Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout135 REDWOOD AVE; ; CB010379; Permit/35S5 08-24-2001 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Residential Permit Permit No:CB010379 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: 135 REDWOOD AV CBAD Permit Type: RESDNTL Parcel No: 2042531500 Valuation: $396,940.00 Occupancy Group: # Dwelling Units: 1 Bedrooms: 4 Sub Type: SFD Status: Lot #: 0 Applied: Construction Type: VN Entered By: Reference #: Plan Approved: Structure Type: SFD Issued: Bathrooms: 5 Inspect Area: ISSUED 01/30/2001 RMA 08/02/2001 08/24/2001 Project Title: CORBIN RES-4409 SF.600 SF GAR, Orig PC#: 264 SF DECKS Applicant: AL CORBIN 434-6887 Total Fees: $29,955.87 Building Permit Add'l Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add'l Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park in Lieu Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee Other Bridge Fee BTD#2Fee BTD#3Fee Renewal Fee Add'l Renewal Fee Other Building Fee Pot. Water Con. Fee Meter Size Add'l Pot. Water Con. Fee Reel. Water Con. Fee Plan Check*: Owner LEDGERWOOD CHARLES B TR 3862 CARLSBAD BLVD 8349 CARLSBAD CA 92008 - «.-.- , (TRUST A) 06/24/01 0002 01 02 COP 29006-01 -- - •- Total Payments To Date: $949.86 Balance Due: $29,006.01 $1,461.32 Meter Size $0.00 Add'l Reel. Water Con. Fee $949.86 Meter Fee $0.00 SDCWA Fee $0.00 CFD Payoff Fee $39.69 PFF $0.00 PFF (CFD Fund) $0.00 License Tax $0.00 License Tax (CFD Fund) $0.00 Traffic Impact Fee $0.00 Traffic Impact (CFD Fund) $0.00 Sidewalk Fee $0.00 PLUMBING TOTAL $0.00 ELECTRICAL TOTAL $0.00 MECHANICAL TOTAL $0.00 Housing Impact Fee $2,400.00 Housing InLieu Fee D5/8 Master Drainage Fee: $0.00 Sewer Fee: $0.00 Additional Fees: TOTAL PERMIT FEES $0.00 $80.00 $2,004.00 $0.00 $7,224.31 $6,668.59 $0.00 $0.00 $432.00 $488.00 $0.00 $217.00 $60.00 $78.50 $2,925.00 $0.00 $408.60 $4,459.00 $60.00 $29,955.87 PERMJT APPLICATION CrfV OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK EST. VAL. Plan Ck. Deposit _ Validated By Date f_ / Address (include Bldg/Sulte ft) Legal Discription #>?% 2*V^6 Assessor's Parcel it Description of Work Business Name (at this address) ^-^Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Existing Use £f/tf//f£>SQ. FT, #of Stories Unit No. Phase No, 0?1"? 01/30/0^ 3Proposed Use I # of Bedrooms+J Total if of units QQ7 T» Tl? -S^= ?-^. # ofBathrooms (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, defnolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars I$500]). Name State License # Address License Class City State/Zip City Business License # Telephone # Designer Name State License # Address City State/Zip Telephone Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: D I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. D I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Date (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS) ^0_ CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars (S 100,000), In addition to the-cost orcompensatlon, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE Jh^L /K • /S^/fa—' DATE / — 3 0 — &—. I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: ffiL '< as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). Q I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractors) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). D I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES QNO 2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE ILDiNG PERMITS ONLY Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 2S533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? Q YES Q NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? Q YES Q NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? Q YES Q NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the CitV of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 1 80 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced^ a period of 18<Ldays (Secti<106.4JJOniform Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance PERMIT APPLICATION QITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT tB35 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 1. PROJECT INFORMATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO. EST. VAL. Plan Ck. Deposit Validated By Date Address (include Bldg/Suite #)Business Name (at this address) Legal Description Lot No.Subdivision Name/Number Unit No.Phase No,Total * of units Assessor's Parcel #Existing Use Proposed Use Description of Work CONTACT PERSON (H different from applicant) SQ. FT.#of Stories * of Bedrooms » of Bathrooms Q Name 3, APPLICANT O Contractor Mi Address D Agent for Contractor City D Owner Q Agent for Owner Stele/Zip Telephone t Fax # S Name Address City State/Zip Telephone * PROPERTY OWNER Name Address City State/Zip Telephone * 6. CONTRACTOR - COMPANY NAME (Sec. 7031.5 Business end Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file e signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption^ Any violation of ^ec|ion 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant toj civil penalty of not more than five, hundreq_dollars IJSQQJ)^ o Name , . Address _. j* 1 /" Jf F^4J /£<State License # /.. a>C (t9 7 _^> / License Class , (JL2 City State/Zip A Tjelepb^neJ' \ «-.*„ r- City Business License *(WjOJLU' i~^/~T7^) W7 '3'<*<*'/ ^ • f , Designer Name Address State License # City State/Zip Telephone 6. WORKERS'COMPENSATION Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance ! the work for which this permit is issued. I have end will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section. 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are; _/-v Insurance Company ^T^TJLC. fatfA/£} Policy No. £ff2*Y^ f? l3/~~ C/ / Expiration Date_ (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS 1*100] OR LESS) Q CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, ( shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars (S1QO,000> in addition to thy^bst of cjlmpepeaiton. damages es provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code. Interest and attorney't fees. SIGNATURE {l/*Mtls^^ (J' ~T^fp?^A^_j^ DATE X / 2&J 7. OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION // ' I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License LaV'forfhe following reason: Q I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements ere not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). Q I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor^ licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). Q I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. Q YES QNO 2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / eddress / phone number / type of work): PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25605, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? Q YES Q NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? Q YES Q NO (s the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? Q YES O MO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFRCE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. 8. CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS 9. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION 1 certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced lor a period of 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE _ DATE WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance City of Carlsbad Final Building Inspection Dept: Building Engineering Plan Check #: Permits: CB010379 Planning CMWD Project Name: CORBIN RES-4409 SF.600 SF GAR, 264 SF DECKS Address: 1 35 REDWOOD AV Contact Person: AL CORBIN Sewer Dist: CA Inspected By: flat^lJ DjW£ *> Inspected By: Inspected By: Phone: 7604346887 Water Dist: CA Date / Inspected: "7/2.fe/ Date Inspected: Date Inspected: St Lite Fire - L ° & - Date: 07/26/2002 Permit Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: SFD Lot: 0 J #1 Approved: £^^ Disapproved: Approved: Disapproved: Approved: Disapproved: Comments: City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 08/01/2002 Permit* CB010379 Title: CORBIN RES-4409 SF.600 SF GAR, Description: 264 SF DECKS Inspector Assignment: PD Type: RESDNTL Job Address: Suite: Location: APPLICANT AL CORBIN Owner: Remarks? Sub Type: SFD 135 REDWOOD AV Lot 0 Phone: 7604191657 Inspector, Total Time: CD Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Requested By: AL CORBIN Entered By: CHRISTINE Act « Comments Associated PCRs/CVs Inspection History Date Description 07/30/2002 89 Final Combo 07/26/2002 89 Final Combo 04/30/2002 32 Const. Service/Agricultural 04/26/2002 32 Const. Service/Agricultural 02/20/2002 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 02/20/2002 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall 01/30/2002 16 Insulation 01/23/2002 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 01/23/2002 24 Rough/Topout 01/23/2002 34 Rough Electric 01/17/2002 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 01/16/2002 13 Shear Panels/HD's 01/16/2002 16 Insulation 12/17/2001 13 Shear Panels/HD's 12/04/2001 15 Roof/Reroof 10/05/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers Act tnsp Comments CO PD SEE NOTICE ATTACHED CA PD AP JC T.S.P.B. NR JC NO CONTRACTOR ON SITE AP JC AP JC AP JC AP JC AP JC ELEC BOX 2 HANGER/BLOCK AP JC CO JC SEE LIST WC JC PA JC SOFFITS AP JC AP JC AP JC City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 07/30/2002 Permit# CB010379 Title: CORBIN RES-4409 SF.600 SF GAR, Description: 264 SF DECKS Inspector Assignment: PD Type: RESDNTL Job Address: Suite: Location: APPLICANT AL CORBIN Owner: Remarks: Total Time: Sub Type: SFD 135 REDWOOD AV Lot 0 Phone: 7604191657 Inspector: Requested By: AL CORBIN Entered By: CHRISTINE CD Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Act Comments Li) Associated PCRs/CVs Insoection Historv Date 07/26/2002 04/30/2002 04/26/2002 02/20/2002 02/20/2002 01/30/2002 01/23/2002 01/23/2002 01/23/2002 01/17/2002 01/16/2002 01/16/2002 12/17/2001 12/04/2001 10/05/2001 10/04/2001 Description 89 Final Combo 32 Const. Service/Agricultural 32 Const. Service/Agricultural 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall 16 Insulation 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 24 Rough/Topout 34 Rough Electric 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 13 Shear Panels/HD's 16 Insulation 13 Shear Panels/HD's 15 Roof/Reroof 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 1 1 Ftg/Foundation/Piers Act CA AP NR AP AP AP AP AP AP CO we PA AP AP AP CO Insp PD JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC Comments T.S.P.B. NO CONTRACTOR ON SITE ELEC BOX 2 HANGER/BLOCK SEE LIST SOFFITS SOILS & PROPERTY PINS CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT NOTICE (760) 602-2700 1635 FARADAY AVENUE DATE °LOCATION r\ TIME PERMIT NO, LABf't- DA tiD ^ -.,,. ..... .,r- fFOR INSfPtfCTION CALL (760) 602-2725. RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? LJ YES FOR FATHER INFORMAJOpN, CONTACTtic "BUILDING INSPECTOR CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 01/29/2002 PermiW CB010379 Title: CORBIN RES-4409 SF.600 SF GAR, Description: 264 SF DECKS Inspector Assignment: JC Type:RESDNTL Job Address: Suite: Location: APPLICANT AL CORBIN Owner: Remarks: Sub Type: SFD 135 REDWOOD AV Lot 0 Phone: 7604346887 Inspector: Total Time:Requested By: AL CORBIN Entered By: CHRISTINE CD Description 16 Insulation Act Comments Associated PCRs Date 01/23/2002 01/23/2002 01/23/2002 01/17/2002 01/16/2002 01/16/2002 12/17/2001 12/04/2001 10/05/2001 10/04/2001 09/25/2001 09/12/2001 Inspection Historv Description 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 24 Rough/Topout 34 Rough Electric 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 13 Shear Panets/HD's 16 Insulation 13 Shear Panels/HD's 15 Roof/Reroof 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 21 Underground/Under Floor 15 Roof/Reroof Act AP AP AP CO we PA AP AP AP CO AP AP Insp JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC Comments ELEC BOX 2 HANGER/BLOCK SEE LIST SOFFITS SOILS & PROPERTY PINS CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE_ NOTICE (760) 602-2700 1635 FARADAY AVENUE LOCATION PERMIT NO. TIME. FOR INSPECTION CALL (760) 602-2725. RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? I 1 YES FOR FURJBERJNFORMATION, CONTACT _ PHONE BUILDING INSPECTOR CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 01/17/2002 Permits CB010379 Title: CORBIN RES-4409 SF.600 SF GAR, Description: 264 SF DECKS Inspector Assignment: JC Type:RESDNTL Sub Type: SFD Job Address: 135 REDWOOD AV Suite: Lot 0 Location: APPLICANT AL CORBIN Owner: Remarks: Phone: 7604191657 Inspector: Total Time:Requested By: AL CORBIN Entered By: CHRISTINE CD Description Act Comments 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Associated PCRs Inspection History Date Description Act Insp Comments 12/17/2001 13 Shear Panels/HD's 12/04/2001 15 Roof/Reroof 10/05/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 10/04/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 09/25/2001 21 Underground/Under Floor 09/12/2001 15 Roof/Reroof AP JC AP JC AP JC CO JC SOILS & PROPERTY PINS AP JC AP JC NOTICECITY OF CARLSBAD (760) 602-2700 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 FARADAY AVENUE DATE ^^~ TIME J" PERMIT NO. FOR INSPECTION CALL (760) 602-2725. RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? LJ YES FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT PHONE BUILDING INSPECTOR CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 10/05/2001 Permit# CB010379 Title: CORBIN RES-4409 SF.600 SF GAR, Description: 264 SF DECKS Inspector Assignment: JC Type: RESDNTL Job Address: Suite: Location: APPLICANT AL CORBIN Owner: Remarks: Sub Type: SFD 135 REDWOOD AV Lot 0 Phone: 7604927114 Inspector: \J *C_ Total Time: CD Description 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers Act Comments Requested By: DANNY Entered By: CHRISTINE Associated PCRs Inspection History Date Description Act Insp Comments 09/25/2001 21 Underground/Under Floor AP JC 09/12/2001 15 Roof/Reroof AP JC LOVELACE ENGINEERING Structural Engineering Services October 5, 2001 Mr. Al R. Corbin 167 Redwood Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Subject: Footing Inspection @ SW corner of residence Single Family Residence Redwood Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 APN 204-253-15 Mr. Corbin: In accordance with your request, I reviewed the existing plans and Geotechnical letter (see attached). Based upon my review of the letter, the restaurant retaining wall is not surcharged by the residence continuous footing, and the concrete pour can proceed. LIMITATIONS The conclusion presented in this letter is based on a review of the existing calculations and the Geotechnical letter. We did not perform any calculations or make any field measurments. If any additional calculations are required please contact Lovelace Engineering, Inc. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, LOVELACE ENGINEERING, INC. Bob Schimmel Project Engineer RDS/bs Attachment 6496 Weathers Place • Suite 200 • San Diego, California 92121-2958 www.fovelaceeng.com • phone 858.535.9111 fax S58.535.1989 BARRY AND ASSOCIATES GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING P.O. Box 230348 Encinitas, CA 92023-0348 (760) 753-9940 October 5, 2001 Mr. Al R. Corbin 167 Redwood Ave. Carlsbad, California 92008 Subject: FOOTING INSPECTION SW CORNER OF PROPOSED RESIDENCE Proposed Single Family Residence Redwood Ave, ; Carlsbad, California 92008 APN 204-253-15 Dear Mr. Corbin, This letter will confirm that I measured the height of the restaurant basement retaining wall from the inside of the restaurant and found it to be 7 feet high. The 45 degree line from the bottom of the proposed residence to the retaining wall at the SW corner of the proposed residence falls below the bottom of the restaurant retaining wall, which mitigates the concern of the surcharge mentioned in the previous letter of October 5, 2001. I recommend that the scheduled concrete pour for Monday October 8, 2001 be continued as planned. If you have any questions please call us at (760) 753-9940. Sincerely, Barry and A; Principal Copy City of BARRY AND ASSOCIATES GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING P.O. Box 230348 Encinitas, CA 92023-0348 (760) 753-9940 October 5, 2001 Mr. Al R. Corbin 167 Redwood Ave. Carlsbad, California 92008 Subject: FOOTING INSPECTION SW CORNER OF PROPOSED RESIDENCE Proposed Single Family Residence Redwood Ave. Carlsbad, California 92008 APN 204-253-15 Dear Mr. Corbin, This letter will confirm that I measured the height of the restaurant basement retaining wall from the inside of the restaurant and found it to be 7 feet high. The 45 degree line from the bottom of the proposed residence to the retaining wall at the SW corner of the proposed residence falls below the bottom of the restaurant retaining wall, which mitigates the concern of the surcharge mentioned in the previous letter of October 5, 2001. I recommend that the scheduled concrete pour for Monday October 8, 2001 be continued as planned. If you have any questions please call us at (760) 753-9940. Sincerely, Barry and A.1 Principal Copy City of jdarl BARRY AND ASSOCIATES GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING P.O. Box 230348 October 4, 2001 Encinitas, CA 92023-0348 Mr. Al R. Corbin (760)753-9940 167 Redwood Ave. Carlsbad, California 92008 Subject: FOOTING INSPECTION Proposed Single Family Residence Redwood Ave. Carlsbad, California 92008 APN 204-253-15 References: ROUGH GRADING REPORT 2 Proposed Single Family Residences Redwood Ave. Carlsbad, California 92008 APN 204-253-15 and 16 PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Proposed Single Family Residence Redwood Ave. Carlsbad, California 92008 APN 204-253-16 and 15 Dear Mr. Corbin, In accordance with your request we have inspected the footing excavation for the proposed residence. The footing excavation was inspected on October 4, 2001. The bottom of the footing excavation was probed with a steel probe and determined to be adequate. The depth and width of the footing excavation and in-place reinforcing steel meet the minimum requirements of the plans and above referenced documents. The bottom of the footing excavation should be clear of loose debris prior to pouring concrete. If you have any questions please call us at (760) 753-9940. Sincerely, Barry and A.R. Bar Principal Engineer Copy: City of Carlsb BARRY AND ASSOCIATES GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING P.O. Box 230348 Encinitas, CA 92023-0348 (760) 753-9940 October 5, 2001 Mr, Al R. Corbin 167 Redwood Ave. Carlsbad, California 92008 Subject: FOOTING INSPECTION SW CORNER OF PROPOSED RESIDENCE Proposed Single Family Residence Redwood Ave. Carlsbad, California 92008 APN 204-253-15 Dear Mr. Corbin, As per our conversation yesterday it is my understanding that the south west corner of the proposed residence has been designed by your structural engineer to protect the adjacent basement retaining wall to the west of the proposed residence. The lateral pressure caused by the vertical load of the proposed 2 story residence will be transferred to the east wall of the existing restaurant. Unless the existing basement wall has sufficient reinforcing steel to resist the said lateral pressure, the wall could possibly crack and cause problems. If you have any questions please call us at (760) 753-9940. ciatei Sincerely, Barry and A A.R. Barry, Principal Enginee Copy City of Carls EsGil Corporation In ^artnersdif zvitfc (jovernme.nt for <Bui6£ing Safety DATE: 8/2/01 a APPLICANT a JURIS. JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 01-379 SET: III PROJECT ADDRESS: 135 Redwood Ave. PROJECT NAME: Residence for Al & Pam Corbin | The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. |~l The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Al Telephone #: in person Date contacted: 8/2/01 (by: CM) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: By: Chuck Mendenhall Enclosures: Esgil Corporation Q GA D MB D EJ D PC Walk in tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 4 San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation In fartnersdip vsit/i government for 'BuiCding Safety DATE: 5/30/01 Q APPLICANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad Q PLAN REVIEWER Q FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 01-379 SET: H PROJECT ADDRESS: 135 Redwood Ave. PROJECT NAME: Residence for Al & Pam Corbin The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Robin Franklin 6070 Mission gorge Rd, Suite #4, San Diego, CA 92120 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: A\ Telephone #: (760) 434-6887 Date contacted:5^A>' (by:-fro^ Fax #: (G>) ^ 6>2-4-* O 7*?3 - Jo *h Mailw^ Telephone Fax ^ In Person REMARKS: By: Chuck Mendenhall Enclosures: Esgil Corporationn GA n MB n EJ n PC 5/26/01 tmsmu.** 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 4 Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad O1-379 5/30/01 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES NOTE: The items listed below refer to the item numbers from the previous list. These remaining items have not been adequately addressed. The notes in bold at the end of each item are to emphasize the remaining problem. 2. All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). I could not find the signatures on any of the sheets except the structural sheets. • FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS 7. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents (required by the soil report). Letter from Barry and Assoc. refers to a 5ft separation between the residence and P/L. the letter did not address the review of the building foundation plans as noted in the report of Dec. 26, 2000. • FRAMING 10. Plans show the floor joists spanning as much as 24ft over the Guest quarters and Hall. The design of the floor joists is for a max span of 20ft. the response from the design engineer was "The floor joists are 18"TJ/L65 @ 24" OC and they can span 24ft. See the floor joist span table". The span tabvle provided shows that the 18"TJL65 has a LL capacity of 75 PLF when spanning 24ft. the required LL for the floor system with joists at 24" OC is 80 PLF. 12. What is the size and spacing of the FJ-1 above the garage and cantilevered from the steel beam? Include in the design calc's FJ-1 above the garage. The response from the engineer was "See the attached joist and beam schedule. The floor joists are 18"TJL65 @ 16" OC. See our calculation packet pages 5-10". The joists above the garage span 19ft and cantilever 5'-6" beyond the steel beam support. The end of the cantilever supports uniform floor loads and concentrated roof loads from trusses that span 30ft. the typical TJ span table does not include this condition and the calculations referenced in the response do not address this condition. • MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 16. Location of the FAU is now shown in the attic. Include the following notes on the plans: A. Note that passageway to the attic furnace shall be unobstructed not less than 30" high and 30" wide and have continuous solid flooring not less than Carlsbad 01-379 5/3O/01 24 inches wide, not more than 20 feet in length through the attic. Section 307.3.2, UMC. B Show or note permanent electrical outlet and lighting fixture controlled by a switch for furnace located in attic or underfloor space. Sections 306.3 and 306.4, UMC. 18. Specify on the plans the following information for the fireplace(s), per Section 106.3.3: The elevations and floor plan shows that you are intending to install a direct vent gas appliance. The ICBO number listed on the plans as #2578 is not a valid ICBO approval number and the Marco Co. generally produces solid fuel (wood) burning fireplaces. Please clarify what you intend to install • Manufacturer's name. • Model name/number. • ICBO approval number, or equal. • Show height of chimney above roof per I.C.B.O. approval or UBC Table 31-B. • Note on the plans that approved spark arresters shall be installed on all chimneys. UBC, Section 3102.3.8. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Chuck Mendenhall at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. EsGil Corporation In Partnership with government for DATE: 2/8/01 a AeEUCANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad Q PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: O1-379 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 135 Redwood Ave. PROJECT NAME: Residence for Al & Pam Corbin The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. | The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. | | The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. | The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Robin Franklin 6070 Mission Gorge Rd., Suite #4, San Diego, CA 92120 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Robin Franklin ^ Telephone #: (619) 624-0769 Date contacted: 9tfe (by:-j^) Fax #: Telephone Fax -" In Person REMARKS: By: Chuck Mendenhall Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 2/1/01 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 4- San Diego, California 92123 * (858)560-1468 * Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad O1-379 2/8/01 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 01-379 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 135 Redwood Ave. FLOOR AREA: 4409 REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: 2/8/01 STORIES: two HEIGHT: 25ft approx per UBC DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 2/1/01 PLAN REVIEWER: Chuck Mendenhall FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 1998 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 1997 UBC, 1997 UPC, 1997 UMC and 1996 NEC (all effective 7/1/99). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed UP the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked UP list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad O1-379 2/8/01 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave, Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2721. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego.^CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). 3. When sleeping rooms are upstairs smoke detector must be located at the upper level in close proximity to the stair. See sheet 6 of the plans and location of the upper level smoke detector in the hall. 4. Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406.4 : A. Window 'G' adjacent to Game Room Door. B. Sidelight windows adjacent to the entry door at the Foyer. C. Windowsl&Jat the Master bath tub and Shower D. Windows adjacent to the stairs that are within 5ft of the top and bottom of the stairs. • ROOFING 5. Show on the elevations the location of the roof vents. How do you intend to provide the vents at the eaves and in the upper part of the roof? • FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS 6. The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: a) The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, b) The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and Carlsbad 01-379 2/8/O1 c) The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report." 7. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents (required by the soil report). • FRAMING 8. Provide truss details and truss calculations for this project. Specify truss identification numbers on the plans. The truss design must include the horizontal drag truss load as well as the vertical loads. 9. Per UBC Section 2321.4, provide the following note on the plans if trusses are used: "Each truss shall be legibly branded, marked or otherwise have permanently affixed thereto the following information located within 2 feet of the center of the span on the face of the bottom chord: a) Identity of the company manufacturing the truss. b) The design load. c) The spacing of the trusses." 10. Plans show the floor joists spanning as much as 24ft over the Guest quarters and Hall. The design of the floor joists is for a max span of 20ft 11. Where on the plans does dj-1 apply? The design of this beam occurs on pages 11 thru 14 of the design calc's. 12. What is the size and the spacing of FJ-1 above the garage and cantilevered from the steel beam? Include in the design calc's FJ-1 above the garage. 13. FB-3 above the garage appears to be supporting 10ft of tributary floor load. The design shows only 12/2(60). This is only 6ft of tributary floor load. Please clarify. 14. Where in the design calc's is the design of the beams supporting the roof loads at the Veranda above the Game Rm? 15. The design of the spread footings found on pages 22 & 23 of the calc's is incomplete. Include a schematic of the foundation showing the location of all spread footings, the load at the footing and the designation in the calc's. • MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 16. Show the location, type and size (BTU's) of all heating and cooling appliances or systems. Carlsbad 01-379 2/8/01 17. Every dwelling unit shall be provided with heating facilities capable of maintaining a room temperature of 70 degrees F at 3 feet above the floor in all habitable rooms. Show basis for compliance. UBC, Sec. 310.11. 18. Specify on the plans the following information for the fireplace(s), per Section 106.3.3: • Manufacturer's name. • Model name/number. • ICBO approval number, or equal • Show height of chimney above roof per I.C.B.O. approval or UBC Table 31-B. • Note on the plans that approved spark arrestors shall be installed on all chimneys. UBC, Section 3102.3.8. • ENERGY CONSERVATION 19. The regulations require a properly completed and properly signed Form CF-1R to be either imprinted on the plans, taped to the plans or "sticky backed" on the plans, to allow the building inspector to readily compare the actual construction with the requirements of the approved energy design. 20. Door 10 must have a U-value of 0.55, It must be dual glazed wood or vinyl frame to achieve this. The door schedule shows single light glass door. 21. Provide fluorescent general lighting (40 lumens per watt minimum) in the 2nd floor kitchen. The flourescent lighting must be controlled by a switch at the entrance to the kitchen. 22. Provide a note on the plans stating "All new glazing (fenestrations) will be installed with a certifying label attached, showing the U-value." To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Carlsbad 01-379 2/8/O1 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PREPARED BY: Chuck Mendenhall BUILDING ADDRESS: 135 Redwood Ave. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3/U1 PLAN CHECK NO.: O1-379 DATE: 2/8/01 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN BUILDING PORTION dwelling garage decks Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code AREA ( Sq. Ft.) 4430 600 230 cb Valuation Multiplier City Est City Est City Est By Ordinance Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance "V Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) V 396,940 $1,660.58 Plan Check Fee by Ordinance $1,079.37 Type of Review: LD Repetitive Fee Repeats 0 Complete Review D Other D Hourly Structural Only Hour(s) * Esgil Plan Review Fee $863.50 Comments: Sheet 1 of 1 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DATE:PLANCHECK NO.: BUILDING ADDRESS: I 3$ PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER:EST. VALUE: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: DENIAL Please seV. the^-attached report of deficiencies marked withJSMake necessary corrections to plans or specifications for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. By:Date: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT: ! ;: Date: ' ATTACHMENTS Dedication Application Dedication Checklist Improvement Application Improvement Checklist Future Improvement Agreement Grading Permit Application Grading Submittal Checklist Right-of-Way Permit Application Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet Sewer Fee Information Sheet ENGINEERING PERT. CONTACT PERSON Name: JOANNE JUCHNIEWICZ City of Carlsbad Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue. Carlsbad. CA 92008 Phone: (760? 602-2775 CFD INFORMATION Parcel Map No: Lots: Recordation: Carlsbad Tract: A-4 H:\WORDiDOCfflCHKLST»ul«ng Ptandwek CkM Form (G«Mrtc) Joe r\\ BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN IST ./oND gRD Q 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: A. North Arrow F. Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets B. Existing & Proposed Structures G. Driveway widths C. Existing Street Improvements H. Existing or proposed sewer lateral D. Property Lines I. Existing or proposed water service E. Easements J. Existing or proposed irrigation service Q 2. Show on site plan: A. Drainage Patterns 1. Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. 2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." B. Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography C. Size, type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service (s) that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service, however, second dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception. D. Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per standards. Q 3. Include on title sheet: A. Site address B. Assessor's Parcel Number C. Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION HWVOKWOCSCHKLSP0tMngPlinGhM*C)dMFcMn(OwN>lc)xloc IST oND Qfd BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval, for **; v ti Project No. fryv\tv^ igg-f fl-v)* /oleL'w /^vjo/^fc- LJL/L<S j\ Ov x-' J 77^NNjjT ^ ,S , CrS^cA \ Ji \ vx ^* K-^ xh ,rvx^ «.J Q O 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS D D 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $15.000. pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 W x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by: Date: IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS D D D 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $75.000. pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the H:lWORDU)OCS\CHKLST\Bui(Nng Ranch** CkW Form (RIDDLE • HARVEY 7-12-00).**: A R«v. 12QMt BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 3rd checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by: Date: D 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $280 so we may prepare the necessary Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Neighborhood Improvement Agreement will include the following: D D D 6c. Enclosed please find your Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. 0 I Neighborhood Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: n 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective -- improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction 1 "^ of the Citv Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. D D D 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). D D D 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: D D D 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) H:\WORD\DOCSCHKlST\Biddlng PtanctMC* CUM Form (RIDDLE - HARVEY 7-12-OO).dW t ftn. W2OTO BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST RD 7d .No Grading Permit required. 7e. If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan. /MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: streetjmprovements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for: D D D D D D D D 9. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7153, for assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: 11 10. NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. GKRequired fees are attached Q No fees required WATER METER REVIEW 12a. Domestic (potable) Use Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized. Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions. If it is oversized, for the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used. • All single family dwelling units received "standard" 1" service with 5/8" service. H:\WORnDOCSCHKLSnBuftftv PtandMCk CHn fonn BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST >ND 3RD D D • If owner/developer proposes a size other than the "standard", then owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations, which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons per minute (gpm). A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is attached. Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing schedule" to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit. • Maximum service and meter size is a 2" service with a 2" meter. • If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2", suggest the installation of multiple 2" services as needed to provide the anticipated demand, (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit multiple trenching into the street). 12b. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available) All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior to approval. The developer must provide these calculations. Please follow these guidelines: 1. If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the recent improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on the improvement sheets. If so, at the water meter station, the demand in gpm may be listed there. Irrigation services are listed with a circled T, and potable water is typically a circled "W". The irrigation service should look like: STA 1+00 Install 2" service and 2. 3. 1.5: meter (estimated 100 gpm) If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach). Typically, Larry Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared, but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use. Once you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for your reference. In general the calculations will include: Hydraulic grade line Elevation at point of connection (POC) Pressure at POC in pounds per square Inch (PSI) Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head) Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with no HOA). As long as the project is located within the City recycled water H:\WOREftDOCStCHKLSTOvMtag Ptwchw* CUM Fom (OvNric) .doc R«v. 7/14/00 4 ST 2ND (RD BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST service boundary, the City intends on switching services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future. these irrigation D D D 12c- Irrigation Use (where recycled water is available) 1. Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above. 2. If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development. For subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the improvement plans. Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water Capacity fees. However, if they front a street which the recycled water is there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego Water Capacity Charge. If within three years, the recycled water line is charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund. However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and they must deal with the SDCWA for this. 13. Additional Commonfl VIA H:\WORCHX>C5CHKLSTOuUtag Ptandwck CMtf Fwm (GwwricMtoc tov. 7/1*00 D D ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant. Calculation based on building plancheck plan subrnittal. Address:Bldg. Permit No. Prepared by:Date:Checked by:Date: EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: ,5*F Sq. Ft./Units: ) Sq. Ft./Units:Types of Use: APT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: ^ f- Sq. Ft./Units: I Sq. Ft./Units:Types of Use: FEES REQUIRED: EDU's: EDU's: ADT's: ADT's: WiTHIN CFD: D YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District #1, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) PARK AREA & #: O-flO . PARK-IN-LIEU FEE FEE/UNIT:NO. UNITS:-S G/2. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ADT's/UNITS: / X /tij3. BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE {DIST. ADT's/UNITS: X Mfr-4. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE ZONE:yH UN1T/SQ.FT.: X EX5. SEWER FEE EDU's: 1 X BENEFIT AREA: FJft / EDU's: X [36. SEWER LATERAL ($2,500) D/ 7. DRAINAGE FEES PLDA XV : FEE/ADT: ^7^ = $ $2O #1 DIST. #2 DIST. #3 ) FEE/ADT: « $ J^ I FEE/SQ.FT./UNIT: -$ ^^ FEE/EDU: £75J =$ | ^$Y FEE/EDU: =S -« ?,T^cP HIGH y /LOW . ACRES: . /5" X FEE/AC:?")!1* =$ LtHt. t>O B 8. POTABLE WATER FEES UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE 7 ' " METER FEE SDCWA FEE IRRIGATION ^^7-^HL ^ ^m$ fiffltf Wofd\Doe*\MMonra\FM CalcultUon WorfcvhMt Iof2 Rev. 7/14/00 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET .9. RECLAIMED WATER FEES UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE METER FEE TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES*: $ *NOTE: This calculation sheet is NOT a complete list of all fees which may be due. Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits. 2 of 2 WoRnDocs\MMonTMtFMCatculaUonWoifc«hMt Rev. 7/14/00 PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST 0 Plan Check No. GB O \ -Address Planner Greg Fisher APN: Phone (760) 602-4629 -\5 Type of Project & Use: Zoning: R-^S General Plan: Net Project Density: Facilities Management Zone: DU/AC CFD fin/nut) # Circle One JDate of participation:Remaining net dev acres: (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit: } Legend: X Item Complete D Environmental Review Required: DATE OF COMPLETION: YES Item Incomplete - Needs your action NO TYPE Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: I I Discretionary Action Required: APPROVAL/RESO. NO./iI PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: I | I | Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES X NO CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES NO ^7 If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619) 521-8036 Determine status {Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #: [j?M Follow-Up Actions: 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. H :\ADM!N\COUNTER\Bldg PlnchkRe vChklst Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES X NO (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES NO V (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) Site Plan: 1. Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines. 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. Zoning: 1. Setbacks: _ .tlSI n x~i r Front: Interior Side: Street Side: Rear: 2. Accessory Structure setbacks: Front: Interior Side: Street Side: Rear: Required C/^/. f Required ) Required ' ~~ Required / (] ' itbacks: ^ Requife*a Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown 5" ' -- —ini J^equired Shown Recfaked Shown Requirea^^^ Shown Required Shown 3. Lot Coverage: 4. Height: Required Required 5. Parking: Spaces Required &— Guest Spaces Required ^ Shown Shown Shown Shown Additional Comments AT CVTy 0V OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER H:\ADMlN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst DATI BARRY AND ASSOCIATES QEQTECHWCAL ENQIHEEHiNQ P.O. Box23034S Encinltgs, CA 92023-0348 (760) 753*9940 March 5, 2001 Mr. Al R, corfein 167 Redwood Ave. Carlabad, California 92008 Subject.: Separation Requirement! For Drainage Swale Proposed Single Family Residence Redwood Ave . Carlafaftd, California 92006 APW 204-253-15 Reference; PRKLIMINWIY OZOTBCHNICAL IMVS6TIOAT10N Propoied Single Family Residence R*dwood \ve. carlobad. California 9200B APN 204-253-16 Dear Mr, Certain, Thia letter presents the our acceptance of the 5 foot separation from che residence to the property lina, Tha 5 foot separation will provide sufficient apace to incorporate an adequate 2 foot wide drainage swale and direct water avay from the foundation, If you have any questions, pleate contact u* at <7SO) 753-9940. Respectfully submitted, &.R. SARKY A.R. Barry,Principal Engineer . 0 BARRY AND ASSOCIATES GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING P.O. Box230348 Encinitas, CA 92023-0348 (760) 753-9940 February 12, 2001 Mr. Al R. Corbin 167 Redwood Ave. Carlsbad, California 92008 Subject: ROUGH GRADING REPORT 2 Proposed Single Family Residences Redwood Ave. Carlsbad, California 92008 APN 204-253-15 and 16 Reference: PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Proposed Single Family Residence Redwood Ave. Carlsbad, California 92008 APN 204-253-16 and 15 Dear Mr. Corbin, In response to your request, we have observed the grading operation and performed field density tests for the proposed residence on the above referenced property. The results of our density testing and laboratory testing are presented in this report. Based on the results of our testing, it is our opinion that the fill was placed in an adequate manner and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory maximum dry density. If you have any questions, please contact us at 760.753.9940. This opportunity to be of service is appreciated. Respectfully submitt A.R. BARRY Barr Principal Engin ROUGH GRADING REPORT 2 Proposed Single Family Residence Redwood Ave. Carlsbad, California 92008 A.P.N. 204-253-15 and 16 Prepared for Mr. Al R. Corbin 167 Redwood Ave. Carlsbad, California 92008 February 12, 2001 W.O. G- 1658 Prepared by: BARRY AND ASSOCIATES P.O. Box 230348 Encinitas, California 92023-0348 February 12, 2001 W.O.tf G-1658 Page 1 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our observations and field density testing of the grading project for the proposed residence. The project consisted of removing approximately 4 feet of loose surficial soil and re-compacting. The results of our density testing are presented on Table 1. LABORATORY TEST DATA The laboratory standard for determining the maximum dry density was performed in accordance with ASTM D 1557-92. Field density tests were performed in accordance with ASTM D 1556. The results of the laboratory maximum dry density, for the soil used as compacted fill on the site, is summarized below: Maximum Dry Density Optimum Description (p.c . f .) Moisture (%) Tan silty sand 128.2 10.2 EXPANSIVE SOILS Pad grade soils have an expansion potential in the low range. DISCUSSION The following is a discussion of the grading operations, as they were performed on the site: 1. Approximately 4 feet of loose soil was removed from the February 12, 2001 W.O.tt G-1658 Page 2 northerly one half of the lot and stockpiled on the southerly one half. The bottom of the excavation was probed with a steel probe and determined to be adequate. 2. Fill soil was placed in lifts of approximately 6.0 to 8.0 inches thick. 3. The soil was moistened as required to achieve optimum moisture content, and compacted with track mounted Caterpillar Tractor. 4. The fill was placed to a minimum of 90 percent of the maximum dry density, as indicated by our test results. 5. Removal and recompaction included the area 5* outside the building line. INSPECTIONS All structural footings excavations should be inspected and probed by this firm prior to setting reinforcing steel. LIMITATIONS This firm assumes no responsibility for any alterations made without our knowledge and written approval to the slope or pad grade on the lot, subsequent to the issuance of this report. February 12, 2001 W.O.tt G-1658 Page 3 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at (760) 753-9940. This opportunity to be of service is greatly appreciated Respectfully submitt*^ A. R^ BARRY A. R. Ba Principal Engin W.O. # G-1658 Lot 15 and 16 Redwood Avenue Carlsbad, CA APPENDIX "A" LABORATORY TEST RESULTS TABLE I Test No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Field Dry Test Location Under See See See See See See See Driveway Plan Plan Plan Plan Plan Plan Plan Density and Moisture Moisture Content Elev. % grade -3' grade - grade - grade - grade - grade - grade - grade - 8 8 9 14 9 8 9 10 .0 .7 .0 .7 .5 .6 .0 .1 Content Dry Relative Density % (pcf) Compaction 117 118 113 114 117 118 119 117 .8 .6 .0 .8 .9 .1 .3 .6 93 93 92 90 92 92 93 92 AL § PAM CORBIN RESIDENCE QO 45.00' LOT 16 45. 00 LOT D O T (f JZZDWOQP W.O. #G-1658 DENSITY TEST LOCATION PLAN December 26, 2000 BARRY AND ASSOCIATES GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING P.O. Box 230348 Encinitas, CA 92023-0348 (760) 753-9940 Mr. Al R. Corbin 167 Redwood Ave. Carlsbad, California 92008 Subject: PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Proposed Single Family Residence Redwood Ave. Carlsbad, California 92008 APN 204-253-1V Dear Mr. Corbin, In response to your request, we have performed a preliminary geotechnical investigation at the subject property for the proposed single family residence. The findings of the investigation, laboratory test results and recommendations for grading and foundation design are presented in this report. From a geotechnical point of view, it is our opinion that the site is suitable for the proposed project, provided the recommendations in this report are implemented during the design and construction phase. If you have any questions, please contact us at (760) 753-9940. Respectfully submitted, A.R. BARRY ANJX^SSOCIA0*EFES$/; A.R. Barry, P.E. Principal Engineer PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Proposed Single Family Residence Redwood Ave. Carlsbad, California 92008 APN 204-253-16 Prepared For Mr. Al Corbin 167 Redwood Ave. Carlsbad, California 92008 December 26, 2000 W.O. P-1658 Prepared By: A.R. BARRY AND ASSOCIATES P.O. Box 230348 Encinitas, CA 92023-0348 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 2 SITE CONDITIONS 2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 2 SITE INVESTIGATION 2 LABORATORY TESTING 3 GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS 4 A. SOIL CLASSIFICATION 4 B. EXPANSIVE SOIL 4 C . SEISMIC 4 D. LIQUEFACTION 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5 A. GENERAL 5 B . GRADING 6 C . FOUNDATION 6 D. SLABS ON GRADE 7 E . DRAINAGE 7 F. FOOTING INSPECTION 8 G. PLAN REVIEW 8 LIMITATIONS 8 APPENDIX A REFERENCES LOG OF TEST TRENCHES LABORATORY TEST RESULTS VICINITY MAP SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP TEST PIT LOCATION PLAN FIGURE 1 FIGURE 2 APPENDIX B GRADING SPECIFICATIONS December 26, 2000 W.O. ttP-1658 Page 2 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our preliminary geotechnical investigation. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the nature and characteristics of the earth materials underlying the property and their influence on the proposed residence and garage. SITE CONDITIONS The 45' x 115' rectangular lot is located on the south side of Redwood Avenue between Garfield and Carlsbad Blvd., in the City of Carlsbad, California. (See Vicinity Map, Appendix A.) The property slopes gently to the south west at an average rate of approximately 4 per cent. The lot is vacant and has been cleared. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Plans were not available to us during the investigation however it is our understanding that a two story single family residence and garage will be constructed on a level graded pad. Plans are presently being designed by Franklin Enterprises of San Diego, California. SITE INVESTIGATION Three exploratory trenches were excavated with a backhoe to a maximum depth of 6 feet. Earth materials in the excavations were visually classified and logged by our field engineer. In-place soil density tests were performed in the excavations by driving thin December 26, 2000 W.O. ttP-1658 Page 3 wall Shelly tube samplers at various depths. See Laboratory Test Results, Appendix A. Bulk samples were obtained and transported to the laboratory for verification of soil type, an<3 determination of the maximum density and optimum moisture content. Maximum dry density and optimum moisture content were determined for representative soil samples obtained from the excavation. See Laboratory Tests, Appendix A. LABORATORY TESTING Classification The field classification was verified through laboratory examination in accordance with the unified Soil Classification System. The final classification is SM (Reddish brown Silty Sand). LABORATORY TEST DATA The laboratory standard for determining the maximum dry density and optimum moisture content was performed in accordance with ASTM D 1557-92. The results are presented in Appendix A. PENETROMETER AND TORVANE SHEAR TESTING The soil plug from the maximum dry dens i ty and optimum moi s ture test was tested for bearing capacity and unconfined soil strength with penetrometer and torvane shear testing devices. The results are shown in Appendix A. December 26, 2000 W.O. ttP-1658 Page 4 GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS Soil The on site soils consist of SM (Reddish brown fine to medium grained silty sand. Expansive Soil Detrimentally expansive soils were not encountered in our exploratory trenches and are not expected to be encountered during grading. The potential for expansion is in the very low range. Seismic The review of available geologic maps including Maps of Known Active Faults Near-Source Zones in California and Adjacent Portions of Nevada published by ICBO (1998) indicate that the nearest active fault is the Rose Canyon Fault located approximately 7 kilometers south west of the subject site. The Rose Canyon Fault is a class B fault capable of generating a magnitude 6.9 earthquake. The following seismic factors are in accordance with the 1997 uniform Building Code. Parameter Seismic Zone Factor Soil Profile Type Seismic Coefficient Seismic Coefficient Near Source Factor Table 16-1 16-J 16-Q 16-R 16-S Symbol Z - Ca Cv Na Factor 0.4 SD 0.44Na 0.64Nv 1,0 Near Source Factor Seismic Source Type 16-T Nv December 26, 2000 W.O. #P-1658 Page 5 1.12 B Maximum Moment Magnitude 6.9 Slip Rate, SR 1.5 mm/yr. Liquefaction In accordance with reference #4 (Planning Scenario For A Major Earthquake, San Diego-Tijuana Metropolitan Area, published by the California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology) the site is located just outside the fringe area of the Agua Hadianda Lagoon which is subject to potential seismically induced liquefaction. The soils on the subject site however are not considered subject to seismically induced liquefaction based on such factors as soil density, sand particle size, and lack of groundwater. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General The on site soils are suitable for the proposed project and for the support of the proposed structure, provided the recommendations in this report are implemented during the design and construction. December 26, 2000 W.O. ttP-1658 Page 6 Grading General Laboratory tests indicate that the soils in the upper 3 to 4 feet are loose and should be removed and re-compacted. The final depth of excavation will be determined during grading. See Grading Specifications, Appendix B Foundation Footings for the proposed structure should be a minimum of 15" wide and founded a minimum of 18" below finish grade for a two story structure. Footings founded a minimum of 18" below grade may be designed for a bearing value of 2000 psf. The bearing value indicated above is for the total of dead and applied live loads. This value may be increased by 33 percent for short durations of loading, including the effects of wind and seismic forces. Resistance to lateral load may be provided by friction acting at the base of foundations and passive earth pressure. A coefficient of friction of 0.3 should be used with dead-load forces. A passive earth pressure of 250 pounds per square foot, per foot of depth of fill penetrated to a maximum of 2000 pounds should be used in the design. December 26, 2000 W.O. ttP-1658 Page 7 Minimum steel reinforcement should consist of 4-#4 bars, 2 placed 3" from the bottom of the footing and 2 placed 2" below the top of the footings. Slabs on grade Slab on grade should be a minimum of 4.0 inches thick and reinforced in both directions with No. 3 bars, placed 18 inches on center. The slab should be underlain by a minimum 4-inch sand blanket which incorporates a minimum 6.0-mil visqueen or equivalent moisture barrier in its center, for moisture sensitive floors. Utility trenches underlying the slab should be bedded in clean sand to at least one foot above the top of the conduit, then backfilled with the on-site granular materials, compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory maximum dry density. However, sufficiently compacting the backfill deposits may damage or break shallow utility lines. Therefore, minor settlement of the backfill in the trenches is anticipated in these shallow areas. To reduce the possibility of cracks occurring, the slab should be provided with additional reinforcement to bridge the trenches. Drainage All roof water should be collected and conducted to the street via non-erodible devices. Roof gutters are recommended. Pad water should be directed away from foundations and around the residence to a suitable location. Pad water should not pond. December 26, 2000 W.O. ttP-1658 Page 8 Footing Inspections Structural footing excavations should be inspected by a representative of this firm prior to the completion of the footing excavation. Plan Review A copy of the final building plans should be submitted to this office for review, prior to the initiation of construction. Additional recommendations may be necessary at that time. LIMITATIONS This report is presented with the provision that it is the responsibility of the owner or the owner's representative to bring the information and recommendations given herein to the attention of the project's architects and/or engineers so that they may be incorporated into the plans. If conditions encountered during construction appear to differ from those described in this report, our office should be notified so that we may consider whether or not modifications are needed. No responsibility for construction compliance with design concepts, specifications or recommendations given in this report is assumed unless on-site review is performed during the course of construction. December 26, 2000 W.O. #P-1658 Page 9 The conclusions and recommendations of this report apply as of the current date. In time, however, changes can occur on a property whether caused by acts of man or nature on this or adjoining properties. Additionally, changes in professional standards may be brought about by legislation or the expansion of knowledge. Consequently, the conclusions and recommendations of this report may be rendered wholly or partially invalid by events beyond our control. This report is therefore subject to review and should not be relied upon after the passage of three years. The professional judgments presented herein are founded partly on our assessment of the technical data gathered, partly on our understanding of the proposed construction and partly on our general experience in the geotechnical field. If you have any questions, please call us at (760) 753-9940. This opportunity to be of service is greatly appreciated. Respectfully submitted, A.R. BARRY A.R. Barry, P.E. Principal Engine A W0.# P-1658 REFERENCES 1. Sketch of Site Plan prepared by the Owner. 2. UBC 1997 Addition 3. Maps Of Known Active Fault Near Source zones in California and Adjacent Portions Of Nevada, Published by (I.C.B.O.) 1998 California Division And Mines And Geology 4. Planning Scenario For A Major Earthquake San Diego Tijuana Metropolitan Area, Published By I.C.B.O. 1990 W.O. P-1658 LOG OP EXPLORATORY TRENCHES TRENCH tt DEPTH CLASSIFICATION TP-1 TP-2 0-6' 0-6 SM SM DESCRIPTION Tan fine to medium grained silty sand, dry to slightly moist, loose to moderately dense, slightly cemented. Tan fine to medium grained silty sand, dry to slightly moist, loose to moderately dense, slightly cemented. TP-3 0-6*SM Tan fine to medium grained silty sand, dry to slightly moist, loose to moderately dense, slightly cemented. W.O. #P-1658 APPENDIX "A" LABORATORY TEST RESULTS TABLE I Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content (Laboratory Standard ASTM D-1557-78) Sample Location TT-1 2.5 Max. Dry Density (pcf) 128.2 Optimum Moisture Content (%) 10.2 Sample Location TT-1 @ l.O1 TT-1 ©5.0' TT-2 @ 4.0' TT-3 @ 3.0* TABLE II Field Dry Density and Moisture Content Field Dry Field Moisture Max. Dry Relative Density (pcf) Content (%) Density(pcf) Compaction (%) 107.3 105.3 103.2 103.5 7.3 7.2 6.0 5.4 124.2 124.2 124.2 124.2 86 85 83 83 Sample Location TABLE III Per Cent Smaller than #200 Sieve, Pocket Penetrometer, and Torvane Shear Tests (From Soil Plug Of Proctor Test) % Smaller than #200 Sieve Penetrometer Tons/S.F. Torvane Shear Tons/S.F TT-1 @ 2.5 17%2.0 3.0 1106 W.0.11658 R.ZDWOOO AV£- TT-3 10 TT-1 \ TT-2 SCALE. /"-20' 45.0' TEST TRENCH LOCATION PLAN ARRENDIX B APPENDIX B RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATIONS GRADING INTENT The intent of these specifications is to establish procedures for clearing, compacting natural ground, preparing areas to be filled and placing and compacting fill soil to the lines and grades shown on the accepted plans. The recommendations contained in the preliminary geotechnical investigation report are a part of the recommended grading specifications and would supersede the provisions contained herein in case of conflict. INSPECTION AND TESTING A geotechnical engineer should be employed to observe and test the earthwork in accordance with these specifications. It will be necessary that the geotechnical engineer or his representative make adequate observations so that he may provide a memorandum that the work was or was not accomplished as specified. Deviations from these specifications will be permitted only upon written authorization from the geotechnical engineer. It should be the responsibility of the contractor to assist the geotechnical engineer and to keep him apprised of work schedules, changes and new information and data so that he may provide the memorandum to the owner and governmental agency as required. If in the opinion of the geotechnical engineer, substandard conditions such as questionable soil, poor moisture control, inadequate compaction, adverse weather, etc. are encountered, the contractor should stop construction until the conditions are remedied. Unless otherwise specified, fill material should be compacted by the contractor while near the optimum moisture content to a density that is no less than 90 percent of the maximum dry density determined in accordance with ASTM Test No. D1557-78 or other density test methods that will yield equivalent results. CLEARING AND PREPARATION OF AREAS TO RECEIVE FILL All trees, brush, grass and other objectionable material should be collected, piled and burned or otherwise disposed of by the contractor so as to leave the areas that have been cleared with a neat and finished appearance, free from unsightly debris. APPENDIX B Page 2 All vegetable matter and objectionable material should be removed by the contractor from the surface upon which the fill is to be placed, and any loose or porous soils should be removed or compacted to the depth determined by the geotechnical engineer. The surface should then be plowed or scarified to a minimum depth of 6 inches until the surface is free from uneven features that would tend to prevent uniform compaction by the equipment to be used. When the slope of the natural ground receiving fill exceeds 20 percent {5 horizontal to 1 vertical), the original ground should be stepped or benched as shown on the attached plate. Benches should be cut to a firm, competent soil condition. The lower bench should be at least 10 feet wide and all other benches at least 6 feet wide, ground slopes flatter than 20 percent should be benched when considered necessary by the geotechnical engineer. FILL MATERIAL Materials for compacted soil should consist of any material imported or excavated from the cut areas that in the opinion of the geotechnical engineer is suitable for use in construction fills. The material should contain no rocks or hard lumps greater than 12 inches in size and should contain at least 40 percent of material smaller than 1/4 inch in size. (Materials greater than 6 inches in size should be placed by the contractor so that they are surrounded by compacted fines; no nesting of rocks will be permitted.) No material of a perishable, spongy or otherwise improper nature should be used in filling. Material placed within 36 inches of rough grade should be select material that contains no rocks or hard lumps greater than 6 inches in size and that swells less than 3 percent when compacted (as specified later herein for compacted fill) and soaked under an axial pressure of 150 psf. Potentially expansive soils may be used in fills below a depth of 36 inches and should be compacted at a moisture greater than the optimum moisture content for the material. PLACING, SPREADING AND COMPACTING OF FILL Approved material should be placed in areas prepared to receive fill in layers not to exceed 6 inches in compacted thickness. Each layer should have a uniform moisture content in the range that will allow the compaction effort to be efficiently applied to achieve the specified degree of compaction to a minimum specified density with adequately sized equipment, either specifically designed for soil compaction or of proven reliability. Compaction should be continuous over the entire area and the equipment should make APPENDIX B Page 3 sufficient trips to ensure that the desired density has been obtained throughout the fill. When moisture content of the fill material is below that specified by the geotechnical engineer, water should be added by the contractor until the moisture content is as specified. When the mo i s ture content o f the fill material is above that specified by the geotechnical engineer, the fill material should be aerated by the contractor by blading, mixing or other satisfactory methods until the moisture content is as specified. The surface of fill slopes should be compacted and there should be no excess loose soil on the slopes. UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION Identifying Criteria Group Symbol Soil Description COARSE-GRAINED (more than 50 percent larger than #200 sieve) Gravel (more than 50 percent larger than #4 sieve but smaller than three inches) Non-plastic GW GP Sands (more than 50 percent smaller than #4 sieve) GM GC SW SP Gravel, well-graded gravel-sand mixture, little or no fines Gravel, poorly grad- ed gravel-sand mix- ture, little or no fines Gravel, silty, poor- ly graded, gravel- sand-silt mixtures Gravel, clayey, poorly graded, grav- el-sand-clay mixture Sand, wel1-graded, gravelly sands, little or no fines Sand, poorly graded, gravelly sands, little or no fines APPENDIX B Page 4 SM Sand, s i1ty, poorly graded, sand-clay mixtures FINE-GRAINED {more than 50 percent but smaller than #200 sieve) Liquid limit less than 50 ML CL Liquid limit greater than 50 OL MH CH OH Silt, inorganic silt and fine sand, sandy silt or clayey-silt- sand mixtures with slight plasticity Clay, inorganic clay of low to medium plasticity, gravelly clays, sandy clays, silty clays, lean clays Silt, inorganic, silts and organic silt-clays of low plasticity Silt, inorganic, silts micaceous or diatomaceous fine, sandy or silty soils elastic silts Clay, inorganic, clays of medium to high plasticity, fat clays Clay, organic, clays of medium to high plasticity HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT Peat, other highly organic swamp soils APPENDIX B Page 5 INSPECTION Observation and compaction tests will be made by the geotechnical engineer during the filling and compacting operations so that he can state whether the fill was constructed in accordance with the specifications. The geotechnical engineer will make field density tests in accordance with ASTM Test No. D1557-78. Density tests will be made in the compacted materials below the surface where the surface is disturbed. When these tests indicated that the density of any layer of fill or portion thereof is below the specified density, that particular layer or portion should be reworked until the specified density has been obtained. The location and frequency of the tests well be at the soil engineer's discretion. In general, the density tests will be made at an interval not exceeding 2 feet in vertical rise and/or 500 cubic yards of embankment. PROTECTION OF WORK During construction, the contractor should properly grade all excavated surfaces to provide positive drainage and prevent ponding of water. He should control surface water to avoid damage to adjoining properties or to finished work on the site. The contractor should take remedial measures to prevent erosion of freshly graded areas and until such time as permanent drainage and erosion control features have been installed. TD 13 O cn -o '> Or> S?^S ,-q O ^roo - AVE AVE CDr<o s- fi,If ^°'Jt».S <l, *«a mlw•»!, //< < j -*--®-i "*"'**' /~x "*"(C) f\j •« 'M.I/ TJ £d) t ^ ^* ^£W$»TJ V9/a c2 - *y u *1 *3k^-- rf-ff <r -. 0 (w)oi * « G)«> ^3b 03 ©<D C*)-1 >. \sQ (7)00 ®—-» (OT)U> •<* ®—0) P)o 5 \«N^7 *"'J7'f ItO s0s a l*i>. 07 .PMI073J JA * ^(Ma?S »v^1 ftno.** ^©Ki S * /^^x "*>>, ' 5©= 4t? teA ul> =E ~i \ ^ (T) -I TAMARACK AVE S- W O J>0'"O »2m -no ^^P0 Vro o> w 1. CO Hm K j. J| D* ? 0 I8 S ai ^ 9 i 0 M Sl>zo I ^F"«• •< Z ^* % t^: - tntxjS CH : 10 §>o J II H* 1^ o — K $ o o MCJ ». City of Carlsbad ..? 7? Building Department CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OTHER MITIGATION This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit. The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form. Project Name: Building Permit Plan Check Number: Project Address: A.P.N.: Project Applicant (Owner(s) Name(s)) Project Description: Building Type: Residential Number of New Dwelling Units Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling Second Dwelling Unit: Square Feet of Living Area in SOU Res. Additions: Comerc./ Ind.: City Certification of Applicant's information: Net Square Feet New Area Square Feet Floor Area OL DISTRICTS WITHIN TH Date: Carlsbad Unified School District 801 Pine Ave. Carlsbad CA 92009 (729-9 CITY OF CARLSBAD San Marcos Unified School District 215 Mata Way San Marcos. CA 92069 (736-2200) rfLinitcij UnijrrScHool District 101 South Ranch Santa Fe Rd Encinitas, CA 92024 (944-4300) San Dieguito Union High School District 710 Encinitas Blvd. Encinitas. CA 92024 (753-6491) Certification of Applicant /Owners. The person executing this declaration ("Owner") certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square footage after the building permit is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and that (2) the Owner is the owner/ developer of the above described project(s), or that the person executing this declaration is authorized to sign on behalf of the Owner. Signature:Date: 2O75 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) 438-0894 SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school district(s))**************************************************************************************************** THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED. SCHOOL DISTRICT: The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District. The City may issue building permits for this project. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL TITLE NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT DATE PHONE NUMBER SAN DIEGO AREA RESIDENTIAL CIRCUIT CARD AND LOAD SUMMARY (1990 NEC) THIS CARD MUST BE RILED OUT AND AVAILABLE, AT THE SERVICE EQUIPMENT FOR THE ROUGH INSPECTION ADDRESS / 3; < 4X^/3 &/&&#--) /T~£^ , OWNER &£• {?<&'/£./£3/S? PHONE 4?^^^ ^£'£'7 CONTRACTOR^^-^ ^>7%ff£> PHONE PANEL 6uL fa- LOCATION GrrJ &<"-» L^ 1-U/p, ,,,,,, I,.,, r^&c H i Diwn ./r',;*/'-' -Lli bUj DfvA^l [>fM.cl£J (rfl?l^ny ?. MAIN: C BUS: SERVICE E A) SIZE: NC C) INSULAT D) CONDUn SERVICE G A) SIZE: NC C) CLAMP L E3 u Qj w L3 Q n - ] IDD /2<" NTRANCE OR FE 4 B ir*i- ,u,fj CKT 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 BXR SIZE \ \^~ t f K l^' is /S" ?u 20 A WIRE SIZE h !^<. ^^ ;u ^4 (? ji TYPE ^J i. (\ i!o,-*L c.y (V ^L1 -4 LTG X V X X AMPBKB/FUSE DMLO AMP frsvv, EDER CONDUCTORS: ) TYPE: npcu [~IAL S*7* ftfrlWrf ROUNCVBOND: H HI TYPE: E)CU [^AL OCATIONfS): FCT ATERPPE FOUND ROD 250 • 61(c) 250 •&>(•). B1(»> 250 - S3[c) GFCI LOCATIONS 2164. 680-70: 0 BATHROOM (S) Q GARAGE (S) L3 OUTDOORS 3 KTTCHEN ^ HYDROMASSAGETUB .C. REC V y y X" X ^^X t^^dflC R£C v7 // V' // V COMPU SMC«lc BRANC A) UGK B) TWO C) LAU D) CEN REMAR LTG y/ i /' pERMrrfC/^V O3/7 CENSUS TRACT f AREA IN SO. FT. X ^^ /^ IT f '*-/.; 2 MISC TED LO H CIRCU T1NGCIR SMALL JDRYC1F TRALHE KR Icortify ff in»truct» «l«ntot Qowr DCON SIGNED DATE 'VOLTS WIRE SIZE n t-W tU ^i'i to hi b t, TYPE fllti ;-'"(( C!;,' -f , L i; C C/ /J d,' H. BKR SIZE 15' tT ;>0 2.6- 0L; ?bJ :,<0 50 P 0 winp CKT 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 IS 20 22 24 26 21 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 nn y^P •^^^t* ' TS REQUIRED:currs 2 APPLIANCE CIRCUITS 2 CUfT 2 ATING EQUIPMENT 4 LOCATION { T-^/A^f ^^4 t^tl/V l-4~tia KW Vtr^o FLi^ Tstn,/ P/W ' ( UzMs- " t>/y^ D-'/^ Ramr P, ^f\ ^ H A C M^PS 20-3(b). 4{d) 20-4(b) 20-4<c) 22-7 «t an lannnaboru have bs«n torqucd in iccontcnc* with mBnufKtirsf*s ns «nd ihct the work shown on thi* oreuit nrct rapr«Mnh th« tul th« wortt pcrtornwd untar this p*rnit JFB |/4^ ^ AXXt-^—-^ rrRAcre rfi w ' ?/%//£ *?ydW<£> £,C>%$/ ^ fj * j&— -J""r 2 !> j^A_r_ REFERENCE Ssn D«go Etartieal NwnlMtr 21S-5 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING ELECTRICAL SERVICE LOAD CALCULATION _ OPTIONAL METHOD NEC 220-30 _ As an alternative method, the STANDARD METHOD, _ _ found in ARTICLE 220 of the National Electric Code, may be used 1. GENERAL LIGHTING LOADS Dwelling _ sq. ft. x 3 VA = ^»I27 VA Small appliance loads -220-16 (a) 1500VAx_b _ circuits = Laundry load -220-16(b) 1500 VA x _ circuits = 1toQ VA General Lighting Total &%> VA &tQhit(/'«*> > A-* *>« er ity <:,v£iv. 2. COOKING EQUIPMENT LOADS - Nameplate Value £** Range _ VA = B^ ^«vX &>^° VU*U-T/ 2J?6i VA fa Cooktop _ VA = _ VA fa Oven(s) - VA = _ Cooking Equipment Total ^2. &»*[ a 3. ELECTRIC DRYER 220-18 (Nameplate. 5000 VA minimum) Water Heater^ /I ' H^ , ^ VA Hydromassage Bathtub = (o K ^; ^ ^^ VA Microwave Oven = I1 f*»y 2Q VA Built-in Vacuum = ii rtrs? ^^ VA Dryer_2Q _ VA = ~^?° ^ fr Dryer Total ^° VA Z3 a4. FIXED APPLIANCE LOADS 230-30(b3) Dishwasher = \(?*f f^T7T\ h / / _LS— _ V ADisposal 9 ^f \£tJ/A)k^ ^ VA Compactor = $ M ' , r> , L/^^ — ^^ — VA ' 1>U" Fixed Appliance Total 5. OPTIONAL SUBTOTAL (Add all of the above totals) 6. APPLYING DEMAND FACTORS - TABLE 220-30 rx- • i c w* » i /«« r <rv T First 10,000 VA x 100% = 10,000 VAOptional Subtotal (from line 5) i D __ . ! ... .ft_ /m w& _.Ar I Remaining _ VAx40%= 'x.£_SE__ VA 7. HEATING OR AC LOAD - TABLE 220-30 A Larger of the Heating or AC Load = (J\JO'n61 0 VA 8. OPTIONAL LOADS TOTAL (Add totals from lines 6 and 7)= /OZ » VA 9. MINIMUM SERVICE SIZE = Op*»°^^Total = (Please put total on front of card under Computed Load) SAN DIEGO AREA RESIDENTIAL CIRCUIT CARD AND LOAD SUMMARY (1990 NEC) THIS CARD MUST BE FILLED OUT AND AVAILABLE AT THE SERVICE EQUIPMENT FOR THE ROUGH INSPECTION ADDRESS X*c3^" rtC/b ttJOdQD OWNER PHONE CONTRACTOR PHONE PANFl ^t\\v\ LOCATION iCCift IfYlr «-!?•(t/l -y'J\') Y'f^L if Jib •&,$&$&; \^ Hdtr f /// A U ' f-\ ••• , r/.^'iOW) ^AUestRo^ (V^ DSi D",sU/,AWr |J<\ fc^fc. lX\ 'b^V'H i~^ij rxCO'*' ^ ; /! . I? l[. n'/jd^;,^ CYK|W 3d Lkvr fft'i -5 £wUfk|j_ MAIN: £ BUS- ^ SERV A) SIZ C) MS D) CO SERV A) SE C) CUm E D GFCI E E CEB E: NO ULAT1 NOUIT CEG E: NO rPL ^ ^ r « ] ^.ot'-; f**V~-UQ ^TRANCE OR PE OM- CKT 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 BKR SIZE JCC^ jfliw? 1C} -3-0 2.0 C ^'C 1ST l£ £f (^ 15 i^ A WIRE SIZE ^k &l_l r\ n &2 ^2. ^4Hlf "*/Lj ^/if ^M TYPE -1 /". -1, Co tt- •V, Cu do A . /v ^ Cv MISC V K ^/ !/ LTG V v/I/ Y L/ AMP BKIVFUSE n MLO AMP EDER CONDUCTORS: 1) TYPE: 0CU O**- ftrre- "ji7 ROUND/BOND: 4 R XATOKS): =ffl ATERPFE %XM>ROD 1 TYPE: Ecu [3**- 250- 81 (e) 250-80(1). 81(«) 250 • «3(c) .OCATIONS 210-8, 660-70: BATHROOM (S) GARAGE (S) OUTDOORS 2 WTCHEN 3 HYOROUASSAGETUB D .C. REC ^/ L> ^\/ \/ V^ v/ / ''%^ REC \f' / I/ \r" / V' V V / y? COMPU SMC«tC BRANC A) UGH B) TWC C) LAUT D) CEN REMAR LTC / V / pERwrr* CENSUS TRACT « AREA IN SO. FT. gp"* B6' VOI TR MISC / Y TED LOAD. ulation WorksJ * ciRCurrs TTNGCJRCUr SMALL APF JDRYCtRCU TRALHEATII KR Icwfitytf instructie •ctvnlof DOWI DCON SIGNED DATE WIRE SIZE 1> 'a a. ft 14 i^ |4 i^l 1? p 6' £ ft (*, rvpE !3^ j~a (^ Cv Cu (i/ iu r*i, Cv t(j r^/v r,; £(/ BKR SIZE ^20 2.0 -2() \fc it }** f^ 70 90 ^^^v ^^6- '^ Z (A X S wi CKT 2 4 6 8 10 12 U 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 ^30 32 34 36 38 40 42 iuu-1 — ./ iMtonbuk. ^0 P REQUIRED: TS 2 UANCE CIRCUITS 2rr z NG EQUIPMENT 4 LOCATION N'VifrX ^r •*- X2/-3 ^T j_ P(S f^e^ bS fackcsi (JS)\ rW-'^t'/ ^fj'f IQJblCf l5«,fK Qy ^>T^ti V ^ D'^^vl fixradr tfJ//f^ D^A;^ PkeK Ad r^-f *t /l^ ,^,r ^i &J //^f^? Jl ri -.-,#*'? UriPS 20-3<b). 4(d) 2D-4(b} 20-4(C) 22-7 tat aft tamnatorw hav« b**n torqiwd in tccantonc* with mwutekirWi n« end that tha work ihown on Inis areuit card r«prM«nh th* tul th« work p«ffarm>d und« ihis pwrrtt -JFH ITRACTC B REFERENCE Sw Dwgo Etortwi NwnWIw 216-5 ^-4^1?^^ " v/•"^9^4^^ v^^^ V:^H%^^-J'^^KKSWii^ttfo^ r>> TKrr^*; - ^}f...r-\--v-/ r .-. S.W./ >^ A . ^-.^*i-v<*-.---Mi ^^SS2M^^^;- ^fK-\; SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING ELECTRICAL SERVICE LOAD CALCULATION OPTIONAL METHOD NEC 220-30 As an alternative method, the STANDARD METHOD, found in ARTICLE 220 of the National Electric Code, may be used 1./TKTTOAI I Tf* HTTM/"1 1 f}(jL.INc.KAJ-1 LlLrJl 1 JLTilj-4-.U Small appliance loads -221 Laundry load -220-16(b) ADS sq. ft. x 3 VA = 3-16 (a) 1500 VA isnnvA « ^ x JL circuits = . circuits = General Liel ]3j^^? VA VA fiHtia Tofal &°CJ VA )(.5\t\K< & 'a.*J crajt o^. 2. COOKING EQUIPMENT LO ADS- Nameplate Value Q^$ Range ' &- «. $ Pnnlrtnp VA =VA VA_ 3. ELECTRIC DRYER 220-18 (Nameplate, 5000 VA minimum) ' ^ VA = Cooking Equipment Total 'O Dryer Total, VA VA 4. FIXED APPLIANCE LOADS 230-30(b3) Dishwasher = Disposal = Compactor = Water Heater = Hydromassage Bathtub = Nficrowave Oven = Built-in Vacuum = VA VAVA- Fixed Appliance Total 5. OPTIONAL SUBTOTAL (Add all of the above totals) 6. APPLYING DEMAND FACTORS-TABLfi 220-30 r^_ - i c u i ,fc~ r CN / K«t 10,000 VA X 100% =Optional Subtotal (from line 5) \ D _ . . ,7. .»-r I Remaining VAx40% = 7. HEATING OR AC LOAD - TABLE 220-30 Larger of the Heating or AC Load = 8. OPTIONAL LOADS TOTAL (Add totals from lines 6 and 7) = 9. MINIMUM SERVICE SIZE = °Ption^y^Totel = 10.000 VA 167 VA Ampere (Please put total on front of card under Computed Load)