Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
CT 2017-0004; SIX ON MADISON; ACOUSTICAL ANALYSIS REPORT; 2017-03-22
RBC ficoustics, Inc. NOISE CONTROL EXPERTS ACOUSTICAL ANALYSIS REPORT SIX ON MADISON CONDOMINIUM City of Carlsbad, California It PREPARED FOR: Oak & Madison LLC. 7851 Mission Center Court, Ste 200 San Diego. 92108 ABC Report No: 2492 March 22, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION: 1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 2 3.0 APPLICABLE STANDARDS: 3 3.1 Exterior Noise Standards: 3 3.2 Exterior-to-Interior Noise Standards: 3 3.3 Interior Noise Limits: 3 3.4 Partition Sound and iMPAa Rating Requirements: 5 4.0 NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT; 6 4.1 Existing Noise Computer Modeling: 6 4.1.1 Vehicular Traffic Noise Modeling: 6 4.1.2 Railroad Noise Impacts: 8 4.1.3 Existing Cumulative Noise Impacts: 9 4.2 Future Noise Environment: 9 5.0 CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT AND MITIGATION: 10 5.1 Exterior Noise Attenuation: 10 5.2 Interior Noise Attenuation: 10 5.3 Train Horn Noise Attenuation: 10 5.2.1 Partition Sound and Impact Rating Requirements: 11 5.2.2 Partition Penetration and Design Guidelines: 11 6.0 ACOUSTICAL NOTES, DETAILS & GUIDELINES:...... 12 6.1 Piping and Ductwork: 13 6.2 HVAC Vibration Isolation: 14 6.3 ELEaRiCAL System:.. 15 6.4 Elevator Isolation: 15 6.5 Resilient Channel Installation Guidelines: 16 6.6 Additional Guidelines: 16 6.7 Quality Control: 16 7.0 FUTURE ACOUSTICAL CONSIDERATIONS: 17 8.0 REFERENCES CITED: 18 9.0 CERTIFICATION: 19 FIGURE 1: VICINITY MAP 1 FIGURE 2: SITE PLAN 2 FIGURE 3: SITE LOCATION AND TRAFFIC NOISE CNEL CONTOURS 7 FIGURE 4: CONVENTIONAL TRAIN HORN NOISE FIGURE 5: SITE LOCATION AND TRAIN WHISTLE NOISE CONTOURS (4'" FLOOR) 9 I UST OF TABLES TABLE 1: CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE NOISE COMPATIBILITY GUIDELINES 4 TABLE 2: STC RATINGS OF TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL PARTITIONS 12 liyiENTS ATTACHMENT "A" - NOISE CALCULATION DATA ATTACHMENT "B" - ACOUSTICAL MATERIAL CUT-SHEETS ATTACHMENT "C" - ACOUSTICAL DETAILS Six on Madison Condominium 1.0 INTRODUCTION: Six on Madison Condominium project would construct a new four-story condominium residential building comprising of 6 living units and a covered over-ground parking. The project site is located northwest of the Madison Street and Oak Avenue intersection in Carlsbad, California. Vicinity land uses are primarily residential. Noise sources of potential significance in the area include the local streets and the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) railroad tracks which run approximately 900 feet west of the site (Figure 1). The City of Carlsbad has requested an Acoustical Analysis Report to assess compliance of the project with the City's exterior and interior noise standards. This Acoustical Analysis Report addresses the cumulative exterior and interior noise levels impacting the project. It is based on vehicular traffic information provided by the City of Carlsbad and noise measurements conducted at the project site by ABC Acoustics. It also makes use of the architectural plans prepared for the project by BGI Architecture (July 2017). The following sections of this report include a description of the project, a discussion of the applicable standards, results of acoustical analysis and the need for acoustical treatment measures to ensure compliance with interior acoustics of 45 dBA Ldn or lower, as required by the City of Carlsbad. m x FIGURE 1: VICINITY MAP ABC Acoustics, Inc.Report 2492 Six on Madison Condominium 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Six on Madison Condominium project site is located at 3095 Madison Street within the City of Carlsbad, California. The project site is currently vacant. The project would construct 6 attached single-story condominium units accommodated within top 3 floors of a four-story building. The ground floor includes covered parking spaces, ancillary spaces and a commercial .space (1,001 square feet). A Site Plan for the project is included in Figure 2. Noise levels impacting the project site stem primarily from traffic on Madison Street and, to a lesser degree. Oak Avenue. BNSF railroads run 900 feet southwest of the site. Although train noise is barely audible at the project site, occasional train whistles are clearly audible. This report includes an analysis of the noise impacts relating to railroad whistle in Section 4.1.3. FIGURE 2: SITE PLAN ABC Acoustic, Inc.Report; 2492 six on Madison Condominium 3.0 APPLICABLE STANDARDS: 3.1 Exterior Noise Standards: The City of Carlsbad has established a set of community noise standards which identify compatible outdoor and indoor noise levels for various types of land uses (Table 1). As presented in Table 1, multi-family residential development is normally acceptable within an exterior noise environment of 65 dBA Ldn or lower. If the exterior noise levels exceed the normally acceptable levels, measures should be examined to reduce such impacts to below a level of significance at the project site. 3.2 Exteiior-to-lnterior Noise Standards: If exterior noise levels cannot be reduced to acceptable levels by practical means, specific design and construction techniques must be incorporated to reduce the interior noise levels. The maximum interior noise limit for residential land uses within the City of Carlsbad is 45 dB-A Ldn. Units of noise are expressed as decibels (dB) and the "A"-weighted noise scale is used because it closely approximates the perception of loudness by humans. Ldn (Day-Night Community Noise Level) is the energy-averaged time-weighted annual noise level over a 24-hour period. Time-weighting technique applies a penalty to the actual hourly noise levels during certain periods of evening and/or nighttime hours. Ldn applies a 10 dB-A penalty to the nighttime hours of 10 pm to the following 7 am. This penalty was selected to reflect people's sensitivity to noise as a function of activity. Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) is similar to Ldn except it has an additional 5 dB penalty applied to the evening hours of 7 pm to 10 pm. Ldn and CNEL are often used interchangeably. 3.3 Interior Noise Limits: The City of Carlsbad, per California Code of Regulations, Title 24, requires all new multi-unit residential projects located within an exterior noise environment exceeding 60 dBA CNEL to conduct an interior acoustical analysis. The interior Acoustical Analysis Report must address the interior noise impacts at the project site and, if necessary, recommend sound attenuation measures to reduce such impacts at all habitable areas to 45 dBA CNEL or lower. ABC Acoustic, inc. Report: 2492 Six on Madison Condominium TABLE 1: CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE - NOISE COMPATIBILITY GUIDELINE Land Use Category Residential- Single Family Residential- Muitlple Family Transient Lodging- Mc^els, Hoteb Schools, Libraries, Churches, Hospitals, Nursing Homes Auditwiums, Concert SptHls Arena, Outdoor Pla)^unds, Parks Golf Courses, Riding Stables, Water Recreation, Cemeteries Odice Buildings, Business Commercial and Professional Industrial, Manuhicturing, Utilities, Agriculture Exterior Day/Night Noise Levels DNLorLdnJB 55 60 65 70 75 80 INTERPRETATION Normally Acceptable Specified land use is satisfiictiMy, based up<Hi the assumption that any buildings involved are of normal ccHiventicmal construction, without any ^>eciai noise insulation requirements Conditionally AcceptaNe New construction or development should be undertaken only after a detailed analysis of the noise reducti<Mi requirements is made and needed noise insulation features included In the desiga Normally Unacceptable: New construction or devel<^ment should generally be discouraged. If new construction or devel(^ment does proceed, a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements must be made and needed noise insidation features included in the design. Clearly Unacceptable: New ccmstructicKi or devdopment clearly should not be undertaken. ABC Acoustic, Inc.Report: 2492 six on Madison Condominium 3.4 Partition Sound and Impact Rating Requirements: The City of Carlsbad requires the common party walls of all attached residential development to be rated for sound. The common floor/ceiling assemblies of residential units should also comply with a minimum impact rating in addition to the sound rating. All common party walls of attached residential units are required to have a sound transmission class (STC) rating of 50 or higher. Similarly, all common floor/ceiling assemblies are required to have an STC rating of 50 or more and an impact insulation class (IIC) rating of 50 or more. STC and IIC ratings are single-numbered ratings which are arrived at through testing the transmission loss of a wall or a floor/ceiling assembly at octave-band frequencies and then fitting the results into a preset curve. The higher the STC or IIC rating, the better the sound and vibration performance of a partition. ABC Acoustic, Inc. Report: 2492 six on Madison Condominium 4.0 NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT: Existing noise sources of potential significance in the vicinity of Six on Madison Condominium project are Madison Street and, to a lesser degree, Oak Avenue and the BNSF railroad tracks. Existing noise levels at the project site were measured during peak hours of afternoon traffic on July 21, 2017, a typical sunny and calm Carlsbad day. On-site cumulative hourly average noise levels (Leqh) at 40 feet from Madison Street's centerline were measured to be 57-58 dBA. Similarly, hourly average noise levels (Leqh) at 30 feet from Oak Avenue were measured to be 53-54 dBA. Hourly average noise levels during peak hours of traffic are often equivalent to the Ldn at that location. Noise measurements were conducted using a Bruel and Kjaer (B&K) Type 2250 analyzer, a Type 1 Sound Level Meter, per ANSI S1.4. 4.1 Existing Noise Computer Modeiing: Noise levels impacting the project site were also calculated using the SoundPlan Computer Model along with traffic information provided by SANDAG and available train noise data. 4.1.1 Vehicular Traffic Noise Modeling: Madison Street is a two-lane, two-way local road running east of the project site. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. According to SANDAG, the current traffic volume along Madison Street is approximately 2,100 Average Daily Trips (ADT). Oak Avenue is a two-lane, two-way local road running east of the project site. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. The current traffic volume along Oak Avenue is approximately 200 ADT (SANDAG). Exterior noise levels impacting the project site from traffic along these two roadways were calculated using the SoundPlan Computer Model. Details of noise modeling are presented in Attachment "A". Noise contours are shown in Figure 3 below. Traffic- related noise impacts at building fagade would be approximately 58 dBA CNEL which is in total agreement with the on-site measured noise levels. ABC Acoustic, Inc. Report: 2492 Six on Madison Condominium <h % % FIGURE 3: SITE LOCATION AND TRAFFIC NOISE CNEL CONTOURS ABC AcoustiC; Inc.Report: 2492 Six on Madison Condominium 4.1.2 Railroad Noise Impacts: The BNSF railroad tracks pass 915 feet southwest of the project site. These tracks are utilized by the Amtrak as well as the Coaster and the BNSF Cargo trains. Train locomotive noise impacts are not significant at the project site due to shielding effect of the existing development within the intervening topography. The only noise of potential significance is due to train horn. Sound intensity of conventional train horns with respect to distance is presented in Figure 4. Although there are no railroad crossings at immediate vicinity of the project site, short-term noise impacts due to train horn were assessed to present peak instantaneous impacts. iia too 90 80 70.s:* 60 50 •8000 CONVENTIONAL TRAIN HORN NOISE INTENSITY vs. DISTANCE 108.5 i t04.o| > 108.5 [ 104.0 96.5f 90.5 2 ^96.5 190.5 84.5/18^* 1 l\84.5 1 X83.0 170^ j —1 !1 j "■■'—-^.^.5' I 1 ' ■ i Inaudible [ r 1 1 1 11 Loud Volct tshouti j 1 1ishouti Loud Voice i 1 : !f T *1 1 1 •6000 -4000 -2000 2000 4000 6000 8000 Distance From Crossing • Feet FIGURE 4: CONVENTIONAL TRAIN HORN NOISE Short term noise impacts due to train horn were calculated at the building facade. Results of modeling is presented in Attachment "A" and Figure 5 below. As shown in Figure 5, the short-term train horn noise level is approximately 53 dBA along the west side of first floor. Similarly, train horn noise level is approximately 63 dBA along the west side of fourth floor. ABC Acoustic, Inc.Report: 2492 Six on Madison Condominium < so k 1 ':v ^ FIGURE 5; SITE LOCATION AND TRAIN WHISTLE NOISE CONTOURS (4^^ FLOOR) 4.1.3 Existing Cumulative Noise Impacts; Noise measurements and modeling for the project resulted in a cumulative exterior noise impact of approximately 58 dBA CNEL on the ground floor. The exterior noise impacts are primarily surface (i.e., vehicular and rail) traffic-related. To account for train horn noise on the 4^*^ floor, a 2 dB penalty was added to the exterior noise level of 58 dB. Hence, exterior noise level along the west side of 4^^ floor is anticipated to be 60 dBA CNEL. To present a worst-case scenario, the entire project site was assumed to be impacted by an exterior cumulative noise of 60 dBA CNEL. 4.2 Future Noise Environment: Future noise levels along Madison Street, Oak Avenue, and BNSF railroad tracks are anticipated to be similar to existing levels. Future exterior noise impacts at the project site would range between 58 and 60 dBA CNEL. ABC Acoustic, Inc.Report: 2492 six on Madison Condominium 5.0 CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT AND MITIGATION: 5.1 Exterior Noise Attenuation: Exterior noise impacts at the project site would be 60 dBA CNEL or lower. Since exterior noise impacts would not be significant, no exterior noise attenuation measures are recommended. 5.2 Interior Noise Attenuation: Since exterior noise impacts at building fagade do not exceed the allowable limit of 60 dBA Ldn, no interior noise attenuation is required. California light-frame residential structures provide for 15 dB exterior-to-interior noise reduction with windows open. Hence, exterior noise of 60 dBA Ldn would be reduced to 45 dBA Ldn inside. The proposed Six on Madison project includes air conditioning systems which provide for closed-window conditions. Closed-window conditions provide for an additional 5-10 dB reduction with double-glazed windows. Therefore, an exterior noise of 60 dBA CNEL would be reduced to 35-40 dBA CNEL with windows closed. Therefore, since interior noise levels would be within the allowable limit of 45 dBA CNEL, no additional noise abatement measures are required. 5.3 Train Horn Noise Attenuation: Noise impacts due to train horn are not considered significant as they are very short term. Although not required by State or City code, train horn noise levels were modeled to determine interior noise levels in selected habitable areas of project during such events. Results of calculations are presented in Tables A-3 and A-4 of Attachment "A". As presented in Tables A-3 and A-4, interior noise levels within all habitable areas of the project would be reduced to 35 dBA Leqh or lower during train horn occurrences if the following optional noise abatement measures are incorporated. 1) Exterior windows and sliding doors shall have STC 33 or higher. 2) Residential entry doors shall be solid core wooden and weather-stripped with an STC of 27 or higher. The above noise treatment measures, if incorporated, would reduce the interior noise impacts at the proposed project site to 35 dBA CNEL or lower during train horn occurrences. ABC Acoustic, Inc. Report: 2492 10 Six on Madison Condominium 5.2.1 Partition Sound and Impact Rating Requirements: The State of California Building Code requires that walls and floor-ceilings separating dwelling units from other units or common use spaces achieve a minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 50. Additionally, party floor-ceiling assemblies shall achieve a minimum Impact Insulation Class (IIC) rating of 50. Table 2 Includes details of the sound-rated common party (demising) wall at the project site. As presented in Table 2, STC rating of the demising walls would be 50 or more. Table 2 also includes details of the Common floor/ceiling assemblies at Six on Madison Condominium. The floor/ceiling assembly has an STC rating exceeding 50 and an IIC rating that exceeds 50. Note: all floor areas shall include AcoustiMat II underlayment system manufactured by Maxxon or equivalent. Attachment "B" includes specifications on AcoustiMat underlayment. 5.2.2 Partition Penetration and Design Guidelines: All sound-rated assemblies, including party walls, corridor walls, plumbing walls, and dropped ceilings between residences, must include batt insulation and have acoustical caulking around the entire perimeter. Additional acoustical notes and guidelines are presented in the following section of this report. All acoustical notes, details, and guidelines shall be included in project's drawings after they have been reviewed by the project's architects & engineers. TABLE 2 STC RATINGS OF TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL PARTITIONS SIX ON MADISON CONDOMINIUM, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA A. Demising Wall fRef: 1.2.4.1.5.41 STC/UC 1. 5/8" type X gypsum wallboard 2. 2x4 wood stud 3. 3 Vi in. thick mineral wool insulation 4. Airspace 1" min. 5. 2x4 wood stud 6. 3 Vi in. thick mineral wool insulation 7. 5/8" type X gypsum wallboard 8. Nominal wall thickness = 10 >4" STC >50 B. Typical Common Floor/Ceiling Assembly IRef: F 99 1736-4 & 7) 1. Topping: Flooring (tile, wood, or carpet) 2. Acoustimat II sound underlayment with Maxxon approved concrete toping 1K" min. 3. %" plywood subfloor 4. Core: 11 7/8" TJI joists with batt insulation in ail joist cavities, 6" min. 5. Ceiling: RC-1 resilient channels 9. 5/8" type x gypsum wallboard STC & IIC > 50 Notes: • Increased size/thickness usually results in improved STC rating. • References: Catalog of STC and IIC Ratings for Wall and Floor/Ceiling Assemblies, (California Department of Health Services, 1980) and Gypsum Association. ABC Acoustic, Inc. Report: 2492 11 Six on Madison Condominium 6.0 ACOUSTICAL NOTES, DETAILS & GUIDELINES: State of California Building Code requires that walls and floor-ceilings separating dwelling units from other units or common use spaces achieve a minimum STC rating of 50. In addition, party floor-ceiling assemblies are required to have a minimum IIC rating of 50. All sound-rated assemblies, including party walls, corridor walls, plumbing walls, shaft walls, and dropped ceilings between residences, shall include batt insulation and have acoustical caulking around the entire perimeter. a) Top & bottom runners of sound-rated party walls shall be set on acoustical isolation tape or a continuous bead of approved acoustical sealant, as shown in Figure C-1. b) The face layer of gypsum board at exterior walls and interior sound-rated partitions shall be held back % inch from intersecting surfaces and caulked airtight with an approved acoustical sealant (Figure C-1). c) Demising walls (i.e., walls between adjacent residential units) shall be an Insulated double-stud wall with minimum two layers of gypsum board on one side and one layer on the opposite side, as shown in Figure C-1 in Attachment "C". d) Party walls in bathrooms behind the tub/shower are to be extended to the floor and sealed. e) The tub/shower enclosures and sinks shall be installed such that all edges contacting a party wall (or a cabinet attached to a party wall) are set on acoustic sealant. f) Non-carpeted floors over habitable areas shall include acoustical underlayment (e.g., AcoustiMat II), as shown in Figures C-2 in Attachment "C". Note: While acoustical underlayment is not required at carpeted areas, there are advantages to installing the underlayment throughout the residences: 1) it allows for carpet to be replaced with hard-surfaced finishes later; 2) it provides for a uniform floor. g) Where elevator is adjacent to occupied spaces, a structural separation shall be maintained. At a minimum, this shall consist of a furred wall with RC-1, a layer of 5/8" gypsum board and batt insulation. h) Electrical, phone, cable, and all other outlet boxes on opposite sides of sound-rated partitions or plumbing walls are to be separated by 24 inches. The exposed backs and sides shall be completely covered with Lowry's pads, as shown in Figure C-3 in Attachment "C". i) Entry doors shall be solid-core wood and gasketed, as shown in Figure C-4 in Attachment "C". ABC Acoustic, Inc. Report: 2492 12 Six on Madison Condominium 6.1 Piping and Ductwork: a) All stud and joist spaces including piping shall have a minimum of R-11 (3-)4-inch thick) batt insulation. b) Ail HVAC and domestic piping (i.e., supply water, waste, drain, vent, condenser water, rainwater leaders, etc.) are to be vibration isolated from the structure as well as other piping, ductwork, gypsum board, etc. (Note: The Contractor shall submit proposed plumbing isolation devices for approval). c) Cast iron pipe shall be used for waste, drain, rainwater, or similar systems, if thin- waiied copper, PVC, or other lightweight piping is used, then it must be completely wrapped with approved acoustical lagging material. d) in double-stud assemblies, do not attach plumbing piping to both stud bays (i.e., a length of plumbing piping shall only be attached to one row of studs). e) Wails containing plumbing piping shall be sized so that there is two-inch clearance between the piping and the gypsum board at non-plumbing rooms and one-Inch clearance at plumbing rooms (Figure C-5 in Attachment "C"). f) Openings for ducts, large pipes (three-inch diameter or greater), conduits, or other penetrations through sound-rated constructions shall be oversized and sealed airtight with acoustically rated caulking, as shown in Figure C-6 in Attachment 'C". g) Smaller pipe, conduit, and other penetrations (less than three-inch diameter) shall be oversized by % inch and sealed airtight with acoustically rated caulking (Figure C- 7 in Attachment "C"). h) An approved K-inch thick neoprene waffle pad is needed between pipe riser clamps and the structure (Figure C-6 in Attachment "C). i) Rainwater leaders shall be avoided in residential ceilings, especially over bedrooms. These pipes often have high levels of fluid flow for long periods of time and can be a source of complaint. J) Supply water flow rates shall not exceed four (4) feet per second (fps) in >i-inch and H-inch diameter pipes. For larger pipes, six (6) fps is allowable. k) Maintain a maximum water pressure of 50 psi at plumbing fixtures as consistent with adequate flow rates. i) At trapeze and unlstrut installations, a resilient material shall be required between the piping and the clamp. ABC Acoustic, Inc. Report: 2492 13 six on Madison Condominium 6.2 HVAC Vibration Isolation: a) All vibration isolation shall conform to current ASHRAE standards. The ASHRAE guidelines include items such as spring isolators and inertia bases as well as ancillary items such as flexible piping and electrical connections. Submittals for all proposed Isolation are required. If possible, all vibration isolation devices shall be from a single manufacturer. b) The slab under rooftop condenser units shall float (i.e., be isolated from the structure). c) Rooftop condenser units shall be placed on spring vibration isolators. Condensers shall be located over common space, where possible. d) Unhoused springs are to be used; where necessary separate seismic snubbers are to be added. Equipment Is to use external spring Isolation; if Internal springs are used, then the housing needs to be Isolated on neoprene waffle pads. The acoustical vibration Isolation must not compromise seismic code or other structural/safety codes/requirements and vice-versa. e) All attachments to vibration-isolated equipment shall be flexible. f) Suspended fan-coil units and heat pumps are to be isolated with sprlng-and- neoprene hangers; floor-mounted units may be isolated with neoprene pads. g) Medium and high-pressure ductwork riser supports shall be isolated from the structure with captive neoprene mounts or Isolated waffle pads. j) Air registers are to be rated with NC ratings at least five points less than the criterion for the space being served. k) Toilet exhaust fans shall be rated at a noise level of 1.5 sones or less. In addition, you shall consider placing the fan and light on separate switches. I) The kitchen hood fans are to be multi-speed units. m) The residential ventilation systems (e.g., fan-coil units, heat pumps, furnaces) shall be placed adjacent to spaces such as corridors and kitchens, and far from bedrooms, living rooms, etc. Where the fan needs to be near a noise-sensitive area, the equipment selection, door assembly, etc. will need to be reviewed to reduce potential noise impacts. n) The residential ventilation systems shall be fully ducted ABC Acoustic, Inc. Report: 2492 14 Six on Madison Condominium 6.3 Electrical System: a) Outlet boxes on opposite sides of sound-rated partitions or plumbing walls are to be separated by 24 inches. The exposed backs and sides shall be completely covered with Lowr/s pads, as shown in Figure C-3 in Attachment "C. b) Low-voltage devices, such as cable and telephone jacks, shall be placed in outlet boxes and , treated as such. If there are limitations as to where outlets can be placed (e.g., outlets for microwave ovens at back-to-back kitchens), the Electrical Engineer/Contractor shall submit a proposed layout for acoustical review. c) Transformers shall be isolated with captive neoprene mounts. The specific isolators can be determined after the equipment has been selected. In addition, the larger units shall include certified measured noise levels at least ten dB below the NEMA rating. 6.4 Elevator Isolatlon: The following Isolation guidelines are for the elevator shafts and equipment. The Project ^ ; Elevator Consultant shall review these as some of our recommendations might be superseded by the applicable elevator codes. a) Where elevator shafts back to suites, a furring wall shall be added to include RC-1 resilient channels, a layer of 5/8" gypsum board and batt insulation. b) Provide vibration isolation for the motor assemblies using load bearing neoprene isolators designed to compress a minimum of 0.2 inches under load. i c) Provide flexible couplings (to reduce pipe-borne noise) where the hydraulic lines attach to the pump capable of withstanding pressures specified by the elevator manufacturer. I d) Isolate hydraulic lines from the building structure at all points of attachment using Mason ( BR isolators or equal between the pipe clamp and the building to prevent metal-to-metal n rigid connection between the pipe and the building. ( ] e) Provide a neoprene pad between the plunger and elevator cab. Provide neoprene pads, washers and bushings between the rail brackets and the building. r- f) Use resilient roller guide tires. ^ g) Provide adjustable volume controls for elevator cab arrival enunciators. V h) Provide optical cab position detectors in order to eliminate structure-bome noise / associated with mechanical detectors. ABC Acoustic, Inc. Report: 2492 15 six on Madison Condominium O 6.5 Resilient Channel installation Guidelines: The following installation guidelines shall be incorporated into the specifications. To meet fire and ^ / structural requirements, it might be necessary to modify these guidelines. ' ; a) Attach channels directly to the framing system only. Do not install channels on gypsum , - board, shear plywood, or like material. ' b) Attaching Channels: f I. Attach single leg resilient channels at 24-Inch center-to-center spacing perpendicular to framing at 16 inches o.c. Use 16-inch channel spacing if framing at 24 Inches o.c., as shown In Figure C-8 in Attachment "C. il. Use Clark Dietrich RC Deluxe (RCSD) 25-gauge single-leg resilient channels or other channels that can be shown to'have equivalent laboratory acoustical performance to USG RC-1 channels. V _ ill. Use one-Inch Type S Bugle Head dry wall or similar screws. Iv. Attach channels with mounting flanges facing In only one direction. V. Hold back ends of channels % inch from Intersecting surfaces, vi. Splice channels only at framing and overlap butt ends no more than 1-J4 Inches. Screw attach through both flanges. 6.6 Additional Guidelines: a) Recessed cabinets in sound-rated assemblies shall be boxed In and treated as shown in Figure C-9 in Attachment 'C. b) Acoustically isolate garage openers, as shown In Figure C-10 in Attachment "C". 6.7 Quality Control: ^ a) Quality workmanship will be required to limit sound transmission to lowest practical level. ^ b) If a certain note or detail presented herein does not apply to this project, the remaining ^ notes and details must be incorporated. ' c) The pertinent acoustical notes and details included herein shall be incorporated into f j project's drawings and design after they are reviewed and approved by project's Archltect(s) and Engineer(s). ABC Acoustic, Inc. Report: 2492 16 six on Madison Condominium 7.0 FUTURE ACOUSTICAL CONSIDERATIONS: Acoustical performance of partitions at the proposed Six on Madison Condominium project depends on proper implementation of all recommendations. 1. All acoustics-related submittals shall be reviewed by a qualified Acoustical Engineer. 2. Inspections shall be conducted by a qualified Acoustical Engineer during construction phase of the project. The following confirmation tests shall be conducted after completion of the project and prior to occupation. 1. Field STC and IIC testing of common party walls and common floor/ceiling assemblies. 2. Interior noise measurements at habitable areas of selected residential units. These measurements shall include measurements within selected units located along the southwestern, northeastern, and northwestern corners of the site. 3. HVAC and plumbing noise measurements within the project site to ensure proper isolation and HVAC background noise per ASHRAE. If the above noise testing results in noise impacts which exceed the maximum compatible levels presented in this report or the industry standards, treatment measures shall be added to ensure project's compliance. ABC Acoustic, Inc. Report: 2492 17 six on Madison Condominium 8.0 REFERENCES CITED: California, State of; Uniform Building Codes 2005 Section 1203 of the California Building Codes (CBC). BGI Architecture 2017 Architectural Plans for Six on Madison Condominium project Carlsbad, City of 2011 General Plan, Noise Element. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare 1975 Compendium of Materials for Noise Control. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration 1978 Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model (FHWA-RD-77-108). ABC Acoustic, Inc. Report: 2492 18 Six on Madison Condominium 9.0 CERTIFICATION: The findings and recommendations presented in this acoustical analysis report are based on available information at the time of analysis. They represent a true and factual analysis of the scope of work relating to potential acoustical issues associated with the subject 1398 Six on Madison Condominium project. There are many factors involved in actual acoustical performance of a structure. And since ABC Acoustics, Inc. has no control over the construction, workmanship and building materials performance, ABC Acoustics, Inc. is not, and could not be held liable, for final results of any recommendations or implementation of such recommendations presented herein. This report was prepared by Sharo T. Sanavi. ABC Acoustics, Inc. (^Aa/rO'^r0(maffl Sharo T. Sanavi Principal sharo (Sabcacoustics.com ABC Acoustic, Inc. Report: 2492 19 Six on Madison Condominium ATTACHMENT "A" NOISE CALCULATION DATA ABC Acoustic, inc.Report: 2492 20 11467719 Client: Oak & Madison LLC Project: Six on Madison Condominiums Project-No. 2492 Map 1 Road Result number 3 Calculation in 1.5 m above ground project engineer: Sal Atter Created- Proceued with SoundPLAN 7.3. Undatc 3/19/201S Levels Ldn In dB(A) 50 so 53 53 -56 56 -59 59 -62 !. p S2 -65 r-=i65 -68 BflB 68 -71 71 -74 MH 74 77 77 •80 VTM 80 •83 IBB 83 •86 ^^B 86 -89 89 m Leng T — Signs and symbols I Doad axis Emission line Wall Inside tunnels 9 Signal Railway aais Surface Wall inside tunnels Main buKdlng Auxiliary bufldlng nn Wall I I Sloped wall areas ^ Point receiver LJ Noise calcuialion area Length scale 1:497 0 4.5 9 18 27 30 RBC RcousUcs, Inc \ 1^ NOISE CONTROL EXPERTS C:\UserslSal AlterVOocumenis\ABC Proiect\SP\60nMadlson\$heetLsgs ■N ■o m eo.5^ 82.0 iO&Ag 1146771911467M211.167490 Client: Oak & Madison LLC Project: Six on Madison Condominiums Project-No. 2492 Map Grid Result number 2 Calculation in l.S m above ground Project engineer Sal Alter Created; Processed wllti SoundPLAN 7J. Update 3/19/201S Levels Leq,d in dB(A} < SO 83 . 86 86 - 89 >= 89 Signs and symbols Road asis Emission Hne Wan l~_"' Inside tunrwis 9 Signal Railway axis Surface WaB r"_"' inside tunnels I / I Main tsuHdiRg 1 I AuxBlary building School — Wail Sloped wail areas Point receiver Noise calculation area Length scale 1:1037 0 5 10 20 30 40 ^ ABC fl cousLics, Inc NOISE CONTROL EXPERTS C;\User$\SBl AtIBr\0ocumenls\A6C Prolect\SP\60nMadlson\Sheell.$g5 6. I 1 lJf<74<Ki Client: Oak & Madison LLC Project: Six on Madison Condominiums Project-No. 2492 Map Fourth Floor Result numbers Calculation in 10 m above ground project englneen Sal Allet Created: Processed with SoundPLAN 7.3, Update 3/19/201S Levels Leq,d In dB(A) 50 s nn 50 53 s El 53 -56 56 n 59 59 -62 :t==ii 62 -65 VH 65 -68 iwagi 68 -71 MH Ti -74 nn 74 -77 77 •80 1 ^Jh 80 -83 nnn S3 86 86 -89 89 Signs and symbols " Road axH Emisslonllne Wan r"_"' ittshle lunoeis 9 Signal ' Railway aals Surface Wall Inside turtneh CZD Main building |__J Au*niarv building School Wall I ij Sloped waii areas Point receivar |_J Noise cakuiation area A Length scale 1:1036 W 0 5 10 20 30 40 RBC Rcoustlcs, Inc OISE CONTROL EXPERTS C:\Users\Sai Alter\Oocumerrts\A0C Prolect\SP\60nMadlson\Shcetl.sgs R1 G 11467703.1 3669016.9 15.93 47.9 38.8 F2 18.73 42.3 33.2 1 F3 21.53 37.7 28.5 F4 24.33 48.4 39.4 R2 G 11467729.1 3669032.4 16.25 53.8 53.2 44.8 F2 19.05 52.8 52.1 43.7 F3 21.85 47.4 46.7 38.3 F4 24.65 54.2 53.5 45.2 16.55 19.35 22.15 24.95 11467736.1 3669041.9 11467733.3 3669049.8 16.25 19.05 21.85 24.65 11467717.5 3669022.5 15.48 18.28 21.08 23.88 Table: A-2ABC Acoustics, Inc Project No: R2492 Six on Madison Condominiums Assessed receiver ieveis Singie-Train Name 11467733.3 3669049.8 16.25 19.05 21.85 24.65 11467736.1 3669041.9 16.55 19.35 22.15 24.95 11467729.1 3669032.4 16.25 19.05 21.85 24.65 11467717.5 3669022.5 15.48 18.28 21.08 23.88 R5 G 11467703.1 3669016.9 15.93 59.1 52.7 52.7 F2 18.73 64.9 58.5 58.5 F3 21.53 68.1 61.7 61.7 F4 24.33 69.5 63.1 63.1 2492-1-63 ABC ACOUSTICS 07-31-2017 ATTACHMENT REPORT-2492 TABLE A-3 RESULTS OF INTERIOR NOISE ANALYSIS Location - Great Room- South View- Fourth Floor Noise Source - TRAFFIC NOISE (NBS, 1978) Octave Band Center Frequency, Hz 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 Reference Exterior A-Weighted Sound Level Spectrum (re. total of 100 dB) 86.0 90.7 93.5 95.8 92.7 87.0 Room Sound Absorption in sabins 252 252 252 252 252 252 INTERIOR A-WEIGHTED SOUND LEVEL SPECTRUM ('CLOSED WINDOWS' CONDITIONS) 29.4 28.7 27.7 28.9 22.7 13.9 Building Facade Reflection Correction - Quality Correction 3.0 dB 3.0 dB SOUND TRANSMISSION THROUGH CONSTRUCTIONS Building Element information # Construction STC area sq.ft. A-Weighted Sound Level EXTERIOR I^^■ERIORClosed Open % ACorr 1. STUCCO WALL 46 155.3 2. WINDOW (5/16 LAMINATED) 33 96.0 63 63 27 27 34 59 I1 Ul 1IOO 1 1 1 OOOO TOTAL A-WEIGHTED SOUND LEVEL IN THE ROOM 35 59 2492-2-63 ABC ACOUSTICS 07-31-2017 ATTACHMENT REPORT-2492 TABLE A-4 RESULTS OF INTERIOR NOISE ANALYSIS Location - Master Bedroom- South View- Fourth Floor Noise Source - TRAFFIC NOISE (NBS, 1978) Octave Band Center Frequency, Hz 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 Reference Exterior A-Weighted Sound Level Spectrum (re. total of 100 dB) 86.0 90.7 93.5 95.8 92.7 87.0 Room Sound Absorption in sabins 217 217 217 217 217 217 INTERIOR A-WEIGHTED SOUND LEVEL SPECTRUM ('CLOSED WINDOWS' CONDTTIONS) 28.4 28.4 27.4 28.6 22.4 13.7 Building Facade Reflection Correction - Quality Correction 3.0 dB 3.0 dB SOUND TRANSMISSION THROUGH CONSTRUCTIONS Building Element Information # Construction STC AREA sq.ft. A-Weighted Sound Level EXTERIOR INTERIOR Closed Open % ACorr 1. STUCCO WALL 46 77.0 2. WINDOW (5/16 LAMINATED) 33 79.0 63 25 63 34 25 59 0 50 oooo TOTAL A-WEIGHTED SOUND LEVEL IN THE ROOM 35 59 Six on Madison Condominium ATTACHMENT "B" ACOUSTICAL MATERIAL CUT-SHEETS ACOUSTIMAT LP, ISOMAX RC ABC Acoustics, inc.Report: 2492 Attachment , another superiot product from MAXXON ACOUSTI-MAT ULTIMATE SOUND CONTROL SYSTEMS h NEW CONSTRUCTION RENOVATION WOOD FRAME CONSTRUCTION CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION OPEN BEAM CONSTRUCTION LIGHT GAUGE STEEL CONSTRUCTION HARD SURFACE AREAS PRIVEN SaUND HNTRBL SBLUTIBNS Documented sound tests over a variety of ossembties More than 100 UL Fire Rated Designs Light weight, easy to instoll Low deflection rote with high lood levels Durable — chemicol ond moisture insensitive Proven on over 200 million square feet WHY ACOUSTI-MAT? BECAUSE ONE ROOM'S FLOOR IS ANOTHER ROOM'S CEILING. We hove all experienced the pitfalls of an inferior sound control system. Whether in a commercial, multifamily, or single family application, sound control is important to the end user. Don't let your project be one of the casualties of poor sound control. With Acousti-AAol®, design possibilities include the full specfrum of floor good options such as marble, ceromic tile or hardwood, without socrificing sound control. Acousti-Mcl con be installed in herd surfoce areas only, or throughout the entire floor plan to ensure peace and quiet from impact and airborne noises. Backed by over 1,000 third party acoustical tests, AcoustiAAot is the proven sound control solution in oil types of construction. Designed for todoy's fost-trock project schedules, Acousti-Mot installation is fast and easy. After loying Acousti-AAat over the subfloor, Moxxon dealers pour a higf^strength Maxxon Underlayment over it. Acousfi-Mot 1, Acousti-AAat II, Acousfi-AAot II HP, Enkasonic®, Enkasonic HP, Acousti-AAat 3, Acousti-AAot 3 HP, and Acousri-AAat SD hove a core of fused entangled filaments ottoched to a non-woven fabric that creates a void and octuolly isolates sound waves between the subfloor and the high-strength AAoxxon Underlayment. Acousti-AAat IP and Acousif-AAat LPR ore monufoctured with a blend of ploymeric fibers offering low profile sound control solutions. When installed together, the Acousti-AAat and AAaxxon Underloymenfs form a warrantied engineered system, offering peoce of mind in your sound system. Not only do Acousti-Mot and Enkasonic help reduce noise pollution, they also promote indoor air quality. The Acousti-AAot/AAoxxon Underlayment system is the only sound control mot/underloyment system that is GREENGUARD and GREENGUARD Gold Certified. Monufoctured with 40% pre-consumer recycled content, the enlongled mesh Acousti-AAot sound control mats may also help contribute toward points for LEED® project certification. For informotion regarding Acousti-AAat and Enkasonic's contribution to LEED, contact your Regional Representative at {800] 356-7887 or visit www.moxxon.com/go_green. •800-356-7837 CHOOSING A SOUND MAT WHICH SOUND MAT IS RIGHT FOR MY PROJECT? There ore many focrors thai go into determining which sound control mot you should choose: WHAT IS THE FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY? The inherent design of a building con dictate the level of sound control you need in order to meet and/or exceed code. Knowing the base sound performance of your floor/ceiling assembly will help norrow down your choices for a sound control mot. WHAT IS THE FIRE CODE? Maxxon sound control mots ore in numerous codes as well as in over 100 UL Fire Designs. See the chart on page 12 for o complete list of Maxxon's UL Fire Designs. Refer to Moxxon's Fire & Soured Manual for o list of UL numbers, the Maxxon sound control mots included In the design, and how each mot performs acoustically on the given assembly. WHAT IS THE ACOUSTICAL REQUIREMENT? The International Building Code specifies thot assemblies shall have a sound tronsmission closs (STC) of not less than 50 {45 if field tested). This STC rating measures the amount of airborne noise transmitted through common walls, partitions, ond floor/ceiling ossemblies. The code also specifies that the impact insulation class (IIC) rating, which measures the impact noise, be no less than 50 [45 if field tested). It has been observed that this code level STC and IIC performance does not guarantee acoustical privacy or that complaints will not be received. In response, the authors of the International Building Code, the International Code Council, have issued on appendix to the code called ICC G2-2010 Guideline for Acoustics. This guideline concedes thot current sound code minimums ore not acceptable levels of sound control and establishes two additional levels of ocousticol performance. Please refer to the chort below for the Internotionol Code Council's Guideline for Acoustics. ICC G2-2010 GUIDELINE FOR ACOUSTICS Loberfllory S»wid Reting HcM Send Raliag Code 50 5TC/IIC 45 F•STC/F^lC Acceptable Performance 55 STC/lIC 52 F-Src/HlC P'e'er'ed Periormance '60 STC/lIC 57 F•STC/F^IC WHAT IS THE BUDGET? Of course, budget also needs to be taken into consideration when selecting o sound control mot. However, future use of the project should also be considered: improving ocoustics once construction Is complete is costly and time^onsuming. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS What about projects that demond even better sound control or those with floor height limiiotions? Maxxon now offers a high performance line of sound control solutions, Acousti-Mot HP series, which moximizes sound control while keeping topping depth at a minimum. See poge 4 to learn more. Mot ( Wsed ommonly used In Assembly Type Open Bern Cemrete Steel Ded Acousti-Mot LP X AcousK-Mat LPR X X 1 Acousti-Mot 1 X X Acousti-Mot 11 X X X Acousti-Mot II HP X X X Enkosonic X 1 1 X X Enkosonic HP X 1 X X Acousti-Mot 3 X X X X Acousti-Mot 3 HP X X X X Acousti-Mot SD X www.MaxxonCorporation.com HIGH PERFORMANCE UPGRADE As you determine the proper level of sound control for your project, keep in mind Moxxon's new high performance (HP) upgrade. Available on Acousti-Mat II, Enkasonic and Acousti-Mat 3, this innovoflve upgrade odds the noise deodening technology of o high performance acoustical fabric that is laminated to the bottom of each mot's entangled mesh core. The HP fabric creates an obsorplive cushion upon which the entangled mesh "spring" rests. The Acousti-Mat HP line of sound control mats reduces impact noise without odding to the overoll floor height, making it an ideal solution where floor height considerations play a foctor or simply to provide upgroded sound control without adding to the required topping depth. Detailed information on Acousti-Mat II HP, Enkosonic HP and Acousti-Mot 3 HP is available on pages 6-8 of this brochure. ACOUSTI-MAT SYSTEM SELECTOR INTERACTIVE SYSTEM SELECTOR Maxxon Corporotion now offers on Interactive System Selector to help you identify the best sound control system for your project. A few clicks of your mouse allows you to see how recommended Acousti-AAot products impact the sound control performance of your assembly. In addition to providing opproximote sound ratings, the Interactive System Selector helps to identify the best solutions for upgraded sound control and matches your selections to a common Ul Fire Rated Design. ITie Interactive System Selector also ollows you to e-mail detail drawings and to request sound tests based on your selections. Gel started at www.maxxon.com/selector. SYSTEM SELECTOR CHART* INTERACTIVE SYSTEM SELECTOR ^1^ Mot To|tping Min.Ibtd System Hek^ Approximate Sound Rating" F-IK F-STC Typical Code PrnTormance"* rifvip l(C CaOlO CuXMiin lu itBoilKil Acousti-Mat LPR 3/4" |]9 mm)=3/4"48-52 55-58 Code Minimum AcoustiAAat t 3/4" [19 mm)w.r 50-53 57-59 1 Code AAinlmufft Acousti-Mat II 1" (25 mm)1/.'51-54 58-60 Code Minimum Acousti-Mat II HP i!' (25 mml ;54-57 58-60 AcceptoUe Enkosonic 1" 125 mm)1 54-57 59-62 Acceptable Enkosonic HP r|25mtn) |!57-60 1 5<Hi2 ' Preferred AcoustiMot 3 1'/?" (38 mm) Reinforced 2 A"57-60 59-62 Preferred AcoustlMot 3 HP 1 Vi* (38 mm) Reinforced ^2Va' I 61-64 59-6)2 Preferred * AppnximatB mlings i^ve ncMe d Inn] swke RntsiKd flow good in tioditiond wood frame urstmction. Aclud rolings may my bosed on ptojed voriol))es. RIC/F-STC leveb dCKM we on oppronmotion of sound leducflon potential in a weNesigned. ocousticdly levels found in wood ftome constnicHon utillTing mstdotion, lesillwit dnrmel ond gypsum bootd ceding. ** See Page 3 for exptonotion of ICC G2'20I0 Giidellne for Acoustics. " Consuh the System Selector ond/ot Mraxon for opproxtmote sound mtings over concrete«steel deck. 1-800-356-7887 ' (25 mm) Appfoved Mowon* UnderloymeniCeramic Tile AcoysfrMor /4* (6 mm) Wocd Sublkxv Resilient Chonfvel^'ttulalion Tli* JoistTwo loyers. 5/8* 116 mm) Gypsum Soofd €NEFITS ACOIISTI'MAT n The Industry Standard TECHNICAL DATA PxcripHon Entongled polymeric filament mot Tlikkness 1/4" (6 mm) Density 4,0 pcf (64 kg/m^j Thermal Resistance R-Value (ft^*°F*h/BTU| Mot Only 0.620 1" Moxxon Underlcymer*t 0.192 Mot/Underioymenl System 0.812 Underioyment Depth See poge 4 Pressure/Deflection 500 psf (2,441 kg/m^) 0.06' (1.52 mm) 1,000 psf (4,882 kg/m'l 0.08" (2.03 mm) 2,000 psf (9,765 kg/m^) 0.15" (3.81 mm) 4,000 psf (19,530 kg/m'l 0.20" (5.08 mm) Fire Performance ASTM E-84 w/ A^oxxon Urxtedoymeni Fuel Contribution 0 Smoke Contribution 0 Flame Spread 0 UL Fire Designs See pcrge 12 Fire & Sound Code Listings,, .......See page 12^ Low 1/4" profile oliows a thinner flooling floor composite Requires only V Moxxon Underioyment [3/4* with reinforcement} Increases STC rating 3-6 points compared to a 3/4" Moxxon Underloyment/wood frame system, 6-15 points when compared to o bore wood frome system Increases IIC rating up to 10 points over wood frome and up to 20 points over concrete Always with 40% pre-consumer recycled conteni GREENGUARD Gold Certified Sound tests available on sales/technical sheet EASTERN NEW MEXICO UNIVERSITY Contractor Architect PORTALES, N^ Bfodbury Stomm Construction, Inc. Van H. Gilbert Aichilecl, PC 47,700 sq. ft. of Acousti-Mof* II and Moxxon'* Reinforcement topped with Level-Righf', ACOUSTl'MAT H'" High Performance Hord Sudace finished Floor Good Approximole 1/4' (6 mm] - Acousti-Moi* II HP TECHNICAL DATA 'Scriprion Entangled polymeric filament mat attached to woter-resistant fobric HP Loyer Microfibrous non-vxoven fobric hickness, nominol 1/4" (6 mm) Jonsity 4.9 pcf (78.5 kg/m') hermal Resistance R-Va1ue (Fl^*"F«h/6TU) Mot Only 1.050 1 * Moxxon Underioyment 0.192 Mct/Underioyment 1.242 nderioyment Depth See poge 4 Prassure/Deflection 500 psf (2,441 kg/m') 0.047' {1.19mm) 1,000 psf (4.882 kg/m') 0.068* (1.72 mm) 2,000 psf (9,765 kg/m') 0.098* (2.48 mm) 4,000 psf (19,530 kg/m') 0.180* (4.57 mm) Fire Performance ASTM E-84 Fuel Contribution 0 Smoke Density 0 Flome Spreod 0 UL Fire Designs See poge 12 Fire & Sound Code Listings See poge 12 n 125 mml Approved ft/ojofon* Wood SubllooJ Resilienr Channel Wood Joist 8atl Insuiotion I loyet 5/8' 116 mmj Gypsum EkK3fd vENEFITS Acousti-Mot II HP ofloches on ocousticol fobric entangled mesh mot, for on overall opproximole 1/4' mot profile Requires only o 1" topping |3/4" with reinforcement) • Incteoses IIC rating up to 16 points over wood frorne ond up to 20 points over concrete • Increoses STC rating 3-6 points compared to o 3/4* Moxxon Underloymenf/wood frome system, 6-15 points when compared to a bore wood frame system Always with 40% pre-consumer recycled content GREENGUARD Gold Certified Sound tests ovoilobie on soies/technico! sheet SOLARIUM AT PONCE HALL FIAGLER COLLEGE Confroctor: A.D. Davis Construction Coro. ST, AUGUSTINE, FLContfoctorA.D. Dovis Construction Corp. Architect Kenneth Smith Architects, inc. 2,700 sq. ft. of AcoustfMot® II HP topped with 1-3*-+ of AAoxxon* Underioyment. :-800-356-7887 TECHNICAL DATA Inscription Entangled polymeric Hloment mat Jhlckness 3/8" (10 mm) ensity 4.65 pcf (74.4 kg/m'| fbormoi Resistance R-Uaiue [ft'*®F*h/BTUl Mot Only 0.780 1* Maxxon Underloyment 0.192 Mof/Underlayment System 0.972 'Jnderiayment Depth See page 4 -ENEFITS nk soni- The Original Sound Conirol Mat Pressure/Deflection 500 psf (2,441 kg/m^) 0.087" (2.210 mm) 1,000 psf (4,882 kg/m') 0.131" (3,327 mm) 2,000 psf (9,765 kg/m') 0.189° (4,801 mm) 4,000 psf (19,530 kg/m^ 0.256" (6.502 mm) Fire Performance ASTM E-84 w/ Mowon Underlaymeni Fuel Contribution 0 Smoke Density 0 Flome Spreod 0 UL Fire Designs See page 12 Fire & Sound Code Listings See page 12 Wood Floonrtg 1 n [25 mm] Approved Mowon* Underlovmenl Enkosofiic* 3/8' (10 mm] Wood Subfbof Resilienl Chonret Bolt Insulolion 5/8* |lPmn,| Gypsum Boofd Wood Joiti UL1593 - Durable and proven solution — the only mot in the industry tested after 10 years of use, (Enkosonic retained 97% of originoi thickness, wos as plioble OS o new roll, and performed equolly to o newly monufoclured roll.] Increoses IIC rating up to 12 points over wood frame k and up to 20 points over concrete Requires only a 1" lopping (3/4" with reinforcement] Exceeds code minimum to achieve the 'Preferred Performance" higher IIC and STC levels, os outlined in the ICC Guideline for Acoustics (For more information, see page 3) Sound tests ovoiloble on soles/technical sheet increoses STC rating 3-6 points compared to o 3/4" Maxxon Underloymenl/wood frame system. 6-15 points when compared to o bore wood frame system Always with 40% pre-consumer recycled content GREENGUARD Gold Ceiiified THE METROPOLITAN CONDOS OMNI SAN DIEGO HOTE. Cnntrnrtnr- IMl Rpnitv SAN DIEGO, CAContractorJMI Realty C Architect Hornberget &. Worstell, Inc. 80,000 sq. ft. of Enkosonic® and AAoxxon® Underloyment instolled in 36 luxury condominiums on floors 22 through 32, which overlooks San Diego harbor and the Son Diego Pefco Ballpark, Hard Syrloce imshed floof Good \ (25 mm] mm Approved Moicxon* Uodefioymeni Enkasontc* HP 3/8 I i 0 mm 3/4' (19 mm Tongue and Ofoove P^yvvood or 05B ipL&ubtion Double Loye* 5/8* (2*16 mrT>] G/psum EnkasonicHP High Performance TECHNICAL DATA Description Entangled polymeric filament mat attached to water-resistant fabric HP Layer Microfibrous non-woven fabric Thickness, nominai 3/8* (10 mm) Density 3.84 pcf [61.56 kg/m^j Thermal ResistaiKe R-Vdue (ft^«°F*h/BTU) Mot Only 1,380 1" Maxxon Underlayment 0.192 Mot/Underloyment 1.572 Underloyment Depth See page 4 Pressure/Deflection 500 psf (2,441 kg/m') 0.067* |1.70 mm) 1,000 psf (4,882 kg/m^) 0.116* (2.95 mm) 2,000 psf (9,765 kg/m') 0.172* (4.37 mm) 4,000 psf (19,530 kg/m') 0.244* (6.20 mm] Fire PerformarMe ASTM E-84 Fuel Contribution 0 Smoke Density 0 Flome Spread 0 UL Fire Designs See page 12 Fire & Sound Code listings See poge 12 .ENEFITS Enkasonic HP combines ocouslica! fobric with entangled mesh for on overoll opproximote 3/8" (10 mm) mot profile Requires only o I* topping Increases IIC rating up to 18 points over wood frame ond up to 25 points over concrete Increases STC rating 3-6 points compared to a 3/4" Maxxon Underloyment/wood frame system, 6-15 points when compared to o bore wood frame system AlvvlJy^ 'Aiii i 40% pre .lo'^surner recycled content GREENGUARD Gold Certified Sound tests ovoiloble on soles/technical sheet KRJ BUILDING NORTH FARGO, ND Contractor: AABA Development Co. Architect: Mutchler Bortrom Architects O/pCrete 2000®/3.2K poured os a leveling layer. 9,000 sq. ft, of Enkasonic* HP topped with GypCrete 2000/3-2fv poured ot o depth of 1 "/s". www.MoxxonCotpoiation.cotn INSTALLATION DETAILS Typicol installation detail drawings. For alternote detail drawings, including transition options, please contact your Moxxon Regional Representative. ACOUSTl-MAr LPR Gyp>wm Board* Wsll Itolofton* n VM bM »»M .Ihn I > 3/i' approved Moxjcon* UriderloyiTwit Acoutli.Mal* IPK ' Wood lubRoor .«=***m, eir he ACOUSTl-MAr LPR Gypium board* Wall iiolation* 3/8' opprovad AAoxxon' Urtdartoymsnl AcoosftMot'lPR IP odhmive or durry ConcrM subftoor jW. w4 \COUSTI-MAr ACOUSTl-MAr II ACOUSTl-MAr II HP . Gypsum Boord* Optloool ^kftxibW lolpx or uliconfl coulk WoB Isobhon Acovsl^Mon Tope or equivalent 3/4* opproved Moxxon* Underktymenl Moxxon Root primer 3/Id' AeouetHMol* 1 Wood or eonerele lubAeor Gypsum Boord* Optional, Flexible lotex ' or tiiicona coulk Woll Is^otlon • Oien we SjiiiI ee >» lij I < rS wK xiWto AcoustiMot* Tope or equivalent r approved Maxxon* Undarlayment Moxxon Door primer 1/4' Acousli.Mal* II Wood or concrete subftoor . Gypwm Boord* Opiionol. Flexible lotex or silicone coulk Won Isolation AcoustvMot* lope or equivolent 1' opproved Moxxon* Underloyment Moxxon Root primer Approximate 1/4* AcousttMot* II HP Wwd or concrete subftoor ^NKASONIC®ENKASONIC®HP ACOUSTl-MAr 3 Gypsum Board* Opiiond, Flexible latex silicone coulk WoB Isokslion I' opproved Moxxon* Underloyment Moxxon Root primer 3/8* Enkosonie* Weed or concrete subRoor . Gypsum Board* Opiionol. Flexible lotex or silicone coulk Won IsMotion r^ousliMat* Tape or equivaleni 1' approved Maxxon* Underioymeni Roor primer Approximote 3/B' Enkosonie* HP Weed or concrete siABoor Gypsum Board* Optiorsol. Flexible lotex or illkcm coulk AcouslhMot* Tope or equivalentWall Isolation IV]' approved Moxxon* Underloyment Monon Reinloicement1111 III! I Maxxon Roor primer 3/4" AcouslAW*3 Wood Of concrete subftoor XCOUSTl-MAr 3 HP ACOUSTl-MAr SD ACOUSTl-MAr LP OphonoL Flexi^ latex ilicone couHc Acousli-Mor Tape or equivalentWoli iSolomon 1W ^>proved Moxxon* Underloyment Maxxon Reintorcement Moxxon floor prtmer Approximofe 3/4* A^ihMo1*3 HP Wood or concrete subffoo Gypsum Boord* 1*1/2* approved Moxxon* Jndedoyment Acouitkeol SedoAt WoB Isobtion AeeuitkMoi Top« oreqtftvolent Atoxxon Reinforcement Moxxon Acr>4ic AcousHMol* so Gypsum ftoord* Acoutti*Mat Tope or equiv^ent 1/2" opproved Moxxon* Ur»d«rloyment OpKonol. Flexible lotex or ilfkone couHt Wall Isolotion Acointl44al* LP LP AdhoftM or ^urry www, MaxxonCoiporation.com Resilient Sound Isolation Wall and Ceiling Clips IsoMax - Patent No. 7,093,814 Low Cost, Space Saving Walls and Ceilings Designers wanting low-cost, space-saving ceilings and wails that provide superior noise control employ Kinetics Model IsoMax resilient sound isolation clips. Model IsoMax, attached to ceiling joists, wall studs, or masonry, simply and easily secures drywall furring channel. One or more layers of gypsum board are hung to the furring channel using common construc tion practices. Offering higher STO values than drywall attached to resilient channel. Model IsoMax ensures that installers will not inadvertently screw through the "resilient" leg of the channel into the joist or stud. This feature cannot be underestimated given the frequent, unknown occurrences where resilient channel is accidentally rendered ineffective because it is hard-attached. Benefits Can achieve same rating (SIC 63) as double wall con struction with less material in smaller space Flexible "snap-on' dips install quickly, and allow for height adjustments during installation of channel Low-profile design; maximizes available occupied space and reduces materials vs. double stud wall design Emor free installation of standard drywal furring channel. Eliminates accidental short drcuiting common with RC Channel UL Fire Rated Assemblies Design No. L583 Floor/Ceiling Assembly allows the broadest range of joist or truss assemblies including: engineered "I" joists, wood and steel trusses, 2x10 wood joists, and parallel chord trusses. Allows fiberglass or mineral wool insulation with two (2) layers of gypsum wailboard. More ULfire rated assemblies detailed online at kineticsnoise.com/arch/lsomax/ul.aspx. Ceilings Design No. L546 Design No. V477 Design No. V489 Walls Design No. U305 Design No. U419 A/VvKINETICS Noise Control CREATE QUIET Typical Construction Detail 24.00 C«ihng Sbucturs MinemI Fiber Insulallon for Fire Stopping IsoWax aip w/Drywall Furring Cnannel MAX. Stud, Steel or Wood Gypsun Vlfonboail Ceullc wHh a Non-Hardening Acoustical Sealarii with Required Fire Rating Clips typically spaced 48" apart along channels. Sound Tests for Airborne and impact Noise - STO and iiC Tested Composite Wall Constructions per ASTM E90 and ASTM E413 at Riverbank Labs. STC 57 +7 STC improvement compared to the same wall with resilient channel. Request our report, isoMax vs RC. for details Wood Stud partition, 2x4, 16" O.C. with 5/8" gypsum board, one layer each side. Fiberglass in cavity. IsoMax clips and 7/8" furring channel. Additional IsoMax STC and IIC test results: IIC 57 - Wood i-Jolst floor/ceiling assembly with wood floor STC 60 - 63 -Steel Stud wall assemblies STC 66 - Gypsum board ceiling/concrete slab IIC 58 - Gypsum board ceiling/concrete slab/wood floor on 1/8" mat Product Detail 3.86" <)-<> 1 1.00 i Plan View IsoMax Clip STC 63 Ul us Wood stud partition, 2x4, 16" O.C. with 5/8" gypsum board, two layers on both sides. Fiberglass in cavity. IsoMax clips and 7/8" furring channel. Vmt wrww.kineffcsno/se.com/arch/fesfs/fsomax.hftn/ for complete IsoMax STC/IIC Sound test data 2.41" 1.32" 7/8" Drywail Furring Channel Side View NOTE.- Some color variation on the rubber component of the IsoMax clip is normal. This is based on the amount of surface wax (white in color) present on the black rubber. Product perfonnance is not affected. Kinetics Noise Control, inc. United States 6300 Irelan Place Dublin, Ohio. 43017 Phone; 614-889-0480 Fax:614-614-889-0540 Canada 3570 Nashua Drive Mississauga, Ontario Phone; 905-670-492 Fax; 905-670-1698 Kinetics Noise Control. Inc. ia continuall products. We reserve the right to make d without notice. / '(grading the q aripes to this and Download Model installation guidelines, three-part specification, and more at www™eticsnoise-com/^h/ispmax/. Call the faclofv at800-959-1229 if rpeding additional4^rmat^n; ask for Architec^ralsales. Purchase Mocbl IsoMax aad^cessones,^rough your.local sales representcitive Qwww.klil^G^noise-corri/replbc^on.asp). www.kli^ archsafes^ ■klne^c^ ;afes@lun€ ^oise.ccan/aRh/isomax/ neticsnoi^.cdm IsoMax 6/12 Six on Madison Condominium-Acoustical Details ATTACHMENT "C" ACOUSTICAL DETAILS ABC Acoustics, Inc.Report: 2492 Attachment Six on Madison Condominium-Acoustical Details GYPSUM BOARD R-11 BATT INSULATION 2x4- WOOD STUDS r SEPARATION (MIN.) HOLD GYPSUM BOARD BACK )i"; CAULK AIRTIGHT WITH ACOUSTICAL SEALANT FLOOR NOTE: WHERE REQUIRED FOR SHEAR. PLYWOOD MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR BASE LAYER OF GYPSUM BOARD. NOTES: MINIMUM 1" AIR SPACE AND 3 LAYERS OF 5/8" GYPSUM WALL BOARD. FIGURE C-1 ACOUSTICAL TREATMENT OF PARTY WALLS FOR ACOUSTICAL INFORMATION ONLY © ABC 2013 ABC Acoustics, Inc.Report: 2492 Attachment Six on Madison Condominium-Acoustical Details FLOOR ACOUSTICAL SEALANT %" PERIMETER ISOLATION BOARD (RIB) HARD-FINISH FLOORING THRESHOLD ACOUSTICAL UNDERAYMENT (E.G., RESUPOL OR ACOUSTI-MAT LP) CONCRETE TOPPING PER MANUFAaURER SPECS FIGURE C-2 I IMPACT ISOLATION OF FLOOR FOR ACOUSTICAL INFORMATION ONLY © ABC 2013 ABC Acoustics, Inc.Report: 2492 Attachment Six on Madison Condominium-AcoListical Details BATT INSULATION GYPSUM BOARD FILL 34" GAP WITH ACOUSTICAL SEALANT ALL ROUND PERIMETER SEAL OUTLET BOX AIRTIGHT WITH SHEET CAULKING (PADS) REFER TO PLAN FOR WALL TYPE NOTES: 1.SEPARATE OUTLETS ON OPPOSITE SIDES OF THE WALL BY 24" MINIMUM 2. CEILING CONDITIONS SIMILAR 3. APPLICABLE AT ALL SOUND-RATED CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING INTERIOR INSULATED ASSEMBLIES. FIGURE C-3 JUNCTION BOX ISOLATION IN SOUND-RATED CONSTRUCTION FOR ACOUSTICAL INFORMATION ONLY © ABC 2013 ABC Acoustics, Inc.Report: 2492 Attachment Six on Madison Condominium-Acoustical Details JAMB AND HEAD I PEMK0TYPES-88 0R STANLEY TYPE 10-5050 SOLID-CORE WOOD OR INSULATED METAL DOOR WOOD OR METAL RAISED THRESHOLD PEMKOTYPE234AV DOOR SHOE p 3/8" CLEARANCE SOL D THRESHOLD FIGURE C-4 UNIT ENTRY DOOR FOR ACOUSTICAL INFORMATION ONLY ©ABC 2013 ABC Acoustics, Inc.Report: 2492 Attachment Six on Madison Condominium-Acoustical Details NON-PLUMBINGSIDE (E.G., BEDROOM, DINING ROOM) Vi" MINIMUM CLEARANCE VENT PIPE KEEP PIPE CLEAR OF STRUCTURE EXCEPT AT HEAD AND SILL PLATES 2" MINIMUM rz 1- COPPER SUPPLY PIPE 1— ADJUST DEPTH OF PARTITION TO ACCOMMODATE DRAIN LINE — BATT INSULATION GYPSUM BOARD Yi" MINIMUM CLEARANCE r MINIMUM CLEARANCE FIGURE C-5 PLUMBING WALL WIDTH AND CLEARANCES FOR ACOUSTICAL INFORMATION ONLY © ABC 2013 ABC Acoustics, Inc.Report: 2492 Attachment Six on Madison Condominium-Acoustical Details CAULK AIRTIGHT; USE FIRE-RATED RESILIENT FILLER IF REQUIRED FOR FIRE RATING STEEL PLATE (OPTIONAL) %" NEOPRENE WAFFLE PAD (40DUROMETER)z FLOOR CONSTRUaiON SAFING BATT INSULATION IF REQUIRED FOR FIRE RATING 1" NOMINAL NOTE: IF PIPE IS SUSPENDED FROM-OR DIRECTLY ATTACHED TO STRUCTURE OR OTHER BUILDING ELEMENTS, USE 3/8" THICK FELT, OR 40-DUROMETER NEOPRENE AS SLEEVE BETWEEN PIPE AND PIPE HANGER FIGURE C-6 PIPE ISOLATION FOR PLUMBING RISERS FOR ACOUSTICAL INFORMATION ONLY ©ABC 2013 ABC Acoustics, Inc.Report: 2492 Attachment Six on Madison Condominium-Acoustical Details SUPPORT 4" TO 8 TYP. ON BOTH SIDES ACOUSTICAL SEALANT (PIPE OR CONDUIT LESS THAN 3" DIA.) NOTE: APPLICABLE AT ALL SOUND-RATED CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING INTERIOR INSULATED ASSEMBLIES. FIGURE C-7 TYPICAL PIPE/CONDUIT PENETRATION THRU SOUND-RATED CONSTRUCTION FOR ACOUSTICAL INFORMATION ONLY © ABC 2013 ABC Acoustics, Inc.Report: 2492 Attachment Six on Madison Condominium-Acoustical Details NOTE 4 NOTE 3 NOTE 2 6" MAX EQ. (NOTE 1 t f 6" MAX. WOOD STUD OR JOIST GYPSUM BOARD MOUNTING FLANGE OF CHANNEL FRAMING FLANGE WITH SCREW SECTION THROUGH RESILIENT CHANNEL NOTES: 1. INSTALL CHANNELS 24" ON CENTER UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED 2. AVOID STUD OR JOIST WHEN FASTENING GYPSUM BOARD TO CHANNEL-GYPSUM BOARD SCREWS MUST NOT CONTACT FRAMING 3. HOLD BACK /i" FROM INTERSECTING SURFACES 4. DO NOT CANTILEVER CHANNEL BY MORE THAN 6" FROM FRAMING FIGURE C-8 INSTALLATION GUIDE FOR RESILIENT CHANNEL FORACOUSTICALINFORMATION ONLY © ABC 2013 ABC Acoustics, Inc.Report: 2492 Attachment Six on Madison Condominium-Acoustical Details GYPSUM CONCRETE JOIST PLYWOOD SUBFLOOR GYPSUM BOARD ENCLOSURE BATT INSULATION m FIRE SAFING RECESSED FIXTURE GYPSUM BOARD SOUND ISOLATION CLIP FIGURE C-9 RECESSED FIXTURES IN SOUND-RATED FLOOR-CEILING ASSEMBLIES FOR ACOUSTICAL INFORMATION ONLY © ABC 2013 ABC Acoustics, Inc.Report: 2492 Attachment Six on Madison Condominium-Acoustical Details STRUCTURE MASON BR ISOLATORS SUSPENSION HARDWARE AS REQUIRED MOTORIZED DOOR OPERATOR RESILIENTLY MOUNTED MOTOR FIGURE C-10 GARAGE DOOR OPENER ISOLATION FOR ACOUSTICAL INFORMATION ONLY © ABC 2013 ABC Acoustics, Inc.Report: 2492 Attachment