HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 00-22; REDEEMER BY THE SEA LUTHERAN CHURCH; TRAFFIC STUDY; 2000-11-14.1
I
I
I
I
I
·1
'I
'-
I
I
1
1
I
I
I
I
1
.J
,I
, :' For
.'f",,_ • " "'~
Redeemer hy the S~~ iutlJ,f}r~~:~Church
in the City of Carls had
Submitted To:
Redeemer by the Sea Lutheran Church
Submitted By:
Darnell & Associates, Inc.
November 14,2000
~ T Od-Z2
1\
"
.'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
~. ..
Dar·neII & ASSOCIATES, INC.
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
November 14,2000
Mr. Ken Voertman
c/o Redeemer by the Sea Lutheran Church
6355 Corte Del Abeto #100
Carlsbad, CA 92008 D&A Ref. No: 001001
Subject: Traffic Study for the Proposed Redeemer by the Sea Lutheran Church Located at the
Southeast Corner of Poinsettia Lane and Black Rail Road in the City of CMlsbad.
Dear Mr. Voertman:
In accordance with your authorization, Darnell & Associates, Inc. (D&A) has completed the transportation
study to assess impacts related to the proposed Redeemer by the Sea Lutheran Church located at the
southeast corner of Poinsettia Lane and Black Rail Road in the City of Carlsbad. This report analyzes the
traffic impacts associated with the proposed project on local roadways and intersections, including existing,
existing plus Phase I of the project, existing plus other approved/pending projects, existing plus other
approved/pending projects plus Phase I of the project, buildout without project, and buildout plus the Master
Plan of the project conditions for the area.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office.
Sincerely,
DARNELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Vicki S. Root
Bill E. Darnell, P .E.
Firm Principal
1446 FRONT STREET • THIRD FLOOR • SAN DIEGO, CA 92101
PHONE: 619-233-9373 • FAX: 619-233-4034
E-mail: BD492@aol.com
. ~ .. ' .~. ,~ .. ~~ ~ ... ,... .... .. -.
I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TRAFFIC STUDY
FOR
REDEEMER BY THE SEA LUTHERAN CHURCH
IN THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD
Submitted To:
REDEEMER BY THE SEA LUTHERAN CHURCH
6355 CORTE DEL ABETO #100
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
Submitted By:
Darnell & Associates, Inc.
1446 Front Street, Third Floor
San Diego, CA 92101
619-233-9373
November 14, 2000
I
·1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION .......................................................... " .. 1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................ 1
REPORT ORGANIZATION ............................................... 1
SECTION I -ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY ....................................... 4
ROADWAY SEGMENTS ................................................. 4
INTERSECTIONS ............................................. ',' ........ 4
LEVEL OF SERVICE ........................................... ' ......... 4
LEVELS OF SIGNIFICANCE STANDARDS ................................. 5
SECTION II -EXISTING CONDITIONS .......................................... 6
EXISTING CHARACTERISTICS .......................................... 6
Existing Roadway Segments ......................................... 6 '
Existing Intersections ............................................... 9
EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE CONDITIONS ............................... 9
Roadway Segments ................................................ 9
Intersections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
SECTION III -PROJECT RELATED CONDITIONS ................................ 11
TRIP GENERATION RATES ............................................. 11
TRIP DISTRIBUTION/ASSIGNMENT ..................................... 14
SECTION IV -IMPACTS ...................................................... 20
EXISTING PLUS PROJECT -PHASE I .................................... 20
Roadway Segments ............................................... 20
Intersections ..................................................... 20
EXISTING PLUS OTHER APPROVED/PENDING PROJECTS ................. 20
NEAR TERM CUMULATIVE CONDITIONS ............................... 24
Roadway Segments ............................................... '24
Intersections ..................................................... 24
BUILDOUT CONDITIONS .............................................. 29
Forecast Analysis ................................................. 29
Roadway Segment Analysis ......................................... 29
SECTION V -PROJECT ACCESS AND ON-SITE CIRCULATION ................... 33
PROJECT ACCESS .................................................... 33
Near Term Conditions ............................................. 33
Buildout Conditions ............................................... 33
ON-SITE CIRCULATION ............................................... 33
SECTION VI -RECOMMENDED TRAFFIC MITIGATION MEASURES ............... 35
ROADWAY SEGMENTS .......................................... 35
INTERSECTIONS ................................................ 35
SECTION VII ............................................................... 36
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ........................... 36
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
;1
I
I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 -Vicinity Map ......................................................... 2
Figure 2 -Site Plan ............................................................ 3
Figure 3 -Existing Roadway and Intersection Geometries .............................. 7
Figure 4 -Existing Traffic Volumes ............................................... 8
Figure 5 -Near Term Trip Distribution ............................................ 16
Figure 6 -Long Term Trip Distribution ............................................ 17
Figure 7 -Phase I Project Related Traffic Volume .......................... '.' ....... 18
Figure 8 -Master Plan Project Related Traffic Volumes ................................ 19
Figure 9 -Existing Plus Phase I Project Traffic Volumes .............................. 21
Figure 10 -Existing Plus Other ApprovedlPending Projects Traffic Volume ............... 25
Figure 11 -Existing Plus Other ApprovedlPending Projects Plus Phase I Project
Traffic Volumes .................................................... 26
Figure 12 -Buildout Without Project Traffic Volumes ................................ 30 .
Figure 13 -Buildout Plus Master Plan Project Traffic Volumes ......................... 31
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 -Level of Service Ranges ................................................. 5
Table 2 -Existing Roadway Segment Level of Service Summary ........................ 9
Table 3 -Existing Intersection Level of Service Summary ............................. 10
Table 4 -Trip Generation Rate Summary .......................................... 12
Table 5 -Weekday Trip Generation Summary ...................................... 13
Table 6 -Trip Generation Summary on a Special Occasion ............................ 14
Table 7 -Sunday Trip Generation Summary ........................................ 15
Table 8 -Existing + Phase I Project Roadway Segment Level of Service Summary ......... 22
Table 9 -Existing + Phase I Project Intersection Level of Service Summary ............... 23
Table 10 -Existing + Other ApprovedlPending Projects + Phase I Project Roadway
Segment Level of Service Summary ..................................... 27
Table 11 -Existing + Other Projects + Phase I Project Intersection
Level of Service Summary ............................................. 28
Table 12 -Buildout With and Without Phase V-Master Plan of the Proposed Project Roadway
Segment Level of Service Summary ...................................... 32
Table 13 -Project Access Level of Service Summary ................................. 34
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
>-Peak Rour Counts
>-Daily Traffic Counts
>-Buildout Forecast Volumes
>-City of Carlsbad Circulation Plan
>-City of Carlsbad Arterial Segment Capacities
>-SANTEC/ITE Measure of Significant Project Traffic Impacts
APPENDIXB
>-Redeemer by the Sea Lutheran Church Phasing Plan
APPENDIXC
>-List of Other Approved/Pending Projects
>-Other Approved/Pending Projects Trip Generation
>-Other Approved/Pending Projects Trip Distribution
APPENDIXD
>-Existing Conditions (lCU & HCS)
APPENDIXE
>-Existing + Phase I Project Conditions (lCU & RCS)
APPENDIXF
>-Existing + Other Approved/Pending Projects Conditions (lCU & RCS)
APPENDIXG
>-Existing + Other Approved/Pending Projects + Phase I Project Conditions (lCU & HCS)
APPENDIXR
>-Project Access Analysis (RCS)
1
1
1
'1
1
1
1
I
1
I
1
1
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
INTRODUCTION
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This transportation report has been prepared to evaluate the traffic related impacts of the proposed Redeemer
by the Sea Lutheran Church. The project is located at the southeast corner of Poinsettia Lane and Black Rail
Road in the City of Carlsbad. Figure 1 shows the regional location of the project and Figure 2 shows the
detailed site plan.
The project is proposed to be constructed in five phases, with the first phase anticipated t9 be developed by the
Year 2002 and the last phase anticipated to be completed by the year 2020. (A copy of the proposed phasing
can be found in Appendix B.) Each of the proposed phases is briefly described below:
Phase I: Construct the Sanctuary Building. During this phase the worship center will be
approximately 6,258 square feet and seat 200 people. A preschool for 48 students will be located in
the lower level. This phase is anticipated to be completed by the Year 2002.
Phase II: Construct the Preschool Building for 118 students. During this phase the pre-school will be
moved out of the Sanctuary thereby allowing the worship center to be expanded to approximately
19,170 square feet. Phase II is anticipated to be completed by 2005-2006.
Phase III: Construct the Administration Building. During this phase the church offices will be moved
out of the Sanctuary thereby allowing the worship center to be expanded to its maximum capacity of
406 seats, approximately 23,014 square feet. A 2,884 square foot Elder Center with conference
rooms, game rooms, and a kitchen will be built in the lower level of the Administration Building.
Phase III is estimated to be completed by 2008-2010.
Phase IV: Construct an Elementary School for 240 students. The Elementary School is estimated to
be completed by 2013-2015.
Phase V-Master Plan: Construct a 22,386 square foot Family Life Center with youth meeting rooms,
a theater, a gymnasium, and a kitchen. The Master Plan is estimated to be completed by 2018-2020.
It should be noted that the phasing pattern described above is very preliminary. In reality, the project will be
developed upon demand and may not be phased exactly as described above. For instance, the Administration
Building may be constructed prior to the Preschool and the Family Life Center may be constructed prior to the
Elementary School.
REPORT ORGANIZATION
Section I discusses the analysis methodology and Section II evaluates the existing roadway characteristics and
traffic conditions surrounding the project area. Section III examines the potential trips generated by the
proposed project and it defines the trip distribution assumptions. Section IV analyzes the near te11l1 and long
term impacts of the proposed project. Section V analyzes the project's access points and on-site circulation.
Section VI provides recommended mitigation measUres and Section VII summarizes the teport's findings and
conclusions.
1
-
I\.)
--
~ I
: lEe ~" <l
.l[yr;n
\ I
----..._./
I I '= I~ " -j"
1'" I ,
I I \
\t
-~----
.<:1 Srr.,
-",:!!-4l(r
...... ,~
---~
-
" ,
I I
--
Darnell & ASSOCIATES, INC.
-----
"'~'r ... :~~: ..... ,,:i •••
----
I-I ( I \: r -----I\:--;;f C:-:::' ~:':r \t __ " /'" I\", \\~, /' ("
\.()",,~" ...-/ ct-.\l-~;':; ,:.~....--
, ,'i.f'COSTA ";,"
:' COUNTRY';': : ':t~+\:,
"!':.
: .....
t_,
--
" I '. J":) '-'1';::1 \ L<;;:I ~ .• \rnl ''-'fL,' FS~ I'
"" :/
'FIGURE 1
VICINITY MAP
--
,30
:z 0:: c.n
0 0
I I 0 ,N I~ «
I§
0 0
I
I
I
I
I
I N z «
I w ~
~ a..
::J w
I
(.? I-
I...L. (f)
I
I ~ $ \ _____ C
I ,
I I'
I' " ,
/..'
I I 1'", ~;
I
I
: ',' / :~
,:.' I.' t' I ,.. I '
"..-, ' ,1
/
-.. ; ! II
~. I"': .. ' ", I,; .
./. '; ! "
I
I
I
I 3
1
I
1
1
.1
1
I
I
1-
I
I
1
1
1
I
I
I
1
I
SECTION I
ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY
ROADWAY SEGMENTS
The levels of service for the roadway segments in the vicinity of the project were analyzed under existing,
existing plus Phase I of the project, existing plus other approved/pending projects, existing plus other
approved/pending projects plus Phase I of the proposed project, buildout without project, and buildout plus
the Master Plan of the proposed project conditions. The roadway segment LOS was detenniried by comparing
the traffic volumes under all traffic conditions to the capacity of the roadway according to its arterial segment
classification.
INTERSECTIONS
The Poinsettia LanelAviara Parkway and the Poinsettia LanelBlack Rail Road intersections were analyzed
under existing, existing plus Phase I of the project, existing plus other approved/pending projects, and existing
plus other approved/pending projects plus Phase I of the proposed project conditions. Traffic counts for the
Aviara ParkwaylBlack Rail Road intersection were collected, however, the intersection was not analyzed
because the proposed project assigns a maximum of 20 peak hour trips through the intersection during Phase
I and a maximum of 35 peak hour trips through the intersection during the Master Plan (see Section III). A
general guideline for Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) is that an intersection is only required to be analyzed if the
proposed project adds 50 or more peak-hour trips in either direction to the existing traffic.
To conform to the requirements of the City of Carlsbad, the signalized intersection of Poinsettia Lane and
Aviara Parkway was analyzed using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Methodology. The ICU
methodology calculates a volume to capacity (vic) ratio based on a capacity of2000 vehicles per hour green
per lane (vphgpl) for all thm lanes, a capacity of 1,800 vphgpl for all single tum lanes, and a capacity of 1,620
vphgpl for all dual tum lanes. A ten percent (0.10) clearance interval, time allowed for all vehicles to clear the
intersection, was utilized throughout the analysis.
Since the ICU methodology can only be used on signalized intersections, the Highway Capacity Software
(HCS), version 3.2 (which is based on the most recent Highway Capacity Manual procedures) was utilized to
analyze the morning and afternoon peak hour conditions of the unsignalized intersection of Poinsettia Lane and
Black Rail Road.
LEVEL OF SERVICE
Level of Service (LOS) is a professional industry standard by which the operating conditions of a given
roadway segment or intersection are measured. Level of Service is defined on a scale of A to F; where LOS
A represents the best operating conditions and LOS F represents the worst operating conditions. LOS A
facilities are characterized as having free flowing traffic conditions with no restrictions on maneuvering or
operating speeds; traffic volumes are low and travel speeds are high. LOS F facilities are characterized as
having forced flow with many stoppages and low operating speeds. Table 1 shows the volume to capacity (vic)
ratio and delay ranges that are equivalent to each Level of Service.
4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 1
Level of Service Ranges
Level of Roadway Segments -Volume Signalized Intersections -Unsignalized Intersectio~ -
Service to Capacity (vic) Ratio1 Volume to Capacity (vic) Rati02 Delay'(SecondsiVehicle)3
A 0.00 to 0.60 0.00 to 0.60 0.00 to 10.0
B 0.61 to 0.70 0.61 to 0.70 10.1 to 15.0
C 0.71 to 0.80 0.71 to 0.80 15.1 to 25.0
D 0.81 to 0.90 0.81 to 0.90 25.1 to 35.0
E 0.91 to 1.00 0.91 to 1.00 35.1 to 50.0
F Greater than 1. 00 Greater than 1.00 Greater than 50.0
1 The volume to capacity ratios are based on the City of Carlsbad Arterial Segment Capacities.
2 The delay ranges shown are based on the ICU Methodology for signalized intersections:
3 The delay ranges shown are based on the Highway Capacity Software version 3.2 for unsignalized
intersections.
The City of Carlsbad encourages operation of LOS C or better at planned intersections and roadway
segments. In developed areas, LOS D is an acceptable Level of Service for existing intersections and
roadway segments.
LEVELS OF SIGNIFICANCE STANDARDS
The San Diego Traffic Engineers' Council (SANTEC) and the Institute of Transportation Engineers
(ITE) Guidelines for Traffic Impact Studies (1'IS) in the San Diego Region, February 29, 2000 Draft was
utilized to detennine the significance of traffic impacts in regards to requiring mitigation. The
SANTECIITE TIS Guidelines consider an increase in volume to capacity (vIc) ratio of two percent (0.020)
or less or an increase in delay time of two (2) seconds or less on roadways and intersections operating at
LOS D, E, or F to be insignificant. The levels of significance are not applied to roadway segments or
intersections which operate at LOS C or better. (A copy of the SANTECIITE TIS Guidelines can be found
in Appendix A.)
5
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SECTION II
EXISTING CONDITIONS
This section of the traffic study is intended to assess the existing conditions of the roadways and intersections
within the vicinity of the project to determine travel flow and/or delay difficulties, if any, that exist prior to
adding the traffic generated by the proposed project. The existing conditions analysJs establishes a base
condition which is used to apply the other scenarios discussed in this report.
Darnell & Associates, Inc. conducted a field review and collected twenty-four hour machine counts and
morning and afternoon turn counts for the area surrounding the project in late October early November, 2000.
Current traffic volumes for Poinsettia Lane and Aviara Parkway were obtained from the City of Carlsbad
Growth Management Plan 1999 Traffic Mon!toring Program and the San Diego Region Average Weekday
Traffic Volumes 1995-1999. Figures 3 and 4 depict the existing roadway and intersection geometrics and
traffic volumes, respectively, in the project vicinity. The count sheets, a copy of the "Arterial Segment
Capacities" for the City of Carlsbad, and a copy of the City of Carlsbad Circulation Plan can be found in
Appendix A.
EXISTING CHARACTERISTICS
Existing Roadway Segments
Poinsettia Lane is an east-west roadway that extends from west of Interstate 5 to Black Rail Road. West of
Aviara Parkway, Poinsettia Lane is a four-lane roadway with bike lanes and a raised center median. This
section of Poinsettia Lane has a cross-section equivalent to that of a four-lane Major Arterial with a capacity
of 44,450 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) at Level of Service (LOS) E.
Between Aviara Parkway and Black Rail Road, Poinsettia Lane is a two-lane roadway with bike lanes and a
raised center median. The capacity of this segment of Poinsettia Lane is estimated to be equivalent to that of
a two-lane Collector with no access (22,230 ADT at LOS E).
A short segment of Poinsettia Lane is constructed from just east of Ambrosia Lane to Cassia Road as a foui'-
lane roadway with a raised center median. This section of Poinsettia Lane has a cross-section equivalent to
that of a four-lane Major Arterial with a capacity of 44,450 ADT at LOS E.
In the City of Carlsbad Circulation Plan, Poinsettia Lane is planned to be constructed as a four-lane Major
Arterial from Carlsbad Boulevard to Melrose Drive. In this analysis, it is assumed that the connection of
Poinsettia Lane from Black Rail Road to El Camino Real will be completed by the Year 2020.
Aviara Parkway is a four-lane roadway with bike lanes and a raised median. The cross-section of Aviara
Parkway is equivalent to that of a four-lane Secondary Arterial, capacity of 33,340 ADT at LOS E.
Black Rail Road is a north-south two-lane undivided roadway with forty-feet (40') of pavement curb to curb.
The cross-section of Black Rail Road is equivalent to that of a two-lane Local Road, capacity of 11, 120 ADT
at LOS E.
6
-------------------
~
'"
Darnell & ASSOCIATES, INC.
/ ~
I -j \
I p 1
\ ~ -l / ~t /
""h ---< ~ " (2) ~
.". " » o S~~~ LN A
«a~ (2)
(2)
,/
----/
I -t--..:: \ ~/ r-v
\ J / \~ -1--/
~ -
:::0 ~ r
:::0 Cl
~~
(4) J!~
POIN ~ L~F:T77A
(2)'~ ~ ---y
~
» ~ 9
(4)
FIGURE 3
EXISTING CONDITIONS
. "
. (
(
.. ;.' . ~
- - - - - - - - --. --.-- --_. - --.
00
-~ I ~/~~ \ ~ I J, r-~ "-[i I· 1 " /31.-J 1 ~ ) -", "'" 13 ~'-'" \ 21/18, ~::: / "-
"--2,700(99 •• 1) ---------
--..------
LEGEND
------------------,
1 ,470(00)
908(00)
;0 e r ~
4,000(9gest)
> $
;:0
;0 /0 o (/) j;
13,600(9gest)
xX/YY -AM/PM TURN VOLUMES __ ~ &
I,ZZZ -DAILY TRAFFIC ~
(~O) -YEAR COUNT WAS TAKEN 'f
~----------------------.-------------------------------------~--------------------~g
Darnell & ASSOCIATES, INC. . FIGURE 4
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
I ~ ~
<l
<f
C C
C c
1
1
I
·1
. 1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Existing Intersections
Darnell & Associates, Inc. collected morning and afternoon peak hour tum counts at the follo~g three
intersections in late October and early November, 2000:
1. Poinsettia Lane/Aviara Parkway (Signalized),
2 . Poinsettia LanelBlack Rail Road (Stop-controlled on Poinsettia), and
3. Aviara ParkwaylBlack Rail Road (Signalized).
It should be noted that although traffic counts were collected at the Aviara ParkwaylBlack Rail Road
intersection, the intersection was not analyzed because the proposed project assigns less than 50 peak hour trips
in either direction to this intersection (see Section III).
EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE CONDITIONS
Roadway Segments
For the purpose of this report, the daily traffic volumes of the roadway segments in the vicinity of the project
(as presented in Figure 4) were compared to the City of Carlsbad "Arterial Segment Capacities". The daily
(24 hour) traffic count sheets and a copy of the City of Carlsbad "Arterial Segment Capacities" are included
in Appendix A.
Table 2 shows that all roadway segments analyzed currently operate at LOS A.
Table 2
Existing Roadway Segment Level of Service Summary
Roadway Segment Classification Capacity} A.D.T. vic LOS Ratio
Poinsettia Lane
-West of Aviara Parkway 4-Ln Major Arterial 44,450 13,800 0.310 A
-Btwn Aviara Pkwy and Black Rail Rd 2-Ln Collector 22,230 1,600 0.072 A
Aviara Parkway
-North or Poinsettia Lane 4-Ln SecondaIy Arterial 33,340 2,700 0.081 A
-Btwn Poinsettia Ln and Black Rail Rd 4-Ln SecondaIy Arterial 33,340 14,000 0.420 A
-East of Black Rail Road 4-Ln SecondaIy Arterial 33,340 13,600 0.408 A
Black Rail Road
-North of Poinsettia Lane 2-LnLocal 11,120 1,470 0.132 A
-Btwn Poinsettia Ln and Aviara Pkwy 2-LnLocal 11,120 908 0.082 A
} The caI>8ci~ is based on the upper limit of LOS EIJeJ the City_of Carlsbad Arterial Segment Capacities.
9
.'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Intersections
To meet the requirements of Carlsbad, the ICU methodology was used to analyze the signalized intersection
of Poinsettia Lane and Aviara Parkway and the RCS, version 3.2, was used to analyzed the stop-controlled
intersection of Poinsettia Lane and Black Rail Road. The results of the analysis are summarized in Table 3.
As can be seen from Table 3, both intersections currently operate at LOS A during both the morning and
afternoon peak hour.
A copy of the ICU and RCS worksheets for existing conditions can be found in Appendix D.
Table 3
Existing Intersection Level of Service Summary
Signalized Intersection1
AM Peak PM Peak
Intersection
v/cRatio LOS v/cRatio LOS
Poinsettia Lane @
-Aviara Parkway 0.35 A 0.32 A
One-Way Stop-Controlled Intersection2
Critical Movement AM Peak PM Peak
Intersection
Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS
Poinsettia Lane @ NB Approach 7.3 A ' 7.3 A
-Black Rail Road EB Left Tum Movement 9.1 A 9.0 A
EB Right Tum Movement 8.5 A 8.5 A
I The vIc ratio and corresponding Level of Service (LOS) is per the ICU methodology
2 The delay per vehicle and the corresponding Level of Service (LOS) is per the ICU methodology per the
Highway Capacity Software, version 3.2
10
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SECTION III
PROJECT RELATED CONDITIONS
TRIP GENERATION RATES
The trip generation potential for a project is estimated based on the land use characteristics. Trip
generation rates, daily and peak hour, for each phase of the proposed project was based on The Institute of
Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 6th Edition. Table 4 summarizes the trip
generation rates used for each component of the proposed project.
Elder Center & Family Life Center Trip Generation
The ITE Trip Generation Manual does not have a standard trip generation rate for uses such as the Elder
Center and the Family Life Center. In these cases, since both of the uses are associated with the Sanctuary,
the trip generation was estimated to be equivalent to that of a Sunday worship service. In the trip
generation calculations, only the square footage of the uses anticipated to contribute to trip generation (Le.
the meeting rooms, the game room, the theater, the kitchen) were considered. It should also be noted, that
based on discussions with the developer, it was determined that the Elder Center would only be utilized
during the weekdays, typically 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., and would be expected to contribute a nominal
amount of traffic to the morning or afternoon peak hour traffic. Likewise, the Family Life Center is
intended to only be used by the youth during the evenings and would not generate any traffic during the
morning peak hour. In this analysis, it was estimated that approximately five percent (5%) of the total
daily trips generated by the Family Center would be generated during the afternoon peak hour.
In the trip generation calculations, it was also assumed that the gymnasium in the Family Life Center would
only be used on special occasions occurring during the evenings or on a Saturday and would not be used in
conjunction with the other facilities, i.e. meeting rooms, within the Family Life Center.
Weekday Trip Generation
Table 5 summarizes the weekday trip generation calculations for each phase of the proposed project. As
can be seen from Table 5, Phase I of the proposed project is estimated to generate 274 average daily trips
(ADTs), 44 morning peak hour trips, and 45 afternoon peak hour trips. Phase V-the Master Plan of the
proposed project is estimated to generate 1,335 ADTs, 183 morning peak hour trips, and 193 afternoon
peak hour trips. During a special event, the Master Plan of the proposed project is estimated to generate
1,459 ADTs, 183 morning peak hour trips, and 200 afternoon peak hour trips, see Table 6.
For this analysis, the trip generation for Phase I of the project was used to determine the immediate near
term impacts of the proposed project. The Master Plan trip generation of 1,335 ADT was utilized to
determine the long term impacts of the proposed project.
11
~ . ;
-. -- -.-- - - ------.-----
~~-------
Table 4
Trip Generation Rate Summary
Weekday Trip Generation Rate Sunday Trip Generation Rate
Land Use AM Peak Hour Trip Generation PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Peak Hour Trip Generation
Daily Trip Rate Rate Daily Trip Rate
Generation Rate! Generation Rate!
Total %In % Out Total %In % Out Total %In % Out
Sanctuary 9.11 Trips/ksf O.72/ksf 54% 46% 0.661ksf 54% 46% 36.63 Trips/ksf 9.49/ksf 51% 49%
Preschool 4.52 Trips/Student 0.811Student 53% 4?o/O 0.86/Student 47% 53% 0.37 Trips/Student O.II/Student 54% 46%
Elder Center 36.63 Trips/ksf O/ksf --Olksf - -
o Trips/ksf O/ksf --
Elementary School 1.02 Trips/Student 0.29/Student 59% 41% 0.26/Student 46% 54% o Trips/Student O/Student - -
Family Life Center 36.63 Trips/ksf O/ksf --1. 83/ksf 100% 0% o Trips/ksf O/ksf - -i
.
! All trip generation rates are based on The Institute ojTransportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 6th Edition
2 Since both the Elder Center and Family Life Center are associated with the Sanctuary, the trip generation was estimated to be equivalent to that of a Sunday worship
service
-'"
I'\,)
I
I
·1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TableS
Weekday Trip Generation Summary
AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips
Land Use Total No. of Units Daily Trips
Total In Out Total In Out
Phase I -Completed by 2002
~ Sanctuary 6.258 ksf 57 5 3 2 4 2 2
~ Preschool 48 Students 217 39 21 18 41 19 22
Total Trip Generation Phase I: 274 44 24 20 45 21 24
Phase II -Completed by 2005-2006
~ Sanctuary 19.17 ksf 175 14 8 6 13 7 6
~ Preschool 118 Students 533 96 51 45 101 47 54
Total Trip Generation Phase II: 708 110 59 51 114 54 60
Phase III -Completed by 2008-2010
~ Sanctuary 23.014 ksf 210 17 9 9 15 8 7
~ Preschool 118 Students 533 96 51 51 101 47 54
~ Elder Center 1.03 ksf1 38 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Trip Generation Phase III: 781 113 113 60 116 55 61
Phase IV -Completed by 2013-2015
~ Sanctuary 23.014 ksf 210 17 9 8 15 8 7
~ Preschool 118 Studcnts 533 96 51 45 101 47 54
~ Eldcr Center 1.03 kst:' 38 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ Elementary School 240 Students 245 70 41 29 62 29 33
Total Trip Generation Phase IV: 1,026 183 101 82 178 84 94
Phase V -Master Plan Completed by 2018-2020
~ Sanctuary 23.014 ksf 210 17 9 8 15 8 7
~ Preschool 118 Students 533 96 51 45 101 47 ' 54
~ Elder Center 1.03 ksf1 38 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ Elementary School 240 Students 245 70 41 29 62 29 33
~ Family Life Center 8.44ksf 309 0 0 0 IS 15 0
Total Trip Generation Phase V-Master Plan: 1,335 183 101 82 193 99 94
1 The size of the Elder Center includes the Conference Room, Assembly Room, Game Room, Lobby, and Kitchen.
2 The size of the Family Center includes the Youth Meeting Room, Fireside Room, Theater, Fitness Center, Church Store,
and Kitchen.
13
I
I
'1
·1
I
I
·1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 6
Trip Generation Summary on a Special Occasion
AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips
Land Use Total No. of Units Daily Trips
Total In Out Total In Out
Phase V -Master Plan Completed by 2018-2020
• Sanctuary 23.014ksf 210 17 9 8 15 8 7
• Preschool 118 Students 533 96 51 45 101 47 54
• Elder Center 1.03 ksf 38 0 0 0 0 0 0
• Elementary School 240 Students 245 70 41 29 62 29 33
• Family Life Center 8.44ksF 433 0 0 0 22 22 0
Total Trip Generation for Phase V-Master Plan: 1,459 183 101 82 200 106 94
I The size of the Elder Center includes the Conference Room, Assembly Room, Game Room, Lobby, and Kitchen.
2 The size of the Family Center includes the Gym and the Kitchen because these are the facilities anticipated to be utilized
during a special event.
Sunday Trip Generation
Table 7 summarizes the trip generation of each phase of the proposed project on a Sunday, the day of
worship. Based on discussions with the developer, it was detennined that at no time will the Elder Center
or Family Life Center be utilized at the same time as Sunday Service. Table 7 shows that on a Sunday,
Phase I of the proposed project will generate 247 ADTs and Phase V-the Master Plan of the proposed
project is estimated to generate 887 ADTs. These Sunday trip generation rates for Phase I and the Master
Plan of the proposed project are significantly less than the weekday trip generation. Therefore, the Sunday
trip generation was not considered in the analysis.
TRIP DISTRIBUTION/ASSIGNMENT
Trip distribution for this site was detennined based on the location of the residents who would utilize the
proposed project facilities. The project distribution percentages for near term and Quildout conditions are
presented on Figures 5 and 6, respectively. For the near term analysis (Phase I of the project), it was
assumed that Poinsettia Lane would not be extended from its existing tenninus at Black Rail Road.
Therefore, the project's only access would be via Black Rail Road. For buildout conditions (Master Plan
of the project), it was assumed that Poinsettia Lane would be extended as a four-Iafle Major Arterial east to
EI Camino Real. It was assumed that there would be a median break on Poinsettia Lane at Street "A", the
project's access, providing a full access point into and out of the project site.
New traffic volumes generated by the proposed project were assigned to the local roadway network using
the percentages depicted in Figures 5 and 6. The project related daily and peak hour trips are shown in
Figures 7 and 8, respectively for Phase I and the Master Plan. The impacts .associated with the addition of
project traffic are discussed in the following section, Section IV.
14
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
1
I
,I
I
I
I
Table 7
Sunday Trip Generation Summary
Peak Hour Trips
Land Use Total No. of Units Daily Trips
Total In Out
Phase I -Completed by 2002
~ Sanctuary 6.258 ksf 229 59 30 29
~ Preschool 48 Students 18 5 3 2
Total Trip Generation Phase I: 247 64 33 31
Phase II -Completed by 2005-2006
~ Sanctuary 19.17 ksf 702 182 93 89 ,
~ Preschool 118 Students 44 13 7 6
Total Trip Generation Phase II: 746 195 100 95
Phase ill -Completed by 2008-2010
~ Sanctuary 23.014ksf 843 218 111 107
~ Preschool 118 Students 44 13 7 6
~ Elder Center' 1.03 ksf 0 0 0 0
Total Trip Generation Phase TIl: 887 231 118 113
Phase N -Completed by 2013-2015
~ Sanctuary 23.014 ksf 843 218 111 107
~ Preschool 118 Students 44 13 7 6
~ Elder Center' 1.03 ksfl 0 0' 0 0
~ Elementary School 240 Students 0 0 0 0
Total Trip Generation Phase N: 887 231 118 113
Phase V-Master Plan Completed by 2018-2020
~ Sanctuary 23.014 ksf 843 218 . 111 107
~ Preschool 118 Students 44 13 7 6
~ Elder Center' 1.03 ksf 0 0 0 0
~ Elementary School 240 Students 0 o· 0 0
~ Family Life Center1 8.44 ksf 0 0 0 0
Total Trip Generation for Phase V-Master Plan: 887 231 118 113
1 The Elder Center and Family Center will not be utilized at the same time the Sanctuary worship is conducted, therefore,
they are not anticipated to generate any traffic on Sunday.
15
-
Q)
------------------
I~ I/~~\\_'---~
i 1\ 50%, 1 ~ J,,~ '" '"
. LEGEND
I
(
\
"
'" / ------
/ ~
'-... -------
XX% -DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGE * -PROJECT SITE
~
, \
~/
I '" .,. / -----
:;0 » r=
45%
:;0 o
~ ~ "J':POINS~A ~ LN
/
-----
~ ~ --y
/ ~
-I l
.l:> \
'" ---ffi ;:0
~
~ ~ ---I
~
L55% \
,45%
PROJECT \ .
fNTRANC]
~ ~ / ---
I
z ~ ~
o o ~--------------------------------,-------------------~--------------------------------------------------~------------;18
Darnell & ASSOCIATES, INC. FIGURE 5
NEAR TERM TRIP DISTRIBUTION
I
<I: < 5 o
5 o
-------------------
:::JI
/ ~
/. ~ \ f --40%
{ , ,nom \
\ ~~~ I t I / I ~~E!--o \{) 0
"" T"")I --------
/\ ~
I
(
\
"-"---------
LEGEND
XX% -DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGE * -PROJECT SITE
---
/ ~ /. \
( ,25% \
\
40%~1-~I I ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ -:> cr 0 LO
"-0 F "<t C"J ~~ '" g: t1 / --~ --------t~% \
~
, \
~/
/
/ --------
o
;;>;;40%.
:;0
~ r
18%
:;0 o
):.
$ ::0 ~
~ I")
~
--
~
ll) T"" L
~
\
--20% \.
~J --I
~ N
/
------
L 15% \
,20%
PROJECT \.
fNTRANCj
~ 0 / N --------
z ~ ~
o o r---------------------------------~--------------------------------------~--------------------------------------------;I~
Darnell & ASSOCIATES, INC. FIGURE 6
LONG TERM TRIP DISTRIBUTION
I --< .< o o o o
-------------------
co
/ ~
I ..-\ ,
..-
( t l-----
\ 12/11, It J
'---....
~, '" ,..-
"" ~ / 'y. "" ~----------
/ '" ,,~ \ U\ 82 I < -(
\
\.
'-.... ----
LEGEND
xx/yy -AM /PM TURN VOLUMES'
Z.ZZZ -DAILY TRAFFIC * -PROJECT SITE
---
/
\--/
/
/
'~' --
~
, \
~/
J
/ ---
:::0 ~ r
:::0 o
--
/
I ~
~ -
---J L
\
"" --
~
L11/13\
,9/11
PROJECT \
ENTRANCE/ ' r /-
0)
?: / ---
z ~ ~
o o r---------------------------~------------------------------------------------------------------------~I~
Darn e 11 & ~SSOCIATES. INC. FIGURE 7
PHASE I PROJECTED RELATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES
I ..-..-
< < Ci o
Ci o
-------------------
<D
-----........
/ '" I · ~ ~ 10 --33/37 ~ ,nom/nom
\ 41/39-I t I )
\
10/10, ~~ 8/ ___
OJ '<t c
'-.. ~-~~
../
/~
r")
(
---
\
'-
/
/ --
LEGEND
xx/yy-AM/PM TURN VOLUMES
. Z.ZZZ -' DAILY TRAFFIC * -PROJECT SITE
-----
~
\
,25/25 ,
,~
'\ / ~
I ""I /
. '--' -------
240
;;0 o
.l>
I
/ ~-
I ~ ~I<) \
-20/20 \ ( .
\ 16X~~11
.,/ 2/2, ~
"" ' C'\j
/
/ --
10
~ ..-
L
--
-------
~
L12/14\
,16/19
PROJECT \.
r-NTRANC~
a ~ /
-------
z ~ ~
o o ~----------------~----~------------------------------------------------------------~I~
Darnell & ~SSOCIATES. INC. FIGURE 8
MASTER PLAN PROJECT RELATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES
I ~ ~
< < o o o ~ ____________________________________ _L ________________________________________________________________________________________________ ~Io
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SECTION IV
IMPACTS
EXISTING PLUS PROJECT -PHASE I
Roadway Segments
The roadway segments were reanalyzed with the traffic generated from Phase I of the proposed project
added to existing traffic volumes. The daily and peak hour turn volumes for existing plus Phase I
project conditions are illustrated in Figure 9. Table 8 summarizes the existing plus Phase I project
roadway segment analysis.
As can be seen from Table 8, all roadway segments analyzed continue to operate at LOS A with the
addition of Phase I of the project. '
Intersections
The intersections were reanalyzed with the traffic generated from the proposed project added to existing
traffic volumes. The intersection analysis for the existing plus Phase I project conditions are summarized
in Table 9.
As can be seen from Table 9, both intersections continue to operate at LOS A during both peak hours with
the addition of traffic generated by Phase I of the project.
The ICU and RCS worksheets for the existing plus Phase I project conditions can be found in
Appendix E.
EXISTING PLUS OTHER APPROVED/PENDING PROJECTS
Other Approved/Pending Projects
From discussions with the Engineering Department at the City of Carlsbad, it was determined that the
development of the property along Poinsettia Lane from Black Rail Road to Ambrosia Lane should be
included in the traffic analysis. (A copy of the correspondence with the City staff regarding which projects
to include in the analysis can be found in Appendix C.) These projects include the followi)lg:
1. Ocean Bluff (CT 93-09): A 96 single-family dwelling unit subdivision located at the northwest
comer of Poinsettia Lane and Black Rail Road. The project takes access off Black Rail Road and
Poinsettia Lane.
2. DeJong (CT 98-05): A 28 single-family dwelling unit subdivision located at the northeast comer
of Poinsettia Lane and Black Rail Road. The project takes access off Black Rail Road.
3. Daybreak Community Church (CUP 00-06): A 18,112 square foot (approxima~ size)
community church located at the southwest comer of Poinsettia Lane and Ambrosia Lane. The
project is assumed to take access, in the near term, off Ambrosia Lane.
20
-------------------
1\.)1
/ ~ I W U) NC'oI \ .................... OlCO
I JT \-----
\ 13/31~ I! ) 33/29, ~~ .................... ~-'" ~~/ -------') 71:;1:;~
~ -~ \'~ ;:.~ lD L:A/'O· \ ~ 13,882
( ",-:;:t;, ---59r' / -;!)~~ ,9 0
j\\.; \(1---/
\ \\e"1~ ~;O~ ) "S6Af(/O to ~ t')
\.4'\4 5~'2.' ::-~ " ~7 -------
LEGEND
XX/YY-AM/PM TURN VOLUMES
. Z,ZZZ -DAILY 'TRAFFIC * -PROJECT SITE
~
~
A\.~ "" I ~I" F"
1,031 . ..........
:;:0 --.. ~ r
:;:0
CI
(}{<J:;;-~ / ~
I ~<"l L11/13\ .......... ~ co;;'
--f TL ,9/11
PROJECT \
\
t ENTRANCE w[ /
'" ~:: / r--.. ......
10 -------
z ~ ~
o o r---------------------------------~~---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------418
Darnell & ASSOCIATES, INC. FIGURE 9
EXISTING PLUS PHASE I PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES
I
~ ~ o o o ~------__________________________________ _L __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ~I 0
-------------------
I'\:)
I'\:)
TableS
Existing + Phase I Project Roadway Segment Level of Service Summary
Existing Conditions Existing + Phase I Project
Roadway Segment Classification Capacityl
A.D.T. vIc LOS A.D.T. vIc LOS Ratio Ratio
Poinsettia Lane
-West of Aviara Parkway 4-LnMajor 44,450 13,800 0.310 A 13,882 0.312 A
-Btwn Aviara Pkwy & Black Rail Rd 2-Ln Collector 22,230 1,600 0.072 A 1,737 0.078 A
A viara Parkway
-North or Poinsettia Lane 4-Ln Secondary 33,340 2,700 0.081 A 2,755 0.083 A
-Btwn Poinsettia Ln & Black Rail Rd 4-Ln Secondary 33,340 14,000 0.420 A 14,014 0.420 A
-East of Black Rail Road 4-Ln Secondary 33,340 13,600 0.408 A 13,709 0.411 A
Black Rail Road
-North of Poinsettia Lane 2-LnLocal 11,120 1,470 0.132 A 1,484 0.133 A
-Btwn Poinsettia Ln & Project Ent. 2-Ln Local 11,120 908 0.082 A 1,059 0.095 A
-South of Project Entrance 2-Ln Local 11,120 908 0.082 A 1,031 0.093 A
1 The capacity is based on the upper limit of LOS E per the City of Carlsbad Arterial Segment Capacities.
2 Significance is based on the SANTECIITE Traffic Impact Guidelines.
NI A = Not Applicable because siJnIificance is not applied to segments that operate at LOS C or better.
Inc in
vIc Sign.
Ratio Impact2
0.002 N/A
0.006 N/A
0.002 N/A
0.000 N/A
0.003 N/A
I
0.001 N/A
0.013 N/A
0.011 N/A
---.-- - - - - - - - ---- ---
~ Ij.)
I
Table 9 -~ Existing + Phase I Project Intersection Level of Service Summary
Signalized Intersection1 Ii
Existing Conditions Existing + Phase I Project
Intersection AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak
vic Ratio LOS vic Ratio LOS vic Ratio LOS Inc. Sig. ? vic Ratio LOS Inc. Sig. ? in vic in vic
Poinsettia Lane @
-Aviara Parkway 0.35 A 0.32 A 0.35 A 0.0 N/A 0.32 A 0.0 N/A
One-Way Stop-Controlled Intersection2 I
Existing Conditions Existing + Phase I Project
Intersection Critical AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak
Movement
Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay Sig. ? Delay LOS Delay Sig. ? (sec/veh) (seclveh) (sec/veh) Inc. (sec/veh) Inc.
Poinsettia Lane @ NBApproach 7.3 A 7.3 A 7.3 A 0.0 N/A 7.3 A 0.0 N/A
-Black Rail Road EBL Movement 9.1 A 9.0 A 9.2 A 0.1 N/A 9.2 A 0.1 N/A
EBR Movement 8.5 A 8.5 A 8.6 A 0.1 N/A 8.6 A 0.1 N/A
1 The vIc ratio and corresponding Level of Service (LOS) is per the ICU methodology
2 The delay per vehicle and the corresponding Level of Service (LOS) is per the ICU methodology per the Highway Capacity Software, version 3.2
Sig. ? = Significance is based on the SANTECIITE Traffic Impact Guidelines.
NI A = Not Applicable because significance is not applied to intersections that operate at LOS C or better.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4. Redeemer by the Sea Subdivision: A 12-10t subdivision located at the southeast comer of the
Redeemer by the Sea Lutheran Church, property. Although this subdivision is actually shown on
the site plans for the proposed project, Redeemer by the Sea plans to sell these 12 lots to som~ne
else to develop.
The list of projects provided by the City staff also included the Cobblestone (CT 84-32A) project which is
located off Black Rail Road north of Poinsettia Lane. This project, however, is over ten years old and a
Tentative Map for the site no longer exists. Therefore, it was not included in the near term analysis.
City staff also indicated that two parcels of land, one located at the southwest comer of PoinSettia Lane and
Black Rail Road and the other located off Poinsettia Road between the Redeemer by the Sea site and the
Daybreak Community Church site, should be included in the analysis assuming they were developed
according to the General Plan. The General Plan calls for these parcels to be developed as low to medium
residential at approximately three (3) dwelling units per acre. Since a Tentative Map has not been filed for
these parcels at this time, it assumed that they will not be developed within the next two to three years.
Therefore, they are not included in the near term analysis. These parcels, however, are assumed to be
developed as per the General Plan under buildout conditions.
Trip Generation/Distribution
The trip generation and distribution assumed for the other approved/pending projects can be found in
Appendix C. Figure 10 illustrates the existing plus other approved/pending projects daily and peak
hour turn volumes.
NEAR TERM CUMULATIVE CONDITIONS
Roadway Segments
The roadway segments were reanalyzed under near term cumulative conditions (exist~ng plus other
approved/pending projects plus Phase I of the proposed project). The daily and peak hour turn
volumes for near term cumulative conditions are illustrated in Figure 11. Table 10 summarizes the
near term cumulative roadway segment analysis.
As can be seen from Table 10, all roadway segments analyzed continue to operate at LOS A under
near term cumulative conditions.
Intersections
The intersections were reanalyzed under near term cumulative conditions (existing plus other
approved/pending projects plus Phase I of the proposed project). The intersection analysis for the near
term cumulative conditions are summarized in Table 11.
As can be seen from Table 11, both intersections continue to operate at LOS A during both peak hours
under near term cumulative conditions.
The ICU and HCS worksheets can be found in Appendix F and G, respectively, for ,the existing plus
other approved/pending project conditions and near term cumulative conditions.
24
-------------------
~I
/ ~
\ t-..~ I <DN .................. Nt-..
r------'---. JT (
\ 34/103~ 11 )
~ 23/25t ~? / ~ ~ "" ----'7; 1?A ---
?~l\~ ,/" -~ \)\ 14,56~ ~
;:: ~ to Lo73j/o~ \ ~~ --973 /\0 '" " ., ,\ \---( ~>:!"'L (
j\ J~\:'J \ t --'fh",-\\~ \01 _cO.
\ 473 /5734, ~ :7 4\0 ..t
......... -------
LEGEND
XX/YY-AM/PM TURN VOLUMES
Z,ZZZ -DAILY TRAFFIC
'" ) ~ "" I~\~ CJ~~ A\\>--:=--J
F,POINS£T77A 1,131 ~ LN %
\~ \~
~-?A1 I~
:z ,Q.
C/
C c I ~----------~-------------F-IG-U-R-E--10-·----------~11
Darnell & ASSOCIATES, INC. EXISTING PLUS' OTHER ·APPROVED/PENDING
PROJECTS TRAFFIC VOLUMES
<l. <!
E c
E c
-------------------
I'\:)
0)
/"-~
I r--.IO \ <ON , ,
NOO
r J' T r------
\ 34/103..J l, 1 / ~ "'"
35/36, S~ .'\~ "" "" ~.-/ '-"---..---'
/ i / ~ ~ L S1/7:J}6'O \ I to ..-.q-'\ a?.
0'> -;0-..--'\ 7:J '\ () ( j\~~\ \ ( \--
\ ~\~~tOJ 7:J1..J ~ U> -:;: ,\\'0/ ,\A---to.:c..
"/' ." -to \. SV IS7:J A, ~ ~/ A,\6 .q-'/ " --..---'
LEGEND
xx/yy -AM/PM TURN VOLUMES
Z,ZZZ -DAILY TRAFFIC * -PROJECT SITE
7: 170 (3 ..-<\ \" LN /' ~
I ~~ L17/17\
---~ ~ ,10/11 --f i L PROJECT \
ENTRANCE
:;0 o
» $ ;;u
~
FIGURE 11
\ t I / ~o
r<)'-/ " 0"-~ ..----.:--""
Darnell & ~SSOCIATES, INC. EXISTING PLUS OTHER ,APPROVED/PENDIN.G
PROJECTS + PHASE I PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES
-------------------
f\.:I --.J
-~----------------------------
Table 10
Existing + Other ApprovedlPending Projects + Phase I Project Roadway Segment Level of Service Summary
Existing + Others Existing + Other Projects
Projects + Phase I Project Inc in
Roadway Segment Classification Capacityl vIc vIc vIc Ratio A.D.T. Ratio LOS A.D.T. Ratio LOS
Poinsettia Lane
-West of Aviara Parkway 4-LnMajor 44,450 14,565 0.328 A 14,647 0.330 A 0.002
-Btwn Aviara Pkwy & Black Rail Rd 2-Ln Collector 22,230 2,772 0.125 A 2,909 0.131 A 0.006
Aviara Parkway
-North or Poinsettia Lane 4-Ln Secondary 33,340 3,124 0.094 A 3,179 0.095 A 0.001
-Btwn Poinsettia Ln & Black Rail Rd 4-Ln Secondary 33,340 14,148 0.424 A 14,162 0.425 A 0.001
-East of Black Rail Rmid 4-Ln Secondary 33,340 13,886 0.416 A 13,995 0.420 A 0.004
Black Rail Road
-North of Poinsettia Lane 2-LnLocal 11,120 2,657 0.239 A 2,671 0.240 A 0.001
-Btwn Poinsettia Ln & Project Ent. 2-LnLocal 11,120 1,131 0.102 A 1,282 0.115 A 0.013
-South of Project Entrance 2-LnLocal 11,120 1,039 0.093 A 1,162 0.104 A 0.011
1 The capacity is based on the upper limit of LOS E per the City of Carlsbad Arterial Segment Capacities.
2 Significance is based on the SANTEC/ITE Traffic Impact Guidelines.
NI A = Not Applicable because significance is not applied to segments that operate at LOS C or better.
---l
Sign.
Impact2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-------------------
I\J co
I
Table 11 ~ Existing + Other Projects + Phase I Project Intersection Level of Service Summary
Signalized Intersection1
Existing Other Projects Existing Other Projects + Phase I Project
Intersection AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak.
vIc Ratio LOS vIc Ratio LOS vIc Ratio LOS Inc. Sig. ? vIc Ratio LOS Inc. Sig. ? in vIc in vIc
Poinsettia Lane @
-Aviara Parkway 0.37 A 0.33 A 0.37 A 0.0 N/A 0.34 A 0.1 N/A
One-Way Stop-Controlled Intersection2 I
Existing Other Projects Existing Other Projects + Phase I Project !
Intersection Critical AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak
Movement
Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay Sig. ? Delay LOS Delay Sig. ? (seclveh) (seclveh) (sec/veh) Inc. (seclveh) Inc.
Poinsettia Lane @ NBApproach 7.5 A 7.4 A 7.5 A 0.0 N/A 7.4 A 0.0 N/A
-Black Rail Road EBL Movement 9.5 A 9.6 A 9.6 A 0.1 N/A 9.8 A 0.2 N/A
EBR Movement 8.7 A 8.7 A 8.7 A 0.0 N/A 8.7 A 0.0 N/A
1 The vIc ratio and corresponding Level of Service (LOS) is per the ICU methodology
2 The delay per vehicle and the corresponding Level of Service (LOS) is per the ICU methodology per the Highway Capacity Software, version 3.2
Sig. ? = Significance is based on the SANTECIITE Traffic Impact Guidelines.
NI A = Not Applicable because significance is not applied to intersections that operate at LOS C or better.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
BUILD OUT CONDITIONS
Forecast Analysis
The buildout forecast volumes for Poinsettia Lane in the vicinity of the project were obtained from
O'Rourke Engineering. The buildout forecast was based on the SANDAG model and assumed that
Poinsettia Lane would be extended east to EI Camino Real. Since Black Rail Road is a Local Road,
forecast volumes were not available. O'Rourke Engineering estimated the volume on Black Rail Road
north and south of Poinsettia Lane to be 1,100 ADT, however, this volume is lower than the near tenn
cumulative volume (2,671 ADT north of Poinsettia Lane and 1,162 south of Poinsettia Lane), Therefore,
in order to ensure that the buildout volumes encompass existing traffic plus traffic generated by future
development, Darnell & Associates, Inc. estimated the buildout volume on Black Rail Road to be 4,000
ADT north of Poinsettia Lane and 3,000 ADT south of Poinsettia Lane. (A copy of the correspondence
with O'Rourke Engineering regarding buildout forecast volumes can be found in Appendix A.)
The buildout forecast volumes received from O'Rourke Engineering included the proposed project traffic.
Therefore, to get buildout without project traffic volumes, the trips generated by Phase V:.the Master Plan
of1;he proposed project were subtracted from the forecast volumes. Figure 12 illustrates the buildout daily
traffic volumes without project traffic and Figure 13 illustrates the buildout daily volumes with Phase v-
the Master Plan of the proposed project.
Roadway Segment AnalYSis
The roadway segments were analyzed under buildout conditions with and without Phase V-the Master
Plan of the proposed project. In this analysis, it was assumed that Poinsettia Lane would be improved
to four-lane Major Arterial Standards from A viara Parkway to Black Rail Road and that it would be
extended east to EI Camino Real. Table 12 summarizes the buildout roadway segment analysis.
As can be seen from Table 12, all roadway segments analyzed operate at LOS A under buildout
conditions with or without Phase V -the Master Plan of the proposed project.
29
-------------------
~
LEGEND
3,933(est) 1m r » ('")
LN .'"
:;0 0
I» $ ;0
1& »
< < 5 o
5 o
z,zzz -DAILY TRAFFIC ~~~~_I~ -== I~ o I ..-..-Darnell & ASSOCIATES, INC. ,FIGURE 12
BUILDOUT WITH OUT PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES
-------------------
tv .......
LEGEND
I
(
/' ~
-736/6~
,25/25 \
512/927--WI I" ~ \43/47~ t; ~ ..... '<t Tw« '<tC'\l -:> 0::: '--.. '--.. OF 0y \ ~ 8:(5 '<tC'\l
-------\ 4, OOO( est) + co
~ ~ o '?~ LN ~ 9,5 (Ji <e
* PO/NSf 19,500 \ LN TTJA
~ 3,000(est)+:;o ......... __ ~Y
» -j= 2,400 ~
):.
$ ;;u
:;0 {O
o ~
xx/yy -AM/PM TURN VOLUMES -ESTIMATED BASED ON DAILY VOLUME t,zzz ...: DAILY TRAFFIC' . '. . .. * -PROJECT SITE
~
I ~L{) '--.. .....
IX) '--..
-1 it
\
~ --
~
L12/14\
,16/19
PROJECT \
tEr
ANC
]
0> 0
1"')C'\l/ ...-'--.. '--..0 COC'\l 3--
z ~ w
o o I r--------------------------------------r------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~I ~
Darnell & ASSOCIATES, INC. FIGURE 1'3
BUILDOUT + MASTER PLAN PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES
I
~ ~
« « o o o o
-------------------
(;.:)
I'\J
Table 12
Buildout With and Without Phase V-Master Plan of the Proposed Project Roadway Segment Level of Service Summary
Buildout w/o Project Buildout + Phase V-
Master Plan of Project Inc in
Roadway Segment Classification Capacity! vIc
vIc vIc Ratio A.D.T. Ratio LOS A.D.T. Ratio LOS
Poinsettia Lane
-Btwn Aviara Pkwy & Black Rail Rd. 4-LnMajor 44,450 17,933 0.403 A 18,600 0.418 A 0.015
-Btwn Black Rail Rd. & Project Ent. 4-LnMajor 44,450 18,966 0.427 A 19,500 0.439 A 0.012
-Btwn Project Ent. & Ambrosia Rd. 4-LnMajor 44,450 19,166 0.431 A 19,500 0.439 A 0.008
-East of Ambrosia Road 4-LnMajor 44,450 7,533 0.169 A 7,800 0.175 A 0.006
Black Rail Road
-North of Poinsettia Lane 2-LnLocal 11,120 3,933 0.354 A 4,000 0.360 A 0.006
-Btwn Poinsettia Ln & Project Ent. 2-LnLocal 11,120 2,800 0.252 A 3,000 0.270 A 0.018
-South of Project Entrance 2-LnLocal 11,120 2,733 0.246 A 3,000 0.270 A 0.024
! The capacity is based on the upper limit of LOS E per the City of Carlsbad Arterial Segment Capacities.
2 Significance is based on the SANTECIITE Traffic Impact Guidelines.
N/A = Not Applicable because signi!icance is not applied to segm~nts that o~rate at LOS C or better.
II
I
Sign.
Impact2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
I
1
1
I
SECTION V
PROJECT ACCESS AND ON-SITE CIRCULATION
PROJECT ACCESS
The project proposes a twenty-four foot (24') wide access off Black Rail Road and a forty-six (46') foot wide
access off Poinsettia Lane. The access point off Black Rail Road will have one lane eXiting and o~e lane
3"'~---'-d will serve as an unrestricted driveway. The access off Poinsettia Lane will.be constructed as a
I (J' he." _P_.n_·v..."ate eet and serve as the primary access to the 12-10t residential subdivision located at the southeast \ Jr' er of the property. The Poinsettia Lane access will have two lanes exiting and one lane ~ntering. It is
assumed that there would be a median break on Poinsettia Lane at Street "A", the project's access, providing I a full access point into and out of the project site. ~ 7 \tJb\.'('(ald(\' l:?
I
1
I
1
I
I
·1
I
I
1
1
1
·1
Near Term Conditions
For the near term analysis (Phase I of the project), it was assumed that Poinsettia Lane would not be extended
from its existing tenninus at Black Rail Road. Therefore, the project's only access would be via Black Rail
Road. The project access off Black Rail Road was analyzed under near term cumulative conditions using the
HCS, version 3.2, assuming that it would be stop-controlled on the westbound (the driveway) approach. The
results of the analysis are summarized in Table 13. As shown in Table 13, the project access off Black Rail
Road will operate at LOS A under near term cumulative conditions without the addition of
acceleration/deceleration lanes. A copy of the HeS worksheets can be found in Appendix H.
Buildout Conditions
In order to analyze the project's access points under buildout conditions (Phase V-the Master Plan of the
proposed project), peak hour thm volumes on Poinsettia Lane and Black Rail Road were estimated based the
daily volumes utilizing the existing directional split and peak hour percentages. Both access points were
analyzed using the HCS, version 3.2, for unsignalized intersections. Table 13 summarizes the results of the
analysis.
As shown in Table 13, all movements at the project's access point off Black Rail Road will operate at LOS
A during the morning peak hour and LOS B or better during the afternoon peak hour under buildout conditions
without the addition of acceleration/deceleration lanes. All movements at the access off Poinsettia Lane, the
Poinsettia Lane/Street "A" intersection, will operate at LOS C or better during the morning and afternoon peak
hours under buildout conditions without the addition of acceleration/deceleration lanes.
A copy of the HCS worksheets for the project's access analysis can be found in Appendix H.
ON-SITE CIRCULATION
The on-site circulation of the proposed project provides 142 perpendicular parking spaces and 10 parallel
parking spaces on the south side of the project site. Of these 142 parking spaces, 6 are deSIgnated as handicap
parking. A small pick-up/drop-off circle is provided in front of the elementary school. The dimensions of all
parking spaces, the pick-up/drop-off circle, and the drive aisle are consistent with the City of Carlsbad
Standards. The proposed circulation will adequately accommodate project traffic.
33
-------------------
CJ.)
.f:>,.
I
------------------
Table 13
Project Access Level of Service Summary
One-Way Stop-Controlled Intersection1 I
Near Tenn Cumulative + Phase I Project Buildout + Master Plan Project
Intersection Critical AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak
Movement
Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS (sec/veh) (sec/veh) (sec/veh) (sec/veh)
Black Rail Roadz @ SBApproach 7.3 A 7.3 A 7.4 A 7.6 A
-Project Entrance WBApproach 8.9 A 8.9 A 9.7 A 10.1 B
Poinsettia LruQ WBApproach 8.7 A 10.6 B
-Street "A", Project Entrance NBL Movement - ---16.1 e 23.3 e
NBR Movement 10.3 B 12.5 B
1 The delay per vehicle and the corresponding Level of Service (LOS) is per the leu methodology per the Highway Capacity Software, version 3.2
2 The access drive was assumed to have one lane exiting and one lane entering. It was assumed that there were no acceleration/deceleration lanes on Black
~IRoad.
3 he access street was assumed to have two lanes exiting and one lane entering. It was assumed that there were no acceleration/deceleration lanes on
Poinsettia Lane.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SECTION VI
RECOMMENDED TRAFFIC MITIGATION MEASURES
ROADWAY SEGMENTS
~ All roadway segments analyzed were found to operate at LOS A under near tenn and buildout
conditions with and without the proposed project. Mitigation is not required.
INTERSECTIONS
Both intersections analyzed were found to operate at LOS A under near tenn conditions with and
without the proposed project. Mitigation is not required.
35
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
1
1
I
1
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
SECTION VII
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
The applicant proposes to construct the Redeemer by the Sea Luther Church facility at the southeast
comer of Poinsettia Lane and Black Rail Road.
The project is proposed to be constructed in five phases. Phase I is planned to be developed by 2002-
2003 and would consist of a worship center to seat 200 people and a preschool for 48 students. The
Master Plan of the proposed project includes a Worship Center which will s.eat -.406 people, a
Preschool for 188 students, an Administration Building with a 2,884 square foot Elder Center located
in the basement, an Elementary School for 204, and a 22,386 square foot Family Life Center. Phase
V-the Master Plan is planned to be developed by 2018-2020.
Phase I of the proposed project is estimated, on a weekday, to generate 274 average daily trips, 44
morning peak hour trips, and 45 afternoon peak hour trips. Phase V-the Master Plan is estimated, on .
a weekday, to generate 1,335 average daily trips, 183 morning peak hour trips, and 193 afternoon peak
hour trips. On a special occasion, Phase V-the Master Plan is estimated to generate 1,459 average
daily trips, 183 morning peak hour trips, and 200 afternoon peak hour trips.
All roadway segments analyzed operate at LOS A under near term and buildout conditions with
or without the proposed project.
Both intersections analyzed operate at LOS A undernearterm conditions with and without the addition
of project traffic.
All movements at the proposed driveway otIBlack Rail Road were found to operate at LOS A under
near term plus Phase I of the project conditions and LOS B or better under Buildout plus Phase V-the
Master Plan of the proposed project conditions without the addition of acceleration/deceleration lanes
on Black Rail Road.
All movements at the proposed driveway otIPoinsettia Lane were found to operate at LOS C or better
under Buildout plus Phase V-the Master Plan of the proposed project conditions without the addition
of acceleration/deceleration lanes on Poinsettia Lane.
Access and internal circulation were reviewed and found to be satisfactory.
36
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-I
I
APPENDIX A
~Peak Hour Counts
~ Daily Traffic Counts
~Bui1dout Forecast Volumes
~City of Carlsbad Circulation Plan
~City of Carlsbad Arterial Segment Capacities
·~SANTEC/ITE Measure of Significant Project Traffic Impacts
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I,
'I
I
I
I
1
1
I
TRAFFIC VOLUMES & PEAl{ HOUR CALCULATIONS
Intersection: City: Carlsbad, CA
-.. Day/Date:
Poinsettia Ln/Aviara Pkwy
Wed,10-11-00 By: Hartshorn
':", C. ,I· '",!
\ ..
Aviara Pkwy Poinsettia Lane
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
L T R L T R L T R L T R Total Hour Peak
Lanes 2 2 0 1 2 0 2 1 2 1 2 0
7:00AM 99 37 0 2 30 15 19 4 94 3 11 4 318
7:15 AM 108 44 1 3 40 16 27 9 111 3 14 5 381
7:30AM 112 52 1 7 36 14 25 8 106 3 13 7 384
7:45AM 122 54 1 3 26 6 47 8 103 0 15 14 399 1482
8:00AM 86 26 3 9 28 8 28 11 59 3 15 24 300 1464
8:15 AM 84 30 1 7 29 11 15 7 85 1 10 16 296 1379
8:30AM 77 28 2 5 23 9 18 6 77 0 9 7 261 1256
8:45AM 79 24 1 3 20 9 14 6 80 2 9 9 256 1113 1482
ITOTALS 7671 2951 101 391 2321 88/ 193/ 59/ 7151 151 961 861 25951
JAM PEAK I 4411 1871 31 151 1321 511 1181 29/ 414/ 91 531 301 14821
Aviara Pkwy Poinsettia Lane
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
Time L T R L T R L T R L T R Total Hour Peak
4:00 PM 86 28 1 3 28 7 11 11 107 0 10 3 295
4:15 PM 88 35 1 4 26 11 9 13 114 2 14 0 317
4:30 PM 108 38 0 4 34 21 16 13 111 0 9 5 359
4:45.PM 90 42 0 2 37 24 14 11 109 0 6 1 336 1307
5:00 PM 91 32 2 3 39 25 9 16 136 1 10 2 366 1378
5:15 PM 96 34 0 3 33 28 10 13 128 2 11 3 361 1422
5:30 PM 89 41 0 4-36 19 10 16 133 2 7 4 361 1424
5:45 PM 82 44 1 2 30 21 8 14 135 1 6 3 347 1435 1435
1 TOTALS 7301 2941 51 251 2631 1561 871 1071 9731 81 731 211 27421
jPM PEAK 1 3581 1511 31 121 1381 931 371 591 5321 61 341 121 14351
SIGNALIZED
peakcalc
~-\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Intersection:
DayIData:
Lanes
7:00AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45AM
6:00 AM
6:15 AM
8:30AM
8:45AM
TRAFFIC VOLUMES & PEAK HOUR CALCULATIONS
PoinsettialSlack Rail
Wed,11-01-00
Black Rail
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND
l T R L T R a 1 0 0 1 0
4 2 2 5 e 3 5 7
5 ..-6 7
7 1 2 9
8 3 4 6
5 2 4 7
6 4 3 5
5 2 2 S
City: Carlsbad, CA
By: Hartshom
Poinsettia
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
L T R L T R
0 1 0 0 0 0
2 3
4 6
2 3
2 7
5 5
3 2
2 3
4 5
Total
18
31
27
28
31
23
23
23
[TOTALS 461 21/ oC 01 281 51 r 241 ,01 341 01 01 01 2041
lAM PEAK I 261 11/ 01 01 171 291 131 01 21/ 01 01 01 1171
Black Rail Poinsettia
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
Time L T R L T R L T R L T R Total
4:00 PM 4 2 4 3 5 4 22
4:15 PM 2 6 8 2 e 3 27
4:30 PM 2 2 2 4 6 6 22
4:45 PM 1 3 5 6 8 7 30
5:00 PM 3 5 5 7 11 4 35
5:15 PM 4 5 8 5 5 3 30
5:30 PM 2 3 6 8 7 4 30
5:45 PM 2 2 4 5 6 5 24
ITOTALS 201 281, 01 01 421 401 541 ':91 ~I 01 o( 01 2201
IPM PEAK I 10/ 16/ 0/ 01 241 26/ 31/ ,01 1l}1 01 01 01 1251
STOP SIGN CONTROL ON POINSETIIA
. peakcalc
A-I-
Hour Peak
104
117
109
105
100 117
Hour Peak
101
114
117
125
119 125
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I , .
I
I
I
I'
I'
I
Intersection:
Day/Date:
Lanes
7:00AM
7:15 AM
7:30AM
7:45AM
8:00AM
6:15 AM
8:30AM
8:45AM
TRAFFIC VOLUMES & PEAK HOUR CALCULATIONS
Aviara/Black Rail
Thur, 11-02-00
Black Rail
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND
L T R L T R
0 1 0 0 1 a
15 0 5 5 0 0
14 0 10 9 0 0
9 1 6 14 a 0
5 0 10 8 0 1
8 0 8 10 0 2
9 2 6 10 1 3
9 0 1 7 a 2
6 0 3 5 0 2
City: Carlsbad, CA
By: Hartshorn
Ayiara
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
L T R L T R
1 2 0 0 2 0
4 97 2 1 86 6
0 144 3 1 100 '3
2 160 6 4 182 7
0 124 3 1 157 5
1 155 4 3 133 5
0 107 2 5 133 10
0 107 3 4 00 4
1 111 2 3 101 3
Total Hour
221
'284
311
314 1190
329 1298
290 1304
233 1166
237 1089
I TOTALS 751 31 511 e81 11 101 8110051 251 221 9681 '431 22791 '
!AM PEAK I 311 31 32} 421 11 61 31 5461 151 13) 5851 271 '13041
Black Rail Aviar;~
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
Time L T R L T R L T R L T R Total Hour
4:00 PM 7 0 3 7 0 0 0 137 5 5 108 7 279
4;15 PM 5 0 4 7 0 0 3 120 4 5 121 7 276
4:30 PM 4 0 4 10 0 1 0 155 10 4 112 6 306
4:45 PM 2 0 2 7 0 1 1 145 4 6 125 2 295 1158
5:00 PM 9 1 6 4 '\ 0 0 169 6 7 130 4 337 121e
5:15 PM 2 1 7 3 0 0 1 169 9 4 119 ,5 320 1260
5:30 PM e 0 4 3 a 1 1 155 e 6 123 4 309 1261
5:45 PM 4 0 3 4 1 0 0 136 5 7 118 3 283 1249
ITOTALS 1 391 21 331 451 21 31 611188\ 491 441" 9scj 401 24071
(PM PEAK 1 HII 21 191 17[ 11 21 31 6381 251 231 4971 15{ 12611
SIGNALIZED ,-----_.--
peakcalc
~-3
...
vtc~t
'2, r)~ ".
Peak
1304
Peak
1261
H (I '"" ., ";:1 7 -0 0 "::15: 5~. PI'l F' _ I 1
L:'. Location:Blackrail n/o Poinsettia
I
Carlsbad Volumes for \Ved. 11MIOO 10370002 } AM . ~-PM Peri0d NB SB :/ , Period NB SB )0' "
I 12:00-12.15 9 .1. 12:00-12: 15 1 2 7 , r !'12:15-12:30 1 0 12:15-12:30 7 21 .!> ·12:30-12:45 0 0 12:30-12:45 11 14
I '.'':i>! 12:45-!;~O 1 3 0 2 5 11;45-1;00 10 35 18 62 97
... ~ ... ~. 1:00-1: 15 1 0 1:00-1:15 12 13
· . ·,l·;.'i:15-1:30 1 2 1: 15-1:30 13 10
I . B::" 1:30-1:.45 1 0 1:30-1:45 11 9 ··.::·f: .. l·45-2'OO 1 4 0 2 6 1:45-2:00 9 45 15 41 92 , };~ •. ",:", I '; · . . 'fi·;-'2:00-2:15 0 0 2:00-2: 15 11 11
I . ~,. ~ , '. : .. ~ , .. , 0 0 2:15-2:30 13 14 : ,." ' .. f:: 2:15-2:30
'... ' .. (/;. 2:30-2:45 0 1 2:30-2:45 9 10 ': : :·-:.::f::!· 0 0 0 1 1 2:45-3;00 15 48 13 48 96 · .' . ··:t' 2:45-3-00 I ~ .. '" 'II:'~, '~;1~::,_' \ ... '" .' .' ".":"··3-00-3' 15 1 0 3:00-3:15 12 9 '" ',.' "I :~!:.;.i. _ ... •
~' .. ':"T'~ 3'15-3'30 0 1 3:15-3:30 13 20 : .... ;' 'W" .' • ,
I .~ ..... ·:;~ti.' ·3'30-3'45 0 0 3:30-3;45 10 18 :;:;. :, :11{.I~{ ~-. t:
· .' .' .~.I:;,': 3:45-4; 00 0 1 0 1 2 3:45-4:00 15 50 11 64 114 ,'" '., ~:'f\ 1'" ..... 1 0 4;00-4: 15 13 12 ,.":, ,.r'·:'·1:. '00-4-15
:; ~ . ::.:5~:~~:~:~ ....: • ~ ~
I !,'. ·j~"'i·.4,15 4)0 0 0 4: 15-4:30 11 21
:. .: ,~~., ~'30 4' 45 0 0 4:30-4:45 10 12 ") ''';1 1tf, -' .. ~ . bl',', .;"; ".: ... :~1'1 .• '45-5:00 0 1 0 0 1 4:45-5:00 12 46 10 55 101 ~ "k,:'""~',, 11.,~'I.'~" ~ ._ '
I '. " : ":'1':: 5-00-5'15 1 2 5:00-5: 15 13 10 ; . : : .. ~:> :.;'1.', 5: 15-5:30 0 1 5:15-5:30 15 14 h·...: <-4if··: _: :, . . 1..:L·'~I"· 5,3.0 5.45 1 0 5:30-5:45 13 10
I :.. ..'. ·:~:L· .,. 5-6:00 0 Z 1 4 6 5:45-6:00 13 54 12 .6 100 ';, ',~ , ' ,~. ~U'~~l.: ,4 .;. ,.. "
:; '. '. :-.,.:;. 6:00-6: 15 0 1 6:00-6: 15 13 13 :' .,: ': )\(i:: 6: 15-6; 30 0 4 6: 15-6:30 9 11 I' .... ··y·f·', '.'630 6 45 1 4 6:30-6:45 11 9 . ,\ ~!: " ...
.' I" " • :::: ..... ).~:'~ ':., "45·7~OO 0 1 5 14 15 6:45-7:00 19 52 9 42 94 .. . .. ;, ,r'!I .. ' I ~ ::.: ... " .... :'l'i. 7'QO-t 15 1 9 7:00-7:15 14 S
I :; ":: .' .::~fi:] .. ·.·:·1; 15-7~30 3 16 1:15-7:30 16 14
, ....... '~(i "1-30-7-45 1 14 1;30-7:45 15 6 ' . : .:. ~I\~'~'· ,
! .... . ~."'iI. 'f"-1 45 S' 00 6 11 16 55 66 7:45-8:00 10 5S 6 34 89 ." ,~, '.;,,,,I"j : -;
I ::. : ...... :: 1/" '8:00-8"1:5 7 19 8:00-8: 15 10 1 \' . :~ '., ~.!-,~. , ; < " .... :·,C.'; :8: 15-8:30 5 27 8: 15-8:30 13 3 '.. ·f .. ··' 32 8:30-8:45 13 3 1 .: ".' ,~.'$i:';~' .;30-S:45 5
; .:. ;··,]if.F:.:!i,4S-9::00 12 29 ~O 98 127 8:45-9:00 11 47 7 20 67
, "~".~':!." 9'00-9:15 13 43 9:00-9;15 9 4 j.;:.. , ;.:f':j M '
I .::. :1: ·,':1'·:" 9'15-9'30 13 17 9:15-9:30 12 3 ; .' ~.; .. :J;.:;-:. 9':~O-9:45 5 17 9;30-9:45 7 2 .' ·· .. iff·,' • .' ~.,:.:':: '. :\~j.! :',"9'45-£6'00 7 38 20 97 135 9:45-10:00 6 34 2 H 45. ',:;,' "',>~'!~~~" ,-", , ...
I : .... ' ...... ::. :i/')' 10:00-10: 15 4 13 10:00-10:15 7 4 :.:. ' . : ... -.~'l: i:. ' . 5 14 10:15-10:30 4 ;, .;." :····'~·;i·' '10'15-10'30 1 ~. • :' :M~t:. l • • I •
. ~.:.: ".:'.~·:~:lj)·:10'30-lO'45 6 18 10:30-10:45 6 3 ;' ...... <:~r'( .: : '. 1 22 11 56 16 10:45-11:00 6 23 2 to 33 1 (': :j, ~.: ·.1~·4S~11:0~ . I ..... : ..... '.' "':;;:l,; . 11:00~11:15 9 13 11:00-11: 15 6 2 :
~ _:.~ .:: -:::./f;i ::'.11:: 15-11: 30 1 6 11:15-11:30 1 1
I :,,:: .' .r; f~ '· .. ·11·30·11·4; 8 11 11:30-11:45 2 1 "'~" "k.'::::i~;I~.!;,~ : ~ ,~, 7 31 11 . 53 84 11:45-12:00 3 12 0 A .16, ; ': >~.::;.:t'V·.:'.· 11!~? 12,00
:. '.' ," . -:,~':~j'. total Vol 143 383 526 501 443 944.
I >-. :. ),.l,:!' Duily T Qtals 14-~, 644 826 I ~470J I ~. I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I:
I
I
I
NOV-07-08 85:52 PM p, I , .:' t; LO~8tion:Blackroil bm. PQinsettie-Avira
~. AM Period NB SB
·~.;12:00-12:15 1 1
. . I
Carlsba Volwnes for Wed. 11/1/001
... PM Period NB
12:00'12:15 6
, 10310001
sa
1 .,
·1.'12:15-12:30 0 0
... '1...,; 12:30'12:45 0 0
12:15-12:30 . 5
12:30'12:45 10
-1'0.
~
. ·J.l·12:~5'1: 00 0 1 0:
'i .. {:'1;OO-1:15 1 1
1 2 12:45'1:00 S
1:00-1:15 8
60 S; 31 .
1~
29' .
.\' . ,. ·¥;.:·1:15-1:30 0 0···· 1:15'L30 10
;'. ' .. 1;.1:30'1:45 0 0 1:3.0-1:45 8 ~ ", .. }1L 1:45-2:00 O· 1 0 1 2 1:4:5-2:00 7 33 11
'/I -; •• ..... ):,. 2:00-2:15 0 0 . 2:00-2:15 6 :" . 5
,;":' ····l<"·· 2:15'2:30 0 1 2:15-2:30 8 .::.:. 10 .. . .. :".; : . ; . -.: i~': 2:30-2:45 0 0 2:30-2:45 8 -.:. 10
'.'
4
'13
44 17
; . :,: .,"I;!, ',! 2:45-3:00 0 0 O· 1 . 1 2:'45-3;00 8 30 '.: . 12 37 . 67
; ". '" .;-:-';-<-~3~:O':;"'O-':;"'3:"'15~--.~---O ------:..O--.....:---~3:~OO-· 3';""': 1--::"5--. -9= ....... --'"""'.:--. "":""13::--------
. ::r ~ 3:15'3:30 0 0 3:15-3:30 10 ': 6
1 ..... :.;::rF· 3;30-3:45 0 0 '3:30,3:45· 7 '::12 ;';···:.<·:l~>;·'·3:45-4:00 0 0 0 . 0 03:45-4:00 10' 36"· 12 43 . 79 ~: -. . "':,~; :. ~."'>:: 0~O--:"4 :'"":"'15;--------=-1---~0::---:--~---4:.,-: 0=-"=0""":-4-:: 1~5 ----.:............~:-:-1---..;...-,-· ~. -:;:';'9 -~-.....:..:.-
.' .·':1:::'4:15-4:30 0 0 .4:15-4:30 11 11 .:. ." .... r: 4:30-4:45 '0 0 4;30-4:45 10 9. :.' : : ... ·1/' 4;45'5:00 4 5 Z 2 1 4:45-5:00 10 42 .: 9 36 80 ; . .' ':'lJ ·"':I'5.~· O'1:"O-":"'5:'-:-15:-----=-O------:1;----........;..-~-:5:-:: 0::-::"0-::-5-:": 1-5~ ---::-9-------:~~1~O _ ......... _~m
i,,' : . ,~.: 'I "15-5'30 0 0 5: 15-5:30 11 ~ :' .: '.;( ,:, ' '. . ,
; '. " :}; .. '5:30-5:45 0 0 5:30-5:45 13
11'
1
i': ... :.' ,::"tC' 5-45:6:00 1 1 0 1 2 5:45'6:00. .,'. ·'··'f; '~6""::':O-:-O-~{~15::-----~O----l"----.-:-· ---6~:OO'():15
i· ' .... ;ll'~ --,
4 '. 37' .
11
6 .. ...:3!.
6 -
j . ":'~::, .. " 6:15-6;30 0 2 6:15'6:30 9 .' 6
5 'j ..... .(~,j '.6:30-6:45 0 0 ·6:30-6:45 .' ., .;~t-: ~:45'7:00 . 1 1 1 4 . 5 6;45-7:00 31 . '. 5
!. .1:!' l'OO-7'lf 2 4 7:00-7:15'b 4
5
6
,:.. .. ::.f'·; '.1; 15-7;30 1 8 7: 15-7:30 6 4
22
'·;.11
53.
:: .. '. :' ::::JiT ,1;30-7:45 1 9 7:30-1:45 3 3
:. r . ··.:::i·},":;··"'7'45-S·OO 4 8 14 35 43 7;45'8:00 1 22 4 15' 31 : .. ':'<:l~~( "1:i~~O~O-;::"'S:~15""""--2=------;::'9 ------8=-:0:;:-;;:0-.,8--=: 1-=-5 ----=-6-'-· ----=3=-""'----
.;':.' '::':'f:~:" 8:15-8:30 3 15 8:15'8:30 5 2
.; . /)1\; 8'30'8'45 S 17 8:30-8;45 5' 3 i· '. :':,;1;.\.',.: -': . 5 ; :: '}::i' 8,45 9.,00. 7 20 10 51· 71 8:45-9:00 3 19 '. '''. ··fi~~· 9:00'9: 15 . 8 13 9:00-9: 15 4 1 . . ,t.··· ~:; .. ·:~.f;·.9;15-9:30 8 11 9:15-9:30 4 1 .:. ". ""~+.:: '.'9'30-9'45 6 1 9:30-9:45 3 2 . ~
: ,: :." ':':'<f:'i . 9:45-1:0'00 4 26 11'''; 42 ··68 9:45-10:00 ·4 15 " 2 6 21 '-.; ; '.: :.1(,,; ~ .. ~-~I-:-::"~_--::-___ ~:--_~ __ -:-!'-::-=--:-:=-~ ___ ~ ___ ~' -:--~_....:;.;.-;~J' :"<':·i;~:···10;OO~lQ;15.. 5 10 10:00'10:15 3 2 .
::.: ':;(~€';i" 10: 15-10:30' 1 9 10: 15-10:30 2 . 1
: :.:. :'.::':.~J~,. 1030 1045 4 11 10.'30'10',4'::: 2 1 ~ '. . . :~. j['}~ .: • :. . J r'; .' .. ·.:.;·;~fj. !O:45-1~O .. 20 7 . ,37' 57 10:45-11:00 0·' 7 1
;.: .. : ..... ,ff,:·!··U-OO-1l·15 8 9 11:00-11:15 2 1 :;.:~:: :-~;~;.;fi·r' 11;15:11;30 4 6 11:15'11:30'0 1
.. .. ...II.. . 1 45 5 ;··:·-'::':':\~";".11:30-1: 5 7 11:30-11:4 0 1
~.' ·:-:-·k> 11:45;i2:00 6' 23 10 '32 55 11:45'12:00 ... ' 1 3 0 . .' '1: ' '. ' :' .. : :.:.:y'~;:" Totatyol.· 106 io]. 313 304 291
.:. ·,,:,(::,'DailyTot~s ' .. ~""5. 410 .. 498'
13 32 . :.:
,.. .: ~ ,
· ,
· . . ,
. OJ .. ~ · ,
12 ~ I II. .!
: ::' i . 3 . 6" f . ',: :
595
(-908:1 ';,
I
I
I~
I::
I'·
I , ..
1 ••
I ••
·1 "'"
1 ,.
I.:
I'· ,-
'. 1 .. -..
1--I.~
I -l--I
SAN DIEGO REGION
AVERAGE WEEKDAY
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
1995-1999
MAY 2000
San Diego
~
ASSOCIATION OF
GOVERNMENTS
401 B Street, Suite 800
San Diego, CA 92101
(619) 595-5300
This report was financed with federal funds from the U.S. Department of Transportation,
Urban Mass Transportation Administration; state funds from the California Department
of Transportation; and local funds from SANDAG member jurisdictions.
MEMBER AGENCIES: Cities of Carlsbad, Chula Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, Ei Cajon, Encinitas, Escondido, Imperial Beach, La Mesa,
Lemon Grove. National City, Oceanside, Poway, San Diego, San Marcos, Santee, Solana Beach, Vista, and County of San Diego.
ADVISORYILIAISON MEMBERS: California Department of Transportation, Metropolitan Transit Development Board,
North San Diego county Transit Development Board. U.S. Department of Defense, San Diego .
Unified Port District, San Diego County Water Authority, and Tijuana/Baja California/Mexico.
A-(O
.. -,..-,.-..... ,.--... ~
L} L.j L.J L-} L-J l_.l L.._I l -.--- --..... -... ... -l _ 1 L _.1 l. I L ... I L ... I L_I L_J j .1 L. ... J j. ..1
CITY OF CARLSBAD
Average Weekday Traffic Volumes
(Thousands)
1998-99
Primary Street First Cross Street Second Cross Street 1995 1996 1997 1m 1999 Change
ALGARD EL CAMINO REAL AUCANTEST 19.7 20.0E 21.1 22.0E 24.0 9%
ALGARD AUCANTEST ELFUERTEST 12.6 13.5 13.5 14.0E 13.5 -4%
ALGARD ELFUERTEST MELROSE DR 8.6 9.2 9.2N 10.1 10.7 6%
AUCANTERD ALGARD CORTE DE LA VISTA 6.5N 7.0E 7.1 7.0 7.0N 0%
AMBROSIALN POINSETTIA LN AVIARAPKWY O.ON O.ON O.ON 3.6 4.0E 11%
ARMADA DR LEGOLANDDR PALOMAR AIRPORT RD O.ON O.ON 1.6 3.6 3.7 3%
AVENlDA ENCINAS CANNONRD PALOMARAIRPORTRD 10.5 10.5N 12.4 12.2 12.5E 2%
A VENlDA ENCINAS PALOMAR AIRPORT RD TRANSIT CENTER 6.1 5.8 5.8N 7.2 7.5E 4%
AVENlDA ENCINAS TRANSIT CENTER POINSETTIA LN 5.4 5.4 5.4N 6.0 6.3E 5%
JS A VENlDA ENCINAS POINSETTIA LN SAN LUCAS (RALPHS ENT) 11.5 10.8 10.4 12.6 12.3 -2%
I A VENlDA ENCINAS SAN LUCAS (RALPHS ENT) CARLSBAD BLVD O.ON 1.1 1.1 1.9 1.9 0%
-tl A VIARA PKWY PALOMAR AIRPORT RD COBBLESTONE RD O.ON O.ON O.ON 1.2 1.5 25%
AVIARAPKWY PLUMTREERD POINSETTIA LN O.ON O.ON 1.0E 2.4 2.7E 13%
AVIARAPKWY POINSETTIA LN FOUR SEASONS PT 8.4 10.4 13.4 13.4 14.0E 4%
AVIARAPKWY FOUR SEASONS PT AMBROSIALN '8.4 10.4 12.2 13.0 13.6E 5%
AVIARAPKWY AMBROSIALN MIMOSA DR 9.7 10.6 14.1 14.9 15.5E 4%
AVIARAPKWY MIMOSA DR EL CAMINO REAL 16.4 16.1 18.1 18.9 17.1 -10%
BATIQUITOS DR POINSETTIA LN KESTREL DR 2.2 2.2N 4.2 5.9 6.3E 7%
BATIQUITOS DR KESTREL DR AVIARAPKWY 1.3N 3.0 2.9 3.1 3.3E 6%
CALLE ACERVO CAMINO DE LOS COCHES CALLE BARCELONA 1.2 2.5E 3.0E 3.6 4.0E 11%
~.
CALLE ACERVO CALLE BARCELONA RANCHO SANTA FE RD O.ON 1.8 2.0 5.1 5.5E . 8%
CALLE BARCELONA EL CAMINO REAL PASEOAUSO O.ON O.ON O.ON 2.2 5.1 132%
CALLE BARCELONA PASEOAUSO PASEO AVELLANO O.ON O.ON O.ON O.ON 2.4 0%
CALLE BARCELONA PASEO A VELLANO RANCHO SANTA FE RD O.ON O.ON O.ON O.ON 1.6 0%
CALLE BARCELONA RANCHO SANTA FE RD CALLE ACERVO 4.6 5.8 5.8N 5.2 5.5E 6%
.... -'.'~. . ......... _. -, , , L_ .i. _. i L._' I .... ) i
.::Is
I
.i,Q\)
CITY OF CARLSBAD
Primary Street
POINSETTIA LN
POINSETTIA LN
POINSETTIA LN
POINSETTIA LN
POINSETTIA LN
POINSETTIA LN
RANCHO SANTA FE RD
RANCHO SANTA FE RD
RANCHO SANTA FE RD
RANCHOSANTAFERD
RANCHO SANTA FERD
ROOSEVELT ST
ROOSEVELT ST
ROOSEVELT ST /MAGNOUA AVE
STATEST
STATEST
STATEST
TAMARACK A VB
TAMARACK AVE
TAMARACK AVE
TAMARACK AVE
TAMARACK AVE
TAMARACK AVE
TAMARACK AVE
TAMARACK AVE
;-;------- ------h f ~ 1 ~ :: I: t': :i
First Cross Street
CARLSBAD BLVD
AVENIDA ENCINAS
INTERSTATE S
PASEO DEL NORTE
BATIQUITOS DR
AVIARAPKWY
MELROSE DR
QUESTHA VEN RD
LA COSTA AVE
CALLE BARCELONA
OLIVENHAIN RD
LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR
CHESTNUT A VB
CARLSBAD BLVD
LAGUNA DR
GRAND AVE
CARLSBAD BLVD
]EFFERSON ST
INTERSTATES
PIOPICODR
ADAMSST
IiIGHLAND DR
VALLEYST
PARK DR
Second Cross Street
AVENIDA ENCINAS
INTERSTATES
PASEO DEL NORTE
BATIQUITOS DR
AVIARAPKWY
BLACK RAIL RD
QUESTHA VEN RD
LA COSTA AVE
CALLE BARCELONA
OLIVENHAIN RD
AVD LA POSTA/CALLE ACERVO
CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR
CHESTNUT AVE
]EFFERSON ST
LAGUNA DR
GRAND AVE
CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR
]EFFERSON ST
INTERSTATES
PIOPICODR
ADAMSST
HlGHiANDDR
VALLEYST
PARK DR
EL CAMINO REAL
I i J :i : ci 1 j J
Average Weekday Traffic Volumes
(Thousands)
1998-99
1995 1222 122Z 1m 1999 Change
S.3 5.4 4.1 6.1 6.SE 7%
12.1 13.4 1S.0 18.1 19.0E 5%
16.3 18.4 22.S 26.7 27.SE 3%
12.6 1S.1 18.8 21.S 20.4 -S%
8.1 10.6 14.3 13.8 13.8N 0%
O.ON O.ON O.ON O.ON 1.6 0%
23.3 23.6 23.3 25.S 26.2 3%
21.2 21.9 22.7 24.4 25.1 3%
16.5 18.8E 20.5E 24.0 2S.0E 4%
18.4
11.5
6.7
4.2
4.7
·6.2
5.8
5.6
9.0
15.1
17.6
14.8
11.6
9.2
8.9
6.9
21.0
11.4
6.5
21.6
11.8
7.0E
26.6
11.S
7.0N
27.SE
14.2
7.0N
4.2N 5.1 5.9 5.9N
4.7N 4.7E 4.7 4.7N
6.2N 6.3 6.3N 6.3N
S.7 5.8E 5.6 5.6N
S.O 5.3E S.3N 5.3N
10.9 10.S 11.0E 11.0N
1S.SE 15.SN 16.0 16.0N
18.0E 18.0N 20.3 20.3N
14.8N 14.9 1S.SE 16.0E
11.6N 12.3 12.3N 12.SE
9.2N 9.7 9.7N 10.0E
8.9N 9.4 9.4N 9.7E
7.0E 7.7 . 7.3' 7.8E
3%
23%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
'0%
0%
3%
2%
3%
3%
7%
I
I (
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I !
I
I
growtli fJv(anagement P{an
illY-of Carlsbad
Caillornia
1999 ~raffic Monitoring Program
..
! '
Preparea fir:
(I) ,"
City of Carlsbad
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92009
(760) 438-1161
VRP.f-\..
VRPA Technologies
9683 Tierra Grande street, Suite 205 .
San Diego, CA 92126
(858) 566-1766
I
I
1
I
'I
1
1
1
·1
I
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
I
Weekly Summary Report
Generated by MSC3000 Version 2.01 Copyright 1990-1992 Mitron Systems Corporation
Location .......... Poinsettia Ln:Paseo del,Norte-Batiqu.:itos
Location Code ..... 1499
County ............ San Diego County
Recorder Set ...... 07/24/99 17:43
Recording Start ... 07/27/99 00:00
Recording End ..... 07/29/99 00:00
Sample Time ....... 15 Minutes
Operator Number ... 8772
Machine Number .... 20348
Channel ........... 1
Recorder Mode ..... Volume
Week of July 25, 1999. Channel: 1 Direction: W
End 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Wkday
Time Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Avg.
01:00 38 46 42
02:00 12 25 19
03:00 16 12 14
04:00 14 15 15
05:00 32 31 32
06:00 178 176 177
07:00 505 499 502
08:00 743 706 725
09:00 750 784 767
10:00 627 706 667
11:00 634 622 628
12:00 635 677 656
13:00 635 681 658
14:00 678 707 693
15:00 641 704 673
16:00 771 769 770
17:00 661 728 695
18:00 671 727 699
19:00 595 597 596
20:00 378 454 416
21:00 264 275 270
22:00 187 241 214
23:00 102 130 116
24:00 81 101 91
Totals 9848 10413 1013·1
% Avg Wkday 97.2 102.8
% Avg Day 97.2 102.8
AM Peak Hr 09:00 09:00
AM Count 750 784
PM Peak Hr 16:00 16:00
PM Count 771 769
A-JD
, .. "
Daily
Avg.
42
19
14
15
·32
177
502
725
·767
667
628
656
658
693
673
770
695
699
596
416
270
214
116
91
10131
I
1
1
I
1
,I
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
Weekly Summary Report ,
Generated by HSC3000 Version 2.01 Copyright 1990-1992 Hltron Systems Corporation
Location .......... Poinse'ttia Ln:Paseo del, Norte-Batiquitos
Location Code ..... 1499
County ............ San Diego County
Recorder Set ...... 07/24/99 17:43
Recording Start ... 07/27/99 00:00
Recording End ..... 07/29/99'00:00
Sample Time ....... 15 Minutes
Operator Number ... 8772
Machine Number .... 20348
Channel ........... 2
Recorder Mode ..... Volume
Week of July 25, 1999. Channel: 2 Direction: E
End ,25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Wkday
Time Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Avg.
01:00 52 68 60
02:00 31 34 33
03:00 28 24 26
04:00 12 10 11
05:00 20 23 22
06:00 116 107 112
07:00 368 344 356
08:00 453 503 478
09:00 509 558 534
10:00 480 504 492
11:00 469 510 490
12:00 535 575 555
13:00 638 610 624
14:00 593 676 635
15:00 648 650 649
16:00 713 716 715
17:00 840 807 824
18:00 973 970 972
19:00 799 874 837
20:00 585 577 581
21:00 448 475 462
22:00 379 389 384
23:00 247 273 260
24:00 123 164 144
Totals 10059 10441 10250
%" Avg Wkday 98.1 101. 9
%" Avg Day 98.1 101.9
AM Peak Hr 12:00 12:00
AM Count 535 575
PM Peak Hr 18:00 18:00
PM Count 973 970
it-JI
Daily
AVfI·
60
33
26
11
22
112
356
478
534
492
490
555
624
635
649
715
824
972
837
581
462
384
260
144
10250
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·1
I
I
11/ [1'2,"" 2000
O'Oourl(o
EnuiHOOring
wfM •
• ClF-.:ClUFYE EI·ll~IIIEEF:IH:.1
o'nourl\€! Ell.g.i.lH?ering Phone: 70()-74.~·3599
FAX: 760-74.4-3052
K:'vlai1:
PAGE OJ
)!)1S S, R<'lflc/ll) Sallt<l Fe HOllu
Suite z{,rr
Sail Man:wl, CA HZ06!J ORour}l.(,·Engrng@CS.com
.W( ..... :n tr....,..,."m N 'F az:aA!M • -
Transmittal
To: Bill D(lrnell
From: Meliss(1 Dale
Dale: Thursday, Nooernber 2, 20(}O
Subject: 2020 Forecast Volumes
Attacl1£,U vel' your req uest arc the Z020 forecast volumes for Poinsettia LN, Black
Rail Road, and Amhrosia RO(lc.1. ![you haV'(? any questions OJ.' comments you can call
Eril{ or myself.
Thanlt you
A--I2-
-------------------
E 'W
1
1
Po \Y\ e > ~£.,( ~
wlo ibta.c.,L.~ '. ~ ~ () ~ \" c.. "'-~ h\ tI Of) ~ 'v:) ril '). \P\-
o o..uL lull \ / ~D 0b~c.~'\.<.l.
6(0 f>f}1.t'\~~ •
A~~\(A
..,) io rD,'" ~hc....
s{ 0 PtHw'\ seil~ ~st.11'~ ?--~
\.'» "
,/ ~ /
I ~ '\
(-\ \'--, ( ---\
\ "11\ ')
'\ .----,,-~ / -\-----
0~j.
~'\I
LEGEND ~,{)1"~
__ -TRAVEl l AHE
'\
/
-------
I '
(X) -t.Jt~6ER or LANES X 1 tJ \(ot>o' ~
..R.. -STOP $lGN § _ 1RAfRC SIGNAL -!> 1'\1 ~...-i>u.T )1M 1\. ..... _' .. ~,.,~ Pel ?c_""'" ~ . 4~ S\...c..'c..~"-~1"l ~~ \If' ~ A ~a. CG.l'k-re4. 6frnMI.!r-n!.b ~ <>
. Darnell It. ASSOClA'aS. INC.
, rIGURE~ " ~ ~J«ve_ VOl~W$:::€Ot~DITION3 i . 8
.... .... •.... • ::1
f :. .....
r.:.
(:::1 o .:::.
I-
uj
t·,)
U
~.J
.t.
L. ,_,_I
1'::'" ,"'1
r)
.--1 ;D ':-! C ~
M
c:.J
'::,1 ....
,[T1 r:: AJ >--. ••
~. ~)
IJ 1:,
G" fT1
.=, . "
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I·
I
I
I
I
I
CIRCULATION PLAN
PACIFIC
OCEAN
CITY OF CARLSBAD
CIRCULATION PLAN
+++ RAILROAD
-FREEWAY
-PRIME ARTERIAL· f I-~ tL
-MAJOR ARTERIAL ( . \~ ";-f c.\: r. tV
SECONDARY ARTERIAL /1./ ~/(/
COLLECTOR STI1EET
HWY 78
J
/
.. -'1.. : .. J
J
J
..
J
MAP 1
Page 11
....
- --.-- --. - - - - - --- ----
TABLE 1
ARTERIAL SffMEJIT CAPACITIES*
CI'IY OF CARlSBW
ARI'ERIAL LlliK ADI' LINK AIJr LINK ADI' LINK ADl' LlliK Am:
CI.AS5IFI acrrrn AOCESS ~IBN lLQS bl (IOS B) (W3 C) (IDS D) (lOS E)
6 lANE ffilliE .ARI'ERIAL ID YES 40,000 46,670 53,340 60,000 66,6"70
6 lANE mIME .ARI'ERIAL SCl1E YES 33,340 38,890 44,450 50,000 55,560
,-. " .0 ;--, ;-, ..........
4 lANE MAJOR ARI'ERIAL NO YES 26,670 31,120 351 560 40,000 44 1 450
4 lANE SED:::t-rDARY ARIrnIAL SCME YES 20,000 23,240 26,670 30,000 33,340
:p 4 lANE OJLlECIDR YES NJ .16,670 19,450 22,220 25,000 27,780
0\
f, .-D v
2 lANE OJLLECTOR NJ ID 13,34() 15,560 17,'780 20,000 22 1 230
2 LANE OJLI..ECTOR YES NJ 10,000 ll,670 13,340 151 000 1£,670
2 lANE I...OC.AL YES NJ 6,675 7,785 8,900 10,000 11,120
* Nt.nrbers represent :maxirruro capacity alla,.,>ed for the identified level of service.
':.
I
I
I
I
I
·1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Febr
uary
29
Ii d. ·tlHa
,
Mar-eh
SANTEC/ITE
GUIDELINES FOR TRAFFIC
IMPACT STUDIES [TIS]
IN THE SAN DIEGO REGION
PREFACE
These guidelines are subject to continual update, as future tecluiology and
documentation become available. Always check with locaijurisdictions tor
their preferred or applicable procedures.
Committee Compilation by Kent A. Whitson
Reviewed by committee members: Hank Morris (co-chair),
Tom Parry (co-chair), Arnold Torma (co-chair), Susan O'Rourke,
Bill Darnell, Labib Qasem, John Boarman, Ralph Leyva, and Erik Ruehr
Additional review by: Ann French Gonsalves, Bill Fig.ge,
Bob Goralka, and Gary Halbert
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
IV.
service of "C. " Individual local jurisdictions, as well as Caltrans, have slightly elifferent LOS
objectives. For example, the Regional Growth Management Strategy for San Diego has a
level-of-service objective of "D;" while the Congestion Management Program has
established a minimum level-of-service of "E", or "F" if that is the existing 1990 base year
LOS. In other words, if the existing LOS is "D" or worse, preservation of the existing LOS
must be maintained or acceptable mitigation must be identified.
These guidelines do not establish a legal standard for these functions, but are intended to
supplement any individual TIS manuals or level-of-service objectives for the various
jurisdictions. These guidelines attempt to consolidate regional efforts to identifY when a .
TIS is needed, what professional procedures should be followed, and what constitutes a
significant traffic impact.
The instructions outlined in these guidelines are subject to update as future conditions and
experience become available. Special situations may call for variation fi'om these guidelines:
Cal trans and lead agencies should agree on the specific methods used in traffic impact
studies involving any State Route facilities, including metered and· unmetered freeway
ramps.
NEED FOR A STUDY
A TIS should be prepared for all projects which generate traffic greater than 1,000 total
average daily trips (ADT) or 100 peak-hour trips. If a proposed project is not in confor-
mance with the land use and/or transpol1ation element of the general or community plan,
use threshold rates of 500 ADT or 50 peak-hour trips. Early consultation with any affected
jurisdictions is strongly encouraged since a "focused" or "abbreviated" TIS may still be
required -even if the above threshold rales are not met.
Currently, a Congestion Management Program (CMP) analysis is required for all large
projects, which are defined as generating 2,400 or more average daily trips or 200 or more
peak-hour trips. This size of study would usually include computerized long-range forecasts
and select zone assignments. Please refer to the following flow chart (Figure 1) for TIS
req uirements.
The geOgraphic area examined in the TIS must include the following:
• All local roadway segments (including all State surface routes), intersections, and
mainline freeway locations where the proposed project will add 50 or more peak-hour
trips in either direction to the existing roadway traffic.
• All freeway entrance and exit ramps where the proposed project will add a significant
number of peak-hour trips to cause any traffic queues to exceed ramp storage capacities
(see Figure 1). (NOTE: Care must be taken to include other ramps and intersections
that may receive project traffic diverted as a result of already existing, or project causing
congestion at freeway entrances and exits.)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 1
MEASURE OF SIGNIFICANT PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACTS
Level of Allowable Change due to Project Impact*"
Service with
Project'"
"Ramp"""
Freeways Roadway Segments Intersections Metering
VIC Speed (mph) VIC Speed (mph) Delay (sec.) Delay(min.)
D, E, & F (or 0.01 1 0.02 1 2 2
ramp meter
delays above
15 min.)
NOTES:
*
**
***
All level of service measurements are based upon HCM procedures for peak-hour
conditions. However, VIC ratios for' Roadway Segments may be estimated on an
AOT/24-hour traffic volume basis (using Table 2 or a similar LOS chart for each
jurisdiction). The acceptable LOS for freeways, roadways, and intersections is
generally liD" ("C" for undeveloped or not densely developed locations per
jurisdiction definitions). For metered freeway ramps, LOS does not apply.
However, ramp meter delays above 15 minutes are considered excessive.
If a proposed project's traffic causes the values shown in the table to be
exceeded, the impacts are determined to be significant. These impact changes
may be measured from appropriate computer programs or expanded manual
spreadsheets. The project applicant shall then identify feasible mitigation (within
the Traffic Impact Study [TIS] report) that will maintain the traffic facility at an
acceptable LOS. If the LOS with the proposed project becomes unacceptable
(see above * note), or if the project adds a significant amount of peak-hour trips
to cause any traffic queues to exceed on-or off-ramp storage capacities, the
project applicant shC)1I be responsible for mitigating significant impact changes.
See Attachment B for ramp metering analysis.
KEY: VIC = Volume to Capacity ratio
Speed = Speed measured in miles per hour
Delay = Average stopped delay per vehicle measured in seconds for
intersections, or minutes for ramp meters
LOS = Level of Service
Y-l--18
I
I
I
I
I
-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIXB
>-Redeemer by the Sea Lutheran Church Phasing Plan
. . . Proposed Phase One Program -Option E CUE! le~ I Redeemer by the Sea LutheranChurcll -Carlsbad, C:;A I
00(001
Focus Facility Qiy SFIQty Est$ISF Total Area Est TOla! $
I . Worship
Worship Center (Seats) 200 15 $ 80 3,000 $ 240,000
I' Sacristy I 240 $ 55 240 :$ 13,200
Sound System I allow $ 25,000
Organ / Keyboards I allow $ 55,000
I Narthex 67 8 $ 75 533 $. 40,000
N ursery for 15 I 525 $ 55 525 $ 28,875
Elevator 1 allow $ ':36,000
I Restrooms 2 265 $ 65 530 $ 34,450
Subtotal 4,828 .$ 472,525
Artwork 2% $ 9,451
I Storage 10% $ 35 483 $ 16,899
Circulation 5% $ 35 241 $ 8,450
Mechanical 3% $ 35 145 $ 5,070
I Total Worship . 5,697 $ 512,394
. Church Offices
Offices:
I Pastors 300 $ 55 300 $ 16,500
Workspace for Support Staff 175 $ 55 175 $ 9,625
Subtotal 475 $ 26,125
I Storage 5% $ 35 24 $ 831
Circulation 10% $ 35 48 $ 1,663
Mechanical 3% $ 35 14 $ 499
Total Cllureh Offices 561 $ 29~118 I • Child Care / PreSchool for 48
A-PU\.1" Classrooms: $
81S L06 (I) Infant Rm for 8 2 280 $ 55 560 $ 30,800
I ~s (I) 2 yr. old Rms for 8 2 280 $ 55 560 $ 30,800 L. \V ( I n yr • K Rms t'or 8 2 280 $ 55 560 $ 30,800 'Z6 ~eov Lobby 1 200 $ 55 200 $ 11,000
I Student Restrooms 2 135 $ 65 270 $ 17,550
Subtotal 2,150 $ 120,950
Storage 5% $ 35 108 $ 3,763
I Circulation 10% $ 35 215 $ 7,525
Mechanical 3% $ 35 65 $ 2,258
Total Child Care 2~537 $ 134,495
I· ' Site Improvements
W,E,F,S 8,795 $ 1.90 8,795 $ 16,710
Grading 200,228 $ 0.90 200,228 $ 180,205 I Irrigation & Landscape 22,062 $ 1.75 22,062 $ 38,609
Outdoor Fellowship
I Courtyard 67 15 $ 5.00 1,000 $ 5,000
Preschool Outdoor Play
Area 24 75 $ 2.75 1,800 $ 4,950
II Church Parking 100 350 $ 2.50 35,000 $ 87,500
Total Site Improvements 268,885 $ 332,975
I i I!
I t?-J 0110912000
I:
.. ----
1
·1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
2
_ ........ r ... U-.............. ~_ .....,11 .. _ ... 11..,0 .... ;,. -~I' •• V'''.I.J
Redeemer by the Sea LutheranChurch -Carlsbad, CA !
Other Considerations
Agency Fees, Conditions 3% $ 30,269
.. ··---T AlE Fees 12% $ 121,078
GC Overhead + Profit 17% $ 171,527
Insurance 3.00% $ 30,269
Performance Bond 2.00% $ ::20,180
Interest (Construction
Loan) 8.75% $ 22,071
Blueprinting, Repro 0.20% $ 2,018
Furnishings, Fixtures,
Equip 15% $ 151,347
Contingency 10% $ 100,898'
Subtotal, Otller Considerations $ 649,658
8,795 $ 189
()/I{)912{)()O
:=;-orn ':',.,< iJoertrnan PHONE No. 760 721 6674 Ma'::j.162000 9: 18RM P0:3 I ,.
,
Master FacUitJ.tts Program -1,300 Members
I Redeemer by the Sea LutheronChurch -C~rLt;had, CA
Mechanical 3% $ 35 98 $ 3,421 -.---tOlal ('11llrch 0Dlcc~' 3,8·14 J 250,355 I .~?!lId Carc..! PreSchvol La" J J 8
CIE1ssroom!:: $
(2) Jnf.,:i"Rll'~ lor 8 2 280 $ ,~ 560 $ 42,000
I (3) " yr . .)fcfTiinB for 14 3 560 $ ~5 1,680 $ lO~.~Oo
~r:r~07K1Giil; (II' ~O 3 700 $ 65 2,ioO $ 1 :J6,~OO
-;;r;hb;" I 200 $ 6~ 200 $ 1 ~~!..O(Ii'i_
I TlmZi, Rnum (Oce's) ~~ 12 $ 65 -708 $ 46,020
"R1iCI1cn (S/;rving) 59 3 $ 85 177 $ ljjl45-
Nurse/Sbk Room 1 250 ~ 75 250 $ 1 8 ,'i50
I 1\iJj"j"Sfc··/i oom (Oce':,;) 40 9 $ 65 360 ~ ~J.400 .
'Studelll'Restroom~ i ~30 $ ,-85 1,060 $ 90,100
Pre Sd!ool 0]Jir.p..~:
I Dliector 1 ]()U $ 65 300 $ 11),:>00 -_ ........
Ass'L Director 200 ~ 65 .~ 200 $ 13,000 1
SU~rlUrl Slall' I .. 200 $ 65 200 5: D,O()()
'I ConfRoom (0ccupams) 8 15 $ 65 120 $ 7,800 omr.:-Restrooms 2 189 $ 85 378 $ 32,130
Subtotal 8,293 $ 494,015
Sbrai::-",-5% $ 35 415 $ 14,513
I ::,.C"";!at/on )0% $ 35 829 $ 29,026
T.1< caanieal 3% $ 35 249 $ 8,701.{
Total Child Care 9,786 $ 516J161
I Ekmentary Sc/~/J(llf{)r 240 Students
Comp\"cr teaming
Center (Workstations) 3U 30 $ 65 900 $ 58,500
I Medin :CentcrlJ ,ibrnry ] 900 $ 65 900 $ 58,500
Classl )QJ11I-; for 24
Stude :ts eaeh 10 900 $ 65 9,000 $ 585,000
Student Ifcstroom!> , -'1 6 290 $ H5 1,740 $ 147.900
Nurse/Sick Room I 250 $ 75 250 $ 18,750
~Day Srh:-:r-.l "o.ffzces:
I Principal 300 $ 65 300 $ 19,500 ----Vice Princj~al 200 $ 65 200 $' 13,000
'N Clkspacc for Support
I Staff 2 175 $ 85 350 $ 29"722-suppocr ~taff
WOrkF)Om 600 $ 65 600 $ 39,000 -.,
I Starr, ,ounge 250 $ G5 250 $ 16,150
Conii;rcmcc Room
(Occl!pants) 12 . 15 $ 6.5 180 $ 11.700
I School 'Office Restrooms 2 189 $ 85 372 $ 32,J30
Subtotal: 1J,048 $ 849,900
I -
I 6-1
2 {//,OJ/2000
I RECE· .... 'ED TIME MRY.16. 9: ,I ?!=1M
I
I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
PHONE No. : 760 721 6674
MU$ter FacUlties Pr(Jsrant -1,300 Members
Redeemer by the Sea.Lutht:rQnCh~1'Ch -C"I'lsbalt CA
$ 35 752 $
35 752 $
$ 35 1131 :I;
17.004 S
Ma~.16 2000 9:19AM P05
26.334
26,334
15,~OO
918;368
E/dl~r Center
. i';!'
I' 1,,', £~(7
ConfRl.lom (Occupl'.nts) 8 15 $ 65 120 $
Assemhly Room
(Oc~:1If'.\::.:n:::ts~)~ ____ -::.3~2-_' __ 1 __ 1:.:2=--_._....:$:-_~7;.5 ___ ...;3~9-=O_$;:-. ____ ....;·2;.;,9""r2 ... 3_2_
Game iioolll (,",ee's) 16 12 $ 65 195 $ 12,667
l .. obbY· 1 200 S 65 20() $ 13,O~
Kitchen (Serving
Capac.lty)
Nurse/Sick Rnom ----F ;;strr ,"ms
I·
32 4 $ 85 l;iO S' 11,04)
J 250 $ 75 250 $ IR,750
2 530 $ 85 1 • .060 $ 90.1 00 -------SubtllJal 2,3JJ $. 182,J91
Storage , ____ . __ l:..;:O;.;.o/c.:.,o _-"-ii. ____ .;;$_--=3:.;5 ___ ..;2;;;,:3..;,4_· $~ ____ ;:.)8,~20;;..;6~
CirClIlllti'.;n 10% $ 35 234 $ 8,206
MoohQ\,,[i1'-,A":"1 -----~3:;..:%~------;.$ ----:;3.;:..5----;;.:;7~O-~$-· ----~2~,4~6~2-
.. -.~------~:-------..:::--.-~----I Total Eldt!I' CqJ1'p. 2,884 $ 2{Ji,466
_Family Life C!.:=-m=:=.:te:.:.r-:--~ _____ _
It ,"'~ l Youtt':-:-M-=e~c_tin~g~R~oo-:m-:,s __ --.;;2~-,_-:.:12:;.:;0~O_--=$::--..:;65:-_--/-~:..::.=..-:-.:::..-. ____ 1:.:5;.::6.!.:.0:.;;:;O..:.:.-..O 3 '-
I .. ,:!>I.f-'l"'..-~!Ie Room (Oec's) 40 30 $ 6S 78,000 vS /. Theah-:r-;-(O=-cc"7',s-:-·)::....----':...---12...:.0~--...;1;...;8~-...;$~-.;;;.6;;.5 --~~:..:.-+.;...::;...----1....;4~O:.!.:,4:::0:..::...0
I
I
I
I,
I
Oreat IIall / Oym " I '," ") (Occ'~) 650! 15 $ 65 /9,750, /$ i
Changing Rooms 2 750 ' $ 85 +..-.:::1',500~..:l$ \
Kitchen (Serving 'l '-...--'" ~
I Cap.1city) 520 4 $ 85 2~080 $ J 76,KOO
633,750
( ( 127,500
'Fitness Center ,·1 300 $ 65 300 $ 19,500
Church ~·~t·-o-re-------:---:----:3~O-:-O ----:$:--7~5:-----=-30~0~..:::$----..:2:.:2.!.:.5~O~O
ReslrO_li.:.:.m:.-s _____ ~...::.2 --: ___ ..:2:..:.J.::..6_~$=___..::8.::..S ____ 4.:.::3:.:2~.::.$ ____ ....:3::.::6:!., 7:.:2~O;...
Subtotal .. , 20,122 $ 1,391,170
Stora,~c 5% $ 35 1,006 $ 35,214 ~;:fla~ti~on------------~5~o/!~o------------~$--~3~5~----~5~0~~$~------~~1.~76~J~
~;anical 3% $ 35 604 $ 21,128
T()tal Family Life Center 21,782 $ 1,449,272
Support St!n·ice,~·
Maintcr.i1,~:e Shop 2400
Tutal Support Sen-Ices
. ; ,
RECETVED TIME MAY. 16. 9:47AM
$ 35
o II041Z 000
I
I
I
I
'1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
F\~~"m ';., K Uoertman
I
PHONE No. : 760 721 6674 Ma\:!.16 2000 9: 19Ar1 P04
Masle,. FacUU;cs Progl'am -1.300 Members
. Redeemer by the Sea LutheranChlirch -Carlsbad, C4
.:~~~e Improvements ... . ,
WtE,F,~ ____ 74t471 !Ii 1.90 74z471 $ 141J4~
Grading· 243,182 $ 0.90 24~, 1 82 $ 2l8,864
l7(jga tiOii-&l.andscapc 1 186,327 $ 1.7~ 186,327 $ 326,072
~l'lOr Fellowship
Courtyard 203 --i 15 $ s.oo 3,045 $ 15,125
Preschoo' Outdoor Play
A,'CSl 118 75 $ 2.75 8,850 $ 24,338
\)ay ~cl,ool Outdoor
Play A/Cn 240 . 75 $ 1.95 18,000 $ J5,IOO
Chure); Parking 162 350 $ 2.75 56,840 $ 156,310
7ulu/ Site ImpI'OVC'r'Cllts 590,715 $ 917,-1(13
" l1 .. IIel' CQ" .id{o'I'!1iJon.f: _ ... _--,_._---------------------------------
.\g",}CY Fees, Conditions J% $ 175,631
AlE Fees' 12% $ 702,523
OC Ove;';}-ea-d-+-}-)r-o--fi-t --17% $ 995,242
$ 175,631
$ 117,087
InSUl'llllCe 3.00% Pcrlo;;-la-n-~-~~B-o-n~d-------2~ .. ~O~O~%~-------------~----------------~---------~~~~
J ntcrc! .:. (Constructi~~-
$ 128,064 LOlln) "~_,,,",::":-____ .....::.8.:..;' 7..:;S..;.'X.,:.o ___________________ :....-____ ..;;..;:.~...:.-_
D1uep 'inting, Repro 0.20% $ 11,709
·~~;.:~~k~iJlSs, Fixtures, ,',
$ 1,170,872
$ 585,436
$ 4,062,196
Equip .'~ _..::2:..;O~o/t7-0--'I~--_----_-_-_-~----...:.!.::..:..:~:.:,.... COnli"ge~_'~~y_~~--~~_IO-O~Yo~-7--~-----------------------~------~~~~~
Subtotal, Other Cunsiderations
l.
O//M/2(1(1(}
RECL'v'ED TIME MRY. 16. 9!·1?RM
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIXC
~ List of Other Approved/Pending Projects
~Other Approved/Pending Projects Trip Generation
~Other Approved/Pending Projects Trip Distribution
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
OCT-25-2000 WED 08: 58 Ml C lTV OF CARLSBAD FAX NO. 760 602 8558
-f
FAX TRANSMITTAL
Engineering Department
DATE: Oct. 24, 2000
TIME SENT: ~ PM
TO: Vicki.
COMPANY; DameJl & Asso.
PHONe NO; 619/233-9373
FAX NO: 619/233-4034
Number of pages being transmitted;
(including transmittal) 2
FROM: Michael J. Shirey
DIVISION: Development Services
PHONE NO. (760) 602-2747
FAX NO: (760) 602-8562 .
RE; PRE 00-06; REDEEMER-BY·THE SEA
TRAFFIC REPORT CUMULATIVE PROJECTS
Vicki,
Per your request. I have attached an exhibit showing which projects you sl!ould use for
your cumulative trip generation. I do not have the ADT. You need to come to our front counter
and research the traffic reports, or look at the tentative maps, CUP's, etc. Where projects have
not been proposed, use the City's General Plan land use assumptions to generate ADT from
those parcels.
Also, analyze whether a deceleration/right-turn-only lane will be required for eastbound
Poinsettia Lane to southbound 'A' Street
Thanks,
Mike S.
Cc. Planning File
1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • TEL 760/602-2720 • FAX 760/602-8562
c-(
p, 01
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
OCT-25-2000 WED 08:58 AM CITY OF CARLSBAD
~un-13-00 Oa,Q1A ~owards,. Brown ing.
z a
F= u w
(f)
0::
I=! ~
FAX, NO. 760 602 8558
619 436-a603 P.03
o o c:> N
\.
, "
P. 02
", .
, ' ,
'. . ..-
", :
, '
1
.1
I
I
1
I
1
1
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
1
'I
Table A
Other Approved/Pending Projects Trip Generation Summary
Weekday Trip Generation Rate
AM Peak: Hour Trip PM Peak: Hour Trip
Land Use Daily Trip Generation Generation Rate Generation Rate
Ratel
Total %In % Out Total %In % Out
Single Family Residential 9.57 TripsIDwelling Unit O.751DU 25% 75% l.OllDU 64% 36%
Church 9.11 Trips/ksf O.72/ksf 54% 46% 0.66/ksf 54% 46%
1 All trip generation rates are based on The Institute o/Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 6th Edition
ksf= 1,000 Square Feet
DU = Dwelling Unit
Weekday Trip Generation
Total No. of Daily AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak: Hour Trips
Land Use Units Trips Total In Out Total In Out
Ocean Bluff -CT 93-09A
• Single Family 96 919 72 18 54 97 62 35
DeJong-CT 98-05
• Single Family 28 268 21 5 16 28 18 10
Daybreak Community Church 18.11 ksf 165 13 7 6 12 6 6
Redeemer by the Sea
• Single Family 12 115 9 2 7 12 8 4
Total Trip Generation by Other Projects: 1,467 115 32 83 149 94 55
-------------------
\).\
/'" ~
/ ~~ 00 0) ~ \
( ~ ~ \---~
\ 90%..3 t / '" ~ 0 '~L. "" "" / -----
/'
I
(
\
"-
"" ----~
LEGEND
'XX% '-DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGE
(1) -OCEAN BLUFF (CT 93-09) PROJECT SITE
(2) -DE JONG (CT 98-05) PROJECT SITE
Darnell & ASSOCIATES, INC.
OTHER
10%
I ;;0 » F J~
> $
;0
;;0 (~ 0
~
\
l'oJ< \ J --5%0 V
/
"" / --'---
FIGURE A
APPROVED/PENDING PROJECTS TRIP DISTRIBUTION
I z n:: en
0 0 I (1)
0 I ..... .....
« «
0 0 ..... 0 0
----- - - ----- --- - - - - -
Q
th
LEGEND
(
\
/'" ~
I \
( \-'--
\ 90%, 1 ) ~ "'"
"'-<7> / ,,~. "" --------
/'" --..-/ I
( -
\
XX% -DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGE * -PROJECT SITE
"",I / ---~
:::0
~ r
:::0 o
/'" ~
I L go% \
,10% --l PROJECT \.
ENTRANCE ~ \ r )
l "'" ~ /
j;; ---~
z ~
o o I L----------------.------------------~----~----------~----~?
FIGURE B ~ . Darnell & ASSOCIATES, INC. REDEEMER BY THE SEA---12 LOT SUBDIVISION ~
NEAR TERM TRIP DISTRIBUTION 8
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -------
~ ,
<S'
90%--
(
\
--
I 1-__ ~ If)
/
------
"" \ / --.-/
LEGEND
XX% -DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGE * -PROJECT SITE
J
611= 0> \ ~
~ It)
---~~ ---~ IE / ;~J. --------
z ~ ~
o o r---------------------------------.-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~I~ o
Darnell & ASSOCIATES, INC.
FIGURE C
REDEEMER BY THE SEA~ 12 LOT SUBDIVISION
LONG TERM TRIP DISTRIBUTION
I ~ ~
« « E o
E o
- - - - - - - - - - --.------ -
/ ~
I \
( \---~
\ /
" / "'---------
LEGEND
XX% -DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGE * -PROJECT SITE
aJ r » (")
LN (' -* \~ .. ,.,
50~ -r "tit. I '-1~"t ;;0 0
z ~ w
o o I r--------------------------------------r-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------il~
FIGURE D Darnell & ASSOCIATES, INC. DAYBREAK COMMUNITY CHURCH
I. NEAR TERM TRIP DISTRIBUTION
I
~
~
« « o o o o
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIXD
~Existing Conditions (ICU & HCS)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION
WORKSHEET
CITY OF CARLSBAD-SATURATION FLOW RATES
(2,000 VEH/HR/LANE THRUi1,800 TURN, 1,620 DUAL TURN LANES)
INTERSECTION:
DATE:
TIME:
NAME
11/06/00
AM PEAK HOUR
( POINSETTIA-AVIARA-EX
EXISTING
-------------------------------------------------
No. AM Peak 0.00 crit.
Movement Lanes Cap. Vol. VIC Min. Mvmt.
--------------
NL 2 3,240 441 0.14 0.14 1
NR 0 0 3 0.00 0.00 0
NT 2 4,000 187 0.05 0.05 0
SL 1 1,800 15 0.01 0.01 ,0
SR 0 0 51 0.00 0.00 0
ST 2 4,000 132 0.05 0.05 1
EL 2 3,240 118 0.04 0.04 1
ER 2 3,240 414 0.13 0.13 0
ET 1 2,000 29 0.01 0.01 a
WL 1 1,800 9 0.01 0.01 0
WR 0 0 30 0.00 0.00 a
WT 2 4,000 53 0.02 0.02 1
N/S component 0.19
E/W component 0.06
Rt.Tn. compo 0.00
Clearance Interval 0.10
ICU 0.35
LOS A
Critical movement identified by a 1.
Ten lanes for a right turn indicates free movement.
NA -Not Applicable
/)-/
POINSETTIA-AVIARA-EX
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION
WORKSHEET
CITY OF CARLSBAD-SATURATION FLOW RATES
(2,000 VEH/HR/LANE THRUi1,800 TURN, 1,620 DUAL TURN LANES
INTERSECTION:
DATE:
TIME:
NAME
11/06/00
PM PEAK HOUR
( POINSETTIA-AVIARA-EX
EXISTING
-------------------------------------------------
No. PM Peak 0.00 Crit.
Movement Lanes Cap. Vol. VIC Min. Mvmt.
--------------,-----
NL 2 3,240 358 0.11 0.11 1
NR 0 0 3 0.00 0.00 0
NT 2 4,000 151 0.04 0.04 0
SL 1 1,800 12 0.01 0.01 0
SR 0 0 93 0.00 0.00 0
ST 2 4,000 138 0.06 0.06 1
EL 2 3,240 37 0.01 0.01 0
ER 2 3,240 532 0.16 0.16 1
ET 1 2,000 59 0.03 0.03 1
WL 1 1,800 6 0.00 0.00 1
WR 0 0 12 0.00 0.00 0
WT 2 4,000 34 0.01 0.01 0
N/S component 0.17
E/W component 0.03
Rt.Tn. compo 0.02
Clearance Interval 0.10
ICU 0.32
LOS A
critical movement identified by a 1-
Ten lanes for a right turn indicates free movement.
NA -Not Applicable
POINSETTIA-AVIARA-EX
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TWO-WAY STOP'CONTROL SUMMARY ~I~n~t-e-r-s-e-c~t~i-o-n-:----------~Poinsettia'Ln/Black Rail Rd --------------------~--------
Analyst: V Root-Existing .
Project No.: OOIOOl-Redeemer by the Sea
Date: 11/6/00-AM Peak
East/West Street: Poinsettia Lane
,North/South Street: Black Rail Road
Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 1.00
Vehicle
':":M~a""j-o-r---'s;:-t;-r--e-e"t-:---"A;:-p--p-r-o-a-ch
Volumes and
Northbound
2
Adjustments~s;-o-u~t~h'b'-o-u-n-d'---------------
Movement 1
L T
Volume 26 11
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 27 11
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
Lanes
Configuration
Upstream Signal?
Minor street: Approach
Movement
Volume
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Percent Grade (%)
Median Storage 1
Flared Approach: Exists?
RT Channelized?
Lanes
Configuration
storage
o 1
LT
No
Westbound
7 8
L T
o
3
R
9
R
4
L
10
L
13
13
0
5
T
17
17
1
No
0
TR
Eastbound
1
L
11
T
2
1
R
6
R
29
30
12
R
21
22
0
No
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service ""A-p-p-r-o-a-c-h.---------NB S B We s tbou nd ~E:-::a--:s:-:;:t:-;b::-o::-uC':"::'n'3d-----------
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Conf ig LT L R
v (vph)
C(m) (vph)
vic
95% queue length
Control Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
27
1573
0.02
0.00
7.3
A
13
895
0.01
0.00
9.1
A
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2
Bill E Darnell
Da·rne11 & Associates
Phone:
E-Mail:
Fax:
8.7
A
22
1048
0.02
0.00
8.5
A
___________________ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS _______________ ___
Intersection: Poinsettia Ln/Black Rail Rd
City/state:
Analyst: V Root-Existing
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
HCS: unsignal~zed Intersect~ons Helease J.L
TWO-WAY STOP' CONTROL SUHHARY ""I-n'"'"t-e-r-s-e-c-:-t-.i-o-n-:-------;::-Poinset t ia 'Ln/ Bl ack Ra il Rd -----------..,.----
Analyst: V Root-Existing
Project No.: 001001-Redeemer by the Sea
Date: 11/6/00-PM Peak
East/West Street: Poinsettia Lane
North/South Street: Black Rail Road
Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 1.00
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
~M~a~j~o-r-S~t~r-e-e~t-:--A~p~p~r~o~a~ch Northbound ~~~~--~--------Southbound
Movement 1 2 3
L T
Volume 10 16
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 16
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
Lanes
Configuration
Upstream Signal?
Minor Street: Approach
Movement
Volume
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Percent Grade (%)
Median Storage 1
Flared Approach: Exists?
RT Channelized?
Lanes
Configuration
Storage
o 1
LT
No
Westbound
7 8
L T
o
R
9
R
4
L
10
L
31
32
0
5
T
24
25
1 0
TR
No
Eastbound
1
L
11
T
2
1
R
6
R
26
27
12
R
18
18
0
No
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
~A-p-p-r-o-a-c-h~------NB SB Wes tbou nd ""E,....a-s-;t-,b:-o:-u-n-,d~-----
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Conf ig LT L R
v (vph)
C(m) (vph)
vic
95% queue length
control Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
10
1567
0.01
0.00
7.3
A
32
930
0.03
0.00
9.0
A
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2
Bill E Darnell
Darnell & Associates
Phone:
E-Mail:
Fax:
8.8
A
18
1040
0.02
0.00
8.5
A
_______________ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS __________________ __
Intersection: Poinsettia Ln/Black Rail Rd
City/State:
Analyst: V Root-Existing
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIXE
>Existing + Phase I Project Conditions (ICU & HCS)
...
" .. '
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION
WORKSHEET
CITY OF CARLSBAD-SATURATION FLOW RATES
(2,000 VEH/HR/LANE THRUil,800 TURN, 1,620 DUAL TURN LANES)
INTERSECTION:
DATE:
TIME:
NAME
11/06/00
AM PEAK HOUR
( POINSETTIA-AVIARA-EX+PHASEI
EXISTING + PHASE I PROJECT
No. AM Peak 0.00
Movement Lanes Cap. Vol. VIC Min.
--------------
NL 2 3,240 441 0.14 0.14
NR 0 0 3 0.00 0.00
NT 2 4,000 187 0.05 0.05
SL 1 1,800 20 0.01 0.01
SR 0 0 51 0.00 0.00
ST 2 4,000 132 0.05 0.05
EL 2 3,240 118 0.04 0.04
ER 2 3,240 414 0.13 0.13
ET 1 2,000 36 0.02 0.02
WL 1 1,800 9 0.01 0.01
WR 0 0 34 0.00 0.00
WT 2 4,000 59 0.02 0.02
N/S component
E/W component
Rt.Tn. compo
Clearance Interval
ICU
LOS A
Critical movement identified by a 1.
Crit.
Mvmt.
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0.19
0.06
0.00
0.10
0.35
Ten lanes for a right turn indicates free movement.
NA -Not Applicable
POINSETTI~AVIARA-EX+PHASEI
t; - /
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION
WORKSHEET
CITY OF CARLSBAD-SATURATION FLOW RATES
(2,000 VEH/HR/LANE THRU;l,800 TURN, 1,620 DUAL TURN LANES
INTERSECTION: NAME
DATE: 11/06/00
TIME: PM PEAK HOUR
( POINSETTIA-AVIARA-EX+PHASEI
EXISTING + PHASE I PROJECT
No. PM Peak 0.00 Crit.
Movement Lanes Cap. Vol. VIC Min. Mvmt.
--------------
NL 2 3,240 358 0.11 0.11 1
NR 0 0 3 0.00 0.00 0
NT 2 4,000 151 0.04 0.04 0
SL 1 1,800 16 0.01 0.01 0
SR 0 0 93 0.00 0.00 0
ST 2 4,000 138 0.06 0.06 1
EL 2 3,240 37 0.01 0.01 0
ER 2 3,240 532 0.16 0.16 1
ET 1 2,000 66 0.03 0.03 1
WL 1 1,800 6 0.00 0.00 1
WR 0 0 17 0.00 0.00 0
WT 2 4,000 41 0.01 0.01 0
N/S component 0.17
E/W component 0.03
Rt.Tn. compo 0.02
Clearance Interval 0.10
lCU 0.32
LOS A
Critical movement identified by a 1.
Ten lanes for a right turn indicates free movement.
NA -Not Applicable
t-J-POINSETTIA-AVIARA-EX+PHASEI
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.t".1\....:;>; ullbJ..'::J11a.l.J."t;:::U .J..jll,.I:;:::.t.;::,~\....L..1-Vll~ L\\.; ... \..:u. ...... 1.;.. ...; • ..:.
TWO-WAY STOP 'CONTROL SUMMARY
.,..I-n-;-t-e-r:-s-e-c-t;-;-i-o-n-:-----~Poinsettia ,Ln/Black Rail Rd ------------,----
Analyst: V Root-Existing+Phase I
Project No.:. 001001-Redeemer by the Sea
Date: 11/6/00-AM Peak
East/West Street: Poinsettia Lane
North/South Street: Black Rail Road
Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 1.00
~M~a~j~O-r-s~t~r-e-e~t-:--A~p-p-r-o-a--c~ehicle V~;~~~~o~~~ Adjustments~s~O-u~t~h~bc-o-u-n~d,----------
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume 36 12
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 37 12
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
Lanes
Configuration
Upstream Signal?
Minor Street: Approach
Movement
Volume
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Percent Grade (%)
Median Storage 1
Flared Approach: Exists?
RT Channelized?
Lanes
Configuration
Storage
o 1
LT
No
Westbound
7 8
L T
o
9
R
10
L
13
13
0
18
18
1
No
0
TR
Eastbound
1
L
11
T
2
1
R
29
30
12
R
33
34
0
No
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
A=p-p-r--:o--:a=-c--;hc-------NBS B We s tbou nel ";:;E-"a-s""7t""7b-o-u-n-;d-------
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11
Lane Config
v (vph)
C{m) (vph)
vic
95% queue length
Control Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
LT
37
1572
0.02
0.00
7.3
A
L
13
865
0.02
0.00
9.2
1\
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2
Bill E Darnell
Darnell & Associates
Phone:
E-Mail:
Fax:
8.7
A
12
R
34
1046
0.03
0.00
8.6
A
________________ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS ___________________ __
Intersection: Poinsettia Ln/Black Rail Rd
City/State:
Analyst: V Root-Existing+Phase I
........... _;-_ ................ " .
1
1
I
I
1
1
1
·1
I
I
·1
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections ~elease J.~
~~ ____ ~r-__________ ~TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ____________________ ~-------
Intersection: Poinsettia Ln/Black Rail Rd
Analyst: V Root-Existing+Phase I
Project No.: OOlOOl-Redeemer by the Sea
Date: 11/6/00-PM Peak
East/West Street: Poinsettia Lane
.North/South street: Black Rail Road
Intersection Orientation: NS study period (hrs): 1.00
Vehicle Volumes and
~M~a~j~o-r--s~t~r-e-e~t-:---A~--pp-r-o-a--ch Northbound Adjustments
Movement 1 2
L T
Volume 22 17
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 23 17
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
Lanes
Configuration
Upstream Signal?
o 1
LT
No
Westbound
3
R
Minor Street: Approach
Movement 7 8 9
Volume
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Percent Grade (%)
Median Storage 1
Flared Approach: Exists?
RT Channelized?
Lanes
Configuration
Storage
L T R
o
4
L
10
L
31
32
0
Southbound
5
T
28
29
1 0
TR
No
Eastbound
1
L
11
T
2
1
R
6
R
26
27
12
R
29
30
0
No
~ ____ ~~ __________ Delay,
Approach NB
Queue Length, and Level of Service=-~~ __ ~ __________ _
SB Westbound Eastbound
Movement 1
Lane Con fig LT
v (vph)
C(m) (vph)
vic
95% queue length
Control Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
23
1562
0.01
0.00
7.3
A
4 7 8 9 10 11
L
32
888
0.04
0.00
9.2
A
8.9
A
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2
Bill E Darnell
Darnell & Associates
Phone:
E-Mail:
Fax:
12
R
30
1034
0.03
0.00
8.6
A
_______________________ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS ____________________ __
Intersection:
City/State:
Analyst:
Poinsettia Ln/Black Rail Rd
V Root-Existing+Phase I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIXF
> Existing + Other Approved/Pending Projects Conditions
(ICU & HCS)
I
I
I
1
-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION
WORKSHEET
CITY OF CARLSBAD-SATURATION FLOW RATES
(2,000 VEH/HR/LANE THRUil,800 TURN, 1,620 DUAL TURN LANES)
INTERSECTION:
DATE:
TIME:
NAME
11/06/00
AM PEAK HOUR
( POINSETTIA-AVIARA-EX+OTHERS
EXISTING + OTHERS
-------------------------------------------------
No. AM Peak 0.00 Crit.
Movement Lanes Cap. Vol. VIC Min. Mvmt.
--------------
NL 2 3240 443 0.14 0.14 1
NR 0 0 4 0.00 0.00 0
NT 2 4000 188 0.05 0.05 0
SL 1 1800 23 0.01 0.01 0
SR 0 0 51 0.00 0.00 0
ST 2 4000 133 0.05 0.05 1
EL 2 3240 118 0.04 0.04 1
ER 2 3240 416 0.13 0.13 0
ET 1 2000 43 0.02 0.02 0
WL 1 1800 13 0.01 0.01 0
WR 0 0 53 0.00 0.00 0
WT 2 4000 96 0.04 0.04 1
N/S component 0.19
E/W component 0.08
Rt.Tn. compo 0.00
Clearance Interval 0.10
ICU 0.37
LOS A
Critical movement identified by a l.
Ten lanes for a right turn indicates free movement.
NA -Not Applicable
t-/ '
POINSETTIA-AVIARA-EX+OTHERS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION
WORKSHEET
CITY OF CARLSBAD-SATURATION FLOW RATES
(2,000 VEH/HR/LANE THRUil,800 TURN, 1,620 DUAL TURN LANES
INTERSECTION: NAME
DATE: 11/06/00
TIME: PM PEAK HOUR
( POINSETTIA-AVIARA-EX+OTHERS
EXISTING + OTHERS
-------------------------------------------------
No. PM Peak 0.00 Crit.
Movement Lanes Cap. Vol. VIC Min. Mvmt.
--------------
NL 2 3240 360 0.11 0.11 1
NR 0 0 8 0.00 0.00 0
NT 2 4000 152 0.04 0.04 0
SL 1 1800 38 0.02 0.02 0
SR 0 0 93 0.00 0.00 0
ST 2 4000 139 0.06 0.06 1
EL 2 3240 37 0.01 0.01 0
ER 2 3240 534 0.16 0.16 0
ET 1 2000 107 0.05 0.05 1
WL 1 1800 10 0.01 0.01 1
WR 0 0 27 0.00 0.00 0
WT 2 4000 61 0.02 0.02 0
N/S component 0.17
E/W component 0.06
Rt.Tn. compo 0.00
Clearance Interval 0.10
ICU 0.33
LOS A
Critical movement identified by a 1-
Ten lanes for a right turn indicates free movement.
NA -Not Applicable
F~)..
POINSETTIA-AVIARA-EX+OTHERS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ~I~n~t~e~r~s~e~c~tC~"o~n~:--------~Poinsettia Ln/Black Rail Rd . ------------------------~---
Analyst: V Root-Ex+Others
Project No.: 001001-Redeemer by the Sea
Date: 11/6/00-AM Peak
East/west Street: Poinsettia Lane
North/South street: Black Rail Road
Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 1.00
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments~ __ ~~ __ ~ ____________ ___
uM~a~j-o-r~S~t~r~e~e~t~:--A~p~p~r~o~a~ch Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume 32 11 17 92
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 33 11 17 96
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
Lanes 0 1 1 0
Configuration LT TR
upstream signal? No No
Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume 34 23
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 35 24
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0
Percent Grade (%) o 2
Median Storage 1
Flared Approach: Exists?
Storage
RT Channelized? No
Lanes 1 1
Configuration L R
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service ______ --__ -----------
westbound Eastbound Approach
Movement
Lane config
v (vph)
C(m) (vph)
vIc
95% queue length
Control Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
NB
1
LT
33
1489
0.02
0.00
7.5
A
SB
4 7 8 9 10 11
L
35
840
0.04
0.00
9.5
A
9.1
A
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2
Bill E Darnell
Darnell & Associates
Phone:
E-Mail:
Fax:
12
R
24
1005
0.02
0.00
8.7
A
______________________ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS __________________ ~
Intersection: Poinsettia Ln/Black Rail Rd
City/state:
Analyst: V Root-Ex+Others P"3
I
I
I
I
I
·1
I
I
·1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
~I~n~t-e-r-s-e-c~t-k~'o-n~:--------~Poinsettia Ln/Black Rail Rd -----------------------------
Analyst: V Root-Ex+Others
Project No.: 001001-Redeemer by the Sea
Date: 11/6/00-PM Peak
East/West Street: Poinsettia Lane
North/South Street: Black Rail Road
Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 1.00
Volumes and Adjustments Vehicle :":M;-a'""j-o-r--S""t-r-e-e-t:--: --A-:::-p-p-r'-o-a-c h Northbound ~~~~--~---------------Southbound
Movement 1 2 3
L T R
Volume 14 16
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 14 16
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
Lanes 0 1
Configuration LT
Upstream Signal? No
Minor Street: Approach
Movement
Volume
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Percent Grade (%)
Median Storage 1
Flared Approach: Exists?
RT Channelized?
Lanes
Configuration
Storage
Westbound
7 8 9
L T R
o
4
L
10
L
103
108
0
5
T
24
25
1 0
TR
No
Eastbound
1
L
11
T
2
1
R
6
R
67
70
12
R
25
26
0
No
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
~A-p-p-r-o-a-c~h-----------NB SB Westbound ME~a~s~tLb~o'-u~n~d~---------
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane config LT L R
v (vph)
C(m) (vph)
vIc
95% queue length
Control Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
14
1512
0.01
0.00
7.4
A
108
893
0.12
0.41
9.6
A
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2
Bill E Darnell
Darnell & Associates
Phone:
E-Mail:
Fax:
9.4
A
26
1011
0.03
0.00
8.7
A
_______________________ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS ____________________ ___
Intersection: Poinsettia Ln/Black Rail Rd
City/state:
Analyst: V Root-Ex+Others
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
·1
I
1
1
I
1
I
I
1
·1
APPENDIXG
~Existing + Other Approved/Pending Projects + Phase I Project
Conditions (ICU & HCS)
I
I
-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION
WORKSHEET
CITY OF CARLSBAD-SATURATION FLOW RATES
(2,000 VEH/HR/LANE THRUil,800 TURN, 1,620 DUAL TURN LANES)
INTERSECTION:
DATE:
TIME:
NAME
11/06/00
AM PEAK HOUR
( POINSETTIA-AVIARA-EX+OTHERS+PHASEI
EXISTING + OTHERS + PHASE I PROJECT'
-------------------------------------------------
No. AM Peak 0.00 Crit.
Movement Lanes Cap. Vol. VIC Min. Mvmt.
--------------
NL 2 3240 443 0.14 0.14 1
NR 0 a 4 0.00 0.00 a
NT 2 4000 188 0.05 0.05 0
SL 1 1800 28 0.02 0.02 0
SR 0 0 51 0.00 0.00 0
ST 2 4000 133 0.05 0.05 1
EL 2 3240 118 0.04 0.04 1
ER 2 3240 416 0.13 0.13 0
ET 1 2000 50 0.03 0.03 0
WL 1 1800 13 0.01 0.01 0
WR 0 0 57 0.00 0.00 0
WT 2 4000 102 0.04 0.04 1
N/S component 0.19
E/W component 0.08
Rt.Tn. camp. 0.00
Clearance Interval 0.10
ICU 0.37
LOS A
Critical movement identified by a 1-
Ten lanes for a right turn indicates free movement.
NA -Not Applicable
0, -/
POINSETTIA-AVIARA-EX+OTHERS+PHASEI
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION
WORKSHEET
CITY OF CARLSBAD-SATURATION FLOW RATES
(2,000 VEH/HR/LANE THRUi1,800 TURN, 1,620 DUAL TURN LANES
INTERSECTION: NAME
DATE: 11/06/00
TIME: PM PEAK HOUR
( POINSETTIA-AVIARA-EX+OTHERS+PHASEI
EXISTING + OTHERS + PHASE I PROJECT'
-------------------------------------------------
No.
Movement Lanes Cap.
-------
NL 2 3240
NR 0 0
NT 2 4000
SL 1 1800
SR 0 0
ST 2 4000
EL 2 3240
ER 2 3240
ET 1 2000
WL 1 1800
WR 0 0
WT 2 4000
PM Peak
Vol. Vic
-------
360 0.11
8 0.00
152 0.04
42 0.02
93 0.00
139 0.06
37 0.01
534 0.16
114 0.06
10 0.01
32 0.00
68 0.03
N/S component
E/W component
Rt.Tn. compo
Clearance Interval
ICU
LOS
Critical movement identified by a 1.
0.00
Min.
0.11
0.00
0.04
0.02
0.00
0.06
0.01
0.16
0.06
0.01
0.00
0.03
A
Crit.
Mvmt.
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0.17
0.07
0.00
0.10
0.34
Ten lanes for a right turn indicates free movement.
NA -Not Applicable
G"2-
POINSETTIA-AVIARA-EX+OTHERS+PHASEI
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
~I~nLt~e-r~s~e~c~t~i~o~n~:---------=Poinsettia Ln/Black Rail Rd -----------------------------
Analyst: V Root-Ex+Other+Phase I
Project No.: 001001-Redeemer by the Sea
Date: 11/6/00-AM Peak
East/West street: Poinsettia Lane
North/South street: Black Rail Road
Intersection Orientation: NS study period (hrs): 1.00
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments.~~~~ __ ~ ______________ _
~M~a~j~o~r~S~t~r7e~e~t~:--~A~p~p~r~o~a~ch Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 2 3
L T R
Volume 42 12
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 44 12
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
Lanes 0 1
Configuration LT
Upstream Signal? No
Westbound Minor Street: Approach
Movement 7 8 9
Volume
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Percent Grade (%)
Median Storage 1
Flared Approach: Exists?
RT Channelized?
Lanes
configuration
Storage
L T R
o
4
L
10
L
34
35
0
5
T
18
18
1 0
TR
No
Eastbound
1
L
11
T
2
1
R
6
R
92
96
12
R
35
36
0
No
~~~~ ___________ Delay,
Approach NB
Queue Length, and Level of Service __ --__ --~----------
SB Westbound Eastbound
Movement 1
Lane Config LT
v (vph)
C(m) (vph)
vic
95% queue length
Control Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
44
1488
0.03
0.00
7.5
A
4 7 8 9 10 11
L
35
810
0.04
0.00
9.6
A
9.2
A
HCS: unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2
Bill E Darnell
Darnell & Associates
Phone:
E-Mail:
Fax:
12
R
36
1003
0.04
0.00
8.7
A
_______________________ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC} ANALYSIS ____________________ __
Intersection: Poinsettia Ln/Black Rail,Rd
City/state:
Analyst: V Root-Ex+Other+Phase I ~-3
....
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ¥I-n7t~e-r~s~e~c~t~iro~n~:--------~Poinsettia Ln/Black Rail Rd -----------------------------
Analyst: V Root-Ex+Other+Phase I
Project No.: OOlOOl-Redeemer by the Sea
Date: 11/6/00-PM Peak
East/West Street: Poinsettia Lane
North/South Street: Black Rail Road
Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 1.00
Vehicle "'"'M"-a-rj-o-r--::S:-7t-r-e-e"""'t"--: --A"'--p-p-r-o-a-c h Volumes and
Northbound
2
Adjustments
Movement 1 3
L T R
Volume 26 17
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 27 17
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
Lanes 0 1
Configuration LT
Upstream Signal? No
Westbound Minor Street: Approach
Movement 7 8 9
Volume
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Percent Grade (%)
Median Storage 1
Flared Approach: Exists?
RT Channelized?
Lanes
Configuration
Storage
L T R
a
4
L
10
L
103
108
0
Southbound
5
T
25
26
1 0
TR
No
Eastbound
1
L
11
T
2
1
R
6
R
67
70
12
R
36
37 a
No
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service ~A-p-p-r-o-a-c~h-----------NB SB Westbound ~E~a~s~t~b~o~u-n~d~----------
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Config LT L R
v (vph)
C(m) (vPp)
vic '
95% queue length
Control 'Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
27
1510
0.02
0.00
7.4
A
108
855
0.13
0.44
9.8
A
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2
Bill E Darnell
Darnell & Associates
Phone:
E-Mail:
Fax:
9.5
A
37
1010
0.04
0.00
8.7
A
_______________________ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS ____________________ ___
Intersection: Poinsettia Ln/Black Rail,Rd
City/State:
Analyst: V Root-Ex+Other+Phase I (;-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-I
I
I
APPENDIXH
~Project Access Analysis (HeS)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY __________________________ __
~I~n~t-e-r-s-e-c~t-k~·o-n--:~------~Black Rail Rd/Project Entrance
Analyst: V Root-Ex+Others+Phase I
Project No.: 001001-Redeemer by the Sea
Date: 11/6/00-AM Peak
East/West Street: Project Entrance
North/South street: Black Rail Road
Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 1.00
Vehicle Volumes and
Major street: Approach Northbound
Movement 1 2
L T
Volume 40
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 42
Percent Heavy Vehicles _
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
Lanes
configuration
upstream signal?
Minor Street: Approach
Movement
Volume
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Percent Grade (%)
Median storage 1
Flared Approach: Exists?
RT Channelized?
Lanes
Configuration
Storage
7
L
10
10
2
1 0
TR
No
Westbound
8
T
2
No
0 0
LR
Adjustments
southbound
3 4 5 6
R L T R
11 15 45
11 15 47
2
0 1
LT
No
Eastbound
9 10 11 12
R L T R
17
17
2
0
~ ____ ~ ___________ Delay, Queue
Approach NB SB
Length, and Level of
Westbound
Service
~E~a-s~t~b-o-u-n-d~----------
Movement 1 4
Lane Config LT
v (vph)
C(m) (vph)
vic
95% queue length
Control Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
15
1553
0.01
0.00
7.3
A
7 8 9
LR
27
956
0.03
0.00
8.9
A
8.9
A
10 11
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2
Bill E Darnell
Darnell & Associates
Phone:
E-Mail:
Fax:
12
________________________ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS ____________________ ___
Intersection: Black Rail Rd/Project Entrance
City/state:
Analyst: V Root-Ex+Others+Phase I H -/
"I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
1
I
I
I
I
HCS: unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
"r,-n...,t""'e:-r-s--e.....,-::c.,..t-;i...,o...,n""':------=Black Ra il Rd/Proj ect Entranc-e---------------
Analyst: V Root-Ex+Others+Phase I
Project No.: OOlOOl-Redeemer by the Sea
Date: 11/6/00-PM Peak
East/West Street: project Entrance
North/South Street: Black Rail Road
Intersection Orientation: NS study period (hrs): 1.00
:-:--.-_-=.,..-_....,-_-=-___ Vehic le Volumes and Ad jus tmen ts_-_~--,...-----_--
Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 2 3
Volume
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
Percent Heavy Vehicles
L T R
34 10
35 10
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
Lanes
configuration
upstream Signal?
Minor Street: Approach
Movement
Volume
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Percent Grade (%)
Median Storage 1
Exists?
storage
Flared Approach:
RT Channelized?
Lanes
Configuration
1 0
TR
No
Westbound
7 8 9
L T R
11
11
2
o
2
No
LR
o
17
17
2
4 5 6
L T R
19 67
20 70
2
0 1
LT
No
Eastbound
10 11 12
L T R
o
~A-:p-:p""r""'o:-a:-c~h~------De~:y, Qu~~e Lengthwe:~~o~~~el of service=E-a-s-t-;b-o-u-n~d---------
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11
Lane Config
v (vph)
C(m) (vph)
vic
95% queue length
Control "Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
LT
20
1563
0.01
0.00
7.3
A
LR
28
943
0.03
0.00
8.9
A
8.9
A
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2
Bill E Darnell
Darnell & Associates
Phone:
E-Mail:
Fax:
12
_____________ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS ________________ __
Intersection: Black Rail Rd/Project Entrance
City/State:
Analyst: V Root-Ex+Others+Phase I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~ : '. .
, ;
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY __________________________ __
~I~n~t-e-r~s-e-c~t~kr·o-n--:--------~Black Rail Rd/project Entrance
Analyst: V Root-Buildout + Master Plan
Project No.: 001001-Redeemer by the Sea
Date: 11/7/00-AM Peak
East/West street: Project Entrance
North/South Street: Black Rail Road
Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 1.00
Vehicle Volumes and
Major Street: Approach Northbound
Movement 1 2
L T
Volume 66
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 69
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
Lanes
Configuration
Upstream Signal?
Minor Street: Approach
Movement
Volume
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Percent Grade (%)
Median Storage 1
Flared Approach: Exists?
RT Channelized?
Lanes
Configuration
Storage
7
L
16
16
2
1 0
TR
No
Westbound
8
T
2
No
0 0
LR
Adjustments
Southbound
3 4 5 6
R L T R
20 15 168
21 15 176
2
0 1
LT
No
Eastbound
9 10 11 12
R L T R
12
12
2
0
~ ____ ~ ___________ DelaYl Queue Length, and Level of service=-~~ __ ~ ________ __
Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11
Lane Config
v (vph)
C(m) (vph)
vic
95% queue length
Control 'Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
LT
15
1505
0.01
0.00
7.4
A
LR
28
796
0.04
0.00
9.7
A
9.7
A
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2
Bill E Darnell
Darnell & Associates
Phone:
E-Mai.l:
Fax:
12
_______________________ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS ____________________ __
Intersection: Black Rail Rd/Project Entrance
City/State:
Analyst: V Root-Buildout + Master Plan'
I
.1
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY __________________________ __
~I~n~t-e-r~s~e~c-,t~~'·o~n~:----------nBlack Rail Rd/Project Entrance
Analyst: V Root-Buildout + Master Plan
project No.: OOlOOl-Redeemer by the Sea
Date: 11/7/00-PM Peak
East/West Street: Project Entrance
North/South Street: Black Rail Road
Intersection orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 1.00
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Northbound
Movement 1 2 3
L T R
Volume 139 20
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 146 21
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Median Type Undivided
RT Channelized?
Lanes
Configuration
Upstream Signal?
Minor Street: Approach
Movement
Volume
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Percent Grade (%)
Median Storage 1
Flared Approach: Exists?
7
L
19
20
2
Storage
RT Channelized?
Lanes
Configuration
~~~~~ _________ Delay,
Approach NB
Movement 1
Lane Config
v (vph)
C(m) (vph)
vic
95% queue length
Control Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Queue
SB
4
LT
15
1411
0.01
0.00
7.6
A
1 0
TR
No
Westbound
8
T
2
No
o
LR
o
9
R
14
14
2
Length, and Level of
Westbound
7 8 9
LR
34
746
0.05
0.00
10.1
B
10.1
B
Southbound
4 5 6
L T R
15 125
15 131
2
0 1
LT
No
Eastbound
10 11 12
L T R
o
Service
=E-a-s~t~b-o-u-n-d~·-----------
10 11 12
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2
Bill E Darnell
Darnell & Associates
Phone:
E-Mail:
Fax:
_______________________ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS ____________________ __
Intersection: Black Rail Rd/Project Entrance
City/state:
Analyst: V Root-Buildout + Master Pla~J
H-7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
.1
I
I
1
I
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY __________________________ __
'::I:-n...,.t-e-r-s-e-c....,t,...~T"' o-n-: ------=Po in set t ia Ln / st II A II -P ro j. En t
Analyst: V Root-Buildout+Master Plan
Project No.: 001001-Redeemer by the Sea
Date: 11/6/00-AM Peak
East/West Street: Poinsettia Lane
North/South Street: Project Entrance
Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 1.00
Vehicle Volumes and
Major Street: Approach Eastbound
Movement 1 2
L T
Volume 512
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 538
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Median Type Raised curb
RT Channelized?
Lanes
Configuration
Upstream Signal?
Minor Street: Approach
Movement
Volume
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Percent Grade (%)
Median Storage
Flared Approach:
RT Channelized?
Lanes
configuration
1
Exists?
Storage
2 0
T TR
No
Northbound
7 8
L T
40
42
2
2
1 1
L R
Adjustments
Westbound
3 4 5 6
R L T R
43 25 736
45 26 774
2
0 2
LT T
No
Southbound
9 10 11 12
R L T R
21
22
2
0
No
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service ~A~p~p""r~o~a~c~h~------EB WE Northbound ~S-o-u~t~h~b-o-u-n-d~---~
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11
Lane config
v (vph)
C(m) (vph) vic .
95% queue length
Control Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
LT
26
987
0.03
0.00
8.7
A
L
42
365
0.12
0.37
16.1
C
14.1
B
R
22
704
0.03
0.00
10.3
B
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2
Bill E Darnell
Darnell & Associates
Phone:
E-Mail:
Fax:
12
_______________________ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS ____________________ __
Intersection:
City/State:
Analyst:
Poinsettia Ln/st "A"-proj .. Ent
V Root-Buildout+Master Plan
1j-6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY "=I-n-:-t-e-r-s-e-c""'t"""'l'-o-n-: ------=Poinset t ia Ln/ st "A" -Pro j. En7"t--------------
Analyst: V Root-Buildout+Master Plan
Project No.: OOlOOl-Redeemer by the Sea
Date: 11/6/00-PM Peak
East/West Street: Poinsettia Lane
North/South Street: Project Entrance
Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 1.00
Vehicle Volumes and
Major Street: Approach Eastbound
Movement 1 2
L T
Volume 927
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 975
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Median Type Raised curb
RT Channelized?
Lanes
Configuration
Upstream Signal?
Minor Street: Approach
Movement
Volume
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Percent Grade (%)
Median storage 1
Flared Approach: Exioto?
RT Channelized?
Lanes
Configuration
Storage
7
L
41
43
2
2 0
T TR
No
Northbound
1
L
8
T
2
1
R
Adjustments
3
R
47
49
9
R
24
25
2
No
4
L
25
26
2
10
L
Westbound
5
T
672
707
0 2
LT T
No
Southbound
11
T
o
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
6
R
12
R
Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10
Lane Config LT L R
v (vph) 26 43 25
C(m) (vph) 674 240 507
vic 0.04 0.18 0.05
95% queue length 0.00 0.71 0.00
Control Delay 10.6 23.3 12.5
LOS B C B
Approach Delay 19.3
Approach LOS C
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2
Bill E Darnell
Darnell & Associates
Phone:
E-Mail:
Fax:
11 12
____________________ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS ___________________ __
Intersection: Poinsettia Ln/St "A"-Proj. Ent
City/State:
Analyst: V Root-Buildout+Master Plan 4~fo