HomeMy WebLinkAbout3151; PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD; PAVEMENT DISTRESS EVALUATION; 1989-05-10-
V
I v
V V
(
• American Engineering Laboratories Inc. .
V Q V
I V
V
V . •• - • • - -.
V
•
- , -• V 4 ••- a • £
••
-'- •''
S -
V
PAVEMENT DISTRESS EVALUATION
TENPORAPY P/LO?R AIRPORT ROAD
IroRh IA
V
:TT
— I V PREPARED FOR
/CITY OF CARLSBAD
2ø75 1.~-ASI. PALMAS DRIvE V CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 9200 ... •-
,
..?
.. .-. , , •
'V :.-'-
.:- •-:--.-- --. .: -,•
U
-V
V...
San Diego
Corona
OJOB NO 1112 MAY 1Ø, j9 Modesto
Yucca Valley
I
I V
•
V : V ;,
k
V V
I American Engineering Laboratories, Inc
Corporate Office 7940 Arjons Dr Suite A San Diego CA 92126 (619),695'3730 -
350 South MajDle St., Unit K, Corona,CA 91720 (714) 272-4230
515 Galaxy Way Modesto CA 95356 (209) 576-0813 V *
I r 58945 Business Center Dr Unit A Yucca Valley CA 92284 (619) 228-J754 • V - . .-' . - . .- .•
- - - - --
V V
-
-
-. 1SLt-33 (619) 178ZZ6V3 'tcalleA DnA'V 1Ufl 1Q 4Ua3 SSUISfl'55
- 6CZi7 3/2 (tTL) OZLT6 VD euoioj N Iturl aldeN s Usc -
- - cicO-Lc (66) 95C56 v3 'osapo "M ixeec gig
- • OcLc-569 (619) 931Z6VD 'oBiaueS 'V ins'asuoi1V 0V6L
- -
1
- (C#9S)
'•'
/ ia5eie da Buç..xaau-Bu u-çu 3aCo.1d
6'66 331 'ia 3 • - 'uckta •3 OPIenP
-f-3NI -'s3Tho-iv1oav1 9NIaaNIoNa NV3II3I4V
- --.. - 'patuiqns ATTflfl3adsaa
- -4 atj;o stq. o;uoo o. ae .taaq ;ou OP asad 'a3uE;stsàe iaq;in; xTnba.1 .10 suot.sanb. Xue aiq noL pae-rá.idde at'- 23tILXiBB jo aq o L;tun..xoddo aqj
- •- -- .
t
.'- -
-
- - - - -
- - •••• - -- - •'-- - - TToa ape..xeqns
paoaduIo3 AT.1ood o uawaTa8 pue 'UOtes'aseq aee.ifie ;o
I0ET 'utsap l.uawa4ed TeqdBe aenbapeii-r UtPflT3Ut '81O0EJ
Te-la To- uoteurqwo3 a o .-an p aq 0; aieadde a;ts';3aCqnB
aq; ;e a..InTTa ;uawaAed a.eq; 3PnT3UO3 aA•'sea.1e paasai;
- -Sip aq; o st8XTeUe pue 'uot;e -r;S4ut mo tuomj
44
_. 88a1;atp IuawaAed So aUta eIaUa . pue u-re.x3 ;o sutsAoqs aue.umaq;nos aq; So ea.xe oTjlejl AAeaq atfl. uT 8uoT;e3oT rza1as •peom aeedAq A.xemodwa; - -
e- 30 88T5U00 BaCqnBaq;;eq; punoj: uoT;eT;saAuT
- - ..• 4. -. - . ---
-é •fiupmeI-
suoTPuawwoam iue SUOTSflTUO sapAoJd pue .peom Xme.xodwa;
- ;uawa4ed 3-l;Teqd8ea4; ;o s;zadse T TUq3a;O2 eq 8SSfl3STP ;modai pae;;eaqj a;s.aCqnsaq; ;eUOT;enTe ssa.x;s-
;uawaej a pauhxo;mad aieq at ';sanbai=mnoA Tl.A azuapmoe UI
- -
- - - uaiue;uao I
- - - VINiOJI1V3 'uVaS'1w3
- GVOèI .LaOdalv eiVwO1Vd.AuvaOdwaj
- '---•.• - - - NoLLvn-IvAassaILsIa 1N3W3AVd - :133fflflS-
- -- I - - - -
- - - OITTt&ItA TV "-IN NOI.LN3LLV
--L •---.-- • - - --.60036 VO 'peqSe3
- - ZLTT 'ON-80f - --...
t1Q SEUTEd BE9 03 -
- 686T '01'- AVW - - -- QVBS'1UV3 dO A.LID
- •: - --' .----- 4 - -•-.•• - . I _-.- • - • - •
- - 3u 'sauoaioqe 6uuaauifiu uQ3uaw
- I
TABLE OFCONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION .............1
2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICE ....... ................ ....1
3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION...........................
4.0 DESCRIPTION OF DISTRESS .................. 1
5.0 SITE INVESTIGATION.............. ......... 2
6.0 LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAN.... .......... 2
7.0 RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION. &' TESTING. . . . . 2,
7. 1 :A9P1tic Concrete Pavement. . . 2
7.2 Subgrade......................
8.0 CONCLUSIONS ..... ........................... ' .3
8.1 Inadequate Asphaltic
Pavement 'Deeign................3
8.2 Lack of Aggregate Base ........'3
8.3 Settlement of Poorly
Compacted. Fill....................3
9.0 RECOP1flENDATIONS..' ................ .. ......
10.0 , GRADING OBSERVATIONS AND PAVING. . .. . • • 5
11.0 LINITATIONS.OF INVESTIGATION..................5
'I
0
seaie pasaistp OxI IPP4T le uT :ABTJaAO -ITeqdse jp a3uapt4a
8T aiaqj aue1 uetpau aql uo 4qBTj 4uapTAa s- 4uamaAad
aa1cuoD 3TTMdBe ;axa a4l 10 TBABaqdn 'suoT43aJTp qoq 48 peo a; o an(l -az 8 ui ; D, (q 8 SBaT 10
810111 4uuT u -paui at1 uTq4A aTT sea..xe asax.sTp aqj .uaWaARd
8481DuoD 3-peqd8E §u-flsixa aq-. So uo-ew.xojap 818A88
çqqxa peo.x BsedXq Lxe.xodwa, aql §uoTe 8uoTe3oT ,aa1q
SS3LLSIQ JO NOLLdIU3S3U 017
0+96 °- 0+L6 uo-ç4e,e uaaaq 88aL io aioiu pau-çuo aem uoTe5-flsaAuT açs
aqj uawaAed a.aiouoo p;eqds TO 88uef o so §uT8Teuo
peoH 44odaTV ieuioTed jo peo-i 881edAq Xxeiodwa, e Bt as 8t4j
NOILdTh3S30 ailS 0 6
8uopuaw1uo3aJ pue suoTsn1uoo.1no Joy Btseq aq pap-rApid qoqA 'eep A-i.o,4e-ioqBT pue
PT8tJ ;osTaATeue u1aau-çua STTOB pue 3toToao
gspeo AIeaqpaedt3-ue aq
uo paseq uoTaB juamaAed 2qen8 E To usa
uoesaIutpat; aq. BuTanp pau-çe.qo asot.j.
Jo aAteuasaida1 BBTdUIES JO BuTIsal Aioe1oqe9
g8u8a, Ajo4eaoqBT xo
saidwes uueqopue 'saioq uoe1oTdxa aquio.x;
pauteqo erTos pue uoT3aB. uawaAed To BuTo *
apei
;uawaAed tistuT; AOTaq 8843Ut 81 O saqOut ZT
woij BuTBuBJ sqdap o. PaJOD Bafoq c TO
B UTPfl[DUT 'UoTeJoTdxa apei6qns pue BuT JOD
- :papnTDuT uoflefrflsaAuI
8sa18Ta 4uawaABd th14 JOS papTAo.Xd 8 TIi88 ;o ados aqj
S33IAU3S dO :3dO3S 0•Z
ssalsp aql So
iTeda.x ioj suo-çepuawwoai aqens ap-çioid o4 pue ssa.x,sçp
.uawaAed aql ;o pasneo xe aBneo aqeqo.Id .sow- etj aupu
-.xaap pue aenea o4 E38A uo'saAuT .Ino jo asodind aqj
eTuioJTTe3 'peq8xe3 WE peoa iodiTy
ieUloTed A..xeiodwaj aql le ssaistp 4upwaAad 3TTetidse buTsTxa
84. ;o uote -rsaut inc TO 6Tn8a1 a44 suasaid jjodaj srqj
N0Ii3flU0LLNI 01
I I
I
I
I
I
I
PAVEMENT DISTRESS EVALUATION PAGE 2
TEMPORARY PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD JOB NO.: 1172
I CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA - MAY 10, 1989
I 5.0 SITE INVESTIGATION
I
The site investigation, consisting of surficial reconnais-
sance and aubgrade exploration, was conducted on May 4,
1989. The coring of pavement was performed with an 8 inch
diameter hollow core barrel, while the aubgrade exploration
I was made using a hand auger. A total of 3 holes were cored
to a depth rañgihg from 12 to 18 inches below finish grade.
The corings were done at locations where severe distress was
I.
evident. Refer to the attached Core Location Map presented
in Figure 2.) Exploration logs Of core holes. are presented
in Plate 1 of Appendix A. ' -
I Core specimen8 and corresponding subgrade materials were
collected and taken to - our- laboratory for the required
testing and analysis.
1 6.0 LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM .
I
The laboratory testing program included: "R-Value" and
classification teatirigof the subgrade material.'
7.0 ' RESULTS OF -INVESTIGATION AND TESTING -
I Based on our field investigation and subsequent testing of
. available samples, the following findings are presented:
. 7.1 ' Asphaltic Concrete Pavement .. -
All three cores were determined to 'have a slight
I variable thickness'from 3 to ,4 inches. 'Cores 2 and
3 showed an asphalt overlay of 1 inch and 1.5 inches
respectively. •
I .
• 7.2 Subgrade -
-
'
Alluvium-was found to overlie the asphaltic concrete
I pavement at cores land 2. These soils consist of
silty, clayey sand to sandy clay in. a moderately
dense state. In'-situ moisture content rangeS from
1
10 to 14 percent. •
- ' At core 3 the aubgrade'materi'al consists of Class II
base,' more or less 8 inches thick, in moist I .
•aggregate
condition. • .
-
I. • • •',: '
I'
S
PAVEMENT DISTRESS EVALUATION ' ' PAGE, 3
TEMPORARY PALOMARAIRPORT ROAD '', JOB NO.: 1172
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA MAY 10, 1989
8.0 CONCLUSIONS '
Based upon our investigation, the. pavement distress at the
subject site appears, 'to be 'due, to one or more of the
following conditions:
8.1 Inadequate Asphaltic Pavement Design
An inadequate asphaltl'c pavement design section may
be ,a factor 'in the distress settlement and deform-
ation. Based upon; the preeent use Of the road, the
design thickness of the pavement section shouldhave
been underlain by Class. .11 aggregate.
8.2 Lack of Aggregate Base .,
The lack of aggregate' base 'also may be a contributing
factor to the distress of-' the pavement, considering the
heavy traffic loads' in the' areas. The strength of the
existing native subgrade.. is not sufficient to support
,the heavy vehicle loading. A.-4 inch minimum thickness
of aggregate base is typically recommended to underlie
the pavement for a temporary section, and a 21 inch
thickness of aggregate, base for a. permanent road section.
8.3 Settlement 'of Poorly Compacted Subgrade
Settlement of poorly compacted subgrade is the most
likely cause, of the pavement distress at the site.
Based upon 'a probe penetration test,' the subgrade
soil appeared to ,be •in a loose to moderately dense
state. 'The nature of'cracki,ng and settlement of the
'.pavement due to heavy loading further indicates
insufficient subgrade compaction. With the heavy
traffic loads generated, a minimum relative subgrade
compaction of. 95 percent would typically be required
with a minimum s'ubgrade thickness of 12 inches.
However, 'based upon our, obeervátions, the subgradé
did not appear .to meet these requirements.
The distress at core 3" possibly' lies within the
transition change in subgrade materials of different
characteristics. "• ' '
9. 0 RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the aforementioned' concluBio'ns, it appears that the
existing asphaltic' concrete • pavement be removed and a new
pavement design section be Installed based on the R" value of
the in-situ subgrade.
S
PAVEMENT DISTRESS EVALUATION PAGE 4
TEMPORARY PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD JOB NO.:' 1172
CARLSBAD,
------------------------------------------------------------
CALIFORNIA MAY 10, 1989
"R" Value testing was performed on a sample of the surface
soils at the site. The.m'aterial from coring Cl was found to
have a minimum "R" value of '21, and from coring C2, an "R"
value of 18. Based on this "R" value, 'and a recommended
Traffic Index of 9 for heavy 4-axle trailer loads, we
recommend the following minimum pavement section:
Assumed Traffic Recomme'rded"Thickness Recommended Thickness
Index of Asphalt Concrete Class II Aggregate Base
90 4" 21"
The subbase soils over which these paving materials are
placed should be compacted to a minimum depth of 12 inches
and to a minimum of 95 percent of ASTM D-1557-78 maximum dry
density. In addition, it is recommended that all pavements
conform to the following, criteria:
All trench backfills, including utility and
sprinkler lines, should be properly placed
and adequately compacted to provide a stable
subgrade.
An adequate. drainage system should be provided '
to prevent surface 'water or Subsurface seepage
from saturating the' sUbgradS soil.
Placement and construction of the recommended
pavement section shOuld be performed in accord-
ance with the Standard Specifications for Public
Works ConstructiOn. ' 'Class II base should be used
as outlined above, and should have a minimum
"R" Value of 78, a minimum sand equivalent of 28
The aggregate base and asphalt Ooncrete'materials
should conform to the specifications stated in
Sections 26 and 39, respsectively, of the State
of California Standard SpecificatiOnS, latest
edition.
Surface rUn-off and irrigation water should be
directed awSyfrom'the parking areas to avoid
contributing to wet or saturated conditions
beneath the pavement.
PAVEMENT DISTRESS EVALUATION ' PAGE 5
TEMPORARY PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD JOB NO.: 1172
CARLSBAD,
------------------------------------------------------------
CALIFORNIA MAY 10, 1989
F) Pavement sections 'árS prepared assuming that
perodic maintenance of pavements will be done,
including, sealing of cracks and other measures.
6) All curbs surrounding landscape areas should
be embedded at least 8 inches below subgrade
to minimize the movement of moisture beneath
pavements.
10.0 GRADING OBSERVATION AND PAVING
The grading operations' and paving should be monitored and
observed by a Soils Engineer for ' determination of
conformance with the intent of the recommendations herein.
Subgrade materials shall be controlled and tested in
accordance with the ASTM Test Procedures D-1556 and D-1557
for conformance with the recommended minimum relative
compaction of 95 percent
11.0 ' LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION '
Our investigation was performed using the degree of care and
skill ordinarily exercized, under similar circumstances, by
reputable Soils Engineers and Geologists practicing in this
or similar localities. . No ' other warranty, expressed or
implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional
Advice included in this report.,
The Samples taken and used for testing, and the observations
made, 'are believed representative of site ' conditiOns
however, soil and geologic, conditions can vary significantly
between borings, test pits, and surface outcrops
As in most major projects, conditions revealed by 'excavation
may be at variance with preliminary findings If this
occurs, the changed conditions must be evaluated by the
Project Soils Engineer and, Geologist and designs adjusted as
required or alternate design's recommended.
This report is issued with the understanding that it is the
responsibility of the owner, Or of, his representative, to
ensure that the information and recommendations contained
herein are brought to' the attention of the architect and
engineers for the project and incorporated into the plans,
And the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractor
and subcontractors carry out such,' recommendations in the
field
I
S
PAVEMENT DISTRESS EVALUATION PAGE 6
TEMPORARY PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD .. JOB NO.: 1172
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA . . MAY 10, 198
The findings of this report are valid as of the present date.
However, changes in -the conditions of a property can occur
with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural
processes or. the works of man on this or adjacent properties.
In addition, chagnes in applicable or appropriate standards
may occur, whether they result from legislation or the
broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this
report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes
outside our . control. . Therefore, this report is subject to
review and should be updated after a period of three years.
AMERICAN ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, INC.
S
I American Ergineering Laboratories
I
MCCLELLAN PALOMAR
I
/
- '- --.-------. '+-- SiTE t- I I I I
-. -. p4. I PAL ARAIRPORT I
- I A 5, c5M ri
-
os
Wlp f WWTB S - AIRPORT
I \
- ,' - , , MACA ARLSBAD -:i------
-I
a'.
R
-L
,
J-------
o
•" •.• ':
RDE
-
Ni
I , •. •5; I *- -. w C
-
I
M I LIU* U.
I ,
1 A' R •LO.LM 7' _____ -. - C R AIp IOCO4OCMC, - R ACIL2LCE5 --
' /
-
OILML
S
------: -----:
SOUTH- CARLSBAq.
STATE BEACH
I - , •\ ' -- -
(NCwAS -I----------\j7
--
---------------------
- ' ' ...- ' .' •I. •BATIQ4'/TOS LAGOON I -
LA
I - - - SLM
I
I... •.'
•:, ' •-
-'-•- ': ..'- SITE LOCATION MAP -.
I • • •• - - •
•
':: • 1172 ~Y jq~89 ~MG~l
1
I American Engineering Laboratories
I
_ / PLATE____
'-
I
CORE LOGS,
I
I
I
C.
0 (• . . b • :,
-. : - - . . -
to 4" thick asphaltic concrete pavement
I
ALLUVIUM Brown silty, clayey sand to
sandy clay, moist, moderately dense -
—•1'
TOTAL DEPTH -18 inches
I —2'
I
C-2
I -
.(.111 thick -overlay and 3" to 4" thick asphaltic
concrete pavement
ALLUVIUM: Brown silty, clayey sand to sandy - --
. clay, moist, loose to: moderate dense
I..
TOTAL DEPTH - 18 inches
1 —2'
AMERICAN ENGINEERING LAB., INC.
-
0 Ring Sample PAVEMENT DISTRESS EVALUATION
1 0 Bag Sample TEMPORARY PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD
Job No: 1172 Dole 19891
. ..
:, ,., . .... .
CORE LOGS
I :
I L
I C
•
. b.• , :,.( 1.5". thick asphalt' overlay and 3" to 4" thick
I • b •.•' V . (asphalt'concreté pavement .
Class II aggregate base
I o
TOTAL DEPTH `12 inches
—p
1 ,. •-
.-. S.
—2'
I
I
I • • b.> .
• • .•
•
I
I
'i
AMERICAN ENGINEERING LAB., INC.
I S Ring Sample • -
- PAVEMENT DISTRESS EVALUATION
Bag Sample TEMPORARY PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD • I 5
S. • . S • • Job Noi 1172 1 Dole MAY
I