Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3184; CANNON ROAD WEST; RESULTS OF INSTRUMENTATION MONITORING; 1999-09-30URS Greiner Woodward Clyde A Division of URS Corporation September 30, 1999 1615 Murray Canyon Road, Suite 1000 San Diego, CA 92108 Tel: 619.294.9400 Fax: 619.293.7920 Offices Worldwide City of Carlsbad Public Works - Engineering 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009-1161 Attention: Ms. Sherri Howard Subject: Results of Instrumentation Monitoring Cannon Road Bridge Over Macario Canyon Carlsbad, California URSGWC Reference No. 58-9551 1302.03-OINST I Dear Ms. Howard: This letter summarizes URS Greiner Woodward Clyde's (URSGWC) instrumentation monitoring program for the approach embankment fill at the east abutment of the proposed Cannon Road bridge over Macario Canyon. This work has been performed in accordance .with our agreement dated January 29, 1999 The east approach embankment is underlain by deep alluvium that inclUdes soft and compressible soils. Vertical drains were installed to accelerate consolidation of the compressible soils. Instrumentation, consisting of piezometers and settlement plates, were' installed to monitor consolidation of the soils. The embankment was also placed in two stages to mitigate potential instabilities. URSGWC installed four piezometers (designated P-i through P-4) within the footprint of the east approach embankment on October 22 and 23, 1998, prior to placement of embankment fills. The piezometers were installed to monitor the dissipation of excess pore pressures that would be generated in the compressible soils due to placement of the fill soils. The piezometer locations are shown on Figure 1, attached. Two settlement plates were also installed within the footprint of the embankment prior to fill placement. The locations of these plates (designated DSPW and DSPE) are also shown in Figure 1. . Embankment fill was placed in two stages, with each stage receiving approximately 20 feet of fill. Fill placement for Stage 1 commenced on November 6, 1998, and was completed, on December 11, 1998. Stage 2 fill placement commenced on January 15, 1999 and was completed by February 11, 1999. Piezometer and settlement measurements were made during and after placement of fill at approximate intervals of one week. Settlement measurements were provided \\SDG1\WPDATA\9551 1302\Oinst-a-Ldoc\30-Sep-99\SDG Spencer-L. Price, R.C.E. 5 Senior Staff Engineer URS Greiner Woodward Clyde Ms. Sherri Howard City of Carlsbad . September 30, 1999 Page to us by Simon Wong Engineering. Piezometer readings were made by URSGWC personnel using a pneumatic indicator. Settlement and piezometer measurements are presented on Figure 2, attached. The results of measurements made through August 12, 1999 indicate the following: Primary consolidation settlements appear to be substantially complete. The settlement readings indicate a uniform rate of settlement (vs. log of time), indicative of near the end of primary consolidation. In general, the responses of each piezometer were similar, with excess pore pressures reaching a maximum near the end of fill placement and dissipating over time. Stage 2 fill was approved to begin on January 14, 1999. The responses of piezometers P-i and P-4 were somewhat anomalous; P-4 had a significantly higher pore pressure increase, which may indicate a slower-draining material than the material in which the other piezometers were installed. The readings for P-i indicate that the excess pore pressure at that location did not fully dissipate after Stage 2 fill placement, although the pore pressure did level off in a similar manner as the other piezometers. This response may be the result of the piezometer having become damaged. Other subtle variations in the pore pressure response can be attributed to variations in the static groundwater level, calibration error of the pneumatic indicator, and the accuracy and precision of the readings. The continuing settlements appear to be typical of secondary compression. This compression occurs after the excess pore pressures have dissipated and is analogous to creep in other materials. Projecting the current secondary compression rate, we estimate that rate may contribute an additional three to six inches over a period of 50 years. Periodic overlays may be required to alleviate the transition between the bridge and the approach embankment. Should you require further assistance at this time, do not hesitate to give us a call. Very truly yours, URS GREINER WOODWARD CLYDE rs Senior Associate _J LDHISLP:mjr \'ç cc: Hank Gentile, Simon ong"r Attachments \\SOG1\WPDATA\9551 1302\Oinst-a-I.doc'30-Sep-99\SDG LEGEND: 87L00 -H-- INDICATES APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PIEZOMETER [ INDICATES DEEP SETTLEMENT PLATE DSPW = DEEP SETTLEMENT PLATE WEST DSPE = SEEP SETTLEMENT PLATE EAST 40 80 APPROXIMATE GRAPHIC SCALE (FEET) tINS Grelner Woodward Clyt 25 20 15 10 -10 -15 TV -20.00 Piezometer 1 (elev. -11') Piezometer 2 (elev. -33.5') —A--- Piezometer 3 (elev. -23') x Piezometer 4 (elev. +3') 0 - DSPW Settlement - -0 - DSPE Settlement A p _o°.G.G. - ..o 10 100 Elapsed Time (days, Day 0 = 11/6/98) PIEZOMETER AND SETTLEMENT DATA MACARIO CANYON BRIDGE - EAST EMBANKMENT CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA FN: SITE PM: SLP I CHECKED BY: £.OI DATE: 9-29-99 1 PROJECT NO: 58-9551 1302.03—OINST I FIG. NO: 2 - -20 1000