HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 71-02; LAKE SHORE GARDENS MOBILE; FIELD DENSITY TESTS; 1972-07-26• •
WOODWARD· GIZIENSKI & ASSOCIATES
CONSULTING SOIL AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS
An affiliate of Woodward -Clyde Consultants
3467 Kurtz Street
San Diego
California 92110
. (714) 224·2911
July '26, 1972
Project No. 72-102-42
Sequoia Pacific Realco
820 South Grand Avenue
Santa Ana, California 92705
LAKESHORE GARDENS
STREET SUBGRADE· COMPACTION TESTS
CARLSBAD, CALI FORNIA
a 7/-0 2-01
'.
Attached are the results of field density tests taken at the subject pro-,
ject at the request and under the direction of Mr. Russ Morrison, C'ity .
Inspector for the City of Carlsbad on the date indicated and at the loca-
tions given. Also attached are the results of laboratory tests performed
on sample of the material used for fill.
EHP/JLH/lm
Attachments
(6) Sequoia .Pacific Realco
(2) City of Carlsbad, Engr. Dept.
J\ Ii 1972
i..> .. Engifle\,,;. .. j.~~&1, t.. ""\,,,,-,. c.· .~ .. '
_OMPACTION TEST RESUL.
JOB NAME' LAKESHORE GARDENS -CARLSBAD DATE REPORTED July g6" 1972 ..
.JOB NUMBER 72:..102-42 (STREET TESTS)
DATES COVERED July 21, 1972 PAGE. 1 OF 1
MOISTURIt P'IELD LABORATORY REL.ATIVE
DATE TlEST RETEST LOCATION ELEVATION CONTltNT OENSITY DJi(NSITY COMPACTION
NUMBER OF OF'TEST ' % Dl'tYWT. PCP' PCP' ~. OF LAB. OENfil.
JULY 21 S.:.l AVENIDA. ENCINAS STA 2+00 SUB 6.4 121. 7 132.0 92.2
GRADE
S-2 STA 6+40 9.5 127.4 132.0 ,96.6
S-3 STA 11+20 9.·1 128.2 i32.0 97.4 '
W.OODWARD • GfZlENSKI & ASSOCIATES
CONSULT1NG SOIL AND fOUNDATlDN £NG1NEERS AND GEOLOGISTS
;;;:. ;;;; .... ./ ;;;;;;:J~==== .... :&iIJIiiB .. i , ' ~ ~{£CHANICAL ANALYSIS • • .. 4· 4-10 LIO 200 : : 3 100
DIRECT SHEAR TEST DATA 1
80 Dry Density. pef -C!:1 %
Initi~1 Water Content. % -<J) ~ 60
"-Final Water Content •. % -'. I-ffiqo Apparent Cohesion. psf -c..> a::. \.Ll
0 Q., 20 Apparent Friction Angle. -
· .
0 i 'i I I I I I I I
IIlO 1000 100 10 1.0 0.1 0.01 0.001 f\ AIR VOIDS CURVES GRAIN SIZE IN MI LLIMETERS
\-fV·ZERO
·ICOBBLESI G~ArEf I c I ~ANr ISII:.T 8. CLAY I ~ \ f ..
\ ~ 'V2.70 S.G. :
130 PLAST!CITY CHARACTERISTICS 1 . / f\ \IY2.60 S.G.
il i\ ~'vv2.50 S.G. '. Liquid Limit, .r. "':'
\\ 1\ Plastjcit~ Index. % -.
I\'l .\ Classification by' UnIfied Soi·)·
129 \ \ l\. Classi ficati.on System . , -. ./ 1\ ' \
1/ \ 1\ 1\ .. .... ,,\ \-.. u a.
I-\ 1\ f\ SWELL TEST DATA . .1 ::t: , \ \ (!)
110. WJ 1\ ..
3: \ 1\ ., . .
lnit iar Dry Density, pcf -
I-1\ -f\ \. rnitial, Water Content, .r" -.% =>
>-\ \ 1\ Load. psf -cr:. Q [\ .,
1\. Percent Swell .. -\\ I~ 100 \. f\ 'r\. .\ "
\: SAMPLE LOCAifoN \ \ i\.-, .. · ,
\ '\h 1 Tests 1 , 2 & 3
MAXIMUM DRY 1 \ ..
90
'. DENSITY. pet 132~O ~)...
OPTIMUM MOISTURE \..\. r\.. ..
8.0 .. 'KI\. . ,
CONTENT. %
r\." ~\..: . .. ,
.. . t\...~1 ::>.' 80 0
MOfSTURE CONTENT, %
10 20 3Ci · . 40
LABORATORY. COMPACTiON TEST
. FILL SUITASfLlTY TESTS
LABORATORY COMPACTIOM ..
TEST METHOD: 8SI!1-0 ] 55Z,..ZQ1 . LAKESHORE GARDENS .. WOODWARD -GIZI8-JSKI & ASSOCIATES
CONSULTING SOIL AND 'FOUNDATION ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS
. S~N DIEGO, CALI FORN IA
DR. BY: GS SCALE: ---PROJ. NO:72-102-42,
CK'D BY: aN == ""'"
DATE: 7/25172 pAGE 1 nf 1 J
\
PLOT
A
A+D
B
A B D E
C
C+F
A-F
A-F+G
'A-G+l
A-I
. . C1-/I·Z ;-~~--\
. SALKIN'NGINEERING cotPORATION JlAJ/~41
'104!$ W~ST COLl,.lNS AVENUE
ORANGE. CALIFORNIA 92667
(714) 633-7~61
-, .
CT 7'-D'2~ol
'i~ MAX-
~ A-ACRES tCA MIN. :E.-FEET V-FPS
10.6 10.07 26
17.6 16.72 26 110 9
17.5 11.38 24
44.7 34.34 26.2 530 11
6.5 4.55 24
16.5 11.55 33
61.2 45.89 33 240 9
84.6 61.10 33.4 1500 6.5
111.7 78.72 37.3 1450 6.5
134.0 94.33 45 800 2
-. . .
" . -.
-/1359
.
TF-MIN TC-MIN I-IN/HR. Q-CFS
26 1.6 16.1
0.2, 26.2 1.6 26.8
24 1.65 18.8
0.8 27.0 1.55 53.2
24 1.65 7.5
33 1.38 15.9
0.4 33 •. 4 1.36 62.4
3.8 37 .• 3 1.28 78.2
3.7 41.0 1.22 96.0
6.7 51.7 1.04 98.1
..
-
-
~~e,~
GEK /!:Ctf-;..i~. 947$
D~TE 5-25 19 71
~ S/Z3/TZ
, . Sheet. 2 of 4
-.-----~ -----.,.
.
", :PIPE
3-4
4-:-5
5-8
. 8"';9
.9-10-
10"';11
2-4
1-2
5-7
6-7
, ~~;;:~
.
-411 -SALKIN~NGINEERING CORPORATION
1045 WEST COLLINS AVENUE
ORANGE. CALIFORNIA 92667
(714) 633-7261
CONCRETE PIPE n =
SLOPE LENGTH INLET E1
0.012
OUTLETEJ OttA¥ETER
1~359
. .. .-
A 'VV-
Q-CFS A/A FT. (SOFFIT) (SOFFIT) INCHES SF .; 'FBS
\ 18.8 .0040 97 47.25 46.86 27.03 (30 II ) 4.91 3.83
5~~2 .00237 270 47.86 47.22 42.02 (42") 9.62 5.S3
62.4 .0016 I 1500 47.72 45.30 48.02 (48" ) 12.57 4.96 ,
78_2 .0026 1490 45.30 41.43 47.90 (48 11 ) 12.57 6.22
96.0 .0038 260 41.43 40.44 47.98 (48 11 ) 12.57 7.64
98.1 .0040 1995 40.44 22.00 47 .• 99 (48" ) 12.57 7 •. 80
26.8 ,.0200 530 58.46 47.8Q 21.74 (24" ) 3.14 8.54
16.1 .0240 110 61.10 58.46 17.40 (18") 1.17 9.10
15.9 .0200 '240 50.0~ 45.22 17.95 (18 11 ) . 1..77 8.98
7.5 .0200 175 53.52 50.02 12.80 (18" ) 1.17 -4.24
Ii" ,. -,1," ••
:' !
.. {~~~,~
.EC:~ NO. Q47S
DATE' 5-25 19.ll
Rev. ~/'Z8/7Z
Qkn..,,4-';I ~4' "
, ' ~,
" \ :,' , , '0 SALKI~NGINEE~RIN:G CdliPOR.ATlON
, 1045 WEST COLLINS AVENU'E
O'RANGE. CALIFORN'JA 92667
('714) 633-7261
DRAINAGE STUDY
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
1 -Design and procedures Manual, San Diego county Flood Control
District (May, 1969)
2 -Handbook of Hydraulics, H.W. King, 19G3
A-ACRES C CA L-FEET AH-FEET Tt. '-MIN
10.6 0.95 10.07 1000 2.4 26
17.5 0.65 11.38 900 2.2 25\
\
6.5 0.70 4.55 :8,00 1.9 24
7.0 0.95 6.65 600 1.4 21
9.6 0.65 '6.24 600 1.4 2.1
!
'/ 10.0 0.70 7.00 1700 4.1 , 33 '"
23.4 0.65 15.21 1500 3.6 32
22.3 0.70 15.61 2900 7.0 45
27.1 0.65 17.62 1600 4.3 3'5
.
1,1359
: .
,' .
:
"
,
"
j~ ••
SALKIN'NGINEERING COtpORATION
1045 WEST COLLINS AVENUE
ORANGE. CALIFORNIA 92667
(714)633-7261
LOCATION
SOFFIT
l; 61.10
2 58.46
3 47.25
.4 46.86
47.86
5 47.72
47.22,
45.22
6 53 .. 52
7 50.02
8 45.30
9 41.38
,10 40.45
-1,1 22.00,
-
ELEVAT,ION
INVERT
59·.60
56.46
44.75
44.36
43.72
52.02
48.52
41.30
37.38
36,.45
18.00
J '. I" ~i' !r~: ~M "
.,
"
~. 1359
SURFACE
65.0
65.0
52.0
49.0
(49.2)
48.5
(50.0)
"
55.0
55.0
50.6
52.7
50.5
17.0
(24.3) :
.
-~ ,
. ,'-----' 1-;::;' .,,0, GE~-4~~( ~"~-f~_~
, .et:::'<!! IJp .::t47.$"
DATE 5-25 19 71
Rev. ~/e3/7e
Sheet 4 of4
• I
'.'
•
•
" .,'
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Cf 1/-o2-o (
PROJECT GRADING REPORT
Lake Shore Gardens M~bil Home Park
Phase II, 7201 Avenida Encinas
Carlsbad, California
for _
Sequoia Pacific
July,ll, 1974
by
Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc •
Irvin!?, California
,./
,
, 1
I ,.
c
"
,
i
, 1
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERiNG, INC.
17875 SKY PARK NORTH (P.O. BOX OQ) IRVINE, CA. 92664
TELEPHONE: (714) 557-9450
Sequoia Pacific
1000 S. Grand Ave.
. Santa Ana, CA. 92705
Af'tention: Mr. Bob Wells
Project Superintendent
• .....j:; .... \' -. -
Project Grading Report; Lake Shore Gardens
Mobil Home Park, Phase J I, 7201 Avenida
Encinas, Carlsbad, California.
Reference: Foundation Soils Investigation for the subject
Gentlemen:
project, by Kenneth G. Osborns & Associates,
" dated May 24, 1971, (Job No. 71-393-1).
L.A. COUNTY OFFICE
1402 W. 240th Street
Harbor City, Ca. 90710
(213) 325-7272 or 775-6771
VENTURA COUNTY OFFICE
, Post Office.Box 75
Thousand Oaks, Ca. 91360
(213) 889-.9919
(805) 495-6513
July 11, 1974
Work Order'100123
,Your Job No. 410
, This report presents soil engineering data and test results pertaining to the placement of
compacted earth fill on the subject property. Compaction test result·s are 'presented in
Table I, and the approximate locations of tests are shown on the accompanying grading
plan (2 sheets), prepared by Joseph E. Bonadiman and Associates, Engineers-Planners.
Fills, cuts and processing of original ground under the purview of this report has been
completed under our inspection and are, to the best of our knowledge, in compliance
with grading criteria for the City of Carlsbad, California.
The completed work has been reviewed and is considered suitable for the intended use
as a Mobil Home Park. Graded slopes are considered grossly andsurficially stable and
will remain so under normal conditions.
i'
" f
•
•
..
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
r,
July 11, 1974,
Work Order 100123 Page 2
LaboratolY Standard: ASTM:D 1557-70T
Modified to three (3) compacted layers '
Optimum Moisture
Soil Type (%)
Mc.x. Dry Density
(lbs./cu .ft.)
A -Brown Si Ity Sand 11.0
10.0
9.0
125.0
121.0
126.0
B -' Light Brown Silty Sand
D -Light Brown Sand
1. Prior to placement of compacted fill, all heavy vegetation and trees were removed
2.
3.
4.
from the site.
Within areas to receive fill, the exposed sulface was watered as necessary I processed,
'and compacted in-place to a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory standard.
Fill material consisting of the above soil types was placed in thin nfts~ watered as
necessary and compacted in-place to a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory
standard. Compaction was attained by self-propelled and tractor-drawr:' sheepsfoot
'rollers. Each fill lift was treated in a like manner.
The upper six (6) ~ inches of cut pads were watered as necessary, processed and
compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory standard.
Street subgrade was watered, as necessary, and compacted to a minimum of 95
percent of the laboratory standard.
Compaction tests, were taken in every one (1) to two (2) feet (vertically) of fill
placed. The maximum vertical depth of fill placed, per this report, is on the
order of seven (7) feet, on Loi" 365.
PACIFIC SOILS ENGiNEERING, INC.
.' ,-
.",
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
July 11, 1974·
Work Order 100123 Poge.3
5. Fill slopes were over-built during mass grading and upon completion, trimmed back to
the compacted core.
6. A bearing capacity of 1,500 lbs./sq.ft., at an embedment depth of 12-inches, may
be assigned for the subject compacted fill and firm natural ground.
7. The onsite soi Is are considered non-expansive in nature.
8. Upon completion of utility line and storm drain backfill, and retaining wall backfiU,
testing of backfill and reporting of same will be done 0
9. Upon completion of utility work in streets, verificati-on of the proposed pavement
'section will be accomplished. Fine grading and compaction of-street subgrades should
be inspected and tested by the soil engineer.
Respectfully submitted,
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
By:
Dist: (8) Addressee
Reviewed by:
.f.l~~ ~. ETTER, R.C.E .15251
General Manager
• AJJ:RPK/scb
•
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINElEP.ING, INC.
j
t:
; ..
~'
'" ./
. i· r
. -.:. ... , ..... _. ... ~: : ...... -. '. • .. h • ~ •• ___ L" "'.04.':'.-.ko':'::"_,,~w'_"""''''-_'''' _
• • e
': >
,
July 11, 1974
•• Work Order 100123 ! ./
l: f .
TABLE
' i r
• ~Date of Test Lot Elevation . Moisture Ory Density Relative Soil
Test No. No. (feet) .(%) (Ibs/cu. ft.) Comp.% Type
5/28/74 101 * 241 6] .0 10.5 117.0 93.6 SC A
• 102 * 233 76.0 12.4 119.3 95.5 SC A
5/29/74 103 242 65.0 9.3 116.0 96.0 SC B
104 241 65.0 9.9 113.8 94.0 SC B
105 238 66.0 1O~5 114.0 94.2 SC B
106 236 71.0 9.9 ' 115.7 95.7 SC B p
• 107 231 78.0 8.5 118.0, 97.5 B
108 235 73.0 10.5 115.0 95.0 B
109 237 67.0 11.1 114.5 94.7 B
110 240 62..0 9.9 117.0 93.6 B
111 239 64.0 8.5 119.0 98.3 B
112 240 65.0 11.7 114.0 94.2 B • 5/31/74 113 228 84.0 6.4 113.0 93.5 SC B
114 228 86.0 10.5 123.3 98.0 SC 0
115 229 83.0 10.5 110.8 91.5 SC B .. 116 230 81.0 11.7 115.0 95.0 SC B
117 231 80.0 9.5 112.3 93.0 SC B • 118 232 77.0 10.5 ],]8.0 97.5 ~C B
119 234 74.0 8.5 120.5 95.5 SC D
120 236 73.0 9.1 117.0 92.9 SC D
121 237 70.0 7.9 122.0 96.7 D
122 238 69.0 10.5 119.0 94.5 D
• 123 238 72.2 11 • 1 119.5 95.0 D
124 239 67.0 9.9 118.2 94.0 D
6/1/74 125 240 68.0 7.5 116.0 92.0 SC D
126 241 67.0 9.1 120.0 95.1 SC D
127 * 284 75.0 10.5 118.3 94.0 SC D
• 128 * 278 64.0 9.9 117.2 93.0 SC D
129 . 286 77.0 11.1 122.1 97.0 SC 0
130 286 80.0 9.3 118.0 93.8 SC D
131 285 76.0 9.9 117.2 93.1 SC 0
132 285 78.0 11 .1 117.0 92.9 SC D
• 133 280 68.0 9.9 119.8 95.0 SC D
134 280 70.0 8.7 109.0 90.0 SC B
135 276 62.0 9~3 115.5 95.5 SC B
136 276 65.0 10.5 111 .8 92.3 SC B
137 277. 63.0 7.5 110.8 91.5 B
138 277 66.0 10.5 113.0 93.5 B • 139 279 66.0 8.1 111.2 92.0 B
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
. ;'. . .:'" ..• J. .......... .~: • :;.~ ... :..~_~ .......... ~i .... _ ............ ,;..,:. __ ..... .,....4~
• e e .' ) i,
I
i'
July 11, .1974 t
• Work Order 100123 i
I
i
6/1/74 140 279 69.0 11 • 1 110.3 91.2 B I· ~"
• 141 278 67.0 9.9 ... 112.3 93.0 B ,
142 281 71.0 '9.3 115.0 95.0 B ,
f
143 281 73.0 10.5 111.8 92.3 .~ ,.
144 283 74.0 12.4 114.0 94.2 B
145 * 293 71.0 9.9 110.0 91.0 B·
• 146 290 77.0 13.0 116.0 96.0 B
.' 147 295 69.0 9.3 115.5 95.5 B
148 ' 299 62.0 10.5 111.0 91.7 B .
. 6/3/74 149 289 77.0 8.1 120.0 95.4 SC D .' ;,
150 289 80.0 10.5 115.0 91.3 SC. D i ! r
151 288 77.0 909 117.1 93.0 SC D • 152 288 79.0 9.3 116.5 92.5 SC D· '''~ ~ ;
153 287 77.0 8.7 109.5 90.5 SC B' ' I
154 287 80.0 11.1 111.0 91.7 SC B ~I 1
155 291 75.0 9.9 116.0 92.2 SC D ,
156 291 78.0 8.7 115.0 91.3 SC D .
'! • 157 292 74.0 10.5 110.0 91.0 SC B
158 292 . 77.0 11.1 109.0 90.0 SC B
159 294 71.0 9.3 114.0 94.3 SC B
160 294 73.9 9.9 113.0 93.4 SC B
161 296 66.0 8.5 117.5 93.3 D
• 162 296 69.0 11.1 116.2 92.3 D
163 297 64.0 9.3 120.0 95.2 D L
I
164 297 67.0 10.5 119.0 94.5 D ,
165 298 63.0 10.5 122.3 97.2 ,0 i
166 298 66.0 9.9 118.0 93.7 D
• 167 * 320 66.0 8.1 120.5 95.5 D,
168 * 327 68.0 9.3 119.5 9408 D
169 . 334 64 .. 0 11.7 123.0 97.6 D " ,
170 338 64.0 ·11.1 . 117.0 93.0 D
171 330 69.0 9.9 116.3 92.5 D
• 172 335 62.0 9.3 120.0 95.2 D
6/4/74 173 222 83.0 8.7 109.0 9002 SC B
174 223 83.5 9.9 115. 1 95.3 SC B
175 224 84.0 9.3 113.5 94.0 SC B
176 225 84.5 10.5 123.8 98.0 SC D
• 177 226 85.0 8.1 120.0 95.3 SC D
178 227 84.0 9.3 116.0 92.1 SC D
179 328 71.0 8.7 117.4 93.4 SC D
180 329 70.0 11. 'I 1'15.5 91.6 SC D.
181 331 68.0 12.4 1'12.0 92.6 SC B
182 332 66.0 10.5 114.2 94.5 SC B • 183 333 65.0 9.9 113.0 93.4 SC B
c:JACIFIC SOILS ENGINEEr.:IU\lG, INC.
~-' .', , ..... :'" -\.' -0. • -............ ,_ •• .., ..... _.~ ..... 1 .. -
• e e
i"
"
• July 11,1974
Work Order 100123
(' .
6/4/74 184 336 63.0 8.7 118.0 97.5 SC B .,' 185 326 66.0 10.5 118.0 93.5 D
186 325 64.0 8.7 121.5 96.5, D
187 324 64.0 9.9 117.0 93.0 ' D
188 323 62.0 8.1 115.2 91.5 D
189 322 63.0 9.3 119.3 94.6 D
• 190 321 64.0 11. ] 120.0 95.3 D
191 337 64.5 12.4 110.0 91.,0 B
192 326 67.0 9.9 '113.0 93.5 B
193 328 73.0 10.5 112.2 93.0 ' B
194 329 72.5 8.7 114.5 90.8 D
195 ,330 72.0 11 .1 116.0 92.0 D i • ,
196 331 71.0 9.9 115.4 91.7 D
6/5/74 197* 352 64.0 9.3 114.9 94.8 SC B
198 ' 355 64.0 8.7 111.5 92.1 SC B
199 356 65.0 11 .1 117.0 96.7 SC B
" 200* 358 68.0 10.5 120.0 95.2 SC D • 201 359 70.0 9.9 111'.0 91.7 SC B
202 360 72.0 11..1 '109.3 90.5 'sc B
203 361 72.5 10.5 113.0 93.3 SC B
204 321 66.0 12.4 '114.2 94.5 SC B
205 322 65.0 8.1 118.0 93.8 SC D • 206 323 65.5 9.3 115.0 91.2 SC D
207 ' 332 69.0 9.9 117.2 93.2 SC D
208 333 67.0 10.5 116.1 92.0 SC D
209 362 72.5 10.5 114.0 90.5 D
210 363 73.5 12.4 117.0 92.8 0 • 211 364 73.0 8.7 120.4 95.5 D
212 357 67.0 9.3 119.0 , 94.5 D
213 353 ,63.5 9.9 118.5 94.0 D
214 354 62.0 10.5 122.3 97.1 D
215 354 65.0 8.f 125,,0 99.3 D
• 216 302 65.0 13.0, 115.5 91.5 D
217 301 64.0 11.1 ,116.6 92.5. D
218 300 63.0 12.4 118.0 93.7 D
219 275 63.0 9.3 119.4 94.8 D
220 274 64.0 8.7 121.0 96.0 D
• 6/6/74 221 243 65.5 11.1 109.3 90.0 SC B
222 273 65.0 8.1 115.0 95.0 SC B
223 * 253 51.5 10.5 113.0 93.5 SC B
224 * 259 48.5 12.4 110.5 9'1.4 SC B
,225 258 47.4 8.7 112.5 93.0 SC B
•
'PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERII\IG, INC.
-.. ' ..... •• ': ~< ~:,,:,.~, • .:..:;,;...:...~ "'_ .. __ .... _~, •• _ .... ':'..r
•
July II, 1974 • Work Order 100123
" ., J,
6/10/74 268 222 85.3 8.7 113 .. 0 93.4 SC B
!:
• 269 223 85.2 9.9 111.5 92.1 SC B
270 224 86.2 11.1 115.0 95.0 SC B
271 225 86.0 10.5 112.8 93.2 SC B ( ,
272 226 86.6 11.7 110.0 91.0 SC B !
273 227 84.5 8.1 117.0 96~7 SC B ;1
• 274 228 88.6 9.3 114.2 94.5 $C B
275 229 86.0 11.1 116.5 96.4 SC B
276 230 84.9 12.4 109.5 90~5 SC B
277 231 82.8 9.9 115.5 95.5 SC B ;: ,
278 232 80.5 8.1 113.6 93.8 SC B :-:
'"' 279 233 79.4 11.7 111.0 91.7 SC B •• 6/11/74 280 368 77.2 8.1 114.5 94.6 SC B '. , ,.
281 367 78.8 9.9 125.5 99.5 ' SC D ;t
282 366 81.5 10.5 120.8 95.8 SC D J
·283 365 82.6 11 01 . 125.0 99.2 SC D " " ,
284 364 75.9 8.7 123.2 98.0 SC D ,
• 285 363 75.3 11 07 120.1 95.5 D 1 ~ j
286 291 81.9 8.1 124.0 98.4 D
287 290 82.7 12.4 120.0 92.4 D "
288 289 85.1 13.6 116.8 96.5 B I
289 288 86.0 9.3 112.5 93.0 B :
• 290 287 85.5 11.1 122.0 96.8 D ':
291 286 81.5 8.7 119.0 ,94.4 D .j ; ~ )
6/12/74 292 285 80.3 9.3 112.8 . 93.0 SC ,B
293 284 78.7 12.4 116.0 95.0 SC B
294 283 75.0 9.9 118.9 94.2 SC D .'
• 295 283 77.0 . . 8.7 120.0 95 0 3 SC D ,
296 281 75.8 10.5 122.0 96.9 SC D
297 280 74.5 8.1 119.5 95.0 SC D
298 279 72.7 11.1 , 123.1 97.9 SC D
299 278 7108 8.7 117.6 93.3 . SC D
• 300 277 70.3 7.5 116.7 96.2 SC B
301 276 68.3 11.7 115.8 95 0 6 SC B
302 292 78.1 10.5 ' 118.0 97.5 SC B ' .
303 293 74.8 9.3 119.2 98.6 SC B
6/13/74 304 295 72.0 8.7 113.0 93.4 SC B
• 305 296 71.0 10.5 115.2 95.4 SC B
306 297 69.1 9.3 112.0 92.6 SC B
307 298 68.3 9,,9 116.5 96.3 SC B
308 299 66.3 10.5 110.5 91.4 SC B·
309 234 77 .. 0 11.7 118,,0 97.5 SC B
•
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
•
".
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
July 11, 1974
Work Order 100123
6/13/74 310
311
312
313
314
315
6/14/74 316
317
318
319
320
, 321
322
323
324
325
326
327
6/15/74 328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
,339
6/17/74 340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
235 76.8 9.3 ' 117.3
236 75,,0 8.1 120.0
237 74.1 7.5 122.2
239 71.5 12.4 113.5
240 69.9 11.1 111.6
241 68.5 9.9 116.8
242 67.2 9.3 117.2
324 66.9 8.1 110.0
325 69.5 10.5 113.3
326 69.6 9.3 120.5
327 71.4 8.7 118.3
328 75.6 10.5 121.0
329 74.6 9.9 119.5
330 73.8 8.1 117.6
331 73.0 7.5 122.0
332 71.0 11.1 115.2
333 69.3 10.5 113.0
334 67.7 12.4 ' 116.3
356 68.3 8.7 '115.5
357 70.1 10.5 118.0
358 71.7 9.3 111.6
359 73.2 8.1 113.5
360 74.3 9.9 117.0
361 74.0 11.1 111.1
362 74.9 11.1 110.0
369 75.5 9.3 117.5
370 73.5 8.7 118.4
371 72.0 11.7 ' 109.3
372 69.5 10.5 115.0
373 69.0 8.1 114.0
220 82.8 8.1 120.2
219 81.0 9.9 117.0
215 75.5 10.5 119.6
211 70.0 9.3 121.0
210 68.0 12.4 116.5
209 67.0 8.1 117.5
208 66.0 7.5 110.8
372 67.0 9.3 119.0
375 66.0 8.7 116.3
376 64.0 9.9 115.0
355 67.0 10.5 113.5
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINfEERING, INC.
97.0 SC B
95.2 SC D
97.2 SC D
93.9 SC B
92.2 SC B
96.5 SC B
97.0 SC B
91.0 SC B
93.8 SC B
95.7 SC D
94,,0 SC D
96.0 SC D
94.8 D
94.1 D
96.7 D i'
95.4 B
93.3 B
96.2 B
95.5 SC B
97.5 SC B
92 .. 2 SC B
93.9 SC B
96.8 SC B
92.0 SC B
91.0 SC B
97.1 SC B
98.0 SC B
90.5, SC B
95.0 SC B
94.1 SC B
95.6 SC D
93.0 SC D
95.,0 SC D
96.0 SC P
92.5 SC D
93.3 SC D
91.5 SC B
98.5 SC B
96.3 SC B
95.0 SC B
93.9 SC ' B
"
.'. .:. i > •• ' ..... ~. ____ .... ~..:.:........i-n;...,.. • .: .. "-,.,..: ...
July 11, 1974 l' ~
• 'Work Order 100123
"
6/18/74 351 205 62.5 8'.7 '112.8 93.2 SC B I,
352 206 63.0 11. 1 122.0 96.8 SC D " • 353 207 64.0 9.9 123.7 98.0 sC D <11
354 377 63.0 9.3 121.2 ,96.4 SC D
355 354 66.7 10.5 116.0 92.0 SC D'
356 353 65.5 8.1 118.5 94.0 SC D
357 352 65.6 8.1 110.3 91.2 '8 ' • 358 335 66.5 11.7 116.0 96.0 B
359 336 66.7 10.5 113.4 93.8 B
360 337 67.5 9.9 118.0 93.7 D
361 338 66.1 8.7 121.0 96.1 D
362 323 66.4 11.1 117.8 93.5 ' D
• 6/19/74 363 322 67.8 10.5 109.8 90.6 SC B
364 321 68.1 8.7 ' 12.4.0 98.4 SC D ,
365 320 66.5 11.1 116.8 96.5 SC B r
366 300 66.9 9.3 116.7 96.4 SC B ,
367 301 67.5 10.5 123.0 ,97.6 SC D .' 368 302 68.0 8.1 118.8 94.1 SC D
369 275 68.0 7.5 120.0 95.2 SC D
6/20/74 370 274 66.6 9.9 117.0 93.0 SC D
371 378 62.5 12.4 122.0 97.0 SC D
372 202 60.8 11.1 116.5' 92.5 SC D
373 380 61.0 8.7 118.0 93,.8 SC D ;
• ;
374 348 58.5 9.3 122.5 97.3· SC D !
375 344 57.0 10.5 117.8 97.4 SC B
376 314 55.5 10.5 114.2 94.5 SC B
377 317 61.0 8.1 119.0 98.5 SC B
, 378 304 64.5 11.1 113.6 93.9 sC B • 379 307 60.0 9.9 116.0 96.0 ' SC B
6/21/74 380 273 66.0 9.9 118.1 97.2 SC B
381 243 66.6 11 .1 115.0 95.0 SC B
382 246 64.0 8.7 116.5 96.2 SC B
383 249 58.5 8.1 120.0 99.0 SC B
• 384 268 59.0 10.5 113.5 93.9 SC B
385 251 56.0 9.9 117.0 96.7 SC B
6/22/74, 386 5** 71.0 11.1 115.5 95.5 SC B
387 5** 74.0 12.4 112.5 93.0 SC B
388 210*** Subgrade 9.3 119.0 98.3 SC' B
• 389 370*** Subgrade 7.5 115.0 95.0 SC B
390 284*** Subgrade 9.9 115.3 95.2 SC B
391 239*** Subgrade 9.3 115.0 95.0 SC B
• PACIFIC scm .. s ENGlr\.!EE!=UNG, INC.
............. -... .. . .... .;;'
•
July 11, 1974
Work Order 100123
,. • ''-~.
'. t
,
6/24/74 392 227*** Subgrade 8.7 122.0 97.0 SC D , :.
393 364*** Subgrade 11.1 123.0 97.5 D L :. ,
394 329*** Subgrade 8.1 124.0 98.3 D.
395 357*** Subgrade 9.9 122.5 97.2 D ,.
396 324*** Subgrade 10.5 116.8 96.5 B
6/25/74 397 227*** Subgrade 8.1 116.0 95.8 B '
398 . 221*** Subgrade 11. 1 118.2 97.9 B • 6/26/74 399 216*** Subgrade 9.9 117.3 97.0 B
400 213*** Subgrade 10.5 119.0 98.3 B i. ,
401 208*** Subgrade 9.3 117.8 97.3 B f'
6/28/74 402 4** 72.0 8.1 112.5 93.'0 SC B, ,. ,
403 4** 70.0 10.5 114.0 94.3 SC B • t, • 404 4** 68.0 9.1 109.5 9005 SC B 1
405 3 63.0 11.7 '115.0 95.2 SC B f
i
406 3 64.0 8.7 110.0 91.0 SC 'B "
407 3 66.0 10.5 111 .5 92.1 SC B
6/29/74 408 265 54.6 10.5 117.0 ,9607 SC B
• 409 264 51.5 12.4 116.1 96.1 SC B
410 264 53.0 9.3 119.0 98.4 SC B
411 263 52.5 11. 1 113.6 93.8 SC B
412 261 51.8 9.9 115.5 95.5 SC B
413 260 51.5 10.5 110.8 91.5 SC B
'. 6/30/74 414 259 50.6 9.9 116.0 96.0 SC B
415 258 50.2 11.1 122.0 96-.8· SC D
416 256 50.0 8.1 117.0 96.6 SC B
417 255 50.5 9.3 115.2 95.4 SC B
418 254 51.5 10.5 118.0 97.5 SC B
419 253 53.3 9.3 112.5 93.0 SC B • 420 252 54.4 11.7 111.0 91.8 SC B
7/5/74 421 245*** Subgrade 9.3 119.5 98.7 SC B
422 267*** Subgrade 10.5 114.6 95,.0 SC B
423 256*** Subgrade 7.5 119.0 98.3 SC ' B
424 261*** Subgrade 8.1 115.0 95.3 SC B • 425 316*** Subgrade 11.1 118.0 97.6 SC B
426 347*** Subgrade 9.9 1-19.0 98.3 SC B
* Test in II natura I ground" • ** Test i'n "Iake areal!
'i~** Test in IIstreet area ll
sC-Sand Cone test I remainder by drive tube
• PACIFIC SOII-S ENGINEERING, INC.
~ l' .' " \ , , .. , • ,
" ;
; .,
\
:. {
•
\ •
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
,CONCRETE COMPRESSION TESTS AND
BACKFILL COMPACTION TESTS FOR
Cast-In-Place Storm Drain
from Avenida Encinas, Southerly to Barranca
Lake Shore Garden Mobil Home Park, Phase"
7201 Avenida Encinas
in'the City of Carl,sbad, California
.. -
for
Sequoia Pacific
September 19, 1974
'by
Pacific Soils Engineering
Irvine, California
"
,', '>
\'
~
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
,e
•
•
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING. INC.
17921 SKY PARK CIRCLE (SUITE G) IRVINE, CALIF. 92707
TELEPHONE: (714) 557-9450
,Sequoia Pacifi c
1000 S. Grand Ave.
Santa Ana, CA. 92705
Attention: Mr 0 Bob Wells
Project Superintendent
•
Subject: Concrete Compressi on Tests and Backfi II Compacti on
Tests for Cast-In-Place Storm Drain from Avenida
Encinas, Southerly to Barrancai Lake Shore Garden
Mobil Home Park, Phase If, 7201 Avenida Encinas,
in the City of Carlsbad, California. "
Gentlemen:
L.A. COUNTY OFFICE
1402 W. 240th 'Street
Harboi' CltY"Ca. ,90710
(21'3) 325-7272 or 77.5-6771
VENTURA COUNTY 9FFICE
Post Office Box 75
Thousand Oaks, Ca. 91360
(213) 889-9919
(805) 495-6513
September 1 9, 1 974
Work Order 100123 ,
Your Job No. 410
This report presents soil engineering data and test results pertaining to the placement of
compacted earth backfill above the subject storm drain pipe. Test results and approximate
locations are presented in the attached Table I.
Laboratory Standard: ASTM:D 1557-70T
Modified .to three (3) compacted layers'
Optimum Moisture Iv\Jx. Dry Density
Soil Type (%) (lbs~/cu .ft.)
C-1 -Clayey Sand 9.0 126.0
D-l -Sand 10.0 '120.0
E-1 -Clayey Sand 14.0 118.0
1. On-site materials (above soil types) were utilized for backfill over the storm drain.
Compaction was attained by a vibrating sheepsfoot roller. The backfill was com-
pacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory standard •
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
September 19, 1974
Work Order 100123
•
Page 2
2. Backfilling and compacting operations were initiated Cit such time that €oncrete com-
.pression tests indicated a compressive strength of 2500 Ibs./sq .in.
3. Results of concref'e compression tests are presented on the attached Plates A-l through
A-13~ The design strength of 3000 Ibs./sq .ino at 28-days was exceeded for all cylinder
sets.
. 4. Backfills and concrete strength results under the purview of thi's report have been com-
pleted, and are, to the best of our knowledge, in compliance with the governing
agency(s) •
Completed work has been reviewed and is considered suit;:rble for the intended use.
This report is subject to review by the controlli~g authorities for the subject project.
. Respectfully submitted,
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Reviewed by:
By:
ALAN J. 1UJ<'.o.JI" ...
Dist: (6) Addressee
AJJ:RPK/scb
REX P. KETTER,R.C.E. 15251
General Manager
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
• ••
September 19 l 1 974
Work Order 100123
• ~1 ,
.~ / 1
TABLE ,j . 8
; j
~ " Date of Test Test Location Depth Moisture Dry Density Relati'le Soil ! !J • <
. Test No. (Station Noo) (feet) (% ) (I bs/ cu 0 ft .) Compo% Type ~ :1
7/23/74 101-SD 20+50 2.0 9.3 119.5 95.0 C-1 SC
102-SD 23+50 3.0 14.3 116.2 97.0 D-1 SC • 103-SD 25+90 2.0 14.3 117.1 97.5 D-1 . SC <
104-SD 27+80 200 9.9 116.0 96 05 D-l SC ~ ., .;
7/31/74 105-SD 22+35 '2.5 10 08 113.8 90 05 C-l J 106-SD 21+15 0 .. 5 508 117.0 93.0 C-l £
107-SD 22+90 205 90 3 110.8 92.5 D-l {
i
108-SD 23+95 2.5 1000 109.2 91~0 D-l .\ • I
8/1/74 109-SD 21+40 3.0 _ . 11.7 10803 90 ... 0 D-l ; ) ... 1 110-SD 21+80 1.5 11.1 114.3· 91.0 C-l J
I{ 8/15/74 111-SD 16+95 2.0 1101 108.5 92,,0 E-l SC • 112-SD 10+95 4.0 12.4 .111.5 940 5 E-l SC
113-SD 8+00 6 .. 0 10 0 5 109 .. 8 93.0 E-l sC • 114-SD 2+70 8.0 12.4 115.0 97.5 E-l SC 1 ... Ii
iJ
Note: ~ t' --~j '1 '\ • Depth below finished grade in feet. '1 4 ~ ~
SC -"sand cone" method, remainder by drive tube. .J .1 'J If
'J .1
• ~ .J. ,~ .,
~ .~ Ii
•
•
• PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING. INC.
•
•
•
•
PAce Ie SOl L SEN G , NEE R I N G., N C •
CONCRETE TEST
-Job No. 100123 Lab No.: Date: 7/1/74
------------~------------------------
Proiect Address: Poinsettia Lane and San Di e~~o:.-F:..;.r..:..ee.:..w;.;..a;;J.y~,_C.;;;.a;:;.:;r~ls;;;;.ba~d;;:...-___________ _
Cljent: ______ Se_q~u..:..o·~'a_P_=a.:..:c..:..:jf..:..ic_=__ ________________ _:_ ___ _
General Contractor: Bratcher Construction
Concrete Contractor: Nelson Construction Concrete Suppl ier: _P_r __ e_-M_ix _______ _
Sample Location: __ A_v_e_ni_d_a_E_n_ci_n_as_l_a_t_el_·a_' ___________________ ~
(slab, footing, beams, etc.)
Yards P.laced: ___ 6c4_y~a_r_ds_(.;,..1_4_0_fe_e_t):.--___________________ _
'Date Ca~t: ____ 7..;..../...:.I;7_4 ________ Time:(A-l)12:45;{A-2)ll:20;(A-3)1:45;(A-4)3:15
• "Cast by: _____ M_e_I_Th_o_m-:.p_so_n _______ Certificate ~o.: ________ _
'Design St~ength @ 28 days: 3,000 psi Slump (inches): 1-3/4";2-1/2";1-7/8/1;3-1/2/1;2";
_' 1-3/411;2-1/211; 1-7/8 11;3-1/411;2"
Mix: 6 sacks, Type /lA ", 3/4" max aggregate • Remar~: ________________________________ ~'~ _________________ ~
.' Date Crushed Age Cylinder No. UI timate Load Area PS I
-
July 5 4 A-1 42,900 28.25 1520
• , July 8 7 A-2 60,400 28.,25 2140
July 10 9 A-3 66,600 28.25 2360
July 29 28 A-4 89,100 28.25 3150 •
• Distr.
• Plate A-I'
CT 6-72 .J
, "
'" '. ' . ~ -~' •• ---,.-... _. -.-_~_-...-_____ --:~ __ , __ ~ _________ ,. _______ .. _~~ J
i
I
I
i
1 I l j
!
i ~
1
•
•
f
PAcelC SOILS ENGI NEERI NG.JNC •
CONCRETE TEST
Job No. 100123 Lab No.: Date: 7/2/74
------------~-------------------------. .
Pro i ect Address ~ __ P:..:o::i.:.::ns=e.::tt..:.:i a::...::La:.:n,::e:...,:o:.:.n.:.:d:....:Sa:.:.:,:n-=D:..:i..:el:!g,:.o .:..F.:..,:re:.:e:..:,:w..:;a,-Y!.,., ...;C:;:a.:,.:rl,::sb:.:a;;,;d __ ...;,..... _______ _
Client: \ Sequoia Pacific
.• General Contractor:,--=.Br:.:a:.:.tc:.:.h.:..:e.:..r...:C...:o.:...;.ns.:.:.t...:ru...:c..:..:ti~o.:.:.n _____________________ _
Concrete Contractor: Nelson Construction . Concrete Supplier: _P_r_e-_Mo-ix ______ _
S~mpl e' Location: ____ (B_-_1)~27_+_60....:;_(:...B_-2..:..}_2_7+_1_0.:-; ...:.,{B_-..;.,3} .... 2.-;6_+_90..J.;....l{,;;..B-_4;.t...} ,.;;;2.;;,.6+..,;;6;.;.0 __________ _
• (slab, footing, beams, etc.)
Yards Placed: 27+90 to 25+20 (96 yards) ----------------------------------------------------------
. Date Cast: ______ 7::../-=2:<-:17...,:4:..-__________ Time: (B-1) 11 :50j(B-2} 1 :60;(8-3)3: 1 0;(B-4)3:45
• Cast by: _____ M_e_I_T_ho_m...;,p_s_on _________ Certificate No.: . _________ _
"
Design St~ength @28 days: ~3J.,..;..00.;...;O;...p&;.;s;.;..i ______ Slump (inches): 1-7/8"; 2-3/4";~1I;3-1/211;2-5/8";
. . 1"; 2-5/W' .
• Mix: __________ 6_~_ck_s~,_T~y.p_e_II_A_II~,_3~/4_1_'_m_a}_{_a=gg~r_eg~a_t_e ___________________ __
Remar~: __________ Fo_r_m_s_fu_i_le_d_a_t_2_7_+_00~(6~f-o-o-t~ca~v;...e_-~in~)...;,a~n~d~a~t~~~+_4~0 __ ~ ________ __
• Date Crushed Age Cylinder No. Ultimate Load .'
Area· PSI
..
July 8 6 days B-1 57,400 28.25 2030
e· July 10 8 days B-2 62,200 28.25 2200
July 12 10 d.::Jys B-3 88,000 28.25 3120
July 30 • 28 days B-4 100,000 28.25 3540
• Distr. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
By: rlL4 f! .
• . . .Plate A-2
CT 6-72
.,
." "
..
c,
,
"
•
•
.'
•
PACe'C SOILS ENGiNEERING_NC •
CONCRETE TEST
Job Na. 1 001 23 Lab No.: Date: 7/3/74 ------------~------------------------~~------
Project Address : __ P;..;o~i.:.:.ns:..:.e~tt..:..io:....:.:.Lo:..:.n.:..:e_a:..:.n.:..:d:....:Sa:.:.:.:n-=D:...:i-=e~g.:.o .,;..F.:,.;re:...:,e.,;.;w..;;.;0l-Y!...I ..,;;;C...;,;o.;..;;rl.;;,;.sb;.;,.o...;,;d _________ _
Client: ______ Se_q!.:.u_o~io_P_o...:c.:..if..:..ic.:.._ ______________________ _
General Contractor: Bratcher Construction
Concrete Contractor: Nelson Construction ,Concrete Suppl ier: _' P...;.,r_e-.... M_' .;...ix_, _____ _
Sample Location: _.-..;..,( C_-_1 ),-2_4_+_96...:..i...:(_C_-2~)_2_4+_7...;..5,,-· .:...(C_-....l3)...;..2_4_+5_7~;~(C_-_,4~)_2_4~_3_0 _________ _
, (slab, footing, beams, etc.)
Yards Placed: __ --:F:..:.r.::::;om~2::::::;5..;.;+2=.:0::...t:..;:o:..,.;2::.::3::...;+...::.0.::;",0~(1:..;:0::..:4~yr..:0:.:.;rd:.:s:l.,) _______________ _
,
1 .,
; J , 1
~ ~
:1
'L J ~ ~
(I
~ " ~ 1 'l $ ~ ~
i 3 ~ ?l J i ;
Date Cast: ____ 7;J,/...;:;3~!7:....;4=___ _______ Time: '(C-1) 9:15; (C~2) 9:35; (C-3)1O:00;(C-4)1:40 i
,\
t ~ i
.' C t b Mel Thompson C ·f· N ,as Y: ________________ erh,}cate 0.: ________ _
I,
Design St~ength @ 28 doys:_3 .... ,_00_0 ........ ps~i ______ Slump (inches): 1-1/211;2-3/811:1-7/811;311;3-1/211;3" :
1.1
!i ~'
Mix: __________ 6_ro_ck_s~,_T~y~p_e_"_A_II~,_3~/4_'_'_m_ox ___ ag~g~r..;.;eg~a_t_e _________________ __ • , ,Remar~: _______________________________________________________ -------__
Date Crushed Age Cylinder No. Ultimate Load Area PSI
--
July 8 5 C-1 57,300 28.25 2030
• July 10 7 C-2 64,800 28.25 2290
July '15 12 C-3 86,700 28.25 3070
July 31 28 C-4 101,000 28.25 3580 •
-
• Distr. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
BY:~
•
CT 6-72 Plate A-3·
,
~ 1 ;
j
~;,I
(I '~
ii
~
• PAC_C SOILS ENGINEERING~NC.
CONCRETE TEST
• Job No. __ . _1 0_0_1_2_.3 _______ Lab No. : _______ Date: 7/9/74
Pro i ect Address: _.-....:P:.,;o::.i:.:,:ns::e.:,:tt.:..:i a::...::La:.:n.::e~a:.:.n::d~Sa::.:.:n-=D:...:i..:e£.go::..:..F;.:re:.:e..:.:w.::a,-y ,~C;.::a.:...:rl;;s:.b:.:::a;;.;d __ ~ ______ _
CI ient: _____ S:.:e::q!::u.:.o·::la:...:P:..:a:.:c~if.:.:i c=--____________________ _
• General Contractor: Bratcher Construction -=~~~~~~----....------------------------------
Concrete Contractor: Nelson Construction .Concrete Supplier: _P_r_e-_M_ix _____ _
S~mpl e Location: __ 2_2+_5_5 __ (_D-_1...:..:h~2_2_+_00_(~D_-....:2)~i _2_1 +_4_0...:.(D_-_3.:.:.);_2_1_+0....;0_(~D_-4...:J.) _______ ......... _
• {slob, footing, beams, etc.}
.' . Yards Placed: From '23+00 to 19+80 (139 yards)
Dote Cost:, 7/9/74 Time:(D-l)1 0: 1 0i(D-2) 11 :25i(D-3) 1 :00;(D-4) 1 :40 ,
e' Cast by: _____ M_e_I_T_ho_m....;,p_s_on _______ Certificate ~o.: .,;..' ________ _
Design St~ength @ 28 days: 3,000 psi Slump (inches): 2-'/81;2-1/8";3"i3-5/811;2-5/8"i
. 2-1/2"
• Mix: 6 sacks, Tyee "A ", 3/4" max aggregate
Remarks: Th~ following areas were backfilled 7/8/74: 27+97 -'29+35;",25+10 -26+80; 27+20 -27+80.
The following box were poured 7/9/74:' 25+00, 23+05. Contractor was cauf'ioned by Bob Wells and
• County Inspector about driving cement trucks over 25+10 -26+80 and 27+20 -27+80 •
Date Crushed Age Cylinder No. Ultimate Load Area PSI
-
7/16/74 7 D-l 67,400 28.25 2390
• 7/22/74 13 D-2 77,400 28.25 2740
7/25/74 16 D-3 80,400 28 0 25 2840
8/6/74 28 D-4 • 109.000 28.25 3860
-
• Distr.
•
CT 6-72 Plate A-4
1
)
l' l
J
" I'
,I ;
j ,
,
1,
> ,
"
I, ,
-i J
! ! , ,
1 ,
~I ,
II
r
. J !I ..l
•
••
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
PAC_C 501 LS ENGI NEERI NG eNC •
CONCRETE TEST
Job No. 1001 23 Lab No.: Date: 7/10/74 --------------------------------------
Pro i ect Add ress : __ P:..:o::,i:..:.:ns=e.:,:tt.:.;,i a::-.::La:.:n.::e:....:a:.:n.:.:d:....:Sa:.:.:.:n...:D:...:i..:e~g.:.o ,.;..F,;.:re:.,:e.:.,:w..::a,-Y!..., .,:C:.,::a:..:,rl.:,::sb:.;;a:.,::d __ .....-_____ -:-_ .......
CI ient: __ .....,. __ :.:Se:.;:q!.:u.:.o.:.:ia:..:P:.,:a::c::;if:.:.i c=--___________________ ...-___ _
General Contractor: Bratcher Construction
Concrete Con'tractor: Nelson Construction Concrete Suppl ier: _P_r_e-_M_ix ______ _
Sampl e Location: _--:..{E_-.... l ),--19_+...;..60...:.,i...:,{_E-_2,,-} _19_+O~0;....;(~E~...;3;;.c..) ...;,1,;;..8+...;.,7.;:,,5't-· (~E_-4~)..,;1..;:;.8+...;5;.;;0 _______ _
(slab, footing, beams, etc.)
Yards Placed:' From 19+80 to 16+65 (128 yards)
. Date Cast: 7/10/74 Time: (E-l )9:20j(E-2) 1 0:40j(E-3} 11 ~ 1 0;(E-4) 11 :35
Cast by: _____ M_e_I_T_ho_m_p_s_on _______ Certificate No.: ________ _
"
DesJgn St~ength @ 28 days:_3 .... , __ 00_0_p&.;..;s~i ______ Slump (inches): 3"; 3-7j8";2-5!81;2-5!811;3I1i4"i211
M~: __________ ~6~~~c~ks~,_T~y~p_e_II_A_"~,~3~/4_'_'_m_ax~a~gg~r~eg~a_t_e ______________________ __
Remar~: ______________________________________ ~ ________________ __
Date Crushed Age Cylinder No .• Ultimate Load Area PSI
-
7/22/74. 12 E-l 72r OOO 28.25 2550
7/24/74 14 E-2 76,600 28.25 2710
7/26/74 16 E-3 ~ 102,000 28.25 3610
'8/7/74 28 E-4· 28.25 *
• Distr.
*Atta.ined design strength @ 16 days
PACIFIC SOILS ENGI ERING, INC.
BY:~~""~~:::!::::::~;.;z....._
•
· CT 6-72
• .
PACeC so ItS EN GI N EERI N G ,eNC •
CONCRETE TEST
Job No. 100123 Lab No.: Dafe: 7/12/74 . -------------------------------------
. Project Address: \+-......:P:..:o:..:..in:..:.:s:.:.e.:.:.tt,;.:ia:...:.;La:.:.n.;.:e...:a.:..:.n:.:.:d...:Sa:..:.:.:.:.n...:D..:.i..:.e£.go;;;...;..Fr:..;e..:.e~w~ayt...J,~C~ar;..;.l;;;;.;sb:.;:a~d __ ~ _______ _
. I,
Client: _____ ..:..Se:..:q!.:u..-:.o,:.:ia::....P:..:o,:.:c..:..:if:.;..ic=-· _______________ --.-___ ---
•. General Contractor: Bratcher Constructi on ~~~~~~~~-----------------------------------
Concrete Contractor: Nel~on Construction Concrete Supplier: _P_r_e_-M__..ix _____ _
Sample Location: _......;..(F_-~l)_1_6_+5_0.;...; ..;,.{F_-~2)_1_6_+0_0.;...; ..;,.{F_-3...:,}_1_5+_5_0;.,.i .,;..{F_-4...:,}_1_5+O_0 _______ _ • (slab, footing, beams, etc.)
Yards P-Iaced: From 16+65 to 14+23 (96 yards)
.. ' Date Cast: __ 7~!_1...:.2/1_4 ___________ Time: _. _____________ _
• Cast by: _____ M_e_I_T_ho_m .... p_s_on _____ ~ __ ·Certificate No.: ____________ _
'-
Design St~ength @ 28 days:-....;3""',..;;..00_0~pa;;..;s;.;..,i _______ Slump (inches): 311
; 2-3/411
; 3-3/4"; 3"; 1-5/811
• ·Mix: __________ 6_oo __ c_ks~,_T~y~p_e_"_A_II~,_3~/4_'_'_m_ax~a~gg~r .... eg~a_t_e ______________________ __
Remarks: --------------------------------------------~---------
• .
Date Crushed Age Cylinder No. Ultimate Load Area· PSI
-
7/19/14 7 F-l 60,500 28.25 2140
• 7/22/14 10 F-2 71,000 28.25 2510
7/24/74 12 F-3 . 72,400 28.25 2560
• 8/9/14 28 F-4 100,000 28.25 3540
• Distr. PACIFIC SO LS ENGINEERING, INC •
•
CT 6-72 Plate A-6
. ;
!
.' '.
f-
t'
F ,
. '
•
•
i'
•
•
•
•
•
PACe c SOl L SEN GIN E E R I N G • N C •
CONCRETE TEST
Jo~ No. 100123 Lab No.: Date: '7/15/74 --------------------------------------
Pro i~ct Address : __ P:..:o;.:.i.:.:,.ns:...e.:.:,tt.:..i a:.:.--La:.:.:.n.:.:.e_a:;.;.n.:.:,.d_Sa~n_D...-:;i...:.e.:::.g.:.o .:..F.;...;re_e..;.;w...;.;al-oy,~C..;..a.;..;.rl.;..sb..;..a __ d ________ --__
CHent: _____ .:..Se:...q!.:.u..:..o.:.:.ia:...P:...a.:..:c.:..jf..:..ic.:.......-----------~--:__----__
General Contractor: Bratcher Construction
,Concrete Contractor: Nelson Construction Concrete Supplier: _P...;"r_e-..;..M---.ix.-____ _
Sampl e Location: __ 1_4+_0_0..:,..;(G;..;..-_1.:.:.,};_1....;;.3+.-,;2;:,;;;5..,:..{ G,~f -....;;2;J.j};:.-1;..;;;3_+O.;;..;0~(..;;;G_-3=..t.)J-.; .;,.;12=-+..;;;5.=.,:0(\..;:G;,...-...:..4)'--______ _
(slab, footing, beams, etc.),
'Yards Placed: From 14+23 to 11 +50 (l33 yards)
Date Cast: _....;7..(./..;.1~5/7~4:.--__________ Time: ______________ _
Cast by: _____ M_e_I_Th_o_m...;.p_so_n ____ ~ __ Certifjcate ~o.: ____________ ~
Design St~ength @ 28 days: 3,000 psi Slump {inches}: 3/Jil-1!21;3-1!4Ij2-3!4"~3/41\;
. 3-1/8";2-1/2/J ,
Mix: 6 sacks, Type nAil, 3/4n max aggregate
Remarks: "-ro' ----------------------------------------------
Date Crushed Age Cylinder No. Ul timate Load Area PS I
-
7/23/74 8 G-l 79,600 28.25 2820
.7/26/74 11 G-2 77,400 28.25 2740
7/29/74 14 G-3 73,500 28.25 2600
8/12/74 28 G-4 95,000 28.25 3360
.
• Distr •
•
CT 6-72 Plate A-7 . ,~ .1
,
j !~
1 o
j
" .,
• PA<=eIC so I LS ENGI NEERINGeNC.
CONCRETE TEST
Job 'No. __ 1 O_O_1_2_3 _______ Lab NO.: _______ 'Oate: 7/19/74
• Pro iect Address : __ :.:Po::i.:.::ns::e:.:.:tt~ia:..:.La~n..:.:e~a:.:n.:.:d~Sa:.:.:.:n:...:D:..:i:..:e~g.:.o...:..F.:.:re:.:e:.:.:w~a',LY!c.' ...::C~a~rl.;,;sb~a~d __ ...;.... ____ -:--_ ......
Clfent: _____ =Se=q!:u:.:o.:,:ia:..P:..:a:.:c:.:.;if:.,:.ic=-______________________ _
General Contractor: Bratcher Construction • , Concrete Contractor: Nelson Construction Concrete Su ppl ier: ...;P:...;.r..;;.e....;-M..:.:.:.;,ix,;;..-.---. ___ _
Sampl e Location: _....;l~l_+O:;.;O~(Hi..!.-...:..llu.r ...:.,1 ~0+.:..::2~5.u.(H.!...--=21J.);.....!1~0..:..l+O~0:.l.!(H..!..-..:.3:.L..) ___________ --..; _____ _ .' (slab, footing, beams, etc.)
Yards Placed: From 11 +50 to 9+50 (96 yards)
Oate Cast: __ 7~/_19..:-' 17_4 __________ Time:<H -1) 10:45i (H -2) 12:55 i (H -3) 1 :40
• Cast by: _____ M_e_I_T_ho_m...;;,p_so_n _______ Certificate ~o.: ________ _
, Design Strength@28days: --.;;3..L'..;.,00.;..;0~ps:.:.i ________ Sf omp (inches): __ 2_-... 1 /~2;;;.:'.-,;2;,;;..-..;;.7,-/8;.J.,~3~ __ -
"
,Mix: _________ ~6~ro~c~ks~,_T~y~p..;;.e_II~A~"~,....;3~!..;;.~_"~m....;ax~a~gg~r..;;.e~ga~t..;;.e _____________________ __ ,I , • Remar~: __________________________ --__ -___ ~ __________ ~ ________ __
'1
• Date Crushed Age Cylinder No. Ultimate Load Area PSI
-
7/29/74 10 H-1 76,900 28.25 ' 2720
• 8/1/74 13 H-2 83,900 28.25 2970'
8/16/74 28 H-3 93,100 28.25 3300
•
• Oistr. PACIFIC SO 1S ENGINEERING, INC.
•• Plate A-8
CT 6-72 . . . !'
-"J'tI'?~~~~.,....... __ ~_ -". -.".--,..... • .... ~-..:---•• ~ ...... ' --:.-.-..... "'.--.-...... -..... .,~-.-..... ,-:.':.--"-~ -....... ----.-..... , ~._-~ ... -,.::;:-__ .~_~~.:..,..:~, --..".,,..............,..,,....---,.,-<:r~ t_~~~,,,~~I~'"~
•
•
,
P A eel C SOl L SEN GIN E E R IN Gtt, N C •
CONCRETE TEST
Job No. 100123 Lab No.: Date: 7/24/74 -------------------------------------
Proie~A~re~t~--P~o~in~s~~~~~la~L~a~n~e~a~~~~~n~D~ie~g~o~F~re~e~w~a~y~,~C~a~rl~~~a~d~. __ ~~-----------
. Client: ___ I_.--::S:.:e2Q:.:uo:,:i=..a ..:.P.:..ac:::i..:.:fi.:c _______________________ _
General Contractor: Bratcher Construction e. '
Concrete Contractor: Nelson Construction ,Concrete Supplier: _P_re_-_M_i_x ______ _
Sample Location: __ 8_+_75_(:...I-_l~);_8_+_25......:(:...I-_2~)i_7_+_50......:(:...I-_3~) ________________ _ .,. (slab, footing, beams, etc.)
Yards P.laced: From 9+50 to 7+20 (103 yards)
Date Cast: __ 7 ... /_24~/7_4 __________ Time: 0-1)10:30; (1-2)12:00; ((-3)1:50
,.' Cast by: _____ M_e_I_T_h_o_m.;...ps_o_n _____ -.:..._Certificate No.: ___________ _
Design St~ength @28days:---"'3 ...... ,0_0_0 ..... p;.;;..si'-_____ Slump{inches): 2-5/8; 2-3/4;2-3/4;3-1/8,2-3/8
Mix: ____________ 6_~_c_k_s,~TyuP_e_I_IA_I~I,_3~/_4_"_m_ax __ a~gg~r......:eg~a_te __ . ___________ ~ ______ __ •• Remarks: --------------------------------------~-~--------------., .
Date Crushed Age Cylinder No. Ultimate Load Area, PSI
-
8/1/74 8 I-l. 68,500 28.25 2420
• 8/5/74 12 1-2 '79,100 28.25 2800
8/21/74 28 1-3 . 99,900 28.25 3540 ;
•
• Distr.
•
CT 6-72 , Plate A-9
1 : t : . ~ . ~
"
" I'
I l ,j
•
•
•
•
P A C.I C SOl L SEN GIN E E R I N G er N C •
CONCRETE TEST
Job No. 1 00 1 23 Lab No.: Date: 7/25/74 -----------------------------------------------~--
Project Address : __ P:.,:o::i;:.:ns::e,::tt..:,;ia:..,::La:;n.:.:e:..;a:.:.n.:.:d:..,:Sa:.:.:,;n:..,:D:.,:i-=e;,:ag,:.o.:..F.:.,:re:.,:e:.:,:w-=a.l..y~,C;.::a:..:.rI,;.;:sb:.:a:.::;;d __ ........ _______ _
Clieht: _____ ::Se::q!.:u.:.o·::la~P:..:a::c:.:if..:.;i c:..-______________ --------
General Contractor: Bratcher Construction
, Concrete Contractor: Nelson Construction ,Concrete Supplier: _P~r_e-..;.M..;...;.;..ix;....... ______ _
, Sa~ple ~ca"on: __ 6_+_7_5(~J_-~1)~;_6_~_O~U~-_2~b_5_~~~~(~J_-3~)~~~~ ____ ~ ____________ ~~
(slab, footing, beams, etc.), ,
, --. ' .... ~
'Yards Placed: From 7+20 to 5+35 {80 yards}
'Date Cast: __ 7~/_2~5/7_4 __________ Time: (J-1)1O:00; (J-2)11':45; (J-3)1:35
.' Cast by: __ -:--__ M_e_' _Th_o_m...;,p_so_n _______ CertifJcate No.: _______ . ____ _
'-.
Design St~ength @ 28 days:-..::3.L.,O;;..;0;;..;;0-J:p~si=___ _____ Slump (inches): 2-3/4;3-1/2;3-1/4;2-3/4;1-1/2
Mix: ________ ~6~ro:.:c~ks~,_T~y~p~e_"~A~II~,~3~/~41_I~m;.::ax~a~gg~r~eg~a~t~e ________ ~~ __________ __
• Remar~: __________________________ ------_________ ~_' ________________ _
• Date Crushed Age Cylinder No. Ultimate Load Area PSI
-
8/2/74 8 J-1 51,900 28.25 1840
• 8/5/74 11 J-2 75,700 28.25 2680
8/22/74 28 J-3 93,100 28.25 3300
•
• Distr.
• CT 6-72 Plate A-IO
--'I';" ~ -.--
~,
f I
i
" l'
. )
-~'
.(
• PAC_C SOilS ENGINEERING.NC.
CONCRETE TEST
job No. 1 00 1 23 Lab No.: Date: 7/26/74
------------~-----------------------• Project Address: __ P;..:o:..:.i:.:.:ns:.:.e.:..:tt.:..:ia:.:...::.la:.:.n.:.:e.....:a:.:.n.:.:d.....:Sa~n...:..D..:i...:e~go~F.:..:re;,.:e..:.:w..;;;.ay/...;/~C..;;.;,a;:.;;.rl.:.;.;sb;..;;;a..;;.;,d __ ~~ ______ _
Client: _____ .:..Se:..;.q!.:.u.:.o·:.:.'a:,..P...:a;,.:c.:..:if..:,.ic:..--------------....... ---------
. General Contractor: Bratcher Construction •
. Concrete Contractor: Nelson Construction _' Concrete Supplier: _P_r_e_-M_ix _____ _
, ' , ' Sample location: __ 4_+_75~(~K_-1...:.).:...i _4+...;5_0..:...(K_-_2~);_4_+...;5(~K;...-~3) ______________ _ · .',
. (slab, footing, beams, etc.)
, '. Yards Placed: From 5+35 to 4+25 (64 yards)
Date Cast: __ 7./_2.;;.:..6/7...;.....;.4 __________ ' Time: (K -1)3:20; (K-2)4:00; (K -3)4: 10
• Cast by: _____ M_e_I_T_ho_m_p_so_n _______ Certificate No.: ________ _
"
Design Strength@28days:......;3J.c..;.00.;...0;....&;;..ps;.;.i ______ Slump (inches): _-________ _
Mix: __________ 6_~ __ ck_s~,_T.y~p_e_Jl_A_Jl~,_3~/4_'_'_m_ax __ ag~g~r~eg~a_t_e ___________________ __ • Remarb: _______________________________________ T. ______________________ _
• Date Crushed Age Cylinder No. Ultimate Load Area PSI
,
8/5/74 10 K-l 64,2000 28.25 2270'
• 8/8/74 13 K-2 84,400 2~.25 2990
8/23/74 28 K-3 101,000 28.25 3580
•
• Distr. :::ClFl~ INC.
• CT 6-72 Plate A-ll
"
1 /, I
,
l
, i
• PACI. SOilS ENGINEERING,.C •
CONCRETE TEST
Job No. 100123 ' Lab No.: . ----\----~------
Proj ect, Address :..\.I __ P:;..:o:..:.i::.:ns:.:e.:.:tt..:..:ia:...:.La::.:n.:.:e....:a::.:.n.:.:.d __ Sa::.=..:n-=D-=i-=e~g.:-o .:.F.:..:re;.::e..;.;w.;;a'-y,!,....;;C;.:;;.a~rl~sba:.;:.;;.;d ___________ _
Date: 7/31;74 -----------------------
CIiE;lnt: _____ .::..Se:..:q!.:u..:.o.:.:ia:....P:..::a:..:c:.:..:if~ic=---_-__ -__ ------------__ _
• General Contractor:--:,;Br:..:;a;,:,.tc:.:..h:..:;e.:-r ..:C:.:;.o.:.:.ns:.,:.ti:,.:u..:,c,;.:.ti.:-on:..:...-__________________ _
Concrete Contractor: Nelson Construction ,Concrete Suppl ier: _P_r_e_-M_ix _____ _
Sample ~cation:~_4_~_0~(~L-_1~);_2_+_~~(L_-~2)~;~2+_0~0~(L~-~3)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
• (slab, footing, beams, etc.)
, ,
'Yards PJaced: From 4+25 to 2+00 (104 yards)
,Date Cast: ___ 7:..L/:..=;3.:.1,l /7~4 __________ Time: (L": 1 )9:00; (L-2) 1 :30; (L-3)2:45
• Cast by: ___ T_ed_Sc_h_'a_fn_i_tz_·-.-;._~ ______ Certificai'e ~~.: ________ _
Design St~ength @28days:_3.£.,,0_0_0 ..... p..;;.si'--_____ Slump(inches): 1-3/4; 2-1/8; 2-1/4
• Mix: ____________ 6_~ ___ c_ks~,_T~y~p_e_II_A_II~,_3~/4_'_'_m_ax __ a~gg~r_eg~a_t_e ______ ---~--_____ ----
Remarks: ___ S_e_ep:..,a..;:g;...e_a":,,,p.L.,p_ro_x_im_a_te_l.s..y_2_._5_11 _a .... bo_v_e_t_oJ...p_o_f .. p~ip_e .... g,,-r..;..ou;;...;.n.;.;.d __ w~a~te.;...r...;;.st;.;.a;;;..;ti_o.;.;.n...;4_+_25;... ...... ____ _
• .
Date Crushed Age Cylinder No. Ultimate Load Area' PSI
-
8/9/74 9 L-1 61,400 28.25 2170 • .8/12/74 12 L-2 78,300 28.25 2770
8/28/74 28 L-3 97,300 28.25 3440
:
..
,
• Distr~ PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING1 INC.
BY:.~.· ..
• PlateA-12
CT 6-72
, ,
,-, ; , , ,
.' r
1
~ I
1 ,
, 1
: .
;
'1
]
'!'
'\
i 1
, ,
. ~
i
j ,
j
1 l'
•
'.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
PAC. C SOl L $ ENG 1 NEE R I N G e N C •
CONCRETE TEST
Job No. __ 1_0_0_1_2_3_~ _____ Lab No.: _______ Date: 8/1/74
Proiect Address : __ P:..:o:..:.i~ns:..:.e~tt.:.;ia::..::.La:.:.n,;.:e....:a:.:.n.:.:d_Sa:..::.:..:n..:.:D....:i...:;e.2.go~F.:..:re:...;.e~w~aYL.,!.....,.;;C..;..a;...;,rl~sb;.;.;a..;..d __ -,.-____ ~_
Client: _______ .:.Se:..,:q!.:,u..:.,o,;.:ia:...P:...,:Q.:,.:c.:.;if..:..,ic=-------------------------
General Contractor: Bratcher Construction
Concrete Contractor: Nelson Construction Concrete Suppl ier: .... P .... r_e_-M_ix _____ _
Sample Location: __ 1_+O_0~(M_-_1~h_0_+_50......1-(M_-_2=};_0_-__ 00 __ ( ... M;.;..-...;;.3'_~ ______________ _
(slab, footing, beams, etc.)
" Yards Placed: From 1 +85 to 0+00' (96 yards) 1
-
Date Cast: __ 8_/_1/7_4 __________ Time: 12:00(M-l)i 1:00(M-2)i 3:00(M-3)
C~st by: __ T_ed_S_ch_a_f_ni_iz_-_-_' '_',_-,_,~_,,,,_, ______ Certif}cate No.:
• I :--. ----------------
Design St~ength @28 days: ~3.s...,0;..;0;..;;;.O.,.l;p;.;;.;si:....-_____ Slump (inches): 2-3/4, 3-1/2, 3-1/2
Mix: ____________ 6_~ __ ck_s~,_T~y.p_e_I_A_"~,_3~/4_1_I_m_ax_ag~g~r~eg~a_t_e _______________ ~ ______ __
RemarkS: (M-2) ~mple with I itt Ie aggregate -------------~----------~~----------------------------------
. Date Crushed Age Cylinder No. Ultimate Load Ar.ea PSI
8/9/74 8 M-1 70,800 2.8.25 2510
8/12/74 11 M-2 ·72,000 . 28.25 2550
8/29/74 28 M-3 96,800 28.25 3430
Distr. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
Plate A-13
CT 6-72
" .'
. S
, ~
I< 1 ,
1 , , . ,
j
"
~~~ ... ~ __ ".~ •• ___ ••• 0-.--:--~...,... ~_l _~~::.)
I
•
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, -INC.
17921 SKY PARK CIRCLE (SUITE G) IRVINE. CALIF. 92707
TELEPHONE: (714) 557-9450
CTll
Sequoia' Pacifi c
1000 S. Grand Avenue
, Santa Ana, California 92705
Attention: Mr. Bob Wells
Project Superintendent
'.
Subiect: Paving Section for Avenida Encinas and Interior
-Streets, Phase If of Construction at Lakeshore
Gardens Mobile Home Park, 7201 Avenida
Encinas, in the City of Carlsbad, California • ..
Gentlemen:
L.A. COUNTY OFFICE
1402 W. 240th Stre'et
Harbor City. Ca.,907io
(213) 325-7272 or 775-6771
VENTURA COUNTY OFFICE
, Post Office Box 75
Thousand Oaks. Ca. 91360
(213) 889-9919
{80S) 495-6513
, Sep,tember 30, 1974
, Work Order 100123
As required by the City of Carlsbad, this report presents test results and recommendations
, regarding pavement design for Avenida Encinas, which is classified as a public street.
, Design criteria for Avenida Encinas, submitted to us by the City of Carlsbad is as follows:
Description:
Traffic Index:
, Minimum Pavement Section:
. Jv\ajor Arterial Highway
7 '
3 inches A~C. over
6 inches Aggr.egate Base
Two (2) samples obtained at the job site, representative of the subgrade materials in the
street. Hydrometer analyses were performed on each sample for classification purposes.
, ,
The results indicated the subgrade materials to be consistent through the limits of the street.
An R-VaJue test was performed on the less granular of the two (2) samples. The test results
are presented in Table I and on Plate A.
) , 'I
September 30, 1974
Work Order 100123
,
\ ~
•
Page 2
Calculations for a pavement section thickness using the obtained R-Value (78) and, the sub-
mitted design criteria, revealed a section of less thickness than the req~ired' mimimum.
, Therefore, a section of three (3) inches A.C. over six (6) ~nches base should be considered
satisfactory •
It is recommended that the street be cut to meet the minimum pavement section as required
, by the governing agency.
Interior streets and drives are considered to contain similar subgrade materials. The proposed
two and one-half (2-1/2) inches of A.C. on compacted subgrade is considered to be suitable.
C()II/OII If== '
AII.subgrade should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the laboratory standard.
, .
. . Respectfully submitted,
. PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Revi ewed by:
By:
Dist': (6) Addressee
AJJ:RPK/scb
"
. jk. Q IJif;;;=
REP.CTTER, R.C.E. 15251
General Ma~ger
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING. INC.
• -J
. J~
. <
September 30, 1974
Work Order 100123
• • ...
TABLE f
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
Sample No. Location
-Opposite Lot 207
II Opposite Lot 219
Hydrometer Analyse~
(% -Sand, Silt, Clay)
84 11 5
88 8 4
Classi.fi cation
. Sand
Sand .
NOTE: R-Value performed on Sample I, being the less granular and potentially the
most critical of the two (2) samples. Results are presented on the. attached
Plate A •
.... ,~ ...
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
-~'
f . . ,.
•
, ,-. ' ..
;--., : ',~ ..
, '
:1;: ~-."
, "
, "
,I
• \ ..... J
w.o'. /00/23
·'PA~:::C 'SOILS ENGINEEliiNG:,
Ptwc.fVlENT DESIGN DA~
.
, Project Lt?ksbre ~rtk//.f -/%.1lI'i! zz.'
',' Boring ,1-100 EXUDATION PRES'SURE ClI.ART-,
, ' ~(----------------~--
, Sample_. _' I=-________ _
. '~, Location":::;;e-: ;4& .£ '
,'Depth 5;/yJracie
.
, , SPECIMEN A
Moisture Content % 1.1
'Compaction Pressure, psi We:,
Dry Density, psf I%'6
Exudation Pressure, psi 5/~
Expansion Pressure, psf 1).0
R-Value by Stabilometer &2
-"B '
tJ,~
3~o
IZb,/
»~
tP.O
78
C
/atJ
35a
IZ~f
/6tJ
aO
73
U. S • STANDARD S lEVE SIZE
"
,
90,
80 ,---r--..,
70 ~
r-60
S ~ 50
~
~ 40
30
20
10 .
0
700 600 500 400 300 '200 100
EXUDATION PRESSURE (psi) ,-
270 200 100 50 30 16 '0 4 3/8" 1/2-3/4" ," , 1/2" 2" 3"' , , 100
:. 70J-.J---+---+--J--+-+---1---f-+-~-+"'--J-H-1 't)
, ~ ~60~+---~---4----~-~~1---r--;-~-+~~r-~ ~ 'Pot
R-VALUE @ 300 psi
~50
"~ ~~--~--+---J---+~+----~---f-7--r-+~~~ (,)
~40J-.J----+---+--J---+-+-----r--~7--r-r~r-rT1 re '~~-~---+---~-~--4----~--i-t--r-t--~rt1
20~'~-~L---+---~--~~~----r--~-T--r-r--r-rT1
, 10~.J---t-_--+---~--+--+---t--+-r-r-t-:-t-t-H
I
I
I
•• Phone' 325·7272 • 775-6771
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
1402 West 240th Street
Harbor City, California 90710
Augus t 12, 1971
Sequoia Pacific Realco
820 South Grand Avenue
Santa Ana, California 92705 ·CT72-02-61
Attn: Hr. Walter E. McKinley
Subject:
Gentlemen:
Soils Engineering and Compaction Inspection,
Proposed Carlsbad Mobile Home Park,
Poins e t tia Lane and San Diego Free'way,
Carlsbad, California.
" . :
As requested in your letter of July 21, 1971, '~Je have revie1.Jed
the Foundation Soils Investigation dated Nay 24, 1971 by Kenneth
G. Osborne and Associates for the subject development and are
'willing and able to assume the responsibility of project soils
engineer. It is unders tood we 'will be receiving a si te grading
plan this t-veek and tha t you plan to s tart grading the 'week of
Augus t 16th.
We have assigned Alan Jessup, R.C.E. 18431, as project soils
~ngineer and Bob Grant as p~oject fill control inspector.
Sincerely yours,
PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
~ '-4 ~d , " _' (j oiK¥Y . S~1~IC~ PREBTISl'1N'T
R.C.E. 14744
SP:bn
If)
":.,,,-,;:. , .
". -
"'.
:1
:1'" '," :':, '
l! , •• '.~ ._
'0' -, ',-
'I' " .. .,:' . .' , , '
.-." .
" '.'
.' I~ ""':'. ' ,,': "" ,....... ~
, '
1
I, r·'~~., '
, .~~.. .'
"I:,'
"." .
I:' "
. '.,:'
·:1, "
, .
I:, ."
1"'\';:': '" , ,', :h:-··~ " . ", ~ .. '
I":, ,"" '.
I ,(-:,,;, '
-I.
1· -.: '
, "
, 'C?:-71-:',e-"
KE,aETH Go' OSBORNE & ASSOaTES .' I-/'AJ::I r :tI=-, t.
Soils Engineering
1610 EAST BALI" ROAD
AN~HEtM, CAI-(FORNIA 02608'
FOUNDATION SOILS INVESTIG1.\T10N
Mobile Home Park
Poinsettia Lane & San ,Diego Freeway
Carlsbad, California
Client:
Sequoia Pacific ReCilco
'. :' ,.
May 24,1971'
Job No. 71-393-1
.:
, ;,
" ::
'-,
" 1
.'
.',' ,
I"
It'~ ,
-I' .
I·
I"
I
I.
I
I
I"
I·
I'
:1:
-.
1><·, .
, .' ~. .. .
e e
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Mobile Home Park
Carlsbad, Californi~
Page,
INTRODUCTION--------------------------------~---~~
FIELD INVESTIGATION-------------------~---~-------
. LABORATORY TElSTING------------..... --------·-----------._
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Site Conditions------------------~----------
Subsurface Conditions-------------~-·--------
Soil Bearing------------------~---~---------
·Settlement-----------------~-----------------
Lateral Soil Pressure--------~-----·--------
Expansive Soils--------------~-:..---.:..-... ----... --
Concrete Slab Construction------~-------------
Shrinkage and Subsidence----------~--------:..-
Grading----------~-----------------~---------.
General---~------~------~------------------~-·
APPENDIX
Paving Recommendations------·-----------------
Laboratory Testing Procedures--------------~
Grading Specifications
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3'
3
3
4
4
4
i-ii
A-B
a. General Provisions---... -----------------. C-,D
b. Special Provisions----------~--~ ... ------E
Boring Logs---------------~-~----... ------... ~---F-N
Direct Shear Sumrnary----:-...... --.:..--::---,.----.------... ,0
Boring Locations---------~-~---------------... -p
Job No. 71-393-1
' .. '
-"
:
. ' ,": .
,,' ' . . ' .
I
I, .. " ·l ~ , .
I:
'I"
I
·1
I
I· ..
1 ".
I·' "
·1
·1····
1
1
I
I
I"
:1" .' , .
, J • '
"
., .
, , .; . ",.
.' . '.
. :. '
e·
INTRODUCTION
This report presents the re.·sul ts o.f a t(~)l,m~ation So;ils
Investigation performed on the property located at P9~nsettia
Lane and the San Diego Freeway, in the City of Carlsb~d,
California. The property, which covers an area of approxi-
mately 55 acres will be developed into a Mobil~Hom~ Park.
A two-story recreation building is expected to be Gon-
s tructed on conventional contin·uous and pad footings with
~lab-on-grade concrete floor.
FIELD INVESTIGATION
The field investi~ation consisted oJ: excavating seven
exploratory borings to depths ranging fTom ,6 feet to 16
feet. The borings were drilled using a 20 inch bucket ';'uger'
drilling rig. Selected spe.cimens. of the in situ soils ware
obtained by using a 2.5 inch 1.0. drive tub.e sampler equipped
with brass liner rings. In addition. to the relative un--
disturbed specimens, bulk samples of the soils were obtained
.' for laboratory analysis. These s'Oils obtained .in this mann,er
s'erved as the basis for the laborato'ry testing ~nc1 the
engineering conclusions contained in this report •.
The log of the borings and a plot plan showing ,approxi-
mate boring locations are includ'ed with this report. Also
included are logs of Borings 1 and 15 which were drilled for
the adjacent project on February 22, 1970.
LABORATORY TESTING
The laboratory testing consisted of performing olass.i-
fication and strength tests, and debermining' in situ dry
density, moisture cont~nt~ and mbisture-d~hsity relationships.
Descriptions of test procedures are included in the
Appendix of this report.
Job No. 71-393-1 Page 1 ..
~. i
I,
'I' ;-,-_:'
, " '\ t '
~I '
: ." -~"" '. I', <:
, ~ . :;'" .
'I: .'
I·
,I':'
1
I
I >
"'",'
.1
'I"
I'
, " I'
I'
I
I·
.1,
I",
, '
: ~'
CONCLUS IONS AND RECOMMENPATIONS'
Site Conditions
The site is presently utilized to growrenUl1c1.;l,lus 'flowers ,.'
and is almost completely covered with same. It consists of
slightly rolling hills and is vacan~ with respect to·structures. '
, A row of eucalyptus trees is planted in a; nb:t:-t:.herly direction
along the 70 foot elevation line near thecente.r of the property ~
The low elevation points on the property tend to be fairiy,
moist. The west iow area is occupied by patches of heavy weed
growth, while the east 'low area has' been' thoroughly d;i.scec1 and
the topsoil is very loose.
The western corner of the property has deep erosion'scars
wi th a SUbstantial area of loose s.and at the bottortl o,f the fl'ow.
Other than this, no abrupt topographic discontinuities we're
observed.
Subsurface Conditions
The subsurface soils consi.st en.tirely of si,1 ty, cl'ayey
and clean sands. The sands are: quite dense and generally of
a very fine to roedi'um gradation. Caving occurred in three
of the seven borings. The water table was encountered at
depths ranging from 5 to 15 feet and perChed water was en-
countered twice'. No problems other than caving were en-
countered in the drilling.
Soil Bearing
The proposed structure may Joe supported on bot.h continuous
and pad footings.
Footings may be designed for an allowable bearing value
of 1300 pounds per square foot for footings p1ac'ed to a minimum
width and depth of·12 inches. Footings for two-story structures
Job No. 71-393-1 Page 2
; ,
I·
:1··· . .' "">~ •
I .( .. '
I
'·1., ,
I
.1 .
'1· .' . .
I. . . '
<I:'
I'
1
1
I
'I
1-
.1
.: .
:'.,'
',' ".'
shall be placed to a minimum depth ·of 18 inches. An ~ncrease·
of 1/3 o'f the above bearing value is permissible for shor't
duration loading.
Settlement ... ~'. . ;~,
The nature of the soils was such as to make the performing
of settlement tests impractical.
It is anticipated that the proposed struqture is to be a
maximum of two stories in height and will possess relatively ..
light footing loads. On this basis, settlement! and especially
differential settlement, should be neqlig~ble,provided th?
" ..
surface soils are properly compacted during t'he grading •.
Lateral Soil Pressure
.For purposes of designing the structures for lateral
forces, an allowable lateral soil pressure.value of 250
pounds per square foot per foot may 1r>~ used for tbe buildin9:
,·design. A coefficient of friction of 0.45 'm~y be used for
concrete placed directly on the natural soilsi
Expansive Soils
~he soils existing on the site consist of various sands.
These soils are considered to be nonexpansiv~. -As a result, no special construction is required for ex-
pansive soils.
Concrete Slab Construction.'
It is recommended that concrete floor slabs be construct·ed
over a 6 mil plastic membrane. The 'pli;t$tic membrane should be
properly lapped and sealed.
Job No. 71-393-1' Page 3
I
I
I
I·
I. . .
I·
I
I··
I·
I
·1:·
"
I
I '.' '.
" ~' <" . . ".
.1'
I' ..
I',
·1:"
Shrinkage and Subsidence
Based on the in situ densities of the natural soil and
assuming an average fill density of, 92 percen·t relative com-
paction, calculations indicate' that there will be a 3 percent
d~crease in volume between the cut and fill operat~ns. In ~.
addition, it is estimated that there will be a ~.2 of a fo~~'
of sUbsidence due to reworking the sur:face·soils~
Grading'
The grading should be done in accordance with the
attached Grading Specifications:
General
The recommendations contained in this report are based on
the results of field investigation, laboratory testing ~nd re-
present our best engineering judgment. If soii conditions en-
countered during the grading differ s~bstanti.al1Y from those
described in this report, this office should be notified immediately,
so that appropriate recommendations can be made.
OB:dhd
Job No. 71-393-1'
'Respectfully submitted,
KENNETH G'. OSBORNE & ASSOCIATES
g~~ r::J2,~ ,. , ..... .
Osbjorn Br~~': " : ':,
Project Enginee'r
Kenneth G. Osborne .
R. C. E.. 143'4.0
. page 4
'.: .
I .' . . . . . .
. . . .
I'· "', . ~'. '. . .
. . . '-
'1' .' .. ' . ' .' .
'. . . '"
. .'
I ···.··.' .... :
~ : . '
I ..... . ( ."
, .,' , '
1 ... .
1 .. : .. : ........ .
. ' .'
... '1 " .. " .' .
"., : ,: .. ' .
. ",: , '
, ' . . 1 ..... ': .. ' "
. ,'. ~.
" .
I ," . . '-'" .
. . . , .'
. . .
I · .
> " •
, ". " ' .
I , .
. ".
I .. '
I.
I" .
I· ".'
.,' e
. .; ,
.1
.,: .
APPENDIX ..
, '
. . ,
.', ,.-
. .
, '
. . . ~ .....
.'
• • I •
• • r'
. ' . . '.
. '.
, .'
I,
If~':~\
I
I,
I
'I
I
I
I'
I' ,
I
, l:
I
I
I.
I
I: , ,
I
I"
I , ,
KÐ G. OSBORNE-& ASSO.TES
Soils El1gineering
1810 EAST BALt. ROAD
ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 928015'
635-6220
PAVING RECOMMENDATIONS
In determining the pavement design, the development
was divided into two primary areas; those areas which carry
, '
,the main traffic down the center of the property and those
areas carrying the feeder traffic to the individual trailei:
pads. In determining the pavemeht section ,for the center
'section, a traffic index of 5.0 waS Used. In all other
areas, a traffic index of 3.0 was used.
The loading capacity of the surfa,ce $oils in parking
areas was determined by performing Califor~ia B~aring Ratio
tests. These tests were performed in accordance with the
Los Angeles County Road Department Standards dated August,
1963. The primary soil, which covers. ~ost of th~ site, is
slightly silty sand which was test,ed to have a CBR ,value o.f
34.
The following are the recommended pavement section for
use of the Mobile· Horne Park:
1. ' the central dri~e 5.0 TI .' 2..,.1!2IiAC/3" Aggregate -Base
2. all other areas 3.0 TI 2-1/~"Ac/c6mpacted'
$ubgrad~
Job No. 71-393-1 .' Page .i
, "
·I~
I~~ t -t
I
·1'
I
. 1
I
I:.
I . "
, . It ' .. : .. ".'. ,
,I ' .
I
I'
I
I,
I
I
:
I'
I
.,
Paving Recommendations (continued)
To justify the above pavement section, it is necessary
that 12 inches of compacted subgrao.e material ~onsisting of
the silty sand be placed under the base and the asphaltic
concrete. Any other material, if existing wi thin ,12 inches
of finished subgrade of the street areas, should be removed
and replaced with the higher strength sandy material.
The subgrade material for the section containing base
material may be compacted to 90 percent of maximum dens'l tY •
For are'as possessing only the asphaltic concrete over com-
pacted subgrade, the subgrade mate-rial shall be compacted
to at least 95 percent of maximum densi ty ~ '.
Likewise, any soft or unsuitable material located within
street areas should either be excavated and'replaced or a
new pay-ement section designed.
OB:dhd
Job No. 71-393-1
'Respectfully submitted,
KENNETH G. OSBORNE & ASSOCIATES
V~~~~'.
Osbjorn.Bratene
project Engineer
Kenneth G. Osborne
R.C.E. 14340
P.age. ii
I
I'·
I ..
:1
i' . ,
, ' . ·,1'
1:"-.
:t
. . . ' I '"
·1·'
'I
I
I
I'~
I,"
.. t.. :,,', •• : • . i:
LABORATORY TESTING P~OCEDU~S
SHEAR STRENGTH
The shear strength of the soil is determined by per-
forming direct shear tests and unconfin'ed compression tests.
The direct shear tests are performed on both undistuEbed
,specimens and on samples remolded to 90 percent of A.S.T.M.
Test Method D-1557-70T modified to use three layers in lieu
of five. The samples are saturated to' simula,te the worst
field condition and sheared at a constant rate of 0.1 inches
per minute. The relationship between normal stress and shear
stress is shown on the attached Direct Shear .Summa~y.
The unconfined shear strength of se'lected undisturbed
specimens is determined in accordance with ·A.S.T.M. Test
Method D-2l66-66'1'. These tests are'performeq at the existing
moisture content. The results' of' these tests .are 'shown.on·
the Boring Logs.
EXPANSION
Tests for volume change with moisrture are performed on
compac.ted soil in Ciccordahce with trSug·gested Method 6f ':£'est
for Volume Change of Soil It by W.· K. Taylor in Procedu.res for
Testing Soils by the American Society for Testing and Materials'
(A.S.T.M.) April; 1958 •. The samples are either undisturbed or
are remolded to 90 percent of A.S.T.M. Test Meth6d D-15S7-7GT,
modified to use three iay~rs in lieu'of .five. The specimens
are air dried and the percentage of expansion measured after
saturation tinder a surcharge load of 60 and 650 .pounds per
square foot·.
SETTLEMENT
The settlement characteristics of. the in situ soil . .
are determined by pe:tfo~ing standar~·collsolidation tests
Job No. 71-393~1 Page A
10/70 lab testing
" .
',.
-1< _ '
1-, '
.' ,-: ",\
, -'
I'""
I-
I
-I-
·1--
I
I
-1,-,:-
~I
I
'. -........... , I:
'I'
I-
I'
,I-
I
•
on undisturbed specimens. The sample~ are tested in the
'original sample liner l;'ing and the increment loads for con-
s'olidation are applied for periods -of 24 hOUl;S by means of
, -
a single counterbalanced lever system.. The i?-res$'ure se-q.tl.e-
ment curves are shown on the attached plates.
MOISTURE DENSITY
The moisture-density relationship' ,of the:' major soil
is determined in accordance with A.S.T.M. Test Method
D-155 7-70T. This test, may be mod.ified to use th-ree 'layer.$
in lieu of five. The test results are shown on the ~oring
Logs.
CLASSIFICATION
The following test methods are used to aid in 'the
classification of soils in accordance with'the Unified Soil
Classification system:
1. A.S.T.M. Test Method 0-422-63
2. A.S.T.M. Test Method 0-423-6fi
3. A.S.T.M. Test Method 0-424-59
-, '
The results of grain size tests are 'shown on the Grading,'
Analysis sheets. The results of cons_istency tests' ate ,shown, " "
on the Boring Logs. ,: , -'~'I;":": -"-',:,: !,./:::,: "~,':
, '
, --
Job No. '71-393-1 Page B
10/70 lab testing. _
I
, .
I:'
I
I.
I'
I
I
I
'I', '
I""
I
I
I
I'
:1
'I
I
,
I
I',
,
RESPOHSIBILITY
GRADIlJG SPECIFICATIONS'
GENERAL PROVISlONS
1. The Soil Engineer and Engineering ~eologist are'
the Owner's or Builder I s representative on the project.
For the purpose of these speCifications, s'upervision by
the Soil Engineer includes that inspection performed by
any person or persons employed by, and responsible to,
the licensed Civil Engineer signing the soil report.
2. All clearing, si t'e p,reparation, or earthwork per-,
formed on the project shall be conducted by the Contractor
under the supervision of a qualified Soil Engineer.
, ,
3. It is the Contractor's responsibility to cqnfortn
to the Grading Specitications.' .
CLEARING
1. The site shall be cleared of all vegetable growth
including but not limited to trees t stumps; logs, trash,
heavy weed ,growth, and organic deposits. '
2. All houses, barns o'r other bu'ildings, shall be
removed.
3. The foundations and slabs l~ft from the demolition
of structures shall be removed. Included with the removal'
of foundations and slabs shall be the removal of basements,
cellars, cisterns~ septic tanks, paving,'curhs, pipes or
other deleterious materials.
4. Unless otherwise specified, all c.1eared materials'
shall be removed from'the site.'
Job No. 71-393-1 Page C
10/70 'grading specifications
'"
,I,
I
I~
I'
'I:
1
I
,I,
I
I" ",~
I
,I
, ,
I,
I
1
,I
I
I"
,-
"
.' ,
SITE PREPARATION
1. Loose soils within·areas of fill shall be processed
by either excavating and stockpi~ing the loose ~oil -or by
scarifying, adjusting the soil moisture centent to Cl-ppro:l:d . .,.. ,
mately optimum, and compacti.ng to the recommended relative,
compaction.
2. The soils 'within areas of fill shall be processed
'to a depth adequate 'to insure the removal of major tree roots
"and pipe lines and the compactioh of c:avities left from tree
removal.
3. Excavations for the removal of'subsurface structures
shall be cleared of loose soil and fiile:d with compacted soil.
The backfill of such excavations shall be tompacted to the
recommended relative compaction.
4. Cesspools shall be pumped out and back£illed with
clean sand. The sand backfill shall be flooded and jetted,
for obtaining compaction. Any unsuitable backfill of "
cesspools shall be removed. The preparation of Cesspools,
shall be supervised by the ,soil Engineer.,
5. Abandonment of oil wells shali be in accordance with'
California State Law.
6. Unle'ss otherwise specified, the tops of 'any abandoned
subsurface structu,re shall be remoVed to' a depth of S feet
below the finished grade in bui'lding areas and t-o a depth of
10 feet below finished grade in all bther areas.',
FILL PLACEMENT
1. . The placement' 0:£ fill .shali "confbrm to the Special
Grading Provisions.
Job No. 71-393-1 Page 'D
10/70 ' .. '
~' . "
·~~~.i:'. . ~ \. ' . . ! .',
·1'
I, .
I~
"'I~
'I'
I'
I
'I~ '\ ~, ... .t'
, . ,
I"
<I;'
I:
'I,:
, '
:1·
I
I·
I'
. I~
.... ' ',.
GRADING SPECIFICATIONS
SPECIAL PROVISIONS . ; .
Mobile Home Park,
Poinsettia Lane & San Dl~go Freew$y
1. Areas which are to receive fill shall be com-
pacted to a depth of 12 inches minimum or to a -depth
adequate to compact loosened soils, whichever is gre·ater.
2. Areas in cut s.hall b~ compacted to a. depth of 6,
inches or to a depth a.dequate to compact loosened soils,
·whichever is greater.
3. Soil utilized for filling shall 6dnsist of
on-site materials or imported soil.
4. All imported sciil shall be' approved by the Soils
Engineer for both expansive and strength-qua:{.ities.,
5. All fill and reworked natural $01.1 shall be
compacted to at least 90 percertt of maxim~m density as
determined in accordance with A.S .. T.M~ . Te9t Method
D-1557-70T modified to use t.hree layer,s in lieu of five.
6. 'All fill material shail be placed, at or above
the 'optimum moisture content.:
., ..
." ,
, . ",
,' ..
Job No.· 71-393-1 . Page. E
," , ....
I
I
I.
'1 . :';.,. '. , .' ~ .. ! " ,~' ,
, '.1· ... ::.,
I .. ···
'1'''-.,·· . ..... . ~ '".... .
I,'
; .
I ..
I
. ,
I· , .
I:
"
'I'
.'
·1·· . ,
,.
, . : .:,~1
I:
·1:
1
I
I
1
SURFACE ELEVATION
103 125 82 16 2
106 6.4
115
108 9.0
50'
-
-
-
.-
-
.-
. ...:..
SM
SAND'., v~ry fine to fine, silty,
brown
SAND, . fihe., cl~¥ey., dense.!
tan " .',.1.:.:,: '. 'i, .. ::., '. ". '
SAND, very fine to fine, tan
SAND, fine, silty, clayey,
micaceous, moist, tan and
gray
SAND, fine, silty, micaceous,
'wet, light .brown
Bottom of Bor~ng
.. ,.
. .. ',' '. :
", ,
.. 0
,iIS ~ B ,KENNETH G. OSBORNE & ASSOCIATES
o E-! . . ~ ~~ tf) r:J. BOnING LOG
MO 0.-. ~ e1 f.:1 ti~ TEST HOLE NO. .1 ~~ /iJ.t(J.)
. ~ tf).' ~~. 0.8 No.1: DA'l'E J" O,F'
U 1-<:393 5/10/71 SHEET 1 1
Page F"
. ... '
I
I'
I~
I , ,
I·
,I.
I~
I·'
I
,I
.1"
I::
I·
I
;1
I,'
, ,
"
"
, ,
SURFACE ELEVATION
119 125 95 9.5
117' , 125 93 :12 ?
~
>" . E-1 · E-<+J H~ Z tIP
H\l.1 (.1)44 ~8 fl) • Z · ~ Z ~ fil:,j H8 1M U o U .J;-. tJ 0 0'"' "-;t::~ E-t • . · M§: tf.)
?-i It! X !Jl w',. H
0::.0 ~.Q D::o 0 0..-> ... ,-l U :r:
.. ~~ ... " " ., t • . . . 8 -#,.:-• •••• $p .; ',' , , " * ,
• f •• , .
1'0 ~ : ::: ' .. " .
12 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
z ~o Z HH
(') O~
H -r.q f'I ,..:1 w(5 ~ , ~ fl:CH'
8M 'HO OH
~~ gJ~ Mfl4 e-.~ 1'il MM
W' 'Oz ~dJ)
Z ~U) HfIl H fil 5~ ~ t>
.'
S~ND, very fine tofiney silt-yo, ,
moi'st I loose; brown '
SAND, very fine to medium.;
saturated, gray
caving
,Bottom' of 'Boring'
., .'
.. F .
KENNETH G. OSBORNE &: ASSOCIATES
BORING LOG
TEST 'HOLE NO. .2
~' ~ ,
~OB NO. Dl''\TE I 71-~9-3' 5/10/7l SHEE'r l' OF 1
'" Page: G
SURFACE ELEVATION 60 " -, i ;. , Js It' ; .. 4lJ .. .. . * I I&~!P
':~ :.:. ::.". :',: ;. SAND, very· fiht3 to fine, s il ty I ",-.1' :' ,'. SM ',' ... ':': .: 't' '1 moist, loose, brown 2-" .. , \ " '., '; .. ' . ... . ~. ~'. ;. ~ .. , .
til ~tJ, 8M "/. .. 120 9.3 4_ 1% " fill SAND " very fine to fine,; silty,
IJ .1. I!~;: se clayey; dense, moist, light brn ,
I 'of ;:-;:
11.2 i25 90 7.7 ' .. " SAND, fine, silty, dense, 'mol,st, 6-',~ oJ ~'. :.: SM .. " .~ r~·: ,:; :~I tan
0,' ..
8 -: : ~ :. ~ ~ SAND, very ,f'im~ to fine; clean, '0,', • ......... , " 1ight brown ::;~ ....... · .. " . v IV', .....
10 -· .: .: • -0'
..
104 tla 1 f ... , .', ;' '.t, .'-SP saturated, gray arid tan .. :
._ .. t
12 -· ":. ",
I • : : : ' caving · ". -.' 1-'" .,
I II ... , .... ,. 0'
f .. :. to ' '
14 -• " .. 11 ,,~
: : :' ; ;:
,
16 -Bottom of' Boring
:
" " -" , ,
-", " , ..
.. -..
"
, -" : .. "
, , . " 00
' , -.. .' "
, "
' . ,-,.
-I "
z
~ H 0 KENNETH G. OSBORNE &. ASSOCIATES
~ · E-' · Z HH
8 .jJ H .jJ Z dIP 0 O~
'H Ik tJ) Ik g; 0 H 8 :;;1 (I) t:j, BontNG,!'OG tI) · z · H f2 E..f It: ~ H " ' z ~ til P H8 ~ ~ ILl H 0 ClH "
W 0 Cl 0 8 U ~ il~ ~ ~ea ~-..l ~, ?'EST HOtE' NO .. :3 "
0 , , I« ~ t ;; ~ ~'~ H H .-
· . · !.:t ~ U) 0 z ~ tti
~ Ol ><: II) }2 H Z H ~ rJ.l H U) "
.'
p:; .n ~ .0 0 0 r~ S ~ ~'OB NO. DAT-E -II 0 H ,...{ {j ~ ~ 15/10/71 ,SHEET 1 OF '1 t> 71-393
'"page H
:'1' .
:'1
·1
'I" ,
'1'·
. . I
-.j.
I.~, I',
',1
I
"
I'
'I
~I
·1
1
71" " <
'I' " .
·e -,
SURFACE ELEVATION .50 l
114 125 91 9.4
III 125 89 8.1
114 . ,1-5.5
,111 8.6
~ >< · 8 . Z
8.JJ H.JJ Z r1P 0
H'H U}~ rgo ' .....
U) · z to H ~ , &4
z ~ W~ H~ ~ W t> (.) t> 8U ::> 0' , ~o< E-1 8Z · ~,~ U) w ~ b) X til H Z P:;.Q ~.Q ( 0 0 f~ 0...-1 ~ ,-l 'CJ :f~ CI..4
" : • ... 0'
f.' .. :-': ~. SAND;., very fine to fin.'(3'; g,il'ty,
2-~.m 8M ~10ose, moist, brown
.: .... •• t' " ~ . '.,," ..
4 :.', t -':" ',:.~ '.~
~ . . "
f '. t t' .. /. '" ",
.; t'." ..
6 -,:'~.: : :: :.: .: '~I
1igh,t brown
-.'
black s~ndst6ne nodules
.: ~"J:'
8 -::<:: > t/. VilL
',f. ,-, t~' t I '
".' .f
'14 -t:o)[~
.:~;:: ~~:1 SM
SAND, fine i ,san'dstone nodules,
satura·ted, tan ahd 9ray
SAND, fine to medium" s'i1ty,
gravelly, saturated, light
br,QWri . 16 ~,~;~,~~'{~.:.+;~-+~~~--~~--~--~~,~,~.--~~--~
.-
-
-
..,...
, -,
z HQ HH 08 ~.~ ~~ (f)(j ~ ~M HO QH
t~ ~~. . M f4
HH Oz ~(f) ~(f) H(f) H' sj·
t>
Bottom of' Boring.
: ,,"
, "
"
KENNETH, G. OSBORNE & ASSOCIATES
BQnING' LOG
. ,
, '. TSST, HOLE NO., 4
. ' .. -"
~OB NO.\! DATE ,J: 71.:..393 5/10/7-0
'SHEET 1 OF 1.
.-page' r . "
,.', .1
I" ,'-
I,·
I,:
.. . :; ~
-,
,:""
1.',:--,'-,'
I' "
I,
-t "
I
I,:,'
I
I
,I
I:
I
I
I
, .~'. .
SURFACE ELEVATION 44'
IDS 11. 5
'106 18.6
123 7-9
.'
, ' ~
SAND, very fine to fine; silty ,~,
brown,
(j.-!ll'l:,
. 4' -0i~?:t SM : SAND,' very fine to· fine, si1tY1,
, liI/L1-v., ,clay.ey; brown
1':/') h~" ~ . ~i.it ' -
" 6 ':-~~~~ se ' perched wq"ter
SAND, fin~,silty, micaceous,
sandstone nodules, mOist,
gray and tan
SAND, very fihe1 to coarse, silty _.' c+ayey; gr,ave, 1y, m~caceous;
qray
h ' ';;\.~.' •. ~: ••• ~:;!::,.' SF SANI? t very fine to fine 1 -~1=2~0~ __ ~4-__ ~~~,2~-~.24-__ ~' 16~~'~~ __ 4-~:m~,~1~c~~~c~e~o~u~s~;_,~g~-r~a~Y~' __ ~ ________ ~-i
aot·tom' of' Borj:ng
,-
-'. ,.,.
i' ~ •• -
-
-
-
-
z >< ..:to KENNETHG. ' OSBQRNE & ASSOCIATES >-· 8 • Z HH
E-' +J H~ Z ~ 0 o a-s:
HI+-l u)4-< ~g }o.! ,~-~'H tl}t] BORING tI) • z . ~ E-l ,:x;: "1-LOG z ::1 Iil ::l H8 ~ t ... -~ HO ON
~ I'J Q 0 8U l? rx; ~~ ~~ . ~1!lti 'l."EST HOLE NO. 5 q, , tCCi"'C it; ~.~-,HH · H~ ~ , °z Ci./lf.l
~ til X trl H Z e; tIS' Hill . -.,' . . ~o H ~QB NO 1~ bl\~E -P:;.Q ;3;S 0 M ~. 5~ q.-\ U ~ lli 71-:393' 5/10/7) , SHEE'r l' OF 1 u
-',Page J
I
I
I'.
I ::~ .;,/',
j, ',-; •• ; .....
> ••
""I'~ .... ;:
, ~" ~
-. ;' ..
' .. I :' .'
,'. -,
I
1 :' :.' . , .
I"',,· "
. .
I
·1
I' ,
'1·:' '"
I ·
..
'1: ,"'"
'. -0' •
SURFACE ELEVATION
110 110 7
117 125 93 15.8
119 125 95 9.1
117 125 93 U.5.1
;>i >< · ~ · f-r~ H~ Z dP H~ u)4-l g;o U) · z · H '~ z ~ W ::J H~
~'M U , o u 80 ::> 0' '" <idC €-I • . • ~~ rJ.l
~ 00 X III ,..." tJ::.n ,%..0 0 OM ~~ U :£
65'
Z 0 H
E-t ~ 8 :a' f3.l :z
fr.l P.I
•
: '. ~ : : ! •. ,'1' ::.:.; 'SP . SAND,fine. tq rnediu.m,( .g.ray.· .. · 4 _ :.:;;.
:;';:::' '\j! W.L. .
-
-
-
.-
-
.-
-
,8 ~~ p::~ 8w HO gs"-' ~r.q ra'lf Oz 8'&:i
H ;SW ::t
.. :. 'SAND, veJ;yfin~ to fine, s;i.lty.,
gray and brown
SM
f--:
, very fine to coarse, some
gravel' ~' , .
.v~r:y .fine. to medium
~
micaceous
,-
.1lottom .ot' Bo·ring'. '
" ! '. '
. ~:
z KENNETH C: OSBORNE & ASSOCIATES ...:fO HH· 08 Vlti BORING LOG QH
t'r.! \T.4 TEST HOLE NO .• 6' HH ~·tIl H (J)" '. . ~ 1'1.1~OB NO. DATE· j
i.:> ~ 71-:393:, 5/10/71 SHEET 1 OF .1
. Pag.e K
, .
I, ""'-. -~
I' .. ,"
I
I'
.1
I
I
J" , :.', .
I' . "
,
I'
I
I
I,,'
I,;'
I"
I"
I
1:-
I·
I"
•
SURFACE ELEVATION 65'
..
;>-I
)~ · E-i . Z 8 ./-1 H.sJ 8 dP 0
H"-l C/)\!-I ~H H
trl · Z . f# (-1 z::s r:t1 ==' H8 ~ f.tl t> Cl 0 8(,) ::> 0' " 'Ft; ~ E-t 8Z · ,~~ tr.t M ! ~ t1)
x l/) H Z rr..t:2. ~~ ~ M Orl CJ 0.-
~
.4
6
-'
extreme caving
SAND, very fine to fine, siltYt·
,gray
Bot,..tom of Boring
N0Groui'l'd' Water'
'.,-
I", , . " . , ,-
-' ," , .
. :-'.. .' ....
-,
-"
-
, " ~
-
-I
, : -
-
.-
z KENNETH G.OSBORNE &ASS.oCIl~.TES HO " MH , 08~ ,E-J ~:1 Ul £sf :r:: (4 I<t; jo.:} , BORING 'LOG' t fol HO C'll-f , '. l~ ~ E ~I .. ... TE;ST HOLE NQ. 7 M~
Oz
H ' ~ til H tAu. . , , .
.t:. 's ~bOB NO. DNJ.'E L/ " '. '
' . Cilli~393 !5/10f7l SHEET l OF 1
~_qIAlti11"lI:b1
:eage.L
I,
:It"~
r;;., ~. ::
I, "
,I
1
I,
'I'" '". ":
" , I,: .-
I::'>"'~ , '
, '.' ~: ..... ',-
" t -..r" ,-.
, -,
'I',
" ' .' ,I,
,I'
I:, ,
" ':'
"I,' ~
I" ;'.'
:1' '".:",,',,:
'; .' ',t,',",
I/~,>'
, "
"
SURFACE ELEVATION
una~le tp retain
. '
'/
W I '
,1\' ,
>< :>"' • E-! · E-t..-J H~ Z r#>
H~ 1./)4-1 ~S ~11 · Z · '9 ~-r ::::l 1i.1 ::1 H8 "'-P. ,w () 0 () E-~ U ::> 0' , ... .c ..:e E-l · . • ~,~ ttl >j tn x tf) H
0::.0 r.1 ~ :f. U ' (:)
f~ r.r.· ~ ... :r." • '1
,Z
0
H
8 ~ '(--i :z;
ftr
F.l P4
--:--r:--~~-......---..--......... --------.--'.--!
,>.:':": . SAl.'ID, fine i' silty, brown'; ii, "
2 - ' : : '. r-.. f . , It . ." ,SAND, ~ne, S,~ y, gray
'., ,', 'f-,,' SM,'
4 - : ... ,' :.. "I',' ' ....
:,', :-SAND, f1ne~' sil'ty, brownish'
6 -":, gray " ' .. ' ... . . . , .
-'
-
-
-
i. -
-
--
-
(-l
lI:m
(-"I f4 ~Ci4
O:t; ~ .f
. :'~
"
I.
" '
:. ,
I. ::',
Bottom o'f' Bori~g
.. ~: .. --
.' "
. "
;,'
, "
".'
,'t .• -:
",
" '
,1
'r
, :
" ... '
.:' "
. , '. . :"
, I' t, . .'
" I
:1 .'
.~ ..•
,I,
I:
i
,I" ",
"
I
1
'I':
1
I:"""" 'r
'I
:,1 ,-
',I ..
:,'
,> ", ,"
"
I ' ,
~.'I"::,,
"
:1
I':
, '
'J. ,t. ,
'I'~'
'I:'
,
SURFACE ELEVATION
, ..
" . .. : '. SAND, 'fine, silty, brown
~_-+ __ +-_--!.:.-,._!-----..j" " " '2 -': :,-:,~
, 11.,9
, 1'-'-, . ' .
, SAI:I!D" £ ine,. s il ty t ii-gh,t r~d96
116
114
102 tt9.8
>< >< • E-! . Z f-<.iJ H.iJ Z rJ4> 0
H\l-i C.fJ\l-i g: 0, H
C.fJ . Z . H, ~ Cot Z ::1 ~ ::1 H8 ~ C4 0 o 0 8U ::> 0' , r< <, 8 '8Z . ~C\. tI} r4 !;M, tIi X til ~ ~. H Z .... ~..a ~~ 0 0 i~ 0.-1 U ;Fe ~
. '
, " brown , '.~
4' --• ,'" " '-, > , ,
<,::: SM' SAND; fiite,,~iltYt clayey,'
6 -'~'.,:' " red-brown · ...
" .. ,,'
, .' , " , , .
8 _",· , .... "
· "
, ,
SAND ,fine to, ITIedi um , clayey,'
si1 ty, gray in red-brown ' 1 0 ..... ,:,:: ,:
----'-... : ". \ . .'. · ...... · .' . .' 12 ~ . ";' . ~ .. .*. ..... . .
••
'~
, SAND t fine, si1 ty" red-brown
:', and "gray .... prown '
, 16 -.......... '""-t....--t--
. i ••
.....,
~,
-,
-,
:-, "
-
-
.'
. . .,
, ;
' .. ~
Bottom of Boring
No' Ground W·~ter
"
I.' ~ .. ~
".: ~ .';'
f:" : -.~, '; " .
:, ~ ",. "1 " , '
"/., ," "
" ~~., ~ ! :.,:' ~ " '
'.:. ,',
-i" <
';,
"". ~ 0 KENNETH G. (JS130i~NE & AssoC1ATES· HH
r:,. '.
t
I , '':;'j'
,08~' ______ ~ ______ ~ __ ~ __________ ~_i
(/) e~ i 8 ~~ ::t:tti1 8 f1l ' HO A. ~ , fj~ ttl °z 8~ ;)(/) I;f
,C) ow ~ r}~:I' HH ~U) ,
HOO' .' ,
z ~ POB N<? ",PATE, "
;:, dI70..,;216, "2,/22'/1'0 '. SHEE.T 1 OF 1
BORING LOG
TEST HOLE NO. 15
-" ~. " . page N
, , .' : :'. < "
' .. '
I '.'
'1. -" . '.
'I' . . . '
-" "
;1·
:1,.
I
I
I'.'··'
I'·
I .:'.
I······
I', .' , ..
I ..
I:
I
1
I
I'
I:
· ~ • U) · jl.,.
D IRE C T8 H i ARS 0 M MAR Y
o ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
o 400
JOB NUl-lBER 7/-3r.3 - /
BORING NUMBER B-1'
DEPTH _..::: . .5::::,.' _' -.....:;;;...,.:6=:.-.' __
MOl STURE S.4Z:U;<?,4 ZED
u~DISTURBED ----.---
, ·1200
.. ' ..
NORMAL LOAD, P .S. F. .
,I,'
-. . .
REMOLDED --o-@' 90% MAXIMUM DENSI~t
Page. 0
"
--.'"
. ,~, '
~, .' I.
1 -$-15 .
I ······· " ..
',:, " .
'.
. , .'
1 >-.. ~. .I
I·' ~ .~.
I .'
". .'
·1" ..... :
I: .'
~ ~ .~
<: '1' .....
. , ~ .
~ "i
', ....
I' . '\'.
'I
I,' .. .:
I.
I ••
I
1 .. • APPROX, l!JoRI'N& ·LOCATION.
-$-EORINGS PLA<;£D FOf? PRO.lECT 70-~/6·1
. KENNETH G. OSBORNE & ASSOCIATES
..
I ·BORING.LOCATIONS· .
'I'
I: ' ..
,-, ,~
. Page p ..
"I:, ,',
,J.')
1
,I",
.1' .
,I
'I
I. '
I,:
"
I:'~~~,:
'I
I·' .. '
1
I
I.~ ... ( .
\
'I',
•
, , KG 'KENNETH G. OSBORNE ex, ASSOCIATES
Hall & Foreman, Inc.
2530 North Grand Avenue
Santa Ana, California 92711
Attention: Mr. Hugh ~oreman
Reference: Slope St~bility
,Mobil Home Park
Lakeshore Gardens
Dear Mr. Foreman:
',' '
July'29, 1971
As requested, a study has been made of the stability'
of cut and fill slopes which are to be constructed on the
'Lakeshore Gardens Mobil Home Park in 'Carlsbad, California.
The soils encountered during the soil investigation
'consist primarily of cohesionless sand, w~ich in some
areas have been cemented into a haJ;'dpan. This soil possesses
a peak friction angle o'f 40°. The gross stab-ility of }-1/2
to 1 slopes in this material. is' adequat'e provid-eq. the soil
is properly compacted. The surface st8:bility; which is the'
"critical circle" for cohesionless ,soils, can be maintained
by proper landscaping afte~ proper surface compaction. '
The following items should be inc·luded with the 'grading
specifications for th~ 'projebt:
1. Fill slopes shall be compacted to 90 percent
to the slope surface.
'2. Cut slopes which expose the ,hardpan layer
and it is determined t~at ,the hardpan w;ill
cause potential seepage problems; the cut
'slope shall be overexcavateda minimum
width of 10 feet and treated .a~ a fill,
slope.
Job No. 71-393-1 Pagel'
---•• ' >
• J' :
-' .. , .
I, :",~
~I,
I"
'I'
':1:
',1
' ..
" . . . ;1",":
j" l ......
·1:' ",
';I:"'~,~· :" .
'1'
I·
I·'
I .. ~. "
;1
,
I,
t
,I
I'
"
KENNETH G. OSBOR& ASSOCIATES . . -..... ~ .
'" . '.'." ' . '" "
Hall & Forema~, Inc. . July 29,1971
~~!!!!!t1~~~fe'!!)t€a,.,J:t.wo conditions included wi t~ the plans,
fil.l slopes ar,e considered acceptable
-.,
"', .
Respectfully submitted,
KENNETH G. OSBORNE: & ASSOCIATES
, . ,~
. --'" ..... : .,-' '--'--~~'''''':'', . " ",'
KGO:dhd
cc: Sequoia Pacific Realco
Kenneth· G. . bsborn-e
R. C. E j 143,40
Attn; Mr. Walter E. McKinley;'··
Job No. 71-393-1'.'
. '\ .
~ f.
. . , .. ' ..
... '. , "
,. ~ .
-.:.
" !;". "
.:;.-, • 'f,
P~ge 2
.' ,
" . ' -
• I
I
. ·1
!
I
I
I I