The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCT 00-20; FOX MILLER PROPERTY; TRAFFIC FACTORS REPORT; 2001-04-30p-'/ October 16, 2000 REVISED -April 30, 2001 e' WPA Traffic'Engineering A Division of Will dan 27042 Towne Centre Drive, Suite 270 , Foothill Ranch, California 92610 949/470-8840 fax 949/770-9041 www.willc/an.com ~ , . Mr. Bob Ladwig , Ladwig Design Group 703 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 300 Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: FOX-MILLER PROPERTY, CARLSBAD Dear Mr. Ladwig: RECE:IVr=D MAY 0 2 2001 LADWIG DESIGN GR This report provides a summary of traffic factors related to the proposed development of the Fox- Miller Property in the CitY of Carlsbad. The analyses contained in this report are based upon infonnationprovided by you, our past work in the City, previously completed analyses for the study area, and standard reference materials. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed Fox-Miller Property is located on the westerly side of EI Camino Real, between College Boulevard and Faraday Avenue, in the City of Carlsbad. One access to the proposed project site is planned via Salk Avenue, westerly off ofEI Camino Real, which would be ri¥,ht turns in and out only; another access would be via Salk Avenue, easterly off of College Boulevard. Figure 1 illustrates the location of the proposed PJ;"oj ect in relationship to the surrounding street system. The net pad area to be developed on the Fox-Miller Property is 22.4 acres and is planned to consist of Planned Industrial use. ~ . . v-7; Fox-Mfller P,openy -TNljJic Analyses { Willdan / WP A Traffic Engineering Job #12820 City of Carlsbad 20X/10X TAMARACK AVE. -- EL CAMINO REAL ~ ....:r 15X/5X ~ . - OX/lOX \\ \ \ /t, / 't I ~ J ... I I 10/./5/. --- / ~ ~ 0/./5/. ~' / ~ &/ #/ v~ ~ 15X/10/. / / / " ", y OX/10/. wA1RAm~ ENGDRIlIG, m~. " " -. ."" PORT ROAD FOX/MILLER PROPERTY STUDY ZONE FIGURE 1 -~ ~--- / / t ~. I -c -~~-' -,y / OX/lOX No Scale 0/./10/. SITE;, ... ,y. / ~ ,e LEGEND • STUDY INTERSECTION EXISTING - - --PLANNED PROJECT D.ISTRIBUTION ~ YEAR 2005 / YEAR 2020 \ T -=:::;; I' EXISTING CONDITIONS Existing traffic conditions in the study area are subject to significant changes as additional arterial roadway connections and road segments are completed. Some of these in the project study area include the extensions of Faraday Avenue, westerly of College Boulevard and easterly ofE! Camino Real; the extension of College Boulevard to the north ofEI Camino Real; and the construction of segments of Cannon Road. The existing and planned roadways in the study area are illustrated on Figure 1, presented earlier in this study. Figure 1 also shows the intersections that were examined as a part of these traffic ;malyses for the Fox-Miller Property project. The eight study intersections and their status (existing or proposed for the future) are listed below. 1 EI Camino Real / Tamarack Avenue (Existing) 2 EI Camino Real / College Boulevard (Existing) 3 EI Camino Real / Faraday Avenue (Existing) 4 EI Camino Real / Palomar Airport Road (Existing) 5 College Boulevard / Faraday Avenue (Existing) 6 College Boulevard / Palomar Airport Road 7 EI Camino Real / Cannon Road 8 Boulevard / Cannon Road * It should be noted that the study intersection ofEI Camino Real/Cannon Road is now existing; however, at the time the traffic counts were conducted, this intersection had not been constructed. Therefore, in these traffic analyses, the int~rsection was considered as a intersection. The existing conditions at the eight study intersections were analyzed using the Intersection CapacitY Utilization (ICU) methodology for signalized intersections. The ICU methodology utilizes a comparison ofintersection volumes to available intersection capacity, which results in an ICU value. The lCU value then relates to various Levels of Service (LOS), which range from "A" (the best) to Willdan / WP A Traffic Engineering Job #12820 Fox-Miller Property -Traffic Analyses City of Carlsbad , -2- , " -.-oJ , l ~, ''F'' (the worst). For the City of Carlsbad, LOS A through D are considered acceptable, while L<?S E and F' are over capacity. A more detailed explanation of ICU and its relationship to LOS is provided in Appendix A. Table 1 presents a summary of the intersection analyses under existing conditions. Results are shown for the six study intersections which are currently existing (two of the intersections are proposed for the future). The existing lane geometrics at the study intersections, utilized in the leu analyses, are illustrated on Figure 2, while the existing volumes at the study intersections were obtained from a previous traffic study recently completed in the study areal. Both the existing geometries and existing intersection volumes can be referenced on the intersection analyses worksheets provided in Appendix B. [It should be noted that both the existing lane geometries and the existing intersection volumes for these study intersections were obtained directly from the , "Carlsbad Oaks North Traffic Study,,2. Appendix' C ofthis report contains the Executive Summary section of the "Carlsbad Oaks North Traffic Study". The entire report is on file at the City of Carlsbad.] Table 1 shows that all of the existing (six) study intersections have acceptable operations (LOS A through C) during both the AM and PM peak: hours under existing conditions. PROJECT CONDITIONS Trip Generation Trip generation analyses were performed for the currently proposed Fox-Miller Property project, then compared to the trip potential assumed in the Carlsbad Traffic Model for this site. The currently proposed project consists of22.4 acres of Planned Industrial use. Table 2 summarizes the results ofthe trip generation analyses forthe currently proposed project on the Fox-MillerProperty. As shown in Table 2, the proposed project is estimated to generate a total of 1,800 daily trip ends, of which 195 (175 In, 20 Out) trip ends would occur during the AM peakhouf and 215 (45 In, 170 Out) trip ends would occur during the PM peak hour. 2 Tentative Map #CT 97-13; EIR #98-08; "Carlsbad Oaks North Traffic Study"; Willdan / WPA Traffic Engineering; April 2001. Tentative Map "CT 97-13; EIR #98-08; "Carlsbad Oaks North Traffic Study"; op.cit. Willdan / WPA Traffic Engineering Job #12820 Fox:'Miller Property -Traffic Analyses City of Carlsbad , -3-, .. TABLE 1 '<-t, \1 INTERSECTION ANALYSES SUMMARY " Fox-Miller Property, Carlsbad 'EI Camino Real I Tamarack Ave. 0.61/B 0.58 I A 0.69/B 0.68 I B 0.75 I C 0.87/D EI Camino Real I Blvd. 0.45 I A 0.541 A 0.53/A 0.35 I A 0.75 I C 0.65/B EI Camino Real I Faraday Ave. 0.58 I A 0.65/B 0.80/C 0.541 A 0.83/D 0.721 C EI Camino Real I Palomar Airport Rd. 0.57 I A 0.74/C 0.80 I C 0.76/C 0.78/C 0.80 I C College Blvd. I Faraday Ave. 0.23 I A 0.25 I A 0.30 I A 0.30 I A -I 0.441 A 0.38 I A College Blvd. I Palomar Airport Rd. 0.55 I A 0.66/B 0.45 I A 0.48 I A 0.59 I A 0.58 I A EI Camino Real I CanJlonRd: I (1) (2) (1) (2) 0.47 I A 0.40 I A 0.71 I C 0.70/B College Blvd. I Cannon Rd. (1) (1) 0.48/A 0.62/B 0.55 I A 0.62/B (1) These study intersections currently do not exist for these traffic analyses. (2) It is noted that the study intersection ofEl Camino Reali Cannon Road is now existing; however, in these traffic analyses, it is considered as a ''future'' intersection, since it had not been constructed at the time the traffic counts were conducted. I t TAMARACK AVE . • ~ \ \ EL CAMINO REAL .... t, ". / , JDB 112820 ~' I ~ ~/ #/ v~ '/ I / / WPA .m~ ENGINErnrnG, rn~, " "" 't' ~ I .... I --- " " -.."". BPOBJ ROAD .... FOX/MILLER PROPERTY LANE GEOMETRICS USE.D IN EXISTING ANAL YSIS FIGURE 2 / / / PROJEct SITE ... ~-l -~-. No Scale ". e ". ". e LEGEND • STUDY INTERSECTIO EXISTING - - - -PLANNED --5- TABLE 2 TRIP GENERATION -PROPOSED PROJECT Fox-Miller Property, Carlsbad TRIP RATES (1): Industrial Park (Without Commercial) Per Acre 80.0 7.92 0.88 1.92 7.68 TRIP ENDS: Fox-Miller Property (planned Industrial) 22.4 Acres 1,800 175 20 45 170 (1) Rates referenced from Traffic Generators; San Diego Association o/Governments (SANDAG); July, 1998. Table 2 also shows that the trip generation rate utilized to calculate the daily trip generation ofthe proposedF ox-Miller Property proj ect (Industrial Park land use) is 80.0 trip ends per acre3• The daily trip generation rate used in these traffic analyses is comparable to the rate applied to the proposed project site for the Model trip generation (81. 7 trip ends per acre -Light Industry land usel It is, therefore, concluded that the trip generation currently proposed for the Fox-Miller Property project is consistent with (or less than) what was previously assumed for this project site in the Carlsbad Traffic Model. YEAR 2005 AND YEAR 2020 CONDITIONS Table 1, provided earlier in this study, also presents the results of the intersection analyses for the eight study intersections under the Year 2005 and Year 2020 conditions. The lane geometrics at the study intersections, utilized in the 2005/2020 rcu analyses, are illustrated on Figure 3, while the 2005 and 2020 volumes at the study intersections were obtained from a previous traffic study recently completed in the study areas. Both the geometrics and intersection volumes utilized in the 2005 and 2020 rcu analyses can be referenced on the intersection analyses worksheets provided in Appendix B . [As similarly noted, the 2005 and 2020 intersection data (geometrics and volumes) utilized in these analyses for the eight study intersections were obtained directly from the recently completed "Carlsbad Oaks North Traffic Study,J6, which is currently on file at the City of Carlsbad. The Executive Summary section of the "Carlsbad Oaks North Traffic Study" can be referenced in· Appendix C of this report.] Review of Table 1 shows that all of the eight study intersections are projected to operate at acceptable Levels of Service A through D during both the AM and PM peak hours under both the Year 2005 and Year 2020 conditions. 3 4 5 6 Referenced from Traffic Generators; San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAGJ; July, 1998. Information obtained from San Diego Association of Governments (SANDA GJ. Tentative Map #CT 97-13; EIR #98-08; "Carlsbad Oaks North Traffic Study"; op.cit. Willdan / WPA Traffic Engineering Job #12820 Fox-Miller Property -Traffic Analyses City of Carlsbad -6-' ./ TAMARACK AVE. ~ - / / / / *" ~/ ./ &'/ :# (;'i?'/ / iAime EN~n~, me, ,. "'" PALO. \ \"'-~ / ,;H~ \ ff *" --jT~'( .... ,/ I - BPORT ROAD FOX/MILLER PROPERTY LANE GEOMETRIes USED' IN 2005/2020 ANAL YSISlIE FIGURE 3 . ~ -$~--' No Scale , e *" *" • SAME AS GEOMETRICS ~ USED FOR EXISTING CONDITIONS, (EXCEPT 'w'HERE NE'w' INTERSECTION LEGS ADDED) AND THE ADDITION OF T'w'O STUDY INTERSECTIONS LEGEND .• STUDY INTERSECTID ~><ISTING - - - -PLANNED SUMMARY This study has examined traffic factors related to the proposed Fox-Miller Property development. The proposed proj ect is located on the westerly side ofEl Camino Real, between College Boulevard and Faraday Avenue, in the City of Carlsbad. This study was primarily conducted to determine if the proposed project is consistent (from a traffic viewpoint) with the land use assumed in the Carlsbad Traffic Model. Trip generation analyses were performed for the proposed project and compared to the trip generation utilized in the Model. Buildout traffic conditions were examined at eight intersections related to the proposed project. The following are the principal findings of this study. 1) Under existing conditions, the six study intersections which are currently existing are shown to have acceptable operations (LOS A through C) during both the AM and PM peak hours. (It is noted that the study intersection of El Camino Real/Cannon Road is now existing; however, in thes.e traffic analyses, it is considered as a ''future'' intersection, since it had not been constructed at the time the traffic counts were conducted.) 2) The proposed development of the Fox-Miller Property (22.4 acres of Planned Industrial use) , , is estimated to generate 1,800 daily trip ends, of which 195 (175 In, 20 Out) trip ends would occur during the AM peak hour and 215 (45 In, 170 Out) trip ends would occur during the PM peak hour. 3) When compared with the Carlsbad Traffic Model, the proposed trip generation is consistent with or less than the previous assumption. 4) The lCU analyses at the eight study intersections show that acceptable Level of Service D or better operations are projected during both the AM and PM peak hours under both the Year 2005 and Year 2020 conditions. WiTldan I WP A Traffic Engineering Job #12820 Fox-Miller Property -Traffic Analyses City of c;arTsbad -7- * * * * * * * We trust that these analyses will be of assistance to you and the City of Carlsbad; If you have any questions or require additional infonn'ation, please contact us. Respectfully submitted, WPA TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ~F;:·0 Steven S. Sasaki, P.E. Registered Professional Engineer State of California Numbers C52768 & TRl462 SSS:CC #12820 Willdan / WPA Traffic Engineering Job #12820 Fox-Miller Property -Traffic Analyses City of Carlsbad -8- , . J , . ~ ~ APPENDIX A EXPLANATION OF INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION AND LEVEL OF ·SERVICE APPENDIX A EXPLANATION OF INTERSECTION CAPACITY utlLIZA TION The capacity of a street is nearly always greater between intersections and less at intersections. The reason for this is that the traffic flows continuously between intersections and only part of the time at intersections. To study intersection capacity, a technique known as Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) has been developed. ICU analysis consists of (a) determining the proportion of signal time needed to serve each conflicting movement; (b) summing the times for the mbvements; and (c) comparing the total time required to the time available. For example, if for north-south traffic the northbound traffic is 1,000 vehicles per hour, the southbound traffic is 800 vehicles per hour, and the capacity of either approach is 2,000 vehicles per hour of green, then northbound traffic is critical and requires 1,0000/2,000 or 50 percent of the signal time. If for the east-west traffic, 40 percent of the signal time is required, then it can be seen that the ICU is 50 plus 40, or 90 percent. When left-turn phases exist, they are incorporated into the analysis. As ICU's approach 100 percent, the quality of traffic service approaches Level of Service (LOS) E, as defined in the HighwayCapacitvManual, Special Report 87, Highway Research Board, 1965. Level of Service is used to describe quality oftraffic flow. Levels of Service A to C operate quite well. Level of Service D is typically the Level of Service for which an urban street is designed. Level of Service E is the maximum volume a facility can accommodate and will result in possible stoppages of momentary duration. Level of Service F occurs when a facility is overloaded and is characterized by stop-and-go traffic with stoppages of long duration. A description of the various Levels of Service appears on the following page. The ICU calculations assume that an intersection is signalized and that the signal is ideally timed. It is possible to have an ICU well below 1.0, yet have severe traffic congestion. This would occur because one or more movements is not getting enough time to satisfy its demand, with excess time existing on other moves. Although calculating ICU for an unsignaIized intersection is not necessarily valid, it can be performed with the presumption that a signal can be installed and the calculations show whether the geometrics are capable of accommodating the expected volumes. Capacity is often defined in terms of roadway width. However, standard lanes have approximately the same capacity whether they are 11 foot or 14 foot lanes. Our data indicates that a typical lane, whether a through lane or a left-turn lane, has a capacity as high as approximately 2200 vehicles per lane per hour of green time. The 1985 Highway CapacitvManua/found capacities of 1800 vehicle~ per lane per hour of green time. These studies show that values in the 1600 to 1700 range should result in a conservative analysis. J' A c o E F APPENDIX A LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS FOR INTERSECTIONS Low volumes; high speeds; speed not restricted by other vehicles; all signal cycles clear with no vehicles; all signal cycles clear with no vehicles waiting more than one signal cycle. Operating speeds beginning to be affected by other traffic; betw~en one and ten percent of the signal cycles have one or more vehicles which wait through more than one signal cycle during peak traffic periods. Operating speeds and maneuverability closely controlled by other traffic; between 11 and 30 percent of the signal cycles have one or more vehicles which wait through more than one signal cycle during peak traffic periods; recommended ideal design standard. Tolerable operating speeds; 31 to 70 percent of the signal cycles have one or more vehicles which wait through more than one signal cycle during traffic periods; often used as design standard in urban areas. Capacity; the maximum traffic volumes an intersection Cqn 0.00-0.60 0.61·-0.70 0.71-0.80 0.81-0.90 accommodate; restricted speeds; ·71 to 100 percent of the signal 0.91-1.00 . cycles have one or more vehicles which wait through more than one signal cycle during peak traffic periods. . Long queues of traffic; unstable flow; stoppages of long duration; traffic volume and traffic speed can drop to zero; traffic volume will be Not Meaningful less than the volume which occurs at Level of Service E. (a) ICU (Intersection Capacity Utilization) at various Levels of Service versus Level of Service E for urban arterial streets. . . SOURCE: Highway Capacity Manual; Special Report 87; Highway Research Board; 1965. · , ) 1 ~ ~ ; e, APPENDIX ·B INTERSECTION ANALYSES WORKSHEETS. , l EXISTING CONDITIONS PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION: INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD AM PEAK HOUR ECR & TAMARACK· 1999 (EXISTING) VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS .... -......... -............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. . II II I II II I I II I I EXISTING I I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+OTHER II II MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP II EXISTING PROPOSED II EXISTING I OTHER I PROJECT II EXISTING I I + OTHER I I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT II II II LANES I LANES II CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME I VOLUME II VIC I I VIC I I VIC I I V/C·W_IMP II II ========= II === I ==== II ==~~= I ===-~ II ===== I ===-~== I ====== II ==== I I === I I ==== I I ===-----I = II II NL II 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 51 I I II 0.03 I" I 0.03 I" I 0.03 I" I I" II II NT II 2 I 0 II 4000 I 0 II 439 I I II 0.11 I I 0.11 I I 0.11 I I I II II NR II 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 53 I I II 0.03 I I 0.03 I I 0.Q3 I I I II II SL II 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 27 I I II 0.02 I I 0.02 I I 0.02 I I I II II ST II 2 I 0 II 4000 I 0 II 1499 I I II 0.37 I" I 0.37 I" I 0.37 I" I I" II II SR II 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 16 I I II 0.Ql I I 0.Ql I I 0.01 I I I II II EL II 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 38 I I II 0.02 I I 0.02 I l 0.02 I I I" II II ET II 1 I 0 II 2000 I 0 II 55 I I II 0.03 I" I 0.03 I" I 0.03 I" I I II II ER II 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 189 I I II 0.11 I I 0.11 I I 0.11 I I I II II WL II 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 227 I I II 0.13 I" I 0.13 I" I 0.13 I" I I II II WT II 2 I 0 II 4000 I 0 II 206 I I II 0.06 I I 0.06 I I 0.06 I I I" I_ II WR II 0 I 0 II 0 I 0 II 26 I I II I I I I I I I I ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... II =-===== = = = ===-== = == =-~~====-= == = ==~~= = = I ................................ NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.40 I 0.40 I 0.40 I 0.00 II ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT N.S. =-NOT SIGNALIZED LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE .. DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS ECR&TAM 99&99 I II ............................................................................................................................................. II ................................ EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS=-II 0.16 I 0.16 I 0.16 I 0.00 II II ............................................................................................................ ···· ............................. 11 II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II II ====-~ =-== =-===== = = =-=====-== = ==-= ~~~~== =-= II II 0.61 I 0.61 I 0.61 I 0.05 II II ............................................................................................................... : ............................. II II BIB I B I A II CLEARANCE = ICU VALUE = LOS=- == ======== = = = ======= = = = ==----= = == = -----=--= = = == e I·· .. PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION: INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD PM PEAK HOUR ECR & TAMARACK· 1999 (EXISTING) VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS ....................................................................................................... '0' ....................................................................................................................... n .................. 0 ........ _ ............................................................. ,0, ...... 0 ..................................... .. II I II II I I II I I EXISTING I I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+OTHER I II MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP II EXISTING PROPOSED II EXISTING I OTHER I PROJECT II EXISTING I I +OTHER I I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I II I II LANES I LANES II CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME I VOLUME II VIC I I VIC I I VIC I I V/C·WJMP I II I ====== II ===== I == II ======= I ~~===II ====== I ====== I ====== II ~~=== I I ====== I I - ---= I I ====== I = II I NL II 1 I II 1800 I o II 180 I I II 0.10 I I 0.10 I I 0.10 I I I * II I NT II 21 II 4000 I o II 1520 I I II 0.38 I * I 0.38 I * I 0.38 I * I I II I NR II 1 I II 1800 I o II 213 I I II 0.12 I I 0.12 I I 0.12 I I I II I SL II 1 I II 1800 I o II 30 I I II 0.02 1* I 0.02 I * I 0.02 I * I I II I ST II 21 II 4000 I o II 551 I I II 0.14 I I 0.14 I I 0.14 I I I * II I SR II 1 I II 1800 I o II 65 I I II 0.04 I I 0.04 I I 0.04 I I II II EL II 1 I II 1800 I 011 35 I I II 0.02 I I 0.02 I I 0.02 I I * II II ET II 1 I II 2000 I o II 185 I I II 0.09 1* I 0.09 I * I 0.09 I * I II II ER II 1 I II 1800 I 011 56 I I II 0.03 I I 0.03 I I 0.03 I I II II WL II 1 I II 1800 I o II 71 I I II 0.04 I * I 0.04 1* I 0.04 I * I \-II WT II 21 II 4000 I 011 101 I I II 0.03 I I 0.03 I I 0.03 I 1* II WR II o I II 01 o II 28 I I II I I I I I I ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... II ==== = = = ========-~ = == = ====== = == ======== II ................................ NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.00 II ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME ECR&TAM 99&99 II ............................•......................•.......................••.•...................•...... ·································11 ................................ EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.13 I 0.13 I 0.13 I 0.00 II N = NORTHBOUND, S.= SOUTHBOUND II ................................................................................................................ ·····························11 E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05· II L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT II ==== = = = ==== = == = ======= = = = ====---~ = = II N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED ICUVALUE= II 0.58 I 0.58 I 0.58 I 0.05 II LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE II .............................................................................................................. ·······························11 * DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS LOS = II A I A I A I A II == ===---=--= = = = ===== = = = ====--== = == = ======= = == = e -----------------------------------------------------------~-~---~~ INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION: FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD AM PEAK HOUR ECR & COLLEGE· 1999 (EXISTING) VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS .•••••.••. n ••.• u ...................................................................................................................... _ ............................................................ , ................. : ••••••• , ....... ,_, ................................................. _ ........... _ ••• _ •••••••• II I II I II I II I EXISTING I I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+DTHER I II MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP II EXISTING I PROPOSED II EXISTING I OTHER PROJECT II EXISTING I + OTHER I I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I II II LANES I LANES II CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME VOLUME II VIC I VIC I I VIC I I V/C·W_IMP I II ======== II ==== I ==== II ====== I ======= II ====~~= I ===== ====== II ===== I = I ~~= I I === I I ===== I = II NL II 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 83 I II 0.05 I" I 0.05 I" I 0,05 I" I I" II NT II 2 I 0 II 4000 I 0 II 477 I II 0.12 I I. 0.12 I I 0.12 I I I II NR II 0 I 0 II 0 I 0 II' 0 I II I I I I I. I I II SL II 0 I 0 II 0 I 0 II 0 I II I I I I I I I II ST II 2 I 0 II 4000 I 0 II 1358 I II 0.34 I" I 0.34 I" I 0.34 I" I I" II SR II FREE I 0 II N.S. I 0 II 584 I II N.S. I I N.S. I I N.S. I I I II EL II 2 I 0 II 3600 I 0 II 49 I II 0.01 I * I 0.01 I * I 0.01 I * I I" II ET II 0 I 0 II 0 I 0 II 0 I II I I I I I I I II II ER II 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 18 I I II 0,01 I I 0.01 I I 0.01 I I I II II WL II 0 I 0 II 0 I 0 II 0 I I II I I I I I I I II II WT II 01 011 01 011 01 I II' '1*1 .1*1 1*1 1"11 II WR II 0 I 0 II 0 I 0 II 0 I I II I I I I I I I II ~ .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. II ======== = == = === = == = ==-~==== = == = ======= = = II .. ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE " DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS ......................... NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.39 I 0.39 I 0.39 I 0.00 II ECR&COL 99&99 I II ................................................................................................. '" ..... ... ......................... ... ..... II ......................... EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0,01 I 0.01 I 0.01 I 0.00 II II .. _ ......................................................................................................................................... II II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II II ===~-== = == = ==== = == = ====== = == = =~-=== = == II II 0.45 I 0.45 I 0.45 I 0.05 II II ................................................................................................... · .... · .. · ........................ • .. · .... ·11 IIA IA IA IA II CLEARANCE = ICU VALUE = LOS = == ===== = == = ===== = == = ====== = = = ==== = = = e I·· .. INTERSECTION CAPACITY UT!LlZATION ANALYSIS PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION: FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD PM PEAK HOUR ECR & COLLEGE· 1999,(EXISTING) VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................. -.............................................................................................................................................................. -................................................................................................................... -. -....................................... . II II I II I I I II I I EXISTING I I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+OTHER I' II II MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP II EXISTING I PROPOSED EXISTING I OTHER I PROJECT II EXISTING I I + OTHER I I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I II II II LANES I LANES II CAPACITY I CAPACITY VOLUME I VOLUME I VOLUME II VIC I I VIC I I VIC I I V/CW_IMP I II I ========= II ==== I == II ======= I ===--~ I ======= I =~-== I ~-== II ==~-= I I ======= I = I ==== I I ==== I II NL II 1 I II 1800 I 0 I 25 I I II 0.01 I I 0.Q1 I I 0.01 I I I" II NT II 2 I II 4000 I 0 I 1412 I I II 0.35 I * I 0.35 I * I 0.35 I * I I II NR II 0 I II 0 I 0 I 0 I I II I I I I I I I II I SL II 0 I II 0 I 0 I 0 I I II I" I I * I I * I I II I ST II 2 I II 4000 I 0 I 545 I I II 0.14 I I 0.14 I I 0.14 I I I * II I SR II FREE I II N.S. I 0 II 105 I I II N.S. I I N.S. I I N.S. I I I II I EL II 2 I II 3600 I 0 II 503 I I II 0.14 I" I 0.14 I * I 0.14 I * I I * II I ET II 0 I II 0 I 0 II 0 I I II I I I I I I I II II ER II 1 I II 1800 I 0 II 39 I I II 0.02 I I 0.02 I I 0.02 I I I II II WL II 0 I II 0 I 0 II 0 I I II I I I I I I I II e II WT II 01 II 01 011 01 I II 1*1 1*1 1*1 1*11 II WR II 0 I II 0 I 0 II 0 I I II I I I I I I I II .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. II ========= = == = =======-~ = == = ===~-=== = = = ======== = == II ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME N = NORTHBOUND. S = SOUTHBOUND E = EASTBOUND. W = WESTBOUND L = LEFT. T = THROUGH. R = RIGHT N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE " DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS ••.•.•..•....•••.....•.•• NORTHISOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.35 I 0.35 I 0.35 I 0.00 II ECR&COL 99&99 I II ............................................................................................................................................. II ••••..•••••.••..••.••..•• EASTIWEST CRITICAL SUMS = II . 0.14 I 0.14 I 0.14 I 0.00 II II ............................................................................................................................................. II II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II II ======== = == = ======== = = = ===== = = = ====== = = II II 0.54 I 0.54 I 0.54 I 0.05 II II ............................................................................................................................................. II II A I A I A I A II CLEARANCE = ICU VALUE = LOS = == ======= = = = ======== = = = ===== = == = ===== = == == e I .. .. INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION: FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD· AM PEAK HOUR ECR & FARADAY· 1999 (EXISTING) VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................... · .. · .. ··.·u.· ............ _ ... -..................................................................................................................... _0 .................................. -........................................................................ __ ••••••••••••••••••• _ ........................................ _0 •••••• II I rI I II I I II I EXISTING I I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+OTHER I II MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP II EXISTING I PROPOSED II EXISTING I OTHER I PROJECT II EXISTING I + OTHER I I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I II II LANES I LANES II CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME I VOLUME II VIC I VIC I I VIC I I V/C·W_IMP I II ====== II === I === II ==~~ I =~~==== II === I ======== I ===== II =---==== I = I =---== I = I ======== I I ~---= I = II NL II 2 I 0 II 3600 I 0 II 928 I I II 0.26 I" I 0.26 I .. 0.26 I" I I" II NT II 3 I 0 II 6000 I 0 II 441 I I II 0.10 I I 0.10 I 0.10 I I I II NR II 0 I 0 II 0 I 0 II 187 I I II I I I I I I II SL II 2 I 0 II 3600 I 0 II 179 I I II 0.05 I I 0.05 I 0.05 I I I II ST II 3 I 0 II 6000 I 0 II 981 I I II 0.20 I" I 0.20 I .. 0.20 I" I I" II SR II 0 I 0 II 0 I 0 II 239 I I II I I I I I I II EL II 2 I 0 II 3600 I 0 II 43 I I II 0.01 I I 0.01 I 0.01 I I I" II ET II 2 I ** II 4000 I 0 II 59 I I II 0.03 I" I 0.03 I .. 0.03 I" I I II II ER II 0 I 0 II 0 I 0 II 76 I I II I I I I I I I II II WL II 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 66 I I II 0.04 I" I 0.04 I" I 0.Q4 I" I I II II WT II 2 I 0 II 4000 I 0 II 50 I I II 0.02 I I 0.02 I I 0.02 I I I" II e II WR II 0 I 0 II 0 I 0 II 18 I I II I I I I I I I II .................................................................................................................................................................... ············· .... ·····························11 ====================== ======== II. ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE .. DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS ** REPRESENTS RIGHT & THROUGH/RIGHT ••••••.•••.•••.•••.••••••. NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.46 I 0.46 I 0.46 I 0.00 II ECR & FAR 99 II ...................................................................... , ................................................................ , ..... II .......................... EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.07 I 0.07 I 0.07 I 0.00 II II ................................................................................................... · .... · .. ·· .... · .................. · .. · .... ·11 II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II II ==== = == = ~-===== = == = ====== = == = ====== = == II II 0.58 I 0.58 I 0.58 I 0.05 II II ................................................................................................... · .... · ............................ · .. · .... ·11 II A I A· I A I A II CLEARANCE = ICUVALUE= LOS = == ==--= = = = ===== = = = ====== = = = ==--=== = == == e I·· .. I I I I I I I I I I II II INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION: II I II MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP II II LANES I LANES II ======== II ~~== I === II NL II 21 II NT II 31 II NR II 01 II SL II 21 II ST II 31 II SR II 01 II EL II 21 II ET II 2 I ** II ER II o I II FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD PM PEAK HOUR ECR & FARADAY· 1999 (EXISTING) VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS I II I I II EXISTING I PROPOSED II EXISTING I OTHER I PROJECT II CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME I VOLUME II ====== I ===~~ II =~-~=== I ===== I ~~== II 3600 I 011 137 I I II 6000 I o II 1143 I I II 01 o II 88 I I II 3600 I o II 59 I I II 6000 I o II 485 I I II o I o II 34 I I II 3600 I o II 194 I I II 4000 I o II 62 I I II 01 011 830 I I II I I EXISTING I I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+OTHER I II EXISTING I I +OTHER I I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I II VIC I I VIC I I VIC I I V/CWJMP I II ====1 I ~~=== I I ====== I I ===== I II 0.04 I I 0.04 I I 0.04 I I 1* II 0.21 I * I 0.21 I" I 0.21 I * I I II I I I I I I I II 0.02 1* I 0.02 I * I 0.02 I" I I II 0.09 I I 0.09 I I 0.09 I I I * II I I I I I I I II 0.05 I I 0.05 I I 0.05 I I I * II 0.22 I * I 0.22 I" I 0.22 I .. I I II I I I I I I I II II II WL II 1 I II 1800 I 011 263 I I II 0.15 I .. I 0.15 I * I 0.15 I .. I I lie II WT II 21 II 4000 I o II 104 I I II 0.05 I I 0.05 I I 0.05 I I I .. II II WR II o I II o I o II 82 I I II I I I I I I I II .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. II ~~=== = = = ======== = = = ======= = == = ======== = == II ••••••••••••••••••• u ••••• NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.23 I 0.23 I 0.23 I 0.00 II ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME ECR& FAR 99 II .................................................................................................................. , .......................... II ........................... EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.37 I 0.37 I 0.37 I 0.00 II N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND II ............................................................................................................... ···················· .. ········11 E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT II ====== = == = ----=== = == = ======== = = = == = = II N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED ICU VALUE = II 0.65 I 0.65 I 0.65 I 0.05 II LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE II ............................................................................................................................................. II .. DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS LOS = II B I B I B I A II = ======== = == = ==== = == = ====== = == = === = == == ** REPRESENTS RIGHT & THROUGH/RIGHT e INTERSECTION CAPACI1Y UTILIZATION ANALYSIS PROJECT: INTERVAl: INTERSECTION: FOX·MILLER PROPER1Y . CARLSBAD AM PEAK HOUR ECR & PAR· 1999 (EXISTING) VOLUMES WITH' EXISTING CONDITIONS II I I II I I, II I I EXISTING I I EX.:!-OTHER I I EX.+OTHER I II I MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP I EXISTING PROPOSED II EXISTING I OTHER I PROJECT II EXISTING I I + OTHER I I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I II I II LANES I' LANES I CAPACI1Y I CAPACI1Y II VOLUME I VOLUME I VOLUME II VIC I I VIC I I VIC I I V/CW_IMP I II I ===== II === I ===== I ===== I ===== II === I ======== I ==== II ====== I I ~~==== I I ====~~ I I ====== I II I NL II 1 I 0 I 1800 I 0 II 32 I I II 0.02 I I 0.02 I I 0.02 I I I" II I NT I 3 I 0 I 6000 I 0 II 547 I I II 0.09 I" I 0.09 I * I 0.09 I" I I II I NR 1 I 0 I 1800 I 0 II 400 I I II 0.22 I I 0.22 I I 0.22 I I I II I SL 2 I 0 I 3600 I 0 II 650 I I II 0.18 I" I 0.18 I" I 0.18 I" I I II I ST 3 I 0 I 6000 I 0 II 592 I I II 0.10 I I· 0.10 I I 0.10 I I I" II I SR 1 I . 0 I 1800 I 0 II 341 I I II 0.19 I I 0.19 I I 0.19 I I I II I EL 2 I 0 II 3600 I 0 II 126 I I II 0.04 I." I 0.04 I" I 0.04 I" I I" I r II ET 3 I 0 I 6000 I 0 II 620 I I II 0.11 I I 0.11 I I 0.11 I I I II II ER 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 II 36 I I II I I I I I I I II II WL 2 I 0 II 3600 I 0 II 458 I I II 0.13 I I 0.13 I I 0.13 I I I II II WT I 3 I 0 II 6000 I 0 II 1260 I I II 0.21 I * I 0.21 I" I 0.21 I" I I" II II WR I 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 916 I I II 0.51 I I 0.51 I I 0.51 I I I 1-...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... II ===== = == = ======= = == = ==~-==~~ = == = ~=--==~~ = == I_ ICU SPREADSHEET FllI~ NAME N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE " DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS ...•..••.••••••••••.••••••••.... NORTHISOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.27 I 0.27 I 0.27 I 0.00 II ECR&PAR 99&99 I II ............................................................................................................................................. II •...•..•••.••••••••••••.•...••.• EAST IWEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.25 I 0.25 I. 0.25 I 0.00 II II ............................................................................................................ ·································11 CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II II ===== = == = ======== = == = ==== = = = ======= = = II ICU VALUE = II 0.57 I 0.57 I 0.57 I 0.05 II II .................................................................................. : ............................ ······························11 LOS = II A I A I A I A II = ===== = = = ======= = == = ======--== = =:::: = --===== = = = e I·· .. INTE~SECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION: FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD PM PEAK HOUR ECR & PAR· 1999 (EXISTING) VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................... u ...................................................................................................................................................................................... _ .......................................... "0 ..................................... . II I II II I I II I I EXISTING I I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+OTHER I II MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP II EXISTING PROPOSED II EXISTING I OTHER I PROJECT II EXISTING I I + OTHER I I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I II I II LANES I LANES II CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME I VOLUME II VIC I I VIC I I VIC I I V/C·W-'MP I II I ======== II ~~= I ===== II ====== I ===== II ==== I ======== I === II ====== I I ---=== I I ====== I = I ~-====== I II I NL II 1 I II 1800 I 0 II 72 I I II 0.04 I I 0.04 I I 0.04 I I I" II I NT II 3 I II 6000 I 0 II 523 I I II 0.09 I * I 0.09 I * I 0.09 I" I I II I NR II 1 I II 1800 I 0 II 434 I I II 0.24 I I 0.24 I I 0.24 I I I II I SL II 2 I II 3600 I 0 II 918 I I II 0.26 I * I 0.26 I * I 0.26 I" I I II I ST II 3 I II 6000 I 0 II 724 I I II 0.12 I I 0.12 I I 0.12 I I I * II I SR II 1 I II 1800 I 0 II 132 I I II 0.07 I I 0.07 I I 0.07 r I I II I EL II 2 I II 3600 I 0 II 254 I I II 0.07 I I 0.07 I I 0.07 I I I * II II ET .11 3 I II 6000 I 0 II 1417 I I . II 0.25 I" I 0.25 I" I 0.25 I" I I II II ER II 0 I II 0 I 0 II 87 I I II I I I I I I I II II WL II 2 I II 3600 I 0 II 337 I I II 0.09 I" I 0.09 I" I 0.09 I" I I I_ II WT II 3 I II 6000 I 0 II 717 I I II 0.12 I I 0.12 I I 0.12 I I I" I II WR II 1 I II 1800 I 0 II 424 I I II 0.24 I I 0.24 I I 0.24 I I I I ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... II ==~~= = == = ====-~ = == = ===== = = = ======= = = II leu SPREADSHEET FILE NAME N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE " DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS ........................ ,....... NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.35 I 0.35 I 0.35 I 0.00 II ECR&PAR 99&99 I II ............................................................................................................................................. II ................................ EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.34 I 0.34 I 0.34 I 0.00 II II ................................................................................................ · .. ·· .... · .............. : .. · ...... · .... · .... ·11 CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II II =~~== = = = ===-~= = == = ======= = = = ==== = == II ICUVALUE= II 0.74 I 0.74 I 0.74 I 0.05 II II .................................................................................... , ........... · .. · .. · .... · ........................ · .. · .... ·11 LOS = II C I C I C I A II = ===--==== = = = ======--= :;:: == = ======= =.= = === = = == e INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION: FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD AM PEAK HOUR COLLEGE & FARADAY· 1999 (EXISTING) VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS •••••••••.•• _-............................................................................................................................... _ ............................................................................................................................................................... n ............................................................. . II II I II II I I 1\ I EXISTING I I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+OTHER I II II MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP II EXISTING PROPOSED II EXISTING I OTHER I PROJECT II EXISTING I + OTHER I I +PROJECT I, I +PROJECT I II II II LANES I LANES II CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME I VOLUME II VIC I VIC I I VIC I I V/C·W_IMP I II II ===== II ===== I === II ====== I ====== II =~~= I =-~=== I ==== II ==== I = I ==-~=== I I ==== I = I ====== I II II NL II 2 I 0 II 3600 I 0 II 180 I I II 0.05 I * I 0.05 I * I 0.05 I * I * II II NT II 2 I 0 II 4000 I 0 II 105 I I II 0.03 I I 0.03 I I 0.03 I I II II NR II 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 315 I I II 0.18 I I 0.18 I I 0.18 I I II II SL II 2 I 0 II 3600 I 0 II 210 I I II 0.06 I I 0.06 I I 0.06 I I II II ST II 2 I 0 II 4000 I 0 II 315 I I II 0.08 I * I 0.08 I * I 0.08 I * I * II II SR II 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 65 I I II 0.04 I I 0.04 I I 0.04 I I II II EL II 2 I 0 II 3600 I 0 II 5 I I II 0.00 I" I 0.00 I * I 0.00 I * I * II II ET II 2 I 0 II 4000 I 0 II 60 I I II 0.02 I I 0.02 I I 0.02 I I II II ER II 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 40 I I II 0.02 I I 0.02 I I 0.02 I I II II WL II 2 I 0 II 3600 I 0 II 48 I I II 0.01 I I 0.01 I I 0.01 I I I II II WT II 2 I 0 II 4000 I 0 II 185 I I' II 0.05 I" I 0.05 I" I 0.05 I * I I" II II WR II 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 25 I I II 0.01 I I 0.01 I I 0.01 I I I I iA ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... II ====== = == = ===== = == = ====== = = = ======== = == I iW ................................ NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.13 I 0.13 I 0.13 I 0.00 II ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE * DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS COL&FAR 99&99 I II .•..............................••....................•..........................................•••................•.....................••. II ........•....•..........•.•...•• EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.00 II II .............................................................................................................. ·············•·•·· .... ·········11 II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II II ======= = = = ===-~=== = = = ==----= == = ======== = == II II 0.23 I 0.23 I 0.23 I 0.05 II II ............................................................................................................... ·······················.··.· .. 11 IIA IA IA IA II CLEARANCE = ICU VALUE = LOS = = ====--== = = = ==== = = = ===== = = = ===== = == = e I·· .. \I \I \I PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION: COLLEGE & FARADAY· 1999 (EXISTING) VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS \I I \I I \I I I MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP II EXISTING I PROPOSED II EXISTING I OTHER I PROJECT II LANES I LANES II CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME I VOLUME ... \I I I EXISTING I I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+OTHER I \I \I EXISTING I I +OTHER I I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I \I \I VIC I I VIC I I VIC I I V/CW_IMP I \I \I ======== II ==--== I ===== II ===== I ========= II ==----= I ===== I ===== II ======= I I =----~ I I I I =====",,= I \I \I NL \I 21 II 3600 I o \I 65 I I \I 0.02 I I 0.02 I I 0.02 I I I .. \I \I NT \I 21 \I 4000 I o \I 255 I I \I 0.06 I" I 0.06 I .. I 0.06 I .. I I \I \I NR II 1 I \I 1800 I o II 100 I I II 0.06 I I 0.06 I I 0.06 I I I II II SL II 21 II 3600 I o II 25 I I 1\ 0.01 I it I 0.01 I" I 0.01 I" I I 1\ \I ST 1\ 21 II 4000 I o II 135 I I II 0.03 I I 0.03 I I 0.03 I I I .. \I \I SR \I 1 I 1\ 1800 I o II 10 I I 1\ 0.01 I I 0.Q1 I I 0.Q1 I I I II II EL II 21 II 3600 I o II 40 I I \I 0.01 I I 0.01 I I 0.01 I I I .. \I \I ET \I 21 II 4000 I o \I 145 I I \I 0.04 I .. I 0.04 I" I 0.04 I .. I I \I II ER \I 1 I \I 1800 I o \I 155 I I I 0.09 I I 0.09 I I 0.09 I I I \I \I WL II 21 \I 3600 I 01.1 325 I I 0.09 I .. I 0.09 I .. I 0.09 I .. I I lie \I WT \I 21 \I 4000 I o \I 35 I I 0.01 I I 0.01 I I 0.01 I I I .. II \I WR II 1 I \I 1800 I o \I 230 I I 0.13 I I 0.13 I I 0.13 I I I II ....... -.................................................................................................................. -........................................................................................... =====~-= = = = =~-= = = = ===~-== = == = ====~-=== = = II ................................ NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = I 0.07 I 0.07 I 0.07 I 0.00 II ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME COL&FAR 99&99 I ............................................................................................................ ·································11 ................................ EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS = I 0.13 I 0.13 I 0.13 I 0.00 II N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND I ............................................................... , ........................................................................ '-" II E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT II ====== = == = ===~-= = == = ===== = = = ====== = = II N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED ICUVALUE= II 0.25 I 0.25 I 0.25 I 0.05 II LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE II ....................................................... _ ...... , ............................................................................. II .. DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS LOS = 1\ A I A I A I A 1\ = ======= = == = ====--= = = = ===--=== = = = ====== = == = e I" . " INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION: FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD AM PEAK HOUR PAR & COLLEGE· 1999 (EXISTING) VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS ...................................................................................................................................................................... n ............................................................................... , ........................ _ •••••••• '0' .................................................................................. . II I II II I I II I I EXISTING I I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+OTHER I II II MOVEMENT EXIST I PROP II EXISTING PROPOSED II EXISTING I OTHE~ I PROJECT II EXISTING I I + OTHER I I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I II II LANES I LANES II CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME I VOLUME II VIC I I VIC I I VIC I I' V/C·W_IMP I II II ======== ==== I == II =~-=== I ===== II ==-~ I ===-~ I ======= II =-~== I I ====== I I ===== I I == I II II NL I 2 I 0 II 3600 I 0 II 12 I I II 0.00 I * I 0.00 I" I 0.00 I" I I" II II NT I 2 I 0 II 4000 I 0 II 14 I I II 0.00 I I 0.00 I I 0.00 I I I II II NR I 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 9 I I II 0.01 I I 0.01 I I 0.01 I I I II II SL I 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 55 I I II 0.03 I I 0.03 I I 0.03 I I I II II ST I 2 I ** II 4000 I 0 II 8 I I II 0.04 I" I 0.04 I * I 0.04 I * I I" II II SR I 0 I 0 II 0 I 0 II 166 I I II I I I I I I I II II EL I 2 I 0 II 3600 I 0 II 1076 I I II 0.30 I·" I 0.30 I" I 0.30 I" I I" II II ET I 3 I 0 II 6000 I 0 II 1393 I I II 0.23 I I 0.23 I I 0.23 I I I II II ER I 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 66 I I II 0.04 I I . . 0.04 I I 0.04 I I I II II WL I 2 I 0 II 3600 I 0 II 26 I I II 0.01 I I 0.01 I I 0.01 I I I II I- II WT II 3 I 0 II 6000 I 0 II 930 I I II 0.16 I" I 0.16 I" I 0.16 I" I I" II II WR II 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 38 I I II 0.02 I I 0.02 I I 0.02 I I I 11-...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... II ====== = == = ~-===== = == = ===== = == = ===---= = = 11- ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE " DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS ** REPRESENTS RIGHT & THROUGH/RIGHT ................................ NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.04 I 0.04 I 0.04 I 0.00 II PAR&COL 99&99 I II ............................................................... , ............................................................................. II ................................ EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS = \I 0.46 I 0.46 I 0.46 I 0.00 \I II ................................................................................................... · .... · .. · ...................... · .... · .. · .. 11 II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II II ===== = = = ======= = = = ==== = == = ,;,===~~= = == II CLEARANCE = ICU VALUE = II 0.55 I 0.55 I 0.55 I 0.05 II U ................................................................................................... ·· ...... · ............ ·: .......... · .. · .. · .. 11 LOS = \I A I A I A I A \I -- I" .. ... INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION: FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD PM PEAK HOUR PAR & COLLEGE· 1999 (EXISTING) VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................................. ou ............................... u._ ••••••••••••••••• , .................................................. ; •••••••••••••••• u ••••••••••• '0 ......................................................... , •••••• '0' ............................ _ .................................. , ................................. _0_ ......... . II I II II I II I I EXISTING I I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+OTHER I II MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP II EXISTING I PROPOSED II EXISTING I OTHER PROJECT II EXISTING I I +OTHER I I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I II II LANES I LANES II CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME VOLUME II VIC I· I VIC I I V/C I I V/C·W_IMP I II ========= II ===== I ==== II ===== I ====== II ==-~== I ===--~= ====11 ======= I I ====== I I ====== I I ====~~ I II NL II 21 II 3600 I o II 36 I II 0.01 I * I 0.01 I * I 0.01 I" I I " II I NT II 21 II 4000 I o II 1 I II 0.00 I I 0.00 I I 0.00 I I I II I NR II 1 I " 1800 I o II, 111 II 0.01 I I 0.01 I I 0.01 I I I " I SL II 1 I " 1800 I o II 36 I II 0.02 I I 0.02 I I 0.02 I I I II I ST II 2 I ** II 4000 I o II 7 I II 0.25 I " I 0.25 I" I 0.25 I" I I " II I SR II 01 II 01 o II 985 I II I I I I I I I II II EL II 21 II 3600 I o II 228 I II 0.06 I * I 0.06 I" I 0.06' I " I I" II II ET II 3 I II 6000 I o II 1211 I II 0.20 I I 0.20 I I 0.20 I I I II - II ER II 1 I II 1800 I o II 241 II 0.01 I I 0.01 I I 0.01 I I I lie II WL II 21 II 3600 I o II 111 II 0.00 I I 0.00 I I 0.00 I I I II II WT II 31 II 6000 I o II 1731 I I II 0.29 I * I 0.29 I" I 0.29 I" I I " II II WR II 1 I II 1800 I o II 99 I I II 0.06 I I 0.06 I I 0.06 I I I II ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... II ========= = = = ======= = = = ====---= = = ======= = = II ................................. NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.26 I 0.26 I 0.26 I 0.00 II ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME PAR&COL 99&99 II ............................................................................................................ ·································11 ................................ EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.35 I 0.35 I 0.35 I 0.00 II N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND II ............................................................................................................ ·································11 E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT II ======= = == = ======= = == = ===~~=== = == = ======== = == II N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED ICUVALUE= II 0.66 I 0.66 I 0.66 I 0.05 II LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE II ............................................................................................................ ·································11 " DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS LOS = II B I B I B I A II ** REPRESENTS RIGHT & THROUGH/RIGHT e , . , .) " YEAR 2005 CONDITIONS INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION: FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD AM PEAK HOUR ECR & TAMARACK· 2005 VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS II II I II II I I II I EXISTING I I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+OTHER I II II MOVEMENT I EXIST I PROP II EXISTING I PROPOSED II 2005 I OTHER I PROJECT II 2005 I + OTHER I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I II II I LANES I LANES II CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME I VOLUME II VIC I VIC I I VIC I I V/CW_IMP I II II ======= I ==== I == II ===== I =~~= II ====~~ I ==~~ I ======== II ==== I = I === I = I ===== I = I ===~-= I = II II NL I 1 I 0 II 1800 I ci II 121 I I II 0.07 I * I 0.Q7 I * I 0.07· I * I" II II NT I 2 I 0 II 4000 I 0 II 1032 I I II 0.26 I I 0.26 I I 0.26 I I II II NR I 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 74 I I II 0.Q4 I I 0.Q4 I I 0.Q4 I I II II SL I 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 37 I II 0.02 I I 0.02 I I 0.02 I I II II ST I 2 I 0 II 4000 I 0 II 1325 I II 0.33 I * I 0.33 I" I 0.33 I * I * II II SR I 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 11 I II 0.01 I I 0.Ql I I 0.Ql I I II II EL I 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 88 I II 0.05 I I 0.05 I I 0.05 I I" II II ET I 1 I 0 II 2000 I 0 II 50 I II 0.03 I" I 0.03 I" I 0.03 I .. I II II ER I 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 327 I II 0.18 I I 0.18 I I 0.18 I I II II WL II 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 370 I II 0.21 I" I 0.21 I" I 0.21 I" I I II II WT I 2 I 0 II 4000 I 0 II 135 I II 0.06 I I 0.06 I I 0.06 I I I" lie I! WR \I 0 I 0 II 0 I 0 II 95 I II I I I I I I I I! ......••. _................... ..... .............. ... .............. ..... .•..............•............... ... .••.............•..... ....• ......................... . ..........•..........•........•.........•..•.•...... II ======= = == = ~-===== = == = ======= = == = ====== = == II ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE " DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS ........•....................••• NORTHISOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.40 I 0.40 I 0.40 I 0.00 II ECR&TAM 05&99 I II ............................................................... , ............................................................................. II ................................ EAST IWEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.24 I 0.24 I 0.24 I 0.00 II II .........•...........•.•..•...........••................................•....•.•............................ ·································11 CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II II ===== = = = ======= = == = ====--==;= = == = ======= = == II II 0.69 I 0.69 I 0.69 I 0.05 II ICUVALUE; II .....•. , .....•••.•..•..••.....•.•...•••.................•.........•.......•.•••........................•.... ·································11 LOS = \I B I'B IB IA II = ===--= = = = ==--=== = == = ===--==== = = =. ===== = == = e I·· .. INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION: FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD PM PEAK HOUR ECR & TAMARACK· 2005 VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS II II I II II I II I I EXISTING I I EX.+OTHER I EX.+OTHER II II MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP II EXISTING I PROPOSED II 2005 I OTHER PROJECT II 2005 I I + OTHER I I +PROJECT I +PROJECT II II II LANES I LANES II CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME VOLUME II VIC I I VIC I I VIC I V/C·W.JMP II II ===== II === I ---= II ======= I ~~== II ==== I ==== ==== II --I = I ======== I I I ===-~= I = II II NL II 1 I II 1800 I 0 II 319 I II 0.18 I " 0.18 I" I 0.18 I " I" II II NT II 2 I II 4000 I 0 II 1197 I 1\ 0.30 I 0.30 I I 0.30 I I II II NR II 1 I II 1800 I 0 II 433 I II 0.24 I 0.24 I I 0.24 I I II II SL II 1 I II 1800 I 0 II 228 I II 0.13 I 0.13 I I 0.13 I I II II ST II 2 I II 4000 I 0 II 1214 I II 0.30 I " 0.30 I" I 0.30 I " I" II II SR II 1 I II 1800 I 0 II 144 I II 0.08 I 0.08 I I 0.08 I I II II EL II 1 I II 1800 I 0 II 21 I II 0.01 I 0.01 I I om I I" II II ET II 1 I II 2000 I 0 II 172 I II 0.09 I " 0.09 I" I 0.09 I " I II .. II ER II 1 I II 1800 I 0 II 131 I II 0.07 I 0.07 I I 0.07 I I II II WL II 1 I II 1800 I 0 II 113 I II 0.06 I * 0.06 I" I 0.06 I " I I • II WT II 2 I II 4000 I 0 II 76 I II 0.03 I 0.03 I I 0.03 I I" I II WR II 0 I II 0 I 0 II 48 I I II I I I I I I I II ........•...................................•....................•••.........•.........•.....................•....•.•.•.•.....•.........................•..............•.................• '" ........•...............• II ==-~== = = = ======== = == = ===== = == = ==-~=== = = II ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME N = NORTHBOUND. S = SOUTHBOUND E = EASTBOUND. W = WESTBOUND L = LEFT. T = THROUGH. R = RIGHT N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE " DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS ..••...........................• NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.48 I 0.48 I 0.48 I 0.00 II ECR&TAM 05&99 II ............................................................................................................................................. II ...........••...........•....•.. EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.15 I 0.15 I 0.15 I 0.00 II II .............................................................................................................. ·······························11 CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II II ====== = == = =-~===-~ = == = ======= = = = =~~== = = II ICU VALUE = II 0.68 I 0.68 I 0.68 I 0.05 II II ................................................................................................................ ••········•····• .... ·········11 LOS = II BIB I B I A 1\ == === = = = ====== = == = ====~== = = = ===== = = = e INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION: FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD AM PEAK HOUR ECR & COLLEGE· 2005 VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONPITIONS (PLUS ADDED INTERSECTION LEG) II I II I II I ' I II I I EXISTING I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+OTHER I II II MOVEMENT EXIST I PROP II EXISTING I PROPOSED II 2005 I OTHER I PROJECT II 2005 I I + OTHER I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I II II LANES I LANES II CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME I VOLUME II VIC I I VIC I VIC I I V/CW_IMP I II II ====== ==== I ==== II ======== I ====== II ====== I =~~== I ====~-== II ----=-~= I I ==== I ===== I· I == I II II NL 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 208 I I II 0.12 I * I 0.12 * I 0.12 I * I I * II II NT I 3 I 0 II 6000 I 0 II 622 I I II 0.10 I I 0.10 I 0.10 I I I II II NR I 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 9 I I II 0.01 I I 0.01 I 0.01 I I I U II SL I 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 12 I I II 0.01 I I 0.01 I 0.01 I I I II II ST I 3 I 0 II 6000 I 0 II 1676 I I II 0.28 I * I 0.28 * I 0.28 I * I I * II II SR II FREE I 0 II N.S. I 0 II 817 I I II N.S. I I N.S. I N.S. I I I II II EL II 2 I 0 II 3600 I 0 II 208 I I II 0.06 I * I 0.06 * I 0.06 I * I I * II II ET II 2 I 0 II 4000 I 0 II 5 I I II 0.00 I I 0.00 I 0.00 I I I II II ER II 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 135 I I II 0.08 I I 0.08 I 0.08 I I I II II WL II 2 I 0 II 3600 I 0 II 65 I I II 0.02 I I 0.02 I I 0.02 I I I II II WT II 2 I 0 II 4000 I 0 II 45 I I II 0.02 I * I 0.02 I * I 0.02 I * I I * II e II . WR II 0 I 0 II 0 I 0 II 34 I I II I I I I I I I II .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. II ====== = = = ======== = == = ===~-=== = == = ======== = == II ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE * DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS .....•.•..•......•.•.•••. NORTHISOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.40 I 0.40 I 0.40 I 0.00 II ECR&COL 05&99 I II ......................... '" ................................................................................................................. II •..•••••••••••••.•••.•.•• EAST IWEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.08 I 0.08 I 0.08 I 0.00 II II .......................... , .................................................................................................................. II CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II· II ====== = = = =====-~= = == = ====== = = = ========= = = II ICU VALUE = II 0.53 I 0.53 I 0.53 I 0.05 II II ............................................................................................................ ············ .. ···················11 LOS = II A I A I A I A II = ===== = = = ======== = == = ====== = = = ==--==== = = = -- I•· .. INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION: FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD PM PEAK HOUR ECR & COLLEGE· 2005 VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS (PLUS ADDED INTERSECTION LEG) ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ -••••••••••••••••••••••••••• -.................... _ ............. "0 •••••••••• II II I II I II I I II I I EXISTING I I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+OTHER I II II MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP II EXISTING I PROPOSED II 2005 I OTHER I PROJECT II 2005 I I + OTHER I I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I II II II LANES I LANES II CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME I VOLUME II VIC I I VIC I I VIC I I V/CW_IMP I II II ======== II === I ~-= 1'1 ======= I ~-=== II ======= I ==== I ===~-== II ===== I = I ======== I I =~-===== I = I =~-=== I = II II NL II 1 I II 1800 I 0 II 104 I I II 0.06 I I 0.06 I I 0.06 I I I" II II NT II 3 I II 6000 I 0 II 1534 I I II 0.26 I * I 0.26 I * I 0.26 I * I I II II NR II 1 I II 1800 I 0 II 73 I I II 0.04 I I 0.04 I I 0.04 I I I II II SL II 1 '1 II 1800 I 0 II 50 I I II 0.03 I" I 0.03 I * I 0.03 I" I I II II ST II 3 I II 6000 I 0 II 624 I I II 0.10 I I 0.10 I I 0.10 I I I" II II SR II FREE I II N.S. I 0 II 260 I I II N.S. I I N.S. I I N.S. I I I II II EL II 2 I II 3600 I 0 II 15 I I II 0.00 I" I 0.00 I" I 0.00 I" I I" II II ET II 2 I II 4000 I 0 II 53 I I II 0.01 I I 0.Ql I I 0.01 I I I II .. ~- II ER II 1 I II 1800 I 0 II 201 I I II 0.11 I I 0.11 I I 0.11 I I I II II WL II 2 I II 3600 I 0 II 15 I I II 0.00 I I 0.00 I I 0.00 I I I II _ II WT II 2 I II 4000 I 0 II 11 I I II 0.01 I" I 0.01 I" I 0.01 I" I I" II II WR II 0 I II 0 I 0 II 17 I I II I I I I I I I II ...................•.........•.........•.....•••..........•..•........................ : .........•.............•........•..•.• _ .•...•.•...........••.........................•.•.....•..•......................... II ===--==== = == = ========= = == = ======= = == = ==== = == II ICU SPREAPSHEET FILE NAME N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE .. DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS ._...................... NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.29 I 0.29 I 0.29 I 0.00 II ECR&COL 05&99 I II ............................................................................................................................................. II ...........•............. EASTIWEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.01 I 0.01 I 0.01 I 0.00 II II .•.••..•....•.•••.••.•....•.••...•••..••••••.•.......•.•.•••...•.•••....•.••••..•••....•.•..•......••....••.•.•.•.•••..••.•••.•..•••••.•••••• 11 II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II II =~~=== = = = ======= = = = ======= =. == = ----_ = = II II 0.35 I 0.35 I 0.35 I 0.05 II II ..•...•.......... -.......................................................................................................................... II II A IA IA IA II CLEARANCE = ICU VALUE = LOS = = ==--==== = == = ======= = = = ===== = == = ===== = = = - I·· ., INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION: FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD AM PEAK HOUR ECR & FARADAY· 2005 VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS II I I II I II I I II I EXISTING I EX.+OTHER I EX.+OTHER I II II MOVEMENT I EXIST I PROP II EXISTING I PROPOSED II 2005 I OTHER I PROJECT II 2005 I + OTHER I +PROJECT I +PROJECT I II II I LANES I LANES II CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME I VOLUME II VIC I VIC I VIC I v/eW_IMP I II II ====== I ==== I ==== II ========= I ==== II === I ==== I =~~ II ===== I = I ~-===-~ I = I ==---== I = I ===~~ I II II NL I 2 I 0 II 3600 I 0 II 1160 I I II 0.32 1\1' III 0.32 III' III 0.32 1\1' III I" II II NT I 3 I 0 II 6000 I 0 II 1007 I I II 0.20 1\1 III 0.20 III III 0.20 III III I II II NR I 0 I 0 II 0 I 0 II 192 I I II 1\1 1\1 III 1\1 1\1 III I II II SL I 2 I 0 II 3600 I 0 II 19 I I II 0.01 III III 0.01 III III 0.01 1\1 III I II II ST I 3 I 0 II 6000 I 0 II 1600 I I II 0.30 III' 1\1 0.30 III' III 0.30 III' III I" II II SR I 0 I 0 II 0 I 0 II 171 I I II 1\1 III III III III 1\1 I II II EL I 21 011 36001 011 651 I II 0.02111 III 0.02111 III 0.02 111 III 1* II II ET I 2 I ** II 4000 I N.S. II 6 I I II 0.10 III' 1\1 0.10 III' III 0.10 III' III I II II ER II 0 I 0 II 0 I 0 II 400 I I II III III III III III III I II -:. ~. II WL I 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 61 I I II 0.03 III' III 0.03 III· III 0.03 III' III I II II WT I 2 I 0 II 4000 I 0 II 27 I I II 0.01 III III 0.01 III . III 0.01 III III I" II e II WR I 0 I 0 II 0 I 0 II 4 I I II III III III III III III I II .....................•...••............................•..•...........•......•.....•........................•..............................................•..............•••.................................... II ====== = = = ~~==== = == = ====== = == = ======= = = II .............................• NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.62 I 0.62 I 0.62 I 0.00 II ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME ECR & FAR 99&05 II •......................... , ............••.•...........•.....................••...•....•...........••.•..••........•.......................... II N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE " DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS REPRESENTS RIGHT & THROUGH/RIGHT .•...•.......................• EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.13 I 0.13 l 0.13 I 0.00 II II .....................•..•. , .•.... _ ..........••................ , ............•.•.............................................................. II CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II II ==== = == = ===== = == = =----== = == = ======== = = II ICUVALUE= II . 0.80 I 0.80 I 0.80 I 0.05 II II ....................•....•.............•....................•.............••••...........•......•.••.•..•... ·································11 LOS = II C IC IC IA II = =====--=== = = = ======= = = = ===--= =: = = ====== = = == e I·· .. INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION: FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD PM PEAK HOUR ECR & FARADAY· 2005 VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 0 ••••••••••••••••••••••• _ ............................................................................................................................................ _ ........................................ '0 __ ................................................................................... n ........................ . II II I II I II I II I I EXISTING I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+OTHER II II MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP II EXISTING I PROPOSED II 2005 I OTHER PROJECT II 2005 I I + OTHER I +PROJECT I, I +PROJECT II II II LANES I LANES II CAPACITY. I CAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME VOLUME II VIC I I VIC I I VIC I I V/C·W_IMP II II ====== I ===== I =~~= II ======== I ===----= II ===~~= I ===== === II ===== I = I ====== I = I ==== I = I ======= I II II NL I 2 I 0 II 3600 I 0 II 316 I II 0.09 III III 0.09 III III 0.09 III . III I * II II NT I 3 I 0 II 6000 I 0 II 1481 I II 0.27 III * III 0.27 III' 111 027 III * 111 I II II NR I 0 I 0 II 0 I 0 II 115 I II III III III III III III I II II SL I 2 I 0 II 3600 I 0 II 5 I II 0.00 III' 111 0.00 III' III 0.00 III * III I II II ST I 3 I 0 II 6000 I 0 II 959 I II 0.17 III 111 0.17 111 111 0.17 111 III I" II II SR I 0 I 0 II 0 I 0 II 67 I II III III III III III 111 I II II EL I 2 I 0 II 3600 I 0 II 69 I II 0.02 III III 0.02 III 111 0.02 111 111 I" II ':. II ET I 2 I ** II 4000 I N.S. II 42 I II 0.21 111 * 111 0.21 111 * 111 0.21 111 * III I II II ER I 0 I 0 II 0 I 0 II 803 I II III 111 III III .111 111 I II e II WL I 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 23 I II 0.D1 III * III 0.01 III' III 0.01 III * III I II II WT II 21 011 40001 011 71 I II 0.D1'1I1 111 0.D1111 111 0.01111 111 1* II II WR I 0 I 0 II 0 I 0 II 16 I I II III 111 111 111 111 III I II ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. II ====== = == = ======= = == = ===---= == = ======== = = II ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE * DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS .............................. NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.27 I 0.27 I 0.27 I 0.00 II ECR & FAR 99&05 II .......................... , .......................................... '" ..................................................................... II .............................. EAST IWEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.22 I 0.22 I 0.22 I 0.00 II II ............................................................................................................................ ·· .. ······ .. ·····11 CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II II ====== = == = ===== = == = ====== = == = ======= = = II ICUVALUE= II 0.54 I 0.54 I 0.54 I 0.05 II II ................................................................................................ : ............................................ II LOS = II A I A I A I A II' == ==== = = = ======= = = = =====---= == = ======= = = == ** REPRESENTS RIGHT & THROUGH/RIGHT e PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION: ECR & PAR· 2005 VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS II II I II II I II I I EXISTING I I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+OTHER II II MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP II EXISTING I PROPOSED II 2005 I OTHER PROJECT II 2005 I I + OTHER I I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT II II II LANES I LANES II CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME VOLUME II VIC I I VIC I I VIC I I V/CW_IMP ,II I ====== II ==~~ I ===== II ==== I ======= II ~~=== I ====== ====== II ======== I I -----~= I I ==== I = I ======= I = II Nt: II 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 74 I II 0.04 I I 0.04 I I 0.04 I I I" II NT II 3 I 0 II 6000 I 0 II 1106 I II 0.18 I" I 0.18 I" I 0.18 I" I I II NR II 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 856 I II 0.48 I I 0.48 I I 0.48 I I I II SL II 2 I 0 II 3600 I 0 II 1128 I II 0.31 I" I 0.31 I" I 0.31 I" I I II ST II 3 I 0 II 6000 I 0 II 609 I II 0.10 I I 0.10 I I 0.10 I I I" II SR II 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 350 I II 0.19 I I 0.19 I I 0.19 I I I II I EL II 2 I 0 II 3600 I 0 II 147 I II 0.04 I I 0.04 I I 0.04 I I I" II I ET II 3 I 0 II 6000 I 0 II 510 I II 0.10 I" I 0.10 I" I 0.10 I" I I II II ER II 0 I 0 II 0 I 0 II 60 I I II I I I I I I I II II WL II 2 I 0 II 3600 I 0 II 566 I I II 0.16 I" I 0.16 I" I 0.16 I" I I II ';. II WT II 3 I 0 II 6000 I 0 II 762 I . I II 0.13 I I 0.13 I I 0.13 I I I" II II WR II 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 983 I I II 0.55 I I 0.55 I I 0.55 I I I 11_ ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... II ====== = = = ===== = == = ======= = == = ======= = == II" ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE * DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS ................................ NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.49 I 0.49 I 0.49 I 0.00 II ECR&PAR 99&05 I II ............................................................................................................................................. II ................................ EAST IWEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.26 I 0.26 I 0.26 I 0.00 II II ............................................................................................................................................. II CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II II ===== = == = ===== = == = ====== = == = ========= = == II ICUVALUE= II 0.80 I 0.80 I 0.80 I 0.05 II II ............................................................................................................ ·································11 LOS = II C I C I C I A II == ====---==== = == = ====== = = ::: ======= = == = ======== = == == e I" .. PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION: INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD PM PEAK HOUR ECR & PAR· 2005 VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................................. -0 ...................................................... 0 ....................................................... 0 ............................ : ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 0 ............................................. 1 .............. : .............................................. '" •••••••••• II II I II II I I II I I EXISTING I I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+OTHER I II II MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP II EXISTING I PROPOSED II 2005 I OTHER I PROJECT II 2005 I I + OTHER I I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I II II II LANES I LANES II CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME I VOLUME II VIC I I VIC I I VIC I I V/CW_IMP I II II ======== II ===== I ===== II ========= I ========= II ========= I ========= I ========= II ========= I = I ========= I = I ======= I = I ======== I II II NL II 1 I II 1800 I 0 II 102 I I II 0.06 I I 0.06 I I 0.06 I I I" II II NT II 3 I II 6000 I 0 II 629 I I II 0.10 I" I 0.10 I" I 0.10 I * I I II II NR II 1 I II 1800 I 0 II 291 I I II 0.16 I I 0.16 I I 0.16 I I I II II SL II 2 I II 3600 I 0 II 1064 I I II 0.30 I" I 0.30 I" I 0.30 I" I I II II ST 1\ 31 II 6000 1 011 6611 I II 0.111 I 0.111 I 0.111 I 1* II II SR II 1 I II 1800 I 0 II 102 I I II 0.06 I I 0.06 I I 0.06 I I I II II EL II 2 I II 3600 I 0 II 319 I I II 0.09 I I 0.09 I I 0.09 I I I * II -, .,. II ET II 3 I II 6000 I 0 II 901 I I II 0.18 I" I 0.18 I" I 0.18 I" I I II II ER II 0 I II 0 I 0 II 162 I I II I I I . I I I I II II WL II 2 I II 3600 I 0 II 483 I I II 0.13 I" I 0.13 I * I 0.13 I" I I II e II WT II 3 I II 6000 I 0 II 4:97 I I ' II 0.08 I I 0.08 I I 0.08 I I I" II II WR II 1 I II 1800 I 0 II 997 I I II , 0.55 I I 0.55 I I 0.55 I I I II ............................................................................................. --;-..................................................................................................................... II ========== = = = ========== = == ;, ========== = == = ========== = == II ................................ NORTHISOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.40 I 0.40 .1 0.40 I 0,00 II ICU SPREADSHEET rilE NAME ECR&PAR 99&05 I II ......................................................................................................... '" ................................. II ................................ EAST IWEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.31 I 0.31 I. 0.31 I o.oa 1\ N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND II ............................................................................................................................................. II E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I,' 0.05 I 0.05 II L = lEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT II ========= = == = ========== = == = ==7'======= = == = ========== = == II N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED ICU VALUE = II 0.76 I 0,76 I:.' 0.76 I 0.05 II lOS = lEVEL OF SERVICE II .............................................................................. ,., .. , ..................... '" ................................. II .. DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS LOS = II C I C I '9"" I A . II == ========== = == = ========= = == = ==;=ir:!.~===== = == = ========== = == == e PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION: INTERSECTioN CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD AM PEAK HOUR COLLEGE & FARADAY· 2005 VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................................ ! ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. . II II I II II I I II I I EXISTING I. I EX.+OTHER r I EX.+.DTHER I II II MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP II EXISTING I PROPOSED II 2005 I OTHER I PROJECT II 2005 I I +OTHER I +PROJECT. I I +PROJECT I II II II LANES I LANES II CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME I VOLUME II VIC I I VIC I I VIC I I V/C·W_IMP. I II' II ========= II ===== I ===== II ======== I ========= II ========= I ========= I ========= II ========= I I ========= I = I ========= I I ========= I II II NL II 21 011 3600 I 011 189 I I II 0.05 I I 0.05 I r 0.05 I I I * II II NT II 21 o II 4000 I o II 225 I I II 0.06 I * I 0.06 I * I 0.06 I " I I II II NR II 1 I o II 1800 I o II 311 I I II 0.17 I I 0.17 I I 0.17 I I I II II SL II 21 o II 3600 I o II 368 I I II 0.10 I" I 0.10 I " I 0.10 I " I I II II ST II 21 o II 4000 I 011 327 I I II 0.08 I I 0.08 I I 0.08 I I I " II II SR II 1 I 011 1800 I o II 357 I I II 0.20 I I 0.20 I I 0.20 I I I II II EL II 21 o II 3600 I o II 87 I I II 0.02 I I 0.02 I I 0.02 I I 1* II II ET II 21 o II 4000 I 011 191 I I II 0.05 I " I 0.05 I " I 0.05 I * I I II II ER II 1 I o II 1800 I 011 78 I I II 0.04 I I 0.04 I I 0.04 I I I II II WL II 21 o II 3600 I 011 127 I I II 0.04 I * I 0.04 I " I 0.04 I " I I II II WT II 21 o II 4000 I 011 222 I I II 0.06 I I 0.06 I I 0.06 I I I " II II WR II 1 I o II 1800 I 011 61 I I II 0.03 I I 0.03 I I 0.03 I I I II ................................................... , .................................................................................................................................................................. II ========== = == = ========= = == = ========== = == = ========== = :== II •••..•..•.•......•.•.•...••....• NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.16 I 0.16 I 0.16 I 0.00 II ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME COL&FAR 05&99 I II .............................................................. , ................................... , .................................... , ..... II ............... ~ ................ EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.09 I 0.09 I 0.09 I 0.00 II N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND II ............................................................................................................ ·································11 E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT II ========== = == = ========= = == = ========= = == = ========== = == II N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED ICU VALUE = II 0.30 I 0.30 I 0.30 I 0.05 II LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE II .......................................................................................................... , ................. -......... , ..... II * DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS LOS = II A I A I A I A II ;;:;;: ========== = = == ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == == -- tit e I·· .. II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION: II II MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP II II LANES 1. LANES II ========= II ===== I ===== II NL II 21 II NT II 21 II NR II 1 I II SL II 21 II ST II 2 I II SR II 1 I II EL II 21 II ET II 21 II ER II 1 I II WL II 21 II WT II 21 II WR II 1 I II FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD PM PEAK HOUR COLLEGE & FARADAY· 2005 VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS II I EXISTING I P[lOPOSED II 2005 I OTHER CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME ========= I ========= II ========= I ========= 3600 I o II 99 I 4000 I o II 450 I 1800 I o II 105 I 3600 I o II 771 4000 I 011 231 I 1800 I 011 86 I 3600 I o II 305 I 4000 I 011 194 I 1800 I 011 122 I 3600 I 011 242 I 40.00 I o II 154 I 1800 I 011 336 I I I II ·1 I EXISTING I I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+OTHER I II PROJECT II 2005 I I +OTHER I I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I II VOLUME II VIC I I VIC I I VIC I I V/CW_IMP I II ========= II ========= I I ========= I I ========= I I ========= I II II 0.03 I I 0.03 I I 0.03 I I I " II II 0.11 I * I 0.11 I" I 0.11 I * I I II II 0.06 I I 0.06 I I 0.06 I I I II II 0.02 I * I 0.02 I " I 0.02 I " I I II II 0.06 I I 0.06 I I 0.06 I I I " II II 0.05 I I 0.05 I I 0.05 I I I II II 0.08 I * I 0.08 I " I 0.08 I * I I " II II 0.05 I I 0.05 I I 0.05 I I I II II 0.07 I I 0.07 I I 0.D7 I I I II II 0.D7 I I 0.07 I I 0.D7 I I I II II 0.04 I" I 0.04 I * I 0.04 I " I I * II II 0.19 I I 0.19 I I 0.19 I I I II II ............................................................................................................................................................................ , ......................................... II ========= = == = ========== = == = ========= = == = ========== = == II ••••••.•••..••.••••.•••.••••••.• NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.13 I 0.13 I 0.13 I 0.00 II ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME COL&FAR 05&99 II .................................................................................................. , ....... , ............................ , ..... II ..•••......••••••••••••.....•... EASTIWEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.12 I 0.12 I 0.12 I 0.00 II N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND II .............................................................. , ....... , ........................... , ....... , .................................. II E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT II ========== = == = ========== = == = ========= = == = ========== = == II N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED ICU VALUE = II 0.30 I 0.30 I 0.30 I 0.05 II LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE II ............................................................. '" .................................. , ....... , .................................. II " DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS LOS = II A I A I A I A II == =========;:;: :::: == :::: ========== :::: == :::: =========== = == = ========== :::: == == ~" " ':. e - I'· .. ,INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION: FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD AM PEAK HOUR PAR & COLLEGE· 2005 VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... : ................................................................................................................................................... . \I \I I \I \I I I \I I I EXISTING I I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+OTHER I \I \I MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP II EXISTING I PROPOSED II 2005 I OTHER I PROJECT II 2005 I I +OTHER I I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I II \I II LANES I LANES II CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME I VOLUME \I VIC I I VIC I I VIC I I V/CW_IMP I II II ========= II ===== I ===== II ========= I ========= II ========= I ========= I ========= II ========= I I ========= I I ========= I I ========= I II II NL II 21 o \I 3600 I o II 192 I I II 0.05 I * I 0.05 I * I 0.05 I * I I * II II NT II 21 o II 4000 I o II 356 I I II 0.09 I I 0.09 I I 0.09 I I I II II NR II 1 I o II 1800 I o II 318 I I II 0.18 1 I 0.18 I I 0.18 I I I II II SL II 1 1 o II 1800 I o II ll21 1 II 0.06 I I 0.06 I I 0.06 I I I II II ST II 2 1 ** II 4000 1 011 69 I I II 0.10 I * I 0.10 I * I 0.10 I * I I * II II SR II o I o II 01 o II 320 I I II I I I I I I I II II EL II 21 o II 3600 I o II 649 I I II 0.18 I * I 0.18 1 * I 0.18 I * I I * II II ET II 31 o II 6000 1 011 812 I I II 0.14 I I 0.14 I I 0.14 I I I II II ER II 1 I o II 1800 I o II 55 I 1 II 0.03 I I 0.03 I I 0.03 I I I I II WL II 21 o II 3600 I o II 50 1 I II 0.01 I I 0.01 I 1 om I I I II WT II 31 o II 6000 I 011 436 I 1 II 0.07 I * I 0.07 I * 1 0.07 1 * I I * I II WR II 1 I o II 1800 I o II 66 I I II 0.04 I 1 0.04 I I 0.04 I I I I .......................................................... , ........................................................................................................................................................... II ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == I ................................ NORTHISOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.15 I 0.15 0.15 0.00 1 ICU SPREADSHEET ~ILE NAME PAR&COL 05&99 I II ............................................................................................................................................. I ............... " ................ EAST IWEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.25 I 0.25 1 0.25 0.00 I N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND II ............................................................................................................................................. I E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND CLEARANCE = II 0.05 0.05 I 0.05 0.05 I L = LEFT. T = THROUGH. R = RIGHT II "'="'======= = == = ======== = == = ========= = == = ========== = == I N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED ICUVALUE= II 0.45 0.45 I 0.45 0.05 1 LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE II ............................................................................................................................................. I * DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS LOS = II A A I A A I == ========== = == ;:: ========== = == :;;;; ========== = == = =========:;;;; = = == "* REPRESENTS RIGHT & THROUGHIRIGHT ~- ~" e e I" .. II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION: II I II MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP II II LANES I LANES II ========= II ===== I ===== II NL II 21 II NT II 2 I II NR II 1 I II SL II 1 I II ST II 2 I ** II SR II o I II EL II 21 II ET II 31 II ER II 1 I II WL II 21 II WT II 31 II WR II 1 I II FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD PM PEAK HOUR PAR & COLLEGE· 2005 VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS II I EXISTING PROPOSED II 2005 I OTHER CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME I II I I PROJECT II 2005 I I VOLUME II VIC I ========= I ========= II ========= I ========= I ========= II ========= I 3600 I o II 90 I I II 0.03 I" 4000 I o II 102 I I II 0.03 I 1800 I o II 53 I I II 0.03 I 1800 I o II 78 I I II 0.04 I 4000 I 01'1 433 I I II 0.21 I * 01 o II 417 I I II I 3600 I o II 287 I I II 0.08 1* 6000 I o II 382 I I II 0.06 I 1800 I o II 275 I I II 0.15 I 3600 I o II 410 I I II 0.11 I 6000 I o II 678 I I II 0.11 I * 1800 I o II 108 I I II 0.06 I I EXISTING I I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+OTHER I II I +OTHER I I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I II I VIC I I VIC I I V/C·W_IMP I II I ========= I I ========= I I ========= I II I 0.03 I * I 0.03 I " I I * II I 0.03 I I 0.03 I I I II I 0.03 I I 0.03 I I I II I 0.Q4 I I 0.04 I I I II I 0.21 I * I 0.21 I" I I * II I I I I I I II I 0.08 I" I 0.08 I * I I " II I 0.06 I I 0.06 I I I II I 0.15 I I 0.15 I I I II I 0.11 I I 0.11 I I I II I 0.11 I * I 0.11 I" I I " II I 0.06 I I 0.06 I I I II .................................................. , ................................................................................................................................................................... II ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == II . . •.••.....••••..• ,............... NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.24 I 0.24 I 0.24 I 0.00 II ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME PAR&COL 05&99 II ..................................................................... '" .............................................................. , ...... II ••••.••...•••••.•••....•.••••.•• EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.19 I 0.19 I 0.19 I 0.00 II N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND II ................................................................................................... , ......................................... II E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT II ========= = == = ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == II N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED ICU VALUE = II 0.48 I 0.48 I 0.48 I 0.05 II LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE II ...................................................................................................................................... , ...... II * DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS LOS = II A I A I A I A II == ========== ::;: == ;; ======== = == ;; ========== = == = ========== = == == ** REPRESENTS RIGHT & THROUGH/RIGHT " e e INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION' ANALYSIS PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION: FOX,MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD AM PEAK HOUR ECR & CANNON· 2005 VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS (ADDED STUDY INTERSE~TION) ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. II II I II II I I II I I EXISTING I I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+OTHER I II II MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP II EXISTING PROPOSED II 2005 I QTHER I PROJECT II 2005 I I + OTHER I I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I II II II LANES I LANES II CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME I VOLUME II VIC I I VIC I I VIC I I V/C·W_IMP I II II ======== II ===== I ===== II ========= I ========= II ========= I ========= I ========= II ========= I I ========= I I ========= I I ========= I II II NL II 1 I 0 II 1800 I a II 41 I I II 0.02 I * I 0.02 I * I 0.02 I * I I * II II NT II 3 I 0 II 6000 I a II 906 I I II 0.15 I I 0.15 I I 0.15 I I I II II NR II 1 I a II 1800 I a II a I I II 0.00 I I 0.00 I I 0.00 I I I II II SL II 1 I a II 1800 I a II a I I II 0.00 I I 0.00 I I 0.00 I I I II II ST II 3 I a II 6000 I a II 2102 I I II 0.35 I * I 0.35 I * I 0.35 I * I I * II II SR II 1 I 0 II 1800 I a II 54 I I II 0.03 I I 0.03 I I 0.03 I I I II II EL II 2 I a II 3600 I a II 162 I I II 0.05 I * I 0.05 I * I 0.05 I * I I * II II ET II 2 I a II 4000 I a II a I I II 0.00 I I 0.00 I I 0.00 I I I II II ER II 1 I a II 1800 I a II 234 I I II 0.13 I I 0.13 I I 0.13 I I I II "", '. II WL II 2 I a II 3600 I a II a I I II 0.00 I I 0.00 I I 0.00 I I I II II WT II 2 I a II 4000 I a II a I I II 0.00 I * I 0.00 I * I 0.00 I * I I * II e II WR II 1 I a II 1800 I a II a I I II 0.00 I I 0.00 I I 0.00 I I I II ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... : .......... II ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == II ................................ NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.37. I 0.37 I 0.37 I 0.00 II ICU SPREADSHEET ~ILE NAME ECR&CAN 05&99 I II .................................................................................................. , .......................................... II ••...••..•••.••. ,............... EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.00 II N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND II ............................................................................................................................................. II E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND CLEARANCE = .11 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT II ======== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== =< == II N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED ICU VALUE = II 0.47 I 0.47 I 0.47 I 0.05 II LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE II ............................................................................................................................................. II * DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS LOS = II A I A I A I A II == =::======= = = = ========= = ==: ;;;; ========= = == = ========= = == == e I" .. PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION: INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD PM PEAK HOUR ECR & CANNON· 2005 VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS (ADDED STUDY INTERSECTION) ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. II II I II II I I .11 I I EXISTING I II MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP II EXISTING I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+OTHER I II I PROPOSED II 2005 I OTHER I PROJECT II 2005 I I +OTHER I I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I II II II LANES I LANES II CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME I VOLUME II VIC I I VIC I I VIC I I VieW_IMP I II II ========= II ===== I II ========= I ========= II ========= I ========= I ========= II ======== I I ========= I I ========= I I ========= I II II NL II 1 I II 1800 I a II 226 I I II 0.13 I I 0.13 I I 0.13 I I I * II II NT II 31 II 6000 I a II 1955 I I II 0.33 I * I 0.33 I * I 0.33 I * I I II II NR II 1 I II 1800 I a II 01 I II 0.00 I I 0.00 I I 0.00 I I I II II SL II 1 I II 1800 I a II a I I II 0.00 I * I 0.00 I * I 0.00 I * I I II II ST II 31 II 6000 I a II 999 I I II 0.17 I I 0.17 I I 0.17 I I I * II II SR II 1 I II 1800 I a II 240 I I II 0.13 I I 0.13 I I 0.13 I I I II II EL II 21 II 3600 I a II 82 I I II 0.02 I * I 0.02 I * I . 0.02 I * I I * II II ET II 21 II 4000 I a II a I I II 0.00 I I 0.00 I I 0.00 I I I II II ER II 1 I II 1800 I a II 59 I I II 0.03 I I 0.03 I I 0.03 I I I II II WL II 21 II 3600 I a II a I I II 0.00 I I 0.00 I I 0.00 I I I II II WT II 21 II 4000 I a II a I I II 0.00 I * I 0.00 I * I 0.00 I * I I * II II WR II 1 I II 1800 I a II 01 I II 0.00 I I 0.00 I I 0.00 I I I II ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... II ========= = == = ========== = == = =======;=== = == = ========== = == II •...•.••.•........•.•..••••••... NORTHISOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.33 I 0.33 I 0.33 I 0.00 II ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME ECR&CAN 05&99 II ..................................................................................................................................... '" ..... II ........••••••••.••..••.••••.••. EAST IWEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.02 I 0.02 I 0.02 I 0.0'0 II N = NORTHBOUND, $ = SOUTHBOUND II ............................................................................................................ , ................................. II E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT II ========== = == = ========= = == = ========== = == = ========== = == II N.S. =; NOT SIGNALIZED ICU VALUE = II 0.40 I 0.40 I 0.40 I 0.05 II LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE II ............................................................................................................................................. II * DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS LOS = II A I A I A I A II == ========= = == = ========== = == = ========== ;::: == = ======::.== = = =;:;; "- 'c - <e INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION: FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD AM PEAK HOUR CANNON & COLLEGE· 2005 VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS (ADDED STUDY INT~RSECTION) ••••••••••••••• _ ............................................................................................................................................................................ , ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 0 ............................................................... 0" •••••••••• II II I II I II I I II I EXISTING I I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+OTHER I II II MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP II EXISTING I PROPOSED 2005 I OTHER I PROJECT II 2005 I + OTHER I I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I II II II LANES I LANES II CAPACITY I CAPACITY VOLUME I VOLUME I VOLUME II VIC I VIC I I VIC I I V/C·W_IMP I II II ========= II ===== I ===== II ========= I ========= ========= I ========= I ========= II ========= I ========= I I ========= I I ========= I II II NL II 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 109 I I II 0.06 I * 0.06 I * I 0.06 I * I I * II II NT II 21 011 40001 0 7581 I II 0.191 0.191 I 0.191 I I II II NR II 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 363 I I II 0.20 I 0.20 I I 0.20 I I I II II SL II 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 53 I I II 0.03 I 0.03 I I 0.03 I I I II II ST II 2 I 0 II 4000 I 0 640 I I II 0.16 I * 0.16 I * I 0.16 I * I I * II II SR II 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 516 I I II 0.29 I 0.29 I I 0.29 I I I II II EL II 2 I 0 II 3600 I 0 205 I I II 0.06 I 0.06 I I 0.06 I I I * II II ET II 2 I 0 II 4000 I 0 I 389 I I II 0.10 I * 0.10 I * I 0.10 I * I I II II ER II 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 48 I I II 0.03 I 0.03 I I 0.03 I I I II "<. II WL II 2 I 0 II 3600 I 0 II 397 I I II 0.11 I * 0.11 I * I 0.11 I * I I II II WT II 2 I 0 II 4000 I 0 II 48 I I II 0.01 I I 0.01 I I 0.01 I I I * II ~ II WR II 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 46 I' I II 0.03 I I 0.03 I I 0.03 I I I II WI' ....................................................................................... _ ............................................................................................................................. II ======== = == = ========== = = = ========== = == = ========== = == II .•......•.•..•..•.•••••........• NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.22 I 0.22 I 0.22 I 0.00 II ICU SPREADSHEET I';ILE NAME CAN&COL 05&99 I II ........................................................................................................... , ................................. II •.•...•.••.••.•.•....•...•.••.•• EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.21 I 0.21 I 0.21 I 0.00 II N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND II ......................... '" .............................................................................. , .................................. II E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT II ========== = == = ========== = == = ========= = == = ========== = == II N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED ICU VALUE = II 0.48 I 0.48 I 0.48 I 0.05 II LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE II .......................... , ............................................................................... , .................................. '11 * DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS LOS = .II A I A I A I A II == ========== = == = ========== == == = ======== = == = ========= = == == ·e I·· .. INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION: FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD PM PEAK HOUR CANNON & COLLEGE· 2005 VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS (ADDED STUDY INTERSECTION) II II I II II I II I I EXISTING I I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+OTHER I II II MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP II EXISTING PROPOSED II 2005 I OTHER PROJECT II 2005 I I + OTHER I I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I II II II LANES I LANES II CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME VOLUME II VIC I I VIC I I VIC I I V/C·W.JMP I II II ========= II ===== I II ========= I ========= II ========= I ========= ========= II ========= I I ========= I I ========= I I ========= I II II NL II 1 I II 1800 I 0 II 119 I II 0.07 I" I 0.07 I * I 0.07 I * I I" II II NT II 2 I II 4000 I 0 II 815 I II 0.20 I I 0.20 I I 0.20 I I I II II NR II 1 I II 1800 I 0 II 547 I II 0.30 I I 0.30 I I 0.30 I I I II II SL II 1 I II 1800 I 0 II 56 I II 0.03 I I 0.03 I I 0.03 I I I II II ST II 2 I II 4000 I 0 II 744 I II 0.19 I" I 0.19 I * I 0.19 I" I I" II II SR II 1 I II 1800 I 0 II 198 I II 0.11 I I 0.11 I I 0.11 I I I II II EL II 2 I II 3600 I 0 II 349 I II 0.10 I I 0.10 I I 0.10 I I I" II II ET II 2 I II 4000 I 0 II 839 I II 0.21 I * I 0.21 I" I 0.21 I" I I II II ER II 1 I II 1800 I 0 II 114 I II 0.06' I I 0.06 I I 0.06 I I I II ".. II WL II 2 I II 3600 I 0 II 363 I II 0.10 I" I 0.10 I" I 0.10 I" I I II _ II WT II 2 I II 4000 I 0 II 474 I II 0.12 I I 0.12 I I 0.12 I I I" II _ II WR II 1 I II 1800 I 0 II 59 I I II 0.03 I I 0.03 I I 0.03 I I I II .•...........................••............•..................................•.........................................•...................•......................................................................... II ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == II . ......•......................... NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.26 I 0.26 I 0.26 I 0.00 II ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME CAN&COL 05&99 II ....... , .................................................................................................. , ........•......................... II ................................ EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.31 I 0.31 I 0.31 I 0.00 II N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND II .............................................•............................................................................................... II E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT II ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == II N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED ICU VALUE = II 0.62 I 0.62 I 0.62 I 0.05 II LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE II .......................................................................................................... , .................................. II .. DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS LOS = II BIB I B I A II == ========== = == ::: ========= = == = ========== = == = ========== = == == ·e , , ~.' )..1 ,_ ./ _.-• YEAR 2020 CONDITIONS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION: II I II MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP II II LANES I LANES II ========= II ===== I ===== II NL II 1 I o II NT II 21 o II NR II 1 I o II SL II 1 I o II ST II 21 o II SR II 1 I o II EL II 1 I o II ET II 1 I o II ER II 1 I o II WL II 1 I o II WT II 21 o II WR II o I o II FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD AM PEAK HOUR ECR & TAMARACK· 2020 VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS II I I II EXISTING I PROPOSED II 2020 I OTHER I PROJECT II CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME I VOLUME II ========= I ======== II ======== I ======== I ======== II 1800 I o II 209 I I II 4000 I o II 1169 I I II 1800 I o II 80 I I II 1800 I o II 45 I I II 4000 I o II 1472 I I II 1800 I o II 10 I I II 1800 I o II 61 I I II 2000 I o II 160 I I II 1800 I o II 466 I I II 1800 I o II 233 I I II 4000 I o II 138 I I II o I o II 23 I I II I EXISTING I I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+OTHER I II 2020 I +OTHER I I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I II VIC I VIC I I VIC I I V/C·W_IMP I II ======= I = I ========= I I ========= I I ======== I II 0.12 I " I 0.12 I " I 0.12 I " I I " II 0.29 I I 0.29 I I 0.29 I I I II 0.04 I I 0.04 I I 0.04 I I I II 0.03 I I 0.03 I I 0.03 I I I II 0.37 I " I 0.37 I " I 0.37 I " I I " II 0.01 I I 0.01 I I 0.01 I I I II 0.03 I I 0.03 I I 0.03 I I I " II 0.08 I " I 0.08 I " I 0.08 I" I I II 0.26 I I 0.26 I I 0.26 I I I II 0.13 I" I 0.13 I" I 0.13 I" I I II 0.04 I I 0.04 I I 0.04 I I I " II I I I I I I I II ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... II ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == = ========= = == II ................................ NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.49 I 0.49 I 0.49 I 0.00 II ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME ECR&TAM 20&99 I II ............................................................................................................ ·································11 ................................ EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.21 I 0.21 I 0.21 I 0.00 II N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND II ............................................................................................................... ······························11 E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II I,. = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT II ========= = == = ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == II N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED ICU VALUE = II 0.75 I 0:75 I 0.75 I 0.05 II LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE II ........................................................................................................................... ··················11 " DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS LOS = II C I C I C I A II == ========== = == = ========== = == = ========= = == = ======== = == == ~- e Ie I .. .. PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION: INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD PM PEAK HOUR ECR & TAMARACK· 2020 VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... II II I II II I I II I I EXISTING I II MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP II EXISTING I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+OTHER I II I PROPOSED II 2020 I OTHER I PROJECT II 2020 I I +,OTHER I I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I II II II LANES I LANES II CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME I VOLUME II VIC I I VIC I I VIC I I V/C·W_IMP I II II ======== II ===== I ===== II ========= I ======== II ========= I ========= I ========= II ======== I I ========= I I ========= I I ======== I II II NL II 1 I II 1800 I a II 525 I I II 0.29 I * I 0.29 I * I 0.29 I * I I * II II NT II 21 II 4000 I a II 1212 I I II 0.30 I I 0.30 I I 0.30 I I I II II NR II 1 I II 1800 I a II 263 I I II 0.15 I I 0.15 I I 0.15 I I I II II SL II 1 I II 1800 I a II 134 I I II 0.07 I I 0.Q7 I I 0.07 I I I II II ST II 21 II 4000 I a II 1389 I I II 0.35 I * I 0.35 I * I 0.35 I * I I * II II SR II 1 I II 1800 I a II 88 I I II 0.05 I I 0.05 I I 0.05 I I I II II EL II 1 I II 1800 I a II 19 I I II 0.01 I I am I I am I I I * II II ET II 1 I II 2000 I a II 213 I I II 0.11 I * I 0.11 I * I 0.11 I * I I II II ER II 1 I II 1800 I a II 201 I I II 0.11 I I 0.11 I I 0.11 I I I II II WL II 1 I II 1800 I a II 117 I I II 0.07 I * I 0.07 I * I 0.07 I * I I II II WT II 21 II 4000 I a II 293 I I II 0.09 I I 0.Q9 I I 0.09 I I I * II II WR II 01 II a I a II 75 I I II I I I I I I I II ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... II ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == II ................................ NORTHISOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.64 I 0.64 I 0.64 I 0.00 II ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME ECR&TAM 20&99 II ............................................................................................................................................. 11 ...................... _ ........ EAST IWEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.18 I 0.18 I 0.18 I 0.00 II N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND II ............................................................................................................................................. 11 E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT II ========= = == = ======= = == = ========== = == = ========= = == II N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED ICU VALUE = II 0.87 I 0.87 I 0.87 I 0.05 II LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE II ............................................................................................................................................. 11 * DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS LOS = II DID I D I A !I =:;;::: ========== = == = ========== = == = =====::;;:== = == = ========== = == == .... - Ie INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS PROJECT: FOX·MILlER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD INTERVAL: AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION: ECR & COLLEGE· 2020 VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS (PLUS ADDEO INTERSECTION LEG) .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... II II I II I II I II I I EXISTING I I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+OTHER I II II MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP II EXISTING I PROPOSED II 2020 I OTHER PROJECT II 2020 I I + OTHER I I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I II II II LANES I LANES II CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME VOLUME II VIC I I VIC I I VIC I I V/CW_IMP I II II ========= I ===== I ===== II ========= I ========= II ========= I ========= ========= II ========= I I ===;====== I I ========= I I ======= I II II N L 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 147 I II 0.08 I" I 0.08 I" I 0.08 I" I I" II II NT 3 I 0 II 6009 I 0 II 996 I II 0.17 I I 0.17 I I 0.17 I I I II II NR 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 604 I II 0.34 I I 0.34 I I 0.34 I I I II II SL 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 8 I II 0.00 I I 0.00 I I 0.00 I I I II II ST 3 I 0 II 6000 I 0 II 2029 I II 0.34 I" I 0.34 I" I 0.34 I" I I" II II SR FREE I 0 II N.S. I 0 II 725 I II N.S. I I N.S. I I N.S. I I I II II EL 2 I 0 II 3600 I 0 II 212 I II 0.06 I I 0.06 I I 0.06 I I I" II II ET 2 I 0 II 4000 I 0 II 304 I II 0.08 I" I 0.08 I" I 0.08 I" I I II II ER 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 170 I II 0.09 I I 0.09 I I 0.09 I I I II II WL 2 I 0 II 3600 I 0 II 730 I II 020 I" I 0.20 I" I 0.20 I" I I II II WT I 2 I 0 II 4000 I 0 II 594 I I II 0.15 I I 0.15 I I 0.15 I I I" II II WR II 0 I 0 II 0 I 0 II 24 I I, II I I I I I I I II .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. II ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == II ......................... NORTHISOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.42 I 0.42 I 0.42 I 0.00 II ICU SPREADSHEET, FILE NAME ECR&COL 20&99 I II ............................................................................................................................................. II ............. ,........... EAST IWEST CRITICAL SUMS = II. 0.28, I 0.28 I 0.28 I 0.00 II N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE " DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS CLEARANCE = ICU VALUE = LOS = II ................................................................................................... · .... · .. ·· .......................... · .... ·11 II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II II ========== = == = ========= = == = ========= = == = ========== = == II' II 0.75 I 0.75 I 0.75 I 0.05 II II ................................................................................................ · .. · .... · .. · ........................ · .. · .. · .. 11 II C I C I C I A II == =====0::=== = == :;:: ========== :;:: == :;:: ========== = == ::: ========== = == == '- - 'e I·· .. I I I I I I I I I I I I II II II II INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS PROJECT: INTERVAL: FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLsBAD PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION: ECR & COLLEGE· 2020 VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS (PLUS ADDED INTERSECTION LEG) II I I I II I I II I MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP I EXISTING I PROPOSED II 2020 I OTHER I PROJECT II 2020 I II LANES I LANES I CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME I VOLUME II VIC I ========= II ===== I ===== I ========= I ======== II ========= I ========= I ========= II ======== I NL II 1 I I 1800 I 011 91 I I II 0.05 I NT II 31 I 6000 I o II 1543 I I II 0.26 I * NR II 1 I I 1800 I o II 981 I I II 0.55 I SL II 1 I I 1800 I o II 49 I I II 0.03 1* ST II 31 II 6000 I o II 971 I I II 0.16 I SR II FREE I I N.S. I o II 310 I I II N.S. I EL II 21 I 3600 I o II 585 I I II 0.16 I ET II 21 I 4000 I o II 652 I I II 0.16 I * ER II 1 I I 1800 I o II 173 I I II 0.10 I WL II 21 II 3600 I o II 534 I I II 0.15 I * WT II 21 II 4000 I o II 301 I I II 0.08 I WR II 01 II 01 o II 25 I I II I I EXISTING I I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+OTHER I II I +OTHER I I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I II I VIC I I VIC I I V/CW_IMP I II I ========= I I ========= I I ========= I II I 0.05 I I 0.05 I I I * II I 0.26 I * I 0.26 I * I I II I 0.55 I I 0.55 I I I II I 0.03 I * I 0.03 I * I I II I 0.16 I I 0.16 I I I * II I N.S. I I N.S. I I I II I 0.16 I I 0.16 I I I * II I 0.16 I * I 0.16 I * I I II I 0.10 I I 0.10 I I I II I 0.15 I * I 0.15 I * I I II I 0.08 I I 0.08 I I I * II I I I I I I II .....•.......................................•....• , ..•....•.•.•........•..................•...... , ...............••....••.•.....••..................•.•..•. , ..................................................... II ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == II •................. :...... NORTHISOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.29 I 0.29 I 0.29 I 0.00 II ICU SPREADSHEET 'FILE NAME ECR&COL 20&99 I II .......•..................................•.............•.........•........................•.•............................................... II ...............•........• EAST IWEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.31 I 0.31 I 0.31 I 0.00 II N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND II .............................•...................•........•.•........•....................................................................... II E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT II ========= = == = ========== = == = ========== = == = =======;=== = == II N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED . ICU VALUE = II 0.65 I 0.65 I 0.65 I 0.05 II LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE II ..................•.......•....•.........•...........•.•............•...•.•..•...................•...........•••.............•............•.. II * DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS LOS = II BIB I B I A II == ========== == == = ========== = == = ========== = == = ======:::=== = == == '. e Ie . - INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION: FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD AM PEAK HOUR . ECR & FARADAY· 2020 VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS " ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... II II I II I II I II I I EXISTING I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+OTHER I II II MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP II EXISTING I PROPOSED II 2020 OTHER I PROJECT II 2020 I I + OTHER I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I II II II LANES I LANES II CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME VOLUME I VOLUME II VIC I I VIC I VIC I I V/CW_IMP I II II =c======= II ===== I ===== II ========= I ========= II ======== I ========= I ========= II ========= I = I ========= I = I ======== I I ======== I II II NL II 2 I 0 II . 3600 I 0 II 851 I I II 0.24 III III 0.24 III III 0.24 III III I * II II NT II 3 I 0 II 6000 I 0 II 1473 I I II 0.26 III * III 0.26 III * III 0.26 1\1 * III I II II NR II 0 I 0 II 0 I 0 II 80 I I II III III III III III III I II II SL II 2 I 0 II 3600 I 0 II 1012 I I II 0.28 III * III 0.28 III * III 0.28 III * III I II II ST II 3 I 0 II 6000 I 0 II 1535 I I II 0.29 III III 0.29 III III 0.29 III III I * II II SR II 0 I 0 II 0 I 0 II 188 I I II III III III III III III I II II EL II 2 I 0 II 3600 I 0 II 58 I I II 0.02 III * III 0.02 III * III 0.02 III * III I * II II ET II 2 I ** II 4000 I N.S. II 89 I I II 0.11 III III 0.11 III III 0.11 III III I II II ER II 0 I 0 II 0 I 0 II 360 I I II III III III III III III I II II WL II 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 86 I I II 0.05 III III 0.05 III III 0.05 III III I II II WT* II 21 011 40001 011 5321 I II 0.22111* III 0.22111* 1\1 0.22111* III 1* II .A. II WR II 0 I 0 II 0 I 0 II 355 I I II III III III III III III I II .. ..... ......................... ..... .............. ... .............. ..... .............................. ... ....................... ..... ..................... ... ......................... ... ......................... II ========= = == = ========== = == = ========== = == = ========= = == II .............................. NORTHISOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.54 I 0.54 I 0.54 I 0.00 II ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME ECR & FAR 99&20 I II ............................................................................................................................................. II . .. ............ ,............... EAST IWEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.24 I 0.24 I 0.24 I 0.00 II N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND II ................................. '" ......................................................................................................... II E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT II ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == II N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED ICU VALUE = II 0.83 I 0.83 I 0.83 I 0.05 II LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE II ................................. '" ......................... ... ..... ... ......................... ... ..... ... ......................... ... ..... II * DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS LOS = II DID I D I A II == ========== = == = ========= = == = ======== = == = ========= = == == I .. .. ** REPRESENTS RIGHT & THROUGH/RIGHT 'e: I·· ., INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION: FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD PM PEAK HOUR ECR & FARADAY· 2020 VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................................................. -.................................................................................................................. -.................................................................................................. . II II I II I II I II I I EXISTING I EX.+OTHER I EX.+OTHER I II II MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP II EXISTING I PROPOSED II 2020 OTHER I PROJECT II 2020 I I + OTHER I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I II I II LANES I LANES II CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME VOLUME I VOLUME II VIC I I VIC I I VIC I I V/C·W_IMP I II I ========= II ===== I ===== II ========= I ========= II ======== I ========= I ========= II ========= I I ========= I I ========= I I ========= I II I NL II 2 I 0 II 3600 I 0 II 280 I I II 0.08 III III 0.08 III III 0.08 III III I * II I NT II 3 I 0 II 6000 I 0 II 1742 I I II 0.30 111* III 0.30 III * III 0.30 III * III I II I NR II 0 I 0 II 0 I 0 II 71 I I II III III III III III III I II I SL II 21 011 36001 011 3681 I II 0.10111* III 0.10 111* III 0.10 111* III I II I ST II 3 I 0 II 6000 I 0 II 1381 I I II 0.25 III III 025 III III 025 III III I * II I SR II 0 I 0 II 0 I 0 II 89 I I II III III III III III III I II I EL II 2 I 0 II 3600 I 0 II 159 I I II 0.04 III * III 0.04 III * III 0.04 III * III I * II ~- I ET II 2 I ** II 4000 I N.S. II 399 I I II 0.25 III III 0.25 III III 0.25 III III I II I ER II 0 I 0 II 0 I 0 II 589 I I II III III III III III III I II e I WL II 1 I 0 II 1800 I 0 II 0 I I II 0.00 III III 0.00 III III 0.00 III III I \I I WT* II 2 I 0 II 4000 I 0 II 175 I I II 0.23 III * III 0.23 III * III 0.23 III * III I * II II WR II 0 I 0 II 0 I 0 II 763 I I II III III III III III III I II .................................................. , .................................................................................................................................... , •........••...•......••.. II ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == II . • ••••••..••••• ,............... NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.40 I 0.40 I 0.40 I 0.00 II ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME ECR & FAR 99&20 I II ..•.•.•••....•.......•...•• , •••.•.•...•.........••..•••.••.....•.•••••.•..•.•..•••.•...••••.•......•...•. '" ..••........•..............••.... II . .••••......••..•.•........•.•. EAST IWEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.27 I 0.27 I 0.27 I 0.00 II N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND II •..........•.......•.••.•.. , •....•. , ..•.•••..•.•.....••..••....•.•...••••..••.•••••......•......••.....•• '" ..•........•..•..•..•.••..••...•• II E = EASTBOUND, W. = WESTBOUND CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT II ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == II N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED ICU VALUE = II 0.72 I 0.72 I 0.72 I 0.05 II LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE II ................................... , ..................................................................... '" ................................. II * DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS LOS = II C I C I C I A II == ========== = == ;;; ========== = == = ========== ;:; == = ========== = == == ** REPRESENTS RIGHT & THROUGHIRIGHT ( '" ,e INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION: FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD AM PEAK HOUR . ECR & PAR· 2020 VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS •••••.............. ~ ••••••••••••••••••..•.••.••••••••••••• u ......................................................................................................................................................................................... " •••••• , •••••••...••••••.•••....•••• -••••••• -••••.••••.•.••••••.••..•••• , ....... , •••.••.•.••..•••••.•.•..•••••••.••.••. II II I II II I I II I I EXISTING I I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+OTHER I II II MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP II EXISTING I PROPOSED II 2020 I OTHER I PROJECT II 2020 I I +OTHER I I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I II II II LANES I LANES II CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME I VOLUME II VIC I I VIC I I VIC' I I V/CW_IMP I II II ========= II ===== I ===== II ========= I ========= II ========= I ======== I ========= II ======== I I ========= I I ========= I I ========= I II II NL II 1 I o II 1800 I 011 280 I I II 0.16 I I 0.16 I I 0.16 I I I " II II NT II 31 o II 6000 I o II 1378 I I II 0.23 I * I 0.23 I * I 0.23 I * I I II II NR II 1 I o II 1800 I 011 705 I I II 0.39 I I 0.39 I I 0.39 I I I II II SL II 21 011 3600 I 011 780 I I II 0.22 I " I 0.22 I * I 0.22 I " I I II II ST II 3 I o II 6000 I o II 779 I I II 0.13 I I 0.13 I I 0.13 I I I " II II SR II 1 I ,0 II 1800 I o II 415 I I II 0.23 I I 0.23 I I 0.23 I I I II II EL II 21 o II 3600 I 011 187 I I II 0.05 I I 0.05 I I 0.05 I I I " II II ET II 31 011 6000 I o II 689 I I II 0.12 I * I 0,12 I * I 0.12 I * I I II II ER II 01 o II 01 o II 7 I I II I I I I I I I II II WL II 21 o II 3600 I 011 589 I I II 0.16 I * I 0.16 I * I 0.16 I * I I II II WT II 31 o II 6000 I o II 892 I I II 0.15 I I 0.15 I I 0.15 I I I * II II WR' II 1 I o II 1800 I o II 969 I I II 0.54 I I 0.54 I I 0.54 I I I II ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... II ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = = II ................................ NORTHISOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.45 I 0.45 I 0.45 I 0.00 II ICU SPREADSHEET F,ILE NAME ECR&PAR 99&20 I II .............................................................. , ....... , ........................... , .................................... , ..... II ••••..•..••.••.. ,............... EAST IWEST CRITICAL SU~S = II 0.28 I 0.28 I 0.28 I 0.00 II N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND II ...................................................................... , ........................... , .................................... , ..... II E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT II ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == II N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED ICU VALUE = II 0.78 I 0.78 I 0.78 I 0.05 II LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE II ....•................................................................ , ................................................................ , ..... II * DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS LOS = II C I C I C I A II == ======== :;:: = = =====:;::=== = == :;:: ========== = == = ===::;;:====== = == == e 'e I·· .. II II \I II II \I \I II \I II II II II II II II INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION: \I I \I MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP II II LANES I LANES II ========= II ===== I ===== II NL \I 1 I II NT II 31 \I NR II 1 I II SL \I 21 \I ST II 31 II SR II 1 I \I EL II 21 II ET II 3 I II ER II 01 II WL II 21 II WT II 3 I II WR II 1 I II FOX,MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD PM PEAK HOUR ECR & PAR· 2020 VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS \I I EXISTING I PROPOSED II 2020 I CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME I I \I OTHER I PROJECT II VOLUME I VOLUME \I ========= I ========= II ========= I ========= I ========= II 1800 I o II 21 I I \I 6000 I o \I 665 I I \I 1800 I o II 296 I I \I 3600 I o II 7~6 I I II 6000 I o \I 1337 I I \I 1800 I o II 1181 I II 3600 I o \I 327 I I II 6000 I o II 968 I I II 01 o II 197 I I II 3600 I o \I 857 I I II 6000 I o \I 618 I I II 1800 I o II 915 I I II I I EXISTING I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+OTHER I \I 2020 I I +OTHER I I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I \I VIC I I VIC I I VIC I I V/C·W_IMP I \I ======== I = I ========= I . = I ========= I I ========= I = II 0.Ql I I 0.01 I I 0.01 I I I " \I 0.11 I * I 0.11 I" I 0.11 I * I I II 0.16 I I 0.16 I I 0.16 I I I II 0.21 I * I 0.21 I " I 0.21 I" I I \I 0.22 I I 0.22 I I 0.22 I I I " II 0.07 I I 0.07 I I 0.07 I I I II 0.09 I I 0.09 I I 0.09 I I I " II 0.19 I" I 0.19 I" I 0.19 I" I I II I I I I I I I \I 0.24 I * I 0.24 I * I 0.24 I" I I II 0.10 I I 0.10 I I 0.10 I I I " II 0.51 I I 0.51 I I 0.51 I I I II ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... II ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == II ................................ NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.32 I 0.32 I 0.32 I 0.00 \I ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME ECR&PAR 99&20 I II ............................................................................................................................................. II ................................ EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.43 I 0.43 I 0.43 I 0.00 II N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND II ....................................................................... · ............ · ...... · .... ·· ...... ·· ........ · .. · .............. ·· .. · .... 11 E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT II ========== = == = ========== = == = ========= = == = ========= = == II N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED ICU VALUE = II 0.80 I 0.80 I 0.80 I 0.05 II LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE II ............................................................................................. · .. · .. · .... · .. · ........ · .................. ·· .... 11 * DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS LOS = II C I C I C I A II == ========= =' == = ========== = == =:: ========== = == = ========== = == == . ~ -- - ,e' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION: FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD AM PEAK HOUR COLLEGE & FARADAY· 2020 VOLUMES WITH El)ISTING CONDITIONS .................................................................................................................................................................................... h ................................................................ , .......................................... ,. ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• _ ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• , •••••••••• \I II I II II I I II I I EXISTING I I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+OTHER I II II MOVEMENT I EXIST I PROP II' EXISTING PROPOSED II 2020 I OTHER I PROJECT II 2020 I I +OTHER I I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I \I \I I LANES I LANES II CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME I VOLUME \I VIC I I VIC I I VIC I I V/C·W_IMP I \I \I ========= I ===== I ===== II ======== I ======== II ========= I ========= I ========= II ========= I I ========= I I ======== I I ========= I \I \I NL I 21 o \I 3600 I o \I 254 I I \I 0.07 I I 0.07 I I 0.07 I I I .. \I \I NT I 21 o \I 4000 I o \I 448 I I \I 0.11 I" I 0.11 I" I 0.11 I" I I \I \I NR I 1 I o \I 1800 I o \I 390 I I \I 0.22 I I 0.22 I I 0.22 '1 I I \I \I SL I 2 I o 1\ 3600 I o \I 607 I I 1\ 0.17 I * I 0.17 I * I 0.17 I .. I I \I 1\ ST I 21 o 1\ 4000 I o 1\ 428 I I 1\ 0.11 I I 0.11 I I 0.11 I I I * \I II SR I 1 I o 1\ 1800 I o \I 392 I I 1\ 0.22 I I 0.22 I I 0.22 I I I 1\ \I EL I 21 o \I 3600 I o \I 148 I I \I 0.04 I .. I 0.04 I .. I 0.04 I .. I I * \I 1\ ET I 21 o \I 4000 I o \I 212 I I \I 0.05 I I 0.05 I I 0.05 I I I 1\ \I ER I 1 I o 1\ 1800 I o 1\ 100 I I \I 0.06 I I 0.06 I I 0.06 I I I \I 1\ WL I 21 o \I 3600 I o \I 176 I I \I 0.05 I I 0.05 I I 0.05 I I I \I \I WT I 21 o \I 4000 I o \I 287 I I \I 0.07 I * I 0.07 I" I 0.07 I * I 1* \I \I WR I 1 I o 1\ 1800 I o 1\ 137 I I 1\ 0.08 I I 0.08 I I 0.08 I I I 1\ ..................................................................................................................... , ....................................................................... , ........................ II ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == II ................................ NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.28 I 0.28 I 0.28 I 0.00 II ICU SPREADSHEET F!LE NAME COL&FAR 20&99 I II ............................................................................................................................................. II ................ ,............... EAST/WEST CRITICAL SU MS = II 0.11 I 0.11 I 0.11 I 0.00 II N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND II ............................................................................................................................................. II E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT II ========= = == = ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == II N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED ICU VALUE = II 0.44 I 0.44 I 0.44 I 0.05 II LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE II ............................................................................................................................................. II .. DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS LOS = II A I A I A I A II == ========= = == :::; ========== :::; == = ========== :::; == = ========== = == == · " ~" e 'e; I·· .. PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION: INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS FOX·MILLER PROPERTY. CARLSBAD PM PEAK HOUR COLLEGE & FARADAY· 2020 VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. II II I II II I II I I EXISTING I I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+OTHER I " II MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP II EXISTING PROPOSED I 2020 I OTHER PROJECT II 2020 I I + OTHER I I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I II II II LANES I LANES II CAPACITY I CAPACITY VOLUME I VOLUME VOLUME II VIC I I VIC I I VIC I I V/CW_IMP I II II ========= II ===== I ===== II ========= I ========= ========= I ========= ========= II ========= I I ========= I I ========= I I ========= I II II NL II 2 I II 3600 I 0 123 I II 0.03 I I 0.03 I I 0.03 I I I" II II NT II 2 I II 4000 I 0 665 I II 0.17 I" I 0.17 I" I 0.17 I" I I II II NR II 1 I II 1800 I 0 127 I II 0.07 I I 0.07 I I 0.07 I I I II II SL II 2 I II 3600 I 0 158 I II 0.04 I" I 0.04 I" I 0.04 I" I I II II ST II 2 I II 4000 I 0 428 I II 0.11 I I 0.11 I I 0.11 I I I" II II SR II 1 I II 1800 I 0 143 I II 0.08 I I 0.08 I I 0.08 I I I II II EL II 2 I II 3600 I 0 I 288 I II 0.08 I * I 0.08 I * I 0.08 I" I I" II II ET II 2 I II 4000 I 0 II 200 I II 0.05 I I 0.05 I I 0.05 I I I II II ER II 1 I II 1800 I 0 II 159 I II 0.09 I I 0.09 I I 0.09 I I I II II WL II 2 I II 3600 I 0 II 249 I II 0.07 I I 0.07 I I 0.07 I I I II a II WT " 2 I " 4000 I 0 1\ 160 I II 0.04 I" I 0.04 I" I 0.04 I" I I"". II WR II 1 I II 1800 I 0 II 422 I I II 0.23 I I 0.23 I I 0.23 I I I II ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... II ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == II . ................................ NORTHISOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.21 I 0.21 I 0.21 I 0.00 II ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME COL&FAR 20&99 II ......................................................................................................... '" ......................... '" ..... II ••••••....•.•••..•......•••.•••• EASTIWEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.12 I 0.12 I 0.12 I 0.00 II N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND II ................................. '" ................................................................................................. '" ..... II E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT II ========== = == = ========= = == = ========= = == = ========== = == II N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED ICU VALUE = II 0.38 I 0.38 I 0.38 I 0.05 II LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE II ..................................................................................................................................... '" ..... II " DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS LOS = II A I A I A I A II == ========== ::;:; == = ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == == - INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS PROJECT: INTERVAL: FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD AM PEAK HOUR . INTERSECTION: PAR & COLLEGE· 2020 VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS -~ \I II I II II I I II I I EXISTING I I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+OTHER I II II MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP II EXISTING I PROPOSED II 2020 I OTHER I PROJECT II 2020 I I +OTHER I I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I II II II LANES I LANES II CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME I VOLUME II VIC I I VIC I I VIC I I V/C·W_IMP I II II ========= II ===== I ===== II ========= I ========= II ========= I ========= I ========= II ========= I I ========= I I ========= I ========= I II II NL II 21 011 3600 I o II 367 I I II 0.10 I " I 0.10 I" I 0.10 I " I " II II NT II 21 o II 4000 I 011 511 I I II 0.13 I I 0.13 I I 0.13 I I II II NR II 1 I o II 1800 I o II 312 I I II 0.17 I I 0.17 I I 0.17 I I II II SL II 1 I o II 1800 I o II 149 I I II 0.08 I I 0.08 I I 0.08 I I II II ST II 2 I ** II 4000 I o II 189 I I II 0.12 I " I 0.12 I " I 0.12 I " I it II II SR II 01 o II 01 o II 307 I I II I I I I I I II II EL II 21 o II 3600 I o II 759 I I II 0.21 I" I 0.21 I" I 0.21 I" I it II II ET II 3 I 011 6000 I o II 1082 I I II 0.18 I I 0.18 I I 0.18 I I II II ER II 1 I o II 1800 I o II 111 I I II 0.06 I I 0.06 I I 0.06 I I II II WL II 21 011 3600 I o II 102 I I II 0.03 I I 0.03 I I 0.03 I I II II WT II 3 I o II 6000 I 011 637 I I II 0.11 I" I 0.11 I" I 0.11 I it 1* II e II WR II 1 I o II 1800 I 011 61 I I II 0.03 I I 0.03 I I 0.03 I I II ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... II ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == ========== = == II ................................ NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.22 I 0.22 I 0.22 I 0.00 II ICU SPREADSHEET FI.LE NAME PAR&COL 20&99 I II ................................................................................................... · .... ·· .......................... · .. · .... ·11 ................. , .............. EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.32 I 0.32 I 0.32 I 0.00 II N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND II ................................................................................................... · .... · .. · .................... · ...... • .... ·11 E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT II ========= = == = ========= = == = ========= = == = ========== = == II N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED ICUVALUE= II 0.59 I 0.59 I 0.59 I 0.05 II LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE II ................................................................................................... · .... ·· .......................... · .. · .... ·11 " DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS LOS = IIA IA IA IA II == ========== = == = ========= = == = ========== ;: == :;:;: ========== = = == I .. .. *" REPRESENTS RIGHT & THROUGH/RIGHT - I·· .. PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION: PAR & COLLEGE· 2020 VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ , ............................................................................ . II II I II II I I II I I EXISTING I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+OTHER I II II MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP II EXISTING PROPOSED II 2020 I OTHER I PROJECT II 2020 I I + OTHER I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I II I II LANES I LANES II CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME I VOLUME II VIC I I VIC I VIC I I V/C.W_IMP I II I ========= II ===== I ===== II ========= I ========= II ========= I ========= I ========= II ========= I I ========= I ========= I I ========= I II I NL II 2 I II 3600 I 0 II 185 I I II 0.05 I * I 0.05 I * 0.05 I" I I * II I NT II 2 I II 4000 I 0 II 211 I I II 0.05 I I 0.05 I 0.05 I I I II I NR II 1 I II 1800 I 0 II 88 I I II 0.05 I I 0.05 I 0.05 I I I II I SL II 1 I II 1800 I 0 II 63 I I II 0.Q4 I I 0.04 I 0.04 I I I II I ST II 2 I ** II 4000 I 0 II 579 I I I 0.26 I * I 0.26 I * 0.26 I * I I" II I SR II 0 I II 0 I 0 II 480 I I I I I I I I II I EL II 2 I II 3600 I 0 II 277 I I 0.08 I * I 0.08 I * 0.08 I * I * II -- I ET II 3 I II 6000 I 0 II 560 I I 0.09 I I 0.09 I 0.09 I I II I ER II 1 I II 1800 I 0 II 452 I I 0.25 I I 0.25 I 0.25 I I II _ I WL II 2 I II 3600 I 0 II 340 I I 0.09 I I 0.09 I 0.09 I I II I WT II 3 I II 6000 I 0 II 857 I I 0.14 I * I 0.14 I .. 0.14 I .. I" II I WR II 1 I II 1800 I 0 II 188 I I 0.10 I I 0.10 I 0.10 I I II ..... ......................... ..... .............. ... .............. ••..• ................................ •.. ............•......... •.•.. ......................... ... ......................... ... ......................... ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == ========== = == II .................. >............. NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = 0.31 I 0.31 0.31 0.00 II ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME PAR&COL 20&99 I .................................................................................................. ,. ..... . ................................ II ••..••....••..•.•....•.......••• EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS = I 0.22 I 0.22 I 0.22 0.00 II N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND II ........... ~ .................... '" .............................................................. , .......................................... II E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT II ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == II N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED ICU VALUE = . II 0.58 I 0.58 I 0.58 I 0.05 II LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE II .................................................................................................. , .......................................... II * DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS LOS = II A I A I A I A II == =========::: ::: ;;::;;; ::: ::;:;:======== ;;; == ;;; ========== == == ;;; =========== ;;; == == ** REPRESENTS RIGHT & THROUGH/RIGHT e INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS PROJECT: FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD INTERVAL: AM PEAK HOUR -~ INTERSECTION: ECR & CANNON· 2020 VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS (ADDED STUDY.INTERSEC!ION) ................................................. -0-••• _ ....................................................................................................... , ........................... , ............................................................... '0' ............................................................... -....... , ..................................... . II II II II I I II I I EXISTING I I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+DTHER I II II MOVEMENT II EXIST PROP II EXISTING I PROPOSED II 2020 I OTHER I PROJECT II 2020 I I +OTHER I I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I II II II LANES LANES II CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME' I VOLUME I VOLUME II VIC I I VIC I I VIC I I V/C·W_IMP I II II ========= II ===== II ========= I ======== II ========= I ========= I ======== II ========= I I ========= I I ========= I I ========= I II II NL II 1 o II 1800 I 011 143 I I II 0.08 I .. I 0.08 I .. I 0.08 I .. I I .. II II NT II 3 011 6000 I o II 1064 I I II 0.18 I I 0.18 I I 0.18 I I I II II NR II 1 o II 1800 I o II 16 I I II 0.01 I I 0.01 I I 0.01 I I I II II SL II 1 o II 1800 I 011 114 I I II 0.06 I I 0.06 I I 0.06 I I I II II ST II 3 011 6000 I o II 1950 I I II 0.33 I .. I 0.33 I" I 0.33 I .. I I .. II II SR II 1 o II 1800 I o II 388 I I II 0.22 I I 0.22 I I 0.22 I I I II II EL II 2 011 3600 I 011 187 I I II 0.05 I * I 0.05 I ~ I 0.05 I * I I * II II ET II 2 o II 4000 I o II 339 I I II 0.08 I I 0.08 I I 0.08 I I I II II ER II 1 011 1800 I o II 180 I I II 0.10 I I 0.10 I I 0.10 I I I II II WL II 2 011 3600 I 011 487 I I II 0.14 I I 0.14 I I 0.14 I I I II II WT II 2 o II 4000 I o II 818 I I II 0.20 I * I 0.20 I" I 0.20 I" I I .. II e II WR II 1 I 011 1800 I 011 173 I I II 0.10 I I 0.10 I I 0.10 I I I II ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... II ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == II •••.••••••......••.......••..••• NORTHISOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.41 I 0.41 I 0.41 I 0.00 II ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME ECR&CAN 20&99 I II ............................................................................................................................................. II ................................ EAST IWEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.25 I 0.25 I 0.25 I 0.00 II N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND II ............................................................................................................................................. II E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT II ========= = == = ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == II N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED ICU VALUE = II 0.71 I 0.71 I 0.71 I 0.05 II LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE II ........................................................................................................... , ................................. II .. DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS LOS = II C I C I C I A II == ========== === == = ========== = =p === ========== = =::; = ========== = == == e I·· .. INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION: FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD PM PEAK HOUR ECR & CANNON· 2020 VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS (ADDED STUDY INTERSECTION) ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. I I I II II I I II I I EXISTING I I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+OTHER I II I MOVEMENT I EXIST I PROP II EXISTING PROPOSED II 2020 I OTHER I PROJECT II 2020 I I +OTHER I I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I II I I LANES I LANES II CAPACITY CAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME I VOLUME II VIC I I VIC I I VIC I j V/C·W-'MP I II I ========= I ===== I ===== II ======== ========= II ========= I ========= I ========= II ========= I I ========= I I ========= I I ========= I II I NL I 1 I II 1800 011 163 I I II 0.09 I I 0.09 I I 0.09 I I I * II I NT I 31 II 6000 o II 1566 I I II 0.26 I * I 0.26 I * I 0.26 I * I I II I NR I 1 I II 1800 o II 264 I I II 0.15 I I 0.15 I I 0.15 I I I II I SL I 1 I II 1800 o II 264 I I II 0.15 I * I 0.15 I " I 0.15 I " I I II I ST I 31 II 6000 011 1098 I I II 0.18 I I 0.18 I I 0.18 I I I " II I SR I 1 I II 1800 o II 255 I I II 0.14 I I 0.14 I I 0.14 I I I II I EL I 21 II 3600 o II 384 I I II 0.11 I I 0.11 I I 0.11 I I I " II I ET I 21 II 4000 o II 869 I I II 0.22 I * I '0.22 I " I 0.22 I " I I II I ER I 1 I II 1800 I o II 123 I I II 0.07 I I 0.07 I I 0.07 I I I II II WL I 21 II 3600 I o II 84 I I II 0.02 I * I 0.02 I * I 0.02 I " I I II II WT I 21 II 4000 I o II 385 I I II 0.10 I I 0.10 I I 0.10 I I I * II II WR II 1 I II 1800 I o II 166 I I II 0.09 I I 0.09 I I 0.09 I I I II .......................................................................................................... , ........................................................................................................... II ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == II . ................................ NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.41 I 0.41 I 0.41 I 0.00 II ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME ECR&CAN 20&99 II ............................................................................................................................................. II ................................ EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.24 I 0.24 I 0.24 '1 0.00 II N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND II ............................................................................................................................................. II E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT II ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == II N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED ICU VALUE = II 0.70 I 0.70 I 0.70 I 0.05 II LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE II ............................................................................................................................................. II " DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS LOS = II BIB I B I A II == ========== = == = ========== ::: == := ========= ;: == ;;; ========== == == == . . ~~ - e , ... INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS PROJECT: FOX·MILLER PRPPERTY ,CARLSBAD INTERVAL: AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION: CANNON & COLLEGE· 2020 VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS (ADDED STUDY INTERSECTION) ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• " ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• u •••••••••••••••• u •••••••••••••••••••• _ ............................................................ _ •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• , ......................... _ ............................................... . II II I II II I I II I I EXISTING I I EX.+DTHER I I EX.+DTHER I II II MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP I EXISTING I PROPOSED II 2020 I OTHER I PROJECT II 2020 I I +OTHER I I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I II II II LANES I LANES I CAPACITY I CAPACITY II VOLUME I VOLUME I VOLUME II VIC I I VIC I I VIC I I V/CW_IMP I II II ========= II ===== I ===== I ========= I ========= II ======== I ========= I ========= II ========= I I ========= I I ========= I I ========= I II II NL II 1 I 01 1800 I o II 109 I I II 0.06 I * I 0.06 I * I 0.06 I * I I * II II NT II 21 01 4000 I o II 758 I I II 0.19 I I 0.19 I I 0.19 I I I II II NR II 1 I 01 1800 I 011 363 I I II 0.20 I I 0.20 I I 0.20 I I I II II SL II 1 I o I 1800 I o II 53 I I II 0.03 I I 0.03 I I 0.03 I I I II II ST II 21 01 4000 I o II 640 I I II 0.16 I * I 0.16 I * I 0.16 I * I I * II II SR II 1 I 01 1800 I 011 516 I I II 0.29 I I 0.29 I I 0.29 I I I II II EL II 21 01 3600 I o II 205 I I II 0.06 I I 0.06 I I 0.06 I I I * II II ET II 21 01 4000 I o II 389 I I II 0.10 I * I 0.10 I * I 0.10 I * I I II II ER .11 1 I 01 1800 I o II 48 I I II 0.03 I I 0.03 I I 0.03 I I I II II WL II 21 011 3600 I o II 640 I I II 0.18 I * I 0.18 I * I 0.18 I * I I II II WT II 21 o II 4000 I o II 814 I I II 0.20 I I 0.20 I I 0.20 I I I * II e II WR II 1 I o II 1800 I o II 46 I I II 0.03 I I 0.03 I I 0,03 I I I II ............................................. , .. , ....................................... , ............. , ..... , ...... , ................. "' ................... '" ... , ........................................... , ........ II ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == = ========= = == I .................. ,............. NORTHISOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.22 I 0.22 I 0.22 I 0.00 ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME CAN&COL 20&99 I II ........ , ........... , ............... , ................. , .................................................... , ................................. ................................. EAST IWEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.28 I 0.28 I 0.28 I 0.00 N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND II .. , ............. , .. , .................................................................................. , ...................................... E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT . II ========== = == = ========= = == = ========= = == = ========== = == N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED ICU VALUE = II 0.55 0.55 I 0.55 0.05 LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE II ............................................................................................................................................. * DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS LOS = II A A I A A == ========== = = = ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== :::: == == e I·· .. INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS' PROJECT: INTERVAL: INTERSECTION: FOX·MILLER PROPERTY· CARLSBAD PM PEAK HOUR CANNON & COLLEGE· 2020 VOLUMES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS (ADDED STUDY INTERSECTION) ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• -.-............................................................................................................ , ........................................................................................... " •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• , •••••••• ~ ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • ••••• h •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• II II I II II I I II I I EXISTING I EX.+OTHER I I EX.+oTHER I II II MOVEMENT II EXIST I PROP II EXISTING PROPOSED II 2020 I OTHER I PROJECT II 2020 I I +OTHER I +PROJECT I I +PROJECT I II II II LANES I LANES II CAPACITY I CAPACiTY II VOLUME I VOLUME I VOLUME II VIC I I VIC I VIC I I V/C·WJMP I II II ========= II ===== I ===== II ========= I ========= II ========= I ========= I ========= II ========= I I ========= I ========= I I ========= I II II NL II 1 I II 1800 I 011 1191 I II 0.07 I * I 0.07 * I 0.07 I * I I * II II NT II 21 II 4000 I o II 815 I I II 0.20 I I 0.20 I 0.20 I I I II II NR II 1 I II 1800 I o II 547 I I II 0.30 I I 0.30 I 0.30 I I I II II SL II 1 I II 1800 I o II 56 I I II 0.03 I I 0.03 I 0.03 I I I II II ST II 21 II 4000 I 011 744 I I II 0.19 I * I 0.19 " I 0.19 I " I I * II II SR II 1 I II 1800 I o II 198 I I II 0.11 I I 0.11 I 0.11 I I I II II EL II 21 II 3600 I 0'11 349 I I II 0.10 I I 0.10 I 0.10 I I I * II II ET II 21 II 4000 I 011 839 I I II 0.21 I" I 0.21 * I 0.21 I * I I II II ER II 1 I II 1800 I . o II 114 I I II 0.06 I I 0.06 I 0.06 I I I II II WL II 21 II 3600 I o II 363 I I II 0.10 I * I 0.10 I * I 0.10 I * I I II II WT II 21 II 4000 I o II 474 I I II 0.12 I I 0.12 I I 0.12 I I I * II II WR II 1 I II 1800 I, 011 59 I I II 0.03 I I 0.03 I I 0.03 I I I II ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... II ======== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == II ................................ NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.26 I 0.26 I 0.26 I 0.00 II ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME CAN&COL 20&99 II ......................................................................................................... ····································11 ................................ EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS = II 0.31 I 0.31 I 0.31 I 0.00 II N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND II ........................................................................................................................... ··················11 E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND CLEARANCE = II 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 II L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT II ========== = == = ======== = == = ========= = == = ========= = == II N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED ICU VALUE = II 0.62 I 0.62 I 0.62 I 0.05 II LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE II ............................................................................................................. ································11 * DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS LOS = II B I B I B I A II == ========== = ==: = ========== = == = ========== = == = ========== = == == e e -. e APPENDIX c EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE CARLSBAD OAKS NORTH tRAFFIC STUDY Tentative Map #eT 97-13 ; EIR #98-08 Prepared by Will dan / WP A Traffic Engineering April 2001 .. J J EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR-THE CARLSBAD OAKS-NORTH PROJRC'J'_ The "Carlsbad Oaks North Project -Traffic Study" is the culmination of tremendous effort on the part of City Staff and the various consultants participating in the preparation of traffic analyses for major developments within the study area. Existing traffic data were collected for the 49 study intersections and evaluated for inclusion in the report. An extended traffic modeling effort was conducted, which utilized assumptions acceptable to the City of Carlsbad, within the Carlsbad Cities/County Sub-Area, SANlJAG traffic model. The traffic model projections required evaluation, input, review, and ongoing analyses_ to provide acceptable projections of interim traffic conditions incorporating study area cumulative projects and long-range future conditions. The consultants _ worked in conjunction with City Staff and City approval was required for all projections ultimately utilized in the analyses. This document presents a review of the potential traffic impacts related to the Carlsbad Oaks North project. This study identifies the infrastructure needed to support, not only the prop~sed project, but the existing traffic and cumulative growth of the surrounding areas. The necessary improvements are identified in this study and the anticipated responsibilities of Carlsbad Oaks North are provided. The following is a summary of the primary findings oftbis Traffic Study_ 1) Existing conditions were documented to-provide a baseline for evaluating the proposed project impacts. Table 2 shows that two intersections would require improvement under existing conditions in order to provide acceptable operations. Willdan -WP A Traffic Engineering Job #12614 Carlsbad Oaks North Project -Traffic Study City of Carlsbad I J 2) When the interim Carlsbad Oaks North project is added to the existing traffic conditions~ the same two intersections would require improvement. The two improvements needed to mitigate the existing impacts also serve' to accommodate the proposed project. Table 6 and Figures 3A -3M present the findings and illustrate the measures at the two intersections. 3) TIre currently proposed Carlsbad Oaks North project actually represents a significant reduction in development potential. The current proposal is to provide a total of 1,921,000 square feet (SF) of building area; whereas the previously planned project would have resulted in 3,615,916 SF (which would have generated more traffic than the current project). 4) The currently planned project is also assumed to include an· acceleration of tPe construction of the "Faraday Avenue Connection" between EI Camino R~al (ECR) and Melrose Drive. The SANDAG modeling assumed this connection to occur after Year 2005, by theYear 2010. Carlsbad Oaks North, however, is assumed to facilitate this connection as a part of its initial phases of de.velopment. 5) Year 2005 analyses were conducted for conditions both with and without the Faraday Connection. The completion of the Faraday Connection was shoWn to benefit intersection operations on Palomar Airport Road (PAR). The PAR corridor serves traffic in the immediate vicinity, as well as traffic in surrounding areas (other jurisdictions), which use this arterial as a thoroughfare. The findings are summarized it;t Table 9. 6) Analyses were provided for the Years 2005 and 2010 and the infra~cture needed to support these traffic conditions were identified. Tables 8 and. in, respectively, show the intersection operations at the 49 study locations under existing lane geometrics and for conditions with identified improvements (Figures 3A -3M). These evaluations show the Willdan -WPA Traffic Engineering Joh#12614 . -11- Carlsbad Oaks North Project -Traffic Study City of Carlsbad • I / improvements needed to support existing traffic plus cumulative traffic growth, as well as the proposed project. 7) The Year 2020 conditions were evaluated and the intersection ~yses results for the 49 intersections are provided in Tables 11 and 12. These long-range analyses indicate that the improvements necessary to address the Year 2020 traffic voltime projections are consistent with the road system that is anticipated to ultimately be in place. An important example is the Year 2020 :intersection improvements shown on Figures 3A -3M are consistent with the mitigations included in the Traffic Improvement Fee (TIF) _program. _ In addition, these TIF improvements provide acceptable intersection operations at the pertinent study locations. It is shown that all of the study intersections are projected to operate at acceptable Levels of Service with the intersection geometries identified on Figures 3A .. 3M. 8) The existing and existing plus" interim project analyses identifY the project's short-term responsibilities. The Year 2005 and 2010 evaluations identifY the in:fr~cture needed "to support the cumulative traffic growth expected to occur at these intervening years and based on the assumptions included in the SANDAG modeling efforts. The ultimate roadway requirements and the project's" long-term impacts are id(;mtified through the Year 2020 analyses. These evaluations are anticipated to present information necessary for the decision makers to evaluate the traffic related impacts of the proposed project. 9) The proposed Carlsbad Oaks North project is shoWn to be accommoda.ted at each level of development. The factors and requirements which are anticipated to result in the conclusion that the project related impacts have been mitigated are: ... The "Existing Plus Interim" analyses were required by the City to determine the improvements that would be associated with the initial development phase. These "~'-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WitMan -WP A Traffic Engineering lob #12614 -iii- Carlsbad Oaks North Project -Traffic Study City of Carlsbad analyses show that improvements are needed to offset existing traffic impacts~ Added improvements at the location are required to accommodate the addition of the interim portion of the project. The "Existing Plus Interim" findings do not "credit" the Carlsbad Oaks North project plans to facilitate the acceleration of the "Faraday Avenue Connection" project, in conjunction with its initial phases of development. This improvement was anticipated to occur by Year 2010; prior to this project proposal. The accelerated construction of this improvement would serve to benefit intersections' along Palomar Airport Road. .. The Year 2020 analyses, including the proposed project, show that all of the 49 study intersections would have acceptable operations, based on the geometries shown on Figures 3A -3M. The Carlsbad Oaks North project would be subject to the TIF and it is noted that the pertinent study intersections have improvements consistent with the TIF mitigation requirements. The other intersections ~e anticipated to be consistent with the planned road systeJ!4 which will serve long range traffic conditions. Overall, this Traffic Study is expected to provide the information necessary to consider the potential impacts of the Carlsbad Oaks North project and require appropriate mitigation of the proposed project. Wil/dall -WPA Traffic Engineering Job #12614 -iv- Carlshad Oaks North Project -Traffic Study. City of Car,lshad