The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1305 LAUREL TREE LN; ; CB983818; PermitCity of Carlsbad , 04/13/1999 Building Permit Permit No:CB983818 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Occupancy Group: Project Title: Building Inspection Request Line (760) 438-3101 1305 LAUREL TREE LN CBAD APT Sub Type: 2120405900 Lot#: $471,661.00 Construction Type: VN Reference#: SDP95-01 BLDG 21,UNITS 161-163,261-263 Status: Applied: Entered By: Appr/lssued: Inspect Area: ISSUED 05/20/1998 RMA 04/13/1999 6278 SF+1372 SF PORC,BALC+PATIO-LAUREL T C,& 9 i I 54'-{ Applicant: CUATROCORP 1770 4TH AV 92101 619 687-7380 ' " + Owner: ll'i LAUREL TREE INVESTMENTe,b04/13/99 0001 01 02 • , H ..1...C;..lllf'Rl~!ffR'--~4"'S"'22"'7>-..... 3e-+ + ? 'I,,.\ 0 ) :3"-b</-3 . 3 ~ Total Fees: $45,227 .3& ' · Totat!liayments To Dats:· \ /" $0.00 ' . O(IQil:lce Due: $45,227.38 h ' Fee Description .. . ,. -----------------------••-•--------------~----------•----~••-~h-~-~-------------- * ELECTRICAL TOTAL * MECHANICAL TOTAL * PLUMBING TOTAL Building Permit Enter #Units & Code-Pot,.: · Enter Y to Autocalc P. or manually enter Bridg or manually enter T.I.F Payoff Fee for CFD Plan Check Strong Motion Fee Inspector: I< B ' ' ' ' ' ' FINAL APPROVAL s--::i.~,qy Date: 110.00 134. 00 364.00 1,923.00 5 400 00 C a'. SB4. oo,1U>Tj1~ 9,360.00 1,944.00 16,111.38 1,250.00 47.00 Clearance: ______ _ NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions: You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your rMJht to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capactiy changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or seivice fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which uou have nreviouslv been aiven a NOTICE similar to this or as to which the statute of limitations has oreviouslv otherwise exnired. CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr,, Carlsbad, CA 92009 (7601438-1161 ~ ~"'-"Al\'\. .. ~ .. ..Ji/. c:,{4 "QS. -~ • .-;,.~¢<') ,.;-"2..-C,O 'c,u:l;;-,u..""2, -_.._~~--\,.-...... i:l"ti:(01 s;.., 'tJ>.-~<»>~ e"'-~"-l..4i, ~ -€,-q;,i::o., , .... ~~I.."' lr"Q.~ o,,.) Inspection List Permit#: CB983818 Type: APT BLDG 21,UNITS 161-163,261-263 6278 SF+1372 SF PORC,BALC+PATIO-LA Date Inspection Item Inspector Act Comments 5/1/2000 89 Final Combo RB AP 4/28/2000 89 Final Combo RI 4/28/2000 89 Final Combo RB co 4/27/2000 89 Final Combo RI 4/27/2000 89 Final Combo RB co 4/26/2000 89 Final Combo RB NR 4/26/2000 89 Final Combo RI 4/21/2000 39 Final Electrical RB AP EMR 4/21/2000 89 Final Combo RI 4/21/2000 89 Final Combo RB CA FOR ROUTING ONLY 4/21/2000 89 Final Combo RI 4/19/2000 31 Underground/Conduit-Wirin DA NS 4/19/2000 31 Underground/Conduit-Wirin RI 3/8/2000 84 Rough Combo RB NS 2/29/2000 23 GasfTest/Repairs RB AP 2/10/2000 17 Interior Lath/Drywall RB NR HAVE BOXES FLASH W/ DRYWALL 2/9/2000 17 Interior Lath/Drywall RB co EXTEND ALL BOXES FLUSH TO DRYWALL 2/8/2000 17 Interior Lath/Drywall RB NS 2/4/2000 13 Shear Panels/H D's RB NS 2/2/2000 17 Interior Lath/Drywall RB PA 1ST LAYER OK 2/1/2000 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall RB AP 1/31/2000 16 Insulation RB AP 1/25/2000 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin RB co ND ESGIL APPR ON TRUSSES 1/25/2000 24 RoughfTopout RB AP 1/25/2000 34 Rough Electric RB AP 1/25/2000 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers RB AP 1/24/2000 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin RB NR ON CORREC. 1/24/2000 34 Rough Electric RB NR 1/24/2000 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers RB NR 1/21/2000 84 Rough Combo RB CA BY TOM 1/20/2000 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin RB co 1/20/2000 34 Rough Electric RB co 1/20/2000 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers RB co 1/19/2000 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin RB co ON PRELIM 1/19/2000 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall RB NR 1/19/2000 34 Rough Electric RB NS 1/19/2000 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers RB NS 1/18/2000 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin RB co FOR PRELIM INSP. 1/18/2000 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall RB NR 1/18/2000 34 Rough Electric RB NS 1/18/2000 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers RB CA BY TOM 1/14/2000 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin RB co 1/14/2000 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin RB co Tuesday, May 02, 2000 Page 1 of 3 1/14/2000 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall RB NR ND FRMG APPRVL 1ST 1/14/2000 34 Rough Electric RB co FOR 1 ST FLR B UNIT ONLY 1/14/2000 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers RB co 1/13/2000 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin RB NS 1/13/2000 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall RB NS 1/13/2000 34 Rough Electric RB NS 1/13/2000 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers RB NS 1/12/2000 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin RB NR 1/12/2000 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall RB NR 1/12/2000 24 Rough/Topout RB NR 1/12/2000 34 Rough Electric RB NR 1/11/2000 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin RB NS 1/11/2000 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PD AP 1/11/2000 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall RB NS 1/11/2000 34 Rough Electric RB NS 1/11/2000 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers RB NS 1/10/2000 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin TP NS 1/10/2000 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall TP NS 1/10/2000 34 Rough Electric TP NS 1/10/2000 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers TP NS 1/7/2000 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin PD co BUILD DROPS 1/7/2000 34 Rough Electric PD co 1/6/2000 34 Rough Electric PD NS 1/5/2000 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin PD CA 1/5/2000 34 Rough Electric PD CA 12/21/1999 13 Shear Panels/HD's RB WC 12/21/1999 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin RB PA PRELIM @TAB AREAS OK 12/17/1999 13 Shear Panels/HD's RB NR ON INTERIOR PRE LIM INSP 12/16/1999 24 Rough/Topout RB CA WRONG BLDG CALLED IN 12/7/1999 34 Rough Electric RB co STOP-HAVE ESGIL APPR. NOT PER PLN 12/7/1999 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers RB co STILL ND ENG. FOR DUCT SIZE CHANGES 12/6/1999 34 Rough Electric RB NS 12/6/1999 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers RB NS 12/3/1999 34 Rough Electric RB NS 12/3/1999 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers RB NS 12/2/1999 24 Rough/Topout RB NS 12/2/1999 34 Rough Electric RB NR 12/2/1999 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers RB co 11/30/1999 84 Rough Combo RB NS 11/24/1999 13 Shear Panels/HD's RB AP 11/22/1999 13 Shear Panels/HD's RB NR 11/22/1999 84 Rough Combo RB WC 11/18/199913 Shear Panels/HD's RB co MANY CORRECTIONS NEEDED 11/18/1999 14 Frame/Steel/Bolling/Weldin RB WC 11/10/1999 34 Rough Electric RB NR COURTESY INSPE 11/9/1999 13 Shear Panels/HD's RB CA BY GLEN 11/8/1999 24 Rough/Topout RB CA 11/3/1999 13 Shear Panels/HD's RB co STOP -TOO MANY CORR. -NOT COMPLETE 11/3/199915 Roof/Reroof RB AP 11/2/1999 13 Shear Panels/HD's RB NS Tuesday, May 02, 2000 Page 2 of3 11/2/1999 15 Roof/Re roof RB AP 11/2/1999 24 RoughfTopout RB AP 11/1/199924 RoughfTopout RB NS 10/29/1999 13 Shear Panels/HD's RB CA 10/27/1999 15 Roof/Reroof RB NR SEE NOTICE ATTACHED 10/25/1999 15 Roof/Re roof RB co 10/22/1999 15 Roof/Reroof RB NS 10/21/1999 15 Roof/Reroof RB CA BY STEVE 10/19/1999 15 Roof/Reroof RB co 10/18/1999 15 Roof/Reroof RB CA 10/13/1999 15 Roof/Reroof RB CA 10/12/1999 15 Roof/Re roof RB NR 10/12/1999 24 RoughfTopout RB WC 10/7/1999 15 Roof/Reroof RB co 10/6/1999 15 Roof/Reroof RB NS 7/19/1999 11 Fig/Foundation/Piers DH AP 7/15/1999 11 Fig/Foundation/Piers DH NR NO SPECIAL INSP 6/24/1999 21 Underground/Under Floor DH AP 6/21/1999 21 Underground/Under Floor DH co PLANS CALL FOR CAST IRON C/O Tuesday, May 02, 2000 Page 3 of3 ~ CIIY Of Carlsbad i13 Final Building Inspection Dept: Building Engineering Plannin~~t Lite Plan Check#: ~- Fire Date: 4/21/2000 Permit#: CB983818 Permit Type: APT Project Name: BLDG 21,UNITS 161-163,261-263 Sub Type: 6278 SF+1372 SF PORC,BALC+PATIO-LAUREL T Address: 1305 LAUREL TREE LN Lot: Contact Person: BRETT Phone: 7609186733 Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: __ Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: __ ··························································································································································· Comments: ----------,-----1,,---------------------~(-::r I -~ City 01 Carlsbad Ela Final Building Inspection _ Dept: Building Engineering Planning CMWD (St-~Fire Plan Check#: \_____/ Date: Permit#: CB983818 Project Name: BLDG 21,UNITS 161-163,261-263 Address: 6278 SF+1372 SF PORC,BALC+PATIO-LAUREL T 1305 LAUREL TREE LN Contact Person: BRETT Sewer Dist: CA ~;:pecf §JS;-- Inspected By: Inspected By: Phone: 7609186733 Water Dist: CA Date 4 ------ Inspected· -7b Date Inspected: Date Inspected: 4/21/2000 Permit Type: APT Sub Type: Lot: Approved: Disapproved~ Approved: Disapproved: __ Approved: Disapproved: __ Comments: _______________________________ _ City Of Carlsbad ~ ·; Final Building Inspection -'11)'1"~ ' .. Dept: Building Engineering Planning CMWD Plan Check#: St lites 4/21/2000 Permit#: Project Name: Address: CB983818 BLDG 21.UNITS 161-163,261-263 6278 SF+1372 SF PORC.BALC+PATIO-LAUREL T 1305 LAUREL TREE LN Contact Person: BRETT Phone: 7609186733 Water Dist: CA Sewer Dist: CA Lot: Permit Type: APT Sub Type: ··········································································•'"'''·········································································· Inspected Date '10 ✓CJ /Disapproved: __ By: ?11.a. Inspected: Approved: Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: __ Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: __ ............................................... , .......................................................................................................... , Comments: ________________________________ _ -j 03 March 1 999 GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION, INC. SOIL & FOUNDATION ENGINEERING • GROUNDWATER HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT • ENGINEERING GEOLOGY MAR O 4 1999 CA TELL US RESIDENTIAL GROUP 5 Park Place, Suite 400 Job No. 95-6794 Irvine, CA 92614 Attn: Mr. Scott Orrantia Subject: Expansion Index Test Results Building Pad Areas, Proposed Laurel Tree Apartment Project Northeast Quadrant of Cobblestone Road and Aviara Parkway Carlsbad, California Dear Mr. Orrantia: As requested, we are herein providing the results of Expansion Index tests obtained from representative soil samples taken at subgrade elevations in building pad areas. The tests were performed during the last week of February 1999, in accordance with UBC 29-2 Standard procedures. The results are provided in order to follow the recommendations in our soils reports and the post-tensioned slab plans for soils classified as low to medium expansive, and also for highly expansive. The test results were as follows: tot Nos, El Test Soil Expansion Minimum Foundation Result Classification Depth 1 68 Medium 18" 2, 3 54 Medium 18" 4, 5, 6 46 Low 18" 7, 8 53 Medium 18" 9, 10 47 Low 1811 11 45 Low 18" 12, 13 39 Low 18" 14 45 Low 1 8" 15, 16 93 High 24" 17, 18 53 Medium 18" 19, 20 49 Low 18" 21, 24 72 Medium 18" 22, 23 84 Medium 18" 7420 TRADE STREET• SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92121 • (619) 549-7222 • FAX: (619) 549-1604 ., -Laurel Tree Apartment Project Carlsbad, California Job No. 95-6794 Page 2 In general, the foundations shall be embedded 18 inches into the ground for low to medium expansive soils, and 24 inches for highly expansive soils. The depth of foundation shall be measured from the lowest adjacent grade. Since the soils have varying expansion potential, it is recommended that the soil moisture content be maintained above the optimum by sprinkling the soil surface at least every other day. Allowing the soil to dry out may cause soil shrinkage and cracking and increase its expansion potential. Our field representative shall verify soil moisture adequacy and compaction within 48 hours prior to concrete placement for footings and slabs on grade. All other recommendations presented in our reports for this project remain applicable unless superseded in writing by our firm. LIMIIAIIONS The findings and opinions presented herein have been made in accordance with generally accepted principles and practice in the field of geotechnical engineering. No warranty either expressed or implied, is made. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact our office. Reference to our Job No. 95-6794 will help to expedite a response to your inquiries. Respectfully submitted, G~~ONC. Jaime A. Cerros, P.E. R.C.E. 34422/G.E. 2007 Senior Geotechnical Engineer cc: Addressee Mr. Steve Kuptz Mr. Mike Davies Mr. D.J. Bhar GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION, INC. SOIL & FOUNDATION ENGINEERING GROUNDWATER • GEOPHYSICS • ENGINEERING GEOLOGY FIELD REPORT ON OBSERVATION OF FOUNDATIONS DATE: TIME: CLIENT: JOB NO. b '" L-\ ------- PROJECT NAME: ~v\)...b L ~c.'l. PROJECT ADDREss: L~....,~~ '-,~ a~ ~ '\) . □ □ □ The footing excavations listed below were bottomed on material for which the bearing values recommended in the foundation report are applicable. The cast-in-place drilled friction piles listed below penetrated material for which the allowable supporting capacities recommended in the foundation report are applicable. The piles were excavated to diameters at least as large as specified and the excavations extended at least to the depths indicated on the Foundation Plans. The excavations for the cast-in-place belled piers listed below were bottomed on material for which the bearing values recommended in the foundation report are applicable. The excavations were at least as large as specified on the Foundation Plans. The driven piles listed below were observed to be driven to the specified lengths and/or driving resistances o obtain the supporting capacities recommended in the foundation report. Based upon observations, t is our opinion thatt4.he foundation recom.o;iendations presented in the report of the foundation investigation, Job No.'-1 ~~~'"Yr dated ~ J ~-C\:56 ~/Jgre not) applicable to the con itions observed. Foundation Plans by ~,;<\..,: v ,,., ....,::;,\..\..,~~<-, ~O..~ dated \ -~~~~ ~ _were used as a reference for our observations. \ NOTE: 1. The observations reported above do not constitute an approval of foundation location, footing size or dept~( reinforcement, or foundation design. 2. Loose, soft, or disturbed soils must be removed prior to placement of reinforcement or concrete. I 3. The opinions and r commendations presented in this report were based upon our o bserva- tions and are pres nted in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering practke. We make no other warranty, eit::, e-xi:,,&'-r..,~"-s~o .... r h ... im:....._p-lie_d_._-.i. _________ _ ..... • GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION, INC . SOIL & FOUNDATION ENGINEERING GROUNDWATER • GEOPHYSICS • ENGINEERING GEOLOGY FIELD REPORT ON OBSERVATIION OF FOUNDATIONS DATE: )-I~-~~ TIME: 1) . 'N"\ - CLIENT: _c._~_~_lc_t.._:..,_~---'--~.a.....;..;~::;....c.,_. G:..,__Q_;:::)-.1_~_ PROJECT NAME: L~.......,~~ L.. ,Q...~--c.. JOB NO. ~ )~ \\ □ □ The footing excavati9 s listed below were bottomed on material for which the bearing values recommended in the foundation report are applicable. The cast-in-place d illed friction piles listed below penetrated material for which the allowable supporting capacities recommended in the foundation report are applicable. The piles were excavated to diameters at least as large as specified and the excavations extended at least to the depths indicated on the Foundation Plans. The excavations for Jhe cast-in-place belled piers listed below were bottomed on material for which the bearing values recommended in the foundation report are applicable. The excavations were at I .ast as large as specified on the Foundation Plans. The driven piles lis ed below were observed to be driven to the specified lengths and/or D driving resistances o obtain the supporting capacities recommended in the foundation report. Based upon observations, )t Is our opinion that the f~undation recommendations present¢.j_n the report of the foundation nvestigation, Job No. 3,s ,~"\~ ':\, dated 3 · \', · ~ % ~/(are not) ap~licable t9-1 e con it ions observed. Foundation Plans by b go..., <t;1> ,_ \t-)\\.\..1~w-~ ('$lll ~ dated \-do-.\..>..~'-'\ were used as a reference for our observations. NOTE: 2. The observations reported above do not constitute an approval of foundation location, footing size or dept~, reinforcement, or foundation design. Loose, soft, or dis urbed soils must be removed prior to placement of reinforcement or concrete. 3. The opinions and r commendations presented in this report were based upon our observa- tions and are pres nted in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering practiee. We make no other warranty, eit::, e~~ • I -· GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION, INC. SOIL & FOUNDATION ENGINEERING GROUNDWATER • GEOPHYSICS • ENGINEERING GEOLOGY FIELD REPORT ON OBSERJ ION OF FOUNDATIONS CLIENT: .C:::~-e,. "'~ ~'t:-<i-C Q~~ DATE: TIME: JOB NO. _(,_'r\ __ '-\_ PROJECT NAME:~-~-'-___ \ _~_C._t.. __________ _ PROJECT ADDRESS: L-{::\JQ._~ I..... \<Q.~\_ ~ 0 -<._~~\.. <)~ ~'5) □ □ □ I The footing excavations listed below were bottomed on material for which the bearing values recommended in the oundation report are applicable. The cast-in-place d illed friction piles listed below penetrated material for which the allowable supporting capacities recommended in the foundation report are applicable. The piles were excavated to diameters at least as large as specified and the excavations extended at least to the depths indicated on the Foundation Plans. The excat ations for lhe cast-in-place belled piers listed below were bottomed on material for which1 the bearing values recommended in the foundation report are applicable. The excavations were at I ?ast as large as specified on the Foundation Plans. The driven piles listed below were observed to be driven to the specified lengths and/or driving resistances 10 obtain the supporting capacities recommended in the foundation report. Based upon observations, t is our opinion that~ f~ation reco~ndati2.ns.., presented..Jn the report of the foundation nvestigation, Job No."\"';::,' : l'\1.\ dated ~ •Pr"'\ 't'!) ~/(ar~ not) applicablF. to the conditions observed. Foundation Plans by ~vj,~ \);~-.~ \)',I\L\.1~~<) 's'Q~.-,""\ dated \ -d..~-~~ were used as a reference for our observations. ~o \ ~"(\..,'v0... ~~"-'~ ,.r- ~ '\) fS~'\ ~ f-:\ ~ 'c. 'f\ ~ , NOTE: 1. The observations r5ported above do not constitute an approval of foundation location, footing size or dept~, reinforcement, or foundation design. 2. Loose, soft, or disturbed soils must be removed prior to placement of reinforcement or concrete. 3. The opinions and r ommendations presented in this report were based upon our observa- tions and are pres <>nted in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering practice. We make o other warran.ty, e;•::, e,~ I ~ ---·--~. -•r~ " _ .. (.;-• .-J~~\. .. ' -... .r -,._ " ·~~ -T ...... ~r. ~ .. . .. . . < ;,~t:: ~~~r . -i ' ~~~□ GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION, INC. SOIL & FOUNDATION ENGINEERING .. GROUNDWATER • GEOPHYSICS • ENGINEERING GEOLOGY Job Name L~"'\\.~'-,'2..Ee: Job# (, •C\l\ Date ,-,5 -c., ' Project Location: L ~~,Q,.~ '-' <~.:t C. ~\). CP\~<,~C\'J Summary of Observations °'I:_·. ~:)~0..t; (-:\, '=. x~"c '\. ~ ..) 1'\... ~:::,~ <.,_"', ~~~ L5'S ~' .. cl,.,., , C H-t. (_ -.(b. t, ~ ->•~'-"-.'I> ~~ -I'~ ~ -,i:\ ~ ~ ' "'(\._ ~\..J ........ t)~?,--~⇒~~lo,. ..... ~-=>.....,_ L6'"~ l. \ ' ~)_ ~~ ~-~::,, ~\..,~ ~ ~ ~ P\~\ ~c... ~ ~ --c:i.......__c,,._ ""ll ,~ ~°'-.-::>~ \ °' ... ~ \ °\o, -+L \..,-...~"':> \.,.-'-., ~~"\.. "Q, "'~ C. ~'<(-.'+--~" ~j,~'-'O......~ @ ""'~\~ ~L~~ \)'-.J~ ,~ ''< ~ -L ~ '-~........,. \1,-' ~~ '-J \ ~ ....... '£:. \2:.. ~ ~--~ "":, ~,-,.., I I'• Recommendation: j I . - By: ·/:Jd/4 Received by: --:R • .-.--. 11 A. ..... --I \ -\ ' • • I SOUTHER:N CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC . 6280 RIVERDALE STiEET, P.O. BOX 600627, SAN DIEGO, CA 92160-0627, Phone (619) 280-4321, FAX (619) 280-4717 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT FOR: 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE O REINFORCED MASONRY □WELDING 0 FIREPROOFING (j]1".T, CONCRETE 0 EPOXY ANCHORS OH. s. BOLTING □ PROJECTTITLE ,.. ~ _ ,. _P'fA ,.::,r U _ _,,.~ SCS&T FILE No. PROJECT LOCATION I~ ; ~A ~:.JI PERMIT No. J I ..l'r7~ I PLAN FILE No. -. JJCJ ARCHITECT ENGINEER GENERAL CONTRACTOR (};_,£,4.A £ t'--. # -SUB CONTRACTOR MATERIAL CLASSIFICATION Jl b Is -A J,e-/ _,,,,, 7_..,../~ -, ' Pr /.-. _r;_,.,~ J/....::Z.. I DATE DESCRIPTION OF WORK INSPECTED 7/,q/f/CJ .,I.. --./I ~ a.,r, VA,&;.( ~ _.p,,,,,__,., ~ • ~ --:/ ,,.J _,..., O_.<. ~-_/,Y"JA('P A ~ -. . I .4/2~_/-: P.11~ 7✓ -. ._L,,, -~ A .~f7 _L ,? ~f-~~-_ _, UA JI ~..::f-__,,"'_--<d ~P ✓.:1..1 _.., ~ ~ -... ~./4 . .n _c, _,/,..-, r-,.LJJ::~_.,-# <f£,Pd,/1 Y tr-r _.j ~--P ,:f ~ (} 7 p' -;;t -"I ti' I IJ-11~ ,,~.L) f: ~ -7 -•~ ,,,_,I -I 2. I ) l.,£; r .7 .... ~4-A PP 'lhod ~4) 78.3~ ,. 2.2.. 11 O;>., ~a_.., __ .,,, #,~ 7 ~ q ,;-., '1',.;> ( .,, 2.2.. ?_~ 1 10 I ~~-_,,,~/ E~ -✓er--e . q p 381) ~ ~ ~/ .-:Z...7J ~_, ·-"':..,,,.., ;;,-.-r '1 _,, -# t' '1 A A,,,,, ~---~ ,-,.,.,~ . _/ _/'~ .,,. ~ ~-, t?' - . . I \ I I I . I " I . I I -.-,, I hereby certify that I have Inspected the above •eported (~~ ---(!):."" r 80-J r l work. Unless noted otherwise, the work lnspecled Is to the best of my knowledge in compliance with the approved ...__, ~ / INSPECTORS SIGNATURE / REGISTRATION No. plans, specifications and applicable sections of the I j governing building laws. I SUPERINTENDANTS SIGNATURE " DATE