Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1240 PINE AVE; ; CB043221; Permit\J \(J1 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 04-27-2005 Residential Permit Permit No: CB043221 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: 1240 PINE AV CBAD Permit Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: RAD Status: ISSUED Parcel No: 2050203600 Lot #: 0 Applied: 08/16/2004 Valuation: $96,360.00 Construction Type: NEW Entered By: KMT Occupancy Group: Reference #: Plan Approved: 03/31/2005 # Dwelling Units: 0 Structure Type: Issued: 03/31/2005 Bedrooms: 0 Bathrooms: 0 Inspect Area: PY Project Title: RICHIERI RES- 876 SF ADDITION Orig PC#: BED ROOM & BATH ROOM Plan Check#: pplicant: Owner: ORTHING INC, B. A. RICHIERI VIVIAN ITE #201 690 AGE DR 1240 PINE AVE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008 619-729-3965 Building Permit $535.01 Meter Size Add'l Building Permit Fee $0.00 AddI Red. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Plan Check $347.76 Meter Fee $0.00 AddI Plan Check Fee $0.00 SDCWA Fee $0.00 Plan Check Discount $0.00 CFD Payoff Fee $0.00 Strong Motion Fee $9.64 PFF $0.00 Park in Lieu Fee $0.00 PFF (CFD Fund) $0.00 Park Fee $0.00 License Tax $0.00 LFM Fee $0.00 License Tax (CFD Fund) $0.00 Bridge Fee $0.00 Traffic Impact Fee $0.00 Other Bridge Fee $0.00 Traffic Impact (CFD Fund) $0.00 BTD #2 Fee $0.00 Sidewalk Fee $0.00 BTD #3 Fee $0.00 PLUMBING TOTAL $90.00 Renewal Fee $0.00 ELECTRICAL TOTAL $45.00 AddI Renewal Fee $0.00 MECHANICAL TOTAL $41.50 Other Building Fee $0.00 Housing Impact Fee $0.00 Pot. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Housing InLieu Fee $0.00 Meter Size Housing Credit Fee $0.00 Addi Pot. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Master Drainage Fee $0.00 Red. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Sewer Fee $0.00 Additional Fees $0.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES $1,068.91 Total Fees: $1,068.91 Total Payments To Date: $1043.91 Balance Due: $25.00 Insoector: FINAL APPRQVAL Date: Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions.' You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 I •• FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK ______39.c~ 2n _____ EST. VAL. Plan Ck. De Validated By 1 PROJECT INFORMATION Address (include Bid / te if) Business Name let this address) I'Z4 Time AW Legal Description Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Unit No. Phase No. Total if of units Assessor's Parcel if Existing Use Proposed Use -"s c2761 F 4455 Descripti n of Work / SQ. FT. ifof Stories if of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms - 4L4 1jdrn't, 2 CONTACT PERSQ4I 4f dfferent1foni applicant) arv-ie I L1 D—T-'i —014 Name / Address City State/Zip Telephone if APPLICANT /C nractor E Agent f Contractor Owner gent for Gwner SruS P.O. Ox 1b4 C0_16Lad, CA g0 j i toe) —1a9-,3q&-5--1'_ Name ¼) Address City State/Zip Telephone if PROPERTY OW q 11 , . Name Address City / State/Zip Telephone if CONTRACTOR - COMPANY NAME (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemptio . A viojation of Section 7031.5 b an applicant for permit subjects the applic nt to a vil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$5001). Vri I (. D ñ. ói.., ,c4..s r, 11. ci"1/11 - —i - , - Address City State/Zip T e hone if License if 3 1'15 •D 4' - License Class j2— City Business License if S 4 XD Designer Name Address City State/Zip telephone State License if 3q QLS q 6 WORKERS COMPENSATION Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: 0 I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of th work for which this permit is issued. I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier nd policy number are: Insurance Company crl1k.A'C.._fLA.J"._Cl,, Policy 4xpiration Date I- (_05 (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS I$1001 OR LESS) C] CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000),jpAldition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of thaor cod , interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE ..-" DATE / 7. OWNER-BUILDER DECLARA I hereby affirm that I am exempt f om the ontractor's License Law for the following reason: 0 I, as owner of the property or y e ployees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions : The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale), 0 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). 0 I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES []NO I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number I contractors license number): I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES 0 NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES 0 NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES 0 NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. 8 CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code), LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS 9. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Cit' of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenc for a p io if 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE /i '/c_- HITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 08/26/2005 Permit# CB043221 Inspector Assignment: PY Title: RICHIERI RES- 876 SF ADDITION Description: GREAT ROOM, BED ROOM & BATH ROOM Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: RAD Job Address: 1240 PINE AV Suite: Lot 0 Location: APPLICANT WORTHING INC, B. A. Owner: RICHIERI VIVIAN Remarks: Total Time: Phone: 7607293965 Inspector: Requested By: TERESA Entered By: CW CD Description Act Comment 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing j 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Associated PCRs/CVs Inspection History Date Description Act Insp Comments 08/23/2005 89 Final Combo CO PY SEE NOTICE ATTACHED 06/20/2005 82 Drywall/Ext Lath/Gas Test AP PY 06/10/2005 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP PY 06/10/2005 16 Insulation AP PY 06/06/2005 84 Rough Combo PA PD OK TO INSULATE NOTES ON CARD 05/19/2005 13 Shear Panels/HD's AP PD 05/19/2005 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding WC PD 05/09/2005 15 Roof/Reroof AP PY 05/02/2005 33 Service Change/Upgrade PA PY UPGRADE/RELOCATE ELECT SERV 05/02/2005 34 Rough Electric WC PY 04/20/2005 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP PY 04/15/2005 21 Underground/under Floor AP PY j2:13 7693691 BILL '1Ai'TASSEL FGE ai I*SenSpec . 6uilding Consultants Tel: (760) 720-7125 Fax: (760) 720-7110 May 13, 2005 B.A. Worthing, Inc. P.O Box 1041 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Re: Special Inspection 1240 Pine Carlsbad, CA Dear Sirs, The installation of four(4) 5/8"Jhreaded rods 12" into the foundation was-observed at 8:00 am. on Friday, May 13, 2005. The installation was done in accordance with the instructions on the tube of Simpson epoxy #ER5219, plan detail, and standard building practices. Should you have questions regarding this matter please contact me at 760.720.7125. Sincerely, / Dill Van Tassel CBO #2832 ACI 4049694 ICC #0570410 / From silt Van Tassel To. inc. B.A. Worthing Data. 511812005 Time 10:12:44 AM Page 1 of 2 1;800 Grand Ave. #A17 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Ph, 760-720-7125 Fax 760-720-7110 EflC.B.A. Worthing Subject: 8/2005 at 10 12-1 38 AM _____ MESSAGE: ATTENTION In order to promptly deliver this report, it has been typed and taxed to you without being proof read by the inspector. If you note discrepancies in this report from the inspection, please contact us as soon as possible for correction. EsGil Corporation In Partnersfiip with çovernmentforBui&fing Safety DATE: 3/17/05 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-3221 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1240 Pine Ave. SET: IV O APPLICANT JURIS. U P -REVIEWER U FILE PROJECT NAME: Richien Residence Addition and Remodel The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. LIII The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. LII The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Liii Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: Please place "Soils Notice" on the plans. By: Steve Sanders Enclosures: Esgil Corporation L] GA LI MB LI EJ LI PC 3/17/05 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation In (Partnership with government for Bui&fing Safety DATE: February 10, 2005 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-3221 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1240 Pine Ave. SET: III U APPLICANT U PLAN REVIEWER U FILE PROJECT NAME: Richien Residence Addition and Remodel The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. Liii The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. LI The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. LI The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Brooks Worthing P.O. Box 1041, Carlsbad, CA. 92018 LI Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Brooks Worthing Date contacted: 'J,cJtS (by: fc Mail ...—Telephone Fax_— In Person LII REMARKS: By: Bill Elizarraras Esgil Corporation LIGA DMB DEJ 171 PC Telephone #: 760-729-3965 Fax #: 760-729-0784 Enclosures: 2/3/05 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax(858)560-1576 Carlsbad 04-3221 February 10, 2005 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 1240 Pine Ave. DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 2/3/05 REVIEWED BY: Bill Elizarraras PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-3221 SET: III DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: February 10, 2005 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new complete sets of prints to: THE JURISDICTION'S BUILDING DEPARTMENT. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? UYes Carlsbad 04-3221 February 10, 2005 The following corrections are from the original deficiency list, and were either not addressed or a result of new changes. . PLANS Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit two sets of plans for residential projects. For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Sleeping rooms shall have a window or exterior door for emergency escape. Sill height shall not exceed 44" above the floor. Windows must have an openable area of at least 5.7 square feet with the minimum openable width 20" and the minimum openable height 24". The emergency door or window shall be openable from the inside to provide a full, clear opening without the use of separate tools. Section 310.4. @ Mst. Bedroom. Provide drag straps @ front Porch beam to top plates. Section 106.3.3. Show the location, type and size (BTU's) of all heating and cooling appliances or systems. Every dwelling unit shall be provided with heating facilities capable of maintaining a room temperature of 70 degrees F at 3 feet above the floor in all habitable rooms. Show basis for compliance. UBC, Sec. 310.11. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents (required by the soil report). Provide truss details and truss calculations for this project. Specify truss identification numbers on the plans. Detail the interior and exterior shear transfer connections, including roof diaphragms, to shear walls. Section 2315. Carlsbad 04-3221 February 10, 2005 Add a brace wall panel between front door and window at Great room (Add hold downs as needed). Show location of attic access with a minimum size of 22"x30". Section 1505.1. II. Specify nail size and spacing for all shear walls, floor and roof diaphragms. Indicate required blocking. Maintain maximum diaphragm dimension ratios. Sections 2315 and 2513. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes El No El The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Bill Elizarraras at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. EsGil Corporation In (Partnership with Government for cBuitiing Safety DATE: August 26, 2004 El APPLICANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad u PLAN REVIEWER I FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-3221 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 1240 Pine Ave. PROJECT NAME: Richien Residence Addition and Remodel The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. LII The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. EJ The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. E The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Brooks Worthing P.O. Box 1041, Carlsbad, CA. 92018 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Bro ks Worthing 4ax elephone #: 760-729-3965 Date contacted: Ø7/Y(b) #: 760-729-0784 Mail Telephone' Fax'-"In Person LI REMARKS: By: Bill Elizarraras Enclosures: Esgil Corporation LI GA [1 MB [II EJ 0 PC 8/17/04 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • 1858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 - Carlsbad 04-3221 August 26, 2004 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-3221 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 1240 Pine Ave. FLOOR AREA: 1313 sq.ft. Dwelling Add'n STORIES: 2 HEIGHT: 26' REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: August 26, 2004 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 8/17/04 PLAN REVIEWER: Bill Elizarraras This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 2001 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 1997 UBC, 2000 UPC, 2000 UMC and 1999 NEC (all effective 11/1/02). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad 04-3221 August 26, 2004 . PLANS 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit two sets of plans for residential projects. For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation. Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code). 3. Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406.4: Show actual locations. a) Fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24-inch arc of either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the walking surface. 4. Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC Section 1804. 5. Provide calculations for main vertical and horizontal framing members and footings. Section 106.3.3. 6. Provide calculations for lateral loads, shear panels, shear transfer and related. Section 106.3.3. 7. Please provide evidence that the engineer-of-record (or architect) has reviewed the truss calculation package prepared by others (i.e., a 'review" stamp on the truss calculations or a letter). Section 106.3.4.1. 8. Provide all the truss details and truss calculations for this project. Specify truss identification numbers on the plans. Carlsbad 04-3221 August 26, 2004 Show the location, type and size (BTU's) of all heating and cooling appliances or systems. Every dwelling unit shall be provided with heating facilities capable of maintaining a room temperature of 70 degrees F at 3 feet above the floor in all habitable rooms. Show basis for compliance. UBC, Sec. 310.11. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Bill Elizarraras at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 04-3221 August 26, 2004 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-3221 PREPARED BY: Bill Elizarraras DATE: August 26, 2004 BUILDING ADDRESS: 1240 Pine Ave. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3/U1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN BUILDING PORTION AREA (Sq. Ft.) Valuation Multiplier Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) Dwelling Add'n 1313 Per City Value 144,430 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE 144,430 Jurisdiction Code lCD IBy Ordinance Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance Vi I $685.161 Plan Check Fee by Ordinance I Type of Review: 1 Complete Review Structural Only Li El Other Repetitive Fee Hourly I Hour* 1 Repeats Esgil Plan Review Fee $383.691 Comments: Sheet 1 of I macvalue.doc CiAx of Carlsbad 111,1 ;i I Works -Eng i neering BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DATE: 0 1JJIO PLANCHECKNO BUILDING ADDRESS: fi-t(a I (.&L PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 64C& /3 /3 ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER: 2-oc- O 210 -3 (P ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT it/f/- 0 - 2-o APPROVAL DENIAL The item you have submitted for review has been Ple rs se e tached report of deficiencies approved. The approval is based on plans, mar wiLi e necessary corrections to plans information and/or specifications provided in your or cifi f-compliance with applicable submittal; therefore any changes to these items after codand standa4. ubmit corrected plans and/or this date, including field modifications, must be speations to/his otice for review. reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. IA Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: By: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY GINEERING AUTHORIZATION By: TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT bate: 2A10 CBO/' 7l-( EST.VALUE: / By: ( By: Date: 3M Date: Date: ATTACHMENTS El Dedication Application LII Dedication Checklist LII Improvement Application L Improvement Checklist L Future Improvement Agreement LI Grading Permit Application LI Grading Submittal Checklist LI Right-of-Way Permit Application ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Name: KATHI EEN M FARMFR City of Carlsbad Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone: (760) 602-2741 CFD INFORMATION Parcel Map No: Lots: Recordation: Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist Carlsbad Tract: and Information Sheet LI Sewer Fee Information Sheet A-4 CA 9200 -7314 (760) 602-2720 • FAX (760) 602B5 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST WI' Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: Xiiijrth Arrow >-FRight-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets ,Existing & Proposed Structures Driveway widths - Existing Street Improvements ,H Existing or proposed sewer lateral Pr( Lines t C1 ' -1 Existing or proposed water service ....E)asements J. Existing or proposed irrigation service /. Show on site plan: Drainage Patterns , )VBuilding pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. DD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography Size, type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service (s) that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service, however, second dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception. Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per standards. ZO-1 0 F-1 3. Include on title sheet: Site address Assessor's Parcel Number Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION H:\W0RD\D0CS\CHKLST\8ui1diflg Ptantheck Cklst Form (Generic).doc 2 Rev. 7/14/00 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2 ° 3rd DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE DOD 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No. ODD 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels, with a value at or exceeding $15,000, pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 1/2" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by: Date: IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $75,000, pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the H:WORD\DOCS\CHXLSTIBuiIding Plandleck Cklst Forr,, (RIDDLE - HARVEY 7-12-00).doc 3 Rev. 12126/96 1 1ST 2ND 3RD BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by: Date: Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent propegty title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of 3'_kOso we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. Thiagreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Future public improvements required as follows: Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement. Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Future Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: LII E 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adiacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). LI LI 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: LI LI LI 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLSTBuiIdjng Planchecic Cldst Form (GENERIC 7-14-00).doc 4 Rev. 7/14/00 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3RD El El El 7d .No Grading Permit required. El El El 7e. If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS El El El 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for: El El El 9. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7153; for assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: El El El 10. NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. ] 11. 0 quired fees are attached No fees required WATER METER REVIEW El El El 12a. Domestic (potable) Use Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized. Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions. If it is oversized, for the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used. All single family dwelling units received "standard" 1" service with 5/8" service. H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\Suilding plantheck Cklst Form (Generic).doc 5 Rev. 7/14/00 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2 ND 3R0 If owner/developer proposes a size other than the "standard", then owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations, which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons per minute (gpm). A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is attached Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing schedule" to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit. Maximum service and meter size is a 2" service with a 2" meter. If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2", suggest the installation of multiple 2" services as needed to provide the anticipated demand. (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit multiple trenching into the street). E 12b. Irrigation Use (where recycled water isnot available) All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior to approval. The developer must provide these calculations. Please follow these guidelines: If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the recent improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on the improvement sheets. If so, at the water meter station, the demand in gpm may be listed there. Irrigation services are listed with a circled "I", and potable water is typically a circled "W". The irrigation service should look like: - _i STA 1+00 Install 2" service and 1.5: meter (estimated 100 gpm) If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach). Typically, Larry Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared, but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use. Once you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for your reference. In general the calculations will include: Hydraulic grade line Elevation at point of connection (POC) Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI) Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head) Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection 3. In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with no HOA). As long as the project is located within the City recycled water H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLSVBuilding Planthed, Cklst Form (Generic).doc 6 Rev. 7114100 * 1ST 2ND 3RD BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST service boundary, the City intends on switching these irrigation services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future. U • I 12c. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is available) Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above. If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development. For subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the improvement plans. Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water Capacity fees. However, if they front a street which the recycled water is there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego Water Capacity Charge. If within three years, the recycled water line is charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund. However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and they must deal with the SDCWA for this. 13. Additional Comments: I '/ Pc. C J p ouo'J — cL Q21c&I cf (4J(F 1(l/ (a01 H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\Building Plancheck Mist Form (Genenc).doc 7 Rev. 7/14/00 PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No. CB 3 -2 I Address 12-L(C ) p/Ne -v N 'fl Planner /1,4 Ih c2i/\J Phone (760) 602- 42215 APN: •2c2-O-3c Type of Project & Use: Net Project Density: DU/AC Zoning:______ General Plan: Facilities Management Zone: CFD (in/out) #_Date of participation: Remaining net dev acres:______ (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this Circle One permit: ) .c .c) .c Q C.) Legend: Item Complete 0 Item Incomplete Needs your action 0 0 Environmental Review Required: YES NO TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION.- Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: 0 0 Discretionary Action Required: YES NO ____ TYPE APPROVALJRESO. NO. DATE PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: D 0 Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES_ NO__ ____ CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES NO /\ If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at -7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego CA 92108-4402; (619) 767-2370 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES____ NO____ If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log Follow-Up Actions: Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. 0 0 Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES NO)< (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES - NO (AJP/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing YIN, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) Site Plan: H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPIflChkReVChklSt Rev 9/01 *rEl 1. Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show:. North arrow, property line, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines (including all .side and rear yard slopes). 0 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. Policy 44— NelghborhoQ,d Architectural Design Guidelines 1. Applicability: YES.2 NO_______ 0 0 2. Project complies YES NO_______ no Zoning: Setbacks: Front: Required ____ Shown 2-1 Interior Side: Required Shown - Street Side:; Required 4' Shown __________ Rear: Required J-2- Shown Top of slope: Required - Shown Accessory structure setbacks: Front: Required - Shown Interior Side: Required _______________ Shown Street Side: Required Shown - Rear: Required Shown Structure separation: Required I Shown Lot Coverage: Required ' i Shown ' Height: Required Shown Parking: Spaces Required Shown (breakdown by uses for commercial and industrial projects required) Residential Guest Spaces Required Shown Additional rA OK.TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER DATE H:'ADMIN\COUNTER\BIdgPIflCbkReVChkISt Rev 9/01 COAST GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS November 16, 2004 I Vivian Richieri 1240 Pine Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 I Subject: PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Proposed Addition 1240 Pine Avenue Carlsbad, California Dear Ms. Richieri: In response to your request and in accordance with our Proposal and Agreement dated October 4, 2004, we have performed a preliminary geotechnical investigation on the subject site for the proposed residential addition. The findings of the investigation, laboratory test results and recommendations for foundation design are presented in this report. From a geologic and soils engineering point of view, it is our opinion that the site is suitable for the proposed development, provided the recommendations in this report are implemented during the design and construction phases. However, certain geotechnical conditions will require special consideration in foundation design and site development. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at (858) 755-8622. This opportunity to be of service is appreciated. Respectfully COAST GE( Mark Burwell, C.E. Engineering Geolo LU! 2109 Exp. 5-31-06 —{ CERTIFIED k* ENGINEERINGGEOLOWT OFC * Vithaya 'S Geotechni 779 ACADEMY DRIVE • SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92075 1 (858) 755-8622 • FAX (858) 755-9126 oil$ 0 W?O/ I • ' PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION 1 I I I Proposed Addition 1240 Pine Avenue I Carlsbad, California I I Prepared For: I Vivian Richieri 1240 Pine Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 1 1 November 16, 2004 W.O. P-436104 I I Prepared By: ' COAST GEOTECHNICAL 779 Academy Drive Solana Beach, California 92075 I I TABLE OF CONTENTS VICINITY MAP 4 INTRODUCTION 5 SITE CONDITIONS 5 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 5 SITE INVESTIGATION 6 LABORATORY TESTING 6 GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS 7 CONCLUSIONS 8 RECOMMENDATIONS 9 A. EXCAVATION CHARACTERISTICS 9 B. SUBDRAIN 9 C. FOUNDATIONS (CONVENTIONAL) 10 D. FOUNDATIONS (DRILLED PILES) 10 E. SLABS ON GRADE (EXTERIOR) 11 F. SETTLEMENT CHARACTERISTICS 11 G. SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS 11 H. SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS 12 I. UTILITY TRENCH 12 J. DRAINAGE 13 K. GEOTECHNICAL OBSERVATIONS 13 L. PLAN REVIEW 14 LIMITATIONS 14 REFERENCES 17 APPENDICES APPENDIX A APPENDIX B LABORATORY TEST RESULTS EXPLORATORY BORING LOGS PLATE A CROSS SECTION A-A' SITE PLAN REGIONAL FAULT MAP SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS DESIGN RESPONSE SPECTRUM © 2004 DeLorme. Topo USA® 5.0. tMN(13) _____________________ www.delorme.com V 1 , = 466.7 ft Data Zoom 15-0 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Coast Geotechnical November 16, 2004 W.O. P-436104 Page 5 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical investigation on the subject property. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the nature and characteristics of the earth materials underlying the property, the engineering properties of the surficial deposits and their influence on the proposed residential addition. SITE CONDITIONS The subject property is located east of Pico Drive, along the north side of Pine Avenue, in the city of Carlsbad. The property includes a single family residence and detached garage situated on a relatively level rectangular lot. The eastern property line is bounded by a 2.5± foot high cut slope that ascends to an adjacent developed residential lot. The western portion of the site includes a 2.0± foot high fill slope that descends to an adjacent developed lot. Vegetation in the front yard area includes grass and a tree. The eastern portion of the front yard includes a concrete walkway and a gravel driveway. Drainage is generally by sheet flow to the west. An earthen drainage channel is located along the southern property line parallel to Pine Avenue. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Preliminary plans for the development of the site were prepared by Brooks Design. The project will include the construction of a two story addition along the front of the existing residence. Coast Geotechnical November 16, 2004 W.O. P-436104 Page SITE INVESTIGATION Site exploration included three (3) exploratory borings drilled to a maximum depth of 5.5 feet. Drilling depth was limited, due to shallow groundwater conditions. Boring No. 1 was supplemented by hand excavation, due to asphalt fragments. Earth materials encountered were visually classified U and logged by our field engineering geologist. Undisturbed, representative samples of earth materials were obtained at selected intervals. Samples were obtained by driving a thin walled steel sampler into the desired strata. The samples are retained in brass rings of 2.5 inches outside diameter I and 1.0 inches in height. The central portion of the sample is retained in close fitting, waterproof containers and transported to our laboratory for testing and analysis. I LABORATORY TESTING I Classification The field classification was verified through laboratory examination, in accordance with the Unified I Soil Classification System. The final classification is shown on the enclosed Exploratory Logs. Moisture/Density The field moisture content and dry unit weight were determined for each of the undisturbed soil I samples. This information is useful in providing a gross picture of the soil consistency or variation among exploratory excavations. The dry unit weight was determined in pounds per cubic foot. The I field moisture content was determined as a percentage of the dry unit weight. Both are shown on the enclosed Laboratory Tests Results and Exploratory Logs. Coast Geotechnical November 16, 2004 W.O. P-436104 Page 7 GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS The subject property is located in the Coastal Plains Physiographic Province of San Diego. The property is underlain at depth by Pleistocene terrace deposits. The terrace deposits are underlain in turn by Eocene-age sedimentary rocks which have commonly been designated as the Santiago Formation on published geologic maps. The Pleistocene terrace deposits are covered by soil and, in part, by fill deposits. A brief description of the earth materials encountered on the site follows. Artificial Fill A wedge-shaped fill was encountered in the front yard area, ranging from 1.0 foot in Boring No. 3 to approximately 2.0 feet in Boring No. 1. The fill is composed of tan to brown fine and medium- grained sand. The fill contains 2.0 inch thick asphalt fragments ranging to 2.0 feet in diameter. Residual Soil Approximately 3.0 feet of soil was encountered in the exploratory borings. The soil is composed of dark brown to black clayey sand. The soil is saturated and organic. The contact with the underlying terrace deposits is gradational. Terrace Deposits Underlying the fill and soil deposits, grey clayey sand was encountered. The sediments appear to correlate with Pleistocene terrace deposits, as shown on published geologic maps. Exploration was Coast Geotechnical November 16, 2004 W.O. P-436104 Page 8 limited, due to shallow groundwater conditions encountered during drilling. However, based on or experience, the terrace deposits are typically flat-lying and become increasingly dense with depth. Expansive Soil Based on our experience in the area and previous laboratory testing of selected samples, the surficial deposits and clayey terrace deposits reflect an expansion potential ranging from the low to medium. Groundwater Groundwater was encountered at a depth of 3.0 feet in Boring Nos. 1 and 2, and 1.8 feet in Boring No. 3. The groundwater appears to be perched above the denser underlying terrace deposits and was probably generated from recent prolonged rains. CONCLUSIONS From a geologic and soils engineering viewpoint, the proposed addition is feasible, however, certain geotechnical conditions will require special consideration. Groundwater should be intercepted along the eastern side of the addition with a 4.0 to 5.0 foot deep subdrain (see Subdrain Detail, Plate A). Proposed stem wall footings should penetrate fill and soil, and should be embedded into Coast Geotechnical November 16, 2004 W.O. P-436104 Page 9 competent terrace deposits. It is anticipated that footings will range from 6.0 to 7.0 feet deep, in this regard. As an alternative to deepened conventional footings, recommendations are provided for drilled cast in place piles. 4) The other option would be to remove and replace the existing surficial deposits as properly compacted fill. However, highly organic deposits will require removal and replacement with imported fill deposits. Additional recommendations will be necessary, if this option is desired. RECOMMENDATIONS Excavation Characteristics The surficial deposits in the front yard area are saturated due to shallow groundwater conditions and subject to caving in footing excavations. It is suggested that the proposed subdrain be constructed prior to footing excavations and the area be allowed to dry out. Subdrain A subdrain should be constructed along the eastern side of the proposed addition in order to intercept groundwater. Details of the proposed subdrain are shown on the enclosed Plate A. However, it should be noted that a catchment basin and sump pump will be necessary to discharge collected subsurface water. Coast Geotechnical November 16, 2004 W.O. P-436104 Page 10 Foundations (Conventional) Continuous stem wall footings should penetrate all fill, soil and weathered terrace deposits and founded a minimum of 1.5 feet into competent terrace deposits. Footings excavations may need to be supported from potential caving of saturated deposits. Footings should be reinforced with steel, as per the recommendations of the project structural engineer. Footings founded as recommended above may be designed for a bearing value of 2000 pounds per square foot. The bearing value indicated above is for the total dead and frequently applied live loads. This may be increased by 33 percent for short durations of loading, including the effects of wind and seismic forces. Resistance to lateral load may be provided by friction acting at the base of foundations and by passive pressure. A coefficient of friction of 0.35 may be used with dead-load forces. A passive earth pressure of 300 pounds per square foot, per foot of depth of terrace deposits penetrated to a maximum of 2000 pounds per square foot may be used. Foundations (Drilled Piles) Proposed piles should be a minimum of 2.0 feet in diameter to facilitate clean out. A bearing value of 3000 pounds per square foot may be used for cast-in-place piles/caissons embedded a minimum 3.0 feet into competent terrace deposits. As an alternative, the piles may be designed for a skin friction value of 500 pounds per square foot to a maximum of 3000 pounds per square foot. Coast Geotechnical November 16, 2004 W.O. P-436104 Page 11 Resistance to lateral forces may be taken as the sum of the passive and frictional resistance. A coefficient of friction of 0.35 maybe used with dead-load forces. A passive earth pressure of 500 pounds per square foot, per foot of depth of formational rock penetrated may be used. No value should be used for fill, soil and weathered terrace deposits. The point of fixity is assumed to be 1.0 foot below the weathered/dense sandstone contact. All drilled piles should be observed by a certified engineering geologist during drilling. Slabs on Grade (Exterior) Slabs on grade should be a minimum of 4.0 inches thick and reinforced in both directions with No. 3 bars placed 18 inches on center in both directions. The slab should be underlain by a minimum 4.0-inch sand blanket. Slabs should be provided with saw cuts/expansion joints, as recommended by the project structural engineer. All slabs should be cast over dense compacted subgrades. Settlement Characteristics Estimated total and differential settlement over a horizontal distance of 30 feet is expected to be on the order of 1.0 inch and 3/4 inch, respectively. It should also be noted that long term secondary settlement due to irrigation and loads imposed by structures is anticipated to be ¼ inch. Seismic Considerations Although the likelihood of ground rupture on the site is remote, the property will be exposed to Coast Geotechnical November 16, 2004 W.O. P-436104 Page 12 moderate to high levels of ground motion resulting from the release of energy should an earthquake occur along the numerous known and unknown faults in the region. The Rose Canyon/Newport-Inglewood Fault Zone located approximately 5.0 miles west of the property is the nearest known active fault and is considered the design earthquake for the site. A maximum probable event along the offshore segment of the Newport-Inglewood Fault is expected to produce a peak bedrock horizontal acceleration of 0.34g and a repeatable ground acceleration of 0.22g. Seismic Design Parameters (1997 Uniform Building Code) Soil Profile Type - SD Seismic Zone - 4 Seismic Source - Type B Near Source Factor (Ny) - 1.1 Near source Acceleration Factor (Na) - 1.0 Seismic Coefficients Ca = 0.44 C= 0.69 Design Response Spectrum T=0.628 T0 =0.126 Nearest Type B Fault - 8.0 km Utility Trench We recommend that all utilities be bedded in clean sand to at least one foot above the top of the Coast Geotechnical November 16, 2004 W.O. P-436104 Page 13 conduit. The bedding should be flooded in place to fill all the voids around the conduit. Imported or on-site granular material compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction maybe utilized for backfill above the bedding. The invert of subsurface utility excavations paralleling footings should be located above the zone of influence of these adjacent footings. This zone of influence is defined as the area below a 45 degree plane projected down from the nearest bottom edge of an adjacent footing. This can be accomplished by either deepening the footing, raising the invert elevation of the utility, or moving the utility or the footing away from one another. Drainage Specific drainage patterns should be designed by the project designer. However, in general, pad water should be directed away from foundations. Pad water should not be allowed to pond. Vegetation adjacent to foundations should be avoided. If vegetation in these areas is desired, sealed planter boxes or drought resistant plants should be considered. Other alternatives may be available, however, the intent is to reduce moisture from migrating into foundation subsoils. Irrigation should be limited to that amount necessary to sustain plant life. All drainage systems should be inspected and cleaned annually, prior to winter rains. Geotechnical Observations Structural footing excavations should be observed by a representative of this firm, prior to the Coast Geotechnical November 16, 2004 W.O. P-436104 Page 14 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I placement of steel and forms. All fill should be placed while a representative of the geotechnical engineer is present to observe and test. Plan Review A copy of the final plans should be submitted to this office for review prior to the initiation of construction. Additional recommendations may be necessary at that time. LIMITATIONS Minor stucco cracking may occur as existing footings readjust to new loads. This is due, in part, to concrete shrinkage of new underpin footings. This study is limited and does not address stability analysis along the rear slope. This report is presented with the provision that it is the responsibility of the owner or the owner's representative to bring the information and recommendations given herein to the attention of the project's architects and/or engineers so that they may be incorporated into plans. If conditions encountered during construction appear to differ from those described in this report, our office should be notified so that we may consider whether modifications are needed. No responsibility for construction compliance with design concepts, specifications or recommendations given in this report is assumed unless on-site review is performed during the course of construction. Coast Geotechnical November 16, 2004 W.O. P-436104 I Page 15 The subsurface conditions, excavation characteristics and geologic structure described herein are I based on individual exploratory excavations made on the subject property. The subsurface conditions, excavation characteristics and geologic structure discussed should in no way be I construed to reflect any variations which may occur among the exploratory excavations. I Please note that fluctuations in the level of groundwater may occur due to variations in rainfall, I temperature and other factors not evident at the time measurements were made and reported herein. Coast Geotechnical assumes no responsibility for variations which may occur across the site. I The conclusions and recommendations of this report apply as of the current date. In time, however, I changes can occur on a property whether caused by acts of man or nature on this or adjoining properties. Additionally, changes in professional standards may be brought about by legislation or I the expansion of knowledge. Consequently, the conclusions and recommendations of this report may be rendered wholly or partially invalid by events beyond our control. This report is therefore I subject to review and should not be relied upon after the passage of two years. I The professional judgments presented herein are founded partly on our assessment of the technical I data gathered, partly on our understanding of the proposed construction and partly on our general experience in the geotechnical field. However, in no respect do we guarantee the outcome of the I project. I This study has been provided solely for the benefit of the client and is in no way intended to benefit Coast Geotechnical November 16, 2004 W.O. P-436104 Page 16 or extend any right or interest to any third party. This study is not to be used on other projects or extensions to this project except by agreement in writing with Coast Geotechnical. Coast Geotechnical November 16, 2004 W.O. P-436104 Page 17 REFERENCES Hays, Walter W., 1980, Procedures for Estimating Earthquake Ground Motions, Geological Survey Professional Paper 1114, 77 pages. Petersen, Mark D. and others (DMG), Frankel, Arthur D. and others (USGS), 1996, Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment for the State of California, California Division of Mines and Geology OFR 96-08, United States Geological Survey OFR 96-706. Seed, H.B., and Idriss, I.M., 1970, A Simplified Procedure for Evaluating Soil Liquefaction Potential: Earthquake Engineering Research Center. Treiman, J.A., 1984, The Rose Canyon Fault Zone, A Review and Analysis, California Division of Mines and Geology. MAPS/AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Brooks Design, 2004, Site Plan, 1240 Pine Avenue, Carlsbad, California, Scale 1 "=20'. California Division of Mines and Geology, 1994, Fault Activity Map of California, Scale I"=750,000'. Geologic Map of the Encinitas and Rancho Santa Fe 7.5' Quadrangles, 1996, DMG Open File Report 96-02. U.S.G.S., 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Topographic Map, Digitized, Scale Variable. I I APPENDIX A I LABORATORY TEST RESULTS TABLE I Field Dry Density and Moisture Content Sample Field Dry Field Moisture Location Density Content (pc f) B-i @ 2.0' 96.3 20.1 B-i @ 3.0' Lost Sample B-2 @ 2.0' 101.9 25.1 B-2 @ 3.0' Lost Sample B-3 @ 1.5' 107.3 18.2 B-3 @ 2.0' Lost Sample P-436104 LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING NO. 1 DRILL RIG: PORTABLE BUCKET AUGER PROJECT NO. P-436104 BORING DIAMETER: 3.5" DATE DRILLED: 10-21-04 SURFACE ELEV.: 86' (Approximate) LOGGED BY: MB ZO Q t4, 9 E- U 0 U 0 coi LI-] - U . P. 9 GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION 86.00 0.00 SM FILL (af): Tan to reddish brn. fine and medium-grained sand II - — Asphalt fragments, 2" thick to 2' long - - 85.00 1.00 - - 84.00' 96.3 20.1 - 2.00 vit SC SOIL (Qs): Brown to Bik. clayey sand, organic Mt titt - - tot - - tat - 83.00 Groundwater @ 3' - 3.00 Lost Sample - - Caving from 3' - - t5t4ct - 82.00 - . 00 - - - ç4c - C4C - 81.00 - 5.00 P& SC TERRACE DEPOSITS (Qt): Grey to bm. clayey sand MAN SHEET 1 OF 1 COAST GEOTECHNICAL LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING NO. 2 DRILL RIG: PORTABLE BUCKET AUGER PROJECT NO. P-436104 BORING DIAMETER: 3.5" DATE DRILLED: 10-21-04 SURFACE ELEV.: 86' (Approximate) LOGGED BY: MB H z z 0 GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION 86.00 _______ - 0.00 SM FILL (af): Tan to reddish bm. fine and medium-grained sand - - 11 Asphalt fragments - - - :i): 85.00 :.:4.: 1.00 - - - 84.00 ::: 101.9 25.1 - 2.00 SC SOIL (Qs): Brown to Bik. clayey sand, organic - - - - - - 83.00 ug Groundwater @ 3' Lost Sample - 3.00 - — - Caving from 3' - - - - 82.00 - 4.00 - - - - - - - 81.00 - 5.00 SC TERRACE DEPOSITS (Qt): Grey to bm. clayey sand SHEET 1OF 1 COAST GEOTECHNICAL LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING NO. 3 DRILL RIG: PORTABLE BUCKET AUGER PROJECT NO. P-436104 BORING DIAMETER: 3.5" DATE DRILLED: 10-21-04 SURFACE ELEV.: 86' (Approximate) LOGGED BY: MB 0 - Z r.' 0 GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION 86.00 ______ - 0.00 SM FILL (a!): Tan to reddish bm. fine and medium-grained sand - : - ZEE - : 41. - - 1.00 SC SOIL (Qs): Brown to Bik. clayey sand, slightly organic 107.3 18.2 - Groundwater @ 1.8' - 84.00 Lost Sample - 2.00 - - Caving from 2-3' — - - 83.00 %t 3.00 - t - - - 82.00 j 14H - 4.00 ... SC TERRACE DEPOSITS (Qt): Grey to brn. clayey sand - - - - 81.00 5.00 SHEET IOF 1 COAST GEOTECHNICAL SUBDRAIN DETAIL IN I I I I I I I FT. MIN. 4' 5.0' MIN. j_-COMPACTED FILL IL bb 4 P II b IL-FILTER FABRIC P i A .1 Pp p P 3/4 INCH ROCK Pp P s J Iv p pI I . )'>I 't r ILL.Ji I 1' L 4 INCH DR. PERFORATED I PIPE 1.0% MIN. TO OUTLET PLATE A CROSS SECTION A-A' (SHOWING GENERAL SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS) SCALE I"=lO' -T- PROPOSED I I ADDITION I I—.---------------------1 I I -DRIVEWAY FILL - 1IsJL ITI TII ! 8 TERRACE DEPOSITS GW= Groundwater COAST GEOTECHNICAL P-436104 I APPENDIX B I REGIONAL FAULT MAP EXPLANATION ,,.hCdd by *oi.d fl*y. ..hn. ..yII bMS, by 4.htd —. by.y flo...odOI) kndod.y ..,(on,o& .d by odod by. boy oykd by n. by IMo. b.y, o.00, q.000d .yyy Codod F.M.. u. the &... 'Fiky .,y b...d - y( yI.y,.d ..66oy kMo.. . • .yyo....m. .yd ..y ydJFth y.yy FAULT CLASS IFICATION COLOR CODE (Indicating ROcency o( Movcey.nc) F..!, .g 4o00 h,00& (104 2ncy S)d..4.yo. b 000.fTtd ..dn aa. .* oF by F.). o.04&d yd M.d bM...d o. (A0yd t.yd o....d by poo..d .dok...g do).j ...bq.doo.. yg. o.o.y 1yy.d - I9b1b Thydy d ,..d.cncd. Wby..y 0.4... n.yno.... ft by.y byo. od.Iy fto(thy ...y by ydio..yd. y9yoifly d0.liy, oFvo...d (b) F...d ..oep dip9.1. - .40. g,o..od 6..4.oc.a ...dIy . ..4t I0)d.lpldC.d0.,oyy P.M bind rm........__ ddy4 0 ympb0.zg boaio. OF bigOt F...* dit$....c SPECIAL NOTATIONS A 0o.ogkw.M nyd... 0004.40.4.. P.by.okoy.d by Oi..jk, iOFo.. 4.0.44gM. ky.d. A 000inyd b don by.00n 0.0y.th pOt . * OF - 4001.0 oty .. I •I: ( i I . i'.( I I 40 oF.. y —_ .0 — 0*04 ::::: Rw 12 GRAPHIC SCALE .•::.',-.J- -. .. ' ._--•----- -. I — • - — - - MEXICO COAST GEOCNIUCAL * ** * ** * * * * * U B C S E I S * * * * Version 1.03 * * * ** ** * * *** * * * * * *** * COMPUTATION OF 1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS JOB NUMBER: P-436104 JOB NAME: RICHIERI FAULT-DATA-FILE NAME: CDMGUBCR.DAT SITE COORDINATES: SITE LATITUDE: 33.1573 SITE LONGITUDE: 117.3379 UBC SEISMIC ZONE: 0.4 UBC SOIL PROFILE TYPE: SD NEAREST TYPE A FAULT: NAME: ELSINORE-JULIAN DISTANCE: 38.9 km NEAREST TYPE B FAULT: NAME: ROSE CANYON DISTANCE: 8.0 km NEAREST TYPE C FAULT: NAME: DISTANCE: 99999.0 km SELECTED UBC SEISMIC COEFFICIENTS: Na: 1.0 Nv: 1.1 Ca: 0.44 Cv: 0.69 Ts: 0.628 To: 0.126 DATE: 11-16-2004 --------------------------- SUMMARY OF FAULT PARAMETERS --------------------------- Page 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I APPROX. ISOURCE I MAX. I SLIP I FAULT ABBREVIATED IDISTANCEI TYPE I MAG. I RATE I TYPE FAULT NAME I (km) I (A,B,C) I (Mw) I (xnrn/yr) I (SS,DS,BT) I I I I ========= I ROSE CANYON NEWPORT-INGLEWOOD (Offshore) CORONADO BANK ELS INORE-TEMECULA ELSINORE-JULIAN ELSINORE-GLEN IVY PALOS VERDES EARTHQUAKE VALLEY NEWPORT-INGLEWOOD (L.A.Basin) SAN JACINTO-ANZA SAN JACINTO-SAN JACINTO VALLEY CHINO-CENTRAL AVE. (Elsinore) ELSINORE-WHITTIER SAN JACINTO-COYOTE CREEK ELSINORE-COYOTE MOUNTAIN SAN JACINTO-SAN BERNARDINO SAN ANDREAS - Southern SAN JACINTO - BORREGO SAN JOSE CUCANONGA SIERRA MADRE (Central) PINTO MOUNTAIN NORTH FRONTAL FAULT ZONE (West C LEGHORN BURNT MTN. RAYMOND CLAMSHELL-SAWPIT SAN ANDREAS - 1857 Rupture EUREKA PEAK NORTH FRONTAL FAULT ZONE (East VERDUGO SUPERSTITION MTN. (San Jacinto HOLLYWOOD ELMORE RANCH SUPERSTITION HILLS (San Jacint LANDERS HELENDALE - S. LOCKHARDT SANTA MONICA ELS INORE-LAGUNA SALADA MALIBU COAST LENWOOD-LOCKHART-OLD WOMAN SPR SIERRA MADRE (San Fernando) BRAWLEY SEISMIC ZONE JOHNSON VALLEY (Northern) EMERSON So. - COPPER MTN. SAN GABRIEL 8.0 I B 1 6.9 1 1.50 I SS I 8.5 I B I 6.9 I 1.50 I SS I 34.1 1 B I 7.4 1 3.00 I SS I 38.5 I B 6.8 I 5.00 SS I 38.9 I A I 7.1 5.00 I SS I 54.0 I B I 6.8 1 5.00 1 SS 57.5 I B I 7.1 1 3.00 I SS I 70.5 I B 1 6.5 I 2.00 I SS I 73.8 I B I 6.9 1 1.00 I SS I 74.9 I A I 7.2 I 12.00 I SS I 75.7 I B 1 6.9 1 12.00 I SS I 76.1 I B I 6.7 1 1.00 I DS I 82.3 I B I 6.8 I 2.50 I SS I 84.1 I B I 6.8 1 4.00 I SS I 93.3 I B I 6.8 I 4.00 I SS I 95.9 I B I 6.7 1 12.00 I SS 104.2 I A I 7.4 I 24.00 SS I 106.6 I B I 6.6 I 4.00 I SS I 109.4 I B I 6.5 I 0.50 1 DS I 113.6 I A I 7.0 I 5.00 I DS 113.7 I B I 7.0 1 3.00 I DS I 115.4 I B 1 7.0 I 2.50 I SS 122.4 I B 1 7.0 I 1.00 I DS I 124.4 I B I 6.5 1 3.00 I SS 125.2 1 B I 6.5 I 0.60 I SS I 128.3 I B 6.5 I 0.50 I DS I 128.8 I B 6.5 I 0.50 I DS I 129.5 I A 7.8 I 34.00 I SS 129.7 I B I 6.5 I 0.60 I SS 130.9 I B I 6.7 I 0.50 I DS I 132.3 I B I 6.7 I 0.50 1 DS I 133.1 I B 1 6.6 I 5.00 I SS 135.4 I B 1 6.5 I 1.00 1 DS I 138.8 I B I 6.6 I 1.00 I SS I 140.5 1 B I 6.6 I 4.00 I SS I 140.9 I B I 7.3 I 0.60 I SS I 141.8 I B 1 7.1 I 0.60 I SS 143.2 I B 6.6 I 1.00 I DS 143.8 I B 7.0 I 3.50 I SS 147.6 I B I 6.7 I 0.30 I OS I 148.3 I B 1 7.3 I 0.60 I SS I 153.2 I B I 6.7 I 2.00 OS I 153.3 I B I 6.5 I 25.00 I SS I 153.4 I B I 6.7 I 0.60 I SS I 154.2 I B I 6.9 I 0.60 I SS 1 156.0 1 B 1 7.0 1 1_00 1 --------------------------- SUMMARY OF FAULT PARAMETERS --------------------------- Page 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I APPROX. SOURCE I MAX. I SLIP I FAULT ABBREVIATED IDISTANCEI TYPE I NAG. I RATE I TYPE FAULT NAME I (km) (A,B,C) I (Mw) I (min/yr) I (SS,DS,BT) I ====== I I ANACAPA- DUNE PISGAH-BULLION MTN. -MESQUIT CALICO - HIDALGO IMPERIAL SANTA SUSANA HOLSER SIMI-SANTA ROSA OAK RIDGE (Onshore) SAN CAYETANO GRAVEL HILLS - HARPER LAKE BLACKWATER VENTURA - PITAS POINT SANTA YNEZ (East) SANTA CRUZ ISLAND M. RIDGE-ARROYO PARIDA-SANTA RED MOUNTAIN GARLOCK (West) PLEITO THRUST BIG PINE GARLOCK (East) WHITE WOLF SANTA ROSA ISLAND SANTA YNEZ (West) So. SIERRA NEVADA LITTLE LAKE OWL LAKE PANAMINT VALLEY TANK CANYON DEATH VALLEY (South) LOS ALAMOS-W. BASELINE LIONS HEAD DEATH VALLEY (Graben) SAN LUIS RANGE (S. Margin) SAN JUAN CASMALIA (Orcutt Frontal Fa OWENS VALLEY LOS OSOS HOSGRI HUNTER MTN. - SALINE VALLEY INDEPENDENCE DEATH VALLEY (Northern) RINCONADA BIRCH CREEK SAN ANDREAS (Creeping) WHITE MOUNTAINS DEEP SPRINGS I 156.3 B LK I 164.7 I B I 166.9 B I 166.9 I A I 168.6 I B I 177.5 B I 185.3 1 B I 186.0 B I 194.4 B I 194.7 I B I 209.7 I B I 213.6 I B I 214.2 I B 222.8 I B ANA I 224.2 I B I 227.7 I B I 230.3 I A 235.7 I B 241.6 I B I 245.0 I A 256.2 I B 257.8 I B 259.6 I B I 269.5 I B I 274.3 I B 275.7 I B 275.9 I B I 276.4 I B 285.3 I B 302.0 I B I 319.5 B I 326.0 I B 329.0 I B I 329.5 B ut) 337.5 B 342.6 B I 359.1 B I 365.2 I B I 369.2 1 B I 378.4 B I 379.3 A I 379.9 I B I 434.7 I B I 435.9 I B I 439.3 I B I 457.9 I B 7.3 I 3.00 I DS 7.1 I 0.60 I SS 7.1 I 0.60 I SS 7.0 I 20.00 I SS 6.6 I 5.00 DS 6.5 I 0.40 I DS 6.7 I 1.00 I DS 6.9 I 4.00 DS 6.8 I 6.00 DS 6.9 0.60 I SS 6.9 I 0.60 SS 6.8 1.00 I DS 7.0 I 2.00 I ss 6.8 I 1.00 I DS 6.7 0.40 I DS 6.8 I 2.00 I DS 7.1 6.00 I SS 6.8 2.00 I DS 6.7 0.80 I SS 7.3 1 7.00 I SS 7.2 I 2.00 I DS 6.9 1 1.00 I DS 6.9 I 2.00 I SS 7.1 0.10 I DS 6.7 I 0.70 I SS 6.5 I 2.00 I SS 7.2 I 2.50 I SS 6.5 1.00 I DS 6.9 I 4.00 I SS 6.8 I 0.70 I OS 6.6 0.02 I DS 6.9 I 4.00 I DS 7.0 I 0.20 DS 7.0 1.00 I SS 6.5 I 0.25 I DS 7.6 I 1.50 I SS 6.8 I 0.50 1 DS 7.3 I 2.50 I SS 7.0 I 2.50 SS 6.9 0.20 I DS 7.2 I 5.00 I SS 7.3 1 1.00 1 SS 6.5 0.70 1 DS 5.0 I 34.00 I SS 7.1 I 1.00 SS 6.6 I 0.80 I DS --------------------------- SUMMARY OF FAULT PARAMETERS --------------------------- Page 3 I APPROX. (SOURCE I MAX. I SLIP I FAULT ABBREVIATED IDISTANCEI TYPE I MAG. I RATE I TYPE FAULT NAME I (km) (A,B,C) I (Mw) I (rnm/yr) I (SS,DS,BT) DEATH VALLEY (N. of Cucamongo) I 463.1 I A 1 7.0 1 5.00 I SS ROUND VALLEY (E. of S.N.Mtns.) I 469.7 I B 1 6.8 I 1.00 I DS FISH SLOUGH 477.6 1 B 1 6.6 I 0.20 I OS HILTON CREEK I 495.8 1 B I 6.7 I 2.50 I DS HARTLEY SPRINGS I 520.1 I B I 6.6 I 0.50 DS ORTIGALITA I 520.2 I B I 6.9 I 1.00 I SS CALAVERAS (So.of Calaveras Res) I 525.8 I B I 6.2 I 15.00 I SS MONTEREY BAY - TULARCITOS I 528.6 I B I 7.1 I 0.50 I OS PALO COLORADO - SUR I 529.7 I B I 7.0 1 3.00 I SS QUIEN SABE I 539.1 I B I 6.5 1 1.00 SS MONO LAKE 556.1 B I 6.6 I 2.50 I DS ZAYANTE-VERGELES I 557.6 I B I 6.8 I 0.10 I SS SAN ANDREAS (1906) I 562.8 I A I 7.9 I 24.00 I SS SARGENT I 562.9 1 B I 6.8 I 3.00 1 Ss ROBINSON CREEK I 587.3 B I 6.5 I 0.50 I DS SAN GREGORIO I 604.0 I A I 7.3 1 5.00 I SS GREENVILLE I 612.6 B I 6.9 I 2.00 I SS MONTE VISTA - SHANNON I 613.0 I B I 6.5 I 0.40 I DS HAYWARD (SE Extension) I 613.1 B I 6.5 I 3.00 SS ANTELOPE VALLEY I 627.7 I B I 6.7 I 0.80 I DS HAYWARD (Total Length) I 632.8 1 A I 7.1 I 9.00 1 SS CALAVERAS (No.of Calaveras Res) I 632.8 I B I 6.8 1 6.00 1 SS GENOA I 653.0 I B I 6.9 I 1.00 I DS CONCORD - GREEN VALLEY I 680.5 I B I 6.9 I 6.00 SS RODGERS CREEK I 719.3 I A I 7.0 9.00 I SS WEST NAPA 720.1 I B I 6.5 1 1.00 I SS POINT REYES I 738.2 I B 1 6.8 I 0.30 I DS HUNTING CREEK - BERRYESSA I 742.6 I B I 6.9 I 6.00 I SS MAACAMA (South) 1 782.0 1 B I 6.9 I 9.00 I SS COLLAYOMI 798.9 1 B I 6.5 I 0.60 I SS BARTLETT SPRINGS 802.4 A 7.1 I 6.00 I SS MAACAMA (Central) 823.6 I A 7.1 I 9.00 SS MAACAMA (North) 883.1 A I 7.1 I 9.00 SS ROUND VALLEY (N. S.F.Bay) 1 889.3 1 B 1 6.8 I 6.00 1 SS BATTLE CREEK 912.7 I B 1 6.5 I 0.50 1 OS LAKE MOUNTAIN I 947.7 1 B 1 6.7 I 6.00 I SS GARBERVILLE-BRICELAND 1 964.8 I B 1 6.9 I 9.00 1 Ss MENDOCINO FAULT ZONE 1021.1 A I 7.4 I 35.00 OS LITTLE SALMON (Onshore) 1027.7 I A I 7.0 I 5.00 I DS MAD RIVER 1030.5 I B 7.1 I 0.70 I DS CASCADIA SUBDUCTION ZONE 1034.8 I A 8.3 I 35.00 I DS McKINLEYVILLE 1041.0 1 B 1 7.0 I 0.60 l OS TRINIDAD I 1042.5 I B 1 7.3 I 2.50 I DS FICKLE HILL I 1042.9 I B I 6.9 I 0.60 I OS TABLE BLUFF I 1048.3 I B I 7.0 I 0.60 1 DS LITTLE SALMON (Offshore) I 1061.7 1 B 1 7.1 1 1.00 1 05 DESIGN RESPONSE SPECTRUM Seismic Zone: 0.4 Soil Profile: SD 2.50- 2.25-I 2.00-I 0) - 1.75 -I 0 - Co - 1.25-I C 1.00 cu - 0.75- - 0.50 -- (I) : 0.25- 000 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 Period Seconds t1cR-222c05 T U E 03:44 PM 0IT OF CPiRSL8AD FAX W. 7O 502 8558 P 02 4 Ct Oo~ f a r b a and the appropriate school distrcta and returned to the City any building pemt without a completed school fee form. This form must be completed by the City, the ppIca pnor to issiing a building permit. The City will not issyj Project Name* IOr 6uh1rg Permit Plan Check Number Project Address: Project Applicant (Owner Name): (W(f Project Descriphom Budding Type Residential: Second Dwelling Unit: Residential Additions. Commercial/industrial: City Certification of Applicant Information: Feet of a in New Dwell in2 _ Square Feet of Lng Area frt SU Net Square Feet Ow Area 7'Y Square Feet We -Clsbad Urified Sho) District S4n Marcos UnfLed School Distnct 6225 El Camino ReL 215 Mt Way Macos, CA 92069 (299.2649) Contac;:N Doire At Encinitas Uwon Sch1 District i Si Oieguiw Union High Sthooi District 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd 710 EricinitL% Slvd. E.ncinitus, CA 92021 (944-400 ext I Encinita& CA 92024 (753-6491) rtI?icaton of Applicant/Owners, The person executing 41 decloration ("Owr) csrtifles urer penalty of perjury that () the nfomattnn provided above is correct and true to the br of the Ownera knowledge,arbd that the Owner Ml fa art amehde ceiation of payment and pay the addition l fee if Olfrwr request n increase in the iumber of dwelling units or square t*toga after the b ding permit io iaaue or he n(tla terrinaor of units or square footage is foari d to he iricarret, end that (2) the Own is the velo r of the aoov cribed prpjec.t(s), o that the person executing this decleratlon i outnntzed i9l cmi Wall the w rcv Avenue v Car bad. CA 920087314 (7€0) 602-2700 iAR-22-2UO5 TUE 03:46 PM CITY OF CRSLBAD FAX NO. 76C 602 8558 P. 03 SCHOOL DISTRtCT (To be complo ***ft *****ø*P* THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE PROJECT HAVE CHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION jd by the school district(s)) ;HOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE EN OR WILL BE, SATISFIED. SCHOOL DISTRICT: The undersigned, being duly authorized b he applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied11~e obHgatiOn for school faciUties. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid ailJmounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School Distri. The City may issue building permits for this project SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCH DISTRICT OFFICIAL NISAKEN F EMAN TITLE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT 3225 EL CAMINO REAL _C4RSACA92oog_— DATE b4? PHONE NUMBER C8043221 1240 PINE AV CBAD ICHIERI RES- 1313SF ADDITIO ROR FAM RM. STUDY & MSTR SUITE RESDNTL RAID ot# WORTHING INC. B. A. cu3 th2D. Ll CeJcL(- EtcQ CLVY //Z; ZYeJc, ?vi-) 1Ai&ft ( CJ rtL-4 iL cL114e- ry ScM)e DL I/0s C J /l LJt IL f /c. [c77 17 tIDiNG PLANNING O~ ENGINEERING FIRE APPRIFORM HEALTH DEPT HAZMAT I MR QUAI. OTHER SEWER D$STR TO FROM SCHOOL PORM CFD FORM P E & M WORKSHEET&d BLDG FEES COMPLETE PLAN CORR ENG CORR ESGIL CORR FIRE CORR