The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About129 CHINQUAPIN AVE; ; CB002095; Permit06-04-2002 'Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: ..Valuation: Occupancy Group: '# Dwelling Units: Bedrooms: project Title: City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Residential Permit Permit No: CB002095 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 129 CHINQUAPIN AV CBAD RESDNTL 2060700400 $242,902.00 6 1 3 THE PALISADES SFD 2833 SF, GAR 420 SF, BALC 78 SF Sub Type: SFD Lot #: 0 Construction Type: VN Reference #: Structure Type: SFD Bathrooms: 3.5 Status: ISSUED Applied: 06/02/2000 Entered By: JM Plan Approved: 06/01/2001 Issued: 06/04/2002 Inspect Area: OrigPC#: Plan ChecfiK>0 06/04/02 0002 01 Applicant: CSTC :C/O SOUTHLAND COMMUNITIES 0NE COLUMBIA #2020 ,'A'LISO VIEJO, CA 92656 • J949 362-9700 Owner: BEACH KING INC C/O SOUTHLAND COMMUNITIES ONE COLUMBIA #2020 . ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656 02 560.78 Total Fees: $23,211.26 Total Payments To Date: $22,650.47 Balance Due:$560.78 Building Permit Add'l Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add'l Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park in Lieu Fee Park Fee LFMFee Bridge Fee Other Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add'l Renewal Fee Other Building Fee Pot. Water Con. Fee Meter Size Add'l Pot. Water Con. Fee Reel. Water Con. Fee $1,121.58 Meter Size $0.00 Add'l Reel. Water Con. Fee $729.03 Meter Fee $0.00 SDCWAFee $0.00 CFD Payoff Fee $24.29 PFF $0.00 PFF (CFD Fund) $0.00 License Tax $0.00 License Tax (CFD Fund) $0.00 Traffic Impact Fee $0.00 Traffic Impact (CFD Fund) $0.00 Sidewalk Fee $0.00 PLUMBING TOTAL $560.79 ELECTRICAL TOTAL $0.00 MECHANICAL TOTAL $0.00 Housing Impact Fee $2,400.00 Housing InLieu Fee D5/8 Master Drainage Fee $0.00 Sewer Fee $0.00 Additional Fees TOTAL PERMIT FEES $0.00 $80.00 $1,871.00 $0.00 $4,420.82 $4,080.75 $0.00 $0.00 $432.40 $487.60 $0.00 $217.00 $60.00 $59.00 $0.00 $4,515.00 $0.00 $1,959.00 $193.00 $23,211.26 Inspector^ FINAL APPRO/AL Date: _J Clearance: NOTICE: Please take'NOTICEMhat approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions.J* You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing iri accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been oiven a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 1, PROJECT INFORMATION Iffid" FOR OFFICE USE PLAN CHECK NO EST. VAL. P Plan Ck. Deposit.,— .7&* / Validated By \/ W..T. X /v /. i„ 9004 Ob/iM/w uuuJ Date r> .r>rMW f*T CXfc^O fjQ Business Name (at this address) Legal Description Lot No.Subdivision Name/Number Unit No.Phase No.Total # of units Assessor's Parcel #Existing Use Proposed Use Description of Work «(if< i 2. CONTACT PERSON (if different from applicant) A| #of Stories tt of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms Name 3, APPLICANT Address City Contractor Q Agent for Contractor Q Owner D Agent for Owner . !n,£. State/Zip Telephone # Fax # Name 4. Address City State/Zip Telephone PERTY OWNER .ddress City State/Zip Telephone #Name S. CONTRACTOR - COMPANY NAME ' . , (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exeroptjqp. Any violation of£e#i?n 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars I City State/Zip City Business License # State License # 6. WORKERS' COMPENSATION Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: Q / I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance work for which this permit is issued. I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issueJb My worker's compensajion insurance carrier and policy number are: . Insurance Company £^ 1 C&TMSf? Policy No. W^)"/*!? j£^'7<£» Expiration Date (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED^ THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS) CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to Become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,00/31, in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE ^J^k^j^ . DATE 7. OWNER-BUILi|f£M$KRATION I hereby affirm that Tarn exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: O I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). O I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). Q I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement, fj YES QNO 2.. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? d YES L~] NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? d YES Q NO \s the facility to be constructed within 1 ,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? O YES d NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. 8. CO|^|||lCTiO|iiiiSlNljAGENCY ^ I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME ^£V\igY# ( Y? &V\t +— LENDER'S ADDRESS _ __ 9. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the CitV of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is comrnenceid for a period of 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance City of Carlsbad Final Building Inspection Dept: Building Engineering Planning CMWD St Lite Fire Plan Check #: Permit #: Project Name: Address: Contact Person: Sewer Dist: Inspected Bv: jP&& tcf Inspected Bv: Inspected Bv: Comments: CB002095 THE PALISADES SFD 2833 SF, GAR 420 SF, BALC 78 SF 129 CHINQUAPIN AV Phone: CA Water Dist: CA Date / / £2sfTZ- 5 Inspected: £ f<"Pr <* - Date Inspected: Date Inspected: Date: Permit Type: Sub Type: Lot: 0 2 Approved: * Approved: Approved: 05/12/2003 RESDNTL SFD Disapproved: Disapproved: Disapproved: Inspection List Permit*: CB002095 Type: RESDNTL SFD THE PALISADES SFD 2833 SF, GAR 420 SF, BALC 78 SF Date Inspection Item 06/11/2003 89 06/11/2003 89 06/10/2003 89 06/10/2003 89 04/08/2003 39 04/04/2003 39 12/31/2002 23 12/30/2002 23 12/24/2002 17 12/20/2002 16 12/20/2002 18 12/20/2002 84 12/18/2002 14 Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Electrical Final Electrical Gas/Test/Repairs Gas/Test/Repairs Interior Lath/Drywall Insulation Exterior Lath/Drywall Rough Combo Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin Inspector Act PY - - PY PY PY PY JE PY SR SR SR SR AP Rl Rl CO PA CA AP NR AP AP AP AP CO Comments SMOKE ALARM AT LOWER EMR BY MIKE NEED GAS TEST LEVEL REVISION SHEET FROM STRUCT ENGINEER ATTACH CO HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED/STILL ND 12/18/200218 Exterior Lath/Drywall 12/17/2002 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall 12/11/200284 Rough Combo SR SR SR 12/03/200213 Shear Panels/HD's SR 12/03/2002 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin SR 11/12/200213 Shear Panels/HD's SR 11/08/200213 Shear Panels/HD's SR 11/07/200213 Shear Panels/HD's PD 11/06/200213 Shear Panels/HD's SR 09/27/2002 15 Roof/Reroof SR 08/20/2002 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers SR 08/15/200222 Sewer/Water Service SR 08/09/2002 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers SR 08/08/2002 21 Underground/Under Floor SR 08/07/2002 21 Underground/Under Floor SR CO CO CO AP NR CO CO CA CA CO AP AP AP AP CO STRUCT ENGIN STAMPED PAPER WORK ON REV FOR FRME • WEEP SCREED TOUCHING GROUND/HOLES NEED CAULKING/NEEDS TIGHTER NAILING NEEDS TO ADDRESS FLASHING AROUND WINDOWS/NEED TIGHTER NAILING HEADER, POST, JOIST ISSUES, PLUMBING & ELECT OK. LEFT LIST OF CORRECTIONS ON SITE REVISION LETTER PLACED, IN FILE ALL CO HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED BUT STIL ND STRUCT ENG FIX FOR SHEAR PANELS NOT @ CO LENGTH NEED TIGHTER NAILING/ND A-35 IN PLACE SHEAR WALLS TO SHORT ETC/NEED SHEAR TFR AS PER PLAN BY MIKE !. TRUSS PACKAGE NOT PER PLAN OK TO POUR FTG AND FLAT WORK IN THE GARAGE CLEAN OUT IN/RUNNING WATER TEST OK SET BACK CERT AND GRADING CERT ATTACHED, NEED COPY OF SOILS REPORT ; NEEDS TO PUT IN CLEAN OUT FOR UPPER TOILER. NEEDS TO PRESSURIZE SYSTEM (LEAKING FROM CLEAN OUT CAP) Tuesday, June 17, 2003 Page 1 of 1 City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 06/11/2003 Permit* CB002095 Title: THE PALISADES Description: SFD 2833 SF, GAR 420 SF, BALC 78 SF Type: RESDNTL Job Address: Suite: Location: APPLICANT CSTC Owner: Remarks: Sub Type: SFD 129 CHINQUAPIN AV Lot 0 Inspector Assignment: PY Phone: 7604859269 Inspector: Total Time: CD Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Requested By: NA Entered By: CHRISTINE Act Comment Date, 04/08/2003 04/04/2003 12/31/2002 12/30/2002 12/24/2002 12/20/2002 12/20/2002 12/20/2002 12/18/2002 Associated PCRs/CVs PCR02160 ISSUED THE PALISADES; REVISE Inspection History Description 39 Final Ele 39 Final Ele 23 Gas/Tesl 23 Gas/Tes1 17 Interior L 16 Insulation KITCHEN 12/11 /2002 84 Rough Combo Act ctrical PA ctrical CA I/Repairs AP t/Repairs NR ath/Drywall AP i AP .ath/Drywall AP ombp AP teel/Bolting/Welding CO .ath/Drywall CO .ath/Drywall CO ombo CO mels/HD's AP Insp PY PY PY JE PY SR SR SR SR SR SR SR SR Comments EMR BY MIKE ; NEED GAS TEST REVISION SHEET FROM STRUCT ENGINEER ATTACH CO HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED/STILL ND STRUCTENGIN STAMPED PAPER WORK ON REV FOR FRME WEEP SCREED TOUCHING GROUND/HOLES NEED CAULKING/NEEDS TIGHTER NAILING j NEEDS TO ADDRESS FLASHING AROUND WINDOWS/NEED TIGHTER NAILING ', HEADER, POST, JOIST ISSUES, PLUMBING & ELECT OK OF CORRECTIONS ON SITE REVISION LETTER PLACED IN FILE . LEFT LIST City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For. 12/20/2002 Permit* CB002095 Title: THE PALISADES Description: SFD 2833 SF, GAR 420 SF, BALC 78 SF Inspector Assignment: SR Type: RESDNTL Job Address: Suite: Location: APPLICANT CSTC Owner: Remarks: Sub Type: SFD 129 CHINQUAPIN AV Lot 0 Phone: 7602505151 Inspector: Total Time: CD Description 16 Insulation 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 24 Rough/Topout 34 Rough Electric 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers Act Comment Requested By: MIKE Entered By: CHRISTINE ; Q£ {WAtcW IT Associated PCRs/CVs PCR02160 ISSUED THE PALISADES; REVISE KITCHEN Inspection History Date Description Act Insp Comments 12/18/2002 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding CO SR CO HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED/STILL ND STRUCT ENGIN STAMPED PAPER WORK ON REV FOR FRME CO SR WEEP SCREED TOUCHING GROUND/HOLES NEED CAULKING/NEEDS TIGHTER NAILING : CO SR . NEEDS TO ADDRESS FLASHING AROUND WINDOWS/NEED TIGHTER NAILING CO SR HEADER, POST, JOIST ISSUES, PLUMBING & ELECT OK. LEFT LIST OF CORRECTIONS ON SITE i AP SR REVISION LETTER PLACED IN FILE 12/03/2002 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding NR SR ! CO SR ALL CO HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED BUT STIL ND STRUCT ENG FIX FOR SHEAR PANELS NOT @ CO LENGTH ; CO SR NEED TIGHTER NAILING/ND A-35 IN PLACE SHEAR WALLS TO SHORT ETC/NEED SHEAR TFR AS PER PLAN 12/18/2002 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall 12/17/2002 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall 12/11 /2002 84 Rough Combo 12/03/2002 13 Shear Panels/HD's 12/03/2002 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting 11/12/2002 13 Shear Panels/HD's 11/08/2002 13 Shear Panels/HD's FU Maciel DATE DEC-14-02 COMPANY CITY OF CARLSBAD ATTN BUILDING DEPT. PROJECT 129 CHINQUAPIN AVE BE NOTCHED 4X6 COLUMN FIX 714 835 1428 AL MACIEL p.3 2017 W. Also Ave Santa Ana, CA 9270S ph. 7 14 285 1 I 2 1 Rl Maciel DATE DEC-14-02 COMPANY CITY OF CARLSBAD ATTN BUILDING DEPT. PROJECT 129 CHINQUAPIN AVE RE HEADER FIX 714 835 1428 AL MACfEL P.I . 'A 2017 w. Alco Ave Santa Ana, CA 92703 ph. 714 285 1121 City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 12/18/2002 Permit# CB002095 Title: THE PALISADES Description: SFD 2833 SF, GAR 420 SF, BALC 78 SF Inspector Assignment: SR . Type: RESDNTL Job Address: Suite: Location: APPLICANT CSTC Owner: Remarks: Sub Type: SFD 129 CHINQUAPIN AV Lot 0 Phone: 7602505151 Inspector: Total Time: CD Description 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall Act Requested By: MIKE Entered By: CHRISTINE tf^ I J Associated PCRs/CVs PCR02160 ISSUED THE PALISADES; REVISE KITCHEN Inspection History Date Description 12/11 /2002 84 Rough Combo Act CO 12/03/2002 13 Shear Panels/HD's 12/03/2002 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 11/12/2002 13 Shear Panels/HD's Insp Comments SR HEADER, POST, JOIST ISSUES, PLUMBING & ELECT OK. LEFT LIST OF CORRECTIONS ON SITE AP SR REVISION LETTER PLACED IN FILE NR SR CO SR 11/08/2002 13 Shear Panels/HD's CO SR 11/07/2002 13 Shear Panels/HD's CA PD 11/06/2002 13 Shear Panels/HD's CA SR 09/27/2002 15 Roof/Reroof CO SR 08/20/2002 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP SR 08/15/2002 22 Sewer/Water Service AP SR 08/09/2002 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers . AP SR 08/08/2002 21 Underground/Under Floor AP SR 08/07/2002 21 Underground/Under Floor CO SR ALL CO HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED BUT STIL ND STRUCT ENG FIX FOR SHEAR PANELS NOT @ CO LENGTH NEED TIGHTER NAILING/ND A-35 IN PLACE SHEAR WALLS TO SHORT ETC/NEED SHEAR TFR AS PER PLAN BY MIKE TRUSS PACKAGE NOT PER PLAN OK TO POUR FTG AND FLAT WORK IN THE GARAGE CLEAN OUT IN/RUNNING WATER TEST OK SET BACK CERT AND GRADING CERT ATTACHED, NEED COPY OF SOILS REPORT NEEDS TO PUT IN CLEAN OUT FOR UPPER TOILER. NEEDS TO PRESSURIZE SYSTEM (LEAKING FROM CLEAN OUT CAP) 1 \ OCHOA DESIGNS I.O. OCHOA, P.E. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA •CE> ax OCHOA DESIGNS I.G. OCHOA, P.E. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA (714)841-0643 RCE#35217 Exp. 9/30/03 A " City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 08/09/2002 Permit# CB002095 Title: THE PALISADES Description: SFD 2833 SF, GAR 420 SF, BALC 78 SF Inspector Assignment: SR Type: RESDNTL Job Address: Suite: Location: APPLICANT CSTC Owner: Remarks: Sub Type: SFD 129 CHINQUAPIN AV Lot 0 Phone: 7602505151 Inspector: Total Time: CD Description 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers Act Comments Requested By: MIKE Entered By: CHRISTINE Associated PCRs/CVs PCR02160 ISSUED Inspection History Date Description Act Insp Comments 08/07/2002 21 Underground/Under Floor CO SR NEEDS TO PUT IN CLEAN OUT FOR UPPER TOILER. NEEDS TO PRESSURIZE SYSTEM (LEAKING FROM CLEAN OUT CAP) 08/02/2302 11:23 B58591613B ALTA PAGE 02 ALTA CONSULTANTS FLAMMING * ENGINEERING » SURVEYING 4901 MorenaBlvd Ste. 409 San Diego, CA, 92117 Id. (619) 581-6101 Fax. (619) 581-6138 August 1,2002 City of Carlsbad Engineering Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Pad Certifications-Grading Hans, Chinquapin Avenue, Project No. MS 98-03, Parcels 1,2, & 3 Dear Sir; Grading on the above reference Parcels has been checked by our survey crew on July 31,2002 for elevations. These pads have been found to be in substantial confbrmance with the approved Grading Plans, i.e. within 0.1'+/- of the design grade. Should you require any additional information, please do not hesitate to call me at any time. Sincerely, ALTA CONSULTANTS artolome T. R.C.E. 38606 Copy: to Mr. Peter Havacamp Chinquapin Builders Inc. 27221 Ortega Highway, Suite 108 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 AUG-0S-02 03:05 PM SCO OR HrtVERKfttlP 00/07/2002 C"G;1!3 GS9531G13B AuTA T 1 4 489+4S8T; PAGE 02 P . B 1 PI -A.NMNC * ENGINEERING » SURVEYING •1901 MorcnaBlvd. Sift 409 San Diego, CA. 92117 Tel, ((519) 581-6101 Fax, (619) 581-6I3H August 7,2002 181-03a City of Carlsbad F.ntfineering Department 163 5 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Form Certifications-Grading Plans, Chinquapin Avenue, Project No. MS 98-03 Parcels 1, 2. & 3 Dear Sir; I he foundation Forms for the above reference Parcels have been checked by uur survey crew on August 77 2002. These forms have been found to be in substantial CNifofWiince \vith the approved Grading Plans. Should you require any additional information, please,do nut hesitate to call me at any time. Sincerely. ALTA CONSUT.TANTS Copy: to Mr. Peter Havacamp Chinquapin Builders Inc. 27?.?! Ortega Highway, Suite 108 Sar. Juan Capistrano, CA $2675 Special Inspector's Report Duane D. Neyens ICBONo. 105618-88 ACI No. 991027 City of San Diego No.737 Project Name: Project/Drawing No.: Project Address/ Location: Contractor: Engineer: Architect: The Palisades Chinquapin Avenue Carlsbad, California Fred Gonzalez {e>"5^]^\" \1~l^ Alta Consultants Bird Designs Report of (day, date): Shift Hours: WEATHER -Begin: End: Superintendent Pages Thursday, 3 October 2002 N/A Mike Brauckmann 4 Total Pages MATERIALS CLASSIFICATON: Type Epoxy Brand/Description Simpson SET Classification ICBO ER5279 Narrative Report of Operation: On Wednesday, 2 October and Thursday, 3 October I checked drilled holes in the following structures for cleanliness and depth and observed epoxy placement of 5/8" diameter all-thread rods into these holes to an embedment depth of 5+" and 7/8" diameter all-thread rods into these holes to an embedment depth of 14+". Permit No. ©B'002093 CB'002094' CB 002095 Address 121 Chinquapin Ave 125 Chinquapin Ave ^- 129 Chinquapin Ave ^ Qty.5/8" 22 29 34 Qty. 7/8" 1 0 1 The diagrams on the following pages show approximate placement of the anchor bolts indicated in this report. 129 Chinquapin Ave CB 002095 O = 5/8" Rod embedded 5"+ « = 7/8" Rod embedded 14"+ Engineer designed details were not available and this report makes no representation as to conformance with structural requirements. Inspection consisted only of observations based on typical practices in similar applications. Engineer's review is still necessary. (End of Narrative Report) Project Engineer /Project Inspector Signa, are/Date: [ \ f ^ Duane D. Neyens 1^( <T international Conference of Building Officials' DUANE D NEYENS CERTIFIED SPECIAL INSPECTOR REINFORCED CONCRETE 1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE The individual named nereon is CERTIFIED in me category shown, having been so certified pursuant to successful completion of the prescribed written examination, f j I )•• Expiration date: July 16,2003 \J \J No. 1059618-88 &**&-$. X, Not valid unless signeciby^rtificate holder. ICBO certification attests to competent knowledge of codes and standards. Applicable experience should be verified by local jurisdictions. AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE ' This is to certify that i DuaneD Neyens ; Ip#99llJ27 , U5!<i' has demonstrated kmrtftedge an* a$u?$r by successful completing the AGI certification requirements and is hereby recognized as an U3 ACI CONCRETE FpajJ-<HBSTING TECHNICIAN ** GRADE I Examiner: Ed fioVe ''-^ Date: 05/16/1998 Expires: , 05/16/2083^ •S3 Valid card bears ACI T,i jo *••:«: EsGil Corporation In Partnership with Government for^Building Safety DATE: 08/16/OO . a APPLICANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad , U HLANREVIEWER ;; * a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 2095 SET: HI PROJECT ADDRESS: 129 Chinquapin Ave. PROJECT NAME: The Palisades SFD Parcel 3 (PLan 3) X] The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building cod when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: I | Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. I I Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: 3; By: Kal Tumalieh Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 08/07/00 • trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 * Fax (858) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation In Partnership with Government for Building Safety DATE: 07/27/OO a AEEUCANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 2095 SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 129 Chinquapin Ave. PROJECT NAME: The Palisades SFD Parcel 3 I | The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. I | The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. XI The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Al Maciel One Columbia, ste 2020,Aiiso Viejo, CA 92656 I | Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. XI Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Al Maciel Telephone #.: (949) 362-9700 Ext. 28 Date contacted: 7 fe?fao (by: F*-# Fax #: & 4 $ 3 C»2 • 131 2- Mail '-^felephone Fax c~"^ln Person REMARKS: By: Kal Tumalieh Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 07/17/00 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 4 Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 2095 07/27/00 • Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: a) Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602- 2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. b) Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 8. Provide stairway and landing details. Sections 1003.3.3. • Rise may be 8" maximum and run 9" minimum. Show on detail (3/D2). The requested information was not received. • STRUCTURAL 16. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents. The requested information was not received. 17. Provide truss details and truss calculations for this project. Please note that the City of Carlsbad does not accept deferred submittal for roof trusses. The requested information was not received. 19. Provide a complete Manufacturer roof truss drawings. Package shall include the following: • Truss layout plan. • Required roof truss hangers. The requested information was not received. i- *> 20. Project engineer of record to review and stamp trusses layout plan (or provide a letter) manufacturer roof truss drawings. The requested information was not received. 22. Cross-reference all calculations to plans. Please number all beams, to allow me to currently check structural calculations. For example show where do beams BM 5 and H-23 occur on framing plans. Show location of header H-23. Please cloud location. Carlsbad 2095 07/27/OO 27. Revise the design of cantilevered steel column design . Use R=2.2 instead of 5.5 per UBC Table 16 -N. Revise detail (11/3bl). Revise size of steel tube shown on plan section of pile foundation. 28. Show detail of top plate splice on plans. See Calculations page 12. Detail (18/SD2) is not found. • To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. • Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. • Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: • Yes Q No a • The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Kal Tumalieh at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. EsGii Corporation In Partners/tip witd government for Quidling Safety Date: Time Sent: FAX TRANSMITTAL Number of Pages Being Transmitted: (Including Fax Transmittal) To:From:C Phone #: Fax#: Remarks: Hard Copy Mailed? YES NO 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 ^ San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 ^ Fax (858) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation In Partnership with government for 'Building Safety DATE: 7/27/2000 a APPLICANT a JURIS. JURISDICTION: Santa Monica a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 9785 SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 1432 7th Street PROJECT NAME: 5 story apartment-MECH TI The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. X] The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. XI The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: David Essey 429 Santa Monica Boulevard Suite 270, SM 90401 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. XI Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: 310 260-1236 X24 Date contacted:^?& ?l°c (by: f A)c) Fax #: fa o) ^c,o . ^c/(. Mail ^ Telephone Fax ^ In Person REMARKS: Mechanical recheck only, the electric was not submitted for a recheck. By: Eric Jensen Enclosures: Esgil Corporation GA n MB D EJ Q PC 7/21/2000 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 4 (858)560-1468 <* Fax (858) 560-1576 Santa Monica 9785 7/27/2000 GENERAL PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Santa Monica PROJECT ADDRESS: 1432 7th Street DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 7/21/2000 REVIEWED BY: Eric Jensen PLAN CHECK NO.: 9785 DATE REVIEW COMPLETED: 7/27/2OOO FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. • Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new complete sets of prints to: ESGIL CORPORATION. • To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. • Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? Q Yes Q No No energy forms with the electrical or mechanical sets. MECHANICAL (1997 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) Exhaust fan terminations must be a minimum of 3' away from openings back into the building and from adjacent property lines. Please show so on the plans. Note not provided, the fans on the south/west side of the building appear to be closer than the three feet. Santa Monica 9785 7/27/2000 2. Describe how the ceiling rating is maintained at the bathroom exhaust fan penetrations. Where is the rated construction for the floor/ceiling assembly? Does the exhaust fan compromise this rated assembly? 3. Show how make up air is provided to the laundry rooms for operation of the clothes dryers. Provide the architectural specifications (from architectural plans) for the laundry room windows describing them as "sliders".. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Eric Jensen at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. EsGil Corporation In Partnership with Government for Building Safety DATE: O6/16/OO a APPL JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 2095 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 121 Chinquapin Ave. PROJECT NAME: The Palisades SFD Parcel 3 The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. I The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. 3 The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Al Maciel One Columbia, ste 2020,Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. XI Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Al Maciel (V-M) Telephone #: (949) 362-9700 *• 2 £ Date contacted:c.) 1^/00 (by: |c- ) Fax #: Mail \^>Telephone V" Fax In Person REMARKS: By: Kal Tumalieh Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 06/06/00 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 * San Diego, California 92123 * (858) 560-1468 «• Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 2095 O6/16/00 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 2095 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 121 Chinquapin Ave. STORIES: Two HEIGHT: 26Ft. (App. per UBC) REMARKS: FLOOR AREA: 2833 (R-3) 420 (U-l) DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: 06/16/00 DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 06/06/00 PLAN REVIEWER: Kal Tumalieh FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 1998 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 1997 UBC, 1997 UPC, 1997 UMC and 1996 NEC (all effective 7/1/99). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e.. plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad 2O95 06/16/00 • Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: a) Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602- 2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. b) Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 1. All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). 2. Plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, for plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction. Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code). Project engineer of record to sign and stamp structural calculations. 3. On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in a format similar to that shown below. Section 106.3.2. • REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require Special Inspection in accordance with Sec. 1701 of the Uniform Building Code. ITEM • SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION 4. When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. Please review Section 106.3.5. Please complete the attached form. 5. Show locations of permanently wired smoke detectors with battery backup: a) When sleeping rooms are upstairs, at the upper level in close proximity to the stair. Carlsbad 2O95 06/16/OO 6. Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406.4 (see exceptions): a) Fixed and sliding panels of sliding door assemblies and panels in swinging doors other than wardrobe doors. b) Doors and enclosures for bathtubs and showers and in any portion of a building wall enclosing these compartments where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above a standing surface and drain inlet. This applies to windows in master bath. c) Fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24-inch arc of either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the walking surface. This applies to window in master bedroom, dining, living room and at entry. 7. Cross reference detail (10/D-2) to plans. 8. Provide stairway and landing details. Sections 1003.3.3. a) Rise may be 8" maximum and run 9" minimum. Show on detail (3/D2). 9. Provide skylight details to show compliance with Sections 2409 and 2603, or specify on the plans the following information for the skylight(s), per Section 106.3.3: a) ICBO approval number, or equal. 10. Garage requires one-hour fire protection on the garage ceiling common to the dwelling. Table 3-B, Section 302.4.a) Provide 2 layers of 1/2" of type "X" Gyp. Boards for TJI floor joists, per ICBO approval for TJI (NER 200). • MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 11. Note that passageway to the attic furnace shall be unobstructed not less than 30" high and 30" wide and have continuous solid flooring not less than 24 inches wide, not more than 20 feet in length through the attic. Section 307.3.2, UMC. 12. Show permanent electrical outlet and lighting fixture controlled by a switch for furnace located in attic space. Sections 306.3 and 306.4, UMC. 13. Specify on the plans the following information for the fireplace(s), per Section 106.3.3: a) Show height of chimney above roof per I.C.B.O. approval or UBC Table 31-B. Carlsbad 2095 06/16/00 • ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE) 14. Show on the plan the amperage of the electrical service, the location of the service panel and the location of any sub-panels. If service is over 200 amps, submit single line diagram, panel schedule and load calculations. • STRUCTURAL 15. Show on plans the required building setback from top/toe of the slope per UBC (Sectionl806.5) and Figure 18-1-1. 16. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents. 17. Specify the required cement type on plans per soil report recommendations on page 11. . • 18. Provide truss details and truss calculations for this project. Please note that the City of Carlsbad does not accept deferred submittal for roof trusses. 19. Provide a complete Manufacturer roof truss drawings. Package shall include the following • Truss layout plan. • Required roof truss hangers. 20. Project engineer of record to review and stamp trusses layout plan (or provide a letter) manufacturer roof truss drawings. 22. Cross-reference all calculations to plans. Please number all beams, to allow me to currently check structural calculations. For example show where do beams BM 5 and H-23 occur on framing plans. 23. Revise the design of roof headers H21 & H22. Please include the roof loads in design and verify headers span. 24. Revise the design of floor beam BM2. Please include Point load due to the reaction of beam BM4 in design. 25. Show the size of header H22 on plans. 26. Revise First shear wall label along grid line (F). Label shown on plans does not agree with calculations. 27. Revise the design of cantilevered steel column design . Use R=2.2 instead of 5.5 per UBC Table 16-N. Carlsbad 2O95 06/16/OO 28. Show detail of top plate splice on plans. See Calculations page 12. • To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. • Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. • Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: • Yes Q No Q The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Kal Tumalieh at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 2O95 O6/16/00 SPECIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ' PLAN CHECK NUMBER: OWNER'S NAME: I, as the owner, or agent of the owner (contractors may not employ the special inspector), certify that I, or the architect/engineer of record, will be responsible for employing the special inspector(s) as required by Uniform Building Code (UBC) Section 1701.1 for the construction project located at the site listed above. UBC Section 106.3.5. Signed I, as the engineer/architect of record, certify that I have prepared the following special inspection program as required by UBC Section 106.3.5 for the construction project located at the site listed above. EngineerVArcMect's Seal & Signature Here Signed 1. List of work requiring special inspection: n Soils Compliance Prior to Foundation Inspection G Field Welding D Structural Concrete Over 2500 PSI G High Strength Bolting D Prestressed Concrete G Expansion/Epoxy Anchors G Structural Masonry G Sprayed-On Fireproofing G Designer Specified G Other 2. Name(s) of individual(s) or firm(s) responsible for the special inspections listed above: . A. ; . B. , , , ; c. ; ' 3. Duties of the special inspectors for the work listed above: A. B. C. Special inspectors shall check in with the City and present their credentials for approval prior to beginning work on the job site. 21. Carlsbad 2095 06/16/OO VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PREPARED BY: Kal Tumalieh BUILDING ADDRESS: 121 Chinquapin Ave. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-3/U-1 PLAN CHECK NO.: 2095 DATE: 06/16/00 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN BUILDING PORTION Dwelling Garage Balcony Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE BUILDING AREA ( Sq. Ft.) 2833 420 78 2833 VALUATION MULTIPLIER City Est CityEst City Est. > City Est. VALUE (•$) 242,902 242,902 242,902 D 199 UBC Building Permit Fee £3 Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ 1121.57 D 199 UBC Plan Check Fee £3 Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 729.02 Type of Review: £3 Complete Review Q Structural Only Q Hourly D Repetitive Fee Applicable O Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 583.21 Comments: Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc 5100 City of Carlsbad Engineering Department DATE: _ BUILDING ADDRESS: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST PLANCHECK NO.: fc. /y* I I f .0 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. (jk Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: EST. VALUE: DENIAL attached reportPlease see\ the^. attached report of deficiencies marked witiy§||*1v1ake necessary corrections to plans or specifications for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. Date: Date: Date: By: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT: Date: ATTACHMENTS G Dedication Application D Dedication Checklist G Improvement Application D Improvement Checklist D Future Improvement .Agreement D Grading Permit Application D Grading Submittal Checklist 0 Right-of-Way Permit Application [] Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet D Sewer Fee Information Sheet ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Name: JOANNE JUCHNIEWICZ = City of Carlsbad Address: 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 Phone: (619) 438-1161. ext. 4510 i CFD INFORMATION Parcel Map No: Lots: Recordation: Carlsbad Tract: A-4 , CA 92009-^576 • (760) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: A) North Arrow Existing & Proposed Structures rC.) Existing Street Improvements 2. Show on site plan: Property Lines Easements Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets Driveway widths \ A.) Drainage Patterns 1. Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. 2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." '. BJ Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography Include on title sheet: Site address Assessor's Parcel Number Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different Uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE J2f 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for ' ' Project No. g /*&- Q Q Q 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: Q tja-Qf H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\Building Plancheck Cklsl BP0001 Fomi JJ.doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: _ Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 1/z" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by:Date: Q Q IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $ , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: Attached please find an application form and submitta! checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. , Improvement Plans signed by: L-L*@/C*Date: r 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $ so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Future public improvements required as follows: H:\WORDVDOCS\CHKLS'nBuildinfl Plancheck CWst BP0001 Fom JJ.doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST ist/ ond/ ord/ D Q Q 6c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement. Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Future Improvement Agreement completed by: > ' Date: • !! 1 Q Q 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. ; GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS ')' The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). Q Q Q 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. rading Inspectors'ign off by: - Date: 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) 7d.No Grading Permit required. 7e.lf grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tieing into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for: BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST H:\WORD\OOCS\CHKLS'nBuilding Planctieck Cklst BP0001 Form JJ.doc t Rev. 12/26/96 j st/ P5^ ord/ ; tf .J2 Q 9. A SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the building permit issuance. The \ fee is noted in the fees section on the following page. I Q Q 10. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 153, for assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: ;i • . Date: i . —-"'• ' . ' \ Q Q 11.NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. j Q 12. EfRequired fees are attached 1~7>W- &$~ l/4\ We- Q No fees required c^^c 9<7^eA ^-*~O Cl 13. Additional Comments: H:\WORD\DO.CS\CHKLST\Buildin8 Planeheck Cklsl BP0001 Forni JJ.doc D JE &[ C ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant. Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal. Address:Bldg. Permit No. Prepared by: Q\\ Date: Sj (j/Q I Checked by: ' t EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footage.s for all uses. Types of Use: ^ffC. Sq. Ft./Units: .'• Types of Use: . • - • Sq. Ft./Units: Date: APT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: ^?ffl* Sq. Ft./Units:;.- Types of Use: . . .Sq. Ft./Units: __ EDU's: EDU's: ADT's: ADT's: FEES REQUIRED: WITHIN CFD: D YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee .in District #1, reduced Traffic Impact Fee); ;,,^m..-.- , . PARK-IN-LIEU FEE FEE/UNIT: PARK AREA &#:• X ; N0; UNITS: 2, TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ADT's/UNITS:X FEE/ADT: T BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE (DIST, #1 : DIST, #2 ADT's/UNITS: X .FEE/APT: .FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE' ZONE:t;,f : DIST. #3 UNIT/SQ.FT.: 5. SEWER FEE EDU's: [_ X i FEE/SQ.FT./UNIT:= $ FEE/EDU:= $ FIT AREA: EDU's:FEE/EDU: 6. SEWER LATERAL ($2,500) 7. DRAINAGE FEES PLDA_ ACRES: = $ HIGH :/LOW FEE/AC: 8. POTABLE WATER FEES UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE METER FEE SDCWA FEE IRRIGATION Word\Docs\Misforms\FeeCalculation,Worksheel Iof2 Rev. 7/14/00 § C, o I J I PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No. CB Planner APN: OO ~ Z-O Address Van Lvnch Phone (760)602-4613 - 070-&Y Type of Project & Use: /2-6S ?/*>(>£&-/=*- Zoning: £-"3> General Plan: fLtf CFD (in/0Cit))# Date of participation: _Net Project Density :^_ DU/AC Facilities Management Zone: J- Circfe-efie Remaining net dev acres: —- (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit: I ) D Legend:X Item Complete Environmental Review Required: DATE OF COMPLETION: //'- ' Item Incomplete - Needs your action YES X NO TYPE Compliance with conditions of "approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Discretionary Action Required: APPROVAL/RESO. NO. PROJECT NO. YES X NO DATE /• TYPE OTHER RELATED CASES : - flab <?8-o iff-1 ^ 5 Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: &<^ £A»>b$<=*P&~ 'PuJ XH/W/L , At t/^/o/2- O- _j . _ Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES X. NO CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES X NO %& If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 3111 Camiho Del Rio North, Suite 200,,San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619) 521-8036 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #: YES NO Follow-Up Actions: 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete Coastal .Permit Determination Log as needed. Q Q] i =. Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES )<f NO (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES NO (A/P/Ds/Activity1 Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) , Site Plan:t • • - • - » • .-• j Q Q 1. Provide a fully dimensiqnak site ,;plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, -tv property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensjonal setbacks and existing y- topographical lines. ~_ ; /" PI PI 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. D D Zoning: 1 . Setbacks: Front: . -' • i , < ' . ' - V, Interior Side: Street Side: Rear: Required J~~ Required , , i^*- S~' Required ' • Required Vof 0. Q Q] 2. Accessory structure setbacks: Front: x , Required v .--. •- .. Interior Side: Street Side: - (. ••- V"" Rear: '.."/ -''^ *• •- ' Structure separation: l£Js,O D- - 3, Xot,Coyerage:.v^,, .^r> -.-.--,. ,N ,.j-\ ^.---.-v-v. V).. '.•:'. .^Vx?V- .. ^VA(\ .. S/D^D • -4. Height: [SvO CH ^- Parkin9: Spaces Guest Spaces I/V PI (~~| Additional Comments Required \/, Required /A Required Cl-N --^/^ " Required , ,--—-. i ;^ Required ^ > £-&P. *b~ -^ Required 2^¥ ' Required 2— Required 7__ Shown -._r ; Shown ; -Mt £-' Shown - — Shown H^' ':/ C'^ \ 'X Shown Shown Shown I/A Shown ; ^ Shown \ Shown ;• -•-'• '" ^H- J~%-> Shown i 2- 9 r ' Shown Z-_ , ' Shown 2. A , • ' '*•*.,_- i• ' V • : \ • *•• . \ -• ^'i, ; "° •• v^"r^iv,';;;;"j-' • 'tV' . • : OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER DATE - MAY-17-2001 THU 02:33 PM CITY OF CARLSBAD FAX NO. 760 602 8558 P, 05 City of Carlsbad Fire Department Office of Fire Protection Services ADDENDUM TO BUILDING PERMIT This will serve as a reminder to the applicant. By signature, the applicant agrees to comply with these requirements as part of the building permit process: an all weather access road will be provided and maintained during the construction phase, and fire hydrants must be operational prior to combustibles being brought on site If you need further clarification, please contact the Fire Protection Services Department at the telephone number listed below. Thank you. Michael E. Smith Fire Marshal Signature of Applicant \ * '/^^<J^ 4^M Company Name j Phone Number 03/23/2001 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad. CA 92008 • (760) 602-4660 • FAX (760) 602-8561 OCHOA DESIGNS 7692 QUEBEC DRIVE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 (714)841-0643 PROJECT: 129 Chinquapin Ave. CARLSBAD, CA. (THE PALISADES) CRITERIA: CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE 1998 MATERIALS: EXCEPT AS NOTED OTHERWISE Ignacio G. Ochoa, PE RCE#35217 Exp. 09/30/03 CONCRETE FOUNDATION SOIL CONCRETE BLOCK BRICK REINFORCED STEEL STRUCTURAL STEEL WELDING STRUCTURAL PIPE PLYWOOD SHEATHING GLUE LM BEAMS LUMBER SOIL PRESSURE DESIGN REFERENCES: CONCRETE CONCRETE BLOCK STEEL LUMBER 2500 PSI AT 28 DAYS 2000 PSF GRADE N, LT WT UNITS (ASTM C-90) PER ASTM C-62, MW GRADE 20,000 PSI (ASTM A-615 GRADE 0) 24,000 PSI (ASTM A-36, COMPACT) AISC 1997 ED. ELECT ARC PROCESSBY CERTIFIED WELDERS 35000 PSI (ASTM A-53) GRADE B DOUGLAS FIR, STRUC 1, INTR., P.S. 1-76 2400 PSI (D.F. COMB F2) GRADE MARKED DF PER WCLB GRDG RULE 16 2000 PSF ACI DESIGN HANDBOOK CONG MASONRY DESIGN MANUAL, CMA MANUAL OF STEEL CONST. AISC WOOD STRUCT DESIGN DATA, NLMA ALL WOOD DOUGLAS FIR LARCH: Fv No. 2 95 PSI No. 1 85 PSI GLB 165 PSI Fb 875 PSI 1350 PSI 2400 PSI E(X1000000) 1.6 PSI 1.6 PSI 1.8 PSI OCHOA DESIGNS BEACH, CA RCE#35217 Exp. 3 ••;- •* 70,0 fSf fjr LL- I- OCHOA DESIGNS 3 »\ T ! II ^ *1 H 1 .K* I.G. OCHOA, P.E. (714) 841-0643 RCE#35217 Exp. 9/30/03 OCHO4 DESIGNS rig. *.' feG. OGHOA, P.E. (714)841-0643 ' RCE#35217 Exp. 9/30/03 4 4x4 M \A* - 4(3. 5) IQ^.- ^ 3 * <5 '^ 3 S* X . ^ * f (714) 841-0643 RCE#35217 Exp. 9/30/03 \\ 1.1. v\ HUNTiNGTON (714) 841-0643 RCE#35217 Exp. 9/30/03 V Rio S = 30. V\ =4 j( -7 .so ^4x5 = 36.'f (J- HUNTINGTON BEACH, €Jt (714) 841-0643 lpE#35217 Exp. 9/30/03 4* a n -"7 11 4/606)) = X* s'-fe c( \<f OCHA DESIGNS BEACH, CA ., , RCE^35217 Exp^i/30/03 "-•'4- -7- OCHOA DESIGNS RCE#352mExp. 9/3tmi|; 4* f 0 %X(L ^ *7— 56.W- fe. = is , \l- 4s t OCHOA DESIGNS I.G. OCHOA, P.E. vHUNT1N£TON.-BF£$ ih^ (714) 8^1-0643 RCE#35217 Exp. 9/30/03 (ill. •OCHOA DESIGNS •JL oo '\ a b > 3?<f K^OCHOA.P.E. (714) 841-0843 RGE#35217 Exp. 9/30/03 /O- V Mt ' OCH&A DESIGNS HUNTINGf Of (714)841-0643 ! ' RCE#35217 Exp. 9/30/03 8 a OCHOA HUNTINGTON BEACH, SI (7,f! 4) 841-0643 ilfeE#35217 Exp. 9/30/03 DESIGNS ^11NGTON BEACH, CA l4fl4f-£^43 • ' RCE#35217 E^|K 9/30/03 f ° oO AJ * fe) j/0/2- (^) H'i QCHQA DESIGNS ,CA 'I ,S f f \x-A ^ OCHOA DESIGNS I.G. OCHOA, P.E. HUNTINGTQN BB*§M^ (714)841-0643 ":" RCE#35217 Exp. 9/30/03 u - ^ 3(7) m - * s. a' i/ fuf = /I 5 0 is- OCHOA DESIGNS d: - I.G. OGHOA, P.E. $ , i '- 3 •> RCE#35217 Exp. 9/30/03 X O O^liS^DESIGNS ,<-t^\tVr I^D \i vl x |51O entn oooa:So UXOw >~9 HM| ±< tog QiS o U (L O LLt O O pq ^^ pu OH/^^2 W Q ICBO Evaluation Service, Inc. 5360 WORKMAN MILL ROAD • WHITTIER, CALIFORNIA 90601-2299 A subsidiary corporation of the International Conference of Building Officials EVALUATION REPORT Copyright 'S> 1999 ICBO Evaluation Service, Inc. ER-4211 Reissued January 1, Filing Category: FASTENERS—Stsel Gusset Plates (066) COMPUTRUS TRUSS PLATES COMPUTRUS, INC. 10370 H1EMET STREET, SUITE 200 RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92503 1.0 SUBJECT CompuTrus Truss Plates for Wood Trusses. 2.0 DESCRIPTION 2.1 General: ' The CompuTrus Truss Plates are flat steel pfates designed to connect wood truss members. The plates are manufactured from galvanized steel and come in various lengths and widths, and have integral teeth that are designed to laterally transmit load between truss wood members. Plans and cal- culations must be submitted to the building official for trusses using truss plates described in this report. 2.2 Materials: The CompuTrus truss plates are punched from No. 1.8 gage [0.0454 inch (1.15 mm) base metal thickness] and No. 20 gage [0.0375 inch (0.95 mm) base metal thickness] G60-gal- vanized sheet steel complying with the mechanical require- ments established in ASTM A 653 SQ Grade 33 or higher. Each plate has 9.4 teeth per square inch of plate; each tooth is approximately V3 inch (8.5 mm) long and approximately 0.106 inch (2.7 mm) wide. The teeth are punched in pairs, with each pair spaced V4 inch (6.4 mm) on center along the width of the plate, and 0.85 inch (21.6 mm) on center along the length. Alternating rows of teeth are staggered 0.10 inch (2,5 mm) from adjacent rows. The "CN" series plates are identical to the "C" series plates, except that every third row of teeth is omitted. Plates are 0.85 inch (21.6 mm) in length, and are available in widths of up to 12 inches (305 mm), in V2-inch (12.7 mm) increments, as required by design. The plates are applied to truss members in pairs, with one plate on each lace of each joint, using a power press constructed in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. See Figure 4 for de- tails of plate dimensions. 2.3 Allowable Loads: Tables 1, 2 and 3 provide allowable lateral loads, tension loads and shear loads, respectively, for the CompuTrus truss plates. These values are based on the National Design Standard for Metal Plate Connected Wood Truss Construc- tion, ANSI/TPI 1-1995. A copy of the ANSI/TPI 1-1995 stand- ard must be supplied to the building department when this is requested by the building official. 2.3.1 Lateral Resistance: Each CompuTrus truss plate must be designed to transfer the required load without ex- ceeding the allowable load per square inch of plate contact area, based on species on the orientation of the teeth relative to the load, and on the direction of load relative to grain. De- sign for lateral resistance must be iri accordance with Secticw 11.2.1 of ANSI/TP11-1995. Table 1 provides allowable lateral loads for the truss plates. . 2.3.2 Tension Resistance: Each CompuTrus truss plate must be designed for tension capacity, based on the orienta- tion of the truss plate relative to the direction of load. Design for tension must be in accordance with Section 11.2.2 of ANSI/TP11-1995. Table 2 shows allowable tension loads for the truss plates. Additionally, the net section of the truss pfates for tension joints must be designed using the allowable tensile .stress of the metal, adjusted by the truss plate tensile effectiveness ratios shown in Table 2. I 2.3.3 Shear Resistance: Each CompuTrus truss plate must be designed for shear capacity, based on the orientation of the plate relative to all possible lines of shear. Design for shear must be in accordance with Section 11.2.3 of ANSI/TPI 1-1995. Table 3 shows allowable shear toads for the truss plates. Additionally, the net section of the truss plates for heel joints and other joints involving shear must be designed using the allowable shear values for the truss plates, adjusted by the shear resistance effectiveness ratios shown in Table 3. 2.3.4 Metal Plate Reductions: Several allowable-load re- duction factors for the metal plates, when they are applicable, must be considered cumulatively in the design of truss plates used in fabricated wood trusses: 1. Allowable lateral resistance values for the CompuTrus truss plates must be reduced by a strength reduction fac- tor, OR, shown in Table 4, when (the plates are installed in lumber by means of a single-pass, full-embedment roller system having minimum roller diameters equal to 18 inch- es (457 mm). This reduction does not apply to embed- ment hydraulic-platen presses', multiple roller presses that use partial embedment followed by full-embedment rollers, or combinations of partial embedment roller presses and hydraulic-platen presses that feed trusses into a stationary finish roller press. When trusses are fab- ricated with single-pass roller presses, the calculations for the truss design submitted to the building department for approval must specify the minimum diameter of the roller press and the appropriate strength reduction factor from this report. 2. Allowable lateral resistance values for the CompuTrus truss plates must be reduced [by 15 percent when the plates are installed on the narrow face of truss lumber members. 3. Allowable lateral resistance values must be reduced by 20 percent when the CompuTrus truss plates are installed in lumber having a moisture content greater than 19 per- cent at the time of truss fabrication. rKraluatiiin rtpims iiftCliO Evaluation Xtrrict. Inf.. art iisutd salely toprnvide information In C'/ov.v .\ members iiflL'HI). utilizing the aide upun which the repnrt is based. Kmluatiun reports art mil tit he construed as representing aesthetics or any ullitr attributes nm spteifically addressed nor as an endnrsemeiil iir recaminefl- daliiuifur u.\f tif the stihjtcl report. Thin reptirt is based uottn indtaendenl tests iir alhtr technical Jala suhmitttdbt the applicant. The ICHtl Kvalaatinh Strfiee. Inc.. technical waff has reritved th* •n/Vr. Inc.. merchantability- Page 1 of 5 . . . This rrpnrt is hated upun indrpeitdenl text! nr uther ttchnical data submitted Av the applicant. The It lift Kvaliiatmii Service. Inc.. technical naff h (<\l results anil/iir alhtr data, hut dot* mil pussess test facilities la mate on independent rtrifii-iuina. There is tin varranty by "•"" Kvaluaiinn Seni or implied, an in ani "t-'intliny 'iir uther mailer in the repnrt i>rns t» anv prnditct cu*'tr«l hy thf rrpnrt. This disclaimer includes, hut u,.nut limited In, i Page 2 af 5 4. Allowable lateral resistance values for CompuTais truss plates installed at the heel joint of a fabricated wood truss must be reduced by the heel-joint reduction factor, Hp, as follows: Ha = 0.85 - Q.05(12tan8 - 2.0) where: 0.65 <HR< 0.85 8 = Angle between lines of action of the top and bottom chords (shown in Figure 3). Where the top chord slopes are greater than 12:12 (100% slope), this heel-joint reduction factor is not applied. 2.3.5 Combined Shear and Tension: Each CompuTais truss plate must be designed for combined shear and tension capacity, based on the orientation of the truss plate relative to the directions of loading. Design for combined shear and ten- sion must be in accordance with Section 11.2.4 of ANSI/TPI 1-1995. 2.3.6 Combined Flexure and Axial Loading: Truss plates designed for axial.forces are only permitted as splices in the top and bottom chord when the splices are within 12 inches (305 mm) of the calculated point of-zero moment. Design of truss plates at splices in the top and bottom chord that are not placed within 12 inches (305 mm) of the calculated point of zero moment must include combined flexure and axial stresses. 2.4 Truss Design: Plans and calculations must be submitted to the building offi- cial for the trusses using truss plates described in this report.. The truss design must show compliance with the code and accepted engineering principles. Allowable loads for the truss , plates may be increased for duration of load in accordance with the code. Calculations must specify the deflection ratio or the maximum deflection for live and total load. For each truss design drawing, the following information, at a mini- mum, should be specified by the design engineer 1. Truss span, spacing, and slope or depth. 2. Dimensioned location of truss joints. 3. Model, size and dimensioned location of truss plates at each joint. 4. Truss chord and web lumber size, species, and grade. 5. Required bearing widths at truss supports. 6. Top and bottom chord live and dead loads, concentrated loads and their locations, and controlling wind or earth- quake loads. 7. Design calculations conforming to ANSI/TP11 -1995 and any adjustments to lumber and truss plate allowable val- ues for conditions of use. 2.5 Truss Fabrication: Plate connectors shall be installed by an approved truss fabri- cator that has an approved quality assurance program cover- ing the wood truss manufacturing and inspection process in accordance with Sections 2304.4.4 and 2321.3 of the code and Section 4 of ANSI/TPI 1-1995. The allowable loads rec- ognized in this report are for plates that are pressed into wood truss members using hydraulic or pneumatic embedment presses; multiple roller presses that use partial embedment followed by full-embedment rollers; or combinations of partial embedment roller presses and hydraulic-platen presses that ER-4211 feed trusses into a stationary finish roller press or, if }ne ad_ justment factors given in Table 4 are used, single-pass roller presses. When truss fabricators use single-pass roller presses, the rollers must have minimum-18-inch (457 mm) diameters. Plates embedded with a single-pass, full-embedment roller press must be preset, before passing through the roller press, by striking at least two opposite corners of each plate with a hammer. 2.S Identification: The CompuTrus "C" Series plates are embossed with the designation "C-20" or "C-18," for the No. 20 gage or No. 18 gage plates, respectively. For the; "CN" series, the No. 2& gage plate is identified by the designation "CN-20" embossed on the plate, and the No. 18 gage plate is identified by the des- ignation "CN-18." ••!,•' 3.0 EVIDENCE SUBMITTED Test data in accordance with National Design Standard for Metal Plate Connected Wood Truss Construction, ANSI/TPI 1-1995. 4.0 FINDINGS That the CompuTrus Truss P/ates for Wood Trusses de- scribed in this report comply with the 1997 Uniform Building Code'", subject to the following conditions: submitted to the build- using truss plates de- 4.1 Plans and calculations are ing official for the trusses scribed in this report. 4.2 The truss plates are designed to transfer the re- quired loads using the design formulae in ANSI/TPI 1-1995. A copy of the ANSt/TPI 1-1995 standard must be supplied to the building department when this is requested by the building official. 4.3 The allowable loads for the truss plates comply with this evaluation report. 4.4 Truss plates are not permitted to be placed where knots occur in connected wood truss members. 4.5 Truss plates are installed in pairs on opposite faces of truss members. 4.6 Trusses using truss plates described in this report must be fabricated by a truss fabricator approved by the building official, in accordance with Sec- tions 2304.4.4 and 2321.3 of the code. 4.7 Allowable loads shown in the tables of this report may be increased for duration of load in accord- ance with the code. 4.8 4.9 Overpressed truss plates are not permitted. Over- pressed plates occur when the truss plate is em- bedded into the lumber more than one-half the plate metal thickness. Allowable loads shown in the tables of this report are not applicable to truss plates embedded in lum- ber treated with fire-resistive chemicals. 4.10 When a one-hour fire-resistive rating is required for trusses using CompuTrus plates, see Evaluation Report ER-1632. This report is subject to re-examination in two years. I»age3c>f5 ER-4211 TABLE 1—ALLOWABLE LATERAL RESISTANCE VALUES FOR THE COMPUTHUS TRUSS PLATES1-2 PLATE MOOEL C-20 and C-IJI CN-20 and CN-18 LUMBER SPECIES SpaciM Southern yellow pine Douglas fir-larch Hem-fir Spruce-pine-fir Suulhem yellow pine Douglas fir-larch Hem-fir Spruce-pine-fir Specific Gravity 0.55 0.4V 0.4.1 0.42 0.55 0.49 0.43 0.42 DIRECTION OF GRAIN AND LOAD WITH RESPECT TO LENGTH OF PLATED -| AA EA A£E£ — • ' Allowable Load ft' Plata-" (pounds p«r jquata inch at piata contact ana) ' 206 206 161 161 132 132 106 106 151 151 137 137 118 IIS 109 109 113 113 no 110 102 102 114 114 108 108 104 ~ 104 113 ~~ 113 114 114 For SI: I lbyinch: = 6.89 kPa. 'See Figure I for a description of plate orientation. -Values are determined using the gross area method. JTruss plates are insulted in pain on opposite faces of truss members. TABLE 2—ALLOWABLE TENSION VALUES AND TENSION EFFICIENCY RATIOS FOR COMPUTRUS TRUSS PLATES' PLATE MOOEL C-20 CN-20 C-18 CN-IS DIRECTION OF LOAD WnM RESPECT TO LENGTH OF PLATE2 ji ' * . 0=M! Allowable Tonalon Load (pound* par llnaal Inert p*r pair ol platai) 1.310 1.514 1.619 1.859 942 937 t.OSO 1.220 -.-'•'.;,' »0* Ttnalon Lewi Efficiency Ralla 0.63 0.75 0.62 0.73 i 0.46 0.46 I 0.42 0.48 For SI: I Ibf/inch = 0.175 N/mm. 'See Figure 2 for a description of plate orientation. ; 2The length of plate refers to (he dimension of the longitudinal axis of (he area of the plate from which the plate teeth were sheared during plate fabrication. TABLE 3—ALLOWABLE SHEAR VALUES AND SHEAR EFFICIENCY RATIOS FOR COMPUTRUS TRUSS PLATES PLATE MOOEL C-20 CN-20 C-18 CN-18 DIRECTION OF LOAD WTTHDESPECT TO LENGTH OF PLATE [' 0*W »o-W MV \ ISO' Allowable SliMr Load (pound! par Until inch par pair of plaMi) 609 610 702 647 720 696 732 787 1.106 1. 045 1.241 809 801 738 1.041 860 423 587 565 703 506 486 578 508 0'30- | «0-JO*]' [ 1W ISO* Shaar Load Efficiency Ratio 0.49 0.50 0.45 0.42 0.59 0.57 0.46 0.51 0.91 O.S6 0.79 0.52 0.66 0.61 0.66 0.55 0.35 048 036 0.45 0.42 0.40 0.37 0.33 For SI: 1 IblVinch = 0.175 N/mm. TABLE 4—ALLOWABLE LATERAL LOAD ADJUSTMENT FACTOR, OU, FOR COMPUTRUS TRUSS PLATES INSTALLED WITH MINIMUM-18-INCH-DIAMETER SINGLE-PASS ROLLER PRESSES i PLATE MODEL C-20 and C-18 CN-20 and CN-18 LUMBER SPECIES SPECIFIC GRAVITY' 0.49 050 0.49 0 50 <*, 0.96 i0.96 ;o.87 ;;0.87 'The Qn values corresponding 10 the value "O.-W." above, apply m all wood species combinations having an average published specific gravity of 0.49 or lower: the QR values corresponding tu (he value "0.50" applv to all wuod >pccies combinations having an average published specific gravity ol° 0.50 or higher. The Qx values shall be applied 10 all plaie/wood orientations described in Figure I. /PageAofS ER-4211 LOAD ~i?????S ?&: -i?S: > ' 3 0 AA Orientation LOAD LOAD EA Orientation LOAD LOAD 3^'"'-£'-C> LOAD AE Orientation LOAD it B2 fe-J LOAD EE Orientation RGURE 1—PLATE ORIENTATION FOR LATERAL RESISTANCE VALUES Length Width i< » •&s: ^i"^^j 'Sis 0s Plate Orientation 90° Plate Orientation FIGURE 2—PLATE ORIENTATION FOR TENSION VALUES .. FIGURE 3—HEEL JOINTS TO WHICH THE REDUCTION FACTOR. Hn, APPLIES GampuTrus, Inc. Manufacturing • Engineering • Computer Systems WARNINGS: 1. 2. 3. 4. 6. 7. Read all General Notes and Warnings before construction of trusses. Builder and erection contractor should be advised of all General Notes and Warnings before construction commences. 1x3 compression web bracing must be installed where shown*. All lateral force resisting elements such as temporary and permanent bracing, , must be designed and provided by designer of complete structure. CompuTrus assurnes no responsibil- ity for such bracing. No load should be applied to any component until after all bracing and fasteners are complete, and at no time should any loads greater than design loads be applied to any component. CompuTrus has no control over and assumes no responsibility for the fabrication, handling, shipment and installation of components. ,,l \ ' This design is furnished subject to the limitations on truss designs set forth by the Truss Plate Institute in "Bracing Wood Trusses, HIB-9T, a copy of which will be furnished by CompuTrus upon request. : GENERAL NOTES, unless otherwise noted: . Design to support loads as shown. ) Design assumes the top and bottom chords to be laterally braced at 2'-0" o.c. and at 12'-0" o.c. respectively. ! 3. 2x4 Impact bridging or lateral bracing required where shown + -K 4. Installation of truss is the responsibility of the respective contractor. \ 5. Design assumes trusses are to be used in a non-corrosive environment, and are for "dry condition" of use. 6. Design assumes full bearing at all supports shown. Shim or wedge if necessary. 7. Design assumes adequate drainage is provided. 8. Plates shall be located on both faces of truss, and placed so their center lines; coincide with joint center lines. ! 9. Digits indicate size of plate in inches. 10. For basic design values of the CompuTrus Plate, indicated by the prefix "C"jsee I.C.B.O. R.R. 4211 . . ' . • ' -\ •'• . 11. The CompuTrus Net Section Plate is indicated by the prefix "CN", the designator (18) indicated 18 ga. material is used. All others are 20 ga. . ....... v * General Notes: Bracing to top and bottom chords not required, provided the chord members are braced throughout their length by continuous sheathing. To Whom It May Concern; This is a copy of our stamp, as requested , with all data requested. Manufacturer- Calif ornia Truss Company Inc. 23665 Cajalco Rd. Pern's, CA 92570 Quality Control - Timber Products Inspection P.O. Box # 20455 Portland, Oregon 97220 (503) 254-0204 CALIFORNIA TRUSS co. NsiG8^nJRii?ui!a FERRIS CA TOLL U.B.C. SECTION I TCDL 2304.4.4 BCDL NER-QA275 [TOTAL LOAD QUALITY AUDITED BY SPACING 14 10 psf 40 125 24 Com Inc, Gable end trusses that have been designed to support vertical and/or seismic loads sometimes require that their top chords be notched for outlookers. These types of trusses have come under increased scrutiny by the building departments and their field inspectors. The top chord is a critical component in the truss and considerations must be made during the design process to prevent repairs later. Several options are listed below. Option I: For 2x4 Outlookers • For 2x4 Outlookers. • Requires 2x4 blocking between outlookers. Do not cut into heel plate Option II: For 4x2 Outlookers C-l.5x2.6 @36" Do not cut into heel plate • For 4x2 outlookers. • Notches must be cut with care. • No blocking required. . • Same cutting as for common. • Shim let-ins at each end for full bearing. Option III: For 4x2 Outlookers - Span < 24'-0" • For 4x2 outlookers. • 4x2 blocking between outlookers required. Option IV: For 4x2 Outlookers with full continuous bearing, studs at 16" o.c., and sheathing material attached to one face 4x2 notches must be cut with care. No extra measures required. Z IDa 1-1 zZ U. ID >-«co < o t-i a< cc <z ui o o_j < o _» _J Q. < O>-d in cc h~ . U. CD Zz cc o Ul O O IU »-• _J Z U. H- CO CD < UJ < < UJ CC CC i in ui ID< rsj • CD z Q CD )—i f— i—•en >-> u_ o<t >- u. z xcc x o entn < o t- occ > H- x enuj < CD tn o_ >- z: M r) zo < i- cco 2: o H- in_ »-. < _»- tn cc o_ in tn ui o •-< O 3 Z DC U. CC M Z)ru H- i en cc u• 2 i j i i jT u. ui Mm u. O _J 3t n _ • ID CJH- z • a z ujo tn cc o.n in o uj in»- :D x uen < tr u z ain cc i- ui z_ D a. r> <cc CD u_ o a »-< O H- UJ .u. en inz ui _J uj< o a. < en rsitr o o tr r> w~ _i n cc tnH- • in H- i-z u ID uj3: u. 3 a. i-_ o o cc 2: < t— X O t- O _Jtn er tn u o. 7L V m i a : as uwa£ga.Eay^>.j a -.o •"''.» 1 iJj .M 1 !< • li! * 15 I fl Ig 11! .! !i -^filJV " •a. -v5.s.5.jB.:;.£-u! :s?:;8?:S:si:psL,iilOMMiO Sd CO£=0^. !-•! if*!* iMlfHji i m \\if\lt {U!|!j!pSji| jlllllii »* DC3v-U O IU 01 0) 01 a s?c s CO m Hr- ca UJ LO U OT (0 i U.Os 5 a ~O , !5 5 I 'o2o UJ w (4 UJ U O < U O UJ 0 6 z iij HI H- d 5U. Q sCOaa:oxo t .. s. fl u sCQ O 89' go U. ~, _j £ < 5 0*~. Z z§1 UJ O UJ -oc; a, 0-13 S n I II 2 »si Us IIIo S «if* s|is s3 ja'2 2 So It = S•sl 5d.Bf = 19 ra 9-42 a I f - « i"r o 3m a o o ao «- S Sa o UJ 3' 5U. O m ooC)ss g? ^• ftI?o "7 UI< w M ^K o 111&tfUI os o ^ in<0 O) Vftto *t o^CN0 00 o ««i 8»8 *—* *— ^. rf— ^U. U. U.co co to _,_,_! 1- t- g UI &co UI O <l£ O IIIy up019^£h.1CDCM N. ctp **" 1 co a <o CO $ Soupf-b>"b>•i h- u? **" V co Q OS. DO r* 3 b0tof~Tcnr- cn co l*" ^f*. O T- 3 7"""9o>0) CO 1 "" 9 ft* a CN ^ ^CDmCOi.COT-9 CO <n CO Ki fs. a H- Z J 3 c(0COinoCO0iCO in u? in 'CM CO a n XL :j^.O>i*<?mi=to <n * V in a n n A oV"^9"ncna. <D T- 1 *"• cn N. X V) X .cn^.COtN9cn9 CO i. CO h- h* 1 a: S « kcni_COT**"9O)CO CO i^ CO t r^. ^ T- X KicnN-to9r*CO CO N- IO t s> X CM X .cntCO0CO1JL -' T CO t ^. X 1-co uu 3 .COCOm9CO in CO m h- CO 1 co 3 Vr-CB"*CNtnin cn * i in nz a 3 fs.oCO^1COT CO *"" V CO K 2 sM Kiomi^b) «K v. CO at § M 3 9ocor-1^-cnT- J co ** £ Of i g cn 3 b*7r-9coien CO i '" cn N. nr:i o ft k0)^co?CO 0 J_ CO f> h- nr IO g CD & tCMCOr^CO9toT CO 1 (O «? h» a: M g '- S VCO,-ff-rint ^ r 31 B T- T" Q (0 X 9IOTT-*in »~ i i— 9> C>l O [tH 01 S X O)mS9Vb j -; J° o T- S bV?BoQOtcoi 0 t o T a CN « cnCM'fCO9bcn h. V CO 'i m O (0 X foin>-cn2 o ••i1 f? X in fj ^_m, •oT—9tM 0 r-i O f? X DC a k X in0*—910 0 i o 9 T- X tn^o9io<?0 "?u in r CN rl inCMtCO90)b» t ao t 7) S Q (0 X ^COVin•9*" 9 y K i g ^ X "9CO[.'"•toinT "• ^r ?c-< ^i gN enin!VOc1V.i- o !? •9 ee.to o IO o> T- X EnUIf*•cnV*?o 5? CO ce § B X V-m,•7o9CNV10o , Y o 9 nr (O o U) CO T" tot>o9i?9o i? r- tn r- n: g V* X (O _j to ii,^§> oa uiz a UJ< if § § S o i UJ 3553 X ii ii n n CN CM 10 s *••* £ v K UJ U) W O z >- I Eo g Iu. t:a 6 o TJ CV3 £ UI -> Q •B I i« 9 Tn ? mK O M *• UJ ..UI t- u.-J < UJ Zoo: S" 6 6=O.N z z S £ 51 5 SI i 8 S m u O w uT O x N \ rf O UJoI z 5 S *° V£ 15 I o N 6 Z uJ .. 3 S£C o a: 111Q Z I LLo: LU 6 CL I 5 51 u.a: UJ 03 S i^? 5S: ID ^r o 5 o w oat to Q O o_« i- i U5 o " "-' ao a: w r T i U> X [«-!3 V 1 Q 0. I toI s ow w UJo O (N UJ ui)- 6m tooIf) s tOo£oaXo E o P I> £5 »> 3 Sf o t> 2*s|3li8 s•3 9IsII!S| £a 2<n fs§£KulP IS S^ 10 <e UJ I If II <0 § Si o °2s; o O u. om ai .. «u. O UJ UJ T oCD G)in03 Ot O "« CM£101000001010oomrntnmoo'''^« CM njCD 10 CDCM _ • •r 10 IDC9OUJocUJU.11.ir a aO Ois in ini-l ^T ^5UJID *••« en tntDcucnnicvoiajaozoiocntncocnocn i ii i 01 eno o•^ 03 at an_l _l CD •»•O *^cn en •-> CM01 O03 t^ _lin «« u.- _u. u, • • UJ Ul ISI Na a M Mcc cc X X X X •I^1 ll. i- >- H- i- Ct DC CC CC U» HI UJ UJ O O O O o<o a. 1-1 Qi <»o o a o o o o o o u. u. u. u._l _l _J _Ja a. a a 0 o o o....o in o inr* r^ r^ ai»i 1 M i i O S 0 O o in o inm (^ cn oj oooo CD nicu Ol Ol cn cn HI 01 01m i m « i ii o S o o CM CM • C3 0 M 01 < T3 C_ »-» - C_— a ui aa T3 c CT •" L. CJ01 cn ac_ -< c 6- u o — .—. w x 4J •-< 3 D 3 X O O O0) CCC*j c 01 01 cnto a 3 3 3 -H £ O O O Q +J L. C. C.e u c. c c O CJi -U *J 4Ju o 4J CJ U O— . o a o inZo CJ UJacn CO I CD CO in CM* 10 r>." i im -i CM -i z zo a 3 =3 .. ccui cn i- r~\ r~*t m< a. cs cna cccc i-o m o CO U. U.i o a •^ -V T -^1- XX XXCM ru ru ru m i 1- V V cc cro oa. a.Q. a. V* a r• inu• Ho oz sa inru <incci- < no.ccz o !-« X CJ CJ crt ifl- inicj _^ ^ —ticin3its—3a.EaLj ^ 'I1|soii^|uI ijiii III] iiir = 31^] U) CTl in •* CTl o CD o rx i-s toto CD in oo n- -OtO I II I « Icr to r-s a> 01 o<* X X X 3: 3BID t". IX OU> cn CD IO CDUJ I •q- «->CJ «•<CZ I-O «i c\j ro •v in111 X X X XXtoIUJ O) (7) CD CD C7I G)3t ^ -7 ^ 1 ^ ^r* ix r* h» jx r*m n ^ •» en mUJ_iC9Z i « I « i »•-• *-" c\i n ^ in 10in It Itcn cnIu>OOCM 58Ul U. U.a o aCM CMto o> 01K4 ^4 «45 CD CDO O•v oo 01 anCM «-»x» \ » *_l _J •» CDCD CO»* ^rt o *^•ID •"in -< _j _iv O) u. LL• • tti iiii i a ou. u. • •g UJ IS! N Q u. u. u.cn o) cna a a zo cncn uj cr5i ^- OJ 2 <o >-t 1-" X 2 z a •4 O IUa. t-» ui/) t- << a.v> a. i/i (ft D3 aat- o • it • o a acr cr <to a a oz i x _J >-i CJ Ua _i< a. z <o o a i- -11-1-0 o z a. •x• a oin in H- O O oo ti 4-1 4J ct) O o in -H . •U i— I Vi I 0) U X CM uj cna o< trcr oo iu UJ "i" aj cn z>a cr i-cr i- cno m v,T ca ,. anj o ••- CM cn h-* * =» m tnz LUo x z zo o cr cro oa aa a o U. CD U. U.a a a o < U. UJ • Ul CJ •« cnnj < acs cr 5 i CJ CJ •rt <_i.. u. •69- -.uinaiL.*Ta.EaN.I3a£18(9i1SUljZ ii!) i!?!!! »" x :^ . O s ICK *•• in in CD•f -n ID -<VCO CXI ina01 • • ncr o «* cvi m •u§in;OI Olz ni e\iI C\J a) it tO *•« CD CM: o 01 •* to ^ en o•* o in 01 in o •"•"•v v PI ru m v v a •wm v. v*m <nj uj u. a.** cc Q a o o•<T <DCM "->in in o01 01 a or» i-. to•n ^ < OID 111S£enuiinu>< trtuU) V)i-< ZU) <ui a:o i- 55z z u. u. u.en en (na. a. a. in o intn — v >- U O zo a:3a <a. I II a att cco oz io o a a zz a aM h- t—o v-< z o O O CD o z• oin I Oena z in< LU LU0*0:_i < i-i- in_j< z _io 2 2 I- >- Xo < UI O*cr crau. xin ua. o CD o ui 9) > •rl T) Cfl O z zo o 3 ZJ tnzo u UJain a: UJ tn enauj tn tr u.a a oo-to: i o .. acc o f\i u •? in K-u x * t\i to tnu z tu UJ OS>- a t-u o i~UJ ^ OCTa. u. tn tn LLtn a z a O <SJ in 01us i!m IIP ^IlllH f?i! !iMHIilJiii!s;3l3I-5532^1 v. v ** toco ru to r-mnitn- ujucr io »«auj njm o T o to i v ^ i••i T in T v (o inj ID 1 »» *•« ni •CM m v in to r- m mzzzzzzzz00 O CO O to f\l01 ^ to ^ 01 oo tn <n in o •«T tn ni tn ^ v a)mt\i u. u.a a.ui u)01 enz ru ru:**uj to toa: o oaUJ<r<m <no m encr<UJm ~ en o oV IDCM «iin inen aii ir- ivni toP) r-— cu a o< mo_i o+tca< oa oa •totn TImo^^§o < z z t-H • ?«3 t-H VH Q I ccOU.U)UJZ3tnStrzSo tnM Zen <uj tro i-tn cctn < S£i- tn x x••« <z z UJ O . a ztn o>-«in H-tn <o tr ttr ^t- a a<o tn tn ina a a z o I H I Otno ta a z tncc cc < uj uj§§33E DO h- tn O Q- Z < Z _Jz o o i- a < i-H H- t— O »-**-"a >- i- i— xf z o o < -i a .— uj ao z tr a: in u. i«-• tn u -d az_j mo o oru a o o ui < tn <-i 13a . c.in o• ••• -a .cT3 tn t. o in » cu ru * 3 — *•C. CL (0 4^ *J A> *J y 3 3aj -a o o ou a £ c c *J L. C Ol O) Ol U Q) (U O ? 3 ^^ ui o a o PI 0) •COn) •acdo y -• tnzo u. utlja tn _j •4a uj tna o< a£t oor tnoa: UJ u ..v t/7 t ru m z zo o O U O O nj ru a <ro oa a in tn _ _ss UJ UJ —u«^tn3'a.0.EnXD<x I1ij1o1 .i"!|3 iSS-°—3&2-S 5£«c« .CL°> '0 - ^-£-18253 ^gS*!! s|ssfSsis j^l^sft*- iNl^PI MflS'JSl?-»3*oc»s3 •3:3:GU'00-S~S2S<i3.-2S£sjs5.c^o-|2 SccogScScScJg-Slo?zoim -•soi«cnaoiS!"«ji "O ^ [•-c^i wWm to p^a> o>2 ^1 > I .1, «S *I« 1- J-ll*I • i 5 If •ii HIMiljii! WHIilIJ Hi H5|iss?Iif g*"*1u.01 t t 01cc in 01 01 if)LU ro cu ru roz i • i «— ru m vt9z to 01 «t »» 01 tot—* O PI ffl 03 CO Otn r*- ro ro ro ro r**ro ro CM CM ro roi i i i i i it-iccOOCM^ ni <n v in toinz Q1UJ (Occ enh^4KUJ U. U.cc o oCM <MCD cn enz • •r~m -* r--z z 0 oT CD 5D 5»_i _i o air* n01 01 O »rtO IDr- tn _i _iCM in u. u.. . uJ uji i o o* '_ _u. u. • •S UJ N IMa w •-«DC CC X X X X< < < <s: r z s u. u.en toa. a. u.uia >- oi in zi •* a en<n i u> o- cc • S5™ z z o < O UJa. 1-1 cjtn >- << a.tn cc tntn 3 a atr crU) O O Z I I o z• otn o z <_j o i-> < o o a ai- ui tccc a u. utna. xain i- §o CC UJ uiz<a UJ IS) o o< cc cc oo i u UJM a.u D tn 3 O ^~ CC t/Jo -xx ..aru o ru t/i »~* * CD vi31 LUo s o U_ <D U. U. Q Q O z zo a O Up a CM CM I 11V V I- I-cc cc c/l t/: trtu in S +SE•a oc 8 +2| I ill f III 8 I O •oS •a x« 11 . sssmss-sjs^c^.a-gs o c e o Ei c S c S c J g- 8 g.<» SZ.ff.SV~'«-2>*.S1S 2>8 -2-0 "° u>Tiss??»s?ssss|:5.5L,^sSQa<NcM.£a Iso cQa^Qu-r1 H^ II I I*n ;'is i> j J:- * S»I *! -IS5 el 2*S ? ^ llsl !! iitl!! Hi5 iiii c * ,i8|ls o-81 • ;i i -1 Iff!iiiiJpmi*jfj--sin|i]l-°!lli|]iHilMiin!dll'||«5l!-!S|ei 11 f lUHIIIlillls-5l513J535il •** in ir> to•q •«-• in ^to cy maCD I • • »nc o *•» tu p)2 *-• *-i «-«*-«•V.X 3C X 3EUJZXXZZZZ7Z§tijr\ltD*-«CD'*-tCDC\!IOO)TUD^TO1O*-i o in 01 tn o ••-«^ ^ tn run ^ T osnj>-i-«c\iF)-Tinior^i/> "•-•fum^inior^aj — « ii.0).°! oo: c\i fu ^ CDi nj •-•tn in01 01i ir- r-la inni in o o-j -3 UJ UJa a ii U_ U. Ien en ia a. i o in o i u UJ Oi tn• < • O UJ O Cl CC • z£5 <a z Qin o ui*-• uin i- <en < ao tr tntr 3i- a a<o • u a a<r cr0 o1 iCJ U iSIi M H- t—a *—< z ao o oo z o I Otna z in< ui tuo *: a:_i < i-i- tn o z v° O l-< >-! t- h- X 0< a .ui a ^gu. rin u •axin o o in n41 -S M U) Nnj w. T3 tr) O iJ oo tnZo u UIa ui tna a< a: tnocc u.o ozcc o nj o *r tn t—tD i: % aj ro tn ZoL) UIM au o i-u; i- o ccQ. u. 03 entn a z 2 Z O O 3 D O U P P cv ru a a:a oa a.a. a3 3tn en < <CE a UJ UI .E» Ii "r":f=?ls s|t»liM^ifli3»l'5cl'-3 i^^o-Sos"s's i" |i i-2 s jsil^o^ |° Scc°=JcScSc!;8-;SsoS f i^OSl? 23-« bJ •^ = 1^ O H U3 •*cr> r-~ .. O •r. m in on•» ^ CD ^rto 01 inO I • • •cc o *i cv tnSix^xccou.ujxxxxxzx:%ujtMco<ia>»-ico(\iHOOlTia-TCnO— o in 01 in o •«^ •» co IM m i ^UJ_iIDZ C9i-i^-inicn'vinioh-in U- u.a a.in tna11uj to tocc o oaujtzo en encctn ^ 01 55 0 oT CD01 ~*tn inai en o o<* mO_) ou< occ oin T.cao <o x• cco <S'S« in 1u.§inin< ccu10 in*-! Zin <UJ CCa >-cn tren •< u. u. 111 UJa a «-£fl-0« O '-i O I I t/) O UJ"-t LJtn i- <tn < a3 a: ina 3t- o a<a u. u. u.tn tn ina a. a zz ointoina a a z incc cc < tu uj0 o o * cc1 i _i < i-u o i- in _ o o t- o < t-t t— >— O >-**-»a i- i- i- x< z o u <o o m =>-i o .~ uj ap z tr cc in u. i — a *_i in o o CD o o o in c- v vui t/} cr u_ uia a o o \ *- t—< cc r o .. a cc accocMu^tn^ ooui» nicain aau z uj a. a.UJ OS O 3»-* Q. i— t/i tnua t- UJ H- O CC J _ltx u. tn t/) u. < <in o a: o a cc —uc•"•inarj|CLEaUSS\.!5§i8isosu<3I °_• i =I Ia -o i ni ? I ii en i i •uj « ni mun 3t x iou.in in•v v- CC •« -«LLI aj njuj m to_iaz •» cy rvj «->M nj ni nj CMto nj co CD mC\J irt «-i CMi i i i nia>u.UJ UJ:**Ul 1 •«»cr o ogniniUJcrui u. u.cr a oCD n enM *t *-l5UJCD « ino o T -3 u. Ia-in ina a o i uo• uj oCD in l n O acr a:o o az i x •M U U In -a >• °. ^in zi •« o ininz ujui cr a z < •-" X o a a. i- ui cc I CC O a in i inzo ulilain i z a •^ i m t ina II u uo a ru r\j v v i ..a cr ccCXl CJ t\j t/1 t~ O OWi *. 03 en a. a. o _j -)CO U. U. < <a a cr cr UJ UJ n-lcr-c i'Mi lil .Hi i hi aS OT d cnO> lO O)3c tn ^ inv i i_- ac ~< ~*uj ru cuuj co tn_iz •-> ni ru •"i-i cu ru ru ruin ru ID 10 ruru « •< rui i i iaH- s a • H•N. «•> ru m ^K4I/) 1— H- H- t—u. u.a a.in (/]a "s. *^tn;**•Ul V Vcc o ogrviru'UJ U. U.a a aru ruCD cn n v oio tno m in ino ov o m mru vi10 to o oQ| ffili i i a•» ru i if' •• r a aUJ UJ fs* MQ Q t-l I-*cr cr MM X X X X incv <a. >in t J O•v<\i i u<a.in u. u. u.in in inQ. a. Q. >_j0 o o z... oin o in ztn «* ^ o tft z ujuj cr 1 U I ^ I—< ina o o t- <soooz<Z I I _J O l-l l-l U U H Xa _j i- << a T < ••oooi-.a o z oo m o z a<o inzo * » O^ o « C =lll!?5!s|l S^ssiKSS? |SH*S»SS Illol^l T33.co;tee-o _ n-S.3 .-«.*•-;; L O "C — W i. W^P~°l?i"QtSjIflOfOBl «S Jw.a-s«fc» occQ£j5c£c2^2* ""TgwoOJ_'« wO^f »• 5-n S«*>«,' xSo"**SQQMdi C .g=23-So|^ KJiliii! 5 < 03 CT\ o aC3 CMcc to UL U.a. a.tn in• ui CDin i auj t^ r.CE o oUJ U. U.cr o Qin enCD U3 IDa<UJ 0 o1 o a mni »»^^ ^^ * *_l _l 1 CDO O•sr T o oo ni•t CM .. UJ UJa oui ui IM rsja a i-< Mtr cr-J _l O O_j i- i iX XX X< < < o o o z. . . oo o o zm -* T o tnin CM atr i-l Oa< ao o ui cr " ' 3£a a ^- x _i o t-i CJ 1-H X_I 1- <z < ua >- ra .i- o a a>- i- ui cro cr oCD r tn Dr> acri- a O to Z Zo o u UJa tn 5 .. Q 1-i in cr eni a o ^cr i . .. o: o ru u ru in i f D I XI m •v X. m OJi C_9 U3 cu Xtn i C_3 m •^r . Xtn OJi CJ tf 2:u tn a. Z)tn ou. CD u_a Q J J rxeniu§ st°SES*ScSc|i-l«,if Za>s> ~'5°>*S<S2'«cli"11 •°w to r-co a> ^ $ V)g aCD OJtr toa""88- tr o> 01LUtoUJ*M to inin a> a>tn iz I -ttX 10 ni ruta cc c\i rure 3 <r. «5 Sfefe5UJm -Hi- »-z z o o o o<7 a>cu ^.l 00 IDO *••O Om (O _i _i°.°UliS3i i a aUJ UJ M M X X X X< < < < Z X Z X C\Jo o OJ z za o c s in_ a< cccc o o UJ>-. au o UJ t—a iin 3ao Ifl / 3 * XI. . en XT X . UD CXI 1 UD CXI X UT) t CJ -^T X ID .CXI 1 C_J ,1 tr cco aa. CLQ. a X. . < 01 Z CJs . • —U(Jsin3.0.EnU 1|1§1iiI| a-e . Ji iu + S.i; » 5 |i| *f IM i* s|l S 5 si«r s . 1|8 1 I . 3"" « '5 I 85 I lis.8 5. -o J o **M - !PSo a , " -D =«^ S S£is. .3 :•- .1 ^<s- si * 1 IfillP^ r|-- ..c2-°"«S2-' S-£«cS .S°sj-g^sss.0? ^|;f-g2 .""OSo'SS ScSsoiNa, .- liill 21sis si1— - .E a> :"? -;|55H5 ;«E2J !l U:lh Sliil*]5i.i;ii mil tlii||II? SijEfj* fl § llEi|!15|!s!!ms?f»ss?I aCD tncr *»in iUJ fCJ U- u.Q. O.W) UJQuj rn tna: N r**.CDatcuen atui inf> ro CDz o QO) CD ID toon cvn in ro PIo a•v cn si aiV OO •-< _) _lo o u, u. o a•3 -3 X X X X ££££ -a •H M P. - UJ O(O UJ< = I UJ O - CL • 0} U Vz ru 2 z a< o uja •-• ot/i >— << Q-t/> ir cnin on aCLt- a a. a. a >- o o o z... oo o o zrn •«-» T o cn uj a: t R • ^ t-< cn O O Q I-a tr < _iCD o o o z <z r x _i a i-" 1-1 CJ U 1-1 XD _J H- <•< a z < ua o a >- 3 ._i t- i- o a a t— (— UJ CEz o cr oo to iu. u_ cno z a. z o CO IOL-W-0 zo s cr tna x..x .. anj o m in i-*k * CD cnZ UJo s o Lu CO U_a a z zo o U CJo o cr Eo oa. a.a. aD atn cn vO • t-i!Z o in K 3 V1 ^ )« m T Xun exii CJ UD CU X U1 «r-» 1 CJ m T Xin OJi CJ ^ J. J D_ 'SE 6. ., c tfc a -c IflU I!? .1 if !?,».i lliiilHmiiUi«5"<l<Sz.s.3<s.!5.j* (N O CTv O a UJ ID aCD tncc i u. u.a. a.(/] in co coai njm «no o' *» CDni •"T OO -H _l _JO O U. U.. . UJ UJi i a aUJ UI fM NI MM X X X X in ina a incvj o • uo• UJ O1C in i ui o- a •a) o ^z tv z z a<t o uj0,1-10 (/!>-< < D.in a inin D g° 1- Q < O i n a acc ccCD o az x x MOOo< a. xo o o UJ CC*1-< in _o z <_i a i-> -!>-<.< u ^3 . 000 'W z o O CO U. CJina. zain i- z zo o Zo in 3o i—in in cc ino a o \< cc i .. occoruoaiini—oi» »mious ujuj o xi-< a t—o o v- LU f- Oa. u. CD u. u.in o a o C3 O in ft 2 K m x IT) OJ1 CO cvi CO m xin CMi CJ nM cc ttooaaa a.o oin in j j 10-WO ID CO u Oin -> u(—01•3^™5ta>.I1c101i!I1 1* nil?! . II iHI! Ij'lSani li 5-!|!!tli ll^?1|i'|2sili| ]!|llf!ik if?S,i!£8."sS.--^9i a S &•!•» 2 • "*'aly!t:-B» 5l^°5s ilj^fZ X a » *- 4 * r-' c* « * III !«j o U3 ^3< <3\ O U. U.a. a.in in01K- ax in en 01CD cc 01 01r^ >-* i-t • •a&.<rHUJ CD_J.H (D Ul m <no o^ ID a atCM «i_j _i in oo »••».'» o o00b.li.. . u UJi i o acc cr_j _j o oSS ->-xx hH M X X X X 2 2o a 2 <a a a< aa: oa ru UJh-i au oUJ I-a. 01 t/ia CL O nj u f\J o en f 3 \ \\ X IT) CU 1 CJ rvj Xm . i m Xin rui y]M gg Ou_ CD u. D O ten i K .HI:•= m SccoE»c«cSc;s£as,5« zoirn — •50>5s>i!™S«2J1 uc ^l8?-S|s?s28|«5.Sul|SQQCVCN =o So cattiau-rH4 aca ocr mIII V*ou.at a>m m• cr r» r-UJS£ . .— CMuj CD mcoz in inM ID IDcn r* r*-xto "4Ul U, U.cc o a^ n19 ID IDz z1-4 *-*o o o o•t mCM »*» » I Iai m•" m _i _j0 o u. u.. . UJ UJ1 i o oUJ UJ IM Ma a M wX X X X< < < < Z Z X Z • UJl/l •_jooo z. . . oin o in zm *-« ^- o cn z uii cr < cn a UJ1 u<a.cn i u i sss CO O O O Z < Z I I _1 O •-> l-i O U MXa _i i- << a i < cjo o o i- zi ._j t— t— o o o»— i— u crz o cr ao CD xu. u II zo cn 3..a i-LJ cn cc cnooo \< cr r .. acc o aj o ru cn i—cj x » » co cnu z uiui ox >-< Q. h- CJ O >- UI I- On LL tn u. ii ^r D K XI m Xin CMi cn C\J Xin i C_3 Xin OJi ft cr cco oa a. a cr UJ UJ ra CDu ocn - * * Oi= O •g *§E 0» S <g O TJo •+• S "• * 5 |1! ! fWlnn .S i i g 1 1 J !< ^cI&S|2cl I* Sli«iS|S fee»-gu5o«t>o> -3^2^1-i! 3sS-S nO i *• O — « -(_ J^brilli It"t^OmS^ Ol= *°2 o « IQT) r » >.« wS||1|^|?| || sss»|is-2sis2 SccoEjcSrS-" = Sc3 | Pl^f |l«*1s lol^S £S? z? ilfi .E'f »oE2ssisas £QQcNc5£Q So cQO-^QU-« K-5 Qi-'c4 eJt'ift CD c^ai ai^ ^ in18 &fcin enm mm matui§* • -itU. I- OCD CO X UJ O O(O ID CD CC •V V5O O w l-i • •«•* ^"* CC. 3 ** **m oX uiul cc i- (nr- o(O Cn m eno o•^ OT on on.l O -H•« CMo ointointo2 i UlU.ll.cc a aO O.CD Ol 01cc<m m> * n i•« CMo o u. u.i i a o HreO-0'diU. U- •ui uj rsia o w M incu LJ o u. u, u.en in ina a. a. >• o o o z. . . ain o in zm « T o tn ui cc• n •< to: » a a o t- 10 CC CC < -I13 o a o z o t-t x z z< aa i-« a<o o a aH- i- ui az o cc o O CO X U- U o z a z• Q ain in t— II u. ^u ct UJm uj ina a< cc inaacai E / 3 \ V )«n X aji CJ CO CM X UT) 1 CJ m Xin CVIi CJ xl - Ou. m u. • + , 8 +3.S -S 1 II Hill f 2 ||| | |g- Its5^ I 23 «ii!§! If IIQ.O Mi3 -SS ICS VD O Ul UlinID • fn piin (n <nin im •«£3=ou.a> mID 10-a: o oUJ *-»*•»uj CD m13z in inI-H O OUJ " "V. .1 CVI>-l W I- t- >i—xi-t-crin10in olUl Oo io 01 i2 •»-t5UJffl •" I ** n!>• Oia 01 m PJo oM CD O) SInj *i_1 _J O «<~« CM^r ^ O O•« (UT ID _1 _)o o u. u.UJ UJ IM ND Q l-l •-!GC CC M 1-1 X X X X U. U. Iin ui ia a. i I It o acc cr CD O O 2 I X n (J tJ Ul UJj a _ O Z <_i a i-t i-< X z 2 a < O UJa 1-1 u01 i- << a. o z• oin 3°o .o a o>- uj crcr oxu. u U)a. zain ^- •z. zo o 3 3 zo i-< < CCLJ cr o UJ C3 Ia o (/I UJ aa: Or cr crooao.a a. 1 a U. (D U. J J 13 CD U O Ul ~5 u—inr|a.. Ean/IIK13iIf1i SP.»^ iiili I!!J1 * ^ c * *IliHJ siiiU50 35j » _c< BALCONY> •1KBO JLIGN TRUSS (476011 DRAG LOAD I/ 30x30 -ATTIC ACCESS Scale: 20-08-00 SPAN BEAMING / "PALISADES" CUSTOMER: BEACHKING DEVELOPER: SAME PROJECT: "PALISADES" LOCATION: CARLSBAD GENERAL LAYOUT NOTES: ORGINAL DATE:, 6/21/00 DRAWN BY: T'.C. § CALIFORNIA TRUSS CO. BID * 20256 1/8"Date: 07-18-2000 1. TRUSS SPACING IS 24" O.C U.N.O 2. TRUSS LOADING IS TILE. 3. ROOF PITCH IS 3: 12 U.N.O 4. DENOTES VAULT CEILING AREAS WITH A 0:12 INTERIOR PITCH U.N.O. 5. 21" OVERHANGS TYPICAL U.N.O. 6. ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO FABRICATION . 7. BOTTOM CHORD OF TRUSS MUST NOT COME IN CONTACT WITH INTERIOR NON-BEARING WALLS. 8. RECOMMENDED HANGERS ARE SIMPSON OR EQUAL CHECKED FOR VERTICAL LOADS ONLY AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. 9. HANGERS .ARE. SUPPLIED BY OTHWERS,. 10. SEE ALL "WARNINGS" AND "GENARAL NOTES" ON TRUSS ENGINEERING FOR IMPORTANT DETAILS PRIOR TO ANY ERECTING OR LOADING OF TRUSSES. 11. TRUSS FRAMING PLAN REFERS TO LOCATION S VERTICAL LOADING OF TRUSSES ONLY! LATERAL LOADS, OIAPHRAM NAILING, CONV. FRAMING HANGERS, CONNECTIONS, & SUPPORT DESIGNS BY PROJECT ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD. NO REVIEW OR INSPECTION OF THESE ITEMS ARE IMPLIED. : TYPE .Description' Al A1A Bl 1 D1A 01 El E1A A2. A2A A3 A3A A4 A4A 094595 094596 094595 094595 094608 094607 094610 .094611 •094597 094598 094599 094600 094601 094602 ATTIC ACCESS AND F.A.U. LOCATIONS TO BE VERIFIED BY FRAMER PRIOR TO TRUSS FABRICATION. PLAN 3 ELEV A 30-0 SPAN TRUSS WORKS A Company You Can Truss! October 4,2002 Dear Scott, Please see the following truss drawings and layout, they should answer all your questions. Respectfi Steve Butter Manager \a5..jaa, 75-110 ST. CHARLES PLACE, S11A, PALM D^ERT. CALIFORNIA 92211 * (760) 341-2232 • PAX (760) 341-2293 i fluo ** !o a <• • p.*"I 5 i: e t O'B 1 § 1**ao rnaa f« HO (B ** P.P I 9 B rss IS? jss; !* n ^ 4Ais! i s ,1•s sH 1 Sa = SR05S ^Pfiispli5*llJ1liSilIll^flsjMl-C j-^S JSB c^JK^^r* t* ||l|||||||j| snlfiNHi rii«!iS»s«I S 1 S B, *^S-S ;H|?fs i*1*!59K li'sls Ol w|S|if i! iff PO BOX 626 Thousand Palme ca 92276 TRUSSWORKS Fax T«FttHfftl Fax: Phone:Data: CCs x Urgent O Please Commant OPtoase Reply D Plrasv Recycte » Comments: Palm K5«®nft?IS *J.yiiMMOtortOlmrl.sss3NwaK i-M fir Oo '¥ ^ > « ** •b 8u V. 6- l^ ferr{& ( *«*5> fi o •5J O <9 Q *3 t 1 g « 1 tJJ Vj 5>O03"0D)3KKOdo0)3••-3h( c (J (P **" 0 IP 50 (0 0 0 < o 0 •0 »t« c ,T a•9 2!?>(-* 3 a *• 0 i ~ • *— y *HV/— iM0)t\io-_-—Pyyv0) ?2 *o ^\X <n» 5 \r•a3D30-j<nOi, uj uirrl ^ js.A rr 05 13*w fj <7> •Ki « %H oiJS 1 SE. [T] Hf'% go i H M a ? u M Ui K \1J 'T*H-i _._jw ^}>__J7i_i '1 a toKO > H 1 W: ny f"7 ift S Pii o oo o BurFiKS-|Q«rJTac~las / Ms : asjKa/asasa: stv~ Vtt n ra « w H la PJ US C* 1 J) ? & K g 1 u-,v<su IS tlx O! 6 12-4 TRUSSWORKS A Company You Can Trttss! October 4,2002 Dear Scott, Please see the following truss drawings and layout, they should answer all your questions. Respectful] Steve Butler Manager 75-110 ST. CHARUES PLACE, fllA. PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92211 • (760) 341-2232 * FAX (760) 341-2293 i • » *TiTm^ ^ "^m 11SoSifaiffnil!MitPl.fJllfiiS iiifi *'-a* "* o £-8 ai is '%. 3 m 0 -< -i-j o t> O o ''IMS sit I £ ° 2 5 ?f!|ilills SS^*5> ** <» «§ ° j i£ I ii !l S S £^4*.i i i rrr s-oi ^J i^ii"g"0 si*"-Sil •Is 9 5"I i, • Is 1 PS 'p • • KDB OLIS&" - AM n ir is e •F I If1 f « <H Oii OcrzfitSm I _*: *;f* o,*ilSftigCO 3*8I 5*f si! ^ ,!HMl*i*13if Ii fin Hi»ifit ilsff^rSs'8'"SwI* 3f$'tS:«£ c-j £ ~ . •SB? B* • S 5-**f r» ' —• Q" ! =*'l^ff l€-*l|-8'9, 5.5! 111 ff£ 1 ' 1 a-i?= ?:5S|f.l'3.jl=i- ii'llt^flit*-iSff ?|.*|^ fI§» SsillB .its- ,gg!fl!£ff i-l! |SirfsrilIlli fii|I; K JB, J?v * ffi- s ilif1 [fliwj"s|iifiii i * - £ i. 18-^ » 3. 1 II I ? i ? -V>k>U J \ *si:8 R-I-B** §Pf Sj-Orr* tf oR.SS-i' 5T g SIKoJt*5^' § Sf tf'bfs? 5 O9C'to ••i i e » e oo i n, o<3 ri- OerIfttoIIorn Wv> o JUN-I0-03 09; -43 AM :UH, s.2033 June 4, 2033 Page? SCC OR HAVERKAMP P. 03 N0.9SB P. 13 Pwjeot Number 8017-99 TM*THeSULTfi Detsof Hit 826/01 8/28/01 8/26/01 68W fi/27/01 6/2S/01 &28/01 ft/8/0? a/B/02 6/18^02 8/19/02 S7TJ03 T«st 101 1fi2 10/12/01 111 10/12/01 112 10/12/01 113 114 7/28/02 116 117 118 120 121 122 1SS 124 103A** 8(t» Grading 104 104A- 100 106 107 108 106 Site Grading Ste Grading Site arading Parana Lgtatten Elevation MflifcMft 42.5 9.1 42.0 7,8 41.5 f.S 51.S 9.1 48.0 82 46,0 0.8 39.6 9.2 41.0 1O.3 49.0 8.6 38,0 9J 42,0 10,1 4J,S 9.8 39.0 9.» 4fi^J 11.0 42.0 10,3 47.0 11.4 42.C 11,0 39,0 8.3 47.6 S.1 449 10.3 43.0 6.9 45.0 9.5 47.5 8-4 9U 11-4 37.6 11.0 S9.0 8J 8ft»Gfidlng SabSg. Siflbfig. SiabSg. UnttWt.!bs,/ou,n, 114,7 116.8 108.8 110.6 116.9 118.0 116.1 115.0 114.? 1165 118.8 110.3 1183 118,6 118.2 118.0 111,2 1144 110 B Writ Bid3. 120.4 119.5 ReteUva 94 87 B2 68 83 96 03 9422 92 92 93 91 92 SO 97 97 80 99 80 93 96 Soil Type 1 I II \l 1! (1 i 11 1 tf II 1) i! 51 II 1! tl 1 1 if tii ! B II II T«l £& 3 3 D S S S D O 0 D d D D D S D 0 8 D 0 D . D D S D NorCal Engineering JUN-1S-03 09:42 AM SCC OR HftVERKAMP :UM. 3-2003 a'-QMn MCRCftL EMGISCEFIMG T14 4S9+438T NO. P. 02 P.11 T"^JAWJSBAD BLVD NorCal Engineering SOILS A$D OBOTEQqslCALOQN5UI.TASTS UOCAT10N OF OOfrPAOTiON TESTS SHEET 1 JUN-10-03 S9: "UN. 5,2003 AM SCC OR HftVERKAMP NC6CHI EHGIfCEFlNG 714 485+439T P. 01 r ' CARLSBAD BLVD NorCal Engineering SOILS AND CEOTE OR/24/01 THU 14:21 FAX 949 362 8874 SOUTHLAND COMMUNITIES il 002/002 •"* NORCALENGINEERING 562 799 9459 05/24 '01 13:09 NO.297 02 NorCal Engineering Soils and Geotechnical Consultants 10641 HumboK Street Los Alamiios» CA 90720 (562) 799-9469 Fax (562) 799-9459 May 21,2001 Project Number 8017-00 Bird Designs 1 Columbia, Suite 2020 AliSO Vlejo, California 92656 Ann.: Mr. AIMaciel RE: Foundation Recommendations - Proposed "The Palisades" Residential Development - Located at 121,125 and 129 Chinquapin Avenue, in the City of Carlsbad, California Dear Mr. Made): Pursuant to your request, this firm has evaluated a proposed reduction of the sldeyard drainage swale from 5 feet minimum to 3 feet minimum to the building footprint Based on our evaluation, the minimum distance from a given structure may be reduced, Pue to the decreased setback from structure to drainage swale, footings for adjacent structures should maintain a minimum embedment equivalent to 6 inches below the flowllne elevation for any adjacent drainage swale. A representative of this firm shall observe and approve the bottom of all foundation excavations prior to pouring concrete. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact Ins undersigned. Respectfully submitted, NORCALENGINEERING Keith D. Tucker Scott D. Spenslero Project Engineer Project Manager R.G.E.B41 03/24/01 THU 14:21 FAX 949 362 8874 SOUTHLAND COMMUNITIES Ig] 001/002 Fax Transmittal To Company Subject Date M > Jv/6 01T Fax Number From At Comments tf Original to be Mailed Yes No One Columbia Suite *2020 AllspVi^O CA 92656-1473 Hi.9«a062.9700 NorCal Engineering Soils and Geotechnical Consultants 10641 Humbolt Street Los Alamitos, CA 90720 (562)799-9469 Fax (562)799-9459 July 20, 2000 Project Number 8017-99 Bird Designs 1 Columbia, Suite 2020 Aliso Viejo, California 92656 Attn.: Mr. Al Maciel RE: Review of Foundation Plans - Proposed "The Palisades" Residential Development - Located at 121 and 125 and 129 Chinquapin Avenue, in the City of Carlsbad, California Dear Mr. Maciel: Pursuant to your request, this firm has reviewed your latest "Foundation Plan - Plan 3B, 3C and 3" (Sheets A-1) for the above referenced project. The plans are acceptable for the proposed development and conforms with recommendations provided in our geotechnical report dated April 2, 1999. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, NORCAL ENGINEERJ^QFEssTp Keith D. Tucke Project Engine R.G.E. 841 Scott D. Spensiero Project Manager RECEIVED Jill, NorCal Engineering Soils and Geotechnical Consultants 10641 Humbolt Street Los Alamitos, CA 90720 (562) 799-9469 Fax (562) 799-9459 April 2, 1999 Project Number 8017-99 Southland Communties, Inc. 1 Columbia, Suite 2020 Aliso Viejo, California 92656-1473 Attn.: Mr. J.D. Ostic RE: Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation - Proposed Residential Development - Located at Chinquapin Avenue and Carlsbad Boulevard, in the City of Carlsbad, California Dear Mr. Ostic: Pursuant to your request, this firm has performed a Geotechnical Investigation for the above referenced project in accordance with your authorization of proposal dated March 4, 1999. The purpose of this investigation is to evaluate the geotechnical conditions of the subject site and to provide recommendations for the proposed project. This geotechnical engineering report presents the finding of our study along with conclusions and recommendations for development. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, NORCAL ENGINEERIN Keith D. Tucker I j ~ / NO> 841 \ ^\| Scott D. Spensiero Project Engineer |uj ( _„._ ,,/ai/nn ) m|[ Project Manager R.G.E. 841 April 2, 1999 Project Number 8017-99 Page 2 Project Description The purpose of the investigation was to explore the subsurface conditions and to provide preliminary geotechnical engineering design parameters for evaluation of the site with respect to the proposed development. It is proposed to construct a total of six single family residences on two lots located along Chinquapin Avenue. Other improvements will comprise of concrete and asphalt pavement areas, including the street cul-de-sac and landscaping. Site Description The subject project is situated within a residential tract within the 100 block of Chinquapin Avenue, immediately east of Carlsbad Boulevard and west of Garfield Street in the City of Carlsbad. The project consists of two undeveloped sites along both sides of the referenced street and are currently covered with a moderate vegetation growth consisting of natural grasses and weeds. A vicinity map which shows the location of the project site is attached. The easternmost lot is located north of Chinquapin Avenue and is rectangular shaped elongated in a north to south direction. The site is relatively level with topography descending gradually from rear to front on the order of a few feet. The property is bordered by wood fencing and a masonry wall along a,majority of the property perimeter. The westernmost site is situated along the south terminus of Chinquapin Avenue and is perched along the coastal bluff overlying the Agua Hedionda Lagoon to the south. This rectangular shaped site elongated in a east to west direction is elevated approximately 40 to 50 feet above mean sea level (msl) descending overall with an inclination of about 3:1 (horizontal to vertical). A 15 feet high riprap wall of large granite boulders currently lines the toe of the bluff along the shoreline of the lagoon. The lot also descends near the west property line toward Carlsbad Avenue on the order of about 15 feet in height at a gradient of 2:1 (horizontal to vertical). NorCal Engineering April 2, 1999 Project Number 8017-99 Page3 Field Investigation The investigation consisted of the placement of two (2) subsurface borings by a truckmounted hollow stem auger to a depth of 50 feet and five (5) subsurface trenches by a backhoe to maximum depth of 15 feet placed strategically in proposed areas of development. The explorations were visually classified and logged by a field engineer with locations of the subsurface explorations shown on the attached Site Plan. The exploratory excavations revealed the existing earth materials to consist of a fill and native soil. A detailed description of the subsurface conditions are listed on the excavation logs in Appendix A. These soils are described as follows: Fill: A fill soil to a depth of 1 to 11/2 feet was encountered consisting predominately of a brown, fine to medium grained, slightly silty SAND which was noted generally to be loose and damp. These soils were noted to contain some small gravel. Terrace Deposit: An undisturbed terrace material was encountered directly beneath the upper fill soils consisting predominately of a brown to red brown, fine to medium grained, slightly silty SAND which were noted to be dense and moist. Deeper soils consisted of dense to very dense sands to silty sands. The overall engineering characteristics of the earth material were relatively uniform with each boring. Groundwater was encountered at a depth 49 feet below ground surface in Boring B-1 and no caving occurred to the depths of our excavations. Laboratory Tests Relatively undisturbed samples of the subsurface soils were obtained to perform laboratory testing and analysis for direct shear, consolidation tests, and to determine in- place moisture/densities. NorCal Engineering April 2, 1999 Project Number 8017-99 Page 4 These undisturbed samples consisted of one inch rings with inside diameter of 2.5 inches. Bulk bag samples were obtained in the upper soils for expansion index tests, maximum density tests, atterberg limits and sulfate tests. All test results are included in Appendix B, unless noted otherwise. A. The field moisture content (ASTM:D 2216) and the dry density of the ring samples were determined in the laboratory. This data is listed on the log of excavations. B. Sieve analyses (ASTM: D422-63) and the percent by weight of soil finer than the No. 200 sieve (ASTM: 1140) were performed on selected soil samples. These results are shown later within the body of this report. C. Maximum density tests (ASTM: D-1557-78) were performed on typical samples of the upper soils. Results of these tests are shown on Table I. D. Expansion index tests in accordance with the Uniform Building Code Standard No. 29-2 were performed on remolded samples of the upper soils to determine the expansive characteristics. Results of these tests are provided on Table II. E. Determination of Atterberg limits (ASTM: D 4318-84) consisting of liquid limit, plastic limit and plasticity index of soils were performed on representative samples. Results are shown on Table III F. Soluble sulfate tests in accordance with EPA Method 9038 were » performed on representative soils samples. Results are provided in Table IV. NorCal Engineering April 2, 1999 Project Number 8017-99 Page 5 G. Direct shear tests (ASTM: D-3080) were performed on undisturbed and disturbed samples of the subsurface soils. The test is performed under saturated conditions at loads of 500 Ibs./sq.ft., 1,000 Ibs./sq.ft., and 2,000 Ibs./sq.ft. with results shown on Plate A. H. Consolidation tests (ASTM: D-2435) were performed on undisturbed samples to determine the differential and total settlement which may be anticipated based upon the proposed loads. Water was added to the samples at a surcharge of one KSF and the settlement curves are plotted on Plate B. Conclusions and Recommendations Based upon our evaluations, the proposed development is acceptable from a geotechnical engineering standpoint. By following the recommendations and guidelines set forth in our report, the structures will be safe from excessive settlements under the anticipated design loadings and conditions. The proposed development shall meet all requirements of the City Building Ordinance and will not impose any adverse effect on existing adjacent structures. It is recommended that site inspections be performed by a representative of this firm during all grading and construction of the development to verify the findings and recommendations documented in this report. The following sections present a discussion of geotechnical related requirements for specific design recommendations of different aspects of the project. Seismicity Evaluation There are no known active or potentially active faults trending toward or through the site. The proposed development lies outside of any Alquist Priolo Special Studies Zone and the potential for damage due to direct fault rupture is considered very remote. The site is located in an area of high regional seismicity and a peak horizontal ground acceleration of 0.40 may occur from a Magnitude 6.3 earthquake along the Rose Canyon fault zone, which is located approximately 5 miles away. NorCal Engineering April 2, 1999 Project Number 8017-99 Page6 Ground shaking originating from earthquakes along other active faults in the region is expected to induce lower horizontal accelerations due to smaller anticipated earthquakes and/or greater distances to other faults. The following table provides information on nearby major active faults along with peak horizontal ground accelerations. Estimated Maximum Probable Ground Motion Parameters Fault Approximate Distance Maximum Probable Peak Horizontal Zone From Site (Miles) Magnitude (Richter) Acceleration (g) Rose Canyon 5NW 6.3 0.40 CoronadoBank 20 SW 6.8 0.23 Elsinore 23 NE 6.8 0.19 San Andreas 73 NE 8.2 0.10 CDMG Open File Reports 92-03 and 96-08 The following earthquake design parameters are based upon the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC) for a Seismic Zone 4 with a Z factor of 0.40 and a Soil Profile Type of So, based on a stiff soil profile. Earthquake Fault Rose Canyon Coronado Bank 1. Distance from Site 8km 32km 2. Seismic Source Type B B 3. Seismic Coefficient = Ca (0.44) Na (0.44) Na 4. Seismic Coefficient = Cv (0.64) Nv (0.64) Nv 5. Near-Source Factor Na 1.0 1'.0 6. Near-Source Factor Nv 1.2 1.0 Liquefaction Potential The site is expected to experience ground shaking and earthquake activity that is typical of Southern California area. It is during severe ground shaking that loose, granular soils below the groundwater table can liquefy. A review of the exploratory boring log and the laboratory test results on selected soil samples obtained indicate the following soil classifications, field blowcounts and amounts of fines passing through the No. 200 sieve. NorCal Engineering April 2, 1999 Page 7 Location B-1 @ 5' B-1 @ 10' B-1 @ 15' B-1 @ 20' B-1 @ 25' B-1 @ 30' B-1 @ 35' B-1 @ 40' B-1 @ 45' B-1 @ 50' Classification SM SM SM SW SW SM SM SW SW SM Exploratory Boring Field Blowcounts (blows/ft) Project B-1 Relative Density 15 Dense 17 Dense 16 Dense 14 Medium Dense 32 31 >50 >50 >50 >50 Dense Dense Very Dense Very Dense Very Dense Very Dense Number 801 7-99 Amount Passing No. 200 Sieve (%) 16 11 5 6 5 12 17 12 13 12 • Groundwater encountered at a depth of 49 feet below ground surface. Location B-1 @ 5' B-1 @ 10' B-1 @15' B-1 @ 20' B-1 @ 25' B-1 @ 30' B-1 @ 35' B-1 @ 40' B-1 @45' B-1 @ 50' Classification SM SM SM SW SW SM SM SW SW SM Exploratory Boring Field Blowcounts (blows/ft) 15 16 17 28 25 41 31 33 >50 >50 B-2 Relative Density Dense Dense Dense Dense Dense Dense Dense Dense Very Dense Very Dense Amount Passing No. 200 Sieve (%) 16 22 7 9 11 8 13 12 15 i5 No groundwater encountered to the depth of our boring. Our analysis indicates the potential for liquefaction at this site is considered to be low due to the deep groundwater level and dense to very dense sands below a depth of 25 feet. Seismic induced settlements should be less than" one inch and will occur rather uniformly across the site with nominal differential settlements. NorCal Engineering April 2, 1999 Project Number 8017-99 Page8 Site Stability Evaluation The existing descending slopes lie at a 2 to 1 or flatter gradient with a maximum height of 40 feet, beyond the south property line. These silty sands are generally dense to very dense with adequate safety factors greater than 1.5, per latest Uniform Building Code (UBC) Standards. Site Grading Recommendations Any vegetation or demolition debris shall be removed and hauled from proposed grading areas prior to the start of grading operations. Any removed soils may be reutilized as compacted fill once any deleterious material or oversized materials (in excess of eight inches) is removed. All grading operations shall be performed in accordance with the |i attached "Specifications for Compacted Fill Operations". j L The upper disturbed/fill soils (upper 1 to 11/2 feet) shall be removed to exRose native soils, the exposed surface shall be scarified to a depth of 12 inches, brought to the proper moisture content and compacted to a minimum of 90% of the laboratory standard prior to placement of any additional compacted fill soils, foundations and concrete slabs. This fill shall extend a minimum of five horizontal feet or to the depth of vertical overexcavation, whichever is greater, beyond the outside edge of the! perimeter foundation. Temporary Excavations Temporary unsurcharged excavations in the existing site materials less than 4 feet high may be made at a vertical gradient unless cohesionless soils are encountered. , !: Temporary unsurcharged excavations from 4 to 8 feet high may be trimmed at a 1 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) gradient. In areas where soils with little or no binder are encountered, where adverse geological conditions are exposed, or where excavations are adjacent to existing structures, shoring, slot-cutting, or flatter excavations may be I: required. The temporary cut slope gradients given do not preclude local raveling and sloughing. NorCal Engineering April 2, 1999 Project Number 8017-99 Page 9 All excavations shall be made in accordance with the requirements of CAL-OSHA and other public agencies having jurisdiction. Care should be taken to provide or maintain adequate lateral support for all adjacent improvements and structures at all times during the grading operations and construction phase. Foundation Design All foundations may be designed utilizing a safe bearing capacity of 2,000 psf for an embedded depth of 18 and 24 inches into approved compacted fill soils or competent native soils for two and three story structures, respectively. The bearing value may be increased by 500 psf for each additional foot of depth in excess of the 18 inch minimum depth, up to a maximum of 3,000 psf. A one third increase may be used when considering short term loading and seismic forces. Lateral Resistance The following values may be utilized in resisting lateral loads imposed on the structure. Requirements of the current Uniform Building Code should be adhered to when the coefficient of friction and passive pressures are combined: Coefficient of Friction - 0.40 Equivalent Passive Fluid Pressure = 250 Ib./cu.ft. Maximum Passive Pressure = 2,500 Ibs./sq.ft. The passive pressure recommendations are valid only for compacted fill soils and/or competent native soils. Settlement Analysis Resultant pressure curves for the consolidation tests are shown on Plate B. Computations utilizing these curves and the recommended safe bearing capacities reveal that the foundations will experience settlements on the order of 3/4 inch and differential settlements of less than 1/4 inch. NorCal Engineering April 2, 1999 Project Number 8017-99 Page 10 Retaining Wall Design Parameters Active earth pressures against retaining walls will be equal to the pressures developed by the following fluid densities. These values are for granular free draining backfill material placed adjacent to the walls at various ground slopes above the walls. Surface Slope of Retained Materials Equivalent Fluid (Horizontal to Vertical) Density (Ib./cu.ft.) Level 30 5 to 1 35 4to1 38 3 to 1 40 2 to 1 45 Any applicable short-term construction surcharges and seismic forces should be added to the above lateral pressure values. A backfill zone of non-expansive material shall consist of a wedge beginning a minimum of one horizontal foot from the base of the wall extending upward at an inclination no less than 1/4 to 1 (horizontal to vertical). All walls shall be waterproofed as needed and protected from hydrostatic pressure by a reliable permanent subdrain system. Slab Recommendations All concrete slabs shall be a minimum of four inches in thickness and placed on approved subgrade soils. A vapor barrier sandwiched between four inches of select sand shall be utilized beneath floor slabs which would be sensitive to the infiltration of moisture. All concrete slab areas to receive floor coverings should be moisture tested to meet all manufacturer requirements prior to placement. Corrosion Design Criteria Representative samples of the surficial soils, typical of the subgrade soils expected to be encountered within foundation excavations were tested for sulfate concentration. According to the '1994 Uniform Building Code (UBC) Table 19-A-3 - Requirements for Concrete Exposed to Sulfate-Containing Solutions', these contents revealed negligible levels of sulfate exposure. NorCal Engineering April 2, 1999 Project Number 8017-99 Page 11 Therefore, a Type II cement according to latest UBC specifications may be utilized for building foundations at this time. Additional sulfate tests shall be performed at the completion of rough grading to assure that these soils are consistent with the recommendations stated in this design. Sulfate test results may be found on the attached-Table IV. Limitations The recommendations and conclusions contained in this report are based upon the soil conditions uncovered in our test excavations. No warranty of the soil condition between our excavations is implied. NorCal Engineering should be notified for possible further recommendations if unexpected to unfavorable conditions are encountered during construction phase. Any unusual conditions which may be encountered in the course of the project development may require the need for additional study and revised recommendations. It is the responsibility of the owner to ensure that all information within this report is submitted to the Architect and appropriate Engineers for the project. This firm should have the opportunity to review the final plans to verify that all our recommendations are incorporated. This report and all conclusions are subject to the review of the controlling authorities for the project. A preconstruction conference should be held between the developer, general contractor, grading contractor, city inspector, architect, and geotechnical engineer to clarify any questions relating to the grading operations and subsequent construction. Our representative should be present during the grading operations and construction phase to certify that such recommendations are complied within the field. This geotechnical investigation has been conducted in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill exercised by members of our profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the Southern California area. No other warranty, expressed or implied is made. NorCal Engineering April 2, 1999 Project Number 8017-99 Page 12 SPECIFICATIONS FOR PLACEMENT OF COMPACTED FILL Preparation Any existing low density soils and/or saturated soils shall be removed to competent natural seil under the inspection of the Soils Engineering Firm. After the exposed I surface has been cleansed of debris and/or vegetation, it shall be scarified until it is ii uniform in consistency, brought to the proper moisture content and compacted to a minimum of 90% relative compaction (in accordance with ASTM: D-1557-78). Material For Fill f The on-site soils or approved import soils may be utilized for the compacted fill provided they are free of any deleterious materials and shall not contain any rocks, brick, asphaltic concrete, concrete or other hard materials greater than eight! inches in maximum dimensions. Any import soil must be approved by the Soils Engineering firm a minimum of 24 hours prior to importation of site. Placement of Compacted Fill Soils The approved fill soils shall be placed in layers not in excess of six inches in thickness. Each lift shall be uniform in thickness and thoroughly blended. The fill soils shall be brought to within 15% of the optimum moisture content, unless otherwise specified by I! the Soils Engineering firm. Each lift shall be compacted to a minimum of 90% relative compaction (in accordance with ASTM: D-1557-78) and approved prior to the;placement of the next layer of soil. Compaction tests shall be obtained at the discretion of the Soils i> Engineering firm but at a minimum of one test for every 500 cubic yards placed and/or for every two vertical feet of compacted fill placed. NorCal Engineering April 2, 1999 Project Number 8017-99 Page 13 The minimum relative compaction shall be obtained in accordance with accepted methods in the construction industry. The final grade of the structural areas shall be in a dense and smooth condition prior to placement of slabs-on-grade or pavement. No fill soils shall be placed, spread or compacted during unfavorable weather conditions. When the grading is interrupted by heavy rains, compaction operations shall not be resumed until approved by the Soils Engineering firm. Grading Observations The controlling governmental agencies should be notified prior to commencement of any grading operations. This firm recommends that the grading operations be; conducted under the observation of a Soils Engineering firm as deemed necessary. A 24 hour i1 notice must be provided to this firm prior to the time of our initial inspection. Observation shall include the clearing and grubbing operations to assure that all unsuitable materials have been properly removed; approval of the exposed subgrade in areas to receive fill and in areas where excavation has resulted in the desired finished grade and designate areas of overexcavation; and performance of field compaction i1 tests to determine relative compaction achieved during fill placement. In addition, all foundation excavations shall be observed by the Soils Engineering firm to confirm that i: appropriate bearing materials are present at the design grades and recommend any modifications to construct footings. NorCal Engineering CV^LSIOSMI^ \(ettsr}CARLSBAD \ BOULEVARD 1 A/-- IH I NorCal Engineering 'SOILS AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS 8017-99 MOTE APRIL 1999 SITE PLAN APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF FIELD EXPLORATIONS zgoUJ CO •|sU* Do> gu| S 2xu 2 at 3 O e/s d uiuiu.s II Project Number 8017-99 List of Appendices (in order of appearance) Appendix A - Log of Excavations • Log of Borings B-1 and B-2 • Log of Trenches T-1 to T-5 • Appendix B - Laboratory Tests • Table I - Maximum Dry Density • Table II - Expansion • Table III - Atterberg Limits • Table IV -Sulfate • Plate A - Direct Shear • Plate B - Consolidation Appendix C - Site Stability Evaluation NorCal Engineering Project Number 8017-99 Appendix A NorCal Engineering | % Passing1 200 Sieve16 11 5 6 5 12 MOISTUREI »5.6 6.2 3.4 5.7 4.8 7.2 DRY DENSITY(PCF)1PENETRATION 1RESlSTANCe(BLDWS/FOOT)5/7/ IO/B/9 9/8/fi 6/7/' 12/14, 3/15/ ? B } S S S g 18 i 6S if 5- 10- \S- 20- 25- 30- »c DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE MATERIALS THIS SUMMARY AfniEi ONLY AT THE LOCATION or THIS SOAINQ AND AT THE TIME or OAILUNO. SUISUNMCI CONDITIONS MAY OIF«R AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND MAY CHANQE AT THIS LOCATION WITH THE CASSAQC OF TIME. THE DATA PRESENTED IS A SIMPLIFICATION Of ACTUAL CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED. \ / Fill SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty, brown, loose, damp Terrace Deposits SAND fine to medium grained, [slightly silty, brown to red/brown, dense, damp i i i: { SAND fine to medium grained, light brown to tan, dense, damp intermingled lenses of silty sand | with occasional coarse grained sand and small gravel -Layer of gravel @ 27' SAND fine grained, silty, grey/brown moist dense SAND fine to medium grained slightly silty, with occasional coarse grained sands, tan, damp, very dense (continued) SAMPLE TYPES n^ ORILLED: 3/16/gg [C] Rock Core \J\ Bulk Sa«ple EQUIPMENT USED: Hollow Stem Auger [f] Standard Split Spoon [3] Jar Sanple 6ROUNDKATER LEVEL: 49' [*] Ring Sample NorCal Engineering SOILS AND GEOTEOIMCAL CONSULTANTS LOG OF BORING B-1 PRCOBCT 8017-99 DATE f |l -v k 17 12 13 12 £5 „ wn i 8.4 8.2 15.2 18.3 i g JL * 2 •• a? ~* " ?_§ 5 § S52 *539* a 29/50- 50/-/- 40/50- 39/50- - - $ •H2 3 vt 4" S S 6"S 4" S £ E a 5 _ 40- - - 45- - -^'"__ ' "• 55- 60- 65- DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE MATERIALS THIS SUMMARY AmtIS ONLY AT THC LOCATION OP THIS SOAINQ ANO AT THE TIMS OP OAILLINO. SUISUKPACI CONDITIONS HAY DIPPER AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND MAY CHANGE AT THIS LOCATION WITH THC PASSAGE OP TIME. THE DATA PftESENTEO IS A SIMPtIP (CATION OP ACTUAL CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED. SAND fine to medium grained, with occasional coarse grained sand, tan, damp, very dense SAND fine to coarse grained, slightly silty, light tan, damp to moist, very dense SAND fine to medium grained, silty with occasional coarse grained sands, light tan, moist, very dense [ ———————————————— i u SAMPLE TYPES [c] Rock Core (T) Bulk Sanple [Tj Standard Split Spoon [T) Jar Sanple (jQ Ring Sample NorCal Engineering SOILS AND GEOTECHN1CAL CONSULTANTS PROJECT 8017-99 | DATE li i; '"• f : 2 S E _ S3 ~* * -•V DATE DRILLED: 3/16/99 EQUIPMENT USED: Hollow Stem Auger GROUNDMATER LEVEL: 49' LOG OF BORING B-1 16 22 7 9 11 8 i? 6.1 6.4 4.2 3.4 4.0 3.4 DRY DENSITYIPCF>PENETRATION IRESISTANCE(BLOWS/FOOT) J5/6/« 9/7/5 8/8/S 10/13/ 11/13/ IS/18/ j S s s '15 S 12 S >3S ii 5- 10- 20- - - 25- 30- DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE MATERIALS THIS SUMMARY APFtlES ONLY AT THE LOCATION OF THIS BOflINO AND AT THE TIME OF OWLLIHO. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS MAY DIFFER AT OTHER LOCATIONS ANO MAY CHANGE AT THIS LOCATION WITH THE PASSAGE OF TIME. THE DATA PRESENTED IS A SIMPLIFICATION OF ACTUAL CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED. X ^ Fill SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty, brown, loose, damp Terrace Deposits SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty, brown to red/brown, damp, medium dense to dense with depth ii. i* SAND fine to medium grained, light brown to tan, dense, damp intermingled lenses of silty sand with occasional j coarse grained, sand and small gravel 1; i \ \ SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty with occasional coarse grained sands, tan, damp, very dense SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty, tan, damp to moist, dense . ( continued ) SAMPLE TYPES [If] Rock Core [F) Bulk Sample [J] Standard Split Spoon (T) Jar Sample [RJ Ring Sample NorCal Engineering SOILS AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS PRCXJBCT 8017-99 | DATE ELEVATION I(FEET) IDATE DRILLED: 3/15/99 EQUIPMENT USED: Hollow Stem Auger 6ROUNDHATER LEVEL: None Encountered LOG OF BORING B-2 . ' 13 12 15 15 SAW (jjf LT S G? § 8.7 8.5 9.6 10.7 > 2 fij UL3 rj a* 3 - z e 5 f5 2 ills o M * 5. 9/1V <» 50/-/- 50/-/- — 1h- 5•j M 7S 17 S S S x c|i M 40- . 45- . M _ 55- 60- 65- t DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE MATERIALS 5 THIS SUMMARY APPLIES ONLY AT THC LOCATION OF THIS tOftlNQ AND AT THE TIMS OF DRILLING. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS MAY DIFFER AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND MAY CHANGE AT THIS LOCATION WITH THE PASSAGE OF TIME. THE DATA PRESENTED IS A SIMPLIFICATION OF ACTUAL CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED. \ SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty, tan, damp to moist, dense SAND fine grained, silty, tan,; damp very dense i SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty, tan, moist, very dense -Slight decrease in moist content i * g _ii3 ~* ' i »LE TYPES DATE DRILLED: 3/16/99 Rock Core (T) Bulk Sanple EQUIPtCHT USED: Hollow StJem Auger Standard Split Spoon (T) Jar Saaple 6ROUNDW/HTR LEVEL: None Encountered Ring Sample NorCal Engineering SOILS AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS LOG OF BORING B-2 3 PROJECT 8017-99 | DATE I * K 3*i 2.9 4.4 3.1 3.1 E S* " 116.6 113.9 112.0 107.4 IIIs||I a ! § «" R/B R R R r ... Sit - - - " - 10- - 15- 20- 25- 30- DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE MATERIALS rHU SUMMARY AffUIS ONLY AT THC LOCATION Of THIS SOMNO, ANO AT TH( TIMI Of MILLING. SUtllMMCC CONDITIONS MAY OUH* AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND MAY CHANQE AT THIS LOCATION WITH THC PASSAOC Of TIME. THE DATA PRESENTED IS A SIMPLIFICATION Of ACTUAL CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED. \ \ Fill SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty, brown, loose, damp, with" small gravel, upper 18" with small rootlets Terrace Deposits SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty, brown to red/brown, dense to very dense, damp I SAND fine to medium grained, light brown medium dense, damp § =s a d ~ --. SAMPLE TYPES MTE DRILLED: 3-24-99 J£) Rock Core (J] Bulk Sanple EQUIPMENT USED: Backhoe [§] Standard Split Spoon [3] Jar Sanple 6ROUNDWTER LEVEL: None Encountered (jfj Ring Sample 1 NorCal Engineering [SOILS. AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS T/Y3 op ^^.^ ^ PROJECT 8017-99 I DATE i MOISTURE(X)6.9 7.2 5.2 2.4 2.9 OHY DENSITYCPCFl112.9 i12~4 110.1 106.3 105.4 PENETRATIONRESISTANCEIBLOWS/FOOTlSAMPLE TYPE IR R R R R P - 5- 10- 15- - 20- 25- 30- DESCRIPTION OP SUBSURFACE MATERIALS THIS SUMMARY APPLIES ONLY AT THE LOCATION Of THIS SOMNO. ANO AT THE TIME OF DRILLING. SUSIUWACE CONDITIONS MAY OVtlK AT OTHEH LOCATIONS AND MAY CHANQE AT THIS LOCATION WITH THE PASSAGE Of TIUE. THE DATA PRESENTED IS A SIMPLIFICATION Or ACTUAL CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED. \ \ ^ Fill SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty, brown, loose, damp, with small gravel, upper 18" with small rootlets ,! Terrace Deposits SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty, brown to red/brown, dense, moisti SAND fine to medium grained, light brown medium dense, damp i ELEVATION(FEETIv SAMPLE TYPES DATE DRILLED: 3-24-99 C S Q[ Rock Core [§] Bulk Sample EQUIPMENT USED: Backhoe Standard Split Spoon (7| Jar Saaple GROUMWATER LEVEL: None Encountered Ring Sample NorCal Engineering iSOILS AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS LQG op TRE^l ^ 2 [ PROJECT 8017-99 | DATE - I SAMP GL Q[ Q[MOISTURE<*)5.2 . 6.7 DRY OBESITY(PCf)113.6 114.1 PENETRATIONRESISTANCEI8LOWS/FOOTI? R R 11 5- 15- 20- 25- 30- DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE MATERIALS THIS SUMMAAY Afnilt OMLV AT THI LOCATION Of THIS IOAINO ANO AT TH( TIUI Of oniuiNa. sutfunrACi CONDITIONS MAY o\rn* AT OTHCH LOCATIONS AND MAY CHANQI AT THIS LOCATION WITMTHC ^ASSAOC Of TIME. THC DATA PRESENTED IS A SIMPU5ICATIOM 0^ ACTUAL CONDITIONS ENCOUNTEBEO. * Fill SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty, brown, loose, damp, with minor root structures to 18" Terrace Deposit SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty, brown to red/brown, dense i LE TYPES Rock Core (T) Bulk Sample Standard Split Spoon [T] Jar Sanple Ring Sample ; NorCal Engineering [SOILS. AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS PROJECT 8017-99 I DATE ii I i1 "-C f-7 wS JJ] u **• , / DATE DRILLED: 3.24.99 EQUIPMENT USED: Backhoe GROUNDWTER LEVEL: None Encountered LOG OF TRENCH T-3 *MOISTURE(X)2.8 6.5 6:7~ 4.5 >•i- m LL O V lg 113.0 111.4 113.4 108.1 PENETRATIONRESISTANCE(BLOWS/FOOT)SAVt«_E TYPER/B R R R §i 5- 10- 15- 20- 25- - 30- DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE MATERIALS THIS SUMMARY AmiES ONLY AT THE LOCATION Of THIS iOWNQ AND AT THE TIME Of MILLING. SUISimrACE CONDITIONS MAY OirrEN AT OTHEM LOCATIONS AND MAY CHANGE AT THIS LOCATION WITH THE PASSAdE Of TIME. THE DATA PRESENTED IS A SIMPLIFICATION Of ACTUAL CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED. \ Fill SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty, brown, loose, damp, with root structures Terrace Deposit SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty, red brown, dense, slightly moist with occasional trace of clay content 1 SAND fine to medium grained, light brown, medium dense, moist i, t ELEVATION I(FEET! ISAMPLE TYPES DATE DRILLED: 3_24-99 [c] Rock Core (T) Bulk Saaple EQUIPMENT USED: Backhoe T] Standard Split Spoon (7) Jar Sanple GROUOVATER LEVEL: None Encountered HO Ring Sample NorCal Engineering ISOILS AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS TrY, op TORNm ^ 4 I: PROJECT 8017-99 | DATE * !• 4.2 5.8 6.5 1 " 111.9 114.0 112.9 t PENETRATIONRESISTANCE(BLOWS/FOOT)SAMPLE TYPER R R If 5- 15- 20- 25- - 30- DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE MATERIALS THIS SUMMAHY APfUCS ONLY AT THC LOCATION Of THIS IOAINQ ANO AT THC TIMC Of OAILLINQ. SUMUMACC CONDITIONS MAY OIPFEK AT CTHCH LOCATIONS ANO MAY CHANOC AT THIS LOCATION WITH THC 'ASSAflC Of TIUC. THC DATA MteSCNTCO IS A 1IMPLI5ICATION Of ACTUAL CONDITIONS CNCOUNTCHCO. \ Fill SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty, brown, loose, damp with 'minor root structures to 18" Terrace Deposit SAND fine to medium grained, slightly silty, brown to red/brown, dense f i I:ELEVATION(FEET)-i. SAHPLE TYPES ., . OATE DRILLED: 3-24-99 [c] Rock Core [§] Bulk Sanple EQUIPHENT USED: Backhoe (Tj Standard Split Spoon [7) Jar Sample GROUNDtUTER LEVEL: None Encountered |Rj Ring Sample NorCal Engineering I SOILS AND GEOTECHN1CAL CONSULTANTS T/Y, op rmiJNra ^ 1 PROOECT 8017-99 I DATE i • ! Project Number 8017-99 AppendixixB l Engineering ' April 2, 1999 Project Number 8017-99 TABLE I MAXIMUM DENSITY TESTS (ASTM: D-1557-781 Optimum Sample Classification Moisture T1@2' SAND, fine to medium grained, 10.0 slightly silty T4@2' SAND, fine to medium grained, 9.0 slightly silty Maximum Dry Density (Ibs./cu.fU 125.0 123.0 Soil Type T1 @2' T4@2' TABLE II EXPANSION INDEX TESTS (U.B.C. STD. 29-2) Classification SAND, fine to medium grained, slightly silty SAND, fine to medium grained, slightly silty Expansion Index 05 06 TABLE III ATTERBERG LIMITS Sami B1(g 81 <3 B2(g B2(3 )te }2-5' J9-11 1 2-5' J9-11 Liquid Limit 23 21 23 20 Plastic Limit 17 16 17 16 Plasticity Index 6 5 6 4 SULFATE TESTS Sample T1@2' T4@2' % by weight Sulfate (%) 0.020 0.022 NorCal Engineering 2500 1000 1500 2000 NORMAL STRESS (PSF) 2500 3000 SYMBOL X O A Q BORING Uf fUDfTDni^nDti* 1 3 4 4 DEPTH (FEET) 2.0 3.0 2.0 •5.0 i (DEGREES) 35 33 33 31 C (PSF) 150 100 50 150 DRY 116.6 113.6 113.0 111.4 MOISTURE CONTENT 2.9 5.2 2.6 6.5 NOTE: TESTS PERFORMED ON SATURATED SAMPLES UNLESS SHOWN BELOW. (FM) FIELD MOISTURE TESTS PERFORMED ON UNDISTURBED SAMPLES UNLESS SHOWN BELOW. (R) SAMPLES REMOLDED AT 90X OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY NorCal Engineering SOILS AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS PROJECT 8017-99 I DATE DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS Plate A 0- 2 _ ~ M 5** . * — —" •= 0.1 - ar>-. = "•m -=====^^ x5 — — — ^x^ — X \ • i" - N \i -\N \ NOTE: WTER AOOED AT NOWM. I \ \ * \ \ n 0 0.5 1.0 5 10 NORMAL PRESSURE (KSF) SYMBOL X O A D BORING NUMBER 1 2 4 DEPTH (FEET) 5.0 8.0 10.0 DRY DENSITY (PCF) 113.9 110.1 113.4 MOISTURE CONTENT W 4.4 5.2 6.7 LIQUID LIMIT (*) PLASTICITY INDEX (*) COMPRESSION (FM) FIELD NOISTME - NO WTE* ADDED REBOUND («) SAMPLE REMOLDED AT 901 OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY NorCal Engineering SOILS AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS •m 20 40 CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Plate B PROJECT 8017-99 1 DATE Project Number 8017-99 Appendix C NorCal Engineering TAYLOR CRITICAL HEIGHT METHOD: He *»(FS)SN WERE He = VERTICAL HEIGHT OF SLOPE, FT. C = COHESION, PSF ym = MOIST DENSITY OF SLOPE MATERIAL, PCF 1 = SLOPE ANGLE, DEGREES FS = FACTOR OF SAFETY SN = TAYLOR'S STABILITY NUMBER BASED UPON FRICTION ANGLE, *.' AND SLOPE ANGLE, i 0 = INTERNAL FRICTION ANGLE OF SOIL, DEGREES I. FOR existing 40' high 2;1 slope DIRECT SHEAR TEST DATA: A = 34 Q T c = 125psf. irp = 120'pcf. = Tan~1 /.Tan»\ ^F.S. j , FS FOR i He = , SN =.O.Q1 . ( 125PSf) ( 120PCf)(K5)(O.Ol ) 5 J9_FT. NorCal Engineering SOILS AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS PMUECT 8017-99 DATE GROSS SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS Plate C AUG-22-2000 TUE 10:29 AM CITY.OF CARLSBAD TAX NO'.".760 602 8558 P. 05 4* Citv of Carlsbad Building Department CERT'F'CATE OF COMPLIANCE SCHOOL FEES QR OT^fE* MITIGATION This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit. The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form. Project Name: Building Permit -, , Plan Check Number \_s@&0. \ Project Address: A.P.N.: Project Applicant (Owner(s) Name(s)) Project Description: Building Type: Residential E y7 />,/ . /[ ** 4 Number of New Dwelling Units / Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling 9 Second Dwelling Unit: Square Feet of Living Area in SOU Res. Additions: Cornerc./ Ind.: City Certification of Applicant's information Net Square Feet New Area are Feet Floor Area Date: iairJsbsdTJnified School District 801 Pine Ave. Carlsbad CA 92009 (729-9291) SCHOOL DISTRICTS WITHIN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD San Marcos Unified School District 215MataWay San Marcos, CA 92069 (736-2200) Igjrjjtas Union School District——- 101 South Ranch Santa Fe Rd Encinitas, CA 92024 (944-4300) San Dlegulto Union High School District 710 Encinitas Blvd. Encintos. CA 9^024 (753-6491) Certification of Applicant /Owners. The person executing this declaration ("Owner) certifies under penalty of peijury that (1) the information provided above is correct and true to the bast of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square footage after the building permit Is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and that (2) the Owner is the owner/ developer of the above described projects), or that the person executing this declaration is authorized to sign on behalf of the Owner. Signature:.Date: 2075 Las Palmas D.r- • Carlsbad. CA 92OO9-1576 - (760) 438-1161 • FAX (760) 43B-OB94 AUG-22-2000 TUE 10:30 AM CITY OF. CARLSBAD FAX NO. 760 602 8558 P. 10 SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school district(s)) THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE . BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED. SCHOOL DISTRICT: The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District. The City may issue building permits for this project. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL - DISTRICT OFFICIAL ^^^t^^i^ _ TITLE - Assistant SuperlntftnrtBftt - c?r!rt?j '.'.rf!:J ?"t<ft?l nisfrfrt. NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT usness ervce SOI pine £VJBHUe - - -C-arisSud, California 920 DATE PHONE NUMBER -- *. CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT \ \ JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY |" ~[ AVIARA OAKS ELEMENTARY ] CARLSBAD HIGH SCHOOL | | CARLSBAD VILLAGE ACADEMY | | VALLEY JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL | | BUENA VISTA SCHOOL RECEIVED FROM:' (If Applicable) PARENT OF: \ | MAGNOLIA ELEMENTARY \ \ AVIARA OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL \^\ PINE SCHOOL \^\ PACIFIC RIM \ \ KELLY SCHOOL \ \ OTHER _ ' \ \ HOPE SCHOOL ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE- NO. AMOUNT RECEIVED BY:. CASH CHECK TOTAL op- 07-22-2002 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Plan Check Revision Permit No: PCR02160 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel Mo: Valuation: Reference #: Project Title: Applicant: ROGERS BOB 129 CHINQUAPIN AV CBAD PCR 2060700400 Lot #: $0.00 Construction Type: CBOO-2095 THE PALISADES REVISE KITCHEN 0 NEW Status: ISSUED Applied: 06/04/2002 Entered By: MDP Plan Approved: 07/22/2002 Issued: 07/22/2002 Inspect Area: Owner: 1774 07/22/02 0002 01 02 CGF" 120° 949 360--1005*112 Total Fees: $120.00 Total Payments To Date:$0.00 Balance Due: $120.00 Plan Check Revision Fee Additional Fees , $120.00 $0.00 Inspector: FINAL APPROVAL Date:Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as lees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO. EST. VAL. Plan Ck. Deposit Validated By Date Address (include Bldg/Suite Business Name (at this address) Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Unit No.Phase No.Total # of units Name VJ Address City 3. APPLICANT Q Contractor Q Agent for Contractor EJowner D Agent for Owner State/Zip Telephone #Fax# Name 4^, PRpPERTY,OWWBR Address City State/Zip Telephone # so ru ri\ Address City State/Zip , Telephone # ^_ <W-<340-iaoCMrz_Name 5. CONTRACTOR - COMPANY NAME (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]). Name State License # Address License Class City State/Zip City Business License # Telephone # Designer Name State License # Address City State/Zip Telephone 67 WORKERS' COMPENSATION .5 Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: |~1 I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. [~| I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Date (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS) Q CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE DATE 7. OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: (~| I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold wijhin one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). \&t\. as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). O ' am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. l~) YES flNO 2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I haive contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): . 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): . / // „ „ , /} PROPERTY, OWNER SIGNATURE COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? fj YES C] NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? l~l YES l~l NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? Q YES d NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work fotjvhich this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAMEHg^W-0^ VXCM.(JUl/(j&. ( U>C LENDER'S ADDRESS*!^ <DObC ^0^-> j L^UM4^, *Hl<j tlci. Cfi ^llb&l 9. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is comip^nced^or a period ,pt480 days /[Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE L}DATE Be>~ YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance EsGil Corporation In Partnership with Government for Building Safety DATE: 7/17/02 . d APPLICANT" JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-2095, (PCR02-160) SET: II ^.PROJECT ADDRESS: 129 Chinquapin Ave. PROJECT NAME: Revisions to SFD The revised plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by buifding department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. ! [~\ The remarks list below transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. t The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. '; v T"""" - ~ ', The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: I f i; Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check hasjbeen completed. I Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: - ^ ^Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: i. *<>•; !' Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: Sheets A-1 and SD1 Submitted to the city must be incorporated into the city set of revised plans PCR02-160 to make a complete 2nd set of revised plans. By: Chuck Mendenhall Enclosures: ;' Esgil Corporation • ' D GA D MB D EJ D PC 7/5/02 tmsmtLdot EsGii Corporation In TartneTsliif ivitfi. government for 'Building Safety DATE: 6/12/02 O APPLICANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-2095, (PCR02-160) SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 129 Chinquapin Ave. PROJECT NAME: Revisions to SFD The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The remarks list below transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. Submit 2 sets of additional design calculations directly to EsGil Corp for review. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Carlsbad Realty Co. P.O. Box 30121, Laguna Niguel, CA 92607-0121 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Carlsbad Realty Co. (&of> Telephone #: (949) 360-1005 X112 Date contacted: G/r5/02 (by: *^) Woee-s) Fax #.: (^)3(oO./O-7>.. Mait^/ Telephone-^ Fax In Person REMARKS: Include as part of the additional calculations a design for the grade beam to be used at the new Simpson Strong walls. The grade beam must be capable of resiting uplift moments and shear. By: Chuck Mendenhall Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 06/06/02 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 * (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 00-2095, (PCR02-160) 6/12/02 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-2O95, (PCR02-160) PREPARED BY: Chuck Mendenhall DATE: 6/12/02 BUILDING ADDRESS: 129 Chinquapin Ave. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN BUILDING PORTION revision Air Conditioning F:ire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code AREA ( Sq. Ft.) NA cb Rldn Pprmit FPP hv Ordinanrp V Valuation Multiplier Hrly 3y Ordinance Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) ; i ^ * • J! 1 [ 1; 1 ],' 1 I i | i i: ! • ( ,! i, i Plan Check Fee by Ordinance $120.00 Type of Review: CD Repetitive Fee Repeats Complete Review D Other .—. Hourly Structural Only Hour1 Esgil Plan Review Fee $96.00 * Based on hourly rate Comments: Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc PLANNING/ENGINEERING APPROVALS PERMIT NUMBER ADDRESS At/tf* DATE RESIDENTIAL ADDITION MINOR «$10f 000.00) TENANT IMPROVEMENT \ PLAZA CAMINO REAL il ..' '' . i • CARLSBAD COMPANY STORES i| VILLAGE FAIRE i COMPLETE OFFICE BUILDING OTHER tSro^ f PLANNER ENGINEER DATE DATE Docs/Misf araumannina Engineering Approvals ,-T ut o-»:uup Bob 8. Robin Rogers 949.675.2610 GCtiOA DESIGNS . PC. . iJuNTfokTTtfN &CACU. CA 92640 (714)84-0643 PROJECT:THE PALISADES 129 CHINQUAPIN CARLSBAD, CA, CRITERIA. CALIFORNIA I p.l MATERIALS:EXCEPT AS No. «u/v... CONCRETE FOUNDATION SOIL CONCRETE BLOCK BRICK REINFORCED STEEL STRUCTURAL STEEL WELDING STRUCTURAL PIPE PLYWOOD SHEATHING GLUE LM BEAMS LUMBER SOIL PRESSURE CONCRETE CONCRETE BLOCK STEEL LUMBER 2500 PSt AT 28 DAYS 1000 PSF GRADE N, MED WT UNITS (ASTM C-90) PER ASTMC-62, MW GRADE 20.000 PS1 (ASTM /W319 GRADE 40) 24.000 PSI (ASTM A-36, COMPACT) A1SC1987 ED. ELECT ARC PROCESS BY CERTIFIED WELDERS 35,000 PSI (ASTM A-53) GRADE B DOUGLAS FIR, STRUC 1.1NTR., PS. 1-76 2400 PSI (D.F. COMB F24) GRADE MARKED Of PERWCLB GRDG RULE 16 1000 PSF Ad DESIGN HANDBOOK CONC MASONRY DESIGN MANUAL. CMA MANUAL OF STEEL CONST. AJSC WOOD STRUCT DESIGN MANUAL. CMA ALL WOOD DOUGLAS IPift LARCH 1t% MAX. MOIST. CONTENT. (LUMBER «/f1) 2X4 2n6 2x8 2x10 2x12 2x14 6x10/12 GLB Mloratatn CVL Fv 95 95 95 95 95 85 85 165 20$ Ft> 1315/1510 1140/1310 1055/1210 98Sm05 675/1005 790/905 1390/1600 2400 2600 EX1 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 t.6 1.6 1.6 1.8 20 4x8 4x10 4x12 4x14 4x16 Paraum PSL Fv B6 95 05 95 9S 95 290 Fb 1140/1300 1140/1300 1050/1200 965/1100 875/1000 875/1000 2900 EXKT6 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 2.0 -OIB9 OV6W uc uH-.uup Bob 8, Robin Rogers 949.675.2610 p.2 1GNACIO G. OCHOA, P.E- 7692 QUEBEC DRIVE HUNTINCTON BEACM. C ft - » 2 6 4 « (714) 841-C64J -a* see BO*otew IGNACIO G. OCHOA, P.E. 7692 QUEBEC DRIVE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 (714) 841-0643 DESIGNS 7692 <?ULE>cr PRiVc. !. CA 92648 \gnaao CJ",. PC. PROJECT: THE PALISADES 129 CHINQUAPIN CARLSBAD, CA.REV. #1 (WALL G) CRITERIA: CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE 1998 MATERIALS; EXCEPT AS NOTED OTHERWISE ^Ayo-u CONCRETE FOUNDATION SOIL CONCRETE BLOCK BRICK REINFORCED STEEL STRUCTURAL STEEL WELDING STRUCTURAL PIPE PLYWOOD SHEATHING GLUE LM BEAMS LUMBER SOIL PRESSURE DESIGN REFERENCES: CONCRETE CONCRETE BLOCK STEEL LUMBER 2500 PS I AT 28 DAYS 1000 PSF GRADE N, MED..WT UNITS (ASTM C-90) PER ASTM C-621 MW GRADE 20,000 PSI (ASTM A-615 GRADE 40) 24,000 PSI (ASTM A-36, COMPACT) AISC 1997 ED. ELECT ARC PROCESS BY CERTIFIED WELDERS 35,000 PSI (ASTM A-53) GRADE B DOUGLAS FIR, STRUC 1, INTR , P.S. 1-76 2400 PSI (D.F. COMB F24) GRADE MARKED DF PER WCLB GRDG RULE 16 1000 PSF ACI DESIGN HANDBOOK CONC MASONRY DESIGN MANUAL, CMA MANUAL OF STEEL CONST. AISC WOOD STRUCT DESIGN MANUAL, CMA ALL WOOD DOUGLAS FIR LARCH 19% MAX. MOIST. CONTENT. (LUMBER #2/#1) 2x4 2x6 2x8 2x10 2x12 2x14 6x10/12 GLB Microlam LVL Fv 95 95 95 95 95 95 85 165 285 Fb 1315/1510 1140/1310 1055/1210 965/1105 875/1005 790/905 1350/1600 2400 2600 EX10*6 1,6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 . 1.6 1.6 1.8 20 4x6 4x8 4x10 4x12 4x14 4x16 Paralam PSL Fv 95 95 95 95 95 95 290 Fb 1140/1300 1140/1300 1050/1200 965/1100 875/1000 875/1000 2900 EX10*6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 2.0 IGNACIO G. OCHOA, P. E. 7692 QUEBEC DRIVE HUNTING'TON. BEACH, CA . 92648 (714) 841-0643 10 = x If O / & OCHOA DESIGNS 7692 QUEBEC DRIVE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 926' (714) 841-0643 f K 3 Ignacio G. Ochoa, P.E. RCE# 35217 Exp. 9/30/03 PROJECT: THE PALISADES ' CARLSBAD, CA. PLAN 3 I CRITERIA: CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE 1998 MATERIALS: EXCEPT AS NOTED OTHERWISE CONCRETE FOUNDATION SOIL CONCRETE BLOCK BRICK REINFORCED STEEL STRUCTURAL STEEL WELDING STRUCTURAL PIPE PLYWOOD SHEATHING GLUE LM BEAMS LUMBER SOIL PRESSURE DESIGN REFERENCES: CONCRETE CONCRETE BLOCK STEEL LUMBER ALL WOOD DOUGLAS FIR LARCH: 2500 PSI AT 28 DAYS 1000 PSF (assumed) GRADE N, LT WT UNITS (ASTM C-90) PER ASTM C-62.MW GRADE 20,000 PSI (ASTM A-615 GRADE 40) 24,000 PSI (ASTM A-36, COMPACT) AISC 1997 ED, ELECT ARC PROCESSBY CERTIFIED WELDERS 35000 PSI (ASTM A-53) GRADE B DOUGLAS FIR, STRUG 1, INTR..P.S. 1-76 2400 PSI (D.F. COMB F24) GRADE MARKED DF PER WCLB GRDG RULE 16 1000 PSF (assumed)) ACI DESIGN HANDBOOK CONC MASONRY DESIGN MANUAL, CMA MANUAL OF STEEL CONST. AISC. WOOD STRUCT DESIGN DATA, NLMA No. 2 No. 1 GLB Fv 95 PSI 85 PSI 165 PSI Fb. 875 PSI 1350P[SI 2400 PSI E(X1000000) 1.6 PSI 1.6 PSI 1.8 PSI f I.G. OCHOA, P.E. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA (714)841-0643 RCE#35217. Exp. 9/30/03 TVLi^ * H*= m^ffe - .^t4t» s- h\c<^ ^ 2P^" 70,0 f^p 1-5 J.Ci £,<S ^,0 = .'72. fjr LL - OGHUA 3 I \\ \\i. M==|: rt'i \\-L- H 3 Ii Hi IA3 I.G. OCHOA, P.E. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA (714) 841-0643 RCE#35217 Exp. 9/30/03 OCHOA DtS/o/vo ' \\-o -4 -o I.G. OCHOA, P.E. HUNT1NGTON BEACH, CA (714)841-0643 RCE#35217 Exp. 9/30/03 3 5? p I II 7-a. 13.8 -o - 3 ^ OCHOA I.G.OCHOA, P.E. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA (714)841-0643 RCE#35217 Exp. 9/30/03 V1? I.G. OCHOA, P.E. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA (714)841-0643 35217 Exp. 9/30/03 Hio DESIGNS I.G. OCHOA, P.E. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA (714) 841-0643 RCE#35217 Exp. 9/30/03 = 30. 2, 3 3 V 4 N) = -7 .so = 36. M OCHOA DESIGNS *• l.G. OCHOA, P.E. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA (714)841-0643 RCE#'35217 Exp. 9/30/03 -- 50737 L- 37.?_8 ^ 5683 \V -^ s - s V V - /fO -- 55, -3 u OCHOA I.G. OCHOA, P.E. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA (714)841-0643 RCE#35217 Exp. 9/30/03 >< /O • 4 ( =S^*|.n- S*Hp = m H= N V\ S 1= * OCHOA I.G. OCHOA, P.E. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA (714)841-0643 RCE#35217 Exp. 9/30/03 -> OCHOA DESIGNS I.G. OCHOA, P.E. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA (714)841-0643 RCE#35217 Exp. 9/30/03 = i\7 ot 60S OCHOA I G. OCHOA, P.E. HUNT1NGTON BEACH, CA (714) 841-0643 RCE# 35217 Exp. 9/30/03 S *.354 OCHOA DESIGNS • "*'' I.G. OCHOA, P.E. ^7 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA (714) 841-0643 ^ RCE# 35217 Exp. 9/30/03 7—T.1 1'M.t< f iiri^tri -f/.^ = -s.*) OCHOA DESIGNS I.G. OCHOA, P.E. HUNT1NGTON BEACH, CA (714) 841-0643 RCE#35217 Exp. 9/30/03 7^2^T( = /. *^. I - 1. 81 )/ fof I9" = s OCHOA DESIGNS I.G. OCHOA, P.E. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA (714)841-0643 RCE#35217 Exp. 9/30/03 iV6 A OCHOA DESIGNS I.G. OCHOA, P.E. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA (714) 841-0643 RCE# 35217 Exp. 9/30/03 Arf s _•7 (/a) -A 338-72^ A V OCHOA DESIGNS I.G. OCHOA, P.E. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA (714) 841-0643 RCE#35217 Exp. 9/30/03 T if OCHOA DESIGNS t^kt^ \4= 3 *fr£>&6 a Q 2/3 - -s-o^v-neo, ' I.G. OCHOA, P.E. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA (714) 841-064335217 ExP. 9/30/03 T^T ' ivl