Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
EIR 86-05; Batiquitos Lagoon Enhancement Plan Final Design; Batiquitos Lagoon Enhancement Plan Final Design; 1989-08-31
ATIQUITOS LAGOON ENHANGEMEI PINAL DESIGN Pf0posd fo: City of Carlsbiad and the Port of Lo$ Angela August 31, 1989 Subrhitted:^ & Midiol, Engineers In association with Wetlands Research Associates, Inc. P&D Technologies Woodward-Clyde Consultants Ogden Beeman & Associates, Inc. Melchoir Land Surveying, Inc. Marine Construction Consultants MOFFAT T & NICHOL, ENGINEERS August 31, 1989 City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 Attn: Mr. John Cahill, Municipal Projects Manager Subj: Batiquitos Lagoon Enhancement Project Final Design Proposal Our File: 89111 Dear Mr. Cahill: Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers is very pleased to submit this proposal for final design of the enhancement project at Batiquitos Lagoon, this submittal is in response to your request for proposal of July 24, 1989. We have assembled a highly competent team of experts with special knowledge of the area, wetland design, and construction plans, specifications and estimates. The team, lead by Moffatt & Nichol . Engineers is design-oriented with the aim of accomplishing the project in the most expeditious manner to achieve the wetlands enhancement desired. This is a high-visibility project and we have included Dr. Michael Josselyn of Wetlands Research Associates, Inc. for his expertise and credibility with the resource agencies. The schedule is very tight and the project at this stage is not precisely defined. We find that project management and coordination with the client and permit agencies will be critical toward timely and satisfactory delivery of plans to the City of Carlsbad. This is a multi-disci pli nary project with a degree of complexity that requires special attention and sensitivity to the environment. The project management and engineering personnel selected to lead the project have the required special wetlands design experience and management skills to accomplish this. Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers and thfe team members dedicate their resources and expertise to accomplish the tasks outlined in this proposal. We look forward to working with the City and the Port to enhance the wetlands in Batiquitos Lagoon. Please contact Dr. James Walker or Mr. James Crumpley if you have questions or comments. We encourage you to check our references. Sincerely, IFFATT &H«£HpL, ENGINEERS Robert D. Nichol President RDN/mlr Enclosure 250 WEST WARDLOW ROAD • P.O. BOX 7707 • LONG BEACH • CALIFORNIA • 90807 • (213)426-9551, FAX (213) 424-7489 CONTENTS Item Page Preface i i Understanding the Project iii Section 1 - Approach 1-1 Section 2 - Comments and Clarifications to Proposed Scope of Work . 2-1 Section 3 - Approach Used to Assume Quality, Accuracy, Cost Control and Timeliness 3-1 Section 4 - Design Schedule 4-1 Section 5 - Cost Estimate for Services by Tasks 5-1 Section 6 - Progress and Cost Reporting .... 6-1 Section 7 - Program Management and Organization 7-1 Section 8 - Special Capabilities 8-1 Section 9 - Experience Related to this Program 9-1 Section 10 - Equal Employment Opportunities and Affirmative Action 10-1 Section 11 - Insurance and Liability 11-1 References 12 PREFACE PREFACE Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers is responding to your Request for Proposal (RFP) dated July 24, 1989, as an expression of our strong interest in providing the final design services for the Batiquitos Lagoon Enhancement Project. This proposal is organized to correspond to the specific categories and work tasks presented in the RFP. Thus, we have used the same outline and numbering system as used in the RFP. We have assembled a first-class team of experts and have developed a scope and fee that will professionally address the issues and achieve the Final Design Program Goals. The project team has been formulated such that each team member will provide sufficient effort to perform the project tasks associated with their respective fields of expertise. We have a project team comprised of the "best in the business" to complete the project. The project environmental documents are currently under public review for comments during the preparation of this proposal. We understand that there is the possibility of changes to the project as a result of the various comments. We are prepared to negotiate the final scope and fee arrangement contingent upon these changes if necessary. Furthermore, our team is fully capable of assuming the planning role that may be required to develop an acceptable plan, should such services be desired. Regarding some of the engineering aspects of the Batiquitos Lagoon Enhancement Project, Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers has a library of numerical models and hydraulic model testing facilities which could be used on the project. These include a physical water quality model that measures circulation and tidal flushing, and numerical models for shoreline evolution of beachfills, sediment transport in tidal inlets, water quality and circulation. The primary objective of the engineering portion of the project is the preparation of a set of construction drawings and specifications for a workable project within a specified schedule. We propose to use models only as required and as practicable within the project time frame to acquire useful and meaningful results. We use the appropriate models to solve the problem and develop design data to construct the project which will enhance the lagoon and obtain mitigation credits for the Port of Los Angeles. UNDERSTANDING THE PROJECT UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT The following summarizes our understanding of the key issues associated with the Batiquitos Lagoon Enhancement Project: The resource agencies and the public wish to enhance the deteriorating wetlands of Batiquitos Lagoon. The Port of Los Angeles requires a mitigation site to offset the loss of marine habitat associated with their 2020 Plan landfills and channel improvements. The City of Carlsbad would like to enhance Batiquitos Lagoon. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) has been submitted for the Batiquitos Lagoon Enhancement Project and has received extensive comment. A Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) has been signed by the resource agencies to provide overall direction of the Project, however, an extensive permit process remains for final approval of the Project. Alternative concepts have been developed, however, the selected plan is not certain at this time. The Project will greatly enhance water quality by allowing free exchange of water into and within the lagoon. Some of the wetland areas will be provided with new habitat values. The elements of the Final Design Program for the Project consist of the finalization of all design; all documentation for permit filing and approval; coordination with right-of-way acquisition and title search investigations; interface with government agencies, utilities, private property owners, and concerned citizens; a complete project budget and construction cost estimate; and contract drawings and specifications. Adherence to a tight schedule is important because the Project must be constructed prior to the Port's commencement with their 2020 Plan. Construction activities are to be phased and managed to preserve the existing lagoon flora and fauna, especially rare and endangered species. MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS August 31, 1989 City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 Attn: Mr. John Cahill, Municipal Projects Manager Subj: Batiquitos Lagoon Enhancement Project Final Design Proposal Our File: 89111 Dear Mr. Cahill: Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers is very pleased to submit this proposal for final design of the enhancement project at Batiquitos Lagoon. This submittal is in response to your request for proposal of July 24, 1989. We have assembled a highly competent team of experts with special knowledge of the area, wetland design, and construction plans, specifications and estimates. The team, lead by Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers is design-oriented with the aim of accomplishing the project in the most expeditious manner to achieve the wetlands enhancement desired. This is a high-visibility project and we have Included Dr. Michael Josselyn of Wetlands Research Associates, Inc. for his expertise and credibility with the resource agencies. The schedule is very tight and the project at this stage is not precisely defined. We find that project management and coordination with the client and permit agencies will be critical toward timely and satisfactory delivery of plans to the City of Carlsbad. This is a multi-disci pli nary project with a degree of complexity that requires special attention and sensitivity to the environment. The project management and engineering personnel selected to lead the project have the required special wetlands design experience and management skills to accomplish this. Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers and the team members dedicate their resources and expertise to accomplish the tasks outlined in this proposal. We look forward to working with the City and the Port to enhance the wetlands in Batiquitos Lagoon. Please contact Dr. James Walker or Mr. James Crumpley if you have questions or comments. We encourage you to check our references. Sincerely, IFFATT &'S*1CH0L, ENGINEERS Robert D. Nichol President RDN/mlr Enclosure 250 WEST WARDLOW ROAD • P.O. BOX 7707 • LONG BEACH • CALIFORNIA • 90807 • (213)426-9551. FAX (213) 424-7489 CONTENTS Item Page Preface i i Understanding the Project iii Section 1 - Approach 1-1 Section 2 - Comments and Clarifications to Proposed Scope of Work 2-1 Section 3 - Approach Used to Assume Quality, Accuracy, Cost Control and Timeliness 3-1 Section 4 - Design Schedule 4-1 Section 5 - Cost Estimate for Services by Tasks 5-1 Section 6 - Progress and Cost Reporting 6-1 Section 7 - Program Management and Organization 7-1 Section 8 - Special Capabilities 8-1 Section 9 - Experience Related to this Program 9-1 Section 10 - Equal Employment Opportunities and Affirmative Action 10-1 Section 11 - Insurance and Liability 11-1 References 12 PREFACE PREFACE Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers is responding to your Request for Proposal (RFP) dated July 24, 1989, as an expression of our strong interest in providing the final design services for the Batiquitos Lagoon Enhancement Project. This proposal is organized to correspond to the specific categories and work tasks presented in the RFP. Thus, we have used the same outline and numbering system as used in the RFP. We have assembled a first-class team of experts and have developed a scope and fee that will professionally address the issues and achieve the Final Design Program Goals. The project team has been formulated such that each team member will provide sufficient effort to perform the project tasks associated with their respective fields of expertise. We have a project team comprised of the "best in the business" to complete the project. The project environmental documents are currently under public review for comments during the preparation of this proposal. We understand that there is the possibility of changes to the project as a result of the various comments. We are prepared to negotiate the final scope and fee arrangement contingent upon these changes if necessary. Furthermore, our team is fully capable of assuming the planning role that may be required to develop an acceptable plan, should such services be desired. Regarding some of the engineering aspects of the Batiquitos Lagoon Enhancement Project, Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers has a library of numerical models and hydraulic model testing facilities which could be used on the project. These include a physical water quality model that measures circulation and tidal flushing, and numerical models for shoreline evolution of beachfills, sediment transport in tidal inlets, water quality and circulation. The primary objective of the engineering portion of the project is the preparation of a set of construction drawings and specifications for a workable project within a specified schedule. We propose to use models only as required and as practicable within the project time frame to acquire useful and meaningful results. We use the appropriate models to solve the problem and develop design data to construct the project which will enhance the lagoon and obtain mitigation credits for the Port of Los Angeles. ii UNDERSTANDING THE PROJECT UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT The following summarizes our understanding of the key issues associated with the Batiquitos Lagoon Enhancement Project: The resource agencies and the public wish to enhance the deteriorating wetlands of Batiquitos Lagoon. The Port of Los Angeles requires a mitigation site to offset the loss of marine habitat associated with their 2020 Plan landfills and channel improvements. The City of Carlsbad would like to enhance Batiquitos Lagoon. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) has been submitted for the Batiquitos Lagoon Enhancement Project and has received extensive comment. A Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) has been signed by the resource agencies to provide overall direction of the Project, however, an extensive permit process remains for final approval of the Project. Alternative concepts have been developed, however, the selected plan is not certain at this time. The Project will greatly enhance water quality by allowing free exchange of water into and within the lagoon. Some of the wetland areas will be provided with new habitat values. The elements of the Final Design Program for the Project consist of the finalization of all design; all documentation for permit filing and approval; coordination with right-of-way acquisition and title search investigations; interface with government agencies, utilities, private property owners, and concerned citizens; a complete project budget and construction cost estimate; and contract drawings and specifications. Adherence to a tight schedule is important because the Project must be constructed prior to the Port's commencement with their 2020 Plan. Construction activities are to be phased and managed to preserve the existing lagoon flora and fauna, especially rare and endangered species. m SECTION 1 SECTION 1 Approach to Accomplish Work We have prepared our approach to accomplish the proposed work by tasks as outlined in the Request for Proposals (RFP). Our approaches based on our understanding of the project and issues described in the Draft Joint Environmental Impact Report and Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS). The approach to accomplish the work is presented as a project team effort. Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers, under the direction of Dr. James Walker, will have overall responsibility for completing all aspects of the design phase of this project to prepare the City of Carlsbad to construct the project. The primary responsibility for completing specific tasks is indicted under each task number. Task 1 - Review and Evaluate Previous Studies The project team will collect, review and evaluate the available data and assess the need for additional studies. This task will prepare a preliminary report that summarizes the results from the available studies and preliminary comments on the items pertinent to our work. Our findings at the conclusion of this task will be discussed with the City of Carlsbad and Port of Los Angeles to address the need to supplement the existing data with additional studies proposed in the following tasks. Responsibility: Project Team Task 2 - Geotechnical Program A significant amount of subsurface soil data are available for the Batiquitos Lagoon Enhancement Project. Much of this data will be useful, however, it is difficult at this time to determine the exact scope of work necessary to supplement this information until it is reviewed against the final plan. For planning purposes, we have assumed that some additional geotechnical field and laboratory work will be required and, with this in mind, we have prepared a preliminary scope of work for the various geotechnical aspects of the project. The approach to this work has been prepared in such a manner that items can easily be deleted or added. 1-1 2.1 Characterization of Dredge Material It is proposed that approximately ten additional borings be made in the lagoon to a depth of approximately 15 to 20 feet below the existing ground surface. It is assumed that there will be at least 12 inches of water in the lagoon at the time of our investigation. We propose to use a lightweight rig that utilizes a vibracorer sampler which will operate from a floating barge. This procedure will result in minimal disturbance to the lagoon surface and will allow for continuous sampling for the full depth of the boring. The borings will be located with a mini-ranger positioning system. If the water depth is less than 12 inches, we would utilize the same equipment with a helicopter. Continuous logs will be made of each boring and separate samples will be obtained from each 3-foot interval in accordance with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers requirements. Mechanical grain size analyses will be made on each sample. It is estimated that there will be approximately 70 samples. The results of the additional field and laboratory studies will be combined with available data to characterize the type, distribution, and volume of the various materials to be dredged. 2.2 Disposal of Dredged Material The EIR/EIS has identified four possible locations for disposal of the dredged material. We propose to do the necessary field investigation and laboratory testing to evaluate each of these potential disposal options. One possible disposal site is the San Marcos landfill; it is not anticipated that any additional geotechnical studies would be required for this location. The preferred dredge plan is to overdredge the Central Basin, place some of the sandy materials on the beach for beach nourishment, place the fine material in the overdredge area, and cap these areas with the remaining sand. The proposed scope of work for this method and two other disposal methods, beach nourishment and upland disposal at the Green Valley site, are: Central Basin Excavation and Disposal of Fines. To determine the feasibility of this disposal option, several conditions need to be evaluated: • First, the volume of the fines "as-placed" in the Central Basin needs to be estimated. It is anticipated that the fines would be mixed with water and pumped from the East Basin to the Central Basin. The fines would be allowed to settle through the water to the overdredged bottom and some bulking and spreading would occur. We propose to obtain selected samples from the East Basin and 1-2 perform Column Settling Tests to provide a basis for estimating the time required for the material to settle and for estimating the in- place volume of the fines and the approximate bulking factor for the current in-place volume to be dredged from the East Basin. The column settling tests will be in accordance to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Report D-78-56. • Second, the available volume of the overdredged area in the Central Basin needs to be estimated. This volume will be controlled to some extent by the limits of the dredge area and the depths to which sands are present within the Central Basin. The available data, supplemented the proposed boring and sampling program would be used to provide the basis for estimating the available volume of the overdredged area in the Central Basin. Beach Nourishment. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers requires that when dredged material is to be placed on a beach, at least two profiles shall be sampled and additional profiles for each 1/2-mile of beach affected. The Batiquitos Lagoon beach area covers approximately 3000 feet and the Encinas Creek beach area covers approximately 7300 feet. It is estimated that approximately 8 profiles will be sampled. The Corps requires that beach samples be obtained for each 6-foot change in elevation between approximate elevation +12 and -30 feet; but they do allow for waiver of the offshore samples if the dredge materials are compatible with the on-shore material. It is assumed that we can obtain this waiver and we therefore propose to obtain samples from approximately +12 feet down to approximate elevation -2 to -4 feet. It is also possible that much of the proposed beach disposal areas may have a cobble face at the time of sampling. If this is the condition, we would obtain samples from adjacent areas to supplement the profile samples. It is estimated that approximately 35 samples would be obtained. The beach profile would be surveyed at the time of sampling and mechanical analyses would be performed on all samples. Upland Disposal. It is anticipated that if the silts and clays are disposed at Green Valley, they would not be required to support structures; however, the soil may be required to achieve reasonable structural fill qualities. For purposes of this proposal, we have assumed that no special investigation or treatment of the subsurface conditions at Green Valley will be required; however, it will be desirable to evaluate the general characteristics of the material to be placed. In order to make this evaluation, we propose to utilize samples from the dredge material investigation. We propose to test four selected samples for compaction characteristics, shear strength, 1-3 compressibility, and potential expansion. This data will be used to help evaluate disposal methods, special soil treatment, and estimate probable end conditions. 2.3 Bridge Foundations Four bridges (1-5 bridge, railroad bridge, and Carlsbad Boulevard bridges) have been identified as part of the project. It is indicated in the EIR/EIS that the western Carlsbad Boulevard bridge could be replaced; the other bridges should only require supplemental bracing and scour protection. We anticipate that all the bridges will need to be evaluated in regard to their capacity to withstand seismic loads and that a new west Carlsbad Boulevard bridge would require a geotechnical investigation for foundation designs. Additionally, the scour and slope stability that may result from dredging beneath the existing bridges would have to be evaluated. Seismic Evaluation. For Seismic evaluation of the bridges we propose to provide geotechnical information in accordance with the ATC-6.2, Seismic Retrofitting Guidelines for Highway Bridges. In particular, we will provide the following information: • An estimate of the effective peak rock acceleration, "A," for each bridge site. The magnitude of this acceleration will be consistent with ATC-6 guidelines in terms of probability of occurrence. • Identification of the applicable ATC-6 Soil Type (I, II, or III) for each bridge site. • The Vulnerability Rating due to liquefaction for each bridge site. • Should the Vulnerability Rating indicate a potential for major or severe liquefaction-related foundation damage, the associated Capacity/Demand Ratio will be estimated. Our estimates of the effective peak rock acceleration will be based on the results of our previous site-specific studies made by our firm for projects in the vicinity of the lagoon. Initially, no field work, such as exploratory borings, is planned for this task. Full use will be made of whatever boring logs and soils reports are included in the existing records of these bridges and projects in proximity of these sites. We understand that bridge records such as plans and soils reports will be furnished for us, if they exist. We will visit the sites and we will search our 1-4 files for the relevant information. We plan to make use of geologic maps and/or generalized geologic profiles available for the area as well as our experience and knowledge of local conditions to supplement the bridge records. East Carlsbad Bridge Foundation Investigation. The bridge is on southbound lanes of Carlsbad Boulevard over Batiquitos Lagoon. The existing bridge is approximately 160 feet long and has 5 spans. It is supported on shallow footings. The new bridge should be made wider than the existing bridge to provide room for pedestrian and emergency vehicle access and will probably be founded on piles. No information about the new bridge length is available to us. We understand that the bridge design will be done in accordance with the current edition of the AASHTO Bridge Design Specifications with interims and Caltrans supplements. The purpose of our investigation will be to provide information for bridge design in accordance with Caltrans standards including: • Depths and types of bridge foundations; • Settlement; • Lateral earth pressure on retaining walls and abutments; and • Seismic design parameters and liquefaction. For our study, we propose to make four exploratory borings ranging in depths from approximately 40 to 50 feet. Two of the borings will be in the channel and two others will be in the proposed bridge abutment areas. We will log the borings and secure soil samples. We plan to perform laboratory tests on the soil samples to help evaluate certain physical and mechanical properties of the soils, and to confirm the visual classifications made during our field explorations. In our planning of the field and subsurface explorations outlined above and in evaluating the cost of our services, we have made the following assumptions: • The City of Carlsbad will arrange for all necessary site access and traffic control permits; and • It will be permissible to drill channel borings from the existing bridge. Scour and Slope Stability. We propose to use existing available data in our files to address the scour and slope stability that may result from dredging 1-5 beneath the existing bridges. Woodward-Clyde Consultants made 25 shallow (approximately 20 feet deep) borings in the central lagoon and adjacent areas in 1985. This data, along with the data available from the initial bridge studies and construction and the proposed investigation for the West Carlsbad Boulevard bridge should be adequate for our initial evaluations of all bridge foundations. If the available data is found to be insufficient, after completion of Task 1, we would prepare a proposal for additional work. Responsibility: Woodward-Clyde Consultants; Louis Lee Task 3 - Final Lagoon Configuration During the Review and Evaluation of Previous Studies, Task 1, material identified as pertinent to the lagoon configuration plan will be identified. This material and other more recently obtained information pertaining to rights of way, easements, and other legal encumbrances compiled by the City will be addressed under this task. Information pertaining to the existing site conditions will be compiled into an existing site base plan of suitable scale to clearly identify all items that may affect the project design. These items will include, but not be limited to roadway alignments, roadway and railroad bridges, bathymetric and topographic surveys, property lines, easements and rights of way, and utility lines. Proposed modifications based on the review and evaluation of previous studies will then be added to the base plan to produce a lagoon configuration concept plan. This lagoon configuration plan will then be evaluated based upon constructability considerations and further modifications may be recommended to enhance this aspect of the project. Additionally, an inlet stability analysis will be conducted to assure the configuration will function as designed. This concept plan will be reviewed by the Technical Review Committee and modifications, if necessary, will be made. The final concept plan will be submitted to the City of Carlsbad and the Port of Los Angeles for their review and comments. Detailed discussions with the resource and permit agencies will also start. While information is being collected and evaluated during Task 1, the need for a new topographic and/or bathymetric survey of the project area will be addressed. Should the existing surveys be deemed outdated or not include the entire project area, new surveys will be initiated. This could include the lagoon area, beach nourishment area and the Green Valley disposal area. 1-6 Once approval for the final concept plan has been received, the final design of the lagoon configuration plan will begin. Input for the final lagoon configuration will come from all project team members. This input consists of the engineering and pennitting considerations described in the other tasks and significant biological issues such as: • Size, elevation, and slopes suitable for various habitat types such as emergent marsh, mudflat, and subtidal areas; • Seasonal water height, salinity, and freshwater inflow required to sustain brackish marsh vegetation; • Location, size, elevation, and configuration of least tern nesting areas; • Location of habitats relative to high use areas and public access; and • Phasing and timing of construction to minimize impacts to existing natural resources and habitat. Final topographic and bathymetric survey information will be used as a base for the final lagoon configuration plan developed from the conceptual plan. Details and cross sections will be developed as required to show improvements in specific areas. The final design will be reviewed by the Technical Review Committee during the fifty percent and seventy-five percent completion review meetings. Responses to comments from the Technical Review Committee, the City of Carlsbad and the Port of Los Angeles will be incorporated into the plan as appropriate. In addition, the City and Port representatives will have the opportunity to review and comment on progress during the monthly review meetings. The final lagoon configuration plan will be incorporated into the construction drawings and specifications with detailed plans for areas of specific interests. Responsibility: Wetlands Research Associates, Inc.; Dr. Michael Josselyn Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers; James Crumpley Task 4 - Dredging and Disposal Plan The dredge and disposal plan will be developed in conjunction with the final lagoon configuration and agency permit conditions. Three specific dredge and disposal scenarios are being considered: 1-7 • Dredging of sandy sediments in West and Central Basins with disposal for beach nourishment; • Dredging and disposal for habitat development, including least tern habitat and other marsh creation; and • Dredging and disposal of cohesive East Basin sediments with in- water disposal and capping. Additionally, upland disposal has been discussed and is a possible alternative site. Each of these scenarios may require different dredge plans, operating parameters, and schedules to achieve final design objectives. Dredge and disposal plans for each scenario must be reviewed considering sediment characteristics, material transport requirements, final disposal requirements, and other project parameters. Elements of the dredge and disposal plan are: 4.1 Final Project Dredging Prisms Dimensions, depth, overdepth requirements, quantities and side slopes to achieve final design will be determined from the lagoon configuration developed in Task 3. 4.2 Dredge and Disposal Plan Dredging: Types and sizes of dredges suitable to perform the work will be examined and identified. Based on information contained in the preliminary design report, a cutterhead hydraulic dredge will most likely be suitable to all three scenarios. Other options will be reviewed including mechanical equipment and the new multi-capability equipment that operates in shallow water environments as both a cutterhead and clamshell dredge. One option for hydraulic dredging is to temporarily raise the lagoon elevations, or perch the lagoon to allow access by a larger dredge. This would allow higher production rates and shorten construction time as well as contain in-water dredging impacts. The environmental concerns and impacts would have to evaluated to determine if this option is feasible. West/Central Basin Dredging. A larger pipeline dredge may be applied to the west and central basin dredging for the relatively straightforward dredging of the sandy sediments. In-house computer programs for optimizing dredge production versus sediment characteristics and disposal sites/methods to determine horsepower and booster pump requirements will be used. Equipment and 1-8 schedules to provide preliminary cost estimates for West/Central Basin dredging will be developed. This dredge plan will include, if applicable, the dredging and capping of the pit for burial of the East Basin clays and silts. Pit dimensions, including dredging overdepth, will be recommended. East Basin Dredging. Based on geotechnical information provided in Task 2, the dredgeability of the East Basin sediments will be evaluated to present a recommended dredge plan. Based on the preliminary design report, we assume placement of this material in an excavated pit in Central Basin. Applying a hydraulic pipeline dredge, placement may require a downpipe or diffuser for accurate placement within the pit. Disposal: Topographic, hydrographic, sediment type, and receiving water data will be used to develop the disposal plan. Disposal methods and considerations for the scenarios discussed are: West/Central Basin Material Disposal. The assumed disposal method for sediments dredged from West and Central Basin is beach nourishment. Beach nourishment projects often require minimal containment areas; material is pumped onto the beach and the discharge pipeline is moved periodically to achieve sediment distribution. These design elements will be coordinated with the project team. Habitat Development. Disposal for development of least tern habitat and other wetlands must be coordinated closely with project wetland biologists. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, provides guidance for habitat development in their Engineering Manual (EM) 1110-2-5026, "Beneficial Uses of Dredged Material." Habitats developed in existing aquatic sites generally require construction of a perimeter dike and may require interior dikes to stabilize material during placement and promote dewatering, especially of finer materials. Material is placed into the diked areas to approximate design elevations. Often the site is graded and finger channels constructed before the dikes are breached to allow the site to be susceptible to tidal fluctuations. East Basin Material Burial. Disposal of East Basin sediments is assumed to be by pipeline, with a downpipe or perhaps diffuser, depending on water quality requirements. Silt curtains may be applied to create a mixing zone and reduce turbidity in adjacent waters. Accurate placement of the sand cap may require a diffuser pipe. Design of the burial facility will require geotechnical input and short and long-term sediment densification/consolidation. 1-9 We emphasize that the above dredge and disposal plan elements address the three scenarios being considered and this is the basis for our proposed effort estimate for this task. If the selected alternative includes upland disposal, several additional design elements will be required. An upland disposal site will require construction of perimeter dikes to heights that will accommodate the quantities to be disposed with appropriate allowances for freeboard. Weir placement and design to accommodate effluent return must meet water quality permit conditions; this can be accomplished by following appropriate Corps of Engineers design criteria. Other design elements include slopes, project sequencing and dewatering plan. Plans, specifications and estimates will be prepared for the selected alternative. 4.3 Archaeological/Historical Considerations The archaeol ogi cal/hi stori cal consultants will serve on an "as needed" basis to review all site plans and construction documents. These plans will be evaluated to determine whether any cultural resources will be impacted by the design. Furthermore, field reconnaissances will be performed to inspect any constructioin areas or locations for staging operations to assess the potential for impacting sites. The monitoring of all construction efforts or any other use of equipment will be necessary due to the uncertainty of the extent of the encroachment of the program into areas of potential archaeological sensitivity. In the event that resources are potentially threatened, those resources will require evaluation of significance and impact analysis. Should any sites be found to be significant and the impacts be determined to be potentially adverse, then mitigation measures will be developed as appropriate. Responsibility: Ogden Beeman & Associates, Inc.; Ogden Beeman Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers; Brian Ragland Marine Construction Consultants; Hamilton Smith Brian Smith & Associates, Inc.; Brian Smith Task 5 - Tidal Inlet Design The purpose of this task is to develop the final design for a tidal inlet to the Batiquitos Lagoon. The primary purpose of this inlet is to provide desired tidal flushing of the lagoon. Preliminary review of tidal inlet stability criteria indicates that a more complete stability analysis is required. Such analysis will require methods typical of those specified in the U.S. Navy Design Manual 26.3 - Coastal Sedimentation and Dredging. This is a very critical area which requires technical expertise in tidal hydraulics and coastal processes. 1-10 The project team is very fortunate to have the guidance of Dr. van de Kreeke on this issue. The following criteria will be used during the development of tidal inlet design: Minimize probability of inlet closure; Minimize adverse effects to upcoast and downcoast beaches; Maximize tidal exchange between the ocean and the lagoon; Minimize adverse aesthetic impacts; and Minimize construction and maintenance costs. Upon completion of the review and evaluation of previous studies (Task 1), a review of available numerical simulation models for wetland hydraulics and shoreline evolution will be conducted to determine the most effective analytical tools to be used to obtain the desired results. Data from the Geotechnical Program - Task 2 will be used to determine the range of minimum scour velocities associated with the inlet sediments. A numerical analysis of the tidal hydraulics will then be performed to determine inlet configuration and dimensions required for stability. A numerical shoreline evolution model will then be used to determine an optimized jetty length with minimum impacts to upcoast and downcoast beaches. Upon determination of the final tidal inlet configuration, the jetty structures will be designed and material quantities determined for the construction cost estimate. Final plans and specifications for construction of the tidal inlet will then be prepared. Responsibility: Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers; Dr. James Walker, Dr. Andrew Gram Task 6 - Beach Nourishment Plan The work products associated with development of the Beach Nourishment Plan include final plans and specifications plus a contingency plan should dredging operations yield material which is incompatible with the beach fill sites. Prior studies and existing data will be reviewed which is relevant to the proposed beach fill operations (Task 1). The results of Task 2 - Geotechnical 1-11 Program and Task 4 - Dredging and Disposal Plan will be used to determine the volume of acceptable beach fill material and the compatibility of this material with the Batiquitos Lagoon and Encinas Creek beach fill sites. The following planning criteria will then be used to determine the final beach fill configurations: • Verify the longshore transport characteristics of the two proposed beach fill sites and adjacent coastline; • Determine beach berm elevations and widths, as well as dune locations and volumes; • Determine the wave-adjusted foreshore slopes; and • Determine the configurations of the beach fill transition zones. In addition, further detailed consideration of the existing cobbled beach profiles associated with the two proposed fill sites will be required to finalize the fill cross sections in a manner which will minimize the erosion potential of the new sand fill. Final plans and specifications for the Beach Nourishment Plan will then be prepared in conjunction with the Dredging and Disposal Plan as described under Task 4. These will include plans for pipeline routing and material placement sequencing. A detailed contingency plan for the construction contractor will be prepared for disposal of dredge material should such material be determined from the specifications to be unsuitable for beach fill construction. This plan will be developed for a range of material volumes for which alternative disposal methods may be required. Considerations for development of these plans will include cost and schedule impacts as well as environmental permit constraints. Responsibility: Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers; Dr. Craig Everts, Robert Nathan Task 7 - Environmental Management Plan The purpose of the environmental management plan is (1) to address the measures necessary to protect existing resources during and following construction, (2) to set criteria to be met during construction that are necessary to the protection of natural resources, and (3) to establish a short and long-term monitoring program. The management plan will be written to conform to all 1-12 mitigation measures recommended in the final EIS/EIR as well as others recommended by the permitting agencies. Types of measures to protect existing resources which may be recommended within the management plan include: • Seasonal timing of construction; • Phasing of construction; • Protection, temporary removal or transplanting of significant or rare organisms prior to construction; and • Management of brackish water marsh. Coupled with these measures will be criteria that must be met during and following construction, including water quality and circulation, turbidity control, noise control, vegetation protection, and visual intrusion on existing habitats. Implementation of this tasks will be closely coordinated within the project team and permit agencies. An important aspect of the management plan that was not explicitly addressed within the RFP is the preparation of a short and long-term monitoring program. It is likely that such a monitoring program will be required by the permitting agencies and should be incorporated into this task of the Final Design. A monitoring program that closely follows the objectives set forth in the Memorandum of Agreement will be developed working closely with the permitting agencies and the City of Carlsbad and Port of Los Angeles. Responsibility: Wetlands Research Associates, Inc.; Michael Josselyn P&D Technologies; Betty Dehoney Task 8 - Utility Relocation Plan All utilities, easements and rights of way previously identified by the City of Carlsbad will be identified on a utility relocation plan. Each easement will be addressed with regard to the type of easement, restrictions held within the easement and how the proposed improvements may affect or be affected by the easement or the utility line within the easement. All easement holders will be advised of the proposed project. Where conflicts arise, recoimiendations for their resolutions will be made and when necessary, new agreements will be drafted. In the event that new or relocated easements 1-13 are required, legal descriptions and accompanying drawings will be provided for submittal to the City, County and other affected agencies for review and approval. When utility lines are to be relocated, we will coordinate with the utility company during their design work and will review their proposed improvement plans to insure that there will not be a conflict with the proposed lagoon improvements. When appropriate, the proposed location will be shown on the utility relocation plan and the project improvement plans. The preparation of improvement plans for utility line relocations is not included within the scope of this proposal. A separate utility relocation schedule will be prepared for all affected utility lines to insure that there are no conflicts with the proposed project construction schedule. Cost estimates will be prepared for each utility requiring relocation. Responsibility: Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers; George Johnson Task 9 - Bridge Design and Coordination The existing bridge structures crossing the lagoon will require some degree of protection to accommodate the increased depth of the inlet and the proposed dredging. The existing structures involve: the old state highway bridges, which are now called the West and East Carlsbad Boulevard Bridges; the existing AT&SF Railroad Bridge; and the newer state Interstate 5 (1-5) bridge structures, which is actually two separate structures. The plans of the existing highway bridges have been obtained from the Caltrans Bridge Maintenance office for review. A preliminary assessment has been made of the issues to be addressed to modify the structures to accommodate the proposed dredging and the effect of the dredging depth on the foundations. The approach in mitigating the effects of the dredging and the depth in conjunction with the tidal prism increase and modifications at the lagoon vary for each of these structures; thus, the approach will be discussed individually for each one of the structures. 9.1 West Carlsbad Boulevard Bridge The first structure modification would be the West Carlsbad Boulevard bridge which is the seaward bridge near the entrance jetties. It was built as part of the state highway system in 1934. It was designated as essentially a two-lane highway bridge and was built using spread footings, that is footings were 1-14 bearing on the material below the channel. Dredging the channel to a lower elevation may expose the top of the existing footings and settlement would probably occur at the existing bridge. This bridge is assumed to have inadequate foundations to support the existing traffic loads and as such has been noted in the RFP to be replaced by a new structure. The replacement structure will be wider allowing for pedestrian and emergency vehicle access across the lagoon in addition to the existing two southbound lanes. Construction will be accommodated by temporarily detouring the traffic and making a two-way bridge structure out of the existing East Carlsbad Boulevard bridge to accommodate both the northbound and southbound traffic. The existing east structure is presently a 28-foot wide roadway and can provide for a temporary one lane of traffic in each direction at the bridge structure. Temporary detour traffic would be handled as part of the bridge construction plans and the staging of any construction work modification on the East Carlsbad Boulevard would be staged to accommodate the detour traffic. At the completion of the bridge structure, the new lane transitions to accommodate the new bridge width and the new westbound structure will be designed and included in the plans and specifications. It is assumed that the structure is under control of the City of Carlsbad and the only approval that will be required is that of the City of Carlsbad. The geotechnical investigation described in Task 2 will be done to determine the type of foundations that will be required and the depth of penetration of piles and how foundations may be constructed. In addition, possible scour due to the flows in the lagoon channel would be investigated. 9.2 East Carlsbad Boulevard Structure Bridge The existing structure is a two-lane concrete bridge structure serving the northbound traffic on what was the old Highway 1 and was designed and constructed in 1951. The existing pile-supported structure is a flat slab bridge approximately 182 feet long with 24 foot spans per each bent. There was approximately 16- to 20-foot pile penetration below the existing grade at the time of construction, which was approximately +2 to +3 feet MSL. If the channel is dredged deeper then the penetration of the piles may not be adequate. We propose to inspect the existing structure to determine its true condition and to review the Caltrans maintenance and inspection records since construction. Existing and proposed borings will be reviewed to determine the extent of both lateral and vertical capacities of the existing piles to insure that there would be adequate support for the bridge when the pile penetration is reduced. The approach would be to examine and review the existing structure both from the onsite inspection records and the analytical records. The load on the existing 1-15 piles and its effect on both the seismic lateral loading and the effect of scour on the existing foundations need to be determined. If the initial investigation indicates the bridge and foundations would be jeopardized, we would propose as part of this effort, modifications to the existing structure. Scour protection could be utilized at this bridge in the form of a rock blanket to insure that the piles would not be further exposed and lose additional capacity. 9.3 The Atchison. Topeka and Santa Fe (AT&SF) Railroad Bridge. The existing structure is a multi-span single track railroad bridge, with trestle type construction which accommodates approximately 20 passenger and freight trains daily and is considered a prime link in the Los Angeles-San Diego Railroad system. The trestle structure was built in this alignment many years ago and has been under constant maintenance. The approach is to review the plans and existing foundation data available from the AT&SF Railroad, determine the design loads for the Cooper E-80 train system on the structure and determine the required pile capacity both for the lateral and vertical loads. The existing foundation data both east and west of the site and boring data obtained at the site will be used to evaluate these pile foundations. If extensive modifications to the structure is required, a "shoofly" or detour to accommodate the existing 20 daily trains. An agreement with AT&SF to allow the modifications to be done possibly at night will be required. If pile driving were required to accommodate the loadings, this work will likely have to be done at night. This concept of driving piles has been used on another job in the vicinity and was considered to be satisfactory, although it may be disturbing to the surrounding public and a very costly operation. Scour protection or rock blanketing could be used at this structure to prevent any additional scour if such is a possibility. The approach to be used for this structure is to analyze the existing structure, determine pile foundation requirements, determine the pile capacity when dredging removes material under the bridge, and make a recommendation as to the type and method of required modifications. If there are extensive modifications required, then detailed coordination with the AT&SF in both engineering and construction will be required. A maintenance agreement may also be necessary. This will require engineering analysis and coordination with the AT&SF structural design department. It is assumed in this case that whatever reconmendation would be made, a joint meeting with AT&SF structural department in Albuquerque, New Mexico would be organized through their special project manager in Los Angeles to review the recommendations. We have included this review with the structural department in our proposal. 1-16 9.4 The Caltrans Interstate 5 (1-5) Structure The bridge structure, constructed in 1965, is 219 feet long and comprised of 3 spans. The existing structure has a rock blanket and slope protection at the channel and abutments to provide protection against lateral scour in the San Marcos Creek. The structure is supported on driven piles using three column bents at each of the intermediate piers. The existing structure has two roadways, a northbound and a southbound roadway, with the structures completely separated. The geotechnical investigation will determine whether the proposed removal of the existing channel material under the 1-5 structure will have any adverse effects on the existing pile foundations. The foundations are deep and were obviously built in a cofferdam when this structure was originally constructed. We do not expect that the existing structure would be jeopardized due to the proposed removal of material above the footing pile caps. However, the potential for scour would be examined and a determination of the extent of modifications would be made. In summary, our approach is to investigate the existing foundation capacity to determine if there are any adverse effects through the increased dredging depth and to determine if there is any scour potential. It is not expected that any adverse affect on the bridge structure itself will result from the removal of the channel material. Responsibility: Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers; Richard Nei11 Task 10 - Permit Application and Agency Coordination This task will involve the acquisition of the permits to facilitate the design and construction of the project. The first step in the process will be to prepare a timeline for the acquisition of the permits and an estimate (with contingencies) for processing. Although Ms. Dehoney of P&D Technologies will be the point of contact for all permits, all of the project team members will provide input for this task. Although the resource agencies are cognizant of the project, past experience has demonstrated the importance of bringing together the resource specialists, regulatory processors, team engineers and City and Port representatives together to present the project, focus questions and hopefully refine issues that need to be resolved. Close coordination and open communication with the agencies are necessary to minimize conflicts as the project progresses. Permit applications and supporting technical appendices will be submitted to the project team and the City of Carlsbad and Port of Los Angeles for review to 1-17 ensure that all data related to project components are presented correctly. It is assumed that the City and Port will provide all copies of the EIR/EIS for attachment to the permits. The pennit applications and attachments will be submitted to the appropriate agencies. This is the time when the most important aspect will follow: extensive consultation and negotiation with the agencies. This phase typically includes requests for additional information and final negotiation of mitigation. There is an opportunity to bring together the public, including environmental and conservation groups, as well as interested homeowner groups to establish community consensus. The Batiquitos Lagoon Enhancement Project has been in the public eye for some time and consensus building at this time may or may not be a good idea. Upon further discussion with the City and Port staff, we can provide a forum for public meetings. Plans with appropriate presentation graphics can be made. Key professionals from the team can present the current plans and findings. The inclusion of this task is at the discretion of the City and Port. Responsibility: P&D Technologies; Betty Dehoney Task 11 - Construction Cost Estimate The project team will develop construction quantities and costs based upon the final lagoon configuration and environmental management plan. These cost estimates will encompass all aspects of the project including dredging and disposal; bridge construction and modifications, including detours; wetland vegetation; tidal inlet structures; and utility relocation. Our cost estimates will be based on a data base of actual bids from recent similar construction projects. Furthermore, we will supplement our data base with discussions with contractors on equipment availability and methodologies in determining realistic cost estimates. Responsibility: Marine Construction Consultants; Glenn Gibson Task 12 - Sumnary Report A report will be prepared which presents our methodology, data, findings and conclusions from each of the tasks. Construction drawings and specifications for the final lagoon configuration will also be submitted. A draft summary report will be submitted for comment and review by the City and Port. Responsibility: Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers; James Crumpley Project Team 1-18 Task 13 - Program Schedule A detailed critical path (CPM) schedule will be produced at the beginning of the project to indicate the proposed project design schedule. The schedule will include but not be limited to the following: Detailed breakdown of tasks to individual activities Activity durations Anticipated start and finish dates Dependencies Milestones Review periods by the Technical Review Committee, City of Carlsbad and Port of Los Angeles Permit filing and anticipated approval dates Individual task products submission and approval dates Draft and final report due dates A draft and final program schedule will be prepared and submitted to the City and Port for their review and approval. The schedule will be updated monthly for review at the monthly progress meetings. Responsibility: Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers; Brian Ragland 1-19 SECTION 2 I II SECTION 2 Comments and Clarifications to Proposed Scope of Work The delineation of the wetland and it's habitats has been previously defined. No further studies nor agreements are assumed to be necessary under the scope of work. Improvement plans for utility lines requiring modifications as a result of the project will be designed by others. We will coordinate with affected utility companies and will review their improvement plans to insure compatibility with the project. There will not be an impact to the cost and project schedule. Although a project construction schedule is not defined under the scope of work, a proposed schedule will be prepared showing the major items of work involved. There will not be an impact to the cost and project schedule. It has been assumed that in the preparation of the bid documents that the City of Carlsbad will furnish the invitation to bid, instructions to bidders, bid proposal and agreement, general and supplemental conditions, etc., which we would include in the final bid package. It is posssible that separate construction packages may be required for work in the Caltrans and the AT&SF Railroad rights of way. The costs associated with these separate packages will be subject to negotiation. The preparation of plans, specifications and estimates for any remedial measures to the East Carlsbad, 1-5 and the AT&SF railroad bridges are not included since the extent of remedial measures involved for each structure is not known at this time. We are proposing to prepare a study that will identify the required remedial measures and the associated construction and engineering costs involved in modifying the structures to meet the needs of the project and associated agencies. The study will be completed within the time frame of the program schedule. Caltrans will require that the City of Carlsbad obtain an encroachment permit for the improvements to the 1-5 bridges. Since the time required to obtain such a permit is completely dependent upon Caltrans, the duration for this item of work is not reflected in the project schedule. The costs associated with obtaining the permit are included in our Proposal. Modifications to the AT&SF railroad bridge, if necessary, will require extensive and lengthy coordination. Depending on the extent of modifications and the AT&SF's own scheduling,the time required to obtain their approvals and permits could exceed the project completion date. 2-1 Many tasks within the Scope of Work are not accurately definable with regard to effort and cost, while others can be defined relatively well. As such, the final form of the design contract may be more equitable to both the City and the Consultant if there were both Time and Material, and Fixed Fee sections based on the type of services required. This would have an effect on the project cost depending on the ease or difficulty of resolving the unknown issues in pennitting, conflict resolution, etc. The project schedule could be effected by these issues regardless of the form of contract. Rate schedules are based on current and projected fee schedules through the April, 1990 period. Should work extend beyond June, 1990, adjustments for salary and fee basis would need to be reconsidered. Our proposal does not include design of an upland dike disposal site for hydraulic disposal. Should this be required, additional design scope and fee would be required. The schedule is very tight and requires diligent project direction and management as well as execution. We will require complete and timely feedback from the City, Port and agencies to meet the time schedule. The scope does not explicitly call for public meetings and our approach suggests you may not wish or require more duting this phase. Should public meetings be required and desired, additional compensation and time may be required. A sediment trap has been identified in the prior studies. We are not certain that the sediment trap will be required based on the final lagoon configuration. We have included a fee for design of the sediment trap. This is a negotiable item and the fee would be reduced if a trap is not required. Construction services, including pre-bid conferences are not included in our proposal. 2-2 SECTION 3 SECTION 3 Approach Used to Assure Quality. Accuracy. Cost Control and Timeliness 3.1 Technical Review Committee The technical review committee was carefully chosen to include recognized leaders in their respective fields. The committee consists of members independent of the project team with the inherent capability of providing timely and useful comments into the design process. Dr. Tom Johnson, MEC Analytical, has knowledge of the biological resources and issues and can provide project guidance. Dr. Jacobus van de Kreeke is a world-renown expert in tidal hydraulics and Mr. John Lesnik has extensive experience in coastal structures and sediment transport. Mr. Charles Robers owns a dredge company and can provide constructive document review from a contractor's perspective to provide valuable insight to reduce the probability of construction claims and cost over-runs. The members of the Technical Review Committee will receive periodic reports and will review the progress at the five percent, 50 percent and 75 percent completion points. The Technical Review Committee will report directly to the Principal-in-Charge, Dr. James R. Walker. Please note that we have added an initial review at the five percent level. We believe this is important to conduct our studies with independent guidance from the start. The Technical Review Committee will address both specific and overall planning issues. Detailed review of calculations for the bridges is required by Caltrans and is also a standard Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers' design practice. We will assign individuals who are not part of the project team to review construction documents and calculations. 3.2 Project Management Project Management at Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers embraces many key facets necessary to the successful achievement of a completed project. These basic precepts are intrinsic to the Moffatt & Nichol philosophy of design and construction project management regardless of the project size. Our management approach adheres strictly to the recognition of the importance of these issues and our day-to-day practice maintains an aggressive sensitivity to these principles. The major issues are: 3-1 Quality Control Design Continuity Budget Control Constructability Review Design Schedule Adherence Construction Schedule Optimization Documentation Coordination Client Sensitivity Communication Internal Quality Assurance Program To implement our Quality Assurance Program for the Batiquitos Lagoon Enhancement Project, we will start with the steps listed below in each of the tasks: Pursuit of projects and clients best suited to the firms' capabilities and experience. Recruitment and retention of highly qualified engineers and support personnel. Concentration of our efforts in our specialty fields. Use of specialized, highly qualified subconsultants. Principal involvement in every project. Control of execution of each project by an experienced project engineer. Emphasis on importance of proactive communication. Commitment of skilled management, technical and support personnel. Independent review of project work provided by senior engineering and construction personnel. In adhering to the above practices we plan to utilize project management and management information systems that we will select and/or adapt to the particular requirements of this project. Our in-house computer assets, both hardware and software, enhance our capabilities and will allow Moffatt & Nichol 3-2 to achieve a quality product and effective management practice for the job. These aggressive and proven techniques have resulted in consistent project success and real tangible benefits to our many clients. Cost Control and Timeliness Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers' ability to control costs and meet schedules can best be illustrated by example. We believe effective cost controlling and project completion begins in the design portion of the project — design the project within the client's budget and schedule. Examples of Cost Control Effectiveness and Project Completion: Downtown Street Improvement Program, Santa Barbara, CA Estimated Construction Cost: $3,500,000 Cost Performance: under budget Schedule: 1987-1990 Schedule Performance: on schedule Number of Agencies Involved: 3 State and Local, 4 Utilities Freeway Access/State Route 55 Ramps, John Wayne Airport Expansion Project Orange County, CA Estimated Construction Cost $13,000,000 Cost Performance: under budget Schedule: 1987-1989 Schedule Performance: On Schedule Number of Agencies Involved: 6 State and Local, 1 Federal, 4 Utilities Pacific Coast Highway Bridge Widening, Huntington Beach, CA Estimated Construction Cost: $11,000,000 Cost Performance: on budget Schedule: 1987-1990 Schedule Performance: on schedule Number of Agencies Involved: 3 State and Local, 2 Federal, Utilities Alton Parkway Overcrossing, Irvine, CA Estimated Construction Cost: $2,500,000 Cost Performance: on budget Schedule: 1984-1988 Schedule Performance: on schedule Number of Agencies Involved: 5 State and Local, 3 utilities 3-3 Barranca Parkway Interchange at State Route 133, Irvine, CA Estimated Construction Cost: $8,300,000 Cost Performance: under budget Schedule: 1984-1989 Schedule Performance: on schedule Number of Agencies Involved: 5 State and Local, 3 utilities Lincoln Avenue Grade Separation, Anaheim, CA Estimated Construction Cost: $5,000,000 Cost Performance: under budget Schedule: 1986-1988 Schedule Perfonnance: on schedule Number of Agencies Involved: 2 State and Local, 2 Railroads Examples of Experience in Estimating Construction Costs: Bridges: Project: Bob Hope Bridge Widening, Rancho Mirage, CA E. L. Yeager Construction Co. Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers J. F. Shea Company SoCal Constructors Brutoco Engineering & Construction W. F. Maxwell, Inc. $1,212,574 1,266.000 1,287,899 1,299,998 1,334,182 1,358,474 Project: Alton Parkway Overcrossing-State Route 133, Irvine. CA Brutoco Engineering & Construction Adva Co., Inc. Hoffatt & Nichol, Engineers Estimate Steve P. Rados W. F. Maxwell, Inc. $2,901,475 3,111,994 3.234.205 3,302,028 3,641,899 Project: Center Street Bridge at Piru Creek, Ventura County, CA C. A. Rasmussen Granite Construction K.E.C. Company Kasler Corp. 1,136,795 1,169,009 1,175,114 1,178.271 3-4 Project: Project: SHORE PROTECTION Project: United Bridge Corp. 1.179,761 Socal Construction 1,230,671 Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers Estimate 1,248,690 M.C.M. Construction 1,263,558 McCutcheon-Superi or 1,318,444 Novo-Rados 1,323,179 Union Engineering 1,330,604 Brutoco Engineering & Construction 1,335,559 Gerstenberger Corp. 1,354,713 Griggs Corporation 1,367,314 32nd Street Bridge at Las Choi las Creek, San Diego. CA W.F. Maxwell, Inc. $782,202 Daley Corp. 792,458 Carolyn Scheidel 809,863 Hoffatt & Nichol, Engineers Estimate $846,602 T.B. Punick & Sons, Inc. 861,488 ANAHEIM BAY MITIGATION PROJECT, ANAHEIM BAY. CA Tudor Sal Ida $5,087,229 Kiewit Pacific 6,805,000 Clark Contractors 7,373,500 Advance 7,450,000 J.E. McAmis 7,600,000 Moffatt & Nichol. Engineers $7,613,869 Roy E. Ladd 8,350,000 Dutra Construction 8,381,250 PKB Construction 8.737,373 Si 1 berger 8,784,000 VENTURA COUNTY - HOBSON & FARIA PARKS Burdick Excavating Company, Inc. Greg J. Harris Construction Moffatt & Nichol. Engineers Kiewit Pacific Co. Granite Construction Co. $607,294.39 614,733.00 $643,226.00 690,815.00 694,955.00 3-5 Spiess Construction Co. 699,401.00 Union Engineering Co. 711,000.00 Jim Hubbs Construction 718,888.00 Connolly Pacific 724,559.00 Oberg Contracting Corp. 763,011.00 J.W. Mitchell Co., Inc. 763,751.00 Bianco Corporation 834,013.00 Project: SEAWALL AND MOORINGS, USCG SUPPORT CENTER, ADWEDA. CA Crowley Constructors $7,338,361 General Construction Contractors 7,338,566 Riedel International 7,798,000 Moffatt & Nichol. Engineers Estimate $7,881,144 Contractors, Inc. 7,904,748 Guy F. Atkinson 8,195,750 Morrison-Knudsen Co. 8,567,146 3-6 SECTION 4 SECTION 4 Design Schedule The following schedule of professional services is proposed for completion of the Final Design Program. In addition to the thirteen tasks described the project Scope of Work, the schedule indicates the monthly progress meetings and required review dates for the City of Carlsbad, the Port of Los Angeles and the Technical Review Corranittee. The schedule also shows that the draft summary report and draft plans and specifications will be submitted for review by March 1, 1990. A three week review period for the City and Port is allotted. This will then allow 30 calendar days to complete the final design program package by the required April 20, 1990 deadline (per Program Task 12). 4-1 DESCRIPTION 1989 NOVEMBER DECEMBER 990 JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL NOTICE TO PROCEED 1 - REVIEW k EVALUATE PREVIOUS STUDIES 2 - GEOTECHNICAL PROGRAM TOPOGRAPHIC/BATHYtlETRIC SURVEY 3 - LAGOON CONFIGURATION CONCEPT PLAN CITY/POLA LAGOON CONCEPT PLAN REVIE CONFIGURATION PLAN - FINAL DESIGN TECH. REVIEW COMMITTEE - 5Z REVIEW TECH. REVIEW COMMITTEE - SOX REVIEW TECH. REVIEW COMMITTEE - 75Z REVIEW A - DREDGING AND DISPOSAL PLAN 5 - TIDAL INLET DESIGN 6 - BEACH NOURISHMENT PLAN 7 - ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 8 - UTILITY RELOCATION PLAN 9 - BRIDGE DESIGN ANO COORDINATION 10 - PERMIT APPLIC./AGENCY COORDINATION 11 - CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE 12 - PREPARE DRAFT SUMMARY REPORT SUBMIT DRAFT REPORT AND PS&E CITY/POLA DRAFT REPORT REVIEW PREPARE FINAL SUMMARY REPORT 13 - PREPARE/UPDATE PROGRAM SCHEDULE SUBMIT FINAL REPORT AND PS&E MONTHLY PROGRESS MEETINGS DESC LEGEND PROGRESS LS FLOAT 1 ^ MILESTONE HIGHLIGHTED A 1=1 I 1 ID A • A RUN DATE 30AU689 REVISION NO 0 BASE DATE 0IN0Ve9 DATA DATE 0IN0V89 PLOTTRAK BATIQUITOS LAGOON ENHANCEMENT PROJECT FINAL DESIGN CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA SCHEDULE USED' BATIQUITOS LAGOON ENHANCEMENT SECTION 5 SECTION 5 Cost Estimates for Services by Tasks The fee estimate given in this section covers the scope of services discussed in this proposal. We have conformed to your request for a fixed fee and an upper limit fee on a Time and Material basis. The calculated fee by task and discipline is shown in the following table. The calculated fee is our fixed fee price, of $1,381,656. The estimated fee on a Time and Material basis would be $1,500,000. These fees are negotiable based on the final scope. We would be pleased to work with you to develop a fair and equitable fee to accomplish the program goals. Man-months and manhour estimates are included in this section. Rate schedules and description of expenses are also included. Downtime due to equipment failure of unforseen "acts of God" will have a negligible affect on cost, but may adversely affect the project schedule. 5-1 I mpQm oisTRisurioN fiANHQURS OESCRIPTION ffiOJECT HftNAGEHENT HISCELLANEOUS PLANNING P ftOMINISTRATIQN P SUB-CONTRACTS P CLIENTS/PRIME P TASK SUB TASK P P !l Batiquitos Lagoon Enhanceaent Projeci .^uqust 198Y Final Ossiqn MOFFATT k NICHOL, ENBINEERS PRINCIPAL PROJ.MAN. PROJ.ENS. COAST.SCT STR. EHB. COAST.ENG CIV. ENG. SR. ENS. SPECS DRAFT ! DRAFT 2 . WORD PROC 8. Sfiith ARCHEQL06. «NJ Netlanda Research Associates JNB DS PH TECH P ^ D Technoioqies PROJ.flAN. ANALYSTl ANALYST2 WORD PROC. GRAPHICS Oqden Beaaan Assoc. PRINC/PH PROJ.ENS WORD PROC !0 40 10 40 40 lb ' 8 40 M.C.C. Woodwar(i Clyde Consultants CONSULTANT PRINCIPAL SR.PR.ENG AS.PR.ENG SR. STAFF FIELD TECH OFF.ASST DR.AFTING SR.PR.GEO AS.PR,SEO WORD PROC SUB T.ASK FEE./ HOURS/ TOTALS SUB TASK TASK FEE/ j TASK 0 90 80 16 18 0 9720 9830 1632 2016 204 21248 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT MISCELLANEOUS' MEETINS-iH HOUSE MEETING-OUTSIDE •REVIEW STUDIES GEOTECHNICAL 30 48 24 30 40 30 96 12 24 96 30, 72 16 .30 32 4 16 16' 8 16' 24 • 32- 16 16 16 48 40 16 .14 24 16 16 24 40 24 25 16 64 40 158 30 12 32 12 26 0 258 426 480 455 0 22817 37659 36433 37286 684 480 455 60476. 372B6 FINAL LAGOON CONFIG. 3 Overall Plan 3 Detail Pians 3 Sections 3 Fresh Water Laq. 3 Sedisent Trap 3 • Legal Descriptions 3 24 16 4 4 80 40 20 40 16 120 120 120 60 60 30 144 120 40 • 96 80 16 48 3 16 16 16 24 16 600 260 244 168 120 112 4169S 17000 13368 10776 8760 7952 1504 99554 DREQ8E/DISP. PLAN 8athy»etric Survey Dredging Plan Dredge/Disposal Historic Staoino Area Cut k Fill Quant. 4 16 24 4 4 2 4 24 24 30 24 3 40 16 80 80 16 40 40 20 76 40 16 16 200 24 376 212 212 44 90 1712 27402 15479 11446 2924 5212 958 64175 TIDAL INLET 5 Nuserical Model 5 Bave/Sedieent Anal. 5 Plans k Specs. 5 Cost Estiiate 5 BEACH NOURISHMENT 6 Pipe Plan/Oetail 6 Contingency Plan 4 Plans k Specs. 6 40 12 40 240 120' 640 120 Art 16 1296 95040 16 40 240 300 80 16 704 53032 24 40 112-120 16 40 160 4 •-'i. 548 35320 2 16 8 40 16 82 5468 2630 138860 16 40 200 80 120 456 28672 8 24 40 16 •) 60 20 1 4 4 179 10954 24 40 24 224 164 40 80 1 12 20 T-T -.'i. 665 45514 1300 S5140 ENVIRON. MANAGEMENT 7 Review Doc. 7 0 Environ.Review 7 1 Environ.Consult. 7 2 Mitig.Monitoring 7 3 Envir.Man.Plan 7 4 16 16 24 24 100 32 40 500 20 200 34 13 16 40 40 24 120 32 40 846 172 9200 2650 3312 61101 12272 1210 885 UTILITY RELOCATION Confiict Resolut. Easesent Coord. Schedule Draft Agreesents . Cost Estiaates 16 12 4 16 24 24 3 16 16 120 230 40 120 40 100 168 416 •Ji. 152 12816 26323 3816 11168 4300 846 5842B MftNPOMER DISTRIBUTION HANHOURS DESCRIPTION TASK SUB TASK Batiquitos Lagoon Enhancetent Project August 1989 Final Design MOFFATT k NICHOL, ENGINEERS PRINCIPAL PROJ.MAN. PROJ.ENG. COAST.SCT STR. ENG. COAST.ENG CIV. ENG. SPECS SR. ENS. DRAFT 1 DRAFT 2 HORD PROC B. Seith ARCHE0L06. Wetlands Research Associates MNJ JHB DS PW BRIDGE DESIGN 9 West Caribad Br, 9 Roadway I up. 9 3 Bridge Study' 9 Reports 9 PERMITS/AGENCY COORD. 10 COST ESTIMATES 11 "Concept 11 m 11 75X 11 Final 11 SUMMARY REPORT 12 Draft Report 12 Final Report 12 PROGRAM SCHEDULE 13 Draft Schedule 13 Final Schedule 13 TOTAL HOURS HOURLY FEE TOTALS 20 20 334 40080- 40 32 40 ' 8 40 8 r, 0 8 f6 80 40 16 8 884 90168 116 102 180 60 40 16 16 16 16 120 80 16 16 348 60 30 66 IBOe 155488 416 35776 1048 73360 EXPENSES Topographic k Hydrographic Survey Coaputer Charges Reproduction Expenses - Hoffatt k Nichol Expenses - B. Seith Expenses - Wetland Research Expenses - P St D Assoc. Expenses - Ogden Beaaan Expenses - M.C.C. Expenses - 'Woodward Clyde TOTAL EXPENSES TOTAL LABOR TOTAL DESIGN FEE TECHNICAL REVIE?} COHMITTEE TOTAL FEE 24 1490 98340 112 480 108 40 20 20 40 48 3026 205768 1- lljJ/vl 19500 7500 5000 1150 2714 6900 2760 1150 36570 i 193819 f 1138216 i 1337037 44619 296 92 400 120 36 • 80 20 40 40 24 442 28730 983 1376 39520 71552 P Jl D Technologies Ogden Beaaan Assoc. M.C.C. Woodward Clyde Consultants TECH PROJ.MAN. ANALYSTl ANALYST2 HORD PROC. GRAPHICS PRINC/PH PROJ.ENG NORD PROC CONSULTANT PRINCIPAL SR.PR.ENG AS.PR.ENG SR. STAFF FIELD TECH OFF.ASST DRAFTING SUB TASK FEE/ HOURS/ FEE/ SR.PR.GEO AS.PR.GEO WORD PROC TOTALS SUB TASK TASK TASK 40 12 40 16 230 9200 16 40 24 300 100 100 16 40 16 8 16 16 24 240 12420 104 10764 120 9660 56 289B 112 5152 m 3542 1028 B511B 20 920 200 10350 187 9677 118 5428 248 27094 20 4 400 29900 3? 1030 40 30 20 20 80 24 8 396 49 90 193 52 30 44 . 38 6762 9833 16394 3827 1725 1619 1966 1494 718 844 204 756 174 108 232 434 221 96 84 15892 1138218 90990 51136 61914 13643 54845 1961B 12029 7037 16908 19119 8033 6672 3260 217688 756 770 180 15892 54845 14705 1138218 BATIQUITOS LAGOON ENHANCEMENT PROJECT Manpower Distribution - Man Months Moffatt & Nichol. Engineers TASK PRINCIPAL PROJ. MAN. PROJ. ENG. SR. ENG COAST. SCT STR. ENG. COAST. ENG CIV. ENG. SPECS DRAFT 1 DRAFT 2 WORD PROC. p - Project Management 0.346 0.600 0.231 V - Project Development 0.450 0.450 0.727 0.115 0.692 0.265 0.173 1 - Review Studies 0.138 0.231 0.415 0.185 2 - Geotechnical 0.046 0.092 0.023 3 - Final Lagoon Conflg. 0.138 0.254 1.131 3.231 0.831 0.738 1.338 0.277 4 - Dredge/Disposal Plan 0.046 0.312 0.438 0.923 0.092 0.323 0.969 0.023 5 - Tidal Inlet Design 0.300 0.473 1.938 2.077 6.116 2.077 0.092 0.323 1.385 0.208 6 - Beach Nourishment 0.277 0.600 0.138 1.523 2.192 0.496 1.269 0.577 0.012 7 - Environ. Managanent 0.046 0.185 0.277 8 - Utility Relocation 0.046 0.288 0.508 3.462 0.577 9 - Bridge Design 0.092 0.692 2.642 4.304 4.039 1.038 1.708 3.208 0.531 10 - Permit/Agency Coord. 0.046 0.231 0.231 0.462 0.000 11 - Cost Estimates 0.231 0.369 1.050 0.692 0.577 0.138 12 - Summary Report 0.231 0.692 1.154 0.069 0.185 0.185 0.138 13 - Program Schedule 0.046 0.138 0.185 0.462 BATIQUITOS LAGOON ENHANCEMENT PROJECT Manpower Distribution - Man Months B. Smith Wetlands Research Associates P&D Technologies TASK ARCHEOLOG. HNJ JWB DS PW TECH PROJ. MAN. ANALYST 1 ANALYST 2 WORD PROC. GRAPHICS P - Project Management V - Project Development 1 - Review Studies 2 - Geotechnical 3 - Final Lagoon Conflg. 4 - Dredge/Disposal Plan 5 - Tidal Inlet Design 6 - Beach Nourishment 7 - Environ. Management 8 - Utility Relocation 9 - Bridge Design 10 - Permit/Agency Coord. 11 - Cost Estimates 12 - Summary Report 13 - Program Schedule 0.092 1.154 0.138 0.046 0.185 0.185 0.138 0.185 0.092 0.277 0.231 0.046 0.092 0.092 0.092 0.138 0.092 0.231 0.046 0.231 0.138 0.138 0.138 0.046 3.877 1.731 0.138 0.115 1.54 0.485 0.577 0.017 0.104 0.577 BATIQUITOS LAGOON ENHANCEMENT PROJECT Manpower Distribution - Man Months Oqden Beeman Assoc. M.C.C. Woodward Clvde Consultants TASK PRINC/PM PROJ. ENG WORD PROC. CONSULTANT PRINCIPAL SR. PR. ENG. SR. PR. GEO p -Project Management V -Project Development 0.185 0.231 0.092 0.058 1 -Review Studies 0.138 0.231 0.046 0.092 2 -Geotechnical 0.092 0.138 0.144 0.369 3 -Final Lagoon Conflg. 0.092 0.185 4 -Dredge/Disposal Plan 0.346 0.692 0.092 0.115 5 -Tidal Inlet Design 0.185 6 -Beach Nourishment 0.092 0.138 0.185 7 -Environ. Management 8 -Utility Relocation 9 -Bridge Design 0.092 0.231 0.231 10 -Permit/Agency Coord. 0.092 0.231 11 -Cost Estimates 0.046 0.092 1.154 12 -Summary Report 0.185 0.231 0.092 0.185 13 -Program Schedule 0.069 0.138 AS. PR. ENG SR. STAFF FIELD TECH OFF. ASST DRAFTING AS. PR. GEO WORD PROC. 0.231 0.912 0.300 0.173 0.069 0.185 0.069 0.150 5.2b Rate Schedule MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS Rate Schedule Classification Hourlv Rates Principle $120 Project Manager 102 Project/Senior Engineer 86 Coastal Scientist 86 Structural Engineer 70 Civil Engineer 68 Specifications 65 Drafter II 52 Drafter I 40 Word Processing 40 Expenses , Cost Topographic and Hydrographic Survey 105,500 (Melchior Land Surveying & Zenith Aerial) Computer Charges (1300 Hours @ $15/Hour) 19,500 Reproduction ($.10/SF to $1.00/SF) 7,500 Miscellaneous Expenses 5,000 (Milage @ $.25/Mile, airfare as necessary for railroad and permit coordination, etc.) Subcontractors Cost plus 15% 5-7 BRIAN SMITH AND ASSOCIATES Rate Schedule Classification Brian F. Smith Expenses Miscellaneous Expenses (assumed) Hourlv Rates $45 Cost $1,000 WETLANDS RESEARCH ASSOCIATES Rate Schedule Classification President Senior Associate Associate II Associate I Staff Technician Expenses Airfare (7 @ $230) Auto Rental (6 @ $45/Day) Per Diem (7 @ $25/Day) Miscellaneous Hourly Rates $90 70 45 40 35 Cost $1,610 270 175 350 5-8 P&D TECHNOLOGIES Rate Schedule Classification Project Manager Analyst Word Processing Graphics Expenses Miscellaneous Expenses Hourlv Rates $78 45 45 40 Cost $6,000 OGDEN BEEMAN Rate Schedule Classification Principle/Project Manager Project Engineer Secretarial Expenses Airfare (4 @ $450) Per Diem (4 @ $100/Day) Reproduction Long Distance Telephone Miscellaneous Hourly Rates $95 65 28 Cost 1,800 400 25 75 100 5-9 MARINE CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS I Rate Schedule Classification Consultant Expenses Miscellaneous Expenses Hourly Rates $75 Cost $1,000 neer/Geologist WOODWARD CLYDE CONSULTANTS Rate Schedule Classification Principle Senior Project Engineer/Geologist Assistant Project Engii Senior Staff Engineer Field Technical Assistant Drafting/Word Processor Office Assistant Expenses Mobilize/Demobilize Field Equipment Barge & Vibracorer (2 bays @ $505/Day) Operator (2 Days @ $35[)/Day) Mini-Ranger (2 Days @ $250/Day) Mechanical Analysis (105 @ $100/EA) Column Settling Test (4 @ $625/EA) Compaction Test (4 @ $600/EA) Test Borings (4 @ $150b/EA) M.C./D.D. Test (20 @ $20) Mechanical Analysis (4 @ $60) Plastic Index (3 @ $60) Direct Shear Test (2 @ $300) Specific Gravity Test Miscellaneous (2 @ $40) Hourly Rates $120 95 72 64 50 45 32 Cost $5,500 1,010 700 500 10,500 2,500 2,400 6,000 400 240 180 600 80 1,238 Note: Field investigation Cost will be increased by 25% if a helicopter is required. 5-10 TECHNICAL REVIEW COWITTEE Rate Schedule Classification C. Robers Airfare (3 @ $700) Auto Rental (13 Days @ $40/Day) Per Diem (13 @ $120/Day) J. Van De Kreeke j Airfare (3 @ $5q0) Auto Rental 13 ^ $40) Per Diem(13 @ $120) Hourly Rates $ 500/day 2,100 520 1,560 $ 650/day 1.500 520 1,560 J. Lesnik Airfare (3 © $720) Auto Rental (13 ]@ $40) Per Diem (13 @ $120) T. Johnson Milage (450 @ $0 Miscellaneous .25) $ 688/day 2,160 520 1,560 $440/day 112.50 100 5-11 SECTION 6 SECTION 6 Progress and Cost Reporting I We consider the progress and cost reporting aspects to be a major key to the ultimate success of the project. Inherent with any successful large-scale project is an effective and ijeliable system of communication. The reporting system must have the structure and rigidity to be reliable and easy to implement, but it must also have the flexibility to meet additional specific needs of the client. 6.1 Progress Reports In addition to frequent dail^ interfacing through telephone/telefax communication, we will provide brief informal written weekly summaries of work progress. We will also provide in-depth monthly progress reports. We will prepare a sample monthly progress report format at the outset of the project for your approval. These reports will enable timely management briefings. At occasional key dates, plan illustrations can also be provided where appropriate for informal presentations or other uses which may arise. The monthly progress reports previous month. Each task wi i tems: will be submitted for the progress made in the 11 be addressed individually by the following Work completed during the month Project status, included percent completion Summary of meetings and all communications ays, problems, conflicts including suggestion of Notice of any de solutions Program Schedule (Task 13) update Projected work to be accomplished for following month An example of a monthly progr^ess report we have used in the past is attached for your review. We would recommend this format as a minimum, however, such will likely be expanded to include all progress items described above. 6-1 In addition to the project progress reporting, we will provide a minimum of one week advance notice for meetings. We will assume responsibility for coordination of all meetings and will make all necessary contacts and arrangements. 6.2 Terms of Payment A monthly invoice will be prepared based upon the work completed for each task as described in the monthly progress report. The following items will be identified for each task: • Total contract dollar amount • Billed this period • Previously billed • Remaining to be billed If the contract is on a time and material basis, the invoice will also indicate: • Total hours for each discipline • Billing rate for each discipline If the contract is on a fixed-fee basis, the percentage complete will be reported. A total for the invoice and certification for the accuracy of the invoice will be located at the bottom of the invoice. An example of a monthly fixed-fee invoice is attached. 6-2 MOFFATT & NI C H O L, E N G I N E E R S January 15, 1988 Mr. E.L. Gorman Port of Los Angeles P.O. Box 157 San Pedro, CA 90733 Attn: Mr. Richard Wittkop Subj: Berth 212-215 Landfill and Wharf Improvements, Agreement No. 1432 December 1987 Progress Report, Our Job: L-2455 Dear Dick: The monthly progress report for the subject project is as follows: 1. Work completed During Month. a. Phase II Concept Study submitted for Port review. Meeting with Port and A/E Technical Advisory Board to be scheduled upon receipt of Port's review comments. b. Preparation of Draft Geotechnical Report under way. c. Results of supplemental elutriate testing reviewed and plan formulated for additional testing. d. Phase III wharf design concept study started. Preliminary pile design data received from H-LA. Study of crane rail gauge and container ship size complete. 2. Drawing Status a. Preparation of interim submittal of Phase II construction drawing started which will cover borrow site, fill cross sections and general construction information. 3. Project Schedule. Revised project schedules attached to report. 4. Actual vs Original Project Schedule. A number of project schedule items have been delayed. Schedule completion dates have been revised for the following items: 250 WEST WARDLOW ROAD • P.O. BOX 7707 • LONG BEACH • CALIFORNIA • 90807 • (2 1 3) 426-9551. FAX (21 3) 424-7489 Mr. E.L. Gorman January 15, 1988 Page Two a. Corps of Engineers and Regional Water Quality Control Board permit processing time extended due to requirements for additional elutriate testing of backland soil samples. Revised completion date May 20th, b. Coastal permit processing dependent on COE and RWQCB and therefore delayed to June 14th. c. Draft of Geotechnical Report delayed due to additional elutriate testing of backland samples. Draft report now due January 14th. d. Preparation of Goldenwest Restoration Plan has been extended until 1 February. e. Preparation of Phase I negative declamation has been extended until February 22nd. f. Both the Larson Restoration Plan, and the Final Draft of the Phase II & III EIR has been extended until February 1. EIR Final Draft is expected to be completed during the first two weeks of February with the public comment time period ending 1 Apri1. g. The demolition and cleanup of the Goldenwest site is now scheduled to start mid January with completion during the first week of April. h. Certification of the EIR is now expected to be completed by May 6th. i. The Phase I Advertising/Award/Construction activities have been delayed approximately two and one half months. Construction is now expected to start mid April. j. The Phase II Concept Study submittal was made two weeks after the original due date because of the problems encountered during the geotechnical field investigation portion of the work. An interim construction drawing submittal will be made mid January. k. The Phase II Advertised/Award/Construction activities have been delayed due to the permitting problems that have been encountered. 1. The Phase III Concept Study is on schedule and will be submitted during the first week in February. m. The Phase III Advertise/Award/construction sequence has been delayed due to late start of Phase II construction. -At I Tv" Mr. E.L. Gorman • I January 15, 1988 Page Three 5. Delays, Problems and Conflicts. a Problems with elutriate testing of backland continues. Further test plan required due to Hugo Neu stockpiling of scarp on previously cleared areas. b. Project delays discussed under Item 4 above. r Tnnflict with survev data and establishment of project grid system wil] reqlirrf additional field survey work in the area of Berth 214. 6. Meeting, Hearing and Communications. a Meeting held December 21st to discuss interface between Port and A/E prepared construction drawings for Phase ll. b Meeting held December 22nd to discuss results of supplemental elutriate testing and rock dike slope stability. c Meeting with Port CADD consultant and A/E staff on December mh, to review features of CADAM and AutoCAD and translation problems. d. No meetings with outside agencies were held this month. 7. Percent Complete, the project is approximately 25 percent complete. 8. Invoice amount enclosed is our invoice for work performed during December. Very truly yours, MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS Walter E>'HuT*ti Projec WEH:kg lenne Project Manager E. L. Bortan - Chief Harbor Engineer Les Angeles Harbor Departient P.O. Box 151 San Pedro, CA 90733-0151 Hoffatt i Hichol, Engineers #«•»** P.O. Box 7707 INVOICE Long Beach, CA 90808 »*•»«• (E13) «6-9551 BTRC t '196791.33 BERTHS 212-215 LANDFILL & WHARF IHPROVEHENTS AGREEMENT I 1«S m Job t 2455 Invoice f M January 12, 19B8 Itet Aiount Billed Percent This Period Aaount Previous Billed Retaining To Bill I. Geotechnical Investigation (LS) A. Mobilization $35,000.00 100.OS B. Drilling $125,000.00 100.OX C. Soil Data $'»2,000.00 100.OX D. Preliiinary Report $^15,000.00 O.OX E. Final Report $35,000.00 O.OX $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $35,000.00 $125,000.00 $W,000,00 $0,00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $'i5,000.00 $35,000.00 II. Geotechnical Investigation (T&H) A. Indicator Piles $66,000.00 O.OX $0.00 $0.00 $66,000.00 B. Soil Testing $32,000.00 97. OX $0.00 $30,910.00 $1,090.00 III. Geotechnical Investigation (Optional) A. Vertical Pile Load Test $30,000.00 O.OX $0.00 $0.00 $30,000.00 B. Lateral Pile Load Test $53,000.00 O.OX $0.00 $0.00 $53,000.00 C. Fill Instruaentation $55,000.00 O.OX $0.00 $0.00 $55,000.00 D. Construction Services $25,000.00 O.OX $0.00 $0.00 $25,000.00 E. Diving Services $3,000.00 O.OS $0.00 $0.00 $3,000.00 F. Equipaent Standby $15,000.00 O.OX $0.00 $0.00 $15,000.00 IV. Design Effort $915,532.00 16.00X $36,621.28 $109,863.8A $769,0^16.88 V. Design Effort, Optional $25,000.00 O.OX $0.00 $0.00 $25,000.00 VI. Construction Services A. Phase II Advertise $5,000.00 O.OX $0.00 $0.00 $5,000.00 B. Phase II Construction $35,000.00 O.OX $0.00 $0.00 $35,000.00 $5,000.00 C. Phase II As Bui Its $5,000.00 O.OX $0.00 $0.00 $35,000.00 $5,000.00 D. Phase III Advertise $7,500.00 O.OX $0.00 $0.00 $7,500.00 E. Phase III Shop Drawings $10,000.00 O.OX $0.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 F. Phase III Construction $71,000.00 O.OX $0,00 $0.00 $71,000.00 G. Phase III As Builts $7,500.00 O.OX $0.00 $0.00 $7,500.00 VII. A. Change Orders Change Order tl Change Order 12 TOTALS $82,000.00 $80,000.00 $1,80'*,532.00 95. OX O.OOX 2.OX $0.00 $0.00 $77,900.00 $0.00 $^1,100.00 $80,000.00 $36,621.28 $'120,673.84 $1,347,236.88 TOTAL THIS INVOICE $36,621.28 I Certify under penalty of perjury that the above bill is just and correct according Agreeaent No. 1432 and that payaent has not been received. the teras of 11 '0 IA 1010 EM I IH » lOM PO 1010 Pa 1110 [I 10*0 Ea I Ito n. 1110 c* lOSO [• ms [• Ia«o f0 lore » lOM n 1000 n IIM I ISO M. IIU HL )3ro M. iMO M. I3M n. lOU HL Ilia M. 1111 M. IXI« M. Dif i«. 1310 M. 1130 m. IIIO IIIO ra 13*0 m itss ra 1IS0 ra 1300 m I tro m 13*0 ra isu m t9M W i)w ra 1400 m itM m 1330 ra i4fS ra ISM m 13T0 ra isro f*i i«io m 13u ra 1 *io ra lt«ft fo i4at ra I «M r« I4S0 ra IIM m 1410 ra 13M ra mo ra IS30 ra tsio ra 1140 ra OUCHIPItOl GOLOUMCii maiojitiioa M It! mLin oMTT .WISOa sail. CNAOACTtRIIAIH PM I aCeallVI DICLMIAtlON Cia ML* HVIfW yUSOa IfSIM PIM 4 tfPttlL ctn riKM. oRtfr cam.iic iilOaM. •llto>«i;Oa COVOCIMSI OCra I CLEMUP Eia Ptur t DKimiun iMisai KEsioajiriaH HC'T Etl PuoLic corneals USFOaO'CII PUOLIC COMMI .4 ccmiricAiiaa HIICC TO PHOCEED CEOPMTSICM. KOU KSIB CEOTECMIICM. ¥Sm IWILLIH VtOOtCOKt soiLi 0414 otraat ELUIRUri TCttlHO CLUItl4I[ ten REMtS ran. in MILI ittraoi AfiOltlOOM. nil IMVICI 400ITI0Ui. MIL lUTIM •M. UIL SATVLCI AOOiiiaoM toil ruttio riiM. niLi KcraMT uiLXiri MMcr flEUtunoa cot 4 •HOC! PMccia nnnii nil *fr H/coi k RHOCI •LOS PEMIT AfniCAIIOl OOTAIR cat 4 lUOCI PEMtttl oirAia COUIU. PEMIt PM 11 pmiR oitiea PM III pmm oeiiM PH I DUIM r*! II siar rta til iiARf PM 11 POIA PtELln lEVIEW PM 11 PLAM tmCM la tl PMLIHIRAtt PH I Aomntc PM til POLA PKCLln ACIIEV PM Ilt PLM CMCa PN I UltO PM I! PIM.4 Pt*H CM lEVlCH PM 11 FlUL DCSieH 140 111 PtELIntOUT PR I MtP H/coaai«uGtloa J*» 11 P1B4L PN II PL4« iicoAiuac PH 1 coasiinJcilOB PM II UfttTIU »M tt 4H4jlD FH MI POIA PLAH cm Mf PM 111 F[a«4. CE9I0H PH 11 alP U/COHSIHUCIIOB TAO 111 niAL PN 11 COalltUCTIOM 11 P14M SieKAIURC PM III AOftlTISC 1988 MII AUAIO PH 111 HIP N/coaiiiucilOa PM 111 coaiTtucrioa SEP lOEC CROUP CODEi EMVIRONMENTAL \i* pnim oWAfi j '^AHSOH ^niL cuAiAcrEWirAtii PN 1 UgAfltE 0EC1.AWAI10II ;ROUP COD£< CEOTECHN Norici TO Pftocus A I I aOPHTItCAL MIM I ,'MttO «01tt)«ICA4. MK VX|BIIAC0RE saiU-Oi i*ftQ««L 4nrop4ttQw' lATA WEPyi •0L0t4>rfir strc 4 :LEM.»P 'jm p4iT 4 oismtiui i/mjQfl KHIGItAHOII ELUTBIAlt rtSTlHO C Ei-UtRIATI TEir KSULII I I >»nin laiLi .t.ii«i GROUP COOE" PERMITS M)aiMO..L sail IMVIES D I I :riO>*L SOIL TtlTIW leSPQWO-^ll PUOLIC COHP*»I CCiltPICAIIOI I JMIIIMM MIL SMVIH I I I alTtOOM. UIL lESTINB I I fi.M. SOILI ncroiT pm 1 ..at. fiwciss WHm I ^L, flLt V. H/GOt 4 • ;R0UP CODE' OESION ANO CON?rRUCI [" " '"'I' Illlill , I I . f" I" '"I°"l" Ill .!«. ChtC« SEP OCT •tOCI PERMI II II COAOIAl. PCMII p 11 PP^i A PLAR Ci« RCTIEU Ml PRELlnlliART PN I <rp U/JOAITRUCI lOH a", •X»t SICHATURC - I •N I :0HSlRtJCT10M MAR 111 Pim APR 5EP_ DEC FEB . APR PH ill 'LAH SIC>4ruRC PH 111 *fli.EBIlSf PJ< 111 prP M/CQHIIRWCIIMI PW Ml COMIimCTlOR WPATT A HiCm. [lOtRCERf pROjui NMiAOu - MAtr NuariiMO uywMiiLiiT Ltsiw CA - tLif IT Ajucuns EE - (Et {• - EMVlVSPMERt m. - MAttiMt LAKUB m - mxtkTt 1 aiuoL Kl • FOOT V LCa AWLCi I OAll QIJAAU RCtitioa M 3 •AU 0411 lOJUal/ DATA OAK IIJIMOr URtM III - 111 LAROFILL A HMNV imOVUCHII PORT OP LOl AalELII iO*.OULl USEOi URiN 113-111 irr*Qi(p««ii ACTIYITT NUMBER OESCRIPTION DUR 1 987 SEP OCT NOV DEC 1 988 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN 1170 EA 1020 EN 1190 EN 1090 PO 1030 PO 1210 EN 040 EN 1160 HL 1180 EA 1050 EN 1215 EN 1060 PO 1070 EN 1080 PO GOLDENWEST RESTORATION PLN EIR PRELIM DRAFT LARSON SOIL CHARACTERIZATN PH I NEGATIVE DECLARATION EIR POLA REVIEW LARSON RESTOR PLN & APPRVL EIR FINAL DRAFT COMPLETE NATIONAL RESTORATION GOLDENWEST DEMO & CLEANUP EIR PRINT L DISTRIBUTE LARSON RESTORATION REC'V EIR PUBLIC COMMENTS RESPOND-EIR PUBLIC COMMENT EIR POLA CERTIFICATION 218 123 81 152 45 72 62 132 85 15 106 35 24 13 GROUP CODE: ENVIRONMENTAL GOLDENWEST RESTORATION PLN EIR PRELIM DRAFT LARSON SOIL CHARACTERIZATN PH I NEGATIVE DECLARATION EIR FINAL DRAFT COMPLETE I ^ I NATIONAL RESTORATION I GOLDENWEST DEMO & CLEANUP EIR PRINT & DISTRIBUTE LARSON RESTORATION REC*V EIR PUBLIC COMMENTS I 1 RESPOND-EIR PUBLIC COMMENT EIR POLA CERTIFICATION DESC LEGEND PROGRESS LS FLOAT I j/\ MILESTONE HIGHLIGHTED RESPONSIBILITY LEGEND EA - ELBERT ASSOCIATES EE - EEI EN - ENVIROSPHERE HL - HARDING LAWSON MN - MOFFATT & NICHOL PO - PORT OF LOS ANGELES RUN DATE 06JAN88 REVISION NO 2 BASE DATE 28JUN87 DATA DATE 28JUN87 PLOTTRAK BERTH 212 - 215 LANDFILL & WHARF IMPROVEMENTS PORT OF LOS ANGELES SCHEDULE USEOt BERTH 212-215 IMPROVEMENTS ACTIVITY NUMBER 1000 PO 1260 HL 1250 HL 1280 HL 1270 HL 1300 HL 1290 HL 095 HL 1310 HL 1312 HL 1314 HL 1316 HL 1318 HL 1320 HL DESC DESCRIPTION NOTICE TO PROCEED GEOPHYSICAL WORK BEGIN GEOTECHNICAL WORK DRILLING VIBRACORE SOILS DATA REPORT ELUTRIATE TESTING PRE ELUTRIATE TEST RESULTS PRELIM SOILS REPORT ADDITIONAL SOIL SAMPLES ADDITIONAL SOIL TESTING ADDITIONAL SOIL SAMPLES ADDITIONAL SOIL TESTING FINAL SOILS REPORT DUR 0 3 0 12 5 41 28 1 65 10 31 1 987 1 988 SEP OCT NOV DEC ROUP CODE-. GEOTECHNICAL A NOTICE TO PROCEED LEGEND PROGRESS LS FLOAT ^ MILESTONE HIGHLIGHTED I GEOPHYSICAL WORK ° I BEGIN GEOTECHNICAL WORK A DRILLING VIBRACORE • SOILS DATA REPORT ELUTRIATE TESTING ] JAN FEB PRE ELUTRIATE TEST RESULTS PRELIM SOILS REPORT! MAR ADDITIONAL SOIL SAMPLES 0 1 I ADDITIONAL SOIL TESTING ADDITIONAL SOIL SAMPLES D I 1 ADDITIONAL SOIL TESTING • I i FINAL SOILS REPORT RESPONSIBILITY LEGEND EA - ELBERT ASSOCIATES EE - EEI EN - ENVIROSPHERE HL - HARDING LAWSON MN - MOFFATT & NICHOL PO - PORT OF LOS ANGELES RUN DATE 06JAN88 REVISION NO 2 BASE DATE 28JUN87 DATA DATE 28JUN87 PLOTTRAK BERTH 212 - 215 LANDFILL i WHARF IMPROVEMENTS PORT OF LOS ANGELES SCHEDULE USEDt BERTH 212-215 IMPROVEMENTS ACTIVITY NUMBER 1110 PO 1140 PO 1130 PO 1240 MN 1155 PO 1150 PO DESC DESCRIPTION DUR WILDLIFE AGNCY NEGOTIATION COE i RWQCB PROCESS PERMIT FILE APP W/COE i RWQCB BLDG PERMIT APPLICATION OBTAIN COE i RWQCB PERMITS OBTAIN COASTAL PERMIT 55 132 LEGEND PROGRESS LS FLOAT ^ MILESTONE HIGHLIGHTED 31 21 12 1 987 DEC 1 988 JAN FEB ROUP CODE: PERMITS WILDLIFE AGNCY NEGOTIATI ON MAR COE & RWQCB PROCESS PERMIT APR A FILE APP W/COE i RWQCB BLDG PERMIT APPLI CAT 1 ON RESPONSIBILITY LEGEND EA - ELBERT ASSOCIATES EE - EEI EN - ENVIROSPHERE HL - HARDING LAWSON MN - MOFFATT & NICHOL PO - PORT OF LOS ANGELES MAY JUN JUL OBTAIN COE i RWQCB PERMITS I ] OBTAIN COASTAL PERMIT RUN DATE 06JAN88 REVISION NO 2 BASE DATE 28JUN87 DATA DATE 28JUN87 PLOTTRAK BERTH 212 - 215 LANDFILL i WHARF IMPROVEMENTS PORT OF LOS ANGELES SCHEDULE USED* BERTH 212-215 IMPROVEMENTS ACTIVITY NUMBER DESCRIPTION DUR 1390 MN PH II PRELIM OESIGN 91 i4ro MN PH III PRELIM DESIGN ISO 1340 PO PH I OESIGN 54 1550 MN TAB II START 1 ISBO MN TAB III START 1 1395 PO PH II POLA PRELIM REVIEW 21 1400 MN PH II PLAN CHECK 71 IS60 MN TAB II PRELIMINARY 7 1350 PO PH I ADVERTISE 31 1475 PO PH III POLA PRELIM REVIEW 21 1480 MN PH III PLAN CHECK 210 1360 PO PH I AWARD 29 1405 PO PH II POLA PLAN CHK REVIEW 21 1410 MN PH It FINAL OESIGN 42 1590 MN TAB III PRELIMINARY 7 1370 PO PH I NIP W/CONSTRUCTION 31 1570 HN TAB II FINAL 7 1420 MN PH II PLAN SIGNATURE 21 1380 PO PH I CONSTRUCTION 153 1490 PO PH 11 ADVERTISE 42 1440 PO PH II AWARD 42 1485 PO PH tit POLA PLAN CHK REV 21 1490 MN PH III FINAL DESIGN 40 1450 PO PH II NTP W/CONSTRUCTION 42 1600 MN TAB III FINAL 7 1460 PO PH It CONSTRUCTION 211 1500 MN PH III PLAN SIGNATURE 23 1510 PO PH III ADVERTISE 42 1520 PO PH III AWARD 42 1530 PO PH III NTP W/CONSTRUCTION 43 1540 PO PH III CONSTRUCTION 473 I 987 S |0 N D 1 988 J IF |M |A |M IJ IJ S 0 N D 98 FMAMJJAS 990 M M DESC SRO'UP 'C0[!lE« ' DESIGN /^ND COI^STRUC PH II PRELIM DES1GN T -I 1 1 PH III PRELIM DESIGN PH I DESIGN TAB II START I I I I TAB III START LEGEND PROGRESS LS FLOAT /\ MILESTONE HICHLIGHTED II POLA PRELIM REVIEW ]| I I PH II PLAN CHECK TAB II PRELIMINARY • ill PHI ADVERTISE [=• I I PH III POLA PRELIM REVIEW 1=1| I I I I ^H 111 PLAN CHECK I ' PH I AWARD !=• I PH 11 POLA PLAN CHK REVIEW I I i PH II FINAL DESIGN •±•1 I I TAB III PRELIMINARY • I I I PHI HTP W/CONSTRUCTION 1=] I I TAB II FINAL • I I I I'H II PLAN SIGNATURE I H 1 CONSTRUCT I J ICTION PH II ADVERTISE [==1| I PH II AWARD ^—l I PH III POLA PLAN CHK REV L_i j I I I PH III FINAL DESION ^ ] I I I PH II NTP W/CONSTRUCTION 1 I TAB III FINAL • I I PH II CONSTRUCTIDN PH III PLAN SIONATURE •ill PH III ADVERTISE '~J| I PH III AWARD PH in NTP W/CONSTRUCTION tll=l Illl PH III CONSTRUCTION MOFFATT i NICHOL, ENGINEERS PROJECT MANAGER - WALT HURTIENNE RESPONSIBILITY LEGEND EA - ELBERT ASSOCIATES EE - EEI EN - ENVIROSPHERE HL - HARDING LAWSON MN - MOFFAH & NICHOL PO - PORT OF LOS ANGELES RUN DATE 06JAN88 REVISION NO 2 BASE DATE 28JUN87 DATA DATE 28JUN87 PLOTTRAK BERTH 212 - 215 LANDFILL & WHARF IMPROVEMENTS PORT OF LOS ANGELES SCHEDULE USED' BERTH 212-215 IMPROVEMENTS SECTION 7 SECTION 7 Project Management and Organization 7.1 Pro.iect Organization Included in this section is the Project Organization chart which details the division of responsibility and reporting structure for this project. 7.2 Personnel Management Project management is essential for a successful project. Dr. Walker, the principal-in-charge/project director, will be responsible to the City of Carlsbad and the Port of Los Angeles to see that the design team follow schedules and make progress. Project management will require a specific set of goals, budgets and schedules. These will be monitored by weekly budget reports which are prepared in-house for review by project managers. A project schedule is provided in this proposal. This schedule is purposely kept simple to enable comprehension and general monitoring. We will prepare a more comprehensive CPM chart on Micro Trak to follow progress. An individual will be assigned to monitor progress. This chart will be updated and made a part of the monthly progress report and invoice. Project management responsibilities require ease of communication with the City of Carlsbad and the Port of Los Angeles as well as with team members, the public and the various agencies. The project will be managed in Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers' Long Beach office, just over one hour away from the project site. The work will be conducted in this office as well. P&D Technologies is available for coordination of community relations. Monthly progress reports will be prepared. A sample of such is included in Section 6 of this proposal. Minutes of the meetings will be taken by Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers and copies will be provided to the representatives from the City of Carlsbad and the Port of Los Angeles. Successful project management and implementation of the project requires a positive interface with the public and the various agencies. We have carefully selected a "top notch" team to meet this goal. 7-1 The project director will dedicate weekly time to leading the project and will have direct involvement to maintain the schedule and quality and to see that communication continues to flow smoothly and properly. 7.3 Consultants Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers has assembled a team of highly qualified individuals to perform the various services on this project. Each of the sub- consultants will report directly to the project manager. Wetlands Research Associates, Inc. Woodward-Clyde Consultants Ogden Beeman, Associates MCC Engineers Brian Smith Associates Melchoir Land Surveying, Inc. P&D Technologies Environmental and Wetlands Planning Geotechnical Engineering Dredging Cost Estimates & Construction Consultant Archeologist and Cultural Expert Survey Permit Processing 7.4 Project Manager Mr. James R. Crumpley will serve as Project Manager for the Batiquitos Lagoon Enhancement Project. Mr. Crumpley will be the individual responsible for coordinating the overall work with the City of Carlsbad. 7.5a Resumes Resumes for the members of the project team may be found at the end of this section. 7-2 7.5b Similar projects James R. Walker, Ph.D, Principal-in-Charge/Project Director Name Beach Restoration and Sand Management Size $2,500,000 Location Alameda, CA Responsibility Project Manager Name Oceanside Sand Bypassing Size $8,000,000 Location Oceanside, CA Responsibility Project Manager Name Bolsa Chica Size 400 acres Location Orange County Responsibility Project Manager James R. Crumpley, Project Manager Name Anaheim Bay Mitigation Size $8,000,000 Location Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station, CA Responsibility Project Manager Name Los Cerritos Wetlands Size 119 acres Location Long Beach, CA Responsibility Project Manager Craig H. Everts, Coastal Geophysicist Name Study of Sand Littoral Losses to Submarine Canyon Size Southern California Coastline Location La Jolla, CA Responsibility Project Manager Name Sediment Budget Analysis, Oceanside Littoral Cell Size Dana Point to Point La Jolla Location San Diego, CA Responsibility Project Manager 7-3 Andrew L. Gram, Ph.D Environmental/Hydraulic Engineer Name Bolsa Chica Size 400 acre Location Orange County, CA Responsibility Performed Hydraulic Analysis of Tidal Flow Name Size Location Responsibility Play Vista Marina 139 acres Marina del Rey, CA Developed numerical hydrodynamic dispersion model to evaluate water quality in a proposed marina basin. Also designed a physical model to verify numerical results. Robert A. Nathan, Coastal Engineer Name Historic Wave and Sea Level Data Report Size Dana Point to San Diego Location San Diego, CA Responsibility Project Engineer Name Size Location Responsibility Las Tunas Beach Fill $3,000,000 Malibu, CA Project Engineer David G. Cannon, Coastal Engineer Name Size Location Responsibility Name Size Location Responsibility Hellman Ranch Wetlands Restoration 40 acres Seal Beach, CA Coastal Engineer responsible for wetland design, hydraulic analysis and flow control structures. Bolsa Chica 400 acres Orange, CA Performed coupled refraction and reflection analysis to determine the sediment transport in the vicinity of a jetty. Performed preliminary design of a tidal inlet. 7-4 George D. Johnson, Civil Engineer Name Size Location Responsibility Name Size Location Responsibility Long Beach Auto Mall $14,000,000 Long Beach, CA Project Manager for complete site preparation of building pads and related facilities. Buena Vista Lagoon 22 acres Oceanside, CA Conducted hydraulic study for the Buena Vista Creek watershed. Brian A. Ragland, Civil Engineer Name Size Location Responsibility Name Size Location Responsibility Pacific Coast Highway Bridge Sewer Line Replacement 800' outfall sewer line Huntington Beach, CA Developed plans and specifications; determined construction phasing and junction structure requirements and prepared engineer's estimate Anaheim Bay Mitigation Project UO-acre Marshland Long Beach, CA Designed relocation of all above and underground utilities including electrical, water and gas lines. H. Richard Nelll, Structural Engineer Name Size Location Responsibility Name Size Location Responsibility Grove Avenue Union Pacific Railroad Grade Separation $10,500,000 Ontario, CA Project Manager — including traffic handling detours, utility adjustments. Union Pacific right-of-way and relocation of adjacent property users Alton Parkway Overcrossing at State Route 133 $2,500,000 Irvine, CA Project Manager—involved close coordination with Caltrans and FHWA. Opened to traffic in 1988. 7-5 Arun K. Jain, Structural Engineer Name Pacific Coast Highway Bridge Replacement over Santa Ana River Size $6,000,000 Location Huntington Beach, CA Responsibility Project Engineer--included permit processing and design considered impacts to nearby tern habitat. Name Bob Hope Drive Bridge Widening at Whitewater River Size $1,200,000 Location Palm Springs, CA Responsibility Project Engineer—conducted design modifications to bring structure up to current seismic codes. Michael N. Josselyn, Ph.D., Wetlands Design Name Chula Vista Bayfront Restoration Plan Size 50 acres Location Chula Vista, CA Responsibility Complete wetland and coastal scrub-shrub habitat restoration planning for the San Diego Bay shoreline of the City of Chula Vista Name Huntington Beach Restoration Plan Size 25 acres Location Huntington, Beach, CA Responsibility Complete responsibility for the planning and approval for a wetland restoration plan to provide fish and rare and endangered species habitat in a diked wetland behind the sand dunes of Huntington Beach. Betty Dehoney, Permit Processing Coordinator Name Cannon Road Size $20,000 Location Carlsbad, CA Responsibility Permitting for a major circulation element, bridge, sewer line and sewer pump station in Carlsbad--located in the Coastal Zone adjacent to Agua Hedionda Lagoon and a proposed city park. The project affected sensitive biological resources requiring permitting under federal, state and local jurisdictions. 7-6 Name Size Location Responsibility La Costa Avenue Road Widening $40,000 Carlsbad, CA Environmental documentation and permitting — required coordination with a multitude of regulatory agencies, some conflicting mandates. Louis Lee, Geotechnical Engineer Name Size Location Responsibility Name Size Location Responsibility Dredge Depth Requirements for Planned Ship Berthing 380 acres and 2,800,000 cubic yards of dredging San Diego, CA Project Manager and Responsible Geotechnical Engineer for geotechnical investigations including assessment of bottom conditions, provide bottom elevations, development of soil profiles, evaluation of dredge soil characteristics in accordance the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers criteria, and estimate dredge quantities. West Channel/Cabrillo Beach Recreation Complex 100+ acres Los Angeles, CA Responsible Engineer for geotechnical investigations including evaluation of dredging material characteristics, embankment construction dike and groin stability, site stabilization by surcharge fills, pile foundations for structures and marina, and construction-related problems. Ogden Beeman, Dredging Engineer Name Size Location Responsibility Vancouver Lake Reclamation 8.5 million cubic yards Vancouver, WA Project Manager responsible for dredge plan, cost estimates and construction monitoring for lake reclamation project requiring removal of 8.5 million cubic yards of clays and sand. Largest EPA-sponsored reclamation project in the United States, requiring extensive resource agency coordination. 7-7 Name Olyrnpia East End Boat Basin Size 1.3 million cubic yards Location Olyrnpia, WA Responsibility Responsible for dredging and disposal plan and design parameters for dike construction for one million cubic yard dredging project with high concerns for water quality. Doug Melchoir, Survey Name Oceanside Water Treatment Plant Size $7,500,000 Location Oceanside, CA Responsibility Responsible for laying out all construction staking. Name San Diego Bay Naval Station Mapping Size $14,000,000 Location San Diego, CA Responsibility Performed hydrographic and topographic mapping survey. Brian Smith, Archeologist Name Archaeological Investigations at Batiquitos Bluffs Size $65,000 Location Carlsbad, CA Responsibility Conducted testing and mitigation programs for the archaeological sites within the Sammis Properties development located on the north shore of Batiquitos Lagoon, west of Interstate 5. Name Green Valley Property Archaeological Investigation Size 280 acres Location Carlsbad, CA Responsibility Archaeological investigation of the Green Valley property on the southeast shore of the Batiquitos Lagoon. Hamilton J. Smith, Cost Estimating/Construction Consultant Name Pier 12 US Naval Station Size $25,000,000 Location San Diego, CA Responsibility Resident Engineer—Provided constructability review and cost analysis for various alternate designs. 7-8 Name Armour Property Revetment Size $500,000 Location Lake Forest, IL Responsibility Construction Consultant--Provided all inspection services, on-site supervision, participated in contractor selection, handled labor matters and selected equipment for client. 7.5c Location of personnel during pro.iect All of Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers staff members who are assigned to this project are presently situated in the firm's Long Beach, California office and will remain in that office during the course of this project. With the exception of Wetlands Research Associates, Inc., and Ogden Beemen & Associates, Inc., all of the subconsultants whom we have selected for our team have offices in Southern California — most within minutes of the project site. The team members are aware of the project schedule and will be available throughout the duration of the project. The technical review committee is composed of: Charles Robers, La Crosse, Wisconsin; Jacobus van de Kreeke, Ph.D., Miami, Florida; John Lesnik, Raleigh, North Carolina; and Thomas Johnson, Ph.D., San Diego, California. 7-9 BATIQUITOS LAGOON ENHANCEMENT PROJECT FINAL DESIGN PROJECT ORGANIZATION TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE DREDGING -C. ROBERS COASTAL -J. VAN DE KRbbKE J. LESNIK ENVIRONMENTAL - T. JOHNSON ENVIRON. / WETLANDS WETLANDS RESEARCH ASSOC. INC. M. JOSSELYN GEOTECHNICAL WOODWARD CLYDE L. LEE CITY OF CARLSBAD AND PORT OF LOS ANGELES PRINCIP AL-IN-CHARGE J. WALKER PROJECT MANAGER J. CRUMPLEY BRIDGE g RAILROAD M e N. ENG. H. NELL A. JAIN SURVEY MELCHOIR LAND SURVEYING INC. D. MELCHOIR QUALITY CONTROL A. ELY PERMITS PSD TECHNOLOGIES B. DEHONEY ARCHEOLOGY BRIAN SMITH ASSOC. B. SMITH COASTAL M S N. ENG. D. GRAM C. EVERTS R. NATHAN D. CANNON CIVIL / UTIUTIES M S N. ENG. B. RAGLAND G. JOHNSON DREDGING OGDEN BEEMAN ASSOC. INC. O. BEEMAN CONSTR. CONSULT. COST ESTIMATES M.C.C. H. SMITH .MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS JAMES R. WALKER, Ph. D. Principal Coastal Engineer Dr. Walker's career has included serving as Project Manager and Project Engineer on a wide range of projects involving marina design, dredging and disposal, beach design and protection, shore protection, wetland hydraulic design, structure interaction with wave forces, sand bypass systems, littoral process studies and flood control and sedimentation projects. He has worked for several districts of the Corps of Engineers, U.S. Navy, Coast Guard, several port districts, state, county and city governments, and as a consultant to other engineering and construction companies. Several of these projects have been for foreign clients in the Pacific Basin, Mexico, and Saudi Arabia. In addition to the many projects demanding design experience, Dr. Walker has authored several technical manuals, including Section 54 "Low Cost Shore Protection" for Office of the Chief of Engineers, and "Help Yourself Shore Protection Manual" for Honolulu District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. For the firm's revision of the U.S. Navy's Design Manuals DM 26 series, Dr. Walker served as Project Manager of DM 26.2 Coastal Protection. DM 26.4 Fixed Moorings and DM 26.5 Fleet Moorings. His duties range from preparing feasibility reports, managing multidiscipline design teams, design and construction support services. Dr. Walker is Director of Departments of Moffatt & Nichol. Dr. Walker's marina development experience includes Spud Point Marina, Bodega Bay, California where he prepared conceptual plans for a commercial fishing and recreational harbor. The project included selecting and evaluating various sites for disposal of dredged material and planning landsite facilities, slip layouts and wave protection devices. For the firm's design of the Downtown Marina, Long Beach, CA, Dr. Walker conducted wave studies for major 1700 boat small craft harbor. The project included design of basin, mole, breakwaters, slip system and dock utility services, fueling and pump-out facilities, and land based support infrastructure such as site utilities, roads and parking. Dr. Walker served as Project Engineer forthe design of North Point Marina, Winthrop Harbor, IL, a 1500 slipicommercial and recreational marina, dredging, breakwater, and dock system design. I Other marina projects include Ewa Marina, Honolulu, HI; Bolsa Chica Marina, Bolsa Chica, CA; Marina Del Rey, CA Expansion Project; VVild Dunes Beach and Racquet Ciub Marina, Isle of Palms, SC; Alviso Marina, Alviso, CA; Dr. Walker's coastal engineering expertise also entails the design of innovative solutions to shore erosion problems. He was instrumental in the design of the Experimental Isand Bypass System at Oceanside, California for the Corps of Engineers. Dredging design projects include the Port of Los Angeles Harbor deepening to -45 feet, including dike and 200 acre fill design and thei Santa Cruz Phased dredging project for Corps of Engineers, San Francisco District. Dr. Walker has been involved in many projects which studied littoral processes and the subsequent design solutions. Projects include authorship of Section 111 at Grand Marais, Ml, Harrisville, Ml, Palm Beach, FL for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Cooperative Beach Erosion Control Project, Lakeview, Lorain, Ohio for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Buffalo District; the Alameda Beach, California beach restoration and sand management project; the winterization of Seal Beach, California sand dune and sand management plan. MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS ! I JAMES R. WALKER, PH.D. j Page 2 I I I Expertise in the areas of wave and current studies include Halfmoon Bay, California wave impacts of sewer outfall construction; Pier 39, San Francisco and Birkenhead, Sydney wave damage analysis on dock system;Harrahs Marina, Atlantic City, New Jersey current problems on marina system; current studies for sewage disposal sites in Kauai, Hawaii; storm surge analysis and design of causeway at Huivila, Mexico;wave transformation of breaking waves, Ph.D. dissertation; assisted contractor in oceanographic consideration during biding and construction of the SWOOP outfall in San Francisco, California; studied and measured boat generated waves for Larkspur Ferry and Saucilito Ferry in San Francisco Bay including shore protection studies and design. j Experience in the design and repair of shore protection structures includes the glass breakwater restoration using unique dolos application in Guam; Reef Runway in Honolulu, planning, model studies and design consultation of dike protection; and serving as Project Manager for the Everett, Washington Home Port breakwater design for the U.S. Navy. i REGISTRATION • Professional Engineer - State of Hawaii, No. 3459-E Professional Engineer - State of Michigan, No. 26791 EDUCATION Ph.D. in Ocean Engineering, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, 1974 M.S. in Ocean Engineering, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, 1969 B.S. in Ocean Engineering, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, 1967, First in graduation class. ! Major in Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 1965 CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE PROFESSION i I Memberships: American Society of Civil Engineers American Shore and Beach Preservation Society A Partial Summary of Papers Authored by Dr. Walker: • Author, "Santa Barbara Breakwater: An Update" American Shore and Beach, Presented at Symposium to Honor M.P. O'Brien Berkeley, 1987. • First Author, "A Sand Bypass System for Oceanside, California" • Coastal Zone 87, Seattle, Washington, 1987. MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS JAMES R. WALKER, PH.D. Page 3 ! • First Author, "Management of the Marina Design Team for a Multiple Purpose Marina Development', International Marina Conference, Brisbane, Australia, 1987. • Co-Author, "Wave Forces on Piles of Variable Diameter", 20th ICCE ASCE Coastal En- gineering Conference at Capetown, South Africa, Nov. 1982. • First Author, "An Engineering Approach to Non-linear Wave Shoaling", 20th ICCE ASCE Coastal Engineering Conference at Capetown, South Africa, November 1982. JVIOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS ALLEN L. ELY Principal Structural Enginieer Mr. Ely has served in the position of Project Engineer and Project Manager for the firm since 1969. Primarily, his responsibilities have been concerned with the structural design of waterfront structures, such as bridges, piers, wharves, drydocks and other types of heavy construction. His background also includes design of small craft harbors, buildings, civil works and highway design. Mr. Ely has over twenty five years of structural design experience in the design and investigation of harbor facilities including piers, wharves, quay walls, drydock facilities, marine causeways, bridges and other major structures. Most recently, Mr. Ely served as Project Manager for the design of the Freeway Access Ramps to State Route 55 as part of the John Wayne Airport Expansion Project, Orange County, CA. This multi-million dollar project entails the design of ramps which will link the airport to'SR55, overcrossing a major 10 lane freeway. The project includes the design of bridges, retaining walls, overcrossings, and interchange geometries. His waterfront structure experience includes the design of Pier 12, San Diego Naval Station; Fender System Upgrade, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii; Shlplift and Land Level Transfer System, Todd Pacific Shipyards, San Pedro, CA; Evaluation of Facility Certification Reports of drydock structures and drydock improvements for the U.S. Navy; Trident Ammunition Pier, Keyport, WA; and container terminal facilities for Marine Terminal, National City, CA. Mr. Ely's experience includes responsibility for the structural design of many bridges within the southern California area including the South "E" Street Bridge over the Santa Ana River for the San Bernardino County Flood Control District; Tippecanoe Avenue Bridge, Live Oak Canyon Bridge, Base Line Road Bridge, Mt. Baldy Road Bridges, Main Street Grade Separation, and Riverside AVenue Bridge for the San Bernardino County, CA Highway Department; Michelson Drive over the San Diego and San Joaquin channels for the Fluor Corporation and the Urban Bridge Prototype for the Instant Freeway Corporation. In the area of civil design, Mr. Ely has had responsibilities for the design of storm drains, grading and paving in the following projects: Carnelian and Anderson Street Grade Separations for the San Bernardino County, CA Highway Department; Highway Bridges over the Colorado Aqueduct, Base Line Road Bridge over Lytle Creek and Two Barton Road Bridges for the San Bernardino County, CA Highway Department; Katella Avenue Underpass for the City of Anaheim, CA; and Western Avenue Grade Separation for the City of Glendale, CA. REGISTRATION Civil Engineer, State of California, CE 18880 Structural Engineer, State of California, SE 1812 EDUCATION B.S. Civil Engineering, California State University at Long Beach, 1969 M.S. Civil Engineering, California State University at: Long Beach, 1976 MEMBERSHIPS Tau Beta Pi, National Honorary Engineering Society! MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS ALLEN L. ELY Representative Bridge Projects • Freeway Access/SR55 Ramps for John Wayne Airport Expansion Project, Orange County, CA • South "E" Street Bridge over the Santa Ana River for the San Bernardino County Flood Con- trol District • Tippecanoe Avenue Bridge, Live Oak Canyon Bridge, Base Line Road Bridge, Mt. Baldy Road Bridges, Main Street Grade Separation, and Riverside Avenue Bridge for the San Bernardino County, CA Highway Department • Michelson Drive over the San Diego and San Joaquin channels for the Fluor Corporation, Irvine, CA • Urban Bridge Prototype for the Instant Freeway Corporation In the area of civil design, Mr. Ely has had responsibilities for the design of storm drains, grading and paving in the following projects: : • Carnelian and Anderson Street Grade Separations for tfje San Bernardino County, CA Highway Department • Highway Bridges over the Colorado Aqueduct, Base Lirie Road Bridge over Lytle Creek and Two Barton Road Bridges for the San Bernardino County, CA Highway Department • Katella Avenue Underpass for the City of Anaheim, CA : • Western Avenue Grade Separation for the City of Glendale, CA _MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS JAMES R. CRUMPLEY Structural/Civil Engineer Mr. Crumpley's responsibilities as Project Manager involve the administration of large-scale, multldlscipli- nary engineering projects. His experience Includes the management of both waterfront and landslde developments including piers, marinas, bulkheads, heavy civil works projects and building design. Recent civil project management experience includes responsibility for the layout and ramp configurations for Alton and Barranca Interchanges from the Laguna Freeway in Orange County, CA. Mr. Crumpley has also been responsible for the structural design of 16 bridges in San Bernardino County, CA. Mr. Crumpley has also been responsible for the design of a berthing pier, seawall and moorings for the simultaneous berthing of four high endurance cutters. United States Coast Guard, Alameda, CA. The project included the design of a reveted seawall, a 1330 foot long concrete wharf parallel to the wall and associated utilities. i I Mr. Crumpley has been involved in numerous small craft harbor projects, including the Ventura Marina Expansion in Ventura, CA and the Huntington Harbor Development in the Huntington Beach, CA. He has been involved both in the development of an innovative marina float!system using glass fiber reinforced concrete and in the preparation of a technical manual for its use. ! Waterfront rehabilitation experience includes the renovation of marinas and open ocean piers. For the City of Santa Barbara, he lead the Moffatt & Nichol design team that replaced the severely storm damaged Marinas 3 & 4 in Santa Barbara Harbor. His open ocean pier design experience includes renovations of the San Clemente, Pismo Beach and Imperial Beach Piers, all of which were severely damaged in the March 1983 storms. As Project Manager for the Anaheim Bay Mitigation Project, located vyithin the Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station, CA, Mr. Crumpley was responsible for contour and grading plans for the mitigation sites, analysis of tidal flushing and water quality characteristics, and relocation of utilities. Mr. Crumpley was Project Engineer for road, railroad and utility repair projects at the Naval Weapons Station, Seal Beach and the design of a heavy lift helicopter pad at MCB Camp Pendleton, which included the design of a concrete landing pad and a 4,000' access road. REGISTRATION Civil Engineer, State of California, CE 19871 Structural Engineer, State of California, SE 2519 EDUCATION ! B.S., Architectural Engineering, California State Polytechnic College, San Luis Obispo, 1967 MEMBERSHIP American Society of Civil Engineers MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS JAMES R. CRUMPLEY Representative Projects United States Coast Guard Pier and Seawall, Alameda, CA Responsible for design large enough to accommodate simultaneous berthing for four 378' high endurance cutters. Designed a rock fill and reveted seawall stabilization and a 1330 foot long concrete wharf parallel to the wall. Other design elements included non-marking white fenders to protect the white ships; full utility stations for water, compressed air, power, communications and sewage and oily waste disposal. San Clemente Municipal Pier Rehabilitation, San Clemente, CA Responsible for the rehabilitation design of pier damaged in severe winter storms of 1983. Conducted wave studies, which revealed that if the pier was reconstructed to its original design, wave crest heights would be above the elevation of the pier deck at its seaward end. An innovative solution involved a design which allowed the decking to come off to release the dynamic wave load, while the rest of the structure remained intact. Coated steel pipe piles and steel pile caps were used to create a rigid frame for transverse loads. Pismo Beach Municipal Pier Rehabilitation, Pismo Beach, CA Project Manager for pier design which included complete plans, specifications and estimates for redesign and reconstruction of 1200 foot timber pier, with 4 large platforms set at 45 degree angels to the axis of the pier with 10 cantilevered fishing decks and utilities. Imperial Beach Municipal Pier Rehabilitation, Imperial Beach, CA Project Manager for project which included investigation and evaluation of the pier after storm damage in 1983. Responsible for the plans, specifications and estimates for the 800 foot extension to the pier which accommodated a boat landing for sport fishing, restroom facilities, building shells for bait shops and sport fishing offices. Marina Rehabilitation, Santa Barbara, CA Project Manager for the replacement design of severely storm damaged Marinas 3 & 4. Because of the 2-3 foot waves continuing to penetrate the harbor, a resilient wood system was chosen for the floats and larger concrete guide piles were used to resist the lateral loads. The entire utility system was upgraded on the floats and landslde, including the provision for computerization and remote reading of electrical meters for each slip. Manhattan Beach Municipal Pier Rehabilitation Study, Manhattan Beach, CA Project Manager for the rehabilitation study for the deteriorated existing concrete pier. A major consideration was the preservation of the historic architecture of the existing structure. Huntington Harbour, Huntington Beach, CA Project Engineer for medium and low density residential water-oriented development Project included marinas, deepwater bulkheaded channels and sand beaches. Mandalay Bay Bulkhead and Channel Repair, Oxnard, CA Design of repairs including compaction grouting behind bulkhead footing, channel slope protection and repairs to structures behind bulkhead were included in project. MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS JAMES R. CRUMPLEY Page 2 Representative Projects Heavy Lift Helo Pad at MCB Camp Pendleton, CA Project Engineer for the design of 600' diameter asphalt concrete pad capable of supporting large helicopters with 30,000 pound practice loads. A 4000' access road was designed up a mountain to site, which required 35' deep cuts and fills to provide for the maximum 10% grade required. Adjacent to the pad is parking lot for emergency vehicles, restrooms and ready-room storage building. Kanan Road Realignment, Los Angeles, CA Project manager for the design of improvements of 1.7 miles of 4 lane highway. Design provided for roadway construction, grading, drainage structure modifications, signing & striping, driveway connections and three street intersections. Work also consists of determining all surface and subsurface interference and cost analysis of alternative solutions. Under Mr. Crumpley's supervision, work is performed on IBM compatible (MS-DOS) equipment and configured AutoCad. Studebaker Road Improvements, Long Beach, CA Project Manager for the design of improvements to 2500 foot roadway, 110 ft right-of-way, 14 ft median, 8 ft wide sidewalks, 10 ft wide bike path, street lighting, striping and roadway storm drainage. Work also includes revision of sewer improvement plans and relocation of oil pipelines. Los Cerritos Wetlands, Long Beach, CA Project Manager for the design of restoration of two wetlands in conformance with the Los Cerritos Wetland, Local Coastal Program. Anaheim Bay Wetlands Restoration, Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station, CA Project Manager for the restoration design of 110 acres of wetlands. Project included contour and grading plans; analysis of tidal flushing and water quality characteristics; and relocations of utilities. Railroad Repair Project at Naval Weapons Station, Seal Beach, CA Project Engineer for design of repairs to 15 miles of track, 94 turnouts, and upgrade road crossings as well as replacement of culverts. Also involved in mole and road repairs at the Naval Weapons Station. Project Engineer for several site development projects including Bixby Village & The Marketplace, Long Beach; Huntington Harbour developments, Huntington Beach; Bayhill Shopping & Commercial Center, San Bruno; Calabasas Townhouse, Calabasas; which included engineering of all utilities, site paving, roadways, bridges, traffic & railroad circulation planning and design. .MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS ANDREW L. GRAM, Ph.D Environmental/Sanitary Engineer Dr. Gram joined Moffatt & Nichol in 1977 as a Project Engineer for environmental work, with emphasis on hydraulic water quality. His experience also includes sanitary engineering as well as numerical computation methods. Much of his recent activity with the firm has been in the areas of environmental assessment and water quality evaluation and monitoring, water quality management in harbors and estuaries, and solid waste handling. Prior to joining the firm. Dr. Gram served as a sanitary engineer with the U.S. Public Health Service (1956-58); project engineer with the firm of Engineering-Science, Inc. (1958-1962); research fellow and assistant professor in the Environmental Health Engineering Department of Caltech (1962-67); and principal in Gram/Phillips Associates, Consulting Engineers (1967-77). Specific projects which exemplify Dr. Gram's experience in the hydraulics and industrial waste areas are the following: • Design of 3-MG steel reservoir, booster pumping station, and transmission line for the City of Azusa. • Master plan of water distribution system. City of Carlsbad. • Analysis of surge effects in 15-mile gravity aqueduct, Twentynine Palms Marine Base. • Design of gas engine booster pumping station, reservoir, and pressure reducing stations. City of Chino. • Design of 5,000-gmp closed system booster pumping station, Hallcraft Homes, San Diego, CA. • Pressure-capacity analysis of water distribution system with four pressure zones, more than 300 pipes. Mammoth Lakes, CA. • Analysis of surge pressures in long waste water outfall with inverted siphons, Santa Fe Springs Waste Water Disposal Company. REGISTRATION Civil Engineer, State of California, No. CEl 2607 Civil Engineer, State of Nevada, No. 2657 Civil Engineer, State of Washington, No. 10295 Professional Engineer, North Carolina, No. 5298 MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS ANDREW L. GRAM Page 2 EDUCATION Ph.D., Sanitary Engineering, University of California, 1956 M.S., Sanitary Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1953 B.S., Civil Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, 1952. MEMBERSHIPS American Society of Civil Engineers; Chairman, Sanitary Technical Group, Los Angeles Section, 1970 MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS CRAIG H. EVERTS, Ph.D Coastal Geophysicist Dr. Everts, a recognized expert in the specialized field of sediment transport, has been the Principal investigator on numerous Moffatt & Nichol studies requiring this area of expertise. He also provides technical advise and input on projects involving sedimentation and hydraulics. Through his research. Dr. Everts has developed design guidelines to estimate harbor and channel sedimentation rates, shoreline change rates adjacent to coastal structures and beachfill sand loss rates. Recent project experience illustrating these guidelines includes the Sediment Budget Analysis for Port San Luis, CA; the Coastal Resources Management Plan for the City of Laguna Beach, CA; the Sediment Budget Analysis in the Silver Strand Littoral Cell, and Mission Bay Littoral Cell, San Diego, CA for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. His work experience includes the Coastal Flood Plain Development Study for the County of Orange, CA. which involved the study of erosion along approximately forty miles of coastilne. In this report. Dr. Everts provided technical criteria and standards as a basis for the design and review of coastal structures. Other projects include a sedimentation investigation of the Columbia River Estuary, investigation of sediment transport rates to and down submarine canyons in San Diego County, CA, and a coastal processes investigation of the Malaysian Coast for the government of Malaysia. Components of the Malaysian study included the determination of longshore and cross-shore sediment transport rates in a reconnaissance of the 4000-km long coast, and the functional design to mitigate shore erosion problems at three sites. Dr. Everts is the former Chief, Coastal Processes Branch, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Coastal Engineering Research Center. He has authored numerous technical papers and conducted many presentations and lectures on the topics of sediment transport and beach nourishment Well known as both a speaker and a writer. Dr. Everts' works have appeared in a variety of technical publications related to coastal and harbor engineering. EDUCATION Ph.D Geophysics (Hydraulics), University of Wisconsin, 1971 M.S. Geophysics, University of Wisconsin, 1968 B.S. Geophysics, University of Southern California, 1966 MEMBERSHIPS American Society of Civil Engineers American Geophysical Union A.S.C.E. Research Committee, W.P.C.O. Division, Chairman A.S.C.E. Task Committee on Sediment Budgets MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS CRAIG H. EVERTS, PH.D. Representative Projects Sediment Budget Analysis, Port San Luis, CA Estimated the net and gross longshore sand transport rates for the vicinity of Santa Maria River. Study included assessment of shoreline changes using aerial photographs, river discharge estimates, and littoral sediment sources. Coastal Resources Management Plan, Laguna Beach, CA Developed Guidelines, based on technical criteria, to manage coastal resources for the City of Laguna Beach. Project evaluated shoreline changes, sea level rise, littoral transport and shore protection structures. Sediment Budget Analysis, Silver Strand Littoral Cell, and Mission Bay Littoral Cell, San Diego, CA Established sediment budget analysis methodology and quantified sediment budget using historical shoreline changes, sediment seacllff retreat rates, shoreface profile changes and bathymetric changes. Coastal Flood Plain Development Study, County of Orange, CA Conducted study of erosion along Orange County coastline, approximately 40 miles; provided technical criteria and standards as a basis for design and review of coastal structures. Shoreline Investigation Report Portuguese Bent to Mexican Border, CA Evaluation & interpretation of historic shoreline changes obtained from National Ocean Survey shoreline maps. These maps represent the only consistent data source that provides a mean to quantify shoreline behavior before 1930, & before human intervention in the coastal zone modified the natural behavior of the shoreline. Sedimentation and Channel Deepening Study, mouth of the Columbia River, WA Investigation taken to forecast the rate of sedimentation if the navigation channel through the bar at the mouth of the Columbia River was deepened. Combined estuaries and river flows were established, and estuaries were made of modifications to the flow patterns that could reduce sedimentation and optimize navigation for the Portland District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Study of Littoral Sand Losses to a Submarine Canyon, La Jolla, CA Studied littoral sand losses to submarine canyons to determine the quantity of littoral sand removed in order to refine the sediment budget analysis for the Oceanside littoral cell for the Los Angeles District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Whaler's Village Club, CA Provided design data, evaluated existing protective structures and provided improvement guidelines. Sea Level Rise Study, Ocean City, MD Studied effects of sea level rise on prediction of shoreline retreat for the Environmental Protection Agency. MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS CRAIG H. EVERTS, Ph.D. Page 2 Coastal Erosion, Capistrano Bay, CA Investigated coastal erosion and developed solutions for homeowners association. Beachfill Design, Sandbridge, VA Designed beachfill and provided an estimate of post-fill loss rates for Corps of Engineers using his sediment budget analysis procedure to make such predictions. Coastal Processes Investigation, Coast of Malaysia Provided longshore and cross-shore sediment transport rates in a reconnaissance of the 400-km long coast of Malaysia, and the functional design to mitigate shore erosion problems at three sites. .MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS ROBERT A. NATHAN Coastal Engineer Mr. Nathan joined Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers in 1979 and since that time has proven to be, not only an innovative coastal engineer but a highly competent project manager as well. His responsibilities fiave included assisting the Coastal Engineering Department on a variety of projects such as construction and operation of a hydraulic model, climatic and oceanographic studies, littoral transport studies, breakwater, revetment, and bulkhead design. His responsibilities include determining wind and wave hindcasts; coastal processes and wave hydrodynamics; analysis of harbor shoaling; preparation of beach nourishment programs; statistical analysis of wind and wave climate; numerical modeling of coastal processes, shoreline evolution, wave forces and wave refraction; design of marinas and shore protection; and preparation of technical reports and design manuals. Mr. Nathan's coastal engineering experience also includes extensive research in the area of coastal erosion. He served as Senior Coastal Engineer for National Coastal Erosion Study in Malaysia to determine causes and impacts of coastal erosion to agricultural dikes, dense mangrove forests and sandy beaches. The study formulated design parameters and mitigation measures. In the area of marina design, Mr. Nathan has prepared feasibility studies and assisted in the design of dock systems, bulkheads, and beach protection for various small craft harbors including Wild Dunes Beach and Racquet Club, Isle of Palms, SC; Marina del Rey, CA; Downtown Marina, Long Beach, CA; North Point Marina, Lake Michigan; and Keppel Harbor, Singapore. For the Experimental Sand Bypass System, Oceanside, CA for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Mr. Nathan served as coastal engineer for the design of the jet pump and fluldlzer sand bypassing system. He reviewed oceanographic conditions, littoral processes, soils, developed design criteria, and conducted underwater site investigation. Additional projects completed forthe U.S. Army Corps of Engineers includes participating in the Coast of California Storm and Tidal Wave Study. Mr. Nathan provided statistical evaluation of available wave extreme and sea level data sets in the San Diego Region. REGISTRATION Civil Engineer, State of California, No. C038543 Professional Engineer, State of Indiana, No. ENE8700955 EDUCATION B.S., Ocean Engineering, California State University at Long Beach, 1981, Graduated with Distinction Completed various graduate courses at California State University at Long Beach MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS ROBERT A. NATHAN Page 2 CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE PROFESSION Memberships: Member, American Society of Civil Engineers Vice-Chairman, Waterways, Harbors and Coastal Engineering Group, ASCE Member, Tau Beta Pi, National Engineering Honorary Society Member, Phi Kappa Pi, National Honorary Society Diver, National Association of Underwater Instructors Diver, Professional Association of Diving Instructors Presentations: Invited Speaker, "1982-1983 Winter Storm Damages Along the California Coast," the National Society of Professional Engineers, Long Beach Chapter, September 1983; and the American Society of Civil Engineers' Watenways, Harbors and Coastal Group, Novem- ber 1983. Invited Speaker, "Santa Barbara Harbor," ASCE Ventura-Santa Barbara Section, April 1986. Invited speaker on a variety of coastal engineering topics at the Ocean Engineering Student Association at California State University, Long Beach. Publications: Author, "Malaysian National Coastal Erosion Study," Presented at the Second International Conference on Coastal and Port Engineering in Developing Countries, Beijing, China, and published in proceeding, 1987. Author, "Emergency Shore Protection," Presented at the Fifth Symposium of Coastal and Ocean Management, ASCE, and published in the proceedings, 1987. Co-author, "An Example of a Destination Harbor for Pleasure Craft", Permanent Interna- tional Association of Navigation Congresses, Bulletin No. 55, 1987. Co-author, 'Coastal Design Criteria in Southern California," presented at the ASCE 19th International Coastal Engineering Conference, and published in Proceedings, 1984. Co-author, "An Historical Evaluation of North Pacific Storms, During the Winter of 1983," Proc. of ASCE 19th International Coastal Engineering Conference, 1984. MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS ROBERT A. NATHAN Representative Projects Malaysia Senior Coastal causes and impaijits sandy beaches included 11 months Engineer for National Coastal Erosion Study in Malaysia to determine of coastal erosion to agricultural dikes, dense mangrove forests and peslgn parameters and mitigation measures were developed. The study field work in Malaysia. Malaysia Coastal Engineer Design study inc establishing desidn on soft clayey material. Pulax Bunting, Malaysia Developed and study included Port of Long Beach, CA Assisted in desigrp parameters. Experimental Sand Coastal engineer Oceanside Harbor developed desigr Coast of California Project Engineer in the San Diego Dune Acres, Indiana Project Engineer Michigan. Lake Forest, Illinois Project Engineer Amchitka, Alaska Assisted in desig for design of protection to dikes used to protect agricultural lands, uded analysis of erosion rates using aerial photographs and surveys, wave conditions, and evaluation of alternative structures constructed prepared oceanographic design criteria for a proposed port facility. The identification of potential coastal processes problems. of proposed Pier J expansion. Established coastal engineering design evaliiated revetment design and developed service craft basin facility. Bypass System, Oceanside, CA for the design of the jet pump and fluldlzer sand bypassing system for reviewed oceanographic conditions, littoral processes, soils, criteria, and conducted undenwater site investigation. Stdrm and Tidal Wave Study lor statistical evaluation of available wave extreme and sea level data sets Region for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. for design of rock revetment to protect private residences on Lake for design and construction of 800-foot long rock revetment for private residence; included on-site construction support and inspection. n of barge mooring in Aleutian Islands for U.S. Navy facility. Keppel Harbour, Singapore Prepared wind and wave statistical analysis for marina development. Petaluma, CA Project Engineer [for feasibility study for a marina located along Petaluma River. MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS ROBERT A. NATHAN Page 2 Atlantic City, New Jersey Evaluated unacceptable berthing facilities due to strong currents and floating ice at an existing marina and suggested measures to reduce the dangerous conditions. Sunset Aquatic Park, California Project Engineer for feasibility study of marina expansion; prepared construction cost estimates and report of findings and recommendations. Ventura County, California Project Engineer on the preliminary engineering design of a proposed marina and resort area; studied wave climate, designed breakwaters, prepared boat slip layouts, and developed grading plans. Isle of Palms, South Carolina Designed marina and assisted client with selection of floating dock systems, bulkhead design, and beach protection for the Wild Dunes Beach and Racquet Club. Long Beach, California Prepared wind and wave studies for the Long Beach Downtown Marina. North Point Marina, Lake Michigan Participated in design of a 1600 slip marina. Assisted in evaluation of potential impacts of the marina on littoral processes. Santa Barbara, CA Project Engineer to address long-term issues of dredging, harbor expansion, and harbor protection for Santa Barbara Harbor Master Plan. St. Malo Beach, California Prepared guidelines for emergency repairs of the St. Malo Seawall in the event of storm damage. Study included preparation of a monitoring program and the required procedure for obtaining permits. .MbfTatt & Nichol, Engineers DAVID G. CANNON Coastal Engineer Mr. Cannon joined Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers in August 1988. His responsibilities have included determination of wind and wave hindcasts; coastal processes and wave hydrodynamics; statistical analysis of wind and wave climate; numerical modeling of coastal processes; wave forces and wave refraction; design of shore protection; and preparation of technical reports. Mr. Gannon has worked on such projects as the Playa Vista Marina Model, Marina del Rey, CA; and Kwajalein Wave Hindcast project Pnor to joining Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers, Mr. Cannon was a research assistant at the University of Delaware where he assisted in formulation and solution of thesis topic, "Wave-Induced Flexural Motion of an Ice Sheet." REGiSTRATiON Engineer-in-Tralnlng, State of Delaware EDUCATION Master of Civil Engineering (November 1989), (Concentration in Coastal Engineering), University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering (June 1986), University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware PUBLICATION Kobayashi, Nobuhisa and Cannon, David G., "Interaction of Sea Waves with Discrete Ice Floes" Research Report No. CE-87-64 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Delaware MEMBERSHIPS American Society of Civil Engineers j Chi Epsllon Merit Fraternity REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS Huntington Beach, CA Responsible for analysis of extreme waves, storm surge, pressure and astronomical tides, wave setup and wave refraction, and shoaling. Oceanside, CA Assisted in the design of a rubble revetment to protect private residences along the Pacific Ocean. Ventura, CA Performed wide and wave analysis, as well as assisted in the conceptual design of an artificial surfing reef for a private developer. Malibu, CA Assisted in the design and evaluation of a groin field along the Santa Monica Bay. Malibu, CA Developed design criteria and subsequently assisted in the design of a shore protection structure to protect private residences along the Santa Monica Bay. Huntington Beach, CA Performed a coupled refraction and reflection analysis to determine the resulting sediment transport in the vicinity of a jetty. .MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS BRIAN A. RAGLAND Civil Engineering Department Head i Mr. Ragland joined Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers in 1986 bringing to the firm experience in municipal engineering, petrochemical engineering and construction engineeririg. As Civil Engineering Department Head, he has full responsibility for the management of the civil engineering department He allocates manpower resources and is actively involved in document reviews for quality assurance. Moffatt & Nichol project experience includes the sewer line replacement as part ofthe Pacific Coast Highway Bridge Replacement Project at the Santa Ana River, Huntington Beach, CA. The project involved the development of plans and specifications for the replacement of 800 feet of 78-inch diameter standby ocean outfall sewer line with 120-inch line. Mr. Ragland was responsible for the utility and petroleum piping relocation design of Union Pacific Resource Company's 50 acre facility at Rear Berth 200 in the Port of Los Angeles; the design of grading plans for the Perimeter Roadway; Surfer's Point Park, Ventura County; and the relocation of all underground and above ground utilities for the Anaheim Bay Mitigation Project at the Seal Beach Naval Station, CA. Mr. Ragland's hydraulic experience includes the use of HEC-2 to perform the hydraulic analysis of a 300'-700' wide Mill Creek channel. Previous employment includes extensive construction management experience with firms such as CF. & Braun & Co. and Kiewit Pacific Co. While serving as Project Engineer for residential and municipal engineering projects, he was responsible for the development and finalization of surveys, maps, plans and specifications. Specific project elements included the design of underground utility systems, streets and parking lots, grading plans; and the development of engineers estlryiates and material take-offs. Project management responsibilities included all phases of design coordination with clients consultants, surveyors, contractors; and the presentation of project proposals before plannirig commissions and city councils. His field experience included the directing of survey crews, preparation and approval of fleld orders, project payments, punch lists, project acceptance and project closeout As a site engineer, Mr. Ragland designed numerous storm drain, fire protection and other underground utility systems for Conoco and Aramco. Mr. Ragland served as the civil engineer in charge of underground piping material coordination for a $2.3 billion Kuwait refinery and was in charge of specification writing, material take-off, review and approval of material requisitions, the development of a material coding system and the input of material codes and descriptions to a company wide data base management system. As a field engineer on a $6.8 million water treatment plant, he was responsible for survey services, coordinating earthwork and grading activities, shop drawing review and quality control for the cast in place and structural steel portion of the project. REGISTRATION Civil Engineer, State of California, CE 35316 i EDUCATION Certificate in Engineering Management for Construction University of California, Los Angeles, 1983 B.S. Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, 1980 MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS BRIAN A. RAGLAND Representative Projects Mill Creek Channel Improvements, San Bernardino, CA Performed hydraulic analysis of an alluvial fan creek channel utilizing the HEC-2 computer program. Multiple computer runs made to investigate how various roadway alignments and their corresponding embankments, pier numbers and pier lengths affected the channel hydraulics. Work was coordinated with San Bernardino Public Works officials & the Corps of Engineers to incorporate existing and proposed channel & levee improvements. Pacific Coast Highway Bridge Sewer Line Replacement, Huntington Beach, CA Developed plans and specifications to replace 800' of the 78" diameter standby ocean outfall sewer line at the County Sanitation Districts pf Orange County Number 2 Facility. Coordinated with Caltrans and CSDOC to include the replacement of the 78" line with 120" line as part of the Caltrans Pacific Coast Highway Bridge Widening Project Determined construction phasing, and junction structure requirements and prepared engineers' es- timate. Rear Berth 200, Port of Los Angeles, CA Project Engineer for renovation of 50 acre facility. The project includes oil production pipeline and wireline facilities relocation; coordination with POLA, client, Santa Fe Railroad, Union Paciflc Railroad and local utility companies; coordination of cathodic protection and surveying subconsultant as well as directing underground utility investigation. Anaheim Bay Mitigation Project, Port of Long Beach, California Designed the relocation of all above ground and underground utilities, including electrical, water and gas lines In this 110 acre marshland restoration project. Helopad Lift, Camp Pendleton Marine Base, California Responsible for plan and specification review checljts for this 600' diameter pad; project included 1 mile of roadway over rough terrain. Puerto del Rey Marina, Puerto Rico Civil Engineer in charge of layout of 650 slip marina. Surfer's Point Park, Ventura County, California Responsible for the grading plans, coordination between city, county and utility companies. Port of San Francisco Study of Container Terminal Alternatives in the Port in support of the City's Mission Bay Redevelopment Project; work included selecting appropriate site comparison criteria and examining 11 different scenarios. Mr. Ragland developed alternate layouts and prepared material cost estimates. .MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS GEORGE D. JOHNSON Chief Civil Engineer Mr. Johnson joined the firm in 1980 after a successful 25 year career in public works engineering for the City of Long Beach, California. His career with the Public Works Department included serving as Deputy City Engineer, Division Engineer and City Engineer. His responsibilities covered the management, supervision, planning and direction of a large, diversified program for the City's Public Works projects. These projects involved the engineering design of streets, highways, airport development, buildings, marina developments, sewers and storm drains. Mr. Johnson is currently serving as Project Manager for the site development of the Long Beach Auto Mall. The project includes the relocation of oil fields and major utilities, and grading plans for the 80 acre site. Moffatt & Nichol project experience includes engineering work for the Wrather Company's Queen Mary Land Development project in the Port of Long Beach; design of the $1,300,000, three mile Long Beach Bicycle/Pedestrian Path; and serving as Project Manager for the [City of Long Beach Veterans Park Rehabilitation project. His project management experience includes the design of the Port of Los Angeles Consolidated Lumber Terminal at Berth 200 B-H. Mr. Johnson served as Project Manager for the Feasibility Study of the Compton Creek Flood Control Channel, and is currently Project Manager for the Long Beach Auto Mall, Long Beach, CA. Additionally, Mr. Johnson prepared the West Seventh Street Sewer Study and the North Harbor Storm Drain Pump Station evaluations and study for the Port of Long Beach. Other projects which provide insight into Mr. Johnson's wide-ranging experience include an investigation for and recommendations to the St. Malo Homeowners Association for the Buena Vista Lagoon outfall weir storm flow capacity: preparation of the Santa Ana River flood hazard damage risk analysis for Tippecanoe Avenue Bridge for the City of San Bernardino; and similar studies for the Center Street Bridge over Piru Creek for the County of Ventura and the 13th Street Bridge over the Santa Ynez River at Vandenberg /^ir Force Base and the Pacific Coast Highway bridge widening project over the Santa Ana River for the County of Orange, CA. REGISTRATION Civil Engineer, State of California, CE 17065 EDUCATION B.S. Civil Engineering, University of New Mexico, 1954 MEMBERSHIPS American Society of Civil Engineers American Public Works Association The American Shore and Beach Preservation Association .MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS H. RICHARD NEILL Chief Structural Engineer As Chief Structural Engineer, Mr. Neill reviews and approves the firm's structural projects, contributing experience in structural design. Mr. Neill has been involved in the design or supervision of more thaiji one hundred and fifty highway and railway bridge structures in California, many of were prepared to Caltrans and FHWA criteria. These Include the following: the Dinah Shore Overcrossing, Rancho Mirage, CA; Bear Valley at Mojave River in San Bernardino County, CA; Barranca Parkway-SR133 Interchange and Alton Parkway Overcrossing-SRl33, Orange County, CA; Irvine Center Drive Interchange in Orange County, CA; and the Kubic Road-Monterey Road Overcrossing/lnterchange, County of Riverside, CA. Mr. Neill has also supervised the design of bridges in several mid-western states as well as several projects o\^er watenways for the North Carolina Department of Transportation. Mr. Nelll is currently Project Manager for the Grove Avenue Unioiji Pacific Railroad Grade Separation Project Ontario, CA. This project presently under design, is a part of the "Ground Access Program" for the development of the Ontario International Airport The project will include local street realignment and traffic handling detours, temporary track relocation and utility adjustrrients, major storm drain design, utility relocation both along local streets and in Union Pacific right-o^-way, intersection modification and right-of-way involvement and relocation of adjacent property users. Other bridge projects include the widening of Washington Street Bridge, Colton, CA and the widening of an existing bridge designed by Moffatt & Nichol, the South "E" Street Bridge, San Bernardino, CA. Project management experience for the design of waterfront facilities include: design of the Expansion of Port Hueneme; a high level cantilevered bridge; an offshore carrier berthing facility; a shlplift and a ship repair facility; a Navy pier subject to typhoon forces; the National City Container Terminal in San Diego, California; and the master plan and design of the major Navy waterfront facilities at Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean. The latter project included a small craft harbor, deep draft wharf and numerous support facilities. REGISTRATION ! Civil Engineer, State of California, CE 12590 Structural Engineer, State of California, SE 1342 Civil Engineer, State of Arizona, 19997 Structural Engineer, State of Arizona, 20073 Professional Engineer, Structural Branch, State of Hawaii, 04293 DOD, Certified Fallout Shelter Analyst, No. 7TT-1317-68 EDUCATION B.S., Mathematics, California State Polytechnic College, 1956 B.S., Engineering, California State Polytechnic College, 1957 MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS H. RICHARD NEILL Page 2 MEMBERSHIPS American Society of Civil Engineers Structural Engineers Association of Southern California American Concrete Institute, and the Earthquake Engineering Research Institute. MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS H. RICHARD NEILL Representative Bridge Projects Mr. Neill has been involved in the design of over one hundred and fifty highway and railway bridge structures in California, including the following: • Grove Avenue Grade Separation at Union Pacific Railroad, Ontario, CA • Tippecanoe Avenue Bridge over the Santa Ana River, San Bernardino, CA • Washington Street Bridge Widening, Colton, CA • South "E" Street Bridge Widening, San Bernardino, CA • Dinah Shore Overcrossing, Rancho Mirage, CA • Bear Valley at Mojave River in San Bernardino County, CA • Barranca Parkway-I_aguna Freeway Interchange, Irvine, CA • Alton Parkway-Laguna Freeway Overcrossing, Irvine, CA • Irvine Center Drive Interchange in Irvine, CA | • Kubic Road-Monterey Road Overcrossing/lnterchange, County of Riverside, CA • Nicole Avenue & Dracaea Avenue Bridges, San Bernarcilno, CA • North Carolina Department of Transportation Bridge Replacement Projects • Vivienda Avenue Grade Separation, Grand Terrace, CA • Lincoln Avenue Grade Separation, Anaheim, CA j • Prospect Avenue Bridge Replacement, Pasadena, CA I • 32nd Street Bridge Replacement, San Diego. CA j I • Willow Avenue Bridge Over San Vicente Creek, San Diego, CA • Bob Hope Bridge Widening, Rancho Mirage, CA • Center Street Bridge at Piru Creek, Ventura, CA MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS ARUN K. JAIN Structural Engineer Since joining Moffatt & Nichol in 1977 as a structural engineer, Mr. Jain has been involved in various bridge and waterfront structures projects. As Project Engineer for particular assignments, he directs the project's dally activity and participates in design. Mr. Jain's engineering experience includes responsibility for the structural design of many of the firm's larger bridge projects. Among these are the Pacific Coast Highway Bridge Replacement over the Santa Ana River, Huntington Beach, CA; the Alton Parkway Overcrossing arid the Barranca Parkway Interchange at State Route 133, Irvine, CA. Other bridge projects include the Vivierida Avenue Grade Separation, Grand Terrace, CA; Prospect Avenue Bridge Replacement, Pasadena, CA: Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Project Bridges, San Bernardino, CA; and the Bob Hope Drive Bridge Widening at Whitewater River, Rancho Mirage, CA. He is fully trained in the design of all types of bridges including: steel, concrete bridges (rigid frames or box), prestressed concrete bridges (pretensloned or post-tensioned); simple spans or continuous; and precast or cast-in-place, straight or curved. Waterfront facility experience includes the structural design of piers, wharves, drydocks and shipyards. Mr. Jain served as Structural Engineer for the design of Pier 16 Extension, Long Beach Naval Shipyard, CA; Pier 12, San Diego Naval Station, San Diego, CA; Wharf D, Todd Pacific Shipyard, San Pedro, CA; Piers Lima, November, Quebec, Papa Structural Evaluation, Charieston Naval Shipyard, Charleston, SC and the Pier "E" Conversion for Industrial Use, Long Beach Naval Stilpyard, CA. Drydock design, repair and study experience includes Improvements to Drydock No. I, Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard, HI; Facility Certification Reports, Drydock No. 3, Hunters Point Shipyard, CA; and Drydock Repairs, Long Beach Naval Shipyard, CA. During a five and one-half year period beginning in 1971, he was | employed by both engineering and construction firms in Southern California on the design of a wide range of structures including residential, commercial and military buildings, high-rise structures, highway bridges, aircraft maintenance docks, tall guy towers, pile foundations and others. His experience includes numerous building modification projects for the U.S. Postal Service, Corps of Engineers, U.S. Air Force and Navy. REGISTRATION Structural Engineer, State of California, No. S2299 Civil Engineer, State of California, No. 26247 EDUCATION M.S. Civil Engineenng, University of California, Davis, 1971 B.S. Civil Engineering, University of Jodhpur, India, 1969 CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE PROFESSION Paper: I Author, "Path Dependent Biaxial Compressive Testing of an All-Light- I weight Aggregate Concrete," published in ACI Jour^ial of December, 1972. MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS ARUN K. JAIN Representative Bridge Projects Pacific Coast Highway Widening, Orange County, CA: Project Engineer responsible for the design of a new structure over the Santa Ana River and Greenville-Banning channels. Project also includes handling of all permit processing, design of bicycle path, pedestrian walkways, traffic signalling and construction traffic scheduling to maintain four lanes open to traffic during construction period. Vivienda Avenue Grade Separation, Grand Terrace, CA: Design for removal and replacement of overhead bridge at Southern Pacific Transportation crossing. Prospect Avenue Bridge Replacement, Pasadena, CA: Design of a 400-foot, five span cast-in-place concrete box girder structure separating Prospect Avenue and Seco Street. Sructural engineer for various bridge projects: • Alton Parkway Overcrossing at SR 133, Irvine, CA. j • Barranca Parkway Interchange at SR 133, Irvine, CA. • Riverside Avenue Bridge at Santa Ana River, San Bernardino, CA. • Moreno Avenue Bridge at San Luis Rey Bridge, San Diego County. • Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Project Bridges, San Bernardino, CA. • Bob Hope Drive Bridge Widening at Whitewater River, Rancho Mirage, CA. • Fogg Street Grade Separation Atchison, Topeka & Sanja Fe RR, Colton, CA. • Lincoln Avenue Overpass for Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe RR, Corona, CA. MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS ARUN K. JAIN Representative Waterfront Projects Pier 16, Long Beach Naval Shipyard, CA. Structural engineer for the 200' extension to existing pier; also designed mooring island. Pier 12, San Diego Naval Station, San Diego, CA. | Structural engineer for the preliminary design of 1450 foot concrete pier designed for the berthing of amphibious assault vessels. Piers Lima, November, Quebec, Papa, Charleston Naval Shipyard, Charleston, SC. Structural engineer providing evaluation of pier structures, cold iron utility system to modernize Pier November. Also provided recommendations for multiple berthing arran- gements based on current velocities and mooring line loads. Recommendations included new resilient fender system, new breasting dolphin, hew mooring dolphin. I Pier "E" Conversion for Industrial Use, Long Beach Naval Shipyard, CA. Structural engineer for studies and design to increase capacity of cellular sheetpile wharf. Improvements to Drydock No. I, Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard, HI. Structural engineer for drydock structure analysis for superfloodlng condition and for design of improvements. Facility Certification Reports, Drydock No. 3, Hunters Point Shipyard, CA; Drydocks I, 2, 3, Long Beach Naval Shipyard, CA. Field inspection of drydock, caisson, pumphouse and other components; structural calculations, preparation of FCR sections. Drydock Repairs, Long Beach Naval Shipyard, CA. Checked structure for crane loadings; designed utility supports, concrete floor at service gallery, and repair of dock walls. I Shipyard Modifications, Todd Shipyard, San Pedro, CA. Design of shipyard modifications to accommodate installation of world's largest shlplift, including design of Wharf D, workbay, and shipllft control house. Maintenance Dredging, Sunset Aquatic Park, Sunset Beach, CA. Designed channel slopes for maintenance dredging. MICHAEL JOSSELYN, PhD President EDUCATION PhD University of New Hampshire, 1978 M.S. University of Miami, 1975 B.S. Cornell University, 1972 POSITIONS President, Wetlands Research Associates, Inc. 1981-present Professor, San Francisco State University 1986-present Associate Professor, San Francisco State University 1982-86 Assistant Professor, San Francisco State University 1978-82 Director, Tiburon Center for Environmental Studies 1982-87 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planning of wetland restoration and mitigation projects in tidal and nontidal wetlands of California, Delaware, and Virgim'a. • Author of three books on wetland restoration and ecology in Califomia including: Community profile of San Francisco Bay tidal wetlands. • Directed environmental assessments of wetlands in San Francisco Bay including monitoring of wetland mitigation sites. • Conducted wetland delineation studies for tidal and non-tidal wetlands. • Consultant to public agencies, including the Bay Conservation and Development Commission and Califomia State Coastal Conservancy. • Development of mitigation plans for wetland restoration at hazardous waste sites. • Provided expert testimony in wetland cases. • Facilitated permit applications requiring wetland mitigation. • Conducted studies on wetland issues in San Francisco Bay for US Fish and Wildlife Service, Environmental Protection Agency, and Bay Conservation and Development Commission. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Society of Wetland Scientists, Chapter President, Western Region Phycological Society of America American Society of Limnology and Oceanography Western Society of Naturalists California Botanical Society HONORS AND AWARDS Fellow, Califomia Academy of Sciences Meritorious Performance and Professional Promise Award 1986, 87 and 88: San Francisco State University PUBLICATIONS (outside of client reports) Josselyn, M.N. 1977. Seasonal changes in the distribution and growth of Laurencia poitei (Rhodophyceae, Ceramiales) in a subtropical lagoon. Aquat. Bot. 3:217-229. Bach, S.D. and M.N. Josselyn, 1978. Mass blooms of Cladophora in Bermuda. Mar. Poll. Bull. 9:34-37 Josselyn, M.N. and A.C. Mathieson, 1978. Contributions of receptacles from the fucoid Ascophyllum nodosum to the detrital pool of a temperate estuary. Estuaries 1:258-261 Bach, S.D. and M.N. Josselyn, 1979. Production and biomass of Cladophora prolifera (Chlorophyta, Cladophorales) in Bermuda. Bot. Mar. 22:163-168. Josselyn, M.N. and A.C. Mathieson, 1980. Seasonal influx and decomposition of autochthonous macrophyte litter in a north temperate estuary. Hydrobiologia 71: 197-208 Niesen, T. and M.N. Josselyn, 1981. The Hayward Regional Shoreline marsh restoration: biological succession during the first year following dike removal. Technical Report #1. Tiburon Center for Environmental Studies. 180pp. Josselyn, M.N. and B.F. Atwater, 1982. Biologic and geologic constraints on man's use of the shoreline of San Francisco Bay. In: Kockelman, W.J.; Conomos, T.J.; and Leviton, A.E. (eds). San Francisco Bay: Use and Protection. Pac Div. AAAS, San Francisco, CA pp 57-84. Josselyn, M.N. (ed) 1982. Wetland restoration and enhancement in Califomia. Califomia Sea Grant College Program. Report #T-CSGCP-007. 116pp. a. Josselyn, M.N. and J. Buchholz, Summary of past wetland restoration projects in California, pp 1-10. b. Zedler, J.; Josselyn, M.; and Onuf, C. Restoration techniques,research, and monitoring: vegetation, pp 63-72. Shellem, B. and Josselyn, M. 1982. Physiological ecology of Enteromorpha clathrata (Roth.) Grev. in San Francisco Bay. Bot. Mar. 25:541-549. McCDreary, S. and Josselyn, M. 1982. Developing an index to describe habitat quality in the San Francisco Bay. In: Herz, M.J. and McCreary, S.T. (eds.) State of the Bay. Proceedings of a conference. June, 1982. The Oceanic Society, San Francisco, CA pp46-65. Josselyn, M.N.; C^lliet, G.M.; Niesen, T.M.; Ctowen, R.; Hurley, A.; Connor, J.; and Hawes, S. 1983. Composition, export, and faunal utilization of drift vegetation in Salt River submarine canyon. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 17:447-465. Versteeg, J. and Josselyn, M.N. 1983. Taxonomic and morphological studies of Cryptopleura (Rhodophyta: Delesseriaceae). Wasman J. Biology 41:97-107. Josselyn, M.N. 1983. Estuarine tidal marshes of San Francisco Bay: a community profile. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Biological Services, Washington, DC FWS/OBS-83/23. 102pp. Josselyn, M.N. and J. W. Buchholz. 1984. Marsh restoration in San Francisco Bay: A guide to design and planning. Tiburon Ctr. Envir. Stud. Tech. Publ. 3, Tiburon, CA. 104pp. Josselyn, M.N. and West, J. 1985. Distribution and seasonal abundance of marine algae in San Francisco Bay. Hydrobiologia 129: Spicher, D. and M.N. Josselyn. 1985. Spartina (Graminae) in northern California: distribution and taxonomic notes. Madrono 32:158-167. Harvey, H.T. and M.N. Josselyn. 1986. Wetland mitigation policy in Califomia: A reply. Environmental Management 10:567-569. Josselyn, M.N., M. Fonseca, T. Niesen, and R. Larson. 1986. The ecology of Halophila decipiens: Distribution and production. Aquatic Bot. 25:47-61. Josselyn, M.N. 1986. Effectiveness of coastal wetland restoration: California. Proceedings of Conference on Mitigation and Restoration, Association of State Wetland Managers, New Orleans. Josselyn, M.N. and D. Spicher. 1986. Feasibility of landfill removal to create wetland habitat at the Benicia State Park Recreation Area. Tech. Rpt. #6, Romberg Tiburon Center for Environmental Studies, Tiburon, CA. Josselyn, M.N. and J.W. Buchholz. 1986. The saline and brackish water wetlands of San Francisco Bay. In: MacDonald, K.B. (ed) Pacific coast wetlands and values: some regional comparisons. Symposium proceedings, WSN. Available from K.B. MacDonald and Associates PO Box 60310 San Diego, CA 92106. Domhelm, R. and M. Josselyn. 1987. Sea level rise: predictions and implications for San Francisco Bay. Prepared for: San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. San Francisco, CA 98pp. Josselyn, M.N. 1987. Introduction to the San Francisco Bay Estuary, pp 9-20. In: Goodrich, D.M. (ed). San Francisco Bay: Issues, Resources, Status, and Management. NOAA Estuary-of-the-Month Seminar Series No.6. US Department of Commerce, NOAA Estuarine Programs Office, Washington, DC. Josselyn, M.N., J. Duffield, and M. Quammen. 1987. An evaluation of habitat use in natural and restored tidal marshes in San Francisco Bay, Califomia. pp 3085-3094. In: Magoon, O.T., H. Converse, and D. Miner (eds). Coastal Zone '87. Am. Soc. Civil Engineers, NY. Rozengurt, M.A., M.J. Herz, and M. Josselyn. 1987. The impact of water diversions on the River-Delta-Estuary-Sea ecosystems of San Francisco Bay and the sea of Asov. pp 35-62. In: Goodrich, D.M. (ed). San Francisco Bay: Issues, Resources, Status, and Management. NOAA Estuary-of-the-Month Seminar Series No. 6. US Department of Commerce, NOAA Estuarine Programs Office, Washington, DC. Williams, P.B. and M. Josselyn. 1987. Recommendations for salinity standards to maintain the wetlands of Suisun Marsh. Prepared for: San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. San Francisco, CA. 35pp. Williams, P.B. and M. Josselyn. 1987. An overview of flow and salinity standards required to protect the ecosystem of San Francisco Bay. Prepared for: San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. San Francisco, CA 45pp. Josselyn, M.N. 1988. Effectiveness of coastal wetland restoration: California. In: Kusler, J.A., M.L. Ouammen, G. Brooks (eds.) Mitigation of impacts and losses. Assoc. State Wetland Managers, Berne, NY. pp 246-251 Josselyn, M.N., D. Kopec, M. Martindale, J. Duffield, and J. Callaway. 1988. Operations and Management Plans for Ecological Reserves and Wildlife Areas. 1. Woodbridge Ecological Reserve 2. Delta Complex: Lower Sherman Lake, Decker Island, and Webb Tract. 3. Sacramento River Complex: Jacinto, Shannon and Pine Islands. 4. Lower Feather River Complex: Abbott Lakes, Conner Lakes, Lake of the Woods Prepared for: California Department of Fish and Game, Natural Heritage Section, Sacramento. 50-100pp. Josselyn, M.N. and J. Callaway. 1988. Ecological Effects of Global Climate Change on San Francisco Bay. Prepared for: Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Cbrvallis, OR. 45pp Josselyn, M.N., J. Duffield, and M. Martindale. 1989. Impact of pubhc access on wetlands. Technical Report #9. Romberg Tiburon Centers, Tiburon, CA 94920, #pp. Josselyn, M.N., D. Kopec, J. Haas, and J. Callaway. 1989. Operations and Management Plan for Bair Island Ecological Reserve. Prepared for: Califomia Department of Fish and Game, Natural Heritage Program, Sacramento. 89pp. Josselyn, M.N., S. Faulkner, W.H. Patrick, Jr. In preparation. The relationship between soil properties and wetland obligate species in diked wetlands. Josselyn, M.N. and J. Zedler. In review. Pacific coast wetlands: characteristics and restoration. Prepared for: US Environmental Protection Agency to be published in a national handbook on implementation of Clean Water Act Section 404, EPA, Washington, DC. Josselyn, M.N., J. Zedler, and T. Griswold. In press. Wetland mitigation along the Pacific Coast of the United States. Prepared for: US Environmental Protection Agency to be published in a national handbook on implementation of Clean Water Act Section 404, EPA, Washington, DC. Josselyn, M.N., L. Hanley, M. Quammen, and D. Peters. In press. The distribution of wetland habitats in the San Francisco Bay Region. Prepared for; US Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Research Center. Slidell, LA. PROFESSIONAL RECORD BETTY DEHONEY Manager, Environmental Studies P&D Technologies EDUCATION M.S., Biology, Northern Arizona University (1979) B.A., Biology, Franklin College (1975) SPECIALIZATION Project Management Environmental Compliance Regulatory Agency Requlremaits FROreSSIONAL AFHLIATIONS Association of Environmental Professionals REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE Ms. Dehoney is a project manager responsible for the preparation of environmental impact reports (EIRs) and assessments for a variety of projects. Her responsibilities include the day-to-day project management and the coordination, analysis, and prepara- tion of technical reports. She has extensive experience in conducting environmental studies for regulatory compliance and impact assessments throughout much of the western United States. She is knowledgeable of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act procedures and requirements. Ms. Dehoney works extensively with regulatory compliance procedural and processing requirements. She routinely works with application submittals and coordinating mitigation programs through such agencies as U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Sections 'tO'f and 10 permits), California Coastal Commission (Coastal Development Permits) and California Department of Fish and Game (Streambed Alteration Agreements). Agency involvement have included U.S. Fish and Wildlife, Bureau of Land Management, National Marine Fisheries, and U.S. Forest Service. Representative projects have included new marina developments, roadways through coastal wetlands, industrial, commercial, and residential developments in riparian habitats, among ot'ners. Miti- gation programs, and impact analyses have included such issues as eelgrass, riparian woodlands, marsh habitat, and endangered species. Ws. Dehoney specializes in managing complex, controversial projects. She maintains a sensitivity to the potential for litigation by the opposition and approaches each project to prevent a viable challenge under the environmental process. -2- Some of Ms. Dehoney's recent projects include: o Prepared an EIR for a major hotel under the flight path of Miramar Naval Air Station. Located adjacent to a State park, traffic, aesthetics, noise and land use compatibility were major issues. o Prepared a Specific Plan and EIR for the 1,100 acre Rancho La Quinta mixed used project in Riverside County. Urbanization of agricultural preserve and fiscal impacts associated with a Redevelopment Agency were the major concerns. o Conducted preliminary report for impacts associated with a trash transfer facility in Oceanside. Major public opposition was generated on this project. o Conducted an extended Initial Study on a resource recovery and recycling project for hazardous wastes in Oceanside. Also subject to major contro- versy. o The La Costa Avenue Road Widening environmental documentation and permitting project in Carlsbad; required coordination with a multitude of regulatory agencies, some with conflicting mandates. o The Carroll Canyon Business Park EIR in San Diego included evaluating and mitigating Coastal land use, traffic, grading/erosion, hydrology and most importantly, biological/wetl and issues. o Crown Isle Hotel/Marina EIR was conducted for the San Diego Unified Port District. Endangered species and eelgrass concerns (including permitting under resource agencies) were the major concerns. o The North Oceanside Annexation EIR included both annexation and site development plans. This project included evaluation of endangered species, land use incompatibility, inadequate transportation plan, steep slopes, inadequate infrastructure, State wildlife preserve, among other issues. o The Mission Wells and Mission del Oro residential projects in Oceanside were located within the Historic District associated with the Mission San Luis Rey. Sensitive concerns included cultural resources, traffic and aesthetics. o A Specific Plan/EIR for a mixed use commercial/residential project in Lemon Grove involved major concerns of land use compatibility, fiscal and traffic impacts. o Seven alternative sites svere reviewed at Camp Pendleton to accommodate needed military family housing. Endangered species, agricultural preserves, public safety, traffic, cultural resources and biological issues were the major concerns. o Three alternative prison sites in Imperial County were reviewed under equal consideration. The sites were located in primarily agricultural areas at some distance from urbanized areas. -3- Several projects have been conducted or required consultation by Ms. Dehoney for the City of Chula Vista, including EIRs for Rancho del Sur, Sunbow, the General Plan Update and Rancho del Rey. The Singing Hills Residential project in the County of San Diego was the site of major archaeological resources, sensitive biological resources, steep slopes and community character concerns. Conducted extended Environmental Assessment of four alternative expansion proposals for Lindbergh Field by the San Diego Unified Port District. Significant issues included noise, endangered species and traffic. Permitting for a major circulation element (Cannon Road), bridge, sewer line, and sewer pump station in Carlsbad. Located in the Coastal Zone adjacent to Aqua Hedionda Lagoon and a proposed City park, the project affected sensitive biological resources requiring permitting under Federal, State and Local jurisdictions. Biological impact assessments for numerous energy projects including trans- portation corridors (transporting coal slurry, oil shale, crude oil and gas) and a coal-fired power plant. PRCFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: Firm Position Timeframe P&cD Technologies, Inc. Manager Environmental Studies 19S8 -present WESTEC Services, Inc. Senior Project Manager 1985 -1988 Port of San Diego Environmental Analyst 198^ -1985 Private Environmental Consultant Project ?v1anager 1982 -198'f Woodward-Clyde Consul tants Staff Biologist 1979 -1982 VITA Brian Frederick Smith 14678 Ibex Court San Diego, Califomia 92129 (619) 484-0915 Education Summary of Experience Master of Arts degree from the University of San Diego in History, 1982. Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of San Diego in History and Anthropology, 1975. As an archaeological consultant and principal investigator registered with govemmental agencies within the City and County of San Diego and the State of California since 1977, Brian F. Smith has successfully completed over four hundred environmental impact studies at properties within this region, accumulating over 20,000 hours of experience in dealing with sensitive cultural resources and govemmental policies. Past projects have included survey, test and salvage phases conducted at sites of historic and/or prehistoric significance. Experience in San Diego County has included the investigation of prehistoric sites of all major cultural complexes which have existed in the region over the past 12,000 years, and historic sites of the Spanish, Mexican and early American periods. Smith's expertise includes the composition of environmental impact reports and the design and implementation of mitigation programs. Maior Professional Accomplishments: These selected major professional accomplishments represent those research efforts which have added significantly to the body of knowledge conceming the prehistoric lifeways of cultures once present in the San Diego area. The following are samples of the research efforts which are considered to have made an impact in the study of historic and prehistoric resources in the area. Charles H. Brown Site — Site Director— Attracted intemational attention to the discovery of evidence of the antiquity of man in North America. Site located in Mission Valley. Del Mar Man Site/Museum of Man — Site Foreman — Mitigation of Early Man site under the direction of Dr. Spencer Rogers and Dr. James R. Moriarty. Texas Soreet Site, Mission Valley — Photographer — Marked the beginning of the Early Man debate through the discovery of crude artifacts by George Carter, Ph.D., Texas A&M University. Mission San Diego — Site Foreman — University of San Diego excavation. Old Town State Park — Site Foreman — University of San Diego excavation. Cabrillo National Monument — Survey of monument properties and surrounding Naval fortifications. Site W-20, Del Mar, California — Co-Director of the two-year-long investigation of a major prehistoric site of the La Jolla Complex. This research effort documented the earliest practice of religious/ceremonial activities in San Diego County (circa 6,000 years ago), facilitated the projection of major non-material aspects of the La Jolla Complex, and revealed the pattem of civihzation at this site over a continuous period of 5,000 yeal-s. The report for the investigation included over 600 pages, nearly 500,000 words of text, illustrations, maps, and photographs which document this major study. Batiquitos Pointe and Batiquitos Bluffs, Carisbad, Califomia — This program was an eight-month study and salvage effort that made a significant contribution to the research pertaining to the prehistoric cultures that occupied the shores of Batiquitos Lagoon circa 5,000 B. C. Vicente Meadows Estates, Ramona, CaUfomia — This research program was focused upon a major Kumeyaay Indian village located along San Vicente Creek near the Barona Indian Reservation. The study included the discovery of a large occupation area, rock shelters, stone wall fortifications, and cremation areas. Caltrans Route 15 Highway Widening Project, Rainbow Valley, Califomia — This project was a test and salvage effort at a series of sites along the San Diego and Riverside County line as part of the completion of the Interstate Highway 15 project. The study was conducted for the Califomia Department of Transportation (under state and federal guidelines) and included the documentation of a variety of prehistoric sites, one of which demonstrated the prehistoric use of a series of hillside fortifications. North City West, San Diego, California — Consisted of a series of surveys, encompassing over 3,000 acres, which led to the discovery of over 50 previously unrecorded sites, most of which were atttibuted to the La Jolla Complex. South Sorrento Business Park, San Diego, Califomia — Included the excavation of a site with a midden deposit which measured over 12 feet in depth and contained two distinct cultural horizons attributed to the La Jolla Complex and the Kumeyaay Indians. The 4-S Ranch, Rancho Bemardo, Califomia — This study of the 3,500-acre ranch was the first archaeological review of the property and resulted in the discovery of over 20 new sites, half of which are considered to be highly significant and will eventually add to the knowledge of prehistoric cultures in the distant past. Carrisoza Adobe, East San Diego County, Califomia — The deterioration of this structure prompted the historical study and excavation of the adobe to gather a sufficient quantity of infonnation to preserve our knowledge of its history. Professional Societies and Academic Honors Publications Rancho Santa Fe Farms Golf Club, Rancho Santa Fe, California — Exhaustive study of a 4,000 to 6,000 year old inland La Jolla Complex seasonal camp site which included X-ray microscopy, oxygen isotopic profiles of shell rings, radiocarbon dating, thermoluminescence dating, stain and edge wear analysis, and a seasonality study. This investigation incorporated regional data to extrapolate proof of a seasonal subsistence pattern between the coast and inland valleys for La Jolla Complex populations. Archaeological Resource Management Society San Diego Historical Society Society for Califomia Archaeology Phi Alpha Theta, Pi Omega Chapter, University of San Diego Templars of the University of San Diego University of San Diego — Dean's List 1975 — "IntagUo Impressions from Mission San Diego," Anthropology Joumal of Canada. Dr. James R. Moriarty and Brian Smith. 1975 — "Baja Califomia During the Mexican-American War," Historv of San Diego — Old Schoolhouse Historians. 1976 — "History of Mission Bay," Historv of San Diego — Old Schoolhouse Historians. 1976 — "Lagoonal Surveys of Southem Califomia," report for the State of Califomia. Funds provided by a grant from the federal govemment. 1977 — "Felipe de Neve, First Governor of Califomia," Cabrillo Seminar. 1982 — "The San Diego of Judge Benjamin I. Hayes: Excerpts from 'The Emigrant Notes - 1850-1875'," thesis for Master of Arts degree. 1982 — "The Use of Radiocarbon Dating to Confirm the Demographic Movements of the La Jolla Complex in San Diego County," Conference on Holocene Climate and the Archaeology of the Cahfornia Coast and Desert, San Diego State University. 1982 — "A Separate Origins Theory for Two Early Man Cultures in California," Conference on Holocene Chmate and the Archaeology of the Califomia Coast and Desert, San Diego State University. 1987 — "A Reinterpretation of the Transitional Phase," San Diego County Archaeological Societv Research Papers. No. 1: San Dieguito/La Jolla — Chronologv and Controversv. I I I I I I I I I I I I I Woodward-Clyde Consultants L^^^^ 'J- LEE project management geologic engineering coastal engineering EDUCATION Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge: M.S., Civil Engineering Soil Mechanics, 1958 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge: B.S., Civil Engineering, 1957 REGISTRATION Registered Engineer: Arizona, 1966; Califomia, 1963; Nevada, 1965. Registered Geotechnical Engineer: Califomia, 1987. PROFESSIONAL HISTORY Woodward-Clyde Consultants, Vice President and Principal, 1962-date Moran, Proctor, Mueser & Rutiedge, Project Engineer, 1958-1962 Haley & Aldrich, Soils Engineer, 1957-1958 REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE Mr. Lee has had considerable experience in land development projects for residential, commercial and recreational use which required movement and placement of large quantities of soil and rock. The studies included the development of design criteria for foundations, retaining structures, transportation facihties, hydrauUc and coastal structures, lakes, and dams. This work has provided him with a solid background for solving problems related to excavation and compaction of soil and rock, land stabilization with surcharge fills, evaluation and treatment of expansive soils, evaluation and design of flexible and ngid pavements, Ume and cement treatment of subgrade soils, seepage and groundwater analyses, slope stability and soil erosion. Specific large residential and commercial projects include geotechnical studies for Rancho Bemardo Development in San Diego, California; Los Penasquitos Development in San Diego, Califomia; and Mission Viejo Development in Orange County, Califomia. These studies included the design of pavements for residential, commercial and indusuial pavements and foundation design for bridges. His work has included several hundred projects of all types in Southem California, Anzona and Nevada during the past 25 years. Mr. Lee has been involved in various research and study projects for the Portland Cement Associahon and the Federal Housing Administration regarding expansive clays. He has also served as an expert witness in regard to expansive soils, settlement, compaction of fills, slope stability, excavation conditions and constmction claims. Mr. Lee has also worked on numerous waterf^ront and coastal zone projects, among them the design of pier, bulkheads, docking and repair facilities, and coastal and river protection facilities including sea walls, rock revetments, jetties and channel lining. Projects include G/01/89/34 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Woodward-Clyde Consultants LOUIS J.LEE page 2 various piers and bulkheads in San Diego, Long Beach and Los Angeles Harbors; waterfront facilities graving dock and crane rails in National Steel and Shipbuilding Company in San Diego, Califomia; Long Beach Marina in Long Beach and CabriUo Marina in Los Angeles; and numerous slope protection designs for beach front and lake front facilities in Califomia. His work has also covered monitoring and assessment of sea cliff erosion along the southem Califomia coast. Mr. Lee has been responsible for the coordination and technical review of geotechnical work on a variety of projects. His experience also includes evaluation of ground response and potential for soil liquefaction under seismic forces. In addition, he has taught courses in soil mechanics, foundation engineering, and highway materials at the university and college levels, and has been active in technical programs with engineering societies. AFFILIATIONS American Society of Civil Engineers (Past President of San Diego Section) Society of American MiUtary Engineers Consulting Engineers Association of Califomia Institute for the Advancement of Engineering (Member of College of FeUows) Califomia Shore & Beach Preservation Association (Cmrent Director) PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS Mr. Lee is the author of more than 10 papers on soil and foundation engineering including such topics as expansive soils, sea cliff erosion, and earthquake hazards. A partial list of his publications is attached for your information. G/01/89/34 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Woodward-Clyde Consultants LOUIS J.LEE page3 PARTIAL LIST OF PUBLICATIONS "PreUminary Research on Lime Stabilization of Swelling Clays in the San Diego Area," Woodward-Clyde and Associates, January 1963. "Methods of Predicting Settiements of Foundations on Cohesionless Soils," Woodward- Clyde-Sherard and Associates, 1963. "Determination of Lateral Resistance of Piles and Drilled Shafts," Woodward-Clyde and Associates, with Agarwal, 1976. "Engineering Geology in Foundation Engineering as Illustrated by San Diego Experience," Paper presented to Woodward-Clyde-Sherard and Associates Engineering Geology Symposium, January 1967, with Westpal, and Pinckney. "Rock and Rubble Fills." Paper presented to Woodward-Clyde and Associates Symposium on Load Bearing Fills, March 1970. "Comparison of Laboratory Swell Tests to Small Field Tests," Proceedings of Intemational Research and Engineering Conference on Expansive Clay Soils, College Station, Texas A&M Press, 1965, with Gizienski. "Expansive Soil Testing," The Importance of Earth Sciences to the Public Works and Building Official, Seminar of Association of Engineering Geologists, Anaheim, Califomia," pp. 100-171, October 1966, with Krazynski. "Soil Stabilization by Use of Moisture Barriers," Third Intemational Conference on Expansive Soils, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel, August, 1973, with Kocherhans. "Potential Foundation Problems Associated with Earthquakes in San Diego," Geologic Hazards in San Diego, 1977, pp. 23-29 "Expansive Soils in San Diego, Califomia," Earthquakes and Other Perils, San Diego Region, 1979, pp. 183-195, with While. G/01/89/34 I I I I I I I I I I Ogden Beeman & Associates, Inc. Consulting in ttie development of ports, waterways, and morine facilities 310 S.W. 4th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97204 Tel (503] 223-8254 Fax (503) 222-0657 OGDEN BEEMAN. P.E. Expertise Consulting Experience Management Experience Waterway Deveiopment and Dredging Port and Marine Faciiity Development Project Management Waterway Deveiopment and Dredging 0 Post-Volcano Channel Restoration Plan, Columbia River, Oregon and Washington 0 Milwaukee Waterway Fill Plan, Tacoma, Washington 0 Pier J Extension Fill Analysis, Los Angeles, California 0 Hopper Dredge Pump-Out for Beach Nourishment, Waten/vays Experiment Station, Vicksburg, [Mississippi 0 Dredging Cost and Production Estimates, Tampico, Mexico 0 Oceanside Sand Bypass Dredging Analysis, Oceanside, California 0 San Lorenzo River Flood Control Study, California 0 Vancouver 1-ake Reclamation Dredge Plan, Vancouver, Washington Port and Marine Faciiity Development 0 Oregon Ports Study - 1980, State of Oregon 0 Rate and Tariff Study, Port of Anchorage, Alaska 0 Korea Port Development Study, a World Bank Project, Korea 0 Port Rehabilitation Plan, Port of Suez, Egypt 0 Coal Transport Analysis, North Slope, Alaska 0 Navigation Optimization System, Lower Columbia River 0 Container Facility Feasibility Analysis, Ningbo, PRC Port of Portland, Oregon 0 Director IVlarine. Responsible for 400 employees and annual revenues of $20 million. 0 Manager, Marine Services. Responsible for operations at Swan Island Ship Repair Yard and 30" hydraulic dredge OREGON. Government U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Experience o Chief, Waterways Maintenance Branch. Responsible for planning and operations of 7 hydraulic dredges, o Coordinator, 40 Foot Project. Responsible for coordinating model studies, planning, design and dredging of Lower Columbia River Channel. U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey 0 Second Officer of 130' Survey Ship BOWIE and officer in charge of various bathymetric and oceanographic surveys. Academic B.S. in Civil Engineering, Stanford University, 1956 Background Diploma in Hydraulic Engineering, Technical University of Delft, Holland, 1963 I I I I I I I I I I Ogden Beeman Page 2 Professional Registered Professional Engineer, Oregon and Washington Affiliations Member, American Society of Civil Engineers Member and Past President, City Club of Portland Member, Western Dredging Association Member, Consulting Engineers Council of Oregon Professional Member, National Academy of Sciences Research Panel on Ocean Affiliations Resources, 1981 Who's Who in Engineering, 1982 Member, National Academy of Sciences Committee on Coastal Engineering Research Systems, 1987 Member, State of Oregon Governor's Port Advisory Committee, 1988 Chair, State of Oregon Economic Development Services Committee, 1988 Publications Specifications for Container Facilities by Computer Simulation, 1975 Korea Port Study, Phase 11, 1976 Productive Land Use of Dredged Material Areas, 1978 Dredge Planning for Lake Reclamation, 1980 Oregon Ports Study, 1980 Application of Microcomputers to Dredging Projects, 1982 Navigation Channel Optimization, 1986 I I I I I I I Re: BATIQUITOS LAGOON ENHANCEMENT PROJECT FINAL DESIGN Melchior Land Surveying, Inc., is pleased to submit qualifications and proposal for the above reference project. Melchior Land Surveying, Inc., has been involved in a number of Hydrographic Mapping projects as vjell as supplemental surveys for bridge design. Hydrographic Mapping: Lake O'Niel - Camp Pendleton Long Beach Naval Station Harbor Survey San Diego Bay - Naval Station Mapping Coronado Base 28th Street Base Sub-Base Oceanside Harbor - Sand Bypass System Bridge Design Surveys: Carlsbad Bridges La Costa Poinsettia Palomar Airport Road La Jolla Village Drive and Interstate 5 Equipment and Personnel: Melchior Land Surveying, Inc., maintains 6 field survey crews using the Lietz Set 4 Electronic Total Station Instrument System v;ith Data Collectors. Field Data is supplemented by office staff of surveyors (three) using Hewelett Packard (IBM Compatible) Computers and Lewis & Lev7is Survey Soft- vjare. All mathematical data generated can be transferred to other systems for compatability. Such as Auto-Cadd etc.. 5205 AVENIDA ENCINAS • SUITE F • CARLSBAD, CA 92GQ8 619-438-1726 • FAX 619-438-3991 L.S. 4611 I Harper Development (continued) Projects: *Tustin 130 Family Housing Units Tustin, California Collins General Contractors 11750 Sorrento Valley Road Suite 209 San Diego, CA 92121 (619) 276-3380 Contact: Gil Marshall, Project Manager Projects: *Mission Grove Office Park *Fallbrook Town Center San Diego, California Fallbrook, California *Rose Canyon Office Bldg. San Diego, California Metro-Young Construction Company P. 0. Box 261310 San Diego, CA 92126 (619) 450-9747 Contact: Chris Tresize, Civil Superintendent Project: *Oceanside Water Treatment Plant Oceanside, California Cost: $7,500,000.00 Morrison-Knudsen Company P. 0. Box 7808 Boise, Idaho 83729 (208) 386-5000 Contact: Duane Hoffman, General Superintendent Project: *300 Housing Units Tustin, California Cost: $12,000,000.00 Raymond A. Whitwer Construction Company 4470 Braeburn Road San Diego, California 92115 (619) 282-9503 Contact: Raymond A. Whitwer, Owner Projects: *Reserve Training Building *North Broadway Elem. School San Diego, California Escondido, California Cost: $4,040,000.00 Cost: $1,700,000.00 *Village Park Jr. High Sch. Encinas, California Kvaas Construction Company 7950 Othello Street San Diego, CA 92111 (619) 268-8112 Contact: Harold Kvaas,, Owner Projects: *San Di Stru San Di Cost: *Lion's San Di *Beech San Di *0xford Chula *Morena San Di ego Sta cture I ego, Ca $2,800 Manor ego, Ca Street ego, Ca Commer Vista, Indust ego, Ca te Parking I lifornia ,000.00 lifornia Towers lifornia cial Site California rial Park lifornia *Cerro Pueblo Elderly Housing San Diego, California *Columbia Towers San Diego, California *Watt Industries Chula Vista, California *Applied Instructional Bldg. Naval Station San Diego, California *Capital Pacific Business Plaza San Diego, California *Composite Remanufacturer Facility North Island Air Station Olivenhain Municipal Water District 1966 Olivenhain Road Encinitas, CA 92024 (619) 753-6466 Contact: Dave McCollom, Assistant Manager Boyle Engineering Corporation 7807 Convoy Court, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92111 (619) 268-8080 Contact: Jerry Campbell, Managing Engineer Projects *Gaty II Reservoir *Mill6r Reservoir *Denk Reservoir *Unit K Pipeline C. E. Wylie Construction Company 8282 Buckhorn Street San Diego, CA 92111 (619) 565-0912 *Aliso Canyon Pipeline *E1 Camino Real Pipeline *Zorro Reservoir Contact: Ed Wylie Projects; *Medical Facility George Air Base Victorville, California *P-600 Parking Structure at Naval Medical Center San Diego, California *Unaccompanied Personnel Housing P-087 North Island, San Diego MELCHIOR LAND SURVEYING INC. R REFERENCES: R. E. Hazard, Jr., Inc. P. 0. Box 81167 5404 Napa Street San Diego, CA 92138 (619) 297-1831 Contact: Carl Starrett Projects: *3100 Front Street Condos San Diego, California *Ralph's Store Oceanside, California *California Laundry San Diego, California *Amador Estate Rancho Santa Fe, CA *Broady Building San Diego, California *Scripps Ranch Village Site-Shops-Vons San Diego, California *Bay Plaza Center National City, California *Mesa Rim Business Park San Diego, California Turnkey Design & Construction Company 8665 Gibbs Drive, Suite 204 San Diego, CA 92123 (619) 268-1205 Contact: Jim Lasater, Project Director Projects: *212 Famiily Housing Units Marine Corp. Air Station (Helicopter) Tustin, California * Base Exchange Addition MCAS, El Toro *Carroll Canyon Research San Diego, California *Los Angeles Autocraft San Diego, California *Camillo Motors San Diego, California *Safeway Store #1444 San Diego, California *California Systems San Diego, California *Alessio Residence San Diego, California *Cardiff Town Center Cardiff, California *County Corner Center Escondido, California •Magnetic Recording Research Building UCSD, San Diego, California *300 Family Units Camp Pendleton Oceanside, California Harper Development 5186 Carroll Canyon Road San Diego, CA 92121 Contact: Ronald D. Harper, Project Director Projects: *UCSD Faculty Housing and Campus Apartments II San Diego, California * Campus Apartments 40 Units San Diego, California 5205 AVENIDA ENCINAS - SUITE F - CARLSBAD. CA 92G08 619-438-1726 - FAX 619-438-3991 L.S. 4611 HAMILTON J. SMITH PROJECT MANAGER Mr. Smith joined Marine Construction Consultants, Inc. in 1985 after being involved in tlie field of construction management for nearly 30 years. During this time, Mr. Smith gained invaluable experience in the capacity of Project Manager, Project Engineer, Plant Manager and Chief Estimator. NCC EXPERIENCE Resident Project Manager, Armour Property Revetment, Lalce Forest, IL Provided all inspection services, on-site supervision, participated in contractor selection, handled labor matters, selected equipment for client. Estimator Services, United States Coast Guard Pier, San Pedro, California. Provided complete construction estimate for client. Estimator Services, Container Crane Turntable, Port of Long Beach, California. Provided constructability review and cost estimate for client. Estimator Services, Pier Bravo, Hawaii. Provided constructability review and cost estimates including value engineering and studies on fender system upgrade for client. Project Manager, Oxnard, California. Providing complete construction management services to owner for construction of small boat harbor and marina. Project Engineer, Pier 12, U.S. Naval Station, San Diego. Providing for client constructability review and cost analysis for various alternate designs. OTHER PROJECT MANAGER EXPERIENCE -Berths 144-146, Port of Los Angeles, CA: 10 acres laydown area, 7" A.C. on 16" PMB base and light standards. -Pier "E" Tanker Terminal, Port of Long Beach, CA -Synchro!ift, Seward, AK -Indian Island Ammunition Pier, Hadlock, WA: 1 1/2 miles of entrance road -U.S. Navy Pier 7 Construction, San Diego, CA: remove and repair 4 mile street after utility work. H. Smith Page 2 -Berths 207-209, Los Angeles Harbor, CA: 8 acres of laydown area, 7" A.C. on 16" PMB base and light standards. -Humbolt Bay Bridge, Eureka, CA: street work at bridge approach. -Coronado Bridge, San Diego, CA: street work at bridge approach. -U.S. Navy Electronic Pier, San Diego, CA -Catalina Terminals, Los Angeles Harbor, CA -Berths 218-225, Los Angeles Harbor, CA: 20 acres laydown area, 7" A.C. on 16" PMB base and light standards. PROJECT ENGINEER EXPERIENCE -Long Beach Marina, Long Beach, CA -Berths 51-55, Los Angeles Harbor, CA PLANT MANAGER -Harbor Precast, San Pedro, CA CHIEF ESTIMATOR -Long Beach based construction firm REGISTRATION Civil Engineer, Cal ifornia CE. 11744 EDUCATION BSCE, University of Southern California RESUME Charles E. Robers, President Robers Dredge, Inc. P.O. Box 484 La Crosse, WI 54602-0484 (608)784-1713 Graduated High School 1942 Three years active duty U.S. Navy. Aviation Machinists Mate 2nd class - Enrolled Officer's Training School prior to discharge. Graduated University of Wisconsin 1948 Bachelor of Science Married 1952 - two daughters. Began in dredging business summer of 1946 in firm father began. Company logo reads "Since 1916." Fonned Robers Dredge, Inc. 1967 and became president, and sole stockholder which position is held to date. Completed many Corps of Engineer Projects, principally involving hydraulic dredging on the following rivers: Mississippi River, St. Louis to St. Paul, MO Illinois River, Alton IL to Lockport, IL Missouri River, Leavenworth, KS to Souix City, IA Cowlitz River, Washington State - Mt. St. Helen's Some inland lake projects performed hydraulically: Lily Lake - Kenosha CO, WI - 80 Acres Lake Manawa - Council Bluffs, IA - 560 Acres Spring Lake - Savanna, IL - 440 Acres Consultant on Lake Winona - Winona, MN Union Grove Lake - Tama Co., IA Lake Colchester - Lakewood, IA Shore Development (dragline) as Contractor Legend Lake - Keshena, WI Lake Redstone - La Valle, WI Sugar Springs Lake - Gladwin, MI Lake Camelot - Adams, WI Our firms have been continuous members of the Wisconsin Road Builders Association since 1936. Member of the Board of Directors for three year term with extended period on labor relations committee. Member Western Dredging Association (WEDA) 1980 to date. President Midwest Chapter WEDA 1983 to 1986. Nominated for President of WEDA, declined due to work load. Attended WODCON conventions in New Orleans, Vancouver, B.C., Singapore, Brighton England, Orlando, FL and many national meetings. Currently performing Corps of Engineer's project in Rock Island, IL district rebuilding approximately five miles of agricultural and flood control levee. Also completing marina project at Trempealeau, WI and operating barge terminal warehousing and dock business at La Crosse, WI. BIO-BIBLIOGRAPHY Name: van de Kreeke, Jacobus Home Address: Date of Birth: 3904 Braganza Ave. Coconut Grove, FL 33133 January 26, 1936 Soc. Sec. #: 261-94-6887 Marital Status: Married No. of Dependents: 2 Education: Ingenieur Degree (Civil Eng) Ph.D. (Coastal and Oceano— graphical Eng.) 1959 1971 Delft Technical University, The Netherlands University of Florida, Gainesville, FL Positions Held: 1959-1961 1961-1964 1964- 1965 1965- 1967 1967-1969 1969-1971 1971-1974 1974-1979 1979-1987 1987-present Ltz 2 JC Royal Dutch Navy Ingenieur, Deltadienst Rykswaterstaat Ingenieur, Laboratoire National d'Hydraulique at Chatou, France Research Associate, Coastal Engineering Laboratory, University of Florida Research Engineer, Science Engineering Associates, Pasadena, CA. Research Associate, Dept. of Coastal and Oceanographical Engineering, University of Florida Assistant Professor, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami Associate Professor, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami Professor, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami Professor, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami Director, Institute of Coastal Studies Editorial Responsibilities: Assoc. Editor, International Journal of Coastal Engineering Assoc. Editor, Journal of Coastal Research Assoc. Editor, Netherlands Journal of Sea Research Committee Service/External: Committee on Coastal Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers, 1976-1981 (Chairman, 1980-1981) Founding member and member of the organizing committee of the Conferences on Physics of Estuaries and Coastal Seas. Committee Service/University: Research Council School Council (Chairman, 1987 — present) Tenure Reviev^^ Board, College of Engineering Research Interest: Shallow water oceanography, coastal engineering. Professional Society Memberships: American Society of Civil Engineers Royal Dutch Institute of Graduate Engineers International Association of Hydraulic Research Teaching Experience: Graduate Courses Taught: Applied Ocean Hydrodynamics Tides and Long Waves Mixing in Coastal Waters Aquaculture Engineering Coastal Engineering MS and PhD Committees: Chairman of 11 committees, member of 15 committees Consultancies: United Nations: Venice Lagoon World Bank: Beach Erosion, Tanzania Dutch Government: Delta Project Books: Editor, Physics of Shallow Estuaries and Bays Lecture Notes on Coastal and Estuarine Studies No. 16 Springer—Verlag, New York, Inc., 1986 Invited Papers Lagoon—Inlet Mechanics. Proceedings of the Summer School on Coastal Processes, Venice, Italy, 1972. Tide-Induced Mass Transport in Lagoons. Proceedings of the Summer School on Coastal Processes, Venice, Italy, 1972. Tide—Induced Residual Flow. Lecture Notes on Coastal and Estuarine Studies, Vol. 1, Mathematical Modelling of Estuarine Physics, Springer-Verlag, 1980. Co-author S. S. Chiu. Dispersion in Shallow Estuaries. In Hydrodynamics of Estuaries. CRC, Inc. Editor, B. Kjerfve, 1988. Hydrodynamics of Tidal Inlets. Hydrodynamic and Sediment Dynamics of Tidal Inlets. Lecture Notes on Coastal and Estuarine Studies No. 29 Springer—Verlag, Editor, D.G. Aubrey, 1988. Circulation in Well— and Partially Mixed Estuaries, The Sea-Vol. 9, Co—Author J.T.F. Zimmerman. In press. Longitudinal Dispersion of Salt in the Volkerak Estuary. Lecture Notes on Coastal and Estuarine Studies. Springer—Verlag, Editor R.T. Cheng, in press. Publications in Refereed Journals Water Level Fluctuations and Flow in Tidal Inlets, Journal of the Waterways and Harbors Division, Vol. 93, No. WW4, November 1967. Discussion of "Tide Gage Frequency Response" by Ralph H. Cross, Journal of the Waterways and Harbors Division, ASCE, Vol. 95, No. WW2, May 1969. Damage Function of Rubble-Mound Breakwaters, Journal of the Waterways and Harbors Division, Vol. 95, No. WW4, August 1969. Discussion of "Quadratic Loss and Scattering of Long Waves," by Chiang C. Mei, Phillip L.F. Liu and Arthur T. Ippen, Journal of the Waterways and Harbors and Coastal Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 101, No. WW4, Proc. Paper 11677, November 1975, pp. 4454^57. Tide—Induced Mass Transport in Lagoons, Journal of Waterways and Harbors and Coastal Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 101, No. WW4, Proc. Paper 11731, November 1975, pp. 393-403. Co-author R. G. Dean. Tide-Induced Mass Transport: A Flushing Mechanism for Shallow Lagoons. Journal of Hydraulic Research, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1974. Increasing the Mean Current in Coastal Channels. Journal of Waterways, Harbors and Coastal Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 102, No. WW2, May 1976. Water Motions in a Closed—end Residential Canal. Journal of Waterways, Harbors and Coastal Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 103, No. WWI, February 1977. Co-authors J. H. Carpenter and D.S. McKeehan. Mass Transport in a Coastal Channel, Marco River, Fla. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science, 7, 1978. Equilibrium Flow Areas in the Rhine-Meuse Delta. Coastal Engineering 3, 1979, 97—111. Co-author Jac Haring. Tide-Induced Residual Flow in Shallow Bays. Journal of Hydraulic Research, Vol. 19, No. 3, 1981. Co-author S. S. Chiu. Residence—Time: Application to Small Boat Basins. Journal of the Waterways, Port, Coastal and Ocean Division, ASCE, Vol. 109, No. 4, November 1983. Stability of Tidal Inlets: Pass Cavallo, Texas. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 21, 1985. Discussion of "Planform Effects on Tidal Flushing of Marinas" by Ronald E. Nece. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering, ASCE, Vol. Ill, No. 4, July 1985. Experimental Determination of Salt Intrusion Mechanisms in the Volkerak Estuary. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 20(1): 1-19, 1986. Co-author J. Dronkers. Field and Model Investigation of Tidal Circulation in North Biscayne Bay. J. of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering, November 1986. Co-author J.D. Wang. Vertical Circulation and Stratifiction in the Partially Mixed Part of the Volkerak Estuary. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research. Co-author K. Robaczewska. In press. Can Multiple Inlets be Stable? Estuarine and Coastal Shelf Science. Accepted for publication, April 1989. Publications in Proceedings of Conferences and Symposia On Optimum Breakwater Design, (English Text) Proceedings of IXth Conference on Coastal Engineering, Lisbon, 1964. Co—author A. Paape. Sediment Pollution in Coastal Waters. Proceedings of the Xllth Conference on Coastal Engineering, Washington, 1970. A Numerical Model for the Hydromechanics of Lagoons. Proceedings of the Xlllth Conference on Coastal Engineering, Vancouver, July 1972, Vol. No. III. Tide—Induced Mass Transport in Lagoon-Inlet Systems. Proceedings of the XlVth Conference on Coastal Engineering. Copenhagen, 1974. Co—author D. C. Cotter. Tide-Induced Mass Transport in Coastal Channels and Lagoons. Proceedings XVIth Congress of the International Association for Hydraulic Research. Vol. 1, San Paulo, 1975. Mass Transport and Mean Water Level in Long Waves. Proceedings Civil Engineering in the Oceans/lII Delaware, June 1975. Tidal Hydraulics and Salt Balance of Lake Worth, Florida. Proceedings of XVIth International Conference on Coastal Engineering. Hamburg, 1978. Co-author J. D. Wang. Stability of Estuary Mouths in the Rhine—Meuse Delta. Proceedings XVIIth International Conference on Coastal Engineering, Sydney, Australia, 1980. Co-author Jac Haring. Surface Water Flow from a South Florida Wetland Area. Proceedings National Symposium on Freshwater Inflow to Estuaries, San Antonio, Texas, September 1980. Co-author E. Daddio. Carbon Export from a South Florida Wetland Area. Proceedings Coastal Zone '80, Hollywood, Florida, November 1980. Co-author E. Daddio. Meeting Water Quality Standards in Marinas. Proceedings 1981 Annual Meeting, South Florida Section, ASCE, Vol. II. Co-author P. W. Larsen. Computation of Particle Paths using the Lagrangian Long Wave Equations. Proceedings XVII International Conference on Coastal Engineering, Cape Town, South Africa, 1982. Co—author M. A. Savoie. Stability of Multiple Inlets. Proceedings XIX International Conference on Coastal Engineering, Houston, Texas, 1984. Technical Reports The Exceedence Frequency of Significant Wave Heights off the Dutch Coast. (Dutch text) Hydraulics Division of the Delta Service, 1962. Flow Resistance of Stones on a Dam with a Horizontal Crest. (Dutch Text) Hydraulics Laboratory, Delft, Report M-711, 1962. Dynamic Wave Forces on Structures with a Sloping Weather Side Front and the Response of the Structures to these Forces. (Dutch Text) Hydraulics Division of the Delta Service., Report No. 2, 1963. The Response of a Force Meter to Dynamic Wave Forces. (Dutch Text) Hydraulics Division of the Delta Service, Report No. W-691, 1963. Multi-Purpose Harbor Unit. (English Text) Report for the U.S. Department of the Navy, Burau of Yards and Docks, 1963. (with several other authors). The New Breakwaters for Europoort Harbor, Rotterdam. (Dutch Text) Hydraulics Laboratory, Delft, Hydraulics Division of the Delta Service, Report No. M-748, 1964. Co-author A. Paape. Coastal Engineering Study of Macquarie Harbor. Engineering and Industiral Experiment Station, College of Engineering, University of Florida, 1967. Coastal Engineering Study of St. Lucie Inlet. Engineering and Industrial Experiment Station, College of Engineering, University of Florida, 1967. Hydraulic and Sediment Survey in the Vicinity of the Greenway Flats, Potomac River. Science Engineering Associates, 1968. Residence Time of Waters Behind Barrier Islands. Technical Report No. 7, Department of Coastal and Oceanographic Engineering, University of Florida, 1970. Co-authors R. G. Dean and T. Y. Chiu. The Use of Tidal Computations in Establishing Tidal Datums: Results of a Pilot Study. Engineering and Industrial Experiment Station, College of Engineering, University of Florida, 1971. Hydrographic Study for the Improved Flushing of Lake Worth. Engineering and Industrial Experimental Station, College of Engineering, University of Florida, 1971. Tide-Induced Mass Transport in Shallow Lagoons. Technical Report No. 8. Department of Coastal and Oceanographic Engineering. University of Florida, 1971. Technical Reports (continued) A Hydrographic Study of the Barfield Bay-Blue Hill Bay-Big Key Area. Deltona Corp., June 1972. Special Report (UM-RSMAS-72058) 26 pp. Water Quality in the Proposed Canal Systems of the Barfield Bay-Blue Hill Bay-Big Key Area. Deltona Corp., October 1972. Special Report (UM-RSMAS-72091) 9 pp. Circulation in Waterfront Canals: Evaluation of the Flushing Characteristics of a Proposed Waterway System between Mill Cove and the St. Johns River, Jacksonville, FL. With Frank W. Rose. Fulton Development Corp. December 1973 (UM-RSMAS-73077) 21 pp. A Statistical Comparison of Daily Oxygen Minima in Artificial and Natural Waterways, Marco Island, Florida. With M. A. Roessler. Deltona Corp., Miami, FL. April 1975 (UM-RSMAS-75020) 51 pp. Addendum to Technical Report — A Statistical Comparison of Daily Oxygen Minima in Artificial and Natural Waterways, Marco Island, Florida. With M. A. Roessler. Deltona Corp., Miami, FL. April 1975. (UM-RSMAS-75020) 153 pp. Forecasts of Water Quality in the Barfield Bay, Blu7e Hill Bay, Collier Bay and Big Key Areas of Marco Island, Florida. With J. H. Carpenter. Deltona Corp., Miami, FL. May 1975 (UM-RSMAS-75023) 37 pp. Tide—Induced Residual Current in a Coastal Channel (Mass Transport in the Marco River). With F. E. Thompson. National Science Foundation and the Deltona Corp. UM-RSMAS-TR77-3, February 1977, 70 pp. Freshwater Inflow and its Effect on the Salinity and Biota of Shallow Lagoons. With J. D. Wang, R. G. Rehrer and M. A. Roessler. Office of Water Research and Technology. UM-RSMAS TR77-4, September 1976, 100 pp. Flux of Dissolved Organic Carbon from a Wetland Area near Marco Island, Florida. With E. Daddio. Deltona Corp., Miami, Florida UM-RSMAS TR79-2, March 1979, 24 pp. A Finite Difference Solution to the Two-Dimensional (Horizontal) Long Wave Equations. University of Miami, RSMAS, Technical Report TR80-1, January 1980, 38 p. Co-author S. S. Chiu. Residual Flow in a Sea Level Canal; The Eendracht, The Netherlands. University of Miami, RSMAS Technical Report TR-81-3, May 1981. Salt and Water Flux in Naples Bay, Florida, University of Miami, RSMAS, Technical Report, TR 82-2, May 1982, 28 pp. The 2-D Lagrangian Conservation Equations: Application to Tidal Hydraulics, University of Miami, RSMAS, Technical Report TR 82-3, June 1982, 70 pp. Co-author M. A. Savoie. An Analysis of the Salt Transport Mechanisms in the Volkerak Estuary, The Netherlands. University of Miami, RSMAS, Technical Report TR 84-3, January 1984. Co-author J. D. Wang. Hydrography of North Biscayne Bay, Part I: Field Measurements. University of Miami, RSMAS Technical Report, January 1984. Co—author J. D. Wang. Hydrography of North Biscayne Bay, Part II: Modeling. University of Miami, RSMAS, Technical Report, January 1984. Co—author J. D. Wang. THESIS AND DISSERTATION ADVISING CHAIRMAN M.S. — F. W. Rose — June 1974. "An Experimental Investigation of Waves Superimposed on a Steady Current". M.S. — D. Cotter - June 1974. "Tide-Induced Net Discharge in Lagoon Inlet Systems". M.S. - E. Ozoy - July 1974. "Numerical Model for the Prediction of Tidal Motions in an Estuarine Network". g M.S. - D. McKeehan - July 1975. "Water Motion in Closed End Channels". M.S. - P.E. Thompson - February 1977, "Tide Induced Residual Current in a Coastal Channel (Mass Transport in the Marco River)." " M.S. - G. Monopolis - June 1978. "Circulation in Closed End Canals." I D.A. — S. S. Chiu - January 1980. "Tide-Induced Residual Circulation in Shallow Bays; A Theoretical Approach". n M.S. — M. A. Savoie — December 1981. "The 2—D Lagrangian Conservation Equations: Apphcation to Tidal Hydrauhcs". O M.S. - A. Duggal — December 1987. "Experimental Study on a Wave Absorber for a Vertical Seawall". M.S. — L. Pescio - December 1987. "Wave Reflection from a Perforated Breakwater". P M.S. - M.A. Yanez, - May 1987. "Stability of a Double Inlet-Bay System; Marco Island, Fla. I COMMITTEE MEMBER M.S. - R. D'Amato - July 1973. "The Movement of Effluent from the City of Miami Sewage Ocean Outfall". M.S. — F. W. Morris — August 1973. "Wave Shoaling, Breaking and Run—up". M.S. — J. D. Riege — August 1974. "Investigations of Tidal Boundary Hydraulics in Card Sound, Florida". M.S. — E. J. Barron — December 197. "Suspended Sedimentation Processes Marco Island, Florida". M.S. - E. A Swakon - June 1977. "Modeling of Tide and Wind-Induced Flow in South Biscayne Bay and Card Sound". M.S. - J. Dravis — September 1977. "Holocene Sedimentary Depositional Environments in Eleuthera Bank, Bahamas". COMMITTE MEMBER (continued) Ph.D. - C. V. Carter - December 1977. "The Hydro-Thermal Characteristics of Shallow Lakes". Ph.D. - T. B. Curtin - December 1978. "Physical Dynamics of the Coastal Upwelling Frontal Zone off Oregon". M.S. - J. C. Valle - June 1978. "Modeling of Dispersion in South Biscayne Bay." M.S. - R. A. Laura - July 1980. "Numerical Modehng of Stratified Flow in Estuaries". Ph.D. - E. V. 0. Nwadike - April 1981. "Numerical Investigations of the Thermal Characteristics of Lakes". M.S. - J. Chin Fatt - August 1986. "Canal Impact on Biscayne Bay Salinities". Villy Kourafalou Keith Ludwig 10 .MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS JOHN R. LESNIK Coastal and Hydraulic Engineer Mr. Lesnik joined Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers as Chief Coastal and Hydraulic Engineer. His areas of specialization include: planning and design of coastal engineering projects, hydrology and hydraulics, shore protection, beach erosion, inlet stabilization, flood control and protection, sediment transport proces- ses, wave mechanics and hurricane surge predictions. Previously Mr. Lesnik directed the conceptual design and the preparation of plans and specs for shore protection at Fort Frederica National Monument, St. Simons Island, GA. Prepared three guidebooks on low-cost shore protection for national distribution by the Corps of Engineers and presented informational lectures on same. Prepared Engineer Manual EM1110-2-1614 (April 1985). "Design of Coastal Revetments, Seawalls and Bulkheads" for the Office, Chief of Engineers of the Corps of Engineers. Responsible for the engineering and economic evaluations of several Corps of Engineers local flood protection projects including hydrology, hydraulics and economic analyses and design of channel im- provement and levee plans. Mr. Lesnik has worked for the US Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore District and Coastal Engineering Research Center. Significant responsibility for the hydraulic design of several flood control projects, loca- tion and proportioning of improved channels, levees and flood walls; design of interior drainage systems including storm sewers, culverts, overflow spillways and bank protection. Served as technical coordinator and consultant to the Office, Chief of Engineers and to Shoreline Erosion Advisory Panel for the "Low-Cost Shore Protection Demonstration Program". Consultant to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission on storm surge simulation and other coastal related problems. Consultant to Corps of Engineers Districts on the design of revetments, bulkheads, beach fills, and entrance breakwaters. REGISTRATION Professional Engineer: Virginia, Maryland EDUCATION B.S., Civil Engineering, Penn State University, 1971 MEMBERSHIPS American Society of Civil Engineers; American Water Resources Association; and American Shore and Beach Presentation Association. ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS, INC. THOMAS D. JOHNSON, Ph.D. Dr. Johnson has 16 years of experience in the fields of aquatic biology and environmental research. He has managed or participated in ecological studies and impact assessments of marine, estuarine/wetlands, freshwater, and terrestrial systems, and is experienced in data collection in a wide variety of habitats, in ecological analysis, and in the assessment of impacts. He has developed a habitat valuation methodology for application in mitigation planning and monitoring. Dr. Johnson has participated in scientific studies and the preparation of EISs for ocean disposal of dredged material, sewage, and iron-acid wastes, and other manufacturing wastes, for wastewater facilities plans, and for various transportation and energy-related projects. Dr. Johnson is OSHA-certif ied (29CFR1910.120) for hazardous material/hazardous waste site operations. His specialty is the ecology of nearshore marine zooplankton. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE MEC Analytical Systems, Inc., Carlsbad. CA — 1987 to Present Senior Scientist. Contributed to the draft ard final reports to the Califomia Coastal Commission Marine Revi^ Committee on the results of monitoring studies of the San Qnofre Nuclear Generating Station. Analyzed da1:a, prepared technical sections, and served as techrucal editor for a biological baseline report conceming Los Angeles HartxDr. Principal aut±ior of a method for valuing ecological areas for mitigation purposes. Conducted several studies and evaluations of southem Califomia coastal wetlands, including Batiquitos Lagoon and the Alamitos Bay wetlands. Major author of a report to the Minerals Management Service on 1±ie soft- bottom bentiios off the central and northem Califomia coast. Marine Sciences Research Ctx. State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY. — 1983 to 1987 Research Fellow. Prepared zooplankton portion of EIS for Gulf of Farallones dredged material disposal site designation. Army Corps of Engineers. Coriducted research on zooplankton ecology in Long Island Sound and Chile; assonbled existing data for EPA Region II conputerized data base for Long Island Sound; edited in-house publications, and assisted the editors of the Quarterly Review of Biology. Environmental Resources Manaaement. Inc., West Chester, PA. — 1980 to 1982 Project Ecologist. Responsible for conducting field operations, analyzing data, and preparing r^x^rt on oxygen dynamics arxi plankton in 1±ie Susquehanna River, MD., and for various biological surveys and bioassay projects. Responsible for data collection and preparing EIAs of wastewat:er facilities designs for the cities of Eunice and Jennings, IA. Participated in preparing a review of principles of bioconcentration in aquatic orrganisms for USEPA Headquarters. ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS, INC. Ilii I THOMAS D. JOHNSON Roy F. Weston. Inc.. West Chester. PA. — 1975 to 1980 Project Ecologist. Sv^servised field surveys, the analysis of data, and the prepara- tion of project r^rts. Major projects included the Environmental Assessment (and i^j-dates) of the Aberdeen Proving Ground (MD), an EIS for prcposed remedial actions at a site contaminated with radioactive wastes, an EIS for a navigation project for the New Orleans Army Corps of Engineers, and a Draft EIS for a coal conversion facility on a wetlands site in Illinois. Pr^ared the EIA for an ocean disposal of manufacturing wastes at the 106 Site, and participated in the preparation of the DEIS for the U.S. Coast Guard's LDRAN-C sites in the westem U.S. Prepared 316(a) and (b) demons1:rations for several coal-fired generating sliations and conducted thermal monitoring studies at both fossil-fueled and nuclear-powered generating stations. EDOCATION B.A., Zoology, Cornell University, 1964. M.S., Marine Sciences, University of Delaware, 1981. Hi.D., Coastal Oceanography, State University of New York, 1987; Dissertation: Growth and regulation of the population of Parvocalanus crassirostris (Copepoda: Calanoida) in Lor^ Island Sound, New York. SELECTED POBLICATIONS AND PRESENTAnONS Peterson, W.T., D. Arcos, G. McManus, H. Dam, D. Bellantoni, T.D. Johnson and P. Tiselius. 1988. Coastal v;5Jwelling off central Chile: a 25 day time series of I±iysical, chemical and biological measurements in 1986. Progress in Oceanography. 20:1-40. Barnett, A.M., L.G. Gleye, K.D. Green, T.D. Jc±inson, W. Watson, and S.D. Watts. 1987. San Onofre nuclear Generating Station Monitoring Studies on Mysids aixi Soft Bottom Benthos. Final R^xirt sutanittied to the Marine Review Committee of the Califomia Coastal Commission. Factors Affecting Egg Production b^' the Calanoid Ccp^xxi Parvocalanus crassirostris in Long Island Sound. Annual Meeting, American Society of Limnology and Oceanograpiiy, Kingston, RI, Jiane, 1986. Detecting Differences Between Adjacent Estuarine Zooplankton Assemblages. 45th Anniaal Meeting, American Society of Limnology and Oceanography, Raleigh, NC, June, 1982. Potera, G.T., P.N. KLose and T.D. Jc±inson. 1984. Regulatory i^lications of Biocon- centration Principles in Aquatic Systems. EPA Research Report, Office of Pesti- cides and Toxic Substances. ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS, INC. THOMAS D. JOHNSON Author or co-author of more than thirty other technical reports and EIA/EISs on aquatic and terrestrial projects. AFFILIATIONS American Society of Limrxslogy and Oceanography Society of WeU.ands Scientists SECTION 8 SECTION 8 Special Capabilities 8.1 Special Skills The project team was organized to provide extensive special and unique skills to address the issues identified in the Request for Proposals. A project of this size and complexity requires these special skills to provide a workable set of construction drawings and specifications. These skills include, but are not limited to: dredging bypassing wetlands - designs and studies bridges - Caltrans and railroad ocean structures - revetments and jetties beachfills numerical models - tidal hydraulics, water quality, sediment transport pennits biological data construction realities and costs surveys geotechnical water quality utilities archeological sites 8.1a Environmental Considerations The firm of Wetlands Research Associates, Inc. led by Dr. Michael Josselyn is very well respected. Dr. Michael Josselyn is President of Wetlands Research Associates, Inc. and a Professor of Biology at San Francisco State University's Romberg Tiburon Center for Environmental Studies on San Francisco Bay. Since 1978, Dr. Josselyn has been active in both research in the field of wetland ecology and in the development of wetland restoration and mitigation plans throughout California. Dr. Josselyn is currently on retainer to the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission and the State Coastal Conservancy to provide technical advice on wetland restoration. He has also provided technical consulting services to the State Department of Parks and Recreation and the Department of Fish and Game. He has published numerous articles on wetland restoration and is the author of a chapter on the status of 8-1 wetland mitigation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act for sites along the west coast of North America. This chapter will appear in a forthcoming book published by the Environmental Protection Agency. Relevant to this project. Dr. Josselyn is very familiar with Southern California wetlands and has practical experience in the restoration of these areas. In addition, the staff has extensive training and experience in wetland delineation using the Federal Unified Method, HEP procedures, and WET evaluation procedures. 8.1b Dredge Techniques Ogden Beeman & Associates, Inc. provides special in-house computer capabilities for application to dredge and disposal project planning and execution. OBAI's Dredge Production Program computes production and limit conditions for hydraulic dredges working noncohesive sediments and pumping through long pipelines. It is applicable to equipment selection, cost estimating, and claims analysis for changed conditions and cost escalation. Other proprietary programs include calculation of rental rates and operating rates for dredge plant and other heavy equipment based on the Corps of Engineers' and Associated General Contractor's (ACG) recommended formulas. This computer application is especially useful in preparing cost estimates and adjudicating claims or disputes from construction projects. 8.1c Coastal Engineering — Jetty Design. Beach Nourishment, and Sediment Transport Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers is thoroughly experienced in all aspects of coastal engineering including jetty design, beach nourishment and sediment transport. We have explored, studied, and designed solutions for the complex problems of coastal development and resources management since our founding in 1945. Our innovative ideas, tempered with practicality, have set the standards in coastal engineering worldwide and won industry-wide acclaim. Today, we have one of the largest coastal engineering staffs in the United States. As further demonstration of our special capabilities in the design of coastal structures, Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers has prepared U.S. Navy Design Manuals for Harbors (DM-26.1), Coastal Protection (DM-26.2), and Coastal Sedimentation and Dredging (DM-26.3). Modeling Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers is also experienced in the application of numerical and physical modeling techniques for sediment transport and water quality problems. Several numerical models are either available to or have been developed by Moffatt & Nichol. Techniques used to evaluate cohesionless 8-2 sediment transport in tidal inlets and a description of our hydraulic model are discussed below: • Hydrauli c Model Faci1i ty Moffatt & Nichol has a hydraulic model facility in Long Beach. The model has been used to test the water quality parameter of several marinas including Marina del Rey and Long Beach. While these can be useful in some cases, we believe that hydraulic modeling of the wetland, which has very shallow water, would be inappropriate for either water quality testing or inlet stability. The large dimensions of the basin and shallow depths would require a high distortion factor to address scale effects. Numerical models would be much more appropriate. HEC-6. HEC-6 is a multi-purpose program developed by the Hydrologic Engineering Center of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for the purpose of modeling cohesionless sediment transport in unidirectional river flow. The model is a general one which can, with some effort and approximation, be adapted to tidal flow problems. • Implicit Model for River Aggregation/Degradation. This implicit finite difference model was developed by Chu (1980) for the purpose of modelling river bed evolution downstream of the Aswan Dam in Egypt. The model is similar to the HEC-6 model, but is computationally more efficient and can be fused with the results of the four point implicit model for tidal flows. The model can be used to model bed evolution (i.e. scour and deposition) with time. • Simplified Power Law Model. Moffatt & Nichol used an approximate means to evaluate sediment transport characteristics in Lake Worth Inlet, Florida. The purpose of the model was to evaluate the change in sediment transport characteristics in the inlet resulting from changes in channel and bay geometry. The model assumes sediment transport by bed load alone, and that bed load is proportional to channel velocity raised to some power. Sediment transport is integrated over a tide cycle resulting in a sediment transport index. The model results are used in a qualitative sense to evaluate the sediment transport potential for various channel geometries. 8-3 • Closure Curve Analysis. Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers has used the closure curve analysis of Van De Kreeke (1980) to evaluate tidal inlet stability against closure. Closure analysis begins by developing the Escoffier curve. An Escoffier curve consists of a plot of cross sectional area of the channel throat at mean sea level versus peak channel velocity for spring tide conditions. The Escoffier curve is then used in conjunction with equilibrium shear stress based on hydraulic conditions and sediment characteristics to evaluate the stability of the inlet against closure. This methodology has been used to appraise the stability of inlets in Holland, Florida, California and Texas. • Area-Prism Relationships. M.P. O'Brien developed an empirical relationship between the tidal prism of a bay and the equilibrium cross sectional area of a tidal inlet. The approach has been used with success to estimate the stable cross sectional area of existing tidal inlets. Recent extensions of O'Brien's formula were developed by Jarett (1978) to account for additional factors such as jetties or location of the inlet (i.e. east, west or Gulf coast of the U.S.). The approach is purely empirical, hence the published formulas must be applied cautiously to inlets which differ substantially from those used to develop the formulas. Link-Node Model We have developed a link node hydraulic model specifically to model wetlands and muted wetlands. This model has been used extensively on Bolsa Chica, Hellman Ranch, Playa Vista, Anaheim Bay and other projects to simulate hydraulics and study water quality parameters. Sediment transport analysis in tidal inlets is a complicated process best evaluated by a variety of means. Initial analysis should be based on the qualitative techniques for evaluating inlet stability. Accordingly, the simplified power model, the closure curve analysis and the area-prism relationships can be used to bracket a problem. Detailed numerical models like HEC-6 or the implicit aggregation/degradation model described above can then be used to evaluate channel geometry, local scour around flow obstructions, and channel sediment transport during periods of high littoral drift. 8-4 8.Id Bridge Desiqn and Familiarity with Caltrans Operations. Procedures and Scheduling. Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers is a multi-discipline firm based in Southern California and has successfully assumed the design responsibility for single projects with construction costs in excess of $100 million. The Gerald Desmond bridge in Long Beach and the Willamette River bridge in Portland Oregon are examples of larger bridge projects our firm has designed over the years. Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers has provided engineering services in support of the transportation industry since the 1950's when we were responsible for the design of a number of interchanges along the 1-710 Freeway. Since then Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers has achieved national recognition in the form of awards for major highway projects. Within the last 25 years, the firm has prepared construction documents for more than 200 highway projects within Southern California. The professional design staff consists of over 30 California licensed civil and structural engineers, many of whom have over 25 years of experience in the design of highway facilities. The firm has proven excellence and success in FHWA and Cal trans-approved highway projects, as well as projects that require multi-agency participation and coordination, accelerated design schedules, and budget constraints. The firm is especially noted for its rare capabilities in the design of highway structures and is extremely proud of the working relationship and mutual respect that it enjoys with Caltrans Division of Structures. Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers can provide "in-house" engineering services for the following design categories: • Highways (mainlines) • Highway Structures • Interchanges and • Toll Facilities (Structure Intersections at portion) Grade • Highway Lighting, Signing, • Drainage Striping 8.1e Multidisciplinarv Project Manager Mr. Crumpley's responsibilities as Project Manager involve the administration of large-scale, multidisciplinary engineering projects. His experience includes the management of both waterfront and landside developments including piers, marinas, bulkheads, heavy civil works projects and building design. As Project Manager for the Anaheim Bay Mitigation Project located within the Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station, California, Mr. Crumpley was responsible for 8-5 I n n II H n I I I n « n n I I i I I I I contour and grading plans for the mitigation sites, analysis of tidal flushing and water quality characteristics, and relocation of utilities. Mr. Crumpley's recent civil management experience includes: the structural design of 16 bridges in San Bernardino County, California; the design of a berthing pier, seawall and moorings for the simultaneous berthing of four high endurance cutters for the United States Coast Guard, Alameda, California. The Coast Guard project included the design of a reveted seawall, a 1330-foot long concrete wharf parallel to the wall and associated utilities. His waterfront rehabilitation experience includes the renovation of marinas and open ocean piers. For the City of Santa Barbara, he led the Moffatt & Nichol design team that replaced the severely storm damaged Marinas 3 & 4 in Santa Barbara Harbor. His open ocean pier design experience includes renovations of the San Clemente, Pismo Beach and Imperial Beach Piers, all of which were severely damaged in the March 1983 storms. Mr. Crumpley has extensive experience in a variety of engineering disciplines and is capable of managing the diverse aspects of this project. 8-6 SECTION 9 SECTION 9 Experience Related to this Program 9.1 Recent Experience — Moffatt & Nichol. Engineers ANAHEIM BAY MITIGATION PROJECT Location: Anaheim Bay, Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station, CA Client: Port of Long Beach • Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers was retained to design the restoration of wetlands in Anaheim Bay within the Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station grounds. This project includes contour and grading plans for the mitigation sites; the analysis of tidal flushing and water quality characteristics; the determination of culverts at roadways and railroad tracks to accommodate tidal flow to the sites; and relocation of utilities. The client, the Port of Long Beach, proposed to expand its facilities by filling an area in San Pedro Bay adjacent to Pier J. To obtain the construction permit, the client is required by various environmental agencies to replace the habitat lost in San Pedro Bay by creating a equivalent habitat. The mitigation site, roughly 110 acres, was selected by the Port of Long Beach, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Marine Fisheries Services and the California Department of Fish and Game. These sites will be restored into functioning wetlands to provide a suitable habitat for several bird and fish species that will be affected by the Pier J expansion project. The existing habitat of the four sites is different from that of fully functioning wetlands since the tide flow in and out of the sites has been greatly reduced due to construction of roads and rail lines. The design of the mitigation sites included culverts, channels and islands to provide favorable tide ranges and water quality for the growth of pickleweed and cordgrass. A numerical model was used to analyze the water elevations and flow velocities in the existing wetlands that result from tidal action. Once calibrated to field data, the model was used to evaluate the effects of connecting the new mitigation sites to the existing channels. 9-1 BOLSA CHICA WETLAND RESTORATION CONCEPT PLAN Location: Proposed Bolsa Chica Project Orange County, CA Client: Signal Landmark, Inc. • In 1985, the Orange County Board of Supervisors adopted the Bolsa Chica Land Use Plan. The Plan calls for a residential and commercial complexes to be developed around a 2000 slip marina, located on the Pacific Ocean between the cities of Seal Beach and Huntington Beach, California. This project includes the restoration of over 900 acres of wetlands associated with the development of commercial and residential areas for the proposed Bolsa Chica project. Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers, as a member of a team of consultants, provided expertise in hydraulic engineering which includes numerical modeling, culvert and control structure design, navigation channel design and desilting basin design. The firm is engaged in an on-going study investigating ocean entrance options including non-navigable tidal inlets. The preliminary hydraulic analysis was conducted on ocean linking systems of free-surface channels and under-beach conduits. Other project studies included evaluation of historic shoreline positions including the development of recommendations of the best probable representatives of tidal boundaries. Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers used guidelines for the design of the most suitable marsh system which was provided by biologists and earth scientists. From these guidelines, the firm designed the necessary channels and control structures, and developed and calibrated a numerical model for the area comprising Anaheim Bay, Seal Beach Wildlife Refuge, Huntington Harbour and the Bolsa Chica Wetlands. HELU4AN RANCH DEVELOPMENT Location: Seal Beach, CA Client: Port of Long Beach The Moi a Development Company proposed a plan for residential development of the Hellman Ranch area in Seal Beach. The plan calls for development of 85 acres for residential use and 40 acres for wetlands. Moi a Development contacted the Port of Long Beach about the possibility of participation in the wetlands restoration. The Port decided to examine the project feasibility as a possibility to fulfill mitigation requirements. 9-2 Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers was charged by the Port of Long Beach to perform a feasibility study. A range of plans was developed to provide a starting point for input from various environmental agencies. This is an on-going project to determine if there is a plan acceptable to the Port, Moia and the various agencies. A numerical model was used to analyze water levels and flow control structures. Habitat distributions for each plan were determined using guidelines provided by the agencies and other biologists. LAKE WORTH INLET BEACH EROSION STUDY Location: Palm Beach, Florida Client: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District • Studied the effect of the Lake Worth Inlet channel and jetties on the adjacent shoreline. Hydraulics of the inlet numerically modeled for the four different channel sizes that had resulted from successive channel enlargements. Shoreline evolution compared with fillet-growth and downdrift-erosion theory at a littoral barrier, and a time-phased accounting of the sand budget at the inlet was graphically portrayed. LAKEVIEW PARK COOPERATIVE BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT Location: Lorain, Ohio Client: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Buffalo District • This project involved the design of erosion control measures for a public beach, which was subject to very limited littoral drift. Developed a potential solutions based on costs, benefits, environmental effects, public interest. A beach fill, protected by a series of three segmented offshore breakwaters, found to be the most effective erosion control method. NATIONAL COASTAL EROSION STUDY Location: Malaysia Client: Government of Malaysia • Performed coastal processes investigation and quantification of beach erosion problems and solutions along the coast of Malaysia, resulting in development of preliminary engineering for 11 selected sites. Project also included the evaluation of river sediment sources and sinks and their effects on littoral transport. 9-3 ALAMEDA BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT Location: Alameda, CA Client: East Bay Regional Park District • Prepared plans, specifications and bid documents for dredging and sand replenishment of one and one-half mile of seriously eroded beach. Project included the layout and dimensioning of sand traps, groins, development of final beach contours in anticipation of landscaping. BALBOA ISLAND BEACH REPLENISHMENT STUDY Location: Balboa Island, Newport Beach, California Client: City of Newport Beach • Conducted beach replenishment study, which analyzed the problem and evaluate alternative methods of stabilizing beaches on the island. Study involved a site investigation, data collection, a review and evaluation of dredging and beach replenishment ordinances, and review of the effectiveness of existing groins on beach stability. STUDY OF LONGSHORE SAND TRANSPORT RATES Location: San Luis Obispo County Client: Port San Luis Harbor District • Study involved sand transport processes, evaluation of potential impacts of the proposed harbor on those processes, suggested measures that could mitigate any adverse impacts. Phase I estimated longshore sand transport rates using results from prior studies, aerial photographs and a sediment budget analysis; Phase II addressed the potential impacts of the proposed harbor, and specific recommendations to mitigate any adverse impacts. THE WINTERIZATION OF SEAL BEACH Location: Seal Beach, California Client: City of Seal Beach • Prepared a study which included analyses of water levels, wave runup, and beach erosion rates; determined the probability of waves overtopping a dike constructed to a given height and distance from houses; recommended sand dike construction procedure; investigated the magnitude of subsidence from existing data, determined its effect on the flooding potential; and devised and evaluated alternative solutions of adding beach sand to the system as the primary means of solving the wave runup problem. 9-4 GUIDELINES TO MANAGE THE COASTAL RESOURCES OF LAGUNA BEACH Location: Laguna Beach, California Client: City of Laguna Beach • Conducted a study to develop guidelines to manage the coastal resources, which provide an objective methodology to make decisions in accord with the City's coastal commitment. Study provides a means to evaluate the potential impacts that could result from various natural and human- induced modifications to the coastal environment. STUDY OF LITTORAL SAND LOSSES TO A SUBMARINE CANYON Location: La Jolla, California Client: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers • Studied littoral sand losses to Scripps and La Jolla submarine canyons as part of the Coast of California Storm and Tidal Wave Study. Study determined the quantity of littoral sand removed in order to refine the sediment budget analysis for the Oceanside littoral cell. Study involved extensive underwater data collection in the form of transects, and sand thickness and movement measurements. Primary findings of the study were 1) the amount of sand lost to the canyon is greatly influenced by the net annual longshore sediment transport rate and 2) the beach width is also an important factor controlling sand losses to the canyon. SANTA CRUZ HARBOR SHOALING STUDY Location: Santa Cruz, California Client: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers • Studied the littoral processes and resultant shoaling mechanism entrance channel; developed and evaluated alternative methods of mitigating the shoaling effects. Study determined that the net littoral transport rate was between 300,000 to 500,000 cubic yards per year from west to east and that a considerable quantity of littoral drift bypasses the harbor entrance by natural processes. Methods to mitigate the entrance shoaling included a phased-dredging plan and the construction of an offshore breakwater. 9-5 EXPERIMENTAL SAND BYPASS SYSTEM Location: Oceanside, California Client: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District • Site investigation, study and design of experimental system to mitigate severe entrance channel shoaling and downshore beach erosion by means of jet pump and fluidizer system which pumps sand from the channel shoaling areas through a delivery pipeline to nourish the depleted beaches. BEACH FILL DESIGN Location: Diego Garcia, B.I.O.T. Client: U.S. Navy • Design of breakwater sheltering Navy small boat harbor and basin perimeter and slope protection. Site investigation, study and design for use of dredge fill to create sacrificial beaches at critical areas of island shoreline including protection of airport runway and parking apron. Site investigation and evaluation of mining reef for fill material and determination of maximum limits for reef mining operation. 9-6 INTRODUCTION TO THE FIRM In 1945 John G. Moffatt and Frank E. Nichol formed partnerships in California and Oregon to provide engineering design services to private clients and governmental agencies as well as engineering sup- port services to construction contractors. Initially, emphasis was placed in the fields of harbor works and waterways, bridges, buildings, industrial facilities, military installations and public works. Later, services were expanded to include coastal and oceanographic engineering, port planning, and management supervision and inspection in the field of construction. Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers has completed feasibility studies, modeling studies, cost estimates, and preliminary and final designs for nearly 1000 waterfront projects worldwide. These projects have Included piers and wharves for commercial and military ships, vessel navigation, drydocks, shiplifts, boat harbors, marinas, dredging, bulkheads, shore protection, breakwaters, causeways, artificial islands, sand bypassing, oil terminals, cargo terminals, and mooring systems. In addition, Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers has designed pump stations, utility systems, mechanical systems, storm and flood control devices and more than 200 bridges. Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers has written design and planning manuals for the U.S. Government which have become standards in the areas of drydocks, moorings, port facilities, coastal protection, utility services and small craft harbors. Over the past 40 years, Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers has provided civil engineering services for City and County Municipal Departments of Public Works. These services have included the design of sewers, storm drains, utility relocations, street surface im- provements, site grading, freeway overcrossings and interchanges, grade separations, highways, oil facilities relocation, flood control structures and pump stations. Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers offers clients a profes- sional and experienced staff of civil, structural, mechanical, electrical, coastal and construction en- gineering disciplines. Having all key engineering design disciplines in-house enables Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers to serve clients with well in- tegrated projects under high quality control stand- ards. Individual and company memberships are main- tained in the American Association of Port Authorities, the Pacific Coast Association of Port Authorities, the American Society of Civil Engineers, the Joint Commission on Sport & Pleasure Naviga- tion of the Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses and the American Public Works Association. The main office of Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers is in Long Beach, California. Branch offices opened in Raleigh, North Carolina in 1981, in Walnut Creek, California in 1985, in Ventura, California in 1988 and in Costa Mesa, California in 1989. The firm has served governmental agencies, cor- porations and private clients in over thirty countries and is currently involved in a variety of bridge and highway design, sewer amd drainage systems design, pump stations, coastal protection, waterfront structure and marina projects. Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers TYPES OF PROJECTS Commercial Ports and Harbors Ports, Harbors, Marine Terminals Design and Operation Planning Piers, Wharves, Drydocks, Bulkheads, Break- waters, Bridges, Marine Structures Drainage and Flood Control Hydrology Studies, Flood Plain Master Planning, Hydraulic Design Open Channels, Culverts, Storm Drains, Pump Sta- tions, Hydraulic Structures Dredging, Hydraulic Modeling, Permit Processing Debris Basins, Erosion Control Harbor Facility Renovation and Repair, Terminal Operations and Throughput Capacity, Con- tainerization. Navigation Coastal Engineering Shore Protection, Beach Nourishment, Wave Climates, Wave Impact Forces Littoral Processes, Particle Transport, River Outlets Ship Mooring Forces, Channel Inlets, Currents Small Craft Harbors and Residential Marinas Harbors, Marina Basins, Channels, Facility Renova- tion and Repair, Bulkheads, Breakwaters, Jetties, Boat Slips, Launch Ramps, Dry Boat Storage Hydraulic Modeling, Water Quality, Navigation, Per- mit Processing Bridges and Grade Separation Structures Highway, Freeway, Railroad and Pedestrian Bridges and Grade Separations Traffic Studies, Cost Analysis-Agency Coordination Repair Design Construction Control, Utilities, Utilities Relocation Engineering Studies and Reports Planning and Feasibility Studies, Multidiscipline Project Planning Design Manuals, Problem Analysis, Damage As- sessment Water Resources Council Principles and Standards Documentation Transportation Facilities Streets and Highway Design and Repair, Sewers, Storm Drains, Water Systems, Geometries, Plan- ning, Safety Lighting Bridges, Culverts, Grade Separations, Right-of- Way, Legal Descriptions, Mapping, Drainage, Utilities Marinas, Waterfront Operations and Maintenance Facilities Parks and Recreation Facilities Bicycle Paths, Parking Lots, Site Development Walls, Grading Plans, Drainage, Utilities, Comfort Stations Industrial and Commercial Development Industrial Parks, Office and Shopping Center Site Development Planning Grading Plans, Surface Improvement Plans, Drainage and Utilities Plans Building Design, Problem Site Analysis and Design Subdivision and Site Development Residential Commercial and Industrial DevelopmentsTract Maps, Topographic Mapping, Boundary Survey, Grading Plans, Roads Surface Improvements, Drainage and Utilities Design Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers AWARDS OF RECOGNITION FEDERAL AGENCIES U.S. Department of the Navy P-172 Ship Wastewater Collection Ashore, Long Beach Naval Shipyard; Long Beach, California; 1981, Award for Superior Ac- complishment of NAVFAC Contract Revisions to Design Manual DM 29.3, Drydock- ing Fadlities, Chapter 11; 1982; Letter of Com- mendation Repair Capstans, Drydocks No. 2, 3, 4 and 5; Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, Pennsylvania; 1984, Letter of Commendation Breakwater and Harbor Restoration, Guam, Mariana Islands; 1979, Letter of Commendation Facility Certification Report Drydock No. 1, Mare Island Naval Shipyard, California; 1978, Letter of Commendation Study for Industrial Waste and Ship Wastewater Collection and Disposal Facility, Drydocks 1, 2, & 3, Long Beach Naval Shipyard; Long Beach, California; 1975, Letter of Commendation California Society of Professional Engineers Gerald Desmond Bridge, Port of Long Beach, Long Beach, California, 1979, Engineering Achievement Award THUMS Oil Drilling Island, Long Beach, California, 1966, Engineering Achievement Award American Institute of Steel Construction Robert R. Shoemaker Bridges, Long Beach, California, 1959, Honorable Mention-Most Beautiful Class II Bridge Willamette River Bridge, West Linn, Oregon, 1971, Award of Merit, Long Span Bridge Southern California Ready Mixed Concrete Association and Portland Cement Associa- tion, Southern California Long Beach Bicycle/Pedestrian Path, Long Beach, California; Outstanding Paving Project for 1987 MUNICIPAL AWARDS OF RECOGNITION U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Santa Fe Dam Recreational Area, Irwindale, California; 1978, Environmental Achievement Award PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATION AWARDS OF RECOGNITION American Shore & Beach Preservation As- sociation Cooperative Beach Erosion Control Project, Lakeview Park, Lorain, Ohio; 1988, presented to M&N, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Buffalo District, and the City of Lorain, Ohio Consulting Engineers of California Shipllft and Land Level Transfer Facility, Todd Pacific Shipyard; San Pedro, California; 1985, Engineering Excellence Award Society of American Military Engineers Repair of Drydock No. 1 Caisson, Long Beach, California; 1978, Vice President's Award City of Long Beach, California Woodruff Avenue Improvement Project; 1979, Letter of Commendation for Excellent Work Long Beach Beautiful Committee 1) Moffatt & Nichol Professional Building, Long Beach, California, 1972, Long Beach Beautiful Award; 2) Sea-Land Rail and Truck Terminal, Long Beach, California, 1971, Long Beach Beautiful Award City of Pismo Beach, California Reconstruction of Municipal Pier, 1986, Letter of Commendation for Innovative Design City of Santa Barbara, California Replacement of Marinas 3 and 4,1984, Letter of Commendation for Excellent Work City of San Bernardino, California Tippecanoe Ave. Bridge at Santa Ana River, 1987, Letter of Commendation City of San Clemente, California Reconstruction of Municipal Pier, 1988, Letter of Commendation Moffatt & Nichol, Engmeers EFFECTIVE PROJECT CONTROL SYSTEMS Project management at Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers embraces many key facets necessary to the suc- cessful achievement of a completed facility. These basic precepts are intrinsic to the Moffatt & Nichol philosophy of design and construction project management regardless of the project size. Our management approach adheres strictly to the recognition of the importance of these issues and our day to day practice maintains an aggressive sensitivity to these principles. Major issues are: • Quality Control • Design Continuity • Budget Control • Constructability Review • Design Schedule Adherence • Construction Schedule Optimization • Documentation • Coordination • Client Sensitivity • Communication • Use of specialized, highly qualified sub- consultants. • Principal involvement in every project. • Control of execution of each project by an experienced project engineer. • Emphasis on importance of proactive com- munication. • Commitment of skilled management, tech- nical and support personnel. • Independent review of project work provided by senior engineering and con- struction personnel. In adhering to the above practices we utilize a myriad of project management and management information systems that we select or adapt to the particular requirements of each individual project. Our in-house computer assets, both hardware and software, enhance our capabilities and allow Mof- fatt & Nichol to achieve quality products and effec- tive management practices for each job. These aggressive and proven techniques result in consis- tent project success and real tangible benefits to our many clients. INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM In our continuous effort to employ these principles in our management we are actively engaged on a day-to-day basis in the following practices. • Pursuit of projects and clients best suited to the firms' capabilities and experience. • Recruitment and retention of highly qualified engineers and support personnel. • Concentration of our efforts in our special- ty fields. Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers JOHN G. MOFFATT-FRANK E. NICHOL HARBOR AND COASTAL ENGINEERING AWARD John G. Moffatt and Frank E. Nichol, the founding partners of Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers, both spent many years in the field as engineers in charge of major waterfront construction projects. They brought with them to their own design firm in-depth practical experience as well as technical under- standing and an intuitive grasp of the natural forces that beset stmctures sited on the shoreline or in the ocean. They understood that design of waterfront and offshore structures was as much an art as a science. They were however, very much aware that coastal and waterfront engineering at that time was still in its infancy, less developed as a science than some other areas of engineering. Much remained to be learned abou\ coastal processes, wave and wind climates and other oceanographic conditions. During their distinguished careers, they constantly sought to expand the boundaries of coastal en- gineering knowledge and to advance the quality of design for the coastal and ocean environment. In October, 1977, the Board of Directors of the American Society of Civil Engineers established the John G. Moffatt-Frank E. Nichol Harbor and Coas- tal Engineering Award which was endowed in their memory by the firm of Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers. This award was designed to recognize new con- cepts which can be efficiently implemented to ex- pand the engineenng or construction techniques for harbor and coastal projects. The development of such concepts can occur in any of the academic, design, or construction disciplines, and the results must translate directly into applications which benefit the profession and the public. The award has been made annually since 1978 to a member of the ASCE who has made such a con- tribution in either the form of written presentations or notable performance. It consists of a specially designed plaque, a certificate inscribed with the name of the recipient and circumstances of the award, and an Honoranum. f MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS PROJECT LOCATIONS OUTSIDE CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES I MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS SITES OF COASTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES COASTAL ENGINEERING PROJECTS NATIONAL COASTAL EROSION STUDY Location: Malaysia Client: Government of Malaysia Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers performed coastal processes investigation and quantification of beach erosion problems and solutions along the entire coast of Malaysia. The study was conducted in two phases: Phase 1 involved an assessment of coastal erosion along the 4000- km shoreline. Phase 2 included a senes of detailed feasibility studies on selected sites to mitigate coastal erosion. Sedimentation rates in rivers and sediment transport and deposition pattern at river entrances was a part of the study. Hydrographic surveys and wave climatic analysis were also conducted. The firm also completed detailed plans and specifications for coastal protection works at four severely eroded sites. BOLSA CHICA DEVELOPMENT Location: Orange County, California Client: Signal Bolsa Company Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers is engaged in an on-going study investigating ocean entrance options including non-navigable tidal inlets. In- vestigations include earthwori^, storm drainage systems, bridges and cost estimates. The preliminary hydraulic analysis was conducted on ocean linking systems of free-surface chan- nels and under-beach conduits. Other project studies included evaluation of histonc shoreline positions including the development of recom- mendations of the best probable representative tidal boundaries. PRELIMINARY DESILTING BASIN DESIGN Location: Proposed Bolsa Chica Project- Orange County, California Client: Signal Landmark, inc. In 1985, the Orange County Board of Super- visors adopted the Bolsa Chica Land Use Plan. The plan calls for residential and commercial complexes to be developed around a 2000 slip marina, located on the Pacific Ocean between the cities of Seal Beach and Huntington Beach, California. Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers was retained to determine the magnitude of sediment being transported in the channel and to design a desilting basin which is needed to protect the proposed marina and navigable channels from excessive deposition of sediment from the Wintersburg Channel. It is estimated that ap- proximately 14,000 cubic yards of sediment per year is transported by the channel to the project site. LAKEVIEW PARK COOPERATIVE BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT Location: Lorain, Ohio Client: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Buf- falo District This project, completed for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Buffalo District, involved the design of erosion control measures for a public beach in Lorain, Ohio. Very limited literally drift was available to nourish the beach at this site. Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers, in Phase II of the General Design Memorandum for this project, studied this problem and developed a number of potential solutions. These alternatives were evaluated on the basis of first costs, annual costs, benefits, effects on the environment, public interest, and views of Federal and non-Federal agencies. A beach fill, protected by a series of three segmented offshore breakwaters, was found to be the most effective erosion control method for this par- ticular site. ORANGE COUNTY COASTAL FLOOD PLAIN DEVELOPMENT Location: Orange County, California Client: Orange County Environmental Management Agency Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers was retained by the Orange County Environmental Management Agency to prepare a manual providing techni- cal criteria and guidelines as a basis for review of stmctures and coastal protective devices on private coastal property. The manual covered five coastal reaches in Orange County. The purpose of this manual was to establish: 1) coastal data that can be used in the design of structures and protective devices on private property in the five Local Coastal Plan areas, 2) the boundaries of coastal areas where the design of structures and protective devices must consider ocean wave forces and flooding by ocean water, and 3) design criteria and standards for stmctures and protective devices in the coastal areas using coastal design data. WALLOPS ISLAND SHORE PROTECTION STUDY Location: Wallops Island, Virginia Client: NASA/Goodard Space Flight Center Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers was retained by NASA/Goodard Space Flight Center for con- ducting an investigation to establish existing site conditions, define shore processes, determine future shoreline behavior and facility damage and provide preliminary recommendations for constmction of corrective measures. The study concluded that a nearby inlet was a major sediment trap, causing erosion at Wal- lops Island. In the study, the erosion and ac- cretion areas along Wallops Island were identified and alternative shore protection measures were recommended. EXPERIMENTAL SAND-BYPASS SYSTEM AT OCEANSIDE HARBOR Location: Oceanside, California Client: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers retained Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers to perform a data collection and analysis for the experimental sand-bypass system at Oceanside, California. The study included a literature review and evaluation of fluidizing systems and analysis of sand-bypass system performance. An evalua- tion of the coastal processes including review of dredge records and location of sand deposits at the harbor were conducted during the study. The results of the study indicate that the system can be installed and would have a reasonable chance of success. Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers was retained by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for preparation of the plans and specification for constmction of the sand-bypass system. LOW COST SHORE PROTECTION GUIDE Location: U.S. Client: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers This report documents the results of a program conducted by the U.S. Army Corps of En- gineers to develop and demonstrate low-cost methods of shore protection. The program ob- jectives were to provide a data base for use in the logical selection of devices, or combination of devices, to protect inland or sheltered shorelines in any region of the United States, and to develop techniques for making such a selection. As a consultant to the Corps of Engineers Coas- tal Engineering Research Center, Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers performed field investiga- tions at thirty six sites nationwide in the areas of Delaware Bay, the Great Lakes, Alaska, Hawaii, and along the Pacific. Atlantic and Gulf Coasts. The five major categories of shore protection systems investigated were bulkheads and seawalls, revetments, breakwaters and sills, groins, and non-stmctural devices. Construc- tion materials included filter cloth, mbble, con- crete blocks, gabions, steel fuel barrels, iongard tubes, quarrystone, asphalt mastic and vegetation. Site monitoring included the collection of several types of data. Wind, wave and current data were used to evaluate the performance of the stmctures. Bathymetric surveys, made prior to installation of the shore protection devices and conducted periodically thereafter, were used to evaluate beach and offshore profile changes and to trace the movement of littoral drift. Aerial photography was used to trace changes in shoreline position and to study beach and backshore ten-ain changes. Sedi- ment samples were collected and analyzed to determine littoral sediment characteristics. These data were analyzed by Moffatt & Nichol on the bases of stability, effectiveness, main- tenance requirements and cost and presented to the Corps in a draft report which provided direct input to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Low-Cost Shore Protection. Final Report nn the Erosion Control Demonstration Program /Sfic- liQDL541(1981). SEDIMENTATION IN HIGH TIDE EST UARIES OF ALASKA Location: Nashage Bay and Cook Iniet, Alaska Client: Alaska District, Corps of Engineers Dr. Craig Everts of Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers performed a comprehensive study of sedimen- tation problems, causes and solutions in the Nashage Bay and Cook Inlet in Alaska. Much of the effort was devoted to the investigation of intertidal sedimentation involving fine-grained cohesive sediments. The problem addressed was harbor and navigation channel shoaling within and landward of large intertidal regions composed variously of mud, silt, and sand- sized material. Study results provided design guidelines to reduce sedimentation problems in watenways and hartjors and information on tidal hydraulics. Tidal hydraulics, river hydraulics and sedimentation, (both cohesive and non- cohesive sediments) were addressed in this in- vestigation. SEDIMENT DISCHARGE BY GLACIER-FED RIVERS IN ALASKA Location: Knik and Mantanuska Rivers, Alaska Client: Study published by American Society of Civil Engineers Dr. Craig Everts of Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers conducted a study which provided information for use in optimizing a sampling program, and in predicting the behavior of glacier-source sediment in the Knik and Mantanuska Rivers, lo- cated near Anchorage, Alaska. The study, which was presented at the Symposium on In- land Watenways for Navigation, Flood Control and Water Diversions, also addressed river hydraulics, estuarine hydraulics and sediment transport in rivers and estuaries. SEDIMENTATION RATES AND CHANNEL DEEPENING STUDY Location: Moutfi of Columbia River, Washington Client: Portland District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers The study discusses the results of a three-part investigation taken to forecast the rate of sedimentation if the navigation channel through the bar at the mouth of the Columbia River was deepened. A prototype data analysis produced a view of past estuary behavior. The causes of sediment (mostly sand) scour, transport and deposition, and evolving changes in the Columbia estuary as a result of human modification affecting the tidal prism and river discharge were used to forecast future problem areas and means to deal with the problems. Cost savings as a result of the investigation come in improving planning and design for dredging projects. Combined estuaries and river flows were established, and estuaries were made of modifications to the flow patterns that could reduce sedimentation and optimize navigation. ALAMEDA BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT Location: Alameda, California Client: East Bay Regional Park District Moffatt & Nichol. Engineers was contacted by the East Bay Regional Pari< District to provide engineering services in connection with the Alameda Beach Erosion Control Project which is located along the Robert Crown Memorial State Beach and the South Shore Beach of the City of Alameda. For the one and one-half miles of seriously eroded public beach. Moffatt & Nichol prepared engineering design calculations, detailed constmction plans, specifications and bid documents for dredging and sand replenishment. The project design included the layout and dimensioning of sand traps, groins, and development of final beach contours in an- ticipation of landscaping. The partial solution to the beach erosion problem was due to specifying a medium sand for the beach replenishment portion of the project. The medium sand would be less sus- ceptible than the existing fine sand to longshore, offshore, and wind-blown transport. IMPACTS OF ILLINOIS BEACH STATE PARK MARINA ON LITTORAL PROCESSES Location: Illinois Beacfi State Park, Illinois Client: Epstein Civil Engineering Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers prepared a report to address the potential impacts of a marina on the littoral processes at and adjacent to the project site. Ranges of littoral transport rates were defined using previous studies. Potential erosions and accretions upcoast and downcoast of the marina were then determined using an implicit numerical model. Calibration of the model was done using historic shoreline data. Model input consisted of longshore sedi- ment transport rates at each computational cell, boundary conditions, initial shoreline positions, depth of profile change and magnitude of off- shore losses. Longshore transport rates were obtained from energy flux calculations using deep water wave hindcasts. Results of the shoreline evolution model were used to discuss potential impacts upcoast and downcoast of the marina. Mitigation measures including sand bypassing alternatives and stmctural alternatives were discussed. LAKE WORTH INLET BEACH EROSION STUDY Location: Palm Beach, Florida Client: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Moffatt and Nichol. Engineers was selected by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District to study the effect of the Lake Worth Inlet channel and jetties on the adjacent shoreline. Historical records were researched, all avail- able hydrographic survey data were plotted and compared, a wave-energy analysis of the local wave climate was made, the hydraulics of the inlet were numerically modeled for the four dif- ferent channel sizes that had resulted from suc- cessive channel enlargements, the shoreline evolution was compared with fillet-growth and downdrift-erosion theory at a littoral barrier, and a time-phased accounting of the sand budget at the inlet was graphically portrayed. BALBOA ISLAND BEACH REPLENISHMENT STUDY Location: Newport Beach, California Client: City of Newport Beach The City of Newport Beach had noticed a gradual net loss of sand from its beaches, and retained Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers to conduct a beach replenishment study. The area studied was Baltxja Island, and focused primarily on the south shore beaches between Emerald Avenue and the Grand Canal. The purpose of the study was to conduct a brief analysis of the problem and evaluate altemative methods of stabilizing beaches on the island. The study in- volved a site investigation, data collection, a review and evaluation of dredging and beach replenishment ordinances, review of the effec- tiveness of existing groins on beach stability, and interviews with residents to ascertain their opinions of the shoreline and dredging his- tories. STUDY OF LONGSHORE SAND TRANSPORT RATES Location: San Luis Obispo County Client: Port San Luis Harbor District Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers was engaged by the Port San Luis Harbor District to study sand transport processes in the area, evaluate the potential impacts of the proposed hartjor on those processes, and suggest measures that could be incorporated in design of the hartjor to mitigate any adverse impacts. The study was done in two phases: the first phase estimated longshore sand transport rates using results from prior studies, aerial photographs and a sediment budget analysis; the second phase addressed the potential impacts of the proposed harbor, and specific recommenda- tions to mitigate any adverse impacts. THE WINTERIZATION OF SEAL BEACH Location: Seal Beach, California Client: City of Seal Beach Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers prepared a study to identify problems associated with the winteriza- tion of Seal Beach and to develop alternative solutions to the protection of beach-front properties from stonn wave inundation. The study relied upon the data available regarding beach profiles and nourishment records, and comments from homeowners, city staff. Corps of Engineers personnel, and contractors. The specific wori< items included analyses of water levels, wave mnup, and beach erosion rates; determining the probability of waves overtop- ping a dike constmcted to a given height and distance from houses; recommending a sand dike constmction procedure; investigating the magnitude of subsidence from existing data, and determining its effect on the flooding poten- tial; and devising and evaluating alternative solutions of adding beach sand to the system as the primary means of solving the wave mnup problem. GUIDELINES TO MANAGE THE COASTAL RESOURCES OF LAGUNA BEACH Location: Laguna Beach, California Client: City of Laguna Beach Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers employee. Dr. Craig Everts conducted a study to develop a set of guidelines to manage the coastal resources of Laguna Beach at the request of the City of Laguna Beach. The set of guidelines is to provide an objective methodology to make decisions in accord with the City's coastal com- mitment. The study is presented in a step-by- step format, and provides a means to evaluate the potential impacts that could result from various natural and human-induced modifica- tions to the coastal environment. CARPINTERIA DOWNTOWN/WATERFRONT REViTALiZATION PROGRAM Location: Carpinteria, California Client: City of Carpinteria Moffatt & Nichol. Engineers was retained by the City of Carpinteria to conduct a pier feasibility study for the Carpinteria downtown/waterfront area. The study is to be part of the Carpinteria Downtown/Waterfront Revitalization Program. The report will give recommended design wave criteria, minimum pier deck elevation, possible shore protection requirements, and possible pier construction materials based on available geotechnical data. The scope of work includes participating in workshops and presentations in Carpinteria, reviewing available reports and pertinent data, performing a wave study, and giving recommendations for additional studies if pier feasibility is to be refined. VENTURA COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS AND SURFERS POINT PARK SHORE PROTEC- TION STUDY Location: Ventura, California Client: City of San Buenaventura Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers was requested by the City of San Buenaventura to study methods of coastal protection, make preliminary design recommendations, and to investigate environ- mental impacts of coastal protection measures. The purpose of the study was to develop an understanding of the coastal processes, and to develop and evaluate methods of protecting the shoreline at the Ventura County Fairgrounds and Surfers Point Park. The study recom- mended a shore protection measure which minimized impacts on public access and surf- ing. The items of wori< included site investiga- tions, evaluating the area's coastal processes, determining the design wave and water level for conceptual design alternatives, identifying and evaluating shore protection alternatives, preparing preliminary cost estimates and schedule, defining the project's permit process, identifying potential funding sources, and evaluating the impacts of the proposed shore protection project. BATIQUITOS LAGOON Location: San Diego County, California Client: Frank Ayres Company Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers were engaged to develop and evaluate various schemes for creating a recreational water body at Batiquitos Lagoon. Studies were made over a twenty year time span and included fully navigable entran- ces and semi-stable tidal exchange inlets. Fac- tors considered in the water ways studies included the hydraulic conveyance of the predicted San Marcos Creek flood flows, the excavation and disposition of the soft clays in the eastern portion of the lagoon, the lowering of Highway 5 bridge footings, and the existing Underground utilities in the area. STUDY OF LITTORAL SAND LOSSES TO A SUBMARINE CANYON Location: La Jolia, California Client: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Littoral sand losses to Scripps and La Jolla sub- marine canyons were studied by Moffatt & Nichol. Engineers for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as part of the Coast of Califomia Stonn and Tidal Wave Study. The purpose of the study was to determine the quantity of littoral sand removed in order to refine the sediment budget analysis for the Oceanside littoral cell. The study was conducted over three years, be- tween 1984 and 1987, and it involved extensive undenwater data collection in the form of tran- sects, and sand thickness and movement measurements. The primary findings of the study were 1) the amount of sand lost to the canyon is greatly influenced by the net annual longshore sediment transport rate and 2) the beach width is also an important factor control- ling sand losses to the canyon. SANTA CRUZ HARBOR SHOALING STUDY Location: Santa Cruz, California Client: U.S. Antiy Corps of Engineers The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers retained Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers to study the littoral processes and resultant shoaling mechanism of Santa Cmz Harbor entrance channel and to develop and evaluate alternative methods of mitigating the shoaling effects. The study determined that the net littoral transport rate was between 300,000 to 500,000 cubic yards per year from west to east and that a considerable quantity of littoral drift, between 175.000 to 375.000 cubic yards per year, bypasses the harbor entrance by natural processes. Methods to mitigate the entrance shoaling included a phased-dredging plan and the constmction of an offshore breakwater. PENETRATION OF WAVE ENERGY INTO SANTA BARBARA HARBOR Location: Santa Barbara, California Client: City of Santa Barbara Moffatt & Nichol. Engineers conducted a study of the wave climate and littoral processes at Santa Bartiara HartDor. The primary purpose of the study was to estimate the probable cause of wave penetration into the hartDor and to propose altematives to mitigate damages caused by storm waves and to reduce daily wave action in the harbor. A report was prepared to present environmental conditions, wave climate within the harbor, and a prelimi- nary analysis of possible modifications to exist- ing stmctures and dredging practices which would provide added protection to the hartxjr. SAND SPIT BREAKWATER EXTENSION AT SANTA BARBARA HARBOR Location: Santa Barbara, California Client: City of Santa Barbara Moffatt & Nichol. Engineers prepared a report to address the feasibility of extending the sand spit breakwater to prevent waves from entering the hatbor. Preliminary engineering analyses included: 1) investigation of breakwater exten- sion configurations, alignments and stmcture types; 2) wave refraction analysis for the break- water configurations; 3) assessment of naviga- tion channel alignment; 4) discussion of constmction methods and costs. FEASIBILITY OF A CITY-OPERATED DREDGING PROGRAM FOR SANTA BAR- BARA HARBOR Location: Santa Barbara, California Client: City of Santa Barbara The City of Santa Barbara retained Moffatt & Nichol. Engineers to determine the feasibility of the City owning and operating a dredge or sand bypass system to better maintain the navigation channel and mooring area in Santa Bartjara HartDor. The feasibility study included estab- lishing dredge selection criteria based on his- torical dredging practice, shoaling pattems, sediment type, disposal areas, and permitting restrictions and requirements. Type and size of dredge appropriate for Santa Barbara were identified in the study as well as benefits and costs of a City-owned dredge. BUHNE POINT SHORELINE EROSION DEMONSTRATION PROJECT Location: Humboldt Bay, California Client: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Purpose of project was to design, constmct and monitor a shore protection project designed to protect the community of King Salmon. Project features included a 23-acre sandfill, a groin and a breakwater. Moffatt & Nichol is under contract to analyze the monitoring data and prepare a report describ- ing the perfonnance of the project, an opera- tion and maintenance manual, and the final project report. Coastal engineering analyses includes review of aerial photographs, dredg- ing records and beach profile data. MISSION BAY LITTORAL CELL STUDY Location: San Diego, California Client: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers is preforming a sediment budget study of Mission Bay cell as part of the Coast of California Storm and Tidal Waves Study. Results of the study will be used to assess future regional scale shoreline chan- ges due to natural forces such as storms, and due to manmade modifications to the shoreline such as hartjors and groin fields. The study will also provide a set of baseline conditions for the Mission Bay littoral zone on which to base fu- ture engineering and planning efforts and decisions. SILVER STRAND LITTORAL CELL STUDY Location: San Diego, California Client: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers completed a study of the Silver Strand littoral cell as part of the Coast of California Storm and Tidal Wave Study for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The study identified the quantity and effect of all major components in the sediment budget as well as outlined a series of findings and recom- mendations to further the understanding of the area and help in future planning decisions. SAN DIEGO REGION HISTORIC WAVE AND SEA LEVEL DATA REPORT Location: Southern California Client: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers As a part of the Coast of California Storm and Tidal Wave Study undertaken by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Moffatt & Nichol Engineers is currently preparing a report on the historic wave data and sea level data available in the San Diego Region. The work includes compil- ing wave data from existing data bases, com- piling historic and predicted sea level data, compiling a chronology of extreme storm events and conducting an extreme event analysis for the wave and sea level data. NEWPORT BEACH LITTORAL SAND MOVE- MENT STUDY Location: Newport Beach, CA Client: City of Newport Beach Public Works Department Performed study to determine effect proposed Santa Ana River Flood Control project will have on beaches at West Newport and Balboa penin- sula. Studied present patterns of beach be- havior and cases; determined effort of proposed project on discharge or sand to the littoral zone and on the sand bypassing river jet- ties; conclude optimum disposal procedure for sand removed from Santa Ana River. I I I I I I I i I I I I i I I I I I BOLSA CHICA WETLAND RESTORATION CONCEPT PLAN Location: Proposed Bolsa Chica Project, Orange County, CA Client: Signal Landmark, Inc. In 1985, the Orange County Board of Supervisors adopted the Bolsa Chica Land Use Plan. The Plan calls for a residential and commercial complexes to be developed around a 2000 slip marina, located on the Pacific Ocean between the cities of Seal Beach and Huntington Beach, California. This project includes the restoration of over 900 acres of wetlands associated with the development of commercial and residential areas for the proposed Bolsa Chica project. Moffatt & Nichol. Engineers, as a member of a team of consultants, provided ex- pertise in hydraulic engineering which includes numerical modeling, culvert and control structure design, navigation channel design and desilting basin design. The firm is engaged in an on-going study investigating ocean entrance options in- cluding non-navigable tidal inlets. The preliminary hydraulic analysis was con- ducted on ocean linking systems of free-surface channels and under-beach con- duits. Other project studies included evaluation of historic shoreline positions in- cluding the development of recommendations ofthe best probable representatives of tidal boundaries. Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers used guidelines for the design of the most suitable marsh system which was provided by biologists and earth scientists. From these guidelines, the firm designed the necessary channels and control structures, and developed and calibrated a numerical model for the area comprising Anaheim Bay, Seal Beach Wildlife Refuge, Huntington Harbour and the Bolsa Chica Wet- lands. ANAHEIM BAY MITIGATION PROJECT Location: Anaheim Bay, Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station, CA Client: Port of Long Beach Moffatt & Nichol. Engineers was retained to design the restoration of wetlands in Anaheim Bay within the Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station grounds. This project includes contour and grading plans for the mitigation sites; the analysis of tidal flushing and water quality characteristics; the determination of culverts at road- ways and railroad tracks to accommodate tidal flow to the sites; and relocation of utilities. The client, the Port of Long Beach, proposed to expand its facilities by filling an area in San Pedro Bay adjacent to Pier J. To obtain the construction permit, the client is required by various environmental agencies to replace the habitat lost in San Pedro Bay by creating a equivalent habitat. The mitigation site, roughly 110 acres, was selected by the Port of Long Beach, Fish and Wildlife Service, Nation- al Marine Fisheries Services and the California Department of Fish and Game. These sites will be restored into functioning wetlands to provide a suitable habitat for several bird and fish species that will be affected by the Pier J expansion project. The existing habitat of the four sites Is different from that of fully functioning wet- lands since the tide flow In and out of the sites has been greatly reduced due to construction of roads and rail lines. The design of the mitigation sites included culverts, channels and islands to provide favorable tide ranges and water quality for the growth of pickleweed and cordgrass. A numerical model was used to analyze the water elevations and flow velocities in the existing wetlands that result from tidal action. Once calibrated to field data, the model was used to evaluate the effects of connecting the new mitigation sites to the existing channels. ARTIFICIAL SURF SITE Location: Imperial Beach and Oceanside, CA Client: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District Surfing is a recreational opportunity conducted in the nearshore surf zone which utilizes phenomena that occur in the natural environment. Surf conditions vary in time and location as a function of the wind, tide level, waves and the ocean bot- tom configuration. A proposed beach erosion control project at Oceanside. California presented a threat to surfing conditions along a stretch of the beach. The Los Angeles District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers contacted Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers to in- vestigate the feasibility of constructing an artificial surf reef or modifying coastal structures to create or enhance recreational surfing at Oceanside. Moffatt & Nichol prepared a preliminary feasibility study based on review of literature and theoreti- cal and practical engineering consideration. Items addressed included: literature survey; description of general surfing reef; identification of the potential impacts ofthe reef on littoral processes; discussion of construction methods; brief descrip- tion of the wave climate at Oceanside; discussion of risks including personal in- jury; and a preliminary cost and benefit analysis. The feasibility study presented basic background information regarding construc- tion of an artificial surf site. Two concepts were outlined. First to be outlined is called a demonstration site where a low, submerged groin or offshore breakwater could form a trap to capture the longshore flux of sand to create a stabilized bar. A rip current is established on the uplift side of the groin and sand is transported offshore. This sand bypasses the groin and a tip shoal is formed off the head and on the lee side. Waves arriving at an angle to the bottom contours produce a peel during breaking. The shoal also increases wave height by refraction. The surf can be found on either side of the groin, but conditions are often best on the down- drift side. The initial cost of the demonstration site is low. as the materials which can be used such as sand-filled bags or a devise called a Longard Tube. The Longard Tube is filled with sand and are either 69" in diameter or 2-40" diameter tubes joined together to be placed in 6 to 8 feet below MLLW. A 50 to 100-meter long tube would be angled relative to the shoreline to create a peel under predominant waves. Two to 4-foot waves with 10 to 16 second periods should break at mid-tide over the shoal trapped behind the tube. This type of site can last several years. The second concept is the permanent site, which would require detailed engineer- ing studies and would be more expensive. The construction material would have to remain stable for seive design waves and impacts on the shoreline would be carefully considered. The site would be located offshore in deeper water than the demonstration site. Possible materials to be used would be sunken barges or cais- sons, treimied concrete in rock voids, or precast slabs. It would have an offshore slope and a reef with a contoured surface to control the peel under a wide range of wave conditions. The site would be permanent and transform incident waves into consistent breakers. PROPOSED SALIENT POINT AT PORT HUENEME BEACH Location: Port Hueneme Beach, Ventura County, CA Client: The Surfrider Foundation Port Hueneme is located on the Pacific Coast, in Ventura County, about 65 miles northwest of Los Angeles. Port Hueneme Beach is located about 3,000 feet down coast of the east jetty of Port Hueneme Harbor. The reach between the jetty and beach is stabilized by a rock revetment and is used as a feeder beach for bypass- ing. The Surfrider Foundation contacted Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers to investigate the general feasibility of creating a temporary salient point at Port Hueneme, to en- hance ocean wave refraction. A salient would be created by minor modifications of current dredge disposal practices. The purpose of the salient is to locally and temporarily realign the shore to create a right break for surfing and possibly to ex- tend the life of the sand nourishment in the area. The final study was based on review of literature and theoretical and practical en- gineering considerations. Items addressed included: the oceanographic climate at Port Hueneme Beach; surfing mechanics and surfsite concepts and the proposed plan which developed criteria for monitoring the salient's change over space and time. BRIDGE & GRADE SEPARATION PROJECTS FEDERAL AGENCIES MUNICIPAL AGENCIES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, U.S. CORPS OF ENGINEERS Southern Pacific Railroad Bridge over the Los Angeles River Raising of the Union Pacific Railroad Bridge over the Los Angeles River Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Bridge over Devil Creek, San Bernadino County 13th Street Bridge Structural Adequacy Inves- tigation, Vandenburg Air Force Base DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, U.S. FOREST SERVICE Inspection and Rating of Forty-Eight Bridges in the State of Oregon DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE Design of Bridge Crossing Franklin Creek, Santa Barbara, California STATE AGENCIES STATE OF HAWAII Highway Structures, Honolulu (A Joint Venture) Lunalilo Freeway Structures, Honolulu (A Joint Venture) STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, DEPART- MENT OF TRANSPORTATION Dutchmans Creek Bridge, Gaston County Hank's Creek Bridge, Davidson County Town Creek Bridge, Brunswick County Grant's Creek Bridge, Salisbury Rich Fork Creek Bridge, Davidson County High Point Lake Bridge, Guilford County Swift Creek Bridge, Wake County STATE OF OREGON, HIGHWAY DEPART- MENT Willamette River Bridge, 1-205 CITY OF ANAHEIM, CA Final design for the Lincoln Avenue Underpass under the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe; Union Pacific; and Southern Pacific Railroads Katella Avenue Underpass under the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad CITY OF BARSTOW, CA Yucca Street Grade Separation over the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Study and Report of the Barstow Road Grade Separation over the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad and the Mojave River CITY OF COLTON, CA Washington Street Bridge Widening-part of the Cooley Ranch-Santa Ana River Improvement Project Fogg Street Grade Separation CITY OF CORONA, CA Lincoln Avenue Overpass CiTY OF GLENDALE, CA Western Avenue Grade Separation over the Southern Pacific Railroad Whiting Road Bridge over the Verdugo Wash Jackson Street Bridge over the Verdugo Wash CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CA Vivienda Avenue Bridge Replacement CiTY OF IRVINE, CA Michelson Drive over the San Joaquin and San Diego Channels Barranca Interchange at State Route 133 Alton Overcrossing at State Route 133 CITY OF LONG BEACH, CA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Airport Runway Underpasses at Spring Street and Lakewood Boulevard Appian Way Bridge over Alamitos Bay CiTY OF LONG BEACH, CA HARBOR DEPARTMENT Anaheim Street Bridge over the Los Angeles River and Freeway Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers CiTY OF LONG BEACH continued Harbor Traffic Analysis for Freeway Terminus, Streets and Bridges Robert R. Shoemaker Bridge over the Los Angles River and Freeway Separation Seventh Street Underpass, Robert R. Shoemaker Bridge Approach Gerald Desmond Bridge over the Harbor Entrance Channel CiTY OF VENTURA, CA Seaward Avenue Grade Separation Under the Southern Pacific Railroad CITY OF VERNON, CA Feasibility Reports, Traffic Interchanges and Bridge Widening COUNTY AGENCIES CiTY OF ONTARIO, CA Grove Avenue-Union Pacific Railroad "G" Street Bridge over Cucamonga Creek CITY OF PASADENA, CA Prospect Boulevard Bridge Replacement CiTY OF PORTLAND, OR Willamette Boulevard Viaduct Union Pacific Railroad Underpass CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE, CA Bob Hope Bridge Widening Dinah Shore Bridge Widening CiTY OF RIVERSIDE, CA Central Avenue Grade Separation under the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Ivy Street Grade Separation over the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Olivewood Avenue Grade Separation over the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe and Union Pacific Railroads CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CA Rialto Avenue Grade Separation over the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Tippecanoe Avenue Bridge at the Santa Ana River CITY OF SAN DIEGO, CA 32nd Street Bridge over Chollas Creek CITY OF SANTA ANA, CA First Street Grade Separation under the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe and Southern Pacific Railroads CITY OF TORRANCE, CA Crenshaw Boulevard Grade Separation under- pass at the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad FRESNO COUNTY, CA HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT Jensen Avenue Grade Separation of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe and Southern Pacific Railroads LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CA FLOOD CONTROL DlSTRiCT Study and Reports for Three Bridges over San Jose Creek MULTNOMAH COUNTY, OREGON; CLARK COUNTY, WASHINGTON; AND THE PORT OF CAMAS-WASHUGAL Study and Report for the Lady Island Bridge over the Columbia River MULTNOMAH COUNTY, OREGON Morrison Street Bascula Bridge over the Wil- lamette River East Approach to the Hawthorne Street Bridge West Approach to the Hawthorne Street Bridge Automatic Bridge Traffic Control Study ORANGE COUNTY, CA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AGENCY Pacific Coast Highway Replacement between Orange Street and Brookhurst Avenue Elevated Roadway for Parking Structure, John Wayne Airport Freeway Access-SR-55 Ramps, John Wayne Airport RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CA Kubic Road and Montery Road Overcrossing SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CA FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT & HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Chann in Ontario and Rancho Cucamonga: Guasti SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY continued Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers Street, Holt Avenue, Hellman Avenue, Vineyard Avenue, and 4th, 6th, 8th, and 9th Streets Bridges over Flood Control Channels at Central Avenue (one bridge) and City Street (eleven bridges) Bridges over the Lytle Creek Channel at "1" Street, Mill Street Inland Center Drive, "G" Street, Central Avenue Benedict Street and In- terstate 1-15 South "E" Street Bridge over the Santa Ana River Nicole Avenue and Dracaea Avenue Over Flood Control Channels Waterman Avenue Grade Separation over the Southern Pacific Railroad Waterman Avenue Bridge over the Santa Ana River Bear Valley Cutoff over the Mojave River Etiwanda Avenue Grade Separation over the Southern Pacific Railroad Mt. Vernon Avenue Grade Separation over the Southern Pacific Railroad Mt. Vernon Avenue Bridge - the Santa Ana River Carnelian Street Grade Separation under the Southern Pacific Railroad Anderson Street Grade Separation over the Southern Pacific Railroad Tippecanoe Avenue Bridge over the Santa Ana River Harper Lake Bridge over the Mojave River Sixteen Highway Bridges over the California Aqueduct Base Line Road Bridge over Lytle Creek Live Oak Canyon Bridge Anderson Street Bridge over San Timoteo Creek Barton Road Grade Separation over the Southern Pacific Railroad Barton Road Bridge over San Timoteo Creek Base Line Road Bridge over Cucamonga Creek Mt. Baldy Road over San Antonio Creek Mt. Baldy Road over Ice House Creek Main Street Grade Separation over the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Riverside Avenue Bridge over the Santa Ana River Riverside Avenue Approaches to the Santa Ana River Bridge Study and Reports for the Bridge over the Colorado River at Needles SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CA HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT Cole Grade Road Bridge over the San Luis Rey River Willow Road Bridge over San Vicente Creek 32nd Street Bridge Replacement VENTURA COUNTY, CA Center Street Bridge over Piru Creek PRIVATE CLIENTS CM ENGINEERiNG ASSOCIATES Bear Valley Road Bridge Via Del Rio Bridge Nicole Avenue and Dracaea Bridges DAMON ESTATE Monalua Overcrossing, Lunalilo Freeway, Honolulu (A Joint Venture) FLUOR CORPORATION Michelson Drive over the San Diego and San Joaquin Channels HUNTINGTON HARBOUR CORPORATION Bridges One, Two, Five and Six INSTANT FREEWAY CORPORATION Urban Bridge Prototype PACIFIC POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY Bridge over Swift Creek PROCTOR & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY Two Bridges over Seventh Street Conveyor Bridge SHELL OIL COMPANY Friant Canal Pipe Bridge STOLTE INCORPORATED Shoreline Drive Bridge Stress Investigation UPLAND INDUSTRIES CORPORATION San Sevaine Channel Railroad Bridge VAN DELL & ASSOCIATES, INC. Main Street Bridge at San Diego Creek Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers WETLANDS RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC. ECOLOGICAL CONSULTANTS 2169-G East Francisco Blvd. San Rafael, CA 94901 (415) 454-8868 3650 Silverside Road, Suite 1036 Wilmington, DE 19810 (302) 655 - 7974 Summer, 1989 INTRODUCTION Wetlands Research Associates, Inc. provides professional consulting services in coastal, estuarine, and freshwater wetland habitat protection, restoration, and management. Formed in 1981, Wetlands Research Associates, Inc. has completed over 100 projects for govemment agencies, non-profit organizations, and private companies. With offices located in California and Delaware, the firm specializes in a broad range of coastal, freshwater, and riparian wetland studies, including: • Delineation and mapping of wetland habitats using COE/EPA/SCS methods. • Evaluation of wetlands using Wetland Evaluation Procedures. • Determination of impacts on wetlands for EIR/EIS documents. • Completion of mitigation and restoration plans in compliance with state and federal regulations. • Planning and implementation of coastal and freshwater wetland restoration, including planting of vegetation. • Development of management and monitoring plans for wetlands and endangered species protection. • Field and laboratory research on wetland vegetation and associated animals. Wetlands Research Associates, Inc. provides its clients with a full range of services in the biological sciences and environmental planning. Our staff is experienced in the application of federal and state regulations to wetland habitats, and trained in the wetland evaluation methods used by public agencies. Using a team approach with hydrologic and civil engineers. Wetlands Research Associates, Inc. can provide complete services in the evaluation, planning, and implementation of coastal and wetland restoration and enhancement projects. PERSONNEL Michael N. Josselyn. PhD President - Senior Wetland Ecologist Dr. Josselyn is nationally known for his expertise in wetland ecology and restoration. He has authored or edited four books and numerous articles on wetland ecology and mitigation in national and international scientific journals. As Founder and President of Wetlands Research Associates, Dr. Josselyn has been the principal-in-charge for the firm's wetland restoration and mitigation projects, open space planning studies, environmental impacts statements, and remedial action plans for wetlands in hazardous waste sites. He has served on national advisory committees for the Corps of Engineers, US Fish and Wildlife Service, and the National Wetlands Technical Council in the development of wetland delineation and evaluation techniques. Dr. Josselyn is currently retained as a wetlands consultant to the California Coastal Conservancy and the Bay Conservation and Development Commission. He has also provided expert witness testimony on substantive federal and state cases relative to the legal definition of wetlands and wetland mitigation costs. He is a member of the Society of Wetland Scientists, Estuarine Research Foundation, Society for Ecological Restoration and Management, and Westem Society of Naturalists. He was elected as a fellow of the California Academy of Sciences in 1984 in recognition of his scientific accomphshments in wetland ecology. James W. Buchholz. MA Senior Associate -• Senior Wetland Ecologist Mr. Buchholz has had over 10 years of experience in project management for wetland-related studies. He has worked closely with govemment and private clients in the development of feasible and successful wetland mitigation projects. He is experienced in the application of Corps of Engineers Section 10 and 404 wetland delineation procedures and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service wetland classification system, and is certified in Habitat Evaluation Procedure (USFWS-HEP). Mr. Buchholz has co-authored papers on wetland enhancement and restoration and is a member of the Society of Wetland Scientists and Society for Ecological Restoration and Management. Mr. Buchholz has been project director on wetland restoration and enhancement projects, wetland mapping and delineation studies, environmental impact statements, planting plans for wetlands and coastal uplands, and wetland restoration monitoring studies. He supervises studies on water quality and soils characterization. Douglas Spicher. MA Associate — Wetland botanist Mr. Spicher has had extensive experience in the field study of wetland plant distribution and identification and is responsible for wetland vegetation mapping. He is experienced in a variety of wetland types including coastal tidal marshes and inland bottomland hardwoods. Mr. Spicher is trained in the use of the Army Corps of Engineers wetland delineation procedures and habitat evaluation using the Adamus and WET techniques developed by the Federal Highway Administration. As a result, his studies have received acceptance by both federal and state regulatory agencies. He has extensive experience in wetland plant cultivation and has successfully implementated many restoration projects involving planting, construction supervision, and post-project monitoring. Pamela L. Williams. PhD Associate ~ Wildlife Ecologist Dr. Williams received her PhD and MA degrees in zoology, specializing in vertebrate ecology, and has a B.S. in Conservation of Natural Resources. In over ten years experience in field observations and analyses, she has acquired extensive experience with both upland and wetland habitats. She has conducted numerous bird censuses and has authored many publications on both wildlife censusing and population biology. In addition, she has taught natural history of amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals in the laboratory and the field and is familiar with the habitat requirements of a variety of vertebrate species, including many rare and endangered species. She has received grants for her research from the University of California at Berkeley, the American Museum of Natural History, Sigma Xi, and the Harris Foundation. Dr. Wilhams is familiar with NEPA and CEQA regulations. She is responsible for wildlife studies and habitat analysis for water birds, and field studies of rare and endangered species. Kim Bobzien. BS Technician — Wetland biologist Ms. Bobzien has a degree in Environmental Science specializing in soil and plant ecology. She is experienced in field and laboratory analysis, and is familiar with the WET method. Ms. Bobzien has published a research paper on riparian restoration, and conducted research on the effects of salinity on coastal plants. She has worked in wetlands of Califomia, Delaware, and Virginia and is familiar with soil and hydrologic requirements of these wetland systems. She is knowledgeable in the use of computer modeling and computer analysis. Ms. Bobzien is responsible for laboratory and field soils testing, literature searches, data compilation and analysis, and report production. John Van Staveren. BS Technician - Wetland biologist Mr. Van Staveren received his Biology degree specializing in invertebrate zoology. He has extensive experience in the collection, identification and preservation of marine and freshwater invertebrates and has participated in field studies involving fireshwater fish populations. He is also trained in water quality measurements, both in the field and in the laboratory. Mr. Van Staveren is responsible for field water quality studies, analysis of benthic invertebrate and fish communities, graphics production, literature searches and report preparation. CLIENTS Wetlands Research Associates, Inc. has worked for a variety of clients including federal and state agencies, local and regional authorities, non- profit organizations, consulting firms, and private companies. A partial list of clients includes: Federal and State Agencies US Army Corps of Engineers State Coastal Conservancy US Department of Justice San Francisco Bay Conservation California Department of Transportation and Development Commission Virginia Department of Transportation Delaware Department of Transportation Michigan Department of Transportation Regional and Local Authorities County of Marin, Open Space District County of Sonoma, Regional Park District East Bay Regional Park District Seattle Waste Water Treatment Agency City of San Francisco, Planning Department City of Chula Vista, Redevelopment Agency City of South San Francisco City of Sunnyvale, Parks and Recreation City of Palo Alto, Pubhc Works Non-profit organizations Marin Audubon Society Huntington Beach Conservancy Sonoma County Farmlands and Open Space Foundation Consulting firms Philip Williams and Associates William Patrick, Inc. Jones and Stokes and Associates Cole/Mills Associates Jefferson Associates Danadjieva and Koenig The Planning Collaborative Santina and Thompson Tito Patri and Associates Harvey and Stanley Assoc. WAPORA Earth Metrics Private Companies Lincoln Properties, Dallas Leshe Salt Company, Newark Price Company, San Diego Santa Fe Realty, San Francisco Waste Management, Oakland PROJECT EXPERIENCE Restoration and Enhancement Planning Project Title: Rush Ranch Management Plan Client: Sonoma County Farmlands and Open Space Foundation Date Completed: In Progress Preparation of land management plan for 2000 acre wetland, riparian, and grazing land adjacent to Suisun Marsh. Project includes assessment of restoration and mitigation potential of wetland portions, development of grazing management plan, and design of pubhc access features. Project Title: Wetland mitigation for Virginia Route 288 CHent: Virginia Department of Transportation Date Completed: In Progress Preparation of wetland mitigation plans for FEIS for Route 288 near Richmond, VA. Project includes field studies of existing wetlands and development of specific wetland mitigation plans for 24 impacted wetlands, primarily palustrine forested habitats. Final plans to be approved by federal and state interagency committee. Project Title: Wetland mitigation for Michigan Route 131 extension Client: Michigan Department of Transportation Date Completed: In Progress Preparation of wetland mitigation plans for impacted wetlands along a highway ahgnment near Cadillac, Michigan. Assist in evaluation of impacted wetlands and determination of least environmentally damaging altemative. Project outcome will include site specific plans for wetland restoration, including hydrologic control and re-vegetation specifications. Project Title: San Antonio Creek floodplain restoration Chent: Sonoma County Water Agency Date Completed: In progress Development of a floodplain restoration plan to restore riparian and freshwater vegetation. Project involves evaluation of causes of flooding within the watershed, recommendation of structures to be demolished in the floodplain, and means by which sites can be restored with minimal cost. Project Title: Wetland mitigation plan for Delaware Route 13 realignment Client: Delaware Department of Transportation and WAPORA Date Completed: In progress Preparation and implementation of wetland mitigation plans for 52 wetland sites (primarily bottomland hardwoods) being impacted by new highway alignment. Project involves field assessments, evaluation of wetland replacement needs, and development of specific wetland mitigation activities for each impacted wetland. Phase II will involve detailed conceptual plans for all mitigation sites. Project Title: Wetland mitigation plan for Virginia Route 199 Interchange Client: Virginia Department of Transportation and WAPORA Date completed: In progress Preparation of a 10 acre wetland creation plan to mifigate bottomland hardwood losses associated with a highway interchange near Williamsburg, VA. Conducted soils analysis, groundwater studies, and developed water budget model for mitigation site. Project design saved $200,000 over previous project design. Project Title: North Richmond Waterfront Master Plan Chent: City of Richmond Date Completed: In progress Evaluation of the shorehne of North Richmond along San Francisco Bay towards the implementation of a shoreline restoration plan, including urban waterfront development. Project involves restorafion assessment of tidal, non-fidal, and stream wetland habitats within the confines of a proposed urban waterfront development plan. Project analysis must consider numerous hazardous waste sites within the study region. Outcome will be used to locate sites for habitat protection, public access, and restoration. Project Title: Baliona Lagoon Restoration Client: Friends of Ballona Lagoon Date Completed: In progress Integration of lagoon restoration, public access, and marina development within the Ballona Lagoon in Marina del Rey, California. Project involves development of a water quahty management plan, restoration of dune and wetland vegetation, evaluation of optimal public access facihties, and cost estimation for implementation. Project Title: Moffett Technology Center mitigation plan Client: Liberty Service Corporation Date Completed: August 1988 Preparation of on-site and off-site mitigation plans for a light industrial development within a seasonally ponded wetland. Project involved site evaluation using modified HEP techniques, evaluation of altemative mitigation sites, and preparation of final plan for approval by federal and state agencies. Project Title: Redwood High School Wetland Enhancement Plan Chent: State Coastal Conservancy and Marin Audubon Society Date Completed: September 1988 Prepared an enhancement plan for a degraded salt marsh in Larkspur, CA. Conducted vegetation surveys; analyzed wetland soils; assessed existing invertebrate and fish utiliza- tion; and worked with Audubon volunteers in avian assessment. Worked with local and state agencies to receive approval of plan. Project Title: Price Club Wetland Mitigation Plan Chent: City of South San Francisco and Price Club Date Completed: December 1987 Dehneated salt marsh on project property and developed on-site and off-site mitigation plans to meet federal and state permit requirements. After plan was accepted, WRA provided biological supervision during construction and was responsible for all wetland vegetation planting and completion of subsequent site monitoring requirements. Project Title: Landfill Expansion and Wetland Mitigation Plan Client: Zanker Road Resource Recovery Corporation Date Completed: June 1987 Prepared mitigation plan to provide for expansion of landfill operation within seasonal ponded wetland. Plan required habitat evaluation to assess acreage requirements for enhancement to off-set fill impacts.Planned for endangered species populations and wintering waterfowl usage. 8 Project Title: Huntington Beach Wetland/Dune Restoration Plan Client: State Coastal Conservancy and Huntington Beach Conservancy Date Completed: June 1987 Prepared an enhancement plan for a back duneAvetland area near Newport Beach in coordination with a Caltrans roadwidening project and Flood District flood channel construction. Project involved soils and vegetation mapping for duneAvetland area, investigation of endangered species use of wetland and nearby sites, and completion of enhancement plan to be operated in conjunction with flood control measures. Project Tifle: Chula Vista Bayfront Enhancement Plan, Chula Vista, CA Chent: State Coastal Conservancy and City of Chula Vista Date Completed: May 1987 Prepared enhancement plans for four salt marsh, one freshwater marsh and an upland sites within the City of Chula Vista's Bayfront redevelopment area. The existing area, which has been heavily disturbed by industrial and agricultural development, provided habitat for three federally endangered animal species and two rare and endangered plant species. The final enhancement plan report contained additional information on habitat objectives, buffer zone considerafions and predator management plans, reviewed the impacts of urban mn-off on wetlands, and proposed pubhc access regulations. Plan approved and accepted by City of Chula Vista. Project Title: Mission Bay Plan, San Francisco, CA Chent: City of San Francisco, Planning Department Date Completed: September 1986 Conducted assessment studies and developed tidal salt marsh creation plans for wildlife habitat in the midst of a 200-acre redevelopment project on the eastern shoreline of the City of San Francisco. Project received design awards from the American Association of City Planners and Commendation Award from the City of San Francisco. Project Title: Doran Park Enhancement Plan, Bodega Harbor, CA Client: County of Sonoma, Regional Parks District Date Completed: July 1986 Prepared an enhancement plan for a coastal dune and salt marsh system as part of the Section 404 permit requirements for a marina. A final report documented the field data collected, management altematives presented, and final management plan with estimated construction costs. Project was accepted as meeting all federal and state permit requirements. Project Title: Downtown Tiburon Freshwater Marsh Restoration Client: Town of Tiburon, CA Date Completed: May 1986 Provided biological assessment services to the Town of Tiburon in the planning and implementation of a seven-acre freshwater marsh, pond, and riparian habitat enhancement project. A planting plan for native wetland and riparian vegetation was developed, and on-site supervision for the plan's implementation was provided. Project Title: Remillard Pond Restoration Plan Chent: Marin Audubon Society Date Completed: May 1986 Performed a biological evaluation of a bayfront freshwater lagoon located in and recommendation of enhancement actions to preserve and plant native vegetation, fulfill habitat requirements for wildlife, and arrange dredging necessary to control nuisance cattail growth. Project Title: Restoration Plan for Guadalaupe Slough Wetland Fill Chent: Leshe Salt Company Date Completed: Febmary 1986 Planned a half-acre tidal brackish restoration site required as mitigation for non-permitted fill. Developed grading specifications and monitoring program to eliminate cease and desist order against chent. Project Title: Rush Creek Wetland Enhancement Plan Client: Parks and Open Space District, County of Marin Date Completed: August 1985 Prepared an enhancement plan for a 100-acre degraded non-tidal marsh in Novato, CA. Project involved the assessment of existing habitat conditions and determination of conditions leading to degradation of the wetland habitat. Vegetation surveys, soils analysis, and wildlife assessment were conducted. Plan involved a combination of tidal and managed wetland systems. 10 Project Title: Eelgrass Transplantation and Monitoring Program Chent: Regional Park District, County of Sonoma Date Completed: May 1984 Prepared subtidal eelgrass transplantation and monitoring specifications as mitigation for Spud Point Marina Navigational Improvements Project, Bodega Harbor, CA. Planting was successfully implemented by University of Cahfomia biologists. 11 Resource Management and Wetland Revegetation Project Title: Biological Monitoring and Revegetation Plan for Shorebird Marsh Client: Emest W. Hahn, Inc. Date Completed: In Progress Provided biological monitoring services on a 34 acre controlled-tidal wetland in Corte Madera, CA. Analyzed wetland plant distribution, conducted pilot planting program for wetland and transitional species, propagated and installed transition zone species, and developed recommendations for improvement of habitat management. Project Title: Revegetation of Waste Water Treatment Ponds Chent: Chevron, USA Date Completed: June 1988 Provided planting design and all wetland vegetation to create a freshwater marsh treatment facility for treated refinery waste from Chevron, USA refinery in Richmond, CA. Facility designed to meet state and federal water discharge requirements. Project Title: Revegetation at San Bruno Slough Client: The Price Company Date Completed: December 1987 Revegetated a half-acre restored marsh with wetland and transition zone species. Services included installation of cordgrass and pickleweed, and propagation and installation of gumplant, coyote brush, and salt marsh rosemary. Project Title: Price Club Public Access Planting Client: B & K Landscaping and The Price Company Date Completed: December 1987 Propagated plant materials and completed installation of plants in the transition zone between existing wetlands and a public access pathway. Plant materials included rooted coyote brush and gumplant and salt marsh rosemary grown from seed. 12 Project Title: Plant Propagation for Granite Creek, Inc. Chent: Granite Creek Landscaping, Inc. Date Completed: December 1987 Project involved reviewing landscaping planting plans around a seasonal wetland and making recommendations of which species to plant. Propagation of recommended species was completed. Project Title: Chent: Date Completed: DiGiovine Planting Enhancement DiGiovine Family December 1987 Completed propagation and installation of wetland and transitional species at the wetland in front of a private residence. Owners wanted to enhance the beauty and wildlife habitat values of their wetland. Project Title: Chent: Date Completed: Nuisance Algae Blooms in Salt Ponds Leshe Salt Company November 1986 Implemented field study program to determine the causes of nuisance algae blooms in salt evaporation ponds. Conducted initial field studies, supervised Leslie personnel involved in study, and developed recommendations for control and long-term monitoring. Project Title: Wetland Revegetation at Shoreline Center Client: Lincoln Properties, Inc Date Completed: May 1985 Completed wetland revegetation on excavated area adjacent to office building complex. Planted cordgrass and pickleweed in 1.0 acre area and monitored site until plant establishment completed. 13 Wetland Delineation and Habitat Evaluation Project Title: Consultant Services to Bay Conservation and Development Commission Client: Bay Conservation and Development Commission Date Completed: In progress Services include evaluating wetland restoration/enhancement plans submitted to Commission as part of permit apphcations, providing short reports to staff on wetland issues, and conducting field work in support of Commission actions. Project Title: Wetland Mitigation Site Evaluation Chent: Dr. WiUiam Patrick, Inc. Date Completed: In progress Project involves the delineation of freshwater wetland on parcels in Suisun Bay region, implementing Habitat Evaluation Procedures, and providing assessment of wetland restoration feasibility for specific sites. Site encompasses over 4000 acres. Project Title: Wetland Delineation Chent: Santa Fe Pacific Realty Date Completed: In progress Determination of wetland extent on various parcels throughout San Francisco Bay area using US Army Corps of Engineers wetland delineation techniques. Evaluated vegetation, soils, and hydrology. Sites involve over 200 acres. Project Title: Wetland Delineation Client: City of Suisun City Date Completed: In progress Delineation of tidal and non-tidal wetlands on development parcels adjacent to Suisun Marsh. Study involves aerial photographic reconnaissance, vegetation mapping, hydrologic studies, and soil evaluation. Site involves over 150 acres. 14 Project Title: Santa Clara Ballpark Wetland Delineation Client: Santa Clara BaUpark Task Force Date Completed: August 1988 Evaluation and delineation of palustrine wetland habitats on site proposed for major league baseball stadium. Used COE criteria for degraded wetland habitats. Resulted in successful proposal for ballpark site selection. Project Title: Santa Rosa Vernal Pool Delineation Chent: XL Homes Date Completed: October 1988 Delineation of potential wetland and vernal pool areas on residential development site in West Santa Rosa. Applied COE comprehensive delineation methodology with an evaluation of "adjacency" component of the section 404 Clean Water Act regulations. COE District Engineer found in favor of client. Project Title: Wetland Vegetation, Delineation, and WET Evaluation Chent: Leslie Salt Company Date Completed: April 1988 Conducted over four year period, an extensive wetland vegetation study, wetland delineation, and WET (Version 1) on pastures, salt crystallizers, and freshwater marshes, and tidal salt marshes owned by the Leslie Salt Company. Evidence presented in Federal court with the case decided in favor of chent. Project Title: WET Evaluation of Bottomland Hardwoods Client: Virginia Department of Transportation Date Completed: March 1988 Conducted WET evaluation of bottomland hardwood forests along highway alignments near Richmond, Virginia. 15 Project Title: Wetland Delineation Client: City of Sunnyvale Date Completed: April 1988 Used Corps of Engineers wetland delineation procedure to determine seasonal wetland extent on parcels to be used for park development within the City of Sunnyvale. Delineation accepted by Corps of Engineers, San Francisco District. Project Title: Wetland Delineation Client: Lockheed Corporation Date Completed: 1987 Delineation of nontidal wetland extent on various parcels in Sunnyvale, California using Army Corps of Engineers wetland dehneation techniques. Evaluated vegetation, soils, and hydrology. Project Title: Dumbarton Bridge Approach Chent: Califomia Department of Transportation Date Completed: 1984 Identified and classified existing and historical weflands in south San Francisco Bay along the approach roads to Dumbarton Bridge as consultants to the Califomia Department of Transportation; findings were used as expert testimony in litigation. Case settled. 16 Environmental Impact Determination Project Title: Concord Naval Weapons Station Wetland Remedial Action Plan Client: Department of Justice Date Completed: In progress Consultant to the US Navy and Department of Justice in evaluating the impact of a potential toxic spill in a wetland area and developing a plan for containment and restoration of site at the Concord Naval Weapons Station. Project Title: Marathon Project EIR/EIS Client: City of Hayward/US Army Corps of Engineers Date Completed: August 1988 Review of mitigation plans proposed by Marathon Corporation for mitigation of wetland fill and endangered species habitat reduction. Involved evaluation of WET method for project site and alternative mitigation sites. Project Title: Sunnyvale Baylands Park Master Plan EIR/EIS Chent: City of Sunnyvale and Tito Patri and Associates Date Completed: June 1988 Conducted wildlife studies of site, including supervision of trapping for salt marsh harvest mouse. Participated in evaluating impacts of various park configurations and in preparation of final plan. Project Title: Chevron Outfall EIR/EIS Client: Jefferson Associates, San Francisco Date Completed: November 1986 Determined the impacts of proposed treated refinery effluent discharge on aquatic and shorehne habitats. Project included mapping of aquatic and shorehne vegetation in the region of outfall; conducting field studies on wildlife in wetland areas, including two endangered species; determination of impacts of outfall on species and habitats; and recommendation of mitigation measures to alleviate potential environmental impacts. 17 Project Title: Leslie Salt Dredge Lock Client: Cole/Mills Associates Date Completed: July 1986 Provided a field assessment of impacts of a dredge lock on adjacent wetland habitats and completed Initial Study recommendations. Project involved working with federal and state agency personnel. Project Title: Wetland Impact Analysis for Town of Corte Madera Chent: Town of Corte Madera Date Completed: 1984 Prepared Environmental Impact Report assessments for three projects involving impacts on adjacent wetlands. Reports were prepared for the Town of Corte Madera on the Corte Madera Inn, The Habitat Townhouses, and Madera del Presidio. The report included an evaluation of wetland impacts and developed recommendations for mitigation. 18 Project Title: Associates: Affiliation: Client: Date Completed: Other Projects Involving WRA. Inc. Associates Effects of Water Diversion on Suisun Marsh Josselyn Romberg Tiburon Center for Environmental Studies San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission November 1987 Prepared an analysis of the effects of increased water diversion on the ecology and long-term stability of the managed and tidal marshes surtounding Suisun Bay. Developed water salinity standards to protect the wetlands and assisted BCDC staff in the preparation of testimony to the State Water Control Board. Work conducted under subcontract to Philip Williams and Associates. Project Title: Associates: Affiliation: Chent: Effects of Global Climate Change on the Wetlands of San Francisco Bay Josselyn Romberg Tiburon Center for Environmental Studies Moffat and Nichol, Engineers Date Completed: January 1988 Evaluated the impacts of increased sea level on the ecology of tidal and diked wetlands surrounding San Francisco Bay. Summarized the existing literature on Bay wetlands and their abihty to respond to rising sea-level under scenarios prepared by Moffat and Nichol. Prepared testimony to Bay Conservation and Development Commission along with recommendations for future mitigation projects to account for rising sea level. Project Title: Associates: Affiliation: Client: Operations and Management Plan for Riparian and Wetland Natural Reserves in the Central Valley Josselyn, Duffield, and Martindale Romberg Tiburon Center for Environmental Studies California Department of Fish and Game Date Completed: September 1988 Study of 9 natural reserves from Antioch to Chico, along the Sacramento River. Project involves mapping of wetland habitats, conducting field work on species of special concern and rare and endangered species, preparation of habitat management plans, and completion of operations procedures for habitat management. 19 Project Title: Wetland Change in San Francisco Bay Associates: Josselyn, Duffield Affiliation: Romberg Tiburon Center for Environmental Studies Client: US Fish and Wildlife Service Date Completed: In progress Reviewed wetland mapping for 1950, 1976, and 1986 to determine changes in various wetland habitats over time. Project involves analyzing various re mote sensing map prod- ucts, interacting with federal and state agencies, and collecting information on causes of changes in wetland acreage and habitat types. Selected wetland restorations are being studied to determine the effectiveness of various habitat configvu^ations in supporting wildhfe uses. Project Title: Associates: Affihafion: Chent: Date Completed: Landfill Removal in Benicia State Recreation Area Josselyn, Spicher Romberg Tiburon Center for Environmental Studies Cahfornia Parks and Recreation In progress Developed a remedial action plan for the removal of an old landfill site from a wetland section in Benicia State Recreation Area. Project involves determination of the feasibility of various altematives, supervision of hydrologic consultants, and development of conceptual plan for restoration. Project Tifle: Associates: Affihation: Client: Date Completed: Waterbird Utilization of an Urban Run-off Demonstration Wetland Duffield San Francisco State University National Institute for Urban Wildhfe 1985 Determined waterbird use of a wetland system designed to demonstrate the effectiveness of various wetland configurations for pollutant removal. Results of the one-year study of bird abundance and utilization of various habitats within the demonstration marsh were published in a technical report and scientific journals. 20 Project Tifle: In-Service Training for Corps of Engineers Personnel Associates: Josselyn Affihation: Romberg Tiburon Center for Environmental Studies Chent: US Army Corps of Engineers Date Completed: 1984, 1985, 1987 Conducted training sessions in wetland restoration for Corps of Engineers personnel. Teaching materials and articles were provided for the sessions and site demonstrations in wetland restoration and vegetation planting were conducted. Project Title: Assessment of Marsh Restoration in Marin County Associates: Josselyn, Buchholz, and Spicher Affihation: Romberg Tiburon Center for Environmental Studies Client: San Francisco Foundation Date Completed: 1983 Assessed three wetland restoration sites in Marin County. Assessment involved a study of plant succession, soil characteristics, sedimentation and tidal channel changes, invertebrate and vertebrate habitat utilization, and shorehne erosion control techniques. The final report included a review of wetland changes in Marin County and development of recommendations for improving the wetland restoration planning and implementation process. Results pubhshed in a book entitled: Marsh Restoration in San Francisco Bay: A Guide to Planning and Implementation. 21 References Liza Riddle, Project Manager Enhancement Program State Coastal Conservancy 1330 Broadway, Suite 1100 Oakland, CA 94612 (415) 464 - 1015 Steve McAdam, Deputy Director Bay Conservation and Development Commission 30 Van Ness Avenue, Room 2011 San Francisco, CA 94102 (415) 557 - 3686 David Ramsey Virginia Department of Transportation 1401 East Broad Street Richmond, VA 23219 (804) 786 - 7428 22 Ogden Beeman & Associates. Inc. OGDEN BEEMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. (06A1) specializes in the planning and execution of complex dredging projects. Since 1976 the firm has been involved in major dredging projects throughout the United States and abroad. Clients have included government agencies, including states, the U.S. Navy and Corps of Engineers, ports, industry, and dredging contractors. The firm often serves as part of multi-disciplinary teams, providing expertise in the integration of dredging project elements with larger project objectives. Relevant projects which demonstrate the firm's breadth of experience are provided below. 0 Vancouver Lake Reclamation. Washington: Dredge plan, cost estimates and construction monitoring for lake reclamation project requiring removal of 8.5 million cubic yards of clays and sand. Largest EPA-sponsored reclamation project in United States, requiring extensive resource agency coordination to preserve water quality and reduce fisheries Impact. Provided optimum dredged material disposal plan considering creation of disposal islands, and use of on-shore diked areas. Basin configuration combined with flushing channel to promote lake flushing and alleviate maintenance dredging. Applied Dredged Material Research Program criteria to weir design, disposal site configuration, dike design criteria and dewatering methods. Client: Port of Vancouver, WA 0 Corps of Engineers Dredge Curriculum: Curriculum development, text and instruction for four Individual course sequences encompassing all elements of dredging for the federal government. Since 1982, OBAI has instructed Corps of Engineers and Navy personnel from throughout the United States In four separate curricula: Dredge Inspectors, Dredging for Engineers and Estimators, Dredge Contract Administration, and Dredging Fundamentals. Subject matter encompasses pipeline, hopper and mechanical dredge techniques, plan and specifications development, project layout, production criteria, channel design, hydrosurveys and application of Corps' Dredge Material Research Program to project planning and disposal area design. Client: U.S. Army Engineer Division, Huntsville 0 Design Criteria for Contained Dredged Material Disposal, State of Washington: Subconsultant for dredging and disposal elements of sediment disposal standards development. Dredging alternatives, transport modes and preliminary design criteria for contained disposal options. Mandate by Puget Sound Water Quality Authority calls for the state to develop standards for confined disposal of contaminated sediments, i^reliminary design criteria provided for in-water capping, nearshore and upland disposal options. In- water disposal elements include depth limitations, slope and berm requirements, water column velocity restrictions and cap thickness. Client: State of Washington Department of Ecology, through Parametrix, Inc. 0 San Francisco Bay Dredge and Disposal Open End Contract: Open end contractor to provide dredging, disposal and sedimentation expertise to San Francisco District, Corps of Engineers. Disposal site constraints in the San Francisco Bay estuary have resulted in pressure to reduce sedimentation, find alternatives to in-water disposal and analyze benefits resulting from maintenance dredging. OBAI expertise in engineering, economics, environmental and regulatory analysis has been applied to land disposal analysis, sedimentation reduction, and identification of project beneficiaries. Upland disposal site investigations have included detailed feasbility study for three long term sites, including 2.0 million cyd disposal for creation of salt marsh habitat in upper San Francisco Bay. Client: U.S. Army Engineer District, San Francisco OGDEN BEEMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Page two. 0 Oceanside Sand Bypass Svstem. CA: Subconsultant to Moffatt & Nichol for dredging elements related to sand bypass system development at Oceanside. Provided pump and production analysis for various physical and operating configurations for entrance channel maintenance system. Client: U.S. Army Engineer District, Los Angeles, through Moffatt & Nichol Engineers 0 Smith-Bvbee Lake Reclamation: Phase One: Preliminary alternative assessment with cost estimates for lake reclamation and enhancement effort in metropolitan Portland area. Provided engineering analysis of hydraulic and hydrologic characteristics necessary to restore stagnant lakes to ecologically viable state for fisheries and waterfowl enhancement. Phase Two: Water budget, surface area and volumes and hydrologic characteristics assessment for development of lake management plan. Determination of hydrologic basin water budget including precipitation, evaporation, surface runoff, groundwater seepage, and relationship to adjacent Columbia and Willamette River stages; assessment of alternative construction Impacts on water quality and mitigative measures. Client: Port of Portland 0 Hopper Dredge Feasibility Analysis for Beach Nourishment Pump-Out: Prime contractor to assess U.S. hopper dredge fleet's capability to address requirements for beach nourishment. Investigated hopper dredge fleet characteristics, pumping capabilities, European technology and beach nourishment requirements. Client: Watenways Experiment Station, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, MS 0 Navy Homeport Dredging and Disposal. Final Design Phase. Everett. WA: Design Phase I: Dredging and disposal subconsultants on final design team for Navy Homeport project in Puget Sound, WA. Firm responsible for dredge pian, including equipment selection, methods and preliminary cost estimates, for dredging and disposal of contaminated (800,000 cyds) and clean (2.0 million cyds) of sediments in ocean and upland sites. Contaminated sediment disposal included deepwater placement using diffuser pipe with subsequent placement of clean cap material. Project designed to meet EPA Section 404 and 40 CFR-Subchapter H criteria for in-water, upland and nearshore disposal and ocean dumping. Extensive resource agency input, review and coordination required as well as liaison with Corps of Engineers' project input. Environmental Impact Statement Phase: Responsible for dredging and disposal elements of Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for Homeport project supplemental EIS. Considered sediment type and chemical analysis, dredge equipment and methodologies to assess impacts on water quality and other physical characteristics. Monitoring Plan Development Phase: Responsible for development of monitoring plan to meet State Water Quality Certification and Section 10/404 permit requirements for Navy Homeport. Coordinated integration of sediment, physical oceanography, biological and water quality elements into an integrated approach to monitor dredging and disposal of mound, contaminated and cap materials. OBAI had primary responsibility for physical oceanography elements, including positioning, bathymetric, side scan sonar and sediment profile camera surveys, and water quality monitoring, including sea surface microlayer. Client: Department of Navy, WESTDIV 0 Dredge and Disposal Plan. Barge Facilitv. Wallula. WA. Dredge and disposal plan for maintenance dredging access channel to Columbia River paper mill. Developed final dredge plan, cost estimates, technical provisions and schematic drawings for dredging and upland disposal of 100.000 cyds. Included permit documents and liaison, contract review and construction monitoring. Client: Boise Cascade, Inc., Wallula Paper Group OGDEN BEEMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Page three. 0 Olyrnpia East End Boat Basin: Dredging and disposal plan and design parameters for dike construction for one million cubic yard dredging project with high concerns for water quality. Project Included 50-acre fill In estuary portion of Puget Sound and a dredge plan to accommodate timely construction. Identified dewatering methods and costs for fine- grained sediments. Provided weir and disposal site configuration to satisfy water quality aspects and coordinate agency permitting on dredging Issues. Client: Port of Olympla, WA » OCT rQ-3- 13^=^. ''Dredge Planning for Lake Reclamation' a Case Study By: Ogden Beeman, P.E. and Greg Hartman, P.E. 62 Port leeman & Associates i/th Avenue 97201 •^^-i^/O^Fi/th Av :anciy/3fe^ ABSTRACT OGDEN BEEMAN &.ASSOCIATES, INCL 310 S.W. FOU.TO) AVENUE, SUITE ni» POfillANO. OREGON 97204 Vancouver Lake is a shallow lake of approximately 1052 hectares (2600 acres) situated adjacent to the major popula- tion centers of Vancouver, Washington and Portland, Oregon. Extensive studies have concluded that Vancouver Lake is rapidly dying as a result of naturai and manmada causes. Fortunately, the means are available to reverse this trend through a combination of lake bed dredging to improve circulation and construction of a flushing channel to add circulation water to the lake from the Columbia River. The Port of Vancouver requested proposals in January 1979 for completion of the Vancouver Lake Reclamation Plan. This operation pian contained five major tasks, one of which covered dredging and disposal operations. That task was done by the consulting firm of Ogden Beeman & Associates, acting as subcontractor to the firm of Dames and Moore. The dredge and disposal planning task was broken into three components: o Hydraulic issues - relating to lake depths available for floating dredge plant and creation of island disposal sites. o Cost estimating - relating to determination of a dredging method and the cost of perform.ing the work. o Optimization of the dredge plan - relating to sedi- ment type and disposal site locations. 287 Ogden Beeman Gregory L. Hartman Mr. Ogden Beeman was an employee of the Portland District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers between 1961 and 1967. During that time he served as a loaned consultant to various U.S. government agencies on dredging projects throughout the United States and in Asia. Prior to work with the Corps of Engineers, he was employed as a civil engineer for a major dredging contractor. Between 1957 and ISlL, Mr. Beeman served in various management capacities at the Port of Portland, Oregon. After leaving the Port of Portland, Mr. Beeman was the Project Manager (197i-1976) for Phase Two of the Korean Port Development Study. Mr. Beeman is current- ly an independent consultant. His assignments have taken him throughout North America and intc Africa, Asia and the Middle East. Mr. Beeman received his B.S. in Civil Engineer- ing in 1956 from Stanford University in California; and at Technological University in Delft, Netherlands, he received a diploma in Hydraulic Engineering in 1963. Gregory L. Hartman has been involved in dredging activities since 1970 as a civil engineer in the Portland District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, providing engineering support for government owned pipeline and hopper dredges. In 1973, Mr. Hartman became Chief, Dredging Operations Section where he supervised and administered engineering, planning and co- ordination of channel dredging for 710 miles of navigable wateway. Since 1978, Mr. Hartman joined the firm of Ogden Beeman & Associates and has been consulting in waterway development and dredging. He received his B.S. in Civil Engineering in 1968 from Oregon State University, and return- ed to Oregon State in 197^ to obtain an M.S. in Civil Engineering, with major studies in ocean and river hydrau- lics and minor studies in management science. 288 SnHlaooo Lake \-A.'~T!irVKK LAKE 103 19 'J. -. 1 fSl*?! ' ^- ' "'^oX'p^,"' '^ • • ^':VA:N•(COJfV ER'••J^•'^i:i(V-• FIG. i Vancouver Lake near Vancouver, Washington and Portland, Oregon (from USGS topographic Quadrangle, 15 minute series, Portland, Wash-Oreg.) 289 This paper discusses the rationale and approach to these issues with emphasis given to optimization of the dredge plan, selection of the equipment and determination of dredge production. VANCOUVER LAKE DREDGING SITES Vancouver Lake reclamation has been on the "drawing board" for several years. Detailed studies specifically ad- dress lake reclamation, or more appropriately the lake rehabilitation. General criteria for a dredging plan was assembled in the Dames and Moore study, "Vancouver Lake Rehabilitation" (1977). The recommended final dredging plan is conceptually unchanged with the exception of omitting a proposed 1.2 mile diameter sailing area. The final Vancouver Lake dredging plan includes: o A channel approximately 305 m (1000 ft.) wide dredged to minus 0.3 m (-1 foot) mean sea level (msi) along the west side of the lake. o A channel approximately 305 m - AbO m (1000 ft. - 1500 ft.) wide along the east side of the lake dredged to minus 1.2 m (i feet) msl depth to control the flow from Burnt Bridge Creek. o A channel approximately 305 m (1000 ft.) wide along the southerly side of the lake dredged to minus 0.3 m (1 foot) msi depth to enhance and provide flush- ing water through the east side channel. o Sediment traps in the lake dredged to minus l.S m (6 feet) msl and minus 1.5 m (-5 feet) msl at the discharge from the flushing channel and the entry to Lake River, respectively. o Extension of the east channel at a width of 152 m (500 feet) and a dredged depth of minus 0.6 m (2 feet) msl into the lake area at the mouth of Burnt Creek Bridge. o A dredging quantity of 6.u million cubic meters insitu. We categorized the lake dredging area into 18 subgroups on the basis of sediment characteristics of grain size and bulking factor, dredge quantities and dredge depths. Table 1 presents a summary of sediment quantities and sediment characteristics to be dredged. Prototype tests with a 20 cm (8 inch) hydraulic cutterhead dredge revealed the dredged fines will initially occupy 50% more volume in the disposal area than in the lake bottom. The fine sediments consolidate over a short period of time to occupy approximately 30% greater volume. Coarser, sandy sediments demonstrated no volume increase in the disposal area. A bulking factor of 1.3 is accordingly applied to silty sediments, 1.1 factor to silt-sand mix, and 1.0 factor to sandy sediments. 290 TABLE 1 INSITU AND DIKED DREDGE VOLUMES Dredge Site Sediment Type Volume Insitu - (1000 m-^ Bulking Factor Volume Disposal, (1000 m-^) 1 Sand ^18 1.0 ^18 2 Silt & Sand 832 1.1 915 3 Silt ^50 1.3 585 i. Silt \U 1.3 • 213 5 Silt 288 1.3 37^ 6 Siit 203 1.3 26^ 7 Silt 208 1.3 270 8 Silt 262 1.3 3:il 9 Silt 215 1.3 280 10 Silt 229 1.3 298 11 Siit 1.3 559 12 Silt & Sand 636 1.1 700 13 Silt 255 1.3 332 U Silt 391 1.3 508 15 Silt U5 1.3 189 16 Siit 292 1.3 380 17 Siit & Sand 287 1.3 373 18 Sand 738 1.0 738 Total 6,i-i3 Total 7,737 DISPOSAL SITES The Vancouver Lake Rehabilitation Plan (Dames and Moore, 1977) identified eight separate sites as potential locations for disposal of dredged sediment. Subsequent coordination with resource agencies, upland owners and recommendations by the consulting team provided a final array of nine sites composed of three new sites and including all or a portion of only six previous sites. Table 2 identifies the available sites and their disposal capacity in cubic meters at dif- ferent elevations of fill. EVALUATION OF DREDGING SYSTEMS Three types of dredging systems were considered for the lake excavation work. These systems are: 1. Mechanical shore based high solids content systems 2. Floating high solids content systems 3. Hydraulic pipeline systems The three systems were evaluated on an initial level to determine whether they should be included or excluded from the final detailed dredging plan and cost estimates. The evaluation focused on three factors: o Degree of risk associated with system; i.e. is it well proven? Can the system physically move sedi- ments the distances required from the lake bed to 291 TABLE 2 DISPOSAL SITE CAPACITIES SITE ELEVATION CAPACITY' (MSL) (Cubic Meters) Buckmire (1) 6.7 m ^10,000 North Park (I) 6.1 m 229,000 7.6 m 535,000 Kadow (111) 7.3 m 2,179,000 Dugan - Cenex (IV) 6.1 m 986,000 Dugan - Cenex (IV) 7.3 m 1, ^^49,000 South Park (V) 3.^ m 583,000 5.2 m 1,032,000 6.1 m 1,262,000 S.W. Island (VI) 573,000 N.E. Island (Vll) 795,000 N.E. Shore (Vlll) 1.5 m 505,000 Alcoa (IX) 6.1 m 382,000 7.3 m 745,000 Maximum Elevation Total = 8;353,000 the disposal site locations? Has the system been utilized to accomplish similar dredge efforts at other locations? o Relative cost of excavation. Has one system consis- tently experienced higher unit costs or are differ- ences in unit costs negligible? o Performance of system related to water quality con- siderations. Obvious deterimental water quality ef- fects could outweigh marginal production benefits on any system. Mechanical Shore Based High Solids Svstem. Mechanical shore based systems include the dragline or crane with clamshell. Physical reach limitations beyond the bank line appear to eliminate the use of this equipment. However, there was a modification of the dragline that appeared suitable for the Vancouver Lake application. That system incorporates a special design dragline bucket operated from a high line between two towers, and is sometimes called the Sauerman system. The Sauerman system can excavate to a depth of 1 m - 2.2 m below the water surface. However, a Sauerman dragline system is limited to a maxium haul distance less than 305 m . Nominal channel widths to be dredged' in the lake are now at or in excess of this limit. In summary, the Sauerman system provides the most probable effective land based mechanical system for the Vancouver Lake project dredging. However, the physical limitations dictate it is not a good application, and the equipment was 292 not recommended because: 1. The haul distances approach and exceed maximum system capability. 2 Fir behind some of the diked areas would require rehandling and use of land transport systems. This would be prohibitively expensive. r-.;,Tinci His'p Solids Content System. Increased concern for qualitv and problems wal> aredging toxic chemicais h!ve led to' the recent deveiopment of a floating dredge 'vctem capable of pumping high concentrations of s°;ids !,Th a minimal increase in bottom turbulence. Although or marily apolied to removal of industrial wastes from •[vers a'^nd harbors, the system appeared to be a potenUai ; ternative for dredging the Vancouver Lake fine sediments The high sclid concentration was attractive because of the potential to reduce disposal site ponding requirements, asso- ciated dikingcosts and water quality concerns. Two companies are known to manufacture the high density vstems the Oozer pump from Japan and the Pnuema System from Italy. The Oozer and Pneuma systems demonstrate the following characteristics: 1. Procuciion rates (fine sediments): 90 - 105 cu. m per hour 2. Disposal distances: 900- 1200 meters (with no lift) 3. Fuel consumptions: 265-320 liters per hour Both work veil in free-fiowing ciay and silt sediments but are not caoabie of moving compacted sedim.ents due to the lack of a mechanical cutterhead. The hieh density system requires dredging plant similar to a conventional hvdraulic dredge. The system wouid provide marginal improvement in local turbidity at the dredging site over a conventional system but, in spite of its high solids content output, would provide soiiQs production at onlv 20-25% of the comparable conventional pipeline system. The cost is inversely proportional to this production, i.e. the high densitv system would be 4 to 5 times more expensive. Ve concluded it was more economical to handle sediment water quality problems at the disposal site with a conventional pipeline .ystem than pay an excessive penalty on dredging costs for the high density system. Hvdraulic Pipeline System. Analysis therefore points to a S^d auac pipeline dredge equipped with a cutterhead o ouroose-buili suction intake system. There appears to be ubstantial energy and °P-ating efficiencies with a conven tional hvdraulic dredge up to about 50 cm (20 in) di^me er discharge line. A large dredge would exceed ^^e disposal site capabilities and jeopardize water quanty control. There appears to be severe cost and completion time penait es asroci/ted Vlth dredges less the 40 _ cm (16 in ) diameter discharge line. Thus, a system employing a 40 - 50 cm hydraulic cutterhead dredge was analyzed in more detail lor cost and enxironmental impacts. 293 There are no exact production rates established for 40 cm, 45 cm, or 50 cm pipeline dredge systems. Production rates are a function of numerous independent factors including but not limited to the dredge horsepower, pipeline size, sediment size, pump condition, weather conditions, density of water (i.e. saline, fresh) and crew experience. Assump- tions must be made to derive valid production curves for a dredge system. The details of the Vancouver Lake dredging program, including the sediment analysis, project location, and available disposal sites were known or could be assum- ed. Given this knowledge and the consultants' experience with dredging, production curves were determined for 45 cm (18") dredge system and for a 50 cm (20") dredge system that could be applied to the Vancouver Lake work. The production curves were derived with a few basic assump- tions which, though relatively simple, were necessary and foiiowed a logical sequence. First was the assumption that the equipment to be used was new. New equipment costs could be documented in terms of 1979 dollars, which would not require application of sophisticated equipment deprecia- tion, capital cost recovery and so on to derive plausible equipment costs. Also, the new equipment would be expected to perform at average to above average production rates. The second assumption was that a new equipment purchase for this work would come from a leading manufacturer of dredge plant and associated heavy construction equipment. The equipment wouid therefore be a basic "off the shelf" syf;!cr;; offered by leading manufactuers. This reduces the variation of dredge sizes that could be availabe for produc- tion curve derivation. That is, horsepower-pipeline size combinations are limited to manufacturer's "off the shelf" systems. This would in fact reflect the most efficient sys- tems in demand from long term experience in the dredging industry. 45 CM DREDGE SYSTEM Production curves were developed, based on sand and fine sediments identified in the Lake River project (figure 2). Pumping distances as identified in the optimum cost plan were applied to the 45 cm (18 in) pipeline production rates to compute an approximate 3.03 years time. This would include 3562 hours during which a booster pump system would be required. Booster time requirements are important because use of the booster would approximately double the unit cost. A high time requirement for booster pumps is an indicator of inadequate dredge plant horsepower and/or pipeline size for the project. The labor cost of a 45 cm dredge is approximately equal that of a 50 cm system. Increased time due to lower production rates of a 45 cm system would accordingly raise project labor costs. Critical concern on use of the 45 cm system was the questionable uniformity of sediments on the lakebed. A potential exists to dredge through pockets of sandy sedi- 294 45 cm Pipeline 1125 HP Vancouver Lake Sediment 1 2 PIPELINE LENGTH • lOOO i FIG. 2 Pipeline length versus production for 45 cm pipeline dredge pumping Vancouver Lake sediments ments in many of the dredging sites designated as silt. Capability to discha^g^ ^^^^^^ ^ sediments is iimited to approximately 19DO m with a booster unit (1125 horsepower package) and pumping distances in the project are bevond sandv -^''"'"'^ ^''^°-''y °f additional pockets of sandy materials wouid necessitate a booster system use beyond that estimated. y = Lcm us,e 50 CM DREDGE SYSTEM The production curves for a 50 cm dredge unit, 2 250 horsepower package were also computed (figure 3). The 20" dredge package wouid require an estimated 2.00 years to aTooVter Th""'' ^17 hours time requirement for file /K """" PUi^Ping isolated pockets of sand r.nih ? because a dredge plus booster system has the capability to pump over 2800 meters. This also alleviates concern about inability to complete the work. Reduced pro- ject time provided by a 50 cm dredge also reduces labor cost. Consequently, the 50 cm dredge was used for cost estimating purposes. 295 12. o o Z o u ae 50cm Pipeline 2250 HP Van. Lake Sediment 1 2 PIPELINE LENGTH • lOOOm FIG. 3 Pipeline length versus production for 50 cm pipeline dredge pumping Vancouver Lake sediments LAKE PERCHING Early in the development of the dredging plan, it became apparent that water depths in the lake would be critical to eauipment selection and project completion. Vancouver Lake has a complex hydrologic system. Water enters the lake by way of Burnt Bridge Creek., Lake River, surface flow from the land and ground water flow. Water leaves the lake by Lake River and evaporation. The predominant control ot water level comes from a two directional flow that occurs in Lake River. Lake River is a tributary to the Columbia River. The Lake River fiow responds to the Columbia River stage leveis. Short term water fluctuations in the Columbia River, such as those caused by tidal effects and small rainstorm runoli from upriver watersheds, are much greater than in Vancou- ver Lake. Long term stage conditions in the Columbia, sucn as the spring freshet stages and the summer/faH_ low water stage will create very similar water leveis in the lake. 296 Applying the Columbia River Summary Hydographs (Dames & Moore, 1977), it can be demonstrated that minimum daily low stages where water levels are 1.2 meters (4 feet) msl or less can be experienced in the lake from August through January, or approximately six months of the year. During the period from February through April, water levels of 1.2 m to 1.8 m (4 feet to 6 feet) msl could occur. Aver- age bed elevation leveis in Vancouver Lake are plus 0.6 m to 0.9 msl. Net water depths could then be 0.3 m and 0.6 m for six months and three months of the year respectively. Typical dredge plant requires a minimum water depth of 0.6 m to 1.2 m for flotation. Hydraulic pipeline dredges that utilize a ladder with cutterhead must have 1.8 meters of water depth to avoid air suction which reduces dredge production and causes significant pump damage through cavitation. Subsequently, during a low flow year in the river, use of conventional dredge plant could be practical only for three to five months. Limitation of dredging to that period of time is obviously not acceptable. It is desirable to insure adequate water depths in the project area on a year around basis. The vagaries of the seasonal hydrograph in the river does not provide this insurance, and an alternative concept for perching the lake was developed so that the dredging contractor can perch the lake if he chooses during dredging work. The perching of the lake could be accomplished by construc- tion of a fill structure in Lake River downstream of the lake. The fill materiais could come from: sandy bed sedi- ments dredged from the project. A spillway structure must be placed at the fill site to allow catchment of higher water following the May, June and July freshets, and the release of water as deemed necessary for dredging and environmen- tal considerations during other time periods. DREDGE PLAN OPTIMIZATION The 18 dredge areas and the 9 disposal sites were identified to form a basis of alternatives for the dredge plan. The objective was to determine what combination of required dredging and available disposal sites provides an optimum pian in terms of pro-^ect cost and equipment capability. Advanced linear program methodology was applied to dredg- ing and disposal site options to derive the optimum pian. Linear program methodology also allowed a systematic com- parison of alternative combinations in disposal site avail- ability and capacity. Linear programming is a technique used by managers to make decisions on production schedul- ing, investment analysis, industrial management, process control, transportation and distribution, capital planning and task allocation. The program optimized the dredge plan to minimize dredging cost. The linear program methodology utilized in developing the optimum dredge plan is available in more detail from the authors. 297 At the request of the Port of Vancouver, three dredge - disposal alternatives were examined: 1. Assume all 9 disposal sites avaiiable to the maxi- mum elevation as discussed in the disposal site section. 2. Assume Kadow property will be filled to 100 per cent capacity, the South Park site limited to 16 ft. fill height, and ail other sites remain unchanged. 3. Assume no material is placed at the Southwest Island site, all other sites remain the same a = alternative 1. All Sites Available - Alternative One. The solution given in Table 3 is the least cost option and optimum dredge plan. It does not restrict placement of sediments from any one dredge area to any of the disposal locations. The linear program derived the minimum mass movement of sediments in this alternative. The time to complete dredging would be approximately 10,990 pumping hours. Assuming 18 hours per day average pumping time, 6 days per week work schedule and 8 holidays per year, the pumping time is equivalent to 2.00 years total time. This work wouid also include 717 hours for a booster pump. Kadow Fill - Alternative Two. The requirement to fill the Kadow property increases the total project time. The linear program solution required 2,180,000 cubic meters bulked quantity placed into the Kadow fill site, thus removing a degree of freedom offered by alternative one. The program aiso limits the South Park site to a quantity of 956 cubic meters, commensurate to a 4.9 m fill "height. The pumping time to complete dredging would be approximately 11,180 hours, which is equivalent to a total dredge time on site on 2.03. There is no requirement to increase booster pump time, which remains at 717 hours. Omit Southwest Island - Alternative Three. Omission of the Southwest Island increases project time beyond that for Kadow fill, alternative two. In the alternative one plan, 573,000 cubic meters are preferentially placed at the S.W. Island Site. In alternative three, all this yardage is spread among the other eight (8) sites, with the Kadow property receiving the majority increase. The pumping time to complete dredging would be 11,301 hours, or an equiva- lent total on-site time for the dredge at 2.06 years. Booster pumping time is aiso increased to 935 hours. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Innovative methods are necessary with the increasing com- plexity of new dredging assignments and the Vancouver Lake dredge planning effort is a case in point. The project calls for removal of. large quantities of material (over 8 million cubic meters), a long project time period (over two years), multiple sediment types, contained dike disposal areas and 298 TABLE 3 SUMMARY OF DREDGE PUMP HOURS, BASED ON ALL SITES AVAILABLE Alternative One 50 cm pipeline, 2250 horsepower pump Dredge (Insitu) Pumping Site 1000 cu. meters Hours (a) 1^ 33.5 65 382.3 729 2 370.9 514 456.0 508 3 446.9 1,050 4 163.4 326 5 137.6 323 63.1 146 85.1 144 6 201.4 368 7 206.7 324 8 259.2 367 9 213.6 331 10 228.0 395 11 427.9 695 12 364.8 593 267.5 503 13 253.8 380 14 297.9 490 90.4 135 15 123.9 158 19-8 31 16 290.3 490 17 285.0 670 18 307.8 604 425-6 652 10,991 Assume 18 hours/day = 108/week 101.8 weeks (6.64) 52 weeks/year 1.96 years 8 holidays/year 2.00 years long pumping distances (over 3000 m ). Use of a lake perching concept to control dredging depths and application of linear programming to optimize the dredging site versus disposal site costs are examples of innovative approaches used in dredge planning for Vancouver Lake. 299 BRIAN F. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL CONSULTANTS 14678 Ibex Court, San Diego, California 92129 Telephone (619) 484-0915, FAX (619) 484-0988 GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS AND CAPABILITIEvS Brian F. Smith and Associates is a sole proprietorship firm operating in Southem Califomia which offers consulting services conceming all aspects of cultural resource investigations and environmental review documents. The combined experience of the principal consultants and associates represents over 50 years involved in the study of the history and prehistory of this region. The firm is recognized as qualified historians and archaeologists by the federal govemment, state agencies, and all local or county jurisdictions to which applications have been made. The firm has experience in all facets of cultural resource projects, including surveys, site testing and evaluation, historic site recordation and research, mitigation programs, and evaliiations for National Register eligibility. These projects have been conducted for both govemmental agencies, such as the U. S. Navy and the Califomia Department of Transportation, for cities and counties, such as the City and County of San Diego, and for engineering firms, private developers, and environmental firms. The permanent staff of Brian F. Smith and Associates hold a minimum of a bachelor's degree, with key staff members who hold memberships in the Society of Professional Archaeology, one Ph.D., and two Master's degrees. All personnel have extensive experience in the fields of archaeology, including special emphasis in Southem Califomia prehistory, Channel Islands prehistory, underwater archaeology, the history of California, historic archaeology, Hispanic origins in the Southwest, and environmental policy/law. Qualifications of specific personnel have been appended. Key personnel include: • Brian F. Smith, M.A. — principal investigator of historic and prehistoric studies; owner. • James R. Moriarty, III, Ph.D., full professor. University of San Diego; eminent historian and archaeologist; pioneer in submarine archaeology; authority on Califomia history and Native American affairs. • Larry J. Pierson, M.A. — principal investigator and field supervisor, with extensive experience in field archaeology, underwater archaeology, remote sensing data collection and interpretation, and historic research. • Dennis L. Fischer, B.A. — project manager, with extensive experience in completing EIR studies. • Stephen J. Burke, B.A. — field and laboratory supervisor, graphics preparation. • Kathryn J. Smith, B.A. — office manager; editing and preparation of archaeological reports; accounts management. The capabilities of the firm include a wide range of professional abilities and company assets, which include the following: Field archaeological teams with supervisors and trained crews that are equipped with all appropriate field tools and instruments, including four-wheel drive vehicles, survey equipment and radio communications. Knowledge of procedures and equipment necessary to complete extensive excavations at sites in any terrain, including experience in hydro-screening. The ability plan, support and field crews and equipment for long periods, including on-site living and laboratory facilities. Underwater archaeologists with experience and equipment to locate and study submerged prehistoric and historic sites. The capability of completing and analyzing remote sensing data for off-shore cultural resource surveys. Laboratory facilities that permit the recording and analysis of recovered artifacts and ecofacts, and the capacity to curate all samples. Technical report production capabilities that include state-of-the-art computers and software, scanners and plotters, laser printers and copiers, graphics equipment, and a production staff with over 20 years combined experience in the typing, editing, and graphics preparation for technical reports in archaeology. It is noteworthy that our staff includes three qualified principal investigators who are capable of writing detailed and thorough technical reports which meet all appropriate standards. The types of documents which are within our scope of capabilities include the following: Cultural resource survey reports (as required by CEQA and NEPA) Cultural resource significance reports and constraints analysis EIR and EIS cultural resource reports Evaluations for Section 106 and National Register eligibility Research designs for mitigation programs Statistical analysis and computer applications Historical properties analysis, architectural review, and preservation plans General plan updates, for cultural resource planning and management The firm of Brian F. Smith and Associates is dedicated to the study of the cultural heritage of Califomia and the Soutiiwest. We are also sincere in the process of conducting environmental impact studies and the evaluation of cultural resources in order that such resources are professionally and accurately analyzed for significance and that impacts are correcdy identified. We pride ourselves in the timely and cost-effective completion of projects of all sizes and parameters. The firm has a long record of interaction with govemmental agencies at all levels, including experience in public hearings, which has provided the firm with wide recognition in the field of cultural resource management. SECTON 10 SECTION 10 Equal Employment Opportunities and Affirmative Action Affirmative Action Plan Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers is an equal opportunity employer and has always maintained a policy of hiring qualified personnel without regard to sex, race, religion, or national origin. During past years, the company has hired professional engineers, technicians, drafters and office support personnel who were members of minority groups. This is a continuing policy which is reflected in the composition of our work force. The only limitation to the implementation of this policy has been the scarcity of applicants from some minority groups For most positions in a consulting engineering firm such as Moffatt & Nichol, the nature of the work performed requires the services of individuals who (1) hold a degree in specific types of engineering, or who (2) have had considerable practical experience in engineering related work, or who (3) have a combination of these two requirements. The company's affirmative action program consists of two parallel efforts: A. Recruitment of Minority Persons It is the policy of the firm whenever employment opportunities become available to make those opportunities known to members of minority groups. This is done by informing the State of California Employment Department of the job requirements and requesting that the Department send us minority applicants If they are available; by placing classified newspaper advertisements stating that we are equal opportunity employers; and at times, by seeking help through employment agencies and job shops, making known to these organizations that the positions are open to qualified members of minority groups. All the company's job categories are open to minority persons within the limitations of the company's labor requirements at any given time. B. Training of Minority Persons It Is the policy of the firm to recruit students from engineering schools, with particular emphasis upon minority persons for summer employment as engineering aides and drafter trainees. An effort is made later to hire these students on a full-time basis after graduation, subject to the 10-1 firm's work load. It is also the policy of Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers to encourage minority employees to take courses that will Improve their skills in various engineering disciplines pertinent to the work performed by the company. This encouragement takes the form of arranging work schedules to allow attendance at courses during work hours and of reimbursing the cost of tuition; encouraging employees to attend company-paid, work related, conferences and seminars; and through in-house seminars and training sessions. 10-2 SECTION 11 SECTION 11 Insurance and Liabilitv We have reviewed the sample Engineering Agreement In Attachment 5 to the Request for Proposal. We can furnish certificates for all insurance specifically required in the sample agreement. The sample agreement contains some language which 1s uninsurable, however, the language can easily be modified to comply with the terms of our insurance policy which are standard to the profession. 11-1 REFERENCES I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Project: Project: Project: Project: Project: Project: REFERENCES Playa Vista Marina Mr. Chris Klinger County of Los Angeles Department of Beaches and Parks 13837 Fiji Way Marina del Rey, CA 90292 (213) 305-9507 Bolsa Cf^ica Wetland Restoration Project Mr. Carl Neuhausen Signal Landmark Properties, Inc. 17890 Sl<y Park Circle Irvine,icA 92714 (714) 261-0360 Hellman Ranch Development Mr. Ralph Appy Port of I Los Angeles 425 S. ffalos Verdes Street P.O. Box 151 San Pedro, CA 90733-0151 (213) 519-3497 Grove AVenue Union Pacific Structural-Grade Separation Mr. LeRoy Bender, City Engineer City of Ontario Ontairo; CA 91764 (714) 986-1151 Alton Parkway Mr. Dayr^e Stiles The Irvine Company 550 Newport Center Drive NewportjBeach, CA 92658-8904 (714) 720-2359 Irvine Center Drive City of Irvine Mr. Russ Thiele, Project Management 1 Civil I Center Plaza Irvine,jCA 92714 (714) 724-6000 R-l