Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout971009-005; Bressi Ranch Lennar Homes Part 2; Mass Grading Bressi Ranch Part 2; 2001-03-14971009-005 APPENDIX C Laboratory Testing Procedures and Test Results Atterberg Limits: The Atterberg Limits were determined in accordance with ASTM Test Method D4318 for engineeringclassificationof the fine-grained materials and presented in the table below: Sample Location B-2#7@40' B-3 #7 @30' B-5#6@20' B-6#4@15' Liquid Limit (%) 35 39 42 42 Plastic Limit (%) 16 16 20 17 Plastic Index (%) 19 22 22 25 USCS Soil Classification CL CL CL CL Direct Shear Tests: Direct shear tests were performed on selected remolded and/or undisturbed samples, which were soaked for a minimum of 24 hours under a surcharge equal to the applied normal force during testing. After transfer of the sample to the shear box and reloading of the sample, the pore pressures set up in the sample (due to the transfer) were allowed to dissipate for a period of approximately 1 hour prior to application of shearing force. The samples were tested under various normal loads utilizing a motor-driven, strain-controlled, direct-shear testing apparatus at a strain rate of less than 0.001 to 0.5 inches per minute (depending upon the soil type). The test results are presented in the test data. Sample Location LB-25#3@11- 14' LB-25#8@53' LB-26#4@20' LB-28#1@10' Sample Description Pale brown silty SAND Green gray CLAY Pale green sandy CLAY Pale yellow silty SAND Test Type Remolded to 90% Remolded to 90% Undisturbed Undisturbed Friction Angle (degrees) 30 26 25 25 Apparent Cohesion (psf) 460 180 750 100 Moisture and Density Determination Tests: Moisture content and dry density determinations were performed on relatively undisturbed samples obtained from the test borings and/or trenches. The results of these tests are presented in the boring and/or trench logs. Where applicable, only moisture content was determined from "undisturbed" or disturbed samples. C-l 971009-005 APPENDIX C (Continued) Expansion Index Tests: The expansion potential of selected materials was evaluated by the Expansion Index Test, U.B.C. Standard No. 18-2 and/or ASTM Test Method 4829. Specimens are molded under a given compactive energy to approximately the optimum moisture content and approximately 50 percent saturation or approximately 90 percent relative compaction. The prepared 1-inch thick by 4-inch diameter specimens are loaded to an equivalent 144 psf surcharge and are inundated with tap water until volumetric equilibrium is reached. The results of these tests are presented in the table below: Sample Location Sample Description Light brown clayey silty sand to sandy clay Compacted Dry Density (per) 101.5 Expansion Index 28 Expansion Potential Low Maximum Dry Density Tests: The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of typical materials were determined in accordance with ASTM Test Method Dl 557. The results of these tests are presented in the table below: Sample Location LB-25#3@11-14' LB-25#8@53' Sample Description Pale brown silty SAND Green gray CLAY Maximum Dry Density (pcf) 117.5 111.0 Optimum Moisture Content (%) 13.5 17.5 Consolidation Tests: Consolidation tests were performed on selected, relatively undisturbed ring samples in accordance with Modified ASTM Test Method D2435. Samples were placed in a consolidometerand loads were applied in geometric progression. The percent consolidation for each load cycle was recorded as the ratio of the amount of vertical compression to the original 1-inch height. The consolidation pressure curves are presented on the attached figures. Where applicable, time-rates of consolidation were recorded and presented below: Sample Location B-2@20' B-3 @20' B-5@15' Coefficient of Consolidation Cv (cmVsec) 2.2 xlO'3 2.3 x W4 2.9 xlO"4 C-2 TERATEST LABS, DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULT ASTM D 3080 Project Name: Project Number: Boring Number: Sample Number: Soil Description: BRESSI RANCH 971009-005 LB-25 3 PALE BROWN SILTY SAND (SM) Date: 10/31/00 Tested By: BCC Checked By: ffl*-^ Depth (ft.): 11.0-14.0 VERTICAL STRESS (psf) 554 1108 2216 PROVING RING DIAL READING PEAK 51 101 127 RELAXED 44 83 104 CONVERSI ON FACTOR 15 15 15 SHEAR STRESS (psf) 765 1515 1905 RELAXED STRESS (psf) 660 1245 1560 PEAK COHESION (psf) FRICTION (dag.) 550 35 RELAXED COHESION (psf) FRICTION (deg.) 460 30 z % 'Sfifi 1 n -( * 3 s r / > '> /•/ ^ f f / '* 5(X ' r i9 s f * s S* ? S ^ 130 S •; s 0 7 I s F * ' E / S / S S / t ( ' p S s1 1 Sf S 50 ' 0 / s / / f S S f ,' 2( , * 30 f * 0 { s ' ** | S ' t * S 2 / ^ 500 TERATEST LABS, INC. DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULT ASTM D 3080 Project Name: Project Number: Boring Number: Sample Number: Soil Description: BRESSI RANCH 971009-005 LB-25 8 GREENISH GRAY LEAN CLAY (CL) Date: 10/31/00 Tested By: BCC Checked By: jft£/ Depth (ft.): 53.0 VERTICAL STRESS (psf) 554 1108 2216 PROVING RING DIAL READING PEAK 35 54 99 RELAXED 31 45 86 CONVERSI ON FACTOR 15 15 15 SHEAR STRESS (psf) 525 810 1485 RELAXED STRESS (psf) 465 675 1290 PEAK COHESION (psf) FRICTION (deg.) 200 30 RELAXED COHESION (psf) FRICTION (deg.) 180 26 ?non . a. z 3 mnn . C) >^'•*'*• f *• 5 , OC _ \\J f * s * '* 10 * 0 s f 1 0 T ' ^1 R ** E s S ^ S * *• ( w P f 1 s 5 0 *» « 0 , 3 •* * ^s ** 2 ^ * 0 ^ 0 s 0 f '' ,1 ,- 1 ^ . ^ ^ ^^ 2 f * 500 TERATEST LABS, IN c. DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULT ASTM D 3080 Project Name: Project Number: Boring Number: Sample Number: Soil Description: BRESSI RANCH 971009-005 LB-26 4 PALE GREEN SANDY LEAN CLAY s(CL) Date: 10/30/00 Tested By: BCC Checked By: SfU^ Depth (ft.): 20.0 VERTICAL STRESS (psf) 554 1108 2216 PROVING RING DIAL READING PEAK 77 84 138 RELAXED 74 78 127 CONVERSI ON FACTOR 15 15 15 SHEAR STRESS (psf) 1155 1260 2070 RELAXED STRESS (psf) 1110 1170 1905 PEAK COHESION (psf) FRICTION (deg.) 750 29 RELAXED COHESION (psf) FRICTION (deg.) 750 25 •(Knn ,STRAIN (psf)3 ID CD C*ion . * - ?^ _ ^* - * »4 ii 3>K.c- ^* *. ,* *1 ^f » + **> f j X ' - * + 1 - * • ' X / ." X X .* ^ * 1 ' k f ^ ^ •* ,' ^ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 STRESS (psf) TERATEST LABS, INC. DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULT ASTM D 3080 Project Name: Project Number: Boring Number: Sample Number: Soil Description: BRESS1 RANCH 971009-005 LB-28 1 Date: 10/30/00 Tested By: BCC Checked By: Depth (ft.):10.0 PALE YELLOW POORLY-GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM) VERTICAL STRESS (psf) 554 1108 2216 PROVING RING DIAL READING PEAK 33 103 160 RELAXED 30 98 147 CONVERSI ON FACTOR 15 15 15 SHEAR STRESS (psf) 495 1545 2400 RELAXED STRESS (psf) 450 1470 2205 PEAK COHESION (psf) FRICTION (deg.) 100 49 RELAXED COHESION (psf) FRICTION (deg.) 100 47 STRAIN (psf)-xD C3 C3 Ci t' A tr A~ - iT 4 t /, 't '/ 1¥I '/ // // )/ (} rf s/ t Lf T ,' /' - i t / / / / J / / / / • /// _ / / t£- / . - ^ ._, 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 STRESS (psf) Leightonand Associates, Inc. GENERAL EARTHWORKANDGRADINGSPECIFICATIONS Page 1 of 6 LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROUGH GRADING 1.0 General 1.1 Intent: These General Earthwork and Grading Specifications are for the grading and earthwork shown on the approved grading plan(s) and/or indicated in the geotechnical report(s). These Specifications are a part of the recommendations contained in the geotechnical report(s). In case of conflict, the specific recommendations in the geotechnical report shall supersede these more general Specifications. Observations of the earthwork by the project Geotechnical Consultant during the course of grading may result in new or revised recommendations that could supersede these specifications or the recommendations in the geotechnical report(s). 1.2 The Geotechnical Consultant of Record: Prior to commencement of work, the owner shall employ the Geotechnical Consultant of Record (Geotechnical Consultant). The Geotechnical Consultants shall be responsible for reviewing the approved geotechnical report(s) and accepting the adequacy of the preliminary geotechnical findings, conclusions, and recommendations prior to the commencement of the grading. Prior to commencement of grading, the Geotechnical Consultant shall review the "work plan" prepared by the Earthwork Contractor (Contractor) and schedule sufficient personnel to perform the appropriate level of observation, mapping, and compaction testing. During the grading and earthwork operations, the Geotechnical Consultant shall observe, map, and document the subsurface exposures to verify the geotechnical design assumptions. If the observed conditions are found to be significantly different than the interpreted assumptions during the design phase, the Geotechnical Consultant shall inform the owner, recommend appropriate changes in design to accommodate the observed conditions, and notify the review agency where required. Subsurface areas to be geotechnically observed, mapped, elevations recorded, and/or tested include natural ground after it has been cleared for receiving fill but before fill is placed, bottoms of all "remedial removal" areas, all key bottoms, and benches made on sloping ground to receive fill. The Geotechnical Consultant shall observe the moisture-conditioningand processing of the subgrade and fill materials and perform relative compaction testing of fill to determine the attained level of compaction. The Geotechnical Consultant shall provide the test results to the owner and the Contractor on a routine and frequent basis. 3030.1094 Leightonand Associates, Inc. GENERALEARTHWORKANDGRADINGSPECIFICATIONS Page 2 of 6 1.3 The Earthwork Contractor: The Earthwork Contractor (Contractor) shall be qualified, experienced, and knowledgeable in earthwork logistics, preparation and processing of ground to receive fill, moisture-conditioning and processing of fill, and compacting fill. The Contractor shall review and accept the plans, geotechnical report(s), and these Specifications prior to commencement of grading. The Contractor shall be solely responsible for performing the grading in accordance with the plans and specifications. The Contractor shall prepare and submit to the owner and the Geotechnical Consultant a work plan that indicates the sequence of earthwork grading, the number of "spreads" of work and the estimated quantities of daily earthwork contemplated for the site prior to commencement of grading. The Contractor shall inform the owner and the Geotechnical Consultant of changes in work schedules and updates to the work plan at least 24 hours in advance of such changes so that appropriate observations and tests can be planned and accomplished. The Contractor shall not assume that the Geotechnical Consultant is aware of all grading operations. The Contractor shall have the sole responsibility to provide adequate equipment and methods to accomplish the earthwork in accordance with the applicable grading codes and agency ordinances, these Specifications, and the recommendations in the approved geotechnical report(s) and grading plan(s). If, in the opinion of the Geotechnical Consultant, unsatisfactory conditions, such as unsuitable soil, improper moisture condition, inadequate compaction, insufficient buttress key size, adverse weather, etc., are resulting in a quality of work less than required in these specifications, the Geotechnical Consultant shall reject the work and may recommend to the owner that construction be stopped until the conditions are rectified. 2.0 Preparation of Areas to be Filled 2.1 Clearing and Grubbing: Vegetation, such as brush, grass, roots, and other deleterious material shall be sufficiently removed and properly disposed of in a method acceptable to the owner, governing agencies, and the Geotechnical Consultant. The Geotechnical Consultant shall evaluate the extent of these removals depending on specific site conditions. Earth fill material shall not contain more than 1 percent of organic materials (by volume). No fill lift shall contain more than 5 percent of organic matter. Nesting of the organic materials shall not be allowed. If potentially hazardous materials are encountered, the Contractor shall stop work in the affected area, and a hazardous material specialist shall be informed immediately for proper evaluation and handling of these materials prior to continuing to work in that area. As presently defined by the State of California, most refined petroleum products (gasoline, diesel fuel, motor oil, grease, coolant, etc.) have chemical constituents that are considered to be hazardous waste. As such, the indiscriminate dumping or spillage of these fluids onto the ground may constitute a misdemeanor, punishable by fines and/or imprisonment, and shall not be allowed. 3030.1094 Leighton and Associates, Inc. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS Page 3 of 6 2.2 Processing: Existing ground that has been declared satisfactory for support of fill by the Geotechnical Consultant shall be scarified to a minimum depth of 6 inches. Existing ground that is not satisfactory shall be overexcavatedas specified in the following section. Scarification shall continue until soils are broken down and free of large clay lumps or clods and the working surface is reasonably uniform, flat, and free of uneven features that would inhibit uniform compaction. 2.3 Overexcavation: In addition to removals and overexcavations recommended in the approved geotechnical report(s) and the grading plan, soft, loose, dry, saturated, spongy, organic-rich, highly fractured or otherwise unsuitable ground shall be overexcavated to competent ground as evaluated by the Geotechnical Consultant during grading. 2.4 Benching: Where fills are to be placed on ground with slopes steeper than 5:1 (horizontal to vertical units), the ground shall be stepped or benched. Please see the Standard Details for a graphic illustration. The lowest bench or key shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide and at least 2 feet deep, into competent material as evaluated by the Geotechnical Consultant. Other benches shall be excavated a minimum height of 4 feet into competent material or as otherwise recommended by the Geotechnical Consultant. Fill placed on ground sloping flatter than 5:1 shall also be benched or otherwise overexcavated to provide a flat subgrade for the fill. 2.5 Evaluation/Acceptance of Fill Areas: All areas to receive fill, including removal and processed areas, key bottoms, and benches, shall be observed, mapped, elevations recorded, and/or tested prior to being accepted by the Geotechnical Consultant as suitable to receive fill. The Contractor shall obtain a written acceptance from the Geotechnical Consultant prior to fill placement. A licensed surveyor shall provide the survey control for determiningelevations of processed areas, keys, and benches. 3.0 Fill Material 3.1 General: Material to be used as fill shall be essentially free of organic matter and other deleterious substances evaluated and accepted by the Geotechnical Consultant prior to placement. Soils of poor quality, such as those with unacceptable gradation, high expansion potential, or low strength shall be placed in areas acceptable to the Geotechnical Consultant or mixed with other soils to achieve satisfactory fill material. 3.2 Oversize: Oversize material defined as rock, or other irreducible material with a maximum dimension greater than 8 inches, shall not be buried or placed in fill unless location, materials, and placement methods are specifically accepted by the Geotechnical Consultant. Placement operations shall be such that nesting of oversized material does not occur and such that oversize material is completely surrounded by compacted or densified fill. Oversize material shall not be placed within 10 vertical feet of finish grade or within 2 feet of future utilities or underground construction. 3030.1094 Leightonand Associates, Inc. GENERALEARTHWORKANDGRADINGSPECIFICATIONS Page 4 of 6 3.3 Import: If importing of fill material is required for grading, proposed import material shall meet the requirements of Section 3.1. The potential import source shall be given to the Geotechnical Consultant at least 48 hours (2 working days) before importing begins so that its suitability can be determined and appropriate tests performed. 4.0 Fili Placementand Compaction 4.1 Fill Layers: Approved fill material shall be placed in areas prepared to receive fill (per Section 3.0) in near-horizontal layers not exceeding 8 inches in loose thickness. The Geotechnical Consultant may accept thicker layers if testing indicates the grading procedures can adequately compact the thicker layers. Each layer shall be spread evenly and mixed thoroughly to attain relative uniformity of material and moisture throughout. 4.2 Fill Moisture Conditioning: Fill soils shall be watered, dried back, blended, and/or mixed, as necessary to attain a relatively uniform moisture content at or slightly over optimum. Maximum density and optimum soil moisture content tests shall be performed in accordance with the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM Test Method D1557-91). 4.3 Compaction of Fill: After each layer has been moisture-conditioned, mixed, and evenly spread, it shall be uniformly compacted to not less than 90 percent of maximum dry density (ASTM Test Method Dl 557-91). Compaction equipment shall be adequately sized and be either specifically designed for soil compaction or of proven reliability to efficiently achieve the specified level of compaction with uniformity. 4.4 Compaction of Fill Slopes: In addition to normal compaction procedures specified above, compaction of slopes shall be accomplished by backrolling of slopes with sheepsfoot rollers at increments of 3 to 4 feet in fill elevation, or by other methods producing satisfactory results acceptable to the Geotechnical Consultant. Upon completion of grading, relative compaction of the fill, out to the slope face, shall be at least 90 percent of maximum density per ASTM Test Method Dl 557-91. 4.5 Compaction Testing: Field tests for moisture content and relative compaction of the fill soils shall be performed by the Geotechnical Consultant. Location and frequency of tests shall be at the Consultant's discretion based on field conditions encountered. Compaction test locations will not necessarily be selected on a random basis. Test locations shall be selected to verify adequacy of compaction levels in areas that are judged to be prone to inadequate compaction (such as close to slope faces and at the fill/bedrock benches). 3030.1094 Leightonand Associates, Inc. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS Page 5 of 6 4.6 Frequency of Compaction Testing: Tests shall be taken at intervals not exceeding2 feet in vertical rise and/or 1,000 cubic yards of compacted fill soils embankment. In addition, as a guideline, at least one test shall be taken on slope faces for each 5,000 square feet of slope face and/or each 10 feet of vertical height of slope. The Contractor shall assure that fill construction is such that the testing schedule can be accomplished by the Geotechnical Consultant. The Contractor shall stop or slow down the earthwork construction if these minimum standards are not met. 4.7 Compaction Test Locations: The Geotechnica! Consultant shall document the approximate elevation and horizontal coordinates of each test location. The Contractor shall coordinate with the project surveyor to assure that sufficient grade stakes are established so that the Geotechnical Consultant can determine the test locations with sufficient accuracy. At a minimum, two grade stakes within a horizontal distance of 100 feet and vertically less than 5 feet apart from potential test locations shall be provided. 5.0 Subdrain Installation Subdrain systems shall be installed in accordance with the approved geotechnical report(s), the grading plan, and the Standard Details. The Geotechnical Consultant may recommend additional subdrains and/or changes in subdrain extent, location, grade, or material depending on conditions encountered during grading. All subdrains shall be surveyed by a land surveyor/civil engineer for line and grade after installation and prior to burial. Sufficient time should be allowed by the Contractor for these surveys. 6.0 Excavation Excavations, as well as over-excavation for remedial purposes, shall be evaluated by the Geotechnical Consultant during grading. Remedial removal depths shown on geotechnical plans are estimates only. The actual extent of removal shall be determined by the Geotechnical Consultant based on the field evaluation of exposed conditions during grading. Where fill-over-cut slopes are to be graded, the cut portion of the slope shall be made, evaluated, and accepted by the Geotechnical Consultant prior to placement of materials for construction of the fill portion of the slope, unless otherwise recommended by the Geotechnical Consultant. 3030.1094 Leightonand Associates, Inc. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS Page 6 of 6 7.0 Trench Backfills 7.1 The Contractor shall follow all OHSA and Cal/OSHA requirements for safety of trench excavations. 7.2 All bedding and backfill of utility trenches shall be done in accordance with the applicable provisions of Standard Specifications of Public Works Construction. Bedding material shall have a Sand Equivalent greater than 30 (SE>30). The bedding shall be placed to 1 foot over the top of the conduit and densified by jetting. Backfill shall be placed and densified to a minimum of 90 percent of maximum from 1 foot above the top of the conduit to the surface. 7.3 The jetting of the bedding around the conduits shall be observed by the Geotechnical Consultant. 7.4 The Geotechnical Consultant shall test the trench backfill for relative compaction. At least one test should be made for every 300 feet of trench and 2 feet of fill. 7.5 Lift thickness of trench backfill shall not exceed those allowed in the Standard Specifications of Public Works Construction unless the Contractor can demonstrate to the Geotechnical Consultant that the fill lift can be compacted to the minimum relative compaction by his alternative equipment and method. 3030.1094 PROJECTED PLANE 1TO1 MAMMUM FROM TOE OF SLOPE TO APPROVED GROUND NATURAL GROUND FILL SLOPE REMOVE UNSUITABLE MATERIAL BENCH HEIGHT 2'MIN. KEY DEPTH —15' MIR LOWEST BENCH (KEY) NATURAL GROUND t— BENCH HEIGHT FILL-OVER-CUT SLOPE REMOVE UNSUITABLE MATERIAL I—2'MIN. KEY DEPTH OUTFACE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO RLL PLACEMENT TO ASSURE ADEQUATE GEOLOGIC CONDTTTONS CUT FACE TO BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO FILL PLACEMENT^ NATURAL GROUND OVERBUILT AND TRIM BACK PROJECTED PLANE 1TO1 MAXIMUM FROM TOE OF SLOPE TO APPROVED GROUND <s>«r CUT-OVER-FILL SLOPE DESIGN SLOPE REMOVE NSUITABLE MATERIAL For Subdrains See Standard Detail C BENCH HEIGHT 2* MIN.- KEY DEPTH .15' LOWEST BENCH (KEY) 8ENCHNG SHAU BE DONE WHEN SLOPES ANGLE IS EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 5:1 MINMUM BENCH HEIGHT SHALL BE 4 FEET MINIMUM FILL WIDTH SHALL BE 9 FEET KEYING AND BENCHING GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS STANDARD DETAILS A ia-> uu REV. 4/11/96 FINISH GRADE SLOPE FACE ---"--——-*?^-—I-I-^^^^-i-i-i-i-2£E^-i-l^--_-_--^^^ .- - _ _ .-_ j-r _^*^^ __ - _ —_———-———-A-\*^if —**———__ JETTED OR FLOODED GRANULAR MATERIAL • Oversize rock te larger than 8 Inches In largest dimension. • Excavate a trench in the compacted fill deep enough to bury all the rock. • Backfill with granular soil jetted or flooded in place to fid all the voids. • Do not bury rock within 10 feet of finish grade. • Windrow of buried rock shaH be parallel to the finished slope fid.ELEVATION A-Af PROFILE ALONG WINDROW —A— JETTED OR FLOODED GRANULAR MATERIAL OVERSIZE ROCK DISPOSAL GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS STANDARD DETAILS B ia-s. 4/95 NATURAL GROUND BENCHING REMOVE UNSUITABLE MATERIAL - COMPACTED FILL ^TL—_^nr^rrr-_- V MIN. OVERLAP FROM THE TOP HOG RING TIED EVERY 6 FEET CALTRANS CLASS II PERMEABLE OR #2 ROCK" (9FT.VFT.) WRAPPED IN FILTER FABRIC FILTER FABRIC (MIRAF1 140 ORV \ X \COLLECTOR PIPE SHALL CANYON SUBDRAIN OUTLET DETAIL PERFORATED PIPE MIN. APPROVEDEQUIVALENT) BE MINIMUM 6- DIAMETERSCHEDULE 40 PVC PERFORATED PIPE. SEE STANDARD DETAIL D FOR PIPE SPECIFICATION DESIGN RNISHED GRADE a o FILTER FABRIC (MIRAFI 140 OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT) 20* MIN.- . NON-PERFORATED 6'* MIN. V,5* MIN.ROCK WRAPPED IN FILTER FABRIC OR CALTRANS CLASS II PERMEABLE. CANYON SUBDRAINS GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS STANDARD DETAILS C <i)-» LU 4/95 OUTLET PIPES 4'* NON-PERFORATED PIPE, 100' MAX. O.C. HORIZONTALLY, 30' MAX. O.C. VERTICALLY BACKCUT1:1 OR FLATTER KEY -v DEPTH J 2' MIN. POSITIVE SEAL SHOULD BE PROVIDED AT THE JOI 12- MIN. OVERLAP FROM THE TOP HOG RING TIED EVERY 6 FEET v: OUTLET PIPE (NON-PERFORATED) CALTRANS CLASS II PERMEABLE OR *2 ROCK <3FT.*/FT.) WRAPPED IN FILTER FABRIC FILTER FABRIC (MIRAFM40OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT) T-CONNECT1ON FOR COLLECTOR PIPE TO OUTLET PIPE • SUBDRAIN INSTALLATION - Subdraln collector pipe shall be installed with perforations down or, unless otherwise designated by the geotechnlcaf consultant Outlet pipes shaft be non-perforated pipe. The subdrain pipe shad have at toast 8 perforations uniformly spaced per foot. Perforation shaft be W to W if drilled holes are used. All subdrain pipes shall have a gradient at least 2% towards the outlet • SUBDRAIN PIPE - Subdrain pipe shall be ASTM D2751, SDR 23.5 or ASTM D1527, Schedule 40, or ASTM D3034, SDR 23.5, Schedule 40 Pofyvinyi Chloride Plastic (PVC) pipe. • All outlet pipe shall be placed in a trench no wider than twice the subdrain pipe. Pipe shall be in soil of SE>.30 jetted or flooded in place except for the outside 5 feet which shall be native soil backfill. BUTTRESS OR REPLACEMENT FILL SUBDRAINS GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS STANDARD DETAILS D ia-> LU 4/95