HomeMy WebLinkAbout480530-01; Home Plant Sewer Pump Station Storage Res.; Home Plant Sewer Pump Station Storage Res.; 1980-08-06SOILS INVESTIGATION
FOR
PROPOSED STORAGE RESERVOIR
HOME PLANT SEWER PUMP STATION
WEST SIDE OF CARLSBAD BOULEVARD
NEAR INTERSECTION WITH STATE STREET
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
August 6, 1980
Project No. 480530-01
Prepared for
PI City of Carlsbad
'—' Engineering Department
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
LEIGHTON and ASSOCIATES
INCORPORATED
SOIL ENGINEERING TESTING GEOLOGY
August 6, 1980
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Project No. 480530-01
TO: City of Carlsbad
Engineering Department
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
ATTENTION: Mr. David A. Hauser
SUBJECT:Soils Investigation
Proposed Storage Reservoir
Home Plant Sewer Pump Station
West side of Carlsbad Boulevard near Intersection with
State Street, Carlsbad, California
Gentlemen:
This report presents the results of a soils investigation at the site of the
proposed storage reservoir at the subject sewer pump station. Our investiga-
tion was performed in July and August, 1980 and consisted of field recon-
naissance, subsurface exploration, laboratory testing, engineering analysis
and the preparation of this report. The purpose of the investigation was to
provide recommendations for embankment stability, site grading and reservoir
lining.
Proposed Construction
The proposed construction consists of an earth embankment storage reservoir
having a depth of about 8 feet and overall dimensions of about 70 feet square.
The reservoir will be constructed partly in cut and partly in fill materials.
Present olans show an outboard embankment slope of 2 to 1 (horizontal to
vertical) and inside slopes of 1 to 1.
Site Description
The sewer pump station is located west of the intersection of Carlsbad
Boulevard and State Street and south of the Buena Vista Lagoon in Carlsbad,
California (see Index Map, Figure 1). The proposed reservoir site is located
7290 ENGINEER ROAD, SUITE H, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92111 (714) 292-8030
IBVIWE . WESTLAKE/VEMTURA • DIAMOND BAH/raALWUT • SAW BERNARDINO/RIVERSIDE « SAM DIEGO
480530-01
\*r \, \> -»x. Ar\\ \, \^ v .1
2000
scale
FIGURE 1
feet
HOME PLANT SEWER PUMP STATION
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
BASIS: U.S.G.S. San Luis Rey Quadrangle
LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES
D
480530-01
at the north end of the Pump Station on a grass-covered north-facing slope
having an overall inclination of about 5 horizontal to 1 vertical. An
existing 100-foot diameter trickling filter is located at the upper south
end of the property. Various sprinkler lines cross the reservoir site.
Subsurface Exploration
Our subsurface exploration consisted of drilling two 6-inch diameter test
borings to depths of 25 and 26 feet. The approximate locations of the test
borings are shown on the attached Plot Plan, Figure 2. Bulk and undisturbed
samples of the subsurface materials were obtained for laboratory testing.
Logs of the borings (Figures 3 and 4) are included with this report.
Laboratory Testing
Laboratory testing consisted of moisture content and dry density, maximum
density, gradation, direct shear and consolidation tests. Results of the
laboratory tests (Figures 5, 6, 7 and 8) are presented with this report.
Subsurface Conditions
Boring 1 which was drilled at the upper end of the proposed reservoir en-
countered loose sands and silty sands to a depth of 6.5 feet underlain by a
layer of stiff, sandy clay to a depth of 8 feet underlain in turn by very
dense sands to the depth explored of 26 feet.
Boring 2 at the lower end encountered loose, silty and clayey sands and clean
sands to a depth of 18 feet underlain by very dense sands to the deptn ex-
plored of 25 feet.
No groundwater was encountered during drilling of Boring 1. In Boring 2
groundwater was encountered at a depth of 6 feet. A piezometer was installed
in Boring 2 to allow future monitoring of groundwater. Groundwater levels
are probably influenced by the adjacent lagoon.
-3-
480530-01
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
D From a soils engineering standpoint the site is suitable for construction of
the proposed reservoir provided the following recommendations are incorporated
into the design of the project:
A. Reservoir Cut Slopes
Due to the looseness of the upper sandy soils the proposed reservoir cut
slopes will be marginally stable at an inclination of 1 to 1. Accordingly,
we recommend that cut slopes for the reservoir be constructed no steeper than
1% to 1 (horizontal to vertical). Alternatively, the slopes may be con-
structed at a slope of 1 to 1 provided the outer portion of the slopes are
recompacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction for a minimum width of
15 feet measured horizontally from the face of the slope.
B. Recompaction of Surface Soils
Because of the looseness of the surface soils, settlements on the order of
3 to 5 inches are anticipated beneath the weight of the fill embankment. To
minimize settlements and the potential for cracking of the reservoir lining
we recommend that the surface soils beneath the fill embankment and reservoir
be overexcavated to a depth of about 5 feet (elevation 10*) or until further
excavation is impracticable due to wet pumping soil conditions resulting from the
high groundwater table. The excavated soils may be replaced as compacted fill.
D some additional settlement is anticipated due to compression of materials
below this depth but should occur relatively rapidly on account of the granular
(free draining) nature of the materials.
C. Earthwork Recommendations
Prior to grading the site should be cleared of vegetation and surface and
subsurface obstructions including buried sprinkler lines.
The on-site soils are suitable for re-use as fill provided they are free of
organic materials and debris. Any imported soils should be approved by the
Soils Engineer.
All fill placed at the site should be compacted to a minimum relative com-
paction of 90 percent based on ASTM Test Designation D1557-70. Fill should be
compacted by mechanical means in lifts not exceeding 6 inches in compacted
thickness.
Fill slopes should be compacted by sheepsfoot rolling or by overbuilding and
cutting back.
Volume shrinkage of about 15 percent will occur due to compaction of the
surface soils.
-4-
480530-01
D. Reservoir Lining
The proposed 3-inch A.B.M. lining reinforced with 6x6-10/10 welded wire mesh
'— ' is a suitable lining for the reservoir. To minimize the potential for
cracking we do recommend that construction of the lining be delayed as long
as possible following construction of the embankment.
E. Inspection
It is recommended that the project earthwork be inspected and tested by the
Soils Engineer to verify conformance with these recommendations.
This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. If you have
'-' any questions concerning our findings, please call.
Respectfully submitted,
Martin R. Owen, RCE 23155
Chief Geotechnical Engineer
MRO/pw
Distribution: (4) Addressee
-5-
Scale
1" = 20'
& CONTfl&L-V/ICE
TRENCH: . - .--.
LEGEND
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF TEST BORING
PLOT PLAN
RROJECT NO. 480530-01
LJ
FIGURE NO, 2
LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC,
7/9/80Date
• Project Name
Perilling Co.
Hole Diameter
Drill Hole No.5-1
Home Plant Sewer Pump Station
Sheet i of
Project No. 480530-01
Geo Drill
6"Drive Weight
_Type of Rig Truck Mounted Flight Auger
140# Drop 3Q in.
Elevation Top of Hole 26 +-'- Ref. or Datum MSLJ
£ *^
8* "
"1
0
5 —
' 10 —
15 —
20 —
25 —
• -
30
o
• H
P. Ort -J
0
4 •
. ."
• • •
'$/
/•/•/?./s<//,-1 . .1.
* 1 •J. . .
. . . J.
. . .
: : •
• » • *
m « * *
. * * *
» • » •
• % * '
• • * >
. » . .
....
....
....
....
• ...
(/>
CD
T3
•P
•H
4->
O
2
O
D —I
03
W
si/
1
2
D
3
4
^
">
° a
a.
-
i
I 8
J 507
4
50/
4
SO/
!J
i
50/
3
X
•Htn i — »
(U CJf ) pi,
X< .
Q
99.7
100.9
90.9
sample
distur
107.2
°> -p§s^
^^"J5
21.9
11.7
15.8
bed)
10.4
.
w ^
^ C/-u ^
o3
SM
sc
CL
SP-
SM
SP
SP
d.
GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION
Logged By SRH
Sampled By SRH
Brown, silty fine to coarse sand, moist,
loose, grass roots in upper 1 foot
Gray-brown, clayey fine to medium sand,
micaceous, damp, loose
Gray, sandy clay, moist, stiff
Gray, silty fine sand, moist-, ; very dense
Gray-white, medium-grained sand with shell
fragments, moist, very dense
Gray-white sandstone, moist, very dense
Total Depth: 26 Feet
No H20
-
-
-
-
-
.
_
-
LEIGHTON and ASSOCIATES FIGURE 3
Date 7/9/80 Drill Hole No.B-2 Sheet
Project No.
of
Project Name HQtne Plant Sewer Pump Station
Fj Drill ing Co. Geo Drill T>Te of Rig Trurlc MountPd Flight fltjger
Hole Diameter 6"Drive Weight Drop 30 in.
Elevation Top of Hole 15 - Ref. or Datum MSL
L
1i —
IL
cLJ
C
pL
i—
[
[
[
[
L
r-
L
L
C
r
jC *~**
Q ^
0
5 —
10 —
-
15 —
20 —
—
-
25
-
30
o
• H
f (50cx on) -3
C5
• 1 - 1 • 1 •
,| . . .
-|.|.|.
•1 -1 ' I'
/ /
/ /
//'/
A >
Y/.
•/•/• • .
• / /• •
* • * •
» • • *
f • • •
• • * •-
• * » *
• • * •
• * * *
• * * *
0>•o
3•p•H
•P
1*
0
xC.
D •-<
rt
i
2
3
4
</i S^ ^
,°
^ fO
o.
1
1 5
i 4
50/
4
SO/
4
1
X
-H(/> < — >
<D O
Q PL,v — y
X
Q
95.7
110.9
120.0
121.1
0> ^j
-J C
^ Q) <—N
w C ^
1"
26.4
29.2
11.8
15.3
w ""?
rt "^^^ *u ^
•H 'o oCO
SP-
SM
sc
sw
SP
GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION
Logged By SRH
Sampled By SRH
Red-brown, silty fine sand, loose, grass roots
in upper 1 foot (possible fill)
Gray clayey sand, slightly micaceous, wet,
loose (possible fill )
^
-
Gray, fine to coarse sand with fine gravel,
saturated, loose
_
-
Gray-white sandstone, wet, very dense
-
_
*Piezometer installed
Total Depth: 25 Feet
H90 @ 6 Feet
LEIGHTON and ASSOCIATES FIGURE 4
[~1J -
I SOIL TYPE OR
LOCATION
MAXIMUM DENSITY
SOIL DESCRIPTION
TEST RESULTS
OPTIMUM
MOISTURE(%)
MAXIMUM
DENSITY
DRY
(PCF)
B-1 @ 5' Gray-brown clayey fine to medium 12.0 120 5
sand (SC)
[
c
Project NO, 480530-01 Leighton & Associates "GURE:
53IA (8/77) -. ' '
CZD
•*"* O
•z.O
CD
OunCO
OI
O
g>
CQ'
IT
O
U
e°
V)Oo
CDCO
100
90
80
70
2 60
5' 50n
cr
U.S.
2 1-1/2
Standard Sieves
in inches
30
20
10
i 1
1 3/4 1/2 3/8 4
U.S.Standard
16 30
Numbers —
50 100 200 40 30 20 10
I
ill
i 1rl.11ILL
1141Lilt
-L
iL±
jiiiiii
li
i_
il
.ill'
iii
tm
ilil:
ttli
tQi-ii^
44:h
IMM
..LU.-LLi.
Jill
1
Uil
HI
ii
all1U
Hi
i iiii mu
B-l @ 5'
I I I I i I M liilllililClayey fine n ito medium sand
J
l
I
X
_1_!_
-U_
lllll
JI!
M.I
JL
I(sc
I!intilii
^-rrtt
.titiiM1041111
.... lili
-H-
-U-L
.111.1-
00
90
80
70
60
20
10
50 10 1 0.5
Grain Size
O.I 0.05 0.01 0.005 0.001
in Millimeters
Gra vol
Coarg*Fins
Sand
Coarto Modium Fin«Silt or Clay
Symbol Hole
No.
Sample
No.
Depth
or
Elev.
Field
Moisture LL PI Activity
Pl/-2u
Cu Cc
(D30)2
oionoeo
Percent
Passing
No. 200
PercentPassing
2u
U.S.C.S.
RESULTS
n '-* DIRECT SHEAR SUMMARY
1 j 330O
D
LJ 3OOO
D
— 2 3OO
D
in[;-
to
n '^ .300^
U :w
n IOOO
u •
.
3OO
n11 • •
D -
„
.p(\ ^\&~^
. p^O ^ &^>- wsx
^ ^^y\ = ^
.v^VVi^X
/
s-^^ /^ /L^ /"fii ^LfJ^
^T^
_S
jS
^T
m,^<^
•xX"^i
' •^x'lx'
s// ^//-
X^X
^
11
1^i\
/ J
/ ^fh^ u^x-
36O
370
320
270
zeo
230
240
Z30
220 O
210 >
2OO
33190 m
•«>
170 2
O
160
130
140
30
20
1 O
00
BO
80
7O
60
0
4O
3O
0
O
u u
(~~| ° 30° I00° 1300 2000 2SOO SOOO
^ NORMAL STRESS, PSF
D FrictionB°nng Depth Symbol Angle Cohesion Remorks
B-l 5' O 32° 50 psf Undisturbed
H B-l 5' El 28° 250 psf Remolded to 90%
n
U
Project No.1
l«0 A (8/77)
480530-01 Leighton & Associates FIGURE 7
CONSOLIDATION - PRESSURE CURVE
inin4)
Q.
Ea
ca>o
<Q
Oc/)zoo
0.05 0.
PRESSURE (Kips per Square Foot)
0.5 1.0 5.0 10.0 50.0
0.05 O.I 0.5 1.0 5.0 10.0 50.0
Hi
III'
Iffm
iiEEm. . t,~~,-Jjj,
Jill I
III
ITT
-ilil
TT
TIT
31 li
II
nnii
Til
t 1«-I iffil
IT
11 iii
11
¥
il
ill ml
mltiirlii
.n
fiiTl
Ulil
fTT
1 ! !a
fflIMljtlllTIT ""
J-l!
m
ilTmtl
l
UJJJi
I
J|i]J]|JlJUJJ!p
iii
iw.IDT
ffl!
nip^,m
iff
IL
II
11jiji in; r^t r
I!!HUM
Ji!
ntim
n14IJlN
ill iill "
i
Mliif
n:
1!
-Ul If
f
TT
II
Ml:
liillira
111
Rill
r-- —LProject No.:
3SU (12/77)
O Indicates Sample
At Reid Moisture
Indicates Sample
After Saturation
480530-01
Leighton & Associates
FIGURE 8