HomeMy WebLinkAbout3466; OLIVENHAIN RD WIDENING & REALIGNMENT; ROUTE ADOPTION REPORT; 1990-08-16-
--- __i•_• ..-
I 1
Project Design Consultants
OLIVENHAIN ROAD
ROUTE ADOPTION REPORT
August 16, 1990
Revised February 26, 1991
PREPARED FOR:
FIELDSTONE/LA COSTA ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
5465 Morehouse Drive, Suite 250
San Diego, CA 92121
PREPARED BY:
PROJECT DESIGN CONSULTANTS
701 B Street, Suite 800
San Diego, CA 92101
R/737-RTE.R2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
TITLE PAGE ................1
TABLE OF CONTENTS .............2
I. INTRODUCTION ................3
II. BACKGROUND .................3
Right-of-Way .............3
Future Westerly Extension ......5
III. EXISTING FACILITY ............7
A. Rancho Santa Fe Road Intersection 7
B. Olivenhain Road ...........7
C. El Camino Real Intersection 8
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA ............9
V. GEOTECHNICAL INFORMATION .........9
VI. TRAFFIC DATA ...............10
VII. ULTIMATE FACILITY ............10
A. Alignment Alternatives .........11
Alignment No. 1 .........11
Alignment No. 2 .........16
Alignment No. 3 ..........18
Alignment No. 4 . . ...... 25
B. Six-Lane Facility Cross Section. . . . 27
Right-of-Way Summary ........ 31
C. Rancho Santa Fe Road Intersection 32
D. El Camino Real Intersection .....34
E. Construction Detouring ........36
VIII. CONCLUSION ................37
IX. REFERENCES ................38
X. APPENDICES .................39
I OLIVENHAIN ROAD
ROUTE ADOPTION REPORT
I
INTRODUCTION
This report has been prepared at the request of the City of
Carlsbad and is to be used as a reference during the City of
Encinitas' preparation of the Environmental Impact Report
for the improvement of Olivenhain Road, as called. for
Carlsbad's Local Facilities Management Plan for Zones 11 and
12. Olivenhain Road currently exists along the southern
boundary of the City of Carlsbad and northern boundary of
the City of Encinitas, between El Camino Real and Rancho
Santa Fe Road (Figure 1, Page 4).
BACKGROUND
Olivenhain Road is an east-to-west road which connects El
.Camino Real to the west with Rancho Santa Fe Road to the
east. In this area, Olivenhain Road is designated in the
Circulation Element of the City of Carlsbad and City of
Encinitas General Plans as six-lane prime arterial.
A. RIGHT-OF-WAY
Olivenhain Road was originally constructed as paved
two-lane arterial thoroughfare, within a 60-foot road
easement, as described on Road Survey . 1.631. The
3
Metrose Drive
La Costa
Meadows Drive.
Questhaven Rood
ENCENITAS
Project Location
Figure 1
Project Design Consultants
J.N. 737.00
Carlsbad/Encinitas city boundary is coincident with the
north line of the 60-foot road easement for a majority
of the road's length (Figure 2, Page 6). Between 1975
and 1987, the Rancho Del Ponderosa and Santa Fe Ridge
subdivisions on the north side and Encinitas Tract
4579-1 subdivision on the south side were developed.
Along the frontages of the these developments,
additional right-of-way of 21 feet to the north was
dedicated to the City of Carlsbad and 26 feet to the
south was dedicated to the City of Encinitas.
Improvements to Olivenhain Road associated with these
developments included road widening and installation of
concrete curb and gutter, and sidewalk. Subsequent to
these widenings, a portion of Olivenhain Road was
striped to provide four through lanes and a striped
median for left turns.
B. FUTURE WESTERLY EXTENSION
The City of Encinitas General Plan Circulation Element
proposes a future 85-foot right-Of-way (scenic roadway)
extension of Olivenhain Road, west of El Cthnino Real, to
connect to the existing Leucadia Boulevard (Figure 2,
Page 6). This future extension lies within the limits
of the County of San Diego, yet within the Encinitas
sphere of influence.
5
City Of Carlsbad
San Diego County
Encinitas Sphere of Influence)
eek
Possible Center
Future 85' Scei
Road Alignment
Foxfl Point.
C
Leucadia
Boulevard
LI
Rancho
.Santa Fe
Road
Santa
NORTHERN
ALTERNATIVESI RanchoDel Ponder osa Ridge
city Of Carlsb
t of Encinitas
SOUTHERN I 1,
ALTERNATIVE ,.' Tract No.4579-1
-, -
Olivenhain I /
Road .
-
Olivenhain Road
Figure 2
..."$IIIlItIIIIlII$uuultluulllhulllwhluuttltllllutlllltlllttl*IIlfttlIu.ulivj
ProjectDesign Consultants
J.N. 738.00
LI
I III. EXISTING FACILITY
A. RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD INTERSECTION
I Olivenhain Road, between El Camino Real and Rancho Santa
1 . Fe Road, is appràximately one mile in length and is
comprised of three typical cross-sections, with a major
I intersection at each end. It begins to the east at the
signalized intersection of Rancho Santa Fe Road and
1 Camino Alvaro. Rancho Santa Fe Road approaches this
I
. intersection from the north as a six-lane prime arterial
and continues to the south as an unimproved two-lane
I, road.
I B. OLIVENHAIN ROAD
I
.Along the frontage of the Santa Fe Ridge subdivision
west of the Rancho Santa Fe Road intersection, the
I . northerly side of the road has been improved to include
two travel lanes, a bike lane, curb and gutter, and
I sidewalk. The southerly side of the road consists of
I
two travel lanes with an unimproved shoulder. The
median in this area is also unimproved and varies in
width.
I Further to the west, between the Rancho Del Ponderosa
I
and Encinitas Tract No. 4579-1 subdivision, the right-
of-way exists at a uniform 107-foot width. The road
consists of two eastbound and two westbound lanes,
1 7
1
LI
I separated by a striped median which allows for left turn
I
pockets into the adjacent developments. The
improvements also include a bike lane, curb and gutter,
1 and sidewalk along both sides of the road. There are
two isolated areas that are not improved to these
dimensions. These two areas are on the south side of
the road, adjacent to Encinitas Tract No. 4579-1 (see
1 Figures 5-1A and 5-2A, Pages 14 and 15). Right-of-way
I
has not been dedicated and improvements have not been
made in these two locations.
West of the boundary of the Rancho Del Ponderosa and
I Encinitas Tract No. 4579-1 developments, Olivenhain Road
I
transitions into a two-lane roadway with unimproved
shoulders to the El Camino Real intersection.
I
The condition or adequacy of the existing structural
I section of Olivenhain Road is unknown at this time.
I
Further analysis will be required prior to final design
of the six-lane facility.
C. EL CANINO REAL INTERSECTION
I The El Camino Real intersection is a signalized
intersection, with four travel lanes and a striped 1 median on El Camino Real. Olivenhain Road intersects El
Camino Real at a skew approximately parallel with
8
1
HI
I . Encinitas Creek, which crosses under El Camino Real
directly south of its intersection with Olivenhain Road.
I A preliminary study by Rick Engineering (Reference 'F',
1 Page 38) indicated that the existing bridge and creek
are extensively silted in this area, and hydraulic
I capacity is not sufficient to convey a 100-year-
frequency storm. The finding was corroborated in a
I study performed by Dr. Howard H. Chang, P.E.,.September
1990 (Reference 'G', Page 38).
I IV. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA
An environmental reconnaissance has been completed which
I addresses the .project impact on wetlands, noise, archaeology
I
. and visual aesthetics. An Environmental Initial Study (EIS)
was submitted concurrent with the original (August 23, 1989)
I version of this report. The City of Encinitas has agreed
to be the lead agency for this project and has initiated the
I . environmental clearance process. Presently, Brian F. Mooney
I
. and Associates is preparing an Environmental Impact Report
for this project, scheduled to be completed in mid-1991.
I . V. GEOTECHNICAL INFORMATION
I Information has been gathered and evaluated concerning the
stability of the proposed fills and structural settlements
I . in the wetland areas. The information is provided in the
9
II
"Soil and Geological Reconnaissance for Olivenhain Road,"
prepared by GEOCON, Inc. (dated July 5, 1989).
TRAFFIC DATA
The traffic analysis in the City of Carlsbad's Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zones 11 and 12 indicates
that Olivenhain Road at the present time has a capacity of
16,670 ADTs. The plan also indicates that the ADT count for
1988 was 11,200, and the projected ADT count in 1995 will be
32,400. The traffic analysis concludes that the projected
increase in traffic volumes for this area will put the
existing road at a Level of Service (LOS) of 'F' in the
early 1990s. This level of service has been deemed
unacceptable by both the Cities of Carlsbad and Encinitas
Traffic Standards. This increase in traffic volumes will
also result in a LOS of 'F' at the intersections of El
Camino Real/Olivenhain Road and Rancho Santa Fe
Road/Olivenhain Road.
ULTIMATE FACILITY
As previously mentioned, the Circulation Elements of the
General Plans for both Carlsbad and Encinitas classify
Olivenhain Road between El Camino Real and Rancho Santa Fe
Road as a six-lane prime arterial. There are four
alignments considered in this report which accommodate the
ultimate six-lane facility. Additionally, as a result of
10
the Study of Encinitas Creek performed by Dr. Howard H.
Chang (Reference 'G', Page 38), this report considers two
alternative solutions for correcting the current hydraulic
capacity condition of the existing bridge at the Olivenhain
Road and El Camino Real intersection. One alternative
method is to construct a new bridge approximately 4 feet
higher than the existing bridge and raise approximately
1,000 feet of El Camino Real. The other method, recommended
by Dr. Chang's study, is to construct a detention basin
approximately 4,000 feet east of the intersection
(Reference 'G', Page 38).
A. ALIGNMENT ALTERNATIVES
Four alinments and two solutions to the existing bridge
capacity problem are being considered east of the El
Camino Real intersection to the westerly boundary of
Rancho Del Ponderosa.
1.
Alignment No. 1
I Alignment No. 1 extends nearly due west, crossing
Encinitas Creek and intersecting approximately
perpendicularly with El Camino, Real. This alignment
I will require the building of a bridge over potential
environmentally sensitive vegetation associated with
I Encinitas Creek (Figure 3k, Page 12).
I
I
11
HI
EJI'
N CE NIT
I .1
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ROAD ALIGNMENT STUDY OF
Oflyan h wh Road
Alternative No. 1
ProjèctDesign Cnu1tants
PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING
701 B Street, Suite BOO, San Diego, CA 92101
619-235-6471 FAX 234-0349
-
Y.
Victity Mao Figure 3A
MOT TO SCALE
The Encinitas Creek channel may contain environmentally
sensitive vegetation which may be impacted by the
construction of the new bridge. Impacts are limited
because the majority of wetland vegetation will be
spanned by the proposed bridge. This area may also
require remedial grading and ground stabilization (i.e,
rock, sub-base and stabilization fabric) under the
roadway in order to minimize potential settlement.
These issues will be further evaluated during final
design for the roadway.
An existing 30-inch gas main valving or pressure
reducing station, located south of the existing roadway,
may be in conflict with this alignment. The gas
facility may need to be relocated further to the south
along the gas main, if a conflict is determined during
final design.
Alignment No. 1 will also require right-of-way
acquisition west of Rancho Del Ponderosa (Figures 5-1A
and 5-2A, Pages 14 and 15). A majority of the needed
right-of-way is within three parcels of land, Assessor's
Parcel Numbers 255-024-01, 255-04-06, and 255-041-14
(owned by W.H. and N.B. Hunt, Leucadia Boulevard Limited
and Fieldstone/La Costa Associates Limited Partnership,
respectively).
13
I
I N co
255-O23O1 '
I
\
255-041-14
i
s Rancho Del Ponderosa
LU
I l 255-023-02 27
I :
I-.
—
26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 306 307308 309 LL
C:t y o f Carlsbad LI_I
LU
I
/
Olivenhain
126' PROPOSED R/W
04 Co. /
Road yofn
I
40 /38 / 37/ \ 35 / I I I C1 LU
-
107' EXIST R/W / I / / 36 / I I z
255-024-01 J/ / / II I 1 I I
—
/ / pt-K I
Lo
i \ 255-040-06 (•LO
I \ -
33 c'J (\1
U) U) I—
I •jw • \
i - \ Encinitas
= • Tract No. 4579-1
S..
.5
5
. \• I .....
N
I NOTE \ ALTERNATIVE NO: 1
This exhibit does not represent a detailed 2~Qç1 Land to be acquired .. 126 /107 Cross Section
I title / right-of-way evaluation and is not intended öOc for right-of-way - Right-of-Way Acquisition
to be used as a right-of way acquisition plat. (Approximate) Olivenhain Road-Westerly
1 S Figure 5-1.
SI
;. ProjectDesign Consultants
J.N. 737.00
I
I
P
I
•1 \
86
Santa--Fe -.Ridge
I 36
Tract No. 83-16
255-192-58
U Rancho Del Ponderosa \37
S5q
1 07' PROPOSED R/W*
Uj 414
M 44 AS
46 45 50 48- 47
U- 310 311 312
313
314 315 316 317 318 319
320 422 420 418 417 416 4.15 49. 4.21 419 2557031-033
City of Carlsbad .00~
_
31 0 1
3 3 2r
1 1 g
n
3 f3
/ Ohvenhain Road 9it of'Enc;n,ts
it
107' EXIST. R/W
I
< 255-040-17
Tract No. 4579-1 255-040-45 -
107' Cross Section
NOTES I This exhibit does not represent a detailed LVX22V'<.A Land to be acquired : Right-of-Way Acquisition
title / right-of-way evaluation and is not intended S [X)<XXXXM for right-of-way S . Olivenhain Road-Easterly
I to be used as a right-of-way acquisition plat. (Approximate)
S
S
S Figure 5-2A
i
ProjectDes
- S
-
J.N. 737.00
1
I Alignment No. 2
Alignment No. 2 follows a more northerly route to an
I intersection with El Camino Real, approximately 350 feet
' north of the Alignment No. 2 intersection (Figure 3B,
Page 17). Alignment No. 2 does not meet all of the City
I of Carlsbad design criteria for a prime arterial route.
Centerline radii are 1,600 feet, and not 2,400 feet as
I per standard. Centerline intersection of Olivenhain
I
Road with El Camino Real is skewed approximately 3.
Design speed for this alignment would be 50 miles per
i hour, instead of 60 as per standard. Alignment No. 2
does not cross Encinitas Creek east of El Camino Real;
therefore, this alignment will not require the
construction of a bridge over Encinitas Creek.
The Alignment No. 2 layout is north of Encinitas Creek,
which may avoid areas of sensitive vegetation; however,
some mitigation may be needed for traffic detouring
during construction. Alignment No. 2 may also avoid the
saturated ground areas which may require stabilization.
Approximately 60,000 cubic yards Of excavation are
required to construct Alignment No. 2, creating a cut
slope ±35 feet in height on the north side which may
require buttressing.
16
ROAD ALIGNMENT STUDY OF
Ov (B n h r P1 ons d
Alternative No--'. 2
ProjectDeszgn Cons'uJtants
PLA N NING ENGI NE ERING SURVEYING
701 B Street, Suite 800, San Diego, CA 92101
619-235-6471 FAX 2340349
- 17-
I
I . A 30-inch gas main and two fuel mains which are within
the existing SDG&E easement will need to be relocated to
I accommodate the required road profile.
Alignment No. 2 will also require right-of--way
I acquisition west of Rancho Del Ponderosa (Figures 5-1B
and 5-2B, Pages 19 and 20). The majority of the new
I right-of-way will be needed from two parcels of land,
I
Assessor's Parcel Numbers 255-023-02 and 255-041-14,
owned by Northern Western Pacific Railroad Company and
I Fieldstone/La Costa Associates, respectively.
I Alignment No. 3
I .
. Alignment No. 3 follows a more northerly route to an
intersection with El Camino Real, approximately 350
I north of Alignment No. 1 (Figure 3C, Page 21). The
Alignment No. 3 layout is north of existing Olivenhain
I Road and approximately 40 feet south of Alignment No. 2.
Alignment No. 3 does not meet all of the City of
I.
Carlsbad design criteria for a prime arterial route.
Centerline radii are 1,800 feet, and not 2,400 as per
I standard. The centerline horizontal curve begins at the
centerline of El Camino Real, instead of 100 feet beyond
I the back of curb return as per standard. Centerline
intersection of Olivenhain Road with El Camino Real is
1
18.
LU
cc
-
LU. LU Co
NOTE: Land to be acquired This exhibit does not represent a detailed for right-of-way
title I right-of-way evaluation and is not intended I
(Approximate)
to be used a& a right-of way acquisition plat.
J
ALTERNATIVE NO. 2
1267107'Cross. Section
Right-of-Way Acquisition
Olivenhain Road-Westerly
Figure-5-1B
P,
ProjectDesign Consultants
-.19- J.N. 737.00
Santa Fe Ridge
Tract No. 83-16
36
37
\ p /
44 45
50 46 45
255-031-033
\\
EXIST. R/W . \_\ 107' EIST. R/W
VARIES
255-040-17
.c. 255-192-58
NCO
Rancho Del Ponderosa -
I 107' PROPOSED R/W . ..•
414
E 310 312. 314 318 320 22 4O .21 419 418 417 416 415 311 313 31 31 113 9
City of Carlsbad
nnnusnumsusautmsuIannneWVNP "
-.
Uj./ Olivenhain Road J\'CItY of Encinitas
N 19 17 15 5
N 13
U.1
13
J
tract No. 4579-1 -
NOTE:
This exhibit does not represent a detailed
title / right-of--way evaluation and is not intended
to be used as a right-of-way acquisition plat.
[ t
255-040-45
-. - 107' Cross Section
Land to be acquired . .
Right-of-Way Acqusfti0fl.
for right-of-way . Ohvenhan Road-Easterly
(Approximate). Figure 5-213
PojectDe.O1lSU1taflt
-zo- -- J.N. 737.00
LL
>- 0 00 •
I— z. w w= > _ ('%J z
. E 0 'L 0 cc -
—.
-
r-'
IL
O\
0-
— I.— ,..iia La
)U'
-. '— -
r- TF.N
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I
I at a ±7° skew for this alternative and not at right
angles (90°). The design speed would be 55 miles per
I hour, instead of 60 as per standard.
The Alignment No. 3 layout is north of Encinitas Creek,
which may avoid areas of sensitive vegetation; however,
some mitigation may be needed for traffic detouring
during construction. Alignment No. 3 may also avoid
the saturated ground areas which may require
stabilization. Approximately 50,000 cubic yards of
excavation are required to construct Alignment No. 3,
creating a cut slope ±25 feet on the north side which
may require buttressing.
At this time, it is believed that a 30-inch gas main and
two fuel lines located within the SDG&E easement will
need to be relocated to accommodate the required road
profile.
Alignment No. 3 will require right-of-way acquisition
west of Rancho Del Ponderosa (Figure 5-,IC and 5-2C,
Pages 23 and 24). The majority of the new right-of-way
will be needed from two parcels of land, Assessor's
Parcel Numbers 255-023-02 and 255-041-14, owned by
Northern Western Pacific Railroad Company and
Fieldstone/La Costa Associates, respectively.
22
Land to be acquired
for right-of-way
(Approximate)
ALTERNATIVE NO. 3
:126' /107 '.Cross;Section
Right-of-Way Acquisition
Olivenhain Road-Westerly.
Figure .5-1C
ProjectDesign consultants
J.N. 737.00
NOTE:.
This This exhibit does not represent a detailed
title / right-of-way evaluation and is not intended
to be used as a right-of-way acquisition plat.
IC)
Santa Fe Ridge
Tract No. 83-16
0,I
I . Ill W
- VARIES
-,
0 255-040-17
255-040-45
O Land to be acquired
0 . for right-of-way
(Approximate)
I
I .
1
I
0
00
Rancho Del Ponderosa
107' PROPOSED R/W
U.. 310 312 31 316 318
311 313 315 317 31
I Olivenhain :>':•>':
0
C14 18 * 16
.1 . LU
CY
0 Tract No.4579-1
I . 0 I -
NOTE:
I This exhibit does not represent a detailed
title / right-of-way evaluation and is not intended
to be used as a right-of-way acquisition plat.
255-192-58
0• .\.
107' EXIST. R/W
. \'
\\\
0 107' Cross Section
Right-of-Way Acquisition
0
Olivenhain Road-Easterly
0
0 Figure 5-2C
PmjectDesignCou&mtS
-24-- J.N. 737.00
Alignment No. 4
Alignment No. '4 follows the existing layout of
Olivenhain Road for the most part (Figure 3D, Page 26).
Alignment No. 4 fails to meet many of the design
criteria established by the City of Carlsbad for a prime
arterial route.
Centerline radii are 1,400 feet, not 2,400 feet as per
standard. 'The centerline intersection of Olivenhain
Road with El.. Camino Real is at a 23° skew, and not at
right angles (90°). Normally, public agencies will
allow a maximum of 10° skew at an intersection. The
design speed is 55 miles per hour, instead of 60 as per
standard.
Approximately 12,000 cubic yards of excavation is
required to construct Alignment No. 4, creating an
I maximum cut slope of approximately 25 feet on the north
I
side of the proposed layout which may require
buttressing. The existing 30-inch gas main and two fuel
I lines located within the SDG&E easement will need to be
relocated to accommodate the required alignment profile.
LI
The future extension of Olivenhain Road west of El
I Camino Real to Leucadia Boulevard impacts the Green
Valley Creek riparian area west of El Camino Real. The
25
---( çLi—i
---- -If ;..:•-- _'(-? >r))>" '; .1.-_ "
:
CM TANCOM
WA
7. Izz
Lrema ACT. : L sm .. •
__.••_••!. -• 'r-Z . -
- - C
i 4ç ' i5'ro
4 'L -
z/j too oft IN"
JAf N
.41
\\
___ ________ B •
41,
NN
-•
A . 0 -
_—:---- \
Vicinity Mao Figure 30
NOT TO SCALE
ROAD ALIGNMENT STUDY OF
Ofl yenhah oid
Alternative No. 4
;?ProjectDesign Consultants
PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING
701 B Street, Suite 800, San DiegQ CA 92101
619-235-6471 FAX 234-0349
I impact is estiinated to be approximately 1.7 acres in
size, based on current vegetation limits.
1
I
-.Alignment-No.-4 will require right-of-way acquisition
west of Rancho Del Ponderosa (Figure 5-1D and 5-2D,
I Pages 28 and 29). The majority of new right-of-way will
- be needed froni' two parcels of, land, Assessor's Parcel
I Numbers 255-023-02 and 255-041-14, owned, by Northern
.
Western Pacific Railroad Company and Fieldstone/La Costa
I Associates, respectively.
i
B. SIX-LANE FACILITY CROSS SECTION -
I
The road cross sections being considerd consist of six
lanes separäted"by a median and provide a bike lane,
I. sidewalk, and cub and gutter on each side. This
facility will be accommodated by two cross section
widths', .,one utilizing the existing 107-f6ot right-of-way
I
. section along the Rancho Del Ponderosa and Santa Fe
Ridge projet frontages, and' the second utilizing
.1 ., Car1sbad'standard 126-foot right-of-way section west .
of the Rancho Del Ponderosa project to El Camino Real
Tract No. No. 4579-1
Land to be acquired
for right-of-way
(Approximate)
:14
V
• .
ALTERNATIVE No. 4
I 6L1O7Ccos6Section
Right-of-Way Acquisition
Olivenhain Road-Westerly
Figure
MOM
•
ProjectDeszgn Consultants
-2 - • J.N. 737.00
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
V
Santa. Fe Ridge
Tract No. 83-16
I
Rancho Del Ponderosa
107' PROPOSED R/W
/. P
255-192-58
18. 16 14
19 18 17 16 15
14
Tract No.4579-1
NOTE:
This exhibit does not represent a detailed
title / right-of-way evaluation and is not intended
to be used as a right-of-way acquisition plat.
I
255-040-45
LAIC) I. h/. VV
VARIES
255-040-17
__________ • Land to be acquired
for right-of-way
(Approximate)
107' EXIST. R/W •
• \ \ \\\
107' Cross Section..
Right-of-Way Acquisition
Olivenhain Road-Easterly
. Figure 5-21)
PmjectDeszgn COnsultants
J.N. 737.00
SMITH _ NORTH
6 Lanes Through Traffic
SOUTH NORTH 107' Right-ofWay
90'
I
__i
I
7''i ii'
11
11' 10' 4' 11' 11' 11' 5'l 10' -I
I L[ Bike I ITua1 I I I Bike.I)
-. .i— - s_I . - I
I I Lane I Lan Lane
sI II I I liii I I II I, I I I III I i II iS..
Left Turn Lane
SOUTH 126 Right-of-Way NORTH
10
CE
53' -
wr
-
10' 20' 12' 12' 9' 9'.12' 12 20' 10'
,-5' Bike [ 18' 5'Bike
LlLanel Ret. Wall
Where Req'd.
6 Lanes Through Traffic
Road Cross Section
1079! 126' Right-of-Way
Figure 4
Project Design Consu&mts
intersections, the distance between the curbs is
increased to 90 feet by reducing the existing parkway
width on the north side of the road to 7 feet. Striping
could then be provided to accommodate six 11-foot lanes,
a 4-foot median, and a 10-foot left-turn pocket
(Figure 4, Page 30). The provision of the six-lane
facility within the. existing 107-foot right-of-way
eliminates the need for acquisition of additional right-
of-way from the property owners in Rancho Del Ponderosa
and Santa Fe Ridge subdivisions, along with the costly
retaining wall and franchise utility system relocation
along these same frontages.
The 126-foot right-of-way section west of the Rancho Del
Ponderosa subdivision would provide for 106 feet between
curbs, with four 12-foot lanes and two 20-foot lanes
separated by an 18-foot raised median. Through
intersections, the raised median would be reduced to an
8-foot width to accommodate a 10-foot left turn pocket.
Right-of-way Summary
Refer to the Appendix, which summarizes the approximate
areas and estimated costs associated with right-of-way
acquisition for each alignment. On the south side of
Olivenhain Road, adjacent to Encinitas Tract No. 4579-1,
acquisition of additional road right-of-way will be
31
I
I necessary across the frontage of Assessor's Parcels
I
255-221-31, 255-221-32, 255-222-46, 255-222-47,
255-040-45 and 255-040-17, regardless of which alignment
I is adopted.
I C. RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD INTERSECTION
.I
East of the western boundary of Rancho Del Ponderosa,
the improvements to Olivenhain Road as a six-lane prime
I arterial will be made along the alignment of the
existing road (Figure 6, Page 32). The existing road
I curves to the northeast along the frontage of the Santa
Fe Ridge subdivision to the intersection with Rancho
Santa Fe Road, where it matches the existing six-lane
improvements of Rancho Santa Fe Road to the north. The
existing curve has a centerline radius of 1,200 feet.
Approval will be needed from the City of Carlsbad to
construct the new road through the existing curve with
either a super-elevated cross-section, or with a. reduced
traffic speed, or both.
The southerly extension of Rancho Santa Fe Road is
identified in the City of Carlsbad General Plan as a
future four-lane arterial. This project will include
widening the south leg of the intersection to the
ultimate four-lane configuration and then transitioning
to the south to the existing two-lane facility. These
32
Rancho Santa Fe Ridge
Subdivision
Uc
NCO
-•Free right turn
to be abandoned
to be abandoned
0
Olivenhain Road /
Rancho Santa Fe Road
Intersection
Figure 6
L &TM ifP;i71
- 3'2> - J.N. 737.00
intersection improvements will require right-of-way
acquisition from the Olivenhain Water District parcel
(APN 255-031-03). The deletion of the free right-turn
lane to northbound Rancho Santa Fe Road and the removal
of the intersection bypass from eastbound Olivenhain
Road to southbound Rancho Santa Fe Road will also result
from improvement of this intersection (Figure 6,
Page 32). The right-of-way that will be vacated due to
removal of the intersection bypass could be exchanged to
offset new right-of-way acquisition on the Olivenhain
Water District property.
D. EL CANINO REAL INTERSECTION
Modifications will need to be made to El Camino Real at
the intersection of Olivenhain Road to accommodate the
new six-lane facility, regardless of which alignment is
adopted. A preliminary study by Rick Engineering
(Reference 'F', Page 38) indicated that the bridge under
El Camino Real and the existing channel west of El
Camino Real are extensively silted. These findings were
further corroborated in a study performed by Dr.
Howard H. Chang, P.E., September 1990 (Reference 'C',
Page 38). The bridge and roadway may need to be rebuilt
and raised to an elevation sufficient to provide for the
conveyance of the 100-year storm flows without
over-topping the road surface. Raising the bridge and
34
roadway may also require the relocating or raising of
any existing utilities within El Camino Real.
I An alternative solution to the existing capacity problem
of the existing bridge at the intersection of Olivenhain
I Road and El Camino Real would be to construct a
I
detention basin approximately 4,000 feet east of the
intersection.
The proposed detention basin would attenuate peak
stormwater discharge to a flow which would mitigate the
existing hydraulic problems associated with the bridge.
A berm with an outlet structure would be constructed
across the existing channel to control the rate of
stormwater discharge reaching the existing bridge. The
proposed detention basin would be constructed on
Assessor's Parcel Number 255-0.40-17 in the City of
Carlsbad. Refer to Reference 'G', Page 38 for more
specific details regarding the proposed detention basin
report prepared by Dr. Howard H. Chang, P.E..
Intersection modifications may also be needed when the
future westerly extension of Olivenhain Road is
constructed. These modifications are not considered in
this report, but should be addressed during the design
of the future extension.
35
E. CONSTRUCTION DETOURING
Traffic detouring will be an important consideration
I during the construction phase of this project. This
report, however, addresses the topic of detouring and
construction phasing only in a general sense.
Traffic detouring during the construction of the
Southern Alignment does not appear to be necessary.
Phasing the road construction by building one side at a
time should minimize road closures and allow for
portions of the existing road to be used for two-way
traffic.
The Northern Alignments can be constructed in phases,
utilizing the existing alignment for traffic flow while
slopes and the proposed northern half of Olivenhain Road
are constructed. Traffic would be routed to the newly
constructed northern half of Olivenhain Road while work
on the southern half of Olivenhain Road was performed.
The majority of environmental sensitive area south of
Olivenhain Road could be left undisturbed by this method
of construction. Some displacement of wetland
vegetation would be expected as a result of
construction. Along with the additional detouring and
phasing associated with this scheme, the time to
complete the proposed improvements would be longer and,
36
I
I therefore, traffic congestion and commuter inconvenience
would be longer.
I
The reconstruction of El Camino Real, if the proposed
I detention basin is not built, could be accomplished by
I constructing one side of the roadway at a time, with
traffic temporarily routed to the opposite side.
I
VIII. CONCLUSION
I As a result of the City of Carlsbad and the City of
Encinitas Council Subcommittee dated Wednesday, December 9, I 1990, Alignment No. 2, the most northerly alignment, was
I selected as the preferred project.for evaluation in the
Environmental Impact Report, which is being prepared by
I Brian F. Mooney and Associates. All other alignments will
be studied as alternatives in the EIR. Additionally, the I recommendation proposed by Dr. Howard H. Chang, P.E. for
I solving the current hydraulic problem at the intersection of
Olivenhain Road and El Camino Real will be evaluated along
I with Alignment No. 2 as the preferred project. The
alternative solution of raising El Camino Real and I constructing a new bridge with increased capacity should be
I considered as an alternative in the Environmental Impact
Report.
I
I
37
1]
II
IX. REFERENCES
"City of Carlsbad Growth Management Program, Local
Facilities Management Plan Zone 12," The William Hofmari
Company, Rick Engineering Company, and Weston Pringle &
Associates, January 20, 1988.
"City of Carlsbad Growth Management Program, Local
Facilities Management Plan Zone 11," The William Hofman
Company, Rick Engineering Company, and Weston Pringle &
Associates, January 20, 1988.
"Arroyo La Costa Master Plan, Draft Environmental Impact
Report," STA Planning, Inc., February 1989.
"General Plan, City of Carlsbad," May 1975.
"General Plan, City of Encinitas," March 29, 1989.
"Encinitas Creek Master Drainage Plan, City of Carlsbad
Zones 11, 12, and 23," Rick Engineering Company,
July 28, 1988.
"Drainage Study for Encinitas Creek," Howard H. Chang,
P.E., September 1990.
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATES
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
ef
APPENDICES
39
PRELIMINiIFtY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTihTE
OLIVENH111N ROAD ASSEIEITMEENT DISTRICT
FEER'UARV 27, 1991
SU11rM OF COSTS FOR ALL hLIGNMENTS WITH AND WITHOUT FROFOSED
DETENTION. INCLUDES COMMUW1T' FAILITIES DISTRICT
ADMINISTRATION COSTS.
AL 161 ENT 1
WITHOUT PROPOSED DETENTION 21.S6O,0()
WITH PROPOSED DETENTION • 19.320,000
ALIGNMENT 2
WITHJT PROPOSED DETENTION 5 17,830,000
WITH PROPOSED DETENTION % 15,900,000
ALIGNMENT 3
WITHOUT PROPOSED DETENTION 17,880,000
WITH PROPOSED DETENTION $ 15,650,0(a)
ALIGNMENT 4
WITHOUT PROPOSED DETENTION $ 14.940,000
WITH PROPOSED DETENTION 12,370,000
a
ALIGNMENT I WITHOUT PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
uI
I
I ALIGNMENT 1 WITHOUT PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991
SHEET I OF 5
SUMMARY TABLE
I ACQUISITIONS 2,010,000
ENVIRONMENTAL 600, c'Oi)
SITE PREPARATION 185,500
I GRADING 712,570
STORM DRAIN 395,031
STREETS - CONCRETE 221,408
I STREETS - PAVING 1,708,050
I LANDSCAPING 220,440
UTILITIES 1,093,000
•
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION 2,630,000
SUBTOTAL $9,775,999
PLUS 207. CONTINGENCY $1,955,200
PLUS 207. ENGINEERING, BONDS, & FEES $1,955,200
I
HYDROLOGY STUDY * $85,655
SUBTOTAL $13,772,054
FRANCHISE UTILITIES IN EXCESS OF 57. CAP 940,000
PLUS 207. CONTINGENCY 188,00t)
PLUS 207. ENGINEERING, BONDS & FEES 188,000
TOTAL PROJECT COST $15,088,054
377. COMMUNITY FACILITIES
I DISTRICT COST $8,088,327
TOTAL $21,860,381
See Exhibit A for General Assumptions.
See Exhibit B' for Items Included in the Assessment District.
* Hydrology Study was prepared by Dr. Chang for the Encinitas
Creek Basin, dated September 1990. The costs reflected herein
are for the completed study.
I .
I
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 2 OF 5
ACQUISITIONS
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
----------------------------
RIGHT OF WAY ACQUIS. 6.7 AC $300,000.00 $2,010,000
TOTAL $2,010,000
RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION COSTS ARE BASED ON AN ESTIMATED
PRICE OF $ 300,000 PER ACRE FOR PROPERTY WHICH IS NOT
OTHERWISE REQUIRED TO BE DEDICATED AND FOR WHICH AGREEMENTS
FOR ACQUISITION BY THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ARE NOT ALREADY IN PLACE.
LAND ACQUISITION INCLUDES THE ENTIRE NORTHWESTERN
RAILROAD PROPERTY.
ENVIRONMENTAL
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
MITIGATION 6 AC $100,000.00 $600,000
MONITOR & MAINTENANCE
TOTAL $600,000
ACREAGE OF WETLANDS MITIGATION IS ACTUAL CREATED AREA, BASED ON
DISTURBED AREA TIMES THE APPLICABLE MITIGATION FACTOR
(3:1 FOR WETLANDS).
MITIGATION, MONITORING, AND MAINTENANCE COSTS INCLUDE ESTIMATED
FOR PLANTING, REPLANTING, IRRIGATION, AND CONSULTING FEES
DURING THE COURSE OF THE 5 YEAR MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM.
SITE PREPARATION
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
CLEAR & GRUB 8.7 AC $1,000.00 $8,700
REMOVE EXIST. AC PAVE 221000 SF $0.80 $176,800
TOTAL $185,500
SEE GENERAL NOTE 9 - EXHIBIT A.
ALIGNMENT 1 WITHOUT PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 3 OF 5
GRADING
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
MOBILIZATION & CONST. WATER 214320 LS $1.00 $214,320
MASS EXCAVATION & COMPACTION 11330 CV $2.50 $28,325
IMPORT PREMIUM 28510 CV $4.00 $114,040
REMEDIAL REMOVE & RECOMPACT 78850 CV $3.50 $275,975
DEWATERING 50000 LS $1.00 $50,000
BUTTRESS 0 CV $4.50 $0
BUTTRESS DRAIN 0 15 $12.00 to
BROW DITCH 2180 IF $12.00 $26,160
EROSION CONTROL FENCE 2500 LF $1.50 $3,750
TOTAL $712,570
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF REMEDIAL GRADING WAS PROVIDED
BY GEOCON, INC. IN A PHONE CONVERSATION DATED AUGUST 9, 1989.
QUANTITY OF BUTTRESSING IS BASED ON A SOILS REPORT PREPARED
BY GEOCON, INC. ,DATED AUGUST 1989.
ALL EARTHWORK QUANTITIES ARE GEOMETRIC QUANTITIES.
POTENTIAL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE POSSIBLE USE OF RECLAIMED
WATER DURING CONSTRUCTION ARE NOT INCLUDED.
MOBILIZATION AND CONSTRUCTION SET UP COSTS WERE BASED ON 2
OF THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST.
STORM DRAIN
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
18" RCP 440 LF $60.00 $26,400
30" RCP 2000 LF $75.00 $150,000
TYPE A-4 CLEANOUT 12 EA $3,000.00 .336,000
TYPE B INLET 12 EA $3,310.00 $39,720
RIFRAP 880 CV $140.00 $123,2C)
REMOVE EXIST. RIP RAP 900 SF $1.00 $900
CLEANING & ACCEPTANCE 1BB11 IS $1.00 $18,811
TOTAL $395,031
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
CLEANING AND ACCEPTANCE COST IS ESTIMATED AT 5 OF THE TOTAL
COST FOR NEW STORIIWATER FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION.
ALIGNMENT I WITHOUT PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
DLI VENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 4 OF S
STREETS - CONCRETE
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
6" CURB & GUTTER 5250 LF $12.00 $63,000
F.C.C. SIDEWALK 19990 SF $2.50 $49,975
TYPE "B" MEDIAN CURB 6300 LF $12.00 $75,600
PCC ACCESS DRIVEWAYS 2500 SF $3.00 $7,500
PEDESTRIAN RAMP 6 EA $500.00 $3,000
CITY MONUMENTS 7 EA $315.00 $2,205
MAINTENANCE/ACCEPTANCE 20128 LS $1.00 $20,128
TOTAL $221,408
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
CONCRETE MAINTENANCE AND ACCEPTANCE IS ESTIMATED AT 10 X
OF THE TOTAL COST OF NEW CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION.
UNIT PRICES INCLUDE ESTIMATED WINTER CONSTRUCTION AND
SUBSRADE PREPARATION PRICES.
STREETS - PAVING
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
AC PAVEMENT 6"/20" 278300 SF $3.50 $974,050
2" PAVING AND FABRIC 199000. SF $1.30 $258,701)
STREET NAME SIGN 2 EA $250.00 $5(1)
SIGNAGE 1 EA $3,000.00 $3,000
STRIPING 52000 LF $0.45 $23,400
TRAFFIC SIGNAL . 2 EA $100,000.00 $200,000
SIGNAL MODIFICATION 1 EA $60,000.00 $60,000
GUARD RAIL 1200 LF $32.00 $38,400
TRAFFIC CONTROL 150000 LS $1.00 $150,000
TOTAL $1,708,050
* SEE GENERAL NOTE B - EXHIBIT A.
NEW TRAFFIC SIGNAL LOCATIONS AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF OLIVENHAIN
ROAD - EL CAMINO REAL AND RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD.
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION AT THE INTERSECTION OFOLIVENHAIN
ROAD AND AMARGOSA DRIVE.
ALIGNMENT 1 WITHOUT PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 5 OF 5
LANDSCAPING
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
PLANT & IRRIGATION 127600 LS $0.65 $82,940
MEDIAN AND PARKWAYS 55000 SF $2.50 $137,500
TOTAL $220,440
* SEE GENERAL NOTE B - EXHIBIT A.
FRANCHISE UTILITIES
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
RELOCATE 30' GAS, 16"&10" FUEL LINES 0 LS $1.00 $0
ELECTRIC AND GAS DIST. 596000 LS $1.00 $596,000
PAC BELL RELOCATIONS 1000000 LS $1.00 $1,000,000
STREET LIGHTS 29 EA $3,000.00 $87,000
REMOVE/REPLACE 12'WATER LINE 2000 LF $50.00 $100,000
RELOCATE GAS FRV STATION 250000 LS $1.00 250000
SUBTOTAL $2,033, 000
5 X CAP (SEE NOTE 2 BELOW) $1,093,000
REMAINDER TO BE FUNDED BY OTHERS $940,000
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
A $ 1,000,000 LUMP SUM COST FOR RELOCATING PACIFIC BELL
FACILITIES HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE ESTIMATE, SEE ATTACHED LETTER
DATED, JANUARY 22, 1991. THIS COST IS SUBJECT TO FURTHER
REFINEMENT.
FRANCHISE UTILITY COSTS ARE FROM A LETTER BY UTILITY SPECIALISTS
INC., DATED, JUNE 9, 1989.
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS ESTIMATE, A CAP OF 57. OF THE TOTAL
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT COST IS APPLIED TO FRANCHISE UTILITIES.
THE COST BALANCE IS TO BE FUNDED BY OTHER SOURCES.
TOTAL FRANCHISE UTILITIES COST DOES NOT INCLUDE POTENTIAL
REFUNDS AND REIMBURSEMENTS OF $ 390,000.
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
EX. BRIDGE DEMOLITION 75000 LS $1.00 $75,000
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION 36500 SF $70.00 $2,555,000
TOTAL $2,630,000
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ALIGNMENT
LAND ACQUISITION FOR 1071/1261 RIGHT-OF-WAY
ALIGNMENT NO. 1
I Area
APN (± 0.1 Ac.) Cost @ $300,000/Ac.
255-024-01 3.6 1,080,000
255-031-03 .4 120,000
255-040-06 1.1 333,000
255-040-17 .3 90,000
255-040-45 .5 150,000
255-221-31 .2 60,000
255-221-32 .2 60,000
255-222-46 .2 60,000
255-222-47 .2 60,000
TOTAL 6.7 $2,010,000
NOTE: Areas are approximate and are for comparison
purposes only.
R/737-APPX 1
9 Project Design Consultants
PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING
EXHIBIT 'A'
OLIVENHAIN ROAD CONSTRUCTION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT COST ESTIMATE
These cost estimates are based on 200-scale Conceptual
Alignment Studies. These cost estimates represent the best
estimate of construction costs by the Engineer.. Unit costs
and quantities, in some cases, have been provided by others.
The plans used in producing these estimates have not received
final approval. Cost figures are estimates only, and the
Engineer is not responsible for fluctuations in cost factors
or changes in quantities resulting from final design or agency
processing.
The costs associated with forming and administering the
Assessment District are included in this cost estimate.
4 Items included in this estimate are based on the list in
Exhibit 'B', as defined by the City of Carlsbad Policy No. 33.
Costs associated with construction of reclaimed water mains,
use of reclaimed water during construction, and use of
reclaimed water for irrigation are not included in this cost
estimate.
Information regarding the sizing of utilities is available
I upon request.
For the purposes of the Assessment District funding, a cap of
5% of the total district cost estimate is applied to franchise
utilities. The cost balance, if any, .is to be funded by other
sources.
. .
Line items marked by an: asterisk define quantities and
associated cost which. would be reduced/increased by
construction of a detention basin as recommended in the
"Drainage Study for Encinitas Creek" prepared by Dr. Howard H.
Chang, P.E., September 1990. The detention basin is an
alternative method of solving the current hydraulic capacity
problem associated with the . existing bridge at the
intersection of Olivenhain Road and El Camino Real.
~ I
~ I
~ I
2C/737-EXHB.'A'
March 5, 1991
San Diego 701 San Dicgn 6I9.2.641 Tcmecula 41661 Temecula 7146944200
It Street Calilnrnia FAX 2340349 Enterprise Circle N. Calilisrnia FAX 694-4205
Suite 800 02101 1 Suite 221 923911
® 100%
Recycled
Paper
~ I
~ I
Project Design Consultants V
PLANNING. ENGINEERING SURVEYING
EXHIBIT 'B'
ITEMS PROPOSED TO BE INCLUDED IN THE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD CONSTRUCTION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
I. ACQUISITIONS
A. Right-of-way ..acquisition. is included only for those
properties which are not required to dedicate or may not
voluntarily dedicated right-of-way. . .
II. ENVIRONMENTAL V
A. Environmental mitigation, monitoring and maintenance
associated with impacts caused by the road improvements
are included. V
III. GRADING
A.. Where the road is adjacent to development areas, grading
within vertical lines at the road right-of-way limits is
included.
B. Where the road is adjacent to open space areas (future or
existing), slopes to daylight are included in this cost
estimate. V .
IV. UTILITIES (STORM DRAIN, SANITARY SEWER, WATER)
All utility costs within the.-road right-of-way are
included (sewer, water,. storm drain).
Storm drain crossings - only portions needed because of
road construction are included.
V. IMPROVEMENTS (STREETS: CONCRETE AND PAVING) •
All surface improvements are included. V
Construction detours and traffic control costs are
included.
1
San Diego I 701 San Diego 619.235-6471 Temecula 41661 Temecula 714-691-42110 10(1%
8 Street California FAX 234-0349 . Enterprise Circle N. California FAX 694-4203 Recycled
Suite 800 921111 . Suite 221 92390 Fairer
VI. LANDSCAPING '' S
Slope landscaping outside right-of-way as described in
Item III.B. above is included.
Median and parkway landscaping, is included.
VII. FRANCHISE UTILITIES S
A. All franchise utilities within the road right-of-way are
included, up to a maximum of 5% of Assessment District
cost. '
VIII., INCIDENTALS S S
A. The following are included in allowance for "Engineering,
Fees and Bonds":' S
EIR costs.
Costs for design of 'the facilities. S
Soils investigation and. 'compaction monitoring costs.
4. Route Adoption Report preparation costs. •
5. Cost associated with plan check and inspection fees.
2C/737-EXHB.'B' S • S March 5, .1991 • • 2
Ri 3! Vtia:nn
1337 bade Street. Room 5410
San Oe;o. Cahiorna 9211
I611 bi5 29Gb
I . . January 22, 1991
PACIFIC BELL,.
A Psc.l.c leei.,s Co..ony
LS
I Patrick Murphy
Z:F E
1
Community Development Department . . .- . .
. City of Encinitas...... . . ... . . . . . . .. .. .
527 Encinitas Boulevard . .
Encinitas, CA 92024
I . RE: Draft Environmental Impact Report for Olivenhain Road
Alignment Case No. 90-259
I
. In response to your letter dated January 3, 1991, I would
l
i
k
e
t
o
point out some major concerns of Pacific Bell.
I ..
On the "Environmental Impact Assessment form 7 Part II" und
e
r
t
h
e
heading "fluman Environment" item number 18, the "X" was p
l
a
c
e
d
u
n
d
e
r
"Yes (insig)" as to the affect on public utilities.
I
The affect on the telephone plant would be very significant
.
I have attached a marked copy of our facilities affect
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
p
r
o
-
I.
. ject.. While it is difficult to determine the amount of conflict
without improvement plans, it is probable that our entire s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
would have to be relocated to maintain a safe access into o
u
r
I.
manholes in an area near the edge of the right of way.
Our cost to relocate our facilities is estimated to be i
n
e
x
c
e
s
s
o
f
I.............
. . S1,000,000.00. We will require a position behind the
u
l
t
i
m
a
t
e
c
u
r
b
-
line of the proposed final six-lane alignment if possible
.
W
e
w
i
l
l
need the new roadbed to be near final grade before our f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
c
a
n
be placed and our existing facilities must remain in s
e
r
v
i
c
e
u
n
t
i
l
I
all cable are in, spliced, tested and working in the Dew'.system. ......
Please-provide improvement plans at your earliest conven
i
e
n
c
e
.
.
I..
Sincerely,
Danny7Bchanan .. . . .,. ,.. .
Liaison
..-
-
I. .
. ....
. .
- . -... ..
..
I . . ..
. . . ... .
ALIGNMENT 1 WITH PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
I
I ALIGNMENT 1 WITH PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE S
1
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 1 OF 6
I SUMMARY. TABLE
I ACQUISITIONS 2,010,000
- ENVIRONMENTAL 600,000
SITE PREPARATION 115,100
I GRADING 658,679
STORM DRAIN 186,879
STREETS - CONCRETE 1391332
• STREETS - PAVING 1,365,290
I LANDSCAPING 151,940
UTILITIES 966,000
I
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION
DETENTION BASIN
1,610,000
829500
SUBTOTAL $8!632,720
I
PLUS 207. CONTINGENCY $1,726,544
• PLUS 207. ENGINEERING, BONDS, & FEES $1,726,544
I HYDROLOGY STUDY * $85,655
SUBTOTAL $12,171,463
I
FRANCHISE UTILITIES IN EXCESS OF 57. CAP 1,015,000
PLUS 207. CONTINGENCY 203,000 I PLUS 207. ENGINEERING, BONDS & FEES 203,000
I TOTAL PROJECT COST $13,592,463
377 COMMUNITY FACILITIES
I DISTRICT COST $7,148,300
TOTAL $19,319,763
I
See Exhibit for General Assumptions.
See Exhibit B for Items Included in the Assessment District.
I * Hydrology Study was prepared by Dr. Chang for the Encinitas
Creek Basin, dated September 1990. The costs
are for the completed study.
reflected herein
I.
ALIGNMENT 1 WITH PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 2 OF 6
ACQUISITIONS
DESCRIPTION
RIGHT OF WAY ACQUIS.
QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
6.7 AC $300,000.00 $2,010,000
TOTAL $2,010,000
RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION COSTS ARE BASED ON AN ESTIMATED
PRICE OF $ 300,000 PER ACRE FOR PROPERTY WHICH IS NOT
OTHERWISE REQUIRED TO BE DEDICATED AND FOR WHICH AGREEMENTS
FOR ACQUISITION BY THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ARE NOT ALREADY IN PLACE.
LAND ACQUISITION INCLUDES THE ENTIRE NORTHWESTERN
RAILROAD PROPERTY.
ENVIRONMENTAL
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
MITIGATION 6 AC $100,000.00 $600,000
MONITOR & MAINTENANCE
TOTAL $600,000
ACREAGE OF WETLANDS MITIGATION IS ACTUAL CREATED AREA, BASED ON
DISTURBED AREA TIMES THE APPLICABLE MITIGATION FACTOR
(3:1 FOR WETLANDS).
MITIGATION, MONITORING, AND MAINTENANCE COSTS INCLUDE ESTIMATED
FOR PLANTING, REPLANTING, IRRIGATION, AND CONSULTING FEES
DURING THE COURSE OF THE 5 YEAR MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM.
SITE PREPARATION
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY LftilT PRICE TOTAL
CLEAR & GRUB 8.7 AC $1,000.00 $B,700
REMOVE EXIST. AC PAVE 133000 SF $0.80 $106,400
TOTAL $115,100
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
ALIGNMENT 1 WITH PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 3 OF 6
GRADING
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
MOBILIZATION & CONST. WATER 192954 LS $1.00 $192,954
MASS EXCAVATION & COMPACTION 2800 CY $2.50 $7,000
EXPORT PREMIUM 25710 CV $4.00 $102,841)
REMEDIAL REMOVE & RECOMPACT 78850 CY $3.50 $275,975
DEWATERING 50000 LS $1.00 $50,000
BUTTRESS 0 CV $4.50 $0
BUTTRESS DRAIN 0 LF $12.00 $0
BROW DITCH 2180 LF $12.01) $26,160
EROSION CONTROL FENCE 25('A) LF $1.50 $3,750
TOTAL $658,679
* SEE GENERAL NOTE B - EXHIBIT A.
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF REMEDIAL GRADING WAS PROVIDED
BY GEOCON, INC. IN A PHONE CONVERSATION DATED AUGUST 9, 1989.
QUANTITY OF BUTTRESSING IS BASED ON A SOILS REPORT PREPARED
BY GEOCON, INC. ,DATED AUGUST 1989.
ALL EARTHWORK QUANTITIES ARE GEOMETRIC QUANTITIES.
POTENTIAL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE POSSIBLE USE OF RECLAIMED
WATER DURING CONSTRUCTION ARE NOT INCLUDED.
MOBILIZATION AND CONSTRUCTION SET UP COSTS WERE BASED ON 2 X
OF THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST.
STORM DRAIN
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
18" RCP 0 LF $60.00 $0
30" RCP 1780 LF $75.00 $133,500
TYPE A-4 CLEANOIJT 6 EA $3,000.00 $18,000
TYPE B INLET 8 EA $3,310.00 $26,480
RIPRAP 0 CV $140.00 $0
REMOVE EXIST. RIP RAP 0 SF $1.00 $0
CLEANING & ACCEPTANCE 8899 LS $1.00 $8,899
TOTAL $186,879
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
CLEANING AND ACCEPTANCE COST IS ESTIMATED AT 57. OF THE TOTAL
COST FOR NEW STORMWATER FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION.
ALIGNMENT 1 WITH PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 4 OF 6
STREETS - CONCRETE
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
6 CURB & GUTTER 3150 LF $12.00. $37,800
P.C.C. SIDEWALK 11590 SF $2.50 $28,975
TYPE RB" MEDIAN CURB 4500 IF $12.00 $54,000
PCC ACCESS DRIVEWAYS 500 SF $3.00 $1,500
PEDESTRIAN RAMP 5 EA $500.00 $2,500
CITY MONUMENTS 6 EA $315.00 $1,090
MAINTENANCE/ACCEPTANCE 12667 LS $1.00 $12,667
TOTAL $139,332
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
CONCRETE MAINTENANCE AND ACCEPTANCE IS ESTIMATED AT 10 7.
OF THE TOTAL COST OF NEW CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION.
UNIT PRICES INCLUDE ESTIMATED WINTER CONSTRUCTION AND
SUBSRADE PREPARATION PRICES.
STREETS - PAVING
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
AC PAVEMENT 6'/20" 181500 SF $3.50 $635,250
2 PAVING AND FABRIC 199000 SF $1.30 $258,700
STREET NAME SIGN 2 EA $250.00 $500
SIGNAGE 1 EA $3,000.00 $3,000
STRIPING 43200 IF $0.45 $19,440
TRAFFIC SIGNAL 2 EA $100,000.00 $200,000
SIGNAL MODIFICATION 1 EA $60,000.00 $60,000
GUARD RAIL 1200 IF $32.00 $38,400
TRAFFIC CONTROL 150000 LS $1.0') $150,000
TOTAL $1,365,290
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
NEW TRAFFIC SIGNAL LOCATIONS AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF OLIVENHAIN
ROAD - EL CANING REAL AND RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD.
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION AT THE INTERSECTION OF OLIVENHAIN
ROAD AND AMARGOSA DRIVE.
ALIGNMENT 1 WITH PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 5 OF 6
LANDSCAPING
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
PLANT & IRRIGATION 127600 LB $0.65 $82,940
MEDIAN AND PARKWAYS 27600 SF $2.50 $69,000
TOTAL $151,940
QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
0 LS $1.00 $0
596000 LB $1.00 $596,000
1000000 LB $1.00 $1,000,000
20 EA $3,000.00 $60,000
1500 LF $50.00 $75,000
250000 LB $1.00 250000
SUBTOTAL $1,981,000
5 CAP (SEE NOTE 2 BELOW) $966,001)
REMAINDER TO BE FUNDED BY OTHERS $1,015,000
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
FRANCHISE UTILITIES
-----------------------------
DESCRIPTION
RELOCATE 30 GAS, 16&10' FUEL LINES
ELECTRIC AND GAS DIST.
PAC BELL RELOCATIONS
STREET LIGHTS
REt1OVEIREPLACE 12WATER LINE
RELOCATE GAS PRV STATION
* SEE GENERAL NOTE B - EXHIBIT A.
A $ 1,000,000 LUMP SUN COST FOR RELOCATING PACIFIC BELL
FACILITIES HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE ESTIMATE SEE ATTACHED LETTER
DATED, JANUARY 22, 1991. THIS COST IS SUBJECT TO FURTHER
REFINEMENT.
FRANCHISE UTILITY COSTS ARE FROM A LETTER BY UTILITY SPECIALISTS
INC., DATED, JUNE 9, 1989.
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS ESTIMATE, A CAP OF 57. OF THE TOTAL
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT COST IS APPLIED TO FRANCHISE UTILITIES.
THE COST BALANCE IS TO BE FUNDED BY OTHER SOURCES.
TOTAL FRANCHISE UTILITIES COST DOES NOT INCLUDE POTENTIAL
REFUNDS AND REIMBURSEMENTS OF $ 390,000.
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
EX. BRIDGE DEMOLITION 0 LS $1.00 $0
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION 23000 SF $70.00 $1,610,000
TOTAL $1,610,000
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
ALIGNMENT 1 WITH PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN RI)AD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 6 OF 6
DETENTION BASIN
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
LAND ACQUISITION 12 AC $50,000.00 $600,000
CLEAR AND GRUB 11 AC $1,500.00 $16,500
EXCAVATION AND COMPACTION 62000 CY $2.50 $155,000
CUTLET STRUCTURE 14000 LS $1.00 $14,000
HYDRO-SEEDING 11 AC $4,000.00 $44,000
TOTAL $829,500
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ALIGNMENT
LAND ACQUISITION FOR 1071/126 RIGHT-OF-WAY
ALIGNMENT NO. 1
Area
APN (± 0.1 Ac.) Cost @ $300,000/Ac.
255-024-01 3.6 1,080,000
255-031-03 .4 120,000
I 255-040-06 1.1 333,000
255-040-17 .3 90,000
255-040-45 .5 150,000
255-221-31 .2 60,000
255-221-32 .2 60,000
255-222-46 .2 60,000
255-222-47 .2 60,000
TOTAL . 6.7 $2,010,000
NOTE: Areas are approximate and are for comparison
purposes only.
R/737-APPX 1
U
I?
Project Design Consultants
PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING
EXHIBIT 'A'
OLIVENHAIN ROAD CONSTRUCTION
. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT COST ESTIMATE
1. These cost estimates are based on 200-scale Conceptual
Alignment Studies. These cost estimates represent the best
U estimate of construction costs by the Engineer.. Unit costs
and quantities, in some cases, have been provided by others.
.
2. The plans used in producing these estimates have not received U final approval. Cost figures are estimates only, and the
Engineer is not responsible for fluctuations in cost factors
or changes in quantities resulting from final design or agency
I processing.
The costs associated with forming and administering the
I Assessment District are included in this cost estimate.
Items included in this estimate are based on the list in
I Exhibit 'B', as defined by the City of Carlsbad Policy No. 33.
Costs associated with construction of reclaimed water mains,
use of reclaimed water during construction, and use of
I reclaimed water for irrigation are not included in this cost
estimate. .
I . Information regarding the sizing of utilities is available
upon request. .
For the purposes of the Assessment District funding, a cap of
U
.
5% of the total district cost estimate is applied to franchise
utilities. The cost balance, if any, is to be funded by other
I
sources. .
Line items marked -by an, asterisk define quantities and
associated cost which would be reduced/ increased by
construction of a detention basin, as recommended in the I "Drainage Study for Encinitas Creek" prepared by Dr. Howard H..
Chang, P.E., September 1990. The detention basin is an
I
. alternative method of solving the current hydraulic capacity
problem associated with the existing bridge at the
intersection of Olivenhain Road and El Camino Real.
17
2C/737-EXHB. 'A'
March 5, 1991
I S2n Diego 701 San Diego 6I9-23540I . Temecula 41661 Tcmccula 711691.12011 11)11%
I) Street (tIiIrrnia FAX 24.0)49 Enterprise Circle N. CaliI,,rnia FAX 694.421)
Suite MIMI 1211)l Suite 221 92390 per
Project Design Consultants.
PLANNING ENGINEERiNG SURVEYING
EXHIBIT 'B'
ITEMS PROPOSED TO BE INCLUDED IN THE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD CONSTRUCTION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
I.- ACQUISITIONS . .
A. Right-of-way acquisition is included only for those
properties which are not required to dedicate or may not
voluntarily dedicated right-of-way.
II. ENVIRONMENTAL .
A. Environmental mitigation, monitoring and maintenance
associated with .iinpacts caused by the road improvements
are included.
III. GRADING
Where the road is adjacent .to development areas, grading
within vertical lines at the road right-of-way limits is
included.
Where the road is adjacent to open space areas (future or
existing), slopes to daylight are included in this cost
estimate.
IV. UTILITIES (STORM DRAIN, SANITARY SEWER, WATER)
A. All utility costs within the'..-road right-of-way are
included (sewer, water,. storm drain).
B. Storm drain crossings - only portions needed because of
road construction are included.
V. IMPROVEMENTS (STREETS: CONCRETE AND PAVING)
All surface improvements are included. . .
Construction detours and traffic control costs are
included. .
1
Sn Diego 701 San Diego 619•2356471 Temecula 41661 Temecula 714.691-4200 100%
B Street California FAX 234.0349 Enterprise Circle N. Callrornii FAX 694-4203 Recycled
Suite R011 92101 Suite 221 92390 Paper
- VI. LANDSCAPING
Slope landscaping outside right-of-way as described in
Item III.B. above is included.
Median and parkway landscaping is included.
VII. FRANCHISE UTILITIES • •
A. All franchise utilities within the road right-of-way are
included, up to a maximum of 5% of Assessment District
cost. •
VIII. INCIDENTALS • - •
A. The following are included in allowance for "Engineering,
Fees and Bonds": • • •
EIR costs.
Costs for design of the facilities.
Soils investigation and 'compaction monitoring costs.
Route Adoption Report preparation costs.
Cost associated with plan check and inspection fees.
2C/737-EXHB.'B'
March 5, 1991 2
R ! Vav'1i:snn
1337 1'ade Siieat. Room 5410
San Diego. Cahiono 97I1
PAC IF1CIBELL .
A l,,e,s Co—o—, I
Janu a ry
'•'•' ::::: . .. .
.:.
91 JA 25199,
Y OF
. '. Community Development Department
City of Eocinitas........ . . .' . . . . . . . . •,
521 Encinitas Boulevard . .
Encinitas, CA 92024 .' .
.
RE: Draft Environmental Impact Report for Olivenhain
R
o
a
d
Alignment Case No. 90-259 . . .
In response to your letter dated January '3, 1991, I wo
u
l
d
l
i
k
e
t
o
point out some major concerns of Pacific Bell.
On the "Environmental Impact Assessment form
- Part II" under the
heading "Buman Environment" item number' 18, the "X" was placed under
"Yes '(insiq)" as to the affect on public utilities.
The affect on the telephone plant would be very significant.
I have attached a marked' copy of our facilities affe
c
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
p
r
o
-
ject., 'Vhile it is difficult to determine the amou
n
t
o
f
c
o
n
f
l
i
c
t
'witbbut improyément plans, it is probable that our enti
r
e
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
'
'
would have to be relocated to 'maintain a safe access i
n
t
o
o
u
r
manholes in an area near the edge of the right of way
.
Our cost to relocate our facilities is estimated to
b
e
i
n
e
x
c
e
s
s
o
f
51,000,000.00. We will require a position behind t
h
e
u
l
t
i
m
a
t
e
curb.-.-.-
line of the proposed final six-lane alignment if poss
i
b
l
e
.
W
e
w
i
l
l
need the new roadbed to be near final grade before ou
r
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
c
a
n
• be placed and our existing facilities must remain 'i
n
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
u
n
t
i
l
all cable are in, spliced, tested and working in the
n
e
w
'
s
y
s
t
e
m
.
Please•provide improvement plans at your earliest
c
o
n
v
e
n
i
e
n
c
e
.
' '•' '•.
Sincerely,
Danny7Bchanan '. ' ' ••.. ' '•'
Liaison '' '• ' ' • .' '. 2
ALIGNMENT Z. WITHOUT PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
ALIGNMENT 2 WITHOUT PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OUVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 1 OF 5
SUMMARY TABLE
ACQUISITIONS 2,190,000
ENVIRONMENTAL 150,000
SITE PREPARATION 188,400
GRADING 804,793
STORM DRAIN 430,721
STREETS - CONCRETE 251,279
STREETS - PAVING 1,808,500
LANDSCAPING 247, 103
UTILITIES 893,996
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION -1,020,000
SUBTOTAL $7,984,791
PLUS 207. CONTINGENCY $1,596,958
PLUS 207. ENGINEERING, BONDS, & FEES $1,596,958
HYDROLOGY STUDY * $85,655
SUBTOTAL $11,264,362
FRANCHISE UTILITIES IN EXCESS OF 57. CAP 1,470,004
PLUS 207. CONTINGENCY 294,001
PLUS 207. ENGINEERING, BONDS & FEES 294,001
TOTAL PROJECT COST $13,322,368
377. COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT COST $6,615,560
TOTAL $17,879,922
See Exhibit 'A' for General Assumptions.
See Exhibit 'B' for Items Included in the Assessment District.
* Hydrology Study was prepared by Dr. Chang for the Encinitas
Creek Basin, dated September 1990. The costs reflected herein
are for the completed study.
ALIGNMENT 2 WITHOUT PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 2 OF 5
ACQUISITIONS
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
RIGHT OF WAY ACQUIS. 7.3 AC $300,000.00 $2,190,000
TOTAL $2,190,000
RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION COSTS ARE BASED ON AN ESTIMATED
PRICE OF $ 300,000 PER ACRE FOR PROPERTY WHICH IS NOT
OTHERWISE REQUIRED TO BE DEDICATED AND FOR WHICH AGREEMENTS
FOR ACQUISITION BY THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ARE NOT ALREADY IN PLACE.
LAND ACQUISITION INCLUDES THE ENTIRE NORTHWESTERN
RAILROAD PROPERTY.
ENVIRONMENTAL
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
MITIGATION 1.5 AC $100,000.00 $150000
MONITOR &. MAINTENANCE
TOTAL $150,000
ACREAGE OF WETLANDS MITIGATION IS ACTUAL CREATED AREA, BASED ON
DISTURBED AREA TIMES THE APPLICABLE MITIGATION FACTOR
(3:1 FOR WETLANDS).
MITIGATION, MONITORING, AND MAINTENANCE COSTS INCLUDE ESTIMATED
FOR PLANTING, REFLANTINI3, IRRIGATION, AND CONSULTING FEES
DURING THE COURSE OF THE 5 YEAR MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM.
SITE PREPARATION
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
CLEAR & GRUB 11.6 AC $1,000.00 $11,600
* REMOVE EXIST. AC PAVE 221000 SF $0.80 $176,800
TOTAL $188,400
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
*
*
*
*
*
ALIGNMENT 2 WITHOUT PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 3 OF 5
GRADING
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
MOBILIZATION & CONST. WATER 115000 IS $1.00 $115,000
MASS EXCAVATION ¶ COMPACTION 68570 CV $2.50 $171,425
EXPORT PREMIUM 47070 CV $4.00 $188,280
REMEDIAL REMOVE & RECONPACT 36270 CV $3.50 $126,945
DENATERING 50000 IS $1.00 $50, 000
BUTTRESS 20885 CI $4.50 $93,983
BUTTRESS DRAIN 1500 LF $12.00 $18,000
BRON DITCH 3180 LF $12.00 $38,160
EROSION CONTROL FENCE 2000 LF $1.50 $3,000
TOTAL $804,793
* SEE GENERAL NOTE B - EXHIBIT A.
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF REMEDIAL GRADING WAS PROVIDED
BY GEOCON, INC. IN A PHONE CONVERSATION DATED AUGUST 9, 1989.
QUANTITY OF BUTTRESSING IS BASED ON A SOILS REPORT PREPARED
BY GEOCON, INC. ,DATED AUGUST 1989.
ALL EARTHWORK QUANTITIES ARE GEOMETRIC QUANTITIES.
POTENTIAL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE POSSIBLE USE OF RECLAIMED
WATER DURING CONSTRUCTION ARE NOT INCLUDED.
MOBILIZATION AND CONSTRUCTION SET UP COSTS WERE BASED ON 2 7.
OF THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST.
STORM DRAIN
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
l8n RCP 680 LF $60.00 $40,800
30RCP 2300 LF $75.00 $172,500
TYPE A-4 CLEANOUT 13 EA $3,000.00 $39,000
TYPE B INLET 12 EA $3,310.00 '$39,720
RIPRAP 880 CI $140.00 $123,200
REMOVE EXIST. RIP RAP 900 SF $1.00 $9010
CLEANING & ACCEPTANCE 14601 LS $1.00 $14,601
TOTAL $430,721
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
CLEANING AND ACCEPTANCE COST IS ESTIMATED AT 57. OF THE TOTAL
COST FOR NEW STORt1WATER FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION.
I,
I
ALIGNMENT 2 WITHOUT FROFOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 4 OF 5
STREETS - CONCRETE
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
6n CURB & GUTTER 6000 IF $12.00 $72,000
P.C.C. SIDEWALK 27000 SF $2.50 $67,500
TYPE B" MEDIAN CURB 6300 IF $12.00 $75,600
FCC ACCESS DRIVEWAYS 2500 SF $3.00 $7,500
PEDESTRIAN RAMP 6 EA $500.00 $3,000
CITY MONUMENTS 9 EA $315.00 $2,835
MAINTENANCE/ACCEPTANCE 22844 LS $1.00 $22,844
TOTAL $251,279
* SEE GENERAL NOTE B - EXHIBIT A.
CONCRETE MAINTENANCE AND ACCEPTANCE IS ESTIMATED AT 10 7.
OF THE TOTAL COST OF NEW CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION.
UNIT FREES INCLUDE ESTIMATED WINTER CONSTRUCTION AND
SUBl3Rc,DE PREPARATION PRICES.
STREETS - PAVING
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
AC PAVEMENT 6V20' 283000 SF $3.50 $990,500
r PAVING AND FABRIC 199000 SF $1.30 $258,700
STREET NAME SIGN 2 EA $250.00 $500
S1GNAGE 1 EA $3,000.00 $3,001)
STRIPING 52000 IF $0.45 $23,400
TRAFFIC SIGNAL 2 E $100,000.00 $2001001)
SIGNAL MODIFICATION 1 EA $60,000.00 $60,000
GUARD RAIL 700 IF $32.00 $22,400
TRAFFIC CONTROL 250000 IS $1.00 $250,000
TOTAL $1,.808,500
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
NEW TRAFFIC SIGNAL LOCATIONS AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF OLIVENHAIN
ROAD - EL CAIIINO REAL AND RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD.
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION AT THE INTERSECTION OF OLIVENHAIN
ROAD AND AMARGOSA DRIVE.
U II8IHX3 - 8 310N 1U0439 338 '
000 'OZO '1$ 1UIOI
000'6s 000L$ JS 0041 t40113f))I1SU03 39UI18
000'4L$ 001$ Si 0009L NOIIflOWJU 390fl19 •X3
iU101 3318d IINI1 A1I1NUfl N3I1dDJ3S3Q
----------------------------------------------------------
N0IJ2IièJ1SlO3 3E)UIS
000'0622 $ JO S1N32SflSWI3 UNU S0Nfld3J
1UI1N31Od 3fli314I AN S300 1903 9311111111 3SIH3NU'dJ 1UIOI
533:flQ9 3H10 AS U3N1lJ 39 01 SI 33NU1U9 1503 3H1
S3I11iI1fl 3SIH31-IVJ 01 G3I1d.0 SI 1503 13I1SIU IN314SS30SU
1UIOI 3H1 J0 4 JO dU3 U '3IUWIIS3 SIHJ. JO S360d'dfld 3H1 80J Z
E) 34flf '031U0 '3N1
S1SIiUI33dS Allillfl AS 831131 U WOiJ 3U 51803 A1IiI111 35I041 J
llflI43NId3J
3H1flJ 131 133fSflS SI 1O3 SIHI 1661 AUnN1J1' '03IU(1
31131 U3H3VIIU 335 '3IUWII53 3H1 01 (IJOQU N339 SUH S3I1I1I3UJ
1139 3tJI3Ud 9NI1U30138 80J 1503 14115 dWfli 000'000'1 $ U •1
'V LIGIHX3 - 8 310N iU0439 339 '
00'0L''I$ S.3HI0 AS 03QNflJ 39 01 OUNIVW38
966'68$ (110139 Z 310N 339) dUJ 7. 9
:o 'p92 'zs i91O18flS
3N11 J31UM
000 '001$ 000c$ Ji 000 21 33Uid3/3AOU3I
000'6$ 00000'$ U3 I 51H911 13381S
000'000'I$ 001$ Si 0000001 SN0I1V3013 1139 DUd
000'969$ 001$ Si 000964 15113 SUE) GNU 311i3313
000'4L4$ 00.1$ Si 0004L4 S3NIi 13113 019I 'SUE) .01 31U30138
iU1O1 33Pid 1lNfl A1I1NUf11 NOI1dI83S3U
S3llflllfl 3SIH3NUJJ
U IISIHX3 - 8 31ON iUd3N39 335 *
L0I'LbZ$ iU101
009'LI$ 09Z$ 38 00049 SAU90d UNJ NUIU3W
09'601$ 990$ Si (JZ989I NOI1U9II I 1Iid
iU101 33Id IINIl • A1I1NU1iJ NOI1dI3S3O
9N IdU3S0NUi
4 30 4 133H5 1661 'L AUI1d93J
13I1SIG IN3WSS3SSU UU0I NIUHN3AI10
3IUWIIS3 1803 N0I13fl11SNO3 AUNIWIi3d
N011N3130 U3SOdO8d 1110111111 Z IN3WN911U
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ALIGNMENT
LAND ACQUISITION FOR 1071 /126' RIGHT-OF-WAY
ALIGNMENT NOS. 2 AND 3
I I Area
APN (± 0.1 Ac.)
i
Cost @ $300,000/Ac.
255-023-01 3.9 $1,170,000
255-023-02 .9 I 270,000
255-024-01 .3 90,000
255-031-03 I
•
• 120,000
255-040-06
I
.2 60,000
255-040-17 .3 t 90,000
255-040-45 1 . 150,000
55-221-31 .2 60,000
255-221-32 .2 60,000
255-222-46 .2 • 60,000
255-222-47 .2
t
60,000
TOTAL 7.3 $2,190,000
NOTE: Areas are approximate and are for comparison
purposes only.
R/737-APPX 2
Project Design consul/ants
PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING
EXHIBIT 'A'
OLIVENHAIN ROAD CONSTRUCTION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT COST ESTIMATE
These cost estimates are based on 200-scale Conceptual
Alignment Studies. These cost estimates represent the best
estimate of construction costs by the Engineer.. Unit costs
and quantities, in some cases, have been provided by others.
The plans used in producing these estimates have not received
final approval. Cost figures are estimates only, and the
Engineer is not responsible for fluctuations in cost factors
or changes in quantities resulting from final design or agency
.processing.
The costs associated with forming and administering the
Assessment District are included in this cost estimate.
4 Items included in this estimate are based on the list in
Exhibit 'B', as defined by the City of Carlsbad Policy No. 33.
Costs associated with construction of reclaimed water mains,
use of reclaimed water during construction, and use of
reclaimed water for irrigation are not included in this cost
estimate.
Information regarding the sizing of utilities is available
upon request.
For the purposes of the Assessment District funding, a cap of
5% of the total district cost estimate is applied to franchise
utilities. The cost balance, if any,. is to be funded by other
sources. . . .
Line items marked by an. asterisk define quantities and
associated cost which. would be reduced/ increased by
construction of a detention basin as recommended in the
"Drainage Study for Encinitas Creek" prepared by Dr. Howard H.
Chang, P.E., September 1990. The detention basin is an
alternative method of solving the current hydraulic capacity
problem associated with the. existing bridge at the
intersection of Olivenhain Road and El Camino Real.
2C/737-EXHB. 'A'
March 5, 1991
Sn Diego .701 S2n Dicgo 619-235.6471 Temecul. 41661 Temecula 714-694.42011 11111%
B Street California FAX 234.0349 Enterprise Circle N. California FAX 69-1-4203 Recycled
Suite 8011 92101 Suite 221 92390
Project Design consultants
I'LANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING
EXHIBIT 'B'
ITEMS PROPOSED TO BE INCLUDED IN THE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD CONSTRUCTION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
I. ACQUISITIONS :
A. Right-of-way acquisition is: included only for those
properties which are not required to dedicate or may not
voluntarily dedicated right-of-way.
II. ENVIRONMENTAL
A. Environmental mitigation, monitoring and maintenance
associated with impacts caused by the road improvements
are included.
III. GRADING
Where the road is adjacent to development areas, grading
within vertical lines at the road right-of-way limits is
included.
Where the road is adjacent to open space areas (future or
existing), slopes to daylight are included in this cost
estimate.
IV. UTILITIES (STORM DRAIN, SANITARY SEWER, WATER)
A. All utility costs within the .-road right-of-way are
included (sewer, water,.storin drain).
B. • Storm drain crossings_ only port,ions needed because of
road construction are included. •.. :
IMPROVEMENTS (STREETS: CONCRETE AND PAVING)
All surface improvements are included.
Construction detours and traffic control costs are
included.
1
San Diego 701 • San Diego 619.235-64 Tensecula 41661 Temccula 714.694'4200 11)02,
B Street Calif,rnia FAX 234049 Enterprise Circle N. CaliFornia FAX 6944203
Suite ROD 921))! • Suite 221 92390
VI. LANDSCAPING
Slope landscaping outside right-of-way is described in
Item III.B. above is included.
Median and parkway landscaping is included.
VII. FRANCHISE UTILITIES
A. All'franchise.utilities within the road right-of-way are
included, up to.a maximum of 5% of Assessment District
cost. 0
VIII. INCIDENTALS 0
A. The following are included in allowance for "Engineering,
Fees and Bonds":
.1. EIR costs.
Costs for design of the facilities.
Soils investigation and compaction monitoring costs.
Route Adoption Report preparation costs.
Cost associated with plan check and inspection fees.
2C/737-EXHB. 'B'
March 5, 1991 2
I
Rh ! Vison
1331 liade Siteat. Room 54G
San Den. Cahiorna 92121
39O
PACIFIC WrA BELL.. ITAA
A 'cI.c CO"Dfly
:::::::
22, 1991 2 5 ;/991
i~ TA S
Community Development Department . . • . •. . . .
City of Encinitas........ . . . . . .
. . . .
521 Encinitas Boulevard
.
Encinitas, CA 92024 .
RE: Draft Environmental Impact Report for
O
l
i
v
e
n
h
a
i
n
R
o
a
d
Alignment Case No. 90-259
In response to your letter dated January 3
,
1
9
9
1
,
I
w
o
u
l
d
l
i
k
e
t
o
point out some major concerns of Pacifi
c
B
e
l
l
.
On the "Environmental Impact Assessment
f
o
r
m
7
P
a
r
t
I
I
"
u
n
d
e
r
t
h
e
heading "Human Environment" item number'
1
8
,
t
h
e
"
X
"
w
a
s
p
l
a
c
e
d
u
n
d
e
r
"Yes (insig)" as to the affect on public ut
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
The. affect on the telephone plant would be v
e
r
y
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
.
I have attached a marked copy of our faci
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
f
f
e
c
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
p
r
o
-
ject.. While it is difficult to determine
t
h
e
a
m
o
u
n
t
o
f
c
o
n
f
l
i
c
t
without improvement plans, it is probable th
a
t
o
u
r
e
n
t
i
r
e
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
would have to be relocated to maintain a sa
f
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
n
t
o
o
u
r
manholes in an area near the edge of the
r
i
g
h
t
o
f
w
a
y
.
Our cost to relocate our facilities is estim
a
t
e
d
t
o
b
e
i
n
e
x
c
e
s
s
o
f
. S1,000,000.00. We will require a positio
n
b
e
h
i
n
d
t
h
e
u
l
t
i
m
a
t
e
curb-
line of the proposed final six-lane alignme
n
t
i
i
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
.
W
e
w
i
l
l
need the new roadbed to be near final .grad
e
b
e
f
o
r
e
o
u
r
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
c
a
n
be placed and our existing facilities must
r
e
m
a
i
n
i
n
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
u
n
t
i
l
all cable are in, spliced, tested and worki
n
g
i
n
t
h
e
n
e
w
,
s
y
s
t
e
m
.
. • .:'.
Please.provide improvement plans at you
r
e
a
r
l
i
e
s
t
c
o
n
v
e
n
i
e
n
c
e
.
0
Sincerely,
Danny Bi'chanan . . .
0•
Liaison . . .
.
•0
• -
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
ALIGNMENT Z WITH PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
ALIGNMENT 2 WITH PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 1 OF 6
SUMMARY TABLE
ACQUISITIONS 2,190,000
ENVIRONMENTAL 150,000
SITE PREPARATION 118,000
GRADING 996,758
STORM DRAIN 200,109
STREETS - CONCRETE 169,202
STREETS - PAVING 1,465,740
LANDSCAPING 178,603
UTILITIES 795,000
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION 0
DETENTION BASIN 829500
SUBTOTAL $7,092,912
PLUS 207. CONTINGENCY $1,418,582
PLUS 207. ENGINEERING, BONDS, & FEES $1,418,582
HYDROLOGY STUDY * $85,655
SUBTOTAL $10,015,732
FRANCHISE UTILITIES IN EXCESS OF 57. CAP 1,511,000
PLUS 207. CONTINGENCY 302,200
PLUS 207. ENGINEERING, BONDS & FEES 302,200
TOTAL PROJECT COST $12,131,132
377. COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT COST $10,015,732
TOTAL $15,897,972
See Exhibit 'A' for General Assumptions.
See Exhibit 'B' for Items Included in the Assessment District.
* Hydrology Study was prepared by Dr. Chang for the Encinitas
Creek Basin, dated September 1990. The costs reflected herein
are for the completed study.
I
I
ALIGNMENT 2 WITH PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
I OLIVENR4IU ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 2 OF 6
I ACQUISITIONS
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
RIGHT OF WAY ACUIJIS. 7.3 AC $300,000.00 $2,190,001)
TOTAL $2, 190,000
RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION COSTS ARE BASED ON AN ESTIMATED
PRICE OF $ 300,000 PER ACRE FOR PROPERTY WHICH IS NOT
OTHERWISE REQUIRED TO BE DEDICATED AND FOR WHICH AGREEMENTS
I FOR ACQUISITION BY THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ARE NOT ALREADY IN PLACE.
LAND ACQUISITION INCLUDES THE ENTIRE NORTHWESTERN
I RAILROAD PROPERTY.
I ENVIRONMENTAL
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
I MITIGATION . 1.5 AC $100,000.00 $150,000
MONITOR & MAINTENANCE
_
I
TOTAL $150,t
ACREAGE OF WETLANDS MITIGATION IS ACTUAL CREATED AREA, BASED ON
I
DISTURBED AREA TIMES THE APPLICABLE MITIGATION FACTOR
(3:1 FOR WETLANDS).
MITIGATION, MONITORING, AND MAINTENANCE COSTS INCLUDE ESTIMATED
I . FOR PLANTING, REPLANTING, IRRIGATION, AND CONSULTING FEES
DURING THE COURSE OF THE 5 YEAR MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM.
I SITE PREPARATION
I
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
CLEAR & GRUB 11.6 AC $1,000.00 $11,600
I
* REMOVE EXIST. AC PAVE 133000 SF $0.80 $106,400
TOTAL $118, 1)01)
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
I.
ALIGNMENT 2 WITH PROPOSED DETENTION
PRIN1NARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 3 OF 6
GRADING
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
MOBILIZATION & CONST. WATER 172078 IS $1.00 $172,078
MASS EXCAVATION & COMPACTION 76400 CV $2.50 $191,000
EXPORT PREMIUM 71550 CV $4.00 $286,200
REMEDIAL REMOVE & RECOMFACT 36270 CV $3.50 $126,945
DEWATIN6 50000 LS $1.00 $50,000
BUTTRESS 24750 CY $4.50 $111,375
BUTTRESS DRAIN 1500 LF $12.00 $18,000
BROW DITCH 3180 LF $12.00 $38,160
EROSION CONTROL FENCE 2000 LF $1.50 $3,000
TOTAL $996,758
* SEE GENERAL NOTE B - EXHIBIT A.
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF REMEDIAL GRADING WAS PROVIDED
BY GEOCON, INC. IN A PHONE CONVERSATION DATED AUGUST 9, 1989.
QUANTITY OF BUTTRESSING IS BASED ON A SOILS REPORT PREPARED
BY GEOCON, INC. ,DATED AUGUST 1989.
ALL EARTHWORK QUANTITIES ARE GEOMETRIC QUANTITIES.
POTENTIAL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE POSSIBLE USE OF RECLAIMED
WATER DURING CONSTRUCTION ARE NOT INCLUDED.
MOBILIZATION AND CONSTRUCTION SET UP COSTS WERE BASED ON 2 Z
OF THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST.
STORM DRAIN
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
18' RCP 160 1$ $60.00 $9,600
301 RCP 1780 LF $75.00 $133,500
TYPE A-4 CLEANOtJT 7 CA $3,000.00 $21,000
TYPE B INLET 8 CA $3,310.00 $26,480
RIPRAP 0 CV $140.00 $0
REMOVE EXIST. RIP RAP 0 SF $1.00 $0
CLEANING & ACCEPTANCE 9529 LS $1.00 $9,529
TOTAL $200,109
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
CLEANING AND ACCEPTANCE COST IS ESTIMATED AT SY. OF THE TOTAL
COST FOR NEW STORIIWATER FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION.
ALIGNMENT 2 WITH PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 4 OF 6
STREETS - CONCRETE
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
6" CURB & GUTTER 3900 LF $12.00 $46,800
P.C.C. SIDEWALK 18600 SF $2.50 $46,500
TYPE "B MEDIAN CURB 4500 LF 12.00 $54,(00
FCC ACCESS DRIVEWAYS 500 SF $3.00 $1,500
PEDESTRIAN RAMP 5 EA $500.00 $2,500
CITY MONUMENTS B EA $315.00 $2,520
MAINTENANCE/ACCEPTANCE 15382 LB $1.00 $15382
TOTAL $169,202
* SEE GENERAL NOTE B - EXHIBIT A.
CONCRETE MAINTENANCE AND ACCEPTANCE IS ESTIMATED AT 10 7.
OF THE TOTAL COST OF NEW CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION.
UNIT PRICES INCLUDE ESTIMATED WINTER CONSTF.IJCTION AND
SUBORADE PREPARATION PRICES.
STREETS - PAVING
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
AC PAVEMENT 6"/20" 186200 SF $3.50 $651,700
2' PAVING AND FABRIC 199000 SF $1.30 $258,701)
STREET NAME SIGN 2 EA $250.00 $500
sIsNe1t3E 1 EA $3,000.00 $3,001)
STRIPING 431,200 LF $0.45 $19,440
TRAFFIC SIGNAL 2 EA $100,000.00 $200,000
SIGNAL MODIFICATION 1 EA $60,000.00 $60,000
GUARD RAIL 700 LF $32.00 $22,400
TRAFFIC CONTROL 250000 LS $1.00 $250,000
TOTAL $1,465,740
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
NEW TRAFFIC SIGNAL LOCATIONS AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF OLIVE1D1AIN
ROAD - EL CAt1INO REAL AND RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD.
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION AT THE INTERSECTION OF OLIVENHAIN
ROAD AND AMARGOSA DRIVE.
ALIGNMENT 2 WITH PROFOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 5 OF 6
LANDSCAPING
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
PLANT & IRRIGATION 168620 LS $0.65 $109,603
MEDIAN AND PARKWAYS 27600 SF $2.50 $69,000
TOTAL $178,603
QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
575000 LS $1.00 $575,000
596000 LS $1.00 $596,000
1000000 LS $1.00 $1, 000,000
20 EA $3, 000. no $60,000
1500 LF $50.00 $75,000
0 LS $1.00 0
SUBTOTAL. $2,306,000
5 Z CAP (SEE NOTE 2 BELOW) $795,000
REMAINDER TO BE FUNDED BY OTHERS $1,511,000
* SEE GENERAL NOTE B - EXHIBIT A.
FRANCHISE UTILITIES
DESCRIPTION
RELOCATE 30 GAS, 16"&100 FUEL LINES
ELECTRIC AND GAS DIST.
PAC BELL RELOCATIONS
STREET LIGHTS
REMOVE/REPLACE 12WATER LINE
RELOCATE GAS PRY STATION
* SEE GENERAL NOTE B - EXHIBIT A.
A $ 1,000,000 LUMP SUM COST FOR RELOCATING PACIFIC BELL
FACILITIES HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE ESTIMATE, SEE ATTACHED LETTER
DATED, JANUARY 22, 1991. THIS COST IS SUBJECT TO FURTHER
REFINEMENT.
FRANCHISE UTILITY COSTS ARE FROM A LETTER BY UTILITY SPECIALISTS
INC., DATED, JUNE 9, 1989.
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS ESTIMATE, A CAP OF 57. OF THE TOTAL
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT COST 16 APPLIED TO FRANCHISE UTILITIES.
THE COST BALANCE IS TO BE FUNDED BY OTHER SOURCES.
TOTAL FRANCHISE UTILITIES COST DOES NOT INCLUDE POTENTIAL
REFUNDS AND REIMBURSEMENTS OF $ 390,000.
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
EX. BRIDGE DEMOLITION . 0 LS $1.00
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION 0 SF $70.00 $0
TOTAL $0
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
ALIGNMENT 2 WITH PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 6 OF 6
DETENTION BASIN
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
LAND ACQUISITION 12 AC $50,000.00 $600,000
CLEAR AND GRUB 11 AC $1,500.00 $16,500
EXCAVATION AND COMPACTION 62000 CV $2.50 $155,000
OUTLET STRUCTURE 14000 LB $1.00 $14,000
HYDRO-SEEDING 11 AC $4,000.00 $44,000
TOTAL $829,500
I,
I
1
I
I
I
Hi
Hi
I
I
I
I .
1
1
I
I
.1
I
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ALIGNMENT
LAND ACQUISITION FOR 1071/126' RIGHT-OF-WAY
ALIGNMENT NOS. 2 AND 3
Area
APN (± 0.1 Ac.) Cost @ $3001000/Ac.
255-023-01 3.9 $1,170,000
255-023-02 .9 270,000
255-024-01 .3 90,000
A I Id .'.j . .LLU , UVU
255-040-06 .2 60,000
255-040-17 .3 90,000
255-040-45 .5 150,000
255-221-31 .2 60,000
1-
255-221-32 .2 60,000
255-222-46 .2 60,000
255-222-47 .2 60,000
TOTAL 7.3 $2,190,000
NOTE: Areas are approximate and are for comparison
purposes only.
R/737-APPX 2
1 S
I Project Design consultants
PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING
EXHIBIT 'A'
I
OLIVENHAIN ROAD CONSTRUCTION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT COST ESTIMATE
I . .
1. These cost estimates are based on 200-scale Conceptual
I .Alignment Studies. These cost estimates represent the best
estimate of construction costs by the Engineer. Unit costs
and quantities, in some cases, have been provided by others.
I .
2. The plans used in producing these estimates have not received
final approval. Cost figures are estimates only, and the
Engineer is not responsible for fluctuations in cost factors
or changes in quantities resulting from final design or agency I .
processing. . .
I .
The costs associated with forming and administering the
Assessment District are included in this cost estimate.
Items included in this estimate are based on the. list in
I Exhibit 'B', as defined by the City of Carlsbad Policy No. 33.
Costs associated with construction of reclaimed water mains,
.I
use of reclaimed water during construction, and use of
reclaimed water for irrigation are not included in this cost
estimate.
1 . Information regarding the sizing of utilities is available
upon request.
For the purposes of the, Assessment District funding, a cap Of
I
.
5% of the total district cost estimate is applied to franchise
utilities. The cost balance, if any,--is to be funded by other
I .
sources.
. . . .
.
Line items marked by an. asterisk define quantities and
associated cost which. would be reduced/ increased by
I .
. construction of a detention . basin as recommended in the
"Drainage Study for Encinitas Creek" prepared by Dr. Howard H.
Chang, P.E., September 1990. The detention basin is an
alternative method of solving the current hydraulic capacity
I . .
..
problem associated with the existing bridge at the
intersection of Olivenhain Road and El Camino Real.
.1. ..
.
2C/737-EXHB.'A'
1
March 5, 1991
..
.
.
.
I . San Diego . 701 San Diegn . 619.235.6471 Tcmccula 41661 1mecula 714.61.1.12110 1151%
Ii Street California FAX 234.11349 Enterprise Circle N. California FAX (9.l.42ll3 Recyci.
suite 81111 92101 . Suite 221 9239(1
Project Design consultants
PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING
EXHIBIT 'B'
ITEMS PROPOSED TO BE INCLUDED IN THE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD CONSTRUCTION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
I. ACQUISITIONS
A. Right-of-way acquisition is included only for those
properties which are not required to dedicate or may not
voluntarily dedicated right-of-way.
II. ENVIRONMENTAL
A. Environmental mitigation, monitoring and maintenance
associated with - impacts caused by the road improvements
are included.
III. GRADING
Where the road is adjacent .to development areas, grading
within vertical lines at the road right-of-way limits is
included.
Where the road is adjacent to open space areas (future or
existing), slopes to daylight are included in this cost
estimate.
IV. UTILITIES (STORM DRAIN, SANITARY SEWER, WATER)
All utility costs within the-'road right-of-way are
included (sewer, water,.storm drain). I
Storm drain crossings - only porions needed because of
road construction are included.
V. IMPROVEMENTS (STREETS: CONCRETE AND PAVING)
All surface improvements are included.
Construction detours and traffic control costs are
included. .
1
San Diego 701 San Diego 619-235-6471 Temecula 41661 - flunccul;t 71-1.694-4200
B Street California FAX 234-0540 Enterprise Circle N. California FAX 694-4203
Suite BOO 92101 Suite 221 925011
®ltntr,
See vtlt I
l'.lflcl
VI. LANDSCAPING
Slope landscaping outside right-of-way as described in
Item III.B. above is included.
Median and parkway landscaping is included.
VII. FRANCHISE UTILITIES
A. All franchise utilities within the road right-of-way are
included, up to a maximum of 5%. of Assessment District
cost. . . .
VIII. INCIDENTALS
A. The following 'are included in allowance for "Engineering,
Fees and Bonds": .:
EIR costs.
. Costs for design of 'the facilities.
Soils investigation and 'compaction monitoring costs.
Route Adoption Report preparation costs.
Cost associated with plan check and inspection fees.
2C/737-EXHB. 'B'
March 5, 1991 2'
I
I I
I
I
I
I
af Vov 1i:snn
7337 Ii ado Sireat. Room 410
San Oeo. Cahiorna 9121
16191 Sö 19Q,
PAC 1FCBELL.
A PcI.c lelej.% Con'o.ny
Ls
:::::::
22, 1991
!Y o
Community Development Department ..
City of Encinitas .' • S
521 Encinitas Boulevard -
S
Encinitas, CA 92024 :
RE: Draft Environmental Impact Report for Olivenhain R
o
a
d
Alignment Case No. 90-259
In response to your letter dated January 3, 1991, I would like to
point out some major concerns of Pacific Bell.
On the "Environmental Impact Assessment form 7 Part II"
u
n
d
e
r
t
h
e
heading 'Human Environment" item number 18, the "X" was
p
l
a
c
e
d
u
n
d
e
r
"Yes •(insig)" as to the affect on public utilities.
The affect on the telephone plant would be very significan
t
.
I have attached a marked copy of our facilities affected
b
y
t
h
e
p
r
o
-
ject.. -'r'bile it is difficult to determine the amount o
f
c
o
n
f
l
i
c
t
without improvement plans, it is probable that our en
t
i
r
e
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
would have to be relocated to maintain a safe access
i
n
t
o
o
u
r
manholes in an area near the edge of the right of way.
Our cost to relocate our facilities is estimated to be i
n
e
x
c
e
s
s
o
f
••• $1,000,000.00. We will require a position behind the
u
l
t
i
m
a
t
e
c
u
r
b
-
line of the proposed final six-lane alignment if possibl
e
.
W
e
w
i
l
l
need the new roadbed to be near final grade before ou
r
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
c
a
n
fl-.. • be placed and our existing facilities must remain in
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
u
n
t
i
l
all cable are in, spliced, tested and working in the
n
e
w
s
y
s
t
e
m
.
• s. •
Please .provide improvement plans At your earliest conveni
e
n
c
e
.
Sincerely,
S.. • S
Danny 7Bchanan S • •• . •
Liaison . -
• •- •• :
S •••• .. •••• •
ALIGNMENT 5 WITHOUT PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
ALIGNMENT 3 WITHOUT PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 1 OF 5
SUMMARY TABLE
ACQUISITIONS 2,190,000
ENVIRONMENTAL 150,000
SITE PREPARATION 188,400
GRADING 796,662
STORM DRAIN 437,252
STREETS - CONCRETE 2501932
STREETS - PAVING 1,808,500
LANDSCAPING 2471 103
UTILITIES 894,000
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION 1,020,000
SUBTOTAL $7,982,848
PLUS 207. CONTINGENCY $1,596,570
PLUS 207. ENGINEERING, BONDS, & FEES $1,576,570
HYDROLOGY STUDY * $85,655
SUBTOTAL $11,261,643
FRANCHISE UTILITIES IN EXCESS OF 57. CAP 1,470,000
PLUS 207. CONTINGENCY 294,000
PLUS 207. ENGINEERING, BONDS & FEES 294,000
TOTAL PROJECT COST $13,319,643
377. COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT COST $6,6139963
TOTAL $17,875,606
See Exhibit 'A' for General Assumptions.
See Exhibit 'B' for Items Included in the Assessment District.
* Hydrology Study was prepared by Dr. Chang for the Encinitas
Creek Basin, dated September 1990. The costs reflected herein
are for the completed study.
1
ALIGNMENT 3 WITHOUT PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
I OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 2 OF 5
I ACQUISITIONS
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
I RIGHT OF WAY ACUIJIS. 7.3 AC $300,000.00 $2,190,000
TOTAL $2,190,000
1
I
RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION COSTS ARE BASED ON AN ESTIMATED
PRICE OF $ 300,000 PER ACRE FOR PROPERTY WHICH IS NOT
OTHERWISE REQUIRED TO BE DEDICATED AND FOR WHICH AGREEMENTS
I FOR ACQUISITION BY THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ARE NOT ALREADY IN PLACE.
LAND ACQUISITION INCLUDES THE ENTIRE NORTHWESTERN
RAILROAD PROPERTY.
ENVIRONMENTAL
I TOTAL DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE
MITIGATION 1.5 AC $100,000.00 $150,000
I MONITOR & MAINTENANCE
1
TOTAL $150,000
I ACREAGE OF WETLANDS MITIGATION IS ACTUAL CREATED AREA, BASED ON
DISTURBED AREA TIMES THE APPLICABLE MITIGATION FACTOR
I (3:1 FOR WETLANDS).
MITIGATION, MONITORING, AND MAINTENANCE COSTS INCLUDE ESTIMATED
FOR PLANTING, REPLANTING, IRRIGATION, AND CONSULTING FEES
I DURING THE COURSE OF THE 5 YEAR MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM.
I SITE PREPARATION
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
I CLEAR & GRUB 11.6 AC $1,000.00 $11,600
* REMOVE EXIST. AC PAVE 221000 SF $0.80 $176,800
I TOTAL $188,400
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
I
I.
ALIGNMENT 3 WITHOUT PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 3 OF 5
GRADING
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
MOBILIZATION & CONST. WATER 189057 LS $1.00 $189,057
MASS EXCAVATION & COMPACTION 57410 CY $2.50 $143,525
EXPORT PREMIUM 35000 CV. $4.00 $140,000
REMEDIAL REMOVE & RECONPACT 36270 CY $3.50 $126,945
DEWATERING 50000 LB $1.00 $50,000
BUTTRESS 19550 CV $4.50 $87,975
BUTTRESS DRAIN 1500 IF $12.00 $18,000
BROW DITCH 3180 LF $12.00 $38,160
EROSION CONTROL FENCE 2000 LF $1.50 $3,000
TOTAL $796,662
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF REMEDIAL GRADING WAS PROVIDED
BY GE000N, INC. IN A PHONE CONVERSATION DATED AUGUST 9, 1989.
QUANTITY OF BUTTRESSING IS BASED ON A SOILS REPORT PREPARED
BY LEOCON, INC. ,DATED AUGUST 1989.
ALL EARTHWORK QUANTITIES ARE GEOMETRIC QUANTITIES;
POTENTIAL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE POSSIBLE USE OF RECLAIMED
WATER DURING CONSTRUCTION ARE NOT INCLUDED.
MOBILIZATION AND CONSTRUCTION SET UP COSTS WERE BASED ON 2 7.
OF THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST.
STORM DRAIN
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
18" REP 680 LF $60.00 $40,800
300 RCP 2300 LF $75.00 $172,500
TYPE A-4 CLEANOUT 12 EA $3,000.00 '$36,000
TYPE B INLET 13 EA $3,310.00 $43,030
RIPRAP 880 CV $140.00 $123,200
REMOVE EXIST. RIP RAP 900 ' SF $1.00 $900
CLEANING & ACCEPTANCE 20822 IS $1.00 $20,822
TOTAL $437,252
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
CLEANING AND ACCEPTANCE COST IS ESTIMATED AT 57. OF THE TOTAL
COST FOR NEW STORMWATER FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION.
ALIGNMENT 3 WITHOUT PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 4 OF 5
STREETS - CONCRETE
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
60 CURB & GUTTER 6000 LF $12.00 $72,000
P.C.C. SIDEWALK 27000 SF $2.50 $67,500
TYPE MEDIAN CURB 6300 IF $12.00 $75,600
PCC ACCESS DRIVEWAYS 2500 SF $3.00 $7,500
PEDESTRIAN RAMP 6 EA $500.00 $3,000
CITY MONUMENTS 8 EA $315.00 $2,520
MAINTENANCE/ACCEPTANCE 22812 LS $1.00 $22,812
TOTAL $250,932
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
CONCRETE MAINTENANCE AND ACCEPTANCE IS ESTIMATED AT 10 h
OF THE TOTAL COST OF NEW CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION.
UNIT PRICES INCLUDE ESTIMATED WINTER CONSTRUCTION AND
SUBGRADE PREPARATION PRICES.
STREETS - PAVING
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
AC PAVEMENT 6/20" 283000 SF $3.50 $990,500
20 PAVING AND FABRIC 199000 SF $1.30 $258,700
STREET NAME SIGN 2 EA $250.00 $500
SIGNAGE 1 EA $3,000.00. $3,000
STRIPING 52000 15 $0.45 $23,400
TRAFFIC SIGNAL 2 EA $100,000.00 $200,000
SIGNAL MODIFICATION 1 EA $60,000.00 $60,000
GUARD RAIL 700 IF $32.00 $22,400
TRAFFIC CONTROL 250000 IS $1.00 $250,000
TOTAL $1,808,500
* SEE GENERAL NOTE B - EXHIBIT A.
NEW TRAFFIC SIGNAL LOCATIONS AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF OLIVENHAIN
ROAD - EL CA?IiNO REAL AND RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD.
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION AT THE INTERSECTION OF OLIVENHAIN
ROAD AND AMARGOSA DRIVE.
I
I
ALIGNMENT 3 WITHOUT PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCT ION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 5 OF 5
LANDSCAPING
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
PLANT & IRRIGATION 168620 LS $0.65 $109,603
MEDIAN AND PARKWAYS 55000 SF $2.50 $137,500
TOTAL $247,103
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
FRANCHISE UTILITIES
DESCRIPTION
RELOCATE 30 GAS, 16.10 FUEL LINES
ELECTRIC AND GAS 01ST.
PAC BELL RELOCATIONS
STREET LIGHTS
REMOVE/REPLACE 12WATER LINE
RELOCATE GAS PRY STATION
QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
575000 LB $1.00 $575,000
596000 LS $1.00 $596,000
1000000 LB $1.00 $1,000,000
31 EA $3,000.00 $93,000
2000 LF $50.00 $100,000
0 LS $1.00 0
SUBTOTAL $29364,000
5 X CAP (SEE NOTE 2 BELOW) $894,000
REMAINDER TO BE FUNDED BY OTHER'S $19470,000
* SEE GENERAL NOTE B - EXHIBIT A.
A $ 1,000,000 LUMP SUM COST FOR RELOCATING PACIFIC BELL
FACILITIES HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE ESTIMATE, SEE ATTACHED LETTER
DATED, JANUARY 22, 199i. THIS COST IS SUBJECT TO FURTHER
REFINEMENT.
FRANCHISE UTILITY COSTS ARE FROM A LETTER BY.UTILITY SPECIALISTS
INC., DATED, JUNE 9, 1989.
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS ESTIMATE, A CAP OF 5'!. OF THE TOTAL
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT COST IS APPLIED TO FRANCHISE UTILITIES.
THE COST BALANCE IS TO BE FUNDED BY OTHER SOURCES.
TOTAL FRANCHISE UTILITIES COST DOES-NOT INCLUDE POTENTIAL
REFUNDS AND REIMBURSEMENTS OF $ 390,000.
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
EX. BRIDGE DEMOLITION 75000 LB $1.00 $75,000
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION 13500 SF $70.00 $945,000
TOTAL $1,020,000
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ALIGNMENT
LAND ACQUISITION FOR 1071 /126' RIGHT-OF-WAY
ALIGNMENT NOS. 2 AND 3
APN
Area
(± 0.1 Ac.) Cost @ $300,000/Ac.
255-023-01 I3.9 1 1,170,000
255-023-02 .9
t
1
270,000
255-024-01 I • 90,000
255-031-03 .4 120,000
255-040-06 .2 60,000
i 255-040-17 .3 90,000
255-040-45 .5 150,000
255-221-31 .2 60,000
255-221-32 .2 •• 60,000
i 255-222-46 .2 60,000
255-222-47 .2 60,000
TOTAL • 7.3 $2,190,000
NOTE: Areas are approximate and are for comparison
purposes only.
R/737-APPX 2
Project Design consultants
PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING
EXHIBIT 'A'
OLIVENHAIN ROAD CONSTRUCTION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT COST ESTIMATE
These cost estimates are based on 200-scale Conceptual
Alignment Studies. These cost estimates represent the best
estimate of construction costs by the Engineer.. Unit costs
and quantities, in some cases, have been provided by others.
The plans used in producing these estimates have not received
final approval. Cost figures are estimates only, and the
Engineer is not responsible for fluctuations in cost factors
or changes in quantities resulting from final design or agency
processing.
The costs associated with forming and administering the
Assessment District are included in this cost estimate.
Items included in this estimate are based on the list in
Exhibit 'B', as defined by the City of Carlsbad Policy No. 33.
Costs associated with construction of reclaimed water mains,
use of reclaimed water during construction, and use of
reclaimed water for irrigation are not included in this cost
estimate.
Information regarding the sizing of utilities is available
upon request..
For the purposes of the Assessment District funding, a cap of
5% of the total district cost estimate is applied to franchise
utilities. The cost balance, if any, is to be funded by other
sources.
Line items marked by an. asterisk define quantities and
associated cost which would be reduced/increased by
construction of a detention basin as recommended in the
"Drainage Study for Encinitas Creek" prepared by Dr. Howard H.
Chang, P.E., September 1990. The detention basin is an
alternative method of solving the current hydraulic capacity
problem . associated with the . existing bridge at the
intersection of Olivenhain Road and El Camino Real.
2C/737-EXHB.'A' . .. .
March 5, 1991 . . . .
San Diego 701 San Diego . . 6I9.2.56471 Temecula 41661 Tcmecula 7I4•69442111 U Street California FAX 2340.i9 Enterprise Circle N. Calirornia FAX 69442U Suite 80)) 92101 1 Suite 221 92391)
I Project Design consultants
PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING
EXHIBIT 'B'
ITEMS PROPOSED TO BE INCLUDED IN THE
I OLIVENHAIN ROAD CONSTRUCTION.
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
I. ACQUISITIONS
' A. Right-of-way acquisition is included only for those
properties which are not required to dedicate or may not
voluntarily dedicated right-of-way.
1 . II. ENVIRONMENTAL .
I A. Environmental mitigation, monitoring and maintenance
associated with impacts caused by the road improvements
are included. .
I. S
III. GRADING
I . Where the road is adjacent to development areas, grading
within vertical lines at the road right-of-way limits is
included.
1 Where the road is adjacent to open space areas (future or
existing), slopes to daylight are included in this cost
estimate. . S
' IV. UTILITIES (STORM DRAIN, SANITARY. SEWER, WATER)
All utility costs within the. road right-of-way are
I
included (sewer, water,.storm drain).
Storm drain crossings - only portions needed because of
road construction are included.
V. IMPROVEMENTS (STREETS: CONCRETE AND PAVING)
1 A. All surface improvements are included.
B. Construction detours and traffic control costs are
1 .
included. S
' 52n Olcgo 701 52n Diego 6I9.2.617I - lcecula
13 SIred
m
Csiilornia FAX 234049
Suite 3300 92101
41661 Temecula 714.69142(10 1)1)17,
Enterprise Circle N. California FAX (9142(13 ED Hecyck'I
Suite 221 - 92390 I.p.r
VI. LANDSCAPING
Slope landscaping outside right-of-way s described in
Item III.B. above is included.
Median and parkway landscaping is included.
VII. FRANCHISE UTILITIES
A. All franchise utilities within the road right-of-way are
included, up to a maximum of 5% of Assessment District
cost.
VIII. INCIDENTALS
A. The following are included in allowance for "Engineering,
Fees and Bonds":
EIR costs.
Costs for design of the facilities.
Soils investigation and compaction monitoring costs.
Route Adoption Report preparation costs.
Cost associated with plan check and inspection fees.
2C/737-EXHB.'B'
March 5, 1991 2
Rt ! Vs bawn
. 1331 liade Street. Room b41G
San Oe;o. Cahoinia 912I
6390J
PACLFICBELL,
A Fac.hc leses.% Co'o.ny
LS r
:::::::
TA L !
Community Development Department .• . . ... . .
City of Eucinitas......... . . . . . . . . . ..
521 Encinitas Boulevard
Encinitas, CA 92024 .:
RE: Draft Environmental Impact Report f
o
r
O
l
i
v
e
n
h
a
i
n
R
o
a
d
Alignment Case No. 90-259
In response to your letter dated January 3,
.
1
9
9
1
,
I
w
o
u
l
d
l
i
k
e
t
o
point out some major concerns of Pacific Be
l
l
.
On the "Environmental Impact Assessment for
m
Part II" under the
heading "Human Environment"..item number 18, the "X" was placed under
"Yes •(insig)" as to the affect on public ut
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
The. affect on the telephone plant would b
e
v
e
r
y
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
.
I have attached a marked copy of our fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
f
f
e
c
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
p
r
o
-
ject.. While it is difficult to determi
n
e
t
h
e
a
m
o
u
n
t
o
f
c
o
n
f
l
i
c
t
without improvement plans, it is probable t
h
a
t
o
u
r
e
n
t
i
r
e
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
would have to be relocated to maintain a sa
f
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
n
t
o
o
u
r
manholes in an area near the edge of the ri
g
h
t
o
f
w
a
y
.
Our cost to relocate our facilities is es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
t
o
b
e
i
n
e
x
c
e
s
s
o
f
.. 51,000,000.00. We will require a positi
o
n
b
e
h
i
n
d
t
h
e
u
l
t
i
m
a
t
e
c
u
r
b
-
line of the proposed final six-lane alignme
n
t
i
f
-possible. We will
need the new roadbed to be near final gr
a
d
e
b
e
f
o
r
e
o
u
r
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
,
c
a
n
be placed and our existing facilities must r
e
m
a
i
n
i
n
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
u
n
t
i
l
all cable are in, spliced, tested and workin
g
i
n
t
h
e
n
e
w
. system. • .
Please provide improvement plans at your
e
a
r
l
i
e
s
t
c
o
n
v
e
n
i
e
n
c
e
.
. . ..
Sincerely,
. . .
•.
••
Danny7Bchanan • ... .. . •• ..
Liaison ' . . . • • ..- . -
:.: • .' . . • •. . •, :. •., . .
•
I
I
I'
Ii
'Ii
I
I
I
I
1
1
ALIGNMENT. 5 WITH PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
I
ALIGNMENT 3 WITH PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
I OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET I OF 6
SUMMARY TABLE
ACQUISITIONS 2,190,000
ENVIRONMENTAL 150,000
SITE PREPARATION 1181000
I GRADING 896,268
STORM DRAIN 200,109
STREETS - CONCRETE 169,202
I STREETS - PAVING 1,465,740
LANDSCAPING 178,603
UTILITIES 762,000
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION .0 I DETENTION BASIN 829500
SUBTOTAL $6,979,422
PLUS 207. CONTINGENCY $1,395,884
PLUS 207. ENGINEERING, BONDS, & FEES $1,395,884
• HYDROLOGY STUDY * $85,655
SUBTOTAL . $91856,846
FRANCHISE UTILITIES IN EXCESS OF 57. CAP 1,524,000
PLUS 207. CONTINGENCY 304,800
PLUS 207. ENGINEERING, BONDS & FEES 304,800
TOTAL PROJECT COST $11,990,446
I 377. COMMUNITY FACILITIES $5,788,926
DISTRICT COST
I TOTAL . $15,645,772
I See Exhibit A for General Assumptions.
See Exhibit 8 for Items Included in the Assessment District.
* Hydrology Study was prepared by Dr. Chang for the Encinitas
Creek Basin, dated September 1990. The costs reflected herein
I
I are for the completed study.
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 2 OF 6
ACQUISITIONS
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
RIGHT OF WAY ACQUIS. 7.3 AC $300,000.00 $2, 190,0(X)
TOTAL $2,190,000
RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION COSTS ARE BASED ON AN ESTIMATED
PRICE OF $ 300,000 PER ACRE FOR PROPERTY WHICH IS NOT
OTHERWISE REQUIRED TO BE DEDICATED AND FOR WHICH AGREEMENTS
FOR ACQUISITION BY THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ARE NOT ALREADY IN PLACE.
LAND ACQUISITION INCLUDES THE ENTIRE NORTHWESTERN
RAILROAD PROPERTY.
ENVIRONMENTAL
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
MITIGATION 1.5 AC $100,000.00 $150,000
MONITOR & MAINTENANCE
TOTAL $150,000
ACREAGE OF WETLANDS MITIGATION IS ACTUAL CREATED AREA, BASED ON
DISTURBED AREA TIMES THE APPLICABLE MITIGATION FACTOR
(3:1 FOR WETLANDS).
MITIGATION MONITORING, AND MAINTENANCE COSTS INCLUDE ESTIMATED
FOR PLANTING, REPLANTING, IRRIGATION, AND CONSULTING FEES
DURING THE COURSE OF THE 5 YEAR MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM.
SITE PREPARATION
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
CLEAR & GRUB 11.6 AC $1,000.00 $11,600
REMOVE EXIST. AC PAVE 133000 SF $0.80 $106,400
TOTAL $118000
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
t
ALIGNMENT 3 WITH PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 3 OF 6
GRADING
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
MOBILIZATION & CONST. WATER. 170068 LS $1.00 $170,068
MASS EXCAVATION & COMPACTION 63150 CY $2.50 $157,875
EXPORT PREMIUM 57540 CV $4.00 $230,160
REMEDIAL REMOVE & RECOIIPACT 36270 CV $3.50 $126,945
DEWATERINS . 50000 LB $1.00 $50,000
BUTTRESS 22680 CV $4.50 $102,060
BUTTRESS DRAIN 1500 LF $12.00 $18,000
BROW DITCH 3180 15 $12.00 $38,160
EROSION CONTROL FENCE 2000 LF $1.50 $3,000
TOTAL $896,268
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF REMEDIAL GRADING WAS PROVIDED
BY GEOCON, INC. IN A PHONE CONVERSATION DATED AUGUST 9, 1989.
QUANTITY OF BUTTRESSING IS BASED ON A SOILS REPORT PREPARED
BY GEOCOII, INC. ,DATED AUGUST 1989.
ALL EARTHWORK QUANTITIES ARE GEOMETRIC QUANTITIES.
POTENTIAL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE POSSIBLE USE OF RECLAIMED
WATER DURING CONSTRUCTION ARE NOT INCLUDED.
MOBILIZATION AND CONSTRUCTION SET UP COSTS WERE BASED ON 2 7.
OF THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST.
STORM DRAIN
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
18 RCP 160 IF $60.00 $9,600
30fl RCP 1700 LF $75.00 $133,500
TYPE A-4 CLEANDUT 7 [A $3,000.00 $21,000
TYPE B INLET 8 EA $3,310.00 $26,480
RIPRAP 0 CY $140.00 $0
REMOVE EXIST. RIP RAP 0 SF $1.00 $0
CLEANING & ACCEPTANCE 9529 LB $1.00 $9,529
TOTAL $200,109
* SEE GENERAL NOTE B - EXHIBIT A.
CLEANING AND ACCEPTANCE COST IS ESTIMATED AT 5'!. OF THE TOTAL
COST FOR NEW STORIIWATER FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION.
ALIGNMENT 3 WITH PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
DLI VENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 4 OF 6
STREETS - CONCRETE
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
6" CURB & GUTTER 3900 LF $12.00 $46,800
F.C.C. SIDEWALK 18600 SF $2.50 $46,500
TYPE "B" MEDIAN CURB 4500 LF $12.00 $54,000
FCC ACCESS DRIVEWAYS 500 SF $3.00 $1,500
PEDESTRIAN RAMP 5 EA $500.00 $2,500
CITY MONUMENTS 8 EA $315.00 $2,520
MAINTENANCE/ACCEPTANCE 15382 LB $1.00 $15,382
TOTAL $169,202
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
CONCRETE MAINTENANCE AND ACCEPTANCE IS ESTIMATED AT 10 h
OF THE TOTAL COST OF NEW CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION.
UNIT PRICES INCLUDE ESTIMATED WINTER CONSTRUCTION AND
SUBORADE PREPARATION PRICES.
STREETS - PAVING
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
AC PAVEMENT 6"/20" 186200 SF $3.50 $651,700
2' PAVING AND FABRIC 199000 SF $1.30..... $258,700
STREET NAME SIGN 2 EA $250.00 $500
SIGNAGE 1 EA $3,000.00 $3,001)
STRIPING 43200 LF $0.45 . $19,440
TRAFFIC SIGNAL 2 EA $100,000.00 $200,000
SIGNAL MODIFICATION 1 EA $60,000.00 $60,0()
GUARD RAIL 700 IF $32.00 $22,400
TRAFFIC CONTROL 250000 LB $1.00 $250,000
TOTAL $1,465,740
* SEE GENERAL NOTE B - EXHIBIT A.
NEW TRAFFIC SIGNAL LOCATIONS AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF OLIVENHAIN
ROAD - EL CAMINO REAL AND RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD.
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION AT THE INTERSECTION OF OLIVENHAIN
ROAD AND AMARGOSA DRIVE.
ALIGNMENT 3 WITH PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 5 OF 6
LANDSCAPING
DESCRIPTION
-----------------
* PLANT & IRRIGATION
* MEDIAN AND PARKWAYS
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
FRANCHISE UTILITIES
DESCRIPTION
RELOCATE 30 GAS, 16&10 FUEL LINES
ELECTRIC AND GAS DIST.
1 PAC BELL RELOCATIONS
* STREET LIGHTS
* REMOVE/REPLACE 12'WATER LINE
RELOCATE GAS PRY STATION
QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
165620 LS $0.65 $109,603
27600 SF $2.50 $69,000
TOTAL $178,603
QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
575000 LS $1.00 $575,000
596000 LS $1.00 $596,000
1000000 LS $1.00 $1,000, 000
20 EA $3,000.00 $60,000
1500 LF $50.00 $75,000
0 LS $1.00 0
SUBTOTAL $2,306,000
5 h CAP (SEE NOTE 2 BELOW) $7821000
REMAINDER TO BE FUNDED BY OTHERS $1,524, 000
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
A $ 1,000,000 LUMP SUM COST FOR RELOCATING PACIFIC BELL
FACILITIES HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE ESTIMATE, SEE ATTACHED LETTER
DATED, JANUARY 22, 1991. THIS COST IS SUBJECT TO FURTHER
REFINEMENT.
FRANCHISE UTILITY COSTS ARE FROM A LETTER BY UTILITY SPECIALISTS
INC., DATED, JUNE 9, 1989.
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS ESTIMATE, A CAP OF 57. OF THE TOTAL
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT COST IS APPLIED TO FRANCHISE UTILITIES.
THE COST BALANCE IS TO BE FUNDED. BY OTHER SOURCES.
TOTAL FRANCHISE UTILITIES COST DOES NOT INCLUDE POTENTIAL
REFUNDS AND REIMBURSEMENTS OF $ 390,000.
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION .
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
* EX. BRIDGE DEMOLITION 0 LB $1.00 $0
* BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION 0 SF $70.00 $0
TOTAL $0
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 6 - EXHIBIT A.
ALIGNMENT 3 WITH PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 6 OF 6
DETENTION BASIN
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
LAND ACQUISITION 12 AC $50,000.00 $600,000
CLEAR AND GRUB 11 AC $1,500.00 $16,500
EXCAVATION AND COMPACTION 62000 CY $2.50 $155,000
OUTLET STRUCTURE 14000 LB $1.00 $14,000
HYDRO-SEEDING 11 At $4,000.00 $44,000
TOTAL $829,500
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ALIGNMENT
LAND ACQUISITION FOR 1071/1261 RIGHT-OF-WAY
ALIGNMENT NOS. 2 AND 3
APN (± 0.1Ac.) Cost @ $300,000/Ac.
255-023-01 3.9 $1,170,000
255-023-02 .9 270,000
255-024-01 .3 90,000
255-031-03 .4 120,000
255-040-06 .2
t
60,000
255-040-17 .3 I 90,000
255-040-45 .5 150,000
255-221-31 .2 60,000
255-221-32 .2 60,000
255-222-46 .2 60,000
nMC—nnn A"
TOTAL 7.3 $2,190,000
NOTE: Areas are approximate and are for comparison
purposes only.
R/737-APPX 2
I
1 Project Design Consultants
PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING
I EXHIBIT 'A'
— ' OLIVENHAIN ROAD CONSTRUCTION
— - ASSESSMENT DISTRICT COST ESTIMATE
I
These cost estimates are based on 200-scale Conceptual
Alignment Studies. These cost estimates represent the best
I 'estimate of construction costs by the Engineer. Unit costs
and quantities, in some cases, have been provided by others.
I . The plans used in producing these estimates have not received
• final approval. Cost figures are estimates only, and the
Engineer is -not responsible for fluctuations in cost factors
or changes in quantities resulting from final design or agency I processing. .
The costs associated with forming and administering the
1
3.
Assessment District are included in this cost estimate.
4.' Items included in this estimate are based on the list' in
I Exhibit 'B', as defined by the City. of Carlsbad Policy No. 33.
Costs associated with construction of reclaimed water mains,
use of reclaimed water during construction, and use of
I
.
reclaimed water for irrigation are not included in this cost
estimate.
I Information regarding the sizing of utilities is available
upon request. .
For the purposes of the Assessment District funding, a cap of I 5% of the total district cost estimate is applied to franchise
utilities. The cost balance, if any,..-Is to be funded by other
1 .sources. .
Line items marked by an. asterisk çlefine quantities and
associated 'cost which would be reduced/increased by
I construction of a detention basin as recommended in the
"Drainage Study for Encinitas Creek" prepared by Dr. Howard H.
Chang, P.E., September '1990. The detention basin is an'
.alternative method of solving the current hydraulic capacity I problem associated with the . existing bridge at the
intersection of Olivenhain Road and El Camino Real.
I
2C/737-EXHB.'A'
1
March 5, .1991
I . San Diego , 703 ' San Diego
I) Street ' California
Suiie 800 92101
619.235.13471 Temecula 416131 lcrnccula 714.694-121111 11)111;
FAX 234-3)3)9 ' gnlcrprNc Circle N. California FAX 694-4203 Rc,vcl,
Suite 223 923941
I
1 Project Design consultants
PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING
EXHIBIT tBI
ITEMS PROPOSED TO BE INCLUDED IN THE
I .. OLIVENHAIN ROAD CONSTRUCTION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
I. ACQUISITIONS
A. Right-of-way acquisition is included only for those
properties which are not required to dedicate or may not
voluntarily dedicated right-of-way.
II. ENVIRONMENTAL.
A. Environmental mitigation, monitoring and maintenance
associated with impacts caused by the road improvements
are included.
III. GRADING
Where the road is adjacent to development areas, grading
within vertical lines at the road right-of-way limits is
included.
Where the road is adjacent to open space areas (future or
existing), slopes to daylight are included in this cost
estimate.
IV. UTILITIES (STORM DRAIN, SANITARY SEWER, WATER)
All utility costs within the'.. road right-of-way are
included (sewer,.water,.storm drain).
Storm drain crossings - only portions needed because of
road construction are included.
.V. IMPROVEMENTS (STREETS: CONCRETE AND PAVING)
A. All surface improvements are included.
B. Construction detours and traffic control costs are
included. .
1
I
San Diego 701 San Diego 619.235.6.171 Temecula 41661 Temecula 711.694.4200
B Street California FAX 234•0349 . • Enterprise CirIc N. CaIifornj FAX 691-42113 KecycIel
• Suite 800 92101 Suite 221 '12390 /
Paper
VI. LANDSCAPING
Slope landscaping outside right-of-way as described in
Item III.B. above is included.
Median and parkway landscaping is included.
VII. FRANCHISE UTILITIES
A. All franchise utilities within the road right-of-way are
included, up to a maximum of 5% of Assessment District
cost.
VIII. INCIDENTALS :
A. The following are included in allowance for "Engineering,
Fees and Bonds":
EIR costs.
Costs for design of'the facilities.
Soils investigation and compaction monitoring costs.
Route Adoption Report preparation costs.
Cost associated with plan check and inspection fees.
2C/737-EXHB.'B'
March 5, 1991 2
PAC LFIC' BELL...
7331 bade Sirea. Room 541G
San Oie;o. Calulo:na 91?1
A Pacd,c lcs.s Co."o.ny
I6iä3SOO
::::::: Mu rphy
199
JAN 5
Community Development Department •. '•.
City of Encinitas
521 Encinitas, Boulevard .
Encinitas, CA 92024 .'
RE: Draft Environmental Impact Report for Olivenha
i
n
R
o
a
d
Alignment Case No. 90-259
: '' In response to your letter dated January '3, 199
1
,
I
w
o
u
l
d
l
i
k
e
t
o
point out some major concerns of Pacific Bell.
.'
On the "Environmental Impact Assessment form Part II" under the'
heading "Human Environment" item number 18, the "I" was placed u
n
d
e
r
"Yes •(insig)" as to the affect on public utilities.
The affect on the telephone plant would be very sign
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
.
I have attached a marked' copy of our facilities af
f
e
c
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
p
r
o
-
ject.. While it is difficult to determine the amount of confli
c
t
vithbut improvement plans, it is probable that
o
u
r
e
n
t
i
r
e
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
would have to be relocated to 'maintain a safe acc
e
s
s
i
n
t
o
o
u
r
manholes in an area near the edge of the right
o
f
w
a
y
.
Our cost to relocate our facilities is estimated to
b
e
i
n
e
x
c
e
s
s
o
f
- ',•• $1,000,000.00. We will require a position behind th
e
u
l
t
i
m
a
t
e
c
u
r
b
-
line of the proposed final six-lane alignment
i
f
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
.
W
e
w
i
l
l
need the new roadbed to be near final grade before o
u
r
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
c
a
n
be placed and our existing facilities must remain 'i
n
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
u
n
t
i
l
all cable are in, spliced, tested and working in th
e
n
e
w
'
,
s
y
s
t
e
m
.
• • ".:'.
Please -provide improvement plans at your earlie
s
t
c
o
n
v
e
n
i
e
n
c
e
.
Sincerely,
Danny7Bchanan • : '
Liaison . ' '
•. .'
:;. • . • '., '' ••.t :. • • •
ALIGNMENT 4 WITHOUT PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
I
I ALIGNMENT 4 WITHOUT DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
1
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 1 OF S
SUMMARY TABLE
I ACQUISITIONS 1,290,000
ENVIRONMENTAL 150,000
SITE PREPARATION 197,000
I GRADING 506,493
STORM DRAIN 437,252
STREETS - CONCRETE 250,932
• STREETS - PAVING 1,824,500
I LANDSCAPING 247,103
UTILITIES 747,000
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION 1,020,000 i
I SUBTOTAL $6,660,280
PLUS 207. CONTINGENCY $1,332,056
PLUS 207. ENGINEERING, BONDS, & FEES $1,332,056
I
HYDROLOGY STUDY * $85,655
SUBTOTAL $9,410,046
FRANCHISE UTILITIES IN EXCESS OF 57. CAP 1,617,000
PLUS 237. CONTINGENCY 323,400
PLUS 207. ENGINEERING, BONDS & FEES 323,400
TOTAL PROJECT COST $11,673,946
1 377. COMMUNITY FACILITIES $5,526,520
DISTRICT COST
TOTAL $14,936,567
I See Exhibit 'A' for General Assumptions.
See Exhibit 'B' for Items Included in the Assessment District.
* Hydrology Study was prepared by Dr. Chang for the Encinitas
Creek Basin, dated September 1990. The costs reflected herein
are for the completed study.
I
I
I
ALIGNMENT 4 WITHOUT PROPOSED DETENTION
I
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 2 OF 5
1
ACQUISITIONS
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
I RIGHT OF WAY ACQUIS. 4.3 AC $300,000.00 $1,290,000
TOTAL $1,291), 000
I
I RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION COSTS ARE BASED ON AN ESTIMATED
PRICE OF $ 300,000 PER ACRE FOR PROPERTY WHICH IS NOT
OTHERWISE REQUIRED TO BE DEDICATED AND FOR WHICH AGREEMENTS
I FOR ACQUISITION BY THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ARE NOT ALREADY IN RACE.
LAND ACQUISITION INCLUDES THE ENTIRE NORTHWESTERN
RAILROAD PROPERTY.
I
ENVIRONMENTAL
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
I MITIGATION 1.5 AC $100,000.00 $150,000
MONITOR & MAINTENANCE
I TOTAL $150,000
ACREAGE OF WETLANDS MITIGATION IS ACTUAL CREATED AREA, BASED ON
DISTURBED AREA TINES THE AFFLICABLE MITIGATION FACTOR
I (3:1 FOR WETLANDS).
MITIGATION, MONITORING, AND MAINTENANCE COSTS INCLUDE ESTIMATED
I FOR PLANTING, REPLANTING, IRRIGATION, AND CONSULTING FEES
DURING THE COURSE OF THE 5 YEAR MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM.
I SITE PREPARATION
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
-------- -----
I CLEAR & GRUB 10.2 AC $1,000.00 $10,200
* REMOVE EXIST. AC PAVE 221000 SF $0.80 $1761800
I TOTAL $187,000
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
I
ALIGNMENT 4 WITHOUT PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 3 OF 5
GRADING
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
MOBILIZATION & CONST. WATER 165546 IS $1.00 $165,546
* MASS EXCAVATION & COMPACTION 23170 CV $2.50 $57,925
* IMPORT PREMIUM 4400 CV $4.00 $17,600
REMEDIAL REMOVE & RECOMPACT 36270 CV $3.50 $126,945
DEWATERING 50000 IS $1.00 $50,004)
* BUTTRESS - 6515 CV $4.50 $29,318
* BUTTRESS DRAIN 1500 LF $12.00 $18,000
* BROW DITCH 3180 LF $12.00 $38,160
EROSION CONTROL FENCE - 2000 LF $1.50 $3,000
TOTAL $506,493
* SEE GENERAL NOTE B - EXHIBIT A.
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF REMEDIAL GRADING WAS PROVIDED
BY GEOCON, INC. IN A PHONE CONVERSATION DATED AUGUST 9, 1989.
QUANTITY OF BUTTRESSING IS BASED ON A SOILS REPORT PREPARED
BY GEOCON, INC. ,DATED AUGUST 1989.
ALL EARTHWORK QUANTITIES ARE GEOMETRIC QUANTITIES.
POTENTIAL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE POSSIBLE USE OF RECLAIMED
WATER DURING CONSTRUCTION ARE NOT INCLUDED.
MOBILIZATION AND CONSTRUCTION SET UP COSTS WERE BASED ON 2
OF THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST.
STORM DRAIN
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
* 18 RCP 680 IF $60.00 $40,800
* 30' RCP 2300 LF $75.00 $172,500
* TYPE A-4 CLEANOUT 12 LA $3,000.00 $36,004)
* TYPE B INLET 13 EA $3,310.00 $43,030
* RIPRAP 880 CY $140.00 $123,200
* REMOVE EXIST. RIP RAP 900 SF $1.00 $900
* CLEANING & ACCEPTANCE 20822 LS $1.00 $20,822
- TOTAL $437,252
* SEE GENERAL NOTE B - EXHIBIT A.
CLEANING AND ACCEPTANCE COST IS ESTIMATED AT 57. OF THE TOTAL
COST FOR NEW STOR1IWATER FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION.
*
ALIGNMENT 4 WITHOUT PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 4 OF 5
STREETS - CONCRETE
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
6 CURB & BUTTER 6000 IF $12.00 $72,000
F.C.C. SIDEWALK 27000 SF $2.50 $67,500
TYPE MEDIAN CURB 6300 IF $12.00 $75,600
FCC ACCESS DRIVEWAYS 2500 SF $3.00 $7,500
PEDESTRIAN RAMP 6 EA $500.00 $3,000
CITY MONUMENTS 8 EA $315.00 $2,520
MAINTENANCE/ACCEPTANCE 22812 LS $1.00 $22,812
TOTAL $250,932
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
CONCRETE MAINTENANCE AND ACCEPTANCE IS ESTIMATED AT 10 L
OF THE TOTAL COST OF NEW CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION.
UNIT PRICES INCLUDE ESTIMATED WINTER CONSTRUCTION AND
SUBGRADE PREPARATION PRICES.
STREETS - PAVING
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
AC PAVEMENT 6"/20" 283000 SF $3.50 $990,500
2" PAVING AND FABRIC 199000 SF $1.30 $258,700
STREET NAME SIGN 2 EA $250.00 $500
SIGMAGE 1 EA $3, 000.00 $3, 000
STRIPING 52000 IF $0.45. 123,400
TRAFFIC SIGNAL 2 EA $100,000.00 1200,000
SIGNAL MODIFICATION 1 EA $60,000.00 160,000
GUARD RAIL 1200 LF $32.00 $38,400
TRAFFIC CONTROL . 250000 LS $1.00 1250,000
TOTAL $1,824,500
*. SEE GENERAL MOTE 8 - EXN10I1 A.
MEN IRAFFIU 1I3I4L LCCA110M Al THE IUIERE1,110I4S OF'OLIVENHAIN
RGAU - EL CAIIINO REAL AND RANCHO SN1A FE ROAD.
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION AT THE INTERSECTION OF DLI VENHAIN
ROAD AND AMARGOSA DRIVE.
*
*
ALIGNMENT 4 WITHOUT PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 5 OF 5
LANDSCAPING
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY
PLANT & IRRIGATION 168620 LS
MEDIAN AND F'AR}(WAYS 55000 SF
UNIT PRICE TOTAL
$0.65 $109,603
$2.50 $137,500
TOTAL $247,103
QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
575000 LS $1.00 $575,000
596000 LS $1.00 $596,000
ioo':000 LS $1.00 $1,000,000
31 EA $3,000.00 $93,000
2000 LF $50.00 $100.000
0 LS $1.00 0
SUBTOTAL $21 364,000
5 X CAP (SEE NOTE 2 BELOW) $747,000
* SEE GENERAL NOTE B - EXHIBIT A.
FRANCHISE UTILITIES
DESCRIPTION
RELOCATE 30 GAS, 16"&10' FUEL LINES
ELECTRIC AND GAS DIST.
PAC BELL RELOCATIONS
STREET LIGHTS
REMOVE/REPLACE 12'WATER LINE
RELOCATE GAS PRV STATION
REMAINDER TO BE FUNDED BY OTHERS $1,617,000
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
4 $ 1,000,000 LUMP SUM COST FOR RELOCATING PACIFIC BELL
FACILITIES HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE ESTIMATE, SEE ATTACHED LETTER
DATED, JANUARY 22, 1991. THIS COST IS SUBJECT TO FURTHER
REFINEMENT.
FRANCHISE UTILITY COSTS ARE FROM A LETTER BY UTILITY SPECIALISTS
INC., DATED, JUNE 9, 1989.
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS ESTIMATE, A CAP OF '57. OF THE TOTAL
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT COST IS APPLIED TO FRANCHISE UTILITIES.
THE COST BALANCE IS TO BE FUNDED BY OTHER SOURCES.
TOTAL FRANCHISE UTILITIES COST DOES NOT INCLUDE POTENTIAL
REFUNDS AND REIMBURSEMENTS OF $ 390,000.
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
* EX. BRIDGE DEMOLITION , 75000 LS $1.00 $75,000
* BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION. 13500 SF $70.00 $945,000
TOTAL $1,020,000
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ALIGNMENT
LAND ACQUISITION FOR 1071/126' RIGHT-OF-WAY
ALIGNMENT NO. 4
APN
I Area
(± 0.1 Ac.) Cost @ $300,000/Ac.
255-023-01 .6 $ 180,000
255-023-02 .3 90,000
255-024-01 .5 150,000
255-031-03 .4 120,000
255-040-06 .9 270,000
255-040-17 .3 90,000
255-040-45 .5 150,000
QU . VU',)
255-221-32 .2 .. 60,000
255-222-46 .2 .. 60,000
255-222-47 .2 60,000
TOTAL .4.3 $1,290,000
NOTE: Areas are approximate and are for comparison
purposes only.
R/737-APPX . 3
I
Project Design consultants
PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING
I . EXHIBIT 'A'
I
.OLIVENHAIN ROAD CONSTRUCTION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT COST ESTIMATE
1 .
1. These cost estimates are based on 200-scale Conceptual
I
Alignment Studies. These cost estimates represent the best
estimate of construction costs by the Engineer. Unit costs
and quantities, in some cases, have been provided by others.
I . The plans used in producing these estimates have not received
final approval. Cost figures are estimates only, and the
Engineer is 'not responsible for fluctuations in cost factors
'or changes in quantities resulting from final design or agency
I processing.
I
The costs associated with forming and administering the
Assessment District are included in this cost estimate.
Items included 'in this, estimate are based on the list in
1
Exhibit 'B', as defined by the City of Carlsbad Policy No. 33.
Costs associated with construction of reclaimed water mains,
use of reclaimed water during construction, and use of
1
'
reclaimed water for irrigation are not included in this cost
estimate.
I . Information regarding the sizing of utilities is available
upon request.,
, For the purposes of the Assessment District funding, a cap of
I 5% of the total district cost estimate is applied to franchise
utilities. The cost balance, if. any,is to be funded by other
I
.sources.
Line items marked 'by an. asterisk define quantities and
associated 'cost which. would be reduced/ increased by
I construction of a detention basin as recommended in' the
"Drainage Study for Encinitas Creek" prepared by Dr. Howard H.
Chang, P.E., September -'1990. The detention basin is an
alternative method of solving the current hydraulic capacity
I
.
problem associated with the existing bridge at the
intersection of Olivenhain Road and El Camino Real.
I
2C/737-EXHB. 'A'
1 March 5, 1991
I San Diego .701 San Diego
B Street CIi1orni
Suili 900 92101
6192356471 . Temecula 41661 Tcrnccuh 714.694.4'IIl)
FAX 234-0349 , Enterprise Circle N. California FAX 694.4203 Riced
Suite 221 923911
Project Design consultants
PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING
EXHIBIT 'B'
ITEMS PROPOSED TO BE INCLUDED IN THE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD CONSTRUCTION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
I. ACQUISITIONS
A. Right-of-way acquisition is included only for those
properties which are not required to dedicate or may not
voluntarily dedicated right-of-way.
II. ENVIRONMENTAL
A. Environmental mitigation, monitoring and maintenance
associated with impacts caused by the road improvements
are included.
III. GRADING
A. Where the road is adjacent to development areas, grading
within vertical lines at the road right-of-way limits is
included.
B.. Where the road is adjacent to open space areas (future or
existing), slopes to daylight are included in this cost
estimate.
IV. UTILITIES (STORM DRAIN, SANITARY SEWER, WATER)
All utility costs within the road right-of-way are
included (sewer, water,. storm drain).
Storm drain crossings - only portions needed because of
road construction are included.
V. . IMPROVEMENTS (STREETS: CONCRETE AND PAVING)
A. All surface improvements are included.
B. Construction detours and traffic control costs are
included. •
San Diego 701 San Diego • 619-235-6471 • Temecula 41661 Temecula 714-691-4200
B Sireci California FAX 234-0349 Enterprise Circle N. California FAX 694-1203 Rccwclr-,I
Suite 800 92101 Suite 221 923011 Paper
VI. LANDSCAPING
Slope landscaping outside right-of-way as described in
Item III.B. above is included.
Median and.parkway landscaping is included.
VII. FRANCHISE UTILITIES
A. All franchise utilities within the road right-of-way are
included, up to a maximum of 5% of Assessment District
cost.
VIII. INCIDENTALS
A. The following are included in allowance for "Engineering,
Fees and Bonds":
EIR costs. '
Costs for design of'the facilities.
Soils investigation and 'compaction monitoring costs.
Route Adoption Report preparation costs.
Cost associated with plan check and inspection fees.
2C/737-EXHB.'B'
March 5, 1991 2
Ro?: of Vav'1usnn
7337 Lade Street. Roam S4C
San Oen. CahIona 37I
6iö39Qi
PAC1rIC Rl"
VA BELL..
A F)cI,C lest,.% Co"o.y I
.: ..LS r
::::::: Murphy
991
Community Development Department . .• . . .. .
JAN 5 T
. .
City of Etcinitas.......: . . . . . .. . . .
527 Encinitas Boulevard
.
Encinitas, CA 92024 :
RE: Draft Environmental Impact Report for O
l
i
v
e
n
h
a
i
n
R
o
a
d
Alignment Case No. 90-259
.
In response to your letter dated January 3,
1
9
9
1
,
I
w
o
u
l
d
l
i
k
e
t
o
point out some major concerns of Pacific Bel
l
.
On the "Environmental Impact Assessment
f
o
r
m
- Part II' under the
heading "Human Environment" item number 18, the "X' was placed under
"Yes (insig)" as to the affect on public
u
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
The affect on the telephone plant would be ve
r
y
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
.
I have attached a marked copy of our facil
i
t
i
e
s
a
f
f
e
c
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
p
r
o
-
ject.. While it is difficult to determine
t
h
e
a
m
o
u
n
t
o
f
c
o
n
f
l
i
c
t
withbut improvement plans, it is probable th
a
t
o
u
r
e
n
t
i
r
e
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
would have to be relocated to maintain a saf
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
n
t
o
o
u
r
manholes in an area near the edge of the r
i
g
h
t
o
f
w
a
y
.
Our cost to relocate our facilities is es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
t
o
b
e
i
n
e
x
c
e
s
s
o
f
:.. S1,000,000.00. We will require a position be
h
i
n
d
t
h
e
u
l
t
i
m
a
t
e
c
u
r
b
-
•
line of the proposed final six-lane align
m
e
n
t
i
f
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
.
W
e
w
i
l
l
need the new roadbed to be near final gra
d
e
b
e
f
o
r
e
o
u
r
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
c
a
n
be placed and our existing facilities mus
t
r
e
m
a
i
n
i
n
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
u
n
t
i
l
all cable are in, spliced, tested and wor
k
i
n
g
i
n
t
h
e
n
e
w
'
.s'stem.........•. •.
Pleaseprovide improvement plans at your earl
i
e
s
t
c
o
n
v
e
n
i
e
n
c
e
.
. . ..
Sincerely,
Dan~Bchanan . . . .••
.Liaison • . .
.. . .. .. . .. -..-
11
I I
I I
I I
I I
HI
Li
ALIGNMENT. 4 WITH PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
I
I
ALIGNMENT 4 WITH PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 1 OF 6
SUMMARY TABLE
ACQUISITIONS 1,290,000
ENVIRONMENTAL 150,000
SITE PREPARATION 116,600
6RADINS 485,862
STORM DRAIN 200,109
STREETS - CONCRETE 169,202
STREETS - PAVING 1,465,740
LANDSCAPING 178,603
UTILITIES 618,000
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION 0
DETENTION BASIN 829500
SUBTOTAL $5,503,616
PLUS 207. CONTINGENCY $1,100,723
PLUS 207. ENGINEERING, BONDS, & FEES $1,100,723
HYDROLOGY STUDY * $85,655
SUBTOTAL $7,790,718
FRANCHISE UTILITIES IN EXCESS OF 57. CAP 1,688,000
PLUS 207. CONTINGENCY 337,600
PLUS 207. ENGINEERING, BONDS & FEES 337,600
TOTAL PROJECT COST $10,153,918
377. COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT COST $4,575,489
TOTAL $12,366,206
See Exhibit A for General Assumptions.
See Exhibit B for Items Included in the Assessment District.
* Hydrology Study was prepared by Dr. Chang for the Encinitas
Creek Basin, dated September 1990. The costs reflected herein
are for the completed study.
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 2 OF 6
ACQUISITIONS
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
RIGHT OF WAY ACQUIS. 4.3 AC $300,000.00 $1,290,000
TOTAL $1,290,000
RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION COSTS ARE BASED ON AN ESTIMATED
PRICE OF $ 300,000 PER ACRE FOR PROPERTY WHICH IS NOT
OTHERWISE REQUIRED TO BE DEDICATED AND FOR WHICH AGREEMENTS
FOR ACQUISITION BY THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ARE NOT ALREADY IN PLACE.
LAND ACQUISITION INCLUDES THE ENTIRE NORTHWESTERN
RAILROAD PROPERTY.
ENVIRONMENTAL
DESCRIPTION ' QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
MITIGATION 1.5 AC $100,000.00 $150,000
MONITOR & MAINTENANCE
TOTAL $150,000
ACREAGE OF WETLANDS MITIGATION IS ACTUAL CREATED AREA, BASED ON
DISTURBED AREA TIMES THE APPLICABLE MITIGATION FACTOR
(3:1 FOR WETLANDS).
MITIGATION, MONITORING, AND MAINTENANCE COSTS INCLUDE ESTIMATED
FOR PLANTING, REPLANTING, IRRIGATION, AND CONSULTING FEES
DURING THE COURSE OF THE 5 YEAR MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM.
SITE PREPARATION
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
' CLEAR & GRUB , 10.2 AC $1,000.00 $10,200
* REMOVE EXIST. AC PAVE 133000 SF $0.80 $1061400
TOTAL $116,600
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
ALIGNMENT 4 WITH PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 3 OF 6
GRADING
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
MOBILIZATION & CONST. WATER 143832 LB $1.00 s143,832
MASS EXCAVATION & COIfACTION 25500 CV $2.50 $63,750
EXPORT PREMIUM 2050 CV $4.00 $8,200
REMEDIAL REMOVE & RECONPACT 36270 CV $3.50 $126,945
DEWATERING 51:1000 LS $1.00 $50,000
BUTTRESS 7550 CY $4.50 $33,975
BUTTRESS.DRAIN 1500 LF $12.00 $18,000
BROW DITCH 3180 LF $12.00 $38,160
EROSION CONTROL FENCE 2000 LF $1.50 $3,000
TOTAL $485,862
* SEE GENERAL NOTE B - EXHIBIT A.
ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF REMEDIAL GRADING WAS PROVIDED
BY GEOCON, INC. IN A PHONE CONVERSATION DATED AUGUST 9, 1989.
QUANTITY OF BUTTRESSING 15 BASED ON A SOILS REPORT PREPARED
BY GEOCON, INC. ,DATED AUGUST 1989.
ALL EARTHWORK QUANTITIES ARE GEOMETRIC QUANTITIES.
POTENTIAL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE POSSIBLE USE OF RECLAIMED
WATER DURING CONSTRUCTION ARE NOT INCLUDED.
MOBILIZATION AND CONSTRUCTION SET UP COSTS WERE BASED ON 2 Z
OF THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST.
STORM DRAIN
______________--------------------------------.
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY LIT PRICE TOTAL
* 18" RCP 160 LF $60.00 $9,600
* 30" REF 1780 LF $75.00 $133,500
* TYPE A-4 CLEANOUT 7 EA $3,000.00 $21,000
* TYPE B INLET B EA $3,310.00 $26,480
* RIPRAP 0 CY $140.00 to
* REMOVE EXIST. RIP RAP 0 SF $1.00 $0
* CLEANING & ACCEPTANCE 9529 LB $1.00 $9,529
TOTAL $200,109
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
CLEANING AND ACCEPTANCE COST IS ESTIMATED. AT 57. OF THE TOTAL
COST FOR NEW STORIIWATER FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION.
*
*
*
*
*
ALIGNMENT 4 WITH PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 4 OF 6
STREETS - CONCRETE
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
6° CURB & GUTTER 3900 IF $12.00 $46,800
P.C.C. SIDEWALK 18600 SF $2.50 $46,500
TYPE 'B° MEDIAN CURB 4500 LF $12.00 $54,000
FCC ACCESS DRIVEWAYS 500 SF $3.00 $1,500
PEDESTRIAN RAMP S . EA $500.00 $21500
CITY MONUMENTS B ER $315.00 $2,520
MAINTENANCE/ACCEPTANCE 15382 LS $1.00 $15,382
TOTAL $169,202
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
CONCRETE MAINTENANCE AND ACCEPTANCE IS ESTIMATED AT 10 7.
OF THE TOTAL COST OF NEW CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION.
UNIT PRICES INCLUDE ESTIMATED WINTER CONSTRuCTION AND
SUBGRADE PREPARATION PRICES.
STREETS - PAVING
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE.... TOTAL
AC PAVEMENT 6°/20° 186200 SF $3.50 $651,700
2° PAVING AND FABRIC . 199000 SF $1.30.,.'' $258,700
STREET NAME SIGN 2 ER $250.00 500
SIGNAGE . 1 ER $3,000.00 $3,000
STRIPING 43200 IF $0.45 $19,440
TRAFFIC SIGNAL 2 ER $100,000.00 $200,000
SIGNAL MODIFICATION . 1 EA $60,000.00 $60,000
GUARD RAIL . 700 IF $32.00 . $22,400
TRAFFIC CONTROL 250000 LS $1.00 $250,000
TOTAL $1,465,740
* SEE GENERAL NOTE B - EXHIBIT A.
NEW TRAFFIC SIGNAL LOCATIONS AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF OLIVENHAIN
ROAD - EL CAtlINO REAL AND RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD.
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION AT THE INTERSECTION OF OLIVENHAIN
ROAD AND AftARGOSA DRIVE.
ALIGNMENT 4 WITH PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 5 OF 6
LANDSCAPING
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT
* PLANT & IRRIGATION 168620 LS
* MEDIAN AND PARKWAYS 27600 SF
* SEE GENERAL NOTE-8 - EXHIBIT A.
FRANCHISE UTILITIES
PRICE
$0.65
$2.50
TOTAL
TOTAL
$109,603
$69,000
$178,603
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
RELOCATE 30's GAS, 16'&10' FUEL LINES 575000 LS $1.00 $575,000
ELECTRIC AND GAS 01ST. 596000 LB $1.00 $596,000
PAC BELL RELOCATIONS 1000000 LS $1.00 $1,00c),000
* STREET LIGHTS 20 EA $3,000.00 $60,000
* REMOVE/REPLACE 12"WATER LINE 1500 LF $50.00 $75,000
RELOCATE GAS PRV STATION 0 LB $1.00 0
SUBTOTAL $2,306,000
5 h CAP (SEE NOTE 2 BELOW) $618,000
REMAINDER TO BE FUNDED BY OTHERS $1,688,000
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
A $ 1,000,000 LUMP SUM COST FOR RELOCATING PACIFIC BELL
FACILITIES HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE ESTIMATE, SEE ATTACHED LETTER
DATED, JANUARY 22, 1991. THIS COST IS SUBJECT TO FURTHER
REFINEMENT.
FRANCHISE UTILITY COSTS ARE FROM A LETTER BY UTILITY SPECIALISTS
INC., DATED, JUNE 9, 1989.
FOR THE PURPOSES (IF THIS ESTIMATE, A CAP OF 57. OF THE TOTAL
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT COST IS APPLIED TO FRANCHISE UTILITIES.
THE COST BALANCE IS TO BE FUNDED BY OTHER SOURCES.
TOTAL FRANCHISE UTILITIES COST DOES NOT INCLUDE POTENTIAL
REFUNDS AND REIMBURSEMENTS OF $ 390,000.
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
* EX. BRIDGE DEMOLITION 0 LS $1.00 $0
* BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION 0 SF $70.00 $0
TOTAL $O
* SEE GENERAL NOTE 8 - EXHIBIT A.
ALIGNMENT 4 WITH PROPOSED DETENTION
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 1991 SHEET 6 OF 6
DETENTION BASIN
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
LAND ACQUISITION 12 AC $50,000.00 $600,000
CLEAR AND GRUB 11 AC $1,500.00 $16,500
EXCAVATION AND COMPACTION 62000 CV $2.50 $155,000
OUTLET STRUCTURE 14000 LS $1.00 $14,000
HYDRO-SEEDING 11 AC $4,000.00 $44,000
TOTAL $829,500
OLIVENHAIN ROAD ALIGNMENT
LAND ACQUISITION FOR 1071/126' RIGHT-OF-WAY
ALIGNMENT NO. 4
APN
Area
(± 0.1 Ac.) Cost @ $300,000/Ac.
255-023-01 .6 $ 180,000
255-023-02 .3
t I.
90,000
255-024-01 .5 150,000
255-031-03 .4
t
120,000
255-040-06 .9
t
270,000
255-040-17 .3
t
90,000 I
255-040-45 .5 150,000
I.
255-221-31 .2 60,000
255-221-32 .2 60,000
255-222-46 .2 60,000
255-222-47 .2 60,000
TOTAL 4.3 $1,290,000
NOTE: Areas are approximate and are for comparison
purposes only.
R/737-APPX 3
I S
I Project Design Consultants
PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING
EXHIBIT 'A'
OLIVENHAIN ROAD CONSTRUCTION
1
S ASSESSMENT DISTRICT COST ESTIMATE
1 These cost estimates are based on 200-scale Conceptual
Alignment Studies. These cost estimates represent the best
estimate of construction costs by the Engineer. Unit costs
I . and quantities, in some cases, have been provided by others.
The plans used in producing these estimates have not received
final approval. Cost figures are estimates only, and the I Engineer is not responsible for fluctuations in cost factors
or changes in quantities resulting from final design or agency
I
processing.
The costs associated with forming and administering the
Assessment District are included in this cost estimate.
Items included in this estimate are based on the list in
Exhibit 'B', as defined by.the City of Carlsbad Policy No. 33.
Costs associated with construction of reclaimed water mains,
use of reclaimed water during construction, and use of
reclaimed water .for irrigation are not included in this cost
I estimate.
Information regarding the sizing of utilities is available
I upon request. . S
For the purposes of the Assessment District funding, a cap of
I
5% of the total district cost estimate is applied to franchise
utilities. The cost balance, if any,.. is to be funded by other
sources.
5 0
I Line items marked by an. asterisk define quantities and
associated cost which. would be reduced/ increased by
construction of a detention basin as recommended in the
"Drainage Study for Encinitas Creek" prepared by Dr. Howard H.
I Chang, P.E., September 1990 The detention basin is an
alternative method of solving the current hydraulic capacity
problem associated with the . existing bridge at the
I .. intersection of Olivenhain Road and El Camino Real.
I .. 2C/737-EHB.'A' .
March 5, 1991
1 0
San Diego .701 San Diego 619-235-6471 Temeculu 41661 . lcmecula 71.1.691.12011 1001A
II Street California FAX 234-0549 Enterprise Circle N. California FAX 694-42113 Recycled
I Suite HO)) 92101 Suite 221 9239() l.er
F'roject Design consultants
PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING
EXHIBIT 'B'
ITEMS PROPOSED TO BE INCLUDED IN THE
OLIVENHAIN ROAD CONSTRUCTION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
I. ACQUISITIONS
A. Right-of-way acquisition is included only for those
properties which are not required to dedicate or may not
voluntarily dedicated right-of-way.
II. ENVIRONMENTAL
A. Environmental mitigation, monitoring and maintenance
associated with impacts caused by the road improvements
are included.
III. GRADING
Where the road is adjacent to development areas, grading
within vertical lines at the road right-of-way limits is
included.
Where the road is adjacent to open space areas (future or
existing), slopes to daylight are included in this cost
estimate.
IV. UTILITIES (STORM DRAIN, SANITARY SEWER, WATER)
All utility costs within the.. road right-of-way are
included (sewer, water,.storm drain).
-
Storm drain crossings - only portions needed because of
road construction are included.
V. IMPROVEMENTS (STREETS: CONCRETE AND PAVING)
All surface improvements are included. .
Construction detours and traffic control costs are
included. .
1
S2n Diego 701 San I)iego 619-235-6-171 1cniecuI 41661 Teniecula 711-69.i.I2IttI
B Sired C31i1orni FAX 2340349 Enterprise Cirt1c N. (:Iiri,ria FAX 691.420
Suite 800 92101 1 Suite 221 929'1 I'api
VI. LANDSCAPING
Slope landscaping outside right-of-way as described in
Item III.B. above is included.
Median and parkway landscaping is included.
VII. FRANCHISE UTILITIES . .
A. Alifranchise utilities within the road right-of-way are
included, up to a maximum of 5%. of Assessment District
cost.
VIII. INCIDENTALS
0
A. The following are included in allowance for "Engineering,
Fees and Bonds": 0
1. EIR costs. 00 • S
Costs for design of the facilities.
Soils investigation and compaction monitoring costs.
O 4 • Route Adoption Report preparation costs.
5. Cost associated with plan check and inspection fees.
2C/737-EXHB.'B' . 0
March 5, .1991 • 2 • .
Ir
Ro ' 'vLsnn
. . PACIFIC BELL
7337 Trade Street. Room S40 . .
San Diego. CahOJnIa 92I . -
. A Pbcd.c 1Iie. Co'o.ny
I6r S 29J .
in~
::::::: :::::"
JAN 5
I . .
ity Development Department •.
City of Encinitas......... . . . . . . .
521 Encinitas Boulevard
I .
Encinitas, CA 92024 :
RE: Draft Environmental Impact Repor
t
f
o
r
O
l
i
v
e
n
h
a
i
n
R
o
a
d
Alignment Case No. 90-259 .
.
In response to your letter dated Janua
r
y
3
,
1
9
9
1
,
I
w
o
u
l
d
l
i
k
e
t
o
point out some major concerns of Pac
i
f
i
c
B
e
l
l
.
I
On the "Environmental Impact Asses
s
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
m
Part II" under the
heading "Human Environment" ..item numb
e
r
1
8
,
t
h
e
O
X
'
, was placed under
I
"Yes (insig)" as to the affect on p
u
b
l
i
c
u
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
The affect on the telephone plant w
o
u
l
d
b
e
v
e
r
y
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
.
I .
. I have attached a marked copy of ou
r
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
f
f
e
c
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
p
r
o
-
ject.; While it is difficult to determ
i
n
e
t
h
e
a
m
o
u
n
t
o
f
c
o
n
f
l
i
c
t
without improvement plans, it is prob
a
b
l
e
t
h
a
t
o
u
r
e
n
t
i
r
e
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
I
would have to be relocated to maintai
n
a
s
a
f
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
n
t
o
o
u
r
manholes in an area near the edge
o
f
t
h
e
r
i
g
h
t
o
f
w
a
y
.
Our cost to relocate our facilities i
s
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
t
o
b
e
i
n
e
x
c
e
s
s
o
f
............... $1,000,000.00. We will require a p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
b
e
h
i
n
d
t
h
e
u
l
t
i
m
a
t
e
c
u
r
b
-
line of the proposed final six-lane
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
i
f
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
.
W
e
w
i
l
l
need the new roadbed to be near fina
l
g
r
a
d
e
b
e
f
o
r
e
o
u
r
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
c
a
n
I .
be placed and our existing facilit
i
e
s
m
u
s
t
r
e
m
a
i
n
i
n
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
u
n
t
i
l
all cable are in, spliced, tested
a
n
d
w
o
r
k
i
n
g
i
n
t
h
e
n
e
w
s
y
s
t
e
m
.
. ..
Please -provide improvement plans at
y
o
u
r
e
a
r
l
i
e
s
t
c
o
n
v
e
n
i
e
n
c
e
.
.
I.
. Sincerely,
Danny7Bchanan . S • . .•. .
•Liaison
• • .. •
:
I;....................
- S. •• .•.
. - -,..
. •i••
;•
S -
S •
• . .5.,.. .
•
5.