The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About; LAS ENCINAS OVERCROSSING/ CARLSBAD BLVD UNDERCROSSING; LAS ENCINAS OVERCROSSING/ CARLSBAD BLVD UNDERCROSSING STATE BRIDGE REPORTS; 1982-07-07- - •---- - - - - - - --.- - - - - - -- - - - I * - .-• STATE OF CALIFORNIA Bridge No ___57_ç-_2_1_____ p - - DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - - - - SUPPLEMENTARY BRIDGE REPORT Location Dist PIA City .CO.Rt, ON-OS MIS (REV. 1/741 - p - - --' - Date of Investigation - -- -. -:1 •• - LAS ENCINAS OVERCROSSING (Palomar Airport Road-0.4 mile westerly' A o Nan* - .•• -----------------•......_..••.- • CONDITION RATING: Route. 1-5) APPRAISAL RATING: Deck 8 Superstructure 8 Substr. & Pipes 8 Overall 8 Channel & Channel Protection N Retaining Walls N • : • * ..-v Widenable? Yes No M Conditional ' City • Action Required by E&tC Yes No SEISMIC RETROFIT: This is a multiple continuous span bridge and does not reriuire seismic retrofitting. CONDITION OF STRUCTURE: - - There are some vertical cracks developing at the corners of some of the columns, probably due to the corrosion of the bar reinforc- ing steel. Otherwise, the structure is in good condition. RECOMMENDATION : None RECOMMENDED PCSTING: None - 4*' Frank J. Walliser C-19767 FJW:pdh - cci- DRHiggins -(2) - • - • City of Carlsbad (2) -- - 31 - - - -. - -.. ) •' r' -. - - - - • ;,- - - l • • r - -•-••..•- --- --.-- -- - _ - - Zia P STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENTOFTRANSPOI ON BRIDGE REPORT Bridge No. OS.141158 AREV. 1/75) OtherNo. ............................................................................................. P.U.C. No. .......................................................................................... REVISED Location ............1.L.S....01C. - DIst -o -Rts.PM - CIty Date of Investigation obe....1280........ ........ ........... Name .. .................................OVERCR06.S1 (Pali aij.ee weste Lat. ..!.2 . Long. ..W117°.19.7. of Route I- STRUCTURAL DATA AND HISTORY 1953 Division Year ...... By ................................ .. Contract No. ..L].YcF 11-022474 Date of Revisions ......1DC...R.Yiti.Qfl..................................................................... Designed by: B.D. -. Plans Avail. B.D.. De3cription: Continuous RC box girder (5 cells) spans on RC column (3) bents and RC seat abutments, all on spread footings. Spans ...(NW).1 ..... 68.7'i.J.... .I. ... (SE) ....... .Lc.............................. Length .... 308.................Skew..............44 ....................................Design LL !.644 Ratings: Inventory ..!I8....25/1 _Operating .... ...............................Permit ...PPPPPLLF DESCRIPTION — ON STRUCTURE Bridge Width .....(S);1..9c.u; .26.7....5.l ..swi......brLi').......................................................... Total Width .................... ...9.' Lanes .......... . ............ _Tracks..N0fle........... Median ........None Rail Type ....M1.... alluster (0000) Vert. Clearance over deck .........Xed Appr. Rdwy. Width ............................................. Wearing Surface ( .1..) ... - Deck Seal ......................................................................... Alignment....................................................................................................................................................................... DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE (W)t,5 5' (dirt); 7'cu;28 5'; 7'cu;17 5' (dirt) Roadway Section .iBtL13.8....(di).7'cui34........cuj.1.5.(di..)LBt,,.....(3) Clearances: Vert . ............ 19a1ON 12...Lt...................................................Rt. Lanes ........ . ............ _ Tracks .... None ............Pumpplant: None See Or. No. .......................................................... Facilities Crossed.....car ' .d Bou.1var.drkUS10].. cc: (1) CON 'T. STTE OF CALIFORNIA EARTMLNT OF TRANSPOF IN BRIDGE REPORT Bridge No. DS.M58A REV t 75 Date ..............................10-08-80 . DESCRIPTION - HYDRAULICS Channel NOfl ...... Navigable: Yes 7, No Clearances: Vert . ................ N. ...................................... Horlz ............... N............ MAINTENANCE Custodian d .Owner ............Same .. ORIGINAL . ORIGINAL CONDITION RATING APPRAISAL Deck (8) Overall Superstructure (8) Deck Geometry (4) -- Substructure & Pipes Underclearances Vert. 9 Channel & Channel Protection N Horlz. (4) Retaining Walls N Safe Load Capacity Approach Rdwy. Alignment Waterway Adequacy Estimated Remaining Life • 50 . Approach Rdwy. Alignment (9) City: Widenable' Yes No D Conditional . Action Required byQ: Yes No , AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC - 5000 (Estimated 1980). BYPASS DETOUR LENGTH - 3 miles CONDITION OF STRUCTURE - The structure is in good condition. LOAD CAPACITY - The inventory, operating and permit ratings s h o w n were obtained through the "Frame Rate" program using the load., factor (IF) method of analysis. . RECOMMENDATIONS None. . RECOMMENDED POSTING - None. Original signed by FRANK J. WALLZSER C 019767 FJ'W:ll cc: DRHiggins Diet. 11 Local Assistance City of Carlsbad (2) (2) STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUPPLEMENTARY BRIDGE REPORT DH-OS M19 (REV. 1/74) 215 Bridge No.......... 11...SD-SD 1Z13..O.,O Location .................................................................................. Dist - Co- Rte - PM - City March Date of Investigation 22.197k SBAD Name ............................................... ......BLYD inas 00 00NDITION RATING: APPRAISAL RATING: Deck 9 Superstructure 9 Substr. & Pipes 9 Overall 9 Channel & Channel Protection NA Retaining Walls NA XiOOXO CX CfXXXXW)t6X Refer to Bridge Report dated December 15, 1971 by Bernard S Lapedis. CONDITION OF. STRUCTURE: No change from condition reported previously. CAACITY: . The 2tructure is capable of carryihg legal loads. RECOMMENDATIONS: None Original signed by W 114 Baker WRB: cc: San Diego County (2)/ 11 (1) STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUPPLEMENTARY BRIDGE REPORT OH-OS M19 (REV. 1/74) . 5 215 BridgeNo. -------------------------------------------------------------- - USD4AS 1L&13.O.O Location......................................................................... Dist - Co - Ate - PM - City Date of Investigation --------------22---74 Name.....................................................BLVD CONDITION RATING: APPRAISAL RATING: Deck 9 Superstructure 9 Substr. & Pipes 9 Overall 9 Channel & Channel Protection NA Retaining Walls NA AW UXW4 Refer to Bridge Report dated December 15, 1971 by Bernard S. Lapedis. CONDITION OP STRUCTURB No change from condition reported previously. CAPACITY; The structure Is capable of carrying loCal 1otde. RECO)IMENDATXONS: None Original signed by W, R. Baker WEB:ah cc; San Diego County (2) 7 (1) - - \ z... STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATION AGENCY RONALD REAGAN, Governor DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS P.O. BOX 1499, SACRAMENTO 95807 July 19, 1972 .11.00.11 C' 11.-SD-FAS 1413 C:') City Manager IS1c City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Street Carlsbad, QPL 92008 Dear Sir: Attached for your files are two copies of the Bridge Report for Carlsbad Blvd. Undercrossing (Las Enemas overcrossing), Bridge No. 57C-215, in your County that is included in the 1968 Federal Bridge Inventory and Appraisal Program. - The structure is capable of carrying legal loads or greater. Sincerely, J. E. McMAHON Assistant State Highway Engineer - Bridges 1 By / D. R. Higg1i Assistant Bridge Engineer Maintenance Attachments Sheet.. ...........................2 .4. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Bridge No BRIDGE REPORT Date of Investigation 15 ,1971 Location V)I$T-CO.-RTE. - CITY - P.M. Name .........Carlsbad .Blvd .9jg.). ........ ....... Location of FAS 1413, .0.35 59 ..oxar...Ajrpo.rt Road 33007 -5 111101tl 7 1 Latitude. ............ ..Longitude ...' ................. DOD Rd .........................Br City of Carlsbad SECTION LETTER Custodian ....................................Owner Ci.ty...of..Ca-.1s.b.ad CLASSIFICATION . . 08 4 , 3 Federal Aid System ......................................Administrative ...............' ....................Functional ......................... STRUCTURAL DATA AND HISTORY 1952; Rev. 1966 Deck revision YearBuilt .................. By..Stat.e ............................. Cont. No. ....... FAP No............................... Designed by ..........................................Plans Avail at Pep. Spans 1@60 ......I.......L..@ .....]@71..1. Length ... Q?.. ............ Skew......4.4!.Lt. Continuous RC _.5 cells c/c Description .......box .94 ......On .001RC .kents an.d........ RC seat w/Uqa11s,....aJ .on .çig.s ............................... On Structure . ' 1 J....9.1 Roadway S?ction ...................... ....f-*'..01 .......... ..*.?...... ............ Total Width .................. Stl. sti. il Rail Type L .Ste Rt.............. ........................... Median...)~1 e...Lanes ...2 ......Tracks ......NJA Clearances: Vert. UnimpairedHoriz.............3.a..'...... ............. PUC No. ...... .N.LA............... ............ Design LL Q.1.44 Capacity Rating .Jg1....loads Under Structure 14. 1' Cu, 8.3' sh , 1@25.7 ' ,36.0 'm, 1@27 .7' ,4.6 ' cu RoadwaySection ........................................................................................................Lanes ......2.... Tracks 61.7'L & 51.5'R NO. .. N Clearances: Vert. ....................... Horiz. 0f PUC No. ...... ISI/A....................... HYDRAULIC STRUCTURE N/A Report? Yes E_1 No. C] Nay. Control Yes C] No. J Clear. Diag. Yes [J N 0 ReliefStructures ................................................................................................................................................................ APPRAISAL OF NON-STRUCTURAL FACTORS Deck Geometry ............................................................Approach Aligmnent ......................5 Waterway Adequacy ......... N/A ....................................Clearances: Vert.9 ........................ Horiz........5 cc: County (2) UBO.M70 111/711 STATE OF CALIFORNIA BRIDGE REPORT Sheet ... of ............ 57C-215 Bridge No.......................... December 15, Date of Investigation ..........1971 ADT... ?. ..................Year ........ RATING OF CONDITION: Deck 9 Substructure Superstructure 9 Overall EXISTING POSTING There is no record of any restrictive posting for load or speed by the Director and there are no limiting signs posted at the bridge site. CONDITION OF STRUCTURE There is a thin., layer of surfacing on bridge deck which is worn through at edges and over abutments. Structure is in good condition otherwise. ENCROACHMENTS None CAPACITY Bridge is good for legal loads by design and for no overloads by design calculation check. POSTING RECOMMENDATION None =AD• LAPEDIS Associate Bridge Engineer P. E. Lic. No. C-17067 FORM HBDM70A