 56 388 33 0 135 .4 7 5 117 .2 4 .6 87 90 FG 3009A 09/30/03 3 .13 LOT 66 388 33 0 135 .4 7 .5 127 . 8 7 .3 94 90 FG 3010 09/05/03 3 .13 LOT 65 394 33 0 135 .4 7 .5 119 .9 5 .3 89 90 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No 05105-12 -06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Elev. Plus Max. Opt. Field Field Field Req'd or 3/4" Dry Moist. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel. Test Depth Curve Rock Dens. Cont. Dens . Cont. Comp. Comp. No. Date Test Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (% ) (%) (%) FG 3010A 09/30/03 3 .13 LOT 65 394 33 0 135 . 4 7 5 129 . 6 7 . 1 96 90 3026 09/05/03 3 .13 LOT 97 410 33 0 135. 4 7 5 121. 5 9. 3 90 90 3038 09/08/03 3 .13 LOT 91 339 33 0 135 . 4 7 5 125. 0 9. 6 92 90 3039 09/08/03 3 .13 LOT 91 341 33 0 135 . 4 7 5 122 . 7 9 . 5 91 90 FG 3052 09/10/03 3 .13 LOT 71 361 8 20 128 . 5 9 7 122 . 1 10 . 4 95 90 FG 3053 09/10/03 3 .13 LOT 72 356 8 20 128 . 5 9 7 124 . 7 8 . 7 97 90 FG 3054 09/10/03 3 .13 LOT 73 353 8 20 128 . 5 9 7 123 . 4 10 . 8 96 90 FG 3055 09/10/03 3 .13 LOT 74 350 8 20 128 . 5 9 7 120 . 7 9 . 1 94 90 FG 3056 09/10/03 3 .13 LOT 75 343 33 0 135 . 4 7 5 130 . 8 5 . 3 97 90 FG 3057 09/10/03 3 .13 LOT 77 340 33 0 • 135 . 4 7 5 121. 6 6 . 6 90 90 FG 3058 09/10/03 3 .13 LOT 78 336 33 0 135 . 4 7 5 129 . 3 7 . 3 95 90 FG 3059 09/10/03 3 .13 LOT 79 342 33 0 135. 4 7 5 124 . 0 5 . 2 92 90 FG 3062 09/11/03 3 .13 LOT 80 349 33 0 135. 4 7 5 124 . 1 7 . 0 92 90 FG 3063 09/11/03 3 .13 LOT 81 355 33 0 135 . 4 7 5 123 . 3 8 . 6 91 90 FG 3064 09/11/03 3 .13 LOT 82 351 33 0 135 . 4 7 5 127 . 7 6 . 1 94 90 FG 3055 09/11/03 3 . 13 LOT 83 368 33 0 135. 4 7 5 121. 8 7 . 0 90 90 FG 3079 09/12/03 3 .13 LOT 91. 347 33 0 135 . 4 7 5 120 . 3 4 . 9 89 90 FG 3079A 10/14/03 3 .13 LOT 91 347 33 0 135 . 4 7 5 122 . 2 5 . 9 90 90 FG 3080 09/12/03 3 .13 LOT 90 353 33 0 135 . 4 7 5 121. 7 5 . 8 90 90 FG 3080A 10/14/03 3 .13 LOT 90 353 33 0 135 . 4 7 5 124 . 1 5 . 7 92 90 FG 3081 09/12/03 3 .13 LOT 89 362 33 0 135 . 4 7 .5 124 . 0 7 . 9 92 90 FG 3082 09/12/03 3 .13 LOT 88 368 33 0 135. 4 7 .5 124 . 5 7. 7 92 90 FG 3083 09/12/03 3 . 13 LOT 86 379 33 0 135. 9 7 .5 121. 4 5. 5 90 90 FG 3084 09/12/03 3 . 13 LOT 87 374 33 0 135 . 9 7 .5 123 . 7 8. 1 91 90 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 06105-12-06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Elev. or Plus 3/4" Max. Dry Opt. Moist. Field Dry Field Moist. Field Rel. Req'd Rel. Test No. Date Test Location Depth (ft) Curve No. Rock (%) Dens . (pcf) Cont. (%) Dens. (pcf) Cont. (%) Comp. (%) Comp. (%) FG 3085 09/12/03 3 13 LOT 85 381 33 0 135 . 9 7 . 5 125 . 5 10 . 4 93 90 3086 03/12/03 3 13 LOT 53 434 8 30 131. 3 8. 7 122 . 0 8 . 2 93 90 3087 09/13/03 3 13 LOT 53 423 8 30 131. 3 8 7 124. 6 8 8 95 90 3089 09/13/03 3 13 LOT 62 434 8 40 134 . 1 7 7 124 . 0 9 2 92 90 FG 3090 09/15/03 3 13 LOT 50 407 17 20 124 1 10 5 112 8 13 9 91 90 3091 09/15/03 3 13 LOT 64 400 8 30 131 3 8 7 118 5 9 3 90 90 3092 09/15/03 3 13 LOT 63 425 8 30 131 3 8 7 117 8 8 1 90 90 FG 3093 09/15/03 3 13 LOT 57 463 8 30 131 3 8 7 118 0 7 9 90 90 FG 3094 09/15/03 3 13 LOT 56 451 8 30 131 3 8 7 118 4 8 6 90 90 FG 3095 09/15/03 3 13 LOT 55 451 8 30 131 3 8 7 123 9 8 2 94 90 FG 3095 09/15/03 3 13 LOT 54 438 8 30 131 3 8 7 121 6 10 8 93 90 FG 3097 09/15/03 3 13 LOT 53 429 8 30 131 3 8 7 122 7 9 3 93 90 FG 3098 09/15/03 3 13 LOT 52 420 8 30 131 3 8 7 125 2 7 2 95 90 FG 3099 09/15/03 3 13 LOT 51 414 8 30 131 3 8 7 125 2 7 .4 95 90 FG 3100 09/15/03 3 13 LOT 58 463 33 0 135 4 7 5 118 3 6 .3 87 90 FG 3100A 09/17/03 3 13 LOT 58 463 33 0 135 4 7 5 130 4 8 .9 96 90 FG 3101 09/16/03 3 .13 LOT 59 461 33 0 135 4 7 .5 121 1 5 .2 89 90 FG 3101A 09/17/03 3 .13 LOT 59 461 33 0 135 4 7 .5 127 .0 10 .2 94 90 3102 09/15/03 3 .13 LOT 61 442 8 30 131 .3 8 . 7 118 .4 10 .3 90 90 3103 09/16/03 3 .13 LOT 64 399 8 30 131 .3 8 . 7 120 .1 7 . 9 91 90 3117 09/16/03 3 .13 LOT 64 401 8 30 131 .3 8 .7 119 .6 10 .0 91 90 FG 3121 09/16/03 3 .13 LOT 46 382 17 30 127 .4 9 .3 120 .0 9 . 1 94 90 FG 3122 09/16/03 3 .13 LOT 47 389 17 30 127 .4 9 . 3 119 .3 8 .5 94 90 FG 3123 09/16/03 3 . 13 LOT 48 395 8 20 128 .5 9 .7 120 .1 10 .1 93 90 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 06105-12-05 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Test No. Date Test Location Elev. Plus Max. or 3/4" Dry Depth Curve Rock Dens. (ft) No. (%) (pcf) Opt. Moist. Cont. (%) Field Dry Dens. (pcf) Field Moist. Cont. (%) Field Rel. Comp. Req'd Rel. Comp. (%) FG FG FG FG FG FG FG 3124 3129 3130 3131 3132 3133 3214 3250 09/16/03 09/17/03 09/17/03 09/17/03 09/17/03 09/17/03 09/30/03 10/03/03 3.13 LOT 4 9 3.13 LOT 60 3.13 LOT 61 3.13 LOT 62 3.13 LOT 63 3.13 LOT 64 3.13 LOT 75 3.13 LOT 63 402 454 445 436 426 402 345 415 20 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 128.5 131.3 131.3 131.3 131.3 131.3 131. 3 131.3 9.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 120.9 121.6 118.3 121. 0 117.8 119.9 124 .5 120 .4 9.0 8.7 8.4 8 . 7 8.1 10.0 5.1 7.8 94 93 90 92 90 91 95 92 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 06105-12-05 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Elev. or Plus 3/4" Max. Dry Opt. Moist, Field Dry Field Moist. Field Rel. Req'd Rel. Test Depth Curve Rock Dens . Cont. Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp No. Date Test Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (% ) (%) (%) 1280 10/15/02 LCA 153+50 259 11 0 108 . 0 18 3 100 5 20 . 1 93 90 1281 10/15/02 LCA 153+50 261 8 0 123 . 0 11 9 114 0 15 . 6 93 90 SZ 1325 10/18/02 LCA 153+80 264 8 40 134 1 7 7 121 4 13 . 6 91 90 1325 10/18/02 LCA 153+10 265 8 10 125 8 10 8 115 8 12 . 1 92 90 1331 10/21/02 LCA 154+75 254 8 10 125 8 10 8 118 4 11 . 9 94 90 1414 10/28/02 LCA 154+90 278 8 40 134 1 7 7 123 9 13 . 1 92 90 1441 10/31/02 LCA 153+85 275 15 20 128 5 8 8 117 6 15 . 3 92 90 1442 10/31/02 LCA 154+10 275 15 40 134 0 6 8 122 2 12 . 7 91 90 SZ 1444 10/31/02 LCA 153+10 271 9 40 136 5 7 2 125 5 11. 8 93 90 1467 11/01/02 LCA 153+55 275 8 20 128 5 9 7 116 7 10 . 8 91 90 1468 11/01/02 LCA 153+60 275 8 20 128 5 9 7 118 8 11. 2 92 90 1485 • 11/04/02 LCA 153+70 275 8 50 139 6 5 9 127 8 6. 2 92 90 1495 11/05/02 LCA 152+80 275 8 60 139 6 5 9 127 9 9. 1 92 90 1496 11/05/02 LCA 153+20 278 8 60 139 6 5 9 130 7 6 . 3 94 90 1497 11/05/02 LCA 153+50 280 9 60 141 3 5 7 137 0 5 . 7 97 90 1514 11/07/02 LCA 152+20 270 8 40 134 1 7 7 120 6 12 . 5 90 90 1520 11/12/02 LCA 153+50 283 9 30 134 1 8 1 124 .5 10 . 5 93 90 1525 11/13/02 LCA 148+55 275 8 10 125 8 10 8 118 .5 14 . 9 94 90 1540 11/15/02 LCA 155+90 280 8 60 139 8 5 8 125 .4 10 . 0 90 90 M 1582 11/27/02 LCA 156+50 293 10 80 0 0 5 . 0 0 .0 10 . 6 0 0 1583 11/27/02 LCA 156+55 291 9 40 135 5 7 .2 125 .1 12 . 1 92 90 M 1592 12/03/02 LCA 156+60 310 9 80 0 .0 5 . 7 0 .0 9. 2 0 0 M 1593 12/04/02 LCA 155+00 290 9 80 0 .0 5 . 7 0 . 0 4 . 0 0 0 M 1593A 01/08/03 LCA 155+00 290 9 80 0 .0 5 . 7 0 .0 6 . 9 0 0 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 06105-12-06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Elev. or Plus 3/4" Max. Dry Opt. Moist. Field Dry Field Moist. Field Rel. Req'd Rel. Test Depth Curve Rock Dens . Cont. Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp No. - Date Test Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%) 1662 12/18/02 LCA 154+10 300 1 0 119 6 13 7 108 4 15 0 91 90 1663 12/18/02 LCA 153+40 302 1 0 119 6 13 7 108 3 16 2 91 90 M 1799 01/08/03 LCA 155+60 309 9 80 0 0 5 7 0 0 9 7 0 0 1847 01/10/03 LCA 153+75 309 8 60 139 6 5 9 127 0 8 9 91 90 1848 01/10/03 LCA 154+00 310 8 50 139 5 5 9 126 9 8 1 91 90 1852 01/09/03 LCA 155+80 300 8 60 139 8 5 8 131 9 5 1 94 90 2120 03/14/03 LCA 150+85 268 9 20 131 7 8 9 119 0 11 1 90 90 2121 03/14/03 LCA 149+00 266 9 50 138 9 6 4 128 8 7 3 93 90 2122 03/18/03 LCA 148+00 268 8 0 123 0 11 9 112 8 15 0 92 90 2123 03/18/03 LCA 149+85 272 8 20 128 5 9 7 115 8 13 6 90 90 2133 03/18/03 LCA 148+30 274 9 30 134 1 8 1 120 9 10 3 90 90 2134 03/18/03 LCA 150+35 275 9 30 134 1 8 1 125 0 8 3 93 90 2135 03/19/03 LCA 148+90 278 9 10 129 3 9 8 118 5 11 9 92 90 2136 03/19/03 LCA 154+50 294 8 40 134 1 7 7 121 1 10 0 90 90 2137 03/19/03 LCA 153+85 292 9 40 136 5 7 2 123 5 9 0 90 90 2138 03/19/03 LCA 159+90 299 8 50 136 8 5 8 130 0 7 1 95 90 2139 03/19/03 LCA 153+45 302 9 20 131 7 8 9 123 2 11 3 94 90 2140 03/19/03 LCA 154+95 305 9 20 131 7 8 9 118 9 13 8 90 90 2293 04/10/03 LCA 151+30 273 8 40 134 1 7 7 121 5 8 6 91 90 2294 04/10/03 LCA 152+00 276 8 40 134 1 7 7 121 9 9 .4 91 90 2316 04/11/03 LCA 152+40 284 8 20 128 5 9 7 117 .6 11 .7 92 90 M 2322 04/18/03 LCA 152+90 282 9 0 0 .0 10 7 0 . 0 12 .6 0 0 2353 04/23/03 LCA 151+40 287 26 0 138 .5 6 9 124 . 9 8 .5 90 90 2354 04/23/03 LCA 152+85 290 25 0 138 .5 6 9 128 . 1 7 .0 92 90 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 05105-12-06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Elev. or Plus 3/4" Max. Dry Opt. Moist. Field Dry Field Moist. Field Rel. Req'd Rel. Test No. Date Test Location Depth (ft) Curve No. Rock (%) Dens . (pcf) Cont. (%) Dens. (pcf) Cont. (%) Comp. (%) Comp (%) 2355 04/23/03 LCA 149+10 278 26 0 138 5 5 . 9 126 8 7 7 92 90 2357 04/23/03 LCA 153+15 294 26 0 138 5 5. 9 129 6 6 8 94 90 2358 04/23/03 LCA 151+10 290 25 0 138 5 5 . 9 124 9 9 3 90 90 2359 04/23/03 LCA 153+00 298 26 0 138 5 6 . 9 125 7 9 3 91 90 SZ 2361 04/23/03 LCA 150+65 287 9 30 134 1 8 . 1 120 0 5 0 89 90 SZ 2361A 04/23/03 LCA 150+55 287 9 40 136 5 7 . 2 123 4 7 0 90 90 2410 04/29/03 LCA 155+10 311 26 0 138 5 5 . 9 124 4 4 8 90 90 2410A 04/29/03 LCA 155+10 311 26 0 138 5 5. 9 124 7 6 5 90 90 SZ 2411 04/29/03 LCA 151+55 290 8 30 131 3 8 . 7 115 6 8 1 89 90 SZ 2411A 04/30/03 LCA 151+55 290 8 30 131 3 8 . 7 118 6 9 5 90 90 2420 05/03/03 LCA 153+30 306 25 0 138 5 6. 9 128 2 8 6 93 90 2421 05/03/03 LCA 150+70 293 25 0 138 5 6. 9 125 7 7 6 91 90 2426 05/06/03 LCA 146+05 257 1 10 122 7 12 . 4 110 3 15 8 90 90 2432 05/06/03 LCA 146+60 260 3 0 119 0 12 . 7 110 7 15 4 93 90 2433 05/06/03 LCA 146+10 262 3 0 119 0 12 . 7 108 1 16 6 91 90 2434 05/06/03 LCA 147+00 264 3 0 119 0 12 . 7 108 4 14 9 91 90 ST 2475 05/12/03 LCA 151+00 284 8 20 128 4 9 . 7 115 3 13 2 90 90 ST 2477 05/12/03 LCA 153+80 295 8 30 131 3 8. 7 119 3 9 9 91 90 2570 05/05/03 LCA 145+20 260 5 0 116 4 16 . 1 105 .2 18 .0 90 90 2571 06/06/03 LCA 144+75 259 5 0 116 4 15 . 1 104 .8 15 .3 90 90 2572 06/06/03 LCA 145+00 261 5 0 116 .4 16 . 1 106 . 7 18 .3 92 90 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 06105-12-06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Elev. or Plus 3/4" Max. Dry Opt. Moist. Field Dry Field Moist. Field Rel. Req'd Rel. Test No. Date Test Location Depth (ft) Curve No. Rock (%) Dens. (pcf) Cont. (%) Dens . (pcf) Cont. (%) Comp. (%) Comp (%) M 114 05/14/02 JUNIPERO 13+00 418 4 80 0 0 5 . 8 0 0 13 9 0 0 115 06/17/02 JUNIPERO 31+60 405 4 60 140 5 5. 8 130 9 9 0 93 90 M 212 07/02/02 JUNIPERO 17+30 411 9 80 0 0 5 . 7 0 0 16 2 0 0 M 221 07/03/02 JUNIPERO 12+35 427 9 80 0 0 5 . 7 0 0 16 9 0 0 M 222 07/03/02 JUNIPERO 12 + 00 430 9 80 0 0 5 . 7 0 0 18 3 0 0 M 230 07/08/02 JUNIPERO 12 + 80 430 9 80 0 0 5 . 7 0 0 11 7 0 0 M 231 07/08/02 JUNIPERO 13+30 427 9 80 0 0 5 . 7 0 0 14 9 0 0 M 253 07/10/02 JUNIPERO 13 + 80 433 9 80 0 0 5 . 7 0 0 16 9 0 0 M 255 07/10/02 JUNIPERO 13+80 430 9 80 0 0 5 . 7 0 0 13 8 0 0 342 07/22/02 JUNIPERO 42+80 453 3 0 119 0 12 . 7 107 4 16 2 90 90 343 07/22/02 JUNIPERO 46+70 430 3 0 119 0 12 . 7 105 5 14 4 90 90 M 395 07/29/02 JUNIPERO 16+50 429 9 80 0 0 5 . 7 0 0 14 5 0 0 M 788 08/28/02 JUNIPERO 22+30 413 9 80 0 0 5. 7 0 0 19 7 0 0 M 789 08/28/02 JUNIPERO 21+85 423 9 80 0 0 5 . 7 0 0 18 7 0 0 790 08/28/02 JUNIPERO 21+45 427 10 0 126 4 10 . 1 107 9 12 1 85 90 790A 08/29/02 JUNIPERO 21+45 427 10 0 126 4 10 . 1 117 9 13 1 93 90 M 795 08/29/02 JUNIPERO 10+25 419 9 80 0 .0 5 . 7 0 0 18 .6 0 0 M 845 09/04/02 JUNIPERO 22 + 80 419 9 0 0 . 0 10 . 7 0 0 15 .5 0 0 M 845 09/04/02 JUNIPERO 22+00 420 9 80 0 .0 5. 7 0 0 15 .5 0 0 M 897 09/10/02 JUNIPERO 15 + 70 418 9 80 0 .0 5 . 7 0 0 14 .9 0 0 M 899 09/10/02 JUNIPERO 16+20 425 9 80 0 . 0 5 . 7 0 .0 13 .6 0 0 M 928 09/11/02 JUNIPERO 15+20 427 9 80 0 . 0 5 . 7 0 . 0 19 .0 0 0 M 929 09/11/02 JUNIPERO 16 + 00 433 9 80 0 .0 5 . 7 0 .0 17 .6 0 0 M 93 0 09/11/02 JUNIPERO 14+70 430 9 80 0 .0 5 . 7 0 . 0 19 .4 0 0 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 06105-12-05 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS M M Elev. Plus Max. Opt. Field Field Field Req' or 3/4" Dry Moist. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel. Test Depth Curve Rock Dens. Cont. Dens . Cont. Comp. Comp No. Date Test Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (% ) (pcf) (% ) (%) (%) 944 09/12/02 JUNIPERO 16+90 431 9 80 0 . 0 5 . 7 0 . 0 15 . 6 0 0 945 09/12/02 JUNIPERO 16+80 432 9 80 0 . 0 5 . 7 0 . 0 14 . 4 0 0 979 09/17/02 JUNIPERO 15+25 434 8 10 125 . 8 10 . 8 117. 5 15 . 1 93 90 1202 10/08/02 JUNIPERO 12 + 80 440 8 0 123 . 0 11. 9 115. 0 13 . 5 93 90 1209 10/09/02 JUNIPERO 14 + 00 441 17 0 117 . 6 13 . 4 110 . 1 17 . 1 94 90 1210 10/09/02 JUNIPERO 20+20 440 17 0 117 . 6 13 . 4 113 . 7 15 . 0 97 90 1347 10/23/02 JUNIPERO 19+80 427 8 30 131. 3 8 . 7 119. 5 10 . 2 91 90 1348 10/23/02 JUNIPERO 18+50 429 8 40 134 . 1 7 . 7 123 . 2 13 . 2 92 90 1360 10/23/02 JUNIPERO 17 + 90 431 8 50 136. 8 6. 8 124 . 6 12 . 9 91 90 1622 12/11/02 JUNIPERO 19 + 10 434 5 0 115 . 4 16 . 1 106. 7 18 . 3 92 90 1623 12/11/02 JUNIPERO 15+30 443 5 0 115 . 4 16. 1 104 . 7 17 . 1 90 90 1624 12/11/02 JUNIPERO 12 + 95 445 5 0 115. 4 16 . 1 107 . 2 16 . 9 92 90 1629 12/11/02 JUNIPERO 17 + 85 438 5 20 123 . 2 13 . 2 110 . 9 13 . 3 90 90 1630 12/11/02 JUNIPERO 17 + 85 447 5 10 119. 8 14 . 6 112 . 8 17 . 1 94 90 1650 12/12/02 JUNIPERO 20 + 15 436 11 0 108 . 0 18 . 3 106 . 4 19. 2 99 90 1651 12/12/02 JUNIPERO 15 + 00 445 11 0 108 . 0 18 . 3 103 . 2 22 . 5 96 90 1690 12/19/02 JUNIPERO 23 + 70 423 9 10 129. 3 9. 8 118 . 4 12 . 1 92 90 1691 12/19/02 JUNIPERO 22 + 10 428 9 10 129. 3 9 . 8 116 . 5 9 . 7 90 90 1593 12/19/02 JUNIPERO 23 + 05 425 7 0 122 . 8 11. 0 110 . 9 8 . 0 90 90 1593A 12/23/02 JUNIPERO 23 + 05 425 7 0 122 . 8 11. 0 113 . 0 13 . 6 92 90 1697 12/23/02 JUNIPERO 24 + 15 420 8 10 125 . 8 10 . 8 120 . 4 11. 1 96 90 1732 12/30/02 JUNIPERO 24+20 425 7 0 122 . 8 11. 0 113 . 1 13 . 3 92 90 1733 12/30/02 JUNIPERO 23 + 00 430 7 10 125 . 6 9. 9 114 . 8 10 . 8 91 90 1738 12/31/02 JUNIPERO 24 + 10 428 8 0 123 . 0 11. 9 110 . 9 12 . 5 90 90 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 06105-12-06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS ST Elev. or Plus 3/4" Max. Dry Opt. Moist. Field Dry Field Moist. Field Rel. Req'd Rel. Test Depth Curve Rock Dens . Cont. Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp No. Date Test Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%) 1739 12/31/02 JUNIPERO 22+55 432 8 30 131 3 8 7 124 6 12 2 95 90 1777 01/05/03 JUNIPERO 12+85 433 5 0 116 4 16 1 106 9 15 2 92 90 1778 01/06/03 JUNIPERO 12+00 435 1 0 119 6 13 7 112 4 12 9 94 90 1779 01/06/03 JUNIPERO 12+45 437 1 0 119 6 13 7 11 1 13 4 93 90 1785 01/06/03 JUNIPERO 13+45 439 1 20 125 8 11 1 115 7 12 9 92 90 1785 01/06/03 JUNIPERO 12+40 442 14 0 140 0 6 1 132 5 6 5 95 90 1787 01/06/03 JUNIPERO 11 + 70 444 14 0 140 0 5 1 129 9 7 3 93 90 1788 01/07/03 JUNIPERO 13+10 446 11 0 108 3 18 3 101 4 21 2 94 90 1789 01/07/03 JUNIPERO 12+40 448 11 0 108 3 18 3 103 5 19 6 95 90 1800 01/07/03 JUNIPERO 25+50 420 11 0 108 3 18 3 100 7 20 8 93 90 1801 01/07/03 JUNIPERO 27 + 00 419 9 10 129 3 9 8 118 8 9 5 92 90 1802 01/07/03 JUNIPERO 25 + 05 425 9 0 126 9 10 7 116 9 9 9 92 90 1803 01/09/03 JUNIPERO 12+95 450 9 30 134 1 8 1 124 8 9 3 93 90 1811 01/08/03 JUNIPERO 12+75 452 9 10 129 3 9 8 118 4 12 1 92 90 1831 01/08/03 JUNIPERO 26+50 421 9 30 134 1 8 1 121 4 10 3 91 90 1838 01/09/03 JUNIPERO 13+10 457 8 20 128 5 9 7 118 7 9 5 92 90 1860 01/10/03 JUNIPERO 45+80 445 8 30 131 3 8 7 119 9 5 3 91 90 1860A 01/10/03 JUNIPERO 45+80 445 8 30 131 3 8 7 122 7 9 4 93 90 1861 01/10/03 JUNIPERO 45+40 447 8 30 131 3 8 7 123 7 8 7 94 90 1864 01/13/03 JUNIPERO 41+40 448 8 20 128 5 9 7 118 1 10 2 92 90 1870 01/13/03 JUNIPERO 26+25 421 8 0 123 0 11 9 110 5 12 8 90 90 1871 01/13/03 JUNIPERO 24 + 75 422 8 30 131 3 8 7 123 8 9 0 94 90 1872 01/13/03 JUNIPERO 25+50 425 8 40 134 1 7 7 120 9 9 0 90 90 1873 01/13/03 JUNIPERO 26 + 10 427 4 10 127 . 8 10 3 115 7 13 2 91 90 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 06105-12-06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Test No. Date Test Location Elev. Plus Max. Opt. Field Field Field Req'd or 3/4" Dry Moist. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel. Depth Curve Rock Dens. Cont. Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp. (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%) SZ SZ 1874 1882 1883 1884 01/13/03 01/13/03 01/13/03 01/14/03 JUNIPERO 24+70 JUNIPERO 43+00 JUNIPERO 44+2 0 JUNIPERO 45+50 430 448 439 442 40 20 20 20 134 .1 128 .5 128 .5 128 .5 7 . 7 9.7 9.7 9.7 121.4 117 .4 119.7 115 . 0 11.3 10 .5 11.8 11.4 91 91 93 90 90 90 90 90 SZ 1885 1885 1887 1888 01/14/03 01/14/03 01/14/03 01/14/03 JUNIPERO 45+10 JUNIPERO 45+40 JUNIPERO 41+10 JUNIPERO 44+50 444 449 450 448 20 30 30 30 128 . 5 131. 3 131 .3 131.3 9 . 7 8 . 7 8 . 7 8.7 115.5 120 .1 118 .4 117 . 5 11.8 1.3 10 .5 9.3 90 91 90 90 90 90 90 90 SZ SZ 1889 1890 1891 1909 01/14/03 01/15/03 01/15/03 01/17/03 JUNIPERO 45+30 JUNIPERO 45+50 JUNIPERO 43+70 JUNIPERO 28+90 445 447 449 422 30 20 20 30 131.3 128.5 128.5 131. 3 8.7 9 . 7 9 . 7 8.7 124 . 7 117 . 0 115.3 116 .2 11.8 9.5 10 .3 5 . 8 95 91 90 88 90 90 90 90 1909A 1910 1912 1913 01/17/03 01/17/03 01/17/03 01/18/03 JUNIPERO 28+90 JUNIPERO 27+4 0 JUNIPERO 28+00 JUNIPERO 41+00 422 423 418 451 30 30 30 50 131.3 131. 3 131.3 139 . 8 8.7 8 . 7 8.7 5.8 117 .7 121.7 118.1 130.9 8.0 9.5 11.6 6.9 90 93 90 94 90 90 90 90 1914 1938 1939 1940 01/18/03 01/21/03 01/21/03 01/21/03 JUNIPERO 42+00 JUNIPERO 42+50 JUNIPERO 41+3 0 JUNIPERO 40+40 448 450 449 449 50 20 20 20 136.8 128.5 128.5 128 .5 5.8 9 . 7 9.7 9.7 130 .1 119.7 120.3 116.6 7 . 8 8 . 8 10 .2 8.9 95 93 94 91 90 90 90 90 2005 2006 2007 2008 02/04/03 02/04/03 02/03/03 02/04/03 JUNIPERO 3 8+95 JUNIPERO 3 8+95 JUNIPERO 35+00 JUNIPERO 35+4 0 446 446 431 441 14 14 14 14 140 . 0 140 . 0 140 . 0 140 . 0 6.1 6.1 6 .1 6.1 129.5 126.2 125 . 8 126.3 5.7 6.6 5.8 7 . 0 92 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 06105-12-05 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS SZ SZ Elev. Plus Max. Opt. Field Field Field Req' or 3/4" Dry Moist. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel. Test Depth Curve Rock Dens. Cont. Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp No. Date Test Location (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (% ) (%) (%) 2009 02/05/03 JUNIPERO 37+95 447 14 0 140 . 0 6 1 127 . 5 4 . 7 91 90 2009A 02/05/03 JUNIPERO 37+95 447 14 0 140 . 0 5 1 126 . 4 6 . 4 90 90 2010 02/05/03 JUNIPERO 37+95 451 14 0 140 . 0 6 1 129. 7 5. 3 93 90 2011 02/06/03 JUNIPERO 41+80 455 8 20 128 . 5 9 7 118. 5 10 . 4 92 90 2012 02/06/03 JUNIPERO 43+65 455 8 20 128 . 5 9 7 117 . 0 11. 3 91 90 2013 02/05/03 JUNIPERO 46 + 00 452 8 20 128 . 5 9 7 119. 1 9 . 5 93 90 2307 04/09/03 JUNIPERO 29+50 416 26 0 138 . 5 5 9 125 . 5 8 . 5 91 90 2308 04/09/03 JUNIPERO 28 + 55 420 26 0 138 . 5 6 9 128 . 3 7 . 7 93 90 2422 05/03/03 JUNIPERO 30 + 35 419 25 0 138 . 5 5 9 124. 9 8 . 1 90 90 2585 06/17/03 JUNIPERO 31 + 80 399 10 30 133 . 8 7 4 121. 7 9 . 2 91 90 2592 06/18/03 JUNIPERO 31+50 401 10 30 133 . 8 7 4 121. 5 7 . 4 91 90 2593 05/19/03 JUNIPERO 30+45 411 5 30 126 . 5 11 8 117. 2 13 . 4 93 90 2594 06/19/03 JUNIPERO 31 + 20 416 5 30 125. 5 11 8 118. 9 12 . 5 94 90 2595 06/19/03 JUNIPERO 31+50 403 10 30 133 . 8 7 4 119. 9 8 . 6 90 90 2599 06/20/03 JUNIPERO 30+25 415 10 30 133 . 8 7 4 120 . 6 7 . 2 90 90 2600 06/20/03 JUNIPERO 32 + 00 410 10 30 133 . 8 7 4 122 . 2 8 . 7 91 90 2626 06/27/03 JUNIPERO 31+30 398 5 30 126 . 5 11 8 114 . 1 11. 4 90 90 2529 06/27/03 JtJNIPERO 31+70 406 5 30 126 . 5 11 8 113 . 9 12 . 7 90 90 2630 06/27/03 JUNIPERO 31+40 401 5 20 123 . 2 13 2 113 . 3 12 . 5 92 90 2531 06/27/03 JUNIPERO 31 + 60 402 5 20 123 . 2 12 2 112 . 2 12 . 9 91 90 2632 06/30/03 JUNIPERO 30 + 95 417 10 20 131. 3 8 .3 119 4 10 . 5 91 90 2633 06/30/03 JUNIPERO 32 + 00 419 10 20 131 . 3 8 3 121. 2 8 6 92 90 2587 07/14/03 JUNIPERO 32 + 05 411 8 30 131. 3 8 .7 118 0 9. 4 90 90 2688 07/14/03 JUNIPERO 31+05 407 8 30 131. 3 8 .7 120 6 9 7 92 90 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms Project No. 06105-12-06 TABLE I FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS Test No. Date Test Location Elev. Plus Max. Opt. Field Field Field Req'd or 3/4" Dry Moist. Dry Moist. Rel. Rel. Depth Curve Rock Dens. Cont. Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp. (ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%) 2712 2720 2721 2722 2723 2724 2725 2726 2729 272 9A 2743 2743A 07/17/03 07/18/03 07/18/03 07/18/03 07/21/03 07/21/03 07/21/03 07/21/03 07/22/03 07/22/03 07/25/03 07/25/03 JUNIPERO 29+85 JUNIPERO 33+10 JUNIPERO 31+85 JUNIPERO 30+50 JUNIPERO 33+85 JTJNIPERO 30+50 JXJNIPERO 30+50 JUNIPERO 32+70 JUNIPERO 31+70 JUNIPERO 31+70 JUNIPERO 31+50 JUNIPERO 31+50 420 423 419 419 428 418 419 422 421 421 421 421 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 135 .4 135 .4 135 .4 135 .4 135.4 135.4 135 .4 135 .4 135.4 135 .4 135 .4 135 .4 6.8 6.8 6.8 5.8 5 . 8 6.8 6 . 8 6 . 8 6 . 8 6 . 8 6 . 8 6 . 8 128 . 0 123 .5 127 .2 126 .6 122 . 8 125.7 123 .0 121.5 120 .4 122 . 7 118 .3 122 .1 7.4 7.4 6.7 8.0 8.1 7.5 7.5 8.4 5.5 6 . 8 4 . 8 5.9 94 91 94 93 91 93 91 90 89 91 87 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Note: See last page of table for explanation of coded terms ProjectNo. 06105-52-06 EXPLANATION OF CODED TERMS PREFIX CODE DESIGNATION FOR TEST NUMBERS AC - Asphalt Concrete FG - Finish Grade B - Base JT - Joint Trench CG - Curb & Gutter M - Moisture Test SD SG SL Storm Drain Subgrade Sewer Lateral SM ST SW Sewer Main Slope Test Sidewalk SZ WB WM Slope Zone Wall Backfill Water Main SUFFEX CODE DESIGNATION FOR TEST NUMBERS A, B, C,... : Retest of previous density test failure, foUowdng moisture conditioning and/or recompaction. R : Fill in area of density test failure was removed and replaced with properly compacted fill soil. • TEST LOCATION ABBREVIATIONS^ M V X SH B Adjacent to, or in, Median Strip Joint or Electrical Trench Vault Joint or Electrical Trench Crossing Shade Sand Bedding N S E W CDS North Side of Street South Side of Street East Side of Street West Side of Street Cul-de-sac ^ For Example: "M-E" would describe a density test taken on the East Side of the Median Strip at the specified street and station number (i.e., MILLER RD 10+00 M-E) CURVE NO. Corresponds to curve numbers listed in Table II, representing the laboratory maximum dry density/optimum moisture content data for selected fill soil samples encountered during testing and observations. ROCK CORRECTION For density tests with rock percentage greater than zero, laboratory maximum dry density and optimum moisture content were adjusted for rock content. For tests with rock content equal to zero, laboratory tnaximum dry density and optimum moisture content values are then unadjusted values. ELEVATION/DEPTH Test elevations/depths have been roimded to the nearest whole foot. TYPE OF TEST SC: Sand Cone Test NU: Nuclear Density Test DC: Drive Cylinder Test TABLE II SUMMARY OF LABORATORY MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AND OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT TEST RESULTS ASTM D 1557-00 Sample No. Description Maximum Dry Density (pcf) Optimum Moisture Content (% dry veeight) 1 Orange to olive-brown, mottled, very Clayey SAND 119.6 13.7 3 Olive-gray, Sandy CLAY 119.0 12.7 4 Reddish brown. Clayey SAND 125.2 11.3 5 Dark brovra, Sandy CLAY 116.4 16.1 8 Reddish-brown, Gravelly, fine to coarse SAND with frace silt 123.0 11.9 9 Reddish-gray, fine to coarse, Sandy GRAVEL with frace clay 126.9 10.7 10 Yellowish-brown, Clayey, fine to coarse SAND 126.4 10.1 11 Light Yellowish-brown, Silty CLAY with frace sand 108.0 18.3 14 Dark Reddish-brown, fme to coarse Sandy GRAVEL with frace clay 140.0 6.1 15 Brown, fine to medium Sandy CLAY with frace gravel 122.9 11.0 17 Light Olive-gray, Silty CLAY with Sand and Gravel 117.6 13.4 26 Olive brown, fine to medium, Sandy GRAVEL with silt 138.5 6.9 33 Light brownish-gray GRAVEL with Sand and frace clay 135.4 7.5 ProjectNo. 06105-52-06 November 12, 2003 TABLE III SUMMARY OF LABORATORY EXPANSION INDEX TEST RESULTS ASTM D 4829-95 Sample No. Moisture Content Dry Density (pcf) Expansion Index Sample No. Before Test (%) After Test (%) Dry Density (pcf) Expansion Index EI 3.13-58 10.4 24.1 109.0 40 El 3.13-59 9.7 22.1 113.4 28 EI 3.13-60 10.5 22.2 107.8 6 El 3.13-61 9.4 22.8 112.3 27 EI 3.13-62 12.2 30.0 107.6 88 El 3.13-63 12.6 32.4 102.5 113 EI 3.13-64 11.3 30.2 109.8 100 EI-3.13-65 10.3 30.3 108.5 73 EI 3.13-66 10.8 31.3 101.7 55 EI 3.13-67 11.3 31.2 108.8 81 EI3.12-76 9.5 17.4 115.1 0 El 3.12-77 9.3 20.6 115.7 14 El 3.12-78 9.0 19.4 118.3 0 EI 3.12-85 6.8 21.7 125.4 15 EI 3.12-86 6.8 20.1 122.3 0 EI 3.13-94 7.1 15.5 122.1 0 EI 3.12-95 8.8 18.4 116.7 15 EI 3.12-96 7.1 23.6 120.5 13 EI 3.13-97 8.3 22.6 119.1 21 El 3.13-98 8.3 22.1 117.2 17 EI 3.13-102 7.3 18.8 120.3 22 El 3.13-103 7.9 18.8 119.4 0 EI 3.13-104 9.6 19.5 116.0 0 EI 3.13-105 8.0 22.7 116.4 8 EI 3.13-108 11.6 20.6 111.3 33 ProjectNo. 06105-52-06 November 12,2003 TABLE IV SUMMARY OF LABORATORY DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS ASTM D 3080-98 Sample No. Dry Density (pcf) Moisture Content (%) Unit Cohesion (psf) Angle of Shear Resistance (degrees) 8E 111.4 11.5 725 20 8F 110.5 12.1 405 33 8G 110.5 12.4 640 25 8H 109.8 13.0 405 30 Samples were remolded to approximately 90 percent of maximum dry density at near optimum moisture content. TABLE V SUMMARY OF LABORATORY WATER-SOLUBLE SULFATE TEST RESULTS NEIGHBORHOODS 3.12 AND 3.13, LA COSTA OAKS CALIFORNIA TEST NO. 417 Sample No. Water-Soluble Sulfate (%) Sulfate Exposure S-1 0.047 Negligible S-2 0.260 Severe S-3 0.048 Negligible S-4 0.031 Negligible S-5 0.027 Negligible S-6 0.030 Negligible S-7 0.090 Negligible S-8 0.090 Negligible ProjectNo. 06105-52-06 November 12, 2003 TABLE VI SUMMARY OF FINISH GRADE EXPANSION INDEX TEST RESULTS LOT NOS. 1 THROUGH 91 NEIGHBORHOODS 3.12 AND 3.13, LA COSTA OAKS SOUTH Lot Numbers Sample at Finish Grade Expansion Index UBC Classification 1 through 5 El 3.12-76 0 Very Low 6 through 10 EI 3.12-85 15 Very Low 11 and 12 EI 3.12-95 15 Very Low 13 and 14 EI 3.12-86 0 Very Low 15 through 18 EI 3.12-96 13 Very Low 19 through 23 EI 3.12-78 0 Very Low 24 through 27 El 3.12-77 14 Very Low 28 through 32 EI 3.13-58 40 Low 33 through 37 EI 3.13-59 28 Low 38 through 42 EI 3.13-60 6 Very Low 43 and 44 EI 3.13-61 27 Low 45 El 3.13-62 88 Medium 46 EI 3.13-63 113 High 47 EI 3.13-64 100 High 48 EI 3.13-65 73 Medium 49 EI 3.13-66 55 Medium 50 EI 3.13-67 81 Medium 51 through 55 El 3.13-98 17 Very Low 56 through 59 EI 3.13-97 21 Low 60 through 64 EI 3.13-108 33 Low 65 through 70 EI 3.13-94 0 Very Low 71 through 75 EI 3.13-102 22 Low 76 through 81 EI 3.13-105 8 Very Low 82 through 86 EI 3.13-104 0 Very Low 87 through 91 EI 3.13-103 0 Very Low ProjectNo. 06105-52-06 November 12, 2003 TABLE Vll SUMMARY OF AS-GRADED BUILDING PAD CONDITIONS LOT NOS. 1 THROUGH 91 NEIGHBORHOODS 3.12 AND 3.13, LA COSTA OAKS SOUTH Lot No. Fad Condition Approximate Maximum Depth of FiU Approximate Depth of Differential FiU 1 Fill 28 17 2 Undercut due to cut/fill fransition 14 11 3 Undercut due to cut/fill fransition 6 1 4 Undercut due to rock 4 1 5 Undercut due to rock 4 1 6 Undercut due to rock 4 1 7 Undercut due to rock 4 1 8 Undercut due to rock 7 2 9 Undercut due to rock 6 1 10 Undercut due to rock 5 1 11 Undercut due to rock 5 1 12 Fill 14 9 13 Fill 20 15 14 Undercut due to cut/fill fransition 14 11 15 Fill 39 8 16 Fill 40 13 17 Fill 38 12 18 Fill 39 16 19 Fill 38 20 20 Fill 40 17 21 Fill 30 5 22 Fill 27 7 23 Fill 29 15 24 Fill 27 21 25 Fill 20 10 26 Fill 20 12 27 Fill 18 15 28 Fill 62 17 29 Fill 61 10 30 Fill 62 6 31 Fill 61 3 ProjectNo. 06105-52-06 November 12, 2003 TABLE Vll (Continued) SUMMARY OF AS-GRADED BUILDING PAD CONDITIONS LOT NOS. 1 THROUGH 91 NEIGHBORHOODS 3.12 AND 3.13, LA COSTA OAKS SOUTH Lot No. Pad Condition Approximate Maximum Approximate Depth Lot No. Pad Condition Depth of FiU of Differential FiU 32 Fill 61 5 33 Fill 58 3 34 Fill 53 5 35 Fill 57 5 36 Fill 60 4 37 Fill 60 4 38 Fill 52 8 39 Fill 51 10 40 Fill 53 8 41 Fill 53 6 42 Fill 50 10 43 Fill 50 10 44 Fill 33 14 45 Fill 42 18 46 Fill 41 14 47 Fill 45 25 48 Fill 47 21 49 Fill 41 17 50 Fill 27 16 51 Undercut due to cut/fill fransition 23 20 52 Undercut due to cut/fill fransition 16 13 53 Undercut due to cut'fill fransition 14 11 54 Undercut due to cut/fill fransition 18 15 55 Undercut due to cut/fill fransition 14 11 56 Undercut due to rock 4 1 57 Undercut due to rock 4 1 58 Undercut due to rock 4 1 59 Undercut due to rock 4 1 60 Undercut due to rock 4 1 61 Undercut due to rock 4 1 62 Undercut due to cut/fill fransition 18 15 63 Undercut due to cut/fill fransition 13 10 ProjectNo. 06105-52-06 November 12, 2003 TABLE Vll (Continued) SUMMARY OF AS-GRADED BUILDING PAD CONDITIONS LOT NOS. 1 THROUGH 91 NEIGHBORHOODS 3.12 AND 3.13, LA COSTA OAKS SOUTH Lot No. Pad Condition Approximate Maximum Depth of FiU Approximate Depth of Differential FiU 64 Undercut due to cut/fill fransition 7 4 65 Undercut due to cut/fill fransition 4 1 66 Undercut due to cut/fill fransition 18 15 67 Undercut due to cut/fill fransition 20 17 68 Undercut due to cut/fill fransition 15 12 69 Undercut due to cut/fill fransition 24 21 70 Undercut due to cut/fill fransition 23 20 71 Fill 36 31 72 Fill 35 24 73 Fill 39 35 74 Fill 24 20 75 Fill 25 22 76 Fill 30 21 77 Fill 58 38 78 Fill 54 12 79 Fill 52 35 80 Fill 49 41 81 Fill 30 21 82 Undercut due to cut/fill fransition 40 37 83 Undercut due to cut/fill fransition 37 34 84 Undercut due to cut/fill fransition 37 34 85 Undercut due to cut/fill fransition 13 10 86 Fill 28 24 87 Fill 28 25 88 Fill 36 33 89 Fill 38 35 90 Fill 36 33 91 Fill 41 37 ProjectNo. 06105-52-06 November 12, 2003