HomeMy WebLinkAbout57C0191; Agua Hedionda Creek; El Camino Real; 2007-04-04Gx/fransf
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Structure Maintenance & Investigations
Bridge Inspection Report
Bridge Number :
Facility Carried:
Location :
City :
Inspection Date :
Inspection Type
57C0191
EL CAMINO REAL
3.1 MI S ROUTE 78
CARLSBAD
04/04/2007
Routine FC Underwater Special Other
B D D D D
STRUCTURE NAME; AGUA HEDIONDA CREEK
CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION
Year Built : 1971
Year Widened: N/A
Length (m) : 34.4
Skew (degrees):
Wo. of Joints :
No. of Hinges :
Structure Description: Three simple PC/PS concrete deck units (18) with continuous
composite CIP/RC deck slab spans on two open end RC seated abutments
supported on concrete piles and on two RC pile (14) bents.
Span Configuration : (W) 3 @ 11.3 m (E).c/c
LOAD CAPACITY AND RATINGS
Design Live Load: MS-18 OR HS-20
Inventory Rating:32.6
Operating Rating: 57.1
Permit Rating : PPPPP
Posting Load : Type 3
metric tons
metric tons
N/A
Calculation Method: LOAD FACTOR
Calculation Method: LOAD FACTOR
Type 3S2 N/A Type 3-3 N/A
DESCRIPTION ON STRUCTURE
Deck X-Section: (S) 0.3m br, 12.0 m, 1.2m med, 18.8 m, 0.3 m br (N)
Total Width: 33.5m Net Width: 32.9 m
Rail Description: Type 9-11 Railing
Min. Vertical Clearance: Unimpaired
No. of Lanes: 6
Rail Code : 0000
DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE
Channel Description: Natural, well defined & weed filled w/ rip rap at the abutments.
CONDITION TEXT
CONDITION OF STRUCTURE ;.
There are transverse and longitudinal cracks, moderate in size and density throughout the
deck.
The northerly concrete barrier has crushed at easterly end and one bolt has missing from
the northerly east corner.
Otherwise, the structure appears in good condition.
ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS
F#Elem Element Description
101
101
101
101
101
101
101
38
205
215
227
234
312
335
Concrete Slab - Bare
Reinforced Cone Column or Pile
Extension
Reinforced Cone Abutment
Reinforced Cone Submerged Pile
Reinforced Cone Cap
Enclosed/Concealed Bearing
Other Bridge Railing
Env Total Units
Qty
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1120 sq.m.
28 ea.
67 m.
1 ea.
66 m.
2 ea.
87 m.
Qty in each Condition State
St. 1 St. 2 St. 3 St. 4 St. 5
1120
28
67
1
66
2
86
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Printed on: Wednesday 05/02/2007 01:53 PM 57C0191/AAAF/10836
F#Elem
101 358
Element Description
Deck Cracking
Env
2
Total units
Qty
1 ea.
Qty in
St. 1 St.
0
each Condition
2 St. 3 St.
0 0
State
4 St.
1
5
0
WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
RecDate: 07/30/2004 EstCost:
Action : Deck-Methacrylat StrTarget: 2 YEARS
Work By: LOCAL AGENCY DistTarget:
Status : PROPOSED EA:
Seal the deck cracks with methacrylate.
Inspected By M. Zaarour/ A. Shenouda
Registered Civil Engineer
Printed on: Wednesday 05/02/2007 01:53 PM 57C0191/AAAF/10836
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL REPORT
IDENTIFICATION
(1)
(8)
(5)
(2)
(3)
(6)
(7)
(9)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(16)
(17)
(98)
(99)
STATE NAME- CALIFORNIA
STRUCTURE NUMBER
INVENTORY ROUTE (ON/UNDER) -
HIGHWAY AGENCY DISTRICT
ON
069
57C0191
1500S3440
11
COUNTY CODE 073
FEATURE INTERSECTED-
FACILITY CARRIED-
LOCATION-
(4) PLACE CODE 11194
AGUA HEDIONDA CREEK
EL CAMINO REAL
3.1 MI S ROUTE 78
MILEPOINT/KILOMETERPOINT 0
BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK-. NOT ON NET 0
LRS INVENTORY ROUTE & SUBROUTE
LATITUDE 33 DEG 08 MIN 56 SEC
LONGITUDE 117 DEG 17 MIN 49 SEC
BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE % SHARE %
BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER
STRUCTURE TYPE AND MATERIAL
(43) STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN:MATERIAL- PRESTRESS CONC
TYPE- SLAB CODE 501
(44) STRUCTURE TYPE APPR:MATERIAL-
TYPE- CODE
(45) NUMBER OF SPANS IN MAIN UNIT 3
(46) NUMBER OF APPROACH SPANS 0
(107) DECK STRUCTURE TYPE- CIP CONCRETE
(108) WEARING SURFACE / PROTECTIVE SYSTEM:
A) TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE- NONE
B) TYPE' OF MEMBRANE- NONE
C) TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION- NONE
*************** AGE AJJD SERVICE ***************
(27) YEAR BUILT 1971
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED 0000
(42) TYPE OF SERVICE: ON- HIGHWAY 1
UNDER- WATERWAY 5
CODE
CODE
CODE
CODE
06 UNDER STRUCTURE 00
22000
3 %
16 KM
(109) TRUCK ADT
(28) LANES:ON STRUCTURE
(29) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
(30) YEAR OF ADT 1990
(19) BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH
*************** GEOMETRIC DATA ****************
(48) LENGTH OF MAXIMUM SPAN 11.3 M
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH 34.4 M
(50) CURB OR SIDEWALK: LEFT 0.0 M RIGHT 1.2 M
(51) BRIDGE ROADWAY WIDTH CURB TO CURB 32.9 M
(52) DECK WIDTH OUT TO OUT 33.5 M
(32) APPROACH ROADWAY WIDTH (W/SHOULDERS) 32.9 M
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN- CLOSED (NO BARRIER) 2
(34) SKEW 0 DEG (35) STRUCTURE FLARED NO
(10) INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR 99.99 M
(47) INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR 18.8 M
(53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY 99.99 M
(54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF- NOT H/RR 0.00 M
(55) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF- NOT H/RR 0.0 M
(56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT 0.0 M
*************** NAVIGATION DATA ***************
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL- NO CONTROL CODE 0
(111) PIER PROTECTION- CODE
(39) NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M
(116) VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERT CLEAR M
(40) NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M
(112)
(104)
(26)
(100)
(101)
(102)
(103)
(105)
(110)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(37)
SUFFICIENCY RATING = 79.0
STATUS STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT
HEALTH INDEX 100.0
PAINT CONDITION INDEX = N/A
************* CLASSIFICATION *************
NBIS BRIDGE LENGTH- YES
HIGHWAY SYSTEM- NOT ON NHS
FUNCTIONAL CLASS- OTHER PRIN ART URBAN
DEFENSE HIGHWAY- NOT STRAHNET
PARALLEL STRUCTURE- NONE EXISTS
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC- 2 WAY
TEMPORARY STRUCTURE-
FED. LANDS HWY- NOT APPLICABLE
DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK - NOT ON NET
TOLL- ON FREE ROAD
MAINTAIN- CITY OR MUNICIPAL HIGHWAY AGENCY
OWNER- CITY OR MUNICIPAL HIGHWAY AGENCY
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE- NOT ELIGIBLE
**************** CONDITION ***
(58) DECK
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE
(61) CHANNEL & CHANNEL PROTECTION
(62) CULVERTS
CODE
Y
0
14
0
N
2
0
0
3
04
04
5
CODE
4
7
7
9
N
********* LOAD RATING AND POSTING ********* CODE
(31) DESIGN LOAD- MS-18 OR HS-20 5
(63) OPERATING RATING METHOD- LOAD FACTOR 1
(64) OPERATING RATING- 57.1
(65) INVENTORY RATING METHOD- LOAD FACTOR 1
(66) INVENTORY RATING- 32.6
(70) BRIDGE POSTING- EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL LOADS 5
(41) STRUCTURE OPEN, POSTED OR CLOSED- A
DESCRIPTION- OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
CODE
(67)
(68)
(69)
(71)
(72)
(36)
(113)
. (75)
(76)
(94)
(95)
(96)
(97)
(114)
(115)
(90)
(92)
A)
**************** APPRAISAL ***************
STRUCTURAL EVALUATION
DECK GEOMETRY
UNDERCLEARANCES, VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL
WATER ADEQUACY
APPROACH ROADWAY ALIGNMENT
TRAFFIC SAFETY FEATURES
SCOUR CRITICAL BRIDGES
********** PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS *********
TYPE OF WORK- CODE
LENGTH OF STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT
BRIDGE IMPROVEMENT COST
ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT COST
TOTAL PROJECT COST
YEAR OF IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATE
FUTURE ADT 30000
YEAR OF FUTURE ADT 2015
7
9
N
9
8
0000
5
M
*************** INSPECTIONS **********
INSPECTION DATE 04/07'(91) FREQUENCY
CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION: (93)
FRACTURE CRIT DETAIL- NO MO A)
24 MO
CFI DATE
B) UNDERWATER INSP- NO MO B)
C) OTHER SPECIAL INSP- NO MO C)
Printed on: Wednesday 05/02/2007 01:53 PM 57C0191/AAAF/10836