The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About102 ACACIA AVE; ; CB990265; Permit85-252000 City of Carlsbad Residential Permit Permit No:CB990265 P Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: 102 ACACIA AV CBAD Permit Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: SFD Parcel No: 2042331 000 Lot #: 0 Valuation: Occupancy Group: 6 $431.418.00 Construction Type: VN # Dwelling Units: 1 Bedrooms: 4 Bathrooms: 3 Project Title: SFD Reference #: Structure Type: SFD Applicant: VIOLA TED Owner: VOLKOFF ALEX J Applied: 01/20/1999 Status: ISSUED Plan Approved: 02/24/1999 Issued: 03/01/1999 Entered By: MDP Inspect Area: PD Pian Check#: Orig PC#: 859 VIOLET CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 760 720-0290 Building Permit Add’l Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add’l Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park in Lieu Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee Other Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee $287.00 Add’l Renewal Fee $60.00 Other Building Fee $445.75 MECHANICAL TOTAL $1 13.50 Pot. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Housing Impact Fee $0.00 Add‘l Pot. Water Con. Fee Meter Size Recl. Water Con. Fee Housing InLieu Fee $0.00 $0.00 Master Drainage Fee: $0.00 $317.76 Sewer Fee: $7,002.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES $8,563.23 Date: FINAL APPROVAL 4 - IS*O/ Clearance: NOTICE: Please fake NOTICE that appmval of your pmjd includes the‘lmpmi(on’ of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exaclions kreaftermlk-3vely follow the protest prccedures setforh in Government Code Section 66020(a), and filethe protest and any other required information with the City Managerfw referred to as Yeeslexactwns.’ You have 90 days from the date this permRwas issued to protest imposition of these feeslexactms. If you pmtest them, you must pmcessing in accordance with Cadsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that pdure will bar any subdequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their impmition. Yw are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specifed feedexactions DOES NOT APPLY to wakr and sewer connection fees and Caw$ changes, nor planning, zoning grading or other similar applicalbn pmzssirg or service fees in mnnection with this pmjea. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any feeslexactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which me statute of limitations has previouslv othemise expired. CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (760) 438-1161 11/01/1999 City of Carlsbad Right of Way Permit Permit No: RW990360 Job Address: 102 ACACIA AV CBAD Permit Type: ROW Subtype: MINOR Parcel No: Status: ISSUED Start Date: Est Complete Date: Applied: 11/01/1999 Insurance Expire: 11/01/2000 Issued: 11/01/1999 Traffic Control Plan: Y Expired: 01/09/2000 Liability Insurance: Y GOP: Reference#: Location: Lot #: 0 Entered By: JJ This permit may be revoked by the City Engineer if it is deemed that inadequate progress is being made towards the completion of the work or if the work does not meet City Standards. The applicant may be billed for the cost of any corrective work that the City must perform. Permit Release Date Released YOU MUST CALL UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT (1-800-4224133) TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO WORK. UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT NO. . THIS PERMIT IS INVALID WITHOUT THIS NUMBER IF ANY EXCAVATION OR BORING IS DONE. 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (760) 438-1161 CITY OF CARLSBAD PERMIT APPLICATION @ CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT DIWo (si=D> $ SW 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009 (760) 438-1161 I FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO. EST. VAL. y/p, bud Plan Ck. Deposit Validated By Date I, 8s ownst of the property or my employees with wages 88 their sole mmpmsation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offersd for sale such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements 818 not intended or offered tor sale. If, however, the building or improvemmt is ISsc. 7044. Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property Who builds or improves thereon, and Who does Sold bthm one year of completion. the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or irnPlOYe for the PU~POBB Of said Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and Contracts for such projects with ~ontra~torl~l licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). d"' I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project ISec. 7044. Business and Professions Code: The Inspection List Permit#: CB990265 Type: RESDNTL SFD Date inspection Item 03/14/2001 89 Final Combo 03/14/2001 89 Final Combo 11/08/1999 21 Underground/Under Floor 11/08/1999 23 GasmesffRepairs 11/05/1999 34 Rough Electric 09/01/1999 32 Const. Service/Agricultural 08/30/1999 82 DrywalllExt Lath/Gas Test 08/19/1999 16 Insulation 08/16/1999 84 Rough Combo 08/13/1999 84 Rough Combo 07/19/1999 24 Roughmopout 06/14/1999 13 Shear PaneMHDs 06/07/1999 13 Shear Panels/HDs 06/07/1999 15 Roof/Reroof 04/21/1999 14 FramelSteellBoltingMeldin 04/05/1999 63 Walls ~~~~ ~ inspector Act PD AP RI PD NR PD NR PD AP DM CA TP AP PD AP PD AP PD co PD NR PD AP PD co PD AP PD PA SP AP 03/30/1999 11 03/30/1999 62 03/29/1999 61 03/26/1999 62 03/23/1999 28 03/23/1999 63 03/17/1999 63 03/16/1999 11 03/11/1999 11 03/09/1999 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers SteeWBond Beam Footing Steel/Bond Beam Plumbing RepairsISprinkler Walls Walls FtglFoundationlPiers FtgIFoundationlPiers Ftg/Foundation/Piers PD AP PO AP PD NR PD PA PD wc PD PA PD AP PD co DH PA DH AP TSPB SEE NOTICE ATTACHED FLOOR LAUNDRY SLAB GARAGE OPENING RETAINERS DRAINS SEE NOTICE ATTACHED LOWER FOUNDATION REBAR IN WALLS LOWER FOUNDATION 27 X 27 AREA Thursday, March 15.2001 Page 1 of 1 C19r et Carisball Rnal Bulldlnm InsDectlon Dept: Building EMneering ,. Planning CMWD St Lite Fire . , ,. Plan Check 11: Permit #: CB990265 Projed Name: SFD Address: 102 ACACIA AV Contact Person: Phone: Sewer Dist: CA Water Dist: CA Date: 02/08/2001 PermnType: RESDNTL Sub Type: SFD Lot: 0 .... ' 1 ?: .......................................................................................................................................................... Inspected Q.2 Date By: flcAfiu Inspected: 02- f 2 0 I Approved: - 4pproved: - Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: - Disapproved: - By: Inspected: Approved: __ Disapproved: __ Inspected Date ........................................................................................................................................................... City of Carlsbad Bldg For: 03/14/2001 Permit# CB990265 Title: SFD Description: Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: SFD Job Address: 102 ACACIA AV Suite: Lot Location: APPLICANT VIOLA TED Owner: VIOLA THEODORE D Remarks: Total Time: CD Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical 0 Inspection Request Inspector Assignment: PD Phone: 7606138333 Inspector: & Requested By: TED VIOLA Entered By: CHRISTINE Act Comments Associated PCRs PCR99065 ISSUED PCR99132 ISSUED Date 11/08/1999 11/08/1999 11/05/1999 09/01/1999 08/30/1999 08/19/1999 08/16/1999 08/13/1999 07/19/1999 06/14/1999 06/07/1999 06/07/1999 04/21/1999 04/05/1999 03/30/1999 Desuiption InsDection History 21 Underground/Under Flwr 23 GasKesffRepairs 34 Rough Electric 82 DrywaWExt Lath/Gas Test 32 Const. Sewice/Agricultual 84 Rough Combo 16 Insulation 24 Roughfropout 64 Rough Combo 13Shear Panels/HDs 13 Shear Panels/HD's 15 Rwf/Reroof 14 Frame/Steel/Boltinglding 63Walls 11 FtglFoundatiorVPiers Act lnsp Comments NR PD NR PD AP PD TSPB CA DM AP TP AP PD AP PD CO PD SEE NOTICE ATTACHED AP PD NR PD AP PD CO PD PA PD FLOOR AP PD AP SP LAUNDRY SLAB GARAGE OPENING RETAINERS CITY OF CARLSBAD I E (760) 438-3550 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE FOR IdP&TION CALL (760) 438-3101. RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? 0 YES FORflY: INFORMATION, CONTACT PHONE BUILDING INSPECTOR CODE ENFORCEMENTOFFICER @ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~~ Y" CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE DATE TIME - EsGil - Corporation Zn Tartnrrship with Government for %uililingSafcty DATE: February 24, 1999 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-265 PROJECT ADDRESS: 102 Acacia St. SET I11 0 PLAN REVIEWER 0 FILE PROJECT NAME: SFD for Viola [XI The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. 0 The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. 0 The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. 0 The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. 0 The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. 0 The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: [XI Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. 0 Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax in Person 0 REMARKS: By: Bert Doming0 Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA 0 MB 0 EJ 0 PC 2/22/99 tmsrntl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 - EsGil Corporation 1ri Tartncrship with +mm-rmcnt for !Buifdin#Safety DATE: February 16, 1999 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-265 PROJECT ADDRESS: 102 Acacia St. PROJECT NAME: SFD for Viola SET I1 p33 0 APPLICANT 0 PLAN REVIEWER 0 FILE 0 The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. 0 The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. [XI The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil *,I?@ Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. 0 The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Ted Viola 859 Violet Court, Carlsbad, CA 92009 H Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant(except by mail) that the plan check has been completed. 0 Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: 1 Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person 0 REMARKS: By: Bert Doming0 Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA MB 0 EJ 0 PC 211 6/99 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 99-265 I1 February 16,1999 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-265 NPROJECT ADDRESS: 102 Acacia St. SET: I1 N DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 2/16/99 DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: February 16, 1999 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, +,,('a 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: ESGIL CORPORATION. B. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. C. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. D., Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? OYes ONo . Carlsbad 99-265 I1 February 16, 1999. 3. 5. 9. 14. 16. EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS Guardrails (Section 509.1): a) Shall be detailed showing adequacy of connections to resist the horizontal force prescribed in Table 16-B. Please submit calculations. Please show on the plan the recommended detail. Where is the calculations for the pre cast guardrail connection? Provide details of winding stairway complying with Section 1006.4: a) Minimum tread is 6 inches at any point and minimum 9 inches at a point 12 inches from where the treads are narrowest. Please show on the winding stair plan the dimensions requested. FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS Investigate the potential for seismically induced soil liquefaction and soil instability in seismic zones 3 and 4. This does not apply to detached, m- dwellings. Section 1804.5 Please submit soils engineer‘s report regarding the potential for seismically induced liquefaction as requested. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents. Please see page 13 of the soils report. ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE) For a single-family dwelling unit (and for each unit of a duplex), show that at least one receptacle outlet accessible at grade level will be installed outdoors at the front and back of the dwelling. NEC Art. 210-52 (e). This receptacle must be GFCl protected. Please show a GFCl protected receptacle at the back of the house. PLUMBING (UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) Show T and P valve on water heater and show route of discharge line to exterior. UPC, Section 608.5. Carlsbad 99-265 I1 February 16, 1999 ENERGY CONSERVATION 18. The house is not a slab on grade. Please clarify the recommended thermal mass area shown on the calculations. The R 19 insulation shown on sheet A9 may not fit in the 2x4 stud walls. Please clarify. 23. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commerciallindustrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1, Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculationslreports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760) 438-1 161. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculationslreports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (619) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calcuiationskeports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. MISCELLANEOUS 24. Please show how the water heater and FAU compartment would be provided with combustion air. The louvered door from the garage is not allowed for the source of combustion air. The combustion set up should be high and low system. 28. Please cross reference the shear transfer details for the interior shear walls(along lines A-I, B , C, etc. The 2/D-2 detail is for the floor. The interior shear walls for the upper level need the shear transfer details cross referenced to the framing plan. Carlsbad 99-265 I1 February 16, 1999 To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes 0 No U The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Bert Doming0 at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. EsGll - Corporation Zn Tartncrsfiip witfi Sjouemnunt for guilding Safety DATE: February 2, 1999 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-265 PROJECT ADDRESS: 102 Acacia St. PROJECT NAME: SFD for Viola SET I ~ 0 FILE 0 The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. 0 The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. 0 The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. H The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil tt Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. 0 The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant ,. ,**! contact person. H The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Ted Viola 859 Violet Court, Carlsbad, CA 92009 Ix] Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant(except by mail) that the plan check has been completed. 0 Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: 1 Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person 0 REMARKS: By: Bert Doming0 Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA 0 MB EJ PC 1/21/99 1msmll.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 99-265 February 2, 1999 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PROJECT ADDRESS: 102 Acacia St. FLOOR AREA: 5004 SQ. FT. STORIES: TWO HEIGHT: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: ESGlL CORPORATION: 1/21/99 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW PLAN REVIEWER: Bert Doming0 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building ,,;,$I Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with Title 24 and the following model codes: 1994 UBC (effective 12/28/95), 1994 UPC (effective 12/28/95), 1994 UMC (effective 2/23/96) and 1993 NEC (effective 12/28/95). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copv) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. LIST NO. 1, GENERAL SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES WITHOUT SUPPLEMENTS (1994 UBC) r3fom.dot Carlsbad 99-265 February 2, 1999 1. 2. 3. 5. 6. 7. 8. GENERAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS Provide mechanical ventilation capable of providing five air changes per hour in bathrooms, water closet compartments, laundry rooms and similar rooms if required openable windows are not provided. Section 1203.3. Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406.4 (see exceptions): a) Doors and enclosures for hot tubs, whirlpools, saunas, steam rooms, bathtubs and showers and in any portion of a building wall enclosing these compartments where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above a standing surface and drain inlet. EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS Guardrails (Section 509.1): a) Shall be detailed showing adequacy of connections to resist the horizontal force prescribed in Table 16-B. Please submit calculations. The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-1/4 inches nor more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension, Handrails projecting from walls shall have at least 1-112 inches between the wall and the handrail. Section 1006.9. Provide details of winding stairway complying with Section 1006.4: a) Minimum tread is 6 inches at any point and minimum 9 inches at a point b) Maximum rise is 8 inches. c) Minimum width is 36 inches. The walls and soffits of the enclosed usable space under interior stairs shall be protected on the enclosed side as required for one hour fire-resistive construction. Section 1006.12. 12 inches from where the treads are narrowest. GARAGE AND CARPORTS Garage requires one-hour fire protection on the garage side of walls and ceiling common to the dwelling. Table 3-B, Section 302.4. All elements supporting floor above garage, including walls supporting floor joists, must have one-hour fire-resistive protection on the garage side. Section 302.2. Carlsbad 99-265 February 2, 1999 FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS 9. Investigate the potential for seismically induced soil liquefaction and soil instability in seismic zones 3 and 4. This does not apply to detached, sinqle- ston/ dwellings. Section 1804.5 IO. The soils engineer recommended that helshe review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: a) The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, b) The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and c) The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report." 11, Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents. Please see page 13 of the soils report. FRAMING 12. Detail shear transfer connections, including roof and floor diaphragms, to shear walls. Section 2314. 13. Show location of attic access with a minimum size of 22"x30", unless the maximum vertical headroom height in the attic is less than 30. Access must be provided to each separated attic area, shall be located in a hallway or other readily accessible location and 30" headroom clearance is required above the opening. Section 1505.1. ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE) 14. For a single-family dwelling unit (and for each unit of a duplex), show that at least one receptacle outlet accessible at grade level will be installed outdoors at the front and back of the dwelling. NEC Art. 210-52 (e). This receptacle must be GFCl protected. 15. Show on the plan that ground-fault circuit-interrupter protection complies with 1993 NEC Art. 210-8, which reads as follows: All 125-volt, single-phase, 15- and 20- ampere receptacles installed in bathrooms, garages, basements, outdoors and within 6 feet of a kitchen sink. Carlsbad 99-265 February 2, 1999 16. 17. 18. 19. 22. 23. PLUMBING (UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) Show T and P valve on water heater and show route of discharge line to exterior. UPC, Section 608.5. Show that water heater is adequately braced to resist seismic forces. Provide two straps (one strap at top 113 of the tank and one strap at bottom 113 of the tank). UPC, Section 510.0 ENERGY CONSERVATION The house is not a slab on grade. Please clarify the recommended thermal mass area shown on the calculations. The calculations did not include the floor area exposed to unheated space. Please clarify. CARLSBAD S.F.D. & DUPLEX SUPPLEMENT New residential units must be pre-plumbed for future solar water heating. Note that two roof jacks must be installed where the water heater is in the one story garage and directly below the most south facing roof (City Ordinance No. 8093). Note that two 3l4" copper pipes must be installed to the most convenient future solar panel location when the water heater is not in a one story garage and is not directly below the most south facing roof. (City Ordinance No. 8093). All piping for present or future solar water heating must be insulated when in areas that are not heated or cooled by mechanical means (city policy). Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commerciallindustrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculationslreports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760) 438-1161. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculationslreports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (619) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculationslreports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. Carlsbad 99-265 February 2, 1999 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. MISCELLANEOUS Please show how the water heater and FAU compartment would be provided with combustion air. The louvered door from the garage is not allowed for the source of combustion air. The text of the general notes for the shear walls are too small to read. Please show the plans the grade and specie of the headers and beams. Please show a section detail of the steel beams reflecting the arrangement of the joists relative to the top flange. Please cross reference the shear transfer details for the interior shear walls(along lines A-1, B , C, etc. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, Le., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result ,,,:vfi' of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: t Yes 0 NO a The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Bert Doming0 at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 99-265 February 2, 1999 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-265 PREPARED BY: Bert Doming0 DATE: February 2, 1999 BUILDING ADDRESS: 102 Acacia St. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R 3 . TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V N HOUSE 3,840.00 12 320 BALCONY 17,250.00 23 750 GARAGE 410,328.00 82 5004 I I I I I I ,Id Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers I TOTALVALUE I It I $ 431,418.00 I 1994 UBC Building Permit Fee Bldg. Permit by ordinance: $ 1783.08 Type of Review: Complete Review 0 0 Hourly 1994 UBC Plan Check Fee 0 Plan Check by ordinance: $ 1159.00 Repetitive Fee Applicable 0 Other: $ 927.20 Comments: Sheet 1 of 1 rnacvalue.doc 5196 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST PLANCHECK NO.: CB 94 -67b 5 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: SFB ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER: s/ - 2.3 3 - /D EST. VALUE: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL The item you have submitted for review has been Please see t attached report of deficiencies approved. The approval is based on plans, information andlor specifications provided in your marked wit Make necessary corrections to plans or specifi x ti s for compliance with applicable this date, including field modifications, must be submittal: therefore any changes to these items after specifications to this office for review. codes and standards. Submit corrected plans andlor reviewed by this oftice to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review with instructions in this report can result in carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply suspension of permit to build. Date: g/c& Date: Rght-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: By: Date: i ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT WH~ENTS ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON - Dedication Application Dedication Checklist Improvement Application Improvement Checklist Future Improvement Agreement Grading Permit Application Grading Submittal Checklist Right-of-way Permit Application Right-of-way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet Sewer Fee Information Sheet Name: JOANNE JUCHNIEWICZ City of Carlsbad Address: 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad. CA 92009 Phone: (619)438-1161, ext. 4510 CFD INFORMATION Parcel Map No: Lots: Recordation: Carlsbad Tract: A4 ~‘WOR~P?33FFC+iWfWfW4W~.~aflsbad, CA 92009-1576 - (760) 438-1161 - FAX (760) 431-69 @ BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN 3Rw 0 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: pd A. North Arrow B. Existing & Proposed Structures E. Easements C. Existing Street Improvements F. Right-of-way Width & Adjacent Streets D. Property Lines G. Driveway widths 2. Show on site plan: QDrainage 1. Building Patterns pad surface . dralnage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. drainage of 2% to swale 5’ away from building.” 2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: ”Finish grade will provide a minimum positive 6. Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography 3. Include on title sheet: A. Site address B. Assessor‘s Parcel Number C. Legal Description For commerciallindustrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION / DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE CI 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of a roval for 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: H:\WORDWOCSCHI(LSlWdWW PU- Ckht BPOml Fa JI ms 2 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 0 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. , pursuant to Carlsbad Dedication required as follows: Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 ’/2” x 11” plat map signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications a be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by: Date: IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 0 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of buildina construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $ Section 18.40.040. - , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Public improvements required as follows: Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by: Date: 0 0 0 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $ Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Future public improvements required as follows: 3 .. , BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST ,61/ 2nd.‘ 3d/ 0 0 0 6c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement, Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Future Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: 0 0 0 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaaed or defective imDrovements found adiacent to buildina site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the Citv InsDector Drior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. 0 P 0 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading 0 0 0 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). attached. NOTE: The Gradina Permit must be issued and rouah aradinq Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form amroval obtained Drior to issuance of a Buildina Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: 0 0 0 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) 0 7d.No Grading Permit required. 0 D 0 7e.lf grading is not required, write “No Grading” on plot plan. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS 0 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-way and/or rm private work adjacent to the public Right-of-way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tieing b- w- into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-way permit required for: BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 4 3a' CI 9. A SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the building permit issuance. The fee is noted in the fees section on the following page. 0 10. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 153, for provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: 0 11. NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs tint. 0 12. / Required fees are attached 'f D No fees required 5 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET Y timate based on unconfirmed information from applicant. Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal. Address: 102 .,&-c~C-iie~ Bldg. Permit No. 9 4 / 26 5 Prepared by: Date: 29 /% Checked by: Date: EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: S PR Sq. Ft./Units: EDU's: \ Types of Use: Sq. FtJUnits: EDU's: ADT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: Sq. Ft./Units: ADT's: t Types of Use: Sq. FtJUnits: ADT's: FEES REQUIRED: WITHIN CFD: 0 YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District #1, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) 0 NO k +- K . PARK-IN-LIEU FEE PARK AREA & #: FEEAJNIT: X NO. UNITS: =$ 62. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ADT'slUNITS: X FEE/ADT: =$ 3. BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE IDIST. #1 - DIST. 12 - DIST. #3 __ 1 ADT'slUNITS: X FEEIADT: =$ &4. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE ZONE: UNIT/Sa.FT.: X FEE/Sa.FT./UNIT: =$ 5. SEWER FEE PERMIT No. EDU's: / x FEEIEDU:J@~Y =$ /ASY DRAINAGE BASIN: EDU's: X FEEIEDU: =$ WER LATERAL 1$2,5001 =$ zsm- 7. DRAINAGE FEES PLDA : HIGH /LOW ACRES 3 I h x FEE/AC: & Y 6 =$ 317. 76 TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES*: $ *NO= This calculation sheet is NOT a complete list of all fees which Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits. PNKKSWBFORWEE CWUUTloN WURKWEEl REV 7/13/98 PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST cg Plan Check No. CB 39-d k I; Address / 03 &&&i& 8s. -r( APN: 2OY-d33-/0 q I Planner 5. Icennek Phone (619) 438-1 161, extension 433 I o 2 2 Type of Project & Use: sfiq Net Project Density: % DUIAC Zoning: E-3 General Plan: RtS Facilities Management Zone: I CFD linlntltl # Date of participation: Circle One - Remaining net dev acres:a (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit: ) ccc mvm hhh Legend: Item Complete Item Incomplete - Needs your action 0 0 Environmental Review Required: YES - NO x TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Discretionary Action Required: YES x NO -TYPE (',oci" @X&-/- APPROVAL/RESO. NO. fc QCSD 4445 DATE I -b-q? PROJECT NO. WP qg-7 2- OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: uof7ee OF &mbfl(r- cnd -& g +-c doc .' s;Wd- 4 m/ia.lI $0 2dL -ta p/.+cH.'dA. Pleast dwotned a7Rh P/anfll/l;n,c- w w + h~ @ 0 Coastal Zone AsiessrnentlCompliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YESX NO- CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES NO Y If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 31 11 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200. San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619) 521-8036 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Reaulczb-o Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES'J" NO- If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #: 9 - /2 Follow-Up Actions: 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. Floor Plans). lnclusionary Housing Fee required: YES - NO x Tedr cLot~n egi+ ns (Effective date of lnclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES NO IAIPIDs. Activity Maintenance. enter CBb. toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing YIN, Enter ~ee, UPDATE!) - Site Plan: 1. Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines. 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. Zoning: 1. Setbacks: Front: Required ,220 ' Shown 36 ' Interior Side: Required 5' Shown Street Side: Required lo Shown 10' Rear: Required 16 ' Shown lo' I 2. Accessory structure setbacks: fJ /^A Front: Required Shown Interior Side: Required Shown Street Side: Required Shown Rear: Required Shown Structure separation: Required Shown 3. Lot Coverage: Required bo% mg Shown 42 yb 4. Height: AA02 Required 30' MA)( Shown 30' pm &Gsh pk 5. Parking: Spaces Required . 2. Shown 2 p! OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER %&&,I DATE a-a.;-sq I 1 6le COP? cB”i.7 2-bS COASTAL PERMIT DETERMINATION FORM (To Be Completed By Planning Staff) This form is used to identify and record those projects which either require a Coastal Development Permit or which are exempt from the requirement for a Coastal Development Permit. Note: This is not a building permit or a determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. COASTAL PERMIT DETERMINATION NUMBER: 77” f3 ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER: 2 Y- a 3 3 -1 o NAME: I\ ; nl CL Resibce ADDRESS: 1 oa k6z &I*& LOCATION OF PROJECT (IF DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE): COASTAL PERMIT DETERMINATION: 0 1. This development is exempt from the requirement for a coastal permit. F 2. This development requires a coastal development permit from the City of Carisbad. CD p 9 a-7 2- “48 /-S-4$ 0 3. This development is in the State of California Coastal Commission area of jurisdiction. /-dZ/?T Date This determination relates only to the project described above and shown on the attached plans. Any change to the project may change the determination status. If the information contained in shall be invalid. this submittal (including plans) is changed, found to be incorrect, or incomplete this determination c: Applicant, Project File, Building Permit File (when applicable) H:\IVDMIN\COUNTER\OETERMlNATlON FORM (CDP) LIMITED FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION PROPOSED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE 102 Acacia Street CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA prepared for: MR. TED VIOLA 3831 Garfield Street Carlsbad, California 92008 by: SAGE ENGINEERING, INC. 10035 Carroll Canyon Road, Suite A San Diego, California 92131 Project No. 8077 December 31, 1998 -4 SAGE Engineering, Inc Mr. Ted Viola 3831 Garfield Street Carlsbad, California 92008 December 31, 1998 Project No. 8077 Subject: LIMITED FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION Project: Proposed Single-Family Residence 102 Acacia Street Carlsbad, California 92008 Dear Mr. Viola: In accordance with our signed Proposal No. 98-096, dated December 5, 1998, SAGE Engineering, Inc. has conducted a Limited Foundation Investigation at the above referenced site in Carlsbad, California. The attached report discusses the earthwork construction and foundation design aspects of the project, along with other recommendations for site improvement. From our investigation, testing, and analysis of the subsurface soils, we conclude that the proposed development is geotechnically feasible if recommendations contained herein will be incorporated into the design and planning and implemented during construction. SAGE Engineering appreciates the opportunity to be of assistance to you on this project. We welcome the opportunity to continue our role as geotechnical consultants for this project. If we can be of further assistance to you, please feel free to contact us at your convenience. +- Chappell, EIT e Staff Engineer - \8M7.sge - 10035 Carroll Canyon Road, Suite A San Diego, CA 921 31 61 9-530-1 977 Fax 61 9-530-0657 TABLE OF CONTENTS . . ... INTRODUCTION General .............................................. 1 Purpose ............................................. 1 Scope of Services 1 ........................................ PROJECT BACKGROUND Site Description ......................................... 2 Proposed Development ...................................... 2 SITE INVESTIGATION Subsurface Exploration ..................................... 2 Laboratory Testing Program ................................. 3 General .............................................. 4 Groundwater ........................................... 5 GEOLOGIC SETTING Site Stratigraphy ......................................... 4 SEISMICITY Seismic Evaluation ....................................... 5 Earthquake Design ....................................... 5 Compressible Soils ....................................... 6 Expansive Soils ......................................... 6 Groundwater ........................................... 6 GEOTECHNICAL.EVALUATION GRADING AND EARTHWORK RECOMMENDATIONS General .............................................. 7 Clearing and Grubbing ..................................... 7 Structural Improvement of Soils ............................... 7 Transitions Between Cut and Fill ............................... 8 Method and Criteria of Compaction ............................. 8 . . .. . TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) FOUNDATION AND SLAB RECOMMENDATIONS General .............................................. 9 Structure Foundations ..................................... 9 ................................... ........................................... ......................................... ......................................... Lateral Earth Resistance 10 Settlement 10 Interior Slabs 10 Exterior Slabs 11 Pre-soaking Beneath Slabs ................................... 11 ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS Retaining Walls ........................................ 12 Trench Backfill 12 13 ............................................. Surface Drainage ....................................... Plan Review and Geotechnical Observation ....................... 13 CLOSURE Limits of Investigation .................................... 13 FIGURES Figure 1 - Site Location Map Figure 2 - Plot Plan APPENDICES Appendix A - References Appendix B - Field Exploration Logs Appendix C - Laboratory Test Results Appendix D - Summary of Seismic Data INTRODUCTION General This report presents the findings and conclusions of a Limited Foundation Investigation for the proposed single-family residence to be located at 102 Acacia Street in Carlsbad, California. The location of the project is indicated on the Site Location Map, Figure 1, which follows the text of this report. The investigation basically consisted of field reconnaissance and geologic mapping, subsurface exploration, laboratory analysis and engineering/geological evaluation of the obtained information. Pumose The purpose of the investigation was to evaluate the surface and subsurface conditions at the site and provide recommendations regarding earthwork construction and suitable foundation systems for the proposed residential construction. Scone of Services The following scope of services were conducted during the development of this report: 0 Site reconnaissance and review of published geologic, seismological and geotechnical reports and maps pertinent to the project area; 0 Advancing four (4) test pits within the proposed area of development. The Plot Plan, Figure 2 (following the report text), indicates the approximate test pit locations. The detailed Exploration Logs are contained in Appendix B; 0 Collection of representative soil samples at selected depths. The obtained samples where sealed in moisture-resistant containers and transported to the laboratory for subsequent analysis; 0 Laboratory testing of samples representative of those soil materials encountered during the field investigation; 0 Conducting geologic and engineering analysis of the field and laboratory data, which provided the basis for our conclusions and recommendations; 0 Production of this report which summarizes the results of the above analysis and presents our findings and recommendations for site development. SAGE Engineering. Inc. * PmDored SFR I 102 Acacia Street * Carlsbad. California * Proiect No. 8077 * December 31. 1998 1 PROJECT BACKGROUND Site Descriotion The subject site is a rectangular-shaped parcel located at 102 Acacia Street in Carlsbad, California. The site is further located on the northeast comer of Acacia Street and Carlsbad Boulevard (Pacific Coast Highway). The boundary of the lot is approximately 100 feet east of the coastal bluff edge above Carlsbad State Beach. The project location is shown on Figure 1, Site Location Map, which follows the text of this report. The residential property encompasses approximately 5,400 square-feet that was reportedly developed in the 1950’s. A small single-story woodiframed residence and concrete driveway are located along the eastern boundary of the lot. It is understanding that the residence and driveway are to be demolished prior to construction. Topographically, the site is relatively flat with a low slope of approximately 3 feet in height along the western and southern limits. At the time of our investigation, the remainder of the lot was covered with low grass and weeds. Proposed DeveloRrnent Based on the preliminary plans provided by the owner, Mr. Ted Viola, the proposed residence will basically include a 2,500 square-foot two-story building with partial under-parking. Additional improvement are to include a concrete driveway and adjacent landscaping. The Plot Plan, Figure 2 following the text of this report, provides a preliminary layout of the proposed development. The structure is anticipated to be supported by a combination of continuous spread footings and restrained wall footings for the garage walls. The plans indicate that slab-on-grade floors will be used. Construction of the building pad is expected to include normal cut and fill earthwork, Fills of 4 feet above existing grade are anticipated in the western portion of the structure and cuts to 5 feet below existing grade for the garage. SITE INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING Subsurface Exdoration The site investigation, consisting of surficial reconnaissance and subsurface exploration, was conducted on December 7, 1998. Subsurface exploration was conducted with a small track- mounted excavator equipped with a 12-inch wide bucket. The purpose of the test pit excavations was to evaluate the subsurface conditions to depths that may influence, or be influenced by, the proposed residential development. SAGE Eneineering. Inc. * Proposed SFR I 102 Acacia Street * Carlsbad. California * Pmiect No. 8077 * December 31. 1998 2 A total of four (4) test pits were completed within the proposed area of development to depths ranging from 5 to 7.5 feet below the existing ground surface. The test pits were logged in the field by the Engineering Geologist. Representative samples were collected, were sealed in moisture-resistant containers, and transported to the laboratory for subsequent testing. Detailed descriptions of the encountered subsurface materials is provided in the Site Stratigraphy section of this report. Appendix B contains the subsurface exploration logs. Elevations noted on the expIoration logs are estimated from the preliminary plans. Laboratory Testing Promam In addition to the field exploration, a supplemental laboratory testing program was conducted to establish the pertinent engineering characteristics of the foundation materials. The laboratory testing program included supplementary visual classification, gradation, laboratory maximum density and optimum moisture content, expansion index, in-situ moisture/density determination and consolidation analysis. All phases of the laboratory testing program were conducted in general accordance with applicable ASTM specifications or other accepted test method(s). Appendix C provides a summary of test procedures and results. SAGE Engineering. Inc. * Prooored SFR I 102 Acacia Srreet * Carlrbad. California * Pmiecr No. 8077 December 31, 1998 3 GEOLOGIC SETTING General The near-coastal area of Carlsbad, in which the subject site lies, is underlain locally by relatively flat-lying Tertiary-age sedimentary materials. According to the geologic literature, sedimentary materials of the Tertiary age Del Mar and Scripps Formations are found in the area. Specifically, the area where the residential structure is proposed is underlain by bedrock interpreted as belonging to the Scripps formation. Partially to unconsolidated marine terrace deposits are mapped as overlying the consolidated bedrock materials. Site Stratieraohy The subsurface descriptions provided are estimates from field interpretation of conditions observed or inferred from limited data, and may not represent all subsurface conditions at the site. Descriptions of subsurface soil conditions are presented on the boring logs provided in Appendix B, of this report. Undocumented Fill Undocumented fill was observed in all four of the test pits excavated on site to a depths of 4 to 4.5 feet below existing grade. The fill material consisted of a light brown silty sand that was dry, loose to medium dense in consistency, moderately porous, and contained some organic materials. Clay pipe apparently related to an abandoned septic system was also encountered in test pit SG2 at a depth of 2.0 feet. An abandoned three-inch diameter iron pipe was observed above the clay pipe. Topsoil Topsoil was observed in each of the borings to depths ranging from 1 to 1.5 feet below surface grade. The material was classified as a medium brown silty sand that was dry to moist and loose in consistency. Abundant amounts of roots or rootlets were observed within this horizon. Weathered Bedrock Weathered bedrock materials interpreted as belonging to the Scripps Formation were observed in all four test pits at depths ranging from 4.0 to 4.5 feet below surface grade. This material consisted of a medium red-brown sandstone that was generally damp and medium dense to dense in consistency. The sand was poorly graded and fine grained. Excellent exposures of the underlying bedrock is provided in the coastal bluff located across Carlsbad Boulevard (Pacific Coast Highway), west of the site. SAGE Engineering, Inc. * Proposed SFR I 102 Acacia Street * Carlsbad. California * Pmiecr No. 8077 * December 31. 1998 4 Groundwater Groundwater was not encountered to the maximum explored depth of 7.5 feet in the test pits completed during this investigation. The nearby coastal bluff achieves a maximum height of approximately 30 feet and does not indicate the presence of a shallow groundwater surface. SEISMICITY Seismic Evaluation In general, seismicity in the western portion of California can be attributed to the tectonic movement taking place between the Pacific Plate to the west and the North American Plate to the east. The movement along the roughly north-south trending San Andreas Fault is a result of the tectonic forces applied. The San Andreas Fault Zone, located to the northeast of San Diego County, encompasses an area several miles wide and includes numerous faults with parallel trends. As a result of the major regional fault activities and the density of active faults in the western near-coastal areas of southern California, known faults evaluated within several miles of the subject site possess a high potential for future and relatively frequent occurrence of earthquakes. There are no active faults known in the area of the proposed development, nor was evidence of faulting observed during the site investigation. The figures provided in Appendix D, Summary of Seismic Data, includes a California Fault Map. Earthauake Desim Our evaluation of the site has included analysis of the Probable bedrock accelerations at the site. A summary of the obtained data is provided in Appendix D. For the intended use, it is our opinion that the most significant Probable seismic event would be a 6.0 magnitude earthquake on the Rose Canyon Fault located approximately 4 miles west of the site. A seismic event along the Rose Canyon Fault could produce an estimated 0.31g Repeatable High Bedrock Acceleration at the site. For structural design purposes, a damping ratio not greater than 5 percent of critical damping, and a site coefficient of S1 are recommended. Other earthquake resistant design parameters are recommended to be obtained from the Uniform Building Code (UBC) 1994 edition, Volume 2, Chapter 16, utilizing a Seismic Zone 4 and an occupancy category 4. If site-dependant earthquake response spectra or other specific design parameters are considered necessary by the project structural engineer, or are required by the local government agency with jurisdiction over the project, the geotechnical engineer should be promptly informed for further evaluation. In addition, design of structures should comply with the requirements of the governing jurisdiction’s building codes and standard practices of the Structural Engineers Association of California. SAGE Eneinrcring. Inc. * Proposed SFR I 102 Acacia Street * Carlabad. California * Pmiect No. 8077 * December 31. 1998 5 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION On the basis of our field exploration and evaluation of derived information, a discussion of constraints and mitigative measures regarding the proposed construction are provided below. Comuressible Soils The near-surface soils of this site consist of natural topsoil and undocumented fill materials to depths of 4 to 4.5 feet below existing grade. These soils are generally considered highly compressible and will require complete removal and recompaction during construction. The natural bedrock encountered below the upper horizons'was generally medium dense to dense in consistency and is shown by our laboratory testing to have a low potential for compression. Recommendations regarding mitigation of the potential compression of the upper soil horizon are presented in the following "Grading and Earthwork" section of this report. In consideration of the anticipated loads, removal and recompaction of the upper compressible soils will be required during site development. ExDansive Soils The near surface soils and underlying sandstone bedrock, consisting of generally granular soils, typically exhibit very low expansion characteristics. Due to the low expansion potential, special mitigative measures for potential heave or uplift of the native soils are not considered necessary. Groundwater Groundwater or saturi ited ground conditions were not encountered to the maximum exdore' d depth of 7.5 feet or withinyhe nearby coastal bluff that is approximately 30 feet in heigh;. We do not anticipate groundwater or saturated ground conditions will be encountered to the planned excavation depths for the structure. SAGE Engineennq. Inc. * Proposed SFR I 102 Acacia Street * Carlsbad. California * Proiecl No. 8077 * December 31. 1998 6 GRADING AND EARTHWORK RECO"J3NDATIONS General The major factors affecting the proposed development are the existence of compressible near- surface soil and the possible presence of shallow improvements from pre-existing developments within the site. Based upon a review of data collected during our investigation, we conclude that the proposed development is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint provided that the recommendations contained herein will be properly implemented during construction. The following conclusions are based upon the limited geotechnical investigation performed and should be verified during construction by SAGE'S geotechnical representative. Clearing and Grubbing All areas to be graded or to receive fill and/or structures should be cleared of surface or subsurface improvements and vegetation. This specifically applies to all buried leach lines, septic tanks (if present), utilities, and existing footings exposed during demolition of the existing cottage on site. Vegetation and debris from the clearing operations should be properly disposed of off-site. The area should be thoroughly inspected for any possible buried objects which need to be rerouted or removed prior to the inception of, or during grading. All holes, trenches, or pockets left by the removal of these objects should be properly backfilled with compacted fill materials as recommended in the "Method and Criteria of Compaction" section of this report. All concrete debris must be removed from fill material, especially any footing remains after demolition activities. Structural Improvement of Soils Information obtained from our borings, laboratory analysis, and visual observations indicate that the surficial soils are loose and may be susceptible to settlement upon loading. Based upon the on-site soil characteristics and the proposed structural development, we recommend overexcavation and recompaction of the surficial soils as follows: * Preparation of the building pad for the proposed two-story portion of the structure will require that the surficial soils be overexcavated a minimum depth of 4 feet below existing grade or 2 feet below the bottom of footings, whichever is greater. Overexcavation for the below-grade portion of the structure should be completed to a minimum depth of 2 feet below the bottom of the lowest footing. The overexcavated soils should be moisture- conditioned and recompacted in conformance with the following "Method and Criteria of Compaction" section of this report. The lateral limits of the overexcavation should extend to a minimum of 5 feet beyond the perimeter of the building (5 feet outside the structural footprint). SAGE Eneineenna, Inc. * Prooosed SFR I 102 Acacia Street * Carlrbad, California * Proieer No. 8077 December 31. 1998 I * Preparation of the existing ground in non-structural areas such as driveways, walkways and landscaping will require removal and recompaction of the surficial soils to a minimum depth of 2 feet below existing grade or 1-foot below proposed subgrade, whichever is greater. * Prior to backfill and recompaction of the overexcavated materials, soil exposed at the bottom of the overexcavation zone should be scarified a minimum of 6 inches, moisture- conditioned within 2 percent of optimum moisture content, and recompacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction (ASTM D 1557). Transitions Between Cut and Fill The proposed structure is expected to be founded entirely in properly compacted fill soil. No transition between cut and fill is anticipated to exist below structure foundations. However, if a transition between cut and fill occurs as a result of a change in planning or exposed subsurface conditions, the geotechnical engineer should be promptly informed to evaluate the condition and provide additional recommendations. Due to the likely presence of subsurface improvements such as foundations or utilities, the depth and extent of any overexcavation and recompaction should be evaluated by the geotechnical engineer during grading. Method and Criteria of Comoaction Compacted fills should consist of approved soil material, free of trash or debris, roots, vegetation or other deleterious materials. The material should be free of rocks and debris in excess of 3-inch dimension. The on-site soils, after being processed to delete the aforementioned deleterious materials, may be used for recompaction in fills. Should any importation of fill be planned, the intended import source(s) should be evaluated and approved by us prior to delivery to the site. All fill soils should be compacted by suitable compaction equipment in uniform loose lifts of 6 to 8 inches. Unless otherwise specified, all soil subjected to recompaction should be moisture- conditioned from 0 to 2 percent above the optimum moisture content and recompacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction per ASTM method D-1557. SAGE Eneineennp. Inc. * Proposed SFR I 102 Acacia Street * Carlsbad. California * Proiect No. 8077 * December 31, 1998 8 FOUNDATION AND SLAB RECOMMENDATIONS General The foundation recommendations herein are "minimums", in keeping with the current practice. The footing configurations and reinforcement recommendations presented do not preclude more restrictive criteria of the governing agencies or structural considerations. A California Registered Structural Engineer should evaluate foundation configurations and reinforcement requirements for structural loadings, shrinkage and temperature stresses. All design and site development criteria should conform to the minimum foundation design requirements provided in the current edition of the Uniform Building Code (UBC). Structure Foundations Continuous andlor isolated spread footings are suitable for support of the proposed split-level structure. All footings should be founded entirely in properly compacted fill soil. For the two- story portion of the structure, exterior perimeter footings should be at least 15 inches wide and have a minimum embedment of 18 inches below the lowest adjacent grade. Interior footings should be at least 12 inches wide with a minimum embedment of 18 inches below the lowest adjacent grade For the portion of the structure with underparking, the perimeter restrained wall footings should be at least 15 inches wide and have a minimum embedment of 24 inches below the top-of-slab. An allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 psf may be utilized for two-story perimeter footings founded in compacted fill. Interior footings may be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 1,520 psf. The three-story portion of the structure may utilize an allowable bearing pressure of 2,370 psf. The bearing pressures provided may be increased by 370 and 220 psf for each additional 6-inch increment of footing embedment and width, respectively, beyond the minimum dimensions specified above. Due to settlement considerations, it is recommended that the maximum allowable soil bearing pressure be limited to 3,500 psf for footings bearing in compacted fill. The calculated bearing capacity incorporates a factor-of-safety of 3, and may be increased by one-third when subject to transient loading conditions such as seismic impact or wind load. It is recommended for both two- and three-story construction that the exterior footings be reinforced with a minimum of four No. 4 steel reinforcing bars placed horizontally in the footing, with two near the top and two near the bottom. Interior footings should be similarly reinforced. The minimum reinforcement is based upon soil characteristics and is not intended to be in lieu of reinforcement necessary for structural considerations. SAGE Eneineerine. Inc. * Proposed SFR i 102 Acacia Street * Carlsbad. California * Project No. 8077 December 31. 1998 9 " Should any isolated spread footings be planned, the effective square width should be at least 24 inches. The above bearing capacity and minimum footing embedment conditions are applicable, and the reinforcement should be applied two-way. Lateral Earth Resistance Lateral loads against the structure may be resisted by friction between the bottom of the footing and the supporting soil. An allowable friction coefficient of 0.38 should be incorporated in the design. Alternatively, an allowable passive earth resistance equal to 240 psf/ft (equivalent fluid pressure 240 pcf) may be used. In order to utilize the given values, footings must be poured "neat" against well-compacted fill soils. Should both frictional and passive resistance be used conjunctively, the passive earth resistance value should be reduced by 1/2. A one-third increase in the lateral resistance value may be utilized to resist transient loading conditions such as seismic impact or wind. The values above incorporate a factor-of-safety equal to 1.5. Settlement While subjected to structural loading, a total settlement up to 3/4 inch may be anticipated, with a corresponding differential settlement up to 112 inch across the structural span. It should be noted that, based on the characteristics of the on-site soil types, a majority of the aforementioned settlement will take place prior to completion of the structural construction. The above assessment assumes that positive drainage will be implemented and maintained at the site. Interior Slabs Interior slabs for the structure, which are to support light loading conditions, should consist of a minimum of 4 inches of reinforced concrete. Minimum reinforcement should include No. 3 rebar placed on 24-inch centers or equivalent (10 x 10 - 10/10 WWF), located above mid-height in the slab. For the garage portion of the structure, reinforcement should consist of No. 3 rebar on 18 inch centers. Actual reinforcement for heavier loading conditions should be designed by a structural engineer. The moisture-sensitive portions of the slab or slabs proposed below planned grades (garage) should be underlain by at least 2 inches of clean sand followed by a minimum 10-mil visqueen moisture barrier. The visqueen in the moisture sensitive portion of the structure, or the slab in non-sensitive areas, should be underlain by a minimum 4-inch thickness of sand, gravel or crushed rock meeting the following criteria: 0 The maximum particle size should not exceed 3/4 inch as placed; SAGE Engineenne. Inc. * Proposed SFR I 102 Acacia Smet * Carlrbad. California Praiecl No. 8077 * December 31. 1998 10 0 No more than 10 percent by weight should pass the No. 16 U.S. srandard sieve; No more than 5 percent by weight as placed should pass the No. 200 U.S. standard sieve; and 0 The plasticity index of the fraction passing the No. 40 U.S. standard sieve should not exceed 4. Exterior Slabs Exterior slabs are usually considered non-critical appurtenances. They are, however, cornonly susceptible to cracking as a result of post-construction settlement. This problem is exaggerated when the subgrade is allowed to dry out after rough grading, and then saturated from irrigation water after the exterior slabs are constructed. To reduce potential problems, we recommend the following: 0 Exterior slabs for walkways and patios should be a nominal thickness of 4 inches; 0 Prior to the placement of sidewalk and patio slabs, the subgrade soil should be moisture- conditioned from 2 to 4 percent over the optimum moisture content to a minimum depth of 12 inches; 0 Weakened plane joints for exterior slabs should be provided for any slab greater than 5 feet in width. Any slabs between 5 and 10 feet in width should be provided with a longitudinal weakened plane joint at its center line. 0 Where flatwork adjoins the main structure, it is recommended that foam material or similar expansion joint be utilized to separate the main structure from the appurtenant slab. he-Soaking Beneath Slabs Pre-soaking tests are not required during construction; however, it is recommended that upon completion of placement of the capillary break (below visqueen), the slab area should be thoroughly wetted. Wetting of the sand/gravel layer and subgrade will reduce the potential for cracking after construction. SAGE Engineering. Inc. * ProDosed SFR I 102 Acacia Smet * Carlsbad. California * Pmiect No. 8077 * December 31. 1998 11 ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS Retaining Walls Cantilevered retaining walls should be designed for an "active" lateral earth pressure of 38 psf/ft (38 pcf EFP) for approved granular backfill and level backfill conditions. Walls with 2:l (hor:vert) backfill should be designed for an active earth pressure of 54 psf/ft (54 EFP). Cantilever walls subject to uniform surcharge loads should be designed for an additional uniform lateral pressure equal to one-third (1/3) the anticipated surcharge pressure. Cantilever retaining wall footings should be embedded a minimum of 18 inches below the lowest adjacent grade. Restrained walls should be designed utilizing an "at-rest'' earth pressure of 58 psf/ft (58 pcf EFP) for approved granular and level backfill. Restrained walls subject to uniform surcharge loads should be designed for an additional uniform lateral pressure equal to one-half (112) the anticipated surcharge pressure. Soil design criteria, such as bearing capacity, passive earth pressure, and sliding resistance as recommended under the Foundation and Slab Recommendations section, may be incorporated into the retaining wall design. The design and location of retaining walls should be reviewed by the geotechnical consultant for conformance with the recommendations provided herein. Footings should be reinforced as recommended by the structural engineer and appropriate back drainage provided to avoid excessive hydrostatic wall pressures. As a minimum we recommend waterproofing of the wall and installation of a fabric-wrapped crushed rock and perforated pipe drain system. At least 2 cubic feet per linear foot of free-draining crushed rock should be provided for the backdrain. The backdrain should be constructed to allow for flow to an approved outlet receptor. The remaining wall backfill should consist of approved granular material. This fill material should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent as determined by ASTM D-1557 test method. Flooding or jetting of backfill should not be permitted. Granular backfill should be capped with 18 inches (minimum) of relatively impervious fill to seal the backfill and reduce saturation. It should be noted that the use of heavy compaction equipment in close proximity to retaining structures can result in wall pressures exceeding design values and corresponding wall movement greater than that associated with active or at-rest conditions. In this regard, the contractor should take appropriate precautions during the backfill placement. Trench Backfill Trench excavations for utility lines which extend under structural areas should be properly backfilled and compacted. Utilities should be bedded and backfilled with clean sand or approved granular soil to a depth of at least 1 foot over the pipe. This backfill should be uniformly SAGE Engineerine. Inc. * Proposed SFR I 102 Acacia Street * Carlsbad. California * Proiect No. 8077 * December 31. 1998 12 watered and compacted to a firm condition for both vertical and lateral pipe support. It is recommended that mechanical methods be utilized to compact soils on the sides of water pipes under pressure to assure pipe stability. The remainder of the backfill may be typical on-site soil or imported granular soil which shall be placed in lifts not exceeding 8 inches in thickness, watered or aerated to optimum moisture content, and mechanically compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density. Surface Drainage Drainage should be designed to collect and direct surface waters away from the proposed structure and into approved drainage facilities. Positive drainage with a minimum gradient of 2 percent away from all structures should be provided and maintained within at least 5 feet from the structure to prevent any runoff from infiltrating below the structural foundation. Drainage patterns approved at the time of fine grading should be maintained throughout the life of the proposed structure. Plan Review and Geotechnical Observation When the grading and foundation plans for this project are completed, they should be reviewed by SAGE for compliance with the recommendations herein. Observation by SAGE is essential during grading to confirm conditions anticipated in the preliminary investigation, to adjust designs to actual field conditions, and to determine that grading proceeds in general accordance with the recommendations. In addition, all foundation excavations should be reviewed by our geotechnical representative prior to the placement of forms, reinforcement, or concrete for conformance with the plans. CLOSURE Limits of Investigation Our investigation was performed using the skill and degree of care ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable soils engineers and geologists practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional advice included in this report. This report is prepared for the sole use of our client and may not be assigned to others without the written consent of the client. The samples taken and used for testing and the observations made are believed representative of site conditions, however, soil and geologic conditions can vary significantly between test borings and surface exposures. As in most major projects, conditions revealed by excavations may vary with preliminary findings. If this occurs, the changed conditions must be evaluated by our soil engineer or geologist and designs adjusted as required. SAGE Enrineerinp. Inc. * Pmrwsed SFR I 102 Acacia Street * Carlrbad, California * Pmiect No. 8077 * December 31. 1998 13 This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or of his representative, to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the project architect and engineer. Appropriate recommendations should be incorporated into the structural plans. The necessary steps should be taken to see that the contractor and subcontractors carry out such recommendations in the field. The findings of this report are valid as of this present date. However, changes in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether they are due to natural processes or the works of man on this property. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards may occur from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside of our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should be updated after a period of three years. .................... SAGE Engineering, Inc. SAGE Ennineenn~. Inc. * Proposed SFR I 102 Acacia Street * Carlsbad, California * Pmiect No. 8077 * December 31. 1998 14 ;AGE Engineering, Inc. Scale 1" = 2,000' Adapted from San Luis Rey USGS 7.5 min Topographic Map rqect Name: Limited Foundation Investigation I Site Location Map - Figure 1 1 SFR - 102 Acacia Street Carlsbad, California DafC Project No: 8077 December 1998 REFERENCES 1. 2. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. .- 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. Bowles, J.E., 1977, Foundation Analysis and Design: New York, NY, McGraw-Hill, 750 p. Fault Rupture Hazard Zones in California. Alauist-Priolo Special- Studies Zones Act of and Geology, Revised 1988. Hunt, R.E., 1986, Geotechnical Engineering Investigation Manual, New York,NY, McGraw-Hill, 983 p. Hunt, R.E., 1984, T, New York, NY, McGraw-Hill, 729 p. Jennings, C.W., 1994, An ExDlanaton, Text to Accompanv the 1:750.000 Scale Fault Activity Map of California and Adjacent Areas, California Division of Mines and Geology, Geologic Data Map No. 6. Kennedy, M. P., Greene, H. G., Clarke, S. H., Bailey, K. A,, 1980, Reeencv and ]a, California Division of Mines and Geology Map Sheet 41. Kennedy, M. P., Peterson, G. L., 1975, Geology of the San Diego MetroDolitan Area, California, California Division of Mines and Geology, Bulletin 200. Lee, K.L., and Albaisa, A,, 1974, Earthauake Induced Settlements in Saturated Sands, ASCE, Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, Vol. 100, No. GT4, pp.387- 406. - 1972, Special Publication 42, California Department of Conservation, Division of mines Leighton and Associates, 1983, Citv of San Dieeo Seismic Safetv Study, Prepared for the City of San Diego, California. Naeim, F. 1989, The Seismic Design Handbook, New York, NY, Van Norstrand Reinhold. 450 P. Newmark, N.M. and Hall, W.J., 1987, Earthauake SDectra and Desien: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, El Cerrito, CA 103 p. Oakshott, G.B., 1978, California’s Chaneine hndscaoes, A Guide to the Geology of the State; McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY, 379 p. Ploessel, M.R., and Slosson, J.E., 1974, Reueatable High Ground Accelerations for Earthauakes: California Geology, v. 27, No. 9, pp. 195-199. REFERENCES (continued) 15. Seed, H.B., and Idriss, I.M., and Arango, I., 1983, Ground Motion and Soil Liquefaction During Earthauakes, Berkeley, CA, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, 134 p. 16. Southern California Earthquake Preparedness Project, 1989, The Seismic Risk in the San Diego Region: Suecial Focus on the Rose Canvon Fault Svstem, Workshop Proceedings June 29 - 30, 1989. 17. Uniform Building Code. 1994 Edition: Whittier, CA, International Conference of Building Officials, 3 volumes. 18. Wesnousky, S.G., 1986, Earthauakes. Ouaternarv Faults, and Seismic Hazard in California, Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 91, No. B12, pp. 2587-2631. 19. Winterkorn, H.F., and Fang, H.Y., 1976, Foundation Engineering Handbook: New York, NY, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 751 p. SAGE Engineering, Inc. .. LOG OF TEST PIT KOJECT N.ALIE: 1 SFR 102 Acacia Street PROIECT NO: 8077 ATE OBSERVED: 1217198 METHOD OF EXCAVATION: OWED BY: M. Chappell CROWNDELEVATION: 51.5' LOCATION: See Plot Plan 12" Track hoe UI ;AMPLE CONT. TEST PIT NO.: SGl OEScmON m: Medium brown silty SAND, damp to moist, loose, abundant organics (rootlets). Undocumented Fill: Light brown silty SAND, dry, loos€ to medium dense, trace organics, fine grained. poorly graded, semi-porous. @ 3.0' medium dense . Weathered Bedrock Medium red-brown SANDSTONE, damp, medium dense to dense, poorly graded. XiCiED BY. M. Chappell GRO&D ELEVATION: 52.0' LOCATION: See Plot Plan TEST PIT NO.: SG2 m: Medium brown silty SAND, moist. loose, TD 5.7' No GW abundant organics (rootlets). w: Light brown SAND wid1 silt. dry loose to medium dense, tine grained, poorly graded. trace organics (rootlets). @ 1.7' - 3" diameter iron pipe. @ 2.0' - 6": diameter clay pipe. @ 3.5' medium dense. mthered Bedrock: Medium red-brown SANDSTONE, damp. medium dense to dense. poorly graded. TD 5.3' No GW 1 SAGE Engineering, Inc. LOG OF TEST PIT ROlECT NA.\lE 1 SFR 102 Acacia Street PROSECT MO: 8077 c ATE OUSERVED: 1217198 OGGED BY: M. Chappell GROUND ELEVATION: MmOD OF MCAVATION: 12" Track hoe 53.0' LOCATION: See Plot Plan TEST PIT NO.: SG3 DESCRIPTION SOU TEST m: Medium brown silty SAND, moist, loose, Max Density abundant organics (rootlets). Gradation Undocumented Fill: Light brown SAND with silt, dry, loose, slightly porous, minor organics (rootlets), fine grained, poorly graded. Max Density @2.0', - 6" diameter clay pipe. @3.5', medium dense. Consolidation Weathered Bedrock: Medium red-brown SANDSTONE. damp, medium dense to dense. poorly graded. TEST PIT NO.: SG4 m: Medium brown silty SAND, moist, loose. 1 abundant organics (rootlets). undocumented Fill: Ligbt brown SAND with silt. dty, loose, minor organics (rootlets). semi-porous, fine grained, poorly graded. a3.5' nlediunl dense. wered Bedrock Medium red-brown SANDSTONE, medium dew to dense. damp. poorly graded. TD 7.0' No GW I LABORATORY TESTING Laboratorv Testing Proeram Laboratory tests were performed on representative soil samples to determine their relative engineering properties. Tests were performed in accordance with test methods of the American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) or other accepted standards. The following presents a brief description of the various test methods used. Classification - Soils were classified visually according to the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). Visual classifications were supplemented by laboratory testing of selected samples in accordance with ASTM D-2487. The soil classifications are shown on the Exploration Logs, Appendix B. Particle Size Analysis - Particle size analyses were performed on selected representative samples in accordance with ASTM D-422. The results are provided in the following tables (I & 11). In-Situ Density and Moisture - The density of soils was determined utilizing conventional laboratory techniques from intact "ring" samples obtained from a California split-spoon sampler. The moisture content of selected intact and bulk samples was determined in accordance with ASTM test D-2216. The dry density and moisture content values are indicated on the attached Exploration Logs, Appendix B. Moisture-Densitv Relationship - Laboratory compaction tests were performed in accordance with ASTM D-1557, Method A. Test results are provided in the following tables. Consolidation Tests - The gradual reduction in volume of a soil mass resulting from an increase in compressive stress was measured to determine the consolidation properties of a selected sample. The specimen was laterally confined in a ring and the test conducted in accordance with ASTM D-4186. SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS RESULTS OF PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS (ASTM D-422) 314" #4 #16 #40 #loo #200 USCS 100.0 100.0 99.6 13.8 24.1 16.6 SP II 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 1 2 345 10 20 ll Normal Stress iksf) Location ~ Sample Type ~ Soil Description SG3 @ 5*.7* Block Sample Poorly Graded Sand Explanation d n Sample Loaded at Field Moisture P Sample Loaded at Saturation II PROJECT NAME I It 102 Acacia Street 1 Consolidation Test Report PROJECT NO DATE 8077 December 1998 DATE: Sunday, January 3, 1999 ..................................... * * * * * * EQFAULT * Ver. 2.01 * * * * ..................................... (Estimation of Peak Horizontal Acceleration From Digitized California Faults) SEARCH PERFORMED FOR: SAGE Engineering, Inc. JOB NUMBER: 8077 JOB NAME: Viola Residence SITE COORDINATES: LATITUDE: 33.1518 N LONGITUDE: 117.3477 W SEARCH RADIUS: 65 mi ATTENUATION RELATION: 1) Campbell (1993) Horiz. - O=Soil l=Rock UNCERTAINTY (M=Mean, S=Mean+l-Sigma): M SCOND: 0 COMPUTE PEAK HORIZONTAL ACCELERATION FAULT-DATA FILE USED: CALIFLT.DAT SOURCE OF DEPTH VALUES (A=Attenuation File, F=Fault Data File): A DETERMINISTIC SITE PARAMETERS """"""".""""""" """"""""""""""- Page 1 I 1 AppROX, I___________________I I___________________ I [MAX. CREDIBLE EVENT; [MAX. PROBABLE EVEm ABBREVIATED IDISTANCE 1 MAX.[ PEAK 1 SITE 1 1 MAX.! PEAK 1 SITE FAULT NAME 1 mi (km) 1CRED.I SITE /INTENS/ 1PROB.I SITE !INTEN: I I 1 MAG.IACC. gl MM 1 1 MAG.1ACC. gl MM CASA LOMA-CLARK (S.Jacin.) 1 48 ( 77) 1 7.001 0.0361 V 1 1 6.751 0.0291 V CATALINA ESCARPMENT 1 35 ( 56) 1 7.001 0.057; VI 1 1 6.251 0.0331 V CHINO 1 46 ( 74) 1 7.001 0.0491 VI 1 1 5.501 0.0161 IV COYOTE CREEK (San Jacinto) 52 ( 84) 1 7.00) 0.031) V )I 5.751 0.012l I11 "__"""""""__"""~""""~~""~)"""~"""~ I""_)""")""__ "_""""""""_"""~""""~~"".~"""~"""~ 1""-1"""1"".. ""_"__"__"__""""~)"""".~""~~"""~"""l I I(""_l"""l "__"__"___"__"_"""[""""~~""~~"""~"""~ 1""_1"""1""" I """ ""_"""_""""""" 1 ."""" 1 "".I """ 1 """ 1; ""-1 """ II ELSINORE 1 25 ( 40); 7.501 0.1291 VI11 11 6.751 0.076/";;;' GLN.HELEN-LYTLE CR-CLREMNT) 50 ( 81) 1 7.00) 0.0331 V )) 6.501 0.0221 IV I """""_"""""""~~""""~~""~~"""~"""~ 1""_1"""1 I """ """"""""__""""~""""~~""~~"""l /I I l""_l"""l _""""""""_"""")""""~l""~l"""l I ~1""_~"""1""" NEWPORT-INGLEWOOD-OFFSHORE[ 7 ( 12): 7.001 0.3351 IX [I 5.751 0.1501 VIII HOT S-BUCK RDG. (S.Jacinto) 1 51 ( 82) 1 7.001 0.032[":- 1 1 6.001 0.0151 IV LA NACION 1 25 ( 40)I 6.50'1 0.085'1"i;i-1[ 4.251 0.016' IV I""" """"""""_"".""~""""_~ ""_ 1 """ 1 """ 11 ""-1 """ I I""" ""__""""""""""~""""~~""~~"""l""") /""_1"""1""" "_~""_~"""~"""~ 1""_1"""1""" PALOS VERD-COR0N.B.-A.BLAN1 20 ( 33) 1 7.501 0.163; VI11 I [ 6.751 0.0981 VI1 """""""""""""l- ROSE CANYON I) -;"(- 6) 1 7.001 0.4951 X 1 [ 6.001 0.307; IX SAN CLEMENTE - SAN ISIDRO 1 54 ( 87) 1 8.00: 0.0621 VI 1 1 6.501 0.0201 IV SAN DIEGO TRGH.-BAHIA SOL.; 30 ( 48)) 7.5dl 0.101) VI1 1) 6.251 0.041; V SAN GORGON10 - BANNING 1 61 ( 97) 1 7.501 0.046; VI 1 1 7.001 0.0311 V I ."_""__"_""""""~[""""-)""~l )"""1"""1 I""_("""l ""__"""__"_""""~~"""".~""~l"""~"""~ 1""_1"""1 _""_"""__""""""~""""~~"".l"""l - I I. ""1 1""_["""1 I """ """"_""""""""~~"""".~""~~"""~"""~ 1""_1"""1 _"_"__""_"__"_"""~""""-~""~~"""~"""~ 1""_1"""1 I""" I""" mITTIER - NORTH ELSINORE 1 45 ( 72~1 7.50) 0.0581 VI 11 6.001 o.o19\"ii" ............................................................................. I""" -END OF SEARCH- 15 FAULTS FOUND WITHIN THE SPECIFIED SEARCH RADIUS THE ROSE CANYON FAULT IS CLOSEST TO THE SITE. IT IS ABOUT 3.8 MILES AWAY. LARGEST MAXIMUM-CREDIBLE SITE ACCELERATION: 0.495 g LARGEST MAXIMUM-PROBABLE SITE ACCELERATION: 0.307 g r r r r r I - r i- c I Y 0 50 100 - SCALE (Miles) \ r i r r i r r r r L r r I r o! * 9 I d II I x h .. + Z F 0 Q 0 v 9 W fn Z Q c 1 i X x xx x x x X x xx xx * X X Xx r I LOG N = 3.474 - 0.817M I ‘2 I 5 I I 6 MAGNITUDE (M) SEISMIC RECURRENCE CURVE HISTORICAL EARTHQUAKES FROM 1800 TO 1998 Viola Residence P. 1/2 -F a SAGE Engineering, ac. Telepnone : (619 5301977 xx Fax : (6191 5300657 Job NO.: go18 Date : No. Pages : Two TO : Bert Doming0 FIRM : City of carlsbad FAX NO : (619) 56M 576 RE : Review of Foundation Plans 102 Acacia ST SENDER : John Cerholdt I REMARKS Here is the Review of Foundation Plans letter for 102 Acacia Street in Carlsad. cc : , - . FEB 23 ’99 1Q:SSAM P.2/2 -4 SAGE Engineering, Inc Mr. Ted Viola 859 Violet Court Carlsbad, California 92009 February 22, 1999 Projcct No: 9018 Subject: Review of Fmation Plans project: Proposed Viola Residence 102 Acacia Street Carlsbad, California Refenncc: “bte~hnical Invt~tigation, Proposed SingleFamily Residence, 102 Acacia Street, Carlsbad, C&fomia”, Project No. 8077, dated December 31, 1998, by SAGE Engineering, Inc. Dear Mr. Viola: In accordance with your request we have reviewed the Foundation Plans ptepmd by .%Oft M. Wt, dated Jmuary 20, 1999 for the above referenced project. The plans indicate the foundation details for the proposed new construction. Based upon our review, it is our opinion that the geoWhniCal aspects Of the plans arc in conformance with ow Cnzotechnical Investigation dated December 31, 1998, and the intentions of the undersigned Geotechnical Engineer. SAGE Engineering, hc. appreciates the opp~ty to be of assistance to you on this project. If we can be of futthe~ assistance to yw, please feel free to us at your conveniem. Sincerely, SAGE Engineering, he., chl M. Jerk, GE 2286 Geotcchnical E gineer /WI8Ll.fF v Steven N. Priicipal Geologist 10035 CalrOll Canyon Road, Suite A a San Diego, CA 92131 619-530-1977 - Fax 619-530-08667 FEB 23 '99 ll:30RM P. 1 -F a 1KXA SAGE enfiineerinfl, RC. Telephone : (619 5301977 !=@X : (618) 5300857 Job NO.: 9018 Date : 2/25199 No. Pllges : SEVEN TO : nett DOtnlnQO FIRM : City of Carlbad FAX NO : (61 9 560.1 576 RE : As-Graded compaction Report SENDER : Jonn GernOldt . REMARKS Tne &-Graded Compaction Report on the Building Pad at 102 Acacla street is forwarded nerewitn. cc : FEE 23 '99 ll:30RM P.2 "4" SAGE Englneerlng, Inc Mx. Ted Viola 3831 GarAeld Street carlsbad. cali%mio Rekence: "Gaotcchniep1 Invertlgatlon, Propwed singl~R.mlly ww 1M Acpdr stnd, Carlrbad, Cdhn~W, Project No. 8(m, Dated Demnber 31,1998, by SAGE lhghmiq, Im, Doar Mr. Viola: In accordance with your quest, SAOE En%ncetfq. Inc, 'has wnduaed p~Iing observntion an4 campadion teuting for the preparation of the building pad a! the above mfmd prcject. Observatiun aed tasting services de3aibed herein were provided by SAOR between Febnury 5 and Februaty 22, 1999, at your requclrt. Ab iadlcatbd in the Report of Grading Obaervation ord wort of Field Completion Test provided throughout Ihe project, budding pad preparation and roil compaction operations were obwvcd by repmentatives of thii offica. Ovaexcavation of the building pad wu completed to a minimum depa of 4 feet below existing grade or 2 feet below the bottom of proposed footing, whichever wa greater, 89 recammended in the projut soils report. the attached Plot Plan, Appendii A. Sdw of field and lsbotatory compaction teating m provided The rpproximatrr lateral extant of the wersxul\rhtioa and locations of tha dcnsity tests ue indicated on on Tables I Md II of Appendix E, Comppction Test Rc6Ult8, bsuh of our observations md tcrting indicates all fill placed within the building pad met the minimuin relative oompection requirements of 90% per test method ASTM D-1557. It ie our opinion that build- pad preparation and the plrccrrksm of compacted till wm conducted in substmtial conformance with the project specification8 and wr momnmdarions. If you should have any questione regding the above, plenae do not hesitate to COM the undcrsigned at (619) 5304977. FEB 23 '99 11:31Wl . , , ._ . .. . . ." - . . , .. . . .. , . .. . ". ~ ... .._ .... .. P.3 _j. ,. ' . . ... . . . .. ,. , TABLE 1 FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS TEm DATE DEPTH/ MOlSl'URE DRY DENSITY RELATNE BOIL PASS/ EL&V.(lt)* (%I (pa) COW. (9%) TYPE FAIL 1 2 OUOBI99 49.0 6,l 113.2 93 1 PW 02/08/99 50.0 3 6.2 112.6 02/09/99 51.0 99 1 4.6 4 M/o9/99 S1.5 96 1 9.8 PW 5 02/09/99 114.9 52.0 95 1 Plas 6 MI13199 9.4 46.0 113,7 157 94 1 PUr 108.8 7 02/13/99 90 463 1 Pur 8 02/1s/99 14.2 s2.0 90.6 13.6 75 11s.a 1 Pd 9 w1sm 52.0 10.8 lOS.1 95 3 m 10 0211sl99 51.0 90 10.5 3 PU8 11 oznu99 46.5 101.7 84 11.3 3' Fail 12 108.7 mm199 46.5 10.1 90 3 PW 110.2 13V 02/22/99 91 46.5 3 PM# 14**10 M/22/99 10.7 52.0 11.9 108.7 90 112.1 92 3 Pus 3 Pus PMS 116,a ..~ .. .._:,,. . "I,,.....,,.. . ,,." .: :. ' .. TABLE 2 RESULTS OF "UM DENSITY TEST(S) (ASTM D-1557) SMPLE IfD3BCNFllON rdAx" DRY DENWIY (Ibs) QPIlMUMMOWI'URE corn (%) 9.0 10.2 3 McdIum UJ dark brown silty ad 121.5 10.0 0611 611 999 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Reference #: Project Title: Applicant: VIOLA TED City of Carlsbad Plan Check Revision Permit No:PCR99132 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 438-3101 102 ACACIA AV CEAD PCR 2042331000 Applied: 06/01/1999 CE99-265 Pian Approved: 06/16/1999 VIOLA RESIDENCE Issued: 06/16/1999 ADD ATTIC ACCESS MECHANICAL LADDER Status: ISSUED Lot #: 0 $0.00 Construction Type: NEW Entered By: MDP Inspect Area: FINAL APPROVAL Inspector: Date: Clearance: NOTICE Please take NOTICE mat approval of your project includes lhe'lmpmition' of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "feedexactkns.' You have 90 days from the date ulis permit was issued to protest imposition of these feeslexactions. if you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set 10th in Government Code Secdon 660Xl(a), and file the protest and any other required informtion wiih the City Manager for processing in accordance with Cadsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul meir impmition. changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar applicatkn processing or sewiCe fees in connection with his prokct. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any You ere hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified feeslexaclions DOES NOT APPLY towater and sewer connection fees and Capactiy feedexactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which Me Statute of limitations has previouslv OUleWiSe expired. CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (760) 438-1161 .. ' FOR'OFFICE USE'^' PERMIT APPLICATION PLAN CHECK NO V(-r3" CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009 (760) 438-1 161 EST. VAL. Plan Ck. Deposit Validated By Date Legei Dsscription Lot NO. Subdivision NemdNumber Unit No. Phase No. Total X of unit8 (See. 7031.6 Business and Profasrims Code: Any City or Coumy which reauires a permit to COnltNct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure. Prior to its issuance, also requlms the applicant tor such permit to file a signed statamsnt that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's Lieens0 Law (Chapter 9. commanding with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Codel or that ha is exempt therefrom. and the basis for the alleged axamption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit sUbjeM the appiicam to a civil penalty of mt more than five hundred dollars 1150011. Name State License x Address License Class Cin, City Business License X StatefZip Telephone X Designer Name Address City StatslZip Telephone State License L Workers' Compensation Osdarstion: i hereby affirm under penalty of Perjury one Of the following declarations: 0 I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-inaura for Workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Coda, for the performame of the work for which this permit is issued. 0 I have and will maintain workers' compenrstion, as required by Seclbn 3700 of the Labor Code. for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Dale ITHIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS I$lOOl OR LESS1 to become subject to the Workers' Comp0nsation Laws of California. 0 CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I Certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is iswad, I shall not amploy any person in any manner PO as WARNING: Failure to SeCUrn worka' sornpmsation mv.Rg. 1s unlawhd. and shall subject an smployr to cdrnlnsl pmdtlaa bnd dvll Rnm up m 01). hundrad thousand dollan 1$100.0001. in &ltlon to tho con of cornpansation. dnmagas aa provided for in SeMon 3700 of tha Labor cod.. Interest and mtomey's has. SIGNATURE DATE I hereby affirm that I am axampt from the Contractor's License Law 101 the fdlowing reason: 0 I, ns owner of the property or my emploveas with wager as their so18 compensation, will do the work and the strwture ia not intended or offered for 1.1. ISec. 7044. Business and Professions Coda: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees. provided that such improvements am not intsndad or offered for smle. If, howavnr, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve tor the purpo~e of said. 0 i, as owner of the ~~o~erty, am exclusively contracting with licsnsed contracton to construct the project ISec. 7044, Business and FTofessions Code: Thn Contractor's License Law doe8 not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon. and contracts for such projscta with contractorlsi licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Lawl. 0 I am sxempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I penonally plan to provide the major labor and materials for sonnruction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES ON0 2. I lhava I have not1 signad an application for a building permit for the PIOPOI~ Work. 3. i have contraclad with the followinO person (firm1 to provide the propwed construction (include "me I sddrws I phone number I contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the fOllDWing PBISM to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work linclude name I addleas I phons number I mntractm 1icen.a number): 5. I will provide some of the work. but i have contracted (hired1 the following parsons to provide the work indicated (include name I address I phone number I type 01 work]: PROPERTY DWNER SIGNATURE DATE 1s thn applicant or future building occupant rewiled to submit a burinass plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or riek management and prevention program under Sections 26505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Amount Act? 0 YES NO 1s the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air poilution control dinrict or air quality management district? 0 YES NO Is the taeilw to be constructed within 1.000 feet of the outnr boundary of a school site? YES NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE I hereby affirm that thew is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this pmit is issued 15~. 3097li) Civil Code). City ordinances and State iews relating to building conrvuction. 1 hereby authorize reprsmtativss of the Citt of Cmrirbad to mter upon the above mentioned i certify that I have read the application end nata that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE. INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES. JUDGMENTS. COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA An OSHA permit is tequired for excavations ovor 6'0" deep end demolition or construction of structures ovnr 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION Every permit issued by the Building Official under the Probisions of thia Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such om the data of such psrmit or if the building or work authorized by such pnrmit is suspended or abandoned at any time 180 days ISection 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE WHITE File YELLOW Applicant PINK Finance Wcorporation - In Partnership with Government far Building Safety DATE: June 9, 1999 0 APPLICANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: PCR 99-132(99-265.revI) SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 102 Acacia St. PROJECT NAME: Roof Deck Addition fox Viola Residence The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply $ The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's bulldlng Codes .ij when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by buildlng department Staff. 1:' [7 The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list !, 0 JURIS. 0 PLAN REVIEWER .Z$, 0 FILE ;, ,,,, ..-. y. . ,, , i:. >'i, ,;>,.,. :. .~ , ~. ., ..$ " a,;:: "( ,i.: :I, ,.:., ,. ,, , , <, ; :! q , . i,, .?,l, with the jurisdiction's building codes. id,,! and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil ';: Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. , : : ,: .t *. . _,. 0 The appllcant's copy of the check llst Is enclosed for the jurisdiction to foward to the applicant . z, . ' contact person. ,. . The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: . ... i ! . ,.. . ,' Esgll Corporation staff did not advise the applicant(except by mail) that the Plan check has ,?if. : been completed. , ,; ,<. [7 Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: By: Bert Doming0 Enclosures: Esgil Corporation QA 0 MB EJ PC 6/2/99 ZO 'd 91:9T 66. SI unC Carlsbad PCR 99-132(99-265.revl) June 9, 1999 .,' PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: PCR 99-132(99-265.revl) JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 102 Acacia St. FLOOR AREA: 100 SQ. FT. STORIES: TWO HEIGHT: REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW PIAN REVIEWER: Bert Doming0 COMPLETED: June 9, 1999 DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGiL CORPORATION: 6/2/99 ..:. . ./. , S" FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, it' ' , Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws ;.'.' regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review ?/ is based on regulatlons enforced by the Bulldlng Department. You may have other corrections ,:;I;, based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire .::# Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to :..'' the issuance of a bullding permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with Tale 24 and the ; following model codes: 1994 UBC (effective 12/28/95), 1994 UPC (effective 12/28/95), 1994 ;;; UMC (effective 2/23/96) and 1993 NEC (effective 12/28/95). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code edltlons adopted '. by ordinance. .. , '!!, ,, .. ',: ~,, , z;, . . *: :.:. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied ,.:. before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, $ 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any .;:.::( state, county or city law. ,;r; .,:e., . ,.> ::: ,!,. ,,: . .:/,. .' To speed up the recheck process, please note on this llat (or a CODU\, where c 88 4 ;I: ',' c; ?!: 2.. : ,> , ... ., , '> , . $. USTNO. 1, GENERAL SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGSAND DUPLEXES WITHOUT SUPPLEMENTS (19% UBC) l3fonV.dQl ,.,,.. i. '.&# ../&, .* .. , ,. Carlsbad PCR 99-132(99-265.revl) June 9, 1999 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints, to: Esgil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 921 23, (61 9) 560-1468. 2. Plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, for plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction. Speclfy expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code). EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAlLlNGS . .. , ,,~., , .I , :. . .... 3. Floors above the second story shall have not less than 2 exlts. ''1 I ,,, .. , ., ::, Exceptions: 1. Occupied roofs may have one exit if such occupied areas are less ,-;.it than 500 square feet and located no higher than immediately above the second story. See section 1003.1 of the 94 UBC. Also see section 1001.2 for the definition of exit. .,. , :I., ,,., ,, ! .' 1 :: .. 4, Below are the requirements of a stairway to meet the exit definition. 5. Provide stairway and landing details. Sections 1006.3, 1006.15 and 1006.2. ', I ., . ,. a) Maximum rise is 7" and minimum run is 11". When the stairs serves less Inan 10 occupants, or serves an unoccupied roof, rise may be 8" maximum and run 9 minimum. . .. ., ,. , ,>. '1 b) Minimum headroom is 6'3. c) Minimum width is 36". :? ,. 6. Handrails: , ,>I .i a) Handrails are required on each side of stairways. Stairways less than 44" ;i wide or stairways serving one dwelling unit may have one handrail (if not open on both sides). b) Private stairways (1 tenant) need only have a handrail on one side if 30" or less in height. c) Stairways having less than four risers and serving one individual dwelling ,':,.;; unit need not have handrails. d) Handrails and extensions shall be 34" to 38" above nosing of treads and << & .. <, .!. -/I! ,j: i. .,I .', ~.,.:2; .. ( .". ?: ,,l! , .. t:, . , ... . ,1 .,. . be continuous. .; '. :. ;. e) Except for private stairways, at least one rail shall extend 12' beyond top 3;:. and bottom risers. Section 1006.9. ., J ~ ,; f) All stairs shall have handrails terminating in a newel or safety post. . ., >._ ,. , . ...,, .. . I .. , .,-.; .. ,:is ., ,, .,. . . ,.. <, .,. .. . Carlsbad PCR 99-132(99-265.revl) June 9. 1999 7. The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-1/4 inches nor more '~81: , ,I. : \': i , '< , ,;. . <,8 ,.:. r. ;./., , ,:. ,;: .: ,,>. '. >",' L 'i:, i,:.s., .,:,,.' i :5, ,8, .., than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension. Handrails projecting from.walls shall' ?,, , , have at least 1-1/2 inches between the wall and the handrail. Section 1006.9. ..; 8. Guardrails (Section 509.1): ,,, .*i. a) Shall be detailed showing adequacy of connections to resist the b) Openings between railings shall be less than 4". The triangular openings ti !?>, ; horizontal force prescribed in Table 16-13, Please submit caqlculations. formed by the riier, tread and bottom element of a guardrail at a stair shall be less than 6". : '*_ ~, , ,, .~ , :.. ., ,. MISCELLANEOUS :'I, ..?: 9. Please show how the deck is drained and waterproofed. .,1,:/ , ,. ., ," ,< ,.i, I.. ,. . ,.. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item ':iJ, has been addressed, Le., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. . I. .' Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located In the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: ! Yes P No 0 up . , ?' .i i 1 ., ! >, ., , E. '~ I. ; .i .,* ., .; The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/580-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan ::.;,:, review items, please contact Bert Doming0 at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. /> ., <; 2 !' ,. ., .. , .I.,,, ." , . ,. . Carlsbad PCR 99-132(99-265.revl) June 9, 1999 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad 132(99-265.revl) PREPARED BY: Bert Domingo BUILDING ADDRESS: 102 Acacia St. BUILDING OCCUPANCY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: .,,., DATE: June 9, 1999 . /,L', :"";(: 13; ;...,. ,_.. . , . , ,, , i L, $; ;.;y :'! 5.1 ., *I, ',,,,,. ,, ,I,. . . ,, ., . , ,A [7 199 UBC Building Permit Fee 0 Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ 199 UBC Plan Check Fee Plan Check Fee by ordinance: !$ 217.88 Type of Review: .Complete Review 0 Structural Only UHourly Repetitive Fee Applicable 0 Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: " $ 174.30 Comments: "* Fee was based on 2 hours plan check time @ 5 87.1 Uhr. PLANS Sheet 1 of 1' m+a.&x 6196 PLANNING/ENGINEERING APPROVALS -RESIDENTIAL TENANT IMPROVEMENT RESIDENTIAL ADDITION MINOR PLAZA CAMINO REAL (< $10,000.00) CARLSBAD COMPANY STORES VILLAGE FAIRE COMPLETE OFFICE BUILDING Schroeder Consultants STRLCTURAL ENGINEERS 125 W: Mission, Ste. 211 / Escondido, CA 92025 Phone 760-745-3112 /FAX 76b-745-6759 Date .. .. .. . . ,C-f+ .. Rr Z.S.1 .. 05/24/1999 PACE 01/01 - AV ..... ... .... . - ._ ". . .. ..... -.- ..... - ......... ...... - -...- ._",_ , ........ . .... .... ....... ...... _."" - ..... .... ,.. ...... ..... ~ -.... ... .... -_ ..... " .. ... " ........ , . . ............. , ......... ....... .... .-.. .. ..... ..- .."___,_.,. .. ....... ..... - ... " -. .......... ........... ..... ~__ .......... ..... ...... -.- - - .............. - ........ ...... ....... . - .. . .. .... " " ..... , ......... -.. ". . - ..... -. .... ... , ........................ , .. , ,. ... - .... ......... - ........ , . , ...... " - .. " "_ .... ... . ... - ............ - ....... _- - " ................. ..... - -.- _.." ...... , - ........ .............. ,- " .............. , .. , .- .- , . . ., ........... ... -. - - -. ....... . .... " .. -. - ... - " ... ..... - ". ..... ......... .- ...... "_ ., ......... .. ..... " ... ....... ... ..-.- _..", ." ..... ....... .. ..... ... h ov”kJ +c,irq Citv of Carl’sbad 03/10/1999 Job Address: Permit Type: Valuation: Parcel No: Reference #: Project Title: Applicant: VIOLA, TED PI& Check Revision Permit No:PCR99066 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 438-3101 102 ACACIA AV CBAD PCR 2042331 000 $0.00 Construction Type: NEW Entered By: RMA Status: ISSUED Lot #: 0 Applied: 03/01/1999 Plan Approyd. REVISE RETAIN WALL W/STR CALCS Inspect Area: Issu6d: 8 @-$$#g&01 31 02 C-rnflT 108.W FINAL APPROVAL Inspector: Date: Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the‘lmposi6on’ offees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter wllectively follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for referred to as ’feeslexadions.’ You have 90 days from the date this permh was iwed to protest imposiion of these feeslexadions. If you protest them, you must pr-sing in accordance with Cadsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that pmdure will bar any suhsewent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. YOU are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest Ule specified fees/exa&ns DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capactiy changes, nor planning. zoning. grading or other similar application pmcessing orservice fees in wnnection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY toany feedexactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previouslv otherwise expired. CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (760) 438-1161 PERMIT APPLICATION I CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009 (760) 438-1161 FOR OFFICE USE PLAN CHECK NO. EST. VAL. Plan Ck. Deposit Date 7 EsGil 7 Corporation In Partnership with Govcmnunt for SuiGfing Safety DATE: March 8, 1999 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad 0 PLAN REVIEWER 0 FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: PCR99-66(99-265.rev) SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 102 Acacia Ave. PROJECT NAME: Ret/WaU Change for Viola 0 The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction’s building codes. [XI The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction’s building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. 0 The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. 0 The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. 0 The applicant‘s copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. 0 The applicant‘s copy of the check list has been sent to: - [XI Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. 0 Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: 1 Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: Please have the architect revise the detail 111 1 to reflect the max. ht. Of 66“ and the footing width to 3’9”. By: Bert Doming0 Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA 0 MB 0 EJ 0 PC 3/4/99 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 , .". VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: PCR99-66(99-265.rev) PREPARED BY: Bert Doming0 DATE: March 8, 1999 BUILDING ADDRESS: 102 Acacia Ave. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V N TOTAL VALUE 0 199 UBC Building Permit Fee 0 Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ 0 199 UBC Plan Check Fee 0 Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ Type of Review: 0 Complete Review 0 Structural Only W Hourly 0 Repetitive Fee Applicable 0 Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: ** $ 87.15 Comments: ** Fee was based on one hour plan check time @ $87.15/hr. Sheet of macvaluadoc 5196 PLANNING/ENGINEERINC APPROVALS 0 RESIDENTIAL TENANT IMPROVEMENT RESIDENTIAL ADDITION MINOR PLAZA CAMINO REAL ( < $10,000.00) CARLSBAD COMPANY STORES VILLAGE FAIRE COMPLETE OFFICE BUILDING OTHER L &. & d&L PLANNER B. DATE I I / ENGINEER DATE - J-J-99