HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 81-06B; POINSETTIA VILLAGE; DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL CENTER; 1985-09-27PE.z.l
&
( SCHATZMANN, THOMPSON & ASSOC., INC.
1010 Linda Vista Drive Suite 203
San Marcos, CA 92069 (619) 744-1371
SURVEYING, CIVIL & TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
September 27,1985
Holmes & Reynolds Development Co.
839 West Harbor Drive Suite I
San Diego, Ca. 92101
Attn: Fred Delaney
RE: Driveway Locations for Commercial Center along Avenida
Encinas South of Poinsettia Lane
Dear Fred:
Per your request we have reviewed the site plan for
....:Poinsettia Village, the commercial center along Avenida
:..Encinas and this letter report will outline the findings as
to the location of driveways onto Avenida Encinas. The
proposed site plan is shown on Exhibit 1. The proposed site
plan shows an access to the site at the first two median
breaks south of' Poinsettia Lane with a third access provided
by the southerly portion of Loganberry Drive. The original
subdivision map for this property provided access to all of
the lots by the loop Street Loganberry Drive and access
rights along Avenida Encinas were waived except for the two
Street openings. The site plan shows one additional access
point which must have the access rights quitclaimed by the
City of Carlsbad. The question is whether this third access
Is necessary for the proposed development and whether a safe
access can be provided.
As an alternative to the third access point a redesign of the
site to align the market with the most northerly median break
was considered. After review of the site plan it does not
seem feasible to move the supermarket to the northerly
portion of the project. This is due to the configuration of
the site, as it Is quite narrow at the northern end and Is
widest at the center median break. As the supermarket will be
the major attractor of trips to the center, representing
approximately 1/2 of the trips associated with this
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
,
It would seem logical to have a driveway which aligns
w
i
t
h
this use. This would minimize the amount of interna
l
t
r
a
v
e
l
which would be required by motorists using the center.
T
h
e
r
e
are some concerns about placing a driveway at the l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
shown on the site plan. These concerns are the sight dist
a
n
c
e
which would exist at this location due to the centerl
i
n
e
radius and the existing grading of the site. The
s
e
c
o
n
d
concern would be the addition of another point of po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
conflict and interuption of flow of traffic along
A
v
e
n
i
d
a
Encinas.
Avenida Encinas Is presently shown as a Secondary Arte
r
i
a
l
o
n
the Circulation Element of the General Plan. Th
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
parameters for this classification of street are
a
d
e
s
i
g
n
speed of 40 miles per hour, a stopping sight distance of
2
7
5
feet, an Intersection spacing of 600 feet and a centerl
i
n
e
radius of 550 feet. The existing median breaks are spaced
a
t
600 feet, 580 feet and 570 feet measured southerly
f
r
o
m
Poinsettia Lane. These median breaks would correspon
d
c
l
o
s
e
enough to the required 600 feet Intersection sp
a
c
i
n
g
requirement. All. . of the existing median breaks are constructed ;with. left turn pockets for both movem
e
n
t
s
o
f
traffic. To maintain the 275 feet sight distance fr
o
m
t
h
e
center driveway a setback would be required for all bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
aad.s1.ôpe banks. Exhibit 2 shows the required line
o
f
s
i
g
h
t
to provide the minimumsight distance as well as a
d
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
of 325 feet. which would be. more desirable.
To determine the need and location of future signal
s
a
n
analysis of the trip generaration and distribution was
m
a
d
e
and the trip generation values for this project
, the adjacent commercial area and the mobile home park wa
s
d
o
n
e
and Is shown on Exhibit 3. The trip distribution fr
o
m
t
h
e
driveways for two cases was computed. The first case
I
s
w
h
e
r
e
all three of the access points to the commercial ce
n
t
e
r
a
r
e
constructed. Case 2 Is where only two access poin
t
s
a
r
e
allowed, the most northerly and. most southerly access po
i
n
t
s
.
The volumes for each of these conditions are shown on Ex
h
i
b
i
t
4. To determine the need for signalization of these
a
c
c
e
s
s
points signal warrants were completed and are included
i
n
t
h
e
appendix. The signal warrants were completed for all
o
f
t
h
e
access points for both Case I and Case 2. From th
e
s
i
g
n
a
l
warrants it would appear that a signal would o
n
l
y
b
e
warranted at driveway number 2 under the Case I conditi
o
n
.
With the Case 2 condition a signal would be warranted
a
t
b
o
t
h
driveway number 1 and driveway number 3.
Page 2
If the center access point is not allowed the signal spacing
from Poinsettia Lane south would be 600 feet and 1150 feet.
If the center access point were allowed the signal spacing
would be 1180 feet south of Poinsettia Lane. This alternative
would have one less signal, provide for better Intersection
spacing and place the signal at the main entrance to the
mobile home park.
One of the major factors to consider with the center driveway
Is the sight distance Issue. Due to the curvature of the road
and the grading of the site there is presently Insufficient
sight distance at this location. To provide the required
sight distance a special building and grading setback would
have to be Imposed so the adequate sight distance could be
maintained. This sight distance must be able to be maintained
over time and an easement for maintalnance proposes should be
granted to the City of Carlsbad. This would allow the City to
m aintain this area in the event the private property owner
does not properly maintain the landscaping. If the sight
distance can be maintained for the design speed there should
be no significant Impact associated with this additional
driveway.
From this analysis it would appear that providing the access
at the center median break the ultimate number of traffic
signals could be reduced while providing the best signal
spacing. If the center access were not allowed there would be
a. signal located 600 feet south of Poinsettia Lane. This
distance would be quite short and would require that the two
signals be coordinated. Installation of a traffic signal at
the main entrance to the mobile home park would also provide
those motorists with easier access to both Avenida Encinas
and the commercial center as the traffic volumes Increase
with future development.
It seems that the sight distance at the center driveway Is
the major concern and this can be mitigated with proper
design of the site to provide the necessary building,
landscaping and grading setbacks. It Is recommended that a
maintenance easement be granted over this area so that both
property owners and the City of Carlsbad could do work within
the easement if needed to maintain the proper sight distance.
From this analysis it would appear that the center driveway
as proposed would not cause a problem to the circulation of
Page 3
traffic along Avenida Encinas as long as the proper sight
distance is maintained. By providing the center access point
the total number of signals along this stretch of road could
be decreased and provide controlled access for both the
commercial center and the mobile home park.
If you have any questions or need additional information on
this item please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Len Schatzmann
Professional Engineer
z
71
. 0.•
1.717 .4cA93
LIN
5AN QIGO ,NTJTA
-
0, AZIS ACA
—
I - SCHATZMAIIN. ThOMPSON$ ASSOCIATES 1 DRIVEWAY VOLUMES
(.. -- • suit CIVIL TRAFFIC INGINECRING J - FOR CASE 1 & CASE 2 EXHIBIT 4
96 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual 12.IS7S
Figure 9-IC
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS
(Based on Estimated Average Doily Traffic — See 4.,. 2)
1f7IIJJ.h4i4Y' AJt 1 t4.4t /
URBAN...... -------RURAL Minimum Requirements
EADT
1. Minimum Vehicular
Sati sf1.4 Hot Satisfied_________ Vehicles p., doy on major Veliclssp.rdoyonhi.v..,
,873
street (total of both
approaches)
volume miner. streetapproach
(om direction only) Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach 17, VO
Urbmu Reisi Urban Rural Major Street Minor Street
5,600 2,400 1.680 2 armor ........1 ................9,600 6,720
6,720
2,400 1,680 <j) 2,240
I .................8,000
more 1 .............2 or more ........... 8,000 5,600 3,200 Z240
2. Interruption of Continuous Traffic
Vehicles per day on major Vehicles per day on hier—
Satisfied 3e Not Satisfied ________
street (total of both volume minor- street approach
2 or more ........2 or nor, ............(1.)
approaches)
/P 7O
(on. direction only)
P4um6orof lanes formoving traffic on each approach
Major Street Minor Street Urban Rural Urban Rural
8,400 1,200 850 1 .............1 .................12,000
10,080 1,200 850 2 or mom .........I .................14,400
2 o more ........2 armor ............_____ 10.080 1,120
8,400 1,600 1,120
3. Combination
1 .............. 2or more ............12,000
Satisfied Not Satisfied 2 Warrants 2 Warrants
No one warrant satisfied but following warrants
fulfilled 80% or more....
1 2
NOTE:
Left torn movements from the major street may be included with miner Street volumes if a separate signal phase is to be provided for the left-turn movement.
To ho used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where actual traffic volumes Cannot be counted.
TS- 1O.0
SCHATZM*N I A V EN I D A EN C I N AS L CVL £ TNa I & DRIVEWAY # 1 CASE 1
__ TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual 12-197
Figure 90C
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS
(Bas.4 on Estimated A,.qsg. Doily Traffic — S.. P4.t. 2) V AII 9 4'' /
URBAN........- ...............RURAL..----------...... Minimum Requirements
EADT
1. Minimum Vehicular
Satisfied x Not Satisfied________ Vehicles per day on major
street (total of both
"preaches)
V.hicl.sp.rd.yonkiter_,
volwnominor.str coo approach
(on* direction only)
Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach'
Urban R.p.J Urban Rural Major Street Minor Street
1 .............I ................ 5,600 2,400 1,6 80 vn 2orr ........1 ................9,600 2 or more ........2 or more ............()
6,720
6,720
2,400 680 1,
2,240 1 ............. 2 or tear. ...........8,000
.8000
5,600 3,200 2,240
2. Interruption of Continuous Traffic
Vehicles per day on major Vuhicles per day on
San sfied X Not Satisfied Street (total of both roiwn. minor-streeta.00ch __________
approaches)
/5V C.'
(on, direction only)
31/77 Numb.rof lanes forinoving traffic on each approádi
Major Street Minor Street Urban Rural Urban Rural
8,400 1,200 850 1 .................12,000
2 or more ........ 1 ................. 10,080 1,200 850 2 or more ........2 or more
.14,400
10.080 1,120
8,400 1,600 1,120
3. Combination
1 .............. 2or more ............12,000
Satisfied Not Sati sfi.d 2 Warrants 2 Woryttnt,
No one warrant satisfied but following warrants
fulfilled 80% or more...._
1 2
NOTE:
Left turn movements from the major street may be included with minor Street volumes if a separate signal phase is to be provided for the loft-turn movement.
To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or ether locations where actual traffic volumes cannot b. counted.
- Is- I ct-c
scH*rzMAwI ThO50"* ASS0CImT53 ) I V EN 1 D A EN C N AS
SUtY0. CJVL T•ac'C wrrrJ & DRIVEWAY II 2
1 11
CASE 1
36 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING
Traffic Manual 12.197
Figure 9-IC
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS
on Estimated Avorege, Doily Traffic - S.. P4.s. 2)
All) J
URBAN.... .................RURAL..----------
.... Minimum Requirements
EADT 1. Minimum Vehicular
Satisfied ___________ Not Sotisfl.d________ Vehicles per day on major V.hici.sperdayanhiev.,
stress (total of both
approaches)
volume minor. ssv,,t approach
(one direction only) Plumber of lanes for moving traffic on each approach
urbas I.puó urban Rural
Major Street Minor Street
5,600 2,100 1,680
6,720 2,400 1,680 2 or nor ........2 or nor 6,720 2,240
1 .............I .................8.000 2 or more ........1 .................9,600
. 5.600 3,200 2,240
2. Interruption of Continuous Traffic
Vehicles p., day on major Vehicles p day on higher — Satisfied Not _________
street (total of both volume ininor.streatapproach approaches)
1,072,1d
(one direction only)
2fC.4
Numb.rof lanes formoving traffic on each approach
Major Street Minor Street Urban Rural Urban Rural
1 ............. 2 or more ............8,000
1 ..............I .. ................ 8,400 1,200 850 10,080 1,200 850 2 armor ........ 2or more 10.080 1.120 2ormor . ..........
8,400 10 1,120
2 o more ........1 .................14,400
3. Combination
.12,000
Satisfied Not Satisfied
.12,000
2 Warrants 2 Warrants
No one warrant satisfied but following warrants
fulfilled 80% or more..
1 2
NOTE:
Left turn movements from the major street may 6e included with minor street volumes if a seporote signal phase is to be provided for the left-turn movement.
To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locati
o
n
s
w
h
e
r
e
a
c
t
u
a
l
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
v
o
l
u
m
e
s
c
a
n
n
o
t
6o counted.
TS- 10-C
9-6 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual 12.1S1
Figure a-ic
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS
(Based on Estimated Average Doily Traffic - S., Plot. 2)
URBAN ---------------RURAL Minimum Requirements EADT
1. Minimum Vehicular
_______ Satisfied >0 Plot Satisfied Vehicles per day on major
street (total of both approaches)
Vehid spa yonh.#.r-,
voluwieminor-stveusappraocb (one direction only)
3508 -lea, f/040
Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach
Urban Reed Urban Rural Major Street Minor Street
1 ..............1 ................8,000 5,600 2,400 1,680 2 or more ........1 .................9,600 2 or more ........2 or more 6,720
6,720 2,400 1,68.0 2,240 1 ............. 2 o more ...........8,000 51600 3,200 2,210
2. Interruption of Continuous Traffic
Satisfied Not ________
Vehicles par day on major
street (total of both
Vehicles per day on higker
volume musor.stveetappioodt
approaches)
/4, VW
(one direction only)
3808 P4umb.rof lanes forrnoving traffic on each approach
Major Street Minor Street Urban Rural Urban Rural
1 .............I ..................12,000 8,400 1,200 850
10,080 1,200 850 2 or more ........2 or more 10.080 Ct) 1,120
2 or more ........1 .................14,100
8,400 1,600 1,120
3. Combination
1 ..............2 or more ............12,000
Satisfied Not Satisfied 2 Warrants 2 Warrants
No one warrant satisfied but following warrants
fulfilled 80% or moro..
1 2
NOTE:
Left turn movements from the major street may be included with minor street volumes if a separate signal phase is to be provided for the left-turn movement.
To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where actual traffic volumes cannot be counted.
TC
r,
AMAIe(TSON5A330CMY5 AVENIDA ENCINAS SUVIYINa.CIVUI.ITNA..IC(NG....IN9.G
& DRIVEWAY # 1 CASE 2
9-6 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual
12.1g7
Figure 9-IC
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS
(B.sed on Estimated Average Daily Traffic - S.. Plot. 2)
7-
URBAN ---------------- RURAL Minima R.quir.m.nss
EADT
1. Minimum Vehicular
Sassfi.d Not 5.tisfi.4_______ Vehicles per day on major
street (total of both
appmach.$)
Vehicles per dnyonhi#.r.,
volume miro,.ssraeti.ck
(om direction only)
-7706 Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach
Urban novel Urban Rural Major Street Minor Street
5,600 2,400 1,680
2 o more ........I 6,720 2,100 1,680
6,720 (1 2,240- 2 or more ........ 2cr more ............(9.,600'
1 ............- 2or mom ............8000 rn 5,600 3,200 2,210
2. Interruption of Continuous Traffic
Vehicles per day on major Vehicles per day an higher-
Satisfied ______Met Satisfied street (total of both
approaches)
vc)
voum. minor- st,eut Opp reach
(one direction only)
3708 Numb.rof lanes for moving traffic on each approach
I .............1 .................8,000
Major Street Minor Street Urban Rural Urban Rural
8,100 1,200 850 I .............1 ..................12,000
me 2 or re ........1 .................14,400
2 or more ........2 or more
10,080
10.080
1,200 850
(T) 1,120
8,400 1,600 1,120
3. Combination
1 ..............2 or more .............12,000
Satisfied Not satisfied 2 Warrants 2 Warrants
No one warrant satisfied but f011owing warrants
fulfilled 80%., morn.. 1 2
MOTE:
Loft turn movements from the major street may be included with minor street volumes if a separate
signal phase is to be provided for the loft-turn movement.
To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where actual traffic volumes cannot
be counted.
TS-1iC
[11Th womaAwtomnis
J I AVENIDA ENCINAS I
TPAPM INGli.IIIINO & DRIVEWAY # 3 CASE 2
MN PiE.&O aL( i,4rePCXA1e. 5
S.7J7 AA3
c /
ISIS ACA-13
=
PROPOSED SITE PLAN EXHIBIT 1
S
...
Ii
stop 12 10:
fl il : lanes = 4 I speed = 30 \ I AVENIDA ENCINA V 6 pop. ( 250,000 N- -s 5 PHF=0.90 /
F 50% of 3 impeding -----------50% of 6 Impeding 1 +0% 49% of 2 on right MOVE. 2 . 48% of 5 on right 3 A
1 I r Traffic Unspecified.
Composition Average values I 8 I stop used 7 9 +0% These Movements 8 and 9 DRIVEWAY #1 share lanes: 10 and 11 Kit (Fl> or <PrtSc> key for hard copy: Any other key to continue.
move. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 vol. 120 799 22 6 810 38 10 3 6 10 3 150 evol. 147 888 24 7 900 42 12 4 7 12 4 183 "
sight +0.00 * * +0.00 * * +0.00 +0.00 +0.00 +0.00 +0.00 +0.00 cap. 359 * * 374 * * 31 152 152 42 42 663 xcap. 212 * * 367 * * 19 141 141 26 26 479 LOS .0 *.* B * * E D D B B A
• This Is a..4 - Way Intersection
1) Major street is: AVENIDA ENCINA2) Minor street is: DRIVEWAY #1
3) Volumes 4) Sight adjustments
5).Traff Ic Composition on maJor 6) Traffic Composition on minor Unspecified 7) Speed = 30 8) Number of lanes = 4 50% of 3 Impeding 9) PopulatIon. < 250,000 10) Percentages of 50% of 6 impeding 11) Shared lanes: 8 and 9 traffic in lanes: 49% of 2 on right
10 and 11. 48% of 5 on right 12) Peak Hour Factor = 0.90
.13) Corner A: Stop, no Accel. lane, normal radius
14) Corner B: no right turn lane, normal turn
.15) Corner C: Stop, noAcce.l. lane, normal radius
Corner D: no right turn lane, normal turn
Grades:e = +0, f +0, g = +0 18) Exit to DOS
Enter # to change, 0 to recalculate, 18 to quit:
move. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 vol. 120 799 22 6 810 38 10 3 6 10 3 150 evol. 147 888 24 7 900 42 12 4 7 12 4 183 sight +0.00 * * +0.00 * * +0.00 +0.00 +0.00 +0.00 +0.00 +0.00 cap. 359 * * 374 * * 31 152 152 42 42 663 xcap. 212 * * 367 * * 19 141 141 26 26 479 LOS C * * B * * E D D E B A
3C14ATZMANN INOIlPION I ASSOCIAT1 I
-j CAS E 1 - DRIVEWAY #1
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS --PLANNING METHOD (01-01-1980)
SUMMARY OF INPUT DATA
Street -name (SE - NW): AVENIDA ENCINAS
Street name (NE - SW): DRIVEWAY #2
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Direction of travel: SE HE NW SW
(1) Left-turn volume (+PHF): 256 33 9 131
(2) Through volume (+PHF): 538 18 595 18
(3) Right turn volume (+PHF): 21. 9 88 226
(4) Number of shared (JT/TH/RT lanes: 0 0 .. 0 0
(5) Number of exclusive LT lanes: 1 1 1 1
(6) Number of LT/TH or LT/RT lanes: 0 0 0 0
(7) % LT traffic in exclusive lane(s): ibO 100 100 100
(8) Number of exclusive TH lanes: 1 0 1 0
(9) Number of TH/RT lanes: 1 1 1 1
(10) Number of exclusive RT lanes: 0 0 0 0
(ii) No. of exit lanes (reverse dir.): 2 1 2 1
(la) Peak-hour factor: 0.90
PRESS (SHFT)PRT8C TO PRINT THIS INFORMATION. PRESS (EEC) TO CONTINUE
srGN'AUZED INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS --PLANNING METHOD (01-01-1980)
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Street name(SE -. NW):AVENIDA ENCINAS
Street name (NE - SW) DRIVEWAY #2
Direction of travel: 55 HE NW SW
Critical LT lane volume: 284 37 10 146
Critical TH lane volume 311 30 379 271
Volume opposing LT movement: 759 20 621 20
Conflicting TH + LT movements: 321 176 664 308
Critical movement volume: 664 308 664 308
Sum of critical movements = 972
Relationship to capacity: BELOW CAPACITY
PRESS <SHIFT>PRTSC TO PRINT THESE RESULTS. PRESS (ESC> TO CONTINUE
scNArzIAM* fl4O$CM I ASSOCIATES
- SURVIVINCL CIVIL I TRAFFIC tIG..(CrnNG J CASE 1 - DRIVEWAY #2
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS --PLANNING METHOD (01-01-1980)
SUMMARY OF INPUT DATA
Street name (SE - NW): AVENIDA ENCINAS
Street name (NE - SW): DRIVEWAY #2
(1) (2). (3) (4)
Direction of travel: SE NE NW SW
(1) Left-turn volume (+PHF): 256 33 9 131
(2) Through volume (4PHF): 538 18 595 18
(3) Right turn volume (PHF): 21 9 88 226
(4) Number of shared LT/TH/RT lanes: 0 0 0 0
(5) Number of exclusive LT lanes: 1 1 1 1
(6) Number of LT/TH or LT/RT lanes: 0 0 0 0
(7) % LT traffic in exclusive lane(s): 100 100 100 100
(8) Number of exclusive TH lanes: 1 0 2 0
(9) Number of TH/RT lanes: . 1 . 1 0 1
(10) Number of exclusive RT lanes: 0 . 0 1 0
(11) No. of exit lanes (reverse dir.): 2 1 3 1
(12) Peak-hour factor: 0.90
PRESS (SHIFT>PRTSC TO PRINT THIS INFORMATION. PRESS <ESC> TO CONTINUE
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS --PLANNING METHOD (01-01-1980)
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Street name (SE - NW): AVENIDA ENCINAS
Street name (NE - SW): DRIVEWAY #2
Direction of travel: SE NE NW SW
Critical LT lane volume: 284 37 10 146
Critical TH lane volume: 311 30 331 271
Volume opposing LT movement: 759 20 621 .20
Conflicting TH :+ LT movements: 321 176 615 308
Critical movement volume: 615 308 615 308
Sum of critical movements = 923
Relationship to capacity: BELOW CAPACITY
PRESS <SHIFT>PRTSC TO PRINT THESE RESULTS. PRESS <ESC> TO CONTINUE
SCHATZMAMK nq0"P50"&ASS0QATTS ) I CASE 1 - DRIVEWAY #2
- $'I" CIVIL & TRAFFIC IGw,wø J I ADDITIONAL RIGHT TURN LANE I I
AVENIDA ENCINAS
MOVE. 2
+0%
lanes = 4
speed = 30
pop. ( 250,000
5 - PHF=0.90
4 50% of 3 Impeding
41% of 2 on right
. r Traffic Unspecified.
I I Composition Average values
I I stop used
7 9 +0% These Movements No shared lanes
DRIVEWAY #3 share lanes:
Hit (Fl> or (PrtSc> key for hard copy: Any other key to continue.
move. 2 3 4 5 .7 9
vol. 562 103 130 596 70 10
evol. 624 114 159 662 86 159
sight * * +0.00 * +0.00 +0.00
cap. * * 462 * 66. 770
zcap. * * 303 * -19 612
1.0$ * * B * F A
This Isa 3 - Way intersection
I) Major street is: AVENIDA EMCINA2) Minor street Is: DRIVEWAY #3
3) Volumes 4) SIght adjustments
5) Traffic Compositionon major 6) Traffic Composition on minor Unspecified
7) Speed =1 30 8) Number of lanes = 4 50% of 3 impeding
9) Population ( 250,000 10) Percentages of
11> Shared lanes: None traffic in lanes: 41% of 2 on right
Peak Hour Factor= 0.90
Corner A: Stop, no Accel. lane, normal radius
Corner B: no right turn lane, normal turn
Corner C:
Corner D:
Grades;e = +0, f = +0 18) Exit to DOS
Enter # to change, 0 to recalculate, 18 to quit:
move. 2 3 4 5 7 9
vol. 562 103 130 596 70 130
evol. 624 114 159 662 86 159
sight * * +0.00 * +0.00 +0.00
cap. * *. 462 * 66 770
xcap. * * 303 * -19 612
LOS * * B * F A
IUYIVIM CSVI 4
U50M 4 A$,Ocs*T!3
j CASE ). - DRIVEWAY #3 SCATZAN. Th0
... A
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS --PLANNING METHOD (01-01-1980)
SUMMARY OF INPUT DATA
Street name ( S - N): AVENIDA ENCINAS
Street name ( C - W): DRIVEWAY #1
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Direction of travel: 5 C N U
Left-turn volume (+PHF): 295 10 6 91
Through volume (+PHF): 626 3 648 20
Right turn volume (+PHF): 22 6 91 295
Number of shared LTITH/RT lanes: 0 0 0 0
Number of exclusive LT lanes: 1 1 1 1
Number of LT/TH or LT/RT lanes: 0 0 0 0
% LT traffic In exclusive lane(s): 100 100 100 100
Number of exclusive TH lanes: 1 0 1 0
Number of TM/RI' lanes: 1 1 1 1
Number of exclusive RT lanes: 0 0 0 0
No. of exit lanes (reverse dir.): 12 1 2 1
Peak-hour factor: 0.90
PRESS (SHIFT>PRTSC TO PRINT THIS INFORMATION. PRESS (ESC) TO CONTINUE
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVEL. OF SERVICE ANALYSIS --PLANNING METHOD (01-01-1980)
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Street name -( S - N): AVENIDA ENCINAS
Street name ( E - U): DRIVEWAY #1
Direction of travel: S C N W
Critical LT lane volume: 328 11 7 101
Critical TH lane volume: 360 10 411 350
Volume opposing LT movement: 821 22 720 -3
Conflicting TH + LT "movements: 367 lii 738 361
Critical movement volume: 738 361 738 361
Sum of critical movements = 1099
Relationship to capacity: BELOW CAPACITY
PRESS (SHIFT>PRTSC TO PRINT THESE RESULTS. PRESS <ESC> TO CONTINUE
_ CASE 2 - DRIVEWAY #1 -
3øATZAiu( ThOU5CS I AS3OC1AT3 ] I
FM
U
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS --PLANNING METHOD (12-02-1985)
SUMMARY OF INPUT DATA
Street name ( W - E): AVENIDA ENCINAS
Street name ( S - N): DRIVEWAY #3
(1) (2) (3) Direction of travel: W S E (1) Left-turn volume (PHF): 0 148 222 (2) Through volume (-PHF): 516 0 517 (3) Right turn volume (-PHF): 148 222 0 (4) Number of shared LT/TH/RT lanes: 0 0 0 (5) Number of exclusive LT lanes: 0 1 1 (6) Number of LT/TH or LT/RT lanes: 0 0. 0 (7) 7. LT traffic in exclusive lane(s) 0 100 100 (8) Number of exclusive TH lanes: 1 0 1 (9) Number of TH/RT lanes: . 0 0 0 (10) Number of exclusive RI lanes: 0 ' 1 0 (11) No. of exit lanes (reverse dir.):' 2 1 2 (.12) Peak-hour factor: 0.90
PRESS <SHIFT>PRTSC TO PRINT THIS INFORMATION. PRESS <ESC> TO CONTINUE
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS --PLANNING METHOD (12-02-1985)
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Street name ( W - E):AVENIDA ENCINAS Street name ( S - N): DRIVEWAY #3
Direction of travel: ' W S E Critical LT lane volume: 0 164 247 .;Critical TH lane volume: 738 0 574 Volume opposing LT movementi 574 0 738 Conflicting TH + LT movements: 984 0 574 Critical movement volume: 984 164 984
Sum of critical movements = 1149 Relationship to capacity: BELOW CAPACITY
PRESS <SHIFT>PRTSC TO PRINT THESE RESULTS. PRESS <ESC> TO CONTINUE
5u4vIvNsQ.cgv4cIcgs.((rn$ CASE 2 - DRIVEWAY #3
4OMflN4MI( ThO$ON 4 A3$OaAr11 I