HomeMy WebLinkAbout1380 CYNTHIA LN; ; CB980338; Permit02-13-2006
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA
Building Permit
92008
Permit No:CB980338
Job Address:
Permit Type:
Parcel No:
Valuation:
OccGroup:
Project Title
Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725
1380 CYNTHIA LN CBAD
SFD Sub Type;
1562315400 Lot #•
$0.00 Const Type;
Reference #;
VN
SFD 2161 SF, GARAGE 483 SF
PORCH 324 SF NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
Status;
Applied:
Entered By:
Appr/Issued:
Inspect Area;
EXPIRED
02/05/1998
JM
Applicant:
BA WORTHING
690 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
760 729-3965
Owner:
Total Fees:
$0.00
$603.00 Payments To Date:$603.00 Balance Due:
Description
MISC BLDG PMTS
Fee
603.00
Inspector:
FINAL APPROVAL
Date:Clearance:
NOTICE: Please take NOTICE thai approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively
referred to as lees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must
follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack,
review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capactiy
changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any
fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired.
PERMIT APPLICATION
CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT
2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009
(760)438-1161
FOR OFFICE USE ON
PLAN CHECK NO.
EST. VAL.
Plan Ck. Deposit
Validated By
Date
Business Name (at this address)
Legal Description Lot No.Subdivision Name/Number Unit No.Phase No.Total # of units
Assessor's Parcel #Existing Use Proposed Use
(Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its
issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law
[Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged
exemption,. Any violation .okSection 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects ttie applicant to a civil penalty of nobmore than five hundred dollars [$500]).
Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations:
L3 1 have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance
of the work for which this permit is issued.
D I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is
issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are:
Insurance Company ^^rKm^L P'l/Mf* Policy No. Expiration Date_
(THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS 15100] OR LESS)
Q CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as
to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California.
WARNING: Failure to secuce workers' compensation coverage Is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred
thousand dollars ($JQOrfSOOj, In addition to thai cost of compensation, damages as provided for In Section 3706 of the Labor code. Interest and attorney's fees.
SIGNATURE _^1^A/^^DATE
I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason:
D I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale
(Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does
such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is
sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale).
Q I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The
Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed
pursuant to the Contractor's License Law).
D I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason:
1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. Q YES QNO
2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work.
3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number):
4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone
number / contractors license number): __^__
5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type
of work):
PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention
program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? Q YES Q NO
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? Q YES Q NO
Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? Q YES Q NO
IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT.
I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code).
LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS
I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all
City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned
property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE. INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES,
JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT.
OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height.
EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or
work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 365 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended
or abandoned at any time after the wprif*3 cornrftenced for a period of 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code).
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE ^CwJjUwWs\flJ\s^ DATE
ITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance
02/18/1999
BA WORTH ING
690 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR
CARLSBAD CA92008
Re:
Application Date: 2/5/98
Plan Check # CB980338
Address: 1380 CYNTHIA LN
Expiration Date: 2/5/99
You applied to have your plans checked on the date noted above; to date the related
building permit has not been obtained. The original plan review application will expire
as no building permit has been issued.
Plans submitted and not retrieved from the building department prior to the plan check
expiration date noted above will be destroyed.
The provisions of sections 304 (d) of the Uniform Building Code state:
"Section 304 9d) Expiration of Plan Review
Applications for which no permit is issued within one year following the
date of application shall expire by limitation , and plans and other data
submitted for review may thereafter be returned to the applicant or
destroyed by the Building Official.
In order to renew action on an application after expiration, the applicant
shall resubmit plans and pay a new plan review fee."
In order to provide better service, please indicate your handling choice for the plans
originally submitted and return this letter to the Building Department.
Project Abandoned - I will pickup plans within 10 days
Project Abandoned - Plans may be destroyed.
If you have any questions, please contact the Building Department at (760)438-1161
extension 4331.
Raenette Abbey
Building Department
EsGil Corporation
2« Partnership with government for VJuiGfing Safety
DATE: FEBRUARY 25. 1999 _ ' Q APPLJCANT
JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD _ a PLAN REVIEWER
a FILE
PLAN CHECK NO.: 98-338 _ SET: *
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1380 CYNTHIA LANE _ _ _ _ _
PROJECT NAME: SFD
The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes.
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficieqc^s_ identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff.
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person.
The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to:
Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Person contacted: Telephone #:
Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #:
Mail Telephone Fax In Person
REMARKS:
EXPIRED PLANS DISCARDED AT CITY'S REQUEST. (PER DANA)
By: KR Enclosures:
Esgil Corporation
D GA D CM D EJ D PC tmsmtldot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 4- San Diego, California 92123 + (619)560-1468 4- Fax (619) 560-1576
EsGil Corporation
ProfessionaffPlan Review Engineers
DATE: February 17, 1998 Q APPLICANT
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad OPCANREVIEWER
Q FILE
PLAN CHECK NO.: 980338 SET: I
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1380 Cynthia Lane
PROJECT NAME: SFD
The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes.
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department
staff.
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person.
The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to:
Brooks Worthing
690 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008
Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Person contacted: Telephone #:
Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #:
Mail Telephone Fax In Person
REMARKS:
By: Bert Domingo Enclosures:
Esgil Corporation
D GA D CM D EJ D PC 2/9/98 trnsmtl.dot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 * San Diego, California 92123 * (619)560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576
Carlsbad 98O338
February 17, 1998
PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES
PLAN CHECK NO.: 980338 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad
PROJECT ADDRESS: 138O Cynthia Lane
FLOORAREA: 2161 SQ. FT. STORIES: ONE
HEIGHT:
REMARKS:
DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY
JURISDICTION: ESGIL CORPORATION: 2/9/98
DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW PLAN REVIEWER: Bert Domingo
COMPLETED: February 17, 1998
FOREWORD (PLEASE READ):
This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building
Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state
laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan
review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other
corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering
Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be
required prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with Title 24 and the
following model codes: 1994 UBC (effective 12/28/95), 1994 UPC (effective 12/28/95), 1994
UMC (effective 2/23/96) and 1993 NEC (effective 12/28/95).
The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions
adopted by ordinance.
The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied
before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3,
1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any
state, county or city law.
To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each
correction item has been addressed, i.e.. plan sheet number, specification section, etc.
Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans.
LISTNO. 1, GENERAL SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES WITHOUT SUPPLEMENTS (1994UBC) r3forw.dot
Carlsbad 980338
February 17, 1998
PLANS
1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the
correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two
sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets
can be submitted in one of two ways:
1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City
of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009,
(619) 438-1161. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the
Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments.
2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil
Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (619)
560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to
the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning,
Engineering and Fire Departments.
NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be
reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by
EsGil Corporation is complete.
2. Indicate on the Title Sheet of the plans the name of the name of the person
responsible for the preparation of the plans. Section 106.3.2.
3. Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans that this project shall comply
with Title 24 and the 1994 UBC, UMC and UPC and the 1993 NEC.
GENERAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS
4. Dimension on the plans 30" clear width for water closet compartments and 24"
clearance in front of water closet. Section 2904. See Bath 2 & 3.
ROOFING
5. Compo roof should have 15# felt underlayment.
FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS
6. The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations.
See page 13 of the report. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the
contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils
engineer shall advise the building official in writing that:
a) The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report,
b) The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and
c) The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and
bearing capacity conform to the soils report."
Carlsbad 980338
February 17, 1998
7. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan,
grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been
determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly
incorporated into the construction documents. See page 14 of the report.
FRAMING
8. Provide truss details and truss calculations for this project. Specify truss
identification numbers on the plans.
9. Balloon frame all studs supported by sloping ceiling.
10. Gable end trusses should be uniformly supported at the bottom.
MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE)
11. Specify on the plans the following information for the fireplace(s), per Section
106.3.3:
a) Manufacturer's name.
b) Model name/number.
c) ICBO approval number, or equal.
d) Show height of chimney above roof per I.C.B.O. approval or Table 31-B.
12. Note on the plans that approved spark arresters shall be installed on all
chimneys. UBC, Section 3102.3.8.
• PLUMBING (UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE)
13. Show water heater size, type and location on plans. UPC, Section 501.0.
14. Provide adequate barrier to protect water heater from vehicle damage. An 18"
platform for the water heater does not satisfy this requirement. UPC, Section
510.3.
15. Note on the plans that "combustion air for fuel burning water heaters will be
provided in accordance with the Uniform Plumbing Code".
16. Show T and P valve on water heater and show route of discharge line to
exterior. UPC, Section 608.5.
Carlsbad 980338
February 17, 1998
ENERGY CONSERVATION
17. Provide fluorescent general lighting (40 lumens per watt minimum) in kitchen(s)
and bathrooms.
18. Provide a note on the plan that all glass doors and windows and skylites shall
be dual pane.
CARLSBAD SPECIAL CODE REQUIREMENTS
a) New residential units must be pre-plumbed for future solar water heating.
Note "two roof jacks must be installed" where the water heater is in the
one story garage and directly below the most south facing roof (City
Ordinance No. 8093).
b) Note "two 3/4" copper pipes must be installed to the most convenient
future solar panel location when the water heater is not in a one story
garage and is not directly below the most south facing roof. (City
Ordinance No. 8093).
c) All piping for present or future solar water heating must be insulated when
in areas that are not heated or cooled by mechanical means (City Policy).
To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each
correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number,
calculation page, etc.
Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a
result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly
describe them and where they are located in the plans.
Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction
list? Please indicate:
Yes Q No a
The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320
Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number
of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any
questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Bert Domingo at
Esgil Corporation. Thank you.
Carlsbad 98O338
February 17, 1998
VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 980338
PREPARED BY: Bert Domingo DATE: February 17, 1998
BUILDING ADDRESS: 1380 Cynthia Lane
BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN
BUILDING PORTION !
HOUSE
GARAGE
PORCH
FIREPLACES
Air Conditioning
Fire Sprinklers
TOTAL VALUE
BUILDING AREA
(ft-2)
2161
483
324
2
VALUATION
MULTIPLIER
78
22
6.75
1850
VALUE
($)
168,558.00
10,626.00
2,187.00
3,700.00
$ 185,071.00
• 1991 UBC Building Permit Fee D Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ 940.50
• 1991 UBC Plan Check Fee Q Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 611.33
Type of Review: Q Complete Review D Structural Only D Hourly
n Repetitive Fee Applicable Q Other:
Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 489.06
Comments:
Sheet 1 of 1
macvalue.doc 5196
City of Carlsbad
DATE: -
Engineering Department
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
PLANCHECK N.: CB 7tfO33 <JT
BUILDING ADDRESS:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER:
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
APPROVAL
The item you have submitted for review has been
approved. The approval is based on plans,
information and/or specifications provided in your
submitted; therefore any changes to these items after
this date, including field modifications, must be
reviewed by this office to insure continued
conformance with applicable codes. Please review
carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply
with instructions in this report can result in
suspension of permit to build.
A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to
construction of the following improvements:
DENIAL
Please se« th^ attached report of deficiencies
marked with\{ Make necessary corrections to plans
or specifications for compliance with applicable
codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or
specifications to this office for review.
Date:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
By:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT:
Date:
ATTACHMENTS
Dedication Application
Dedication Checklist
Improvement Application
Improvement Checklist
Future Improvement Agreement
Grading Permit Application
Grading Submittal Checklist
Right-of-Way Permit Application
Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist
and Information Sheet
Sewer Fee Information Sheet
ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON
Name: Michele Masterson
City of Carlsbad
Address: 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009
Phone: (619)438-1161. ext. 4315
CFD INFORMATION
Parcel Map No:
Lots:
Recordation:
Carlsbad Tract:
A-4
tti^ar*UH*aoTa\LiPK^TeN^w*UKUiirji;a^nlM.si«UM^ K)fmMM.ooc A
Rev 09ffl3/^075 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92O09-11576 • (619) 438-1161 • FAX (619) 438-O894
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
SITE PLAN ej%s>emeAd- p#r
{)# rc~4 [ fVl ft
>ND/ oRD/
3 a 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show:/
A. North Arrow D^ Property Lines
B. Existing & Proposed Structures fl^J Easements
C. Existing Street Improvements . rT Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets
G. Driveway widths
2. Show on site plan:
A. Drainage Patterns
1. Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one
percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course.
2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive
drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building."
B. Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography
3. Include on title sheet:
A. Site address
B. Assessor's Parcel Number
Description
For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include:
total building square footage with the square footage for each different use,
existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing,
warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved.
EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION
DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE
Q Q Q 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for
Project No._j
Q Q 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date
\UASPALhlAS\SYSV.IBRARY\eNOWORD\DOCS\CHKLST\Bulldkig Ptanctock CUxl BP0001 Form MM doe
Rev. 09/03/97
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS
5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm
drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and
for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ , pursuant to Carlsbad
Municipal Code Section 18.40.030.
Dedication required as follows:
Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor
prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 Vz x 11" plat map
and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and
signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an
application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the
completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the
Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax.
Dedication completed by:Date:
IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS
6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be
constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the
construction exceeds $ , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code
Section 18.40.040.
Q Q
Public improvements required as follows:
Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public
improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the
appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements
on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan
check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the
checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not
accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted
and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit.
Improvement Plans signed by:Date:
6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad
Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or
current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $ so
we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement
must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a
Building permit.
Future public improvements required as follows:
\\U^SPALMAS\SYS\LIBFlARY^NG\WORD\DOCS«:hi<LST«uIWtng PUncMck CWst BROOCH Form MM (toe
Rev. 09/03/07
£r Q
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
A si-/ ond/ ord/
Q Q Q 6c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement. Please return
agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department.
Future Improvement Agreement completed by:
Date:
Q 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective
improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction
of the City Inspector prior to occupancy.
GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section
11.06.030 of the Municipal Code.
Q Q Q 7a, Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading
requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import; export). Write
"No Grading" on plot plan if none is required.
Q a Q 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form
attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading
approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit.
Grading Inspector sign off by: __ Date:
Q Q Q 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even
if a grading permit is not required.)
Q 7d.No Grading Permit required.
Q Q 7e.lf grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan.
MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS
Q Q 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or
private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are
not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tieing
into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities.
Right-of-Way permit required for: CU\JUijJLUU^
\\LASPALMAS\5YS\LIBRAR>^EMG\WORD\OOCSV:HKLSPBuUing PKncheck CUM BP0001 Forni MM.doc
Rev. 09/03/97
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
3rd/
Q 9. A SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the building permit issuance. The
fee is noted in the fees section on the following page.
Q Q Q 10. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad
sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District,
located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can
provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is
on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 153, for
assistance.
Industrial Waste permit accepted by:
Date:
Q Q 11.NPDES PERMIT
Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best
management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to
discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by
the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever
occurs first.
tar Q Q 12. O-'Required fees are attached
Q No fees required
Q Q Q 13. Additional Comments:
\tLASPALMAS\SYSU.IBRARVCNQVWORDVX>CSVHKLSlnBulUlnD PtanCMCfc Cktst BP0001 Form MM .Hoc
Rev. 09/03/97
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET
Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant.
Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal.
Address: / O rt C' I o^x* /„1 //rY^\ A /y\.Prepared by/ / j(/\' l^~— Date:
X^^^/^VTU-, Bldfl. Permit NO(_J£->> / O ^ ^> J>O
/I7J*7& Checked by: Date:
EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses.
Types of Use: f \ /—/9 Sq. Ft./Units: / EDU's: /
APT CALCULATIONS: List types
o C? r**\Types of Use: c ) / LJ
and square footages for all uses.
Sq. FUUnits: / ADT's: /
FEES REQUIRED:
WITHIN CFD: D YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) H-tfO
/tSnTPARK-IN-LIEU FEE PARK AREA: Ch^e^/ /A^Z^C' AN
, FEE/UNIT:
b'a. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE .
A ADT's/UNITS: /
X NO. UNITS: = S /?? J 7<& ^ ^T
X FEE/ADT: O^-^ =S C\^( )
jtopBRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE ^ ^
* ADT's/UNITS:X FEE/ADT: =$ ( ^
/Wjl^FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE ZONE:
^ UNIT/Ea.FT.:
IJJ/5. SEWER FEE
c"* y*~~ ^-? VPERMIT No/^/r /6(
EDU's: / /
t / /
BENEFIT AREA: K/ /<
^ EDU's:
b/6. DRAINAGE FEES PLDA_f
/i ACRES: e o^^-
fcfa7rSEWER LATERAL ($2,500)
^jTS
X FEE/SQ.FT./UNIT: - $ ^_^
yj?7 ^^ /<?J 4-v X FEE/EDU: /<5 C^'f' = * /O ^^ '
^DRAINAGE BASIN:
X FEE/EDU: . =$ ^^
: HIGH /LOwX J ^— ,-x. . — -fc — -ia^ ±r-^ jc^J "*i / /
X FFF/Af' lajrff*^* — S' — "j^ 1^^& U*/ ^
= $ -T ^ -6? A.
//"M-^X
TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES*: $
*NOTE: This calculation sheet is NOT a complete list of all fees which may be due.
Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits.
P:\DOCS\MISFORMS\FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET REV 01/28/97
ro
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST
Plan Check No. CB
Planner _
APN: VE
Address
VAN LYNCH Phone (619) 438-1161, extension 4325
Type of Project & Use:
Zoning: J£-~/ General Plan:
CFD
Circle
.Date of participation:
Net Project Density:
__ Facilities Management Zone: [_
"—- Remaining net dev acres:
DU/AC
(For non-residential development: Type of land used created by
this permit: AJ/6 )
Legend:X Item Complete
Environmental Review Required:
DATE OF COMPLETION:
YES
Item Incomplete * Needs your action
NO TYPE
Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action.
Conditions of Approval:
\\ Discretionary Action Required:
APPROVAL/RESO. NO.
PROJECT NO.
YES NO ^ TYPE
DATE
OTHER RELATED CASES:
Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action.
Conditions of Approval:
Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance
Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES _ NO
CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES _ NO
If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 3111 Carnino Del Rio North, Suite
200, San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619} 521-8036
Determine status {Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): _
Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed?
If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now.
Coastal Permit Determination Log #: _
YES NO
Follow-Up Actions: •
1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum
Floor Plans).
2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed.
Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES K NO
{Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.}
Data Entry Completed? YES NO
(Enter CB #; UACT; NEXT12; Construct housing Y/N; Enter Fee Amount (See fee schedule for amount); Return)
Site Plan:
1. Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow,
property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing
street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing
topographical lines.
2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number.
Zoning:
|£ 1. Setbacks:
Front:
Interior Side:
Street Side:
Rear:
IA] 2. Accessory structure
Front:
Interior Side:
Street Side:
Rear:
Structure separation
K 3. Lot Coverage:
Required *&£)'
Required /?'3"
Required * — -
Required C£'6U
setbacks:
Required £>^
Required ^rl"
Required — ~~
Required l2-'6i}
: Required /O "
Required ^^O %
Shown 2c?
Shown £ ' 5 e/
Shown
Shown ^2S*5^'
/Shown Y $>
Shown £'3''
Shown
Shown 1 3
Shown f&* f ft
•$$&%s
Shown ^
4. Height:Required
5. Parking: Spaces Required
Guest Spaces Required
Additional Comments
Shown / 9
Shown
Shown
OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER (A it/DATE
COAST GEOTECHNICAL
CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS
April 21, 1997
David Huarte and Brooks A. Worthing
Huarte-Worthing Limited
c/o Brooks A. Worthing
BA Worthing, Inc.
P.O. Box 1041
Carlsbad, CA 92018
Subject: PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
Two Proposed Single-Family Residences
Two Continuous Vacant Lots Terminus of Cynthia Lane
Carlsbad, California
Dear Mr. Huarte and Mr. Worthing:
In response to your request and in accordance with our Proposal and Agreement dated
March 26, 1997, we have performed a geotechnical investigation on the subject site for
the two proposed single-family residences.
The findings of the investigation, laboratory test results and recommendations for
foundation design are presented in this report.
From a geotechnical point of view, it is our opinion that the site is suitable for the
proposed development, provided the recommendations in this report are implemented
during the design and construction phases. However, loose surficial deposits are present
on the site which will require special consideration during the design and remedial
grading phase.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at 755-8622. This
opportunity to be of service is appreciated.
Respectfully submitted,
COAST GEOTECHNICAL
Mark Burwell
Geologist
Vithaya1 Singhanet, P.E.
Geotechnical Engineer
779 ACADEMY DRIVE • SOLANA BEACH • CALIFORNIA 92075
(619) 755-8622 • FAX (619) 755-9126
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
ii
Proposed Two Single-family Residences
Two Continuous Vacant Lots Terminus of Cynthia Lane
Carlsbad, California
Prepared For:
David Huarte and Brooks A. Worthing
Huarte-Worthing limited
c/o Brooks A. Worthing
BA Worthing, Inc.
P.O. Box 1041
Carlsbad, CA 92018
April 21, 1997
W.O. P-256047
Prepared By:
COAST GEOTECHNICAL
779 Academy Drive
Solana Beach, California 92075
TABLE OF CONTENTS
VICINITY MAP
INTRODUCTION
SITE CONDITIONS
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
SITE INVESTIGATION
LABORATORY TESTING
GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS
CONCLUSIONS
RECOMMENDATIONS
5
5
5
6
6
7
9
10
A. BUILDING PAD - REMOVALS/RECOMPACTION
B. FOUNDATIONS
C. SLABS ON GRADE (INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR)
D. DRIVEWAY
E. DRAINAGE/VEGETATION
F. OBSERVATIONS AND DENSITY TESTING
G. PLAN REVIEW
H. LIMITATIONS
10
11
12
12
13
13
14
14
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A REGIONAL FAULT MAP
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
BORING LOGS
SITE SKETCH
APPENDIX B GRADING GUIDELINES
VICINITY MAP
Scale 1:6.250 (at center)
500 Feet
Mag 16.00
Thu Apr 2411:38 1997 Secondary SR/Road/Hwy Ramp
Interstate/Limited Access
Exit
April 21, 1997
W.O. P-256047
Page 5
INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of our geotechnical engineering investigation on the
subject property. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the nature and characteristics
of the surficial deposits underlying the property and their influence on the construction
of two single-family residences.
SITE CONDITIONS
The subject property is located east of Pio Pico Drive, along the eastern terminus of
Cynthia Lane, in the city of Carlsbad. The site includes two contiguous rectangular lots
along the north side of Cynthia Lane. The lots are relatively flat and are currently being
utilized as a floral grove. A variable height cut slope, up to 3-0 feet, is located along the
southern extent of the property adjacent to the street. The property is bounded along
the north and east by developed residential lots and along the west by a vacant parcel.
The site consists of parallel furrows for irrigation of various types of flora. Drainage is
generally to the south, however, a considerable amount of infiltration occurs prior to
runofff.
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Preliminary plans for the development of the site were prepared by B. Worthing Plan
Service. The project will include the construction of a two-story residence and attached
April 21, 1997
W.O. P-256047
Page 6
garage in the central portion of each parcel. The residences will be supported on
continuous wall footings with slab on grade floors. Access will be via separate driveways
entering from the street.
SITE INVESTIGATION
Four exploratory borings were drilled on the site to a maximum depth of 9.5 feet. Earth
materials encountered were visually classified and logged by our field geologist.
Relatively undisturbed and bulk samples of earth materials were obtained at selected
intervals. Samples were obtained by driving a thin walled steel sampler into the desired
strata. The samples are retained in brass rings of 2.5 inches outside diameter and 1.0
inches in height. The central portion of the sample is retained in close fitting, waterproof
containers and transported to our laboratory for testing and analysis.
LABORATORY TESTING
Classification
The field classification was verified through laboratory examination, in accordance with
the Unified Soil Classification System. The final classification is shown on the enclosed
Boring Logs.
Moisture/Density
The field moisture content and dry unit weight were determined for each of the
April 21, 1997
W.O. P-256047
Page 7
undisturbed soil samples. This information is useful in providing a gross picture of the
soil consistency or variation among exploratory excavations. The dry unit weight was
determined in pounds per cubic foot. The field moisture content was determined as a
percentage of the dry unit weight. Both are shown on the enclosed Appendix A.
Maximum Dry Density/Optimum Moisture Content
The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content were determined for selected
samples of earth materials taken from the site. The laboratory standard tests were in
accordance with ASTMD-1557-91- The results of the tests are presented in Appendix "A".
GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS
The subject property is underlain by Pleistocene terrace deposits. The sedimentary unit,
in general, is weathered in the upper 1.0 to 1.5 feet but becomes increasing dense with
depth. The terrace deposits are overlain by soil deposits. A brief description of the earth
materials encountered on the site is discussed below.
Soil
Approximately 1.0 foot of dark brown silty sand blankets most of the site. The soil is
generally very moist to wet, loose and contains a moderate amount of small roots and
organics. A higher concentration of organics appears to be present in the upper 4.0 to
6.0 inches of the soil, probably as a result of cultivation. The contact with the underlying
Pleistocene terrace deposits is gradational.
April 21, 1997
W.O. P-256047
Page 8
Terrace Deposits
The site is underlain by Pleistocene terrace deposits. The terrace deposits are composed
of reddish brown slightly clayey, fine and medium-grained sand. The terrace deposits are
weathered in the upper 1.0 to 1.5 feet. The weathered zone is soft and saturated due to
a perched ground water condition. Below the weathered zone, the terrace deposits are
dense and competent.
Expansive Soils
Based on previous testing and our experience in the area, the surficial materials and
terrace deposits have a potential expansion in the low range.
Ground Water
A perched ground water condition was encountered in the weathered terrace deposit
zone. Irrigation water infiltrates the soil and weathered zones and is perched above the
dense, less pervious terrace deposits. It should be noted that minor seepage problems
may occur after development, as a result of drainage alterations and/or over-irrigation.
In the event that seepage or saturated ground does occur, it has been our experience that
they are most effectively handled on an individual basis.
Faults/Seismicitv
Based on a review of published geologic maps, no faults traverse the site. Active faults
April 21, 1997
W.O. P-256047
Page 9
which could affect the site include the Elsinore, San Jacinto and San Andreas Faults.
These faults are located 24 to 72 miles east of the site. Off-shore faults, including the
active Rose Canyon fault zone are located approximately 3 miles west of the site. The
proximity of the site to known faults is shown on the enclosed Regional Fault Map.
Although the likelihood of ground rupture on the site is remote, it is almost a certainty
the property will be exposed to moderate levels of ground motion resulting from the
release of energy, should an earthquake occur along the numerous known and unknown
faults in the region.
Liquefaction Potential
Liquefaction is a process by which a fine sand mass Loses its shearing strength completely
and flows. The temporary transformation of the material into a fluid mass is often
associated with ground motion resulting from an earthquake.
Owing to the moderately dense nature of the underlying terrace deposits and the
anticipated depth to groundwater, the potential for seismically induced liquefaction and
soil instability is considered very low to non-existent.
CONCLUSIONS
1) No significant geotechnical conditions were observed on the site which would
preclude development. However, certain geotechnical conditions should be
addressed during the design and construction phases.
April 21, 1997
W.O. P-256047
Page 10
2) The soil and saturated weathered terrace deposits are not suitable for the support
of structural footings or concrete flatwork.
3) In order to provide a more uniform support for proposed footings and slabs, the
soil and weathered terrace deposits in the building pad should be removed to a
minimum depth of 3-5 feet below the existing grade and replaced as properly
compacted fill. The removal depth should be such that a minimum of 18 inches
of compacted fill underlies the base of proposed footings.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Building Pad - Removals/Recompaction
The existing soil and weathered terrace deposits should be removed to a minimum depth
of 3.5 feet below the existing grade or 12 inches below the base of proposed footings and
replaced as properly compacted fill. Removals should include the entire building pad
extending a minimum of 10.0 lateral feet beyond the building footprint, where applicable.
With the exception of the upper 4.0 to 6.0 inches of highly organic soil, most of the
existing earth deposits are generally suitable for reuse, provided they are cleared of all
vegetation, debris and thoroughly mixed. Prior to placement of fill, the base of the
removal should be observed by a representative of this firm. Additional overexcavation
and recommendations may be necessary at that time. The exposed bottom should be
scarified to a minimum depth of 6.0 inches, moistened as required and compacted to a
April 21, 1997
W.O. P-256047
Page 11
minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory maximum dry density. Fill should be placed
in 6.0 to 8.0 inch lifts, moistened to approximately 1.0 - 2.0 percent above optimum
moisture content and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory maximum
dry density. Imported fill, if necessary, should consist of granular deposits approved by
the geotechnical engineer.
Foundations
The following design parameters are based on an anticipated expansion potential in the
low range. Footings for the proposed residence and garage should be a minimum of 12
inches wide and founded a minimum of 12 inches and 18 inches below the lower most
adjacent subgrade for single-story and two-story structures, respectively. A 12 inch by 12
inch grade beam should be placed across the garage opening. Footings should be
reinforced with a minimum of four No. 4 bars, two along the top of the footing and two
along the base. Footing recommendations provided herein are based upon underlying
soil conditions and are not intended to be in lieu of the project structural engineer's
design.
For design purposes, an allowable bearing value of 1500 pounds per square foot may be
used for foundations at the recommended footing depths.
The bearing value indicated above is for the total dead and frequently applied live loads.
This value may be increased by 33 percent for short durations of loading, including the
effects of wind and seismic forces.
April 21, 1997
W.O. P-256047
Page 12
Resistance to lateral load may be provided by friction acting at the base of foundations
and by passive earth pressure. A coefficient of friction of 0.35 may be used with dead-
load forces. A passive earth pressure of 250 pounds per square foot, per foot of depth
of fill or terrace deposits penetrated to a maximum of 1500 pounds per square foot may
be used.
Slabs on Grade (Interior and Exterior)
Slabs on grade should be a minimum of 4.0 inches thick and reinforced in both
directions with No. 3 bars placed 18 inches on center in both directions. The slab should
be underlain by a minimum 2.0-inch sand blanket. Where moisture sensitive floors are
used, a minimum 6.0-mil Visqueen or equivalent moisture barrier should be placed over
the sand blanket and covered by an additional two inches of sand. Utility trenches
underlying the slab may be backfilled with on-site materials, compacted to a minimum
of 90 percent of the laboratory maximum dry density. Slabs including exterior concrete
flatwork should be reinforced as indicated above and provided with saw cuts/expansion
joints, as recommended by the project structural engineer. All slabs should be cast over
dense compacted subgrades.
Driveway
The minimum driveway section should be composed of 3.0 inches of asphaltic concrete,
over 4.0 inches of Class 2 base. The driveway should be protected from moisture
April 21, 1997
W.O. P-256047
Page 13
migrating under the pavement section. The upper 12 inches of the driveway subgrade
should be scarified, moistened and compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the
laboratory maximum dry density prior to placement of Class 2 base.
Drainage/Vegetation
Specific drainage patterns should be designed by the project civil engineer or architect.
However, in general, pad water should be directed away from foundations and around
the structure to the street. Roof water should be collected and conducted to the street,
via non-erodible devices. Pad water should not be allowed to pond or flow onto slopes
in an uncontrolled manner. Vegetation adjacent to foundations should be avoided. If
vegetation in these areas is desired, sealed planter boxes should be considered. Other
alternatives may be available, however, the intent is to reduce moisture from migrating
into foundation subsoils and under concrete flatwork. Cut and fill slopes should be
planted with drought resistant and erosion controlling vegetation. Irrigation should be
limited to that amount necessary to sustain plant life.
Observations and Density Testing
Structural footing excavations should be observed by a representative of this firm, prior
to the placement of steel. Fill should be placed while a representative of this firm is
present to observe and test.
April 21, 1997
W.O. P-256047
Page 14
Plan Review
A copy of the final building plans should be submitted to this office for review, prior to
the initiation of construction. Additional recommendations may be necessary at that time.
LIMITATIONS
This report is presented with the provision that it is the responsibility of the owner or the
owner's representative to bring the information and recommendations given herein to
the attention of the project's architects and/or engineers so that they may be incorporated
into plans.
If conditions encountered during construction appear to differ from those described in
this report, our office should be notified so that we may consider whether modifications
are needed. No responsibility for construction compliance with design concepts,
specifications or recommendations given in this report is assumed unless on-site review
is performed during the course of construction.
The subsurface conditions, excavation characteristics and geologic structure described
herein are based on individual exploratory excavations made on the subject property.
The subsurface conditions, excavation characteristics and geologic structure discussed
should in no way be construed to reflect any variations which may occur among the
exploratory excavations.
April 21, 1997
W.O. P-256047
Page 15
Please note that fluctuations in the level of groundwater may occur due to variations in
rainfall, temperature and other factors not evident at the time measurements were made
and reported herein. Coast Geotechnical assumes no responsibility for variations which
may occur across the site.
The conclusions and recommendations of this report apply as of the current date. In
time, however, changes can occur on a property whether caused by acts of man or nature
on this or adjoining properties. Additionally, changes in professional standards may be
brought about by legislation or the expansion of knowledge. Consequently, the
conclusions and recommendations of this report may be rendered wholly or partially
invalid by events beyond our control. This report is therefore subject to review and
should not be relied upon after the passage of two years.
The professional judgments presented herein are founded partly on our assessment of
the technical data gathered, partly on our understanding of the proposed construction
and partly on our general experience in the geotechnical field. Our engineering work
and the judgments given meet present professional standards. However, in no respect
do we guarantee the outcome of the project.
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
TABLE I
Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content
(Laboratory Standard ASTM D-1557-91)
Sample
Location
B-l 1--4
Max. Dry
Density (pcf)
129.0
Optimum
Moisture Content
11.0
TABLE IT
Field Dry Density and Moisture Content
Sample
Location
B-l @ 1.17'
B-l @ 2.5'
B-l @ 4.9'
B-l @ 8.5'
Field Dry
Density fpcf)
90.2
120.1
117.0
116.8
Field Moisture
Content (%)
25.9
13.8
11.4
10.8
B-2 @ 1.0'
B-2 @ 2.0'
B-2 @ 3.0'
B-2 @ 5.0'
B-2 @ 8.5'
100.2
119.1
113.1
113.2
110.0
21.5
14.4
14.4
14.4
13.5
B-3 @ 1.3'
B-3 @ 2.3'
B-3 @ 5.0'
B-3 @ 8.5'
110.0
117.2
112.7
121.6
14.8
12.0
11.2
10.0
B-4 @ 1.5'
B-4 @ 2.6'
B-4 @ 5.0'
104.5
122.9
129.3
16.1
10.6
10.6
P-256047
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING NO. 1
DRILL RIG: PORTABLE AUGER
BORING DIAMETER: 4"
SURFACE ELEV: 100' (assumed)
PROJECT NO. P-2S6047
DATE DRILLED: 04-04-97
LOGGED BY: M.B.
cu
&
>
fc*•*Mz«
ft
>-OS
«
90.2
120.1
117.0
116.8
?
iMHg
M«^
gH
§£
25.9
13.6
11.4
10.8
Wj
^
Z0f*a
HJ
§
£
HQ
100.0C
0.00
98.00
2.00
96.00
4.00
94.00
6.00
92.00
8.00
OOJuM«
9o
5rcfti
>1^
^V^Kf
11wv&imm1
w
9
1
1
•$i
>'?>']
iT t-f *
-".*•'.*
1 ^fr ""S
' **F **j
•
DESCRIPTION
SM
SM
SM
SOIL: Ok brawn, sllty sand, very moist, loose , rootlets, highly organic in
upper 6"
gradttionat contact
TERRACE DEPOSITS: Weathered, gray, tine and med.-gralned sand,
slightly clayey, soft, saturated
SEEPAGE @ 2-2.5', perched above dense terrace deposits
TERRACE DEPOSITS: Reddish brown fine and med.-grained sand, slightly
clayey, moist, dense
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING NO. 2
DRILL RIG: PORTABLE AUGER
BORING DIAMETER: 4"
SURFACE ELEV: 100' (assumed)
PROJECT NO. P-256047
DATE DRILLED: 04-04-97
LOGGED BY: M.B.
C1&
£
<Az
UQ
BQ
100.2
119.1
113.1
113.2
110.0
EBd
E
UsPB
H£3O£
21.5
14.4
14.4
14.4
13.5
W
J
4;
M
2O
B
H
W
ICd
Q
100.0C
0.00
98.00
2.00
96.00
4.00
94.00
6.00
92.00
8.00
»
Oo-4
O
^"/ ••/"
^^SS-•p^v*1
SgK
¥§
i
i;S:K
•:':W
'"•:: '-'.\i" ' V ' ;
t K 1 11
* "' hV' 1
J{J
'."'(•'"'I^ v
^
P
S
1
i!
W
DESCRIPTION
SM
SM
SM
SOIL: Dk brawn, sflty sand, very moist, loose , rootlets, highly organic in
upperff"
gradltionat contact
TERRACE DEPOSITS: Weathered, gray, fine and med.-grained sand,
BKghOy dayey, soft, saturated
SEEPAGE @ 2'-2.5', perched above dense terrace deposits
TERRACE DEPOSITS; Reddish brown fine and med.-grained sand, slightly
clayey, motet, dense
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING NO. 3
DRILL RIG: PORTABLE AUGER
BORING DIAMETER: 4"
SURFACE ELEV: 100' (assumed)
PROJECT NO. P-256047
DATE DRILLED: 04-04-97
LOGGED BY: M.B.
ou
>-
fc(flz
HQ
rtNHQ
110.0
117.2
112.7
121.6
S
Hz0u
S3s*~
S30S
14.8
12.0
11.2
10.0
WJ
3w
£O
*"NH
^M
•JH
w
£H
~ Q
100.0G
0.00
98.00
2.00
96.00
4.00
94.00
6.00
_
92.00
8.00
r^r
-
rlto
u
S
3
r£
>.&$<
^
^?H
Wj-5
%fefe'Jwi
'^rfi
•vfr:frv w tv•'•*•'•£•
!ft
&f
* J • J
jr^f
||
V 11." V
t" viT i
:•;*:•;£
1
)'?)?
• ."* ,"ll
• .'» ."*
•V*.1
." /.* f
DESCRIPTION
SM
SM
SM
SOIL: Dk brown, sllty sand, very moist, loose , rootlets, highly organic In
upper 6"
TERRACE DEPOSITS: Weathered, gray, fine and med.-grained sand,
slightly clayey, soft, saturated
SEEPAGE @ 2-2.5', perched above dense terrace deposits
TERRACE DEPOSITS: Reddish brown fine and med.-grained sand, slightly
clayey, moist, dense
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING NO. 4
DRILL RIG; PORTABLE AUGER
BORING DIAMETER: 4"
SURFACE ELEV: 100' (assumed)
PROJECT NO. P-256047
DATE DRILLED: 04-04-97
LOGGED BY: M.B.
o
&
tflZw
Q
SP
104.5
122.9
129.3
I
fesiU
5
10
S
16.1
10.6
10,6
H
1M
20i-*
»j
1
WQ
100.0C
0.00
98.00
2.00
^~"
96.00
4.00
94.00
6.00
92,00
8.00
VT7
Oo
Us
i
5:^
'^•" •*/*• •*»*
s
$!$Pg
ifc•*.<•' ' i
v'fv* :
•".'•". '^"^
t'fc'fc
ii^ii% %\ V•JRi•ifcti6i•V-".'
1
vfyl
".4":«
y*i
-• t~ f•Art
DESCRIPTION
SM
SM
SM
SOIL: Dk brown, sitty sand, very moist, loose , rootlets, highly organic in
uppers*
TERRACE DEPOSITS: Weathered, gray, fine and med.-grained sand,
slightly clayey, soft, saturated
SEEPAGE @ 2'-2.5', perched above dense terrace deposits
TERRACE DEPOSITS: Reddish brown fine and med.-grained sand, slightly
clayey, moist, dense
FROM 9.25', Grey sand, very weakly cemented
i
WO
o
A fc JPod woZ
38H^»
HnW
+~
uvfi
*
CYNTHIA LANE
B
GRADING GUIDELINES
Grading should be performed to at least the minimum requirements of the governing
agencies, Chapter 70 of the Uniform Building Code and the guidelines presented below:
Site Clearing
Trees, dense vegetation, and other deleterious materials should be removed from the
site. Non-organic debris or concrete may be placed in deeper fill areas under direction
of the Soils engineer.
Subdrainaoe
1. During grading, the Geologist should evaluate the necessity of placing additional
drains (see Plate A).
2. All subdrainage systems should be observed by the Geologist and Soils Engineer
during construction and prior to covering with compacted fill.
3. Consideration should be given to having subdrains located by the project
surveyors. Outlets should be located and protected.
Treatment of Existing Ground
1. All heavy vegetation, rubbish and other deleterious materials should be disposed
of off site.
2. All surficial deposits including alluvium and colluvium should be removed unless
otherwise indicated in the text of this report. Groundwater existing in the alluvial
areas may make excavation difficult. Deeper removals than indicated in the text
of the report may be necessary due to saturation during winter months.
3. Subsequent to removals, the natural ground should be processed to a depth of
six inches, moistened to near optimum moisture conditions and compacted to fill
standards,
Fill Placement
1. Most site soil and bedrock may be reused for compacted fill; however, some
special processing or handling may be required (see report). Highly organic or
contaminated soil should not be used for compacted fill.
(1)
Material used in the compacting process should be evenly spread, moisture
conditioned, processed, and compacted in thin lifts not to exceed six inches in
thickness to obtain a uniformly dense layer. The fill should be placed and
compacted on a horizontal plane, unless otherwise found acceptable by the Soils
Engineer.
If the moisture content or relative density varies from that acceptable to the Soils
engineer, the Contractor should rework the fill until it is in accordance with the
following:
a) Moisture content of the fill should be at or above optimum moisture.
Moisture should be evenly distributed without wet and dry pockets. Pre-
watering of cut or removal areas should be considered in addition to
watering during fill placement, particularly in clay or dry surficial soils.
b) Each six inch layer should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the
maximum density in compliance with the testing method specified by the
controlling governmental agency. In this case, the testing method is ASTM
Test Designation D-1557-91.
Side-hill fills should have a minimum equipment-width key at their toe excavated
through all surficial soil and into competent material and tilted back into the hill
(Plate A). As the fill is elevated, it should be benched through surficial deposits
and into competent bedrock or other material deemed suitable by the Soils
Engineer.
Rock fragments less than six inches in diameter may be utilized in the fill,
provided:
a) They are not placed in concentrated pockets;
b) There is a sufficient percentage of fine-grained material to surround the
rocks;
c) The distribution of the rocks is supervised by the Soils Engineer.
Rocks greater than six inches in diameter should be taken off site, or placed in
accordance with the recommendations of the Soils Engineer in areas designated
as suitable for rock disposal.
In clay soil large chunks or blocks are common; if in excess of six (6) inches
minimum dimension then they are considered as oversized. Sheepsfoot
compactors or other suitable methods should be used to break the up blocks.
(2)
8. The Contractor should be required to obtain a minimum relative compaction of 90
percent out to the finished slope face of fill slopes. This may be achieved by
either overbuilding the slope and cutting back to the compacted core, or by direct
compaction of the slope face with suitable equipment.
If fill slopes are built "at grade" using direct compaction methods then the slope
construction should be performed so that a constant gradient is maintained
throughout construction. Soil should not be "spilled" over the slope face nor
should slopes be "pushed out" to obtain grades. Compaction equipment should
compact each lift along the immediate top of slope. Slopes should be back
rolled approximately every 4 feet vertically as the slope is built. Density tests
should be taken periodically during grading on the flat surface of the fill three to
five feet horizontally from the face of the slope.
In addition, if a method other than over building and cutting back to the
compacted core is to be employed, slope compaction testing during construction
should include testing the outer six inches to three feet in the slope face to
determine if the required compaction is being achieved. Finish grade testing of
the slope should be performed after construction is complete. Each day the
Contractor should'receive a copy of the Soils Engineer's "Daily Field Engineering
Report" which would indicate the results of field density tests that day.
9. Fill over cut slopes should be constructed in the following manner:
a) All surficial soils and weathered rock materials should be removed at the
cut-fill interface.
b) A key at least 1 equipment width wide and tipped at least 1 foot into slope
should be excavated into competent materials and observed by the Soils
Engineer or his representative.
c) The cut portion of the slope should be constructed prior to fill placement
to evaluate if stabilization is necessary, the contractor should be
responsible for any additional earthwork created by placing fill prior to cut
excavation.
10. Transition lots (cut and fill) and lots above stabilization fills should be capped with
a four foot thick compacted fill blanket.
11. Cut pads should be observed by the Geologist to evaluate the need for
overexcavation and replacement with fill. This may be necessary to reduce water
infiltration into highly fractured bedrock or other permeable zones,and/or due to
differing expansive potential of materials beneath a structure. The overexcavation
should be at least three feet. Deeper overexcavation may be recommended in
some cases.
(3)
12. Exploratory backhoe or dozer trenches still remaining after site removal should be
excavated and filled with compacted fill if they can be located.
Grading Observation and Testing
1.
2.
Observation of the fill placement should be provided by the Soils Engineer during
the progress of grading.
In general, density tests would be made at intervals not exceeding two feet of fill
height or every 1,000 cubic yards of fill placed. This criteria will vary depending
on soil conditions and the size of the fill. In any event, an adequate number of
field density tests should be made to evaluate if the required compaction and
moisture content is generally being obtained.
Density tests may be made on the surface material to receive fill, as required by
the Soils Engineer.
•~,' ' ' • H
Cleanouts, processed ground to receive fill, key excavations.subdrains and rock
disposal should be observed by the Soils Engineer prior to placing any fill. It will
be the Contractor's responsibility to notify the Soils Engineer when such areas are
ready for observation. A ; ;;, -
A Geologist should observe subdrain construction.
A Geologist should observe benching prior to and during placement of fill.
Utility Trench Backfill
Utility trench backfill should be placed to the following standards:
1.
2.
3.
Ninety percent of the laboratory standard if native material is used as backfill.
As an alternative, clean sand may be utilized and flooded into place. No specific
relative compaction would be* required; however, observation, probing, and if
deemed necessary, testing may be required.
Exterior trenches, paralleling a footing and extending below a 1:1 plane projected
from the outside bottom edge of the footing, should be compacted to 90 percent
of the laboratory standard. Sand backfill, unless it is similar to the inplace fill,
should not be allowed in these trench backfill areas.
Density testing along with probing should be accomplished to verify the desired
results.
(4)
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL Page 1 CF-1R
*******
*v4.50********
Date 02/03/98Project Title Alan & Debbie Minor
Project Address 1780 Cynthia Lane
Carlsbad, CA. 92008
Documentation Author... T. Q. H.
TH&A, Inc.
125 W. Mission Ave. #201
Escondido, CA 92025
760-746-5112
Climate Zone 07
Compliance Method MICROPAS4 v4.50 for 1995 Standards by Enercomp, Inc.
Building Permit^
Plan Check / Date
Field Check/ Date
MICROPAS4 v4.50 File-MINOR2 Wth-CTZ07S92 Program-FORM CF-1R
User#-MP0820 User-TH&A, Inc. Run-Guest House
GENERAL INFORMATION
Conditioned Floor Area 440 sf
Building Type Single Family Detached
Construction Type New
Building Front Orientation. Front Facing 135 deg (SE)
Number of Dwelling Units... 1
Number of Stories 1
Floor Construction Type.... Slab On Grade
Glazing Percentage 14.3 % of floor area
Average Glazing U-value.... 0.65 Btu/hr-sf-F
BUILDING SHELL INSULATION
Component
Type
Wall
Roof
Door
Frame
Type
Wood
Wood
n/a
Cavity
R-value
R-13
R-30.7
R-0
Sheathing
R-value
R-0
R-0
R-n/a
Assembly
U-Value Location/Comments
0.088 Exterior Wall
0.035 Attic
0.330 Front Door
FENESTRATION
Area
Orientation
Window
Window
Window
Window
Front
Back
Back
Right
(SE)
(NW)
(NW)
(NE)
(Sf)
12
30
6
15
.0
.0
.0
.0
U-
Value
0
0
0
0
.650
.650
,650
.650
# of Interior
Pan- Shading/
es
2
2
2
2
Description
Drapes
Drapes
Drapes
Drapes
.Wht
.Wht
.Wht
.Wht
Exterior
Shading
None
None
None
None
Over-
hang/ Framing
Fins Type
None Vinyl
None Vinyl
None Vinyl
None Vinyl
Type Exposed
THERMAL MASS
Area Thickness
{sf} (in) Location/Comments
SlabOnGrade
SlabOnGrade
InteriorHorz
Yes
No
Yes
54 3.5 Bath
380 3.5 Covered
6 1.0 Tile: Kichen/Bath