The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About3455; COASTAL RAIL TRAIL; PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF ASPHALTIC CONCRETE 2005; 2005-08-15-IuI1_ 828 City of Carlsbad July 22, 2005 5950 El Camino Real Contract No. 90822 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Attention: Mr. Gary Goodman Subject: Laboratory Test Report No. 5 Project: Coastal Rail Trail Tamarack Ave, La Costa Ave & Carlsbad Blvd. Carlsbad, California RECEIVED 4W 292005 ENT I_ DearMr.Goodman:. - Submitted herewith are the results of laboratory testing performed on an import material sample proposed for use as fill at the above referenced project site. The sample location and its respective classification are presented below: Sample Ddte Location Description No. Sampled 6/27/2005.[ Import: Hanson Carlsbad, location W CMB (Class II) Coastal Rail trail sta. 14+50 Maximum density and optimum moisture values determined in accordàne with the ASTM D- 1557-91 laboratory test standard for subsequent compaction monitoring purposes were as follows: - • Sample - MaxD Optirnum No Classification Density Moisture (pcf) CMB(Class II) 140.0 7.0 An evaluation of the grain-size distribution of selected soil sample(s) was performed in general accordance with the latest version of ASTM D422. These test results were utilized in evaluating Testing Engineers -. U.S. Laboratories 7895 Convoy Court, Suite 18 • San Diego California 92111 • (858) 715-5800 • Fax: (858) 715-5810 Offices Nationwide the soil classifications in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. The results are presented below: Sample No. 9 Sieve Size Percent Finer un. 100 341n. 84 1/2 in. 81 3/8 in. 75 #4 58.8 #10 45 #20 31 #40 22 #60 16 #100 13 #200 10.5 The result for sand equivalent testing based on California Test Method 217 is presented below: Sample No. Sand Equivalent 9 31 R-Value testing performed on representative sample(s) in accordance with Caltrans Test Method 301 is presented below: Sample No. R-Value at Equilibrium I 9 I 72 (I) Value interpolated at an exudation pressure of 300 psi The result for Durability Index testing based on California Test Method 229 is presented below: Sample No. Durability Fine Durability Coarse 36 71 It should be noted that test results contained herein are for geotechnical purposes and do not reflect compliance with United States Environmental Protection Agency and State of California regulations regarding environmental concerns. 2 Testing and subsequent approval of any import source applies only to the sample provided. It is the contractor's responsibility to import materials that are consistent with the sample tested. In any case, final approval is contingent upon the actual materials as hauled to the site. The laboratory test results indicate compliance with the project plans and specifications excluding any exceptions, as noted under individual tables. These laboratory tests were performed in accordance with generally accepted standards and do not constitute engineering opinions or project control. It is the responsibility of the contractor to schedule retests or re- inspections of any areas that do not meet project specifications as a- result of the attached information. TE-USL neither controls nor supervises the work at the site. We are not responsible for errors and omissions of the contractor, nor for the contractor's failure to keep the work on schedule or carry it out in accordance with the project plans, specifications, and all applicable codes. Respectfully submitted, TESTING ENGINEERS U.S. Labs, Inc. Aaron Portilla Staff Engineer Van W. Olin, GE 2578 Geotechnical Department Manager APNO:cs Distribution: (1) Addressee (1) Field File T:\Geotechnical FilesProjects\Contract Nunsbers\90822 Coastal Rail TrailLab Repoils\90522 Lab Report #5doc 3 - - a City.of Carlsbad July 11, 2005 5950 Ei.CamiñoReal Contract No. 90822 Cár1sbad,CA92008. Attention: -Mr.- Gary Goodman - RECEIVED Subject laboratory Test Report No. 4 Project: Coastal Rail Trail JUL 13 2005 Tamarack Ave, La Costa Ave & Carlsbad Blvd Carlsbad, California CFfl O CARl S3AO ENGNIERlMT DEPUgTMENT - - - DeaiMGoodthan.:: - - - Submitted herewith, ai-e the results of laboratory testingperformed on an import material sample proposed for use as filf at the'abov referenced project site. The sample location- and its respective classification are presented below: Sample Date Location Description No. Sampled FW7 6/23/2005 Import Hanson Carlsbad location Coastal Rail trail sta.32+50,..,, CMB 3 (Class II) ) a- Maximum density and optimum moisture values deteñmned in accordance with the ASTMD- 1557-9 1 laboratory test standard for sulsequeñt compaction monitoring purposes were as follows: Sample amp e Max Dry Otimurn No. Classification Density Moisture (f) % 8 34"CMB(Cláss II) 121.0 11.0 An evaluation of the grain-size distribution of selected soil sample(s) was performed in general accordance with the latest version of ASTM D422. These test results were utilized in evaluating I .7895 Convoy Court, Suite 18 San Diego, California 92111 (858) 715-5800 1 Fax: (858) 715-5810 Testing Engineers - U.S. Laboratories - 41146 Elm Street, Suite A 820 Research Drive, Suite 2 2001 East First Street Murrieta, California 92562 Palm Springs, California 92262 - Santa Ana, California 92705 (951) 677-0366 • Fax: (951) 677-5761 (760) 325-8378 0 Fax: (760) 325-7480 (714) 568-7300 4 Fax: (714) 664-0252 Offices Nationwide the soil classifications in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. The results are presented below: Sample No. 8 Sieve Size Percent Finer un. 100. 3hin. 96 1/2in. 81 3/8 in. 71 #4 5.1 #10 38 #20 29 #40 21 #60, . 14 #100 9 #200 6.2. The result for sand equivalent testing based on California Test Method 217 is presented below: Sample No. Sand Equivalent 8 T 60 R-Value testing performed on representative sample(s) in accordance with Caltrans Test Method 301 is presented below: . I R Sample No. -Valueat Equilibrium 8 83 (1) Value interpolated at an exudation pressure of 300 psi The result for Durability Index testing based on California Test Method 229 is presented below: Sample No. Durability Fine' Durability . Coarse 8 1 58 73 It should be noted that test results contained herein are for geotechnical purposes and do not reflect compliance with United States Environmental Protection Agency and State of California regulations regarding environmental concerns. 2 Testing and subsequent approval of any import source applies only to the sample provided. It is the contractor's responsibility to import materials that are consistent with the sample tested. In any case, final approval is contingent upon the actual materials as hauled to the site. The laboratory test results indicate compliance with the project plans and specifications excluding any exceptions, as noted under individual tables. These laboratory tests were performed in accordance with generally accepted standards and do not constitute engineering opinions or project control. It is the responsibility of the contractor to schedule retests or re- inspections of any areas that do not meet project specifications as a result of the attached information. TE-USL neither controls nor supervises the work at the site. We are not responsible for errors and omissions of the contractor, nor for the contractor's failure to keep the work on schedule or carry it out in accordance with the project plans, specifications, and all applicable codes. Respectfully submitted, TESTING ENGINEERS U.S. Labs, Inc. Aaron Portilla Van W. Olin, GE 2578 Staff Engineer Geotechnical Department Manager APIVO:cs Distribution: (1) Addressee (1) Field File T:\Geotcchnica] Files\Projccls\Contract Numbcrs\90822 Coastal Rail Trail\Lab Rcports9O822 Lab Report 54doc 1826 IN City of Carlsbad 5950 El Camino Real Carlsbad, CA 92008, Attention: Gary Goodman Subject: Laboratory Test Report No. 3 Project: Coastal Rail Trail Tamarack Ave, La Costa Ave & Carlsbad Blvd. Carlsbad, California I June 21, 2005 Contract No. .90822 RECEIVED JUN 23 2005 CITY OF CARLSBAI) ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CM&i DIVISION Dear Mr. Goodman. Submitted herewith are the results of laboratory testing performed on an import and on-site material samples proposed for use as fill at the above referenced project site The sample locations and their respective classification are presented below: Sample • Date Location Description No. Sampled 5 6/07/2005 on-site Native QoastalRail trail sta. 1 SC/SM 20+00 6 6/07/2005 On-site: Native Coastal Rail trail sta. SC/SM 40+00 7 6/09/2005 Import Hanson Carlsbad location Dark gray olivish Base Coastal Rail trail sta 38+00 w/asphalt Maximum density and optimum moisture values determined in accordance with the ASTM D- 1557-91 laboratory test standard for subsequent compaction monitoring purposes were as follows: Sample Classification Max Dry Optirpum. No.,-(USCS) Density Moisture (pcf) 7 Base 117.5 13.5 An evaluation of the grain-size distribution of selected soil sample(s) was performed in general accordance with the latest version of ASTM D422 These test results were utilized in evaluating Testing Engineers - U.S. Laboratories 7895 Convoy Court, Suite 18 4146 Elm Street, Suite A 820 Research Drive, Suite 2 2001 East First Street * San Diego, California 92111 Murrieta, California 92562 Palm Springs, California 92262 Santa Ana, California 92705 (858) 715-5800 • Fax: (858);715-5810 (951) 677-0366 • Fax: (951) 677-5761 (760) 325-8378 1 Fax: (760) 325-7480 (714) 568-7300 • Fax: (714) 664-0252 Offices Nationwide 1/0 the soil classificationS in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. The results are presented below: Sieve Size Sample No.5 Sample No.6 Percent Percent Passing Passing I #200 17.8 13.3 Sample No. 7 Sieve 1 Size Percent Finer 1 in. 100 3/din. 97 1/2 in. 82 3/8 in. 72 #4 50.7 #8. 40 #16 31 #30 22 #50 14 #100 8.3 #200 5.4 The result for sand equivalent testing based on California Test Method 217 is presented below: Sample Sand No. Equivalent 7 33 R-Value testing performed on representative sample(s) in accordance with Caltrans Test Method 301 is presented below: Sample No. R-Valueat TEquilibrium 5 77 6 82 84 (1) Value interpolated at an exudation pressure of 300 psi. The results for Durability Index testing based on California Test Method 229 are presented below: Sample No. Durability Fine Durability Coarse 28 63 2 It should be noted that test results contained herein are for geotechnical purposes and do not reflect compliance with United States Environmental Protection Agency and State of California regulations regarding environmental concerns,. Testing and subsequent approval of any import source applies only to the sample provided. It is the contractors responsibility to import materials that are consistent with the sample tested. In any case, final approval is contingent upon the actual materials as hauled to the site. The laboratory test results indicate compliance with the project plans and specifications excluding any exceptions, as noted under individual tables. These laboratory tests were performed in accordance with generally accepted standards and do not constitute engineering opinions or project control. It is the responsibility of the contractor to schedule retests or re- inspections of any areas that do not meet project specifications as a result of the attached information. TE-USL neither controls nor supervises the work at the site. We are not responsible for errors and omissions of the contractor, nor for the contractor's failure to keep the work on schedule or carry it out in accordance with the project plans, specifications, and all applicable codes. Respectfully submitted, TESTING ENGINEERS U.S. Labs, Inc. Aaron Portilla Van W. Olin, GE 2578 Staff Engineer Geotechnical Department Manager 1. APNO:cs Distribution: (I) Addressee (1) Field File T:\Geotechnical Filcs\Projccts\Contract Numbcss\90822 Coastal Rail TraiILab Rcports90822 Lab Repott #3.doc 3 lu14 WI : City of Carlsbad June 14, 2005 5950-El Camino Real - Contract No. 90822 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Attention:. . Gary Goodman RECEIVED] Subject: Laboratory Test Report No 2 Project: CoastaiRail Trail JUN 22 2005 Tamarack Ave, La Costa Ave & Carlsbad Blvd. Carlsbad, California ENT - Deaf Mr. Goodrnn, - Submitted herewith-are the results of laboratory testing performed on impoit material samples proposed for use as fill at the above referenced project site The sample locations and their respective classification are presented below: Sample No. Date Sampled Location - Description - 3 5/31/2005 Import Stockpile Sta. 11+00 Olive grayish brown SAND 4 5/31/2005 Import Stockpile Sta 10+50 Brown recycled Base w/AC Maximum density. and optimum moisture, values determined in.,accordance with the ASTM D- 1557-91 laboratory test standard for subsequent compaction monitoring purposes were as follows: - Sample Classification M ax Dry -Optimm u :No. I Density Moisture APO- 3 1 SM 122.5 100 4 Base 1 123.0 10.0 An evaluation of the grain-size distribution of selected soil sample(s)'was performed in general accordance with the latest version of ASTM D422 These test results were utilized in evaluating- the,-soil classifications in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System The result is presented below: i Sieve Sze Sample No.4 Percent - - Passing L_L#L0=0E_6.4 7895 Convoy Court, Suite IS San Diego, California 92111 (858) 715-5800 • Fax: (858) 715-5810 esting Engineers - U.S. LaDo1at6ries 41146 Elm Street, Suite A 820 Research Drive, Suite 2 Murrieta, California 92562 Palm Springs, California 92262 (951) 677-0366 0 Fax: (951) 677-5761 (760) 325-8378 4 Fax: (760) 325-7480 Offices Nationwide 2001 East First Street Santa Ana, California 92705 (714) 568-7300 • Fax: (714) 664-0252 The result for sand equivalent testing based on California Test Method 217 is presented below: Sample No. Sand I Equivalent 3 I 33 R-Value testing performed on representative sample(s) in accordance with Caltrans Test Method 301 is presented below: Sample No. R-Value at Equilibrium 4 85 (1) Value interpolated at an exudation pressure of 300 psi The results for Durabilty Index testing based on California Test Method 229 are presented below: Sample No. Durabilty Fine Durability Coarse 41 66 It should be noted that test results contained herein are for geotechnical purposes and do not reflect compliance with United States Environmental Protection Agency and State of California regulations regarding environmental concerns. Testing and subsequent approval of any import source applies only to the sample provided. It is the contractor's responsibility to import materials that are consistent with the sample tested. In any case, final approval is contingent upon the actual materials as hauled to the site. The laboratory test results indicate compliance with the project plans and specifications excluding any exceptions, as noted under individual tables. These laboratory tests were performed in accordance with generally accepted standards and do not constitute engineering opinions or project control. It is the responsibility of the contractor to schedule retests or re- inspections of any areas that do not meet project specifications as a result of the attached information. TE-USL neither controls nor supervises the work at the site. We are not 2 responsible for errors and omissions of the contractor, nor for the contractor's failure to keep the work on schedule or carry it out in accordance with the project plans, specifications, and all applicable codes. Respectfully submitted, TESTING ENGINEERS U.S. Labs, Inc. 7 Aaron Portilla Staff Engineer Distribution: (1) Addressee (1) Field File - 6 6;;, Van W. Olin, GE 2578 Geotechnical Department Manager T:\Geotecbnical Filcstrrojccts\Contract Numbes\90822 Coastal Rail Trail\Lab Reports\90822 Lab Report #2.doe 3 City of Carlsbad. May 20, 2005 5950EF Camino Real Contract No 90822 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Attention: Gary Goodman £ C E I V £ D Subject: Laboratory Test Report No. 1 MAY 2 5 2005 Project: Coastal Rail Trail Tamarack Ave, La Costa Ave & Carlsbad Blvd. CITNI OF CkRt,SBAD Carlsbad, California ]ENGINEERING1, iION Dear Mr. Goodman, Submitted herewith are the results of laboratory testing performed on on-site material samples proposed for use as fill at the .above referenced project site. The sample locations and their respective classifications are presented below: Sample Date Location 'Desc 1. ription No. Sampled. 1 5/10/2005 On site N End of Site Sta. 11+39 Oringish Brown Silty SAND 2 5/10/2005 On site S end of Site,. ite Sta. 10+31.08 1 Oringish Brown Silty SAND Maximum density and optimum moisture values determined in accordance with the ASTM D- 1557-91 laboratory test standard for subsequent compaction monitoring purposes were,,as follows: ' 0 Sample Classification Max Dry Optimum No. (USGS) Density Moisture (pcf)" I SM ' 128.0 ' 9.5'- 2 'SM , 127.0 ' 9.0 Testing Engineers - U.S. Laboratories 7895 Convoy Court, Suite 18 • SanDiego,'California 92111 • (858) 715-5800 • Fax: (858) 715-5810 Offices Nationwide It should be noted that test results contained herein are for geotechnical purposes and do not reflect compliance with United States Environmental Protection Agency and State of California regulations regarding environmental concerns. The laboratory test results indicate compliance with the project plans and specifications excluding any exceptions, as noted under individual tables. These laboratory tests were performed in accordance with generally accepted standards and do not constitute engineering opinions or project control. It is the responsibility of the contractor to schedule retests or re- inspections of any areas that do not meet project specifications as a result of the attached information. TE-USL neither controls nor supervises the work at the site. We are not responsible for errors and omissions of the contractor, nor for the contractor's failure to keep the work on schedule or carry it out in accordance with the project plans, specifications, and all applicable codes. Respectfully submitted, ESTING ENGINEERS U.S. Labs, Inc. Van W. Olin, GE 2578 Geotechnical Department Manager Distribution: (1) Addressee (1) Kirk Bradbury (Dokken Engineering) (1) Field File T:\Geotechnical Filcs\Projccts\Contract Numbes\90822 Coastal Rail Trail\Lab Rcports\90822 Lab Report #I.doc