The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About; PONTO DOWNS UNDERCROSSING; PONTO DOWNS UNDERCROSSING STATE BRIDGE REPORTS; 1984-06-06STATE OF Ca..CORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUPPLEMENTARY BRIDGE REPORT ON-OS MI9 lACy. I/74 Bridge No. ................5 7C-212 Location ...... 1.FAU... SLO.LCb ................................. Dist -Co-Rt..PMCity Dais of Investigation ...........June6, 1984 Name ............DOWNS )SS.NG (.CarlsbadBlvd. .-P ..9m..e north.tLy...Qf.... La Costa Ave.) CONDITION RATING: APPRAISAL RATING: Deck 8 superstructure 8 Substr. & Pipes 8 - Overall R Channel & Channel Protection N Retaining Walls N PRIORITY Widenable? Yes [3 No Conditional G A — Immediate Action B — Early Scheduling Action Required by City Yes No D C — Routine Maint. 0 .;For Record Only WORK NOT DONE: The erosion at the southeasterly corner of the abutment slope has not been repaired. The damaged southwesterly bridge approach guard rail has not been repaired. CONDITION OF STRUCTURE: The structure is in good condition. RECOMMENDATION: Repair the erosion at the southeasterly corner the structure. B Repair the bridge approach guard rail at.the southwesterly corner of the structure RECOMMENDED POSTING: N5ne. FJW: pdh cc: DRHiggins (2) City of Carlsbad (2) 4é' Frank J. Walliser C-19767 (1) _----- ,- -- - I -' ''•.-- STATE OF CALIFORNIA ' Bridge No - 57c-2j DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION * SUPPLEMENTARY BRIDGE REPORT ..• Location '11-~SD-FAU-S101-Cbd ..- OH OS 4(5 (REV (174) 01st - Co We - PM - City Oat, of Investigation _2...12.L____. Name of CONDITION RATING: La . APPRAISAL RATING: Ave Deck 8 Sup,rstructurs 8 Substr. & Pipes Overall 8 Channel & Channel Protection Retaining Wails N Widenable? Yes No Conditional City Action Required by QAtj= Yes No - SEISMIC RETROFIT: This is a multiple continuous span bridge and does :not recuire seismic retrofitting. CONDITI]ON OF STRUCTURE: The bridge approach guard rail at the southwesterly corr of the structure is damaged. There is erosion at the southeasterly corner of the structure and the abutment is undermined. RECOMMENDATION: Repair the erosion at the southeasterly corner the structure.• Repair the bridge approach guard rail at the southwesterly corner of the structure. RECOMMENDED POSTING: None . Frank J. Walliser C-19767 FJW:pdh cc: DRHiggins (2) City of Carlsbad (2) w I • STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPA'RTMENTOFTRANSPOI BRIDGE REPORT OS-M58 IREV. I/iS) REVISED Bridge No. ........... Other No. P.U.C. No. Location Diet-Co-me-PM-City Date of Investigation ••0Ct0be Name YONTQ..pc.WNS .UNDERC.RQSS.XNG ..3.sba.Boileva.rd-.9 miles northerly of La Costa Avenue) Lat. 0— ... Long. .U2- .]8.8.. STRUCTURAL DATA AND HISTORY Year By ...... .D1Y1..12fl...of H1ghW YBContract No. .... ..1flw1.3................ Dateof Revisions ...................................................................................................................................................................... Designed by: G.D. k7 ......................................................................................... ...Plans Avail. @ .......B...PJI................... Description: Continuous BC slab spans on RC column (3) bents and BC column (2) abutments, all on spread footings. Spans .......................24......•..24. Length ......... .... ........... Skew .........................................................Design LL ........................... Ratings: Inventory .....S2QLLF'................Operating .......HS TAI.34A.r ........... ...... PP/T ---------------------- DESCRIPTION - ON STRUCTURE Bridge Width ....... ----------2.'.e.!x5..2ex!.a!b....... Total Width -------------------------------4 -2 43. 1' Median ..............Nfle Rail Type .0 t .!31iiatW........ (0000) Vert. Clearance over deck Appr. Rdwy. Width --------------------37 . Wearing Surface ......... •Ofl. Deck-Seal ---------------------------------------------------- Alignment ................ -6OO........0 --- cruve.... DESCRIPTION - UNDER STRUCTURE Roadway Section ............ i.Lcui22't ,1.'cu4----dirt;T.(N].................................................. Clearances: Vert. ------ -. 1 '. '.' S ---- II ---------------------------Hor,z.;------------------------------------Lt .....................3...7 ............................ Rt. Lanes--------2 - Tracks Pumpp(ant: None a See Sr. No. .......................................................... Facilities Crossed ----------- pontoDOWn-S cc: (1) CON'T. str CLIFOPNIA W°APTMLNT OF TRANPOR PN BRIDGE REPORT Bridge No. . 0E.M58 REV 1 75 Date ......................... 10-09-80 DESCRIPTION - HYDRAULICS Channel.... . ... ..................... .... .................................................................... ................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Navigable: Yes D No rX, Clearances: Vert ..................N Mar 12 ..........N MAINTENANCE Custodian ....... .C.Y.................................................Owner ...................................................................... ORIGINAL ORIGINAL CONDITION RATING APPRAISAL Deck 8 -- Overall Superstructure S Deck Geometry (7-) -- Substructure & Pipes B Underclearances Veit. - (7) Channel & Channel Protection N Hor,z. (4) Retaining Walls .._N Sate Load Capacity 9 Approach Rdwy. Alignment 8 Waterway Adequacy -.- N_-- Estimated Remaining Life 50 Approach Rdwy. Alignment - City Widenable? Yes = No M Conditional Action Required byJ$ct Yes FX. No D AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC - 10,000 (Estimated 1980) BYPASS DETOUR LEGT}I - 8 miles CODITI0N OF STRUCTURE - The concrete of the top deck has minor random cracking. There is erosion at the ab u t m e n t s l o p e s . O t h e r w i s e t h e structure is in good condition. LOAD CAPACITY - The inventory, operating and permit r a t i n g s shown. were obtained through the "Frame Rate" program using the load factor (LP) method of analysis. RECOMMENDATIONS - Repair the erosion at the abutment sl o p e s . RECOMMENDED POSTING - None. Original signed by FRANK J. WALLISER C 019767 ** , FJW:].l cc:DRHiggin Diet. 11 Local Assistance City of Carlsbad (2) (2) 14 13 ep STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATION AGENCY RONALD REAGAN, Goinor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION' DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS 1120 N Street CIA ?. 01. Sacramento, California 95814 f July 12, 1973 City Manager City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Street Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear. Sir: Attached for your files are two copies of the bridge report for Bridge No. 57C-212, Ponto Downs Undercrossing, in Carlsbad that is included in the 1968 Federal Bridge Inventory and Appraisal Program. The structure is capable of carrying legal loads or greater. Sincerely, DALE F. DOWNING Chief, Office of Structures B/o)/J,,.../ G. A. Hood Bridge Maintenance Section Attachments V STATE OF C ALIFORNIA' BRIDGE REPORT Sheet .......1 of ..........2 Bridge No Date of Investigation ......:1.3.... Location .... 15.20 )ISTCO._RTE. - CITY - P.M. Name ....?PTP....9WN.SUNDERCROSSING .. Location .QP............yd. L cpyAPalomar! Airport Rd. near Ponto. Beach State Park Latitude .33°5.................. Longitude ....... DOD. Rd ..........................Br......................... SECTION LETTER Gustodi aqa.r ..................ownerqY...o!.... CLASSIFICATION Federal Aid System ............................ Administrative ••14 ..Functional ...........3 STRUCTURAL DATA AND HISTORY Year Built .195.2. ..... By....e Cont. No ......... FAP No............................... Designed by .tat.......................................Plans Avail .IQS.............at .... ()......................... Spans .J12.4.!..,.1@32....24..Length.3.................Skew.......9.°.... Description .J.0 (9..ç) RC () &RC(2) column abutments. all on ..spread 2.?$......................................................................................... On Structure Roadway Section].!J.1 Total Width .. .... Conc. 1'W Rail Type Lt.114SY.. Rt. •'.e.e Median!?2! .......Lanes ...!......Tracks ...2........ Clearances: Vert. TP4.1'..............Horiz!9....]-?...........................PUG No Design LL Capacity Rating .....-3 . Under Structure Roadway Section ...Q.,.....?L.7 ...Lanes .Tracks .... ...9 Clearances: Vert. ..:.3.............................Horiz. ?9....PUG No HYDRAULIC STRUCTURE Report? Yes El No. Nay. Control Yes No. Clear. Diag. Yes D ND 0 ReliefStructures ..N/A..................................................................................................................................................... APPRAISAL OF NON-STRUCTURAL FACTORS DeckGeometry ..................9 ............................................. Aligpent ........................................................... Waterway Adequacy .......N/A............................................... Vert . ............ 9. ............ Horiz;...........9........ rflHn:I, 121 . HBO.M70 (It /71) STATE OF CALIFORNIA BRIDGE REPORT ADT• .... 2.9.9.. Year .?7.3.... RATING OFCONDITION: Deck Superstructure She ......... 2. ....... of .....2 Bridge No. ............... Date of Investigation .!... F' Substructure 8 Overall . 8 PREVIOUS REPORTS: . . Refer to report dated February. 18, 1953 by R. A. Wagner and supplements dated through 1967. This structure was numbered 57-247. . . . . CONDITION OF STRUCTURE: The deck surface has some pattern cracking. The RC deck soffit has a longitudinal crack near centerline full length of structure. The concrete is in good condition. The embankment under the end bents has settled approximately 3 inches but is not causing any problems at this time. CAPACITY: . This structure is safe for legal loads by design and is capable of carrying P-13 overload units. W. R. Schott . . C. E. Lic. No. 13592 FORM H80-M70A