The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1311 OAK AVE; ; CB951853; Permit'0000 .,B UI L D I N G P E R N I T Permit No: CB95185:3 02/09796 16:21 - Project No: A9502717 Page. 1 of I Development No: Job Address: 1311 OAK AV Suite: Permit Type: RESIDENTAL ADD/ALT Parcel No: 205-020-14-00 Lot#: Valuation: 118,252 Construction Type: VN Occupancy Group: R3 Reference#: Status: ISSUED Description: 1258 SF RAD,BEDROOM & FAMILY Applied: 12/20/95 Apr/Issue: 02/09/96 Entered By: RMA Appl/Ownr :.NEFF, RAYMOND 619-72041884 1311 OAK AV CARLSBAD, CA *** Fees -Required - & Credits - Fees: 1, 312. Adjustthnts:. /00 -, 0 . -Total Gi 85 V--\ .00 Total Fees: 1,31,.00 • •Total Psymens: '\. -459.00 ' I - • al nc e.Du :- 853 .00 Fee description f -fL. Units F-kit .\ Ext fee Data Building Permit /- 706.00 Plan Check . •• 459.00 Strong Motion Fee 12 00 * BUILDING TOTAL /1!: 1177.00 Enter'Y' for I lj 56. 00 Each Building Sewer .1'51., 0 0 15. 00 lk * PLUMBING TOTAL \ I INCOPORTEO / 91.00 RA Enter "1 for Electric Issue-F5-ee > 1952 . ')..*-1 10.00 1 Enter "Y" for Remodel \ . ._c\XJ 10.00 1 ELECTRICAL TOTAL ' 15.00 1 Install Furn/Ducts/Heat Pumps .- * MECHANICAL TOTAL • 24.00 5979 02/09/96 0001 01 02 - C---•PRMT 459.00 /-APPROVAL I NS DATE/OZ7_q2 CLEARANCE.____________ k I U CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 4 ;I, PERMIT APP11CAnON - PLAN CHECK NO ql) n City of Carlsbad BuiLdir,Department. •- . . ;. ,. . .' - fI #). , 2075 Las PaLns-Dr, CarLsbad, CA 92009(619) 438-1161 - -. sr.v If '; j52 PLAN (3K DEPOSIT LJC4 'b 1. PERMIT TYPE • - VALID. BY DATE ___/ From List 1(see back) give code of Permit-Type: For Residential Projects Only: From List 2 (see back) give' . - -- . . - ... 524O 12/20,'95 OOO1'.O. 02 Code ofStructure-rype: S F 0 ". •: C-PRIIT . 459;, 00'. ,,.t , . . :.. Net Loss/Gain of Dwelling Units 2. PROJECT INFORMATION. . .-.. - .. - - FOR OFFICE USE-ONLY Address . . • Building or. Suite No. . . . IeL/crossQt 4 12L40. .' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number, . -. Unit No. Phase No. - - ----i--- - - . - -- •-'--- - ---, . -'•-. CHECK BELOW IF SUBMIYIED: - • - . --- . ... . .. - - 02 Energy Calcs 02 Structural Calcs 02 Soils Report - 0 1 Addressed Envelope . .• . ,.,. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL ¶&bfj '1D 1'--)° EXISTING USE - PROPOSED USE DESCRIPTION OF WORK toOrfri — ' (-t2f(c'tii-'44 414& (Lf /poI4& I - SQ. vr: / 2' # OF STORIES 2. # OF BEDROOMS ' I - # OF BATHROOMS iA(Ji PkIJN (it dterent from applicant). NAME (last,name first) g44 ADDRESS ::ITY-, (QLK) STATE 4ZIP CODE - 7ô-O DAY TELEPHONE - -- (71 . 72.6 f 'UUAN U CONrCToR DAGE1i FO =1NINALAUK U UVVNtK DACiENT FOR OWKLR - NAME (last name first) - - ADDRESS ,. . - ,,. - •. - . -- .•. - . - : - • CITY • , . STATE ZIP CODE -, •' DAY TELEPHONE PROPERTY OWNER NAMEGastnamefirst) /¼J(7afl / h,4YM0 ADDRESS 3/f CITY - ..STATE IP CODE DAY TELEPHONE •. g. 7. a. / rf CONTRACTOR • . -.. - ,,•., . NAME (last name first) .ADDRESS CITY STATE iZIP CODE . .' .DAY.TELEPHONE STATE UC. # UCENSE CLASS CITY BUSINESS UC. # DESIGNER-NAME (last name first) - - ADDRESS- CITY ' . ••• STATE *ZIP CODE - -. DAY TELEPHONE * STATE UC. # - - WORKERS' CX)MPENSATION . - - Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby alfirm that I have a certificate of consent to self-insure issued by the Director of Industrial - - Relations, or a certificate of Workers' Compensation Insurance by an admitted insurer, or an .exact copy or duplicate thereof certified - - by the Director of the insurer thereof filed with the Building Inspection Department (Section 3800, Lab.,C). . . INSURANCE COMPANY POLICY NO. EXPIRATION DATE -. . . Certificate of Exemption: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner - so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California . - - SIGNATURE DATE OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION - Owner-builder Declaration: 1 hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractors LJcense Law for the following reason: I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or 4- - - offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended' or offered for sale. If, however, the building àr improvement is sold within ar yé &ie 'of completion, the owner-buildr ill have the burden - - of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale.). - - ' - -- . •• 0 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law) -. . - -- ' - • - . . o I am exempt under Section - Business and Professions Code for this reason: . • - - -.- - - .--. -- (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair, any structure, prior to its issuance,-also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the - - - provisions of theçetractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commencing with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is e)im1 therefrom, and the basis fothe gØl exemption. Any violation of Section 70315 by any applicant for a permit subjects the 4p1knt to a ci ty 9f2ner74Je t~fr'e hundred dollars [$500]). - . - •' - • - - SIGNATURE ;; DATE /2 - a 0 -47< - - COMPLETE TF( N (31. NOf-l. 'rVL,u)nING PERMITS ONLY:' - ' -- ' .Is the applicant or f - ure building occupant required to (ibmit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and - prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? - - - .. . ..L_0 YES- - .- • 0-NO------------------------. - . ............-. •, - Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or, air quality management district? - . 0 YES 0 NO - - Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outerboundary of a school site? - 0 YES'. - ' 0 NO -- IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NCYF BE ISSUED AFTER JULY 1, 1989 UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CDNTROL DISTRICT. 9. WNSTRLJCHON LENDING AGENCY, ,,. . - - ,• •. . - - - - - . - - - I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for-which this permit is issued (Sec 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME - ' LENDER'S ADDRESS ., - . " - . • - - -. - - - 10.. APPLICANT WI.ICATlUN I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws- - relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE 10 SAVE INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS, - AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CI1Y IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. - - - - - - 4_ • 1- . •, •• • • t , - is - 'I - •' .' ,._ - .1 - - OSHA. An OSHA perm•it is required for excavations over 5 0 deep I - and demolition or construction of structures over, 3 stories in height - -- -•. -- _____'_.,__•\•_'_ -- . ----•• - - - .•--- Expiration. Every permit issued by the Build g 0 icial under the provisions of this Code shall e pir. by limitation andbecome null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit s no commenced within 365 days from the d of rmit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at ny - e after the work. cnme ed f - - 0 days (Section 303(d) Uniform Building Code). - - APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE - - .' - - - DATE: /2-20 '15 -- - TE/ File YELLOW: Applic t PINK. -. Finance - - - CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERNIT# CB951853 FOR 10/23/97 INSPECTOR AREA PD DESCRIPTION: 1258 SF RAD,BEDROOM& FAMILY PLANCK# CB951853 JOB ADDRESS: 1311 OAK AV APPLICANT: NEFF, RAYMOND CONTRACTOR: OWNER: REMARKS: C/RAY/720-1884 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: 0CC GRP R3 CONSTR. TYPE VN STE: LOT: PHONE: 619-720-1884 PHONE: INSPECTO ?,,1 TOTAL TIME: --RELATED PERMITS-- CD LVL DESCRIPTION PERMIT# TYPE STATUS CB962096 PATIO ISSUED CB951854 PLUM ISSUED ACT COMMENTS 19 ST Final Structural 29 PL Final Plumbing 39 EL Final Eleátrical 49 ME Final Mechanical INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION ACT INSP COMMENTS 060396 Interior Lath/Drywall AP PD 060396 Exterior Lath/Drywall AP PD 060396 Gas/Test/Repairs AP PD 052196 Insulation AP PD 051696 Rough Combo AP PD 042996 Shear Panels/HD's AP PD 042696 Shear Panels/HD's CA PD RESET FOR 4/29/96 PER PD 042296 Shear Panels/HD's CO PD 032996 Shear Panels/HD's NR PK NO ACCESS/NO PLANS 032996 Interior Lath/Drywall NR PK NO ACCESS/NO PLANS 022196 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP PD EsGil Corporation fProfessiona( fP(an Review Engineers DATE: February 6, 1996 CANT JURIS U FIRE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad EVIEWER 0 FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-1853 SET: III PROJECT ADDRESS: 1311 Oak Avenue. PROJECT NAME SFD Addition for Raymond Neff The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantIaIIycompty with the jurisdiction's codes. I The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted Date contacted (by ) Telephone # REMARKS: 1. Sheets 1, 2& 3 of the plans must alsobe signed by the person responsible for their preparation. 2. Please have the applicant make changes to the city set of plans to agree with the owner set. Refer to the changes circled in red on sheets 1, 2 and 4 of the plans. By: Abe Doliente Enclosures: Esgil Corporation GA CM GP PC 2/6/96 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive Suite 208 • San Diego California 92123 • (619) 560-1468 • Fax (619) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation Professional Tlzn Review Engineers DATE: February 1, 1996 0 APPLICANT 0 FIRE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad U PLAN REVIEWER 0 FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-1853 SET: II .PROJECT ADDRESS: 1311 Oak Avenue PROJECT NAME: SFD Addition for Raymond Neff The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's ********** codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified.on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. j The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person U The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: ' Ray Neff 1311 Oak Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted Date contacted (by ) Telephone # El REMARKS By Abe Doliente Enclosures Esgil Corporation II GA CM GP PC 1/25/96 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive Suite 208 • San Diego California 92123 • (619) 560-1468 • Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 95-1853 II February 1, 1996 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 1311 Oak Avenue DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 1/25/96 REVIEWED BY: Abe Doliente PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-1853 SET: II DATE RECHECKCOMPLETED: February 1, 1996 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: ESGIL CORPORATION. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding. corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. - D. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? • - JYes UNo • Carlsbad 95-1853 II February 1, 1996 2. Plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, for plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction. Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code). II. Specify plywood and/or particle board thickness, grade and panel span rating. Table 25-S. (For the roof and floor sheating). NOTE: Plans submitted after January 1, 1993 must comply with the new energy standards. Provide plans, calculations and worksheets to show compliance with 'current energy standards. Revise energy calculations submitted. The addition is on slab on grade, not on raised floor. Recheck also the insulation requirements for the floor. The regulations require a properly completed and properly signed Form CF-lR to be either imprinted on the. plans, taped to the plans or "sticky backed" on the plans, to allow the building inspector to readily compare the actual construction with the requirements of the approved energy design.Building Designer/owner must signCF-lRform. All energy items shown on the plans must be in agreement with the information shown on the properly completed Form CF-IR. . 23. Provide the ICBO approval number for the wood burning stove. ICBO No. 3195 is no longer valid. . The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Abe Doliente at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. EsGil Corporation Professional Plan Review Engineers DATE: January 5, 1996 U APP ANT JURI U FIRE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad REVIEWER U FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-1853 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 1311 Oak Avenue PROJECT NAME: SFD Addition for Raymond Neff The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's *********** codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with tie jurisdiction's codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. LI The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. . = The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: p Ray Neff 1311 Oak Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008; • Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: (by: ) Telephone #: REMARKS: By Abe Doliente Enclosures Esgil Corporation. 'LI GA LI CM LI GP [] PC 12/26/95 trnsmti dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (619) 560-1468 • Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 95-1853 January 5, 1996 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES IPLAN CHECK NO.: 95-1853 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad IPROJECT ADDRESS: 1311 Oak Avenue I FLOOR AREA: Add'n - 1258 SF STORIES: 2 HEIGHT: IREMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: January 5, 1996 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 12/26/95 PLAN REVIEWER: Abe Doliente This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review. is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with Title 24 and the following model codes: 1991 UBC (effective 8/14/92), 1991 UPC (effective 8/14/92), 1991 UMC (effective 8/14/92) and 1990 NEC (effective 7/1/91). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted * by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 303 (c), 1991 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed..up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. LIST NO. 1 GENERAL SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES WITHOUT SUPPLEMENTS (1991 UBC) r3forw.dot Carlsbad 95-1853 January 5, 1996 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: Esgil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite #208, San Diego, California 92123, (619) 560-1468 or to the jurisdiction's building department.- 2. Plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, for plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction. Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code). 3. Show locations of permanently wired smoke detectors with battery backup: Inside each bedroom. Centrally located in corridor or area giving access to sleeping rooms. On each story. When sleeping rooms are upstairs, at the upper level in close proximity to the stair. In rooms adjacent to hallways serving bedrooms, when such rooms have a ceiling height 24 inches or more above the ceiling height in the hallway. NOTE: Detectors shall sound an alarm audible in all sleeping areas of the unit. Section 1210 4. When the valuation of a room addition or repair exceeds $1,000, or when sleeping rooms are created, smoke detectors shall be provided per the above, except that smoke detectors added at existing construction need only be battery powered. Section 1210. 5. Window area must be at least 1/10 of the floor area and a minimum of 10 square feet per Section 1205 (b). Recheck the existing bedroom adjacent to the kitchen. 6. Show safety glazing in the following locations, per Section 5406(d): a) Glazing in shower and tub enclosures (including windows within 5 feet of tub or shower floor. Recheck window G. 7. All handrails, per Section 3306 (i), shall satisfy the following: Provide handrail for stairways with 4 or more risers. Handrails and handrail extensions shall be 34" to 38" above the nosing of treads. C) The handgrip portion of handrails shall be not less than 1-1/2", nor more than 2" in cross-sectional dimension. 8. Note on plan that hold down anchors must be tied in place prior to foundation inspection. Section 305 (e) I. 9. Provide truss details and truss calculations for this project. Specify truss identification numbers on the plans. Carlsbad 95-1853 January 5, 1996 Show clearance between top plate of interior partitions and bottom chord of trusses. (To ensure nonbearing condition between supports as designed). Specify plywood and/or particle board thickness, grade and panel span rating. Table 25-S: Show the size, location and type of all heating and cooling appliances or systems. 13. Show on the plan the amperage of the electrical service, the location of the service panel and the location of any sub-panels. If service is over 200 amps, submit single line diagram, panel schedule and load calculations. Note on the plans that receptacle outlet locations will comply with 1990 NEC Art. 210-52(a). Show shower stall can accommodate a 30" circle and has a minimum floor area of 1,024'sq. in. UPC Section 909 (d). New water closets and associated flushometer valves, if any, shall use no more than 1.6 gallons per flush and shall meet performance standards established by the American National Standards Institute Standard A112.19.2, H & S Code, Section 17921.3(b). NOTE: Plans submitted after January 1, 1993 must comply-with the new energy standards. . . Provide plans, calculations and worksheets to show compliance with current energy standards. Revise energy calculations submitted. The addition is on slab on grade, not on raised: Recheck also the insulation requirements for the floor. The regulations require. a properly completed and properly signed Form CF-IR to be either imprinted on the plans, taped to the plans or "sticky backed" on the plans, to allow the building inspector to readily compare the actual construction • with the requirements of the approved energy design. Building Designer/owner must sign CF-1 R form. • All energy items shown on the plans must be in agreement with the infdrmation shown on the properly completed Form CF-IR. • 21. Provide fluorescent general lighting (40 lumens per watt minimum) in kitchen(s) and bathrooms - 22. Provide a note on the plans stating "All new glazing (fenestrations) will be • installed with a certifying label attached, showing the U-value." • Carlsbad 95-1853 January 5, 1996 . CARLSBAD S.F.D. & DUPLEX SUPPLEMENT All new residential buildings, including additions, -require a soils report. Please submit two copies. Exception: If a room addition is limited to one story and 1000 sq. ft. in area, then a soils report is not required. . MISCELLANEOUS Provide the ICBO approval number for the wood burning stove. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction. item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. . . . Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections fromthis list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. . . Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: El Yes E) No • 27. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Abe Doliente at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. . * 4* Carlsbad 95-1853 January 5, 1996 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-1853 PREPARED BY: Abe Doliente DATE: January 5, 1996 BUILDING ADDRESS: 1311 Oak Avenue BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA VALUATION VALUE (sq.ft.) MULTIPLIER ($) Dwelling Addition 1,258 SF 94.00 118,252 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE 118,252 UBC Building Permit Fee: $ 706.00 UBC Plan Check Fee: $458.90 Comments: ESGIL FEE = 0.80 X.458.90 = $ 367.12 Sheet of 1 valuefee.dot I City of Carlsbad BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DATE: j — - PIANCHECK NO. CB 7/R 3 BUILDING ADDRESS: 344 O PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ?- ASSESSOR's PARCEL NUMBER:,OS 147 EST. VALUE___________ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT / DENIAL APPROVAL The Item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval Is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided In your submittal; therefore any changes to these Items after this date, Including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply, with Instructions In this report can result In suspension of permit to build. EJ A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: Please s the attached report of deficiencies marked with Make necessary corrections to plans or,4 t2 speciflcaions for compliance with applicable codes and ri/3/, standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications I, to this office for review. BVZ6 72ahata: By: Date:________ By:_ Date:________ ATTACHMENTS ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON 11 Dedication Apficl$on C1 Dedication Chickist 0 ImprovemetI ApØcatlán 0 Improvement Checklist 0 Future Improvement Agreement 0 Grading Permit Application 0 Grading Submittal Checklist 0 RIght of Way Perm*Appticatlon 0 Right of Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Shest 0 Sewer Fee Information Sliest NAME/'CI10/e Cflyof Carlsbad ADDRESS: 2075 Lee Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 PHONE:(619)438-1161.Ext A-4 PW0CSCHKLSt\6P0001.FRM REV 05111/94 2075 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (619) 438-1161 • FAX (619) 438-0894 is IM BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST ~3rd,/ JIL!LAN 1 W 2n [a" 0 i. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: A. North Arrow D. Property Lines Easements (J) Existing & Proposed Structures E. Easements C. Existing Street Improvements F. Right-of-way Width & Adjacent Streets.. [%4. 0 0 2. Show on site plan: 'S Drainage Patterns C. Existing Topography Existing & Proposed Slopes . 0 3. Include note: "Surface water to be directed away from the building foundation at a 2% ••. gradient for no less than 5 or 2/3 the distance to the property line (whichever is less)-" [Per 1985 UBC 2907(d)51.' On graded sites, the top of any exterior foundation shall extend above the elevation • of the street gutter at point of discharge or the inlet of an approved drainage device a minimum 0112 Inches plus two percent' (per 1990 UBC 2907(d)5.). 0 4. Include on title sheet Site address Assessors Parcel Number Legal Description - For commercial/lndustrlal buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: Total • building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. • ' EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST / DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE çd' 3rd,/ 1 - ' re-i 0 S. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No. - Conditions were compiled with by: Date:_________________ DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS OK3 0 6. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $_____________ -pursuant to Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Provide the completed application form and the requirements on the checklist at the time of resubmittal. , Dedication completed by ' Date:__________ IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS '}i( E3"iiJ 7a. All needed public Improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of bj.ilding construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $ 5?.) 00 U -pursuant to Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: '&i...t%, Please have a registered CMI Engineer prepare appropriate improvement plans and subm them together with the requirements on the attached checklist for a' separate plancheck process through the Engineering Department. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of permit. * ' Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvements requirements. Provide the completed application form and the requirements on the checklist at the time of resubmittI. Improvement Plans signed by: Date: - P.WOMCHKOTWOM JWM Pegs 2 d 4 REV osii 11e4 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST CW U U U lb. ConudIon of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the propsity and processing fee of $___________________ so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Future public improvements required as follows: _ 1 4- ( O CD / / Improvement Plans signed by: Date:__________ 7c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement. Please return signed and notarized Agreement to the Engineering Department. Future Improvement Agreement completed by: Date:__________________ O 0 0 7d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adlacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found In Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. O 0 0 Ba. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make 's determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill Import, export). O 0 0 Sb. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be Submitted together with the completed application form attached. - NOTE: The GradnQPermft must be issued and rough aradina aøoroval obtained Prior to issuance of a Building Permit // Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: ED" 0 0 Sc. No Grading Permit required.. PDocscHKL*1\aP0001JM Peg. 3 d 4 REV "A I/" BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS 1 Sty'2ndv' 3rd,/ [E1 0 0 9. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, trees, driveways, tieing into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for (2t4- r A separate Right-of-Way permit Issued by the Engineering Department is required for the following: 0 .10. A SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the building permit issuance. The.fee is noted in the fees section on the following page. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT is required. Applicant must complete Industrial Waste Permit Application Form and submit for City approval prior to issuance of a Permit. Industrial waste permit accepted by: Date: Is PWocscHaa.$1\Bp0001,7M - SQS PLANNT1G QQaIST Plan Check No. 95-/S5) Address 13/I ' A/ 4iJ pta.ii' VAN LYNCH Phone 438•1161 ext. $325 (Name) APN: -2zo-/ Type of Project and Use /2-b'X A 1> A /770 II Zone f2 ( Facilities Management Zone / s CALCULATION ciclE (It property in, complete SPECIAL TAX WORKSHEET provided by Building Department.) - Item Complete - 0 D • [tern Incomplete - Needs your action. 1,2,3 Number in circle indicates plancheck number where deficiency was identified D 0, -Review Required: YES NO ~. TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which, require action. Conditions of Approval 0 Diseonasy Actim Ruired YES - NO TYPE APPROVAL/RESO. NO. DATE: PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Appeoval 0 Califoeia Cotal Puir Rpñr YES NO DATE OF APPROVAL San Diego Coast District, 3111 Ca"th,o Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego, CA. 921081725 (619) 5218036 Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval 0 Cndtonazy Ho*flg Fee YES__NO__ (Effective date of [nclusionaxy Housing Ordinance May 21, 1993.) SitePIan 0 Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, sweets, existing sweet improvements, right-of-way width, dimensioned setbacks and existing topographical lines. f1i 0 Provide legal description of property, and assessor's parcel number. Zoning: 0 Setbacks: . ;. Front: Required Z Shown 2-7.0 - Int. Side: Required gt,-If - Shown Jr' Sweet Side: Required ____ Shown Rear: Required (0JShown 0/0 0 Lc coverage: Required Shown 0 Height: Required -' / Shown a~ 0 Parking: Spaces Required - Shown - Guest Spaces Required _____ Shown 0 0 Additional Comments 4 )K TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER (1', 4A1 CL DATE .4 4 S • 4 2 s 4' .. ,. ,%4 • S •5 4 - . . _,', 4 2 - • - 4 —S '1 I 44 4 4 I LIMITED PRELIMINARY r FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION:.4 — 4 PROPOSED ROOM ADDITION • 1311 OAK AVENUE, CARLSBAD 4 1 2 2 47 I 4 * 4 2 JANUARY 18, 1996 - - 1 2 7 4 S 4 4 'S 2 ' S • 2 2 2 PREPARED FOR " 4 - MR RAY NEFF • 1311 OAK AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 I 1 JOB #96-108-P 4 ' - .- '- I •. ;- - •. •• • -'- -i-. .:: . ,1' . ., .• .,'-- - . 4' 7. • I 2 - 4' 4' 1, Si VINJE & MIDDLETON ENGINEERING, INC. - 2450 Vineyard Avenue, #102 Escondido, California 92029-1229 Job #96-108-P Phone (619),743-.1214,: Fax (619) 739 0343 January 23, 1996 Mr. Ray Neff 1311 Oak Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 Limited Preliminary Foundation Investigation for Proposed Room Additions at 1311 Oak Avenue Carlsbad, California Pursuant to your request, Vinje & Middleton Engineering, Inc has completed the attached limited investigation of soils conditions beneath the proposed additions at the site Jhe following report summarizes the results of our field investigation, laboratory analyses, and conclusions, and provides recommendations for the construction of the new additions as understood From a geotechnical engineering standpoint, it is our opinion that the site is suitable for the support the proposed addition provided the recommendations presented in this report are incorporated into the design and construction of the project 0 Thank you for choosing Vinje & Middleton Engineering, Inc If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to call us Reference to our Job #96-108- P will expedite our response to your inquiries We appreciate this opportunity to b of service to you VINJE & MIDDLETON ENGINEE ING, INC v?OFESs/o, - LC" -. •'- . - -'-.. •. . '- . .-- .5!-, N Ocx).) rn M Vinje 123197...4 GE #863 ICH -.- 5 -, - S . - i CA' RMV/mmd • • 0 00 - - 0 0 - 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS I INTRODUCTION 1 II SITE DESCRIPTION 1 III PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1 IV SITE INVESTIGATION 1 FINDINGS 2 A Earth materials 2 B Faults/Seismicity 2 C Geologic Hazards 3 D Laboratory Testing and Results 3 - -. -- •.- $ - -- - VI CONCLUSIONS $54 . • VII RECOMMENDATIONS 4 A Grading and Earthwork 5 1 Clearing and Grubbing 5 2 Removals 5 3 Excavations 5 • - 4 Grading and Compactions 5 5 Inspections 5 B Foundations and Floor Slabs 5 C Soil Bearings and Laterial Pressures 6 VIII GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS 1 7 • IX LIMITATIONS 8 0 S. S ATTACHMENTS PLATE Test-Trench Location Map..-.-...-..- ................ 1 Test Trench Log Grade Beam Cross-Section for Underpinned Wall Footings 2 3 Isolation Joints and Re-Entrant Corner Reinforcement 4 Retaining Wall Drain Detail 5 • /0 5 - .5 4 - 5-0 00 -. 0 - 0 -- •.- -' 3.. 1 •0 -. 1 4 - •00 - - 0. $0.--- 00 -. 0 '00 - •.• . - .4 - - •0 0 - - - 0. - - 0 0 - . - 5 - $ $ L 0 3 00 • . LIMITED PRELIMINARY FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION PROPOSED'ROOM ADDITION 1311 OAK AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 • I INTRODUCTION In accordance with your authorization, Vinje & Middleton Engineering, Inc has completed an investigation of selected portions of the above referenced property The site currently supports an older single-family dwelling We understand the proposed construction will consist of an addition of a two-story, structure to the south of the existing residence in accordance with preliminary plans prepared by R D A Design & Drafting Services It is also understood that minimal grading is planned with the new addition being constructed near the existing grades The purpose of this investigation was to determine soil conditions in areas planned for the new additions and their influence upon the proposed construction Recommendations for earthworks and foundations which are consistent with the indicated soil environment are provided herein General site conditions as well as the proposed residence are depicted on the Test Trench Location Map included with,this report as Plate 1 This report represents a limited study focused on the selected areas proposed for the new additions only and did not cover remaining portions of the site where not trenched and/or investigated Evaluation of portions of the existing building and structures to remain with respect to the indicated site soils and geotechnical conditions were also beyond the scope of this investigation II SITE DESCRIPTION The project site is a level lot which supports an existing residence and detached garage as shown on Plate I Significant slopes do not occur in near, proximity Vegetation at - the property includes low lyihg.grast6sj,trees and bushes..Site drainage sheetfiows over the property III PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The new addition will consist of a two-story wood-frame structure constructed and attached to the south end of the existing residence The addition will have conventional interior slab-on-grade floors with continuous strip and/or spread pad footings IV SITE INVESTIGATION Geotechnical conditions at the study site were determined chiefly from the excavation of one test trench at the approximate location shown on Plate 1 The test trench was logged by our project geologist who also supervised soil sampling at selected depths and frequent intervals Soil samples were sealed in moisture resistant containers and transported to the laboratory for testing Laboratory tests are summarized in a following Section A Log of the test pit is attached to this report as on Plate 2 VINJE & MIDDLETON ENQINEERINQ INC 2450 Vineyard Avenue #102 Escondido California 92029 1229 Phone (619) 7.4A.1214 Fax (619) 739-0343 SOIL TESTING PERC TEST SOIL INVESTIGATIONS QEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS / -L - - - LIMITED PRELIMINARY FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION I PAGE 2 : 13110AKAVENUE,CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA JANUARY18. 1996: V FINDINGS A Earth Materials Test pit excavations exposed ,e x*is'iihg fill soils overlying cemented sandstone units The fill soils as encountered in our excavations are in -a porous, dry and loose condition' overall The test pit also exposed a component of a not-in- service septic system comprised of ,a clay pipe and the associated gravel materials This suggests the fill soils may be associated with the original installation of the system Sandstone naturalt terrace deposit materials underlie site fill deposits Local terrace deposit units consists of a fine to medium grained sandstone in a cemented..and hard condition-.".Faults or other adverse geologic structural features were not in evidence at the site B Faults/Seismicity Faults or significant shear zones are not in evidence on or in near proximity to the project site As with most areas of California, the San Diego region lies within a seismically active zone, however, coastal areas of the County are characterized by low levels of seismic activity relative to inland areas to the east During a 40-year period (1934-1974)-,,37 earthquakes were recorded in San Diego coastal areas by the California Institute of Technology. None of the recorded events exceeded a Richter magnitude of 37, nor did any of the earthquakes generate more than modest ground shaking or significant damages Most of the recorded events / occurred along various off shore faults which characteristically generate modest earthquakes I Historically, th most significant earthquake events which affect local areas originate along well known, distant fault zones to the east Less significant events have been recorded along off-shore faults to the west kf In recent years, the Rose Canyon Fault has received added attention from geologists The fault is a significant structural feature in metropolitan San Diego which includes a series of parallel breaks trending southward from La,Jolla Cove 'through San Diego Bay toward the Mexican border Recent trenching along the fault in Rose Canyon indicates that at that location the fault was last active 6,000 to 9,000 years -ago.Thus, the fault is classified as "active" by the State of California which defines faults that evidence displacement in the previous 11,000 years as active More active faults (to the east and offshore 46ultt to the west) are considered VINJE & MIDDLETON ENGINEERING INC 2450 Vineyard Avenue #102 Escondido California 92029 1229 Phone (619) 743 1214 • Fax (619) 739 0343 SOIL TESTING PERC TEST SOIL INVESTIQATIONS QEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS LIMITED PRELIMINARY FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION PAGE 3' 1311 OAK AVENUE, .CARLSBAD,cALIFORNIA .' JANUARY 18. 1996 most likely. to impact the region during the lifetinie ofthe project. The faults are . periodically active andcapable 'of gene'ratihg moderate to locally high levels of ground shaking at the project site. '.Ground separation asa result.of seismic" activity is not expected at the property. C Geologic Hazards Geologic, hazards aré'not presently indicated in studied areas of theproject site. ' • The most significant geologic hazards at the property will be those associated with ground shaking in the event of a major seismic event Liquefaction or related ground rupture failures are not anticipated D Laboratory Testing and Results Excavation of on-site earth materials generated soils.which have been grouped into the following soil types Soil Type Description 1 Brown silty sand (fill) •. . 2 ' ' ' . " '- orange brown silty sand . . . . (sandstone)-' The following tests were conducted in support of this study I Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content The maximum dry density and optimum mixture content of Soil Type I was determined in accordance with ASTM D-1557-91 The results are tabulated below Max Dry. Optimum Density Moisture Location Soil Type (pcf) Content (%) TP-1 @-2..1 . 1334 88 2 In-Place Dry Density and Moisture Content. l-pIace dry densities and moisture content of representative soil deposits beneath the site were determined from undisturbed chunk samples using the water displacement method Results are presented on the following page and tabulated on the attached trench logs VINJE & MIDDLETON ENQIN ERINQ, INC. 2450 Vineyard Avenue, #102,Escondido, California-9202'9-1229 • Phone (619) 743-1214 • Fax (19) 739-0343. SOIL TESTING . • ..PERC TEST , ' SOIL INVESTIGATIONS '. QEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS V 4 LIMITED PRELIMINARY FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION PAGE 4 H.1311 OAK AVENUE CARLSBAb CALIFORNIA. JANUARY18, 1996 4 Relative - Density Moisture Compaction Location Soil Type (pcf) Content (%) (%) • TP-1@2' I 92 TP-1@3' 2 1288 63 ------ 3.1 Direct Shear Test A direct shear test was performed on representative sample of soil type I Prepared specimens were soaked overnight, loaded with normal loads of 1, 21 and 4 Kips per square foot respectively, and sheared to failure in an undrained condition..Results are presented below Wet Angle of Apparent Soil Density Int.Fric Cohesion Location Type (pcf) ° (degree) C, (psf) TP-I @ 2' 1 1,29 .9 31'454 VI CONCLUSIONS Based upon the foregoing site investigation, construction of the addition to the existing residence is feasible from a geotechnical view point Conventional grading may be effectively utilized for the,.creation of buildings surfaces Unusual grading problems arising :from •geotechnical factors are not expected.. The following 'geotechnica'l conditions are unique to the project site and should be considered in future planning and construction * The entire section of fill soils which overlie the sandstone terrace materials beneath the proposed addition should be removed and recompacted during site grading operations • * Sandstone bedrock beneath the site are hard and competent units which will safely support fills and structures * The septic system exposed in our test pit should be removed and properly disposed of during grading operations Removal of the septic system should be verified by the project geot?chnical engineer * Based on our field and laboratory observations, on-site soils were found to be very low to non expansive VII RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations are provided-'based on the site development as VINJE & MIDDLETON ENGINEERING INC 2450 Vineyard Avenue #102 Escondido California 92029 1229 Phone (619) 743 1214 Fax 619) 739 0343 SOIL TESTING PERC TEST SOIL INVESTIGATIONS GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS • LIMITED PRELIMINARY FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION PAGE 5 1311 OAK-AVENUE, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA JANUARY 18, 1996 understood and shown on the pertinent maps included with this report All recommendations should be confirmed and/or revised in the final as-graded compaction report A Grading and Earthwork I Clearing and Grubbing Surface vegetation and other deleterious materials and debris should be removed from the ifte as directed in the field bythe project engineer. 2 Removals The existing fill soils should be removed to dense and competent sandstone The removal area should extend to a distance of five feet beyond the building perimeter where possible 3 Excavations Excavations and removals adjacent to the existing residence and eastern retaining wall foundations should be done under continuous inspection of the project geotechnical engineer Undermining the existing footings by the removal operations should be avoided Appropriate recommendations including required set backs and the need for temporary shoring should be given at that time based on actual exposures and existing -, bearing soils/foundation conditions and should be anticipated 4 Grading and-Cornpaction Site fill should only be placed upon coripetent bedrock throughout Fill soils should be moisture conditioned to slightly above optimum levels and mechanically compacted in this, horizontal lifts to a minimum 90% of the laboratory maximum density (ASTM D-1557-91) On site soils may be used for site fill - 5 Inspections Site grading operations should be tested and inspected by the project geotechnical engineer or his designated field representative on a continuous basis particular attention should be given to the following items (1) over-excavations and removals, (2) fill compaction, (3) the creation of uniform, and non-expansive compacted foundation soil condition Geotechnical engineering observations and testing should be presented in a formal as-graded compaction report at the completion of rough grading B Foundations and Floor Slabs The following recommendations are consistent with low to non-expansive bearing soils which are present at the site and expected to be exposed at finish grades All recommendations need to be confirmed/revised in the final as-graded compaction report based on actual testing of the finish grade materials prior to the actual construction VINJE& MIDDLETON ENGINEERING; INC. 2450 Vineyard Avetiue, #102, Escondido,CaUfornia 92029-1229 • Phone (619) 7431214 • Fax (619) 739-0343 SOIL TESTING - PERC TEST SOIL INVESTIGATIONS QEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS • LIMITED PRELIMINARY FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION PAGES 1311 OAK AVENUE; CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA. JANUARY 18:1996 1. Continuous concrete fóundations should be sized at least 12 inches wide. and 12 inches deep for single-story structures and 15 inches wide and 18 inches deep for two-story structures Isolated footings should be at least 24 inches square and 18 inches deep Footing depths are 4. measured from the lowest adjacent ground surface, not including the sand/gravel beneath floor slabs 2 Continuous interior and exterior foundations should be reinforced with a minimum 244 bars, one placed three inches above the bottom of the footing and one placed three inches below the top of the footing Reinforcement details for isolated pad footings should be provided by the project architect/structural engineer 3 All interior slabs should be a minimum of four inches in thickness reinforced with #3 reinforcing bars spaced 12 inches on center each way, placed at slab mid-height Slabs should be underlain by four inches of clean sand (SE 30 or greater) which is provided with a six-mu plastic moisture barrier placed mid-height in the sand 4 Interior slabs should be provided with sawcut weak joints spaced 12 feet on center each way within 72 hours after the pour The sawcuts should be a minimum depth of one-half inch but not exceeding three-quarter inch deep maximum 5 In orderto reduce the potential for cracking and eparatuon at the connection of the existing building and the new additions, footing of the two structures may be underpinned using a grade beam where the two foundations meet Typical grade beams used for these purposes are included with this report as Plate 3 Actual detail of the underpinning grade beam should provided by the project architect/structural engineer. C Soil Bearing and Lateral Pressures I Foundations for the new additions will be founded on compacted fill soils as recommended herein An allowable bearing capacity of 1500 pounds per square foot may be utilized for foUndation design This value applies to dead plus live loads and may be increased by one-third for wind and seismic loading The allowable soil bearing pressure provided herein was also determined for footings having a minimum width of 12 inches and a minimum depth of 12 inches below the lowest adjacent ground surface and may be increased per Uniform Building Code for additional depths and widths, if needed VINJE & MIDDLETON ENGINEERING INC 2450 Vineyard Avenue #102 Escondido California 92029-1229 Phone (619) 743-1214 Fax (619) 739 0343 SOIL TESTING PERC TEST SOIL INVESTIGATIONS QEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS . . 4 4 LIMITED PRELIMINARY FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION PAGE 7 1311 OAK AVENUE, CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA. JANUARY 18. 1996 • '4 p 2 Lateral earth pressures for on-site sandy soils with a minimum friction angle of 31 degrees and a wet density of 129.9 pcf are provided below. These values may be used for preliminary design estimates only and are to be re-evaluated when the characteristics of the backfill and foundation soils have been determined Revised recommendations should be anticipated Active Pressure = 42 pcf (EFP), cantilever, unrestrained walls with level backfill surface At Rest Pressure = 63 pcf (EFP), restrained walls Passive Resistance =406. pcf (EFP), level surface condition at the toe Coefficient of friction =-0.38. Notes -Because large movements must take place before maximum passive resistance can be developed, a minimum safety factor of 2 should be considered for sliding resistance -When combining passive reassure and frictional resistance, the passive component should be reduced byronethird VIII General Recommendations I All exterior slabs (walkways, patios) should be a minimum of four inches in thickness reinforced with 6x6/10xlO welded wire mesh placed at mid-height of the slab Weak joints consisting of sawcuts spaced six feet on center each way , -within 72 hours of áoncrete pour. • 2 Provide re-entrant corner reinforcement in all interior slabs as generally shown on the enclosed Plate ,4. The sawcuts should be a minimum depth of one-half inch but not exceeding three-quarter inch deep maximum 3 Footings located near the edge of descending slopes should be setback or deepened to a sufficient depth to provide a minimum seven-foot or one third of the slope height, whichever is more horizontal distance from the bottom outside edge of the footing to the face of the adjacent slope This should also apply to all structures including exterior concrete flatwork placed near the top of descending fill slopes I, 4 Expansive clayey soils should not be used for backfilling of any retaining VINJE & MIDDLETON ENGINEERING INC 2450 Vineyard Avenue #102 Escondido California 92029-122 9 Phone (619)743-12 . 1 4 • Fax (619) 739-0343 SOIL TESTING PERC TEST SOIL INVESTIGATIONS cEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS fi fi - --__•\. fi - - fl fl-fl - t PAGE 8 LIMITED PRELIMINARY FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION ..:' 1311 OAK AVENUE, CARLSBAD CALIFORNIA• - JANUARY 18,J99,6.- : structure All retaining walls should be provided with a I I wedge of granular, compacted backfill measured from the base of the wall footing to the finished surface Retaining walls should be provided with a back drainage as shown on the enclosed Plate 5 5 All underground utility trenches should be compacted "to a minimum of 906/0 of the maximum dry"density of the soil unless otherwise specified by the respective agencies Care should be taken not to crush the utilities or pipes during the compaction of the soil Non-expansive, granular backfill soils should be used 6 Site drainage over the entire yard areas should be improved Some regrading of the yard surface oareas may be necessary to construct proper finish elevation With positive surface drainage directed away from the buildings 'and improvements Surface water should drain at a minimum of 2 percent gradient away from the buildings Ponding of roof water near the building foundations should be avoided by installing appropriate roof gutters and downspouts Area drains are recommended for entire yards 7 Final foundation plans should incorporate recommendations provided in this transmittal and be reviewed and approved by this office prior to the actual construction Additional recommendations will be provided at that time, if it becomes necessary .- 8. Grading operations should be continuously inspected and teted by the project geotechnical consultant and presented in the final as-built cotnpaction report The nature of finished grade soils should also be confirmed in the final - compaction report at the completion of grading prior to implementing foundation And slab recommendations Footing excavations and foundation/slab reinforcement should also be inspected and approved by the project geotechnical consultant * 9 A preconstruction meeting between representatives of this office and the property owner or planner, as well as the grading..'contractor/builder, is recommended in order to discuss grading/construction details associated with site development ' IX LIMITATIONS Ther conclusions and recommendations provided herein have been based on all available data obtained from our limited field investigation and laboratory analyses, as well as our experience with the soils and formational materials located in the general area The materials encountered on the project site and utilized in our, laboratory testing are VTNJE & MIDDLETON ENINEER1NG,INC.245O Vineyard Avenue, #102, Escondido, California 9202911229 • Phone (619) 74312i4 Fax (619) 739-0343 SOIL TESTING PERC TEST SOIL INVESTIGATIONS QEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS • / LIMITED PRELIMINARY FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION PAGE 9 1311 OAK AVENUE, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA JANUARY18, 1996. • believed representative of the total area, however, earth materials may vary in characteristics between excavations Of necessity we must assume a certain degree of continuity between exploratory excavations and/or natural exposures It is necessary, therefore, that all observations, conclusions, and recommendations be verified during the grading operation In the event discrepancies are noted, we should be contacted immediately so that an inspection can be made and additional recommendations issued if required The recommendations made in this report are applicable to the site at the time this report was prepared It is the responsibility of the owner/developer to insure that these recommendations are carried out in the field It is almost impossible to predict with certainty the future performance of a property. The future behavior of the site is also dependent on numerous unpredictable variables, such as earthquakes, rainfall, and on-site drainage patterns The firm of VINJE & MIDDLETON ENGINEERING, INC shall not be held responsible for changes to the physical conditions of the property such as addition of fill soils or changing drainage patterns which occur subsequent to issuance of this report The homeowner should be aware of the development of cracks in concrete surfaces such as floor slabs and exterior stucco associated with normal concrete shrinkage during the curing process These features depend chiefly upon the condition of concrete and weather conditions at the time of construction and do not reflect detrimental ground movement Hairline stucco cracks will often develop at window/door corners, and floor surface cracks up to 1/8-inch wide in 20 feet may develop as a result of normal concrete / shrinkage (according to the American Concrete Institute) This report should be considered valid for a period of one year and is subject to review by our firm following that time If significant modifications are made to your tentative development plan, especially with respect to the height and location of cut and fill slopes, this report must be presented to us for review and possible revision Vinje & Middleton Engineering, Inc warrants that this report has been prepared within the limits prescribed by our, client with the usual thoroughness and competence of the engineering profession No other warranty , or representation, either expressed or implied, is included or intended . V •' . • -. . V.. V ¶ V •.% . 0 V -. VINJE & MIDDLETON ENQINEERING INC 2450 Vineyard Avenue #102 Escondido California 92029 1229. Phone (619) 743 1214 • Fax (619) 739-03 . 43 SOIL TESTING PERC TEST SOIL INVESTIQATIONS QEOTECHNICAL INVESTIQATIONS .7 TEST TRENcHLQpATION, MAP Plate 1 OAK .AVENUE - ] 7, N= T. -1. S..- : - VICINITY MAP 11 - - • :____\.1IIIIIIIII . -- J- 4 1. r : I __ , I I , '~ - '. I I . - . . .. , . -. :, I 1. : i~ :, . - I I I ~ I , ~ PROPOSE 4 ,,: .. ~ I .. , .. - ~, , , , I . .1 - - I 'ADDITION I 1• II I '- I -' -. - . .-., - ,--- -.-.-- _.- •'I •- -..- - -. I- -- .- - -- - --- --j'----. - -•.--. -. -'- . i-- - --- '. - - , .1 .7 - /7 - '- I' s_ 'I 11 , , - r cale 1"=30' S 11 I I - - £ 1 I E ISTING GARAGE : T - r I - - I Dat nl/15/96 SM Logged1 byLLJ DESCRIPTION - - FILL Silty sand Brown ' Roots in upper 12" Dry and loose - in upper 2, slightly moist, moderately firm below Porous Trace of clay pipe with gravel at 2' - - - - TERRACE DEPOSIT TRENCHLO ¼ Vinje Oak Avenue,Car1sbad ? - ENGINEERING, INC ¼ ¼ - Project No 96-108-P Plate 2 ' Sand cone test Bulk sample ¼ D Chunk sample " Q Dnven ¼ rings a -s /Drill 7/8" 0 deep S holes @ 18" C C , thoroughly clean, dowel with #4 -s.. - bars and epoxy grout 4. o" ±6 slab 211 CLR- NI I b6'f or e.. p6uring gTad 1s# continuous : 2. T---5 k6 Dowels@ / existing/new 18 DI / wall footing I sand ties ". .". top and bottom . CLR 1' 611 undisturled'-soil, I orcomPàctd T 1l --:.... per geotechnical engineer .- S -, .............................. '. .,. . ......................... ...... ,"_- -- NOTES 1 This detail is provided as a general guideline and is not for construction 2 Detailed grade beam design for underpinning should be provided by the project structural engineer 3 All grade beam details and dimensions should be confirmed and 'certified by tIe project structural engineer prior to construction I ' .5 .................. . .. S .. ..- . .'" ., .4 .,. 4 ,.. '5 5. 4- ISOLATION JOINTS AND RE-ENTRANT CORNER REINFORCEMENT Typical -noscàle. isdiation • . V - ction jOifl .,.'. ;conir~ _ VO1flt5 V S . . (b) Te-entrant corner, reinforcement 8 contraction pbtei~tial re entrant joints. corner crack,- V " V (c) . V • Notes: S V Isolation joints around the columns should be either circular as shown in (a) or diamond shaped as shown in (b). If no isolation joints are used V , around columns, or if the corners of the isolation joints do not meet the contraction joints, radial cracking as shown, in (c) 'may occur (reference Ad),. In order to control cracking at the fe-entrant corners (±2700 corners), provide 're'inforcément as shown in (c). V V Re-entrant corner reinforcement shown herein- is provided as a gneral guideline only and is subject to verification .and changes by the project architect 'and/of structural engineer'.based upon ,slab geometry, location, and other engineering and construction factors. Th ' -' V , JOB / 96-108-P -- '' •: Plate /I 4 V. 5 • V • V - V V 'V V • V V ENGINEERING ,?INC r / CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE . C CITY OF CARLSBAD Plan Check No. DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SERVICES DIVISION 2075 LAS PALMAS DR., CARLSBAD, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 This form shall be used to determine the amount of school fees for a project and to verify that the project applicant has complied with the school fee requirements. No building permits for the projects shall be issued until the certification is signed by the appropriate schoI district and returned to the City of Carlsbad Building Department. SCHOOL DISTRICT: Y Carlsbad Unified ____ _San Marcos Unified -' 801 Pine Avenue 1290 West SanMarcps Blvd. Carlsbad, CA 9200.9 (434-0610) San Marcos, CA 92024 (744-4776) Encinitas Union . San Dieguito Union High School 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd. 710 Encinitas Boulevard Encinitas, CA.. 92024 (619) 9134-430a Encinitas, CA 92024r(7536491) Project Applicant: _________________________ APN:25-02.0 - RIDO Project Address: RESIDENTIAL: SQ. FT. of living area number of dwelling units____________ SQ. FT. of covered area : SQ. FT. of garage area_____________ COMMERCIAL SQ. FT. AREA______ . Preparedby \. . Date 1 - FEE ERTIFICATION (To be completed by the School District) Applicant has compliedwith fee requirement under Government Code 53080 \Project is subject to an existing fee agreement Project is exempt from Government Code 53080. _____Final Map approval and construction started before September 1, 1986. (other school fees paid) - Other Residential Fee Levied: $c9 /4'3?'.based on sq. ft. @ C3IJ S' I Dist AB 2926 ar AB 2926 is Levied: $ based on sq. ft. @____ 70f'ees Title Date are capped at $1.72 per square foot for residential. I at .28 per square foot for commercial /industrial. ,,,IE- LJFQ9. of C;artsbad njvDevjPmjt SCHOOL FEES Please fill out the form on the reverse side of this page and take it to the appropriate school district. Once you have paid the school fee, a school official has signed the school fee form, and all other plan check requirements have been met, a building permit can be issued. The City of Carlsbad will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form. - k BUILDING 'DEPARTMENT - dc enc. - . - --'-.--. 1 2075 Las Palmas Drive.Carlsbad, California 92009-4859.(619) 438-1161