The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About3166; PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD; INTERSECTION STUDY; 1990-09-13P&D Technologies. Planning 401 W. A Street Engineering V : Suite 2500 Transportation September 13,1990 . . . VV San Diego..CA 92101 FAX 619/234-~022 V V Environmental Economics V V 619/232-4466 Landscape V . VV V V V - Architecture . An Ashland Technology V V . Company V Mr. Dan Clark, P.E. City of Carlsbad V V V V V V V• V V 2075 Las V Palmas Drive V V V V V V V Carlsbad, CA 92009-4859 • V • V Project No. 10365.00 V V Re: El Camino Real/Palomar Airport Road Intersection Study . V Mr. Clark: This letter summarizes Out findings of the analysis of the future operating conditions at the V intersection of Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real. Three conceptual designs for this V V V intersection were tested: V V V V V V • V V A Conventional At-Grade Intersection V A Multiple Intersection Concept V V • • An "Urban Interchange" Configuration V V V Complete calculations and hard Copies supporting , this summary are on file at our office and V available for review. Executive Summary V Two methodologies were utilized. Our analysis is computerized and utilizes the FHWA's Signal V Operations Analysis Package (SOAP-84). Inputs for the future turning'movements were provided by the City of Carlsbad -and, were derived from the SANDAG transportation model. These are the volumes anticipated at build-out of the land uses in Carlsbad and assume completion of the arterial róadwày system. V Acceptable levels-of-service can be maintained in the morning peak period under all scenarios V and the results are shown in Table 1. Less than desirable levels-of-service, however, are expected in the evening peak period These evening peak period levels-of-service were, as might be expected, worst for the conventional at-grade intersection, better for the multi-intersection, and best for the urba.n interchange configuration. The improvement of intersection operation is possible, but involves increasingly complex and cosUy designs V VV V V V V One additional issue was-examined at the direction of the City Traffic Engineer, Robert Johnson. Alternative turning movement volumes were calculated to V allow a conventional V at-grade V V : L.... ...; . ,. :j"; . '. . •. . ., . 'Lk k -'. . 71 J - 4 intersection to operate at acceptable levels-of-service The results of our examination suggest that a minimum overall reduction of 20% in approach volumes in the PM peak penod is necessary to realize the desired levels-of-service This reduction could be the result of a successful transportation demand arrangement program in the future Conclusioiis .. . .• . . - ., . . . . . . The best, configuration for 'managing congestion at this intersection- is jo have an ssTJthan * Interchange," with grade separation of the eastbound and westbound through-movements on . Palomar Airport Rd. Should this recommendation be too expensive, a conventional' at-grade intersection with four through-lanes on northbound and westbound. approaches would be a cost. effective solution. .If an effective transportation' demand management program can be implemented, a further improvement in levels-of-service could be achieved TABLE . . PEAK HOUR V/C RATIO AND LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY AM PEAK PM-PEAK V/C LOS V/C LOS Concept l:' Conventional , At-grade Intersectionk.. *•• -. . . I.- *_.'•_ --.,_-----. • • *. Casel 065 B 095 E • ; . . * - Case 065 B' 095 E ....... . .,I . - -••. . * d' . - . . . . . a" .71 0 :' Cot 2 ___ -. nèep Multi -Intersection --V: ,. •• - .• • Primary Intersection .j 0.57--1 A 079 C Secondary Intersection 0 71 f C .f 0.94 D r. . Conceit 3 Urban Izitéi'change -. / 4 - 4, "Single S/B Left ' 0 75 C 0.77 C Dual S/BLeft • '::. :. 0.58- A •. 0.61 B . • , . - - . . • - . • •- ._._ •_......,__...._._. .:... C 5- - - - CONCEPT 1- CONVENTIONAL AT-GRADE INTERSECTION . Summary Based upon the turning movement data provided by the City, level-of-service S"B' can be maintained in the morning peak period with the "typical" approach geometrics for the intersection of two-6 lane arterials. (Exhibit 1) However, without providing any enhancement • . to the capacity of the intersection, a lvel-of-service "E" can be expected (v/c Of 0.95) in the P.M. peak period, using SANDAG'S simulation of future demand, due to saturated, conditions •. on four of the eight possible turn movements: the N/B and W/B through, and the E/B and W/B : left turn movements. (Case 1 on Table 1). . • . . Enhancement to the intersection's capacity is feasible by providing an additional through lane • (providing a total of four) on the northbound and westbound approaches to the intersection with 4 a resulting level-of-service in the AM peak of "B" (v/c = 0.62) and "E" (v/c = 0.95) in the PM Lf peak. (Case 3 on Table 1). .. .. . . •. A further upgrade to provide an additional turn lane (totalling three) on the .eastbouiid and., . westbound approaches to improve the v/c ratio on these movements is physically possible, .'• . however, we have reservations on the effectiveness of this atypical inteisectiOn feature. From a practical standpoint, therefore, the recommended geometry-for an at-grade intersection is as -follows: ,,. NIB - 1 LT, 4 Th, 1 RT S/B-2LT,3Th,1RT. E/B-2LT,2Th,1 Th +RT W/B - 2 LT, 4 Th, 1 RT • . V ,.LoWest capital cost for construction Low right-of-waj acquisition requirements. Disadvantages 4 • Fails to provide sufficient capacity to maintain desirable lels of service in PM peak period on all traffic movements unless an aggressive demand management program ex.ists.-. : .. :.. • '• , V. . I ••• - - - 5 •. ---c - '' .• ' 5 -. May provide challenges to pedestrians or require increased cycle time for pedestrians " because of considerable distances across each leg of the intersection. (particularly so on', the east and west legs of the intersection). -• - : • - 5 5 May necessitate utilization of median mounted signal poles in order to rneet.MUTCD requirements for signal indication visibility. . - .- • - S ...- - -. - ••S•5 • S • S 4. .• T'' 5 •5•. C -S Advantages:- - - - . . .• .. : - ::: t.4•4. 4-s .. - - . CONCEPT TWO - MULTIPLE AT-GRADE INTERSECTIONS Summary This concept would provide two seprate intersections (Exhibit 4) near each other, the primary intersection accommodating the following movements -. N/B- LT, Th,andRT. S/B - Th FiB - Th, and RT W/B - Th The remaining movements:•S/B LT andRT, E/B LT, and W/B LT and RT being accommodated at the secondary intersection. As seen in Table 1, levels-of-service "A" (v/c0.57) and "C" (v/c = 0.71) èan be expected in the morning peak period at the primary and secondary intersections respectively. Evening peak period levels-of-service drop to "C" (v/c =0.79) and "D" (v/c =0.84), respectively, for the primary and secondary intersection. ••.. . •• ..• This concept would allow utilization of ásimple 2-phase signal at the primary (existing) intersection and could utilize a 3-phase signal at the-secondary intersection. Coordination of - these two signals would be mandatory, and installation of signal control might be necessary at other locations as a result of,the final desigñ.. • • • :.•: - • •_:)-r• . This concept assumes ,the. following .geornetrics at the primary and secondary intersection: Primary Intersection - - - N/B-1LT 2 Tl, 1 RT (Fre) -: W/B -3Th * •:.:_ .. . • . •• •.•- ..• Secondary Intersection. - I .• •• .••• • :. : •i N/B-2Th ç S/B - 21T, 3 Th,41 RT • .-.:•:.. - •. - .• -j -. W/B -2 LT, 1 RT (Free RJT) - • .• • Advantages: ••. -• •.' • -: .. • • •• • •• • • - : •- • • Relocates the turn movements which conflict with the heavy FiB and W/B through traffic volumes. -• • • Removes the requirement for protected left turn phasing for the low volume N/B left turn at the primary intersection.- - ...•. . . . . . .... . •. . . . . . .-:<.:.ct.c.-.:I:.:. : . :. • . . . •.. Allows for a reduction in size of the primary intersection as compared to. the •.. conventional at-grade intersection, thus benefitting pedestrians Removes potential requirement for mounting signal equipment in the median.. . . .4. Maintains acceptable levels-of-service at both the primary and secondary intersections . . during the A.M. and P.M. peak periods.- Requires less capital expense for construction than either grade separated concept. Disadvantages: Requires considerably more right-of-way than the conventional at-grade intersection.. Requires careful signal timing coordination for proper operation of the intersections. Unfamiliar concept to motorists which requires drivers to make turns at non-traditional locations, including making turns at locations in advance of the primary intersection. Has a significantly higher capital cost than for the conventional at-grade intersection. Requires pedestrians and cyclists to cross travel streams at multiple locations. May have a higher overall delay, and result in increased wasted fuel, than with the conventional" at-grade intersection. . V D I) DL12I w Summary .. . c INS,"concept would allow for he highest level-of-service in the peak periods of any of the three options. . . !. Based upon our analysis using the SOAP-84 software, levels-of-service in the morning peak period would remain at or ibove LOS UCU (similar to the other alternatives, but at a v/c of . 0.75). As seen in Table 1, levels .of-service in the evening peak period would improve from NEW .. (v/c 0.95) under the conventional at-grade intersection scenario to WCW (v/c = 0.77) under the worst-case (single NIB & S/B left turn lanes) scenario for the grade separation configuration Two configurations for this concept are possible. First, the "Urban Interchange" concept . . . (Exhibit 4) where all turn movements are accomplished above or below (as dictated by field conditions or a single bridge structure. The second concept (Exhibit 5) would be a modification of this original concept whereby each of one pair of through movements (for example E/B and : W/B through movements on Palomar Airport Road) would be grade separated from all the remaining through movements on its own structure. i! _;• 2'r • •: ::':I: , / 4) • • Each of these two design configurations has its own advantages and disadvantages, which are'cIV- presented below .1 Traditional "Urban Interchange" - Advantages - • •. - : •.. • Consolidates the grade separated movements onto one singlestructure. * S .• Provides capacity benefits over 'either the conventional or multi-intersection at-grade - concepts. ,. • Requires less right-of-way, overall, than. multi-intersection concèpt and has an approximately equivalent right-of-way requirement to the proposed conventional at-grade intersection Requires a reduced capital cost for the bridge structure as compared to alternative "Urban Interchange" concept. • ' Reduces pedestrian crossing problerns'related to either at-grade intersection concept Disadvantages: - Higher construction costs than for either the conventional or multi-intersection concepts. Higher degree of difficulty in construction staging when converting from the interim, al-. grade, configuration to the ultimate configuration This As 6 true foreither1 at-grade concept or the alternative grade separation conceptf" T A., \J Potential flight corridor conflict problems as a resultof the mtersection'spmximity4o Palomar Airp&L:ks -- - Requires more complicated right-of-way controls and turning movement guidance than' the alternative "Urban Interchange" concept 1- : - .• 1tucaIIpLIy uIuduuILriwE,e: '.-ullve[JL; •- Advantages # - - - - ;ç • ;*S•_# • 'I 4 1 - Provides capacity benefits over either, the conventional or multi-intersection at-grade intersection concepts Requires less right-of-way overall than the at-grade multi-intersection concept as -, Reduces the pedestrian and cyclist crossing-problems related to either at-gridà intersection concept.. • • S Potentially less- disruptive construction staging as compaed with "'traditional' Urban Interchange." • S • •-•cZ',' • •. S • • • • . Places the tamps for the turns movements from grade-separated through movement, in the median, potentially reducing the requirement for right-of-way acquisition from the developed property on the SW quadrant of the intersection. .. . . f. ...Consolidates the area of conflict for the non-separated through and turn movements, ..simplifying the right-of-way controls and turn movement guidance requirements. .: Reduces signal cycle clearance time required for individual turn movements, as compared with either the conventional at-grade intersection,. or the "'traditional' Urban Interchange" concept.. Disadvantages: Through movements on the flyovers required to remain on the right-most lanes rather than towards the center. Higher construction capital costs than any of the other alternatives. Potential flight corridor conflict problems as a result of the intersection's proximity to Palomar Airport. Requires the left turning traffic from El Camino Real traffic to merge right, from the median on Palomar Airport Rd., into the high speed through lane. S. Recommendation . ,. In the event that the City's budget would support it, our recommendation is that the traditional "Urban Interchange" would be the appropriate ultimate configuration 'for this intersection. If ..... the City's budget does not support this type of facility to be constructed, we would then recommend that a conventional at-grade intersection, modified to provide 4 through lanes on the . westbound and northbound app If ôaces be constructed to accommodate future demand.; Sincerely, . . P&D TECHNOLOGIES Arnold Torma, P.E. Director of Transportation AT:kp cc: tEntejty of Carlsbad • tiznc-I., ity of Is Roger Hocking, P&D Technologies Marc Jacobson P&D Technologies TABLE .:.. Intersection Volume/Capacity Ratio Geometry AM PK PM PK I Design Alternative NIB SIB FIB WIB Intersection L T R L T R L T R L T R ,i..;.. . Concept 1 Case 1 1 3* 1 2 3 1 2* 3 S 2* 3 1 0.65 0,95 Case 1 3 23 1 2*3 S 2*41 065 095 Case 1 4 1 2 3 1 2* .3 S 2*41 062 095 Concept 2: .• s Multi-intersection Primary intersection 1 2* 1 x 3 x x 2* S x 3 x 0.57 0 79 Secondary intersection x 2* x 2* 3 1 2 0 0 2 0 1 0.71 0.94 Concept 3 Urban Interchange Single SIB left 1 3 1 1* 3 1 2* 0 1 2 0 1 075 077 Dual S/B left 1 , 3 1 2* 3 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 0.58 .0 .61 S - Denotes Shared Through + Right x - Denotes a physically prevented movement . . . .: * - Indicates constraining movemnt (i.e. highest v/c movement) in P.M. i v ..................... •..•.• V. •V L r .. . .; . . .•. - •V . - TABLE3 - EXCESS FUEL USAGE AND OVERALL DELAY I 'I Excess Fuel Usage Overall Delay . . V V • . Gallons . •Veh-hr. V AM PM. AM. PM Concept 1 Conventional At-Grade Case 1 . 59.71 98.04 .. 37.22 73.85. -. • V • V V V •V • V . Case 2 .: V . 59.23 91.18 . 36.86 63.38 Case 3 V 58.81 87.87 36.59 59.50 Concept 2- Multi-Intersection .• - V * V V Primary V 39.76 5894 20.41 31.68 -32.60 40.66 18.51 24.32 Concept 3 Partial Grade Separation - )V • - . .• • SiñIgl S/B . 31'53 . :404 -:16.73 24.80 DuaSIB ['ft lY 3050 3700 < 14 75$ 19' 57 - 41 TDM Measures -' . V 20% Volume Redtictioi ' 45 53 -' - 6742 .. 28 24 i. 44 05 - .• • V VVVV•VVV_ •V• V,, VVVVVVVV - V VV V .•, V - V V ...,, Vj•¼tr:... .V .• '-V ••V - V•?.. * .V, • - •V -V •• V V V •V .+ V . •V •V • V V V V V .. V. I mm V V I Vi V V V V V V V VV:i.:; I VV V V 'p V V I V • /'// Li/ V. V: VS 41+1 L V S V V V V V V. I '. . 1 - I ' I s! I \ -. , .• I / - - ' I.. NE I - - - I VERSION 84 02 RELEASE APRIL, 1985 S 16 N A L OP E RAT I 0 N S AN AL VS IS PACKAGE OFFICE OF IMPLEMENTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION TECHNICAL SUPPORT MESSAGE CENTER: (904) 392-0378 SOMP INPUT ECHO ----------------------------- NO CARD ID A B WBT NBL SBT SBL EBT EBL WBT NFL COMMENT -----------------------------------------------++++-++++----------------: 2 :BEGIN 0 0700 I800 60 5 30 .95 .5 EL CANING/PALOMAR AIRPORT: DATA DECK - PAR3.DAT 6.: CONVENTIONAL AT-GRADE INTERSECTION SCENARIO 7 B : WESTBOUND APPROACH DUAL- LEFT TURN TEST '. 9: - - 10 AM PEAK PERIOD : IL CONTROL 1 0701 100 180 25 13: - 14 WESTBOUND SINGLE LEFT TURN LANE 15:. 16 VOLUME 1 0700 1072 32 125 329 644 79 735 20 17:CAPACITY 1 0700 3 1 3 1 2 3 2 3 1 18 MINGREEN 30 10 30 15 30 10 30 10 19 HEADWAY 25 22 25 22 22 22 22 22 22 '20 .: LEFT 0 0 0 - NSEW 21 SEQUENCE LT LT 22 RUN 1 STD GEOMETRY ++++-++++----------------: 'SIGNAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PACkAGE> PAGE- 2 'S --------------------------------------------------- L E F T I U R N CHECK (PER 60 MINUTE PERIOD) ------------------------------------ PERIOD NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NO. TIME VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP 1 700 32. 104. 329. 506. 79. 237. 230. 319. - t, -- <SIGNAL OPERATIONS 4NALY515 PACKAGE'> PAGE -3 DESIGN AND EVALUATION ---------------------- SUMMARY . .. CONTROLLER SEQUENCE LOST TIME SPECIFIED INTERSECTION NAME ' RUN NOAND TITLE TYPE DIAL N/S E/W PHASES /PH TOTAL SAT. LEVEL EL LANINO/PALOMAR AIRPORT 1 STD GEOMETRY ACTUATED N/A LT LT - 6 2.5 10.0 95.0% MEASURESOFEFFECTIVE!NESS. . -' .' . SEQUENCE DELAY STOPS EXC FUEL,EXC LEFT MAXIMUM V/C' LEFf TURN TREATMENT MOVEMENTS: (VEHHRS)' (X) (GAL)' (VEH) QUEUE - RATIO PROTECTION VEH/CYC PH 1 H2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 NB THRU 1143 040 16.94 29.1. 82 "" XXIX LEFT : .43 94.9 .56 O ",.9. .31 REST SB THRU : 11.72 89.4 18.87 34.1' .78 , ????' XXIX LEFT : -4.00. 94.0 .5.49 .O 8.9 .651. 1 REST '..O XXIX ?'??? LB THRU 588 846 8 98 15 7 50 "" XXIX LEFT 103 95 1 137 0 .21;1 33 REST 0 XXXI "' WBTHRU : 4.73 .72.0 . 8.13 15.3. .39 XXIX LEFT.: 2.87-.. 93.7 3.88 . .0 6.2 '.72 REST .0 XXIX ???? * . . ME A S U R E S. OF E F F E C TI'. V E N E. S " . S ON A L TIM IN 6 ANALYSIS: DELAY STOPS 'EX.' FUEL EX.. LEFT MAXIMUM V/C ALL RED DIAL CYCLE PH 1 PH 'PH 3PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 PERIOD CVEH-HRS) CL) (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO (SEC) NO (SEC) CX) (1) (L) CL) CX) Cl) 700- 800: • 42.10 *87*61; 64.23 .0 , 34.1 .82- . .'' 2:5 N/A 103.8:. 9.6 8.2 28.9 .9.6 12.3 28.9 SUMMARY , 421. 10 87.6 • 64.23 .- .0 34.1-' .82 TIMING BASED.--ON EQUAL DEGREE OF SATURATION. -. - *4 - <SI 6 AL OP ER AT I ON S. ANAL Y'SI S P A C A SE . PAGE - 4 S OA P 1 NP U 1 EC HO ------------------------------ .. r. NO. CARD ID A. B NBT NBL SBT SK EEl EEL WET WBL COMMENT -------------------------------------------------I+++-++++---------------- 23: . . 24 :CONTROL 1 0700 100 180 2.5 25:. 26 : WESTBOUND DUAL LEFT TURN LANES 27: 28 :VOLUME 1 0700 1072 32 1325 .329 644 - 79. 735 230 29:CAPACITV 1 0700 3. 1 . 3 . 2 3 . 2 3 2 : 30 :MINGREEN 30 1 10 30 10 20 10 15 10 31 :HEADWAY - 2.5 2.2 .2.5 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 32 :LEFT . 0 . 0 0 0 NSEW : 33 -SEQUENCE . - ; L?T L?T - 34 :RUN .2 . DUAL WESTLEFT ----++++-++++ NO: CARD ID A B NBT MEL SBT SBL EBT EEL WET -------- WBL . - COMMENT 0 -. - <S IG N A L' ORE RATIONS A A LV 5.1 S P A C K A S E > '. PAGE - 5 L E F T I U R N C H E C K (PER 60 MINUTE -.4 PERIOD) PERIOD NORTHBOUND - SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND ' NO. TIME VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP' VOL CAP . 1 700 32. 108. 329. 637. 79. 245. 230. 476.' - ' ' < SIGNAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS P A C K A G E > PAGE- 6 ----------------------------- DESIGN AND EVALUATION SUMMARY ----------------------------- CONTROLLER SEQUENCE 'LOST TIME SPECIFIED INTERSECTION NAME RUN NO AND TITLE TYPE DIAL N/S E,W PHASES /PH TOTAL SAT LEVEL EL CAHINO/FALOMAR AIRPORT 2 DUAL NEST LEFT ACTUATED N/A LT LT 6 25 10.0 950/ MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS - SEQUENCE DELAY STOPS EXC FUEL EXC LEFT MAXIMUM V/C LEFT TURN TREATMENT MOVEMENTS (VEH-HRS) (I) (GAL) NEW QUEUE 'RATIO PROTECTthN VEH/CYC PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 ------------------------------------------------------------ NB THRU 8.72 85.2 14.37 25.4 65 ???? XXIX LEFT : .41 9426 .55 .0 .8 .30 REST .0. XXIX ???? SB THRU 7.72 74.8 14.55 27.5 • .59 * ???? XXIX LEFT 3.41 89.5 4.99 .0 8.2 .52 REST .0 XXXX ???? EG THRU 693 92.0 1002 165 65 XXXI LEFT .99 94.8 1.34 .0 2.1 • .32 REST .0 XXIX ???? NB THRU 6.53 85.7 10.22 • 17.5 - .55 ???? XXXI LEFT 2.60 91.9 3.67 • .0 5.9 .48 REST .0 XXIX ???? A S R ES 0 F E F F EC T 1 V EN ES S SIGMA L TIM 1 N G ANALYSIS DELAY STOPS El. FUEL El. LEFT MAXIMUM V/C ALL RED DIAL CYCLE PH 1 PH 2 PH PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 PERIOD (VEH-HRS) (I)(GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO (SEC) NO (SEC) (I) (7) (7) (1) (7) (1) 700- 800 3721 84.1 59 71 0 275 65 25 N/A 1'00.0: 10.0 120 359 100 71 226 SUMMARY 37.21 841 59.71 0 275 65 TIMING BASED ON EQUAL DEGREE OF SATURATION I .• *• • I S 16 N A L 0 P ER 4 II 0 N S A N A I Y51 S P A C K A 6 E> PAGE - 7. SIGNAL OPESATIONS ANALYSIS PACKAGE> PAGE- 8 -------------------- CASE COPAR I SON -------------------- TOTAL DELAY EXCESS FUEL EXCESS NO CASE NAME (VEH-HRS) (GAL) LEFT TURNS <SIGNAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS . 1 PCKAGE --------------------------- SOAP INPUT ECHO - - NO. CARD IDA B NBT NBL SBT SBL EBT EBL WBT NBL COMMENT ----------------------------------------------------++++-++++-------- ------- 36 37 : CONVENTIONAL AT-GRADE INTERSECTION SCENARIO 38 39 PM PEAK PERIOD 40: 41 :BEGIN 0 1700 1800 60 5 30 .95 .5 EL CAMINO/PALOMAR AIRPORT: 42: 43 :CONTROL 11700 100 120 3 . . 44 : 45: WESTBOUND SINGLE LEFT TURN LANE • - : 46: WESTBOUND SINGLE LEFT TURN-LANES 47 • • : •• 48 ;VOLUME: 1.17001261 81089 442 1105 381 1347 242 •: •. 49 :CAPACITY 1 1700 3 1 .3 2 3 2 3 1. 50;MIN6REEN. 30.10 3 .15 20 10-30 10 • • . 51 :HEADWAY 2.5 2.2 2.5 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 52 :LEFT • 0 0 0 0 NSEW 53 :SEQUENCE . . L?T L?T 54 :RUN 3 . - - --------- - --- - -------- ---- - PM BID GEOMETRY: -.• ----------. ------++++-++++----------------: NO. CARD ID.A B NBT NBL SRI SBL EBI EBL WBT WBL • COMMENT PAGE - 9 rl ..-.. I I -0 I ,-< -0 CD I -1 CL LU CD LU I I I I I I CD <C - LU l CD I U) I I C'-- C'-- C- C'- C'-- C'-- C C- I I It) — ).0 I I) -I . I I CL - L. —I - I 1. U) I I I Ci. C'- C'-- C'- C' C- C'-- C'- C- I I _ - 0... fr) I I • C..) I__I l..-.- 0' I I I I I I, . I I I ' - 0 <C I I I - I It) - 0) U) I I LU - I I-C I -C =c I I • I I • I I C-) CL LU -.J I CD I I I I I— I— I CD I LU I i.-.- CD I __ I • I <C I— I I - .-c I ,. cm 13- I I- 0) - .._4 -. c":3CL. I r,LU V4 c'-: C'-- C'.- C'-- C'-- C'-- C-• C- I C'-.I - I -0 I U) -1 0) 0... I C'- c,.: I." C' C'-- C'- C'-- C'- 0... I - I CD - • I I I - I I LU • * I I 'I I I I I I 'I 0 I I I LU - U) I I I -C• - I I co I CO • LU 0) I -0 I CL I . - I I 0.. I I LU- I I . <C .j C-) LU I • I . . - I LU C-) I CD CD CD CD I C..) LU I C-I I - ON •-' -' - - I I - _ I - I C.) - I 5'' •'• • ' I 1 LU I - i _I - I I 'CD ' -' • LU- I C- :-, c...a LU I .-J I I ' - I ' 0) - .. - CD IzmI LU 'U) LU - - ' - . ' • I I <C - - - . = -'. CD U) I I F— -. I ' I — I I— C_. I i.— U) i.— U) i.-. C') U) I I - ' ' CD , I - I I - _ . -. - - LU' U) I C- I I - - LU I fr f_ I LU <C LU- LU - <C LU <C I I • LU C.) I I •. I CD - - ' I I . LU <C I • I - ..i U) I I ' . ' ' .CC 215 - LI) CD I ' I CD I ' It) CD- <C U) C-. - co U) If) U) 1 CD I It) I If) - '-- ' - - _ - - CD I CD I LU -'I - I - I-- I <C I - - - . - '• - I - .1 -. I— . <C I • .1 - I I ' . - - : . -- -•' -' LU I I rI) CL I I '. 0.. . , I— C-) - I <C - I ' I 0) . - I LU - ' - I - U) u=, - - ' I I "-I_I.J'.I • • - • ,I .-.-.LU I I '- - LU .1 I U) 0) - LU -O C-I cn - I CD I LL I - , - I •— LI.- '- - I CD I fr -.-. I - I CD • CD -. CD - - I f- - - LU I - I I— I 0) I I C.) LU I C-) ' I' LU .1. I I _ . 3 • I UJ U I I U U - I I - - • I_I.. LU- — I - .-0 *) C') 04C') -.",I.0 - I Li.. LU ._. I -O CD C') <C I I - CD I C') fr. C-.. - CC CM - 0 U) I LU LI.. <C I . - - - • - • I LU LL <C C'-< —I C'4 I • - I CD I CD . ' CD I I - LI. LU I I U. LU I - ' ,I. •• I ' - , . 03 l— I <C I ' C- <C I C') I I) • ' - ' . ' - 0) - I CD - N- CD C'- C'- CD IJ) I 0) I CD - I CO . - • - ' - LU I - 0) - - <C -- I - - • • - I U) <C I • I-- • - • ' - I <C I - • I <C - I • --.1 I I N.. N. If) C') 0) CD If) I ...) I I = I <C I <C I <C . LU I ....i - -.--. ....-. <C LU I <C I - • I CD I LU I - - I LU S_S_i - I - I. I .....J I . -.-..-.I•' - - . - I - I I ' . - - - I _i I I I - CD LI) I - . ' I CD LU <C I I CD I CL I I ..' . • - -,•• •. I I I - I— I— ) I— F- I - ' LU I <C U. <C LI.. <C Li.. <C U.. I ->- I - I <C ' • - I I U) I I - - I LU - - _ U) LU LU - I _I <C I I I' - I CD I <C I <C - I- - LII I f... ..._j C'.. __I i.... ._J '.1...- _.._l I <C LU I C., I I LU I C..) U) I Cl) I I. I CD I CI) I)) CCi IXI I <C I N— I I LU I I .J I - I 0) LU I - ' I —I I U) - - I CD I I LU I I c5IGNAL OFERATIONS ANALYSIS P A C K A G E > PAGE —12 SOAP INPUT I ECHO ----------------------------- NO. CARD ID A B MGI NBL 681 SBL EBI EBL WBT WBL COMMENT --------------------------------------------------++++-++++---------------- 55; 56 CONTROL 1 1700 100 120 3 57 58 WESTBOUND DUAL LEFT TURN LANES 59; 61 VOLUME 1 1700 1261 8 1089 442 1105 781 1347 242 61 CAPACITY 1 1700 3 1 2 3 2 3 2 62 ;MIMGREEN 30 10 30 15 20 10 30 10 63 :HEADWAY 2.5 2.2 2.5 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 1 64 :LEFT 0 0 0 0 NSEW 65 SEQUENCE LT LT 66 RUN 4 - PM-2 WEST LEFT ---------- ----------------------------- NO. CARD IDA B NBT NBL SBT SBL ERT EBL WBT WBL COMMENTS .1 .5 <SIGNL OPERATIONSNALVSIS PCKGE) 'PAGE 13 LEFT ----------------------- TURN CHECV ------------------------- - (PER 6O MINUTE ------------- - PERIOD) PERIOD NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND JESTBOUND NO. TIME VOL CAP - VOL CAP -VOL CAP VOL CAP - I 1700 8. 96, 442. 664. 381. 401.': 242. 2.55. - - - - / S GNAL OPERAT I ONS A N A L Y S I S PACKAGE) PAGE- 14 A - ,DESIGN AND EVALUATION SUMMARY CONTROLLER SEQUENCE LOST TIME SPECIFIED INTERSECTION NAME RUN NO. AND TITLE TYPE DIAL N/S E!W PHASES /PH TOTAL SAT. LEVEL EL CAMIO/PALOMAR AIRPORT 2 FM-2 WEST LEFT ACTUATED N/A LT L'T 6 2.5 10.0 95.0% hEASURES 0 EFECTIVENESS SEQUENCE DELAY STOPS EXC FUEL EXt LEFT MAXIMUM V/C LEFT TURN TREATMENT MOVEMENTS: (VEHHRS) (7.) (GAL) .. NEW QUEUE RATIO PROTECTION VEH/CYC PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 NB THRU 17 80 98 2 23.06 38.8 95 XXIX LEFT : .11, 93.9 .1.4 .0 .2 .08 REST .0 XXXI ???? SB THRU 7.87 762 13.63 260 55 XXIX LEFT 540 922 732 0 128 67 REST U XXXI EB THRU 10.26 860 1566 297 67 XXIX LEFT : 8.07 99.3 8.62 .0 11.8. .95 REST .0 XXXI ???? NB THRU : 18.40 98.0 24.24 41.3 .95 ???? XXIX LEFT : 5.93 99.6 5.97 .0 7.5 .95 REST . .0 -XXIX 7???. MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS S+IGNAL TIMING ANALYSIS DELAY STOPS EX FUEL EY LEFT MAXIMUM V/C ALL RED DIAL CYCLE PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 1/) (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO (SEC) NO (SEC) CL) (I) (V) CL) W CL) PERIOD (VEH-t1RS) 1700-1800 7385 915 9804 A 413 95 30 N/A 112.7. 89 136 293 10.0 45 31.1 SUMMARV /3 85 915 98 U4 0 41 ' 95 TIMING BASED ON EQUAL DEGREE OF SATURATION : PAGE 17 VERSION: 84.02 RELEASE: APRIL 1985 SIGNAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PACKAGE OFFICE OF IMPLEMENTATION !..FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION TECHNICAL SUPPORT MESSAGE CENTER (904) 392-0378 ----------------------------- SOAP INPUT ECHO ------------------------- NO CARD ID A B NET NBL SET SBL EEl EEL WET WBL COMMENT , ---------- ---- ----- ---- ---- .+++-++++---------------- 2 :BEGIN 0 07000800 60 5 30 .95 .5 ELCAMINO/PALOMAR AIRPORT: 3: 4 DATA DECK - PAR4 DAT V V WESTBOUND APPROACH GEOMETRY TEST : : VB AM PEAK PERIOD : 9 10 CONTROL 10700 IcO 180 25 12: THREE WESTBOUND THROUGH LANES 14-:VOLUME 1 0700 1072 321325 329 644 79 735 230 : 15:CAPACITY I 0700 3 1 2 7 2 3 2 16 :MINGREEN 30 10 30 15 30 10 30 10 : 17 :HEADWAY •2.5 2.2 2.5 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 18 :LEFT 0 0 .0 NSEW : 19 :SEQUENCE LIT L?T - 20 RUN 1 STD. GEOMETRY - ------- ----- ------ -- -- --------------- -------------: NO. CARD ID A B NET NBL SET SBL EEl EEL WET WBL V COMMENT - - V V V <SI6NL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PACKAGE' PAGE- 2 LEFT TURN CHECK (PER 6u MINUTE FERIOD) PERIOD NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND, WESTBOUND NO. TIME VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP 'Jill CAP <SIGNAL OP ER-A 110 N S A N AL V.5.1 S PACKAGE > PAGE- 3 DESIGN AND EVALUATI0NSUMMARV CONTROLLER -, SEQUENCE' ' LOST TIME SPECIFIED INTERSECTION NAME RUN NO AND TITLE TYPE DIAL N/S E/W PHASES /PH TOTAL SAT LEVEL EL CAMINO'/PALONAR AIRPORT 1: ST: GEOMETRY ACTUATED N/A L?T L?T 6 ,2.5 10.0 95,0X N LA SURE S OF EFFECT IVE N E S S. -' SEQUENCE DELAY: STOPS EXC FUEL ,EXC LEFT MAXIMUM V/t LEFT TURN TREATMENT MOVEMENTS: 'VEH-HRS) () (GAL) (VEH) ., QUEUE RATIO PROTECTION VEH/CYC PH 'I PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 NBTHRU:. 10.20 91.3 15.90 ., 27.2 ..-.76 .. - ????. XXXX LEFT:- .41-9.4.6 .55 '..O' .8 .30. REST .0.'XXXX???? SBTHRU 9.74 83.6 16.93 -• 30.8, .69 ' ' ???? XXXI' LEFT : 3.59' 91.4 5.16 '- .0 8.4 .57 REST' .0 XXIX ???? 71 EBTHRU : , 5.51 83.4 8.68 '14.9 .40' ???? lxxx LEFT : .99 -94.8 1.34 .0. -. .32 REST .0 ' '- XXXI ???? WB,THRU : 5.38 78.1. 8.97 ' 16.0 .45 ,' . --. . ! ???? XXIX LEFT : 2.68 93.0 3.74 :o 5:9 .. .52 REST .0. XXXI ???? --------------------- MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS SIGNAL TIMING ANALYSIS:' DELAY STOPS El. FUEL, El. LEFT NAXIMUM' WE ALL RED DIAL CYCLE,*•PH I PH 2 PH'3 PH PH 5 PH 6 PERIOD : (VEH-HRS) (I) (GAL) ' (VEH) QUEUE RATIO (SEC) .. NO. (SEC) -(X) (Xl' (X) (Xl (X} (i) 70- 800: 349, '85.9 61.28 .0, 30.8 - .76 - 2.5 .' N/A. 10Mli 16.0 10.3 31.2 '10.0 6.1 30.0 SUMMARY : 3B.49 85.9 61.28 -' .0 30.8. ' .76 ' TIMING BASED ON EQUAL DEGREE OF SATURATION: - - '1 4, .-. - '• '" -, . . '- 1 SIGNAL OFERATIONS ANALYSIS PACKAGE) PAGE- 4 SIP INPUT ECHO NO. CARD ID A B NBT NBL 581 SBL EBT EBL WBT WBL COMMENT -------- - ------------------------------------++++++++---------------- 21 22 FOUR WESTBOUND THROUGH LANES 23 24 CONTROL 1 0700 luO 180 2 5 25 :VOLUME 1 0700 1072 32 1325 329 644 79 735 230 26 :CAPACITY1 0700 3 1 .3 2 3 2 4 2 27 MINGREEN 30 10 30 10 20 10 15 10 28 :HEADWAY 2.5 - 11.2 2.5 '&.'1 2.2 2.2 2.21* 2.2 21.2 - 29 :LEFT 0 0 0 0 NSEW : 30 :SEQUENCE L?T L?T 31 RUN 2 FOUR THROUGH ----------------------------------------------++++-++++---------------- NO. CARD ID B NBT .NBL SBT SBL ERT EBL WBT WBL COMMENT ' a S1 6 A L 0 PER A F I ON S A N A L V S :1 S P A C K 6 E : PAGE -. 5 L E F I TURN C H EC K (PER 60 MINUTE PERIOD) PERIOD NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NO. TIME VOL CAP ------------------------------------------------------------------- VOL .CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP 1 700 32 108 329 637 79 245 230 476 <SIGNAL OF ER A 1,1 ON S A N A LV S I S PA C K AGE > PAGE - 6 ----------------------------- DESIGN AND EVALUATION SUMMARY ------------------------- CONTROLLER SEQUENCE LOST TIME SPECIFIED INTERSECTION NAME, RUN NO. AND TITLE TYPE DIAL N/S E/W PHASES /PH TOTAL. SAT. LEVEL EL CRMINO/PALOMAR AIRPORT 2 FOUR THROUGH ACTUATED N/A- LT LT 6 25 10.0 95.0%- ------------------------- ME A S U RE S OF E F F E CT IV EN ES S SEQUENCE DELAY STOPS, EXC FUEL EXC LEFT MAXIMUM V/C LEFT TURN TREATMENT MOVEMENTS: (VEH-HRS) (7.) (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO PROTECTION VEH/CYC PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH PH 5 PH 6 NB THRU 872 852 1437 25.4 65 "" XXIX LEFT : .41 94.6 .55 . .0 .8 .30 REST .0 XXXI ???? SBTHRU 7.72 748 14.55 , 25 .59 ???? XXIX LEFT 3.41 89.5 4.99 .0 8.2 .52 REST;.-, .0 XXIX ???? EB THRU : 6.83 92.0 10.02 16.5 ' .65 ????. XXIX LEFT: .99 94.8 1.34 .0 21 .32 REST .0 XXIX ???? NB THRU : 6.17 82.1 9.74 16.8 .41 ???? XXXI LEFT 2.60 91.9 3.67 0 59 48 REST A XXXI "" ME A SURE S 0 F EFFECT I EN ES S SIGN Al TIM I. N 8 ANALYSIS: DELAY STOPS El FUEL EX LEFT MAXIMUM V/C ALL RED DIAL CYCLE PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 W4 PH 5 PH 6 PERIOD : (VEH-HRS) (7.) (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO (SEC) 'NO. (SEC) (7.) (7.) (7.) (7.) (7.) (7.) 700- 800 3686 835 59.23 0 275 65 25 N/A 1000 100 120 359 10.0 7 226 SUMMARY : 36.86 83.5 59.23 .0 27.5 .65 TIMING BASED ON EQUAL DEGREE OF SATURATION. S IS A L 0 P E R.A I 10 N S A N A L S IS P A C .K A GE > -------------------------- SOAP INPUT ECHO <SI .6 N A L OF' ER A TI ON S A Ni AL V S S P AC K A GE > ' ' PAGE - 9 ----------------------------- OAPINPUTECHO NO. CARD ID A B NBT NBL SBT SBL EBI EBL WBT NBL COMMENT ' -----------------------------------------------------++++++++---------------- 33' : 34: PM PEAK PERIOD -'C 36 :BEGIN 0 1700 1800 60 5 30 .95 .5 ELCAMINO/PALOMAR AIRPORT: 37 :CONTROL 1 1700 100 120 3 THREE WESTBOUND THROUGH LANES - 41 :VOLUME 1 1700 1261 81089 442 1105 381 1347 242 42 :CAPACITY 1 1700 3 1 3 2 3 2 3 2 - 43 :MINGREEN 30 10 30 15 20 10 30 10 : 44 :HEADWAY 2.5 2.2 2.5 2.2 22 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 : 45 :LEFT - - 0 0 0 0 NSEW : 46 :SEQUENCE , L?T L?T : -. 47 :RUN '3 . FM STD GEOMETRY: , ---------------------------------------------'---++++-++++----------------: NO. CARD ID A B NBT NBL 561 SBL EBI 'EBL WBT WBL COMMENT <SIGNAL OPERATIONS AN AI L SIS PACKASE> PAGE 10 L E F TURN C HE C K (PER 60 MINUTE PERIOD) PERIOD NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NO. TIME VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL ,CAP VOL CAP 1 1700 B. 96. 442. 664. 381. 401. 242. 255. -------------------------------------------------------------- <SIGNAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PACKAGE> PAGE -Il ----------------------------- DESIGN AND EVALUATION SUMMARY ----------------------------- CONTROLLER SEQUENCE LOST TIME SPECIFIED INTERSECTION NAME RUN NO AND TITLE TYPE DIAL N/S E/W PHASES /PH TOTAL SAT LEVEL EL CAMINO/PALOMAR AIRPORT 1 PM STD GEOMETRY ACTUATED N/A LT Li 6 2.5 100 9507 MEASURE S Of E FF E C.T I V E N ES S - •. SEQUENCE DELAY STOPS EXC FUEL EXC LEFT MAXIMUM V/C LEFT TURN TREATMENT MOVEMENTS (VEH-HRS) (1) (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO PROTECTION VEH/CYC PH. 1 PH '2 PH 3, PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 NB THRU 17 Bu 982 2 06 98 95 XXXI LEFT 11 939 14 .0,2 08 REST U XXXX " SB THRU 787 76.2 1303 260 55 " XXIX LEFT 5.40 92.2 7.32 .0 12.8 .67 REST .0 XXXI ???? EBTHRU 10.26 86.0 15.66 29.7 i67 - ???? XXXI LEFT 8.07 99.3. 8.62 .0 11.8 .95 REST. .0 XXXI ???? UB THRU 1840 98.0 2424 41 95 "n XXIX LEFT 5.93 99.6 5.97 .0 7.5 .95 REST .0 XXIX ???? MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS SIGNAL TIMING ANALYSIS: DELAY STOPS EL FUEL El, LEFT MAXIMUM V/C ALL RED DIAL CYCLE PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 PERIOD (VEH-HRS) (<) (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO (SEC) NO (SEC) (A) (Xl CX) (X) (I) (A) 1700-1800 7385 91 ..5 9B.04 0 413 95 30 N/A 1112 7 8.9 13.6 293 10.0 45 311 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY 7385 915 9804 0 413 95 TIMING BASED ON EQUAL DEGREE OF SATURATION <SIGNA.L OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PACKAGE> PAGE-12 SO A P INPUT ECHO NO. CARD ID A 8 .1181 NBL 581 SBL EBT EBL 1181 1181 COMMENT ------------------------'- ---------------++++-++++---------------- 49 :CONTROL 11700 100 120 .3 50: :. 51 : FOUR.WESTBOUND THROUGH LANES . 52; . 53 :VOLUME 1 1700 1261 8 1089 442 1105 381 1347 242 : '54 CAPACITY 1 1700 3 1 3 2 3 It 4 2 55 :MINGREEN 30 10 30 15 20 10 30 10 56 :HEADWAY 2.5 2.2 2.5 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 : 57 :LEFT . 0 0 0 0 NSEW 58 :SEQUENCE . . . . L?T L?T 59 :RUN 4 . . . . PM-FOUR THROUGH: ++++-++++----------------: NO. CARD ID A 8 NBT NBL 981 SBL EBT EBL.1 WBT WBL COMMENT < S IS N A L 0 P E RAT I 0 N S A N A L S S P A C K AG E> PAGE - 13 LEF I I U R N C H E C K (PER 60 MINUTE PERIOD) SIGNAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PACK A G E > PAGE 14 DESIGN AND EVALUATION SUMMARY .- CONTROLLER SEQUENCE - LOST TIME SPECIFIED INTERSECTION NAME RUN NO AND TITLE TYPE DIAL N/S E/W PHASES JPH TOTAL SAT LEVEL ---------------------------- EL CMINO/PALOMAR AIRPORT 2 PM-FOUR THROUGH ACTUATED N/A LT L'T 6 2 5 10 0 95 (Jh -- -MEASURES. OF EFFECTIVENESS - SEQUENCE DELAY STOPS EXC FUEL EXC LEFT. MAXIMUM V/C LEFT TURN TREATMENT - MOVEMENTS (VEH-HRS) (I) (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO PROTECTION VEH/CYC PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 'B THRU 1601 982 2199 351 95 ",' XXXX LEFT 10 9 2 13 0 2 uS REST 0 XXXX SB THRU 713 762 1258 235 55 "" XXXX LEFT 479 914 691 0 114 64 REST 0 XXXX "' EB THRU 992 88.5 1573 277 72 " XXIX LEFT 703 993 B 0 u 10 .7 95 REST 0 XXIX "'" NB THRU 13 8 92.0 2041 315. 1 76 '" XXXX LEFT 5.01 99.6 . 542 u 6.8 95 REST U XXfl "" -S MEASUREb OF EFFECT I V E N E S S SIGNAL TIMING ANALYSIS: DELAY STOPS EX. FUEL EX. -LEFT MAXIMUM V/C ALL RED DIAL CYCLE PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 PERIOD (VEH-HRS) (1) (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO (SEC) NO (SEC) (I) U) (1) (I) (L) (1) 170u-1Bo0 63.38 905 91 18 o 5 1 95 3.6 N/A 102.0- 98 136 295 102 45 294 SUMMARY 63.38 90.5 • 91,18 .0 35.1 • .95 TIMING BASED ON EQUAL DEGREE-OF SATURATION. *5 - SIGNL OPERATIÜNS ANALYSIS PCKAGEi PAGE 16 ----------------------------- CASE COMPARISON TOTAL DELAY EXCESS FUEL EXCESS -; NO. CASE NAME (VEH-HRS) (GAL) LEFT TURNS - - ------------------------------------------------------------------ PM Un IflMTPV 77 or, 00 (i A VERSION: 84.02 . RELEASE: APRIL 1985 SIGNAL OPERATIONS ANALYSI:S' PACKAGE, OFFICE OF IMPLEMENTATION . . . FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION TECHNICAL SUPPORT MESSAGE CENTER:. (904) 392-0378 SOAP INPUT ECHO ------------------------- NO, CARD ID B NBT NBL £81 581 EBT EBL WBT WBL COMMENT -------------------------------------------------++++-++++----------------: 2 :BEGIN 0 0700 0800 60 5 30 95 .5 EL CAMINO/PALOMAR AIRPORT: 7, . 4: DATA DECK - PARS. DAT . 4 APPROACH LANE CONFIGURATION TEST - NIB AND N/B APPROACHES - AM PEAK PERIOD : ... 10 ;CONTROL .1 0700 100 180 2,5 FOUR WESTBOUND THROUGH LANES . : •.': 14 :VOLUME 10700.1072 321325 329 644 79 735 230 : 15 :CAPACITY.1 0700 3 1 . 3 2 3 2 4 2 - 16 :MINGREEN 30 10 30. 15 30 10 30 10 . . - 17 :HEADWAY 2.5 2.2 2.5 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 : 18 :LEFT 0 0 0 NSEW : 19 ;SEQUENCE L?T L?T : 26 :RUN ii S." 4W/B THROUGH : ++++-++++----------------: NO. CARD ID A B NBT NBL £81 SBL EBT EBL WBT WBL COMMENT V. cSIGN4L OPERATIONS ANALYSIS P A C K A G E > PAGE— 3 ----------------------------- DESIGN AND EVALUATION SUMMARY CONTROLLER SEQUENCE LOST TIME SPECIFIED INTERSECTION NAME RUN NO AND TITLE TYPE DIAL N/S E/W PHASES !PH TOTAL SAT LEVEL EL CI1MINO/PALOMAR AIRPORT 1 4 N/B THROUGH ACTUATED N/A LT LT 6 25 100 95.0% MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS SEQUENCE DELAY STOPS EXC FUEL EXC LEFT MAXIMUM I V/C LEFT TURN TREATMENT' MOVEMENTS (VEH—HRS) (I) (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO PROTECTION VEH/CYC PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 NB THRU 1020 913 15.W 272 76 " XXIX LEFT 41 946 55 0 8 30 REST 0 XXIX "" SB THRU 974 836 1693 30.8 60 XXIX LEFT : 3.59 91.4 5.16 .0 8.4 .57 REST .0. XXIX ???? EB THRU 551 834 868 149 48 XXIX LEFT : ".99' 94.8 1.34 .0 2.1 .32 REST .0 XXXI ???? NB THRU 512 74.0 8.57 15 33 XXIX LEFT 268 93.0 374 5.9 52 REST 0 XXIX "" MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS SIGNAL TIMING ANALYSIS: DELAY STOPS EX. FUEL El. LEFT MAXIMUM V/C :,ALL REDL DIAL CYCLE PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 PERIOD : (VEH—HRS) CX) (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO (SEC) ' NO. (SEC), CX) (X) (X) (7.) (7.) CX) 700— 800 3823 85.3 1 6087 o 308 76 ' 25 N/A 100.0: 10.0 103 312 100 61 300 SUMMARY 38.23 85.3 '60.87 .0 30.8' .76 'TIMING BASED ON EQUAL DEGREE OF SATURATION. 5' <SIGNAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PACKAGE ------------------------ SOAP I N P U T ECHO NO CARD IDA B NET NBL SET SEL EBT EEL NET WEL COMMENT ------------------------------------------------------+•+++-++++---------------- 21 : 0 22 :CONTROL 1 0700 100 180 2.5 2 24 FOUR WESTBOUND AND NORTHBOUND THROUGH LANES 25:• 26 :VOLUME 1'0700 1072 32 1325' 329 644 ' 79 735 230 0 27 CAPACITY 10700 4 1 3 2 3 2 4 2 28 MIN6REEN , 30 10 30 10, 20 10 15 10 29 HEADWAY 25 2 25 22 22 22'22 22 22 30 :LEFT ' 0 0 ' 0 0 NSEW 31 :SEQUENCE L?T. L?T 32 RUN 2 - ------------ - ---- ---- ---- ---- 4 NIB THROUGH ---- ----' ----++++-++++----------------: NO. CARD ID A B NET NEL SET SBL EDT EBL WET WBL COMMENT 0 - 0 •0 0 0 PAGE- 4 I b - S 16 NA L OPERA 110 N S A N A L S IS P A CA GE > PAGE - 5 L E F I I UR N ------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------ C H EC K (PER 60 MINUTE PERIOD) - PERIOD NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NO. TIME - VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP 'VOL CAP - 1 700 32 18 329 661 79 245..230 490 SIGNAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS P A C K A G E > PAGE- 6 DESIGN AND EVALUATION SUMMARY ----------------------------- CONTROLLER SEQUENCE LOST TIME SPECIFIED INTERSECTION NAME RUN NO AND TITLE TYPE DIAL N/S E/W PHASES /PH TOTAL SAT LEVEL EL CAMINO/PALOMAR AIRPORT 2 4 N/B THROUGH ACTUATED N/A LT LT 6 2.5 10.0 9507 MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS SEQUENCE DELAY STOPS EXC FUEL EXC LEFT MAXIMUM IVIIC LEFT TURN TREATMENT. MOVEMENTS: (VEH-HRS) (7.) (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO PROTECTION VEH/CYc PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6, NB THRU : 8.59' 82.4 1399 24.5 .53 ???? XXXX LEFT :' .41 98.6 .55 .0 .8 .30 REST .0 XXIX ???? 4 SBTHRU : 8.20 77.0 15.13 28.4 .62. .. ??ThXXXX LEFT 3.34 88.7 492 .0 8.1 .50 REST .0 XXXX ???? ES THRU -6.59 906 9.79 162 62 "" XXXX LEFT 99 948 134 0 21 32 REST 0 XXXX ???') WB THRU 5.90' 803 9.44 168 39 XXXX LEFT : 2.57 91.4 3.64 .0 5.8 • .47 REST .0 XXIX,???? MEASURES OF EFFECT I VENESS SIGNAL TIMING ANALYSIS DELAY STOPS El FUEL EX LEFT MAXIMUM V/C ALL RED DIAL CYCLE PH 1 PH 2 PM 3 PH -4 PH 5 PH 6 PERIOD : (VEH-HRS) (7.) (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO (SEC). NO. (SEC) ....I.) (7.), (7.) (7.) (7.) (7.) 70- 800 3659 829 5881 284 62 25 N/A 100.0: 100 127 336 100 7.5 238 SUMMARY 3659 829 5881 0 284 62 TIMING ,BASED ON EQUAL DEGREE OF SATURATION mom : ... _ t <SI G N 4 L 0 P E R4 110 N S A N A L Y S IS P A C KAG E > PAGE - 9 ------------------------ SOAP INPU,T ECHO NO. CARD ID A B NBT NBL SBT SBL EDT EBL WBT NBL COMMENT --------+++-++++--------------- 34 :BEGIN 0 1700 1800 60 5 30 .95 .5 EL CAMINO/PALOMARAIRPORT 35:. 4 APPROACH LANE CONFIGURATION TEST - WESTBOUND 'AND NORTHBOUND APPROACHES PM-PEAK PERIOD S 40 :CONTROL 1 1700 -100 120 3 S 41: S 42 : FOUR WESTBOUND THROUGH LANES S : 43: 44 :VOLUME 11700126! 81089 442 1105 381 1347 242 45 :CAPACITY 1 1700 3 1 - 3 2 3 2 4 2 ., • : ' ', 46 :P1INGREEN . 30 10 30 iS 20 10 30 10 -. S 47 :HEADWAY' 2.5 2.2-2.5 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 : 48 :LEFT - 0 0 0 0 NSEW. 49 :SEQUENCE ' S L?T L?T 50 :RUN 3 , - . S ' PM STD GEOMETRY: : S ----------------S NO. CARD ID A B NBT NBL SBT SBL EDT EBL WBT NBL COMMENT S S 55 (SIGNAL OPERAT I'D NS -ANALYSIS P A C K A G E > LEFT TURN C HE C K I (PER 60 MINUTE PERIOD) -. - PERIOD NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NO. TIME VOL CAP - VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP I I1AA 0 lOt fi A'l 101 704 AOl OAO or PAGE - 10 p I - - 4- - - -- -. -4 ••1 - - -.. - - - (SIGNAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PACA6E > PAGE -Il ----------------------------- DESIGN AND EVALUATION SUMMARY ---------------------------- F 4. CONTROLLER SEQUENCE LOST TIME. SPECIFIED INTERSECTION NAME RUN NO AND TITLE TYPE DIAL H/S E/N PHASES /PH TOTAL SAT LEVEL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EL CAMINO/PALOMAR AIRPORT 1: PM SIB GEOMETRY ACTUATED N/A L?T L?T 6 2.5 10.0 95.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS SEQUENCE DELAY STOPS EC FUEL EXC LEFT MAXIMUM V/C LEFT TURN TREATMENT MOVEMENTS; VEH-HRS (7.) (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO PROTECTION VEHICYC PHI PH 2 PH3 PH 4, PH 5 PH 6 NB THRU .16.01 98.2 .21.99 35.1 .95 .????. XXXI LEFT: .10 .93.2.13 .0 .2 .08 REST .0 XXIX???? SB THRU 713 762 1258 23 5 55 XXXI LEFT : 4.79 91.4 6.91 .0 11.4 .64 REST .0 XXIX ???? EB THRU : 9.92 88.5 15.73 27.7 :72 ???? XXXI LEFT : 7.03 99.3 8.00 .0 10.7 .95 REST .0 1 XXXI ???? NB THRU : 13.38 92.0 20.41 35.1 ;76 ???? XXIX LEFT 501 996 542 0 6.8 95 REST u XX.(X "" ME A S U RE S OF EFFECTIVE NE SS SIGN AL TIM IN G ANALYSIS DELAY STOPS El FUEL El LEFT MAXIMUM V/C ALL RED DIAL CYCLE PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 PERIOD (VEH-HRS) () (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO (SEC) NO (SEC) (LI (LI (') (L) (7) (/1 1700-1800 6338 90.5 9118 '1 351 95 30 N/A 102.0:, 9.8 136 295 102 45 294 SUMMARY 63 38 ,90 .5 91.18 0 351 95 TIMING BASED ON EQUAL DEGREE OF SATURATION .0 • , <SIGNAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PACKAGE>' . PAGE12 ----------------------------- SOAP INPUT ECHO ----------------------------- -. NO. CARD ID A B NBT NBL 581 SBL EBT EBL WBT 'WBL COMMENT S -------------------------------------------------++++-++++---------------- '51: 52 :CONTROL 11700 100 120 3 S : -. -•' FOUR WESTBOUND AND NORTHBOUND THROUGH LANES . .55: . .. : 56 :VOLUME 1 1700 1261 8 1089'-4421 1105 381 1347 242 : '57 :CAPACITY 1 1700 4 1 3. 2 3 2 4 2 58 :MINGREEN .30 10 30 15 20 10 30 10 : 59 :HEADWAY 2.5 2.2 2.5 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 60 :LEFT 0 0 0 0 NSEW : . -- 61 :SEQUENCE -- L?T L?T : 62 :RUN 4 1 4 NIB THROUGH --------++++-++++_------------ --------: . ------ I - NO. CARD . DA B ' NBT NBL SRI SDL EBI ERL WBT WBL COMMENT' -- - - <SIGNL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PACAE> PASE-13 L E F I TURN C HE C K (PER 60 MINUTE PERIOD) PERIOD NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND : NO. TIME VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP 1 1700 8 106 442 687 381 401 242 255 SI G AL OPERATIONS A N A L S S PACKAGE> PAGE - 14 DESIGN AND EVALUATION SUMMARY ----------------------------- CONTROLLER SEQUENCE LOST TIME SPECIFIED INTERSECTION NAME RUN NO. AND TITLE TYPE DIAL N/S E!W PHASES !PH TOTAL SAT. LEVEL EL CAMINO/PALOMAR AIRPORT 2 4N/B THROUGH ACTUATED N/A L?T L?T 6. 2.5 10.0 95.0X M EA S U R ES OF EFFECT I V NE 55 - SEQUENCE DELAY STOPS EXC FUEL EXC LEFT MAXIMUM V/C LEFT TURN TREATMENT.- MOVEMENTS: (VEH-HRS) () (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO PROTECTION VEH/CYC PH 1 PH 2 PH ,3' PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 NBTHRU : 12.20 90.4 18.72 32.3 .71 ???? XXIX LEFT .10. 93.2. .13 .0 .2 .08 REST .0 XXXI ???? SBTHRU : 7.14 76.3 12.59 2 3. 5 .55 ???? XXIX LEFT 4.78 91.3 6.91 .0 11.4 .64 REST .0 XXIX ???? EBTHRU 9.90 88.4 15.71 27.7 .72 ???? XXXI LEFT - 7.02 99.3 8.00 .0 10.7 .95 REST .0 XXIX NB THRU 13.36 91.9 20.40 35.0 .76 ???? XXIX LEFT 5.00 99.6 5.41 .0 6.8 .95 REST .0 XXIX ???? MEASURES OFEFFECTIVENESS•• .1 SiGNALTiMING ANALYSIS: DELAYJ., STOPS EX. FUEL EX. LEFT MAXIMUM V/C ALL RED DIAL CYCLE 'PH 1 -PH 2 PH 3 PH PH 5 PH 6 PERIOD : (VEH-HRS) (X) (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO (SEC) NO. (SEC) (X) (XI (X) (I) (XI (Xl ----------------------------------- 1700-1800: 59.50 888. 87.87 .0 35.0 .95 3.0 N/A 101.9: 9.8 13.6 29.4 10.2 4.5 29.4 SUMMARY :. 59.50 88.8 87.87 .0 35.0 - .95 TIMING BASED-ON EQUAL DEGREE OF SATURATION. <SIGNAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PACKAGE> CASE COMPARISON ----------------------------- TOTAL DELAY EXCESS FUEL EXCESS No; CASE NAME (VEH-HRS) (GAL) LEFT TURNS 3 PM STD GEOMETRY 63.38 91.18 4 4 NIB THROUGH 59.50 87.87 .0 < S I G N A L OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PACKAGE> PAGE-17 -------------- SOAP INPUT ECHO. V H ----------------------------- NO. 'CARD ID A B NBT 'NBL SBT SBL EDT EBL WBT Wk COMMENT '.. ------------- - ---- ----- ----- ---- ---- ------ ---- ------ ----- ------------------------ 64:END . t V t +s+ END OF SOAP JOB +++ V VERSION: 84.02 RELEASE: APRIL 1985 S16NALOPERAT.IONS ANALYSIS PACKAGE t • -. OFFICE OF IMPLEMENTATION, ...FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION T TECHNICAL SUPPORT MESSAGE CENTER: 904) 392-0378 ----------------------------- SOA'P INPUT ECHO - -------------------------- NO. CARD IDA . B NBT NBL SBT SBL EBT EBL NBT WBL COMMENT ------------ ---- ----- ---- ---- .---- ----- ----- ----- --- -................. --------.: 2 BEGIN 0 0700 0800 60 5 30 95 5 EL CAriiNO/PALOMAR AIRPORT Q 4 :,. MULTI-INTERSECTION CONCEPT : 5: - 6 AM PEAK PERIOD '. 7: . 8 : PRIMARY INTERSECTION 9: : 10 :CONTROL 10700 100 180 2.5 : 11 VOLUME 1 0700 ,1071' 32 1555 0 644 0 735 0 12 :CAPACITY 1 0700 . 2 1 3 0 2 0 3 0 : 13 :MINGREEN 30 10 30 10 .20 . 10 20. 10 : 14 :HEADWAY 2.5 2.2 2.5 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2,2 15 :LEFT 2 0 0 ON : 16 :SEQUENCE . . I T 17 :RUN 1 . . PRIMARY PAR/ECR: ---------- - ---- ---------------- ---- ---- ---- ----++++-++++---------------- NO CARD ID A B NBT NBL SBT sBL EBT EBL WBT WBL COMMENT *** WARNING: LEFT TURN TREATMENT PERM IS NOT ALLOWED WITH ., SEQUENCE T FOR THE NB DIRECTION LEFT TURN TREATMENT CHANGED TO NONE *** WARNING: THE FOLLOWING MOVEMENTS ARE ASSUMED NOT TO EXIST MOVEMENT NO. 4 SOUTHBOUND LEFT. MOVEMENT NO. 6 EASTBOUND LEFT. MOVEMENT NO. B WESTBOUND LEFT. . -..- .4 .<SISNAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS P A C K A G E > .PASE-2 L E F I I U R N ---------------------------------------------------- C H EC K (PER 60 MINUTE ------------------- PERIOD) PERIOD NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND . .. . NO. TIME VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP 1 700 '32. 136. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. A A ' - .. . <SI6NAVOPERATIONSANALYSISPACKGE) PAGE -3 ----------------------------- DESIGN AND EVALUATION SUMMARY ------------------------ CONTROLLER SEQUENCE LOST TIME SPECIFIED INTERSECTION NAME RUN NO. AND TITLE TYPE DIAL N/S -E/W PHASES /PH TOTAL SAT. LEVEL EL CAMINO/PALOMAR AIRPORT 1: PRIMARY PARIECR ACTUATED, N/A T T 2 2.5 5.0 95.0X MEASURES O.F EFFECT I V E N ES S SEQUENCE DELAY STOPS EXC FUEL EXC LEFT MAXIMUM V/C LEFT TURN TREATMENT MOVEMENTS: (VEH-HRS) (X) (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO PROTECTION VEH/CYC PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 NB THRU 412 623 920 187 57 lxxx LEFT 39 92 6 53 u 8 24 NONE 2.0 XXXX SB THRU 579 618 1308 267 55 XXIX EB THRU 4.91 81.3 8.18 14.5 .57 XXXI NB THRU : 5.19 76.8 8.76 15.7 .43 XXIX MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS SIGNAL TIMING ANALYSIS DELAY STOPS EX FUEL El LEFT MAXIMUM V/C ALL RED DIAL CYCLE PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 PERIOD (VEH-HRS) (i) (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO (SEC) NO. (SEC) (7.) (7.) (7.) (7.) (7.) (7.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 700- 800 2041 681 39.76 0 267 57 25 N/A 100.0., '60.3 37.21 SUMMARY 20.41 68.1 39.76 .0 26.7 . .57 TIMING BASED ON EQUAL DEGREE OF SATURATION.. <SIGNAL OPERATIONS A N A L Y S I S P1 ACKAGE> PAGE- 4 / / SOAP I N P U T ECHO -------------------- NO. CARD ID A B NBT NBL 681 SBL EBI EBL WBT WBL COMMENT .. ---------------------------------------------------++++-++++---------------- SECONDARY. INTERSECTION AM PEAK PERIOD : 23 :CONTROL 1 0700 100 180 2.5 214 -VOLUME 1 0700 1072 01325 329 0 79 0 230 *** WARNING: MISSING VOLUME COUNT FOR NORTHBOUND LEFT. *WARNING: MISSING VOLUME COUNT FOR EASTBOUND THRU. * *** WARNING: MISSING VOLUME COUNT FOR WESTBOUND THRU. 25 -.CAPACITY 10700 2 0 .3 .2 0' 2 0 2 26 :MINGREEN 30 10 30 10 20 . 10 20 10 : 27 :HEADWAY 2.5 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2. 2.2 28 :LEFT 0 0 0 0 SEW : 29 :SEQUENCE •. ST LI . '. 30 :RUN 2 2NDARY PARIECR ------------ - ---- ---- ---- --------- ---- ---- ----- ----++++-++++---------------- NO. CARD ID A B NBT NBL 681 SBL EBT EBL WBT WBL COMMENT WARNING: THE FOLLOWING MOVEMENTS ARE ASSUMED NOT TO EXIST: MOVEMENT NO. 2 NORTHBOUND LEFT.'. • MOVEMENT NO. 5. EASTBOUND THRU. . . MOVEMENT NO. 7 WESTBOUND THRU. . • <SIGNALOPERT1ONS ANALYSIS PACA6EY PAGE -5 LEFT I U R N C HE CK -------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- (PER 60 MINUTE PERIOD) PERIOD NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NO TIME VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP 1 700 0. 0. ------------------------------------------------------------------- 329. 462 79. 323. 230. 323. <SIGNAL OPERATIONS ANALSIS PACVAGE PAGE- 6 ----------------------------- DESIGN AND EVALUATION SUMMARY ----------------------------- CONTROLLER SEQUENCE LOST TIME SPECIFIED INTERSECTION NAME RUN NO AND TITLE TYPE DIAL N/S E/W PHASES /PH TOTAL SAT LEVEL EL CAMINO/PALOMAR AIRPORT 2 2NDARY PAR/ECR ACTUATED N/A ST LT 4 25 10 0 95.0% MEASURES 0FEFFECTtVENESS SEQUENCE TOPS EXC FUEL EXCI LEFT MAXIMUM, V/C LEFT TURN TREATMENT DELAY S MOVEMENTS: (VEH-HRS). IX) (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO PROTECTION VEH/CYC PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 NB THRU 6 85 80.3 12.721 2 9 71 LXXX SB THRU 360 512 894 188 43 XXXI XXIX LEFT : 4.06 95.5 5.58. .0 8.7 .71 REST .0 XXXI LEFT :''.9392.4 1.29 .0 -2.0 .24 REST ..0. XXXX LEFT 307 969 407 0 62 71 REST 0 XXXI ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS SIGNAL TIMING ANALYSIS: DELAY STOPS El. FUEL El. LEFT MAXIMUM V/C ALL RED DIAL CYCLE PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 PERIOD : (VEH-HRS) (Xl (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO (SEC) NO. (SEC) (Xl IX) (X) IX) (X) (X) 700- 800:' 18.51 70.8 32.60 .0 23.9 .71 2.5 N/A 100.0: 16.6 48.5 12.4 20.0 SUMMARY : 18.51 70.8 32.60 .0 23.9 .71 TIMING BASED ON EQUAL DEGREE OF SATURATION. <SIGNAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS P'ACKAGE> PAGE —7 SOAP INPUT. ECHO * NO. CARD iDA B HBT NBL SET SBL EDT, EEL WET WBL COMMENT ---++++-++++---------------- 31: 32 :BEGIN 0 1700 1800 60 5 30 .95 .5 EL CAMINO/PALOMAR AIRPORT: PM PEAK PERIOD : : 36 PRIMARY:INTERSECTION 37 38 ICONTROL 1-1700 100 180 3 39 :VOLUME 1 1700 1261 8 1331 0 1105' 0 1347 0 : 40 :CAPACITY 11700 2 1 3 0 2 0 3 0 41 :MINGREEN 30 10 30 10 20 10 20 10 : 42 :HEADWAY 2.5 2.2 2.5 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 : 43 LEFT 2 0 0 ON : 44 SEQUENCE T T 45 :RUN 3 PRIMARY PAR/ECR: -------------------------------------- - ------- : NO. CARD IDA B NET NBL SBT GEL EST EEL WET WBL COMMENT *** WARNING: LEFT TURN TREATMENT PERM' IS NOT ALLOWED WITH SEQUENCE 'T ' FOR THE 'WE'. DIRECTION. Is I LEFT TURN TREATMENT CHANGED TO 'NONE'.. • ' *** WARNING: THE FOLLOWING MOVEMENTS ARE ASSUMED NOT TO EXIST: •. • MOVEMENT N06 4 SOUTHBOUND LEFT. • , • MOVEMENT NO. 6 EASTBOUND LEFT. . MOVEMENT •NO. 8 WESTBOUND LEFT • . '' 4 , . ' • c • . CS 16 N A L OP ER A 110 N S A N A L S IS P A C K A S E > PAGE - 8 4 LEFT I URN C H E C K (PER 60 MINUTE PERIOD) • 4 -. •• PERIOD NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NO TIME VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP 1 1700 8. 140. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. • S •• - V 4 S - S - 'S - S S <SIGNAL OPERATIONS ANALVSIS PACKAGE.> . . PAGE- 9 DESIGN AND EVALUATION SUMMARY CONTROLLER SEQUENCE LOSTTIME SPECIFIED. INTERSECTION NAME RUN NO. AND TITLE . TYPE DIAL N/S E!W PHASES /PH TOTAL. SAT. LEVEL EL CAMINO/FALOMARAIPORT I: PRIMARY PAR/ECR ACTUATED N/A T T 2 2.5 5.0 . 950 MEASURES OF EF'FECT.IVENESS . . * . . SEQUENCE DELAY STOPS EXC FUEL. EXC LEFT MAXIMUM V/C LEFT TURN TREATMENT MOVEMENTS: (VEH-HRS) (I) (GAL) .(VEHY QUEUE RATIO PROTECTION VEH/CYC PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH-5 PH 6 NB THRU : 8.04 82.9 15.28 : 29.0 .79 XXXI . LEFT..: •09 90.8 .13 . .2 .06 NONE 2.0 XXIX SB THRU : 6.75 69.9 13.36 25.9 . XXXI EB THRU : 8.16 86.1 14.41 26.4 .79 . . XXXX • * NB THRU 8.64 78.6 15.77 29.4 .64 * - XXXI • MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS . SIGNAL TIMING ANALYSIS: DELAY STOPS EX. FUEL EX. LEFT MAXIMUM • V/C ALL RED DIAL CYCLE PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 PERIOD: (VEH-HRS) (7.) (GAL) (VEH) * QUEUE' RATIO (SEC) NO. (SEC) (7.) (7.) (7.) (7.) (7.) (7.) 1700-1800: 31.68 79.1 58.94 .0 29.4 79 3.0 N/A 100.0: 51.5 45.5 . SUMMARY : P 31.68. 79.1 58.94 .0 29.4 .79 TIMING BASED ON EQUAL-DEGREE OF SATURATION. <SIGNAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PAC;KAG.E> PAGE1O ----------------------------- - SOAP INPUT ECHO - / / ------------------- / I . NO. CARD ID A B NET NBL SET SEL EEl EEL WET WBL COMMENT -------------------------------------------------++++-++++---------------- 46: . 47 PM PEAK PERIOD . 48:. 49: SECONDARY INTERSECTION 50; 51 ;CONTROL 1 1700 100 180 3 52 :VOLUME 1 1700 1261 0 1089 442 0 381 0 242 . *** WARNING: MISSING VOLUME COUNT FOR NORTHBOUND LEFT. 'H WARNING: MISSING VOLUME COUNT FOR EASTBOUND THRU. *** WARNING: MISSING VOLUME COUNT. FOR WESTBOUND THRU. '. . 53 :CAPACITY 1 1700 2 0 -3 .2 0 2 0 2 : 54 :MIN6REEN -30 10 20 10 10 20 10 20 55 :HEADWAY , 2.5 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 - 56 :LEFT 0 0 0 0 57 :SEQUENCE-. ST LI 58 :RUN 4 . 2NDARY PAR/ECR -- NO; CARD ID A B NET NBL SET- GEL EDT EEL WET WEL COMMENT *** WARNING; THE FOLLOWING MOVEMENTS ARE ASSUMED NOT TO EXIST; - - MOVEMENT-NO. 2 NORTHBOUND LEFT. ' -- MOVEMENT NO. 5 EASTBOUND THRU. - MOVEMENT NO. 7 WESTBOUND, THRU. I - . I _ I S NA L 0 F ER A 110 N S A N A L S S P A CK A SE>. PAGE - 11 LEFT I II R N C H E C K (PER 60 MINUTE PERIOD) PERIOD NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NO. TIME VOL CAP..- VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1700 0. 0 442. 527. 381. 573. 242 573. cSI GNL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PACKAGE> PAGE 12 ------------------- DESIGN AND EVALUATION SUMMARY ----------------------------- CONTROLLER SEQUENCE LOST TIME SPECIFIED INTERSECTION NAME RUN NO. AND .TITLE TYPE DIAL N/S E/W PHASES /PH TOTAL SAT. LEVEL EL CAHINO/FALOMAR AIRPORT 2 2NDARY PAR/ECR ACTUATED N/A ST LT 4 25 100 95.0%, MEASURES OF EFFECT I V E N E S S SEQUENCE DELAY STOPS EXC FUEL EXC LEFT MAXIMUM V/C LEFT TURN TREATMENT - MOVEMENTS: (VEH-HRS) (7.) (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO PROTECTION VEH/CYC 'PH 1 PH 2 PH PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 NB THRU :• 9.26 88.0 16.65 30.8 .84 XXIX SB THRU 249 456 6.46 138 34 XXXI XXAX LEFT : 5.70 97.0 7.71 .0 11.9 .84 REST .0 XXIX LEFT : 4.34 93.4 6.16 .0 9.9 .67 REST .0 XXXI LEFT : 2.54 89.1 3.68 .0 6.0 .42 REST .0 XXXX MEASURES OF E F F E C 4 VENESS SIGNAL TIMING ANALYSIS: DELAY STOPS EX. FUEL EL LEFT MAXIMUM; •YIC ALL RED DIAL CYCLE PHi PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 -PERIOD : (VEH-HRS) IX) (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE • RATIO (SEC) NO. (SEC) (X) (X) (7.) (7.) (7.) (7.) 1700-1800 214.32 76.3- 4066 0 303 84 3.0 N/A 100 .0: 186 48.4 20.0 10 .0 SUMMARY 2432 763 4066 0 30 .8 84 TIMING BASED ON EQUAL DEGREE OF SATURATION VERSION: 84.02 . RELEASE: APRIL 1985 S I GNAL OPERAT I ONS ANALYSIS PACKAGE OFFICE OF IMPLEMENTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION TECHNICAL SUPPORT MESSAGE CENTER (904) 39241378 SOAP INPUT ECHO NO CARD ID A t NT rBL 581 SL EBI EEL 1481 148L COMMENT -------------------------------------------------++++-++++---------------- 3 BEGIN 0 0700 0800 60 5 30 95 5 EL CAMINO/FALOMAR AIRPORT URBAN INTERCHANGE CONCEPT : . 6 AM FEAk PERIOD 7 8 CONTROL 10700 80 180 2.5 9 VOLUME 10700 1072 32, 125 329 0 79 0 ro 10 CAPACITY 1 0700 1 3 1 fl 2 0 2- 11 :MINGREEN 40 in 20 15 'OL 20 f 20 ** NOTE MINIMUM GREEN VALUE FOR EASTBOUND THRU., IS ZERO ***NOTE ... MINIMUM GREEN VALUE FOR WESTBOUND THRU. IS ZERO. 12:HEADWAY 2.5 2.2 2.5 2.2 2.2 22 2.2 2.2 2.2 1 LEFT 0 0 H EW h 14 SEQUENCE LT LT 15 RUN 1 510 GEOMETRY -------------------------------------------------++++-++++---------------- NO CARD ID A B NBT NBL 581 SEL EBT EBL WBT WGL COMMENT *** WARNING THE FOLLOWING MOVEMENTS ARE ASSUMED NOT TO EXIST MOVEMENT NO 5 EASTBOUND THRU MOVEMENT NO. 7 WESTBOUND THRU. v ¶ * I 4 - - (S 16 N AL OP ER A 110 N S A N At V S IS P A C K A 6 r> PAGE - 2 LEFT TURN CHECK (PER 0 MINUTE PERIOD) -. PERIOD NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NO. TIME VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP : 1 700 32. 117. 329. 441. 79. 620. 230. 620. - -- - . SIGNAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS F ArGE PAGE- 3 DESiGF AND EVALUATION SUMMARY CONTROLLER SEQUENCE LOST TIME SPECIFIED INTERSECTION NAME RUN NO. AND TITLE TYPE DIAL N/S E/W PHASES /PH TOTAL SAT LEVEL -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EL CMMINO/PALOMAR AIRPORT 1 STD GEOMETRY ACTUATED N/A LT LT 5 2 5 10 0 95 u7 MEASURES OF EFFECT-IVENSS SEQUENCE DELAY STOPS EXC FUEL EXC LEFT MAXIMUM V/C LEFT TURN TREATMENT MOVEMENTS (VEH-HRS) (L) (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO PROTECTION VEH/CYC PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 NBTHRU 6.35 76.0 11.96 20.9 .58 ???? XXIX - LEFT.: .37 94.0 .52 .0 .8- .27 REST '.O XXIX???? SB THRU 3.93 55.6 7.72 189 45 XXXI LEFT 325 014 496 10 77 75 REST U XXX " LEFT : .69 83.1 1.07 .0 1.7 .13 PERM .0 XXXX LEFT 204 872 3.20, 0 51 37 PERM 0 XXXI MEASURES OF EFFECT I VENESS SIGNAL TIMING ANALYSIS DELAY STOPS EX FUEL EX LEFT MAXIMUM V/C ALL RED DIAL CYCLE PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 PERIOD (VEH-HRS) (1 (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO (SECY NO (SEC) (X) (h) (h) (I) (h) (I) 700- 800 1673 701 3153 0 209 75 25 N/A 52.4: 108 18.8 .43 .3 216 27 SUMMARy 1673 701 3153 o 201.9 75 TIMING BASED ON EQUAL DEGREE OF SATURATION U) I C.I I-.) — U) -C, co -J C" I I U) - •_ U) I I U) * ---..--... *. * ------.--. — I 0 * I i-n m m * .-. - U) U) ' I I C' I I '- U) _ U) C - m U) U) I C) cr I U) I • m — ,. - - i-n U) m m i-) -< m - r - -, -. I U) I i-n -< it=3 U) .. - I-.) • .- .- — I - - I • U) Co -- - - I C=I - m - m m - U) mi-n m I -- U) U) I -1 -4 -fl U)ro — C=U) I I i-n .1 -4 -. U) _ 0 -4 U) (-I P•.) I U) -I I I C) I I- U) U) U) - U) U) I • - - — I I m m I• I I I I - U) - -J Ln • C,1 I r t - m m — r-4 Cou U) C/i U) — N.) U) I U) • I C1 I 0 I — - - - U) Cl) N.) -=>c- — I - U) rn M en to - m 0 U) I -I - r r 'I-..) P-- Co N.) C U) e...4 Cfl 5 mm I 1 U) - -4 U) U) -1 U) U) P..) I CO - - C - U) - -. I U) N.) I P-.) -O - I- - • U) - I MI i E i-rI i--..1 m 3>m i - - - -4 1 - m U) I 0) 0) I CO U) c ) .) - U) I U) U) I U • U) m I U) I - - N.) -.J - - I- I m U) U) r- I i-..) U) U) • I-..) -0 i r • m - - U) - I N.) ' U) C U) I -I -I • • U) I I I - .-. '-. I'-.) . N.) U) U) N.) U) I U) I - • m + r m + 0 — — + + N.J -. m m + + U) • --4 -I - U)U) I m - . . -I- - - + . + + -- I U) C) I _ I - U)I I U) • : = = I m lU) Ci) - -- I .1 • )I U: • I • - I I - - • - I • -. I I1 -- -. -- I 0 l" 0 0 0 - •. - -: -- 0 • .- 0 - - <SIGNAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PACKAGEY PAGE -5 LET TURN CHECK (PER 60 MINUTE PERIOD) PERIOD NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NO. TIME VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP 1 700 32. 132. ------------------------------------------------------------------- 329. 570. 79. 701. 230. 701.. •• . / • • .• <SIGNAL OPERATIONS AN.ALYSIS.PACKA6E>, . PAGE -6 DESIGN AND EVALUATION SUMMARY r CONTROLLER SEQUENCE LOST TIME SPECIFIED INTERSECTION NAME RUN NO. AND TITLE TYPE DIAL N/S E/W PHASES '/PH TOTAL SAT. LEVEL -------------------- EL CAMINO/PALOMAR AIRPORT 2: DUAL SOUTH LEFT ACTUATED N/A L?T LT 5 2.5 10.0 95.01 * MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS SEQUENCE DELAY STOPS EXC FUEL EXC LEFT MAXIMUM V/C LEFT TURN TREATMENT MOVEMENTS: (VEH-HRS) (U (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO PROTECTION VEH/CYC PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 NB THRU : 4.66 69.2 10.22 16.9 .48 ???? XXXI. LEFT .32 92.9 .49 .0 .7 .24 . . REST , .0 XXIX ???? SB THRU 4.45 62.8 11.00 18.9 .50 . ???? XXXI LEFT : 2.98 91.8 4.81 .0 6.9 .58 REST '. .0 XXXI ???? LEFT : .57 80.5 .98 .0 1.4 .11 PERM .0 XXXI LEFT : 1.77 84.5 3.01 .0 8.4 .33 PERM .0 ',XXXX MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS. SIGNAL TIMING -- ANALYSIS: DELAY - STOPS El. FUEL El. LEFT MAXIMUM - V/C ALL RED DIAL CYCLE PH 1 PH '2 PH.3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 PERIOD (VEH-HRS) (X) (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO (SEC) NO. (SEC) "(XI (X) IX) (XI IX) . (X) 700- 800: 14.75 70.6 30.50 .0 18.9 .58 2.5 N/A' 81.7: 12.2 8,2 48.9 24.5 3.1 SUMMARY 14.75 70.6 30.50 .0 18.9 .58 TIMING BASED ON' EQUAL DEGREE OF SATURATION. <SIGNALOPERATIONSANALYSiS.PACA6E> PAGE -9 ----------------------------- S O AP JNPU.T ECHO ------------------------------ NO. CARD ID A B NBT NBL 981 SBL EBT EBL WBT WBL COMMENT --------------------------------------------------++++-++++---------------- 26: 27 :BEGIN, 0 1700 1800 60 . 5 30 .95 .5 EL CAMINO/PALOMAR AIRPORT: 28: 29.: PM PEAKPERIOD 30: 0 : 31 :CONTROL 1 1700 80 180 2.5 : 32 :.VOLUME 11700 1261 81089 442 0 381 Q 242 * 33 :CAPACITY 11700 3 1 3 1 0 2 0 2 34 :MINGREEN . 40 10 20 15 0 20 0 20 *1* NOTE ... MINIMUM GREEN VALUE FOR EASTBOUND tHRU.• IS ZERO. - *** NOTE ... MINIMUM GREEN VALUE FOR WESTBOUND THRU. IS ZERO. 0 - 35 :HEADWAY . 2.5 2.2 2.5 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 36 :LEFT 0 0 0 OEW NS. 37 :SEQUENCE . . L?T LT : 38 :RUN 3 . . PM STD GEOMETRY: . ----------------------------------++++-++++----------------: NO. CARD ID A B NBT NBL SBT SBL EBT 'EBL WBT WBL COMMENT *** WARNING: THE FOLLOWING MOVEMENTS ARE ASSUMED'NOT TO EXIST: . . MOVEMENT NO. 5 EASTBOUND THRU-.` MOVEMENT NO. 7 WESTBOUND THRU. 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - -• <S I S NA LO.P E RAT 1 OHS A N AL VS IS P A C K A GE > PAGE - 10 L E F I t U N C H E C K (PER 60 MINUTE PERIOD) 4 PERIOD NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NO. TIME VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP 1 1700 8. 104. 442. 574. 381. 551. 242. 551. I - <SIGNAL OPERATIONANALYSIS PACKAGE> PAGE It DESIGN AND EVALUATION SUMMARY . . CONTROLLER SEQUENCE LOST TIME SPECIFIED INTERSECTION NAME RUN NO AND TITLE TYPE DIAL N/S E/N PHASES /PH TOTAL SAT LEVEL EL CAMINO/PALOMAR AIRPORT 1 FM STD GEOMETRY ACTUATED N/A LT LT, 5 25 100 95.0% M E A SURE S 0 F E F F E CT IV E N E S S SEQUENCE DELAY STOPS EXC FUEL EXC LEFT MAXIMUM V/C LEFT TURN TREATMENT MOVEMENTS: (VEH-HRS) (I) (SAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO PROTECTION VEHICYC PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 NB THRU 1040 86.'0 -171.09 31.3 71 XXXI LEFT V.10 93.3 .14 .0 .2 .08 REST .0 XXIX ???? SBTHRU : 2.67 46.4 6.65 - 14,6 .35 ???? XXIX LEFT : 4.24 89.0 6.47• .0 11.4 .77 REST .0 XXIX ???? LEFT : 4.69 94.1 6.40 .0 10.4 '.69 PERM .0 XXXI LEFT 2.70 89.8 3.79 .0 6.3 .44. PERM .0 XXXI MEASURES 0C EFFECTIVEPESS SIGNAL TIMING ANALYSIS DELAY STOPS El FUEL El LEFT MAXIMUM V'C ALL RED DIAL CYCLE °'l 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 CH 5 PH 6 PERIOD : (VEH-HRS)- IX) (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO (SEC) NO. (SEC) - (Xl (I) (X) (X) (X) (Xl --------------------------------------------------------- 1700-1800: 24.80 75.0 40.54 . .0 31.3 .77 25' N/A 103.9: 9.6 27.8 38.5 19.2 2.4 SUMMARY : 24.80 75.0 40.54 .0 31.3 .77 TIMING BASED ON EQUAL DEGREE OF SATURATION. SI 6 AL OF ER A TI OHS A N A L S IS PACK ABE> PAGE 12 SOAP INPUT ECHO ----------------------------- NO. CARD ID A B NBT NBL. EDT 581 EDT EBL WBT WBL COMMENT - -- ---- -------++++-++++------ ----------: . - ;-- 40 :CONTROL 1 1700 80 180 2.5 41 ;VOLUME 1 1700 1261 81089 442 0 381 0 242 42 :CAPACITY 1 1700 3 1 3 2 0 2 0 2 43 :MINBREEN .40 .10 20 15 0 20 0 20 . H* NOTE ... MINIMUM GREEN VALUE FOR EASTBOUND THRU. IS ZERO, • *** NOTE ..i MINIMUM GREEN VALUE FOR WESTBOUND THRU. IS ZERO.. 44 :HEADWAY 2.5 2.2 2.5 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 •• 45 :LEFT 0 0 0 OEW NS • 86 :SEQUENCE . S LIT LT . 47 :RUN 4 PM-2 SOUTH LEFT; -------------- - ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----- ----.++++-f+++---------------- NO, .-CARD ID A B NBT NBL SET SBL EDT EEL WET WBL COMMENT • *** WARNING: THE FOLLOWING MOVEMENTS ARE ASSUMED S . . NOT TO EX.IST • MOVEMENT NO. S EASTBOUND THRU. MOVEMENT NO. • 7 WESTBOUND THRU. . S • #5 5. . . S • <SI 6N41: OFERATI ONS ANALYSI S PACABE> PAGE - 13 L E F I ,T U RN C HE C (PERM MINUTE PERIOD) PERIOD NORTHBOUND' SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NO. TIME VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP 1 1700 B. 124. ------------------------------------------------------------------- 442. 729. 381. 660. 242. 660. (SI G A L 0 PIE R A 110 NS ANAL Y S I S PA C K AGE > PAGE - 14 - DESIGN AND EVALUATION SUMMARY -CONTROLLER SEQUENCE '. LOST TIME SPECIFIED' INTERSECTION NAME RUN NO. AND TITLE TYPE DIAL N/S E/W PHASES /PH TOTAL SAT. LEVEL EL CAMINO/PALOMAR AIRPORT 2: PM-2 SOUTH LEFT ACTUATED N/A L?T LT 5 2.5 10.0 95.0X MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS - SEQUENCE DELAY STOPS EXC FUEL EXC LEFT MAXIMUM V/C . LEFT.TURN TREATMENT MOVEMENTS: (VEH-HRS) (7.) (SAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO PROTECTION VEH/CYC PH! PH2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 NB THRU 6.80 76.5 13.72 23.3 .59 ???? XXIX LEFT : .08 91.9 .12 .0 .2 .06 REST .0 XXIX ???? SB THRU : 3.21 55.5 7.97 - 14.6 .39 ???? XXIX LEFT : 3.91 89.9 6.32 .0 9.6 .61 REST .0 XXXI ???? LEFT 3,51 90.8 5.55 .0 8.3 .58 PERM .0 XXXI LEFT 2.06 86.2 3.32 .0 5.0 .37 PERM , .0 XXIX MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS SIGNAL TIMING ANALYSIS: DELAY STOPS El. FUEL El. LEFT MAXIMUM V/C ALL RED DIAL CYCLE PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 'PH 5 PH.16 PERIOD (VEH-HRS) (1) (SAL) (VEH) QUEUE . RATIO (SEC) NO. (SEC) (I) (7.) (7.) (7.) (7.) (X) 1700-1800: 19.57 73.8 37.00 .0 23.3 .61 2.5 N/A 86.8: 11.5 13.6 46.1 23.0 2.9. SUMMARY : 19.57 , 73.8 37.00 .0 23.3 .61 TIMING BASED ON EQUAL DEGREE OF SATURATION. 1 -'---- - - I < S I 6 NA L 0 P ER AT 10 N S A N-A L S I S -P A C K A SE> PAGE - 17 ******************* *************** **** *******************************H***************************** ** H**f** * VERSION: 84.02 RELEASE: APRIL,-1985 -: S GM A L 0 P E R'A.TI 0 N S A N A L VS IS P A C K 6 E OFFICE OF IMPLEMENTATION.-FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION TECHNICAL SUPPORT MESSAGE CENTER (904) 392-0378 ------------------------- SOAP INPUT ECHO NO CARD TD A B NET NEL SET SEL EEl EEL WET WbL COMMENT ---------------------------------------------------++++-++++---------------- 2:BEGIN 0 0700 0800 60 5 30 .95 .5 ELCAMINO/PALOMAR AIRPORT: 3: 4 DATA DECK - PATDM DAT 6 TRANSPORTATION DEMNDMANA6ENEWT STRATEGy SCENARIO PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD/EL CAMINO REAL INTERSECTION 10 AM PEAK PERIOD 12 :CONTROL 10700 100, 180 2.5 SANDAG FORECAST VOLUMES AT G.P. BUILD OUT : 0 16 VOLUME 1 0700 1072 32 1325 320 644 79 735 20 17 :CAPACITY 10700 3 1 3 2 3 2 3 2 : 18 MINGREEN 30 10 30 1 30 10 30 10 19 HEADWAY 25 22 25 22 22 22 22 22 22 20 :LEFT 0 0 0 NSEW 21 SEQUENCE LT LT 22 RUN 1 SANDAG FORECAST ++++-++++ ---------------- NO. CARD ID A B NBT NBL SBT SBL EEl EEL WET WBL COMMENT 0 - 0 0 - -- <SI6NL,0PERATI0NSANLYSiS'PCKA6E> PAGE 21 L E F T. IT U R N C H E C K (PER 60 MINUTE PERIOD) ---------------------------------------- - -- <SI GNAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PACKAGE> .PAGE - 3 ----------------------------- DESIGN AND EVALUATION SUMMARY CONTROLLER SEQUENCE LOST TIME SPECIFIED INTERSECTION NAME RUN NO AND TITLE TYPE DIAL N/S EIW PHASES /PH TOTAL SAT LEVEL EL CAMINO/PALOMAR AIRPORT 1: SANDAG FORECAST ACTUATED N/A L?T L?T 6 2.5 10.0 95.0% MEASURES OF EFFECT IVENE-SS SEQUENCE DELAY STOPS. EXC FUEL EXC LEFT MAXIMUM V/C LEFT TURN TREATMENT MOVEMENTS: (VEH-HRS) CX) (SAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO PROTECTION VEH/CYC PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 NB THRU : 10.20 91.3 15.90 27.2 .76 ???? XXIX LEFT : .41 94.6 .55 .0 ..8 .30 REST .0 XXXI ???? SB THRU 974 836 16.93 700.8 69 'v'" XXIX LEFT : 3.59 91.4 5.16 .0 8.4 .57 REST .0 XXXI ???? ES THRU : 5.51 83.4 8.68 14.9 .48 . ???? XXXI LEFT : .99 94.8 1.34 .0 2.1 .32 REST .0 XXIX ???? NB THRU 5.38 78.1 897 16.0 45 7" XXIX LEFT 268 930 374 0 59 52 REST 0 XXXA ------------------------------ MEASURES OF. E F FE CT IV EN ES SIGNAL . TIMING ANALYSIS: DELAY STOPS El. FUEL EX. LEFT MAXIMUM V/C ALL RED DIAL CYCLE PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 PERIOD : (VEH-HRS) (X) '(GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO (SEC) . NO. (SEC) CX) (X) (Xl ' CX) CX) (X) 700- 800 3849 859 6128 0 308 76 25 N/A 100.0: 10.0 103 31.2 100 61 30.0 SUMMARY 38 49 859 61 28 0 3U 8 76 TIMING BASED ON EQUAL DEGREE OF SATURATION I <SISNAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS P A -' C K A 6 E > . I PAGE- 4 ----------------------------- SOAP INPUT ECHO 2• NO. CARD IDA B NBT NBL SBT 'SBL EEl EEL WET WBL * COMMENT' ---------- - - - ---- ---- --- ----- --- ---- ---- -----. ----++++-++++---------------- 23: 24 : TDM VOLUME REDUCTIONS 25: . . 26 :CONTROL 10700 100 180 '2.5 27 28 : 107. VOLUHEREDUCTION SCENARIO 29: 30 :VOLUME '10700 965 .291193 .296 580 71 662 207 31 :CAPACITY 1 0700 3 1 3 2 3 .- 2 3 2; ' 32 :MINGREEN ' ,. 30 10 30 15 20 10 20 10 33 :HEADWAY, 2.5 '2.2 2.5 2.2 2;2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 : 34 :LEFT , 0 0 . 0 0 . NSEW 35 :SEQUENCE ' ' L?T L?T 36 :RUN 2 , ' 107. REDUCTION : -------------- -,++++-++++----------------: 'NO. .CARD ID A 'B . NET NBL SBT EEL EEl EEL WET WEL COMMENT it <SIGNAL OPERATIONS ANALVSiS PACKAGE> PAGE- 5 LEFT I U R N C HE C K (PER 60 MINUTE PERIOD) PERIOD NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NO. TIME VOL CAP VOL CAP --------------------------------------------------------------- VOL CAP VOL CAP 1 700 29. 108. 296. 637. 71. 245. 207. : I. - r - I-, - <SIGNAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PACKAGE> 1 PAGE- 6 DESIGN AND EVALUATION SUMMARY ------------------------ CONTROLLER SEQUENCE - LOST TIME SPECIFIED INTERSECTION: NAME RUN NO. AND TITLE TYPE DIAL-,N/S E/W PHASES /PH.TOTAL SAT. LEVEL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EL CANINO/PALOMAR AIRPORT 2 lOX REDUCTthN ACTUATED N/A L?T L?T 6 2.5 10.0 95.0X MEASURES OF EFFEITIVENESS - SEQUENCE DELAY STOPS EXC FUEL EXC LEFT MAXIMUM V/C LEFT TURN TREATMENT MOVEMENTS: (VEH-HRS) (XI (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO PROTECTION VEH/CYC PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH6 NB THRU 759 82 9 12 55 , 222 59 XXIX LEFT .37 94.4 .50 .0 .8 •.27 REST .01 XXXX ???? SB THRU 668 722 1262 239 54 XXXI LEFT 3.02 886 443 fl 73 47 REST 0 XXXX "" EB THRU 6.01 90.6 8.86 . 14.6 .59 ???? XXIX LEFT : .88 94.6 1.20 .0 1.9 .29 REST .: .0 XXXI ???? WB THRU : 5.75 84.2 9.03 15.5 .50 ???? XXXX LEFT 231 912 3.27 0 52 43 REST 0 XXXX "" MEASUR.ES OF EFFECTIVENESS I SIGNAL TIMING ANALYSIS DELAY STOPS El FUEL EX LEFT MAXIMUM V/C ALL RED DIAL CYCLE PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 PERIOD : (VEH-HRS) (V.) (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO (SEC) NO. (SEC) (XI (V.) (U (V.) (7.) (7.) 700- 800: 32.61 82.2 52.46 .1) 23.9 .59 2.5 N/A 100.0: 10.0 11.9 35.9 10.0 7.1 22.6 SUMMARY 3261 K.2 5246 U 239 59 TIMING BASED ON EQUAL DEGREE OF SATURATION I - - < SIGNAL OPERATIONS A N A L S IS P A C KA GE Y PAGE - 7 ---------------------------- SO.AP :LNPUT E.C10 NO. CARD ID B • NBT NBL 581 SBL EDT EBL WBT WBL COMMENT. ---------------------- ----++++-++++---------------- 15Z VOLUME REDUCTION SCENARIO 39.- 40 :VOLUME 1 0700 912 27 1026 280 547 67 625 196 : 41 :CAPACITY 1 0700 3 - 1 3 2 3 2 3 2 42 :MINGREEN 30 10 30 10' 20 10 20 10 : 43 :HEADWAY 2.5 2.2 2.5 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 - - 44 :LEFT 0. 0 0 0 NSEW 85 :SEQUENCE .. LIT L?T -: 46 :RUN 3 . - 15% REDUCTION ----------------------------------------------------++++-++++--------------: NO. CARD ID A 8 NOT NBL SOT SBL EDT • EBL WBT WOL COMMENT • -, - - •- - - - - '- •. • .--•. • - - . •. .I .-•-• ,-• • - .-<SIGNA,LOPERATIONS ANALYSIS PACKAGE> PAGE -B L E I TURN CHECK (PER 60 MINUTE PERIOD) PERIOD NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NO. TIME VOL CAP ------------------------------------------------------------------- VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP 1 700 27. 108. 280. 638. 196. 477, -------------------------------------------------------------- 67. 245. / 4 < S I G N.A L OPERA 110 N S A N A.LY S IS P.A C.KA G.E > PAGE - 9 DESIGN AND EVALUATION SUMMARY ---------------.--------. CONTROLLER SEQUENCE LOST TIME SPECIFIED INTERSECTION NAME RUN NO. AND TITLE ' TYPE .DIAL N/S E/W PHASES., IPH TOTAL SAT. LEVEL EL CAMINO/PALOMAR AIRPORT 3: 15% REDUCTION ACTUATED N/A L?T PT 6 2.5 10.0 95.0% ME A S U R E S U F EFFECT I V E N E,S.S SEQUENCE DELAY STOPS EXC FUEL EXC LEFT MAXIMUM ' V/C LEFT TURN TREATMENT MOVEMENTS: (VEH-HRS) (X) . (SAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO PROTECTION VEH/Cyr PH 1 PH 2 PH .3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 NB THRU : 7.06 81.8 '11.70 20.7 .56 . . ???? XXIX LEFT .34 94.3 .46 . .0 .7 :25 REST .0 . . XXXX ???? SB THRU 5.46 69.0 10.36 . 197 .46 xxxx LEFT : 2.83 88.0 4,16 .0 6.8 '.44 REST .0 XXIX ?1?? EB THRU : 5.62 90.0 , 8.29. 13.7 .56 ' . ???? XXIX LEFT : .83 94.4 1.13 .0 1.8 '. .27 REST .0 . XXXI'???? NB THRU : 5.38 83.5 ' 8.45 145 ' , •47 . ???? . XXII' LEFT :2.17 90,9 . 3.08 .0 4.9 ;41 REST .0, XXXI ???? M E A SURE S OF EFFECT IV EN ES S . S S N A L TIM. IN S ANALYSIS: DELAY STOPS El.' FUEL EX. LEFT MAXIMUM V/C ALL RED DIAL CYCLE PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 PERIOD (VEH-HRS) (X) (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO (SEC) NO. (SEC) CX) (X) CX) (V.) 700- 800:' 29.69 81.0 47.64 .0 '.20.7 .56 2.5 , N/A 100.0: 10.0 12.0 35.9 10.0 7.1 2,2.5 SUMMARY : 29.69 81.0 47.64 .0 20.7 ' .56 TIMING BASED ON EQUAL DEGREE OF SATURATION. ' C/I C/I C/i C/I Cfl C/i C_fl . . - P 1 cI C-/I . C--I Ni C -.CI Co --I I. I CO Co Zc 10 Co I C I - I 1= P1 P1 P1-.3>CO I n ]- 0 r- I I c - CO 3> = CO P1 -Sa C Ni I CO . P1 - P1 C- -. C-1 .4. - - P1 --C CO CO I. - cm I - -' .- . .—. . -I- - I..) •-..I --.1 r CO C P1 C_fl CC I I I Co . -4 I I-) Co CO I . P1 --.4 - .. .1 I Ni C. C-.I CO m -4 - I I Ni - CO I Co I - Ni - - r— I .. C_fl C - o- I I Co - C Co Co. I C) I CCI I - C..J CN C' - I Co -4 -.- - - - I . Co I Ni Ni CO Co - . CCI. I - .- I I.) Ij C-.I I r - . .. I P1 I Ni C_fl - I I P1 Co C-.4 C_fl I -I Co ..- . • . P11 Ni . • . P1 - - . Co CM C Co I 111 Co - -- '--4 I . I-i .. .-i CC - I I Co '-•-•I -. Co I C. Ni C. Ni - I r- - + r .+ . -. + ••..)- -. .4.. •__4 + _4•• . 01 P1 + + -. + "-if/I . + -4rI1 -, -I- . . . fr - -. - - - - -'- C . Ni . CO - CO t . - P1. -. •j . . P1 I CO . •I - _ P1 = 1 CO -4 -. -E - . --•. -• < S I GNAL OPERTI ONS AN4LVS IS PACKGE> ----------------------- L E F T I U k N' C H E C K (PER 60 HINUTE PERIOD) PERIOD NORTHBOUND. SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND' NO. TIME VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP ------------------------------------------- t 1AA a! *Afl al !! 17 aAC If! A77 .<SIGNL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PACKAGE> PAGE 121 ----------------------- DESIGN AND EVALUATION SUMMARY ,CONTROLLER SEQUENCE LOST TIME SPECIFIED INTERSECTION NAME RUN NO. AND TITLE TYPE DIAL N/S E/W PHASES /PH TOTAL SAT. LEVEL EL CAMINO/FALOMAR AIRPORT 4 20h REDUCTION ACTUATED N/A L'T LT 6 2.5 100 95.0% MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS SEQUENCE DELAY STOPS EXC FUEL EXC LEFT MAXIMUM V/C LEFT TURN TREATMENT MOVEMENTS: (VEHHRS) (U (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO PROTECTION VEH/CYC PH1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4. PH 5 PH 6 NB THRU : 6.53 80.7 10.84 19.2 - .52 ?T?? XXIX LEFT : .33 94.2 .44 .0 .7 .24 REST. .0 XXIX ???? SB THRU :: 5.71' 69.7 10.81 20.5 .48 ???? XXIX LEFT : 2.64 87.6 3,89 .0 6.4 .41 REST 0 XXIX ???? EBTHRU : 523 89.3 7.73 12.8 .52 - ???? XXXI LEFT : .78 94.3 1,06 40. 1.7 .26 REST .0 XXIX ???? H NP THRU 500 82.9 7.87 135 44 " XXXX LEFT 2 t13 905 288 0 46 39 REST 0 XXIX MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS SIGNAL TIMING ANALYSIS DELAY STOPS El FUEL'EX.'LEFT MAXIMUM V/C ALL RED DIAL CYCLE PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 PERIOD (VEH-HRS) (XI (GAL) (yEN). QUEUE RATIO (SEC) NO. (SEC) (X) (X) '(X) (XI (XI (XI. 700- 800 2828 804 4553 u 205 52 25 N/A 100.0-, 100 119 359 100 71 226 SUMMARY 2824 804 45 53 o 205 52 TIMING BASED ON EQUAL DEGREE OF SATURATION I 17. < S 16 N'A.i 0 P ER AT. I ON S •A..N A L S I S P A C K A S E PAGE - 13 ---------------------------- SOAP INPUT •ECHO NO. CARD ID A B NBT NBL 681 SBL EDT EBL WBT NBL COMMENT --------------------------------------------------++++-++++----------------: 57: 58: 25 VOLUME REDUCTION SCENARIO 59: • . . -• -: 60 :VOLUME 10700 804 24 994 247 482 59 551 173 61.:CAPACITV 10700 3 1 3 • 2 '3 .2- 3 2 62 :MINGREEN 30 10 30, 10 20 10 20 10 63 :HEADWAY .2.5 2.2 2.5 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 1. 64 :LEFT 0 . 0 0 0 NSEW • 65 :SEQUENCE • L?T L?T 66 :RUN S 25% REDUCTION ---------------------------------------------------++++-++++----------------: • NO. CARD ID A B NBT NBL 581 SBL EDT EBL WBT 'WBL . COMMENT -4 .< S I G, N AL OP E R TI ONS AN A L SI S A C K A SE ) PASE-14 L E F I I U R N C H E C P (PER 60 NINUTE PERIOD) PERIOD NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NO. TINE VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL :CAP 1 700 24 108 20.'638 - 59 245 173 478 -: < S I G N A L OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PACKAGE> ' PAGE 15 DESIGN AND EVALUATION SUMMARV CONTROLLER SEQUENCE LOST TIME SPECIFIED INTERSECTION NAME RUN NO AND TITLE TYPE DIAL N/S E/W PHASES /PH TOTAL SAT LEVEL EL CAINO/PALOMAR AIRPORT 5 25% REDUCTION ACTUATED N/A L'T LT 6 25 10.0 95.0% MEASURESOF EFFECTIVENESS : SEQUENCE DELAY STOPS EXC FUEL EXC LEFT MAXIMUM V/C LEFT TURN TREATMENT MOVEMENTS: (VEH-HRS) (%) (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO PROTECTION VEH/CYC 'PH 1 'PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 NB THRU 6.03 797 10 .021 17.0 49 '" XXXI LEFT : .30 94.1 .41 .0 .6 .22 REST .0 XXXI ???? S& THRU 525 685 996 189 45 " XXIX LEFT 2.46 87.1 363 0 6.0 39 REST 0 XXIX "" EB THRU : 4.85 88:7 7.18 11.9 .49 ???? XXXI LEFT : .73 94.2 .99 .Q 1.5 .24 REST. .0 XXIX ???? NB THRU, : 4;64 82.1 7.31 . 12.6 .41 ???? XXIX LEFT 189 902 270 u 43 36 REST A XXX " 4 MEASURES OF EFFECT I VENESS SIGNAL TIMING 'ANALYSIS: DELAY STOPS El. FUEL El. LEFT MAXIMUM V/C ALL RED DIAL CYCLE PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 PERIOD : (VEH-HRS) (X). (GAL) CVEH) QUEUE RATIO (SEC) NO. (SEC) (%),,(X) (Xl (Xi CX) CX) 70u- BOO: 2615 795 4219 o i. 189 49 25 N/A 100.0: 10.0 120 359 10.0 71 225 SUMMARY 2615 795 4219 A 189 49 TIMING BASED ON EQUAL DEGREE OF SATURATION <SIGNAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PACKASE> PAGE 16 SOAF INPVUJ ECHO ------------------------- V NO. CARD ID A .8 NET NEL SET SBL EBT EEL WET WEL COMMENT V -------------------------------------------------++++-++++---------------- 307. VOLUME REDUCTION SCENARIO 70 :VOLUME 1 0700 .750 23 928 230 450 55 515 161 71 :CAPACITY 10700 •3 3 2 :. 3 2 . 3 . 2 V 72 :MING-REEN 30 10 30 10 20 10 20 10 73 :HEADWAY 2.5 2.2 2.5 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 V V 74 :LEFT 0 0 0 V 0 NSEW : V 75 :SEQUENCE V LIT L?T V : 76 :RUN 6 . 307. REDUCTION : V -V++++++++ -- NO. CARDJDA E NET MEL SET SEL EBT EEL WET MEL COMMENT V V V VV V V V - V <SIGNAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PACKAGEY PAGE-17 S V ------------------------------------------------------ L E F.T I UR N C.H EC K. (PER 60 MINUTE PERIOD) ------------------------------------------------------ PRIOD NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND - - NO. TIME VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP -VOL .CAP - - - 1 700 23. 108. 230. 635. 55.245. 161.1. 478, <SIGNAL OFERRTIONS ANALYSIS PCKAGE PAGE 18 DESIGN AND EVALUATION SUMMARY CONTROLLER SEQUENCE LOST TIME SPECIFIED INTERSECTION NAME RUN NO AND TITLE TYPE DIAL N/S E/W PHASES /PH TOTAL SAT LEVEL EL CANINO)PALOMAR AIRPORT 6: 301 REDUCTION ACTUATED N/A L?T L?T 6 2.5 10.0 95.0X NE AS U RE S OF E F FE CII V EN E SE 9 U N C E DELAY STOPS 4EXC FUEL EXC LEFT MAXIMUM V/C LEFT TURN TREATMENT. MOVEMENTS: (VEH-HRS) (1) (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO PROTECTION VEH/CYC PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 NB THRU 5.53 78.6 9.21 16.4 S .4 'S ???? XXIX LEFT : .29 94.0 .39 .0 .6 .21 REST .0 XXXI ????- 9B THRU: 4.82 67.4 9.15 174 .42 ???? XXIX LEFT: 2.28 86.7 3.36 .0 5.5 .36 REST .0 XXXI ???? EB THRU 448 BB .0 6.65 110 46 "" XXXI LEFT : .68 94.1 .92 .0 1.4 V.22 REST .0 XXXI ???? WBTHRU : 4.29 81.4 6.77 11.6 .39 .S ???? XXXX LEFT 175 898 250 U 40 34 REST XXiX '"" MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS SIGNAL TIM INS ANALYSIS:' DELAY STOPS EX. FUEL El. LEFT MAXIMUM V/C ALL RED DIAL CYCLE PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 PERIOD (VEH-HRS) (1) (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO (SEC) NO. (SEC) (1) (1) (X) (X) (Xl CX) 700- 800 2412 78 6 3894 u 174 46 2.51 N/A 100.0: 10.0 119 35.9 100 7.1"22.6 SUMMARY 24.12 78 .6 3894 0 178 46 TIMING BASED ON EQUAL DEGREE OF SATURATION - <SIGNAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PACKAGE> PAGE -20 • V ----------------------- V V - V - V V V TOTAL DELAY EXCESS FUEL EXCESS V • • V NO. CASE VNAME --------------------------------------------------- (VEH-HRS) (GAL) LEFT TURNS,V V 1 SANDAG FORECAST 38.49 61.28 V V V 2 107. REDUCTION. 32.61 52.46 .0 V 3 157. REDUCTION 29.69 47.64 .0 • • 4: 20X REDUCTION 28.28 45.53 .0 - 5 V V 257. REDUCTION 26.15 42.19 .0 6 307. REDUCTION ------------------------------------------------------------------ 24.12 38.94 V .0 V V • ?SIGNAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PAC K. AGE > PAGE 21 SOAP INPUT ECHO ----------------------------- NO CARD ID A 6 NOT MEL SBT SBL ET EBL WBT WBL COMMENT ---------------------------------------------------#+++-++++--------------- , TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT STRATEGY SCENARIO : * at:: PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD/EL CAMINO REAL INTERSECTION 83 PM PEAK PERIOD, 04: .. . : 85: - 86 BEGIN 0 1700 1800 60 5 30 95 5 EL CAMINO/FALOMAR AIRPORT 87 :CONTROL 11700 100. 120 3 .88: 1., 89'..- SANDAG FORECASTYOLUMES AT G.P. BUILD-OUT 90: 91 iVOLUME 1 1700 1261 81089 442 1105 381 1347 242 : 92 .:CAPACITY 1 1700 3 1 3 2 3 2 3 2 93 :MINSREEN 30 10 .30 10 20 10 20 10 , * 94 :HEADWAY 2.5 2.2 2.5 2.2 2.2 2.2 2;2 2.2 2.2 : 95 :LEFT . . 0 0 0 0 NSEW 96. :SEQUENCE . , . L?T L?T 97 :RUN .1 . . OX REDUCTION * - -----------------------------------++++-+++4 •----------------: NO CARD ID B NOT NBL SBT SBL EBT EBL NOT WBL COMMENT <SIGNAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PACKAGE'/ PAGE 22 LEFT TURN CHECK -------------------- (PER6OMINUTEPERIOD) PERIOD NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NO. TIME VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP 1 1700 ----------------------- B 96 442 664 81 401 242 255 <SIGNAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PACKAGE> PAGE 27) DESIGN AND EVALUATION SUMMARY ----------------------------- CONTROLLER SEQUENCE LOST TIME SPECIFIED INTERSECTION NAME :RuN NO. AND TITLE TYPE DIAL N/S E/W PHASES /PH TOTAL SAT. LEVEL EL CAMINO/PALOMAR AIRPORT 1: 07. REDUCTION ACTUATED N/A L?1 L?T 6 2.5 10.0 95.07. -------------------------------------------------- MEASURES OFEFFECTIVENESS SEQUENCE DELAY STOPS EXC FUEL EXC LEFT MAXIMUM V/C LEFT TURN TREATMENT MOVEMENTS (VEH-HRS) (7) (SAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO PROTECTION VEH/CYC PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH ,6 NB THRU 17.80 98.2 23.06 38.8 . .95 .. ???? XXIX LEFT : .11 93.9 .14 .0 .2 .08 REST .0 XXXI ???? SBTHRU 7.87 76.2 13.03 26.0 .55 : xxxx LEFT 5.40 92.2 7.32. .0 12.8 . .67 REST .0 XXXI ???? EB THRU 10.26 86.0 15.66 29.7 .67 . ???? XXXX LEFT 807 993 G. 62 u 118 95 REST 10 XXXI NB THRU 18.40 98.0 24.24 41.3 95 XXX LEFT 5.93 99.6 5.97 .0 7.5 .95 REST .0 XXXI ???? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS SIGNAL TIMING ANALYSIS DELAY STOPS EX. FUEL EX. LEFT MAXIMUM V/C ALL RED DIAL CYCLE PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 PERIOD (VEH-HRS) W . (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO (SEC) NO. (SEC) (7.) (7.) (7.) (Xl (Xl (X) 1700-1800: 73.85 91.5 98.04 .0 t 41. -3) .95 3.0 N/A 112.7: 8..9 13.6 29.3 10.0 8.5 31.1 SUMMARY 73.85 91.5 98,04 .0 41.3 .95 TIMING BASED ON EQUAL DEGREE OF SATURATION. a cSI6AL OFERATIONS ANALYSIS PACKAGE> PAGE 24 SOAP I N UT ECHO ------------------------------ NO CARD ID A B NBT NBL SBT SBL EBT EPL WBT WBL COMMENT -----— ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- —--- ---------- ------- +++—++++---------------- 99:. 99 TOM VOLUME REDUCTIONS 1.00: 101 102 : lOX VOLUME REDUCTION SCENARIO . 103: . . 104 VOLUME 1 1700 1146 7 000 401 1004 IJ46 1224 220 105 :CAPACITY 11700.5 3 1 3 2, 32.32 106 MINGREEN 30 lu 30,::10 ' 20 10 20 10 107 :HEADWAY .2.5 2.2 2.5 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 : 109 :LEFT .- 0 0 0 0 NSEW 109 :SEQUENCE . r L?T :L?T ..: .- 110 :RUN 2 . . . ., . lOX REDUCTION : - ----- ---- ---- ---:- ------------------------++++-++++---------------: NO. CARD IDA B 'NBT NPL SBT SBL EBT EBL WBT WK COMMENT S - + (SI 6 N A L .0 P E R A T JO N S A N A L S S P 4 CK A 6 E > PAGE - 25 ------------------- ----------------------------------- LEFT I U R ------------------------------------------------------ N C H EI C K (PER 60 MINUTE PERIOD) PERIOD NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NO. TIME VOL CAP, VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP I 1700 7.. 108. 401. 668. 346. 384 220. 245. . . < 8'! 6 AL OP £ RAT I ON S AN A L I S PACKAGE >. PAGE -26 DESIGN AND EVALUATION SUMMARY . - 'CONTROLLER SEQUENCE . LOST TIME SPECIFIED INTERSECTION NAME RUN NO, AND TITLE TYPE DIAL N/S E/W PHASES /PH TOTAL SAT. LEVEL - EL CAMINO/PALOLIAR AIRPORT 2: lOX REDUCTION ACTUATED N/A L?T L?T 6 2.5 10.0 95.07. MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS . SEQUENCE DELAY STOPS EXC FUEL EXC LEFT MAXIMUM V/C LEFT TURN TREATMENT MOVEMENTS: (VEH-HRS) (X} (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO PROTECTION VEH/CYC PH 1 PH 2- PH 3 PH-4 PH 5 PH 6 --------------------------------------------- NB THRU : 11.97 94.6 18.02 - 30.1 .85 ???? XXIX LEFT: .08 .93.0 .12 .0 .2 .06 REST .0 XXXI???? SB THRU 6.24 74.6 11.13 20.5 .50 " ???? XXIX LEFT : 4.23 90.7 6.17 .0 10.1' '.. .60 REST .0 XXIX ???? EB THRU : 8.49. 86.0 13.73 24.0 - .65- ???? XXIX LEFT : 5.56 98.7 6.75 .0 9.5 .90 REST . .0 XXXI ???? NB THRU : 13.85 96.8 20.15 - 32.9 ' .91 . ???? XXXI LEFT : 3.91 99.2 4.53 .O - 6.1 - .90 REST .0 XXXI ???? MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS - SIGNAL TIMING ANALYSIS: DELAY STOPS El. FUEL EX. LEFT MAXIMUM V/C ALL RED DIAL CYCLE PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 PERIOD : (VEH-HRS) (X) '(GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO (SEC) NO. (SEC) (U (U ('I.) (Xl (Xl (U 1700-1800: 54.32- 89.9 80.60 .0 32.9 .91 3.0 N/A 100.0: 10.0 12.9 30.0 10.0 4.2 29.9 SUMMARY : 54.32 89.9 - 80.60 .0 - 32.9 - - .91 'TIMING BASED ON EQUAL DEGREE OF SATURATION. - <SI6NA L OPERATIONS ANALVSIS PACKAGE> '' PAGE 27 ------------------------ SOA INPUT ECHO ' Its , S NO. CARD ID A B NBT NBL SBT SBL EDT EBL WBT 'NiL COMMENT ----c------------------------------------------------++++-++++---------------- 111 112 1 1'5X VOLUME REDUCTION SCENARIO * 113:* ' 114 :VOLUME '1 1700 1072 6 926 376 939. 324 1144 206 115 :CAPACITY .1 1700 3 1 3 2 3 2 3 2 : 116 :MINGREEN • 30 .10 30 10 20 10 20, 10 . 117 HEADWAY 2.5 2:2 2.5 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 .. 118 LEFT '. 0 0 - 0 0 NSEW 119':SEOUENCE . . * ' . L?T L?T ' 120 :RUN 3 15% REDUCTION ------------------------------------------------'++++++++---------------- — -' NO. CARD ID A B NET 'NiL SIT SBL EDT EBL WIT WBL ' COMMENT * a' 5-.. <SIGNAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PACKAGE)... . PAGE 'IS L E F I I U R N ---------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------ C H E C K (PER 60 MINUTE PERIOD) PERIOD NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND, WESTBOUND NO TIME VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP 1 1700 6. 108. ------------------------------------------------------------------- 376. 670. 324. 384. 206. 245. • .• . •. -• , • , • < S I G N A L OPERATIONS ANALVSIS PACKAGE> PAGE 20, ------------------------- DESIGN AND EVALUATION SUMMARY CONTROLLER SEQUENCE LOST TIME SPECIFIED INTERSECTION NAME RUN NO. AND TITLE .,, TYPE "DIAL N/S E/W' PHASES /PH TOTAL SAT. LEVEL EL CAMINO/PALOMAR AIRPORT ISL REDUCTION ACTUATED N/ L'T LT 6 2.5 10.0 95 u7 MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS ' SEQUENCE DELAY STOPS EXC. FUEL EXC LEFT MAXIMUM V/C LEFT TURN TREATMENT MOVEMENTS (VEH-HRS) W (CAL) (VE) QUEUE RATIO PROTECTION VEH/CYC PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 NB THRU 10.71 92 8 1637 27 6 79 '?' XXIX LEFT .07 92.9 .10 '.0 .2 .06 REST 0 ' XXIX ???? SB THRU 572 738 1022 18.9 47 ' XXXI LEFT 3.90 09.9 5.72 .0' 9.4 .58 REST' ' .0 ,XXXX ???? * EB THRU 7.78 84.7 12.62 . 22.1 ' .81 . ???? XXIX LEFT : 4.76 98.0 6.03 , '.0 8.8 ' .84 REST .0..' XXXI ???? NB THRU : .12.04 94.8 18.07 30.1 .85. . .' '. ???? XXXI LEFT:. 3.35 98.7 '4.04 '.0 5.6 .84 REST .01 XXXI???? MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS SIGNAL TIMING ANALYSIS: DELAY STOPS El. FUEL. 'El. LEFT MAXIMUM V/C ALL'RED DIAL CYCLE PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 PERIOD (VE-HRS) (I) (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO (SEC) NO (SEC) (1) (hI (LI (I) (LI (L) 170O-180 48.34 885 7318 301 85 3.0 N/A 100A).: 100 130 300 100 42 298 SUMMARY : 48.34 88.5 73.18 .0 30.1 .85 ',TIMING BASED-ON EQUAL DEGREE OF SATURATION. t <616 N A 1 0 P ER A TI 0 N S A N A IV S I 5; P A C K A 6 E > S PAGE - 30 ----------------------------- SOA.P INPUT ECHO ------------- NO. CARD ID A B NBT NBL 661 661 EBT EBL WBT WBL, COMMENT . NO. CARD 207. VOLUME REDUCTION SCENARIO - - 123: V 124 :VOLUME 11700 1009 6 871 353 884 305 1078 194 - 125 :CAPACITY 11700 3 1 3 2 3 2 3 2 - 126 :HINGREEN 30 10 30 15 20 10 -30 10 127 :HEADWAV. 2.5 2.2 2.5 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 : 128 :LEFT 0 0 0 - 0 ' ":NSEW - 129 :SEQUENCE L?T L?T : 130 :RUN 4 - 207. REDUCTION : ----------------: - NO. CARD ID A B NBT .NBL ------------------------------------------++.++-+++ 661 SBL EBT- ERL WBT WBL COMMENT V • • • S *- V I S - V • - - - - -• V V (SIGNAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PACKAGE>. PAGE 31 ---------------- LEFT LU RN C H E C K (PER 60 MINUTE PERIOD) - S PERIOD NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND S. NO. TIME VOL. CAP VOL CAP CAP . -: VOL CAP 1 1700 6. 108. 353. 665. 305. .383; 194. 245. ------------------------------------------------------------------- - -S Co I I CO Co I I I CO I I I CM I I 01 I I Co -4 CC' , - CO 1 - Co r - I CM I m I I I I P1 I - 01. 0 CM I -. I I C) I Cs) I I 0 I 01 m ro 01 I Cs) I I -< co -I I CM I CM -. I I CI) I I I I I .- I. I • • I - I I . I C•• I Co I I I ro 01 I CM I I _ I - - - I I - . I Co CM I 01 3> - - CO X. CO cZ I s..J c-I C_fl -0 I I C CM I 0 I CO I I CM CM I C- C_fl I 0 -.0 I CS) I I -.0 CM .0 CM C-.) .- -.j J 0- 114 (.4 .. S--I -.J CCI I 0 .- I _ -.. I I I ..-. I I CM I I I I-ri • I I I I I D). 0 I I p I p r-,1 I m . I I CD I CI I I CM I 7.0 I I w I I - C.t) I - -.4 I CS) -.0 .-0 -0 CO CO -I -0 C-.) -0 -o C-j - i C r) I - -4 CM I I I I C...I ...0 .* c-I - - O - ..$) C..I CM 1 I P I CP I I I (.1) I I C.fl - . I • I I I I I CM I I I I CM • .1 I rn -n i rn n I I CM I -.C) I I - .4 I I CM -n . - rn I c-I 0 - C_fl - - C_fl -0 - C_fl - I I n m I I I U) r- C I --.j C_fl C_fl C- c- C_fl - CM I C I CM . I I-fl I 0 I I CM C- C_I Cr (.4 - -C CCI I ro I 11 I I I I p I -1 I I1 I --4 2m • - I - I Cfl Cl-I I I CO ro I CM I r- .- I -Z - - C) I. I . I -C P1 P1 I 5.-C I Cfl 3> I I Cl-i I I ro I - I I I CM I I .- mI - I - C CM I fl C. .. I r- - I CO I - . •. • I I -4 I I - I CO I Cl) I . I. I I I I - I . - I I 5C I-fl I I Co I CD I . F..) -..i - I I C-...) 4 I CM 37. I C >< - I I C--.) C_fl -J CCI CM -- CO S-I I'-.) C_fl I CM 3> I CS) - - • CO I I • CO I III I Cli I I (.4 CO C_-I C_fl CCI 0 P-..) 0-. I I-fl I I I I-1-P.... I I I I-fl a= I Cl) .1 I-fl I t CM I I 3> I C) -I . • I I I I CM I I . I I CM I I - I C I 0 CM Co 3> - I I 0 I - I I 3> I - I 4 . CO • I I - I 3> I - I I • . • • I 3> I -4-- I I I-fl I CM I CM -. - co - • CM I I CO CM - I CO P CM . P I .-.J CCI -0 C.- CO C_fl CM •-.J C_fl .rr .4 - CM -I Cl-- C_li I -' CO I CD I I I I CM m . 3> . I .1 I I I I l-0 C) I I I I I I I I I I 3>. I 3> r- I-fl --I I I . I .1 I • .1 I I CM I - I I O Co I I - __ I I.-,I • Co I C) 3> I 3> 3> . 3> 3> CM 0 I -.4 I I U) I I C- I - CO I rn CM I-fl CO - CO - Ct) mI (5) 01 - I C) -I I I .4 I -4 I CO CM CM - 3> I I I I 3> I I Co ro • ImmI CM CE) I I I I I-fl C) I-fl I 3> I CD 3> - I I 3> - C m I I I m 33- ._4 I I-fl PAD - I 1 CM CM I CM - I I • CM - CM CM CM I I C) m I I I I - - • I I I MC) X. . CMI I CO Co I . I CO -4 I I I. t=3CM I I - I I I 0- I CM C) I I - CM I 0 I -4 - I I - - I 0 I I I I I CO CA) 3> I • I I 5< 5 I I CM I 0 I I I 5< 5< 5 I I I 5 C Cfl - CM I I I I I I • I CM I - I s-s CO I I I I I • I I • I I-C I I I 5-s 5 CO • I I I • C-.) I 5 - C) Co I C_-I I • I -C I 5-5 5 PAGE 33 ----------------------------- SOAP INPUT ECHO ------------------------- NO. CARD ID A B NET NBL SET -SBL EEl EBL WET WBL COMMENT 131 •V --------------------------------------------------+#++-++++-----------------V 132 257. VOLUME REDUCTION SCENARIO V 133 V 134 :VOLUME 1 1700 946 6 817 332 829 286 1010 182 135 :CAPACITY 1. 1700 3 1 3 2 .3 2 3 2 V 136 MIN6REEN 30 10 30 15 20 .10 30 10 137 :HEADWAY- 2.5 2.2 2.5 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 : V 138 :LEFT 0 0 0 0 NSEW 139-SEQUENCE LIT L?T 140 RUN V 5 V 257. REDUCTION V ------------------++++-++++---------------- ------------------------V HO. CARD ID A B NET NBL SET SBL EBT EEL WET WEL COMMENT V <SIGNAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PACKAGE PAGE 35 ---------------------------- DESIGN AND EVALUATION SUMMARY ----------------------------- CONTROLLER SEQUENCE LOST TIME SPECIFIED INTERSECTION NAME RUN NO AND TITLE TYPE DIAL N/S E/W PHASES /PH TOTAL SAT LEVEL EL CANING/PALOMAR AIRPORT 5 25% REDUCTION ACTUATED /A L'T L'T 6 25 10.0 95.0% MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS SEQUENCE DELAY STOPS EXC FUEL EXC LEFT MAXIMUM V/C LEFT TURN TREATMENT MOVEMENTS (VEH-HRS) (I) (GAL) )VEH) QUEUE RATIO PROTECTION VEH/CiC PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 NB THRU 894 898 13.8H 23.6 70 ",'" XXXI LEFT .07 92.9 .10 .0 .2 .06 REST .0 XXXI ???? SB THRU 4 92 718 8.80 d6 2 i4l XXXI LEFT 338 887 4..97 82 50 REST 0 XXXI '" EB THRU 6.6.1 82 2 1078 18.9 53 "" XXIX LEFT 3.86 968 508 ii 77 75 REST 0 XXIX '' NB THRU 9.80 .91.3 15,.I0. 25.6 .75 ,. . ???? XXIX LEFT : 2.7 97.9 3.40 .0 5.0 .74 REST .0 XXIX ???? MEASURES OF EFFECT I V E N E S S SIGNAL TIMING ANALYSIS: DELAY STOPS El. FUEL EL LEFT MAXIMUM V/C ALL RED DIAL CYCLE PH 1 PH 2 PH .31 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 PERIOD (VEH-HRS) (X) (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO (SEC) NO (SEC) (/) (h) CX) CX) CX) CX) 17qQ-1800: 40.27 86.0 62.09 .0 256 .75 3.0 N/A 100.0: 10.0 12.8 3.0 10.0 4.2 30.0 SUMMARY 4027 86 .0 6200 0 258 75 TIMING BASED ON EQUAL DEGREE OF SATURATION <SIGNAL.OPERATIONS ANALYSIS FACKASE> PAGE 36 ------------------------------ * SOAF INPUT ECHO ----------------------------- 'H NO. CARD ID A .8 NBT NBL SBT SBL EBT EBL WBT WBL COMMENT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 142 :307. VOLUME REDUCTION SCENARIO 143: 144 :VOLUME 11700 883 5 .762 309 774 267 943 169 : 145 :CAPACITY 1 1700 3 1 3 2 3 2 .3 2 146 :MINGREEN 30 10 30 15 20 10 30 10 : 147 :HEADWAY 2.5 2.2 2.5 2.2 2.2 2.2.., 2.2 2,2 2.2 : 148 LEFT 0 0 0 0 NSEW 149 :SEQUENCE L?T L?T ISO :RUN 6 30 REDUCTION ------------- -- ---- ------ --- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- -----++++-++++---------------- NO. CARD ID A B NBT NBL SBT SBL EBT EBL WBT WBL COMMENT. . < S I ON AL OP ER A.T.I ON S AN ALY.S I S F' A C K E > PAGE - 37 LET TURN C HE C K I (PER 60 MINUTE PERIOD) PERIOD NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NO. TIME VOL 'CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP 4 1 1700 5.. 108. 309. 664. 267. 383. 169. 245. -• • • . • • • ..•• • • .•••.•••,•-• ..• • . • • 1•• •' - -S • • • -. •. -t <SIGNAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PALKAGE> PAGE -38 ----------------------------- DESIGN AND EVALUATION SUMMARY ----------------------------- CONTROLLER SEQUENCE LOST TIME SPECIFIED INTERSECTION NAME RUN NO. AND TITLE TYPE DIAL N/S E/W PHASES /PH. TOTAL SAT. LEVEL. EL CAMINO/PALOMAR AIRPORT 6: 301 REDUCTION ACTUATED N/A L?T L?T 6 2.5 100 95.01 MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS SE8UENCE DELAY STOPS EXC FUEL EXC LEFT MAXIMUM V/C LEFT TURN TREATMENT MOVEMENTS: (VEH-HRS) (1) (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO PROTECTION VEH/CYC PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 NB THRU : 8.15 88.4 12.70 21.7 -. .65 ???? XXIX LEFT .06 92.8 .08 .0 .1 ..05 REST .0 XXXI ???? SOW THRU : 4.53 70.7 8.10 15.0 .39 ???? XXIX LEFT : 3.11 •88.0 4.58 .0 7.6 .47 REST .0 XXIX ???? EB THRU : 6.07 81.1 9.92 17:4 .50 ???? XXXX LEFT : 3.49 96.1 4.66 .0. 7.1 .70 REST .0 XXXI ???? WBTHRU : -8.90 89.7 13.80 23.5 - .70 ???? XXXI LEFT : 2.42 97.5 3.10 .0 4.6 :.,69 REST .0 XXIX ???? MEA.SURESOF EFFECTIVENESS SIGNAL TIMING ANALYSIS: DELAY STOPS EX. FUEL El. LEFT MAXIMUM V/C ALL RED DIAL CYCLE PH 1 PHI. PH .3 PH 4 PH 5 PH PERIOD : (VEH-HRS) (Xl (GAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO (SEC) NO. (SEC). (Xl (X) (X) (V.) (V.) (V.) 1700-1800: 36.72 84.9 56.94 .0 23.5 -. .70 3.0 N/A 100.0: 10.0 12.8 30.0 10.0 4.2 -30.0 SUMMARY : 36.72 84.9 56.94 .0 23.5 .70 TIMING BASED ON EQUAL DEGREE OF SATURATION. - <SISNL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS .PACKABE> PAGE-39 SOAP 11NPUT I ECHO <SIGNAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PACKAGE>. CASECOMPARISON TOTAL DELAY EXCESS FUEL EXCESS NO. CASE NAME (VEH-HRS) (GAL) LEFT TURNS 07. REDUCTION 73.85 98.04 .0 2 lOX REDUCTION 54.32 * 80.60 .0 157. REDUCTION 48.34 73.18 .0 4 207. REDUCTION 44.05 67.42 .0 5 257. REDUCTION ' 40,27 62.09 .0 6 307. REDUCTION. 36.72 56.94 .0 ------------------------------------------------------------- 1 * S -, 5 • 5 PAGE -'40 PAGE -41