Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1 LEGOLAND DR; ; CB100477; Permit04-12-2010 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Retaining Wall Permit Permit No: CB100477 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Reference #: Project Title: Area: Applicant: GEOGRIDINC 1295 DISTRIBUTION WY VISTA CA 92083 76509-0079 1 LEGOLAND DR CBAD RETAIN 2111000900 Lot#: 0 $30,600.00 Construction Type: 5A WATERWORKS CLUSTER Status: Applied: Entered By: Plan Approved: Issued: Plan Check#: 1,700 SF GEO GRID RETAINING WALL, 9 SEPERATE WALLS ISSUED 03/18/2010 MDP 04/12/2010 04/12/2010 Inspect Owner: LEGOLAND CALIFORNIA L L C <LF> PLAY U S ACQUISI C/O PROPERTY TAX SERVICE CO PO BOX 543185 DALLAS TX 75354 Building Permit Add'l Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add'l Plan Check Fee Strong Motion Fee Green Bldg Standards (SB1473) Fee Renewal Fee Add'l Renewal Fee Other Building Fee Additional Fees TOTAL PERMIT FEES $293.73 $0.00 $190.92 $0.00 $3.06 $1.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $488.71 Total Fees:$488.71 Total Payments To Date:$488.71 Balance Due:$0.00 Inspector: FINAL APPROVAL Date: . 5~ 'J-f Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as lees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. CITY OF CARLSBAD Building Permit Application 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 760-602-2717/2718/2719 Fax 760-602-8558 www.carlsbadca.gov Plan Check No. \*£>~ H"! *] Est. Value Plan Ck. Deposit Date JOB ADDRESS 1 Legoland Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92008 | SUITE#/SPACE#/UNIT* CT/PROJECT # 211 100 09 18 # BEDROOMS # BATHROOMS TENANT BUSINESS NAME Legoland CONSTR. TYPE DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Include Square Feet of Affected Areafs) Installation of 9 Keystone retaining walls. 6.67' max total height. ( EXISTING USE PROPOSED USE GARAGE (SF) Theme Park Theme Park CONTACT NAME (If Different Fom Applicant) _ . _ _ .Red One Engineering ADDRESS 1295 Distribution Way CITY STATE ZIP Vista CA 92081 PHONE FAX 760-410-1665 760-509-0078 EMAIL matt@red1engineering.com PROPERTY OWNER NAME . . ,-.,.,Legoland California ADDRESS 1 Leqoland Dr. CITY STATE ZIP Carlsbad CA 92008 PHONE FAX 760-918-5600 EMAIL chris.romero@legoland.com ARCH/DESIGNER NAME & ADDRESS STATE LIC * r.w. aoel 760-943-0760 CA 2825 PATIOS (SF)DECKS (SF) FIREPLACE AIR CONDITIONING FIRE SPRINKLERS YES|~"l# N0| | YESQNOQ YES| | NOJ j APPLICANT NAME _ ...Geognd, Inc. ADDRESS CITY PHONE EMAIL 1295 Distribution Way STATE ZIP Vista CA 92081 FAX 760-509-0079 760-509-0078 mike@geogridwalls.com CONTRACTOR BUS. NAME Geoand, Inc. ADDRESS CITY PHONE EMAIL STATE LIC.# 1295 Distribution Way STATE ZIP Vista CA 92081 FAX 760-509-0079 760-509-0078 mike@geogridwalis.com CLASS CITY BUS. LIC.# 661527 A. B. C-8 1206172 (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($500)). Workers' Compensation Declaration: / hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: Bl have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My workers' compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Co Old Republic General Insurance Corp. Po|jcy No A1CW37710904 Expiration Date *™ This section need not be completed if Ihe permit is for one hundred dollars ($100) or less. I I Certificate of Exemption: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation caver^ga-isunlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars (&100.000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damacps'ab provipe/'for in Settifri 370ftof thejjber-code, interest and attorney's fees. J&Z CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE (/!/(J r ( "^ ^^ - t~l AGENT DATE ~~^> . / C-" . / ^— / hereby affirm that I am exempt from Contractor's License Law for the following reason: [ | I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). I | I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contrxtors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). I | I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason. 1.1 personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. I |Yes I |No 2.1 (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3.1 have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name address / phone / contractors' license number): 4.1 plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone / contractors' license number): 5.1 will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone / type of work): ^PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE IAGENT DATE • t <««% *.- ••*;.i«'. «i;; »! . •- t S1 ^ ? i Vtl 1^1 S**™ i I * £' , J 4- £ >>»> te" Z* & ? -f- $ "/ - ? ""' glj^l s the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Dresley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? I | Yes \ s |No s the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or aNuality management district? LjYes [7] No s the facility to be constructed within 1 ,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? I JYes |/lNo iF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work this permit is issued (Sec, 3097 (i) Civil Code), .ender's Name Lender's Address certify that I have read the application and state that Die above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. hereby authorize representative of the City of Cartsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD \GAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. )SHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0' deep and denjojifon or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the Building Official und&the profens)>f this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within ! 80 days from the date of such permit or ifjtjeJarfding or wd*&orize«Wst>eh permitjssuspsnded or abandoned at any time after the wort, is commenced for a period of 1 80 days (Section 1 06.4.4 Uniform Building Code), ^APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 05/27/2010 Permit* CB100477 Inspector Assignment: PD Title: WATERWORKS CLUSTER Description: 1,700 SF GEO GRID RETAINING WALL, 9 SEPERATE WALLS Type: RETAIN Sub Type: Phone: 6195209943 Job Address: 1 LEGOLAND DR Suite: Lot: 0 Location: Inspector _ _ APPLICANT GEOGRIDINC Owner: LEGOLAND CALIFORNIA L L C <LF> PLAY U S ACQUISI Remarks: JUST REQUESTED INSPECTION Total Time: _ Requested By: GARY Entered By: CHRISTINE CD Description Act Comments 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 69 Final Masonry rHj Comments/Notices/Holds Associated PCRs/CVs Original PC# Inspection History Date Description Act Insp Comments 05/12/2010 84 Rough Combo PA PD 05/05/2010 31 Underground/Conduit-Wiring AP PD FOOTING OBSERVATION SUMMARY Leighton and Associates, inc. LEIGHTON GROUP COMPANY Project Name: /.^-o/A^o(^A'^>c pM/c-c Date: Location: c^yiiA Qftft _ Project No.: *? 6° } Plan File No.: Permit No.: Unit/Phase/Lot(s): ^1 -A- ** Referenced Geotechnical Report(s): Observation Summary _r! Initials A representative of Leighton and Associates observed onsite soil conditions. Soil conditions at Date tne site are substantially in conformance with those assumed in the geotechnical report. Initials A representative of Leighton and Associates observed and measured footing excavation depth/width. Footing excavations extend to proper depth and bearing strata and are in general _Date conformance with recommendations of the geotechnical report. Jnitials A representative of Leighton and Associates measured footing setback from slope face. The Date setback was in general accordance with the recommendations of the geotechnical report. Jnitials Date Notes to Superintendent/Foreman 1. Footing excavations should be cleaned of loose debris and thoroughly moistened just prior to placing concrete. 2. Based on expansion potential of underlying soils, presoaking of soil below slabs may be recommended. Consult the geotechnical report for presoaking recommendations. We note that clayey soils may take an extended period of time and the contractor should schedule accordingly. 3. In the event of a site change subsequent to our footing observation and prior to concrete placement (i.e., heavy rain, etc.), we should be contacted to perform additional site observations. Note to Building inspector 1. Soil compaction test results, including depth of fill, relative compaction, bearing values, and soil expansion index test results are contained in the As-Graded Geotechnical Report provided at the completion of grading. For Leighton and Associates, Inc. Date 3930 R 1-05 FILE COPY FOOTING OBSERVATION SUMMARY Leighton and Associates, Inc. Date: ?.-*-t-toProject Name: ^5e-o ^\^ o /^ fl-flgA- P<VtA^ Location: g^VLCUSfto _ Project No.: ^ (,oiS(-°-S Plan File No.: Permit No.: Unit/Phase/Lot(s): ^4,6, 6, Referenced Geotechnical Report(s): Observation Summary _?-2<-i<> initials A representative of Leighton and Associates observed onsite soil conditions. Soil conditions at the site are substantially in conformance with those assumed in the geotechnical report. Initials A representative of Leighton and Associates observed and measured footing excavation depth/width. Footing excavations extend to proper depth and bearing strata and are in general Date conformance with recommendations of the geotechnical report. / rr Initials A representative of Leighton and Associates measured footing setback from slope face. The Date setback was in general accordance with the recommendations of the geotechnical report. initials £ £ ^Q 7 Notes to Superintendent/Foreman 1. Footing excavations should be cleaned of loose debris and thoroughly moistened just prior to placing concrete. 2. Based on expansion potential of underlying soils, presoaking of soil below slabs may be recommended. Consult the geotechnical report for presoaking recommendations. We note that clayey soils may take an extended period of time and the contractor should schedule accordingly. 3. In the event of a site change subsequent to our footing observation and prior to concrete placement (i.e., heavy rain, etc.), we should be contacted to perform additional site observations. Mote to Building inspector 1. Soil compaction test results, including depth of fill, relative compaction, bearing values, and soil expansion index test results are contained in the As-Graded Geotechnical Report provided at the completion of grading. ^^7^ /^ZL/^ jrv26-/o For Leighton and Associates, Inc. Date 3930 R 1-05 FILE COPY FOOTING OBSERVATION SUMMARY Leighton and Associates, Inc. A LEIGHTON GROUP COMPANY Project Name: l^C^t^j^ /i^jyggX £<Vtl<rDate: Location: Cfrtis g-PP Project No.: Plan File No.: Permit No.: Unit/Phase/Lot(s): Referenced Geotechnical Report(s): Observation Summary Initials A representative of Leighton and Associates observed onsite soil conditions. Soil conditions at Date 'he s'te are substantially in conformance with those assumed in the geotechnical report. Initials A representative of Leighton and Associates observed and measured footing excavation depth/width. Footing excavations extend to proper depth and bearing strata and are in general conformance with recommendations of the geotechnical report. Jnitials A representative of Leighton and Associates measured footing setback from slope face. The Date setback was in general accordance with the recommendations of the geotechnical report. initials —^ ~Date ^AtcS *# & fi^> Notes to Superintendent/Foreman 1. Footing excavations should be cleaned of loose debris and thoroughly moistened just prior to placing concrete. 2. Based on expansion potential of underlying soils, presoaking of soil below slabs may be recommended. Consult the geotechnical report for presoaking recommendations. We note that clayey soils may take an extended period of time and the contractor should schedule accordingly. 3. in the event of a site change subsequent to our footing observation and prior to concrete placement (i.e., heavy rain, etc.), we should be contacted to perform additional site observations. Note to Building inspector 1. Soil compaction test results, including depth of fill, relative compaction, bearing values, and soil expansion index test results are contained in the As-Graded Geotechnical Report provided at the completion of grading. For Leighton and Associates, Inc. Date 3930 R 1-05 FILE COPY FOOTING OBSERVATION SUMMARY Leighton and Associates, Inc. i LEtCHTON GROUP COMPANr Project Name: /^o^A^o J^H^^ P<Vatc Date: 3-3v f 3 t/ Location: C/Vu-c. &fro Project No.: Plan File No.: _ Permit No.: __ Unit/Phase/Lot(s): 1* 3 Referenced Geotechnical Report(s): Observation Summary Initials A representative of Leighton and Associates observed onsite soil conditions. Soil conditions at o Date '^e s'*e are substantially in conformance with those assumed in the geotechnical report. Initials ^ representative of Leighton and Associates observed and measured footing excavation " depth/width. Footing excavations extend to proper depth and bearing strata and are in general IfJDate conformance with recommendations of the geotechnical report. Initials A representative of Leighton and Associates measured footing setback from slope face. The ° Date setback was in general accordance with the recommendations of the geotechnical report. AjOCi f<>oA-'OA'7?b/^J P'^-A F^A- WInitials Q Date Notes to Superintendent/Foreman 1. Footing excavations should be cleaned of loose debris and thoroughly moistened just prior to placing concrete. 2. Based on expansion potential of underlying soils, presoaking of soil below slabs may be recommended. Consult the geotechnical report for presoaking recommendations. We note that clayey soils may take an extended period of time and the contractor should schedule accordingly. 3. In the event of a site change subsequent to our footing observation and prior to concrete placement (i.e., heavy rain, etc.), we should be contacted to perform additional site observations. Note to Building inspector 1. Soil compaction test results, including depth of fill, relative compaction, bearing values, and soil expansion index test results are contained in the As-Graded Geotechnical Report provided at the completion of grading. For Leighton and Associates, Inc. Date 3930 R 1-05 FILE COPY EsGil Corporation In Partnership witfi government for (Building Safety DATE: March 25, 2010 OAEgLlCANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad "~O~PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 10-477 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 1 Legoland Dr. PROJECT NAME: Keystone Retaining Walls; Waterworks; Legoland XI The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: By: Kurt Culver Enclosures: EsGil Corporationn GA n EJ n PC 3/22/10 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 * (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 1O-477 March. 25, 2O10 [DO NOT PAY- THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE] VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PREPARED BY: Kurt Culver PLAN CHECK NO.: 10-477 DATE: March 25, 2010 BUILDING ADDRESS: 1 Legoland Dr. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: Wall TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: Concrete BUILDING PORTION Ret. Walls Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code AREA ( Sq. Ft.) 1700 cb Valuation Multiplier 17.74 By Ordinance Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) 30,158 30,158 $293.73 Plan Check Fee by Ordinance Type of Review: CH Repetitive FeeRepeats Complete Review D Other ,—I Hourly EsGil Fee Structural Only Hr. $190.92 $164.49 Comments: Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc + City of Carlsbad Public Works BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST RETAINING WALL Engineering BUILDING PLANCHECK NUMBER: CB BUILDING ADDRESS: / /_ 7 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Retaining Wall ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore, any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. Date: DENIAL Please see the attached report of deficiencies marked with D. Make necessary corrections to plans or specifications for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. By: By: By: Date: Date: Date: ATTACHMENTS D Right-of-Way Permit Application ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON City of Carlsbad ADDRESS: 1635 Faraday Ave Carlsbad, CA 92008 PHONE:(760)602' F:\UWRENCe\KATHY\MASTERSWetaining Wall Building Pick 200K.doc 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92OO8-7314 - (760) 602-2720 • FAX (760) 6O2-8562 PLANNING/ENGINEERING APPROVALS / 0 -"^' PERMIT NUMBER DATE ADDRESS RESIDENTIAL ADDITION- MINOR (<17,000.00) RETAINING WALL VILLAGE FAIRE POOL/SPA TENANT IMPROVEMENT COMPLETE OFFICE BUILDING OTHER PLANNER ENGINEER DATE DATE H:\ADMIN\COUNTER/PUNNING/ENCINEEIUNG APPROVALS •^X 5 •? '•...- engineering inc Keystone Retaining Wall Structural Calculations for Legoland Waterworks City of Carlsbad, California March 18,2010 W.O. #417-000 Prepared by: Matthew M. Merritt, P.E Red One Engineering, Inc. 1295 Distribution Way Vista, Ca 92081 Prepared for: Geogrid Retaining Wall Systems, Inc. 1295 Distribution Way Vista, Ca 92081 q<(7 engineering inc March 17, 2010 W.O. #417-000 Geogrid Retaining Walls Inc. 1295 Distribution Way Vista, CA 92081 Attention: Mr. Mike Stevenson Subject: Keystone Retaining Wall Structural Calculations Legoland Waterworks City of Carlsbad, California Please find enclosed the structural wall calculations for the Legoland Waterworks Keystone retaining walls. The Keystone retaining wall was designed using the KeyDraw design software; version 1.02 build 126 based on Rankine (modified) methodology, developed by Keystone Retaining Wall Systems, Inc. The retaining walls have been designed for internal and external wall stability only. The Geotechnical Engineer of Record shall confirm global and compound stability. The General contractor/developer shall coordinate the installation of all subterranean construction within the reinforced zone of the Keystone walls. Red One Engineering, Inc. shall be consulted prior to any excavation within the reinforced zone. All efforts shall be made too coordinate the installation of subterranean features during wall construction to limit future disturbance of the geogrid reinforcement. Keystone Retaining Wall Systems are active systems and may exhibit slight movement or creep over time as the geogrid reinforcement elongate to develop full tensile resistance. The owner should be aware that structures and pavement placed within the reinforced or retained zones of the wall may undergo movement that can lead to surface cracking. It is recommended that the compacted soil in the reinforced and retained zones be allowed to consolidate for a time up to 45 days to allow for the elongation of the geogrid reinforcement. This will allow for any slight movement or creep to occur before placement of structures or pavement on top of the fill and further mitigate the possibility of surface cracking. It is also recommended a maintenance program be implemented by the property owner to monitor and repair any cracking in the finished surface above the Keystone retaining wall to prevent water infiltration and hydrostatic pressures. 1295 distribution way, vista, California 92081 phone 760.410.1665 facsimile 760.509.0078 matt@red1 engineering.com Soil design parameters are based on the Geotechnical Investigation by Leighton and Associates, Inc. dated September 30, 2009. The owner shall provide a special inspector to observe the wall installation to satisfy the special inspection requirements as stated in ICC Legacy Report ER-2113. Please contact the undersigned with any questions regarding the Keystone Retaining Wall Structural Calculations. Sincerely, Red One Engineering, Inc. fattnej/i/ M. 'RCE #68429 1295 distribution way, vista, California 92081 phone 760.410.1665 facsimile 760.509.0078 matt@red1 engineering.com ABBREVIATIONS: f = soil internal friction angie c = soil cohesion value g = soil unit weight in pounds per cubic foot TU|t = ultimate tensile strength RFcr = creep reduction factor RFd = durability reduction factor RFjd = installation damage reduction factor LTDS = long term design strength FS = factor of safety Tai = allowable tension Tci = peak connection tension Tsc = serviceability connection tension Cj = puliout soil interaction coefficient Cds = direct shear soil interaction coefficient STONE RETAINING WALL SYSTEMS RETAINING WALL DESIGN Version Version 1.0.2 Build 126 SEISMIC DESIGN Project: LEGOLAND WATERWORKS Project No: 417-000 Case: WALL #1 Design Method: Rankine-w/Batter (modified soil interface) Date: 03/16/2010 Designer: MMM Design Parameters Soil Parameters: Reinforced Fill Retained Zone Foundation Soil Reinforced Fill Type: Unit Fill: f 34 34 34 c 0 0 0 0.75" minus crushed stone or gravel Crushed Stone, 1 inch minus Peak Acceleration = 0.46 g Vertical Acceleration = 0.00 g Factors of Safety (seismic are 75% of static) sliding: 1.50/1.13 pullout: 1.50/1.13 uncertainties: 1.50/1.13 overturning: 2.00/1.50 shear: 1.50 connection: 1.50/1.13 bearing: 2.00/1.50 bending: 1.50 Reinforcing Parameters: MirafiXTc Geogrids Tujt RFcr RFd RFid LTDS FS Ta/ 3XTc 3150 1.60 1.10 1.10 1627 1.50 1085 0.90 Cds 0.90 Analysis: Unit Type: Leveling Pad: Wall Ht: Level Backfill Surcharge: Compacll Crushed Stone 6.65ft Offset: 1.00 LL: 50 psf uniform surcharge Load Width: 100.00 ft Case: Case 2 Wall Batter: 0.00 deg. embedment: 1.33ft DL: 0 psf uniform surcharge Load Width: 0.00 ft Results:Sliding Factors of Safety: 3.82/2.06 Calculated Bearing Pressure: 984/1249 psf Eccentricity at base: 0.35 ft/0.92 ft Reinforcing: (ft & Ibs/ft) Calc. Length Tension 6.0 200/402 6.0 310/630 6.0 366/794 Reinforcing Quantities (no waste included): 3XTc 2.00 sy/n Overturning 7.30/3.21 Bearing 18.79/12.49 Shear 6.41/5.80 Bending 1.84/0.85 Reinf. Type 3XTc 3XTc 3XTc Allow Ten Tal 1085/1851 ok 1085/1851 ok 1085/1851 ok Pk Conn Tel 635/846 ok 83 1/1 108 ok 1027/1370 ok Serv Conn Tsc N/A N/A N/A Pullout fS 3.80/1.51 ok 6.99/2.75 ok > 10/4.25 ok GEOTECHNiCAL DESIGN PARAMETERS I GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION, PROPOSED WATERWORKS CLUSTER LEGOLAND THEME PARK CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: LEGOLAND California One Lego Drive Carisbad, California 92008 Project No. 960151-031 September 30, 2009 Leighton and Associates, inc. A LEIGHTON GROUP COMPANY I T^t; I'w. f G K T O f»J G F; O U K P A To: September 30, 2009 Project No. 960151-031 LEGOLAND California One Lego Drive Carlsbad, California 92008 Attention: Mr. Chris Romero Subject: Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed LEGOLAND Waterworks Cluster. LEGOLAND Theme Park, Carlsbad, California In accordance with your request and authorization. Leighton and Associates, Inc. (Leighton) has conducted a geotechnical investigation for a proposed Waterworks Cluster that is planned for the LEGOLAND Theme Park in Carlsbad, California (Figure 1). This report presents the results of our field investigation activities, review of the laboratory testing, geotechnical analyses, and provides our conclusions and recommendations for the proposed improvements. Based on the result of our preliminary geotechnical investigation, the proposed project is considered feasible from & geotechnical standpoint provided our recommendations are implemented in the design and construction of the project. If you have any questions regarding our report, please do not hesitate to contact this office. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Respectfully submitted. LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES. INC. Sean Principal Engineer Distribution:(2) (3) (1) (1) (1) (1) CD .obert Stroh, CEG 2099 enior Project Geologist rv^r Addressee ^O^CAU^ R.W. Apel Landscape Architects, Attention: Richard Ape! Hofman Planning and Engineering. Attention: Joe Cohan Nogle Onufer Associates Architects, Attention: Joseph Holasek Dunn Savoie Inc., Attention: Rhett Savoie Water Technology Inc., Attention: Nate Soto Whitewater West Industries, Ltd., Attention Eddie Dwyer 3934 Murphy Canyon Road, Suite B205 * San Diego, CA 92123-4 858.292.8030 < Fax 858.292.0771 * www.leightongeo.c 960151-031 Table 1 Potential Causative Fault Rose Canyon (Offshore) Newpon-Inglewood (Offshore) Coronado Bank/Aqua Blanca Elsinore (Julian) -j^iji iiw rate Distance from Fault to Site (miles/Ion) 4.7/7.6 6.9/1 i.l 20.8/33.5 24.4/39.2 IIICLCIO iwi nuLivt. i au Maximum Magnitude (Mw) 7.2 7.1 7.6 7.1 U3 I Peal; Horizontal Ground Acceleration (g) 0.46 0.35 0.21 0.14 As indicated in Table 1. the offshore segment of the Rose Canyon Fault Zone is the 'active' fault considered to have the most significant effect at the site from a design standpoint. For a magnitude of 7.2 earthquake on the fault, a peak horizontal ground acceleration of 0.46e is estimated at the site. 4.3 Seismic Design Parameters We have provided updated seismic design parameters per California Building Code (CBC 2007). The following seismic design parameters have been determined in accordance with the 2007 CBC and the USGS Ground Motion Parameter Calculator (Version 5.0.9). -9- Leighton 960151-031 Table 3 Static Equivalent Fluid Weight (pcf) Conditions Active At-Rest Passive Level 35 55 300 (maximum of 3 ksf) 2:1 Slope - -.D^ 85 150 (sloping down) Retaining structures should be provided with a drainage system, as illustrated in Appendix D, to prevent buildup of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. For sliding resistance, a friction coefficient of 0.35 may be used at the soil-concrete interface. The lateral passive resistance can be taken into account only if it is ensured that the soil against embedded structures will remain intact with time. Retaining wall footings should have a minimum embedment of 12 inches below the adjacent lowest grade unless deeper footings are needed for other reasons. To account for potential redistribution of forces during a seismic event, walls that fall within the requirements of ASCE 7-05 Section 15.6.1 should also be checked considering an additional inverted triangular seismic pressure distribution equal to 20 H psf, where H equals the overall retained height in feet. If conditions other than those covered herein are anticipated, the equivalent fluid pressure values should be provided on an individual case basis by the geotechnical engineer. A surcharge load for a restrained or unrestrained wall resulting from automobile traffic may be assumed to be equivalent to a uniform lateral pressure of 75 psf, which is in addition to the equivalent fluid pressure given above. For other uniform surcharge loads, a uniform lateral pressure equal to 0.35q should be applied to the wall (where q is the surcharge pressure in psf). If segmental walls are planned, a friction angle of 34 degrees and a unit weight of 120 to 125 pcf are considered appropriate for the onsite materials. The design should be performed in accordance with NCMA methodology (NCMA, 2009) and design requirements of the wall system. 6.5 Earthwork We anticipate that earthwork at the site will consist of remedial grading of the near- surface soils and associated improvements; utility construction; subgrade preparation in pavement areas; foundation excavation; and retaining wall construction and backfill -17- Leiqhton ACORa,, CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 'RODUCER Barney & Barney LLC CA Insurance Lie: OC03950 9171 Towne Centre Drive, Suite .500 ' ^, San Diego, CA 92122 858-457-3414 NSURED Geogrid Retaining Wall Systems, Inc. Geocrete Brow Ditch, Inc 1295 Distribution Way Vista, CA 92081 DATE (MIWDD/YYYY) 10/29/2009 14:48 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURER A: OneBeacon America Insurance Company INSURER B- National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh INSURER C: Old Republic General Insurance Corp INSURER D: NAIC# 2062! 19445 INSURER E: I COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE =OR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. . NSRLTR C C -•. B C A ADD'L]NSRD TYPE OF INSURANCE GENERAL LIABILITY X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY | CLAIMS MADE | X | OCCUR GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: ~1 POLICY [*]%£ HLOC AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY X GA ANY AUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS HIRED AUTOS NON-OWNED AUTOS *AGE LIABILITY ANY AUTO EXCESS/UMBRELLA LIABILITY X| OCCUR 1 | CLAIMS MADE R DEDUCTIBLE RETENTION S WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVEOFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? If yes, describe underSPECIAL PROVISIONS below Equipment Floater/Lease Equipment POLICY NUMBER A1CG37710904 A1CA37710904 BE24508289 A1CW37710904 7900079360000 POLICY EFFECTIVEDATE (MM/DDA'Y) 4/1/2009 11/1/2009 4/1/2009 4/1/2009 1 1/1/2009 POLICY EXPIRATIONDATE (MM/DD/YY) 4/1/2010 11/1/2010 4/1/2010 4/1/2010 11/1/2010 LIMITS EACH OCCURRENCE DAMAGE TO RENTED PREMISES (Ea occurenoel MED EXP (Any one person) PERSONAL & ADV INJURY GENERAL AGGREGATE PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT (Ea accident) BODILY INJURY (Per person) BODILY INJURY (Per accident) PROPERTY DAMAGE (Per accident) AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT QTHEP THAN . ^ ACC AUTO ONLY: AGG EACH OCCURRENCE AGGREGATE V WCSTATU- IOTH-A TORY LIMITS I ER E.L EACH ACCIDENT E.L DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ 1,000;000 t 100,000 $ 5,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 s 2,000,000 s $ $ $ s s $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ s $ $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Scheduled Equipment: $3,214,369 Leased Limit: $100,000 Deductible: $2,500 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES / EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT / SPECIAL PROVISIONS *10 days notice for non-payment. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION ) EVIDENCE OF COVERAGE I SHOULD ANY OFTHE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF. THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE "Robert Morton ACORD 25 (2001/08) client* 45676 Mst# 12533 Cert# 214561 Subject: ©ACORD CORPORATION 1988 CB100477 1 LEGOLANO DR WATERWORKS CLUSTER t-.c. Approved Date BUILDING 3-z.5-.fc> PLANNING ENGINEERING Forms/Fees HazHealthAPCD PE&M CFD: Y N LandUse:ImpArea: FY: Comments Building Planning Engineering Fire Need? Application Complete? Y N Fees Complete? Y N