Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3184; CANNON ROAD WEST; EXECUTIVE SUMMARY; 1989-04-01t o feet 800 OS BRIDGE PUMP STATION : I -I 7_77 _•c-, . LAGOON EDGE ALIG 14, NMENT\ -- - _.- \\\ . 1T :17 T1 CANNON ROAD ALIGNMENT \\ \ \\ • \• •\ \ -----PROPOSED SEWER LINE FIGURE 3. PROPOSED ROUTES OF CANNON ROAD AND THE SEWER LINE I al 1w to 11 R-1739 . " PROS AND CONS FOR PROPOSED - CANNON. ROAD'VPUMP STATION : FORCE MAIN ALTERNATIVES LAGOON iEDGE ALIGNMENT (LEA) PROS " CONS Pump'.stationVconstuctidn" 1., Environmental 'irpacts will costs will be $500,000 (12%) require some mitigation :lessthanCRA. 2.Force main breaknear lagoon. By year, 15,, annual operating' V would allow'iess'respónse V and'maintenance costs will'*.be time and fewer containment $400,000 (43%) per year less: options. • V V than 'CPA. V V V V V 3• Force main location does not 3. By yeâr15, total costs will- allow for easy access for V V V be $21,900, 00& (?5%) "less necessary maintenance. V than CPA costs 4 Proximity to wetlands holds .4. Lower operating pressure - V the potential' for adverse, V V than CPA (46,,,, psi vs. V77 psi), impacts to 'sensitive resulting' in: less -likelihood '. resources and would be Of pipeline failure., •V .,inconsistent with those . 5. Lbwer horsepower required , policies df:the Agua V V (75 'Hp vs.. 130 Hp). Hedionda Land Use Plan. V 6 V Special surge control not V 5 Longer force main than CPA required... V'V V ' ' V V (4500 ft vs.' 2000 ft). 4Continuously rising force 6.'May'be V difficult construction main would allow force main ., due to high. water table. air injection for odor.- V control." Redubed.length of -.30-inch .. ' '. .• " ' ' sewer by 1,100 feet V V V , , •'V" , 'V ' - :. . V V . . 'V• ,\ V V 'V. V ' V •' • V V V ,' .' ' '' . - V •?' , I , 4 I V V 'V •' ' V 'V V * kf LUKEDUDEK PROS AND CONS FOR PROPOSED. . CANNON ROAD PUMP STATION . •:. FORCE MAIN ALTERNATIVES -. S CONTINUED CANNON ROAD ALIGNMENT (CRA) PROS CONS.'.. 1. Alignment in road, reducing Pump station construction alignment impacts. -costs will be $50001000 (14%) .2. Shorter force main than LEA ..' higher thànLEA. (2000 ft vs. 4500 ft).. . By year: 15, annual operation Force main break in Cannon and maintenance- costs will be Rd. would allow more response'.:$400,000,'(76%) more per. year. time and containment options than LEA. . than LEA. .. . -.. 3.. By year 15, total costs will Continuously rising force be $2,900,000 ..(34%) .inorethan would allow force main air . LEA costs. injection for odor control. 4. Higher operating pressure (77.psi.vs. 46 psi) thanLEA, increases the risk of S .- . . . accidental breakdoins and - . : potential Impacts to the Iagoon at the pump end of line -5 .• 5. Higher hOrsepower required - • - (130 Hp vs. 75Hp). .:,6. Additional surge control - -: - - • - •- -_ may be required. - - S -• - - 5 7.- Indreaed length of O-inch- S sewer by :I100 feet. LUKE DUDEK • .• o'-• .. . - .. .• . '•N I 0 S .0 .0 u0.. / 001% 000c .- j- • . • . . . . . -• . • - .- ooe : S I • . - . .1'.. 001' • .. - 5 . 0091 U -z - . . - - 001* 61 .: • • .000* .. 1. 0091 '--.5 • .5-• • • -- ,• . - U = -' -IS . wi ::o: 0091 ma I • . .• : .: 009g 0 • - _.•-_, • SI, • 00,9.: : x. 0019 .. 0009 • . - - - '-• - - - 0091 • - . .. - . . - 008 g • . - . • S. 'J. U • -- . . • 0001 . - - U • - 95 - j 009 .5 r , . - 'e0• 0 - . • . -- - I 005 16. 00* 'C 1-009 0 -0 0' 0 0 • 5'. - 0 5'.. N' . .. -. • • 0 0 0 0 0 — — —. . — — S • •N .0 S ', . -- 0095 - p 0' 61 0009 I .' •-- - - ' • 009* 0 't 'I 0 ' I Sce U' P - p ' 10099 U 5 91 S 0 - - ' , -.i• 9 ,' - : S U • 009* 1 U • • ' - 'OOO* 0091 '5_ I S 0051 'S -V S - - . - .• 00*9 S. 'p 0091 0009 H : — . • 00*1 I' - I S 'S 00 , 91 0009 9. I 'u-'- • - - 0099 -s: ' ' 0009 0091 0091 \ . 00*1 U \ 0091 .: It 0001 - -- . 00* \- \ - . - 0 • - . 009 00* 001 0 0 0 0 0 . . ANNUAL 0 & M COSTS ENERGY .& MAINTENANCE 0.9 -. •A N . N A L 0.7 C .0 S TM0.6 ____________________________ SI L -. L. 0.5 . . 0.4 R E 0.3 D 0 L L 0.2— A • •R S 0.1 • 0.0 _____________________________________________ 1. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 . YEAR .. . . . _I Lagoon • Cannon Rd. • • Cannon Rd. . Lagoon Cannon Rd. Increment Tota' Operation & Maintenance: Present worth C $1,091,300 $1,936,400 $845,100 more CLsmJtative future money spent $2,867,400 $5,087,100 $2,219,700 more • . • . LUKE-DLiI)EK CITY OF CARLSBAD SOUTH AGUA HEDIONDA (CANNON ROAD) PUMP STATION FORCE MAIN ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS LAGOON EDGE CANNON RD INCREMENTAL DIFFERENCE DESCRIPTION ALTERNATIVE ALTERNATIVE FOR CANNON ROAD Force main discharge et (ft) 87 170 83 more Force main Length (ft) 4500 2000 2500 tess Wet weLL water surface et (ft) 0 0 0 same 30" gravity Line Length (ft) 0 :.11.0,01 1100 more Maximum TDH (ft), C = 120 106 179 73 more TotaL Operation & Maintenance Present worth $1,091 300 $1,936,400 $845 100 more Cumulative future money spent $2,867,400 $5,087,100 $2,21.9,700 more TotaL CapitaL cost Present worth $4 138,400 $4,707,500 $569,100 more CumuLative future money spent $5,692,500 $6,380,000 $687 500 more Grand total: . . . . . Present.worth . $5,229,700 . . . $6,643,900 . $1.,414.;200 more CumuLative futur.e money spent $8,559,900. $11,467,100 . . $2,907,200. more LUKE-DLJDEK